Research Article
Research Article
An Asiatic Chironomid in Brazil: morphology, DNA barcode and bionomics
expand article infoGizelle Amora, Neusa Hamada, Lívia Maria Fusari§, Vanderly Andrade-Souza
‡ Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil
§ Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Open Access


In most freshwater ecosystems, aquatic insects are dominant in terms of diversity; however, there is a disproportionately low number of records of alien species when compared to other freshwater organisms. The Chironomidae is one aquatic insect family that includes some examples of alien species around the world. During a study on aquatic insects in Amazonas state (Brazil), we collected specimens of Chironomidae that are similar, at the morphological level, to Chironomus kiiensis Tokunaga and Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer, both with distributions restricted to Asia. The objectives of this study were to provide morphological information on this Chironomus population, to investigate its identity using DNA barcoding and, to provide bionomic information about this species. Chironomus DNA barcode data were obtained from GenBank and Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) and, together with our data, were analyzed using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates and the genetic distances were estimated using the Kimura-2-parameter. At the morphological level, the Brazilian population cannot be distinguished either from C. striatipennis or C. kiiensis, configuring a species complex but, at the molecular level our studied population is placed in a clade together with C. striatipennis, from South Korea. Bionomic characteristics of the Brazilian Chironomus population differ from the ones of C. kiiensis from Japan, the only species in this species complex with bionomic information available. The Brazilian Chironomus population has a smaller size, the double of the number of eggs and inhabits oligotrophic water, in artificial container. In the molecular analysis, populations of C. striatipennis and C. kiiensis are placed in a clade, formed by two groups: Group A (which includes populations from both named species, from different Asiatic regions and our Brazilian population) and Group B (with populations of C. kiiensis from Japan and South Korea). Genetic distance between the Brazilian population and specimens in Group A suggests that it was recently introduced in Brazil, and that its country of origin is probably South Korea.


Aquatic insects, non-native species, Amazonas, Chironomus kiiensis, Chironomus striatipennis, sibling species


Alien species represent one of the most serious threats to biodiversity at different taxonomic levels (Mack et al. 2000) including freshwater ecosystems (Gherardi 2007). Human activities have been contributing to the increase and to the strengthening of this process (Lodge 1993) as many species can be transported around the world on human transportation systems such as ships, airplanes and automobiles. Examples include the green crab (Carcinus maenas Linnaeus, 1758), mud crab (Rhithropanopeus harrisii Gould, 1841) and blue mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamark, 1819), which were recorded being transported in ballast tanks (Briski et al. 2012). The Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894)), which is a vector of the dengue viruses, was introduced in several countries through the importation of tires from Asia (Fontenille and Toto 2001).

Despite their dominance in terms of diversity in most freshwater ecosystems, aquatic insects have a disproportionately low number of alien species when compared to other freshwater macroinvertebrates (Karatayev et al. 2009). Exceptions include several examples of recognized alien species of Ephemeroptera (Zimmermann 1957), including one in Brazil, a Baetidae species from Africa reported in Brazil’s Espirito Santo state (Salles et al. 2014).

Among the necessary characteristics for a species to become a successful invasive alien are: phenotypic plasticity, ability for uniparental reproduction and fast growth in disturbed habitats (Kleunen et al. 2010). Additional important characteristics for alien aquatic insects are: generalist feeding (e.g., detritivores), year-round breeding capacity, ability to colonize peri-urban environments and artificial water bodies, and the climatic similarity of invaded and source environments (De Moor 1992). Chironomidae species often have characteristics mentioned above, and cases of successfully introduced Chironomus species have been reported around the world (Jacobsen and Perry 2007, Hribar et al. 2008; Gray et al. 2012).

During a study on aquatic insects in Amazonas state (Brazil), we collected specimens of Chironomidae that were similar, at the morphological level, to Chironomus kiiensis Tokunaga and, we have named it as such (Lacerda et al. 2014). However, Martin (2014) reported that Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer is morphologically similar to C. kiiensis and, that the latter is treated as a junior synonym of C. striatipennis; cytogenetic studies also indicated that both species are included in the pseudothummi-cytocomplex species. Both species have geographic distribution restricted to Asia. Chironomus striatipennis is widely distributed in South and Southeast Asia and it is a common species in rice fields and other wetlands in India (Chaudhuri and Chattopadhyay 1990), while C. kiiensis is reported as the most prevalent species in South Korea and Japan (Ree 1993). The problem is that identification of these species is based, mainly, on their geographical distribution since it is not possible to distinguish them at the morphological level (Martin 2014). This fact results in specimens collected in South and Southeast Asia being identified as C. striatipennis and those collected in South Korea and Japan being identified as C. kiiensis (e.g., Nath and Lakhotia 1989; Yong et al. 1999; Jeong et al. 2004; Nandi et al. 2011).

In view of this complex situation, our objectives were to register a Chironomus population of this Asiatic species complex in Brazil, to provide morphological information on this population, to investigate its identity using DNA barcoding and, to provide bionomic information about this species.


Study area and field collection

Egg masses of the Chironomus Brazilian population were collected in tap water accumulated in a 10 L plastic container, for several days (5th, 6th, 8th, 10th and 14th), in January 2011 in the urban area of Manaus municipality Amazonas, Brazil (03°06'50.17"S, 59°58'30.99"W). The egg masses were placed individually in 80 mL plastic vials, which were labeled with collection information, covered with a screen and observed daily until the larvae hatched and abandoned the gelatinous mass. Larvae from each egg batch were transferred to a plastic tray (19.5×31×6.5 cm) containing burned sand as substrate and 1.5 L of water (pH = 5.9; electrical conductivity of 20.7 µS cm-1). The trays were covered with wooden structures (40×21×32 cm) serving as frames for screens (2 mm mesh), following a model modified from Fonseca and Rocha (2004) for retention of adults and behavioral observations.

Larvae were fed fish food (TETRAMIM®) every 48 hours. The colony established using this collected material was kept in the insect-raising facility at the Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), at environmental conditions similar to those of the climate in Manaus during the months from May to September 2011: temperature of 26 ± 0.3 °C; air humidity of 75 ± 7.7% and photoperiod of 12/12 hours (data obtained from The specimens analyzed in the present study were obtained from this colony.

Species identification based on morphological and molecular analysis

Emerged adults with pupal and larval exuviae from the colony were dissected and mounted on slides with Euparal® following the procedures outlined by Epler (1988). The morphological characteristics analyzed were male genitalia, anal spur and distribution of shagreen in pupae and, in structures present on the larval head capsule (antenna, pectin epipharyngis, premandible, mandible, mentum, labral setae). Comparisons between the Brazilian Chironomus population (n = 40; 10 adult male, 10 adult female, 10 pupae and 10 larvae) and other Chironomus species were made using available species descriptions and related literature (Kieffer 1910; Tokunaga 1936; Chaudhuri et al. 1992; Martin 2014). We also examined specimens of C. striatipennis (n = 4; 1 male adult, 1 pupa and 2 larvae) from India (lent by Dr. Jon Martin, University of Melbourne, Australia) and specimens of C. kiiensis (n = 30; 10 male adult, 5 adult female, 5 pupae and 10 larvae) from Japan (lent by Dr. Masaru Yamamoto, from Yamaguchi Prefecture). The measurements and images presented in this study were obtained using an Olympus compound microscope with a mounted digital photographic camera, model Olympus DP72, using Cell D (Olympus) software and a stereomicroscope (Leica M165C), with Leica software (auto montage, Application Suite V3).

Molecular analyses were done using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue (Qiagen) kit following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Amplifications of the extracted DNA from three specimens (2 larvae and 1 adult male) of the Brazilian Chironomus population were made using primers developed by Folmer et al. (1994) that are specific for the Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) gene in the mitochondrial DNA. The amplified fragments were purified by the EXO-SAP (Exonuclease I-Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase) method and sent to the Centro de Estudo do Genoma Humano (Universidade de São Paulo), where they were sequenced using an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer.

Sequences for 14 Chironomus species and Lipiniella fujiprimus (Sasa, 1985) available at the GenBank and Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) were used in the analysis (accession numbers in Table 1). The alignment and editing of the sequences were done in BioEdit software v.5.0.6 (Hall 1999). A tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates, and genetic distances were estimated using the Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) model in the Mega5 program (Tamura et al. 2011).

Voucher specimens of the Brazilian population are deposited in the Coleção de Invertebrados do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia. Haplotype sequences are deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KJ424334KJ424336.

GenBank and BOLD accession numbers of the sequences from species of Chironomus and Lipiniella fujiprimus included in the analysis.

Species Accession numbers Reference
C. kiiensis JF412086JF412089*;
KC407765*; AB838642AB838646*; JQ350720*; AB740240AB740241*
Kim et al. 2012
C. striatipennis COTW008-08, COTW011-08, COTW012-08, COTW027-10** -
C. balatonicus JN016827* -
C. calligraphus KF278357*;
Proulx et al. 2013
C. columbiensis COTW001-08COTW002-08** -
C. curabilis JN016822* -
C. flaviplumus JF412077* Kim et al. 2012
C. javanus JF412085* Kim et al. 2012
C. nipponensis JN887053* -
C. plumosus JF412198* Kim et al. 2012
C. salinarius KC250756* Kim et al. 2012
C. usenicus JN016819* -
C. xanthus DQ648209* -
L. fujiprimus JF412078* Kim et al. 2012

Biological information

The egg masses were characterized by their shape, length, width and number of eggs; the maximum length and width of eggs were measured. In order to determine the development time of the egg stage, five egg masses were isolated and observed every hour until first instar hatched.

Ten egg masses were isolated to determine the development time of each of the four larval instars; starting from the moment at which the first instar hatched, three larvae were fixed (in 80% ethanol) daily, until the last larva of the egg mass pupated. To identify the instar of each of the fixed larvae; they were mounted between slide and coverslip (using Hoyer as the mounting medium) to measure the ventral length of the head capsule, following the methodology of Strixino (1973). To classify larvae into one of the four larval instars, the measurements obtained were subjected to a frequency-distribution analysis; each peak in the graph indicates a larval instar (Strixino 1973). The development time of each instar was determined based on the size limits of each larval instar obtained in the frequency-distribution graph and the day when they were preserved. The development time of each larval instar was determined by combining information gathered from the frequency distribution graph with the measurements of the head capsule of the larvae collected daily.

To estimate pupal development time, 50 pupae were observed every 12 hours from the moment of pupation until adult emergence. Longevity of adults was estimated using 50 adults that emerged in the laboratory on the same day; these were isolated in pairs (male and female) in cages made of PET bottles and observed until there were no more survivors.


Morphological analysis

The morphology of the Brazilian Chironomus population (adult, pupal and larval) is identical to that presented in the original descriptions of C. striatipennis and of C. kiiensis (Kieffer 1910; Tokunaga 1936), and in other taxonomic papers on these two species (Chaudhuri et al. 1992; Martin 2014), it being impossible to distinguish them from each other morphologically. The examined specimens of C. striatipennis (Fig. 1A, D, G) from India and of C. kiiensis (Fig. 1B, E, H) from Japan were also morphologically indistinguishable from the Brazilian Chironomus population (Fig. 1C, F, I).

Figure 1.

Adult male and pupae. Chironomus striatipennis, Indian population. A Wing D Hypopygium, dorsal view G Anal spur, dorsal view. Chironomus kiiensis, Japanese population B Wing E Hypopygium, dorsal view H Anal spur, dorsal view. Chironomus striatipennis, Brazilian population C Wing F Hypopygium, dorsal view I Anal spur, dorsal view. Scale bar: 500 µm (A, B, C, G, H, I); 200 µm (D, E, F).

Molecular analysis

In the neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 2), we observed that the Brazilian Chironomus population (C. sp1BRA, C. sp2BRA and C. sp3BRA) grouped, with 94% bootstrap support, with others specimens of C. striatipennis and of C. kiiensis from different regions of East Asia. The analysis resulted in two groups, each with 100% bootstrap support, which we named “Group A” and “Group B”. Group A is composed of the Brazilian Chironomus population and specimens identified as C. kiiensis from South Korea and Japan and C. striatipennis from Malaysia and India. Group B included specimens identified as C. kiiensis, also from South Korea and Japan.

Figure 2.

NJ tree based on the COI sequences of the mtDNA of Chironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) species. The sequence of Lipiniella fujiprimus was used as the outgroup. Bootstrap values > 50% are shown on branches. Accession numbers and countries are provided beside the species names. Species flagged with an asterisk (*) are neotropical species. Brazilian Chironomus population: C. sp1BRA; C. sp2BRA; C. sp3BRA

Chironomus species from other regions, including the three specimens from Brazil, were included in a distinct clade (Fig. 2). Considering that Groups A and B represent monophyletic groups, based on the intraspecific genetic distance between their members, we observe that in Group A the genetic distance varied from 0.0 to 3.3%, while in Group B the distance varied from 0.6 to 2.0% (Table 2). The average genetic distance between sequences from Groups A and B was 9.6% (Table 3), and within each group the average genetic distance was 1.3%.

Genetic distance between Groups A and B and other Chironomus species based on the COI gene in the mtDNA. Values in bold in the first two lines indicate genetic distance within each group, and in the remaining lines bold values indicate intraspecific genetic distances. Analyses were conducted using Kimura-2-parameter model.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Group A 1.3
2. Group B 9.6 1.3
3. C. nipponensis 17.0 15.6
4. C. plumosus 17.2 19.5 12.0
5. C. flaviplumus 14.4 13.3 13.5 17.9
6. C. javanus 13.3 13.6 15.4 16.7 15.0
7. C. curabilis 17.2 17.0 11.0 5.5 16.3 17.4
8. C. usenicus 16.5 17.5 10.5 3.1 16.8 17.2 4.0
9. C. balatonicus 18.2 17.2 12.0 8.8 16.1 16.5 8.4 8.2
10. C. salinarius 17.9 15.7 15.4 18.7 15.1 18.3 16.4 17.0 18.4
11. C. calligraphus 14.8 16.1 16.1 17.2 12.1 15.5 17.2 16.2 16.3 17.0 1.8
12. C. columbiensis 13.7 12.2 14.3 15.7 11.7 13.8 15.6 15.0 16.6 16.6 12.3 1.2
13. C. stigmateus 16.9 15.6 16.1 18.6 16.2 15.3 17.0 17.6 19.6 15.7 17.5 15.7
14. C. xanthus 10.5 10.6 10.1 5.9 13.8 9.4 7.4 6.7 6.5 12.3 9.7 10.5 13.8

Pairwise per cent nucleotide differences (p-distance) between all specimens based on the COI gene in the mtDNA. Analyses were conducted using the Kimura-2-parameter model. Values in bold are genetic distances between Groups A and B.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1. C. sp1BRA
2. C. sp2BRA 0.0
3. C. sp3BRA 0.0 0.0
4. C. kiiensis_JF412086_South_Korea 0.8 0.8 0.8
5. C. kiiensis_JF412087_South_Korea 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0
6. C. kiiensis_JF412089_South_Korea 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0
7. C. kiiensis_KC407765_South_Korea 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
8. C. kiiensis_JF412088_South_Korea 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
9. C. kiiensis_AB740241_Japan 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
10. C. kiiensis_AB838643_Japan 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.5
11. C. kiiensis_AB838645_Japan 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.1
12. C. kiiensis_AB838646_Japan 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.2 0.2
13. C. striatipennis_COTW008_Japan 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.1 0.0 0.2
14. C. striatipennis_COTW011_India 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.3 2.6 2.8 2.6
15. C. striatipennis_COTW012_India 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.4 1.3
16. C. striatipennis_COTW027_Malaysia 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 3.1 2.0 1.9 2.0 3.3 2.8
17. C. kiiensis_AB740240_Japan 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.7 9.1 9.2 9.1 10.4 10.0 9.6
18. C. kiiensis_AB838642_Japan 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.9 9.2 9.4 9.2 10.3 9.8 9.9 0.6
19. C. kiiensis_AB838644_Japan 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.6 9.6 10.3 9.4 9.6 9.4 10.1 9.6 9.9 0.6 0.6
20. C. kiiensis_JQ350720_South_Korea 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.3 9.9 11.2 10.1 9.9 10.1 11.1 10.7 10.3 1.9 2.2 2.0

Within Group A there are three specimens of C. striatipennis from Malaysia and India with a mean genetic divergence of 2.6%, a higher value considering that the mean divergence between the remaining group members was 0.6% (Table 3). The mean genetic distance between Groups A, B and other Chironomus species, including Neotropical species, was 15.6%, ranging from 10.5 to 19.5% (Table 3).

Biological information

Egg masses of the Brazilian Chironomus population were found attached by a stem in the wall of a plastic tray with water. The egg masses measured 16.6 mm (SD = 3.1; n = 5) in length and 1.59 mm (SD = 0.04; n = 5) in width (median region). Each mass contained an average of 600 eggs (SD = 104; n = 5). The eggs were elliptical in shape and measured, on average, 0.24 mm (SD = 0.02; n = 50) in length and 0.10 mm (SD = 0.01; n = 50) in width. The mean incubation time of the eggs was two days (SD = 0.5; n = 50) at 26 °C, with a hatching rate of 89.9%. The eggs were distributed in a pseudo-spiral pattern, in alternate parallel rows along the primary axis of the gelatinous mass (Fig. 3A) and eggs were eliptic format (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Chironomus striatipennis, Brazilian population. A Egg mass B Egg.

The four instars of the Brazilian Chironomus population were well defined using the ventral length of the head capsule. Mean length of the head capsule of the 1st-instar is 54.7 µm (SD = 4.2; n = 81); the 2nd 93.7 µm (SD = 4.5; n = 53); the 3rd 157.1 µm (SD = 7.2; n = 67) and the 4th 257.6 µm (SD = 16.7; n = 316) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Frequency of occurrence of the ventral length of the cephalic capsule of a Brazilian Chironomus population (Diptera: Chironomidae) showing the four larval instars.

Development times of the 1st (SD = 0.6; n = 81), 2nd (SD = 1.0; n = 53) and 3rd instars (SD = 1.1; n = 67) were similar, each averaging three days; the 4th instar was the longest, with mean development time of 10 days (SD = 2.5; n = 316). Mean time for complete larval stage development was 19 days (SD = 5.2; n = 517). Mean development time for the pupal stage, at 26 °C, was two days (SD = 0.24, n = 50). The life span of adults, on average, at 26 °C, was three days for both males (SD = 0.70, n = 50) and females (SD = 0.65, n = 50). Development time of the Brazilian Chironomus population from the time larvae hatch to the adult stage was 27 days at 26°C. The emergence percentage was 42.9% for females and 57.1% for males.


Species identification

High morphological similarities observed between the Brazilian Chironomus population and both C. striatipennis and C. kiiensis (Kieffer 1910; Tokunaga 1936) corroborate the studies that reported the difficulty in distinguishing the latter two species at the morphological level, including the one that proposed C. kiiensis as a synonym of C. striatipennis (Martin 2014). However, cytotaxonomic studies have indicated that they are sibling species that belong to the same cytocomplex (Martin 2014). Our molecular analysis showed that both species names have been applied to specimens with high genetic divergence, and that the identification based on geographical distribution, which is currently in common usage to circumscribe both species (e.g., Nath and Lakhotia 1989; Yong et al. 1999; Jeong et al. 2004; Nandi et al. 2011), is not a good taxonomic practice.

Studies on the genetic intraspecific divergence in some Chironomidae genera have reported values between 0.5 and 2.3% (Sinclair and Gresens 2008; Silva et al. 2013; Proulx et al. 2013; Trivinho-Strixino et al. 2012). Similar values were observed in studies on other insects, including some Diptera families (e.g., Beckenbach and Borkent 2003; Hamada et al. 2010; Hernández-Triana et al. 2012). Although Silva et al. (2013) attributed low intraspecific divergence (mean 0.91%) to the specimens having been collected in the same place, our results and other studies, for example, with Lepidoptera and Simuliidae, do not corroborate this hypothesis (e.g., Hebert et al. 2004; Hernández-Triana et al. 2012).

The interspecific genetic divergence observed in our data is in accordance with results for other groups of Chironomidae and other aquatic Diptera families, with values around 15% (Beckenbach and Borkent 2003; Sinclair and Gresens 2008; Proulx et al. 2013; Silva et al. 2013), corroborating the hypothesis that Groups A and B represents at least two distinct species. Group A is composed of specimens identified as C. striatipennis and C. kiiensis from different regions of Asia. Within this group, there are three specimens identified as C. striatipennis from Malaysia and India (the country where this species was described) with high genetic divergence (mean 2.62%) when compared to other members in Group A (Table 3.). This fact might be an indication of the presence of two sibling species in Group A. But, since we have no detailed information on the morphology of all life stages of the populations included in Group A, we suggest that this group should be treated as a species complex. Based on ICNZ rules (Principle of Priority – Article 23.3), and as encouraged by Martin (2014), we named Group A as the C. striatipennis species complex.

The large genetic distance (mean 9%) between Group B specimens (composed of specimens identified as C. kiiensis from Japan and South Korea) and Group A is a clear indication that each clade represents a distinct species. This is also corroborated by the genetic distance observed between specimens in each species group (maximum = 3.3%), and by the interspecific genetic distance values reported by other studies. For example, a study on three Podonomus populations observed that the genetic distances between them were greater than 7%, indicating the presence of three species (Trivinho-Strixino et al. 2012). Since C. kiiensis was described from Japan, we hypothesized that the specimens in Group B may represent this species. On the other hand, because of the lack of information on the morphology of all life stages of these populations, and based on genetic information obtained from GenBank for specimens collected near the type locality of C. kiiensis, we choose do not propose any name for Group B specimens.

The placement of the Brazilian Chironomus population in Group A and its small genetic distance from South Korean specimens (0.8%) indicates that this might represents a recently introduced species in Brazil, probably, from a population from South Korea. This could have occurred due to the fact that Manaus is located in a port zone, receiving many cargo ships from different continents, including Asia, due to the presence of industries in the Manaus Tax-Free Zone (SUFRAMA). We therefore assume that specimens of the Brazilian Chironomus species arrived in Brazil by ship. Other exotic species have been entering the country by this way, perhaps using ballast water or some other source of standing water (e.g. Santos and Lamonica 2008; Brodin and Anderson 2009; Raunio et al. 2009; Jensen 2010).

Biological information

Environmental conditions where the Brazilian Chironomus population and the Japanese C. kiiensis population were collected were different: the Brazilian population was observed inhabiting oligotrophic water and the Japonese population eutrophic water (Inoue et al. 2008; Al-Shami et al. 2010). The Brazilian Chironomus population has double the number of eggs (~ 600 eggs) compared to C. kiiensis from Japan, although they were reared at similar water temperatures (25–26 °C), feeding methodology and food type were not the same (Maeda and Yano 1988). Larval development time of the Brazilian Chironomus population was shorter (10 days) than that of the Japanese C. kiiensis population (14–20 days) (Nandi et al. 2011). Development times of the 1st, 2nd and the 3rd instars of the Brazilian Chironomus population was shorter than that of the 4th instar, as has also been observed in other Chironomus species (Fonseca and Rocha 2004; Zilli et al. 2008). The 4th instar’s long larval development time is probably due to the greatest body growth occurring in this period (Tokeshi 1995), as well the production and maturation of the oocytes (Strixino and Trivinho-Strixino 1985).

The size of last-instar larvae, represented by the ventral length of the head capsule, of the Brazilian Chironomus population was smaller than that of the Japanese C. kiiensis population (Maeda and Yano 1998). Male survival time of the Brazilian Chironomus population under laboratory conditions was shorter (three days) than in the Japanese C. kiiensis population at similar air temperature (25 °C) (Maeda and Yano 1988; Nandi et al. 2011). Environmental conditions can have an effect on species biology and information in this area is important for characterizing the habitat of each species in a species complex and can help to delimit each species in the complex.

Concluding remarks

In this study we addressed the taxonomic problem involving the species named C. striatipennis and C. kiiensis from Asia, since these names have been used for specimens morphologically similar and closely related. Regional variation among Asian populations of the two above mentioned species was observed, but only at molecular level, based on the genetic distance estimated using a partial COI sequence. We hypothesize that these two names encompass at least two, and perhaps three, species, based on sequences deposited in GenBank and BOLD. We indicated that the usual way to identify these two species, which are practically indistinguishable at the morphological level, based on geographical distribution is not a feasible approach, since specimens identified with the same name (C. kiiensis) from Japan and South Korea have highly genetic divergent (genetic distance of 9%). A detailed study, including the morphology of all life stages and a multilocus molecular analysis of populations from the entire distribution needs to be done to solve this taxonomic problem. The presence of an Asiatic Chironomus in Brazil might be the consequence of human globalization, where fast and easy global transportation systems are available to any organisms with the minimum characteristics of alien species. This example also demonstrates that the geographic limits of species cannot be considered in isolation, but rather need to be examined from a broad perspective to avoid mistakes.


Financial support was provided by PRONEX-CNPq/FAPEAM, INCT/ADAPTA, MCTI/INPA/PCI and a master’s scholarship provided by CAPES to the first author. We thank Dr. Jon Martin (University of Melbourne) and Dr. Masaru Yamamoto (Yamaguchi Prefecture) for sending specimens that allowed certification of species identities. Jeferson O. da Silva, Renato Tavares and Cláudio Monteiro Jr. helped in the fieldwork. We thank Natsumi H. Fearnside and Philip Fearnside for the English translation and revision. NH is a CNPq research fellow. VAS is a FAPEAM-CNPq DCR fellow. LMF was supported by a Visiting Expert Grant from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (PCI-CNPq/ MCTI/ INPA program).


  • Al-Shami SA, Rawi CSM, Ahmad AH, Nor SAM (2010) Distribution of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) in polluted rivers of the Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Sciences 22(11): 1718–1727. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60311-9
  • Beckenbach AT, Borkent A (2003) Molecular analysis of the biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 2. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27: 21–35. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00395-0
  • Brodin Y, Andersson MH (2009) The marine splash midge Telmatogon japonicus (Diptera; Chironomidae)—extreme and alien? Biological Invasions 11: 1311–1317. doi: 10.1007/s10530-008-9338-7
  • Briski E, Ghabooli S, Bailey S, MacIsaac H (2012) Invasion risk posed by macroinvertebrates transported in ships’ ballast tanks. Biological Invasions 14: 1843–1850. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0194-0
  • Chaudhuri PK, Chattopadhyay S (1990) Chironomids of the rice paddy areas of West Bengal, India (Diptera, Chironomidae). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 133(2): 149–195.
  • Chaudhuri PK, Das SK, Sublette JE (1992) Indian species of genus Chironomus Meigen (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zoologische Jahrbuecher Jena Systematik 119: 1–51. doi: 10.1080/00359199209520259
  • De Moor FC (1992) Factors influencing the establishment of aquatic insect invaders. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 48: 141–158.
  • Epler JH (1988) Biosystematics of the genus Dicrotendipes Kieffer, 1913 (Diptera: Chironomidae: Chironominae) of the world. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society 36: 1–214.
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3(5): 294–299.
  • Fonseca AL, Rocha O (2004) Laboratory cultures of the native species Chironomus xanthus Rempel, 1939 (Diptera-Chironomidae). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 16(2): 153–161.
  • Fontenille D, Toto JC (2001) Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse), a potential new Dengue vector in southern Cameroon. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(6): 1066–1067.
  • Gherardi F (2007) Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview. In: Gherardi F (Ed.) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht, 3–25. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8_1
  • Gray EW, Royals C, Epler JH, Wyatt RD, Brewer B, Noblet R (2012) Chironomus calligraphus (Diptera: Chironomidae), a new pest species in Georgia. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 28: 258–259. doi: 10.2987/12-6252R.1
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
  • Hamada N, Pepinelli M, Mattos-Glória A, Luz SLB (2010) A new black fly species from Brazil, closely related to Simulium guianense Wise (Diptera, Simuliidae), revealed by morphology and DNA barcoding. Zootaxa 2428: 22–36.
  • Hernández-Triana LM, Crainey JL, Hall A, Fatih F, Mackenzie-Dodds J, Shelley AJ, Zhou X, Post RJ, Gregory TR, Hebert PDN (2012) DNA barcodes reveal cryptic genetic diversity within the blackfly subgenus Trichodagmia Enderlein (Diptera: Simuliidae: Simulium) and related taxa in the New World. Zootaxa 3514: 43–69.
  • Inoue E, Kimura G, Hirabayashi K (2008) Chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) attracted to vending machines in the middle reach of the Shinano River, Japan. In: Robinson WH, Bajomi D (Eds) Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Urban Pests, OOK-Pr. Kft., Veszprém, 177–185.
  • Jensen KR (2010) NOBANIS - Marine invasive species in Nordic waters - Fact Sheet: Telmatogeton japonicus. In: Identification key to marine invasive species in Nordic waters – NOBANIS. [accessed February 5, 2015]
  • Jeong KY, Yum HY, Lee IY, Ree HI, Hong CS, Kim DS, Yong TS (2004) Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Tropomyosin, a Major Allergen of Chironomus kiiensis, a Dominant Species of Nonbiting Midges in Korea. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 11(2): 320–324. doi: 10.1128/cdli.11.2.320-324.2004
  • Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK, Mastitsky SE, Olenin S (2009) Invaders are not a random selection of species. Biological Invasions 11: 2009–2019. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9498-0
  • Kieffer JJ (1910) Etude sur les Chironomides des Indes Orientales, avec description de quelques nouvelles espe`ces d’Egypte. Memoirs of the Indian Museum 2: 181–242.
  • Kim S, Song KH, Ree HI, Kim W (2012) A DNA barcode library for Korean Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) and indexes for defining barcode gap. Molecular Cells 33(1): 9–17. doi: 10.1007/s10059-012-2151-2
  • Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters 13(8): 947–958. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01503.x
  • Lacerda ACF, Gusmão GA, Hamada N (2014) Tests of Chronic and Acute Toxicity of Crude Oil on larvae of Chironomus kiiensis Tokunaga (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the Brazilian Amazon. Brazilian Journal of Biology 74(3): 70–77. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.24012
  • Maeda M, Yano K (1988) Biology of Chironomus kiiensis Tokunaga (Diptera: Chironomidae). Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University 36: 37–47.
  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689–710. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2
  • Nandi S, Aditya G, Saha G (2011) Life history study of Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae). Oriental Insects 45(2–3): 186–193. doi: 10.1080/00305316.2011.647464
  • Nath BB, Lakhotia SC (1989) Heat-shock response in a tropical Chironomus: seasonal variation in response and the effect of developmental stage and tissue type on heat shock protein synthesis. Genome 32: 676–686. doi: 10.1139/g89-498
  • Proulx I, Martin J, Carew M, Hare L (2013) Using various lines of evidence to identify Chironomus species in eastern Canadian lakes. Zootaxa 3741: 401–458. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3741.4.1
  • Raunio J, Paasivirta L, Brodin Y (2009) Marine midge Telmatogeton japonicus Tokunaga (Diptera: Chironomidae) exploiting brackish water in Finland. Aquatic Invasions 4: 405–408. doi: 10.3391/ai.2009.4.2.20
  • Ree HI (1993) Breeding places of non-biting midges (Chironomidae, Diptera) in Korea. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 23: 169–176.
  • Salles FF, Gattolliat JL, Angeli KB, De-Souza MR, Gonçalves IC, Nessimian JL, Sartori M (2014) Discovery of an alien species of mayfly in South America (Ephemeroptera). ZooKeys 399: 1–16. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.399.6680
  • Santos JGAS, Lamonica MN (2008) Água de lastro e bioinvasão: introdução de espécies exóticas associada ao processo de mundialização. Vértices 10(1): 141–152. doi: 10.5935/1809-2667.20080012
  • Silva FL, Ekrem T, Fonseca-Gessner AA (2013) DNA barcodes for species delimitation in Chironomidae (Diptera): a case study on the genus Labrundinia. The Canadian Entomologist 145(6): 589–602. doi: 10.4039/tce.2013.44
  • Sinclair CS, Gresens SE (2008) Discrimination of Cricotopus sp. (Diptera: Chironomidae) with mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase I sequences. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98: 555–563. doi: 10.1017/S0007485308005865
  • Strixino G, Trivinho-Strixino S (1985) A temperatura e o desenvolvimento larval de Chironomus sancticaroli (Diptera: Chironomidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 3(4): 177–180.
  • Strixino ST (1973) A largura da cabeça na determinação das fases larvais de Chironomidae na Represa do Lobo. Master’s dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, 149 pp.
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
  • Tokeshi M (1995) Life cycles and population dynamics. In: Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LCV (Eds) The Chironomidae: Biology and Ecology of Non biting Midges. Chapman and Hall, London, 225–250. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0715-0_10
  • Tokunaga M (1936) Chironomidae from Japan (Diptera), VIII. New species and a new variety of the genus Chironomus Meigen. Philippine Journal of Science 60: 71–84.
  • Trivinho-Strixino S, Pepinelli M, Siqueira T, Roque FO (2012) DNA barcoding of Podonomus (Chironomidae, Podonominae) enables stage association of a named species and reveals hidden diversity in Brazilian inselbergs. Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology 48: 411–423. doi: 10.1051/limn/2012032
  • Yong TS, Lee JS, Lee IY, Park SJ, Park GM, Ree HI, Park JW, Hong CS, Park HS (1999) Identification of Chironomus kiiensis allergens, a dominant species of non-biting midges in Korea. The Korean Journal of Parasitology 37(3): 171–179. doi: 10.3347/kjp.1999.37.3.171
  • Zilli FL, Montalto L, Paggi AC, Marchese MR (2008) Biometry and life cycle of Chironomus calligraphus Goeldi, 1905 (Diptera, Chironomidae) in laboratory conditions. Interciência 33(10): 767–770.
  • Zimmermann EC (1957) Volume 6 Ephemeroptera-Neuroptera-Trichoptera and supplement to volumes 1 to 5. Insects of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 212 pp.