Research Article
Research Article
Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East
expand article infoOlga K. Klishko, Manuel Lopes-Lima§, Elsa Froufe§, Arthur Bogan|, Vera Y. Abakumova
‡ Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Criology, Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch, Chita, Russia
§ Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR/CIMAR), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, United States of America
Open Access


The number of anodontine bivalve species placed in the genus Cristaria (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East is still not stable among authors. Some recognize only one valid species C. plicata (Leach, 1815) while others accept two additional species, C. tuberculata Schumacher, 1817 and C. herculea (Middendorff, 1847). In the present study, these taxonomic doubts are addressed using analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences and shell morphometry. No significant differences have been revealed by the COI DNA sequences or the main statistical morphometric indices from the three Cristaria forms. In the specimens analysed, changes in shell morphometry with age suggest that original descriptions of the different forms may be attributed solely to differences in age and sex. We consider that C. plicata, C. tuberculata and C. herculea from the Russian Far East should be considered as a single species, namely Cristaria plicata (Leach, 1815), with C. tuberculata and C. herculea as junior synonyms. The geographic range of Cristaria plicata and its conservation status are also presented here.


Bivalvia , Unionidae , Anodontini , COI, morphometry, Russia


It is well known that freshwater bivalves of the Unionidae provide important ecosystem functions (Vaughn and Hakenkamp 2001; Aldridge, Fayle and Jackson 2007) and services to humans (Lopes-Lima et al. 2014). However, they are among the most threatened groups worldwide and many of their populations are in decline (Bogan 1993; Klishko 2012; Lopes-Lima et al. 2014). Due to this fact, studies of the diversity of these taxa, at and below the species level, are urgently required for effective conservation.

The different classification systems used in Russia considerably hamper identification of species and inventories of the molluscan fauna. This is the situation for the taxonomy of freshwater bivalve species of the genus Cristaria from the Russian Far East, which has been contentious among taxonomists. According to the classification system of Zhadin (1938, 1952, 1965), Cristaria plicata (Leach, 1815) was the sole representative of the genus Cristaria in Russia. Similarly, other international authors have also synonymized most of the described forms of Cristaria, including all Russian species, under the type species Cristaria plicata, present in Eastern Asia, from Russia to Japan, South Korea, China and Indochina (Haas 1969; Brandt 1974; Đặng et al. 1980; Kondo 2008; He and Zhuang 2013; Klishko et al. 2014). Nevertheless, some authors still recognize two separate species in Far East Russia, Cristaria herculea (Middendorff, 1847) and Cristaria tuberculata Schumacher, 1817, or even three species: C. herculea, C. tuberculata, and C. plicata (Sayenko et al. 2005).

Using a conchological classification system, some Far East Russian specimens from the collection of the Zoological Institute Museum, St. Petersburg (ZIM-SP) have been attributed only to C. tuberculata Schumacher, 1817 and indicated as the type species of the genus (Schumacher 1817; Moskvicheva 1973; Zatravkin and Bogatov 1987). Specimens of C. plicata from Khanka Lake identified by Zhadin in 1927 and Starobogatov in 1967 (specimens from the ZIM-SP collection) were among these. Since then, C. plicata has disappeared from the literature on the East Russian fauna and C. tuberculata Schumacher, 1817 and C. herculea (Middendorff, 1848) were the only species recognized in the region (Zatravkin and Bogatov 1987; Prozorova and Sayenko 2001; Starobogatov et al. 2004).

Only one conchological character, shell convexity, was used to separate both species. Cristaria herculea, with laterally compressed shells, is widespread in the Amur River basin and Khanka Lake in Russia, as well as the Buyr-Nor Lake in Mongolia. Cristaria tuberculata, with inflated shells, is rare and limited to the Russian Far East, in Khanka Lake and the Ussury River basin (Moskvicheva 1973; Zatravkin and Bogatov 1987; Prozorova and Sayenko 2001; Starobogatov et al. 2004). However, there is increasing evidence that suggests the existence of a single Cristaria species in Far East Russia.

Based on conchological observations, Graf (2007) and He and Zhuang (2013) and on the electrophoretic myogen spectra (Kodolova and Logvinenko 1987, 1988) ascertained that C. tuberculata and C. herculea are synonyms of C. plicata. Additionally, studies on the reproductive cycles (Higashi and Hayashi 1964; Prozorova and Sayenko 2001) and glochidial characteristics of C. herculea and C. tuberculata from the Russian Far East and of C. plicata from Japan and China also revealed no significant differences among these forms (Inaba 1941, 1964; Wu et al. 2000; Sayenko 2006). Finally, the recent publication on C. herculea from the Transbaikalia, using morphological, anatomical and molecular data presented convincing arguments that C. herculea should be synonymized with C. plicata (Klishko et al. 2014).

Despite all this evidence, these two species continue to be recognized as independent species by the Russian system of taxonomy (Starobogatov et al. 2004). Therefore, it is necessary to integrate and gather conclusive evidence for the Cristaria species identification, including additional conchological, anatomical and molecular characters.

The main goals of the present work are to establish the taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships of C. tuberculata and C. herculea from the Russian Far East, and C. plicata from the adjacent territories of Transbaikalia and China. This will be achieved by using molecular analysis of the Cytochrome c Oxidase I gene fragment and morphometric statistical analysis of the shells. Finally, the distributional range of these taxa in Russia and Eastern Asia will also be evaluated.

Material and methods

Genetic analyses

For molecular analyses, C. tuberculata specimens were collected in 2014 from the Luchegorsky Reservoir, of Ussury River Basin, in Russian Far East. Cristaria herculea specimens from Khanka Lake, Primorye, were retrieved from the collection of the Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Vladivostok). Whole genomic DNA was extracted from small tissue pieces of 2 C. tuberculata and 2 C. herculea individuals (Table 1), using a standard high-salt protocol (Sambrook et al. 1989). PCR and sequencing conditions are described in Froufe et al. (2014). Forward and reverse sequences were edited and assembled using CHROMASPRO 1.7.4 (Technelysium, Tewantin, Australia) and all sequences were then aligned with CLUSTALW, in BIOEDIT 7.2.5 (Hall 1999). For a preliminary analysis, all Cristaria sp. CO1 sequences available on GenBank were downloaded (n = 65). Afterwards, 52 of these sequences were excluded from the present analyses for clarity (they all represented different haplotypes that fell inside the C. plicata clade, see results; data not shown). A final alignment was analysed, where the selected outgroups included one Anodonta beringiana individual and one Sinanodonta woodiana (Table 1). This final alignment included 21 individuals in total, with the two C. herculea sequences used from Klishko et al. (2014) and the four newly sequenced individuals. The best-fit model of nucleotide substitution evolution under corrected Akaike Information Criterion was estimated using JMODELTEST 2.1.4 (Darriba et al. 2012). Model HKY+I was chosen and used in the phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic Bayesian Inference (BI) was performed using MRBAYES version 3.1.2 (Ronquest and Huelsenbeck 2003). Two independent runs with 24 million generations long were sampled at intervals of 1,000 generations, producing a total of 24,000 trees. Burnin was determined upon convergence of log likelihood and parameters estimation values using TRACER 1.4 (Rambaut and Drummond 2007). Estimates of sequence divergence (uncorrected p-distances) were assessed using MEGA 6.06 software (Tamura et al. 2013).

Table 1.

List of specimen samples sequenced (CO1) and GenBank accession numbers. *Unpublished

Species Locality Country Code/GenBank Study
Cristaria tuberculata Luchegorsky reservoir Russia Biv1530/KT348507 This study
Cristaria tuberculata Luchegorsky reservoir Russia Biv1531/KT348508 This study
Cristaria herculea Onon River Russia Biv246/KT362704 Klishko et al. (2014)
Cristaria herculea Charanorsky Reservoir Russia Biv247/KT362705 Klishko et al. (2014)
Cristaria herculea Khanka Lake Russia Biv1537a/KU297678 This study
Cristaria herculea Khanka Lake Russia Biv1537b/KU297678 This study
Cristaria plicata Lower Yangtze China EU698893; EU698897; EU698913; EU698948 Jia and Li*
Cristaria plicata Unknown China JF700152; JF700153 Zhang et al.*
Cristaria plicata Zhejiang China FJ986302 Jiang et al. (2010)
Cristaria plicata Unknown South Korea GQ451860 Park et al.*
Cristaria plicata Unknown South Korea GU944476 Lee et al. (2012)
Cristaria sp. Lower Yangtze China EU698909; EU698910; EU698940; EU698942 Jia and Li*
Anodonta beringiana Jo-Jo Lake Canada DQ272370 Gustafson and Iwamoto (2005)
Sinanodonta woodiana Unknown Poland HQ283347 Soroka and Burzynski*

Morphometric analyses

For the C. herculea and C. tuberculata morphometric analyses, specimens of Cristaria from the collections of the Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch (INREC-RAS-SB) and from the Zoological Institute Museum, St. Petersburg (ZIM-SP), including the specimens used for the original species descriptions (Zhadin 1938, 1952; Moskvicheva 1973; Zatravkin and Bogatov 1987) were measured. In addition, 20 shells of C. plicata from Khanka Lake of the same series, identified by Zhadin in 1927 and Starobogatov in 1967 were also measured and included in the analyses. The total shell length (L), maximal shell inflation (B) and shell height at umbo (H) were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm. Furthermore, the distance from the umbo to the end of the posterior end of the lateral tooth was also measured, in order to calculate the ratio of maximal shell inflation to this distance. This parameter is used to separate two species of Cristaria from Eastern Russia, according to the identification keys of Zatravkin and Bogatov (1987) and Starobogatov et al. (2004). This ratio is herein designated as the R-index. According to the published identification keys, the R-index for C. herculea should be less than 0.82, while for C. tuberculata it should to be higher than 0.85. Standard morphometric shell indices, namely the ratio of shell inflation to shell height (B/H), ratio of shell inflation to shell length (B/L), and ratio of shell height to shell length (H/L) were calculated. The poorly expressed morphological discreteness between species was examined using a discriminant analysis based on a linear combination of the three morphometric indexes - use of ratios provided independence from shell size. The reliability of discreteness between species was assessed by λ (Wilk’s lambda) value. This may vary from 0 to 1 where λ = 0 indicates ideal discriminatory power of the morphometric predictors and λ = 1 indicates no discriminatory ability of the model. Statistical analyses were made using MICROSOFT EXCEL 2010 and STATISTICA v.6.1 software.

Geographic distribution

The distribution of Cristaria taxa in Far Eastern Russia and adjacent territories was compiled using data from the INREC-RAS-SB and ZIM-SP collections, and from an extensive bibliographic search (Suppl. material 1). The locations of C. plicata in the Upper Amur River Basin and Buyr-Nor Lake, Mongolia, were georeferenced to a precision of ± 0.2 km. However, the locations of Cristaria taxa in the Middle Amur River Basin and remaining territory recovered from the literature and from the labels of the ZIM-SP collections have less accurate localities (Suppl. material 1).


Genetic analyses

Three haplotypes were retrieved from the four newly sequenced individuals: two in C. tuberculata specimens (i.e., Biv1530 and Biv1531; Fig. 1), and one in C. herculea (i.e., Biv1537a and Biv1537b; Fig. 1). The aligned CO1 sequences had a total length of 618 bp, with 141 polymorphic and 90 parsimony informative sites. No indels and no unexpected stop codons were observed after translating all sequences to amino acids. The tree topology resulting from the BI analyses is shown in Fig. 1. Two major mtDNA clades were retrieved with strong support: one includes all individuals from C. plicata together with the four new individuals sequenced for this work (uncorrected p-distance among them <1.1%), and the other clade includes six individuals, also originally assigned to C. plicata (Jia and Li, Unpublished). Therefore, the newly sequenced individuals morphologically identified as C. tuberculata (Biv1530 and Biv1531; Fig. 1) and C. herculea (Biv1537a and Biv1537b; Fig. 1) cluster within C. plicata. As already noted by Klishko et al. (2014), the phylogeny of the genus Cristaria in China needs further evaluation, since the uncorrected p-distance of 9.9% between the two retrieved clades strongly suggests the existence of two different Cristaria species in this data set.

Figure 1. 

Phylogenetic tree obtained by Bayesian Inference analysis, using mtDNA fragments (CO1). Support values are given as Bayesian posterior probability above nodes, except for those within major clades, which have been omitted for clarity. Available sequences downloaded from GenBank and new sequences codes refer to Table 1.

Morphometric analyses

The genus Cristaria exhibits high shell plasticity, common to most unionoid species. However, the basic shell morphology of Cristaria taxa from Russia identified by different authors as C. plicata, C. tuberculata and C. herculea is very similar (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. 

Shell morphology of Cristaria plicata from Eastern Russia: A–C C. plicata from Khanka Lake identified by Zhadin in 1927 D–E C. plicata from Khanka Lake identified by Starobogatov in 1967 F–G C. tuberculata and H C. herculea from Khanka Lake identified by Moskvicheva in 1971 I limnetic, and J riverine forms of C. (herculea) plicata from Transbaikalia (Klishko et al. 2014).

Not only do the morphometric characteristics change with the increase of shell length, but these may also vary considerably in shells from the same size. In fact, all morphometric indexes calculated in this study for Cristaria taxa showed wide variation (Figs 34). The sole character separating or distinguishing C. herculea and C. tuberculata, according to Starobogatov et al. (2004) (here referred as the R-index), varied from 0.727 to 0.866 with shell lengths of 100–250 mm (Fig. 3A). R-indices for C. plicata with the same shell lengths varied from 0.735 to 0.885, completely overlapping the R-index variation ranges for C. herculea and C. tuberculata (Fig. 3A, B).

Figure 3. 

A Variation of the R-index with shell length B range and mean values of R-index for Far East Russian specimens of Cristaria plicata, C. herculea and C. tuberculata.

Figure 4. 

Variation of the morphometric shell indexes (B/H, H/L and B/L) with shell length in the three putative Cristaria taxa.

It should be noted that the R-index for the museum’s specimens of C. tuberculata identified by Moskvicheva in 1971 varied between 0.801–0.813 (shell lengths: 146–175 mm), identifying these specimens as C. herculea and not as C. tuberculata, according to the Key of Starobogatov et al. (2004).

The values of the shell morphometric indexes (B/H, H/L and B/L) varied widely without separating any of the putative species groups (Fig. 4). In fact, there was a complete overlap in the values of the three morphological indices with shell length, for all Cristaria forms. Values of B/H varied in range from 0.611 to 0.825, values of H/L and B/L varied in less ranges 0.419–0.543 and 0.290–0.378, respectively but with weakly expressed trends.

Discriminant analysis revealed no differentiation into discrete entities or species with the distribution of all points (Wilk’s l = 0.852); the discriminant plot shows a considerable overlap in all taxa of Cristaria (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. 

Discriminant analysis plots of Cristaria plicata, C. herculea and C. tuberculata forms from Far Eastern Russia showing the spread of the first two discriminant scores in discriminant space.

No statistically significant morphological discreteness was found between C. plicata and forms C. herculea and C. tuberculata for any of the morphometric indexes used, individually or combined. The reliability of morphological discreteness assessed by Wilk’s λ values for complex indexes values, were near to 1 which indicates the absence of morphological discreteness. A discriminant analysis provided no evidence of differentiation into entities or species (Wilk’s λ = 0.852, F (6.70) = 0.974, n = 40, p < 0.449).

Conservation status

Cristaria herculea is listed as Vulnerable in the Red Book of the Khabarovsky Krai (Voronov 2008) and as Endangered in the Red Book of the Transbaikalsky Krai (Kovaleva and Andreev 2012). C. tuberculata is listed as Endangered in the Red Books of the Khabarovsky Krai, the Primorsky Krai and of the Russian Federation (Sokolov 2001; Kostenko 2005; Voronov 2008). It has also been recommended for registration in the forthcoming Red Book of the Russian Federation as rare and endemic, with a restricted range (Bogatov 2014). Cristaria plicata has been globally assessed by the IUCN as Data Deficient as further research is required on its abundance, distribution, ecology and threats (Bogan and Cummings 2011).

Until now, according to the Russian system of taxonomy, C. herculea and C. tuberculata were considered valid species, both being considered as threatened in regional and national Russian Red Books. Using a synthesis of morphological and genetic data, we present categorical evidence that all forms of the genus Cristaria inhabiting in Russia are one species, C. plicata. This fact should be considered for future conservation measures. At the moment C. herculea and C. tuberculata are considered to be threatened in Eastern Russia and their populations are in decline due to anthropogenic impacts. Integrating both forms into the single species, C. plicata, should maintain a threatened conservation status in this region. However, it is necessary to reassess the conservation status for C. plicata, both at the regional and National (Russia) levels, using the entire distributional range and demographic trends of both previously recognized forms. Nevertheless, further research is still required on the abundance, distribution, ecology and threats to this species for a more accurate Global Red List assessment, especially in its Southern edge of distribution in China and Indochina.


Cristaria plicata is found across the territory of Far East Russia including the Onon, Shilka, Argun, Zeya, Bureya, Ussury river basins, the lower Amur River, the Tym River (Sakhalin Island) and Khanka Lake. It is also present in Mongolia (Buyr-Nur Lake), China (Dong Ting Lake and Poyang Lake of the Yangtze River Basin (Prozorova et al. 2005; Fig. 6a) south to Northern Vietnam, Laos, Thailand and Cambodia (Brandt 1974; Fig. 6b).

Figure 6. 

Distribution of Cristaria plicata in a Eastern Russia, Mongolia, China (pink spots) and b southern edge of the area in northern Vietnam, Laos, Thailand and Cambodia (pink shaded area).


In a previous revision of the Far Eastern Anodontinae, and although specimens identified as C. plicata were already present in the collection of the ZIM-SP, the genus Cristaria was separated into two species, C. tuberculata and C. herculea (Moskvicheva 1973). These forms were widely accepted by most Russian taxonomists and were separated using a comparison of conchological characters including shell convexity, the location of the umbo relative to the anterior shell margin, the position of the dorsal shell margin and the end of the wing apex (Moskvicheva 1973). Later, the use of most of these characters for classification by Russian malacologists was discontinued, but C. herculea and C. tuberculata were still recognized as distinct species based on shell convexity alone (i.e. R-index; Zatravkin and Bogatov 1987; Starobogatov et al. 2004). The present paper clearly demonstrates that there is a substantial variation and overlap of R-index values in C. herculea and C. tuberculata rendering them useless in delimiting these forms. Furthermore, the existence of shell forms of variable convexity can be explained by size, sex or environmental factors. In fact, it has been recognized that juvenile and middle-aged individuals have highly differentiated shell convexity values (Zatravkin and Bogatov 1987). However those differences can be obscured with age or environmental factors (Prosorova and Sayenko 2001).

Buldowsky (1935) also pointed out to the sharp morphological differences between riverine and lake forms of Cristaria from Ussury River and Khanka Lake. Similar differences exist between riverine and lake forms of Cristaria from Transbaikalia (Fig. 2I, J). Studies carried out by Zieritz and Aldridge (2011) on another Anodontine species show that female Anodonta anatina specimens are generally more inflated than males, in order to increase the volume of the branchial chambers for glochidial brooding. Unfortunately, published studies on the Cristaria from Far East Russia dealt only with shells without sexing the individuals. Thus, while the present study has shown that shell convexity in Cristaria can vary with age, a possibility remains that it also might vary with sex. This may explain the previous conchological distinctions between the more or less convex shell shapes of C. tuberculata and C. herculea as a simple description of specimens of distinct sizes or as males and females of the same species, C. plicata.


The authors want to thank the editor, Dr. Richard Willan, and the two reviewers for their excellent comments and suggestions that significantly improved the manuscript. Special thanks go also to Dr. A.V. Chernyshev (Institute of Sea Biology of Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok) for tissue samples of C. tuberculata from Luchegorsky reservoir (Ussury River basin) and Dr. E.M. Sayenko (Institute of Biology and Soil, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok) for tissue samples of C. herculea from Khanka Lake. We also thank Dr. P.V. Kijashko (Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg) for the help with the work on the Cristaria from the museum collections. The financial support for the genetics work was provided by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the COMPETE - Operational Competitiveness Program, and national funds through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, under a Grant to EF (SFRH/BPD/108445/2015) and under the Strategic Funding UID/Multi/04423/2013)


  • Aldridge DC, Fayle TM, Jackson N (2007) Freshwater mussel abundance predicts biodiversity in UK lowland rivers. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 17: 554–564. doi: 10.1002/aqc.815
  • Bogan AE (1993) Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionoida) a search for causes. American Zoologist 33: 599–609. doi: 10.1093/icb/33.6.599
  • Bogatov VV (2014) Resulting list of taxa and populations of water invertebrates recommended for inclusion in Red Book of the Russian Federation (project 2015). Protocol No. 3. (25.12.2014). [Manuscript copy in Russian]
  • Brandt RAM (1974) The non-marine aquatic Mollusca of Thailand. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 105: 1–423.
  • Buldowsky AT (1935) About the marketable freshwater mussels of Far East USSR. Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch, the Academy of Sciences of the USSR12: 39–63. [In Russian]
  • Đặng NT, Thái TB, Phạm VM (1980) Định loại động vật không xương sống nước ngạt Bắc Việt Nam. [The classification of freshwater invertebrates of North Vietnam] Nhà Xuất bảnKhoa hạc và Kỹ thuật, Hanoi, 573 pp. [In Vietnamese]
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Froufe E, Sobral C, Texeira A, Lopes A, Sousa R, Varandas S, Aldrige DC, Lopes-Lima M (2014) Genetic diversity of the pan-European freshwater mussel Anodonta anatina (Bivalvia, Unionoida) based on COI: new insights on the genus phylogeny and implications for its conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24: 561–574. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2456
  • Graf DL (2007) Palearctic freshwater mussel (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida) diversity and the Comparatory Method as a species concept. Graf, D. L. (2007). Palearctic freshwater mussel (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida) diversity and the Comparatory Method as a species concept. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 156: 71–88. doi: 10.1635/0097-3157(2007)156[71:PFMMBU]2.0.CO;2
  • Gustafson RG, Iwamoto EM (2005) A DNA-based identification key to Pacific Northwest freshwater mussel glochidia: importance to salmonid and mussel conservation. Northwest Science 79: 233–245.
  • Haas F (1969) Superfamilia Unionacea. Das Tierreich 88. Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin, 663 pp.
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acids symposium series 41, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 95–98.
  • He J, Zhuang Z (2013) The freshwater bivalves of China. ConchBooks, Harxheim, 197 pp.
  • Higashi S, Hayashi K (1964) On the larvae of freshwater bivalves in the Lake Biwa-ko. Bulletin of the Japanese Society for Scientific fisheries 30: 227–233. [In Japanese with English summary]
  • Inaba S (1941) A preliminary note on the glochidia of Japanese freshwater mussels. Annotationes Zoologicae Japanensis 20: 14–23.
  • Inaba S (1964) Morphological and ecological studies on the glochidia larvae of the Unionidae. Scientific Reports of the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Education, Gifu University 3: 275–307.
  • Jiang WP, Li JL, Zheng RL, Wang GL (2010) Analysis of complete mitochondrial genome of Cristaria plicata. Yi Chuan 32: 153–162. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2010.00153
  • Klishko OK (2012) Mollusca. In: Kovaleva TC, Andreev AV (Eds) Red Book of the Zabaikalsky Territory: Animals. Novosibirsky Publishing House, Novosibirsk, 207–238. [In Russian]
  • Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE (2014) Are Cristaria herculea (Middendorff, 1847) and Cristaria plicata (Leach, 1815) (Bivalvia: Unionidae) separate species? ZooKeys 438: 1–15. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.438.7493
  • Kodolova OP, Logvinenko BM (1987) Comparison of the molluscs of genus Cristaria (Unionidae) on the proteins electropherogram and shells morphology.VIII All-Russian Conference on the study of molluscs. Nauka, Leningrad, 63–64. [In Russian]
  • Kodolova OP, Logvinenko BM (1988) Disputable issues in the taxonomy of Amur-Khanka mollusks of the genus Cristaria (Bivalvia, Unionidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 67: 506–510. [In Russian]
  • Kondo T (2008) Monograph of Unionoida in Japan (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Special Publication of the Malacological Society of JapanNo 3. Malacological Society of Japan, Tokyo.
  • Kostenko VA (2005) Red Book of the Primorsky Krai: Animals. AVK Apelsin, Vladivostok, 408 pp. [In Russian]
  • Kovaleva TC, Andreev AV (2012) Red Book of the Transbaikalsky Krai: Animals. Novosibirsky Publish House, Novosibirsk, 345 pp. [In Russian]
  • Lee JH, Choi EH, Kim SK, Ryu SH, Hwang UW (2012) Mitochondrial genome of the cockscomb pearl mussel Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionoida, Unionidae). Mitochondrial DNA 23: 39–41. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2011.643882
  • Lopes-Lima M, Teixeira A, Froufe E, Lopes A, Varandas S, Sousa R (2014) Biology and conservation of freshwater bivalves: past, present and future perspectives. Hydrobiologia 735: 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-1902-9
  • Moskvicheva IM (1973) Molluscs of subfamily Anodontinae (Bivalvia, Unionidae) of Amur basin and Primorye Territory. Zoological Journal 52: 822–834. [In Russian]
  • Prozorova LA, Sayenko EM (2001) To the biology of the anodontine genus Cristaria (Bivalvia, Unionidae). Ruthenica 11: 33–36. [In Russian]
  • Prozorova LA, Sayenko EM, Bogatov VV, Wu M, Liu YY (2005) Bivalves of the Yangtze River drainage. The Bulletin of the Russian Far East Malacological Society 9: 46–58. [In Russian]
  • Ronquest F, Heilesenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
  • Sambrook J, Frotsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Press, New York.
  • Sayenko EM, Pearce TA, Shea EK (2005) Glochidial morphology of selected species of the genera Cristaria Schumacher, 1817 and Sinanodonta Modell, 1945 (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from far Eastern Russia. American Malacological Bulletin 20: 11–21.
  • Sayenko EM (2006) Morphology of glochidia (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Anodontinae, Pseudoanodontinae). Dalnauka, Vladivostok. [In Russian]
  • Schumacher CF (1817) Essai d’un nouveau système des habitations des vers testacés: Avec XXII planches. Mr. le directeur Schultz, Copenhaguen.
  • Sokolov VE (2001) Red Book of the Russian Federation: Animals. AST Astrel, Moscow, 862 pp. [In Russian]
  • Starobogatov YI, Bogatov VV, Prozorova LA, Sayenko EM (2004) Key to freshwater invertebrates of Russia and adjacent lands. Vol. 6. Molluscs, polychaetes, nemerteans. Nauka, St. Petersburg. [In Russian]
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Vaughn CC, Hackenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 46: 1431–1446. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00771.x
  • Voronov BA (2008) Red Book of the Khabarovsky Krai: Animals. Priamurskiye Vedomosti Publish House, Khabarovsk, 632 pp. [In Russian]
  • Wu X, Liang Y, Wang H, Ou Y (2000) A comparative study on glochidial morphology of Unionidae (Bivalvia). II. Lanceolaria, Lamprotula, Hyriopsis and Cristaria. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 24: 252–256.
  • Zatravkin MN, Bogatov VV (1987) Large bivalve molluscs of the fresh and brackish waters of the USSR Far East. DVO AN USSR, Vladivostok, 152 pp. [In Russian]
  • Zhadin VI (1938) Family Unionidae. Fauna of USSR. Mollusca, Vol. 4. Moscow-Leningrad, USSR. [In Russian]
  • Zhadin VI (1952) Mollusks of fresh and brackish waters of the USSR. Identification guides on the USSR fauna. Zoological Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences 46: 1–376.
  • Zhadin VI (1965) Mollusks of fresh and brackish waters of the USSR. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem. [English translation of Zhadin (1952) by A. Mecado]
  • Zieritz A, Aldridge DC (2011) Sexual, habitat‐constrained and parasite‐induced dimorphism in the shell of a freshwater mussel (Anodonta anatina, Unionidae). Journal of Morphology 272: 1365–1375. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10990

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

References used to determine Cristaria taxa distribution

Olga K. Klishko, Manuel Lopes-Lima, Elsa Froufe, Arthur E. Bogan, Vera Y. Abakumova

Data type: references list

Explanation note: References used to determine Cristaria taxa distribution.

* - Museum of Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St.-Petersburg;

** - unpublished.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (16.82 kb)