Research Article
Print
Research Article
Embryogenesis and tadpole description of Hyperolius castaneus Ahl, 1931 and H. jackie Dehling, 2012 (Anura, Hyperoliidae) from montane bog pools
expand article infoEdgar Lehr, J Maximilian Dehling§, Eli Greenbaum|, Ulrich Sinsch
‡ Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, United States of America
§ University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, United States of America
¶ Universität Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz, Germany
Open Access

Abstract

Tadpoles of Hyperolius castaneus and H. jackie were found in the Nyungwe National Park in Rwanda and adjacent areas. Tadpoles of both species were identified by DNA-barcoding. At the shore of a bog pool three clutches of H. castaneus of apparently different age, all laid on moss pads (Polytrichum commune, Isotachis aubertii) or grass tussocks (Andropogon shirensis) 2–5 cm above the water level, were found. One clutch of H. castaneus was infested by larval dipterid flies. The most recently laid clutch contained about 20 eggs within a broad egg-jelly envelope. The eggs were attached to single blades of a tussock and distributed over a vertical distance of 8 cm. A pair of H. castaneus found in axillary amplexus was transported in a plastic container to the lab for observation. The pair deposited a total of 57 eggs (15 eggs attached to the upper wall of the transport container, 42 eggs floated in the water). Embryogenesis of the clutch was monitored in the plastic container at 20 ± 2 °C (air temperature) and documented by photos until Gosner Stage 25. The description of the tadpole of H. castaneus is based on a Gosner Stage 29 individual from a series of 57 tadpoles (Gosner stages 25–41). The description of the tadpole of H. jackie is based on a Gosner Stage 32 individual from a series of 43 tadpoles (Gosner stages 25–41). Egg laying behavior and embryogenesis are unknown for H. jackie. The labial tooth row formula for both species is 1/3(1) with a narrow median gap of the tooth row. Variation in external morphology was observed in size and labial tooth row formula within the species. With the tadpole descriptions of H. castaneus and H. jackie, 36 tadpoles of the 135 known Hyperolius species have been described, including five of the eleven Hyperolius species known from Rwanda.

Keywords

Cryptic species diversity, egg predation, egg laying behavior, frogfly, Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda

Introduction

The reed frog genus Hyperolius currently comprises 135 species (Frost 2015). Taxonomy of this genus is known to be complicated (e.g., Ahl 1931, Schiøtz 1975, 1999, Lötters et al. 2004, Rödel et al. 2010) because of high intraspecific variability, high interspecific morphological similarity, and sympatric distributions (e.g., Channing et al. 2013, Liedtke et al. 2014). Not surprisingly, the tadpoles of only 34 (24.8%) Hyperolius species have been described to date (Viertel et al. 2007, Channing et al. 2012, Conradie et al. 2013), a serious drawback for a reliable assessment of the presence of species in remote regions where adults are not easily caught (e.g. Greenbaum et al. 2013).

During our recent field work in Rwanda, we focussed on the estimation of Hyperolius diversity, specifically in the Nyungwe National Park (about 970 km² cloud forest, Plumptre et al. 2003; for a map see Dehling 2012: page 60, figure 4). Despite a century of taxonomic studies (Ahl 1931, Hinkel and Fischer 1990, 1995, Fischer and Hinkel 1992, Hinkel 1996, Sinsch et al. 2011, Dehling 2012) diversity of the cloud forest Hyperolius from that area is not yet clear. The checklist of Hinkel (1996) mentions H. adolfifriederici Ahl, 1931, H. alticola Ahl, 1931, H. castaneus Ahl, 1931, H. discodactylus Ahl, 1931, H. raveni Ahl, 1931 and H. viridiflavus francoisi Laurent, 1951, several of which are now considered junior synonyms (Frost 2015). Our current view integrating morphological, bioacoustics and molecular data gives credit to the presence of only four species in the Nyungwe National Park: H. castaneus, H. discodactylus, H. frontalis Laurent, 1950 and the recently described H. jackie Dehling, 2012 (Sinsch et al. 2011, Dehling 2012, Greenbaum et al. 2013, Liedtke et al. 2014, Dehling unpubl. data). Analysing habitat preferences and distribution of these four species within the cloud forest and the adjacent areas now deforested and in agricultural use would be easier, if encountered tadpoles could be assigned to either taxon. Yet, none of the tadpoles are currently described (Channing et al. 2012). Consequently, we surveyed lentic water bodies for Hyperolius tadpoles of these four species at all localities where we previously detected the presence of either species by collection of specimens or based on advertisement calls (Sinsch et al. 2011, Dehling 2012, Greenbaum et al. 2013, Liedtke et al. 2014). This survey yielded a large number of tadpoles which we identified as those of H. castaneus and H. jackie by DNA-barcoding. Herein we describe the morphological features of the tadpoles and provide new information on the egg-laying behavior of H. castaneus and embryogenesis in their terrestrial clutches.

Methods

Study areas and field surveys

Presence of larval and adult individuals of Hyperolius castaneus and H. jackie was monitored in the Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda (Sinsch et al. 2011, Dehling 2012) and adjacent areas used for agriculture (Table 1). Daytime surveys (9.00–17.00) for tadpoles and nightly records (18.00–21.00) of calling males were conducted in March 2009, March and April 2011 and in March 2012. Hyperolius castaneus egg laying behavior was studied in the Uwasenkoko swamp. Tadpoles of H. castaneus were collected at the same site and additionally in the Karamba swamp together with those of H. jackie (Table 1). Additional tadpole specimens were collected from multiple localities in the Albertine Rift in Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda. Museum acronyms are: UTEP = University of Texas at El Paso, ZFMK = Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn (Appendix I).

Table 1.

Localities where H. castaneus and H. jackie adults (= A) and tadpoles (= T) were collected in Rwanda.

Locality Latitude [°S], Longitude [°E] Altitude [m a.s.l.] H. castaneus H. jackie
A T A T
Gisakura 2.457, 29.092 1927 + - - -
Kitabi 2.546, 29.426 2190 + - - -
Nyungwe, stream 2.464, 29.101 1881 + - + -
Nyungwe, Kamiranzovu 2.486, 29.153 1961 + - - -
Nyungwe, Karamba 2.479, 29.112 1936 + + + +
Nyungwe, Pindura 2.481, 29.228 2283 + - - -
Nyungwe, Uwasenkoko 2.529, 29.354 2379 + + - -

Larval characters

The format of the tadpole description follows that of Viertel et al. (2007) but excludes description of oral cavities. Tadpoles were preserved in 5–10% formalin. Body measurements follow the primary landmarks defined by McDiarmid and Altig (1999: see figure 3.1 on page 26 for tadpole drawing with defined primary landmarks). In our descriptions, we use the terminology of Altig (1970) and McDiarmid and Altig (1999) with the labial tooth row formula (LTFR) written as a fraction in line with the rows with median gaps in parentheses. P1 = first posterior tooth row. Ecomorphological types for larvae follow McDiarmid and Altig (1999) and Orton (1953). Tadpoles were staged according to Gosner (1960). Preserved tadpoles were observed on tiny glass beads (1 mm) filled shallowly with water to allow proper positioning. Most measurements were taken to the nearest 0.1 mm using a stereomicroscope equipped with an ocular micrometer, except for tail length, body length, body width, and greatest tail height, which were measured with a digital caliper held under the microscope.

Recorded measurements include: body length (distance from the tip of the snout to the body terminus, which is the junction of the posterior body wall with the tail axis); tail length (distance from the body terminus to the absolute tip of tail); total length (sum of body length and tail length); body width (measured at the widest point right behind the eyes); body height (at level of eye); eye diameter; interorbital distance (measured between the centers of the pupils); internarial distance (measured between the centers of the nostril indicated by reduced pigmentation when closed); distance between tip of snout and naris (from center of the naris to the middle of the snout); and distance between nostril and eye (from the center of nostril to the anterior edge of the eye); spiracle length (medially to opening); and spiracle tube width (at level of opening), and oral disc width (at middle between outer marginal papillae). Drawings of tadpoles were done with a camera lucida attached to a microscope. Descriptions of coloration in life are based on photos taken by JMD shortly after collection in the field.

DNA sampling and barcoding

We isolated DNA from the tail tip of the tadpole morphotypes, collected at the Karamba and Uwasenkoko localities (Table 1). DNA was used to sequence a fragment of the 16S mitochondrial rRNA gene, a suggested universal marker to barcode amphibians for species allocation (Vences et al. 2005). Protocols of DNA extraction, PCR, purification, and sequencing follow Dehling and Sinsch (2013) and Greenbaum et al. (2013). The obtained sequences were compared with our own sequences from adult frog specimens collected in southwestern Rwanda and are deposited in GenBank (Table 2). Editing and alignment were completed in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011). Sequences were trimmed to the same length. The final alignment consisted of 548 base pairs. Calculations of pairwise distances and phylogenetic analysis (Maximum Likelihood) were carried out in MEGA5. A Maximum Likelihood analysis was run with 1000 bootstrap replicates using the GTR + G + I model and the Nearest-Neighbor-Interchange, as proposed by jModelTest 2 (Darriba et al. 2012) using the Akaike information criterion.

Table 2.

Samples of species used for molecular genetic analyses, their geographic origin, voucher specimens (T = tadpole, otherwise adult), GenBank accession numbers, and original source.

Species Origin Voucher GenBank # Source
Afrixalus quadrivittatus Butare JMD544 KT439195 This study
Hyperolius castaneus Nyungwe National Park ZMB 77537 JQ423936 Dehling 2012
Hyperolius castaneus Uwasenkoko, Nyungwe National Park ZFMK 97191, T KT439194 This study
Hyperolius castaneus Karamba ZFMK 97192, T KT439193 This study
Hyperolius cinnamomeoventris Butare ZMB 77533 JQ966568 Dehling 2012
Hyperolius discodactylus Nyungwe National Park
Rwanda
ZMB 77536 JQ966565 Dehling 2012
Hyperolius jackie Karamba, Nyungwe National Park ZMB 77481 JQ966571 Dehling 2012
Hyperolius jackie Karamba, Nyungwe National Park ZFMK 97194, T KT439192 This study
Hyperolius kivuensis Butare ZMB 77532 JQ966567 Dehling 2012
Hyperolius lateralis Butare ZMB 77534 JQ966569 Dehling 2012
Hyperolius rwandae Akagera wetland ZMB 77225 JQ863713 Channing et al. 2013
Hyperolius rwandae Butare JMD 592 KT439191 This study
Hyperolius viridiflavus Gitarama ZMB 77535 JQ966570 Dehling 2012
Leptopelis karissimbensis Uwasenkoko swamp, Nyungwe National Park ZFMK 97188, T KT439190 This study
Leptopelis karissimbensis Uwasenkoko swamp, Nyungwe National Park JMD 631 KT439189 This study
Leptopelis cf. kivuensis 2 Karamba, Nyungwe National Park ZFMK 97189, T KT439188 This study
Leptopelis cf. kivuensis 2 Karamba, Nyungwe National Pak JMD 746 KM047142 Portillo et al. 2015

Results

Distribution and habitat preferences of Hyperolius spp. in the Nyungwe region

Based on call surveys and collection of adult specimens, H. castaneus populations were detected at seven localities, five inside the Nyungwe National Park, and two outside (Table 1). They occured in sympatry with H. discodactylus, H. jackie, Leptopelis karissimbensis Ahl, 1929, L. cf. kivuensis 2 (sensu Portillo et al. 2015), Phrynobatrachus acutirostris Nieden 1912, “1913”, P. cf. versicolorAhl, 1924, Xenopus wittei Tinsley, Kobel & Fischberg, 1979 and an undetermined species of Amietia Dubois, 1987 “1986”. Hyperolius castaneus tadpoles shared the same lentic water bodies with those of H. jackie, Leptopelis karissimbensis and L. cf. kivuensis 2 (Fig. 1). Hyperolius jackie populations are currently known only from the type locality (a natural pond at Karamba, Nyungwe National Park), and a stream at the west end of the Nyungwe National Park (Table 1). Adults were found in sympatry with H. castaneus, H. discodactylus, Leptopelis karissimbensis and Xenopus wittei; and tadpoles syntopically with those of H. castaneus and L. cf. kivuensis 2. Hyperolius discodactylus tadpoles were found syntopically with tadpoles of Phrynobatrachus acutirostris in a slow flowing stream passing through the Uwasenkoko swamp.

Figure 1. 

Tadpole habitats in the Nyungwe National Park. A Karamba swamp B Uwasenkoko swamp. For geographical details see Table 1. Photos by U. Sinsch.

Males of Hyperolius castaneus and H. jackie were observed vocalizing from shrubs and sedges bordering forest swamps. Hyperolius castaneus also called from the ground in moist swamp areas. While H. jackie never started vocalizing before dusk, H. castaneus gave advertisement calls throughout the day, but more frequently at night. Bog pools close to calling sites and containing tadpoles had a pH of 5.5–6.0 and a water depth varying from a few centimetres to a maximum of 35 cm (Fig. 1).

Egg-laying behavior and embryogenesis of H. castaneus

The natural history observations reported here were made on 22 March 2012 between 13:00 and 16:00 hrs, at a small breeding pond forming part of the Uwasenkoko swamp (2379 m a.s.l.; Fig. 1B). During an initial survey of a 25 m² area, we located two males advertising at the ground and an unpaired female, all individuals staying 3–8 m apart from each other. At the shore of the pond we detected three clutches of different ages, laid on moss pads and grass tussocks 2–5 cm above the water level (Fig. 2). The first clutch mass was placed on a moss pad (Polytrichum commune, Isotachis aubertii) and consisted only of the gelatinous remains of the egg envelopes (Fig. 2A). According to the duration of embryogenesis (see below) we estimate the age of this clutch is at least seven days. The second clutch was found upon depressed blades of mainly Andropogon shirensis (Fig. 2B) and had a similar consistency to the first one. However, with the exception of three undeveloped eggs, it contained a large number of undetermined insect larvae, probably of parasitic dipterid flies. The third clutch was recently laid with about 20 eggs within the broad egg-jelly envelope. The eggs were attached to single blades of an Andropogon shirensis tussock and distributed over a vertical distance of 8 cm (Fig. 2C). The eggs had a black pole cap, whereas about two-thirds of the egg was yellowish. Within the shallow water adjacent to the clutches we observed > 50 H. castaneus tadpoles (Gosner stages 25–31, one metamorphic individual with lateral yellowish stripes of Stage 41) and > 15 L. karissimbensis tadpoles (Gosner stages 35–39). The developmental stage of most tadpoles indicated that they had hatched recently. We conclude that a reproductive burst of several pairs had occurred 1–2 weeks prior to the survey, but that reproduction period is prolonged with little synchronisation among the several hundred local H. castaneus adults.

Figure 2. 

Hyperolius castaneus clutches of different age at the Uwasenkoko swamp. A Gelatinous clutch mass following hatching of tadpoles B Parasitized clutch mass with a few undeveloped eggs C Recently laid eggs attached to rush stalks. For further details see text. Photos by U. Sinsch.

During the same survey we observed a pair in axillary amplexus on shore close to the open water surface (Fig. 3A). The male did not call and during the next two hours the pair moved occasionally along the shoreline. As the pair did not oviposit during this period, they were transferred into a small plastic container (5 cm diameter, 12 cm height, containing water to a height of 4 cm) and transported to the laboratory in Butare at 1643 m a.s.l. Reaching the laboratory two hours later we found that the pair had laid 15 eggs attached to the upper wall of the transport container and another 42 eggs were floating in the water (Fig. 3B). Eggs were deposited one by one using the egg-jelly envelope as glue for attachment to the wall and among single eggs. The pair, which already had finished amplexus, was removed from the box. Embryogenesis of the clutch was monitored in the same transport container at 20 ± 2 °C, but at a significantly higher air temperature compared to the native Uwasenkoko locality where daily fluctuations between 5 and 19 °C occur.

Figure 3. 

A Hyperolius castaneus pair in amplexus at the Uwasenkoko swamp B Clutch laid in the transport box; 15 eggs attached to the upper container wall and 42 eggs within the water. For further details see text. Photos by U. Sinsch and M. Dehling.

Six hours after oviposition the first eggs of the upper egg mass showed signs of cleavage (Gosner Stage 2; Fig. 4A). The egg envelope was not swollen by moisture uptake, but each single egg remained distinguishable. After 48 h most eggs were in a stage of gastrulation (Gosner stages 10–13). After 5 d the most advanced embryos had reached Gosner Stage 19 (Fig. 4B), and after 6 d embryos reached Gosner Stage 22 and egg envelopes had fused to a single swollen gelatinous mass (Fig. 4C). Between 6 and 7 d following oviposition the egg-jelly became more fluid and the late embryos and early tadpoles of Gosner stage 24–25 started moving within the egg mass. At the end of day 7 the most advanced tadpoles had moved downwards within the egg-jelly, reaching the water level and beginning their free-swimming tadpole stage (Figs 4D, 5). In general, embryonic development of the 15 eggs was slightly asynchronic and two eggs did not seem to be fertilized (Fig. 5). In contrast, eggs deposited in water failed to develop further than Gosner Stage 10.

Figure 4. 

Embryogenesis of a H. castaneus clutch at 20 ± 2 °C. A Egg mass 4 cm above water level 6h following oviposition B 5d following oviposition C 6d following oviposition D 7d following oviposition; two hatchlings of the upper egg mass and undeveloped eggs within water. For further details see text. Photos by M. Dehling.

Figure 5. 

Hatching of H. castaneus tadpoles from an egg mass attached 4 cm above water level. For further details see text. Photos by M. Dehling.

DNA-barcoding of tadpoles

DNA-sequences of representative specimens of the three morphologically distinct tadpole types collected in the Karamba pond and of the two tadpole types collected in the Uwasenkoko swamp were unequivocally associated (uncorrected p distance 0.0% between tadpole and corresponding adult sequence) with adult sequences of H. castaneus, H. jackie, Leptopelis karissimbensis, and L. cf. kivuensis 2 (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. 

Maximum likelihood phylogram of Rwandan species in the genus Hyperolius with Afrixalus quadivittatus, Leptopelis karissimbensis and L. cf. kivuensis 2 as outgroups, based on comparison of 548 base pairs of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. Included are 42 adult specimens collected in southwestern Rwanda, samples taken from GenBank and five tadpoles representing the morphotypes collected in the Karamba and Uwasenkoko swamps (specimen identification in Appendix I). Numbers above nodes are percentage support values from maximum likelihood. Only values above 50% are shown.

Tadpole of Hyperolius castaneus Ahl, 1931

The following description is based on a Stage 29 individual from the Uwasenkoko swamp, Rwanda (Figs 7A, B, ZFMK 97190, selected from a series of 52 tadpoles, Gosner stages 25–38, ZFMK 97191, and a series of 5 tadpoles, Gosner stages 34–41, ZMFK 97192 from Karamba, Figs 810). Exotrophous lentic benthic Type IV tadpole with following measurements (mm): total length 24.0, body length 9.0, tail length 15.0, body width 4.7, body height 3.6, eye diameter 1.0, interorbital distance 4.0, internarial distance 2.7, snout–naris–distance 1.9, distance–naris–eye 1.6, spiracle length 1.7, spiracle width 1.0, distance–snout–spiracle 6.4, tail muscle height at its beginning 2.4, tail muscle height at tail mid-length 1.8, greatest tail height 4.0, oral disc width 2.3. In dorsal view the body is elongated and ovoid and is widest at the level of the spiracle opening. The snout is rounded both in lateral and dorsal views. The interorbital distance is about twice the snout–naris distance, and internarial distance is 68% of interorbital distance. The eyes are positioned laterally, directed dorsolaterally, and are not visible in ventral view. The external nares are nearly round (slightly elongated horizontally), very small, and positioned laterally. They are more closely positioned to the eyes than to the snout (naris–eye–distance to snout–naris–distance 84%). In lateral view the body is highest at the mid-body length (approximately at the level of the spiracle opening). The body height is 40% of the body length, the body width is about half (52%) the length of the body, and the body height is 77% of the body width. The spiracle is single, sinistral, and attached to the body wall. Its shape is cylindrical and its length is about twice (170%) the eye diameter. The spiracle opening is rounded, directed posteriorly, and located at mid-body with its upper margin below the lower margin of the eye in lateral view. The length of the tail represents 63% of the total length. The tail is highest at about mid-tail and represents about a quarter (27%) of the tail length. The greatest tail height is located at the anterior quarter of the tail. The greatest tail height is slightly more than twice (225%) the body length, and slightly larger (111%) than the body height. The dorsal fin does not extend onto the body. Dorsal and ventral fins are about equal in height throughout their length. The tip of the tail is narrowly pointed and rounded. The height of the tail musculature at mid-body is about half (45%) of the maximum tail height. The vent tube is dextral, short, posteriorly directed, and linked to the tail musculature. The oral disc (Figs 7B, 8) is anteroventral, not emarginated, about half (49%) of the body width, and bordered at its lateral and posterior margin by a row of short and round papillae. Few submarginal papillae are present laterally and below the third lower tooth row. The LTRF is 1/3(1) with a narrow median gap in P1. The first two tooth rows are about equal in length, occupying nearly the entire width of the oral disc, the third tooth row is slightly shorter, and the shortest is the most posterior one. Jaw sheaths are finely serrated. The upper jaw sheath is inversely U-shaped and the lower V-shaped and narrower.

Figure 7. 

Tadpole of H. castaneus (Stage 29, ZFMK 97190) in lateral view (A) and oral disc (B). Drawings by E. Lehr.

Figure 8. 

Oral disc in life of H. castaneus (Gosner Stage 40, from Karamba, ZFMK 97192) in overview (A) and close up view (B). Photos by M. Dehling.

The variation in external morphology of the larval series is limited to size (Table 3) and LTRF. Fourteen tadpoles differ from the above described LTRF: Seven tadpoles had a LTRF of 1/3(1, 3), three of 1/3(1, 2), two of 1/3(1, 2, 3), one of 1(1)/3, and one of 1/3. Hyperolius castaneus tadpoles from outside Rwanda (see Appendix I) correspond well with the description. One tadpole from Uganda (UTEP 21179) had a LTRF of 1(1)/3(1).

Table 3.

Measurements (mm) of 57 larvae of Hyperolius castaneus. Mean followed by one standard deviation, and range in parentheses for sample sizes larger than 2.

Hyperolius castaneus
Stage N Total length Body length Tail length
25 14 11.3–16.0 (13.4 ± 1.4) 3.7–5.1 (4.5 ± 0.4) 7.6–10.9 (9.0 ± 1.0)
26 6 18.6–20.7 (20.2 ± 0.8) 6.5–7.2 (7.0 ± 0.3) 12.1–13.5 (13.2 ± 0.5)
27 4 19.4–25.5 (22.3 ± 2.5) 7.2–8.6 (7.8 ± 0.6) 12.2–16.9 (14.5 ± 1.9)
28 2 23.7, 23.9 8.5, 8.6 15.2, 15.3
29 2 24.0, 27.2 9.0, 9.6 15.0, 17.6
31 4 25.0–28.9 (25.7 ± 3.0) 9.1–9.3 (9.2 ± 0.1) 12.7–19.6 (16.5 ± 2.9)
34 5 27.8–32.7 (29.6 ± 2.0) 9.4–11.0 (10.1 ± 0.6) 18.4–20.3 (19.6 ± 1.4)
35 6 29.3–33.0 (31.1 ± 1.5) 10.0–10.9 (10.6 ± 0.4) 19.1–22.0 (20.6 ± 1.3)
36 5 30.8–33.0 (31.9 ± 0.9) 9.7–11.7 (10.8 ± 0.7) 20.1–23.0 (21.2 ± 1.2)
37 4 32.9–34.9 (33.9 ± 0.8) 10.0–11.5 (11.1 ± 0.7) 22.3–22.9 (22.8 ± 0.5)
38 2 32.1, 33.1 10.6, 11.1 21.5, 22.0
39 2 33.3, 34.2 10.5, 10.6 22.8, 23.6
41 1 31.0 10.7 20.3

In preservative the larvae are entirely pale grayish brown to tan. The body is darker dorsally compared to the translucent venter. Tail musculature is tan and the fins are translucent, both bearing dark gray melanophores in various degrees.

The coloration in life (Figs 9, 10) of the body was dorsally tan with minute brownish-orange spots and translucent whitish on the venter. The tail musculature was greenish tan and the fins were translucent tan with irregular dark marbling. Black spots and flecks were scattered dorsally and laterally on the body, tail musculature and dorsal fin. The ventral fin has fewer black spots and flecks or none at all. Younger stages (e.g., Gosner Stage 25, Fig. 10A) are paler compared to older stages (e.g., Gosner Stage 38, Fig. 10B). The series from Uwasenkoko was overall darker (e.g., Gosner Stage 38, Fig. 10B) compared to the series from Karamba (e.g., Gosner Stage 37, Fig. 9), possibly reflecting phenotypic plasticity. From stages 38 on in both series, distinct tan or whitish yellow dorsolateral stripes are present on each side extending from the snout to the end of the body. The iris was brownish orange with a few dark gray reticulations.

Figure 9. 

Color variation in life of H. castaneus from Karamba (ZFMK 97192) at different Gosner stages. A Stage 35 B Stage 37 C Stage 38 D Stage 44. Photos by M. Dehling.

Figure 10. 

Color variation in life of H. castaneus from Uwasenkoko (ZFMK 97191) at different Gosner stages. A Stage 25 B Stage 38 C Stage 41 D Stage 44. Photos by M. Dehling.

Tadpole of Hyperolius jackie Dehling, 2012

The following description is based on a Gosner Stage 32 individual from the Karamba swamp (Fig. 11, ZFMK 97193, from a series of 43 tadpoles, Gosner stages 25–41, ZFMK 97194, Figs 1214). Exotrophous lentic benthic Type IV tadpole with the following measurements (mm): total length 31.5, body length 9.5, tail length 22.0, body width 5.2, body height 3.4, eye diameter 1.2, interorbital distance 4.8, internarial distance 3.0, distance–snout–naris 1.5, distance–naris–eye 1.6, spiracle length 1.9, spiracle width 0.6, distance–snout–spiracle 7.2, tail muscle height at its beginning 3.3, tail muscle height at tail mid-length 2.8, greatest tail height 6.8, oral disc width 1.6. In dorsal view the body is elongated and ovoid and is widest just posterior to the eye. The snout is rounded both in lateral and dorsal views. The interorbital distance is about three times the snout–naris–distance, and the internarial distance is 62.5% of the interorbital distance. The eyes are positioned laterally, directed dorsolaterally, and are slightly visible in ventral view. The external nares are ovoid and round (elongated horizontally), very small, and positioned laterally. They are nearly positioned in the middle between the eyes and snout (naris–eye–distance to snout–naris–distance 106.6%). In lateral view the body is highest at the mid-body length (approximately at the level of the spiracle opening). The body height is 36% of the body length, the body width is about half (55%) the length of the body, and the body height is 65% of the body width. The spiracle is single, sinistral, and attached to the body wall. Its shape is cylindrical and its length is 158% of the eye diameter. The spiracle opening is rounded, directed posteriorly, and located at mid-body with its upper margin reaching the level of the lower margin of the eye in lateral view. The length of the tail represents 70% of the total length. The tail is highest at about mid-tail and represents 31% of the tail length. The greatest tail height is 72% of the body length, and twice the body height. The dorsal fin does not extend onto the body. The dorsal fin is slightly higher than the ventral fin for about two thirds of the anterior tail length. The dorsal and ventral fins are of equal height for the posterior third of the tail. The tip of the tail is pointed and rounded. The height of the tail musculature at mid-body is slightly less than half (41%) of the maximum tail height. The vent tube is dextral, short, posteriorly directed, and linked to the tail musculature. The oral disc (Figs 11B, 12) is anteroventral, not emarginated, 31% of the body width, and bordered at its lateral and posterior margin by a row of short and round papillae. Few submarginal papillae are present laterally and below the third lower tooth row. The LTRF is 1/3(1) with a narrow median gap in P1. The first two tooth rows are about equal in length, occupying nearly the entire width of the oral disc, the third tooth row is slightly shorter, and the shortest is the most posterior one. Jaw sheaths are finely serrated. The upper jaw sheath is inversely U-shaped and the lower V-shaped and narrower.

Figure 11. 

Tadpole of H. jackie (Stage 32, ZFMK 97193) in lateral view (A) and oral disc (B). Drawings by E. Lehr.

Figure 12. 

Oral disc in life of H. jackie (Stage 35, ZFMK 97194). Photo by M. Dehling.

The variation in external morphology of the larval series is limited to size (Table 4) and LTRF. Seven tadpoles differ from the above described LTRF: four had a LTRF of 1/3(1, 2), one of 1/3(1, 2, 3), one of 1/3, and one of 1/1.

Table 4.

Measurements (mm) of 43 larvae of H. jackie. Mean followed by one standard deviation, and range in parentheses for sample sizes larger than 2.

Hyperolius jackie
Stage N Total length Body length Tail length
25 2 16.0, 16.1 5.5, 5.6 10.5, 11.5
26 1 19.6 6.5 13.1
28 2 20.4 7.1 13.3
30 1 25.0 7.3 17.7
31 2 26.4, 31.5 8.5, 9.3 17.9, 22.2
32 2 30.8, 31.5 9.5, 9.7 21.1, 22.0
34 4 31.4–37.6 (33.6 ± 2.9) 10.0–11.4 (10.6 ± 0.6) 20.8–26.2 (23.0 ± 2.5)
35 6 25.8–35.3 (31.2 ± 3.5) 9.4–11.0 (10.0 ± 0.7) 16.1–24.7 (21.2 ± 3.1)
36 4 30.7–36.7 (32.8 ± 2.8) 9.1–11.7 (10.6 ± 1.1) 19.1–25.5 (22.2 ± 2.7)
37 4 35.1–42.2 (38.2 ± 3.1) 10.8–12.1 (11.5 ± 0.7) 24.2–30.2 (26.8 ± 2.5)
38 4 39.5–41.4 (40.1 ± 0.9) 11.7–12.2 (11.9 ± 0.2) 27.4–29.6 (28.2 ± 1.0)
39 1 43.5 12.7 30.8
40 4 38.9–44.2 (41.9 ± 2.2) 11.2–13.5 (12.3 ± 0.9) 27.7–32.0 (29.6 ± 1.9)
41 2 38.1, 43.7 10.9, 12.1 27.2, 31.6

In preservative the larvae are entirely pale grayish brown to tan. The body is darker dorsally compared to the translucent venter. The tail musculature is tan and the fins are translucent, both bearing dark gray melanophores in various degrees.

The coloration in life (Figs 13, 14) of the body was tan dorsally with minute brownish-orange and grayish-green spots and translucent whitish ventrally. The tail musculature was greenish tan and the fins were translucent tan with irregular dark marbling. Dark gray spots and flecks were scattered dorsally and laterally on the body, tail musculature and dorsal fin. The ventral fin has often fewer gray spots and flecks or is identical to the pattern of the dorsal fin (Figs 13A vs. 13C). Younger Gosner stages (e.g., Gosner Stage 25, Fig. 13A) are paler in overall coloration pattern compared to older Gosner stages (e.g., Gosner Stage 30, Fig. 13B). Individuals greatly differ in the amount of gray spots and flecks. Some have few gray spots and flecks scattered on the body and tail (Fig. 13C), whereas others have either numerous spots or flecks (Fig. 14C) or the tail tip can be nearly uniformly black (Fig. 13D). From Gosner stages 38 on, distinct tan or whitish yellow dorsolateral stripes are present on each side extending from the snout to the end of the body. The iris was brownish orange with a few dark gray reticulations.

Figure 13. 

Color variation in life of H. jackie from Karamba (ZFMK 97194) at different Gosner stages. A Stage 25 B Stage 30 C Stage 34 D Stage 35. Photos by M. Dehling.

Figure 14. 

Color variation in life of H. jackie from Karamba (ZFMK 97194) at different Gosner stages. A Stage 36 B Stage 37 C Stage 40 D Stage 40. Photos by M. Dehling.

Differential diagnosis of bog pool tadpoles

In the Nyungwe National Park Hyperolius castaneus and H. jackie tadpoles may co-occur and share the same pool with Leptopelis karissimbensis or L. cf. kivuensis 2. The tadpole of L. karissimbensis has been described in detail before (Roelke et al. 2009), and that of the morphologically similar L. kivuensis briefly in Channing et al. (2012). At any stage the dark pigmented Leptopelis tadpoles are longer (e.g., total length for L. karissimbensis 51.4 mm at Gosner Stage 42 [Roelke et al. 2009], for L. cf. kivuensis 2 52.0 mm at Gonser Stage 39, for Hyperolius castaneus 31.0 mm at Gosner Stage 38, and H. jackie 43.7 mm at Gonser Stage 38) than Hyperolius tadpoles, mainly because of considerably longer tails. The tail fins are shorter in L. karissimbensis and L. kivuensis, and the LTRF in both species is 4(2–4)/3 vs. 1/3(1) in Hyperolius castaneus and H. jackie. Applying morphometrics on tadpoles of Gosner range 30–39, Gosner stage-adjusted body length and tail length and consequently total length differ significantly among species (ANCOVA, F3,81=21.0/67.9/62.3, P<<0.0001: H. castaneus (n = 56; BL = 10.6 mm; TAL = 19.2 mm; TL = 29.8 mm; least square means) < H. jackie (n = 34; BL = 11.5 mm; TAL = 24.7 mm; TL = 36.2 mm) < L. karissimbensis (n = 26; BL = 13.6 mm; TAL = 27.6 mm; TL = 41.2 mm) < L. cf. kivuensis 2 (n = 24; BL = 12.4 mm; TAL = 30.3 mm; TL = 42.6 mm). We have not recorded any differences in external morphology or coloration to distinguish the tadpoles of H. castaneus and H. jackie.

Discussion

Eleven species of Hyperolius (H. castaneus, H. cinnamomeoventris, H. discodactylus, H. frontalis Laurent, 1950, H. glandicolor Peters, 1878, H. kivuensis, H. jackie, H. lateralis, H. parallelus Günther, 1858, H. rwandae Dehling, Sinsch, Rödel & Channing, 2013 in Channing et al. 2013, and H. viridiflavus Duméril & Bibron, 1841) are currently known to occur in Rwanda (Dehling 2012, unpubl. Data, Sinsch et al. 2011, 2012). Four of the Rwandan Hyperolius (H. castaneus, H. discodactylys, H. frontalis, and H. jackie) have been recorded in cloud forests of the Nyungwe National Park (Dehling 2012, unpubl. data), and three (H. castaneus, H. cinnamomeoventris, H. glandicolor [the latter recorded as H. viridiflavus by Roelke and Smith (2010), but species identification was corrected as H. glandicolor by Dehling, unpubl. data.]) in cloud forests of the Volcano National Park (Roelke and Smith 2010). The tadpoles of five species of Rwandan Hyperolius have been described: H. castaneus (this paper), H. kivuensis (Viertel et al. 2007), H. jackie (this paper), H. lateralis (Channing et al. 2012), and H. viridiflavus (Viertel et al. 2007), whereas the tadpole of H. discodactylus and H. frontalis will be described by Dehling and Sinsch in the near future. All five tadpoles share a LTRF of 1/3(1). At Gosner Stage 36 following total lengths (TL) have been reported (mean followed by range in parenthesis): H. castaneus: 31.9 ± 0.9 (30.8–33.0, n = 5); H. jackie: TL = 32.8 ± 2.8 (30.7–36.7, n = 4); H. kivuensis: TL = 34.9 (28.8–40.7, n = 14, Viertel et al. 2007); H. lateralis: unknown, 35 mm length given without stage assignment (Channing et al. 2012); H. viridiflavus: TL = 35.4 (30.0–39.6, n = 38, Viertel et al. 2007). Based on mean TL at this stage, the tadpole of H. viridiflavus is the largest, followed by H. kivuensis, H. jackie, and H. castaneus in descending TL, and unknown for H. lateralis. The external nares are positioned closer to the eyes than to the snout in H. castaneus, and positioned nearly in the middle between the eyes and snout in H. jackie and H. lateralis, whereas the external nares are more closely positioned to the snout than to the eyes in H. kivuensis and H. viridiflavus. Dorsal and ventral fins are about equal in height throughout their length in H. castaneus, whereas the dorsal fin is slightly higher than the ventral fin for about two thirds of the anterior tail length and of equal height for the posterior third, the upper tail fin is larger in height than the lower in H. kivuensis and H. viridiflavus, and condition unknown for H. lateralis. From Gosner stages 38 on, both H. castaneus and H. jackie tadpoles can be differentiated from the other three tadpoles in having distinct tan or whitish yellow dorsolateral stripes on each side extending from the snout to the end of the body. In summary, the observable differences in Hyperolius tadpoles are subtle as expected for cryptic species and some tadpoles (H. lateralis) need further investigations.

Viertel et al. (2007) were the first ones to describe oral disc and buccal cavity morphology in Hyperolius tadpoles and their value for taxonomy. Applying scanning electron microscopy, Viertel et al (2007) noted inter- and intraspecific differences in the types of labial teeth as well as interspecific differences in the buccal cavity. However, such methodology is relatively expensive and time intensive. Regarding external morphology, proportions, coloration and LTRF, Hyperolius tadpoles are very similar with only minor differences, which make species identifications unreliable, especially in areas with high species diversity, syntopic distributions or areas that have not been surveyed. This is the case for both H. castaneus and H. jackie larva, which only differ externally by their size (H. jackie larva are larger). We therefore consider DNA barcoding the most reliable method for identifications of larval Hyperolius, which was already noted by Viertel et al. (2007).

Dipteran predation on arboreal frog eggs in Africa was first described by Vonesh and Ross (2000) for four species of Hyperolius from Uganda. An infestation rate of 40% was recorded within the 1261 observed clutches of Hyperolius lateralis, H. cinnamomeoventris, H. platyceps (Boulenger, 1900), and H. kivuensis. Larvae of ephydrid and phorid flies feed on frog ova and cause high embryonic mortality, and the surviving tadpoles hatch at a smaller size (Vonesh and Ross 2000, Vonesh 2005). Our observation of an infestation of egg mass by larval dipterid flies in H. castaneus is to our knowledge the first record for this species.

With continuing fieldwork in Rwanda and other African countries, we are confident that the knowledge on reproduction, embryogenesis and species diversity of Hyperolius will increase.

Acknowledgements

Permission for field studies, handling and exportation of specimens was issued by the Rwandan Developmental Board RDB (Rwanda) and the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (DRC). Fieldwork by EG in DRC was funded by the Percy Sladen Memorial Fund, an IUCN/SSC Amphibian Specialist Group Seed Grant, K. Reed, M.D., research funds from the Department of Biology at Villanova University, a National Geographic Research and Exploration Grant (no. 8556-08), UTEP and a grant from the National Science Foundation (DEB-1145459); EG thanks field companions C. Kusamba, M. M. Aristote, W. M. Moninga, M. Zigabe, A. M. Marcel, M. Luhumyo, J. and F. Akuku, F. I. Alonda and the late A. M’Mema in DRC. Fieldwork in Uganda was facilitated by Mathias Behangana and the Uganda Wildlife Authority of Kampala. DNA sequencing at UTEP was conducted by A. Betancourt of the UTEP Border Biomedical Research Center Genomic Analysis Core Facility. The Core is supported by grants from the National Center for Q4 Research Resources (5G12RR008124-12) and the National Institute Q5 on Minority Health and Health Disparities (8G12MD007592-12) from the National Institutes of Health. Plant species used for egg deposition were identified by E. Fischer, University of Koblenz-Landau. We thank the reviewers A. Channing, S. Grosjean, A. Ohler, J. Penner, and M.O. Rödel for their helpful comments that improved our manuscript.

References

  • Ahl E (1924) Neue afrikanische Frösche. Zoologischer Anzeiger 61: 99–103.
  • Ahl E (1929) Zur Kenntnis der afrikanischen Baumfrosch-Gattung Leptopelis. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1929: 185–222.
  • Ahl E (1931) Zur Systematik der afrikanischen Arten der Baumfroschgattung Hyperolius (Amph. Anur.). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 17: 1–132.
  • Altig R (1970) A key to the tadpoles of the continental United States and Canada. Herpetologica 26: 180–207.
  • Bocage JVB du (1866) Reptiles nouveaux ou peu recueillis dans les possessions portugaises d l’Afrique occidentale, qui se trouvent au Muséum de Lisbonne. Jornal de Sciências, Mathematicás, Physicas e Naturaes, Lisboa 1: 57–78.
  • Boulenger GA (1900) A list of the batrachians and reptiles of the Gaboon (French Congo), with the descriptions of new genera and species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1900: 433–456.
  • Channing A, Rödel MO, Channing J (2012) Tadpoles of Africa. The biology and identification of all known tadpoles in sub-Saharan Africa. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt/M., 402 pp.
  • Channing A, Hillers A, Lötters S, Rödel MO, Schick S, Conradie W, Rödder D, Mercurio V, Wagner P, Dehling JM, Du Preez LH, Kielgast J, Burger M (2013) Taxonomy of the super-cryptic Hyperolius nasutus group of long reed frogs of Africa (Anura: Hyperoliidae), with descriptions of six new species. Zootaxa 3620: 301–350. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3620.3.1
  • Conradie W, Branch WR, Tolley KA (2013) Fifty shades of grey: giving colour to the poorly known Angolan Ashy reed frog (Hyperoliidae: Hyperolius cinereus), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3635: 201–223. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3635.3.1
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Dehling JM (2012) An African glass frog: a new Hyperolius species (Anura: Hyperoliidae) from Nyungwe National Park, southern Rwanda. Zootaxa 3391: 52–64.
  • Dehling JM, Sinsch U (2013) Diversity of ridged frogs (Anura: Ptychadenidae: Ptychadena spp.) in wetlands of the upper Nile in Rwanda: Morphological, bioacoustic, and molecular evidence. Zoologischer Anzeiger 253: 143–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcz.2013.08.005
  • Dubois A (1987 “1986“) Miscellanea taxinomica batrachologica (I). Alytes 5: 7–95.
  • Duméril AMC, Bibron G (1841) Erpétologie Genérale ou Histoire Naturelle Complète des Reptiles, Volume 8. Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret, France.
  • Fischer E, Hinkel H (1992) Natur Ruandas / La Nature du Rwanda - Einführung in die Flora und Fauna Ruandas und ihre wichtigsten Biotopsysteme. Ministerium des Inneren und für Sport, Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz, 452 pp.
  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identifications. Herpetologica 16: 183–190.
  • Greenbaum E, Sinsch U, Lehr E, Valdez F, Kusamba C (2013) Phylogeography of the reed frog Hyperolius castaneus (Anura: Hyperoliidae) from the Albertine Rift of Central Africa: Implications for taxonomy, biogeography and conservation. Zootaxa 3731: 473–494. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3731.4.3
  • Günther A (1858) Neue Batrachier in der Sammlung des Britischen Museum. Archiv für Naturgeschichte. Berlin 24: 319–328.
  • Hinkel H (1996) Zur Flora und Fauna der Wälder Ruandas/Zentralafrika III. Der Nyungwe-Wald, Teil 2: Kommentierte Artenliste der Herpetofauna des Nyungwe-Waldes mit Neunachweisen. Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv 34: 55–81.
  • Hinkel H, Fischer E (1990) Checklist of amphibians and reptiles of Nyungwe Forest, Rwanda. Tauraco Research Report 3: 135–138.
  • Hinkel H, Fischer E (1995) Zur Flora und Fauna der Wälder Ruandas/ Zentralafrika. III. Der Nyungwe-Wald. Teil 1: Einführung, Geschichte und Sümpfe. Mainzer naturwissenschaftliches Archiv 33: 63–82.
  • Laurent R (1940) Nouveaux batraciens congolais du genre Hyperolius. Revue de zoologie et de botanique africaines, Tervuren 34: 1–7.
  • Laurent R (1950) Diagnoses préliminaires de treize batraciens nouveaux d’Afrique centrale. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines. Tervuren 44: 1–18.
  • Laurent R (1951) Deux reptiles et onze batraciens nouveaux d‘Afrique centrale. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique africaines 44: 360–381.
  • Liedtke HC, Hügli D, Dehling JM, Pupin F, Menegon M, Plumptre AJ, Kujirakwinja D, Loader SP (2014) One or two species? On the case of Hyperolius discodactylus Ahl, 1931 and H. alticola Ahl, 1931 (Anura: Hyperoliidae). Zootaxa 3768: 253–290. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3768.3.2
  • Lötters S, Schick S, Scheelke K, Teege P, Kosuch J, Rotich D, Veith M (2004) Bio-sketches and partitioning of sympatric reed frogs, genus Hyperolius (Amphibia; Hyperoliidae), in two humid tropical African forest regions. Journal of Natural History 38: 1969–1997. doi: 10.1080/00222930310001613584
  • McDiarmid RW, Altig R (Eds) (1999) Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 444 pp.
  • Nieden F (1912, “1913”) Amphibia. In: Friedrichs A, Herzog zu Mecklenburg (Ed.) Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Zentral-Africa-Expedition, 1907–1908. Volume 4. Klinkhardt & Piermann, Leipzig, Germany, 165–196.
  • Noble GK (1924) Contribution of the herpetology of the Belgian Congo based on the collection of the American Museum Congo Expedition, 1909–1915. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 49: 147–347.
  • Orton GL (1953) The systematics of vertebrate larvae. Systematic Zoology 2: 63–75. doi: 10.2307/2411661
  • Peters WCH (1854) Diagnosen neuer Batrachier, welche zusammen mit der früher (24. Juli and 18. August) gegebenen Übersicht der Schlangen und Eidechsen mitgetheilt werden. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1854: 614–628.
  • Peters W (1878) Über die von Hrn. J. M. Hildebrandt während seiner letzten ostafrikanischen Reise gesammelten Säugethiere und Amphibien. Monatsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1878: 194–209.
  • Plumptre AJ, Behangana MB, Davenport TRB, Kahindo C, Kityo R, Ndomba E, Nkuutu D, Owiunji I, Ssegawa P, Eilu G (2003) The biodiversity of the Albertine Rift. Albertine Rift Technical ReportsNo. 3.
  • Portillo F, Greenbaum E, Menegon M, Kusamba C, Dehling JM (2015) Phylogeography and species boundaries of Leptopelis (Anura: Arthroleptidae) from the Albertine Rift. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 82: 75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.024
  • Rödel MO, Sandberger L, Penner J, Mane Y, Hillers A (2010) The taxonomic status of Hyperolius spatzi Ahl, 1931 and Hyperolius nitidulus Peters, 1875 (Amphibia: Anura: Hyperoliidae). Bonn zoological Bulletin 57: 177–188.
  • Roelke CE, Mehdibeigi R, Smith EN (2009) Tadpole of the frog, Leptopelis karissimbensis, from Rwanda (Anura: Arthroleptidae). Journal of Herpetology 43: 362–366. doi: 10.1670/08-177R2.1
  • Roelke CE, Smith EN (2010) Herpetofauna, Parc National des Volcans, North Province, Republic of Rwanda. Check List 6: 525–531.
  • Schiøtz A (1975) The treefrogs of Eastern Africa. Steenstrupia, Copenhagen.
  • Schiøtz A (1999) Treefrogs of Africa. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt/M.
  • Sinsch U, Greenbaum E, Kusamba C, Lehr E (2011) Rapid assessment of montane anuran communities in the Albertine Rift: Hyperolius castaneus Ahl, 1931 as an umbrella species for conservation. African Zoology 46: 320–333. doi: 10.3377/004.046.0211
  • Sinsch U, Lümkemann K, Rosar K, Schwarz S, Dehling JM (2012) Acoustic niche partitioning in an anuran community inhabiting an afromontane wetland (Butare, Rwanda). African Zoology 47: 60–73. doi: 10.3377/004.047.0122
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
  • Tinsley RC, Kobel HR, Fischberg M (1979) The biology and systematics of a new species of Xenopus (Anura: Pipidae) from the highlands of central Africa. Journal of Zoology, London 188: 69–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1979.tb03393.x
  • Vences M, Thomas M, van der Meijden A, Chiari Y, Vieites DR (2005) Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Frontiers in Zoology 2: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-2-5
  • Viertel B, Lötters S, Baumgart A, Oberst M, Eisenbeis G, Veith M (2007) Larval morphology of reed frogs, Hyperolius kivuensis and H. viridiflavus, from western Kenya (Amphibia, Hyperoliidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 114: 825–837. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.80417
  • Vonesh JR (2005) Egg predation and predator-induced hatching plasticity in the African reed frog, Hyperolius spinigularis. Oikos 110: 241–252. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13759.x

Appendix I

Larval specimens examined

Hyperolius castaneus: DR CONGO: North Kivu: Mt. Tshiaberimu, Virunga National Park (S00.12605, E29.43284, 2767 m a.s.l.) collected on 7 July 2008 by E. Greenbaum, C. Kusamba, W. M. Moninga and M. M. Aristote: UTEP 20620 (one tadpole, Gosner Stage 35), UTEP 20621 (one tadpole, Gosner Stage 37); RWANDA: Nyungwe National Park, from a natural pond forming part of the Uwasenkoko swamp (2.529°S, 29.354°E, 2379 m a.s.l.), collected on 22 and 26 March 2012 by J. M. Dehling & U. Sinsch: ZFMK 97191 (series of 51 tadpoles, Gosner stages 25–38), ZFMK 97190 (single tadpole selected from ZFMK 97191, Gosner Stage 29); Nyungwe National Park, from a natural pond at Karamba (2.479°S, 29.112°E, 1936 m a.s.l.), collected on 24 March 2012 by J. M. Dehling & U. Sinsch: ZFMK 97192 (series of 5 tadpoles, Gosner stages 34–41); UGANDA: Muchuya Swamp, Stream (S01.25543, E29.79689, 2200 m a.s.l.) collected on 25 May 2014 by E. Greenbaum, D. F. Hughes and M. Behangana: UTEP 21179 (one tadpole, Gosner Stage 37).

Hyperolius jackie: RWANDA: Nyungwe National Park, from a natural pond at Karamba (2.479°S, 29.112°E, 1936 m a.s.l.), collected on 24 March 2012 by J. M. Dehling & U. Sinsch: ZFMK 97194 (series of 42 tadpoles, Gosner stages 25–41), ZFMK 97193 (single tadpole selected from ZFMK 97194, Gosner Stage 32).

Leptopelis karissimbensis: RWANDA: Nyungwe National Park, from a natural pond forming part of the Uwasenkoko swamp (2.529°S, 29.354°E, 2379 m a.s.l.), collected on 22 and 26 March 2012 by J. M. Dehling & U. Sinsch: ZFMK 97188 (series of 26 tadpoles, Gosner stages 25–39).

Leptopelis cf. kivuensis 2: RWANDA: Nyungwe National Park, from a natural pond at Karamba (2.479°S, 29.112°E, 1936 m a.s.l.), collected on 24 March 2012 by J. M. Dehling & U. Sinsch: ZFMK 97189 (series of 24 tadpoles, Gosner stages 28–39).

login to comment