Research Article |
Corresponding author: Bin Wang ( wangbin@cib.ac.cn ) Corresponding author: Shize Li ( 976722439@qq.com ) Academic editor: Anthony Herrel
© 2020 Haijun Su, Shengchao Shi, Yanqing Wu, Guangrong Li, Xiaogang Yao, Bin Wang, Shize Li.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Su H, Shi S, Wu Y, Li G, Yao X, Wang B, Li S (2020) Description of a new horned toad of Megophrys Kuhl & Van Hasselt, 1822 (Anura, Megophryidae) from southwest China. ZooKeys 974: 131-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.974.56070
|
A new species of the genus Megophrys is described from Guizhou Province, China. Molecular phylogenetic analyses supported the new species as an independent clade nested into the Megophrys. The new species could be distinguished from its congeners by a combination of the following characters: body size moderate (SVL 49.3–58.2 mm in males); vomerine ridges present distinctly, vomerine teeth present; tongue feebly notched behind; tympanum distinctly visible, oval; two metacarpal tubercles in hand; toes with one-third webbing and wide lateral fringes; heels overlapped when thighs are positioned at right angles to the body; tibiotarsal articulation reaching the level between tympanum and eye when leg stretched forward; an internal single subgular vocal sac present in male; in breeding male, the nuptial pads with large and sparse black nuptial spines present on the dorsal bases of the first two fingers.
China, molecular phylogenetic analysis, morphology, new species, taxonomy
The toad genus Megophrys Kuhl & Van Hasselt, 1822 (Anura; Megophryidae) is widely distributed in eastern and central China, throughout southeastern Asia, and extending to the islands of the Sunda Shelf and the Philippines (
The genus Megophrys currently contains 106 species, of which 50 species have been described in the last decade (
During field surveys in the Huanglian Nature Reserve, Tongzi County, and Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve, Suiyang County in Guizhou Province, China, we collected a number of Megophrys specimens. Molecular phylogenetic analyses, morphological comparisons, and bioacoustics data support it as an undescribed species.
A total of nine molecular samples were collected in this study: five adult males of the undescribed species from two localities of Guizhou Province, China, two M. sangzhiensis and two M. spinata (Table
Sampling localities of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov., M. sangzhiensis and M. spinata in China. 1. Huanglian Nature Reserve, Tongzi County, Guizhou Province; 2. Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve, Suiyang County, Guizhou Province; 3. Badagong Mountain, Hunan Province, China; 4. Leigong Mountain, Guizhou Province.
Total DNA was extracted using a standard phenol-chloroform extraction protocol (
Information for samples used in molecular phylogenetic analyses in this study.
ID | Species | Voucher number | Locality | GenBank accession number | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16S | COI | ||||
1 | Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20190608015 | Huanglian Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MT651553 | MT654520 |
2 | Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20190608017 | Huanglian Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MT651554 | MT654521 |
3 | Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20160715003 | Huanglian Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MT651555 | MT654522 |
4 | Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBKKS20180722002 | Huanglian Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MT651556 | MT654523 |
5 | Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBKKS20180722001 | Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MT651557 | MT654524 |
6 | Megophrys sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062005 | Badagongshan Nature Reserve, Hunan, China | MT651558 | MT654525 |
7 | Megophrys sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062008 | Badagongshan Nature Reserve, Hunan, China | MT651559 | MT654526 |
8 | Megophrys sangzhiensis | SYSa004307 | Zhangjiajie, Hunan, China | MH406798 | MH406260 |
9 | Megophrys spinata | CIBLS20190801001 | Leigong Shan, Guizhou, China | MT651551 | MT654518 |
10 | Megophrys spinata | CIBLS20190801002 | Leigong Shan, Guizhou, China | MT651552 | MT654519 |
11 | Megophrys spinata | SYSa002227 | Leigong Shan, Guizhou, China | MH406676 | MH406116 |
12 | Megophrys binlingensis | KIZ025807 | Wawu Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811852 | KX812115 |
13 | Megophrys binlingensis | SYSa005313 | Wawu Shan, Sichuan, China | MH406892 | MH406354 |
14 | Megophrys binlingensis | SYSa005314 | Wawu Shan, Sichuan, China | MH406893 | MH406355 |
15 | Megophrys binchuanensis | KIZ019441 | Jizu Shan, Yunnan, China | KX811849 | KX812112 |
16 | Megophrys palpebralespinosa | KIZ011603 | Pu Hu Nature Reserve, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam | KX811888 | KX812137 |
17 | Megophrys omeimontis | KIZ025765 | Emei Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811884 | KX812136 |
18 | Megophrys angka | KIZ040591 | Kiew Mae Pan nature trail, Chiang Mai, Thailand | MN508052 | – |
19 | Megophrys wuliangshanensis | KIZ046812 | Huangcaoling, Yunnan, China | KX811881 | KX812129 |
20 | Megophrys daweimontis | KIZ048997 | Dawei Shan, Yunnan, China | KX811867 | KX812125 |
21 | Megophrys jingdongensis | KIZ-LC0805067 | Huanglianshan National Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China | KX811872 | KX812131 |
22 | Megophrys fansipanensis | VNMN 2018.01 | Lao Cai, Sa Pa, Vietnam | MH514886 | – |
23 | Megophrys hoanglienensis | VNMN 2018.02 | Lao Cai, Sa Pa, Vietnam | MH514889 | – |
24 | Megophrys minor | KIZ01939 | Qingcheng Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811896 | KX812145 |
25 | Megophrys jiangi | CIBKKS20180722006 | Kuankuosui Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MN107743 | MN107748 |
26 | Megophrys chishuiensis | CIBCS20190518031 | Chishui Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China | MN954707 | MN928958 |
27 | Megophrys dongguanensis | SYS a001972 | Yinping Shan, Guangdong, China | MK524098 | MK524129 |
28 | Megophrys nankunensis | SYS a004498 | Nankun Shan, Guangdong, China | MK524108 | MK524139 |
29 | Megophrys cheni | SYS a001427 | Jinggang Shan, Jiangxi, China | KJ560391 | – |
30 | Megophrys obesa | SYS a002272 | Heishiding Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China | KJ579122 | – |
31 | Megophrys ombrophila | KRM18 | Wuyishan, Fujian, China | KX856404 | – |
32 | Megophrys wugongensis | SYS a002610 | Wugongshan Scenic Area, Jiangxi, China | MK524114 | MK524145 |
33 | Megophrys lini | SYS a002370 | Suichuan, Jiangxi, China | KJ560412 | – |
34 | Megophrys xiangnanensis | SYS a002874 | Yangming Shan, Hunan, China | MH406713 | MH406165 |
35 | Megophrys nanlingensis | SYS a001959 | Nanling Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China | MK524111 | MK524142 |
36 | Megophrys kuatunensis | SYS a001579 | Wuyi Shan, Fujian, China | KJ560376 | – |
37 | Megophrys jinggangensis | KIZ07132 | Chashan Forest Farm, Jiangxi, China | KX811840 | KX812108 |
38 | Megophrys lishuiensis | WYF00169 | Lishui, Zhejiang, China | KY021418 | – |
39 | Megophrys xianjuensis | CIBXJ190505 | Xianju, Zhejiang, China | MN563753 | MN563769 |
40 | Megophrys wushanensis | KIZ045469 | Guangwu Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811838 | KX812094 |
41 | Megophrys baolongensis | KIZ019216 | Baolong, Chongqing, China | KX811813 | KX812093 |
42 | Megophrys leishanensis | CIBLS20171101001 | Leigong Shan, Guizhou, China | MK005310 | MK005306 |
43 | Megophrys yangmingensis | SYS a002877 | Yangming Shan, Hunan, China | MH406716 | MH406168 |
44 | Megophrys shimentaina | SYS a002077 | Shimentai Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China | MH406655 | MH406092 |
45 | Megophrys jiulianensis | SYS a002107 | Jiulian Shan, Jiangxi, China | MK524099 | MK524130 |
46 | Megophrys shunhuangensis | HNNU16SH02 | Shunhuang Mountains, Hunan, China | MK836037 | – |
47 | Megophrys mirabilis | SYS a002192 | Huaping Nature Reserve, Guangxi, China | MH406669 | MH406109 |
48 | Megophrys tuberogranulata | Tissue ID: YPX10987 | Badagongshan Nature Reserve, Hunan, China | KX811823 | KX812095 |
49 | Megophrys huangshanensis | KIZ022004 | Huang Shan, Anhui, China | KX811821 | KX812107 |
50 | Megophrys boettgeri | Tissue ID: YPXJK033 | Wuyi Shan, Fujian, China | KX811814 | KX812104 |
51 | Megophrys liboensis | GNUG:20160408003 | Libo, Guizhou, China | MF285262 | – |
52 | Megophrys mufumontana | SYS a006391 | Mufu Shan, Hunan, China | MK524105 | MK524136 |
53 | Megophrys brachykolos | ROM 16634 | Hong Kong, China | KX811897 | KX812150 |
54 | Megophrys acuta | SYS a001957 | Heishiding Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China | KJ579118 | – |
55 | Megophrys gerti | ITBCZ 1108 | Nui Chua National Park, Ninh Thuan, Vietnam | KX811917 | KX812161 |
56 | Megophrys elfina | ZMMU ABV-00454 | Bidoup Mountain, Lam Dong, Vietnam | KY425379 | – |
57 | Megophrys synoria | FMNH 262778 | O’Reang, Mondolkiri, Cambodia | KY022198 | – |
58 | Megophrys hansi | KIZ010360 | Phong Dien Nature Reserve, Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam | KX811913 | KX812155 |
59 | Megophrys microstoma | KIZ048799 | Xiaoqiaogou Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China | KX811914 | KX812156 |
60 | Megophrys pachyproctus | KIZ010978 | Beibeng, Xizang, China | KX811908 | KX812153 |
61 | Megophrys baluensis | ZMH A13125 | Gunung Kinabalu National Park, Kogopan Trail, Malaysia | KJ831310 | – |
62 | Megophrys stejnegeri | KU 314303 | Pasonanca Natural Park, Zamboanga, Philippines | KX811922 | KX812052 |
63 | Megophrys ligayae | ZMMU NAP-05015 | Palawan, Philippines | KX811919 | KX812051 |
64 | Megophrys kobayashii | UNIMAS 8148 | Gunung Kinabalu National Park, Sabah, Malaysia | KJ831313 | – |
65 | Megophrys nasuta | KIZ019419 | Malaysia | KX811921 | KX812054 |
66 | Megophrys edwardinae | FMNH 273694 | Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia | KX811918 | KX812050 |
67 | Megophrys aceras | KIZ025467 | Khao Nan National Park, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand | KX811925 | KX812159 |
68 | Megophrys dringi | UNIMAS 8943 | Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia | KJ831317 | – |
69 | Megophrys maosonensis | KIZ016045 | Xiaoqiaogou Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China | KX811780 | KX812080 |
70 | Megophrys mangshanensis | KIZ021786 | Nanling National Forest Park, Guangdong, China | KX811790 | KX812079 |
71 | Megophrys flavipunctata | SDBDU2009.297 | East Khasi Hills dist., Meghalaya | KY022307 | MH647536 |
72 | Megophrys glandulosa | KIZ048439 | Husa, Yunnan, China | KX811762 | KX812075 |
73 | Megophrys medogensis | KIZ06621 | Beibeng, Xizang, China | KX811767 | KX812082 |
74 | Megophrys periosa | BNHS 6061 | West Kameng dist., Arunachal Pradesh, IN | KY022309 | MH647528 |
75 | Megophrys himalayana | SDBDU2009.75 | East Siang dist., Arunachal Pradesh, IN | KY022311 | – |
76 | Megophrys sanu | K5198/ZSI11393 | – | KX894679 | – |
77 | Megophrys zhangi | KIZ014278 | Zhangmu, Xizang, China | KX811765 | KX812084 |
78 | Megophrys katabhako | ZSIA11799 | – | KX894669 | – |
79 | Megophrys major | SYSa002961 | Zhushihe, Yunnan, China | MH406728 | MH406180 |
80 | Megophrys oreocrypta | BNHS 6046 | West Garo Hills dist., Meghalaya | KY022306 | – |
81 | Megophrys auralensis | NCSM 79599 | Aural, Kampong Speu, Cambodia | KX811807 | – |
82 | Megophrys parva | SYSa003042 | Zhushihe, Yunnan, China | MH406737 | MH406189 |
83 | Megophrys nankiangensis |
|
Nanjiang, Sichuan, China | KX811900 | – |
84 | Megophrys wawuensis | KIZ025799 | Wawu Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811902 | KX812062 |
85 | Megophrys gigantica | SYSa003933 | Wuliang shan, Yunnan, China | MH406775 | MH406235 |
86 | Megophrys shapingensis | KIZ014512 | Liziping Nature Reserve, Sichuan, China | KX811904 | KX812060 |
87 | Megophrys montana | LSUMZ 81916 | Sukabumi, Java, Indonesia | KX811927 | KX812163 |
88 | Megophrys lancip | MZB:Amp:22233 | – | KY679891 | – |
89 | Megophrys feae | KIZ046706 | Huangcaoling, Yunnan, China | KX811810 | KX812056 |
90 | Megophrys chuannanensis | CIB20050081 | Hejiang, Sichuan, China | KM504261 | – |
91 | Megophrys carinense | Tissue ID: YPX20455 | Dayao Shan, Guangxi, China | KX811811 | KX812057 |
92 | Megophrys popei | SYS a000589 | Naling Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China | KM504251 | – |
93 | Megophrys intermedia | ZFMK 87596 | U Bo, Phong Nha-Ke Bang NP, Vietnam | HQ588950 | – |
94 | Leptobrachium boringii | Tissue ID: YPX37539 | Emei Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811930 | KX812164 |
95 | Leptobrachella oshanensis | KIZ025778 | Emei Shan, Sichuan, China | KX811928 | KX812166 |
For molecular analyses, the available sequence data for congeners of Megophrys were downloaded from GenBank (Table
In total, 16 specimens including six males of the undescribed species, five males of M. sangzhiensis, and five males of M. spinata were measured (for voucher information see Table
ED eye diameter (distance from the anterior corner to the posterior corner of the eye);
FL foot length (distance from tarsus to the tip of fourth toe);
HDL head length (distance from the tip of the snout to the articulation of jaw);
HDW maximum head width (greatest width between the left and right articulations of jaw);
HLL hindlimb length (maximum length from the vent to the distal tip of the Toe IV);
IAE distance between posterior corner of eyes;
IFE distance between anterior corner of eyes;
IND internasal distance (minimum distance between the inner margins of the external nares);
IOD interorbital distance (minimum distance between the inner edges of the upper eyelids);
LAL length of lower arm and hand (distance from the elbow to the distal end of the Finger IV);
LW lower arm width (maximum width of the lower arm);
NED nasal to eye distance (distance between the nasal and the anterior corner of the eye);
NSD nasal to snout distance (distance between the nasal the posterior edge of the vent);
SVL snout-vent length (distance from the tip of the snout to the posterior edge of the vent);
SL snout length (distance from the tip of the snout to the anterior corner of the eye);
TFL length of foot and tarsus (distance from the tibiotarsal articulation to the distal end of the Toe IV);
THL thigh length (distance from vent to knee);
TL tibia length (distance from knee to tarsus);
TW maximal tibia width;
TYD maximal tympanum diameter;
UEW upper eyelid width (greatest width of the upper eyelid margins measured perpendicular to the anterior-posterior axis).
Measurements of the adult specimens of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov., M. spinata, and M. sangzhiensis. Units are given in mm. See abbreviations for the morphological characters in Materials and methods section.
Species | Voucher number | Sex | SVL | HDL | HDW | SL | NED | NSD | IND | IOD | ED | UEW | LAL | LW | HLL | THL | TL | TW | TFL | FL | TYD | IFE | IAE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20190608016 | male | 58.2 | 16.5 | 21.0 | 6.7 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 7.5 | 5.1 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 25.0 | 6.7 | 89.3 | 27.9 | 32.4 | 8.2 | 40.7 | 28.2 | 4.3 | 10.1 | 16.4 |
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20190608018 | male | 55.1 | 14.9 | 20.6 | 6.9 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 6.5 | 5.1 | 25.0 | 6.5 | 93.0 | 28.4 | 30.6 | 8.7 | 44.0 | 29.1 | 3.5 | 9.0 | 16.0 |
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20190608017 | male | 56.3 | 14.6 | 19.2 | 7.2 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 6.5 | 5.3 | 24.0 | 6.9 | 87.0 | 27.6 | 28.0 | 7.8 | 38.3 | 25.7 | 3.2 | 10.9 | 15.0 |
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20160715003 | male | 54.1 | 17.0 | 20.8 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 25.4 | 5.7 | 93.7 | 27.0 | 30.8 | 7.8 | 43.7 | 29.4 | 3.5 | 10.4 | 15.8 |
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBTZ20190608015 | male | 52.6 | 15.3 | 19.4 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 6.9 | 3.7 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 24.1 | 7.4 | 86.9 | 24.1 | 28.3 | 8.3 | 41.4 | 28.0 | 3.3 | 10.0 | 15.7 |
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | CIBKKS20180722001 | male | 49.3 | 15.5 | 18.3 | 6.8 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 20.4 | 6.6 | 76.9 | 24.5 | 25.0 | 7.0 | 34.5 | 24.5 | 3.4 | 7.8 | 14.0 |
M. spinata | CIBLS20190801002 | male | 56.2 | 14.9 | 18.4 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 5.8 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 24.2 | 5.5 | 93.7 | 27.4 | 29.9 | 6.1 | 40.8 | 28.6 | 2.7 | 9.1 | 14.0 |
M. spinata | CIBLS20190801004 | male | 53.5 | 14.5 | 19.1 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 24.1 | 5.9 | 99.0 | 29.8 | 30.4 | 8.0 | 43.1 | 28.1 | 2.8 | 9.6 | 14.4 |
M. spinata | CIBLS20190801001 | male | 54.8 | 14.6 | 18.6 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 24.3 | 6.1 | 87.7 | 27.6 | 28.9 | 7.0 | 39.7 | 26.4 | 2.8 | 9.2 | 14.2 |
M. spinata | CIBLS20190801003 | male | 51.2 | 14.3 | 18.8 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 25.1 | 6.5 | 93.0 | 26.1 | 29.6 | 7.7 | 41.6 | 29.6 | 2.5 | 9.1 | 14.0 |
M. spinata | CIBLS20160610008 | male | 53.8 | 15.8 | 18.4 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 24.0 | 7.4 | 85.7 | 26.9 | 29.0 | 6.0 | 39.2 | 27.9 | 2.9 | 8.5 | 14.3 |
M. sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062005 | male | 59.8 | 17.8 | 20.6 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 7.3 | 4.8 | 7.1 | 5.7 | 26.6 | 6.6 | 105.0 | 31.6 | 32.6 | 7.8 | 46.1 | 29.4 | 3.1 | 10.4 | 16.1 |
M. sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062008 | male | 58.8 | 17.8 | 21.5 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 7.3 | 4.7 | 7.4 | 6.1 | 26.8 | 6.2 | 97.3 | 30.3 | 31.6 | 7.8 | 42.9 | 26.7 | 3.4 | 10.9 | 17.3 |
M. sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062006 | male | 59.5 | 16.1 | 21.0 | 8.2 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 26.6 | 6.3 | 99.8 | 27.9 | 32.3 | 7.3 | 43.8 | 29.2 | 3.4 | 10.1 | 17.3 |
M. sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062019 | male | 57.4 | 18.0 | 20.9 | 7.3 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 6.4 | 5.1 | 26.2 | 6.1 | 99.5 | 30.2 | 32.6 | 8.1 | 43.2 | 29.9 | 3.7 | 10.4 | 17.3 |
M. sangzhiensis | CIBSZ2012062007 | male | 56.1 | 16.1 | 20.0 | 6.6 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 28.2 | 6.7 | 100.0 | 28.0 | 32.0 | 7.5 | 44.9 | 29.4 | 3.4 | 9.4 | 16.2 |
In order to reduce the impact of allometry, the correct value from the ratio of each character to SVL was calculated, and then was log-transformed for subsequent morphometric analyses. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significance of differences on morphometric characters between different species. The significance level was set at 0.05. To show the spatial distribution of different species on the morphometric characters, principal component analyses (PCA) were performed. These analyses were carried out in the R (
References for morphological characters for congeners of the genus Megophrys.
Species | Literature |
---|---|
M. aceras Boulenger, 1903 |
|
M. acuta Wang, Li & Jin, 2014 |
|
M. ancrae Mahony, Teeling & Biju, 2013 |
|
M. angka Wu, Suwannapoom, Poyarkov, Chen, Pawangkhanant, Xu, Jin, Murphy & Che, 2019 |
|
M. auralensis Ohler, Swan & Daltry, 2002 |
|
M. baluensis (Boulenger, 1899) |
|
M. baolongensis Ye, Fei & Xie, 2007 |
|
M. binchuanensis Ye & Fei, 1995 |
|
M. binlingensis Jiang, Fei & Ye, 2009 |
|
M. boettgeri (Boulenger, 1899) |
|
M. brachykolos Inger & Romer, 1961 |
|
M. carinense (Boulenger, 1889) |
|
M. caobangensis Nguyen, Pham, Nguyen, Luong, & Ziegler, 2020 |
|
M. caudoprocta Shen, 1994 |
|
M. cheni (Wang & Liu, 2014) |
|
M. chishuiensis Xu, Li, Liu, Wei & Wang, 2020 |
|
M. chuannanensis (Fei, Ye & Huang, 2001) |
|
M. damrei Mahony, 2011 |
|
M. daweimontis Rao & Yang, 1997 |
|
M. dongguanensis Wang & Wang, 2019 |
|
M. dringi Inger, Stuebing & Tan, 1995 |
|
M. edwardinae Inger, 1989 |
|
M. elfina Poyarkov, Duong, Orlov, Gogoleva, Vassilieva, Nguyen, Nguyen, Nguyen, Che & Mahony, 2017 |
|
M. fansipanensis Tapley, Cutajar, Mahony, Nguyen, Dau, Luong, Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Portway, Luong & Rowley, 2018 |
|
M. feae Boulenger, 1887 |
|
M. feii Yang, Wang & Wang, 2018 |
|
M. flavipunctata Mahony, Kamei, Teeling & Biju, 2018 |
|
M. gerti (Ohler, 2003) |
|
M. gigantica Liu, Hu & Yang, 1960 |
|
M. glandulosa Fei, Ye & Huang, 1990 |
|
M. hansi (Ohler, 2003) |
|
M. himalayana Mahony, Kamei, Teeling & Biju, 2018 |
|
M. hoanglienensis Tapley, Cutajar, Mahony, Nguyen, Dau, Luong, Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Portway, Luong & Rowley, 2018 |
|
M. huangshanensis Fei & Ye, 2005 |
|
M. insularis (Wang, Liu, Lyu, Zeng & Wang, 2017) |
|
M. intermedia Smith, 1921 |
|
M. jiangi Liu, Li, Wei, Xu, Cheng, Wang & Wu, 2020 |
|
M. jingdongensis Fei & Ye, 1983 |
|
M. jinggangensis (Wang, 2012) |
|
M. jiulianensis Wang, Zeng, Lyu & Wang, 2019 |
|
M. kalimantanensis Munir, Hamidy, Matsui, Iskandar, Sidik & Shimada, 2019 |
|
M. kobayashii Malkmus & Matsui, 1997 |
|
M. koui Mahony, Foley, Biju & Teeling, 2017 |
|
M. kuatunensis Pope, 1929 |
|
M. lancip Munir, Hamidy, Farajallah & Smith, 2018 |
|
M. leishanensis Li, Xu, Liu, Jiang, Wei & Wang, 2018 |
|
M. lekaguli Stuart, Chuaynkern, Chan-ard & Inger, 2006 |
|
M. liboensis (Zhang, Li, Xiao, Li, Pan, Wang, Zhang & Zhou, 2017) |
|
M. ligayae Taylor, 1920 |
|
M. lini (Wang & Yang, 2014) |
|
M. lishuiensis (Wang, Liu & Jiang, 2017) |
|
M. longipes Boulenger, 1886 |
|
M. major Boulenger, 1908 |
|
M. mangshanensis Fei & Ye, 1990 |
|
M. maosonensis Bourret, 1937 |
|
M. medogensis Fei, Ye & Huang, 1983 |
|
M. megacephala Mahony, Sengupta, Kamei & Biju, 2011 |
|
M. microstoma (Boulenger, 1903) |
|
M. minor Stejneger, 1926 |
|
M. mirabilis Lyu, Wang & Zhao, 2020 |
|
M. montana Kuhl & Van Hasselt, 1822 |
|
M. monticola (Günther, 1864) |
|
M. mufumontana Wang, Lyu & Wang, 2019 |
|
M. nankiangensis Liu & Hu, 1966 | Hu and Liu 1966 |
M. nankunensis Wang, Zeng & Wang, 2019 |
|
M. nanlingensis Lyu, Wang, Liu & Wang, 2019 |
|
M. nasuta (Schlegel, 1858) |
|
M. obesa Wang, Li & Zhao, 2014 |
|
M. ombrophila Messenger & Dahn, 2019 |
|
M. omeimontis Liu, 1950 |
|
M. oreocrypta Mahony, Kamei, Teeling & Biju, 2018 |
|
M. oropedion Mahony, Teeling & Biju, 2013 |
|
M. orientalis Li, Lyu, Wang & Wang, 2020 |
|
M. pachyproctus Huang, 1981 |
|
M. palpebralespinosa Bourret, 1937 |
|
M. parallela Inger & Iskandar, 2005 |
|
M. parva (Boulenger, 1893) |
|
M. periosa Mahony, Kamei, Teeling & Biju, 2018 |
|
M. popei (Zhao, Yang, Chen, Chen & Wang, 2014) |
|
M. robusta Boulenger, 1908 |
|
M. rubrimera Tapley, Cutajar, Mahony, Chung, Dau, Nguyen, Luong & Rowley, 2017 |
|
M. sangzhiensis Jiang, Ye & Fei, 2008 |
|
M. serchhipii (Mathew & Sen, 2007) |
|
M. shapingensis Liu, 1950 |
|
M. shimentaina Lyu, Liu & Wang, 2020 |
|
M. shuichengensis Tian & Sun, 1995 |
|
M. shunhuangensis Wang, Deng, Liu, Wu & Liu, 2019 |
|
M. spinata Liu & Hu, 1973 |
|
M. stejnegeri Taylor, 1920 |
|
M. synoria (Stuart, Sok & Neang, 2006) |
|
M. takensis Mahony, 2011 |
|
M. tuberogranulata Shen, Mo & Li, 2010 |
|
M. vegrandis Mahony, Teeling, Biju, 2013 |
|
M. wawuensis Fei, Jiang & Zheng, 2001 |
|
M. wugongensis Wang, Lyu & Wang, 2019 |
|
M. wuliangshanensis Ye & Fei, 1995 |
|
M. wushanensis Ye & Fei, 1995 |
|
M. xianjuensis Wang, Wu, Peng, Shi, Lu & Wu, 2020 |
|
M. xiangnanensis Lyu, Zeng & Wang, 2020 |
|
M. yangmingensis Lyu, Zeng & Wang, 2020 |
|
M. zhangi Ye & Fei, 1992 | Ye and Fei 2012 |
M. zunhebotoensis (Mathew & Sen, 2007) |
|
The advertisement calls of the undescribed species were recorded from the holotype specimen CIBTZ20190608017 in a stream at ambient air temperature of 20.5 °C and air humidity of 87 % in the field on 8 June 2019 in Huanglian Nature Reserve, Tongzi County, Guizhou Province, China. The advertisement calls of M. sangzhiensis were recorded from the specimen CIBSZ2012062005 in a stream at ambient air temperature of 18.5 °C and air humidity of 85 % in the field on 20 June 2012 in Sangzhi County, Hunan Province, China. The advertisement calls of M. spinata were recorded from the specimen CIBLS20190801001 in a stream at ambient air temperature of 19.0 °C and air humidity of 85 % in the field on 1 August 2019 in Leishan County, Guizhou Province, China. SONY PCM-D50 digital sound recorder was used to record within 20 cm of the calling individual. The sound files in wave format were resampled at 48 kHz with sampling depth 24 bits. The sonograms and waveforms were generated by WaveSurfer software (
Aligned sequence matrix of 16S+COI contains 1104 bp. ML and BI trees had almost consistent topology though relationships of some lineages were unresolved (Fig.
Genetic distances on COI gene with uncorrected p-distance model between all samples of the undescribed species were below 0.2%. The genetic distance between the undescribed species and its closest related species M. sangzhiensis was 4.3 % on COI gene, which was higher or at the same level with those among many pairs of congeners, for example, 3.6 % between M. spinata and M. sangzhiensis, 1.8% between M. huangshanensis and M. boettgeri, and 4.3 % between M. maosonensis and M. mangshanensis (Suppl. material
In PCA for males, the total variation of the first two principal components was 63.2 %. In males on the two-dimensional plots of PC1 vs. PC2, the undescribed species could be distinctly separated from M. sangzhiensis and M. spinata (Fig.
Morphometric comparisons between Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov., M. sangzhiensis, and M. spinata. Units given in mm. Abbreviations for the species name: MQ, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov.; MSZ, M. sangzhiensis; MSP, M. spinata. See abbreviations for morphometric characters in Materials and methods section.
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | M. sangzhiensis | M. spinata | p-value from ANOVA in male | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
males (N = 6) | males (N = 5) | males (N = 5) | ||||||
Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | MQ vs. MSZ | MQ vs. MSP | |
SVL | 49.3–58.2 | 54.3 ± 3.09 | 56.1–59.8 | 58.3 ± 1.56 | 51.2–56.2 | 53.9 ± 1.84 | 0.029 | 0.851 |
HDL | 14.6–17.0 | 15.6 ± 0.93 | 16.1–18.0 | 17.2 ± 0.96 | 14.3–15.8 | 14.8 ± 0.59 | 0.027 | 0.124 |
HDW | 18.3–21.0 | 19.9 ± 1.08 | 20.0–21.5 | 20.8 ± 0.55 | 18.4–19.1 | 18.7 ± 0.30 | 0.123 | 0.037 |
SL | 6.7–7.2 | 6.9 ± 0.17 | 6.6–8.2 | 7.4 ± 0.58 | 5.7–7.1 | 6.4 ± 0.56 | 0.067 | 0.085 |
TYD | 3.2–4.3 | 3.5 ± 0.39 | 3.1–3.7 | 3.4 ± 0.21 | 2.5–2.9 | 2.7 ± 0.15 | 0.639 | 0.001 |
IFE | 7.8–10.9 | 9.7 ± 1.13 | 9.4–10.9 | 10.2 ± 0.54 | 8.5–9.6 | 9.1 ± 0.39 | 0.340 | 0.348 |
IAE | 14.0–16.4 | 15.5 ± 0.86 | 16.1–17.3 | 16.8 ± 0.62 | 14.0–14.4 | 14.2 ± 0.18 | 0.019 | 0.009 |
NED | 2.4–3.4 | 2.9 ± 0.36 | 3.0–3.9 | 3.4 ± 0.36 | 2.7–3.0 | 2.8 ± 0.11 | 0.060 | 0.618 |
NSD | 3.5–4.3 | 3.8 ± 0.29 | 3.7–4.6 | 4.2 ± 0.34 | 3.4–4.1 | 3.8 ± 0.27 | 0.101 | 0.683 |
IND | 5.7–7.5 | 6.7 ± 0.62 | 6.8–7.7 | 7.2 ± 0.34 | 5.8–6.3 | 6.0 ± 0.18 | 0.150 | 0.056 |
IOD | 3.7–5.3 | 4.5 ± 0.59 | 4.7–5.8 | 5.1 ± 0.45 | 4.2–5.3 | 4.9 ± 0.44 | 0.117 | 0.257 |
ED | 5.4–6.9 | 6.3 ± 0.58 | 6.1–7.4 | 6.7 ± 0.51 | 5.1–6.0 | 5.6 ± 0.34 | 0.280 | 0.041 |
UEW | 5.1–6.2 | 5.6 ± 0.43 | 5.1–6.1 | 5.7 ± 0.42 | 4.5–6.1 | 5.0 ± 0.65 | 0.484 | 0.126 |
LAL | 20.4–25.4 | 24.0 ± 1.84 | 26.2–28.2 | 26.9 ± 0.78 | 24.0–25.1 | 24.3 ± 0.44 | 0.014 | 0.654 |
LW | 5.7–7.4 | 6.6 ± 0.55 | 6.1–6.7 | 6.4 ± 0.24 | 5.5–7.4 | 6.3 ± 0.72 | 0.394 | 0.364 |
HLL | 76.9–93.7 | 87.8 ± 6.07 | 97.3–105.0 | 100.3 ± 2.84 | 85.7–99.0 | 91.8 ± 5.27 | 0.003 | 0.280 |
THL | 24.1–28.4 | 26.6 ± 1.82 | 27.9–31.6 | 29.6 ± 1.59 | 26.1–29.8 | 27.6 ± 1.38 | 0.019 | 0.343 |
TL | 25.0–32.4 | 29.2 ± 2.63 | 31.6–32.6 | 32.2 ± 0.42 | 28.9–30.4 | 29.6 ± 0.63 | 0.038 | 0.713 |
TW | 7.0–8.7 | 8.0 ± 0.58 | 7.3–8.1 | 7.7 ± 0.32 | 6.0–8.0 | 7.0 ± 0.91 | 0.404 | 0.053 |
TFL | 34.5–44.0 | 40.4 ± 3.58 | 42.9–46.1 | 44.2 ± 1.32 | 39.2–43.1 | 40.9 ± 1.55 | 0.062 | 0.761 |
FL | 24.5–29.4 | 27.5 ± 1.95 | 26.7–29.9 | 28.9 ± 1.28 | 26.4–29.6 | 28.1 ± 1.16 | 0.201 | 0.531 |
There were many differences in sonograms and waveforms of calls between the undescribed species, M. sangzhiensis, and M. spinata (Fig.
Visualization of advertisement calls of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov., M. sangzhiensis, and M. spinata A1 waveform showing one note of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. A2 sonogram showing one note of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. A3 waveform showing 25 notes of one call of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. A4 sonogram showing 25 notes of one call of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. B1 waveform showing one note of M. sangzhiensis B2 sonogram showing one note of M. sangzhiensis B3 waveform showing 38 notes of one call of M. sangzhiensis. B4 sonogram showing 38 notes of one call of M. sangzhiensis C1 waveform showing one note of M. spinata C2 sonogram showing one note of M. spinata C3 waveform showing 20 notes of one call of M. spinata C4 sonogram showing 20 notes of one call of M. spinata.
Comparisons of characteristics of advertisement calls of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov., M. sangzhiensis, and M. spinata.
Call character | Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. | M. sangzhiensis | M. spinata | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | |
Number of notes in a call | 14–26 | 22.5 ± 4.4 | 38 | / | 7–28 | 17 ± 7.92 |
Call duration (ms) | 2832–5621 | 4413 ± 972 | 8152 | / | 1500–6623 | 3905 ± 2010 |
Call interval (ms) | 6812–14387 | 10878 ± 2701 | / | / | 592–5770 | 2708 ± 1863.33 |
Note duration (ms) | 129– 211 | 167 ± 0.02 | 107–155 | 120.3 ± 8.73 | 107–123 | 114 ± 3.79 |
Note interval (ms) | 34–94 | 57 ± 0.01 | 72–132 | 95.6 ± 13.89 | 113–232 | 147 ± 33.12 |
Dominant frequency (Hz) | 2250–3000 | 2469 ± 197.47 | 10380–13200 | 11795 ± 670.58 | 4260–4589 | 4416 ± 130.04 |
Temperature (°C) | 20.5 | 18.5 | 19.0 |
. Holotype. CIBTZ20190608017 (Figs
Paratype. Four adult males from the same place as holotype, and one from Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve (28.21835°N, 107.166388°E, ca.1520 m a.s.l.) collected by Shi-Ze Li. CIBKKS20180722001 collected 22 July 2018 from Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve and CIBTZ20160715003 collected 15 July 2016, CIBTZ20190608015, CIBTZ20190608016 and CIBTZ20190608018 collected 8 June 2019 from Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve.
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. is assigned to the genus Megophrys based on molecular phylogenetic analyses and the following generic diagnostic characters: snout shield-like; projecting beyond the lower jaw; canthus rostralis distinct; chest glands small and round, closer to the axilla than to midventral line; femoral glands on rear part of thigh; vertical pupils.
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. could be distinguished from its congeners by a combination of the following morphological characters: body size moderate (SVL 49.3–58.2 mm in males); vomerine ridges present distinctly, vomerine teeth present; tongue feebly notched behind; tympanum distinctly visible, oval; two metacarpal tubercles in hand; toes with one-third webbing and wide lateral fringes; heels overlapped when thighs are positioned at right angles to the body; tibiotarsal articulation reaching the level between tympanum and eye when leg stretched forward; an internal single subgular vocal sac present in male; in breeding male, the nuptial pads with large and sparse black nuptial spines present on the dorsal bases of the first two fingers.
Photos of specimens of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov., M. sangzhiensis and M. spinata A1–A6 dorsal view, ventral view, dorsal view of hand, ventral view of hand, ventral view of foot and view of oral cavity of the holotype specimen CIBTZ20190608017 of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. B1–B6 dorsal view, ventral view, dorsal view of hand, ventral view of hand, ventral view of foot and view of oral cavity of CIBSZ2012062005 of M. sangzhiensis C1–C6 dorsal view, ventral view, dorsal view of hand, ventral view of hand, ventral view of foot and view of oral cavity of CIBLS20190801001 of M. spinata. Arrow point to vomerine ridge.
(Figs
Forelimbs slender, the length of lower arm and hand 42.6 % of SVL; fingers burly, relative finger lengths: II < I < V < III; tips of digits globular, without lateral fringes; subarticular tubercle distinct at the base of each finger; two metacarpal tubercles, prominent, oval-shaped, the inner one bigger than the outer one.
Hindlimbs slender, 1.54 times of SVL; heels overlapping when thighs are positioned at right angles to the body, tibiotarsal articulation reaching tympanum to eye when leg stretched forward; tibia length longer than thigh length; relative toe lengths I < II < V < III < IV; tips of toes round, slightly dilated; subarticular tubercles present on the base of each toes ; toes with one-third webbing and relative wide lateral fringe; inner metatarsal tubercle oval-shaped; outer metatarsal tubercle absent.
Dorsal skin rough, with numerous granules with black spins; several large warts scattered on flanks; tubercles on the dorsum forming a weak V-shaped ridge; two discontinuous dorsolateral parallel ridges on either side of the V-shaped ridges; an inverted triangular brown speckle between two upper eyelids; several tubercles on the flanks and dorsal surface of thighs and tibias; supratympanic fold distinct.
Ventral surface smooth with numerous white granules; glands on chest indistinct; femoral glands on rear of thighs, numerous white granules on outer thighs; posterior end of the body distinctly protruding and forming an arc-shaped swelling above the anal region.
(Fig.
(Fig.
In CIBTZ20160715003 the dorsolateral parallel ridges are short, just a little bit above the shoulder (Fig.
The call description is based on recordings of the holotype CIBTZ20190608017 (Fig.
Adult males have a single subgular vocal sac. In breeding males, brownish red nuptial pads are present on the dorsal bases of the first two fingers with big and sparse black nuptial spines (Fig.
By having moderate body size (minimum SVL > 49.8 mm in males), Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. aceras, M. acuta, M. angka, M. ancrae, M. baluensis, M. baolongensis, M. binchuanensis, M. binlingensis, M. boettgeri, M. brachykolos, M. caobangensis, M. cheni, M. daweimontis, M. dongguanensis, M. dringi, M. edwardinae, M. elfina, M. fansipanensis, M. feii, M. gerti, M. hansi, M. hoanglienensis, M. huangshanensis, M. insularis, M. jiangi, M. jinggangensis, M. jiulianensis, M. kuatunensis, M. lancip, M. leishanensis, M. lini, M. lishuiensis, M. longipes, M. major, M. microstoma, M. minor, M. monticola, M. mufumontana, M. nankunensis, M. nanlingensis, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, M. oropedion, M. pachyproctus, M. palpebralespinosa, M. parallela, M. parva, M. rubrimera, M. serchhipii, M. shimentaina, M. shunhuangensis, M. tuberogranulata, M. vegrandis, M. wawuensis, M. wugongensis, M. wuliangshanensis, M. wushanensis, M. xianjuensis, M. zhangi, M. zunhebotoensis, M. xiangnanensis, and M. yangmingensis (vs. minimum SVL < 48.0 mm).
By having moderate body size (minimum SVL < 59.0 mm in males), Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. auralensis, M. carinense, M. caudoprocta, M. caudoprocta, M. chuannanensis, M. feae, M. gigantica, M. glandulosa, M. himalayana, M. kalimantanensis, M. kobayashii, M. ligayae, M. mangshanensis, M. orientalis, M. periosa, M. platyparietus, M. popei, M. shapingensis, and M. shuichengensis (vs. minimum SVL > 60.0 mm).
By having vomerine teeth, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. aceras, M. acuta, M. angka, M. auralensis, M. baolongensis, M. binchuanensis, M. binlingensis, M. boettgeri, M. brachykolos, M. caobangensis, M. cheni, M. chishuiensis, M. dringi, M. jiangi , M. leishanensis, M. lini , M. lishuiensis, M. major , M. microstoma, M. minor,. M. mirabilis, M. mufumontana, M. nankiangensis, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, M. shapingensis, M. shuichengensis, M. shunhuangensis, M. tuberogranulata, M. vegrandis, M. wawuensis, M. wugongensis, M. wuliangshanensis, M. wushanensis, M. xianjuensis, M. xiangnanensis, and M. yangmingensis (vs. absent).
By the absence of horn-like tubercle at the edge of each upper eyelid, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. aceras, M. acuta, M. angka, M. ancrae, M. auralensis, M. baluensis, M. baolongensis, M. boettgeri, M. brachykolos, M. caobangensis, M. carinense, M. caudoprocta, M. cheni, M. chishuiensis, M. chuannanensis, M. daweimontis, M. dongguanensis, M. dringi, M. edwardinae, M. elfina, M. fansipanensis, M. feae, M. feii, M. flavipunctata, M. gerti, M. glandulosa, M. hansi, M. himalayana, M. hoanglienensis, M. huangshanensis, M. insularis, M. intermedia, M. jiangi, M. jingdongensis, M. jinggangensis, M. jiulianensis, M. kalimantanensis, M. koui, M. kuatunensis, M. lancip, M. leishanensis, M. lekaguli, M. liboensis, M. ligayae, M. lini, M. lishuiensis, M. longipes, M. mangshanensis, M. medogensis, M. microstoma, M. mirabilis, M. montana, M. mufumontana, M. nankunensis, M. nanlingensis, M. nasuta, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, M. omeimontis, M. oreocrypta, M. orientalis, M. palpebralespinosa, M. parallela, M. parva, M. periosa, M. platyparietus, M. popei, M. rubrimera, M. shimentaina, M. shuichengensis, M. shunhuangensis, M. stejnegeri, M. synoria, M. vegrandis, M. wugongensis, M. xianjuensis, M. xiangnanensis, and M. yangmingensis (vs. present).
With the tongue feebly notched behind, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. aceras, M. acuta, M. angka, M. auralensis, M. brachykolos, M. caobangensis, M. caudoprocta, M. dongguanensis, M. elfina, M. hansi, M. jiangi, M. jinggangensis, M. lancip, M. leishanensis, M. lekaguli, M. lini, M. lishuiensis, M. megacephala, M. mufumontana, M. nankunensis, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, M. orientalis, M. palpebralespinosa, M. parallela, M. parva, M. shunhuangensis, M. takensis, M. wushanensis, and M. xianjuensis (vs. tongue not notched behind in the latter), and differs from M. cheni, M. damrei, M. dringi, M. flavipunctata, M. gigantica, and M. popei (vs. tongue notched behind).
By having lateral wide fringes on toes, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. angka, M. baolongensis, M. brachykolos, M. caobangensis, M. damrei, M. daweimontis, M. dongguanensis, M. fansipanensis, M. feae, M. himalayana, M. hoanglienensis, M. huangshanensis, M. insularis, M. jiangi, M. jiulianensis, M. kalimantanensis, M. koui, M. leishanensis, M. lekaguli, M. lishuiensis, M. major, M. mangshanensis, M. medogensis, M. megacephala, M. microstoma, M. minor, M. nankunensis, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, M. oreocrypta, M. oropedion, M. pachyproctus, M. parva, M. periosa, M. shunhuangensis, M. takensis, M. tuberogranulata, M. wawuensis, M. wugongensis, M. wuliangshanensis, and M. xianjuensis (vs. lacking lateral fringes on toes).
By toes with one-third webs, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. aceras, M. acuta, M. angka, M. auralensis, M. baluensis, M. baolongensis, M. binchuanensis, M. binlingensis, M. boettgeri, M. brachykolos, M. caobangensis, M. caudoprocta, M. cheni, M. chuannanensis, M. damrei, M. daweimontis, M. dongguanensis, M. dringi, M. elfina, M. fansipanensis, M. feae, M. feii, M. flavipunctata, M. gerti, M. gigantica, M. glandulosa, M. hansi, M. hoanglienensis, M. huangshanensis, M. insularis, M. jiangi, M. jinggangensis, M. jiulianensis, M. kalimantanensis, M. koui, M. kuatunensis, M. lancip, M. leishanensis, M. lekaguli, M. liboensis, M. lini, M. lishuiensis, M. longipes, M. major, M. mangshanensis, M. medogensis, M. medogensis, M. megacephala, M. microstoma, M. minor, M. mufumontana, M. nankiangensis, M. nankunensis, M. nanlingensis, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, M. omeimontis, M. oropedion, M. pachyproctus, M. parva, M. periosa, M. robusta, M. rubrimera, M. serchhipii, M. shunhuangensis, M. takensis, M. tuberogranulata, M. vegrandis, M. wawuensis, M. wugongensis, M. wuliangshanensis, M. wushanensis, M. xianjuensis, and M. zhangi (vs. with rudimentary or without webs).
By heels overlapping when thighs are positioned at right angles to the body, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. acuta, M. brachykolos, M. dongguanensis, M. huangshanensis, M. kuatunensis, M. nankunensis, M. obesa, M. ombrophila, and M. wugongensis (vs. not meeting).
By the tibiotarsal articulation reaching to the level between tympanum and eye when leg stretched forward, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. daweimontis, M. glandulosa, M. lini, M. major, M. medogensis, and M. obesa (vs. reaching the anterior corner of the eye or beyond eye or nostril and tip of snout).
By having an internal single subgular vocal sac in male, Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. differs from M. caudoprocta, M. shapingensis, and M. shuichengensis (vs. vocal sac absent).
The congeners M. carinense and M. jiangi have sympatric distribution with Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. (
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. is phylogenetically closest to M. sangzhiensis and M. spinata. The new species differs from M. sangzhiensis by the following characters: horn-like tubercle absent at the edge of each upper eyelid (vs. present in the latter), toes with one-third webs (vs. with rudimentary webbing in the latter), vomerine ridges present distinctly as V-shape and vomerine teeth present (vs. vomerine ridges separated and weak, vomerine teeth absent in the latter), tibiotarsal articulation reaching to the level between tympanum and eye when leg stretched forward (vs. reaching the anterior corner of eye in the latter), spines on nuptial pads on the first two fingers larger and sparser (vs. finer and thicker in the latter), and having significantly higher ratios of HDL, LAL, HLL, TL, and IAE to SVL. On bioacoustics, the new species differs from M. sangzhiensis in the following characters: lower dominant frequency (2250–3000 Hz in the new species vs. 10380 – 13200 Hz in the latter), the amplitude beginning with moderately high energy pulses, increasing slightly to a maximum by approximately mid note, and then decreasing towards the end of each note (vs. beginning with maximum energy pulses and then decreasing towards the end of note in the latter).
The new species differs from M. spinata by the following characters: tibiotarsal articulation reaching the level between tympanum to eye when leg stretched forward (vs. reaching the anterior corner of eye in the latter), present distinctly as V-shape and vomerine teeth present (vs. vomerine ridges separated and weak, vomerine teeth absent in the latter), spines on nuptial pads on the first two fingers little weaker (vs. spines larger in the latter), and having significantly higher ratios of HDW, ED, LAL, TYD and IAE to SVL. On bioacoustics, the new species differs from M. spinata in the following characters: lower dominant frequency (2250–3000 Hz in the new species vs. 4260–4589 Hz in the latter), the amplitude beginning with moderately high energy pulses, increasing slightly to a maximum by approximately mid note, and then decreasing towards the end of each note (vs. beginning with lower energy pulses, then increasing to the maximum by approximately one-four note and then decreasing to the mid note then increasing to the second highest energy pulses and then decreasing towards the end of note in the latter).
Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. is known from Huanglian Nature Reserve, Tongzi County and Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve, Suiyang County, Guizhou Province, China at elevations between 1400–1600 m. The individuals of the new species were frequently found on stone in the streams surrounded by evergreen broadleaved forests (Fig.
Habitats of Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. in the type locality, Huanglian Nature Reserve, Tongzi County, Guizhou Province, China A landscape of montane forests in the type locality B a mountain stream where toads of the new species live (insert the holotype CIBTZ20190608017standing on the stone).
The specific epithet qianbeiensis refers to northern part of Guizhou, also called “黔”, the province where the type locality of the species belongs to. We propose the common English name “Qianbei horned toad” and Chinese name “Qian Bei Jiao Chan (黔北角蟾)”.
The new species Megophrys qianbeiensis sp. nov. resembles M. spinata and M. sangzhiensis, and detailed comparisons with different data are important for recognizing them. Our molecular phylogenetic data on mitochondrial DNA and morphological comparisons both separated the new species from the two closely related species. Megophrys spinata were reported to be distributed widely through the provinces of Sichuan, Guizhou, Hunan, Chongqing, Yunnan, and Guangxi (
South-western China has long been proposed as biodiversity hotspot (
We are grateful to the editors and reviewers for their working on the manuscript. This work was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC31960099), Key project for bio-diversity conservation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of People’s Republic of China. (Code: 2018-02-06-M2019-49/50), Basic research project of science and technology department of Guizhou Province (Nos. [2020] 1Y083), Science and technology support project of science and technology department of Guizhou Provincial (No. [2020] 4Y029) and Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Project (Nos. KY[2018]455 and KY[2018]468).
Table S1
Data type: molecular data
Explanation note: Uncorrected p-distances between the Megophrys species based on COI gene sequences
Table S2
Data type: morphological data
Explanation note: Diagnostic characters separating the new species described in this study from other species of Megophrys