Research Article |
Corresponding author: Norine W. Yeung ( nyeung@hawaii.edu ) Academic editor: Thierry Backeljau
© 2020 Norine W. Yeung, John Slapcinsky, Ellen E. Strong, Jaynee R. Kim, Kenneth A. Hayes.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
Citation:
Yeung NW, Slapcinsky J, Strong EE, Kim JR, Hayes KA (2020) Overlooked but not forgotten: the first new extant species of Hawaiian land snail described in 60 years, Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov. (Achatinellidae, Auriculellinae). ZooKeys 950: 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.950.50669
|
Recent surveys of Oahu’s Waianae Mountains uncovered a small, previously undescribed species of Auriculella that is conchologically similar to the three members of the A. perpusilla group all of which are endemic to the Koolau Mountain Range. However, sequence data demonstrate that the perpusilla group is not monophyletic. Moreover, the new species is not closely related to A. perpusilla or A. perversa, the only extant members of the group, but instead is sister to A. tenella, a species from the high spired A. castanea group. A neotype is designated for A. auricula, the type species of Auriculella; all members of the conchologically similar perpusilla group are anatomically redescribed; and lectotypes designated for A. minuta, A. perversa, and A. tenella. The new species is described and compared to the type of the genus, members of the perpusilla group, and the genetically similar species A. tenella.
gastropod, island, Oahu, Pacific, systematics
Pacific Island land snails are among the most threatened faunas in the world, with more recorded extinctions since 1600 than any other group of animals (
The Pacific Island family Achatinellidae is the second most diverse land snail family in the Hawaiian Islands with 209 species divided into five subfamilies, two of which, the Achatinellinae Gulick, 1873 and Auriculellinae Odhner, 1922, are endemic (
In addition to their morphological similarity, the three species in the perpusilla group are all endemic to Oahu’s eastern Koolau range (Fig.
Within Auriculella, intraspecific shell morphology varies and may often overlap interspecifically, making species delineation based on conchology alone difficult (
Comparative shell morphology of A Auriculella auricula neotype
As part of a long-term study of extant Hawaiian land snails, our team has surveyed more than 1000 sites across the six largest Hawaiian Islands (Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, Lanai, Hawaii). The targeted locations were those that historically supported snail populations, as well as more remote areas with remnant native vegetation that were often accessible only by helicopter. Surveys followed
Newly collected material was photographed, flash boiled (
Radulae were tissue-digested in 180 µL of T1 lysis buffer (Macherey-Nagel) containing 20 mg/mL of Proteinase-K and rinsed in de-ionized water. Cleaned radulae were mounted directly on carbon adhesive tabs attached to aluminum stubs, which were then coated with 25–30 nm gold/palladium (60/40) and photographed using an Apreo scanning electron microscope (FEI Company) at the National Museum of Natural History, Washington.
Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from an approximately 1 mm3 piece of foot tissue using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin Tissue Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions, with the exception that elution was with 60 µl of elution buffer supplied with the kit, and gDNA stored at -20 °C prior to amplification via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Portions of two mitochondrial genes, 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), and the nuclear encoded 28S rDNA were amplified using primers listed in Table
Locus | TA °C | Primers F/R |
---|---|---|
COI | 44-46 | LCO1490/HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994) |
16S | 48-50 | 16Sar/16S2 ( |
28S | 46-48 | LSU2/LSU5 ( |
Museum catalog numbers for specimens used in genetic analysis with numbers of specimens from which shell measurements, reproductive anatomy and radular morphology were obtained. Catalog numbers (
Genus | Species | Island |
|
COI | 16S | 28S | Shell measurements | Reproductive system | Radula |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Auriculella | ambusta | Oahu |
|
MT519807 | – | MT519879 | – | – | – |
Oahu |
|
MT519811 | MT519861 | MT519880 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519808 | MT519860 | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519809 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519810 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
auricula | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 1 | – | |
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 2 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 21 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 26 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 3 | – | – | ||
crassula | Maui |
|
MT519819 | – | MT519888 | – | – | – | |
Maui |
|
MT519814 | – | MT519883 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519813 | MT519863 | MT519882 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519816 | MT519865 | MT519885 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519815 | MT519864 | MT519884 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519817 | MT519886 | – | – | – | |||
Maui |
|
MT519818 | – | MT519887 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519812 | MT519862 | MT519881 | – | – | – | ||
gagneorum sp. nov. | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 7 | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 40 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519823 | – | MT519891 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519826 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519820 | MT519866 | MT519889 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519821 | MT519867 | MT519890 | – | 1 | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519824 | – | MT519892 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519825 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519822 | MT519868 | – | – | – | – | ||
malleata | Oahu |
|
MT519830 | – | MT519894 | – | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
MT519831 | – | MT519895 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519829 | MT519869 | MT519893 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519828 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519832 | MT519870 | MT519896 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519827 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
minuta | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 14 | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 25 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 10 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 2 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 2 | – | ||
Auriculella | minuta | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 3 |
montana | Oahu |
|
MT519833 | – | – | – | – | – | |
perpusilla | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 15 | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 15 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 15 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 4 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519837 | MT519872 | MT519898 | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519835 | MT519871 | MT519897 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519834 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519836 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 2 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 3 | 2 | ||
perversa | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 15 | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | – | 2 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 34 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519839 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519838 | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | ||
tenella | Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 7 | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 1 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 2 | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519841 | MT519874 | MT519900 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519842 | MT519875 | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519843 | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519840 | MT519873 | MT519899 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519844 | MT519876 | MT519901 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
– | – | – | 42 | – | – | ||
turritella | Oahu |
|
MT519845 | – | MT519902 | – | – | – | |
Oahu |
|
MT519850 | – | MT519904 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519847 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519849 | – | MT519903 | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519848 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Oahu |
|
MT519846 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
uniplicata | Maui |
|
MT519851 | – | MT519905 | – | – | – | |
Maui |
|
MT519852 | – | MT519906 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519853 | MT519907 | – | – | – | |||
Maui |
|
MT519856 | – | MT519910 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519855 | – | MT519909 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519857 | – | MT519911 | – | – | – | ||
Maui |
|
MT519854 | – | MT519908 | – | – | – | ||
Tornatellaria | sp. | Maui |
|
MT519858 | MT519877 | MT519912 | – | – | – |
Tornatellides | sp. | Molokai |
|
MT519859 | MT519878 | MT519913 | – | – | – |
Electropherograms were checked for errors, edited, and assembled using Geneious Prime 2019 (http://www.geneious.com/). Sequences of COI were unambiguously aligned using MAFFT ver. 7.388 with the iterative refinement method E-INS-I (Katoh and Standley 2013) implemented in Geneious Prime 2019. Alignments where checked against amino acid sequences as references. Ribosomal genes were aligned using MAFFT and refined using Gblocks ver. 0.91b (
Phylogenetic reconstruction was conducted using maximum likelihood (ML) in IQ-TREE ver. 1.6.12 (Nguyen et al. 2015). The best-fit partitioning scheme and the most appropriate substitution model for each partition were estimated using the integrated ModelFinder algorithm (
To corroborate species delineation based on conchological and anatomical analyses and phylogenetic reconstruction, we used the DNA barcode-based species identification method implemented in SpeciesIdentifier ver. 1.8 (
Museum catalog numbers for specimens used in DNA analysis with numbers of specimens from which shell measurements, reproductive anatomy, and radular morphology were obtained, are listed in Table
Recent surveys recorded extant populations of two of the three species within the perpusilla group: A. perpusilla and A. perversa (Fig.
The 104 snails representing ten Auricullela species and two outgroup taxa (Tornatellaria sp. and Tornatellides sp.) sequenced for this study produced 53 COI haplotypes, 19 and 35 sequences for 16S and 28S, respectively. Alignments for each locus were 654 bp for COI, 464 bp for 16S and 539 bp for 28S, making the concatenated dataset of 53 individuals 1657 bp with 223 parsimony informative sites. Sixteen individuals were represented by all three loci, while three individuals had only COI and 16S, 19 with COI and 28S, and 15 with only COI. The best-fit partitioning scheme used distinct models for each locus with the best-fit models being K3Pu+F+I+G4, TPM2u+F+G4, and TIM3+F for COI, 16S, and 28S respectively.
The ML tree constructed from the concatenated dataset produced a well-resolved tree with all conchologically defined taxa recovered in strongly supported clades (Fig.
The best match/best close match criteria (
Subclass Heterobranchia Burmeister, 1837
Order Stylommatophora A. Schmidt, 1855
Superfamily Pupilloidea W. Turton, 1831
Family Achatinellidae Gulick, 1873
Subfamily Auriculellinae Odhner, 1921
Partula auricula Férussac, 1821 by subsequent designation (
Small to moderately sized Achatinellidae, 4 to 12 mm in adult shell height. Shells either dextral or sinistral, taller than wide, with a strong parietal lamella. Juvenile shells have two columellar lamellae, one or both of which are lacking in adults. Phallus with an epiphallus and a nearly apical appendix. Phallus retractor muscle inserted apically on the epiphallus and not secondarily attached to the appendix. Members of Auriculella are the only achatinellids known to have an epiphallus. All Auriculella species are oviparous (
Partula auricula Férussac, 1821: 66.
Auriculella auricula
–
Neotype
: USA • 1; H = 8.7 mm, W = 4.2 mm, AH = 4.6 mm, AW = 3.3 mm, with 6.4 WH; Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains, Tantalus; 09 Jun 1943; Y. Tanada leg.;
“Sans doute les îles de la mer du Sud?” [without doubt the south sea islands?]; colloquially “sans doute” means probably; here restricted to Tantalus.
Shell. Shell dextral or sinistral with flat-sided whorls and an obtuse apex, H = 8.0 ± 0.4 mm, W = 4.3 ± 0.2 mm, WH 6.0 ± 0.2, AH = 4.1 ± 0.2 mm, AW = 3.1 ± 0.2 mm (N = 50; Table
Reproductive system. Phallus retractor muscle relatively long, attached apically to a short but well-defined epiphallus (Fig.
Comparative reproductive anatomy of A Auriculella auricula
Radula. Radula with an irregular rachidian flanked on either side by rastriform marginal teeth, as diagnostic of the family (Fig.
Comparative radular morphology of A A. auricula (irregular rachidian and rastriform marginal teeth) B A. auricula (rastriform marginal teeth) C A. minuta (rastriform marginal teeth) D A. perpusilla (irregular rachidian and rastriform marginal teeth) E A. perversa (rastriform marginal teeth) F Auriculella tenella (rastriform marginal teeth) G A. gagneorum sp. nov. (irregular rachidian and rastriform marginal teeth) HA. gagneorum sp. nov. (rastriform marginal teeth). Scale bar: 10 μm. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Auriculella auricula is endemic to Oahu’s Koolau Mountains (Fig.
In the original description,
Auriculella minuta
Cooke & Pilsbry in Pilsbry & Cooke, 1915: 90, pl. 25, figs 5–9;
Lectotype
: USA • 1, H = 4.9 mm, W = 2.8 mm, AH = 2.2 mm, AW = 1.7 mm, WH = 5.7.; Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains, Nuuanu; Nuuanu Valley Ridge 7, east, on ti, lehua, Passiflora foetida; Cooke leg.;
Paralectotypes
: USA – Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains • 1; Nuuanu Valley; Cooke leg.;
Paralectotypes not examined.
Possible paralectotype. USA – Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains • 6; Palolo Valley;
Hawaiian Islands, Oahu, Nuuanu. See
Shell. Shell dextral, H = 4.4 ± 0.18 mm, W = 2.7 ± 0.11 mm, WH = 5.1 ± 0.08, AH = 1.9 ± 0.11 mm, AW = 1.3 ± 0.08 mm (N = 50; Table
Reproductive system. Phallus retractor muscle relatively long, attached apically to a short but well-defined epiphallus (Fig.
Radula. Radula with an irregular rachidian flanked on either side by rastriform marginal teeth, as diagnostic of the family (Fig.
Auriculella minuta is endemic to Oahu’s Koolau Mountain Range (Fig.
A holotype was not designated in the original description and the type series came from two different localities: Nuuanu collected by Cooke, and Palolo collected by both Cooke and Lyman (Pilsbry and Cooke 1915: 90). Five figures were provided with the original description (Pilsbry and Cooke 1915: pl. 25, figs 5–9) from Nuuanu, which according to the figure caption were based on specimens from
Unlike the other species traditionally placed in the perpusilla group, the shell of A. minuta is dextral rather than sinistral. The columella does not bear an axially oriented ridge like the one found in A. perversa. The palatal lamella is smooth and not undulate unlike that of A. gagneorum sp. nov. The epiphallus is short and well defined similar to A. gagneorum sp. nov., but unlike the long epiphallus of A. perpusilla or the poorly defined epiphallus of A. perversa. The appendix narrows abruptly at approximately ⅓ its length unlike the gently tapered appendix of A. gagneorum sp. nov.
Auriculella perpusilla
E. Smith in Gulick & Smith, 1873: 87, pl. 10, fig. 26; Pilsbry and Cooke 1915: 91–92, pl. 25, figs 1, 2;
Holotype
: USA • 1; shell crushed; H = 4 mm, W = 2 ⅔ mm (according to original description); Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains; 1918; John T. Gulick leg.;
“Kohalu” (sic, Kahaluu) on Oahu.
Shell. Shell sinistral with inflated whorls, H = 4.4 ± 0.26 mm, W = 3.0 ± 0.15 mm, WH = 5.0 ± 0.14, AH = 2.1 ± 0.14 mm, AW = 1.5 ± 0.11 mm (N = 50; Table
Reproductive system. Phallus retractor muscle relatively short, attached apically to a long epiphallus, which is nearly ⅓ the length of the phallus (Fig.
Radula. Radula with an irregular rachidian flanked on either side by rastriform marginal teeth, as diagnostic of the family (Fig.
Auriculella perpusilla is endemic to Oahu’s Koolau Mountain Range (Fig.
No holotype was designated in the original description which included a single figure and provided a single set of measurements: height 4 mm width 2 ⅔ mm. The shell donated by Gulick is
Unlike A. minuta, A. perpusilla is sinistral and the columella does not bear an axially oriented ridge like the one found in A. perversa. The palatal lamella is smooth and not undulate like A. gagneorum sp. nov. The epiphallus is long unlike the poorly defined epiphallus of A. perversa or the short but well-defined epiphallus of A. minuta and A. gagneorum sp. nov. The appendix narrows abruptly at approximately ⅓ its length unlike A. gagneorum sp. nov.
Auriculella perversa
Cooke in Pilsbry & Cooke, 1915: 90–91, pl. 25, figs 3, 4;
Lectotype
: USA • 1; H = 4.7 mm, W = 3.3 mm, AH = 2.2 mm, AW = 2.0 mm, WH = 5.1; Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains, Nuuanu; Ridge 9, east side, on Passiflora foetida; Cooke leg.;
Paralectotypes
: USA • 1; Honolulu County, Oahu, Koolau Mountains, Nuuanu; Ridge 9, east side, on Passiflora foetida; Cooke leg.;
Paralectotypes not examined
:
Oahu: Nuuanu. See
Shell. Shell sinistral with inflated whorls, H = 4.4 ± 0.26 mm, W = 3.0 ± 0.23 mm, WH = 5.2 ± 0.08, AH = 2.0 ± 0.18 mm, AW = 1.4 ± 0.08 mm (Table
Reproductive system. Phallus retractor muscle relatively short attached apically to a short and poorly defined epiphallus (Fig.
Radula. Radula with an irregular rachidian flanked on either side by rastriform marginal teeth, as diagnostic of the family (Fig.
Auriculella perversa is endemic to Oahu’s southern Koolau Mountain Range (Fig.
A holotype was not designated in the original description and the type series came from two different localities: Nuuanu collected by Cooke, and Kuliouou collected by Thaanum. Two figures were provided with the original description (Pilsbry and Cooke 1915: pl. 25, figs 3, 4) for material from Nuuanu at
Unlike A. minuta, the shell of A. perversa is sinistral. The columella bears an axially oriented ridge unlike all other species in the perpusilla group. The palatal lamella is smooth and not undulate like A. gagneorum sp. nov. The reproductive system includes a short and poorly defined epiphallus and an appendix that narrows abruptly at approximately ⅓ its length. The epiphallus is short and poorly defined unlike the long epiphallus of A. perpusilla or the short but well-defined epiphallus of A. minuta and A. gagneorum sp. nov.
Auriculella tenella
Ancey, 1889: 232–233; Pilsbry and Cooke 1915: 99–100, pl. 19, figs 7, 8;
Lectotype
: USA • 1; H = 6.2 mm, W = 3.5 mm, AH = 2.3 mm, AW = 1.6 mm, WH = 6.6 whorls; Honolulu County, Oahu, Waianae Mountains; Baldwin leg.;
Paralectotypes
: USA • 2; Honolulu County, Oahu, Waianae Mountains; Baldwin leg.;
Paralectotypes not examined
:
“Waianae, dans la partie occidentale de l’île d’Oahu.” [Waianae, western part of Oahu Island].
Shell. Shell sinistral with inflated whorls, H = 5.6 ± 0.8 mm, W = 3.0 ± 0.4 mm, WH = 6.5 ± 0.3, AH = 2.0 ± 0.3 mm, AW = 1.9 ± 0.3 mm (N = 50; Table
Reproductive system. Phallus retractor muscle relatively long attached apically to a short but well-defined epiphallus (Fig.
Radula. Radula with an irregular rachidian flanked on either side by rastriform marginal teeth, as diagnostic of the family (Fig.
Auriculella tenella is endemic to Oahu’s Waianae Mountains, historically found throughout the range between 518 and 1227 m in elevation (Fig.
A holotype was not designated in the original description, however, the type locality is listed as “Waianae” and collected by Baldwin. Ancey provided measurements in the original description, “Long., 6; diam., 3; alt. ap., 2 2/3 millim.”, which agree well with the designated lectotype. The ledger entry for
The shell of A. tenella has approximately seven nearly flat-sided whorls unlike A. auricula, A. minuta, A. perpusilla and A. perversa, which have approximately five whorls, and are inflated in all but A. auricula. Auriculella tenella is sinistral unlike A. minuta and does not bear an axially oriented columellar ridge like A. perversa or an undulating palatal lamella like A. gagneorum sp. nov. The epiphallus is short and well defined unlike the long epiphallus of A. perpusilla or the poorly defined epiphallus of A. perversa. The appendix narrows abruptly at approximately ⅓ its length unlike A. gagneorum sp. nov.
Holotype
: USA • 1, H = 4.7 mm, W = 3.4 mm, AH = 2.3 mm, AW = 1.8 mm, WH = 5.3 whorls; Honolulu County, Oahu, Waianae Mountains, Palawai Gulch; 710 m; 9 Feb. 2018; K. A. Hayes, N. W. Yeung, J. Slapcinsky; hand collected on Pisonia umbellifera; GenBank: MT519824-MT519826, MT519866-MT519868, MT519889-MT519592;
Paratypes
: USA – Honolulu County, Oahu, Waianae Mountains • 1; Puu Hapapa; 23 Jan 2013; D.T.A. Gary, K. Leung, D. R. Sischo, V. J. Costello;
Other material
: USA – Honolulu County, Oahu, Waianae Mountains • 37; Palikea Ridge; 12 October 1912; R. von Holt, Cooke;
Palawai Gulch, Waianae Mountains, Honolulu County, Oahu
Shell. Shell sinistral with inflated whorls, H = 4.8 ± 0.3 mm, W = 3.2 ± 0.2 mm, WH = 5.4 ± 0.4, AH = 2.3 ± 0.1 mm, AW = 1.7 ± 0.1 mm (Table
Reproductive system. Phallus retractor muscle long, attached apically to a short but well-defined epiphallus (Fig.
Radula. Radula with an irregular rachidian flanked on either side by rastriform marginal teeth, as diagnostic of the family (Fig.
Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov. is endemic to Oahu’s Waianae Mountain Range and was recorded as a potentially new species primarily from the southern Waianae Mountain Range, with several populations in the northern part of the range (Fig.
The shell is sinistral unlike A. minuta and the columella does not bear an axially oriented ridge like the one found in A. perversa. The palatal lamella is often undulate unlike all other members of the A. perpusilla group. The epiphallus is short but well defined similar to A. minuta but unlike the long epiphallus of A. perpusilla or the poorly defined epiphallus of A. perversa. The appendix tapers gently unlike the appendices of A. auricula, A. minuta, A. perpusilla, A. perversa, and A. tenella which all narrow abruptly.
Named in honor of Betsy and Wayne Gagne for their indefatigable efforts advocating for the conservation of Hawaii’s unique and highly endangered biota.
The Auriculella perpusilla species group (A. perpusilla, A. perversa, A. minuta) was defined as having species with small, thin, relatively low spired shells of approximately five inflated whorls. Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov., shares these shell characteristics. These four species can be distinguished from one another using a suite of morphological features including shell chirality (only A. minuta is dextral); presence of axially oriented ridge of the columella (only present in A. perversa); appearance of the palatal lamella (undulated only in Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov.); length of the epiphallus (those of both Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov. and minuta are short and well-defined); and development of the appendix (tapers gently in Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov. and narrow abruptly in others). The DNA data corroborate the difference seen in anatomy and conchology. In contrast to expectations based on shell morphology alone, the perpusilla group is not monophyletic and Auriculella gagneorum sp. nov. is not closely related to either A. perpusilla or A. perversa, the only other extant members of the group for which DNA data are available (Fig.
Historically, all four species treated here once had much larger geographic ranges, with multiple populations recorded in the last century (Fig.
Low reproductive and growth rates are often characteristic of species that have evolved on isolated oceanic islands (
Updated and comprehensive assessments of the systematics, biogeography, and ecology of taxa are necessary for effective management and development of long-term recovery plans. Additional surveys to locate remaining species and persisting populations are needed now, while there is still an opportunity to prevent or slow the rate of species loss (
We thank Angela Nishimoto, Kelli DeLeon, Connor Kalahiki, Lily Evans, Anna Ellazar, and Miriam Lipman for databasing the
Non-type material examined for Auriculella auricula, A. minuta, A. perpusilla, A. perversa, and A. tenella
Data type: species data
Explanation note: All material examined for A. gagneorum sp. nov. is provided in the body of the manuscript.