Research Article |
Corresponding author: Raul Bonal ( raulbonal@unex.es ) Academic editor: Miquel A. Arnedo
© 2018 Eduardo Morano, Raul Bonal.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Morano E, Bonal R (2018) Araneus bonali sp. n., a novel lichen-patterned species found on oak trunks (Araneae, Araneidae). ZooKeys 779: 119-145. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.779.26944
|
The new species Araneus bonali Morano, sp. n. (Araneae, Araneidae) collected in central and western Spain is described and illustrated. Its novel status is confirmed after a thorough revision of the literature and museum material from the Mediterranean Basin. The taxonomy of Araneus is complicated, but both morphological and molecular data supported the genus membership of Araneus bonali Morano, sp. n. Additionally, the species uniqueness was confirmed by sequencing the barcode gene cytochrome oxidase I from the new species and comparing it with the barcodes available for species of Araneus. A molecular phylogeny, based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes, retrieved a clade with a moderate support that grouped Araneus diadematus Clerck, 1757 with another eleven species, but neither included Araneus bonali sp. n. nor Araneus angulatus Clerck, 1757, although definitive conclusions about the relationships among Araneus species need more markers examined and a broader taxonomic coverage. The new species was collected on isolated holm oaks and forest patches within agricultural landscapes. Adults were mostly trapped on tree trunks, where their lichen-like colours favour mimicry, while juveniles were collected on tree branches. Specimens were never found either in ground traps or grass samples. This species overwinters as egg, juveniles appear in early spring, but reproduction does not take place until late summer-early autumn. Araneus bonali Morano, sp. n. was found in the same locality from where another new spider species was described. Nature management policies should thus preserve isolated trees as key refuges for forest arthropods in agricultural landscapes, as they may be hosting more unnoticed new species. After including Araneus bonali Morano, sp. n. and removing doubtful records and synonymies, the list of Araneus species in the Iberian Peninsula numbers eight.
DNA barcoding, Iberian Peninsula, isolated trees, mimicry, molecular phylogeny, Quercus ilex
The genus Araneus Clerck, 1757 includes 641 species of orb weaver spiders distributed worldwide (
Here, a new species, Araneus bonali sp. n. (Araneae, Araneidae), collected at several localities in western and central Spain is described. The comparison of Araneus bonali with reference material from the Iberian Peninsula and the south-western Mediterranean Basin available at the National Museum of Natural Sciences (Madrid) confirmed that the specimens represent a new species. In addition, a bibliographic review of the descriptions of Holarctic Araneus species was performed (
Due to the challenging taxonomy of Araneus, the generic delimitation of the new species was queried by using morphological and molecular data. For the morphological analyses, the criteria exposed in the cladistic analysis of the family Araneidae performed by
Most of the specimens of the new species were collected during an extensive sampling campaign carried out in central Spain, in the same site where a new Eutichuridae spider was recently described, namely Cheiracanthium ilicis (Morano & Bonal, 2016). As in the case of C. ilicis, Araneus bonali sp. n. was found on the branches and trunks of holm oaks Quercus ilex interspersed within agricultural fields. Based on a one-year-long systematic sampling, the habitat selection and the phenology of the new species were analysed, testing whether juveniles and adults showed different patterns. Finally, the literature was consulted and all the Araneus species cited from the Iberian Peninsula listed. Their taxonomic status is discussed and the number of species updated after removing dubious species records and including Araneus bonali sp. n.
Intensive spider sampling (see
In Huecas, four different microhabitats were sampled: tree branches, tree trunks, grasses, and soil, at 23 holm oaks randomly selected (both isolated and within forest patches). The canopy of each tree was split into four parts based on the four cardinal points, a beating tray was placed under the canopy, and the branches of the corresponding canopy quarter beaten six times with a wooden stick. All the spiders falling on the beating tray were collected. Trunk traps consisted of a mosquito net attached to the tree trunk that trapped the spiders climbing up and eventually marching into the net. The net partially covered the trunks and ended in an inverted cone with a dry bottle on the top in which the spiders were collected. Soil spiders were caught in pitfall traps placed in pairs, one pair below the oak canopy and another pair at open grassland 10–15 metres far from the tree. These traps consisted of a cone through which ground-living spiders fell into a bottle filled with 90% ethanol and 10% glycerine to preserve the specimens. A small plastic roof was placed on each pitfall trap to protect them from direct sunlight and prevent alcohol evaporation. Lastly, in the grassland close to each study tree, the grass was swept for spiders with a sweep net along two 10 metres long transects on both sides of the straight line joining the two pitfall traps. Each specimen was placed in an Eppendorff tube tagged with the collection data and filled with alcohol 96% to preserve them for further morphological and molecular analyses.
The epigynes of the females were extracted, cleaned, and mounted on slides for further analysis of the internal genitalia. In males one palp was extracted and illustrated; the palpal organ was expanded after maceration in lactic acid. Genitalia were preserved in microvials together with the specimen. The spiders were inspected with a Meiji EMZ-5 stereomicroscope, equipped with a Canon EOS 350D camera to take photos that were further used as templates to draw pictures of the specimens and their copulatory organs. The holotype and paratypes were deposited in the collection of the National Museum of Natural Sciences (CSIC), Madrid, Spain (
Eyes:
ME median eyes;
LE lateral eyes;
ALE Anterior lateral eye(s).
AME Anterior median eye(s).
PLE Posterior lateral eye(s).
PME Posterior median eye(s).
Female epygine:
bs basal epigynal plate;
co copulatory openings;
ct copulatory ducts;
sc scape;
spt spermathecae.
Male palp:
c conductor;
cy cymbium;
dh distal hematodocha;
e embolus;
fe femur;
ma median apophysis;
p patella;
r radix;
s stipes,
sta subterminal apophysis;
t tegulum;
ta terminal apophysis,
ti tibia.
All the measurements are given in millimetres.
To corroborate that Araneus bonali sp. n. is not any of the recorded species, the DNA of three specimens (one male, one female and a juvenile) was extracted following the
Additionally, the barcoding fragment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase I (cox1) was amplified using the primer pair HCO/LCO (
Phylogenetic relationships of the new species and the Holartic Araneus species were inferred by concatenating the available nuclear 28SrRNA and mitochondrial cox1 sequences (Accession Codes in Table
Habitat preferences (tree branches, trunks, grass, and soil) of Araneus bonali sp. n. were analysed by comparing the proportion of individuals captured at each habitat. Because of the different sampling methods employed, the number of Araneus bonali sp. n. individuals captured at each habitat at random is not expected to be the same. Therefore, the proportion of the whole sample of spiders (all species) collected at each habitat was used as expected frequencies.
To assess habitat distribution and phenological differences between adults and juveniles Chi-square tests were used. In the case of phenology, the year was divided in four trimesters starting from January 1st to assess whether the proportion of juveniles and adults differed among these periods. The correlation between the number of individuals and canopy surface (m2) was tested using a GLM (Generalized Linear Model, Poisson distribution, Logistic link function). Finally, a Mantel test was used to assess whether the spatial distance (in metres) between trees was correlated with the differences in the number of individuals collected.
Holotype. Female holotype collected by E. Morano in Spain (Map
Paratypes. Collected in the same locality than the holotype but on different dates, the following 4 males & 3 females. Coordinates and voucher numbers are shown: 1♂, 25 Sep 2012 (trunk traps), 570 m.a.s.l. (lat. 40.013°long. -4.213°) (
Right palp of Araneus bonali sp. n. A ventral B mesal C expanded pedipalp. Abbreviations: c – conductor; cy – cymbium; dh – distal hematodocha; e – embolus; fe – femur; ma – median apophysis; p – patella; r- radix; s – stipes, sta – subterminal apophysis; t – tegulum; ta – terminal apophysis, ti – tibia.
(Map
The specific name is dedicated to Dr. Raul Bonal.
Within the European fauna Araneus bonali sp. n. resembles Gibbaranea gibbosa (Walckenaer, 1802) due to its colouration (Figure
Female (holotype). Measurements of the holotype are shown (ranges for paratypes in parentheses). Total length: 6.0 (5.1–7.2); Prosoma length: 2.4 (2.0–2.5); Prosoma width: 2.5 (1.8–2.5); Opisthosoma length: 4.4 (3.6–4.4); Opisthosoma width: 4.0 (3.2–4.1). Eye diameter: AME: 0.125; ALE: 0.10; PME: 0.10; PLE: 0.075. Distance between eyes: AME – AME: 0.150; AME – ALE: 0.325; PME – PME: 0.125; PME – PLE: 0.375; AME – PME: 0.10; ALE – PLE: 0.05; Height from clypeus to AME: 0.05; Height from clypeus to ALE: 0.05.
Carapace covered by white hairs (Figs
Short and relatively stout legs. The first pair the longest and the third the shortest; the second slightly longer than the fourth (Table
Morphological measurements of Araneus bonali sp. n. holotype. All measurements are given in millimetres. Leg formula: I>II>IV>III.
Holotype (♀) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
leg | segment | length | leg | segment | length |
I | Femur | 3.3 | III | Femur | 1.3 |
Patella | 1.2 | Patella | 0.6 | ||
Tibia | 2,5 | Tibia | 0.7 | ||
Metatarsus | 2.4 | Metatarsus | 0.7 | ||
Tarsus | 1.0 | Tarsus | 0.5 | ||
total | 10.4 | total | 3.8 | ||
II | Femur | 2.1 | IV | Femur | 1.7 |
Patella | 0,9 | Patella | 0.7 | ||
Tibia | 1.4 | Tibia | 1.2 | ||
Metatarsus | 1.5 | Metatarsus | 1.2 | ||
Tarsus | 0.6 | Tarsus | 0.6 | ||
total | 6.5 | total | 5.4 |
In females, tibia I and II with 3–4 pairs of lateral spines and 5–6 pairs of ventral spines. Metatarsus I and II with 5–6 spines on the inner side and three basal spines on the outer side. However, the spines are an extremely variable character because they can be lost and may appear in unusual positions or vary with the dimensions of the segments (
Triangular opisthosoma slightly longer than wide, with brown setae. Folium with a black band and a narrow white line that marks the limit between the anterior spots, the posterior humps, and the greenish folium sides. Three pairs of sigillae, the two anterior ones larger. In females, two pairs of anterior humps, much smaller in males. General colouration mimetic with lichens and mosses, difficult to tell the spiders apart when on the oak branches and trunks. White ventral background with two dark lateral spots; two book lungs and an inconspicuous spiracle before the colulus, behind the colulus six spinnerets.
Female genitalia. The scape of the epigyne short and wrinkled (Fig.
Male (Paratypes). Ranges are shown (and mean values within parentheses) (Table
Morphological measurements of Araneus bonali sp. n. paratypes. The values are in millimetres, indicating the minimum, the maximum and, in brackets, the average of each measure. Leg formula: I>II>IV>III.
Dimensions | Paratypes (4 ♂) |
Paratypes (3 ♀) |
Dimensions | Paratypes (4 ♂) |
Paratypes (3 ♀) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
total length | 3.2–4.3 (3.84) | 5.1–7.2 (5.74) | leg | segment | length | length | |
prosoma | wide | 1.3–2.1 (1.73) | 1.8–2.5 (2.11) | I | Femur | 2.5–3.4 (2.8) | 2.5–3.3 (2.8) |
long | 1.8–2.3 (2.10) | 2.0–2.5 (2.23) | Patella | 0.8–1.4 (1.2) | 1.1–1.5 (1.3) | ||
opisthosoma | wide | 1.2–2.0 (1.76) | 3.2–4.1 (3.71) | Tibia | 2.0–2.7 (2.4) | 1.8–2.7 (2.3) | |
long | 1.7–2.8 (2.28) | 3.6–4.4 (4.10) | Metatarsus | 2.0–2.5 (2.3) | 1.8–2.4 (2.1) | ||
Tarsus | 0.8–1.1 (1.0) | 0.8–1.0 (0.9) | |||||
total | 8.3–10.3 (9.61) | 8.0–10.7 (9.36) | |||||
II | Femur | 1.9–2.5 (2.3) | 2.0–3.0 (2.4) | ||||
Patella | 0,7–1.2 (1.0) | 0.9–1.3 (1.1) | |||||
Tibia | 1.2–2.0 (1.7) | 1.4–2.2 (1.7) | |||||
Metatarsus | 1.5–2.0 (1.8) | 1.5–1.8 (1.6) | |||||
Tarsus | 0.7–1.0 (0.8) | 0.6–0.9 (0.8) | |||||
total | 6.0–8.5 (7.56) | 6.5–9.0 (7.56) | |||||
III | Femur | 1.1–1.6 (1,5) | 1.3–2.0 (1.6) | ||||
Patella | 0.4–0.6 (0.5) | 0.5–0.8 (0.6) | |||||
Tibia | 0.7–0.9 (0.8) | 0.7–1.0 (0.8) | |||||
Metatarsus | 0.7–1.0 (0.9) | 0.7–1.2 (0.9) | |||||
Tarsus | 0.5–0.6 (0.6) | 0.5–0.7 (0.6) | |||||
total | 3.4–4.6 (4.20) | 3.8–5.7 (4.63) | |||||
IV | Femur | 1.6–2.5 (2.1) | 1.7–2.8 (2.1) | ||||
Patella | 0.6–0.9 (0.8) | 0.6–1.2 (0.9) | |||||
Tibia | 1.1–1.6 (1.4) | 1.2–1.9 (1.5) | |||||
Metatarsus | 1.0–1.5 (1.4) | 1.2–1.9 (1.5) | |||||
Tarsus | 0.5–0.7 (0.6) | 0.6–0.7 (0.6) | |||||
total | 5.0–7.2 (6.23) | 5.4–8.5 (6.67) |
Male general appearance and colouration similar to females (Figure
Male genitalia (Figure
The blast of the nuclear 28SrRNA sequence of the new species recovered Araneus angulatus and Araneus diadematus as the most closely related species (sequence similarity 99%). The 28S gene tree (Figure
Gene tree of the nuclear gene 28SrRNA. Araneus bonali sp. n. underlined in red. Sequences for all species except Araneus bonali sp. n. were downloaded from GenBank (accession codes shown besides the species name). Tree topology was inferred using Bayesian inference analyses (GTR + I + Gamma substitution model).
The three specimens of the new species analysed yielded the same cox1 haplotype. The lowest uncorrected intraspecific genetic distance was 11.7%, to Araneus alsine (Walckenaer, 1802). The average genetic distance among Araneus species was 14.9%. The node support values of the concatenated tree were low and most relationships were unresolved. A. bonali formed a small clade with A. iviei (Archer, 1951) and A. alsine, but with a very low support (PP = 0.55) (Figure
Concatenated mitochondrial cox1 and nuclear 28S genes phylogeny. Araneus bonali sp. n. underlined in green within the Holartic Araneus sequences available at GenBank or BOLD (accession codes shown in Table
Accession codes for the mitochondrial cytochrome Oxidase I (cox1) and nuclear (28S) gene sequences downloaded from GenBank and BOLD (Barcoding of Life Datasystems) (BOLD sequences in bold characters).
Cytochrome Oxidase I | 28 S | |
---|---|---|
Araneus acusisetus | JN817144.1 | JN816939.1 |
Araneus alsine | KY268481.1 | |
Araneus andrewsi | BBUSE10611.COI5P | |
Araneus angulatus | JN817138.1 | KC848983.1 |
Araneus bicentenarius | CNSLH311-12.COI-5P | |
Araneus bonali | MH517392 | MH493065 |
Araneus bogotensis | KR058594.1 | |
Araneus corticarius | KF367835.1 | |
Araneus detrimentosus | BBUSE122211.COI5P | |
Araneus diadematus | KY017584.1 | KY016926.1 |
Araneus dimidiatus | KC849065.1 | KC848985.1 |
Araneus ejusmodi | JN817143.1 | JN816938.1 |
Araneus gemmoides | DQ146861.1 | |
Araneus groenlandicola | GU682824.1 | |
Araneus guttulatus | CNKOK095-14.COI-5P | |
Araneus ishisawai | JN817140.1 | JN816935.1 |
Araneus iviei | KM837836.1 | |
Araneus marmoreus | JN817141.1 | FJ525384.1 |
Araneus miniatus | BBUSE179312.COI5P | |
Araneus mitificus | KY467247.1 | |
Araneus monteryensis | BBUSE01411.COI5P | |
Araneus nordmanii | GU684587.1 | |
Araneus omnicolor | KP031493.1 | |
Araneus pegnia | BBUSE144212.COI5P | |
Araneus poltyoides | VAQTB01711.COI5P | |
Araneus pratensis | KP653307.1 | |
Araneus psittaccinus | VAQTB01111.COI5P | |
Araneus quadratus | FR775772.1 | |
Araneus saevus | JN309620.1 | |
Araneus stella | JN817142.1 | JN816937.1 |
Araneus sturmi | KY269282.1 | |
Araneus thaddeus | HQ924458.1 | |
Araneus tijuca | KT945066.1 | |
Araneus trifolium | GU682571.1 | FJ525384.1 |
Araneus triguttatus | KY269635.1 | |
Araneus uyemurai | JN817137.1 | JN816933.1 |
Araneus variegatus | JN817139.1 | JN816934.1 |
Araneus venatrix | KR058592.1 | |
Araneus vincibilis | KR058596.1 | |
Araneus washingtoni | ARSO191-08.COI-5P | |
Araneus workmani | KR058597.1 | |
Argiope aemula | JX307083.1 | DQ018845 |
Araneus bonali is linked to trees, as not a single individual was collected in ground traps or in grasslands. The distribution patterns differed significantly between juveniles and adults though, as all juveniles (44 individuals) were collected in oak branches whereas most adults (66% of a total of 15 specimens) were captured in trunk traps (Figure
Araneus bonali was collected in 18 of the 24 holm oaks sampled. The number of juveniles and adults caught at each oak were significantly related (F1, 22 = 31.41; P < 0.001). The total number of individuals trapped at each tree was unrelated with canopy surface (GLM Estimate = 0.001; Z = 0.35; P = 0.72) or the pairwise spatial distance between holm oaks (Mantel test R = -0.04; P = 0.62).
Araneus bonali sp. n. exhibits a combination of somatic and genital characters typical of Araneus according to the cladistic analyses performed by
The morphology of the male and female genitalia clearly distinguished the new species from any other Araneus species. Moreover, large uncorrected genetic distance to the closest relative (11.7%), further confirms its species status (
A thorough revision of the literature was carried out including reports and descriptions of Araneus in Northern Africa (Audouin 1826;
The 28S gene tree confirmed that the only non-Holartic species that was in the analysis (28S sequence available), namely the Australian Araneus dimidiatus, does not belong in the Araneus spp. group (fig. 28S tree) (
The new species is a tree-specialist: in addition to the more intensively studied area, it was found in holm oaks in the other localities of central and western Spain sampled. However, microhabitat selection did differ among life stages. While juveniles were in all cases collected in the branches, adults were more often caught in trunk traps. The differences in colouration might explain such a contrast in some extent. Juveniles are greenish, similar to oak new shoots, whereas adults show a greyish green colour remarkably similar to the lichens that cover the oak trunks (Figure
The number of individuals of the new species collected at each tree was not spatially correlated, what suggests that A. bonali is able to disperse even in a landscape in which trees are isolated. Its small size may favour ballooning dispersal, a behaviour previously described in different araneids (
The bibliographical review and the revision of the material from several collections allowed evaluation of the taxonomic status and update the list of the Iberian Araneus spp. So far, there were several records of the following seven species in the Iberian Peninsula: A. angulatus, A. diadematus, A. marmoreus Clerck, 1757, A. pallidus (Olivier, 1789), A. quadratus Clerck, 1757, A. sturmi, and A. triguttatus (Morano, Carrillo & Cardoso, 2014). Another three species, namely Araneus circe, A. grossus (C. L. Koch, 1844) and Epeira spinivulva (Dufour, 1835), have been cited in the past, but either the records need to be confirmed or their taxonomic status carefully reviewed.
The presence of Araneus circe (Pozuelo de Calatrava & Fuente, 1898) and A. grossus (Coimbra & Bacelar, 1928), species well known in other European regions, needs confirmation as only two records from old bibliographical references are available for the Iberian Peninsula. The taxonomic status of Epeira spinivulva is doubtful, and very probably corresponds to a synonymy. Léon Dufour describes a female of Epeira spinivulva in Sagunto (Valencia) (
Finally, in his articles from the beginning of the 20th century, Franganillo described a series of varieties of different species, and even new species of Araneus, using ambiguous descriptions lacking illustrations (
The morphological and genetic analyses confirm that Araneus bonali is a new species, hence, the list of Araneus in the Iberian Peninsula now numbers eight species: A. angulatus, A. bonali, A. diadematus, A. marmoreus, A. pallidus, A. quadratus, A. sturmi, and A. triguttatus. The inclusion of A. circe and A. grossus remains to be confirmed.
The geographical distribution of the new species remains to be fully delimited to confirm whether it is widespread or, similar to other species (e.g., Araneus pallidus), its distribution is restricted to the western Mediterranean Basin. The fact that it has not been collected elsewhere in Europe before suggests a potential small geographical range, however, it is true that due to its habitat preferences it may have gone unnoticed, as tree trunks are not so frequently sampled. In the case of Spain, this is the second new species collected in isolated holm oaks within croplands (the first, Cheiracanthium ilicis was sampled in the same study site; see
This research was financed by the projects PII1C09-0256-9052, PPII-2014-01-PJCCM (JCCM and ESF) and AGL2014-54739-R (MINECO). RB was funded by a contract with the Atracción de Talento Investigador Programme (Junta de Extremadura TA13032). Marisa Hernández helped with the field work.
Dra. Begoña Sánchez Chillón, curator of arthropod collection of National Museum of Natural History, Madrid (CSIC) for information and the opportunity to study material of Martinez Escalera´s collection; Dra. Aracéli Anadón & Dr. Carlos Lastra (University of Oviedo) for the permit to study material of Franganillo´s collections and Christine Rollard, curator of the National Museum of History Natural of Paris, for the information about Dufour´s material.
The first author thanks Carlos Antonio Ruiz de la Hermosa, Manuel Carrasco Redondo and Alfonso Díaz-Cambronero Astilleros for the trust and help they provided to the project, and the workers and guards of the National Park of the Tablas de Daimiel, who helped me with the field work. We thank the local authorities of Huecas and the private landowners in Dehesa Casablanca (Enrique Vega) for allowing us to work in their properties.
Comments of the Editor (Dr. Miquel Arnedo) and two reviewers (Dr. Robert Kallal and Dr. Nicolaj Scharff) contributed to improve previous versions of the article.