Monograph |
Corresponding author: Nizar Ibrahim ( ibrahini@udmercy.edu ) Corresponding author: Paul C. Sereno ( dinosaur@uchicago.edu ) Academic editor: Massimo Delfino
© 2020 Nizar Ibrahim, Paul C. Sereno, David J. Varricchio, David M. Martill, Didier B. Dutheil, David M. Unwin, Lahssen Baidder, Hans C. E. Larsson, Samir Zouhri, Abdelhadi Kaoukaya.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ibrahim N, Sereno PC, Varricchio DJ, Martill DM, Dutheil DB, Unwin DM, Baidder L, Larsson HCE, Zouhri S, Kaoukaya A (2020) Geology and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Kem Kem Group of eastern Morocco. ZooKeys 928: 1-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.928.47517
|
The geological and paleoenvironmental setting and the vertebrate taxonomy of the fossiliferous, Cenomanian-age deltaic sediments in eastern Morocco, generally referred to as the “Kem Kem beds”, are reviewed. These strata are recognized here as the Kem Kem Group, which is composed of the lower Gara Sbaa and upper Douira formations. Both formations have yielded a similar fossil vertebrate assemblage of predominantly isolated elements pertaining to cartilaginous and bony fishes, turtles, crocodyliforms, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs, as well as invertebrate, plant, and trace fossils. These fossils, now in collections around the world, are reviewed and tabulated. The Kem Kem vertebrate fauna is biased toward large-bodied carnivores including at least four large-bodied non-avian theropods (an abelisaurid, Spinosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, and Deltadromeus), several large-bodied pterosaurs, and several large crocodyliforms. No comparable modern terrestrial ecosystem exists with similar bias toward large-bodied carnivores. The Kem Kem vertebrate assemblage, currently the best documented association just prior to the onset of the Cenomanian-Turonian marine transgression, captures the taxonomic diversity of a widespread northern African fauna better than any other contemporary assemblage from elsewhere in Africa.
Africa, Cretaceous, dinosaur, Gara Sbaa Formation, Douira Formation, paleoenvironment, vertebrate
Richly fossiliferous strata, commonly referred to as the “Kem Kem beds” (
The Kem Kem beds, nevertheless, are more fossiliferous, better exposed and often more accessible than comparable strata in most other northern African locations. These strata have been studied by several teams and are accessible to locals in some areas; fossils have been collected by researchers affiliated with institutional collections as well as local private collectors that often utilize commercial intermediaries. Our aim in this report is to review both the geological and paleontological aspects of the Kem Kem beds, to describe and name strata as needed, to summarize the taxonomic status of the fauna based on all major collections of Kem Kem fossils, and to evaluate paleoenvironments and the paleoecological significance of the Kem Kem assemblage.
Geographical setting of the Kem Kem region and outcrops. A View of the position of Morocco in Africa and location of the Kem Kem beds (shown in red). B Map showing the geographical location of the Kem Kem in North Africa relative to roughly coeval sites in northern Africa. C Cretaceous outcrops along the Kem Kem and Guir Hamadas (modified from
The age of the “Kem Kem beds” has been regarded variously as mid or early Late Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian).
Seven elasmobranchs and several dinosaur genera (Spinosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, and Deltadromeus) reported from the Kem Kem beds are shared with the Bahariya Formation in Egypt (
Paleoenvironmental interpretations of the Kem Kem beds all agree on their continental status, but differ in regarding either fluvial and floodplain deposits (
Paleoecological interpretation has centered around the taxonomic and numerical dominance of predators and, more specifically, piscivorous terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates. Based on a collection of commercially acquired fossils,
A notable feature of the Kem Kem assemblage is the taxonomic, numerical and ichnological dominance of theropods among dinosaurs. Some authors regard this as an accurate reflection of the dominance of theropods in the fauna during the Cenomanian (
With a similar approach, it has been suggested that Kem Kem fossils as a whole represent a “compound assemblage” derived from two formations (
In the late 1940s,
During the following 45 years from 1950–1995, only sporadic, small-scale fieldwork was undertaken. In the 1970s a small team led by German scientist Helmut Alberti collected fossil vertebrates near Taouz at the northeastern end of the escarpment of the Kem Kem Hamada (pers. com. M. Reich to NI, 2007). The fossils, housed at the University of Göttingen, include isolated remains of cartilaginous and bony fish, crocodyliforms and non-avian dinosaurs. The coelacanth remains were described by
In the last 25 years, paleontologists brought to light a diverse array of new vertebrate fossils (e.g.,
The Kem Kem beds have revealed an important and remarkably diverse vertebrate assemblage including elasmobranchs, osteichthyes, and basal sarcopterygians (
Kem Kem vertebrates are typically preserved in two general taphonomic situations, most commonly in clastic fluvial or deltaic facies or, rarely, within a lake, or pond, facies at the locality Oum Tkout. In the predominant fluvial facies, isolated and transported fossils are the norm. Only three associated partial dinosaur skeletons have been recovered, the diplodocoid sauropod Rebbachisaurus garasbae (
The lentic waters and fine bottom mud at Oum Tkout preserve leaves, crustaceans (prawn, macruran decapod), and the intact skeletons and scales of bony fish (
FSAC Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock, Casablanca, Morocco
IMGP Institut und Museum für Geologie und Paläontologie, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
MNBH Musée national Boubou Hama, Niamey, Niger
MPDM Musée Parc des Dinosaures, Mèze, France
NHMUK Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
SGM Service Géologique du Maroc, Rabat, Morocco
In 1995 a joint expedition from the University of Chicago and the Service Géologique du Maroc explored southern outcrops of the Kem Kem beds beween Erfoud and Hassi Zguilma (Fig.
In 2007 and 2008, joint expeditions from University College Dublin, the University of Portsmouth and the Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock (Casablanca) collected fossils and recorded ichnological, taphonomic, and sedimentological data, focusing on seven sites between Erfoud and Hassi Zguilma (Tables
Presence in three research collections of specimens from 15 localities in the Kem Kem Group. Abbreviations: FSAC Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock, Casablanca, Morocco
Number | Locality | FSAC |
|
|
1 | Aferdou N’Chaft/Ouzina | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
2 | Boumerade/Gara Acacia | ✔ | ✔ | |
3 | Dar el Karib | ✔ | ||
4 | Douira | ✔ | ✔ | |
5 | Gara Sbaa | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
6 | Gara Tabroumit | ✔ | ||
7 | Iferda N’Ahouar | ✔ | ✔ | |
8 | Kouah Trick | ✔ | ||
9 | Moher | ✔ | ||
10 | Oum Tkout | ✔ | ||
11 | Talidat | ✔ | ||
12 | Taouz | ✔ | ✔ | |
13 | Valley near Boumerade | ✔ | ||
14 | Zguilma | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
15 | Zrigat | ✔ |
Six fossil vertebrate localities with geographic coordinates prospected during field work in 2008. Coordinates for other localities may be obtained with permission from the authors.
Number | Locality | Geographic coordinates | |
North | East/West | ||
1 | Aferdou N’Chaft | 30°53'51.23"N, 3°52'13.42"E | |
2 | Boumerade | 30°32'49.00"N, 4°42'55.45"E | |
3 | Douira | 31°38'16.93"N, 4°20'20.23"E | |
4 | Gara Sbaa | 30°30'40.64"N, 4°50'42.87"E | |
5 | Iferda N’Ahouar | 30°47'54.33"N, 4°22'43.74"W | |
6 | Zguilma | 30°12'07.61"N, 5°7'11.48"E |
Taphonomic stages for bone abrasion from transport (following
Stage | Identification | Description |
1 | Very angular | Bone and teeth fresh and unabraded |
2 | Subangular | Bone edges slightly abraded and polished |
3 | Subrounded | Bone edges moderately rounded |
4 | Rounded | Bone edges and processes broken and rounded |
5 | Extremely rounded | Marked abrasion of all external surfaces |
In 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2011, field work was undertaken at the pond locality Oum Tkout by a joint team from the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, the Service géologique du Maroc, and the University Cadi Ayyad. Quarrying operations resulted in the discovery of numerous nonvertebrate fossils (plants, insects, ostracods, decapods, etc.) as well as articulated elasmobranchs and actinopterygians. Much of this material remains to be thoroughly prepared and studied and likely represents several new taxa.
In 2013, field work was undertaken by a joint team from the University of Chicago, the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale (Milan), and the Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock (Casablanca) to explore a locality (Zrigat) approximately 20 km north of Erfoud, where a partial skeleton of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus was discovered by a local collector (
In 2018 and 2019, a multidisciplinary team of scientists from the University of Detroit Mercy, the Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock, the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale (Milan), and the University of Portsmouth, led by NI, explored a number of sites along the Kem Kem escarpment, including several new localities. Finally, regular fieldwork by University of Portsmouth researchers and students has continued to grow the Casablanca collection (Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock).
Besides major collections in Casablanca (Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock), Paris (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle), and Chicago (University of Chicago), additional collections were assembled over the last 50 years from privately acquired specimens collected by locals in villages near the Kem Kem escarpment, although without specific locality data. During a general survey of the Kem Kem beds in 1995, excavation pits in channel sandstones made by local collectors were observed along the entire length of the outcrop. Commercial collecting was therefore already well established by the mid-1990s along most of the available outcrop of the Kem Kem beds with activity concentrated in the northern one-half between Erfoud and Taouz.
The most important collections of commercially collected fossils are in Canada (
Geographic feature names are often cited or adopted for geographic locations, fossil localities and geological terms. Whereas the Geological Survey maintains an authoritative federal database for geographic feature names in the United States (Geographic Names Information System), no such resource is currently available for Morocco. In the Sahara, geographic feature names often originate in Arabic or Amazigh (Berber) languages and exhibit considerable spelling variation in scholarly papers in German, French or English. Sometimes the meaning of feature names is lost, as may be the case with the most salient feature name in this study, Kem Kem. If a specific meaning to feature names persists, nevertheless, that meaning is often unknown to western scholars. To remedy that situation, we have compiled a list of important fossil localities in the Kem Kem region along with their meanings and spelling variants (Table
Nomenclature of Kem Kem localities and geographic terms and their meanings in Arabic or Amazigh (Berber language).
Locality/Term | Meaning | Synonym/Variant |
Aferdou N’Chaft | (aferdou) mortar, (n’chaft) “of the pass” (Amazigh) | “El Begâa” ( |
Boumerade | acacia (Amazigh) | “Gara Acacia” by Lavocat on field records and museum labels for the locality here identified as Boumerade |
Douira | small house (Arabic) | “Jorf” refers to the closest village to the outcrop here identified as Douira |
Gara Sbaa | lion hill or mound (Arabic) | “Gara es Sbaa” ( |
Hamada | plateau or platform (Arabic) | – |
Iferda N’Ahouar | (iferda) mortars, (n’ahouar) large plate (Amazigh) | “Er Remlia” ( |
Oum Tkout | particular Tamarix tree (Amazigh) | “Oum Tkiout” ( |
Talidat | little finger (Amazigh) | – |
Tamenkhirt | common songbird (wheatear) (Amazigh) | – |
Variation in usage can run counter to the original meaning of the name or the feature to which it was originally applied. The term “Tafilalt”, for example, is an Amazigh word referring to a jar made of clay for water and was used as a feature name for the valley of oases south of Errachidia in eastern Morocco. It is used to refer to pre-Mesozoic (mostly Paleozoic) outcrops in the scientific literature (e.g.,
Other variation in geographic names is the result of official name-changing, with older names on geological maps and reports supplanted by newer names. “Ksar es-Souk”, for example, is Arabic meaning “fortified village of the market” and was the longstanding name of a pivotal city in east-central Morocco. In the 1970s it was renamed “Errachidia”. Both names have several spelling variants. Neither should be used with “Province” as the location for the entirety of the Kem Kem outcrop (e.g.,
Some geographic names are simple errors that gain traction in secondary citations. In a prominent compilation of dinosaur localities, for example, the term “Tegana Formation” was cited for the “Kem Kem beds” (
In this report, we formally name several geological units, abiding by the guidelines of the North American Stratigraphic Code (NACSN 2005).
“Continental intercalaire”. The Kem Kem beds correlate to the top of a package of continental sediments in basins across northern Africa referred to by
Divisions of northern African sediments.
ICS timescale | Division |
Danian-Pleistocene | Continental terminal |
Late Cenomanian-Danian | Continental hamadien |
Namurian-Late Cenomanian | Continental intercalaire |
Frasnian-Namurian | Continental post-tassilien |
Ordovician-Frasnian | Continental tassilien |
Cambrian | Continental de base |
The stratotype for the “Continental intercalaire” is located in the Djoua Valley in Algeria. Rocks of comparable age are located in continental basins to the east in Libya and Egypt, to the north and west in Tunisia, Morocco and Mauritania, and to regions south of the Hoggar Mountains in Niger (
The lower boundary is problematic. It does not correspond to any geological event across northern Africa.
Subdivisions of the “Continental intercalaire” introduced by
Division | Sediment series | ICS timescale |
Hamadian series | limestone platform | Cenomanian-Turonian |
Continental intercalaire | Djoua series | Early Cretaceous |
Taouratine series | Jurassic | |
Zarzaitine series | Triassic | |
Tiguentourine series | Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian)-Permian | |
Post-tassilian series | marine limestone | Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) |
The upper boundary of the “Continental intercalaire”, in contrast, is bounded by a well-dated, fossiliferous Late Cenomanian-Turonian limestone platform (Fig.
In sum, there is no consensus regarding the lower boundary of the “Continental intercalaire”, which has never been tied to any regional geological event or episode. Some coeval continental rocks of Cretaceous age, in addition, are excluded because of their location in coastal basins. For these reasons, we question the continued use of “Continental intercalaire” as a heuristic term in discussions of northern African continental strata.
Late Cenomanian-Turonian carbonate platform.
Additional sections were logged across the Akrabou Formation (at Ziz near Akrabou and at Tadighoust 50 km to the west) by
Correlation between sections of the Cenomanian-Turonian platform in central Morocco is challenging, because of lateral variation in the character and age of platform subunits. Transgressive conditions, nonetheless, characterize all of these sections, which grade upward from shallow-water coastal facies to a more massive, deeper-water (subtidal) carbonate platform (
Kem Kem beds and embayment. The Kem Kem beds are exposed along the generally western-facing escarpment of the Guir and Kem Kem Hamadas. Capped by the Late Cenomanian-Turonian platform, the escarpment extends north-south approximately 200 km near the Morocco-Algeria border (Figs
Schematic and simplified geological cross section from the southern Atlas mountains at Amellagou to the northern margin of the Hamada du Kem Kem at Ouzina spanning the Tafilalt Platform. Notice that the Kem Kem Group strata overlie a thick Mesozoic sequence in the north within the southern Atlas Mountain thrust belt but rest unconformably on the Paleozoic basement in the south. Likely the Tafialt Platform was an 'island' within the gigantic Kem Kem river system. The line of sections extends from A at Amellagou to B at Ouzina.
Landsat image of southeastern Morocco showing key localities, villages and cities, modified from
The Kem Kem beds rest unconformably on fossiliferous marine Paleozoic rocks of Silurian, Devonian, and Cambrian age, a contact exposed only in few areas (Figs
Tectonic setting of the Kem Kem region. A Major tectonic complexes in southeastern Morocco (modified from
The Kem Kem beds comprise two units representing predominantly deltaic deposition on a northeast-southwest trending ramp recently termed the “Kem Kem embayment” (
Northeastern Kem Kem equivalents. Continental beds underlying the Cenomanian-Turonian platform are also exposed in the Béchar area of western Algeria northeast of the Kem Kem embayment.
Northern Kem Kem equivalents. The so called “Sillon Préafrican”, or Pre-African Trough, trends southeast-northwest between the Anti-Atlas Massif to the south and the Central and Eastern High Atlas to the north. The trough follows a major rift system (South Atlas Fault or Front) that separates the northern Atlas and Rif regions from the African craton proper to the south (Fig.
Just a few kilometers north of Zrigat near Aoufous, there are two units of red beds underlying the limestone platform along the Meski-Aoufous Hamada. These beds lack the well-developed cross-bedding common in the lower unit of the Kem Kem beds and are considerably thinner, markedly gypsiferous, and barren of footprints or fossils (Fig.
Farther east near Goulmima, a generalized geological section shows the carbonate platform and underlying marl sediments that could correlate with the upper unit of the Kem Kem beds (
One of us (DMM), however, discovered a better outcrop approximately 10 km to the north of Goulmima at a locality near Tadighoust known as Asfla. Both units comparable to those of the Kem Kem beds are exposed, although the facies differ from those typical of the Kem Kem beds. The lower unit has mudstones that pass upward into more typical channel sandstones, although commonly these are more cemented than in the Kem Kem region. The upper unit is finer-grained, as in the Kem Kem beds, but significant gypsiferous evaporates are more common. Fossils appear to be absent from the upper unit but are present, if rare, in the cemented sandstones of the lower unit. Vertebrate teeth recovered pertain to the sawfish Onchopristis, the theropod cf. Carcharodontosaurus, and a large, subconical tooth pertaining to either a crocodylomorph or spinosaurid.
Farther to the west on the flanks of the High Atlas near Tinghir, a similarly more complete section is present and was visited by one of us (DBD). Two units are present under the carbonate platform that correspond well with the two units of the Kem Kem beds (
The two units in the Tinghir region have come to be called, in succession, the Ifezouane and Aoufous formations.
Given that notes to maps and dissertations are often difficult to obtain and of limited distribution, neither are considered “adequate publication” by the North American Stratigraphic Code (NACSN 2005). Here we suggest that stratotypes be recognized for the Ifezouane, Aoufous, and Akrabou formations based on the most detailed published sections, which are located at Tinghir (
Far north Kem Kem equivalents. Red bed units that may also correspond to the Kem Kem beds are situated some 50 km north in the Anoual Syncline in the eastern High Atlas, a basin known for yielding a diverse Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian) vertebrate assemblage including mammals and dinosaurs (
More recent geological and paleontological work in the Anoual region has resulted in the naming of several formations and the establishment of a better temporal framework based on recovered fossils (
Dekkar formations 2 and 3 are preceded by Dekkar Formation 1, a coarse-grained unit lacking vertebrate remains and tentatively regarded as Barremian to Aptian in age. These Dekkar formations compose the Dekkar Group, bounded below by an unconformity and above by the Cenomanian-Turonian platform.
Here we recognize the Hamadian Supergroup for a package of continental rocks across north Africa (Table
Designation and correlation of Hamadian Supergroup and Kem Kem Group strata in central and eastern Morocco as proposed in this study. Hamadian Supergroup strata have been historically referred to as the “trilogie mésocrétacée” (
Stage/Age | Substage | Lithostratigraphic units | Central and Eastern Morocco | |||
South, (Kem Kem) | Central, (Tinghir) | North, (Anoual) | ||||
Turonian, 93.5–89.0 Ma | Upper | Hamadian Super-group | Akrabou Formation | |||
Middle | ||||||
Lower | ||||||
Cenomanian, 99.0–93.5 Ma | Upper | |||||
Middle | Kem Kem Group | Douira Formation | Aoufous Formation | Deckar 3 Formation | ||
Lower | Gara Sbaa Formation | Ifezouane Formation | Deckar 2 Formation |
The Hamadian Supergroup includes strata laid down during a sustained, stepwise transgressive trend during the Cenomanian and Early Turonian. The rocks record a global eustatic second-order stratigraphic cycle that generated a tripartite rock record in continental areas, with two rock units underlying a carbonate platform. The underlying formations are deltaic or near shore, the first coarser-grained than the second, the base of which can often be recognized by sustained and significant mudstone deposition. Several pairs of formations of this general description are recognized below as regional manifestations of the Kem Kem sequence.
The “Hamadian series” or “Continental hammadien” (
We recommend, by contrast, the aptly named Hamadian Supergroup as a heuristic term that includes rocks related to a sustained transgressive stratigraphic cycle that are well exposed across northern Africa. The age of initial deposition is best estimated as Early Cenomanian in the Kem Kem region (see below), and the upper boundary of deposition of the carbonate platform is well established as the end of the Early Turonian (
Here we recognize the Kem Kem Group for rocks in central and eastern Morocco that comprise the first two non-marine units of the Hamadian Supergroup (Choubert’s “trilogie mésocrétacée”, Table
The Gara Sbaa Formation, with stratotype at the locality Gara Sbaa (Fig.
The Gara Sbaa Formation rests unconformably on fossiliferous marine Paleozoic rocks of Silurian, Devonian and Cambrian age (Figs
Lithology. The Gara Sbaa Formation is composed predominantly of red-colored, fine- and medium-grained sandstone beds. The basal one-quarter of the formation is characterized by poorly cemented coarse sandstones with minor conglomerate beds. The basal bed at Tikniouine Bou Tazoult consists of a relatively thin (< 1 m thick) conglomerate with sub-rounded pebbles and cobbles derived from the underlying Paleozoic clastics and, rarely, Paleozoic volcanics. A red-colored medium sandstone forms the basal bed in some areas (e.g., Aferdou N’Chaft). The remainder of the bottom one-quarter of the formation is predominantly medium-to-fine, poorly sorted sandstone with rare siltstone and mudstone beds. The sandstone has interstitial mud and some mafic and feldspar clasts. The poorly sorted sandstone is reddish on both weathered and freshly broken surfaces. Sandstone beds are generally thickly bedded (30–100 cm) with occasional erosional channel scours up to 1 m deep. Limited in exposure, the lower one-quarter of the formation did not yield any body or trace fossils.
The remainder of the formation is composed of coarse-to-fine sandstone beds interspersed with pebble lags. Thin fine-grained beds and paleosols occur rarely. The sandstones show greater maturity than in the basal beds and are composed almost exclusively of well-sorted, well-rounded quartz grains. The sandstone weathers buff-to orange-pink-red and is typically lighter in color, tan-to-yellow, on freshly broken surfaces.
Bed thickness ranges from thinner beds 0.3 m to 1.5 m thick to major units 2 to 80 m in thickness. Thicker beds, which occur toward the top of the formation, occasionally preserve lateral accretion surfaces with paleo-relief up to 8 m. Sandstone bodies typically accrete as tabular beds with a horizontal bottom. Tabular and trough cross-stratification is common with foresets dipping at 20–25° (Figs
Large-scale primary sedimentary structures. Large sedimentary structures occur occasionally in the upper parts of the Gara Sbaa Formation and the lower parts of the Douira Formation. In contrast to the primarily sandstone unit in (A), the lithology of (B) consists of inter-bedded sandstone and finer-grained beds. Human for scale in each equals 185 cm. The large-scale cross-bedding with good bottomsets and relatively low angle foresets is consistent with small Gilbert-type delta fronts. Alternatively, they could represent large point bar deposition with the differing lithologies of B as inclined heterolithic stratification.
Primary sedimentary structures in the Gara Sbaa Formation. A Linear cross-bedding at Gara Sbaa B Trough cross-bedding at Aferdou N’Chaft C Shallow channel cross-bedding (arrow) at Gara Sbaa D Tabular cross-bedding from unidirectional flow at Gara Sbaa E Large-scale cross-bedding at Gara Sbaa F Trough cross-bedding at Aferdou N’Chaft.
The beds in the upper three-quarters of the formation often show cyclic deposition. A basal sandstone bed exhibits trough cross-stratification and sometimes thin conglomerates. This is followed by tabular cross-stratified beds that indicate channel infill. These beds are followed by sandstones rich in yellowish clay and bone fragments that may indicate incipient soil development. These cycles comprise the infilling of channels.
Unusual sedimentary structures include disrupted bedding, spherical concretions, and slab-forming carbonate and iron cemented beds. Disrupted bedding (escape structures, sand volcanoes) and overturned cross-bedding (Fig.
Enigmatic concretions (‘kerkoubs’) in the Gara Sbaa Formation. A In cross-stratified sandstones at Gara Sbaa B In flow direction near Boumerade C With linear sedimentary structures at Gara Sbaa D With great size variation at Gara Sbaa E In tabular cross-bedding at Gara Sbaa F In high density.
The sedimentary structures described above and the lack of substantial conglomerates suggest that the Gara Sbaa Formation records large-scale transport of detrital material typical of a deltaic river system. Cross-bed orientation in the lower quarter of the formation strongly favors a northward flow direction parallel to the axis of the Kem Kem embayment. The change in sedimentary style in the upper three-quarters of the formation suggest the infilling of an expansive alluvial basin centered on the low-gradient Kem Kem ramp.
Paleontology. Vertebrate body fossils most frequently occur as isolated elements (especially bone fragments, teeth, scales) in conglomeratic deposits characterized by rip-up clasts and pebbles. Rostral teeth of a large sawfish, Onchopristis numidus, are often the most common taxon among recovered teeth. Other common fossils include a wide range of aquatic and terrestrial species including polypterids, lepisosteids, amiids, bony fishes, dipnoans, turtles, crocodyliforms, and isolated teeth of the theropods Spinosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus. The teeth of terrestrial herbivores are conspicuously rare and only include sauropods. Articulated skeletons are extremely rare and only include the holotypic partial skeletons of Rebbachisaurus garasbae and Deltadromeus agilis (
The Douira Formation, with stratotype at the locality Douira (Fig.
The formation is thickest at Douira, where a 124-m section is exposed. Maximum thickness of this formation is located more distal (north) than the thickest part of the underlying, progradational Gara Sbaa Formation. Like the Gara Sbaa Formation, it thins to the east to 52 m at Taouz and to the south to approximately 100 m at Oum Tkout and Gara Sbaa and to 46 m farther south at Hassi Zguilma (Figs
Lithology. The Douira Formation is finer-grained and has a greater variety of rock types than the Gara Sbaa Formation. It consists of fining-upwards, coarse-to-fine grained sandstones intercalated with siltstones, variegated mudstones, and occasional thin gypsiferous evaporites (Fig.
Five sandstone facies occur within the Douira Formation. Some 60% of the sandstones are fining-up beds that begin with a coarse-grained sandstone that is poorly sorted with pebble-sized lithics. This basal bed contains cobble-to-pebble-sized clay balls, mud rip-up clasts, bone fragments and isolated teeth. The rest of the facies is composed of fine sandstone or siltstone often characterized by trough and planar large-scale cross-bedding. These beds, which range from 5 to 50 cm in thickness, are also characterized by mud drapes, flaser bedding, vertical burrows and soft-sediment deformation. Rock colors include yellow, orange, red, and tan, with yellow beds sometimes weathering red.
A second sandstone facies comprising ca. 23% of sandstones consists of stacks of cross-bedded, fine- to medium-grained beds with sharp lower and upper contacts. Cross-bedding includes both trough and planar varieties commonly 10–20 cm deep, with a maximum depth of 40 cm. This facies is well-sorted, fine-grained, and buff, red, and occasionally white in color.
A third sandstone facies comprising ca. 16% of sandstones are red to orange, fine-grained beds interbedded with siltstones and mudstones. These sandstones, commonly 5–50 cm thick, often have ripple-scale cross-bedding, laminations, and mud drapes and preserve dinosaur footprints and burrows (
Siltstones and very fine sandstones are persistent but uncommon in the Douira Formation, representing only ca. 10% of the entire stratigraphic thickness. Often these lithologies occur as units less than 50 cm thick, with bed thicknesses more commonly between 5 and 20 cm. Color may vary from bluish white to red-orange. Small-scale cross-bedding, laminae, and nonvertebrate traces are abundant. Occasionally these units also preserve mud-cracks, dinosaur footprints, mud drapes, and flaser bedding. Soft sediment deformation is rare.
Mudstones and claystones dominate the Douira Formation. In the complete and well-exposed sections, these fine-grained units represent an average of 64% of the stratigraphic thickness. Mudstones occur in four facies: reddish-brown massively bedded units (38%), interbedded mudstones (40%), minor laminated beds, and green claystone. Red-brown to red mudstones, which are common in the lower portion of the formation, are characterized by mottling, slickensides, and blocky to crumbly textures. Calcitic nodules, gypsum crystals, root traces, and burrows are rare.
Interbedded mudstone with claystone is the dominant facies of the upper half of the Douira Formation (Fig.
Laminated mudstones, best developed at Oum Tkout (Figs
Limestones and marls, which comprise a very small fraction (< 1%) of the Douira Formation consist of blueish gray-to-white, ledge-forming beds less than 50 cm thick with substantial clay and silt. This facies occurs in the upper 20 m of the Ouzina section. At Douira calcareous beds are more common and comprise 7% of the section. Beds 20–30 cm in thickness occur inter-bedded with mudstones and claystones. One very thin (1 cm) gypsum horizon, in addition, occurs just below a calcareous mudstone. This facies and more significant evaporite deposits become much more common in beds of the Kem Kem Group outside the Kem Kem Hamada (Table
Paleontology. Fossils are less abundant than in the Gara Sbaa Formation, although the same range of vertebrate taxa are recorded. Associated dinosaur remains from the Douira Formation include the cranium of Carcharodontosaurus and partial skeleton of Spinosaurus (
Trace fossils are common in many horizons. The finer-grained deposits and soil development facilitated footprint and other trace fossil preservation. Horizons with vertebrate tracks occur throughout the formation from within a few meters of its base to within 6 or 7 m of the overlying limestone platform (
Cenomanian paleogeography. Currently, there are no major river drainages from northern Africa into the Mediterranean west of the Nile River. In Morocco uplift during the Cenozoic created the Alpine Belt to the north of the Preafrican Trough, cutting off drainage to the Mediterranean. In Cretaceous time, however, a major drainage existed between eastern Morocco and western Algeria that flowed northward into the Tethys Ocean (
Schematic geography of the major rivers systems in northern and western Africa during the Late Cretaceous (modified from Zellouf and Delfaud 1986, Delfaud 1986, Dutheil 2000). A Kem Kem river system with flow to the north B Kem Kem, paleo-Nile and paleo-Niger river systems. Abbreviations: 1 Meseta 2 Anti-Atlas 3 Ougarta 4 Kem Kem river and delta 5 Paleo-Nile river and delta 6 Paleo-Niger river and delta.
An evolving delta. The Gara Sbaa and Douira formations of the Kem Kem Group in Morocco have long been envisioned as deltaic in general character (
Geology and paleontology at the boundary between the Douira Formation and the Gara Sbaa Member of the Cenomanian-Turonian limestone at Gara Sbaa. A Marly limestone separating the Kem Kem Group from the Cenomanian-Turonian limestone B Close-up of a basal limestone unit in the Gara Sbaa Member C Oyster fossil in situ in the basal limestone D Deep-bodied teleost (Diplomystus sp.) from the Gara Sbaa Member of the Cenomanian-Turonian limestone E Long-bodied teleost (Agoultichthys chattertoni) showing preservation of soft fin structures from the Gara Sbaa Member (Murray and Wilson 2009) D and E from Martill et al. (2011). Scale bars equal 1 cm in D and 2 cm in E.
During deposition of the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations as well as other Kem Kem Group formations recognized to date (Table
Gara Sbaa sediments and paleoenvironments. The conglomeratic components, locally derived clasts, and mix of smaller sandstones indicates within-basin deposition via small-scale fluvial systems at the base of the Gara Sbaa Formation (Fig.
Several possible indicators of tidal influence occur within the upper portion of the Gara Sbaa Formation through the Douira Formation. These include mud drapes, flaser and lenticular bedding and inclined heterolithic strata. The maturity of the sandstones within this stratigraphic interval may also reflect tidal influence (
Douira sediments and paleoenvironments. Evidence favoring deltaic progradation is limited to the lowermost portion of the Douira Formation. As the transgression continued, the entire Kem Kem fluvial system appears to have stalled. Grain size and channel forms diminish up-section. In the deeper northern region of the ramp, evaporites and limestones become more common as clastic input waned. The lowered gradient of the Douira Formation largely consists of a variety of low-energy depositional environments under tidal, and later more fully marine, influence.
These depositional settings involve smaller fluvial channels, floodplains with some incipient paleosol development with root traces, crevasse splay deposits important for the preservation of dinosaur tracks, and a freshwater pond deposit at Oum Tkout with decapods and small-bodied bony fishes (Fig.
Brackish water. The Kem Kem delta was dominated by rapidly moving freshwater/brackish (lotic) paleoenvironments with water flowing toward the open ocean, as opposed to the much rarer still water (lentic) paleoenvironments represented by ponds. The Oum Tkout locality, interpreted here as a pond paleoenvironment, preserves small-bodied (< 10 cm) osteichthyans, such as polypterids and osteoglossiforms. Extant representatives live either in exclusively or predominantly freshwater habitats.
Within the much more common lotic paleoenvironments, the question arises as to whether these were predominantly freshwater, brackish or fully marine. Cartilaginous and bony fish can provide evidence regarding the nature of the water systems. Available evidence points to both freshwater and brackish conditions. Dipnoan tooth plates are common and support freshwater conditions, as all extant dipnoans occupy freshwater habitats.
A diverse assemblage of lamnifom shark teeth, however, suggests that brackish conditions were common. Although the batoid Onchopristis dunklei (
In summary, the Kem Kem fluvial system shows evidence of both freshwater, and brackish conditions. Up section, in the upper portion of the Gara Sbaa Formation and the Douira Formation, tidal indicators suggest brackish conditions may have become stronger.
Hothouse climate. Hothouse conditions likely prevailed during deposition of Kem Kem Group rocks in much of the area now occupied by the Sahara, with harsh seasonality, arid conditions and strong convective storms predominating (
The ages of the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations are based on relative dating of a suite of nine elasmobranch genera collected from both the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations (
Nine elasmobranchs were collected in the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations (
The Gara Sbaa, Douira, and Akrabou formations comprise a single, stepped transgressive sequence recording a succession of fluvial, deltaic, low-energy coastal environments, to finally an offshore carbonate platform. The formations do not show any major erosional or hiatal surfaces or incised channels that would argue for a contained regressive phase. Instead, marine influence increases steadily up-section to a comformable and gradational contact with the overlying Akrabou Formation. The contact between the Douira and Akrabou formations is conformable and shows almost no topography, as observed at many places along the Guir and Kem Kem Hamadas. A thin laminated clay layer a few centimeters thick is often present in well exposed sections at the top of the Douira Formation immediately below the first carbonate layers of the platform. This suggests that inundation and development of an initial coastal platform occurred swiftly without a significant temporal hiatus sometime in the Late Cenomanian.
This transgression corresponds in general to rising eustatic sea levels during the Cenomanian, although rising sea levels began during the Albian (
The age of the boundary between the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations is an open question. That boundary is easily distinguished along the length of the Kem Kem region. It also appears to register as a regional event that occurs in comparable strata to the north and east (Table
Regarding the age of the Akrabou Formation, several studies of the carbonate platform in central Morocco have described the range of ammonites and many other nonvertebrates that correspond with two major transgressive events. The first transgression, located at the base of the Akrabou Formation, has yielded a diverse flora and nonvertebrate (limulid, crustacean, insect), elasmobranch and actinopterygian fauna from localities atop buttes near Gara Sbaa with an estimated age near the end of the Cenomanian (
The dates discussed above can be assembled into a chronology for Hamadian Supergroup rocks in central and eastern Morocco (Table
Preservation. Five modes of preservation are possible to distinguish when fossils are found in situ in the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations: (mode 1) channel lags of concentrated resistant material (teeth, vertebrae, etc.); (mode 2) microsite lags of concentrated small material (especially teeth); (mode 3) isolated elements (bone fragments or teeth); (mode 4) associated remains (partial vertebrate skulls or skeletons); and (mode 5) a pond deposit (plants, small-bodied teleost fish and decapods).
Most body fossils in the Kem Kem region were probably preserved in modes 1–3 and are discovered as isolated, fragmentary pieces weathered out from sandstones in both formations. Associated or articulated vertebrate specimens (mode 4) are very rare (Fig.
Taphonomy of Kem Kem vertebrate bone and teeth. A Isolated theropod quadrate (‘valley near Boumerade’ locality) B Fragmentary archosaur teeth (Gara Sbaa) C Cf. Spinosaurus vertebral zygapophysis (Gara Sbaa) D Abraded sawfish (Onchopristis numidus) rostral tooth E Isolated mixed sample of small (<1 cm) fossil vertebrates (Boumerade) F Lungfish toothplate (Boumerade). Abbreviations: 1 Turtle carapace fragment, 2 Fish vertebra, 3 Calcified rostral cartilage of Onchopristis numidus.
The best preserved large-bodied vertebrates are isolated specimens of four dinosaurs from different locations, two in the Gara Sbaa Formation and two in the Douira Formation. The partial skeleton of Rebbachisaurus garasbae appears to be the only associated large vertebrate specimen recovered in the Gara Sbaa Formation. Its stratigraphic position and locality are based on the historical records of R. Lavocat (
The most complete fossils are from a singular pond deposit, Oum Tkout (mode 5), discovered in 1995 and revisited several times in the ensuing years (
A number of bone elements preserve large numbers of borings (
Nearly all specimens, except those in the singular pond deposit, are preserved in sandstone varying in grain size and degree of silicate cementation; the mudstones composing portions of the Douira Formation appear to be barren. Poorly cemented sandstone is the most common matrix, which is easily removed (Fig.
Sedimentary matrix associated with Kem Kem fossils. A Well-sorted, fine-grained sandstone on vertebrate bone (Gara Sbaa) B More oxidized coarse-grained matrix with the base of a rostral tooth of Onchopristis numidus (“valley near Boumerade”) C Moderately-cemented, red-colored matrix on an isolated archosaur bone (
Color and size variation in Kem Kem vertebrate fossils. A Theropod distal quadrate (likely from Douira) B Archosaur bone and scute fragments (collected by R. Lavocat, Kouah Trick) C Theropod left scapula (MPDM 40, unknown locality) D Cf. Rebbachisaurus partial dorsal vertebra (NMC 50844, unknown locality) E Small and medium-sized fossil fragments (
Completeness. Quantitative logging of isolated specimens collected from several localities in 2008 shows that the majority (~75%) are too incomplete to estimate the percentage of missing bone. Of the remaining more complete specimens, more than half are less than 50% complete. At one locality, Aferdou N’Chaft, approximately half of the collected specimens are nearly complete, although this may be an artifact of small sample size. Clearly most specimens found in the Kem Kem Group are very fragmentary.
The prevalence of breakage among fossils suggests that they were deposited in a relatively high-energy environment and either reworked or transported a considerable distance. Bone breakage, however, does not appear to be a good proxy for distance of fluvial transport (
Abrasion. Most of the fossils can be assigned to abrasion category 2 of
Bones, however, can travel long distances without accumulating signs of abrasion (
Specimen size. Although Kem Kem fossils vary across a wide size range from < 1 cm to 2 m (Fig.
Very large fossil specimens are rare. Two partial sauropod limb bones were found in place. In 1995 the proximal end of a large sauropod ulna was discovered in the Gara Sbaa Formation, measuring 54 cm across its proximal articular end (see taxonomic section for further details). In 2008 the mid-section of a large titanosaur humerus was also recovered in this formation, measuring approximately 25 cm at the narrowest portion of its shaft and with a reconstructed length of approximately 1.5 m (
In sum, there appears to be a strong taphonomic bias against very small (< 2 cm), large (> 6 cm), and soft (plant, nonvertebrate) specimens in the majority of localities in both the Gara Sbaa and Douira formations. The largest sample is from the locality Gara Sbaa, where nearly all vertebrate specimens fall into the 2–6 cm size range.
At the pond locality Oum Tkout, thin films are suggestive of bacteria or fungi (Eumycetes) (Fig.
Body fossils of nonvertebrates are preserved almost exclusively at the pond locality Oum Tkout. The fine-grained mud sediment of the pond floor preserves whole and partial specimens of soft-bodied mollusks, crustaceans (prawn, macruran decapod, Fig.
The hooked rostral teeth of the sclerorhynchid, Onchopristis numidus, are the most common vertebrate fossil in Kem Kem group sediments (
Selected isolated remains of the sclerorhynchid Onchopristis numidus. Rostral fragment with the bases of two rostral teeth in place (NMC 41876) in (A) ?dorsal, (B) ?ventral and (C) lateral view. Section of a large rostrum (FSAC-KK 937) in (D) dorsal, (E) ventral, (F) anterior and (G) posterior views H Small section of rostrum (NMC 50397) I Isolated rostral tooth J Placoid scale (
Elasmobranchii Bonaparte, 1838 | ||
†Hybodontoidea Owen, 1846 | ||
†Asteracanthus aegyptiacus Stromer, 1927 | ||
†Bahariyodon (Lissodus) bartheli (Werner, 1989) | ||
†Distobatus nutiae Werner, 1989 | ||
†Tribodus Brito & Ferreira, 1989, sp. indet. | ||
†Acrodontidae Casier, 1959, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Neoselachii Compagno, 1977 | ||
Galea Shirai, 1996 | ||
†Haimirichia amonensis (Cappetta & Case, 1975) | ||
†Cretoxyrhinidae Glickman, 1958, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Cenocarcharias tenuiplicatus Cappetta & Case, 1975 | ||
Batoidea Compagno, 1973 | ||
†Onchopristis numidus (Haug, 1905) | ||
†Marckgrafia lybica Weiler, 1935 | ||
Actinopterygii Klein, 1885 | ||
†Diplospondichthys moreaui Filleul & Dutheil, 2008 | ||
Cladistia Cope, 1871 | ||
†Bartschichthys Gayet & Meunier, 1996, sp. indet. | ||
†Sudania Werner & Gayet, 1997, sp. indet. | ||
†Serenoichthys kemkemensis Dutheil, 1999b | ||
†Bawitius Grandstaff, et al. 2012, sp. indet. | ||
Ginglymodi Cope, 1872 | ||
†Lepisosteiformes Hay, 1929 | ||
† Adrianaichthys pankowskii (Forey et al., 2011) | ||
Lepisosteidae Cuvier, 1825, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Oniichthys falipoui Cavin & Brito, 2001 | ||
†Obaichthys africanus Grande, 2010 | ||
†Dentilepisosteus kemkemensis Grande, 2010 | ||
Holostei Müller, 1844 (emended by Grande, 2010) | ||
Amiiformes Hay, 1929 | ||
†Calamopleurus africanus Forey & Grande, 1998 | ||
Teleostei Müller, 1846 | ||
†Tselfatiiformes Nelson, 1994 | ||
†Concavotectum moroccensis Cavin & Forey, 2008 | ||
Ichthyodectiformes Bardack & Sprinkle, 1969 | ||
†Aidachar (Cladocyclus) pankowskii Forey & Cavin, 2007 | ||
Osteoglossomorpha Greenwood et al., 1966 | ||
†Palaeonotopterus greenwoodi |
||
†Notopteridae Bleeker, 1959, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Acanthomorpha Rosen, 1973 | ||
†Spinocaudichthys oumtkoutensis Filleul & Dutheil, 2001 | ||
Clupeomorpha Greenwood et al., 1966 | ||
†Diplomystus Cope, 1877, sp. indet. | ||
†Triplomystus Forey, Yi, Patterson, & Davis, 2003, sp. indet. | ||
Characiformes Regan, 1911, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Sarcopterygii Romer, 1955 | ||
Actinistia Cope, 1871 | ||
†Mawsoniidae Schultze, 1993 | ||
†Axelrodichthys lavocati Tabaste, 1963 | ||
Dipnoi Müller, 1846 | ||
Ceratodontidae Gill, 1872 | ||
†Ceratodus humei Priem, 1914 | ||
†Neoceratodus africanus (Haug, 1905) | ||
†Arganodus tiguidensis (Tabaste, 1963) | ||
Amphibia Gray, 1825 | ||
Caudata Scopoli, 1777 | ||
Sirenidae Gray, 1825 | ||
†Kababisha |
||
Anura Fischer von Waldheim, 1813, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Pipidae Gray, 1825 | ||
†Oumtkoutia anae Rage & Dutheil, 2008 | ||
Testudines Batsch, 1788 | ||
Pleurodira Cope, 1865 | ||
†Araripemydidae Price, 1973, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Euraxemydidae |
||
†Dirqadim schaefferi |
||
†Podocnemidoidea Cope, 1868 | ||
†Hamadachelys escuilliei Tong & Buffetaut, 1996 | ||
†Galianemys whitei |
||
†Galianemys emringeri |
||
Squamata Oppel, 1811 | ||
Ophidia Brongniart, 1800 | ||
†Norisophis begaa |
||
†Lapparentophiidae Hoffstetter, 1959 | ||
†Lapparentophis ragei Vullo, 2019 | ||
†Simoliophiidae Nopcsa, 1925 | ||
†Simoliophis cf. libycus |
||
†Nigerophiidae Rage, 1975, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Madtsoiidae Hoffstetter, 1961, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Iguania Cope, 1864 | ||
†Jeddaherdan aleadonta Apesteguía et al., 2016 | ||
†Borioteiioidea Nydam et al., 2007 | ||
†Bicuspidon hogreli Vullo & Rage, 2018 | ||
Crocodyliformes Hay, 1930 | ||
†Peirosauridae Gasparini, 1982 | ||
†Hamadasuchus rebouli Buffetaut, 1994 | ||
†Notosuchia Gasparini, 1971 | ||
†Araripesuchus rattoides Sereno & Larsson, 2009 | ||
†Candidodontidae Carvalho et al., 2004 | ||
†Lavocatchampsa sigogneaurussellae Martin and de Lapparent de Broin, 2016 | ||
†Sphagesauridae Kuhn, 1968, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Neosuchia | ||
†Stomatosuchidae Stromer, 1925 | ||
†Laganosuchus maghrebensis Sereno & Larsson, 2009 | ||
†Aegyptosuchidae Kuhn,1936 | ||
†Aegisuchus witmeri Holliday & Gardner, 2012 | ||
†Pholidosauridae Zittel & Eastman, 1902 | ||
†Elosuchus cherifiensis de Lapparent de Broin, 2002 | ||
†Pterosauria Kaup, 1834 | ||
†Ornithocheiridae Seeley, 1870 | ||
†Siroccopteryx moroccensis Mader & Kellner, 1999 | ||
†Coloborhynchus fluviferox |
||
†Ornithocheirus Seeley, 1869, sp. indet. | ||
†Anhanguera Campos & Kellner, 1985, sp. indet. | ||
†Azhdarchidae Nessov, 1984 | ||
†Alanqa saharica |
||
†Xericeps curvirostris |
||
†Tapejaridae Kellner, 1989, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Afrotapejara zouhrii |
||
?†Chaoyangopteridae | ||
†Apatorhamphus gyrostega McPhee et a., 2020 | ||
Dinosauria Owen, 1842 | ||
†Ornithischia Seeley, 1888, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Sauropoda Marsh, 1878 | ||
†Rebbachisauridae Bonaparte, 1997 | ||
†Rebbachisaurus garasbae Lavocat, 1954b | ||
†Titanosauria Bonaparte & Coria, 1993, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
Theropoda Marsh, 1881, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Noasauridae Bonaparte & Powell, 1980, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Abelisauridae Bonaparte & Novas, 1985, gen. et sp. indet. | ||
†Deltadromeus agilis |
||
†Carcharodontosauridae Stromer, 1931 | ||
†Carcharodontosaurus saharicus Stromer, 1931 | ||
†Spinosauridae Stromer, 1915 | ||
†Spinosaurus aegyptiacus Stomer, 1915 | ||
†Dromaeosauridae Colbert & Russell, 1969, gen. et sp. indet. |
†Hybodontoidea Owen, 1846. The Kem Kem hybodontoids, represented by isolated teeth and fin spines, appear to be attributable to three genera, Bahariyodon bartheli, Distobatus nutiae, and Tribodus sp. (
Isolated tooth and fin spine specimens, in addition, cannot be paired with confidence. Two fin spine morphotypes occur in Kem Kem sediments, one with longitudinal striations and the other with tubercles (Fig.
Elasmobranch fossils from Morocco and Egypt. Hybodontoidea fin spine with tubercles (FSAC-KK 943), in (A) lateral and (B) posterior view. Hybodontoidea fin spine (FSAC-KK 944), ornamented with striations in (C) lateral and (D) posterior view. Lamniform tooth (Poi-SGM 52) referred to Haimirichia amonensis in (E) labial and (F) lingual view. Lamniform tooth (Poi-SGM 53) referred to Cenocarcharias cf. tenuiplicatus in (G) labial and (H) lingual views. I Rostral tooth of Peyeria libyca (Poi SGM 61). Scale bars equal 3 cm in A-D, 3 mm in E and F, 2 mm in G and H, 1 cm in I.
Rare teeth of Bahariyodon bartheli (
Galea, Wagler, 1851. The pond locality Oum Tkout has yielded isolated teeth of lamniform elasmobranchs (
Batoidea Compagno, 1973. Rostral teeth of the large-bodied, sclerorhynchid batoid, Onchopristis numidus (
The rostrum was recovered in two pieces from the Valley near Boumerade locality (Fig.
The calcified disc-shaped, biconvex vertebrae have concave sides and decrease in diameter toward the distal end of the series (Fig.
Another specimen of Onchopristis numidus, which was collected commercially from Kem Kem sediments, preserves portions of the cranium and several anterior vertebrae (
Two additional Kem Kem batoids have been found in screen-washed sediment at Douira in the Douira Formation (
Actinopterygii are usually recovered as isolated bones except in rare instances and at the pond locality Oum Tkout, which has yielded nearly complete skeletons. Actinopterygii include basal clades, such as polypterids (Cladistia), lepisosteids and seminotiformes (Ginglymodi), Amiiformes, and a range of teleosts (Table
Cladistia Cope, 1871. Cladistians are widespread in Africa (
Four genera have been recorded. At the pond locality Oum Tkout in the Douira Formation, several articulated skeletons have been recovered of the small cladistian Serenoichthys kemkemensis (
Large jaw bones with teeth (
Ginglymodi Cope, 1872, Semionotiformes Arambourg & Bertini, 1958. Several authors describe a range of ginglymoid and semionotiform fishes from disarticulated material (
Amiiformes Hay, 1929. Isolated teeth and several dentary fragments (Fig.
A curved dentary from Aferdou N’Chaft has at least 20 alveoli for small triangular teeth and lacks interdental plates (Fig.
Scales of a large holostean from the Kem Kem Group. A FSAC-KK 530 (Gara Sbaa) B NMC 50434-A C FSAC-KK 531 (Gara Sbaa) D NMC 50434-C E NMC 50434-B F Lateral view of NMC 50817 G Medial view of NMC 50817 H Lateral view of NMC 41932 I Medial view of NMC 41932 (one of the largest known teleost scales from the Kem Kem Group). Scale bar equals 3 cm.
Actinopterygian remains from the Kem Kem Group. A-C Possible amiid dentary fragment (MDM 02) in right lateral, medial and dorsal (occlusal) views D Possible amiid dentary fragment (
Isolated teleost dentaries from the Kem Kem Group. A-C Partial dentary of an ichthyodectiform with affinities to Xiphactinus and Cladocyclus (NMC 41882) in right lateral, medial and dorsal views D Right dentary of Xiphactinus audax (FHSM VP-2973) from the Late Cretaceous of the USA in medial view (courtesy of Mike Everhart) E-I Isolated dentary (FSAC-KK 906) of possible amiid in right lateral, medial, dorsal (occlusal) ventral, and medial (close-up) views J-K Dentary (NMC 41884) in ?right lateral and dorsal (occlusal) view. L-M Dentary of an unidentified predatory teleost with rostral tooth of Onchopristis numidus (NMC 50836) in lateral and medial view. Scale bars equal 5 cm in A-C, E-H, 10 cm in D, 3 cm in I-K, 5 cm in L and M. Abbreviation: rt rostral tooth.
Teleostei Müller, 1846. More than a dozen genera of teleost fishes have been described from the Kem Kem Group (Table
Actinistia Cope, 1871. Isolated cranial bones pertaining to large-bodied coelacanths are present in both formations of the Kem Kem Group (Figs
Isolated elements referable to Axelrodichthys lavocati or a closely related form from the Kem Kem Group. A Isolated pterotic (NMC 41877) B Right angular (NMC 50816). Parasphenoid (NMC 41813) in (C) dorsal, (D) anterior and (E) posterior view. Visceral arch element (NMC 50828) in (F) lateral and (G) medial view. Visceral arch element (NMC 50827) in (H) lateral and (I) medial view. Isolated postparietal of (FSAC-KK 157), collected at locality 5 (Figure
Large specimens from the Kem Kem Group likely referable to Axelrodichthys. Possible fragment of palatoquadrate region preserving a large part of the pterygoid (
The genera Mawsonia and Axelrodichthys were originally described from South America on the basis of complete specimens in nodules of late Early Cretaceous age (
Measuring approximately 30 cm long, the skull confirms the large size of the genus Axelrodichthys in lake and river deposits on Africa and South America (
Dipnoi Müller, 1844. Lungfish tooth plates are common in both formations of the Kem Kem Group (Fig.
Ceratodontidae Gill, 1872. The generic taxonomy of fossil lungfish, which is based almost exclusively on toothplates, has been unsettled and species have been variously assigned to the extinct genus Ceratodus or to the living Australian genus Protopterus and living African genus Neoceratodus. The most recent assessment (
Caudata Scopoli, 1777
Sirenidae Gray, 1825. Several localities in the finer-grained Douira Formation have yielded two braincases and 38 vertebrae pertaining to salamanders (
One trunk or anteriormost caudal vertebra of an indeterminate salamander is known from the Algerian locality Oued Bou Seroual in a level comparable to the Douira Formation and approximately 25 km distant from Oum Tkout. The morphology of this procoelous vertebra suggests that it pertains to an elongate, snake-like salamander (
Amphibia and Squamata from the Douira Formation. Cf. Kababisha sp. braincase (
Anura Fischer von Waldheim, 1813. A partial braincase, jaw fragments, and procoelous vertebrae probably pertain to several species of non-pipid anurans, but the remains are too fragmentary to assign to particular families (
Pipidae Gray, 1825. The majority of the anuran material collected in the Douira Formation, as in other Gondwanan localities, is referable to the Pipidae (
Testudines are common among vertebrate fossils in the Kem Kem Group (
Cranial material pertains, thus far, exclusively to pleurodires; cryptodires have yet to be reported. Three genera of euraxymydid and podocnemidoid pleurodires were described on the basis of isolated crania (
Testudinid shell fragments from the Kem Kem Group. Partial plastron with sutures (
Possible araripemydid and podocnemidinuran shell fragments from the Kem Kem Group. Possible araripemydid plastral element (
Isolated turtle postcrania from the Kem Kem Group. Pelomedusoides indet., cervical vertebra (
Turtle skull elements from the Kem Kem Group. One of two undescribed skulls likely referable to Galianemys whitei (
Pleurodira Cope, 1865
Araripemydidae Price, 1973. The flattened, fragile-shelled araripemydids are much better known from slightly older (Aptian-Albian) rocks to the south in Niger (
That decision, to limit referral of partial isolated shell elements of this form to Araripemydidae, is prudent and based on a cladistic diagnosis of the family that specifically cites shell structure and texture among some 20 synapomorphies that unite the two valid genera Araripemys and Laganemys (
Thin ornamented shell material characterizing araripemydids is rare in the Kem Kem Group (Fig.
In a similar manner,
The diagnosis offered by
A nearly complete, articulated skeleton with a skull was later described from the Elrhaz Formation as Laganemys tenerensis (
More recently
Fragmentary holotypic specimens without diagnostic features lend themselves to subsequent taxonomic ambiguity. At no point has any author offered a revised diagnosis of T. decorata based solely on the holotypic partial hypoplaston or even on the numerous additional shell pieces referred to this taxon by
We anticipate eventual recovery of more complete araripemydid remains from the Kem Kem Group. More complete remains may resolve its taxonomic distinction and its affinities with the slightly older African and South American genera, Laganemys and Araripemys, respectively.
Euraxemydidae
Dirqadim schaefferi
Podocnemidoidea Cope, 1868
Hamadachelys Tong & Buffetaut, 1996. Hamadachelys escuilliei (
Galianemys
The second, less complete cranium (Fig.
Two very similar shell types, tentatively referred to Galianemys by
A partial carapace, complete plastron and associated pectoral and pelvic girdles of a fairly large testudine (Fig.
In recent years, fossil discoveries have brought to light jaw fragments and, more rarely, nearly complete skeletons of extinct genera positioned as stem taxa to extant squamate clades. For Iguania and Ophidia, in particular, new fossils from circum-Tethyan sites have drawn their stem lineages back to the Early Cretaceous and, in some cases, to the Early Jurassic (
From Morocco more specifically, fragmentary squamate material was first reported in abundance from the Early Cretaceous site Anoual (Broschinski and Sigogneau-
Iguania Cope, 1864
Acrodonta Cope, 1864
Jeddaherdan. A jaw fragment with blunt, unornamented, imbricate crowns that are ankylosed to the dentary was described as Jeddaherdan aleadonta, a new acrodont iguanian with potential affinities with uromasticine agamids (
Ophidia Brongniart, 1800
Norisophis.
More than 100 ophidian vertebrae were recovered from field work in the Kem Kem Group between 1995 and 2018. They were found at sites in both formations, with several recovered at the pond locality Oum Tkout in the Douira Formation (
Lapparentophiidae Hoffstetter, 1959
Lapparentophis . Vullo (2018) described two moderately elongate mid-trunk vertebrae from near Begaa (close to Taouz), naming a new species in the genus Lapparentophis, L. ragei, which was known previously from Algeria. The diameter of the neural canal is much smaller than that of the cotyle, which is slightly broader than high. Centrum length is a little more than 1 cm.
Simoliophiidae Nopcsa, 1925
Simoliophis.
Nigerophiidae Rage, 1975.
Madtsoiidae Hoffstetter, 1961.
The Kem Kem Group has yielded a diverse array of crocodyliforms in size and trophic adaptations, ranging from small insectivorous or herbivorous candidodontid and sphagesaurid notosuchians less than 1 m in body length to large carnivorous neosuchians approaching the 12-meter length of Sarcosuchus (
By the 1990s, considerable new crocodyliforms fossils came to light in commercial collections (e.g.,
Notosuchia Gasparini, 1971
Uruguaysuchidae Gasparini, 1971
This family of notosuchians, united as a clade in some analyses (e.g.,
Araripesuchus. The speciose genus Araripesuchus, known initially from South America and later from Africa and Madagascar, also occurs in the Kem Kem Group as Araripesuchus rattoides (Fig.
A. rattoides does appear to be distinct from A. wegeneri, which is much better known from complete skulls and skeletons from the older (Aptian-Albian) Elrhaz Formation in Niger. Compared to the latter, many of the dentary alveoli are exposed in lateral view of the best-preserved dentary of A. rattoides (Fig.
Candidodontidae Carvalho et al., 2004
This derived family of small notosuchians, first described by its namesake genus Candidodon from Brazil (
Lavocatchampsa.
Recently a commercially collected partial skull from the Kem Kem Group was described as Lavocatchampsa sigogneaurussellae (Martin and de Lapparent de Broin 2016). Its complex, multicuspid crown morphology includes a labial and lingual cingulum reminiscent of that in the molariform teeth of Cretaceous mammaliaforms. Other derived features include the absence of a caniniform tooth. Unlike Notosuchus and close relatives, masticatory movement appears to have been orthal rather than propalinal. The relationships of Lavocatchampsa within Candidodontidae are uncertain. It has been resolved as the sister group to the somewhat older genera Malawisuchus and Pakasuchus (Martin and de Lapparent de Broin 2016). Lavocatchampsa also resembles Adamantinasuchus (
Notosuchia indeterminate. Small multicuspid crocodyliform teeth from the Douira Formation were first reported by
In the second tooth form (
Peirosauridae Gasparini, 1982
Peirosaurids are a diverse and loosely united group of crocodyliforms lying outside Neosuchia. Some authors have united peirosaurids and sebecids as Sebecia outside Notosuchia (
In 2007 a suite of commercially collected material was described and referred to H. rebouli, including a nearly perfect adult cranium (
Sebecid skull, referred to Hamadasuchus rebouli (
Other sebecid cranial specimens. Posterolateral skull roof (FSAC-KK 930) in (A) dorsal and (B) right lateral view. Partial braincase of Hamadasuchus rebouli (
Original material of Libycosuchus brevirostris Stromer, 1914 (BSP 1912 VIII 574-578). Cranium in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral (C) left lateral view. Lower jaw in (D) dorsal and (E) ventral view. Skull in (F) dorsolateral view. ?Sacral vertebra in (G) lateral view. Caudal vertebra in (H) anterior and (I) lateral view. Scale bars equal 10 cm in A-E, 3 cm in G-I.
Comparison of the braincases – in dorsal view – of the small crocodyliforms (A) Libycosuchus brevirostris, (B) sebecid indet. (FSAC-KK 08) and (C) a specimen initially referred to Hamadasuchus rebouli (
More recently, a nearly complete skull and lower jaws were commercially collected from the Kem Kem Group and have yet to be described in detail (
Sebecid upper jaw bones from the Kem Kem Group. Partial left maxilla (NMC 41866) in (A) lateral and (B) medial view. Partial left premaxilla (NMC 41892) in (C) anterolateral and (D) medial view. Maxillary fragment (FSAC-KK 932) in (E) lateral, (F) medial and (G) ?anterior view. Base of the maxillary crown (FSAC-KK 932) in (H) lateral view. Scale bar equals 3 cm in A-G, 1 cm in H.
Sebecid braincases from Aferdou N’Chaft. Braincase (FSAC-KK 1237) referable to Hamadasuchus rebouli in (A) dorsal and (B) ventral view. Partial braincase (FSAC-KK 08) in (C) dorsal, (D) ventral, (E, I) anterior, (F) posterior, (G) left lateral and (H) right lateral view. Scale bar equals 5 cm in A-H. Abbreviations: bo basioccipital bsr basisphenoid recess cqp cranioquadrate passage f frontal fo ICA foramen for internal carotid artery fo MM maxillomandibular foramen fo mAMEP Musculus adductor mandibulae externus profundus fo V1 ophthalmic foramen oc occipital condyle p parietal q quadrate.
Mandibular symphyses of Hamadasuchus rebouli. Mandibular symphysis (
Neosuchia Clark, 1988
Stomatosuchidae Stromer, 1925
This derived family of moderate to large-sized crocodyliforms was first described as Stomatosuchus inermis from the likely Cenomanian-age Bahariya Formation of Egypt (Stromer, 1925). The nearly 2 m long flat cranium of the holotype was found in articulation with a very slender U-shaped mandible (
Laganosuchus.
Recently remains of a similar crocodyliform surfaced in the Echkar Formation of Niger (
The holotype (
Specimens of Laganosuchus from the Echkar Formation in Niger and the Kem Kem Group in Morocco. Cast of lower jaws (
A larger dentary piece of L. maghrebensis was figured by
Aegisuchus.
Aegisuchus witmeri was named on a commercially collected braincase of uncertain locality in the Kem Kem Group (
Striking features of the braincase link Aegisuchus and Aegyptosuchus, which
All of these features, nevertheless, appear to be present in Stomatosuchus inermis, the braincase of which was only partially preserved (
Pholidosauridae Zittel & Eastman, 1902
The first specimens of a long-snouted crocodyliform discovered in the Kem Kem Group were identified as “Thoracosaurus” cherifiensis (
Recently, the material of Elosuchus from Morocco and Algeria was redescribed as pertaining to two species of pholidosaurids. The Moroccan material, based on specimens from the Kem Kem Group, was attributed to E. cherifiensis, whereas the fossils from the potentially slightly older Albian beds in Algeria (at Gara Samani, Fig.
Elosuchus
.
Using the revised diagnosis and lectotype cranium, additional specimens can be referred to E. cherifiensis, which include paired premaxillae and partial rostra (Figs
Cranial remains of the crocodyliform Elosuchus. A, C E. cherifiensis cranium (
Rostral fragments referred to cf. Elosuchus. Rostral fragment (FSAC-KK 10) in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) right lateral and (D) anterior view. Rostral fragment (NMC 41866) in (E) dorsal and (F) ventral view. Maxillary piece (
Braincase and jugal of the crocodyliform Elosuchus cherifiensis. Braincase (
Fragmentary bones tentatively referred to the crocodyliform Elosuchus. Left premaxilla (FSAC-KK 923) in (A) lateral, (B) medial, (C) anterior, (D) dorsal and (E) ventral view. ?Lacrimal (
Dentaries of the crocodyliform Elosuchus cherifiensis. A Left anterior dentary (
Mandibular symphysis of the crocodyliform Elosuchus cherifiensis. Right anterior dentary (FSAC-KK 753) in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) right lateral, (D) medial and (E) anterior view. Reconstructed symphysis of Elosuchus cherifiensis using reflected image of FSAC-KK 753 in (F) dorsal and (G) ventral view. Scale bar equals 5 cm in A-D, F and G, and 2 cm in E. Abbreviations: d6, 12 dentary tooth 6, 12 sp splenial.
De Lapparent de Broin (2002) referred large isolated scutes to Elosuchus, but the association of the skull remains and scutes described is unclear. Large osteoderms have previously been attributed to “Sarcosuchus sp”. (
Neosuchia indeterminate. A large left jugal (FSAC-KK 07, Fig.
Four foramina are visible on medial aspect of the body of the jugal (Fig.
Although not recognised as pterosaurian at the time, the first pterosaur remains to be recovered from the Kem Kem Group consisted of isolated teeth collected by Lavocat in the late 1940s and early 1950s and now in the
Ornithocheirid pterosaur teeth from the Kem Kem Group. A FSAC-KK 885 B FSAC-KK 44 C FSAC-KK 886 D, E FSAC-KK 197 in labial and lingual views F FSAC-KK 887 G FSAC-KK 941 H Teeth of ‘morphotype 1’ of
The first remains to be confidently identified as pterosaurian, an elongate mid-cervical vertebra referred to the Azhdarchidae, was described in a short abstract by
Ornithocheirid pterosaur jaw fragments from the Kem Kem Group. Premaxillae of Siroccopteryx moroccensis in (A) left lateral and (B) ventral views (from
Rostral fragment (BSP 1993 IX 338) referred by
Alanqa saharica, an azhdarchid founded on a well-preserved fragment of a mandibular symphysis (FSAC KK 26; Fig.
Fragment, coated in ammonium chloride, of the mandibular symphysis of Xericeps curvirostris,
All of the Kem Kem Group pterosaur material consists of isolated, often fragmentary specimens (Figs
Postcranial remains including cervical vertebrae (Fig.
Fragments of jaws of a ?chaoyangopterid pterosaur from the Kem Kem Group. FSAC-KK 29 in (A) left lateral, (B) ?dorsal, (C) anterior and (D) posterior views E Detailed view of anterior-most paired foramina. FSAC-KK 32 in (F) left lateral, (G) ?dorsal and (H) posterior view.
Ornithocheiroidea Seeley, 1891
Ornithocheiridae Seeley, 1870
Siroccopteryx. Siroccopteryx moroccensis Mader & Kellner, 1999, based on the anterior portion of a rostrum that retains teeth (
Several authors have suggested that Siroccopteryx may be synonymous with Coloborhynchus (
Coloborhynchus. Coloborhynchus fluviferox
Ornithocheiridae indet. A partial mandibular ramus 160 mm in length and bearing four dental alveoli was collected from Aferdou N’Chaft from the Gara Sbaa Formation (FSAC-KK 33, Fig.
Isolated, often incomplete, ornithocheirid teeth have been described by
All teeth recovered to date can be assigned to one of the four morphotypes recognized by
Azhdarchoidea Nessov, 1984
Tapejaridae Kellner, 1989
Tapejaridae indet. The anterior portion of an edentulous mandibular symphysis bearing a large ventral crest (BSP 1997 I 67) was described by
The morphology of the jaw and deep ventral crest corresponds well to that of tapejarids such as Tapejara (e.g.,
? Chaoyangopteridae
Apatorhamphus. A fragment of an edentulous rostrum missing its anterior tip (FSAC-KK 5010) collected at Aferdou N’Chaft has been made the holotype of a third genus and species of azhdarchoid, Apatorhamphus gyrostega, possibly a chaoyangopterid, from the Kem Kem Group (
The rostrum shows a relatively rapid increase in depth posteriorly and has a slightly concave dorsal profile, which is typical of chaoyangopterids, but not other azhdarchoids. The lateral and palatal surfaces bear prominent foramina and the palatal surface has well developed dental margins, but no median ridge. Posteriorly the bone walls of the rostrum are remarkably thin, but toward the tip they become much more robust enclosing a deep but increasingly narrow central lumen. Unlike azhdarchids, the jaws of which have a ‘Y’ shaped cross-section (
A combination of features including the shape of the rostrum, its unusual cross-sectional profile and the shape and distribution of foramina appear to distinguish FSAC-KK 5010 from other edentulous taxa found in the Kem Kem group, and azhdarchoids more generally although, in the latter case, comparison is often hampered by severe compression of the skull remains, for example in taxa from the Crato and Jiufotang Formations. While FSAC-KK 5010 compares more closely to the rostrum of chaoyangopterids than to other azhdarchoids, the possibility that it might, for example, be thalassodromeid cannot be entirely excluded, hence the caution in assigning this new species to Chaoyangopteridae.
Azhdarchidae Nessov, 1984
Alanqa. Alanqa saharica,
Fragments of the rostrum and mandibular symphysis of this pterosaur have been described in detail, and figured by
The only phylogenetic analysis to include Alanqa to date (
Xericeps
. Xericeps curvirostris
Among azhdarchoids the long slender mandibular symphysis of Xericeps curvirostris (Fig.
Azhdarchidae indet.
The Kem Kem Group has yielded several well-preserved cervical vertebrae comparable to those described for azhdarchids such as Quetzalcoatlus (
Azhdarchoidea indet. Numerous limb bones including the humerus, ulna, wing-metacarpal, wing-phalanges, femur and tibia have been collected in recent years. So far, however, only a single humerus has been described (
Dinosaurs are represented by theropods and sauropods, as well as fragmentary remains of uncertain affinities, including a large ornithischian footprint (
Isolated and often fragmentary dinosaur bones and teeth are found in all major localities in both formations in the Kem Kem Group. Skull bones are rare and usually consist of jaw fragments, pieces of braincase, or the quadrate condyles. On rare occasions, partial skulls and associated and even articulated skeletons are preserved (Lavocat 1954,
Ornithischia Seeley, 1888
Ornithischian teeth and footprints are extremely rare in the Kem Kem Group; ornithischian cranial or postcranial bones have yet to be identified. Evidence from a single small isolated crown (Fig.
A small partial subtriangular crown was recovered from Oum Tkout in the Douira Formation from a small-bodied ornithischian (Fig.
The small size of the crown (~ 1 cm in height), symmetrical enamel, rounded form of the primary ridge, absence of secondary ridges, low number of denticles, basal cingulum and absence of tooth-to-tooth wear facets are consistent with the form and function of a basal ornithischian tooth, possibly from a thyreophoran. Among thyreophorans, ankylosaur and stegosaur teeth often have a similar subtriangular crown shape but usually differ in exhibiting more surface ornamentation, pointed denticles, a bulbous cingulum and tooth-to-tooth wear facets. Although ankylosaur teeth often show an arched divergence of the denticle axis present in the Kem Kem specimen, basal thyreophoran Scutellosaurus has crowns that are otherwise similar in shape and ornamentation and are often unworn (
A single large (~ 51 cm long and wide), clover-shaped, three-toed footprint records the presence of a large ornithischian, presumable a large iguanodontian, in the Douira Formation (
Sauropoda Marsh, 1878
The Kem Kem Group preserves sauropod remains, usually as rare isolated teeth and bone fragments. Only one associated partial postcranial specimen has been recovered (Figs
Holotype material of Rebbachisaurus garasbae. A Dorsal vertebra (
Axial remains of Rebbachisaurus garasbae. NMC 50844 in (A) anterior, (B) posterior, (C) right lateral and (D) dorsal views E Internal appearance of centrum F Posterior articular section of vertebra (
Isolated sauropod teeth from the Kem Kem Group. A NMC 50822 in lingual view B NMC 50825 in labial view C NMC 41808 in labial view. NMC 41812 in (D) labial and (E) lingual views F NMC 41809 in labial view G NMC 50442B in labial view H NMC 41801 in labial view I NMC 41799 in lingual view J NMC 41811 in lateral view. NMC 41810 in (K) lingual and (L) cross-sectional view. NMC 50445 in (M) cross-sectional, (N) labial and (O) lingual views P NMC 50442A in labial view Q-S
Rebbachisauridae Bonaparte, 1997
Rebbachisaurus
. Rebbachisaurus garasbae (Figs
Thin laminae, large oval pleurocoels and highly pneumatized bone characterize the centra and neural arches of R. garasbae (Figs
Isolated narrow, subcylindrical teeth from the Kem Kem Group (
The enamel on the potential rebbachisaurid crown is present on both sides and is lightly textured (Fig.
Titanosauria Bonaparte & Coria, 1993
Isolated teeth and several postcranial bones pertain to one or more titanosaurian sauropods (Figs
Some crowns seem particularly narrow (Fig.
Dimensions of select sauropod crowns from the Kem Kem Group. Measurements in mm. Abbreviation:
Specimen | Height | Basal width |
|
50 | 14 |
|
51 | 11 |
|
44 | 11 |
|
42 | 13 |
|
42 | 11 |
|
36 | 11 |
|
28 | 10 |
|
57 | 11 |
|
37 | 10 |
|
49 | 12 |
|
49 | 12 |
|
52 | 14 |
Isolated sauropod caudal vertebrae, a partial humerus and a tarsal bone have also been identified as titanosaurian (
The proximal end of an ulna from a very large sauropod was found in situ in the Douira Formation (Fig.
Maximum transverse width of the proximal end of large sauropod ulnae in comparison to the large ulna from the Gara Sbaa Formation (
Taxon/specimen | Maximum width |
Neosauropoda indet. |
440 |
Camarasaurus grandis ( |
210 |
Diamantinasaurus matildae ( |
338 |
Titanosaurus colberti ( |
221 |
Theropoda Marsh, 1881
Theropods dominate among dinosaur fossils recovered in the Kem Kem Group. Most specimens are isolated teeth found in surface debris, but some are partial jaw pieces, vertebrae, unguals and, very rarely, articulated partial skulls and skeletons. The best-known Kem Kem theropods are large-bodied basal neotheropods including abelisaurids, spinosaurids, and carcharodontosaurids. Controversy has surrounded the generic and specific assignment of these Kem Kem theropods. Are they congeneric or conspecific with similar age taxa named a century ago (e.g.,
Theropod teeth are relatively common on outcrop surfaces at many localities in the Kem Kem Group. A few were discovered in situ near the boundary between the formations at Aferdou N’Chaft (Fig.
Indeterminate theropod teeth from the Kem Kem Group.
A portion of the isolated teeth can be placed in one of three tooth morphotypes. Tooth morphotype 1 includes relatively small teeth that may pertain to abelisauroid theropods (Fig.
Tooth morphotype 2 includes the largest theropod teeth from the Kem Kem Group and may pertain to carcharodontosaurid theropods (Fig.
Tooth morphotype 3 includes relatively small teeth that may pertain to dromaeosaurid theropods. They are laterally compressed with a distal carina that is either concave, straight or gently convex. They are characterized by having distinctly larger serrations on the distal than mesial carina (Fig.
Pointed manual and pedal unguals pertaining to theropods have also been recovered from the Kem Kem Group (Russell, 1996). One ungual was surface collected from Gara Sbaa (Fig.
Isolated unguals from the Kem Kem Group. NMC 41820 in (A) posterior and (B) lateral views C NMC 50987 (cast) in lateral view. NMC 50842b in (D) posterior and (E) lateral view. FSAC-KK 918 in (F) lateral, (G) dorsal and (H) ventral views I NMC 50839a in lateral view J NMC 50839b in lateral view K 50839c (reversed) in lateral view L NMC 50839e in lateral view M NMC 50839d (reversed) in lateral view N MPDM 43 in lateral view O
Many unguals are approximately 2–4 cm in length and cannot be assigned to a particular theropod subgroup. Some are regarded as manual unguals, because they are laterally compressed, recurved along their length, and have a rounded rather than flattened ventral margin (Fig.
Manual ungual morphotype 1 are large manual unguals exceeding 5 cm in length and may pertain to spinosauroid theropods (Fig.
Manual ungual morphotype 2 are large robust unguals approximately 3–5 cm in length that may pertain to carcharodontosaurid theropods (Fig.
Manual ungual morphotype 3 are moderate-sized unguals approximately 2–3 cm in length that may pertain to paravian or dromaeosaurid theropods (Fig.
Abelisauroidea Bonaparte & Novas, 1985.
Abelisaurid jaw elements and teeth from the Kem Kem Group. Right maxilla (UCPC PV10) in (A) lateral, (B) medial, (C) anterior and (D) dorsal view. ?Abelisaurid tooth (
Alveolar length in the middle of the maxilla in three abelisaurid theropods showing maximum length centered on alveoli 6–8. Measurements in mm. Abbreviations:
Specimen | Alveolus number | |||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
Majungasaurus crenatissimus ( |
19.1 | 19.6 | 17.0 | 21.0 | 20.6 | 19.6 |
Abelisauridae indet. ( |
15.1 | 16.4 | 17.3 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 17.3 |
Rugops primus (MNBH IGU1) | 13.5 | 15.6 | 15.9 | 15.3 | 14.5 | 14.2 |
A commercially collected maxilla with several crowns in place (Fig.
Additional commercially collected specimens have been described more recently, including a pair of maxillae with teeth close in form to
Abelisaurid maxillae from Madagascar and Niger. A Left maxilla of Majungasaurus crenatissimus (
Deltadromeus. The partial and only known postcranial skeleton of Deltadromeus agilis (
Well-preserved elements of the right pes of D. agilis. A Digit IV in dorsal view. B Digit III in dorsal view. C Digit II in dorsal view. Scale bar equals 10 cm. Abbreviations: mt II, III metatarsals II, III ph III-1, 2 pedal phalanges 1 and 2 of digit III ph IV-3, 4, 5 pedal phalanges 3-5 of digit IV.
The form of the coracoid, femur, and the proximal ends of the tibia and fibula of D. agilis, in particular, match that of isolated material recovered from the Bahariya oasis in the Western Desert in Egypt and referred by
Four of Stromer’s referred bones, however, bear a striking resemblance to comparable bones in the skeleton of D. agilis. The coracoid is expanded anteroposteriorly with a subrectangular posterior process; the femur has a very similar proximal end (narrow head, prominent leaf-shaped anterior trochanter), narrow shaft proportions, the unusual accessory trochanter projecting posteriorly from the posterolateral edge of the shaft below the fourth trochanter, and a projecting anterior extension of the medial distal condyle (
Recently,
The Egyptian femur is 122 cm long (
All of the material of Deltadromeus agilis is now fully prepared. Previously unprepared fragments include shaft pieces that have completed the humerus and fibula. These have been included in a revised skeletal restoration (Fig.
Deltadromeus agilis most closely resembles the recently described “didactyl” theropod Gualicho shinyae from the similar-age Huincul Formation of southern Argentina (
Whereas the new Argentine material adds tantalizing details to what is known collectively from these specimens, the phylogenetic position of these genera to each other and to other theropods remains ambiguous (
Spinosauridae Stromer, 1915. Spinosaurid fossils from the Kem Kem Group are most commonly found as isolated specimens, which has generated controversy over how many taxa are present. We review that material below, including the more complete specimens recovered recently that in our view suggest there is but one species present, Spinosaurus aegyptiacus.
Isolated specimens. Subconical teeth, jaw fragments with empty subcircular alveoli, and fragments of elongated neural spines are the most common spinosaurid specimens preserved in the Kem Kem Group (Figs
Dentary fragments of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus from the Kem Kem Group. Dentary section (MPDM 30) in (A) lateral and (B) ?anterior view. Dentary fragment (
Dentary fragments of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus from the Kem Kem Group. Anterior section of the left dentary (NMC 50833) in (A) left lateral, (B) medial, (C) dorsal, (D) ventral, (E) anterior and (F) posterior view. Symphyseal end of the right dentary (NMC 50832) in (G) lateral, (H) medial, (I) dorsal, (J) ventral, (K) anterior and (L) posterior view. Scale bar equals 10 cm. Abbreviations: ad1 3 alveolus for dentary tooth 1, 3 dl dental lamina Mc Meckel’s canal t tooth.
Dentary fragments of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus from the Kem Kem Group. Anterior section of the left dentary (IMPG 969-1) in (A) lateral and (B) dorsal view. Posterior section of the left dentary (IMPG 969-2) in (C) lateral and (D) medial view. Part and counterpart aligned in (E) lateral and (F) dorsal view. The two specimens clearly belong to the same jaw section and individual (contra
Comparison of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus rostra from Morocco and Algeria. Moroccan rostra include
Rostral portions of Spinosaurus from Morocco and Algeria. Rostrum (
Dentary portion of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus from the Kem Kem Group. NHMUK VP 16421 in (A) left lateral, (B) medial, (C) dorsal (occlusal), (D) anterior and (E) posterior view. F Detailed view of dentary alveolus. Size comparison of (G) the anterior end of the dentary of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus (NHMUK VP 16421) and (H) the partial dentary of Baryonyx walkeri (NHMUK VP R9951). Scale bars equal 20 cm in A-E, 10 cm in G and H.
Cervical vertebrae of Spinosaurus cf. aegyptiacus from the Kem Kem Group. Mid cervical vertebra (NMC 50791) in (A) right lateral, (B) anterior, (C) posterior, (D) dorsal and (E) ventral view. Posterior cervical vertebra (NMC 50790) in (F) right lateral, (G) anterior and (H) ventral view. Mid cervical vertebra (NMC 41768) in (I) left lateral view. Posterior cervical vertebra (MPDM 33) in (J) left lateral and (K) dorsal view. Scale bar equals 20 cm. Abbreviations: di diapophysis epi epipophysis ila interspinous ligament attachment ns neural spine pa parapophysis pc pleurocoel prz prezygapophysis.
Isolated spinosaurid vertebrae have been described from cervicodorsal and caudal regions (
Dorsal vertebrae of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus. Anterior dorsal neural arch with partial spine (FSAC-KK 04) from the Kem Kem Group in (A) left lateral, (B) right lateral, (C) anterior and (D) posterior view. Ventral portion of a mid dorsal vertebra (
Problematic cervical vertebrae from Niger and Morocco referable to Spinosaurus. NMC 41629 in (A) right lateral, (B) ventral, (C) anterior and (D) posterior view. NMC 41774 in (E) anterior and (F) posterior view. MNN IGU 11 in (G) right lateral, (H) ventral and (I) posterior view.
More complete specimens. Very rarely more complete specimens have come to light representing partial crania or postcranial skeletons. Only one of each has been recovered so far from the Kem Kem Group. In 1975 a partial rostrum of an adult individual (
In 2008 a partial postcranial skeleton (FSAC-KK 11888, Fig.
Skull and skeleton of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus. A Skull reconstruction in left lateral view (after
In 2013 the Moroccan collector was located and took several of us (NI, DMМ, SZ) to the site of discovery, which was located in a sandstone unit near the base of the Douira Formation. In 2014 the site was revisited for more intensive paleontological and geological work by several of us (NI, SZ, PCS, DMM) and others. The spoils and walls of the initial excavation were screened and further excavated. Teeth and additional fragments came to light. The locality was placed in section at the base of the Douira Formation, with a log of a very complete section across both formations compiled on the side of a nearby butte, Al Gualb Mesa (
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, partial associated skeleton.
Unlike Stromer’s holotypic specimen, the quadrates and several of the excavated girdle and limb bones of the new specimen comprise perfectly matched opposites. All three bones of the pelvic girdle and both hind limbs have opposites of similar size. There are no duplicate bones. A portion of one of the manual digits, in addition, was found in articulation; the end of one phalanx was preserved in articulation with the base of the succeeding nonterminal phalanx, both adhered by matrix in position to a portion of a dorsal vertebra. The concavo-convex interphalangeal articulations in the right pes are precisely fitted, suggesting that at least portions of the hind limbs were also preserved in articulation when excavated. The preserved bones of the axial column also have compatible dimensions. Thus, the evidence from the preserved material and locality (contra
The bones of the new specimen could not plausibly have been assembled from a disparate collection of spinosaurid bones. The bones of the axial column are congruent in size, and paired girdle and long bones of similar size and preservation support interpretation of the material as pertaining to a single individual from a single locality. We regard this specimen of Spinosaurus as an associated partial skeleton. This specimen joins the holotypes of Rebbachisaurus garasbae (
A more plausible concern regarding associated specimens from the Kem Kem Group is actually opposite that imagined by
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, neotype designation. The partial skeleton of Spinosaurus (FSAC-KK 11888) preserves fragments of the skull, portions from all major parts of the axial column, portions or entire bones from both girdles, and portions or complete parts of both fore and hind limbs (
Because critical portions of the skeleton overlap with that of Stromer’s holotype from Egypt, the new Kem Kem specimen provides an excellent opportunity for neotype designation following standard guidelines (
Evers at al. (2015) rejected this designation of a neotype without discussion of any of the diagnostic features noted above, which characterize only the original Bahariya and new Kem Kem specimens. The additional reasons given for rejecting the proposed neotype are questionable. The entirety of Stromer’s holotypic specimen was destroyed in 1944, and since then no significant additional material of S. aegyptiacus has been discovered in the relatively small areas of outcrop available in the Western Desert of Egypt. Designation of a neotype partial skeleton found elsewhere is justified, given the frequent reference to this genus and species and the recovery of additional spinosaurid material from other regions of northern Africa. An existing specimen with greater skeletal coverage than any other is preferred as a type, rather than relying solely on a limited set of drawings and two photographs of the destroyed holotype.
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, lost holotype. In 1944 all of the spinosaurid bones described by
The bones of the holotype were collected by Richard Markgraf in 1912 (
“Spinosaurus B”. A second, less complete partial skeleton (
The current controversy over the number of spinosaurids in the Kem Kem Group originates with the non-overlap between these two Egyptian specimens.
The critical importance of the new specimen of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus from the Douira Formation is that it overlaps both the holotype of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus and “Spinosaurus B” and connects the axial column to the hindlimbs in a single individual, confirming both the initial development of aventral rugose platform on the centrum of a mid-cervical (Fig.
Spinosaurid cervicodorsal vertebrae. A Partial mid cervical of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus (FSAC-KK 11888, cast) lacking the anterior end of the centrum, upper portion of the neural spine and postzygapophyses, B Articulated cervicodorsal series C2-D4) of Suchomimus tenerensis (MNBH GAD70) in left lateral view with most of the cervical ribs removed. Scale bar equals 5 cm in A (bottom), 10 cm in A (top) and B. Abbreviations: ns neural spine pl pleurocoel plf platform prz prezygapophysis tp transverse process.
“Spinosaurus maroccanus” and an intact spinosaurid neck (Suchomimus tenerensis).
An articulated neck of of the Early Cretaceous spinosaurid Suchomimus tenerensis was recovered from the Elrhaz Formation of Niger (Fig.
The mid cervical vertebra of the neotypic specimen of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus (FSAC-KK 11888), nonetheless, has the same absolute centrum length and proportions as the holotype of “Spinosaurus maroccanus” and also has a clearly demarcated, rugose ventral platform (Fig.
“Sigilmassasaurus”. Erected on a single isolated vertebra, Russell (1995) and
Second, “Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis”, which is based on an isolated anterior dorsal vertebra (
Third, three papers have suggested there are two spinosaurids in the Kem Kem Group based on differences in preserved snouts and isolated frontals and quadrates. All are compromised by stratigraphic or identification issues that undermine support for two contemporary spinosaurids.
Finally, two frontal morphs were described by
A second large specimen consists of two, broad fused frontals that much more closely resemble a carcharodontosaurid than a spinosaurid (
Two-piece puzzle. Are the squat cervicodorsal vertebrae of “Spinosaurus B” and “Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis” simply the missing parts of the axial column of the original spinosaurid, Spinosaurus aegyptiacus? We favor this hypothesis.
To better understand how vertebral form changes along the neck, we briefly describe a complete cervicodorsal series from a partial articulated skeleton of Suchomimus tenerensis (Fig.
The Suchomimus cervicodorsal series suggests that centrum proportions alone may not securely position vertebrae in the cervical series. All of the anterior dorsal vertebrae (D1-D4), likewise, are remarkably short. The rectangular shape and height of neural spines appears to be greatest in C3 and C4, decreasing markedly in height and width from C8-D2. In Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, the anterior cervical neural spines (C3 and C4) were relatively taller, as preserved in the holotype of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus (
Carcharodontosauridae Stromer, 1931. When more complete cranial material of the African genus Carcharodontosaurus came to light from the Douira Formation,
Carcharodontosaurus.
Two blade-shaped teeth with a nearly straight distal carina and marginal enamel wrinkles were described as Megalosaurus saharicus (
Teeth from Morocco and Niger referred to Carcharodontosaurus. Teeth of
Endocasts of Carcharodontosaurus saharicus. Endocast (from
In 1995 a more complete cranium (Figs
Right maxilla of Carcharodontosaurus saharicus.
The Moroccan cranium (
Postorbital of Carcharodontosaurus saharicus (
The very close match between Moroccan and Egyptian cranial bones figured prominently in the decision to designate the Moroccan cranium as the neotype for Carcharodontosaurus saharicus (
Additional cranial material referable to Carcharodontosaurus saharicus includes a section of the dentary from a large individual (Fig.
Dentary fragments likely referable to Carcharodontosaurus saharicus. NMC 41859 in (A) right lateral, (B) medial and (C) dorsal (occlusal) view. FSAC-KK 02 in (D) dorsal (occlusal) and (E) medial view. NMC 41859 matched with the dentary of Giganotosaurus carolinii (MUCPv-95, redrawn and reversed from
More recently discovered material of both of these theropod groups has settled this question. The stout, broad-faced centra, close in form to those described from Cenomanian-age rocks in Egypt as “Spinosaurus B” (
“Sauroniops”. Recently another carcharodontosaurid taxon, Sauroniops pachytholus, was described from the Kem Kem Group based on an isolated commercially collected left frontal (
We do not regard the diagnostic features given to distinguish S. pachytholus from C. saharicus as convincing. Great weight is given to the exact contour of the interdigitating lateral sutural edge of the frontal, an edge that is overlapped in part by adjacent bones (
Likewise, we fail to discern other alleged differences, such as “prominent frontal shelves overhanging the supratemporal fossa”, which is similar to a feature (“invaginated anteromedial corner of the supratemporal fossa”) cited previously in the diagnosis of C. saharicus (Brusatte & Sereno, 2007: 904). The anterolateral corner of the supratemporal fossa is said to have a “distinct corner rather than a more gently curved anterolateral margin” in C. saharicus. However, only the central portion of the supratemporal fossa is preserved in S. pachytholus (
Dromaeosauridae Matthew & Brown, 1922. Dromaeosaurid teeth have been reported from several unspecified localities in the Kem Kem region (
Supergroup recognition for formational trilogy.
In this study, we recognize Choubert’s “trilogie mésocrétacée” as the Hamadian Supergroup (Table
Group recognition for formational duo. We recognize as the Kem Kem Group the first two non-marine units of the Hamadian Supergroup, which extends across much of central and eastern Morocco north and south of the Pre-African Trough (Table
Similar pairs of strata, the lower coarser-grained, are present in the Tinghir region to the north near Aoufous and northeast near Goulmima, although they are not connected by continuous outcrop to the Kem Kem region. These deposits, which are generally thinner and much less fossiliferous, appear to have been deposited in depressions separate from the Kem Kem embayment. We do not agree with applying formational names from the Tinghir region (e.g., Ifezouane and Aoufous formations) to the distinctive, mapable strata of the Kem Kem embayment (contra
In his pioneering geological work on Hammadian supergroup rocks in Morocco, Lavocat sometimes referred to beds by the most common fossil, such as the land snail Clavator or the sawfish Onchopristis. The “grès à Onchopristis” (Onchopristis sandstone), for example, corresponds with the Gara Sbaa Formation of this paper, as Lavocat indicated graphically (1954b: pl. IV, fig. 11). It would be incorrect, however, to infer a precise biostratigraphic zonation from Lavocat’s informal stratigraphic nomenclature. The extinct genera Lavocat cited for convenience in affiliation with particular strata are not necessarily limited to those beds.
Fossils collected from the Kem Kem Group, for the most part, are derived from two sources: surface-collected specimens from known or unknown localities that have weathered from their original point of burial and commercially collected specimens from channel sandstones in the Gara Sbaa Formation lacking precise associated locality or stratigraphic data. Most known Kem Kem fossils, thus, are not associated with reliable stratigraphic data. For this reason, little has been said in the literature about biostratigraphic zonation within the Kem Kem Group.
Only a few vertebrate specimens in the Kem Kem Group have been collected in situ by professionals from a precise geographic locality and positioned by measurements on a local stratigraphic section. We have cited most of these specimens in this paper. Some of these specimens are unique, such as the partial articulated skeleton of the theropod Deltadromeus (
To evaluate range, we are limited to considering some of the more common fossil vertebrates in these formations, which comprise teeth and generically diagnostic bone pieces. Only these are common enough to provide a sense of range. They have been found in both formations (as surface-collected and in situ specimens): the elasmobranch Onchopristis, dipnoan Ceratodus, theropod dinosaurs Spinosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus, and bones referable to possibly the same or similar rebbachisaurid and titanosaurid sauropods. This evidence, although meager, suggests that at least some aquatic and terrestrial vertebrate genera ranged across both formations.
The Kem Kem vertebrate assemblage (Table
Two potential pitfalls in the evaluation of fragmentary remains have opposing effects on the estimation of taxonomic diversity. Over-splitting taxa that represent a single species exaggerates diversity, whereas under-splitting (lumping) taxa that are actually distinct underestimates diversity.
Over-splitting, perhaps the more common of the two, occurs when taxa are erected on fragmentary remains that do not overlap, when taxa are differentiated on features that appear during growth and maturation, or when few distinguishing features prove not to be diagnostic. Although estimates vary among vertebrate and nonvertebrate groups and living versus extinct taxa, at least 30% and possibly as much as 50% of non-avian dinosaurian taxa have been relegated to taxonomic error of one sort or another (
Under-splitting occurs when taxonomists lump together non-overlapping remains, assuming that they pertain to a single, rather than closely related, second species or genus. Only overlapping material can directly highlight differences; novel species or genera may remain unrecognized, when material that does not overlap is referred to the same taxon. This is especially true regarding the fragmentary, and often transported, fossils in the Kem Kem Group. Reference to a single taxon, however, may constitute a prudent decision, when no direct comparative evidence exists to justify the presence of a second taxon.
Archosaurian reptiles, the focus of much ongoing research, comprise most of the moderate to large-sized terrestrial vertebrates in the Kem Kem Group. A few of these genera will be discarded for various reasons in future taxonomic work. Other existing genera, on the other hand, are likely to be split, so the current tally is probably a reasonably accurate sum of current knowledge of Kem Kem Group taxonomic diversity (Table
Trends in research activity and collection efforts allow a preliminary assessment of our current state of knowledge. After a period of relatively little research in the region, renewed interest began with the 1995 American-Moroccan survey expedition and subsequent publications (
Given the continued input of new specimens and the continuing expansion of paleontological research, we predict that diversity in the Kem Kem Group will increase substantially in the coming decades. Based on our review of existing collections, this increase will include scores of taxa from the pond locality Oum Tkout including nonvertebrates, such as plants, insects, and ostracods, as well as an array of actinopterygian fish. We also anticipate a continuing trickle of new terrestrial vertebrates that will be named on better preserved specimens that are diagnostic at present only at the familial level, including turtles and various kinds of archosaurs. As nearly half of the reptilian families listed are indeterminate (Table
Other well-known Cenomanian vertebrate assemblages, such as those recorded from localities in the Bahariya Formation in the Western Desert of Egypt (
In summary, the Kem Kem assemblage of nonvertebrates and vertebrates is likely to continue to show dramatic increase in diversity in the coming decades. Nonetheless, the array of taxa currently known, which extends from plants across a range of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates, is sufficiently mature to allow a summary of the vertebrate assemblage and a discussion of its paleoecological context.
Assemblage character
Predominance of aquatic predators. The Kem Kem assemblage is dominated by aquatic and subaquatic nonvertebrates and vertebrates, nearly all of which are predators. Approximately 85% of the vertebrate taxa in the assemblage are aquatic or subaquatic (Table
Aquatic habitats, which include pond, river, delta and nearshore settings, supported a diverse array of elasmobranchs, actinopterygians and basal sarcopterygians in marine, brackish and freshwater settings. Currently numbering approximately 40 distinct species (Table
The overabundance of predatory versus herbivorous dinosaurs was first noticed by
Neither can the overabundance of predatory dinosaur fossils have been generated by preservation factors or selective long-distance transport. No one has described plausible taphonomic biases that would favor the preservation of non-avian theropod tooth, bone and footprints over herbivorous dinosaurs or crocodilians.
Likewise, the evidence for long-distance fluvial transport of vertebrate teeth or bone from one habitat or region to another has come under recent reevaluation. Decades of actual studies have failed to substantiate long-distance fluvial transport of vertebrate fossils as a common phenomenon. The main supporting evidence, bone and tooth abrasion, has been shown to correlate poorly with distance traveled. Long-distance fluvial transport now is regarded by some as only a minor factor in biasing assemblage composition (
Thus, the taxonomic and numerical predominance of predatory dinosaurs, which has been termed an “unbalanced food web” (
Diversity of crocodyliform and dinosaurian predators. Both crocodyliform and dinosaurian predators exhibit unusually diverse cranial form indicative of diverse feeding strategies. Crocodyliforms include an unnamed large-bodied taxon with recurved, transversely compressed teeth presumably preying primarily upon terrestrial animals (
This triumvirate of large predators (abelisaurid, spinosaurid, carcharodontosaurid) has been recorded at Cenomanian localities across northern Africa with precursors in the Aptian-Albian of both South America and Africa (
Absence of Aves and Mammalia. The Kem Kem assemblage has yet to yield diagnostic remains of a bird or mammal.
Avians and eutherian mammals usually are represented in Cretaceous vertebrate faunas as diverse as that from the Kem Kem Group. The absence of any body fossils of these two clades is extraordinary for five reasons. First, eutherian mammals are present in earlier deposits on Africa including localities in Morocco (e.g.,
A variety of small, multicuspid notosuchian crocodilians are present in the Kem Kem assemblage, some of which may have been insectivorous or herbivorous (
Assemblage summary. Geologic, taphonomic and collection biases influence the fossil record of taxonomic diversity (
Plants are preserved most commonly as woody stem or trunk fragments. Complete leaves and fronds of herbaceous and woody plants including ferns, ginkgoes, gymnosperms and angiosperms have been recovered from the pond locality Oum Tkout, many of which remain to be described. Nonvertebrates include shelly and soft-bodied mollusks, crustaceans including the prawn Cretapenaeus (
The hooked rostral teeth (Fig.
Actinopterygian fish are particularly diverse and likely to add to their diversity in the future. They include more than a dozen genera of basal forms including cladistians, lepisosteiforms, and amiiformes. Cladistians include whole body specimens of the small-bodied Serenoichthys (Fig.
Sarcopterygian fish are common in both formations of the Kem Kem Group, including the large coelacanth Axelrodichthys recently described from a 30 cm skull (Figs
Salamander vertebrae assigned to Kababisha and a second unnamed genus were recovered from screenwashed sediment from microsites in the Douira Formation. At least two frogs are present in the Kem Kem assemblage, one a non-pipid anuran known from a partial braincase, jaw fragments and vertebrae (
Turtles are common fossils in the Kem Kem Group, although most specimens are isolated shell fragments (
Snakes and iguanian and borioteiioid squamates are known from isolated jaw framents and vertebrae in both formations and at the pond site Oum Tkout. There are at least three basal snakes including Lapparentophis, Simoliophis, and one assigned to a new genus Norisophis (Fig.
Crocodyliforms are a well-represented and diverse group in the Kem Kem assemblage currently known from abundant teeth, osteoderms, braincases, and skull bones, and partial and complete skulls. Several skulls rank among the most complete for any Kem Kem vertebrate (e.g., Fig.
Pterosaurs of large wingspan (4–6 m) and disparate trophic adaptations are known from abundant elongate, curved teeth, jaw ends (rostra and mandibulae), vertebrae and limb bones. Three families of pterosaurs have been found: long-snouted, dentate ornithocheirids (Figs
Dinosaurian fossils and footprints are common in Kem Kem Group sediments, the latter from several levels in the upper one-half of the Douira Formation (
Ornithischians are extremely rare in the Kem Kem Group. A single isolated tooth and footprint form the Douira Formation provide the only evidence thus far for these herbivores, which were represented by an array of small- and large-bodied genera in the Aptian-Albian of Niger (Gadoufaoua) perhaps ~15 million years prior. The single denticulate, unworn crown, which was recovered from Oum Tkout, comes from a small-bodied, dentally unspecialized ornithischian that may pertain to a thyreophoran (Fig.
Sauropods include a rebbachisaurid diplodocoid (
Isolated teeth (Fig.
Non-avian theropods are known most commonly from isolated remains. Some of these specimens are complete enough to evaluate at a familial taxonomic level. Isolated theropod teeth and unguals are sufficiently abundant that some can be sorted into distinct tooth morphotypes, each allied with a particular non-avian theropod clade (Abelisauroidea, Spinosauridae, Carcharodontosauridae, Dromaeosauridae). Some isolated non-avian theropod unguals, likewise, can be divided into those from the manus and pes. Manual unguals, which tend to diverge more strongly in form than pedal unguals, are divisable into three morphotypes, each allied with particular non-avian theropod clades (Spinosauridae, Carcharodontosauridae, Dromaeosauridae).
Non-avian theropods identified at a generic or species level include an abelisaurid close to the genus Rugops from Niger (
Regarding abelisauroids, we support the interpretation of the described maxillae and several other bones from the Kem Kem Group as likely pertaining to a single mid- to large-sized abelisaurid close to the Nigerien genus Rugops and another maxilla of similar age from Argentina (
Regarding spinosaurids, we support the designation of a new partial skeleton (FSAC-KK 11888) as a neotype on grounds of convincing overlap with Stromer’s now destroyed Egyptian holotype (
Regarding carcharodontosaurids, we review and support the evidence used to designate a well-preserved skull (
In sum, we support the presence in the Kem Kem assemblage of four well established large-bodied theropods, rather than seven, namely, an unnamed abelisaurid, Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, and Deltadromeus agilis (Table
Some of the taxa listed in the Kem Kem vertebrate assemblage (Table
Guir Basin, western Algeria.
Tataouine region, southern Tunisia. Field work over the last two decades in the Tataouine region in southern Tunisia (Fig.
Ain el Guettar Formation deposition, resting on an erosional unconformity, is composed of basal fluvial sandstones marked by channels grading upsection into estuarine and subtidal sandstones of the Oum ed Diab Member. It reaches a thickness of up to ~200 m comparable to the Kem Kem Group. Its age has been variously estimated to be as old as Barremian (
Abundant fragmentary remains have been recovered of elasmobranchs, actinopterygians, sarcopterygians, crocodyliforms, pterosaurs, and saurischian dinosaurs. Unfortunately, currently known elasmobranch genera do not constrain the age estimate to a particular stage. The first partial articulated skeleton of a dinosaur from Tunisia was found recently in the basal part of the formation, the rebbachisaurid Tataouinea hannibalis (
The base of the overlying Zebbag Formation (Kerker Member) begins with a distinctive carbonate bed including the ammonite Knemiceras that is regarded as late Albian in age. Unfortunately, this marked the initiation of a marine transgression in the central region of coastal northern Africa, with subsequent deposition characterized by carbonaceous marls and evaporites indicative of an offshore marine platform (
Mizdah Formation, western Libya.
Bahariya Formation, western Egypt. The Bahariya Formation rests unconformably on much older basement rocks, the contact poorly exposed. The formation reaches a thickness of ~ 200 m in the region of the Bahariya Oasis (
There is considerable overlap in the faunal assemblages between the Bahariya Formation of western Egypt (
Echkar Formation, central Niger. Several genera in the Kem Kem assemblage have also been reported to the southeast in the Echkar Formation of Niger (Fig.
The fauna shows less marine influence, as it was a good distance from a substantial marine margin. Common faunal elements between the Kem Kem Group and the Echkar Formation include large cladistians, basal sarcopterygians including the actinistian Axelrodichthys and dipnoan Neoceratodus, pleurodiran turtles, crocodylomorphs including araripesuchids and an unnamed very large neosuchian (
Kem Kem Group formations are envisioned as the headland of a vast river system feeding north to a prograding delta laid down on the Kem Kem embayment (
Similar conditions have generated similar fining-upward sequences in basins elsewhere in Morocco (
The Kem Kem delta was dominated by rapidly moving (lotic) paleoenvironments with water flowing toward the open ocean and much rarer still water (lentic) paleoenvironments such as ponds (Oum Tkout locality). In the dominant lotic paleoenvironments, there is evidence for both freshwater and brackish conditions; some of the recovered fauna (e.g., dipnoans) prefer freshwater habitats whereas others (e.g., lamnifom sharks) prefer brackish conditions. Some aquatic genera, such as Onchopristis or Axelrodichthys may have been adapted to both freshwater and marine paleoenvironments. In the upper portion of the Gara Sbaa Formation and the Douira Formation, tidal indicators suggest brackish conditions may have predominated as the transgression continued. Hothouse conditions characterized by harsh seasonality, periodic aridity and elevated sea-surface temperatures likely prevailed during deposition of Kem Kem Group rocks and comparable deposits along the northern shore of Africa (
Gara Sbaa Formation, a prograding delta. The conglomeratic components at the base of the Gara Sbaa Formation are locally derived clasts from underlying Paleozoic strata (Fig.
Tidal influence indicative of the proximity of coastal settings first appears in the upper portion of the Gara Sbaa Formation and into the Douira Formation and includes mud drapes, flaser and lenticular bedding. The upper portion of the Gara Sbaa Formation exhibits features of a prograding delta front, including larger, possibly tidally influenced, channels and large-scale cross-bedding (Fig.
Most vertebrate fossils are isolated either in laminar cross-bedded sandstones or in channel lag deposits. Only two partial articulated vertebrate skeletons have been recovered in the formation, both from the uppermost portion of the section. The first is a partial skeleton of the diplodocoid sauropod Rebbachisaurus garasbae (Fig.
Douira Formation, a coastal mudflat. The first significant mudstone bed identifies the base of the lower-energy Douira Formation, which is composed of finer-grained strata that often exhibit tidal influences. Sandstones are more common near the base of the formation, giving way to ledge-forming Siltstone, mudstone, claystone and thin gypsiferous evaporites. Douira beds, like those in the Gara Sbaa Formation, are predominantly red-hued rocks that fine upward as well as northward along the outcrop toward the mouth of the delta.
Mudstones and claystones dominate Douira beds and are characterized by mottling, slickensides, and blocky to crumbly textures with rare calcitic nodules, gypsum crystals, root traces and burrows. Whereas a thin (1 cm) gypsum horizon occurs just below a calcareous mudstone, evaporite deposits of similar lithology are thicker and more common in Kem Kem Group rocks to the west and north of the Kem Kem embayment.
Two other features of the Douira Formation are noteworthy. A freshwater pond deposit, Oum Tkout, is located low in the section halfway along the south-north axis of outcrops on the delta (Fig.
The lower portion of the Douira Formation has yielded associated remains of vertebrates, including a partial shell of the pleurodire turtle Galianemys sp., a partial skeleton of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus (
“Stomer’s riddle”. The overabundance of predatory versus herbivorous dinosaurs, recently dubbed “Stromer’s riddle” (
In most Mesozoic terrestrial assemblages, only one or two large-bodied theropod genera are present. Tyrannosaurus rex, for example, may be the only large-bodied predator in the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) habitats on Laramidia (
Two additional features set apart the Kem Kem and Bahariya predators and their faunas, in addition to the overabundance of large-bodied dinosaurian predators. First, at least three of the four large-bodied predators present in both the Kem Kem and Bahariya assemblages are among the largest (top 10%) dinosaurian predators on record. Maximum adult body size for Carcharodontosaurus and Spinosaurus is based on Kem Kem specimens (
Second, large-bodied herbivores are neither diverse nor abundant. Only three large bodied herbivores have been recovered as diagnostic body fossils in the Kem Kem and Bahariya assemblages, the rebbachisaurid Rebbachisaurus garasbae from the Gara Sbaa Formation (Lavocat 1954,
Signature Cretaceous fauna, northern Africa. The Kem Kem assemblage is dominated by aquatic and subaquatic nonvertebrates and vertebrates (~85%, ~40 species), nearly all of which are predators (Table
Co-occurrence of a trio of large-bodied theropod predators, an abelisaurid, spinosaurid and carcharodontosaurid, characterizes faunas of northern Africa for a duration of at least 20 Ma from the middle (Aptian-Albian) to early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian) time (
The earliest record of this trio is approximately 115 Ma in the Aptian-Albian Elrhaz Formation of Niger. The spinosaurid Suchomimus (
Three other aspects of the Elrhaz fauna are also present in the younger Kem Kem and Bahariya faunas. First, large-bodied herbivores include iguanodontian ornithischians and two ecologically distinct sauropods (a rebbachisaurid and titanosaurian). In both faunas, thus, large herbivores remain a mixture of ornithopods and macronarian sauropods, which is not always the case on other landmasses during the Late Cretaceous.
Second, crocodylomorphs are very diverse and include at least one giant form with a skull length approaching 2 m. In the Elrhaz Formation, that crocodylomorph giant is Sarcosuchus (
Finally, mammals and birds are conspicuously absent or very rare in the Aptian-Albian Elrhaz Formation and in the younger (Cenomanian) Echkar, Kem Kem, and Bahariya faunas, although tracks of both groups were recently reported in the Cenomanian-age Zebbag Formation of southern Tunisia (
We thank Simone Maganuco and Jeffrey Wilson for comments on earlier versions of this paper, Carol Abraczinskas for assistance with the figures, and Marco Auditore for skeletal drawings of Spinosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, and Deltadromeus. Figure