Research Article |
Corresponding author: Omar Torres-Carvajal ( omartorcar@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Anthony Herrel
© 2020 Vanessa Parra, Pedro M. Sales Nunes, Omar Torres-Carvajal.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Parra V, Nunes PMS, Torres-Carvajal O (2020) Systematics of Pholidobolus lizards (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) from southern Ecuador, with descriptions of four new species. ZooKeys 954: 109-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.954.50667
|
Four new species of Pholidobolus lizards are described from poorly explored areas in the Andes of southern Ecuador based on morphological and genetic evidence. Among other morphological characters, Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. and P. condor sp. nov. differ from their congeners in having green dorsolateral stripes on head. Males of P. condor sp. nov. differ from those of P. samek sp. nov. in having reddish flanks and venter. P. dolichoderes sp. nov. is distinguished by having a long neck, with more scales between orbit and tympanum, whereas P. fascinatus sp. nov. is distinguished by lacking enlarged medial scales on collar and a conspicuous vertebral stripe. In addition, the phylogenetic position of the new species is inferred using DNA sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. The phylogeny supports strongly monophyly of each of the new species and renders P. macbrydei paraphyletic and split into six subclades. Available data suggest that the new species have restricted distribution ranges (< 100 km2 each), and it is proposed that their classification be as Data Deficient or Critically Endangered species. The results reveal unexpected levels of diversity within Pholidobolus in the Andes of southern Ecuador and highlight the importance of improving scientific collections and conservation efforts in this area.
Andes, Cordillera del Cóndor, diversity, phylogeny, taxonomy
The uplift of the Andes mountains was one of the most influential geological events for the evolution and diversification of the South American biota during the Cenozoic. For example, it created many habitats and microclimates that became important centers of biodiversity and endemism (
Pholidobolus lizards are among the most prominent gymnophthalmids in the northern Andes. They are small (SVL ≤ 60 mm), terrestrial, oviparous, and restricted to the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador, and northern Peru at elevations between 1800 and 4100 m (
The study of Pholidobolus and other gymnophthalmid taxa has been often hampered by the paucity of specimens in collections. For example, the recent description of P. paramuno reveals the importance of increased sampling effort in the Paramo ecosystem in the northern Andes of Colombia. Similarly, recent collections in poorly explored areas of the southern Andes of Ecuador yielded new specimens of Pholidobolus lizards, which we were unable to assign to any of the currently recognized species. Based on these specimens, here we combine evidence from morphology and DNA sequences to describe four new species of Pholidobolus and infer their phylogenetic affinities.
Total genomic DNA was digested and extracted from liver or muscle tissue using a guanidinium isothiocyanate extraction protocol. Tissue samples were first mixed with Proteinase K and a lysis buffer and digested overnight prior to extraction. DNA samples were quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc.), re-suspended and diluted to 25 ng/µl in ddH2O prior to amplification.
Using primers and amplification protocols from the literature (
Vouchers, locality data, and GenBank accession numbers of taxa included in this study. Sequences added in this study are in bold.
Taxon | Voucher | Locality | GenBank number | GenSeq Nomenclature | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12S | 16S | ND4 | DNAH3 | ||||
Anadia rhombifera | QCAZ 11862 | QCAZ 11862; Ecuador: Cotopaxi: San Francisco de Las Pampas | KU902135 | KU902216 | KU902291 | MN849427 | genseq-4 |
Macropholidus annectens | QCAZ 11120 | Ecuador: Loja: 15 km E Loja | KC894341 | KC894355 | KC894369 | MN849430 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 11121 | Ecuador: Loja: 15 km E Loja | KC894342 | KC894356 | KC894370 | MN849431 | genseq-4 | |
Macropholidus huancabambae | CORBIDI 10492 | Peru: Piura: Huancabamba: Las Pozas | KC894343 | KC894357 | KC894371 | MN849428 | genseq-4 |
CORBIDI 10493 | Peru: Piura: Huancabamba: Las Pozas | KC894344 | KC894358 | KC894372 | – | genseq-4 | |
CORBIDI 10496 | Peru: Piura: Huancabamba: Las Pozas | KC894345 | KC894359 | KC894373 | MN849429 | genseq-4 | |
Macropholidus labiopunctatus | CORBIDI 12932 | Peru: Piura: Ayabaca | KP874774 | KP874826 | KP874936 | MN849432 | genseq-4 |
Macropholidus ruthveni | CORBIDI 4281 | Peru: Lambayeque: El Totora | KC894354 | C894368 | C894382 | MN849433 | genseq-4 |
Pholidobolus affinis | QCAZ 9641 | Ecuador: Cotopaxi: San Miguel de Salcedo, Cutuchi River | KC894348 | C894362 | C894376 | MN849435 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 9900 | Ecuador: Chimborazo: Colta | KC894349 | KC894363 | KC894377 | – | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus condor sp. nov. | QCAZ 16788 | Ecuador: Morona-Santiago: el Quimi | MN724005 | MN720239 | MN717135 | MN849464 | genseq-2 |
QCAZ 16789 | Ecuador: Morona-Santiago: el Quimi | MN724006 | MN720240 | MN717134 | MN849465 | genseq-2 | |
QCAZ 16790 | Ecuador: Morona-Santiago: el Quimi | MN724007 | MN720241 | MN717136 | MN849466 | genseq-2 | |
QCAZ 15844 | Ecuador: Morona-Santiago: el Quimi | MN723996 | MN720230 | MN717125 | MN849434 | genseq-1 | |
Pholidobolus dicrus | QCAZ 5304 | Ecuador: Morona-Santiago: Guarumales | KP874776 | KP874828 | KP874938 | MN849436 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 6936 | Ecuador: Tungurahua: Río Blanco | – | KP874829 | KP874939 | MN849437 | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus dolichoderes sp. nov. | QCAZ 16349 | Ecuador: Cañar: Oña | MN724000 | MN720234 | MN717129 | MN849459 | genseq-2 |
QCAZ 16350 | Ecuador: Cañar: Oña | MN724001 | MN720235 | MN717130 | MN849460 | genseq-2 | |
QCAZ 16351 | Ecuador: Cañar: Oña | MN724002 | MN720236 | MN717131 | MN849461 | genseq-2 | |
QCAZ 16352 | Ecuador: Cañar: Oña | MN724003 | MN720237 | MN717132 | MN849462 | genseq-2 | |
QCAZ 16353 | Ecuador: Cañar: Oña | MN724004 | MN720238 | MN717133 | MN849463 | genseq-1 | |
Pholidobolus fascinatus sp. nov. | QCAZ 15118 | Ecuador: El Oro: Chillacocha | MN724017 | MN720251 | MN717146 | MN849476 | genseq-2 |
QCAZ 15120 | Ecuador: El Oro: Chillacocha | MN724018 | MN720252 | MN717147 | MN849477 | genseq-1 | |
QCAZ 15122 | Ecuador: El Oro: Chillacocha | MN724019 | MN720253 | – | MN849478 | genseq-2 | |
QCAZ 15170 | Ecuador: El Oro: Chillacocha | MN724020 | MN720254 | MN717148 | MN849479 | genseq-2 | |
Pholidobolus hillisi | QCAZ 4998 | Ecuador: Zamora-Chinchipe: near San Francisco Research Station | KP090167 | KP090170 | KP090173 | MN849438 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 4999 | Ecuador: Zamora-Chinchipe: near San Francisco Research Station | KP090169 | KP090172 | KP090175 | MN849439 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 5000 | Ecuador: Zamora-Chinchipe: near San Francisco Research Station | KP090168 | KP090171 | KP090174 | MN849440 | genseq-4 | |
“Pholidobolus macbrydei” | KU 218406 | Ecuador: Azuay: Cuenca | AY507848 | AY507867 | AY507886 | – | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 9914 | Ecuador: Azuay: Guablid | KC894352 | KC894366 | KC894380 | MN849441 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 9932 | Ecuador: Azuay: 20 km on road Cuenca-El Cajas | KC894353 | KC894367 | KC894381 | MN849442 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 9947 | Ecuadro: Cañar: Cañar | MN724012 | MN720246 | MN717141 | MN849474 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 10051 | Ecuador: Cañar: Río Guallicanga, quebrada Juncal | MN724014 | MN720248 | MN717143 | MN849472 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 10052 | Ecuador: Cañar: Río Guallicanga, quebrada Juncal | MN724015 | MN720249 | MN717144 | MN849473 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 10050 | Ecuador: Cañar: A 1000 m de la Panamericana Juncal | MN724013 | MN720247 | MN717142 | MN849471 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15811 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724021 | MN720255 | MN717149 | MN849480 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15812 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724022 | MN720256 | MN717150 | MN849481 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15813 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724023 | MN720257 | MN717151 | MN849482 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15814 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724024 | MN720258 | MN717152 | – | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15815 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724025 | MN520259 | MN717153 | – | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15816 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724026 | MN720260 | MN717154 | MN849483 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15817 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724027 | MN720261 | MN717155 | MN849484 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15818 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724028 | MN720262 | MN717156 | MN849485 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15819 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724029 | MN720263 | MN717157 | MN849486 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15820 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724030 | MN720264 | MN717158 | MN849487 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15823 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724031 | MN720265 | MN717159 | MN849488 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 15824 | Ecuador: Cañar: Mazar | MN724032 | MN720266 | MN717160 | MN849489 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 6945 | Ecuador: Loja: Jimbura | MN724008 | MN720242 | MN717137 | MN849467 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 6946 | Ecuador: Loja: Jimbura | MN724009 | MN720243 | MN717138 | MN849468 | genseq-4 | |
“Pholidobolus macbrydei” | QCAZ 10054 | Ecuadro: Loja: Colambo Yacuri Forest | MN724016 | MN720250 | MN717145 | MN849475 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 7894 | Ecuador: El Oro: Guanazán | MN724011 | MN720245 | MN717140 | MN849470 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 7891 | Ecuador: El Oro: Guanazán | MN724010 | MN720244 | MN717139 | MN849469 | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus montium | QCAZ 4051 | Ecuador: Pichincha: Quito | KC894346 | KC894360 | KC894374 | MN849443 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 9044 | Ecuador: Pichincha: Tababela | KC894347 | KC894361 | KC894375 | MN849444 | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus paramuno | MHUAR 12451 | Colombia: Antoquia | MK215018 | MK215032 | MK215046 | – | genseq-4 |
MHUAR 12480 | Colombia: Antoquia | MK215019 | MK215033 | MK215047 | – | genseq-4 | |
MHUAR 12481 | Colombia: Antoquia | MK215020 | MK215034 | MK215048 | – | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus prefrontalis | QCAZ 9908 | Ecuador: Chimborazo: Alausí | KC894350 | KC894364 | KC894378 | – | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 9951 | Ecuador: Chimborazo: Tixán | KC894351 | KC894365 | KC894379 | MN849448 | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. | QCAZ 14954 | Ecuador: Zamora Chinchipe: Cerro Plateado | MN723997 | MN720231 | MN717126 | MN849445 | genseq-2 |
QCAZ 14955 | Ecuador: Zamora Chinchipe: Cerro Plateado | MN723998 | MN720332 | MN717127 | MN849446 | genseq-1 | |
QCAZ 14956 | Ecuador: Zamora Chinchipe: Cerro Plateado | MN723999 | MN720233 | MN717128 | MN849447 | genseq-2 | |
Pholidobolus ulisesi | CORBIDI 12735 | Peru: Cajamarca: Jaen: Huamantanga Forest | KP874787 | KP874839 | KP874948 | MN849449 | genseq-4 |
CORBIDI 12737 | Peru: Cajamarca: Jaen: Huamantanga Forest | KP874788 | KP874840 | KP874949 | – | genseq-4 | |
CORBIDI 1679 | Perú: Chota: La Granja | KP874786 | KP874838 | KP874947 | MN849450 | genseq-4 | |
Pholidobolus vertebralis | QCAZ 10667 | Ecuador: Pichincha: Santa Lucía de Nanegal | KP874784 | KP874836 | KP874946 | MN849455 | genseq-4 |
QCAZ 10750 | Ecuador: Pichincha: Santa Lucía de Nanegal | KP874785 | KP874837 | KP874947 | MN849458 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 5057 | Ecuador: Carchi: Chilma Bajo | KP874778 | KP874830 | KP874940 | MN849451 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 8687 | Ecuador: Carchi: Chilma Bajo | KP874779 | KP874831 | KP874941 | MN849452 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 8688 | Ecuador: Carchi: Chilma Bajo | KP874780 | KP874832 | KP874942 | MN849453 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 8689 | Ecuador: Carchi: Chilma Bajo | KP874781 | KP874833 | KP874943 | MN849454 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 8717 | Ecuador: Carchi: next to Chilma Bajo | KP874782 | KP874834 | KP874944 | MN849456 | genseq-4 | |
QCAZ 8724 | Ecuador: Carchi: next to Chilma Bajo | KP874783 | KP874835 | KP874945 | MN849457 | genseq-4 |
Data were assembled and aligned in Geneious v5.4.6. (
We examined 98 specimens of Pholidobolus macbrydei (Appendix
AGD axilla-groin distance;
HL head length;
HW head width;
ShL shank length;
SVL and snout-vent length.
Tail length (TL) was measured with a ruler. Sex was determined by dissection or by noting the presence of everted hemipenes. We followed the terminology of
Because the new species are similar in morphology to Pholidobolus macbrydei, we assessed the degree of differentiation among them with a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) in R (
Hemipenes were prepared following the procedures described by
The taxonomic conclusions of this study are based on the observation of morphological features and color pattern, as well as inferred phylogenetic relationships. We consider this information as species delimitation criteria following a general lineage or unified species concept (
The new species share with all known species of Pholidobolus the presence of a ventrolateral fold between fore and hind limbs and the absence of a single transparent palpebral disc (
Tree topologies under ML and BI approaches were generally similar; here we describe the maximum clade credibility tree (Fig.
Phylogeny of Pholidobolus. Maximum clade credibility tree derived from a partitioned analysis of 1904 bp of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches and bootstrap values (RAxML analysis) below branches; values ≤ 0.5 and 50, respectively, are not shown. For clarity, outgroup taxa and values on short branches are not shown. Species outside the “P. macbrydei” complex are in grey; new species described in this paper are in color matching the distribution records of the map in Figure
The “P. macbrydei” species complex (BS = 81, PP = 1) is divided into two allopatric and strongly supported clades (Fig.
Uncorrected p-genetic distances for 16S, 12S, and ND4 are presented in Tables
Pairwise genetic distances (uncorrected p) of 16S DNA sequences among species and clades of Pholidobolus included in this study. This analysis involved 66 nucleotide sequences and 533 positions.
Taxon | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pholidobolus condor sp. nov. | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Pholidobolus dolichoderes sp. nov. | 0.04 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Pholidobolus fascinatus sp. nov. | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||
5 | Clade A | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||
6 | Clade B | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
7 | Clade C | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||||||||
8 | Clade D | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||||||||||
9 | Clade E | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||||||
10 | Clade F | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | ||||||||
11 | Pholidobolus affinis | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||||
12 | Pholidobolus dicrus | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | ||||||
13 | Pholidobolus hillisi | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |||||
14 | Pholidobolus montium | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | ||||
15 | Pholidobolus paramuno | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |||
17 | Pholidobolus prefrontalis | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||
17 | Pholidobolus ulisesi | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
18 | Pholidobolus vertebralis | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
Pairwise genetic distances (uncorrected p) of 12S DNA sequences among species and clades of Pholidobolus included in this study. This analysis involved 65 nucleotide sequences and 339 positions.
Taxon | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pholidobolus condor sp. nov. | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Pholidobolus dolichoderes sp. nov. | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Pholidobolus fascinatus sp. nov. | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||
5 | Clade A | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||
6 | Clade B | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
7 | Clade C | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||||||||
8 | Clade D | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||||||||||
9 | Clade E | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |||||||||
10 | Clade F | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||||
11 | Pholidobolus affinis | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | |||||||
12 | Pholidobolus dicrus | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | ||||||
13 | Pholidobolus hillisi | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | |||||
14 | Pholidobolus montium | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.05 | ||||
15 | Pholidobolus paramuno | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.06 | |||
16 | Pholidobolus prefrontalis | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | ||
17 | Pholidobolus ulisesi | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
18 | Pholidobolus vertebralis | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
Pairwise genetic distances (uncorrected p) of ND4 DNA sequences among species and clades of Pholidobolus included in this study. This analysis involved 64 nucleotide sequences and 621 positions.
Taxon | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pholidobolus condor sp. nov. | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Pholidobolus dolichoderes sp. nov. | 0.13 | 0.12 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Pholidobolus fascinatus sp. nov. | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||
5 | Clade A | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||
6 | Clade B | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||
7 | Clade C | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.11 | |||||||||||
8 | Clade D | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.06 | ||||||||||
9 | Clade E | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |||||||||
10 | Clade F | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||||||||
11 | Pholidobolus affinis | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.15 | |||||||
12 | Pholidobolus dicrus | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 | ||||||
13 | Pholidobolus hillisi | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.19 | |||||
14 | Pholidobolus montium | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.17 | ||||
15 | Pholidobolus paramuno | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.15 | |||
16 | Pholidobolus prefrontalis | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||
17 | Pholidobolus ulisesi | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.16 | |
18 | Pholidobolus vertebralis | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
Two components with eigenvalues > 1.0 were extracted from the PCA (Table
Character loadings, eigenvalues, and percentage of variance explained by Principal Components (PC) I and II. The analysis was based on 16 morphological characters of specimens of “Pholidobolus macbrydei”, Pholidobolus samek sp. nov., Pholidobolus condor sp. nov., Pholidobolus dolichoderes sp. nov. and P. fascinatus sp. nov. Highest loadings are in bold.
Variable | PCA | |
---|---|---|
PC I | PC II | |
NSO | 0.13 | -0.11 |
SUJ | 0.32 | -0.15 |
SLJ | 0.30 | -0.10 |
SGJ | 0.29 | -0.07 |
SGV | 0.31 | 0.25 |
DEL | 0.30 | 0.33 |
NTS | 0.32 | -0.20 |
SAB | 0.26 | 0.39 |
SAT | 0.18 | 0.55 |
SF3 | 0.18 | -0.11 |
SF5 | 0.22 | -0.31 |
ST3 | 0.24 | 0.04 |
ST4 | 0.20 | -0.12 |
ST5 | 0.29 | -0.02 |
LES | -0.05 | 0.20 |
SGC | -0.22 | 0.35 |
Eigenvalue | 6.51 | 1.60 |
% | 40.69 | 9.99 |
Hemipenes of holotypes of the four new species described herein are approximately 4–5 mm and 5−7 subcaudal scales long. The organs are fully everted in specimens of P. fascinatus, P. condor, and P. samek and partially everted in P. dolichoderes; the hemipenes of the holotype of P. fascinatus and P. condor are fully expanded, whereas the organs of P. dolichoderes and P. samek are partially expanded (Fig.
Comparative hemipenial morphology of Pholidobolus. Sulcate (left), lateral (center) and asulcate (right) views of: A Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. (
The sides and borders of the sulcate and asulcate faces are ornamented with a series of roughly equidistant and chevron-shaped flounces, with the chevron vertices aligned medially on each side and directed proximally. All flounces bear calcified comb-like series of spicules, distinctively stained in red with Alizarin. The number of flounces extending along the hemipenial body varies slightly among species: 21 in P. condor and P. samek and 22 in P. dolichoderes and P. fascinatus. The base of the asulcate face bears three medial flounces in P. condor, P. dolichoderes, and P. samek, and four in P. fascinatus. All species have a conspicuous unevenness forming a bulge along the margins of the asulcate face.
Ecuador: Provincia Zamora-Chinchipe:
Pholidobolus samek is unique among its congeners, except P. condor sp. nov., in having green dorsolateral stripes on the head. However, adult males of P. samek differ from those of P. condor sp. nov. in having brighter dorsolateral head stripes and lacking a reddish venter. In addition, P. affinis, P. prefrontalis, P. macbrydei, P. dolichoderes sp. nov., and P. montium differ from P. samek (character states of P. samek in parentheses) in having a loreal scale frequently in contact with the supralabials (loreal scale not in contact with supralabials), and dorsal scales finely wrinkled (slightly keeled). Pholidobolus ulisesi and P. hillisi differ from P. samek in having a diagonal white bar along the rictal region (white rictal bar absent). Pholidobolus samek can be distinguished from P. dicrus by lacking a bifurcating vertebral stripe at midbody. Pholidobolus affinis, P. prefrontalis, P. dicrus, P. hillisi, and P. vertebralis further differ from P. samek in having well defined prefrontal scales (if present, prefrontal scales poorly differentiated). Additionally, P. samek has fewer dorsal scales (27−29) than P. affinis (45−55), P. montium (35−50), P. prefrontalis (37−46), P. macbrydei (31−43), P. fascinatus sp. nov. (32−37), and P. dolichoderes sp. nov. (35−40). Pholidobolus samek can be further distinguished from P. fascinatus by having widened medial scales on collar, and from P. dolichoderes sp. nov. by having fewer temporals (4–5 and 7–9, respectively), fewer ventrals (19–21 and 25–27), and fewer gulars (15–18 and 22–23).
(1) Two (rarely three) supraoculars, anteriormost slightly larger than posterior one; (2) prefrontals present or absent; (3) femoral pores absent in both sexes; (4) four to five opaque lower eyelid scales; (5) scales on dorsal surface of neck striated, becoming slightly keeled from forelimbs to tail; (6) two or three rows of lateral granules at midbody; (7) 27–29 dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimb; (8) lateral body fold present; (9) keeled ventrolateral scales on each side absent; (10) dorsum grayish brown with a distinct golden gray middorsal stripe, slender at midbody, becoming pale gray towards tail; (11) labial stripe white or orange; (12) flanks of body dark brown; (13) conical hemipenial body, with sulcus spermaticus originating between thick lips.
Adult male (
Nuchal scales similar in size to dorsals, except for the anteriormost that are widened; scales on sides of neck small and granular; dorsal scales hexagonal, elongate, imbricate, arranged in transverse rows; scales on dorsal surface of neck striated, becoming progressively keeled from forelimbs to tail; number of dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimbs 27; dorsal scale rows in a transverse line at midbody 26; one longitudinal row of smooth, enlarged ventrolateral scales on each side; dorsals separated from ventrals by two rows of small scales at level of 13th row of ventrals; lateral body fold between fore and hindlimbs present; ventrals smooth, wider than long, arranged in 20 transverse rows between collar fold and preanals; six ventral scales in a transverse row at midbody; subcaudals smooth; axillary region with granular scales; scales on dorsal surface of forelimb striated, imbricate; scales on ventral surface of forelimb granular; two thick, smooth thenar scales; supradigitals (left/right) 3/3 on finger I, 6/7 on II, 8/8 on III, 9/9 on IV, 6/6 on V; supradigitals 3/4 on toe I, 6/6 on II, 10/9 on III, 11/12 on IV, 7/7 on V; subdigital lamellae of fingers I and II single, paired on III (except the four distalmost), paired at base on IV, on finger V all single; subdigital lamellae 5/5 on finger I, 11/12 on II, 15/16 on III, 17/16 on IV, 9/10 on V; subdigital lamellae on toes I and II single, on toe III, IV and V all paired, except for the three distalmost subdigitals; subdigital lamellae 6/6 on toe I, 11/10 on II, 16/15 on III, 21/21 on IV, 14/14 on V; groin region with small, imbricate scales; scales on dorsal surface of hindlimbs smooth and imbricate; scales on ventral surface of hindlimbs smooth; scales on posterior surface of hindlimbs granular; femoral pores absent; preanal pores absent; cloacal plate paired, bordered by four scales anteriorly, of which the two medialmost are enlarged.
Additional measurements (mm) and proportions of the holotype: HL 11.4; HW 7.4; ShL 7.0; AGD 23.9; TL/SVL 1.5; HL/SVL 0.2; HW/SVL 0.2; ShL/SVL 0.1; AGD/SVL 0.5.
Dorsal background from head to base of tail grayish brown, with a golden light brown vertebral stripe extending from occiput to tail; bright green dorsolateral stripes on head; cream white longitudinal stripe extending from first supralabial to shoulder; sides of neck, flanks and limbs dark brown; reddish brown narrow stripe extending from tympanum to arm insertion; ventrolateral region of body grayish brown; throat cream; chest, belly and base of tail cream orange (Figs
Dorsal background uniformly grayish brown, with a golden-gray vertebral stripe extending from occiput to tail; vertebral stripe wider anteriorly, becoming slightly slender at most posterior part of body; dorsal and lateral surfaces of head brown (rostral, frontonasal, frontal, frontoparietals, and supraoculars); bluish white longitudinal stripe extending from first supralabial to shoulder and fading on flanks; ventrolateral aspect of neck dark brown with a dorsolateral light brown stripe extending posteriorly along flanks to hindlimbs; forelimbs with scattered ocelli (black with white center); flanks grayish brown with two dorsolateral stripes on each side, the dorsal one dark brown and the most ventral one brown diffuse with dark brown spots; tail brown dorsally; ventral surface of head gray, chest and venter dark gray, ventral surface of tail slightly gray, with scattered dark brown marks.
Measurements and scale counts of Pholidobolus samek are presented in Table
Pholidobolus samek inhabits cloud forests in Cordillera del Cóndor, southeastern Ecuador at elevations between 2324−2844 m (Fig.
Distribution of samples of the “Pholidobolus macbrydei” species complex included in phylogenetic analyses. Circles correspond to four new species described in this paper: P. samek sp. nov. (red), P. condor sp. nov. (blue), P. dolichoderes sp. nov. (brown), and P. fascinatus sp. nov. (green). Triangles are “Pholidobolus macbrydei” clades as illustrated in the phylogenetic tree (Fig.
Pholidobolus samek is only known from Cordillera del Cóndor. The population size for this species is unknown, but our sampling suggests low abundances. Because of the small known distribution, as well as habitat destruction through mining activities nearby (
The specific epithet samek means green in the Shuar language, in allusion to the green dorsolateral head stripes distinguishing the new species from other congeners. The type locality of Pholidobolus samek lies within territory of Shuar indigenous people, who inhabit the Amazonian rainforest in Ecuador and Peru.
Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. is very similar morphologically and genetically to P. condor sp. nov. These species can be easily distinguished from each other by coloration in adult males, although we recognize that our sample size is small (N = 7 and 4, respectively) and includes only one adult male per species. However, further evidence supports recognition of P. samek and P. condor as different species. First, they are reciprocally monophyletic and they are not sister taxa, with P. samek being sister to “P. macbrydei” Clade A (Fig.
Ecuador: Provincia Morona Santiago:
Pholidobolus condor is unique among its congeners, except P. samek sp. nov., in having green dorsolateral stripes on the head. However, adult males of P. condor differ from those of P. samek sp. nov. in having lighter dorsolateral head stripes, and reddish flanks and venter. In addition, P. ulisesi, P. dicrus, P. hillisi, and P. vertebralis differ from P. condor (character states of P. condor in parentheses) in having a conspicuous light vertebral stripe (light vertebral stripe absent). Pholidobolus affinis, P. prefrontalis, P. dicrus, P. hillisi, and P. vertebralis further differ from P. condor in having prefrontal scales (prefrontal scales absent). Additionally, P. condor sp. nov. has fewer dorsal scales (26−30) than P. affinis (45−55), P. montium (35−50), P. prefrontalis (37−46), P. macbrydei (31−43), and P. dolichoderes sp. nov. (35−40). Pholidobolus condor can be further distinguished from P. fascinatus sp. nov. by having widened medial scales on collar, and from P. dolichoderes sp. nov. by having fewer temporals (7–9 and 4–5, respectively), fewer ventrals (18–20 and 25–27), and fewer gulars (14–16 and 22–23).
(1) Two (rarely three) supraoculars, anteriormost larger than posterior one; (2) prefrontals absent; (3) femoral pores absent; (4) four opaque lower eyelid scales; (5) scales on dorsal surface of neck striated or smooth, progressively striated from forelimbs to tail; (6) two rows of lateral granules at midbody; (7) 27−31 dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimb; (8) lateral body fold present; (9) keeled ventrolateral scales on each side absent; (10) dorsum dark brown with a narrow, pale brown stripe; (11) labial stripe white; (12) flanks of body dark brown or gray; (13) hemipenial body cylindrical with distinctive capitular groove.
Adult male (
Nuchal scales slightly smaller than dorsals, except for the anteriormost that are widened; scales on sides of neck small and granular; dorsal scales elongate, imbricate, arranged in transverse rows; scales on dorsal surface of neck striated, becoming progressively keeled from forelimbs to tail; dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimbs 27; dorsal scale rows in a transverse line at midbody 27; one longitudinal row of smooth, enlarged ventrolateral scales on each side; dorsals separated from ventrals by two rows of small scales at the level of 13th row of ventrals; lateral body fold between fore and hindlimbs present; ventrals smooth, wider than long, arranged in 20 transverse rows between collar fold and preanals; six ventral scales in a transverse row at midbody; subcaudals smooth; axillary region with granular scales; scales on dorsal surface of forelimb striated, imbricate; scales on ventral surface of forelimb granular; two thick, smooth thenar scales; supradigitals (left/right) 3/3 on finger I, 6/6 on II, 8/8 on III, 9/9 on IV, 6/6 on V; supradigitals 3/3 on toe I, 6/6 on II, 9/9 on III, 12/12 on IV, 7/7 on V; subdigital lamellae of finger I, II, III, and V single, on finger IV few scales in the middle paired; subdigital lamellae 6/6 on finger I, 11/11 on II, 15/15 on III, 17/16 on IV, 10/10 on V; subdigital lamellae on toes I and II single, on toes III, IV and V paired, except for two or three distalmost subdigitals; subdigital lamellae 7/6 on toe I, 12/12 on II, 15/16 on III, 22/22 on IV, 12/12 on V; groin region with small, juxtaposed scales; scales on dorsal surface of hindlimbs striated and imbricate; scales on ventral surface of hindlimbs smooth; scales on posterior surface of hindlimbs granular; femoral pores absent; preanal pores absent; cloacal plate paired, bordered by four scales anteriorly, of which the two medialmost are enlarged.
Additional measurements (mm) and proportions of the holotype: HL 11.0; HW 6.6; ShL 5.8; AGD 20.4; TL/SVL 1.7; HL/SVL 0.3; HW/SVL 0.2; ShL/SVL 0.1; AGD/SVL 0.5.
Dorsal background from head to base of tail dark brown, with a golden brown vertebral stripe extending from occiput to tail; greenish cream dorsolateral stripes on head, becoming light brown on posterior part of body; white longitudinal stripe extending from first supralabial to shoulder; sides of neck, flanks and limbs dark brown; chocolate brown narrow stripe extending from tympanum to arm insertion; ventrolateral region of body grayish brown; throat reddish cream; chest, belly, base of tail and lateral region of tail bright orange, with brown marks in some scales; ventral surface of hind limbs with orange diffuse marks (Fig.
Dorsal background uniformly dark brown with a grayish brown middorsal stripe extending from occiput onto tail; dorsolateral stripe distinct, pale gray, extending from snout to near base of tail; head brown dorsally (rostral, frontonasal, frontal, frontoparietals and supraoculars) and dark brown laterally; white longitudinal stripe extending from first supralabial to forelimb; lateral aspect of neck dark brown with a dorsolateral light brown stripe extending posteriorly along flanks to hindlimbs; flanks grayish brown; tail dark brown dorsally and bronze laterally; ventral surface of head gray, with dirty cream genials and scattered black marks; chest, belly and ventral surface of tail light gray with light red spots; ventral surface of limbs dark gray (Fig.
Measurements and scale counts of Pholidobolus condor are presented in Table
Summary of morphological characters and measurements (mm) of Pholidobolus samek sp. nov., P. condor sp. nov., P. dolichoderes sp. nov., and P. fascinatus sp. nov. Range (first line) and mean ± standard deviation (second line) are presented.
Character | P. samek sp. nov. N = 7 (adults = 3) | P. condor sp. nov. N = 4 (adults = 1) | P. dolichoderes sp. nov. N = 5 (adults = 3) | P. fascinatus sp. nov. N = 27 (adults = 4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scales along margin of upper jaw | 7–10 (9.14 ± 1.07) | 8–9 (8.75 ± 0.5) | 9–11 (10.2 ± 0.84) | 7–10 (8.36 ± 0.91) |
Scales along margin of lower jaw | 8–9 (8.25 ± 0.5) | 5–10 (7.14 ± 2.67) | 10–11 (10.2 ± 0.45) | 4–10 (7.4 ± 1.58) |
Gulars | 15–18 (16.71 ± 1.11) | 14–16 (15 ± 0.82) | 22–23 (22.8 ± 0.48) | 14–17 (15.72 ± 0.89) |
Ventrals in transverse row at midbody | 19–21 (20 ± 0.82) | 18–20 (19 ± 1.15) | 25–27 (25.8 ± 0.84) | 21–25 (22.96 ± 1.21) |
Dorsals from occiput to base of tail | 27–29 (27.71 ± 0.76) | 26–30 (27.75 ± 1.71) | 35–40 (36.8 ± 2.05) | 32–37 (34.64 ± 1.19) |
Temporals | 4–5 (4.14 ± 0.38) | 4–5 (4.25 ± 0.5) | 7–9 (8 ± 0.70) | 3–5 (3.44 ± 0.65) |
Scales around midbody | 25–32 (27.71 ± 2.75) | 27–30 (28 ± 1.41) | 31–33 (32.2 ± 0.84) | 28–34 (30.96 ± 1.79) |
Scales around tail | 14–16 (15 ± 0.81) | 14–20 (17.86 ± 2.73) | 18–19 (18.6 ± 0.55) | 18–22 (20.32 ± 1.18) |
Lower eyelid scales | 4–5 (4.14 ± 0.38) | 5 | 4–6 (4.8 ± 0.84) | 4–6 (5.04 ± 0.61) |
Gular (collar) scales | 6–8 (7.14 ± 0.9) | 6–9 (7.75 ± 1.26) | 6–8 (6.4 ± 0.89) | 9–12 (10.28 ± 0.73) |
Head length in adults | 9.9–11.4 (10.76 ± 0.77) | 11 | 9.7–10.6 (10.05 ± 0.46) | 8.9–12.3 (10.22 ± 1.80) |
Head width in adults | 6.5–7.4 (6.93 ± 0.48) | 6.6 | 6.2–6.3 (6.26 ± 0.05) | 6.6–9.2 (7.58 ± 1.45) |
SVL in adults | 41.6–49.3 (45.89 ± 3.89) | 42.7 | 41.1–50.6 (45.75 ± 4.74) | 42.6–52.5 (47.3 ± 4.98) |
Pholidobolus condor occurs in Cordillera del Cóndor in southeastern Ecuador at elevations between 1994–2226 m. The new species is known from El Quimi Biological Reserve in Morona Santiago province (Fig.
Several eggs were found within a bromeliad, suggesting that females of P. condor lay their eggs in communal nests. Four eggs that were found on the ground at the base of bromeliads and under a trunk were incubated in sphagnum and perlite in captivity for approximately three months. On average, hatchlings weighted 0.4 g and were 23.7 mm in SVL.
Pholidobolus condor is only known from Cordillera del Cóndor in southeastern Ecuador. This area is currently threatened by mining activities (
The specific epithet condor refers to Cordillera del Cóndor, where the new species was discovered. The Cordillera del Cóndor is an eastern outlier of the main Andean chain, where a significant number of species have been discovered in the last decade (
See remarks on Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. above.
Ecuador: Provincia Azuay:
Pholidobolus dolichoderes is unique among its congeners in having a long neck with granular scales between the posterior corner of the orbit and the anterior edge of the tympanum, as well as an inconspicuous ventrolateral fold between fore and hindlimbs. In addition, P. ulisesi, P. dicrus, P. hillisi, and P. vertebralis differ from P. dolichoderes in having a conspicuous light vertebral stripe. The new species further differs from P. affinis in lacking ocelli on flanks, and from P. condor sp. nov., P. macbrydei, and P. montium in having prefrontal scales. Pholidobolus dolichoderes has more dorsals (35–40) and ventrals (25–27) than P. samek sp. nov. (27–29 and 19–21, respectively) and P. condor sp. nov. (26–30 and 18–20), and, unlike P. fascinatus sp. nov., it has widened medial scales on collar. In addition, P. dolichoderes has more temporals (7–9) and gulars (22–23) than P. samek sp. nov. (4–5 and 15–18, respectively), P. condor sp. nov. (4–5 and 14–16), and P. fascinatus sp. nov. (3–5 and 14–17).
(1) Three supraoculars, anteriormost larger than posterior ones; (2) prefrontals present; (3) femoral pores present in both sexes; (4) four to six opaque lower eyelid scales; (5) scales on dorsal surface of neck smooth, becoming slightly keeled from forelimbs to tail; (6) two or three rows of lateral granules at midbody; (7) 35−20 dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimb; (8) lateral body fold present but inconspicuous; (9) keeled ventrolateral scales on each side absent; (10) dorsum dark brown with a diffuse pale brown vertebral stripe that becomes grayish brown towards tail; (11) labial stripe white; (12) flanks of body gray brown; (13) white stripe along forelimb present; (14) hemipenial body cylindrical, with sulcus spermaticus originating between thick lips.
Adult male (
Nuchal scales slightly smaller than dorsals, except for the anteriormost that are widened; scales on sides of neck small and granular; dorsal scales elongate, juxtaposed, arranged in transverse rows; scales on dorsal surface of neck striated, becoming slightly keeled from forelimbs to tail; dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimbs 35; dorsal scale rows in a transverse line at midbody 32; one longitudinal row of smooth, enlarged ventrolateral scales on each side; dorsals separated from ventrals by three rows of granular scales at level of 13th row of ventrals; lateral body fold between fore and hindlimbs poorly defined; ventrals smooth, arranged in 26 transverse rows between collar fold and preanals; six ventral scales in a transverse row at midbody; subcaudals smooth; axillary region with granular scales; scales on dorsal surface of forelimb smooth, imbricate; scales on ventral surface of forelimb granular; two thick, smooth thenar scales; supradigitals (left/right) 3/0 on finger I, 7/7 on II, 9/8 on III, 10/10 on IV, 5/5 on V; supradigitals 4/4 on toe I, 7/7 on II, 11/11 on III, 12/11 on IV, 9/8 on V; subdigital lamellae of fingers I and II mostly single, III and IV paired proximally, on finger V all single; subdigital lamellae 5 on left finger I (right finger missing), 10/10 on II, 14/14 on III, 14/14 on IV, 9/9 on V; subdigital lamellae on toe I single, on toe II paired at the middle, on toe III and IV paired along proximal half, and on toe V paired proximally; subdigital lamellae 5/5 on toe I, 10/10 on II, 14/14 on III, 18/19 on IV, 11/11 on V; groin region with small, imbricate scales; scales on dorsal surface of hindlimbs striated and imbricate; scales on ventral surface of hindlimbs smooth; scales on posterior surface of hindlimbs granular; femoral pores present, three on left leg and five on right leg; preanal pores absent; cloacal plate paired, bordered by four scales anteriorly, of which the two medialmost are enlarged.
Additional measurements (mm) and proportions of the holotype: HL 9.8; HW 6.2; ShL 5.4; AGD 20.7; TL/SVL 2.4; HL/SVL 0.2; HW/SVL 0.1; ShL/SVL 0.1; AGD/SVL 0.5.
Dorsal background of head dark brown; diffuse pale brown vertebral stripe that becomes grayish brown towards tail; creamy white dorsolateral stripes on head extending posteriorly and fading away at midbody; white longitudinal stripe extending from first supralabial to shoulder; sides of neck brown; flanks grayish brown with diffuse dark brown marks; limbs brown; ventrolateral region of body grayish brown; throat and chest cream; belly grayish cream; base of tail gray with dark little spots (Figs
Dorsal background uniformly brown with a diffuse light brown vertebral stripe extending from occiput onto tail, but fading at posterior end of body; dorsal and ventral surface of head brown; flanks light brown, with scattered dark brown spots; head and neck with two distinct white longitudinal stripes, the ventral one extending from first supralabial to forelimb, and the dorsal one from canthus rostralis to scapular region, posterior to which if fades into a light brown stripe; lateral aspect of neck dark brown; tail grayish brown; gular, chest and venter regions pale gray; ventral surface of tail and limbs gray.
Measurements and scutellation data of Pholidobolus dolichoderes are presented in Table
Adult females differ from holotype in having a grayish brown vertebral stripe, fading away posteriorly, and grayish brown flanks (Fig.
Pholidobolus dolichoderes is known to occur between 2506−2675 m in San Felipe de Oña, southwestern Azuay province (Fig.
Pholidobolus dolichoderes is only known from unprotected localities around Oña. The population size of this species is unknown, but our sampling suggests low abundances. Because of the small known distribution and lack of additional data, we suggest assigning P. dolichoderes to the Data Deficient category according to
The specific epithet dolichoderes derives from the Greek words dolikhós, meaning long, and derē, meaning neck, in allusion to the distinctively long neck of this species.
Ecuador: Provincia El Oro:
Pholidobolus fascinatus is unique among its congeners in lacking widened medial scales on collar (posterior row of gulars). In addition, P. fascinatus differs from P. affinis, P. prefrontalis, P. macbrydei, P. dolichoderes sp. nov., and P. montium in having a loreal scale frequently in contact with the supralabials (loreal scale, if present, not in contact with supralabials in the other species). Pholidobolus ulisesi, P. dicrus, P. hillisi, P. paramuno, and P. vertebralis differ from P. fascinatus in having a conspicuous light vertebral stripe. Pholidobolus samek sp. nov. and P. condor sp. nov. differ from P. fascinatus in having bright green dorsolateral stripes on the head. In addition, P. fascinatus has more dorsals (32–37) and ventrals (21–25) than P. samek sp. nov. (27–29 and 19–21, respectively) and P. condor sp. nov. (26–30 and 18–20); and it has fewer temporals (3–5) and gulars (14–17) than P. dolichoderes sp. nov. (7–9 and 22–23, respectively).
(1) Two (rarely three) supraoculars, anteriormost larger than posterior one; (2) prefrontals present or absent; (3) femoral pores absent in both sexes; (4) four to six opaque lower eyelid scales; (5) scales on dorsal surface of neck smooth, becoming striated from forelimbs to tail; (6) one row of lateral granules at midbody; (7) 32–37 dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimb; (8) lateral body fold present; (9) dorsum brown with a diffused chocolate brown middorsal stripe that fades away towards tail; (11) labial stripe white or cream; (12) flanks of body brown; (13) conical hemipenial body, with sulcus spermaticus originating between distinctly thick lips; (14) 22 flounces extending along hemipenial body.
Adult male (
Nuchal scales similar in size to dorsals, except for the anteriormost that are widened; scales on sides of neck small and slightly granular; dorsal scales hexagonal, elongate, imbricate, arranged in transverse rows; scales on dorsal surface of neck smooth, becoming progressively striated from forelimbs to tail; dorsal scales between occipital and posterior margin of hindlimbs 33; dorsal scale rows in a transverse line at midbody 25; dorsals separated from ventrals by one row of small scales at level of 13th row of ventrals; lateral body fold between fore and hindlimbs present; ventrals smooth, wider than long, arranged in 25 transverse rows between collar fold and preanals; six ventral scales in a transverse row at midbody; subcaudals smooth; axillary region with granular scales; scales on dorsal surface of forelimb striated, imbricate; scales on ventral surface of forelimb granular; two thick, smooth thenar scales; supradigitals (left/right) 3/3 on finger I, 7/6 on II, 8/8 on III, 10/10 on IV, 5/5 on V; supradigitals 3/3 on toe I, 6/6 on II, 8/9 on III, 11/11 on IV, 8/8 on V; subdigital lamellae of finger I single, on finger II all paired, except by the three distalmost, on finger III (proximal half) paired, on finger IV slightly paired at the middle, on finger V all single in right finger and three paired in left finger; subdigital lamellae 5/5 on finger I, 9/9 on II, 13/13 on III, 14/15 on IV, 9/9 on V; subdigital lamellae on toes I and II paired proximally and single distally, on toes III, IV and V paired, except for the three to five distalmost subdigitals; subdigital lamellae 5/5 on toe I, 10/10 on II, 14/13 on III, 18/18 on IV, 11/12 on V; groin region with small, imbricate scales; scales on dorsal surface of hindlimbs smooth and imbricate; scales on ventral surface of hindlimbs smooth; scales on posterior surface of hindlimbs granular; femoral pores absent; preanal pores absent; cloacal plate paired, bordered anteriorly by two enlarged scales.
Additional measurements (mm) and proportions of the holotype: HL 12.3; HW 9.2; ShL 6.7; AGD 26.5; TL/SVL 0.7; HL/SVL 0.2; HW/SVL 0.2; ShL/SVL 0.1; AGD/SVL 0.5.
Dorsal background from head to base of tail brown, with a diffuse chocolate-brown middorsal stripe that fades away towards tail; light brown dorsolateral stripes on head extending posteriorly and fading away at midbody; white longitudinal stripe extending from third supralabial to shoulder; sides of neck, flanks, and limbs brown; reddish brown narrow stripe extending from tympanum to arm insertion; ventrolateral region of body grayish brown; throat and chest gray; belly background gray with conspicuous orange marks; tail orange anteriorly and laterally (Figs
Dorsal background uniformly brown with a cream brown vertebral stripe extending from head onto tail; vertebral stripe slender anteriorly, becoming slightly wider posteriorly; head light brown with black dots dorsally (rostral, frontonasal, frontal, frontoparietals and supraoculars) and brown laterally; cream longitudinal stripe extending from third supralabial to shoulder; ventrolateral aspect of neck brown; forelimbs with scattered black dots; flanks brown; tail brown dorsally; ventral surface of head light gray, chest and venter dark gray, ventral surface of tail slightly brown, with scattered dark brown marks.
Measurements and scale counts of Pholidobolus fascinatus are presented in Table
Pholidobolus fascinatus inhabits wet paramo in the western slopes of the Andes of southern Ecuador (Fig.
We found 41 eggs (17 as fragmented eggshells) in a communal nest next to male
Pholidobolus fascinatus is only known from localities around Lake Chillacocha. The population size for this species is unknown, but our sampling suggests average abundances. Because of the small known distribution and lack of additional data, we suggest assigning P. fascinatus to the Data Deficient category, according to
The species epithet fascinatus is a Latin word meaning enchanted, in allusion to Lake Chillacocha, also known as the Enchanted Lake. According to local belief, this lake is enchanted and has healing powers.
The systematics of Pholidobolus and its sister taxon Macropholidus have been controversial partly because morphological evidence has been misinterpreted. Nonetheless, the recent use of molecular phylogenies has reshaped the systematics and taxonomy of this clade (
Current evidence prevents us from assigning the name P. macbrydei to any of the recovered clades. However, we suspect that P. macbrydei belongs or is more closely related to Clades C, D, and E for two reasons (Fig.
The Cordillera del Cóndor is a sub-Andean mountain chain geologically similar to the Tepuis of the Guiana region. It is composed of marine and continental sediments (
The discovery of four new species and a paraphyletic P. macbrydei reveals high levels of unexpected diversity within Pholidobolus from southern Ecuador. This study supports the idea that Andean herpetofauna in this region is more diverse in species numbers than previously thought (
This research was funded by the Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación del Ecuador SENESCYT (‘Iniciativa Arca de Noé’, PIs Omar Torres-Carvajal and Santiago Ron), and the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. P.M.S.N. is grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support (Fellowship #313622/2018-3). We thank the
Additional specimens examined of Pholidobolus macbrydei. ECUADOR: Provincia Azuay: Cuenca-Azogues, 2.895222S, 78.95822W, 2486 m,
Phylogeny of Pholidobolus. ML phylogram derived from the analysis of 411 bp of nuclear DNA. Bootstrap values are shown above branches and Bayesian posterior probabilities below branches (≤ 50% not shown). Asterisks indicate maximum values. The outgroup taxon (Anadia rhombifera) is not shown. Species names followed by voucher numbers are shown.