Review Article |
Corresponding author: Catherine Souty-Grosset ( catherine.souty@univ-poitiers.fr ) Academic editor: Elisabeth Hornung
© 2018 Catherine Souty-Grosset, Ariel Faberi.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Souty-Grosset C, Faberi A (2018) Effect of agricultural practices on terrestrial isopods: a review. In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 63-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.24680
|
Terrestrial isopods (approximately 3700 known species in the world) are encountered in temperate and tropical regions, from the seashore to high altitudes and from floodplain forests to deserts. They are known to contribute to soil biodiversity. Environmental factors and anthropogenic actions, particularly land use changes such as primarily agricultural practices, and urbanization affect soil biodiversity and their functions. Human practices, such as soil tillage, pesticide application, chemical pollution, along with soil acidification adversely affect isopod abundance and diversity. It is thus important to recognise the vital contributions of soil biodiversity in support of environmental quality protection through maintaining soil functions and their significance to sustainable land use. This review will also deal with recent studies attempting to evaluate the impact of returning to an environmentally friendly agriculture by restoring refuge habitats such as grass strips, hedges, and woodlands for terrestrial isopods.
agroecosystems, detritivores, ecosystem services, food sources, pests, tillage, woodlice
Among the most important anthropogenic influences on climate are changes in competing land uses such as agriculture. Global croplands, pastures, and plantations have expanded in recent decades, accompanied by large increases in energy, water consumption, and agrochemical consumption, leading to considerable losses of biodiversity.
Agriculture is a dominant form of land management and agroecosystems cover ca. 40 % of land surface (
Terrestrial isopods play a key role in ecosystems influenced by environmental factors, including climate, and so, by global climatic changes (
The negative impact of land-use on biodiversity in Europe has been documented since the 1990s (
The conceptual diagram (Figure
The amount of dicotyledonous plant leaf litter available as high quality food for isopods and hence influencing their growth rates is determined by the type of crop residue and the species composition and biomass of weeds present. These are affected by herbicide applications and possibly indirectly by fungicides but also very much by the type of tillage practiced. As tillage also impacts on the physical structure of the habitat at the soil surface, determining the abiotic favourableness of the habitat, especially its relative humidity which may also be influenced directly by irrigation, both processes potentially impacting on survivorship of isopods and thus on their relative abundance.
The habitat mosaic and population parameters of growth and survivorship interact to determine abundance of different species in different ways, thus influencing biodiversity of the isopod community which, together with the abundance of all the isopod species combined, is instrumental in affecting arable ecosystem functions and hence the level of ecosystem service that they provide. Because of its worldwide distribution, most studies focus on the common pillbug, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille, 1804).
In order to evaluate the impact of agricultural practices on the diversity of terrestrial isopods the preliminary investigations must first include an inventory of species present and their preferred habitat.
They are used as surrogates for natural habitats and grassland biodiversity. They are important primary consumers and are an important food source for other animals, often because of their richness in calcium that is more readily absorbable than in molluscs. The species exhibit a lack of tolerance to low or high values of pH.
For example, in Western France,
Less abundant species included Oniscus asellus Linnaeus, 1758 and Porcellionides pruinosus (Brandt, 1833). Oniscus asellus is a common species in forests and is a litter feeding macroarthropod, favouring humidity of the soil (
By comparison, in the Carei Plain natural reserve of north-western Romania, Ferenti et al. (2012) identified 15 species: Haplophthalmus mengii (Zaddach, 1844), Haplophthalmus danicus Budde-Lund, 1880, Hyloniscus riparius (C. Koch, 1838), Hyloniscus transsylvanicus (Verhoeff, 1901), Platyarthrus hoffmannseggii (Brandt, 1833), Cylisticus convexus (De Geer, 1778), Porcellionides pruinosus (Brandt 1833), Protracheoniscus politus (C. Koch, 1841), Trachelipus arcuatus (Budde-Lund, 1885), Trachelipus nodulosus (C. Koch, 1838), Trachelipus rathkii (Brandt, 1833), Porcellium collicola (Verhoeff, 1907), Porcellio scaber (Lamarck, 1818), Armadillidium vulgare and Armadillidium versicolor Stein 1859. The diversity of the terrestrial isopods in this protected area was high due to the diversity of habitats. The highest species diversity was found in wetlands, with the lowest in plantations and forests. Sylvan species were also present in the open wetlands. Unlike marshes, sand dunes harboured only anthropophilic and invasive species.
As a result of modern agricultural practices, calcareous grasslands have been declining both in their extent and quality across Europe. As the abundance of terrestrial isopods was described in grasslands
Number of isopods collected by hand-searching in three different types of grasslands in western France. The two sites differ in farming intensity: Lusignan has experienced intensive practices over many years, whereas Fors is in a zone of mixed farming, with a more recent history of intensification. Note the different scales in the y axes (from
Hedges were important in increasing isopod diversity within plots. The structure of the landscape and its capacity to provide connections between habitats has been found to be important for isopods. The proximity of a suitable habitat for a permanent community of isopods will favour colonization of new habitats. In this study,
Relative abundance of isopods was different among habitats and the three sampling periods (Figure
Some species were clearly linked to the degree of openness of the land, agreeing with the conclusions by
Number of isopods collected at Fors in three seasons: spring (black bars), summer (grey bars) and autumn (white bars). Habitat abbreviations: CL: clover, AL: alfalfa, TG: temporary grasslands less than 5 years old PG: permanent grasslands more than 5 years old (PG) (from
Following the previous study, Souty-Grosset and co-workers (unpublished results) investigated the diversity of terrestrial isopods in a site («Plaine Mothaise»), where changes in agricultural practices led to replacement of more than 25 % of grasslands by crops and poplar plantations within the period 2000–2010 (Figure
Land cover map with sampling sites in Plaine Mothaise, central-western France. Land cover features of the study site were determined using aerial photographs (Google Earth) and field inspections. Linear characteristics from the landscape were distinguished such as riparian, hedge, continuous and intermittent vegetation. The final categories obtained are Cultivation (crops), Grassland, Poplars, Types of connection, roads and urban. Landscapes were mapped using Arcmap 9.3 (ESRI, 2004) as a main geographical information system. Black dots indicate sites of pitfall trap sampling.
Isopod species collected in Plaine Mothaise in different habitat types. Abbreviations: presence of species in grasslands (G), poplars (P), semi-natural habitats (SN) and Crops (C).
Family/Species | Habitat type |
---|---|
Oniscidae | |
Oniscus asellus (Linné, 1758) | GPSN |
Philosciidae | |
Chaetophiloscia elongata (Dollfus, 1884) | GPSNC |
Philoscia muscorum (Scopoli, 1763) | GPSNC |
Platyarthridae | |
Platyarthrus hoffmannseggi (Brandt, 1833) | P |
Armadillidiidae | |
Armadillidium nasatum (Budde-Lund, 1885) | GPSNC |
Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille, 1804) | GPSNC |
Porcellionidae | |
Porcellio gallicus (Dollfus, 1904) | GPSN |
Porcellio monticola (Lereboullet, 1853) | GPSN |
Porcellio scaber (Latreille, 1804) | GPSN |
Porcellionides cingendus (Kinahan, 1857) | SN |
Scleropactidae | |
Sphaerobathytropa ribauti (Verhoeff, 1908) | PSN |
Trichoniscidae | |
Haplophthalmus mengei (Zaddach, 1844) | P |
Oritoniscus flavus (Budde-Lund, 1906) | GPSN |
Trichoniscoides sp. (Sars, 1899) | GPSN |
Trichoniscoides sp. (Sars, 1899) | P |
A total of 5 726 isopods were captured representing 15 species and seven families.
The effect of agricultural management on soil arthropod diversity and functioning is often context dependent, e.g. diversity of functionally important taxa such as decomposers may be enhanced by increasing habitat heterogeneity (
Table
Agricultural practices, correlation analyses for landscape metrics and Diversity index of Isopoda in Plaine Mothaise. Field metrics: Total size of site (ha); Length of each type of boundary around focal fields (m). Landscape metrics: Relative area of each land cover type (%) in the landscape; Shannon’s Diversity Index (H = –Rpi * ln(pi)) where Pi = Land cover and I = Total Land cover categories. Shannon’s diversity equals zero when there is only one land cover and increases with both the number of land covers and the evenness of land covers; Shannon’s Evenness Index (HE = H/Hmax = (–Rpi * ln(pi))/ln(M)) of the landscape; N: Numbers of land cover types. Evenness equals one when all land-uses cover the same surface and tends to zero when a land-use dominates the landscape. Landscape structure metrics: mumber of patches: total number of patches in the landscape within each sub site; Mean area-perimeter ratio: sum of the area/perimeter ratio of all patches divided by number of patches in the landscape per sub site; mean patch edge: average amount of edge per patch in the landscape around pairs of fields (m).
Landscape metric | Shannon Index (Isopoda) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Pearson Correlation | Sig. (2-tailed) | N | |
Num habitats | 0.424 | 0.477 | 5 |
Num patches | 0.675 | 0.211 | 5 |
Total area | -0.795 | 0.108 | 5 |
Total perimeter | 0.727 | 0.164 | 5 |
Average area | -0.744 | 0.149 | 5 |
Average perimeter | 0.290 | 0.636 | 5 |
Shannon landscape | -0.332 | 0.585 | 5 |
Evenness | -0.630 | 0.254 | 5 |
% Cropland | 0.386 | 0.521 | 5 |
% Refuge | -0.229 | 0.711 | 5 |
% Forest | -0.705 | 0.184 | 5 |
% Road | 0.277 | 0.652 | 5 |
% Connection | 0.600 | 0.285 | 5 |
% Grassland | -0.083 | 0.895 | 5 |
% Urban | -0.392 | 0.514 | 5 |
In Greece, generally, organic vineyards and maize were the poorest in Isopoda species, while olive groves, both conventional and organic, were the richest (
Studies in other continents show that a drought-tolerant species, such as A. vulgare, could have colonised croplands from field margins and boundaries: In Argentina, since the late 1990s A. vulgare has been an abundant and frequent species in agricultural land colonizing broad areas (
In general, untilled agricultural soils are similar to grassland soils since the absence of tillage allows the accumulation of litter on the soil surface, reducing erosion, modifying the soil surface and topsoil environmental characteristics by reducing soil aeration, stronger mechanical resistance to root penetration, smaller soil temperature amplitudes and thus creating a more favourable microhabitat for soil organisms (
The litter layer under NT systems enhances habitat conditions favourable for isopods. These include reducing soil temperature and moisture extremes and provisioning of food and shelter (
According to
In France, agriculture has changed much during the past 50 years, with the transition from small farms to large farms and the overuse of pesticides causing decreases in biodiversity. In Western France,
Shannon indices and species evenness (Table
In the case of wheat plots, Philoscia muscorum is encountered in the cultivated plot when a hedge and /or a border is present on the side of the plot (Figure
The size of the plots also affects the number of Philoscia muscorum (R² = 0.2954, 29 % of the presence of P. muscorum in cultivated plots is explained by the size of the plots). The presence of P. muscorum in wheat is correlated both with the presence of agro-ecological infrastructures bordering the plot (the higher the numbers in the hedge, the higher the numbers in the plot) and with the size of the plot (the smaller the plot, more species in the center of the plot are from a nearby field margin).
Sampling Philoscia muscorum in wheat (pitfall traps). Importance of hedges and woods for inducing the presence of the species in the studied plots. Key: Dark bar: P. muscorum in the plot. Light gray bar: P. muscorum in the borders of the plot (hedges/wood). Codes were expressed for each plot: the first three letters corresponded to the name of the location, the two following numbers to the French department (16: Charente; 86: Vienne; 79: Deux Sèvres; 36 (1 and 2): Indre).
Diversity of isopods in plots, hedges and woodland. Shannon indices (H) and species evenness (EN) according to the different types of cultivations and agro-ecological infrastructures as hedges and wood.
Isopods | Wheat | Maize/sunflower | Grassland | Hedges | Wood | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H’ | Hmax | EN | H’ | Hmax | EN | H’ | Hmax | EN | H’ | Hmax | EN | H’ | Hmax | EN | |
Mean | 0.192 | 0.318 | 0.198 | 0.056 | 0.069 | 0.0811 | 0.316 | 0.448 | 0.371 | 0.403 | 0.645 | 0.432 | 0.156 | 0.311 | 0.181 |
Min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Max | 0.926 | 1.099 | 1 | 0.562 | 0.693 | 0.811 | 0.639 | 1.099 | 0.902 | 1.142 | 1.386 | 1 | 0.652 | 1.099 | 0.593 |
This study shows the importance of refuge habitats like grass strips, hedges and woods for terrestrial isopod populations. Results on A. vulgare in wheat were analysed according to tillage, size of the plot, and presence of pebbles (Table
Isopod abundance and diversity are related to the type of cultivation, the practices (Tillage and use of phytosanitary products (herbicides, nematocides, and fungicides) expressed by TFI i.e., Treatment Frequency Index, calculated also without Herbicides TFIH-), the size of the plot, the presence of agro-ecological infrastructure (AEI) and its quality AEI+) (Table
Number of isopods in wheat plots according to tillage, presence of pebbles and the size. Key: A. v.: Armadillidium vulgare/pitfall; Till: tillage indices (depending upon the number of rotation and depth); Peb: 1: presence; 0: absence of pebbles; Size: plot size (ha). Same abbreviations used for plots than in figure 6.
Field | A.v | Till | Peb | Size (Ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sen86 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6.0 |
Cell16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4.2 |
Puy16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7.0 |
Chât86 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8.7 |
Lin36a | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8.0 |
Lin36b | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8.1 |
Sg3c86a | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7.5 |
Sg3c86b | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8.0 |
Thuda86 | 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 5.9 |
Ath79 | 0.2 | 3 | 1 | 6.2 |
Com79 | 0.2 | 3 | 0 | 6.7 |
Sjs86 | 1.6 | 2 | 1 | 7.8 |
Fon16 | 2.2 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 |
Dio36 | 5.6 | 2 | 1 | 6.0 |
Fon16 | 162 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 |
Tou16 | 223.4 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
Impact of agricultural practices and landscape on the abundance and diversity of terrestrial isopods. (TFI: Treatment Frequency Index: TFIH: Index calculated without herbicides; AEI: agro-ecological infrastructures ; AEI+: agro-ecological infrastructures of good quality): + low significant impact: ++ significant impact; +++ high significant impact).
Isopods | Agricultural practices | Landscape | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tillage | TFI | TFIH- | Plot size | AEI | AEI+ | |
Abundance | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | + | ++ |
Diversity | ++ | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ |
While the effects of isopods on decomposition processes and nutrient cycling are rarely considered in agroecosystems, they are beneficial because they provide ecosystem services, enhancing nutrient cycling by comminuting organic debris and transporting it to moister microsites in the soil (
As an example of agricultural systems in Argentina, crop rotation principally includes wheat, maize, sunflower and soybean crops. When these crops are harvested, different amounts of residues are left in the field, with highest amounts of residues from wheat and maize (7,500 and 6,000 kg ha-1 of dry matter), medium amounts from soybean (3,000 kg ha-1 of dry matter) and the lowest amount from sunflower (2,000 kg ha-1 of dry matter) (
Additionally, the C:N ratio of residues is related to their quality as a food source. Food quality is known to influence the biology of isopods. In general, growth rate and survival are higher when they feed on dicotyledonous leaves than on monocotyledonous leaves (
Isopods are omnivorous and they have a tendency to shift their food source (
The preference for or selection of green tissues over decayed leaf litter can be related to the higher N content of green tissues (
Isopod population outbreaks and their diet switching between dead and live plant material have two possible consequences in agroecosystems. On the one hand,
There are reports on terrestrial isopods as a crop pest over several years (
Until the end of the 20th century the general belief was that terrestrial isopods play a beneficial role in agroecosystems, and that their impact as possible pests is limited (
At the beginning of the 21st century, as a consequence of the adoption and increased utilization of conservation tillage the number of reports in isopods as pests increased. The first cases were reported in Argentina, where A. vulgare was found damaging seeds and seedlings of soybean, and they were named “emerging pests” (
Isopod damage to crops is greatest at the time of sowing and immediately after germination, when plants are most susceptible. Monocotyledonous species such as cereals can sustain a substantial amount of grazing from the ends of the leaves without it significantly reducing yield, because grasses and cereals have basal meristems.
The animals feed both on seeds and seedlings, principally at the hypocotyl level, dramatically reducing plant density. These consumptions are correlated with the density of isopods (
In response to this problem, some management practices, such as residue management, planting date and rate, seed treatment, and chemical control have been tested with different efficacy (
Armadillidium vulgare damage to plants. Pearson correlation coefficient between variables: severe injury in the hypocotyl (SIH), number of plant m-2 (NP), yield (Y) and Armadillidium vulgare density (AvD). * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01).
Agricultural cycle (years) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||
Severe injury in the hypocotyl | Number of plant m-2 | Yield | Severe injury in the hypocotyl | Number of plant m-2 | Yield | Severe injury in the hypocotyl | Number of plant m-2 | Yield | |
NP | -0.77 ** | -0.94 ** | -0.94 ** | ||||||
Yield | -0.61 ** | 0.68 ** | -0.38 * | 0.34 | -0.88 ** | 0.81 ** | |||
Isopod density | 0.54 ** | -0.57 ** | -0.53 ** | 0.50 ** | -0.57 ** | -0.25 | 0.67 ** | -0.60 ** | -0.62 ** |
To evaluate the effects of irrigation on terrestrial isopod assemblages
Isopods provide important ecosystem services, such as the decomposition of leaf litter. Usually isopods are rarely considered in agricultural studies and most of the reports are from habitats adjacent to these lands (Wolters and Ekschmitt 1996). During the last hundred years, a drastic decline of natural grassland area all across Europe has been reported (
Soil biodiversity plays an essential role in the regulation of soil processes that underlie important ecosystem services (
Detritivores, constituting the majority of the soil fauna, i.e., species and functional groups, act in different ways (
Soil macroinvertebrates have a considerable impact on soil functions important to the restoration process, such as decomposition.
Grassland biodiversity is a function of time among other factors; after disturbance, natural or human-induced, it may take a considerable time for natural communities to re-establish themselves. Plant diversity does not bear a close relationship with faunal diversity, for instance, in fallow land rich in plant species the soil fauna may be poor and unstructured. Isopods as surrogates have considerable potential as indicators of the biodiversity potential of plants in grassland habitats. To develop sampling strategies in order to test community recovery and biodiversity of cultivated grassland plots of different ages in Western France, isopod distribution patterns have been studied (
Species richness and activity density of woodlice is known to be largely affected by local management and associated habitat characteristics such as soil humidity, pesticide application, or tillage operations (
Rapid biodiversity assessment (RBA): RBA has been proposed by
A synthetic index of biological soil quality (IBQS) was developed by
The research must be now conducted in two ways. First, it is necessary to know why isopod population outbreaks occur and what intrinsic or extrinsic factors drive the shift in their feeding behaviour. Second, we need to understand isopod density/crop damage relationships in order to know the lowest population density that each crop can tolerate and then reach agroecological equilibrium. According to
Analysis of the literature was also performed by
The funding is partly grant-aided by the following 2015–2020 programs: the State-Region Planning Contracts (CPER) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). Thanks are due to Julian Reynolds (Ireland) for advice and improving the English. We are also thankful for the help of Mark Hassall (University East Anglia, Norwich, UK) for increasing the quality of the English and suggesting the conceptual diagram in order to introduce a clearer view of the content of the manuscript. We would like to thank Katalin Szlávecz (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA) for her helpful comments. Thanks to Dr. Aline Quadros for assisting with the revised version of figures and tables.