Research Article |
Corresponding author: Amanda M. Windsor ( amanda.windsor@fda.gov ) Academic editor: Sammy De Grave
© 2019 Amanda M. Windsor, Jose Christopher E. Mendoza, Jonathan R. Deeds.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
Citation:
Windsor AM, Mendoza JCE, Deeds JR (2019) Resolution of the Portunus gladiator species complex: taxonomic status and identity of Monomia gladiator (Fabricius, 1798) and Monomia haanii (Stimpson, 1858) (Brachyura, Decapoda, Portunidae). ZooKeys 858: 11-43. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.858.33826
|
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently adopted DNA barcoding for the purpose of determining the species identity of commercial seafood products. This effort has revealed instances of incongruence between current scientifically accepted taxon names and those utilized by the seafood industry in product labelling. One such case is that of “Portunus haanii”, a name utilized by the seafood industry to label commercial products under the market name “red swimming crab.” However, carcinologists currently regard P. haanii as synonym of Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798, which itself is the subject of debate over whether it is a secondary homonym of Cancer gladiator Fabricius, 1793. Further complicating matters, DNA barcode sequences from commercial products match GenBank sequences identified as Portunus pseudoargentatus Stephenson, 1961. Here the complicated taxonomic history of the Portunus gladiator complex is reviewed and a resolution proposed based on combined morphological descriptions and molecular phylogenetic analyses. It is demonstrated that, given the provisions of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and the current elevation of Monomia Gistel, 1848, to full genus rank, its type species, Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798, should be treated as a valid and available taxon name. It is also shown, upon examination and comparison of types and topotypic material that Monomia haanii (Stimpson, 1858) is a distinct taxon from M. gladiator, and Portunus pseudoargentatus Stephenson, 1961, is a junior subjective synonym of M. haanii (Stimpson, 1858). Furthermore, it is shown that crab meat sold in the US currently labeled as “Portunus haanii” and/or “red swimming crab” is in fact M. haanii using comparative analysis of DNA barcode sequences between museum-vouchered reference specimens, whole crabs provided directly by a seafood importer, and processed commercial products purchased at retail.
Commercial species, DNA barcoding, molecular phylogenetics, morphology, seafood, swimming crab, taxonomy
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has adopted DNA barcoding for the purpose of species identification to assure the accurate labelling of seafood products as well as to address issues with species substitution and fraud (
At the time of the study by
Within the seafood industry, Portunus haanii and/or “red swimming crab” is the species/market name used for crabs harvested extensively from China and Vietnam (
The taxonomy of the Portunus gladiator complex is so convoluted that it makes a chronologically arranged taxonomic history difficult to compile. Here, we present the significant taxonomic actions for P. gladiator, P. haanii, and P. pseudoargentatus.
Previously, however,
As
As things stand, the issue on the validity of the names “Portunus gladiator” and “Portunus haanii” has not been satisfactorily settled. Recent publications on the systematics of Portunidae have bolstered the concept of Monomia Gistel, 1848, as a valid genus-level taxon distinct from Portunus, but these have also shown that the problem with the taxonomy of the type species, M. gladiator (Fabricius, 1798), and its closely related congeners, M. haanii (Stimpson, 1859) and M. pseudoargentata (Stephenson, 1961), remains unresolved (
An integrative approach with morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses was undertaken to resolve and stabilise the taxonomy of the Portunus gladiator (=Monomia gladiator) complex. The molecular results of the morphologically verified and vouchered reference specimens, which included whole specimens from Asian fish ports and a seafood importer, were then used as standards to identify the contents of cans of pasteurized lump crabmeat labeled as “Portunus haanii” and/or “red swimming crab” through comparative analysis of DNA barcode sequences.
Materials examined are deposited at the US National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (
CL carapace length, taken along the dorsal midline from the tips of the frontal teeth to the posterior margin of the carapace;
CW carapace maximum width, taken at the level of its widest point;
P1–P5 first to fifth pereopods, respectively (P1, chelipeds; P2–P5, first to fourth ambulatory legs);
G1, G2 first and second male pleopods, respectively.
The term, pleomere (first to sixth), here refers to the six somites of the pleon. When possible, DNA was extracted from the specimens utilized for the morphological studies. Details on all specimens utilized in the molecular phylogenetic component of this study are given in Table
Material examined in molecular analyses with details on voucher identification numbers, sex, country in which the specimen was collected, the fish port or body of water, and pertinent GenBank Accession Numbers. Voucher ID abbreviations:
Taxon name | Voucher ID | Sex | Country | Port/Body of Water | GenBank Accession Numbers | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12S | 16S | COI | |||||
Monomia gladiator |
|
M | India | Pazhayar Fish Landing, Bay of Bengal | MK270964 | — | MK281257 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
F | India | Pondicherry, Bay of Bengal | MK270959 | MK271060 | MK281259 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
F | Australia | Pilbara Shelf, Indian Ocean | MK270957 | MK271053 | MK281253 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
M | Australia | Dampier Archipelago, Cape Brugieres | MK270956 | MK271047 | MK281247 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
F | Singapore | Singapore Strait | MK270963 | MK271029 | MK281229 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
F | Thailand | Andaman Sea | MK270962 | MK271030 | MK281230 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
M | Thailand | Pichai Fish Port, Phuket, Andaman Sea | MK270958 | — | MK281230 |
Monomia gladiator |
|
M | Thailand | Pattani Fish Port, Gulf of Thailand | MK270960 | MK271055 | |
Monomia gladiator |
|
M | Thailand | Saiburi Crab Landing, Gulf of Thailand | MK270961 | MK271056 | |
Monomia gladiator |
|
F | Thailand | Pichai Fish Port, Phuket, Andaman Sea | — | — | |
Monomia gladiator |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | KY5244661 | — | |
Monomia gladiator |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | — | JX3980952 | |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | Japan | Pacific Ocean | MK270948 | MK271054 | MK281255 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Australia | Pilbara Shelf | MK270946 | MK271052 | MK281252 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Australia | Exmouth Gulf | MK270944 | MK271048 | MK281248 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | Australia | Exmouth Gulf | MK270945 | MK271049 | MK281249 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Australia | Ningaloo Marine Park | MK270954 | MK271051 | MK281251 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Australia | Shark Bay | MK270949 | MK271050 | MK281250 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | Australia | Shark Bay | MK270943 | MK271045 | MK281245 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | Australia | Abrolhos Islands | MK270953 | MK271046 | MK281246 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270934 | MK271033 | MK281233 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270935 | MK271034 | MK281234 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270936 | MK271035 | MK281235 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270937 | MK271036 | MK281236 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270950 | MK271037 | MK281237 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270938 | MK271038 | MK281238 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270951 | MK271039 | MK281239 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270939 | MK271040 | MK281240 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270940 | MK271041 | MK281241 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270941 | MK271042 | MK281242 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270952 | MK271043 | MK281243 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | China | South China Sea, FAO Fishing Area 61 | MK270942 | MK271044 | MK281244 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Taiwan | Daxi Fishery Port | MK270933 | MK271031 | MK281231 |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | Taiwan | Daxi Fishery Port | MK270955 | MK271032 | MK281232 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Taiwan | Daxi Fishery Port | MK270930 | MK271026 | MK281227 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Taiwan | Daxi Fishery Port | MK270931 | MK271027 | MK281228 |
Monomia haanii |
|
F | Taiwan | Daxi Fishery Port | MK270932 | MK271028 | — |
Monomia haanii |
|
M | Taiwan | Daxi Fishery Port | MK270947 | MK271059 | MK281254 |
Monomia haanii |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | KY5244631 | — | |
Monomia haanii | UO 12J-Vn12 | Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | KY5244641 | — | |
Monomia haanii |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | — | JX3980942 | |
Monomia argentata |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | KY5244801 | — | |
Monomia argentata |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | KY5244791 | — | |
Monomia argentata |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | KY5244781 | — | |
Monomia lucida |
|
M | Vanuatu | South Pacific Ocean | MK270965 | MK271061 | — |
Monomia lucida |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | — | JX3980962 | |
Monomia lucida |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | MG5637923 | — | |
Monomia lucida |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | MG5637933 | — | |
Monomia lucida |
|
Vietnam | Của Bé Fishing Port | — | MG5637943 | — | |
Monomia petrea |
|
Guam | Tepungan Channel | — | KT3656064 | KT3657434 | |
Outgroup Taxa | |||||||
Portunus sanguinolentus |
|
M | India | Pazhayar Fish Landing | MK270966 | MK271057 | — |
Portunus pelagicus |
|
M | India | Porto Novo | MK270967 | MK271058 | MK281258 |
Four cans (454 g each) of pasteurized lump crabmeat labeled as “Portunus haanii” were purchased from grocery stores in Maryland and Virginia in 2016 and 2017. Portions of 10 lumps (i.e., single piece of crabmeat reasonably expected to be from an individual crab), five from the top and five from the bottom, from each tub were sampled for DNA extraction (N=40). The DNA barcode region of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) was amplified and sequenced from samples following the methods described below.
Genomic DNA was extracted from muscle tissue dissected from ethanol preserved or fresh specimens using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s animal tissue protocol. Portions of three mitochondrial genes were amplified: a 658 bp barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase I gene using the primers JgLCO1490 and JgHCO2189 (
Geneious 9.1.7 (Biomatters) was used to visualize, trim, edit, and assemble contigs from forward and reverse sequences. All PCR, sequencing, and analytics were carried out at the Laboratories of Analytical Biology at
Partial sequences for each locus were also amplified from Portunus pelagicus (
A best-fit model of nucleotide sequence evolution compatible with MrBayes and partitioning arrangement for each locus was determined using Partition Finder 2 (
In addition to the concatenated dataset, a COI-only dataset which incorporated sequences from GenBank and BOLD was analysed to identify the species of crab found in four cans of pasteurized lump crabmeat labelled as “Portunus haanii.” For visualization purposes, a neighbour joining tree of the 658bp alignment was built using the Jukes-Cantor model in the Geneious Tree Builder. Patristic and K2P distances were calculated for each alignment using MEGA7 (
Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the concatenated dataset of three mitochondrial loci show that there is a well-supported (98/1) separation between M. gladiator and M. haanii. Monomia petrea (Alcock, 1899) (UF188; KT365743, KT365606) is a strongly supported sister to both (95/1) (Fig.
DNA barcode sequence analyses for species identification of products confirm that crabmeat sold as “Portunus haanii” is indeed what we have identified herein as Monomia haanii s. str. (Fig.
Portunidae Rafinesque, 1815
Portuninae Rafinesque, 1815
Monomia Gistel, 1848
Type species. Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798, type species of Amphitrite De Haan, 1833, by subsequent designation (Miers, 1886); pre-occupied by Amphitrite Müller, 1771 [Polychaeta]; Monomia Gistel, 1848, replacement name for Amphitrite De Haan, 1833.
Portunus gladiator
Fabricius, 1798: 368;
Cancer menestho Herbst, 1803: 34, pl. 55 fig. 3.
Lupea gladiator, H.
Neptunus gladiator, A.
Neptunus (Amphitrite) gladiator, Miers, 1886: 177;
Callinectes gladiator,
Monomia gladiator,
Portunus (Monomia) gladiator,
Portunus (Monomia) gladiator
[sic],
Portunus haanii,
Monomia haanii,
Non Cancer gladiator Fabricius, 1793: 449 (= Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783), fide
Non Portunus (Amphitrite) gladiator, De Haan 1833: 65; 1835: pl. 18 fig. 1 (= Portunus orbitosinus Rathbun, 1911).
Non Portunus gladiator,
INDIA:
AUSTRALIA:
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA:
MYANMAR:
SINGAPORE:
THAILAND: USNM127068, 2 females, Andaman Sea, north of Phuket, IIOE Anton Bruun R/V, 31 July. 1963;
Carapace (Fig.
Dorsal habitus of A lectotype of Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798, deposited in Copenhagen Museum (
Basal article of antennule completely filling antennular fossa, subsequent two articles slender. Basal article of antenna short, with broad, lateral projection entering but not obstructing orbital hiatus; flagellum long, exceeding well beyond orbit. Eyes with well-developed corneas, short, thick peduncles. Proepistome well developed, anterior tip with projecting conical tooth; epistome not extensively projecting posteriorly. Endostome with well-developed lateral ridges.
Third maxillipeds finely granulate on ischium, merus and exopod, setose on external surfaces, extensively pilose on mesial margins; ischium longer than wide, subrectangular, with deep, submesial sulcus; merus longer than wide, rhomboidal, anterolateral angle strongly projecting laterally; palp articles subcylindrical. Exopod stout, with subdistal triangular projection on inner medial border; flagellum well developed.
Male thoracic sternites covered with thick tomentum, thickest on exposed surfaces of sternites 5–8 (Fig.
Chelipeds (P1), long, robust, surfaces tomentose; slightly heterochelous, major chela usually with modified cutting/crushing tooth proximally on cutting margin of dactylus. Merus long, with 4, sometimes 5, curved spines along flexor margin, and 2 distal spines on extensor margin; both margins densely setose. Carpus with sharp spine on inner angle, and flattened spine on external surface continuing as a strong carina, with additional, shorter carina above it. Dorsal surface of palm (propodus) with two straight, longitudinal granular crests, inner one distally ending distally in strong spine; small proximal spiniform tooth at articulation with carpus; two additional, curved granular crests on external surface of palm, first ending at level of articulation with dactylus, second, lower, ending near gape, creating cristate, proximo-ventral margin of palm; inner surface of palm with two wide, distinct rows of granules. Fingers generally straight except for curved, pointed tips; subequal in length to palm; with two granulate crests each on external and internal surfaces; lowest carina on fixed finger extending into palm; numerous teeth on cutting margins, arranged in groups so that each group has large central tooth flanked by smaller teeth of decreasing size, giving the cutting margins appearance of having three or more denticulate, triangular lobes.
First to third ambulatory legs (P2–P4), long, slender; decreasing in length and size, with P2 largest, P4 smallest; flexor margins of meri, carpi, propodi and dactyli heavily setose. Fifth ambulatory (natatory) leg (P5) with quadrate merus, pentagonal carpus, flat, subrectangular propodus, and flat, oval dactylus; margins of articles regularly setose; propodus with four raised glabrous longitudinal bands, including flexor and extensor margins, interspersed with tomentum; dactylus with five raised glabrous bands, including flexor and extensor margins, interspersed with tomentum, distal third with low median crest continuing proximally as narrow tomentose stripe; in fresh specimens, P5 propodus with white band on postero-distal margin, no purple spot, P5 dactylus with small white spot on distal end.
Male pleon (Fig.
G1 (Figs
Male thoracic sternum and pleon. A–C Monomia gladiator (Fabricius, 1798), A
Left G1, sternal view (except D and E). A–D Monomia gladiator (Fabricius, 1798): A)
Following the recognition of Monomia Gistel, 1848, as a genus distinct from Portunus Weber, 1795 (see
Firstly, there are five specimens identified as syntypes of Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798, in the Zoological Museum of the University of Copenhagen (
Secondly, we agree with
Thirdly, there is the matter of the confusion between M. gladiator and M. haanii.
Monomia gladiator differs from M. haanii primarily in these three morphological characters: (1) in the fresh specimens of M. gladiator, there is a white band on the postero-distal margin of the P5 propodus, but no purple spot, and a small white spot on the distal tip of the P5 dactylus (Fig.
Furthermore, the molecular phylogenetic analysis corroborates the morphological evidence, clearly showing two distinct and well-supported clades corresponding to the two species. Specimens identified as M. gladiator based on the characters described above, including a topotypic specimen from India (
Finally, Lupea gladiator H. Milne Edwards, 1834 (Indian Ocean), is re-included in the synonymy of Monomia gladiator (Fabricius, 1898), and Cancer menestho Herbst, 1803 (probably from Indian Ocean) is hereby considered a junior subjective synonym of Monomia gladiator (Fabricius, 1798). We believe that
Portunus (Amphitrite) gladiator: De Haan 1833: 39; 1835: pl. 1 fig. 5, pl. A. Non Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798.
Amphitrite haanii
Stimpson, 1858: 38; 1907: 79;
Neptunus (Amphitrite) gladiator:
Portunus gladiator:
Portunus (Achelous) gladiator;
Portunus pseudoargentatus
Stephenson, 1961: 109, Figs
Portunus haanii:
Portunus (Monomia) gladiator:
Portunus haanii:
Portunus (Monomia) haanii Yamaguchi & Baba, 1993: 396, figs 137A–C.
Monomia pseudoargentata:
Monomia haanii:
Not Amphitrite media Stimpson, 1858: 39; 1907: 79, pl. 10 fig. 1.
Not Monomia haanii,
JAPAN:
AUSTRALIA:
SOUTH CHINA SEA (FAO Area 61): USNM1421161, 1 male, USNM1421181, 1 male, USNM1421182, 1 male, USNM1421185, 1 male, USNM1421187, 1 male, USNM1421191, 1 male, USNM1421194, 1 male, USNM1421195, 1 male, USNM1421186, 1 male, USNM121202, 1 male, USNM1421204, 1 male, USNM1421206, 1 male.
TAIWAN: UF29509, 1 female, Daxi Fishery Port; UF29511, 1 female, Daxi Fishery Port; UF29512, 1 female, Daxi Fishery Port; USNM1420827, 1 female, Daxi Fishery Port; USNM1420828, 1 male, Daxi Fishery Port;
Similar to Monomia gladiator except in the following morphological characters. Infraorbital margin granulate, terminating mesially in small triangular tooth, in line with rest of margin. Sixth pleomere (Fig.
The primary morphological differences between Monomia haanii (Stimpson, 1858) and M. gladiator (Fabricius, 1798) have already been discussed in the Remarks for the latter species.
Specimens morphologically identifiable as M. haanii comprise a highly-supported clade that includes specimens from Japan, the type locality of M. haanii, as well as the holotype of Portunus pseudoargentatus Stephenson, 1961, and the Vietnamese specimens referred to by
Maximum likelihood phylogram of three mitochondrial loci showing genetic distinction between M. gladiator and M. haanii along with three other members of the genus Monomia. Abbreviations:
The need to address and resolve the Portunus gladiator species complex was brought about largely because of the incongruence in taxon names utilized by the scientific community and the seafood industry. This incongruence was highlighted by
Revising and describing the morphological differences between these two species was necessary to verify the identity of the individual specimens used to generate reference DNA sequences for identification of picked crab meat samples labelled as “Portunus haanii.” The morphological findings of two distinct species were corroborated in our multi-locus phylogenetic analysis that showed complete congruence between morphologically derived identity and genetic clade membership. This reciprocally informative approach has enabled us to confirm that the commercial products that we tested, that were labelled and sold as Portunus haanii, were in fact Monomia haanii and should be labelled as such. Based on our findings, the FDA’s seafood labeling guidance to industry, The Seafood List, can be emended to reflect this current understanding of the species in question.
Commercially important species are often presumed to be well understood because they have tangible value, but in the case of decapod crustaceans molecular phylogenetic analyses are re-writing much of what carcinologists thought they knew about species-, genus-, and family-level relationships (
We are grateful to the following persons and institutions. Andrew Hosie and Diana Jones (
The types of Monomia gladiator (Fabricius, 1798) are currently deposited in the Natural History Museum of Denmark (NHMD) in Copenhagen. The lectotype (