Checklist |
Corresponding author: Matteo Dal Zotto ( dalzotto.matteo@yahoo.com ) Academic editor: George Sangster
© 2017 Matteo Dal Zotto, Giuseppe Romeo, Luis A. Mena Aguilar, Dario Sonetti, Aurora Pederzoli.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Dal Zotto M, Romeo G, Mena Aguilar LA, Sonetti D, Pederzoli A (2017) The avian community of the Karen Mogensen Reserve, a wealth of biodiversity within the poorly investigated and threatened environments of northwestern Costa Rica. ZooKeys 722: 101-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.722.14606
|
Despite being characterized by some of the most threatened forest ecosystems of Mesoamerica, the Nicoya Peninsula is among the least known regions of neotropical Costa Rica in terms of its birdlife. Within this region, in the framework of an ongoing international cooperation program between Italy and Costa Rica, we had the opportunity to investigate the Karen Mogensen Reserve, a protected area distinguished by the presence of a variety of habitats, including tropical dry forest and moist forest. Species richness in the Reserve was relatively high compared with similar areas in northwestern Costa Rica. A series of surveys carried out over a 20-year period documented an avian community consisting of 207 species, of which 115 were breeding in the zone and another 14 were potentially breeding. We recorded five IUCN globally Vulnerable or Near-Threatened species, along with six species reported for the first time from the Nicoya Peninsula, each representing range extension of more than 100 km. Twenty-six species, mostly breeding in the area, are at their southernmost range borders, and are likely susceptible to global environmental alterations, such as the effects of climate change. Furthermore, our study revealed the presence of two species endemic to a restricted area of Central America and four subspecies endemic to Costa Rica, along with breeding populations of two species that are geographically isolated from the main ones. The present analysis led to the ecological characterization of the resident avian community, showing that 65% of the species are strictly associated with forested environments, and especially with the understory or middle tree level, hence more vulnerable to environmental change (climatic, anthropogenic, etc.) and susceptible to local extinction. These results underscore the importance of the Karen Mogensen Reserve for bird conservation within a vulnerable environmental context, and warrant the continuation of periodic bird surveys, taxonomic study of isolated populations or endemic taxa, and improvement of local conservation measures. The data collected will be an important tool for future studies aimed at evaluating the consequences of habitat fragmentation and to monitor the effects of climate change on the resident avifauna. We exhort the creation of programs that integrate bird monitoring, ecological research, conservation initiatives, and the involvement of the local communities, by promoting environmental education, capacity-building, and income generation. To this purpose, the Karen Mogensen Reserve may represent a convincing model and valuable example to apply in similar neotropical contexts.
Aves , biogeography, birds, conservation biology, Mesoamerica, tropical ecology, tropical forests
Despite its relatively small size of approximately 51,000 km2, Costa Rica exhibits an extremely rich biodiversity, with more than 500,000 known species, corresponding to nearly 5% of the species estimated worldwide (
Movements of the tectonic plates over approximately the past ten million years led to the formation of four volcanic mountain ranges, aligned in a northwest-southeast orientation, which in some cases exceed 3,500 m in altitude. These ridges act as barriers to the passage of moist air, creating marked differences in rainfall and temperatures between the Pacific and Caribbean slopes of the country, and also between lowlands and highlands. This climate and habitat complexity is the basis for the presence of at least six main life zones (excluding the Cocos Island), each characterized by unique avian communities, namely: Northern Pacific and Southern Pacific lowlands and foothills, Middle elevations, Highlands, Caribbean lowlands and Caribbean foothills (
The extreme biological richness of Costa Rica, together with its favorable socio-political context, a national forest conservation program, and its regeneration policy, have drawn the attention of many scientists, especially during the last 50 years. Numerous surveys have contributed to the knowledge of the Costa Rican avifauna since the pioneering studies of Alexander von Frantzius and José Castulo Zeledón during the nineteenth century. At present, the bird life of the country is considered one of the best known in Central America (
The Nicoya Peninsula, an important geological unit in the northwestern part of Costa Rica (
During the first half of the twentieth century, major parts of the Nicoya Peninsula were deforested and converted to cattle pasture. More generally, the northwestern Costa Rican dry forest was reduced to a series of small patches surrounded by large areas used for cattle pastures or crops (e.g., sugar cane) (
One of these forest patches is the Karen Mogensen Reserve, an area located in the southeastern portion of the Peninsula. Since the foundation of the Karen Mogensen Reserve in 1996, some ornithological expeditions were conducted. The latest of these were in 2016 and 2017, after the opening of the research station “Italia-Costa Rica”. These expeditions were part of a project aimed at investigating the local avian community and the meteorological aspects of the area, in order to assess a possible correlation between biodiversity data and climate change. Here we provide the results of these surveys, along with an annotated checklist of the birds of the Karen Mogensen Reserve and the ecological characterization of the avian community, focusing on the phenological, biogeographic, and conservational aspects of the encountered species.
The Karen Mogensen Reserve, placed in the SE Nicoya Peninsula, northwestern Costa Rica, is an inland foothill zone comprised between 9.85 and 9.88 degrees of latitude (N), and 85.04 and 85.08 degrees of longitude (W). It comprises approximately 1,000 hectares and shows an altitudinal range of almost 500 meters, from 130 to approximately 600 m a.s.l. (Figs
Map of Costa Rica and the Karen Mogensen Reserve. The areas in white, bordered by red lines, are parts of the Karen Mogensen Reserve added to the original nucleus over years. The area filled by a striped pattern represents the biological corridor of the Nicoya Peninsula and the additional protected forested land adjacent to the Karen Mogensen Reserve. “R” shows the position of the Research Station. Red dots are the fixed points, yellow lines are the transects used for the data collection during the surveys; green dots represent the transects endpoints. Numbers and Roman numerals refer to Table
Since the foundation of the Karen Mogensen Reserve in 1996, nearly twenty ornithological surveys have been carried out, the latest of which ended in March 2017. The surveyed periods normally corresponded to the dry season or to the months characterized by lower precipitations (late October-late December and mid-January-beginning of May). We underline that long-term data sets from tropical regions collected under more rigorous protocols are not available from the majority of Neotropical study sites, for a number of reasons, as reported by other recent studies (see
Transects endpoints and fixed points used for data collection. Coordinates, altitudes, and main habitats covered are reported. The numbers (transects endpoints) and Roman numerals (fixed points) refer to Fig.
Point | Latitude (N) | Longitude (W) | Altitude (m) | Habitat |
Transects endpoints | ||||
1 | 9°51'41.443"N, 85°4'22.616"W | 169 | forest border | |
2 | 9°51'23.389"N, 85°4'17.476"W | 209 | second growth moist forest | |
3 | 9°51'49.331"N, 85°3'51.354"W | 208 | forest border | |
4 | 9°51'57.042"N, 85°3'37.429"W | 303 | primary moist forest | |
5 | 9°51'39.708"N, 85°3'34.978"W | 281 | primary moist forest | |
6 | 9°51'26.557"N, 85°3'30.434"W | 302 | primary moist forest | |
7 | 9°51'23.868"N, 85°3'21.470"W | 304 | primary moist forest | |
8 | 9°51'15.858"N, 85°3'7.722"W | 322 | primary moist forest | |
9 | 9°52'6.845"N, 85°3'31.392"W | 314 | primary moist forest | |
10 | 9°52'19.934"N, 85°3'19.199"W | 344 | primary transitional forest | |
11 | 9°52'15.571"N, 85°3'15.552"W | 360 | primary transitional forest | |
12 | 9°52'5.887"N, 85°3'2.880"W | 441 | second growth transitional forest | |
13 | 9°52'17.663"N, 85°3'27.983"W | 333 | second growth transitional forest | |
14 | 9°52'33.085"N, 85°3'25.711"W | 419 | second growth dry forest | |
15 | 9°52'23.282"N, 85°3'6.106"W | 357 | second growth transitional forest | |
16 | 9°52'22.922"N, 85°2'51.821"W | 351 | second growth dry forest | |
17 | 9°52'14.794"N, 85°2'44.171"W | 338 | second growth moist forest | |
18 | 9°51'57.402"N, 85°2'44.948"W | 399 | second growth moist forest | |
19 | 9°52'21.130"N, 85°2'41.482"W | 323 | second growth moist forest | |
20 | 9°52'26.152"N, 85°2'25.642"W | 297 | second growth transitional forest | |
21 | 9°52'39.241"N, 85°3'22.784"W | 418 | second growth dry forest | |
22 | 9°52'56.755"N, 85°3'20.632"W | 388 | second growth dry forest | |
23 | 9°52'49.343"N, 85°1'54.440"W | 216 | forest border | |
24 | 9°52'54.185"N, 85°1'35.731"W | 204 | second growth dry forest | |
25 | 9°52'5.250"N, 85°4'20.438"W | 138 | grassland | |
26 | 9°52'13.350"N, 85°4'37.826"W | 134 | grassland | |
Fixed points | ||||
I | 9°51'22.010"N, 85°4'16.738"W | 191 | second growth moist forest | |
II | 9°51'49.097"N, 85°3'54.065"W | 168 | forest border | |
III | 9°51'24.757"N, 85°3'26.129"W | 302 | primary moist forest | |
IV | 9°52'2.154"N, 85°3'34.945"W | 307 | primary moist forest | |
V | 9°52'20.734"N, 85°3'17.316"W | 348 | primary transitional forest | |
VI | 9°52'4.746"N, 85°3'0.396"W | 411 | second growth dry forest | |
VII | 9°51'41.875"N, 85°3'10.228"W | 377 | second growth transitional forest | |
VIII | 9°52'20.734"N, 85°2'44.444"W | 329 | second growth transitional forest | |
IX | 9°52'39.076"N, 85°2'21.340"W | 270 | second growth transitional forest | |
X | 9°52'55.027"N, 85°1'33.020"W | 180 | forest border | |
XI | 9°53'1.122"N, 85°3'22.064"W | 369 | second growth dry forest | |
XII | 9°52'1.916"N, 85°4'19.247"W | 143 | grassland | |
XIII | 9°52'15.254"N, 85°4'41.401"W | 121 | grassland |
Information was collected on the horizontal and vertical distribution of the avian community. Species recorded in the same habitat were pooled to estimate habitat utilization. The habitat types were classified following
To characterize the resident avian community of the Karen Mogensen Reserve, waterbirds were excluded, i.e., members of the families Anatidae, Scolopacidae, Fregatidae, Ardeidae, Ciconiidae, and Threskiornithidae. Migratory and wintering birds were also excluded as well as a few occasional native species far from their normal geographic breeding distribution ranges. Thus, the typical resident bird community of the area was composed of breeding or potentially breeding species with mainly terrestrial habits. Bird breeding was ascertained by the direct observation of nests or through the collection of indirect evidence (e.g., presence of pulli, adults carrying material for nesting, adults in courtship, adults displaying territorial behavior during the breeding season). Each species was assigned to a forest dependency category, following
The taxonomic sequence and the scientific and common names of the registered taxa follow the AOU Checklist (American Ornithologists’ Union) through the 2016 supplement (
The data reported in this paper is deposited at GBIF, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, http://ipt.pensoft.net/resource.do?r=cr_karen_aves.
In total, 207 bird species in 153 genera, 47 families, and 23 orders were recorded (Table
Checklist of the birds (Aves) observed at the Karen Mogensen Reserve, Nicoya Peninsula, northwestern Costa Rica. The systematization, the scientific and common names follow the AOU Checklist (
Taxon | English name | Phenology | Habitat type | Height level | Forest Dependence category |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINAMIFORMES | |||||
Tinamidae | |||||
Crypturellus cinnamomeus | Thicket Tinamou | RB | 1,2 | 1 | 1 |
Crypturellus soui | LittleTinamou | RB | 1,2 | 1 | 1 |
ANSERIFORMES | |||||
Anatidae | |||||
Cairina moschata | Muscovy Duck | A | 3,4 | n.m. | n.e. |
GALLIFORMES | |||||
Cracidae | |||||
Crax rubra | Great Curassow | RB | 1,2 | 1 | 1 |
Ortalis vetula | Plain Chachalaca | RB | 2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Penelope purpurascens | Crested Guan | RB | 1,2 | 2,3 | 1 |
Odontophoridae | |||||
Colinus cristatus | Crested Bobwhite | RB | 4 | 1 | 3 |
COLUMBIFORMES | |||||
Columbidae | |||||
Claravis pretiosa | Blue Ground-Dove | R | 3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Columbina inca | Inca Dove | RB | 4 | 1 | 2,3 |
Columbina passerina | Common Ground-Dove | RB | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Columbina talpacoti | Ruddy Ground-Dove | RB | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Geotrygon montana | Ruddy Quail-Dove | RB | 4 | 1 | n.e. |
Leptotila plumbeiceps | Gray-headed Dove | R | 1 | 1 | n.e. |
Leptotila verreauxi | White-tipped Dove | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 1 | 1,2,3 |
Patagioenas flavirostris | Red-billed Pigeon | RB | 2,3,4 | 2,3 | 2,3 |
Zenaida asiatica | White-winged Dove | RB? | 2,3,4 | 2,3 | 2,3 |
CUCULIFORMES | |||||
Cuculidae | |||||
Crotophaga sulcirostris | Groove-billed Ani | RB | 3,4 | 1,2 | 3 |
Morococcyx erythropygus | Lesser Ground-Cuckoo | R | 2,3,4 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Piaya cayana | Squirrel Cuckoo | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Tapera naevia | Striped Cuckoo | RB | 1,3 | 1,2 | 2 |
CAPRIMULGIFORMES | |||||
Caprimulgidae | |||||
Chordeiles acutipennis | Lesser Nighthawk | M | 3,4 | 1,4 | n.e. |
Chordeiles minor | Common Nighthawk | M | 3,4 | 1,4 | n.e. |
Nyctidromus albicollis | Common Pauraque | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 1 | 1,2 |
NYCTIBIIFORMES | |||||
Nyctibiidae | |||||
Nyctibius jamaicensis | Northern Potoo | RB | 2,3,4 | 2 | 2,3 |
APODIFORMES | |||||
Apodidae | |||||
Chaetura vauxi | Vaux’s Swift | R | 1,2,3,4 | 4 | n.e. |
Panyptila cayennensis | Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift | RB | 1 | 4 | 1,2,3 |
Streptoprocne zonaris | White-collared Swift | R | 1,2,3,4 | 4 | n.e. |
Trochilidae | |||||
Amazilia rutila | Cinnamon Hummingbird | RB | 2,3 | 1 | 2 |
Amazilia saucerottei | Steely-vented Hummingbird | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Amazilia tzacatl | Rufous-tailed Hummingbird | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Anthracothorax prevostii | Green-breasted Mango | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Archilochus colubris | Ruby-throated Hummingbird | M, W | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Chlorostilbon canivetii | Canivet’s Emerald | RB | 1,3 | 1,2 | 2 |
Heliomaster constantii | Plain-capped Starthroat | RB | 2,3,4 | 2,3 | 2,3 |
Hylocharis eliciae | Blue-throated Goldentail | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Phaeochroa cuvierii | Scaly-breasted Hummingbird | RB? | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Phaethornis striigularis | Stripe-throated Hermit | RB | 1,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
GRUIFORMES | |||||
Rallidae | |||||
Aramides cajaneus | Gray-cowled Wood-Rail | RB | 1,2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
CHARADRIIFORMES | |||||
Scolopacidae | |||||
Actitis macularius | Spotted Sandpiper | A | n.e. | n.m. | n.e. |
CICONIIFORMES | |||||
Ciconiidae | |||||
Mycteria americana | Wood Stork | A | 4 | 1,2 | n.e. |
SULIFORMES | |||||
Fregatidae | |||||
Fregata magnificens | Magnificent Frigatebird | A | n.e. | n.m. | n.e. |
PELECANIFORMES | |||||
Ardeidae | |||||
Ardea alba | Great Egret | M | 3 | 1 | n.e. |
Bubulcus ibis | Cattle Egret | M | 4 | 1 | n.e. |
Butorides virescens | Green Heron | M | 1,2,3,4 | 1 | n.e. |
Cochlearius cochlearius | Boat-billed Heron | M | 3,4 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Egretta caerulea | Little Blue Heron | M | 3,4 | 1 | n.e. |
Tigrisoma mexicanum | Bare-throated Tiger-Heron | RB | 1,3,4 | 1 | 1,2,3 |
Threskiornithidae | |||||
Eudocimus albus | White Ibis | A | n.e. | n.m. | n.e. |
CATHARTIFORMES | |||||
Cathartidae | |||||
Cathartes aura | Turkey Vulture | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 3,4 | 2,3 |
Coragyps atratus | Black Vulture | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 3,4 | 2,3 |
Sarcoramphus papa | King Vulture | R | 1,2 | 3,4 | n.e. |
ACCIPITRIFORMES | |||||
Pandionidae | |||||
Pandion haliaetus | Osprey | A | n.e. | 4 | n.e. |
Accipitridae | |||||
Buteo albonotatus | Zone-tailed Hawk | M | 4 | 4 | n.e. |
Buteo brachyurus | Short-tailed Hawk | M | 1,2,3 | 4 | n.e. |
Buteo plagiatus | Gray Hawk | RB? | 3,4 | 2,3 | 2,3 |
Buteo platypterus | Broad-winged Hawk | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,4 | n.e. |
Buteo swainsonii | Swainson’s Hawk | A | 4 | 4 | n.e. |
Buteogallus anthracinus | Common Black Hawk | A | 1,2,3 | 2,4 | n.e. |
Ictinia plumbea | Plumbeous Kite | M | 1 | 3,4 | n.e. |
Leptodon cayanensis | Gray-headed Kite | RB? | 1,2,3 | 3 | 1,2 |
Morphnarchus princeps | Barred Hawk | A | 1,3 | 2,4 | n.e. |
Pseudastur albicollis | White Hawk | RB | 1,3 | 2,4 | 1,2 |
Rupornis magnirostris | Roadside Hawk | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,4 | 2,3 |
STRIGIFORMES | |||||
Tytonidae | |||||
Tyto alba | Barn Owl | A | 3,4 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Strigidae | |||||
Ciccaba nigrolineata | Black-and-white Owl | A | 1,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Ciccaba virgata | Mottled Owl | RB | 1,2,3 | 2 | 1,2 |
Glaucidium brasilianum | Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Lophostrix cristata | Crested Owl | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Megascops choliba | Tropical Screech-Owl | RB? | 3 | 1,2 | 2 |
Megascops cooperi | Pacific Screech-Owl | RB | 2,3,4 | 1,2 | 1,2,3 |
Megascops guatemalae | Vermiculated Screech-Owl | RB | 1 | 1,2 | 1 |
Pulsatrix perspicillata | Spectacled Owl | RB | 1,2 | 2,3 | 1 |
TROGONIFORMES | |||||
Trogonidae | |||||
Trogon caligatus | Gartered Trogon | RB | 1,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Trogon elegans | Elegant Trogon | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Trogon melanocephalus | Black-headed Trogon | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
CORACIIFORMES | |||||
Momotidae | |||||
Eumomota superciliosa | Turquoise-browed Motmot | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Momotus coeruliceps | Blue-capped Motmot | RB | 2,3,4 | 1,2 | 1,2,3 |
Alcedinidae | |||||
Megaceryle torquata | Ringed Kingfisher | R | 1,3 | 2 | n.e. |
Chloroceryle amazona | Amazon Kingfisher | R | 1,3 | 2 | n.e. |
Chloroceryle americana | Green Kingfisher | RB | 1,3 | 1 | 2 |
PICIFORMES | |||||
Bucconidae | |||||
Notharchus hyperrhynchus | White-necked Puffbird | RB | 1,2,3 | 3 | 1,2 |
Ramphastidae | |||||
Pteroglossus torquatus | Collared Aracari | RB | 1,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Picidae | |||||
Campephilus guatemalensis | Pale-billed Woodpecker | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2,3 | 1,2 |
Dryocopus lineatus | Lineated Woodpecker | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 1,2,3 | 2 |
Melanerpes hoffmannii | Hoffmann’s Woodpecker | RB | 2,3,4 | 2,3 | 1,2,3 |
FALCONIFORMES | |||||
Falconidae | |||||
Caracara cheriway | Crested Caracara | RB? | 2,3,4 | 1,3 | 2,3 |
Falco rufigularis | Bat Falcon | RB | 1,3 | 3,4 | 1,2 |
Herpetotheres cachinnans | Laughing Falcon | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2,3 |
Micrastur semitorquatus | Collared Forest-Falcon | RB | 1,2,3 | 2 | 1 |
PSITTACIFORMES | |||||
Psittacidae | |||||
Amazona albifrons | White-fronted Amazon | RB | 2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Amazona auropalliata | Yellow-naped Amazon | R | 2,3,4 | 2,3 | 2,3 |
Amazona autumnalis | Red-lored Amazon | RB | 1,3 | 3 | 1,2 |
Brotogeris jugularis | Orange-chinned Parakeet | RB | 1,2,3 | 3 | 2 |
Eupsittula canicularis | Orange-fronted Parakeet | RB | 2,3 | 3 | 2 |
PASSERIFORMES | |||||
Thamnophilidae | |||||
Thamnophilus doliatus | Barred Antshrike | RB | 1,2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Furnariidae | |||||
Dendrocincla fuliginosa | Plain-brown Woodcreeper | RB? | 1 | 1,2 | 1 |
Dendrocincla homochroa | Ruddy Woodcreeper | RB | 1,2 | 1,2 | 1 |
Dendrocolaptes sanctithomae | Northern Barred-Woodcreeper | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Glyphorynchus spirurus | Wedge-billed Woodcreeper | RB? | 1 | 1,2 | 1 |
Lepidocolaptes souleyetii | Streak-headed Woodcreeper | RB | 1,2,3 | 2 | 1,2 |
Sittasomus griseicapillus | Olivaceous Woodcreeper | RB | 1,2,3 | 2 | 1,2 |
Xenops minutus | Plain Xenops | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Xiphorhynchus flavigaster | Ivory-billed Woodcreeper | RB | 2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Xiphorhynchus susurrans | Cocoa Woodcreeper | A | 1,2,3 | 1,2,3 | 1,2 |
Tyrannidae | |||||
Attila spadiceus | Bright-rumped Attila | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Camptostoma imberbe | Northern Beardless-Tyrannulet | A | 2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Contopus sordidulus | Western Wood-Pewee | A | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Contopus virens | Eastern Wood-Pewee | M | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Elaenia flavogaster | Yellow-bellied Elaenia | RB | 3 | 1,2 | 2 |
Empidonax flaviventris | Yellow-bellied Flycatcher | M | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Empidonax traillii | Willow Flycatcher | M, W | 3 | 1 | n.e. |
Legatus leucophaius | Piratic Flycatcher | A | 3 | 3 | n.e. |
Megarhynchus pitangua | Boat-billed Flycatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Mionectes oleagineus | Ochre-bellied Flycatcher | RB | 1,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Myiarchus crinitus | Great Crested Flycatcher | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Myiarchus nuttingi | Nutting’s Flycatcher | RB | 2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Myiarchus tuberculifer | Dusky-capped Flycatcher | RB | 3 | 1,2 | 2 |
Myiarchus tyrannulus | Brown-crested Flycatcher | RB | 2,3,4 | 1,2 | 2,3 |
Myiodynastes luteiventris | Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher | A | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Myiodynastes maculatus | Streaked Flycatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2,3 |
Myiopagis viridicata | Greenish Elaenia | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Myiozetetes similis | Social Flycatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 2 |
Oncostoma cinereigulare | Northern Bentbill | RB | 1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Onychorhynchus coronatus | Royal Flycatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Pitangus sulphuratus | Great Kiskadee | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 2 | 2,3 |
Platyrinchus cancrominus | Stub-tailed Spadebill | RB | 1,2 | 1 | 1,2 |
Poecilotriccus sylvia | Slate-headed Tody-Flycatcher | RB | 1,2 | 1 | 1,2 |
Todirostrum cinereum | Common Tody-Flycatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Tolmomyias sulphurescens | Yellow-olive Flycatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Tyrannus forficatus | Scissor-tailed Flycatcher | M, W | 3,4 | 2 | n.e. |
Tyrannus melancholicus | Tropical Kingbird | RB | 3,4 | 2 | 3 |
Tyrannus verticalis | Western Kingbird | M, W | 2,3,4 | 2 | n.e. |
Zimmerius vilissimus | Paltry Tyrannulet | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 2 |
Tityridae | |||||
Pachyramphus aglaiae | Rose-throated Becard | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Pachyramphus cinnamomeus | Cinnamon Becard | RB? | 3 | 1,2 | 2 |
Pachyramphus polychopterus | White-winged Becard | RB | 1,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Tityra inquisitor | Black-crowned Tityra | RB? | 1,2,3 | 3 | 1,2 |
Tityra semifasciata | Masked Tityra | RB | 1,2,3 | 3 | 1,2 |
Cotingidae | |||||
Procnias tricarunculatus | Three-wattled Bellbird | M | 1 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Pipridae | |||||
Chiroxiphia linearis | Long-tailed Manakin | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Vireonidae | |||||
Cyclarhis gujanensis | Rufous-browed Peppershrike | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Pachysylvia decurtata | Lesser Greenlet | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Vireo flavifrons | Yellow-throated Vireo | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2 | n.e. |
Vireo flavoviridis | Yellow-green Vireo | A | 1,2,3 | 2 | n.e. |
Vireo olivaceus | Red-eyed Vireo | M | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Vireo philadelphicus | Philadelphia Vireo | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Vireo solitarius | Blue-headed Vireo | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Corvidae | |||||
Cyanocorax formosus | White-throated Magpie-Jay | RB | 2,3,4 | 2 | 2 |
Hirundinidae | |||||
Hirundo rustica | Barn Swallow | M | 4 | 4 | n.e. |
Petrochelidon pyrrhonota | Cliff Swallow | M, W? | 4 | 4 | n.e. |
Progne chalybea | Gray-breasted Martin | RB | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Troglodytidae | |||||
Campylorhynchus capistratus | Rufous-naped Wren | RB | 2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Cantorchilus modestus | Cabanis’s Wren | RB | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Thryophilus pleurostictus | Banded Wren | RB | 1,2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Thryophilus rufalbus | Rufous-and-white Wren | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Troglodytes aedon | House Wren | RB? | 3,4 | 1 | 2 |
Polioptilidae | |||||
Polioptila albiloris | White-lored Gnatcatcher | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 1 | 2 |
Polioptila plumbea | Tropical Gnatcatcher | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Ramphocaenus melanurus | Long-billed Gnatwren | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Turdidae | |||||
Catharus aurantiirostris | Orange-billed Nightingale-Thrush | RB | 1,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Catharus ustulatus | Swainson’s Thrush | M | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Hylocichla mustelina | Wood Thrush | M, W? | 1,2,3 | 1 | n.e. |
Turdus grayi | Clay-colored Thrush | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 2 |
Fringillidae | |||||
Euphonia affinis | Scrub Euphonia | RB | 2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Euphonia hirundinacea | Yellow-throated Euphonia | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Parulidae | |||||
Basileuterus rufifrons | Rufous-capped Warbler | RB | 1,2,3 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
Cardellina pusilla | Wilson’s Warbler | M, W | 1,2,3 | 1,2,3 | n.e. |
Geothlypis formosa | Kentucky Warbler | M, W | 1,2,3 | 1 | n.e. |
Geothlypis poliocephala | Gray-crowned Yellowthroat | RB? | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Geothlypis trichas | Common Yellowthroat | M | 4 | 1 | n.e. |
Helmitheros vermivorum | Worm-eating Warbler | M | 1,2 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Mniotilta varia | Black-and-white Warbler | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Myiothlypis fulvicauda | Buff-rumped Warbler | RB? | 2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Oreothlypis peregrina | Tennessee Warbler | M, W | 3 | 1,2,3 | n.e. |
Parkesia motacilla | Louisiana Waterthrush | M | 1 | 1 | n.e. |
Parkesia noveboracensis | Northern Waterthrush | M, W | 1,3 | 1 | n.e. |
Protonotaria citrea | Prothonotary Warbler | M, W? | 1,3 | 1 | n.e. |
Seiurus aurocapilla | Ovenbird | M, W | 1,2,3 | 1 | n.e. |
Setophaga fusca | Blackburnian Warbler | M | 1,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Setophaga magnolia | Magnolia Warbler | M, W | 1,3 | 2 | n.e. |
Setophaga pensylvanica | Chestnut-sided Warbler | M, W | 1,3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Setophaga petechia | Yellow Warbler | A | 3 | 1 | n.e. |
Setophaga ruticilla | American Redstart | M | 1,2,3 | 1,2,3 | n.e. |
Setophaga virens | Black-throated Green Warbler | M, W | 1,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Thraupidae | |||||
Cyanerpes cyaneus | Red-legged Honeycreeper | RB | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Eucometis penicillata | Gray-headed Tanager | RB | 1,2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Saltator coerulescens | Grayish Saltator | RB | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Saltator maximus | Buff-throated Saltator | RB | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Sporophila torqueola | White-collared Seedeater | RB | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Thraupis episcopus | Blue-gray Tanager | RB | 1,2,3,4 | 2 | 1,2,3 |
Tiaris olivaceus | Yellow-faced Grassquit | RB? | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Volatinia jacarina | Blue-black Grassquit | RB | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Passerellidae | |||||
Arremonops rufivirgatus | Olive Sparrow | RB | 2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Peucaea ruficauda | Stripe-headed Sparrow | RB | 3,4 | 1 | 2,3 |
Cardinalidae | |||||
Cyanocompsa cyanoides | Blue-black Grosbeak | RB | 1,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Habia rubica | Red-crowned Ant-Tanager | RB | 1,2 | 1 | 1 |
Passerina caerulea | Blue Grosbeak | RB? | 2,3,4 | 1 | 2,3 |
Passerina ciris | Painted Bunting | M | 1,2,3,4 | 1 | n.e. |
Passerina cyanea | Indigo Bunting | M, W | 4 | 1 | n.e. |
Pheucticus ludovicianus | Rose-breasted Grosbeak | M, W | 3 | 1,2 | n.e. |
Piranga ludoviciana | Western Tanager | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Piranga olivacea | Scarlet Tanager | M | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Piranga rubra | Summer Tanager | M, W | 1,2,3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Icteridae | |||||
Amblycercus holosericeus | Yellow-billed Cacique | RB | 1,2,3 | 1 | 1,2 |
Icterus galbula | Baltimore Oriole | M, W | 3 | 2,3 | n.e. |
Icterus pustulatus | Streak-backed Oriole | RB | 2,3 | 2,3 | 1,2 |
Molothrus bonariensis | Shiny Cowbird | A | 3,4 | 1,2 | n.e. |
The species accumulation curve based on the surveys led from 2005 to 2017 tended to stabilize, providing an indication of the completeness of the investigations. Plotted values for Chao 1 and 2, Jackknife 1 and 2 estimators were higher than the species richness observed (Fig.
Overall, 138 species were documented (70 non-passerines and 68 Passeriformes) that were resident in the Karen Mogensen Reserve and/or in the surrounding areas. Of these, 115 species (56 non-passerines and 59 Passeriformes) were breeding in the surveyed area (not always regularly), while another 14 species (six non-passerines and eight Passeriformes) were potentially breeding in the protected zone or, likely, in the adjacent forested land, as they were observed during their breeding season and showed territorial behavior. Eight species were resident but not breeding in the area. Forty-nine species were migratory; 23 of these also spent the winter in the Karen Mogensen Reserve, and another three were potentially wintering species. The remaining 20 species have been recorded one to ten times in the study period, thus were considered accidental in the Karen Mogensen Reserve (Fig.
Two species, i.e., Melanerpes hoffmannii (Picidae) and Procnias tricarunculatus (Cotingidae), are endemic to an area ranging from southern Honduras to Panama. M. hoffmannii was found breeding in the area, whereas P. tricarunculatus was observed only irregularly. In addition, we report the presence and breeding of four subspecies endemic to northwestern Costa Rica, namely: Crypturellus cinnamomeus praepes (Tinamidae), Chlorostilbon canivetii salvini (Trochilidae), Xiphorhynchus flavigaster ultimus (Furnariidae) and Campylorhynchus capistratus nicoyae (Troglodytidae; Fig.
Interestingly, 26 mainly resident breeding or potentially breeding species reach their global southernmost range border within the Nicoya Peninsula or the adjacent areas, i.e., Crypturellus cinnamomeus (Tinamidae), Ortalis vetula (Cracidae), Columbina inca (Columbidae), Morococcyx erythropygus (Cuculidae), Nyctibius jamaicensis (Nyctibiidae), Amazilia rutila and Chlorostilbon canivetii (Trochilidae), Buteo plagiatus (Accipitridae), Megascops cooperi (Strigidae), Trogon elegans and T. melanocephalus (Trogonidae; Fig.
Non-passerine birds observed within the Karen Mogensen Reserve. A Crax rubra (Cracidae), a globally vulnerable species that reproduces in the area B Amazona autumnalis (Psittacidae), species resident and potentially breeding in the area, characterized by declining populations and considered threatened on a national scale C Sarcoramphus papa (Cathartidae), species resident in the area, with declining populations and considered locally threatened D Chlorostilbon canivetii (Trochilidae), female at nest, characterized by traits (e.g., the colour of the lower mandible) which resemble the congeneric C. assimilis E Trogon melanocephalus (Trogonidae) and F Eumomota superciliosa (Momotidae), two species that reach their southernmost range border approximately in the surveyed zone. Photographs by: M. Dal Zotto (F) and G. Romeo (A, B, C, D, E).
Passeriformes observed within the Karen Mogensen Reserve. A Chiroxiphia linearis (Pipridae), a species typical of Central American tropical dry forests reaching its southernmost range border in the area B Campylorhynchus capistratus nicoyae (Troglodytidae), a subspecies endemic to NW Costa Rica, which reaches its southernmost breeding areas in the surveyed zone C Catharus aurantiirostris (Turdidae), species characterized by a local isolated breeding population D Hylocichla mustelina (Turdidae), regular winter visitor in the Karen Mogensen Reserve, but never recorded before from the Nicoya Peninsula. Photographs by: M. Dal Zotto (A, B, D) and G. Romeo (C).
Focusing on the habitat type, eight species were strictly connected to moist forest environments, and six of them potentially reproduced in the area. Another 24 species were associated to moist forests and forest borders. Eighty-seven species were related to either moist or dry forests, and, in some cases, also forest borders. None of the registered species was strictly associated to dry forests, but 12 taxa were associated to dry forests and their borders, and 13 species were associated to dry forests, forest borders, and grassland. Fifteen species were associated to forest borders, and 18 to grassland only (Fig.
Regarding vertical distribution (tree height level), 54 species were associated to the understory, 53 to either the understory and middle tree level, 15 to middle level only, 42 to both middle level and canopy, nine to canopy, four to middle level and open air, five to canopy and open air, eleven to open air, and only six species show no preference, being found from understory to canopy (Fig.
Of 129 resident breeding or potentially breeding species, eleven species were found and reproduced only in extensive mature forests, 20 in habitats with 40–50% of forest cover, 65 in both extensive mature forests and in habitats with 40–50% of forest cover, ten in open areas, 14 in both open areas and habitats with 40–50% of forest cover, and nine appeared to be not specifically associated to any of the three categories (Fig.
Five species that are on the Red List of globally threatened bird species (
Based on the range maps by
In the following accounts details on eight species of particular taxonomic, biogeographic, and/or conservational interest are provided.
Great Curassow (Crax rubra Linnaeus, 1758; Fig.
Great Curassow is considered globally Vulnerable (
Plain Chachalaca (Ortalis vetula [Wagler, 1830])
This species was often associated to dry forests or shrub covering the foothills. The Plain Chachalaca is sedentary breeding in the Karen Mogensen Reserve, where it is commonly observed or detected due to its typical loud call. It represents one of the most intriguing taxa of the site, since the individuals from the Karen Mogensen Reserve are part of the southernmost isolated population occurring in NW Costa Rica, and isolated from the main range of the species, which covers an area from N Nicaragua to S Texas. This population was formerly considered as White-bellied Chachalaca (O. leucogastra), a species living in NW Nicaragua, and more recently assigned to the present species, distinguished from the congeneric Gray-headed Chachalaca (O. cinereiceps) which is found elsewhere in Costa Rica. Recent studies hypothesize that this isolated population may represent an undescribed subspecies of the present species or even a distinct species, as the plumage coloration and voice differ from northern populations (
Canivet’s Emerald (Chlorostilbon canivetii [Lesson, 1832])
The presence of Canivet’s Emerald in the Karen Mogensen Reserve falls within the range documented for this species, which inhabits only the northwestern highlands of the country. Three subspecies of C. canivetii are known, one of which, C. c. salvini (Cabanis & Heine, 1860), is endemic to Costa Rica (see del Hoyo et al. 2017). Beyond the observation of this subspecies, an interesting record concerns a breeding pair (Fig.
Yellow-naped Amazon (Amazona auropalliata [Lesson, 1842])
The distribution of this Psittacid is limited to the northwestern part of the country, where it reaches the southernmost portion of its global range (
Three-wattled Bellbird (Procnias tricarunculatus [Verreaux & Verreaux, 1853])
The Three-wattled Bellbird was encountered on different occasions from 1998 to 2016, from December to May. This species is known to be a winter visitor in the inner and eastern portion of the Nicoya Peninsula and migrates to the highlands of Central Costa Rica or to other countries for breeding (Stiles and Skutch 1989;
Orange-billed Nightingale-Thrush (Catharus aurantiirostris Salvin, 1866; Fig.
This species is relatively easy to observe in the Karen Mogensen Reserve during the breeding season (March-August), but is more difficult to find during the rest of the year. The Costa Rican populations of Orange-billed Nightingale-Thrush are considered to belong to the subspecies C. a. costaricensis Hellmayr, 1902, except for those in southwestern Costa Rica, which are treated as a different subspecies C. a. griseiceps Salvin, 1866 (see
Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina Gmelin, 1789; Fig.
This thrush is a regular winter visitor and migrant in Costa Rica (October to April), reaching its southernmost range in Panama and NW Colombia. Thanks to the present study H. mustelina is reported for the first time from the Nicoya Peninsula and NW Costa Rica. The species is currently considered Near Threatened. The main threat to this species is believed to be loss and fragmentation of forests in both the breeding and wintering ranges (
Shiny Cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis Gmelin, 1789)
The main range of this species is located in South America and is expanding northwards. It has recently reached Panama and, in 2004, the eastern slope of Costa Rica (
The species list resulting from our study is one of the most comprehensive for any site in the Nicoya Peninsula. Compared to other areas, the Karen Mogensen Reserve shows one of the highest species richness of the inland Peninsula. For instance,
The present study shows that the avian community of the Karen Mogensen Reserve represents an assemblage of species typical of both the Central American dry forest environments and the moist forest of southern Pacific Costa Rica (see
Most (138 of 207) species were resident in the Karen Mogensen Reserve, and most of these were also breeding in the area or in the adjacent forested land (115 species plus other 14 species potentially breeding; Fig.
As reported above, 28 species are at the southernmost borders of their range. These populations are likely vulnerable to the future effects of climate change, and may eventually decline or even disappear, moving to more suitable areas, (see, e.g.,
To address future conservation problems properly, it is necessary to focus on the specific ecological traits of these species. The majority of the species recorded during our study were restricted to forested environments, and this aspect underscores the importance of the Karen Mogensen Reserve as a wildlife refuge for such specialized taxa. Our analysis pointed out that 59% of the total number of species (122/207) was connected to either the understory or the middle tree level, and another 20% (42 species) is associated to middle level and canopy or open air (Fig.
More generally, the species connected to the upper middle level exhibit major local horizontal or altitudinal shifting (
The occurrence of three globally Vulnerable species, plus other two Near Threatened, out of the 23 listed from the all of Costa Rica, and the finding of other 44 species – mainly resident and breeding or potentially breeding in the Karen Mogensen Reserve – considered threatened on a national scale (
Furthermore, based on the forest dependence categorization, the proportion of species included in the three categories of forest dependency was roughly similar to the one detected by Barrantes and colleagues (2016) in other much broader protected areas of the Nicoya Peninsula (see above), underlining the importance of the Karen Mogensen Reserve for the local avian conservation. Most of the resident breeding species, i.e., 97 out of 129 (Fig.
Human induced habitat destruction and the reduction of connectivity due to the removal of isolated forest patches are likely to be additional causes of the progressive disappearance of bird populations. The genetic variability of populations limited to isolated forest patches and affected by global and local environmental alterations, may decrease in a short-term, greatly reducing their viability (see e.g.
The present results underscore that further analyses are desirable, including studies aimed at clarification of (i) the taxonomic status of some local populations, (ii) the phenology of some species, (iii) the population-viability of the most vulnerable taxa, and (iv) the vulnerability of species to climate change. More generally, locally-based bird monitoring programs are essential for understanding and mitigating the effects of global change on tropical biodiversity. To measure population change and other demographic parameters – essential actions during the ongoing natural restoration of the forested environment – a long-term bird banding station should be established and supported, also considering that it would provide tools and staff for monitoring and conservation programs focused on other organisms. The presence of the recently inaugurated research station, “Italia-Costa Rica” within the Karen Mogensen Reserve represents an excellent basis for the development of this initiative.
Since birds are good environmental indicators, are relatively easy to monitor, and have a universal appeal as charismatic flagship taxa, they raise the interest of people worldwide. Therefore, short- and long-term bird monitoring and conservation initiatives need to be included in programs that involve the local communities, by promoting environmental education, capacity-building, and income generation or job creation. The educational activities should address students, villagers, conservationists, decision-makers, journalists, and other local people and should better comprise the participation of local universities, museums, and research institutions. Such integrated processes are known as some of the best examples of holistic biodiversity-monitoring programs (
Our results show that the Karen Mogensen Reserve hosts a rich and diversified avian community, and, acting as an island in the surrounding context of NW Costa Rica, is a potential refuge for several birds, as reported in the present analysis, and for other metazoans, such as amphibians and reptiles (which will be reported in further dedicated papers), characterized by a variety of taxonomic, ecological, biogeographic, and/or conservation peculiarities. The isolation of some organisms, the existence of endemic species, the presence of taxa typical of the threatened Central American dry forest environments, and the occurrence of populations at the extreme borders of their species range, certainly encourage the development of new conservation measures together with further dedicated analyses, hopefully including a molecular investigation approach. The data collected during this study, and the characterization of the avian community of the Karen Mogensen Reserve, will be important tools for future analyses, useful to evaluate the consequences of habitat fragmentation and to monitor the effects of climate change and land use modifications on the local avifauna. We foster the creation of programs that integrate bird monitoring, ecological research, conservation initiatives, and the involvement of the local communities, by promoting environmental education, capacity-building, and income generation or job creation.
The study was realized not only but also thanks to the precious reports of several ornithologists and birdwatchers, to whom owe our gratitude; among these we mention: Gloriana Chaverri, Robert Dean, Tyler Christensen, Paul Hansson, Marco Hidalgo, Fabio Rojas, the latest Julio Sánchez, Alejandro Solano, Johnny Villarreal Orias, and Jim Zook. We wish to thank Mery, Arnulfo, and Fernando Quiros Salazar with their families, Daniela Masís Valverde and all the staff and volunteers of the Ecological Association of Paquera, Lepanto and Cóbano (ASEPALECO). We also thank several volunteers of the Association Foreste per Sempre, for the support offered during our field work at the Karen Mogensen Reserve. We are grateful to Roberto Zuñiga Muñoz (Sistema Nacional de Areas de Conservación-Area de Conservación Tempisque) for granting capture permits. The authors want to thank L. Lombroso (Geophysical Observatory-Department of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari”), Leila Myftija, Maurizio Carnevali, Giuseppe Rossi, Irene Drappi, Alessandro Lani, and Drs. M. Antonio Todaro, Andrea Gambarelli, Matteo Bisanti, along with part of the personnel of the Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Eventually, we thank Dr. George Sangster, Dr. Falk Huettmann and an anonymous reviewer for the valuable comments, requests, and suggestions, that greatly improved the manuscript. This study was supported by a Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena grant to M. Dal Zotto, deriving from a funding to A. Pederzoli (Project FCRM2015 - (.20)E92I15002320007). Last but not least, the first author wants to express all his gratitude, along with everything else, to Cecilia, Agnese, Chiara, and Caterina.