Research Article |
Corresponding author: Adrian Smolis ( adek@biol.uni.wroc.pl ) Academic editor: Wanda M. Weiner
© 2018 Adrian Smolis, Nataliya Kuznetsova.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Smolis A, Kuznetsova N (2018) The genera Albanura Deharveng, 1982 and Persanura Mayvan et al., 2015 are no longer monotypic: description of new species from the Caucasus (Collembola, Neanuridae, Neanurinae, Neanurini). ZooKeys 737: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.21191
|
Two new species from the Caucasus belonging to the genera Albanura and Persanura are described and illustrated in detail. Albanura secunda sp. n. is distinctive because of the presence of chaetae E on the head as well as three ordinary chaetae on tubercles De of thorax III and abdomen I–III. Additionally, the species can be recognized by the absence of chaeta O on the head and presence of 3+3 chaetae Di on abdomen V. The most important characters that can be used to distinguish Persanura lencarana sp. n. are the labral formula, an increased number of chaetae De on thorax II and III, and the number of chaetae Di on the thorax and abdomen V. Comments on the status of the genera and the affinities of the Caucasian fauna of Neanurinae are also given.
Azerbaijan, Russia, taxonomy
Creating and establishing new genera, especially monotypic ones, may be very problematic and complicated for taxonomists. Very often such decisions are questioned by other specialists, and authors who decide on such choices are often labelled as ‘splitters’. Interestingly, the term ‘splitter’ was used for the first time by one of the most famous biologists, Charles Robert Darwin. Among Neanurini, one of the six tribes within the subfamily Neanurinae (Cassagnau, 1989), there are both large and “megadiverse” genera, e.g., Deutonura Cassagnau, 1979 and Endonura Cassagnau, 1979 comprising 57 and 51 valid species, respectively (
The examination of rich Neanurinae materials from the Caucasus collected during primarily ecological research has revealed two unknown species that should be classified within the so far monotypic genera Albanura and Persanura. The genus Albanura was created by
The specimens were cleared in Nesbitt’s fluid, subsequently mounted on slides in Phoera liquid (200 g of chloral hydrate, 30 g of arabic gum and 20 g of glycerol dissolved and mixed into 50 g of distilled water) and studied using a Nikon Eclipse E600 phase contrast microscope. Figures were drawn with camera lucida and prepared for publication using Adobe Photoshop CS3.
Institutions of depository of materials:
DIBEC Department of Invertebrate Biology, Evolution and Conservation, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Wrocław, Poland
Terminology. The terminology and abbreviations used in the paper are those of
Abbreviations used. General morphology: Abd. – Abdomen, Ant. – antenna, AOIII – sensory organ of antennal segment III, Cx – coxa, Fe – femur, Scx2 – subcoxa 2, T – tibiotarsus, Th. – thorax, Tr – trochanter, VT – ventral tube.
Groups of chaetae: Ag – antegenital, An – chaetae of anal lobes, ap – apical, ca – centroapical, cm – centromedial, cp – centroposterior, d – dorsal, Fu – furcal, vc – ventrocentral, Veorve – ventroexternal, Vea – ventroexternoanterior, Vem – ventroexternomedial, Vep – ventroexteroposterior, Vel – ventroexternolateral, Vec – ventroexternocentral, Vei – ventroexternointernal, Viorvi – ventrointernal, Vl – ventrolateral.
Tubercles: Af – antenno-frontal, Cl – clypeal, De – dorsoexternal, Di – dorsointernal, Dl – dorsolateral, L – lateral, Oc – ocular, So – subocular.
Types of chaetae: Ml – long macrochaeta, Mc – short macrochaeta, Mcc – very short macrochaeta, me – mesochaeta, mi – microchaeta, ms – s-microchaeta, Sors – chaeta s, bs – s-chaeta on Ant. IV, miA – microchaetae on Ant. IV, iv – ordinary chaetae on ventral Ant. IV, or – organite of Ant IV, brs – border s-chaeta on Ant. IV, i – ordinary chaeta on Ant. IV, mou – cylindrical s-chaetae on Ant IV („soies mousses”), x – labial papilla x, L’ – ordinary lateral chaeta on Abd. V, B4, B5 – ordinary chaetae on tibiotarsi.
Holotype: male on slide, Russia, Caucasus,Karachaevo-Cherkessiya, Teberdinsky Reserve, spruce forest, litter, Oct.1978, leg. E. Dobrolyubova (DIBEC). Paratype: female on slide, same data as for holotype.
The name secunda refers to the fact that the new species is the second member of the genus.
Habitus similar to that of Albanura nana. Dorsal tubercles present and well developed. Buccal cone long, labrum ogival. Head with chaetae A, B, C, D and E. Chaeta O absent. Tubercles Dl and (L+So) on head with six and nine chaetae respectively. Tubercles De on Th. II and III with three and four chaetae respectively. Tubercles De on Abd. I–III with four chaetae. Tubercles L on Abd. III and IV with four and seven chaetae respectively. Abd. IV and V with seven and three tubercles respectively. Abd. V with 3+3 chaetae Di.
General. Body length (without antennae): 0.8 mm (holotype), 0.9 mm (paratype). Colour of the body white. 2+2 rather large black eyes, in a typical arrangement for the genus (one anterior and one posterior, Fig.
Albanura secunda sp. n.: 1 chaetotaxy of head, Th. and Abd. I (holotype), dorsal view 2 chaetotaxy of tubercles Dl and (L+So) on head, ventrolateral view 3 mandible 4 maxilla 5 chaetotaxy and ventral sclerifications of labrum 6 apical bulb, ventral view 7 dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III–IV 8 ventral chaetotaxy of Ant. III 9 dorsal chaetotaxy of Abd. IV–VI 10 tubercle L of Abd. IV 11 sensillum of Abd. V 12 chaeta Di1 of Abd. V 13 furca rudimentary.
Chaetal morphology. Dorsal ordinary chaetae of five types: long macrochaetae, short macrochaetae, very short macrochaetae, mesochaetae and microchaetae. Long macrochaetae relatively thick and short, straight, narrowly sheathed, feebly serrated, apically arc-like or rounded (Figs
Antennae. Typical of the genus. Dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III–IV as in Fig.
Mouthparts. Buccal cone long with labral sclerifications ogival. Labrum chaetotaxy: 4/2, 4 (Fig.
Dorsal chaetotaxy and tubercles. Chaetotaxy of head as in Figs
Chaetotaxy of Albanura secunda sp. n.: cephalic chaetotaxy, dorsal side.
Tubercle | Number of chaetae | Types of chaetae | Names of chaetae |
---|---|---|---|
Cl | 4 | Mc | F |
Mcc | G | ||
Af | 10 | Ml | B |
Mc | A | ||
Mcc | C, D, E | ||
Oc | 3 | Ml | Ocm |
Mcc | Ocp | ||
mi | Oca | ||
(Di+De) | 4 | Ml | Di1, De1 |
Mcc | Di2, De2 | ||
Dl | 6 | Ml | Dl5, Dl1 |
Mc | Dl3, Dl4 | ||
Mcc | Dl2, Dl6 | ||
(L+So) | 8 | Ml | So1 |
Mc | L1, L2, L4 | ||
Mcc | So2, So6 | ||
me | So3–5 |
Segment, Group | Number of chaetae | Segment, Group | Number of chaetae adult |
---|---|---|---|
I | 7 | IV | or, 8 S, i, 12 mou, 6 brs, 2 iv |
II | 12 | ||
III | 5 sensilla AO III | ||
ve | 5 | ap | 8 bs, 5 miA |
vc | 4 | ca | 2 bs, 3 miA |
vi | 4 | cm | 3 bs, 1 miA |
d | 5 | cp | 8 miA, 1 brs |
Terga | Legs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Di | De | Dl | L | Scx2 | Cx | Tr | Fe | T | |
Th. I | 1 | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 19 |
Th. II | 3 | 2+s | 3+s+ms | 3 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 19 |
Th. III | 3 | 3+s | 3+s | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 18 |
Sterna | |||||||||
Abd. I | 2 | 3+s | 2 | 3 | VT: 4 | ||||
Abd. II | 2 | 3+s | 2 | 3 | Ve: 5; chaeta Ve1 present | ||||
Abd. III | 2 | 3+s | 2 | 4 | Vel:5; Fu: 5 me, 8 mi | ||||
Abd. IV | (2+2) | 2+s | 3 | 7 | Vel: 4; Vec: 2; Vei: 2; Vl: 4 | ||||
Abd. V | (3+3) | 7+s | Ag: 3; Vl: 1, L‘: 1 | ||||||
Abd. VI | 7 | Ve: 13–14; An: 2mi |
Ventral chaetotaxy. On head, groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 3, 3, 4 chaetae respectively. Group Vi on head with 6 chaetae. Group L on Abd. IV with 7 chaetae (Fig.
Legs. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Table
Albanura secunda sp. n is easily distinguished from A. nana Cassagnau & Péja, 1979, the only other known species in the genus, by its dorsal chaetotaxy: presence/absence of chaeta O on the head (absent in secunda; present in nana), presence/absence of chaetae E on the head (present in secunda; absent in nana), number of chaetae Dl on the head (six in secunda; five in nana), number of ordinary chaetae De on Th. III (three in secunda; two in nana), number of ordinary chaetae De on Abd. I–III (three in secunda; two in nana), number of chaetae L on Abd. IV (seven in secunda; five in nana), and number of chaetae Di on Abd. V (3+3 in secunda; 2+2 in nana).
Holotype: female on slide, Azerbaijan, Lankaran District, surroundings of Dashdatuk, forest, under stones, 30.I.1985, leg. Expedition of Moscow Pedagogical State University (
The name “lencarana” refers to a region where the new species was found.
Habitus similar to that of Persanura hyrcanica. Dorsal tubercles present and well developed. 3+3 pigmented eyes. Buccal cone short and relatively wide, labral sclerifications nonogival. Chaetotaxy of central area of head complete, chaetae A, B, C, D, E and O present. Tubercles Dl and (L+So) on head with six and ten chaetae respectively. Tubercles Di on Th. with two chaetae. Tubercles De on Th. II and III with five and six chaetae respectively. Tubercles De on Abd. I–III with four chaetae. Tubercles L on Abd. III and IV with five and eight chaetae respectively. Tubercles Di on Abd. V with three chaetae.
General. Body length of holotype (without antennae): 2.15 mm. Colour of the body bluish. 3+3 small black eyes, in a typical arrangement for the genus (Fig.
Persanura lencarana sp. n.: 14 chaetotaxy of head and Th. (holotype), dorsal view 15 chaetotaxy of ventrolateral part of head 16 tubercle De of Abd. II 17 tubercle Dl of Th. II, ventral view 18 mandible 19 maxilla 20 furca rudimentary 21 claw and T III, ventrolateral view 22 sensillum sgv and microsensillum of Ant. III 23 apical bulb, dorsal view 24 apical bulb, ventral view 25 dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III–IV 26 chaetotaxy and ventral sclerifications of labrum 27 chaeta Di1 of Abd. IV 28 sensillum of Abd. V.
Chaetal morphology. Dorsal ordinary chaetae of three types: long macrochaetae, short macrochaetae and mesochaetae. Long macrochaetae relatively thin, slightly arc-like or straight, narrowly sheathed, feebly serrated, apically rounded or pointed (Figs
Antennae. Typical of the genus. Dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III–IV as in Fig.
Mouthparts. Buccal cone short and wide, with labral sclerifications nonogival. Labral chaetotaxy: 4/2, 4 (Fig.
Dorsal chaetotaxy and tubercles. Chaetotaxy of head as in Figs
Chaetotaxy of Persanura lencarana sp. n.: cephalic chaetotaxy, dorsal side.
Tubercle | Number of chaetae | Types of chaetae | Names of chaetae |
---|---|---|---|
Cl | 6 | Ml | F |
Mc | G, D | ||
Af | 8 | Ml | A, B |
Mc | C, E, O | ||
Oc | 3 | Ml | Ocm, Ocp |
Mc | Oca | ||
Di
|
2 | Ml | Di1 |
Mc | Di2 | ||
De | 2 | Ml | De1 |
Mc | De2 | ||
Dl | 6 | Ml | Dl5, Dl1 |
Mc | Dl2–4, Dl6 | ||
(L+So) | 10 | Ml | L1, L4, So1 |
Mc | L2, L3, So2, So6 | ||
me | So3–5 |
Segment, Group | Number of chaetae | Segment, Group | Number of chaetae adult |
---|---|---|---|
I | 8 | IV | or, 8 S, i, 12 mou, 6 brs, 2 iv |
II | 12 | ||
III | 5 sensilla AO III | ||
ve | 5 | ap | 8 bs, 5 miA |
vc | 4 | ca | 2 bs, 3 miA |
vi | 4 | cm | 3 bs, 1 miA |
d | 5 | cp | 8 miA, 1 brs |
Terga | Legs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Di | De | Dl | L | Scx2 | Cx | Tr | Fe | T | |
Th. I | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 19 |
Th. II | 3 | 4+s | 3+s+ms | 3 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 19 |
Th. III | 3 | 5+s | 3+s | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 18 |
Sterna | |||||||||
Abd. I | 2 | 3+s | 2 | 3 | VT: 4 | ||||
Abd. II | 2 | 3+s | 2 | 3 | Ve: 6; chaeta Ve1 present | ||||
Abd. III | 2 | 3+s | 2 | 5 | Vel:5–6; Fu: 5 me, 8 mi | ||||
Abd. IV | 2 | 2+s | 3 | 8 | Vel: 4–5; Vec: 2; Vei: 2; Vl: 4 | ||||
Abd. V | 3 | 7+s | Ag: 3; Vl: 1, L‘: 1 | ||||||
Abd. VI | 7 | Ve: 14; An: 2mi |
Ventral chaetotaxy. On head, groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 4, 3, 4 chaetae respectively (Fig.
Legs. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Table
Persanura lencarana sp. n. most visibly differs from P. hyrcanica in the presence of a complete chaetotaxy in the central area of the head (reduced chaetae C, E and O absent in hyrcanica), the presence of two chaetae Di on Th. I (one chaeta in hyrcanica), the presence of three chaetae Di on Th. II–III (two chaetae in hyrcanica), the presence of four and five ordinary chaetae De on Th. II and III, respectively (two chaetae in hyrcanica), the presence of three ordinary chaetae De on Abd. I–III (two chaetae in hyrcanica), and the presence of three chaetae Di on the penultimate abdominal segment (two chaetae in hyrcanica). In addition, they differ in the number of labral chaetae (4/2, 4 in lencarana; 0/0, 4 in hyrcanica), the presence/absence of chaetae Dl3 on the head (present in lencarana; absent in hyrcanica), the number of chaetae L of Abd. IV (8 in lencarana; 3–5 in hyrcanica), and the presence/absence of microchaetae on furca rudimentary (present in lencarana; absent in hyrcanica).
The discovery of new species, e.g. Albanura secunda sp. n. and Persanura lencarana sp. n. described herein, in so far monotypic genera undoubtedly enriches and extends their characteristics providing new facts about their morphological differentiation. In some cases, nevertheless, they may reduce the number of distinguishing characters available for the genera. For example, the number and arrangement of labral chaetae in P. lencarana sp. n. is typical within the tribe and significantly different from the number described in the type species, P. hyrcanica Mayvan et al., 2015, where it was used as a one of the important generic feature of Persanura Mayvan et al., 2015 (
In addition to supporting taxonomic decisions such as the establishing of monobasic genera, the species described in this work shed light on the origin and composition of the Neanurinae fauna of the Caucasus. The fauna of this subfamily in the region, despite our still poor knowledge, seems to contain elements belonging to the eastern part of Mediterranean Sea and Asia Minor as well as to the mountains in Iran. This assumption is consistent with recent observations on the genus Endonura from the Caucasus, where some of its representatives closely resemble both Mediterranean and Iranian species (
We thank Wanda Maria Weiner, Louis Deharveng, and László Dányi for useful comments that improved this manuscript. The work was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant N16-04-01228) and the Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of Wrocław, Poland (project no. 1076/Ś/IBŚ/2017).