Research Article |
Corresponding author: Barbara Calcinai ( b.calcinai@univpm.it ) Academic editor: Martin Pfannkuchen
© 2017 Barbara Calcinai, Azzurra Bastari, Giorgio Bavestrello, Marco Bertolino, Santiago Bueno Horcajadas, Maurizio Pansini, Daisy M. Makapedua, Carlo Cerrano.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Calcinai B, Bastari A, Bavestrello G, Bertolino M, Horcajadas SB, Pansini M, Makapedua DM, Cerrano C (2017) Demosponge diversity from North Sulawesi, with the description of six new species. ZooKeys 680: 105-150. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.680.12135
|
Sponges are key components of the benthic assemblages and play an important functional role in many ecosystems, especially in coral reefs. The Indonesian coral reefs, located within the so-called “coral triangle”, are among the richest in the world. However, the knowledge of the diversity of sponges and several other marine taxa is far from being complete in the area. In spite of this great biodiversity, most of the information on Indonesian sponges is scattered in old and fragmented literature and comprehensive data about their diversity are still lacking. In this paper, we report the presence of 94 species recorded during different research campaigns mainly from the Marine Park of Bunaken, North Sulawesi. Six species are new for science and seven represent new records for the area. Several others are very poorly known species, sometimes recorded for the second time after their description. For most species, besides field data and detailed descriptions, pictures in vivo are included. Moreover, two new symbiotic sponge associations are described.
This work aims to increase the basic knowledge of Indonesian sponge diversity as a prerequisite for monitoring and conservation of this valuable taxon.
associations, diversity, Indonesia, new species, Porifera
Baseline knowledge on species and assemblages is indispensable for monitoring the more and more frequent changes in biodiversity (
The Indonesian archipelago, with its large number of islands (more than 17,000), hosts various and diversified habitats supporting high levels of diversity and endemism in marine life; this exceptional biodiversity is also the result of its geographic location and geological history (
The knowledge on Indonesian sponges is mainly based on old expedition reports (such as Snellius II and Siboga expeditions) and on fragmented, recent studies including a few genera revisions (
In this paper, a list of 94 sponge species collected during several research expeditions conducted in this area is reported, and six new species are described from the North Sulawesi peninsula. Moreover, two new symbiotic associations are documented.
The aim of this study is to improve the knowledge on sponge diversity and distribution of North Sulawesi, a prerequisite for any study of monitoring and conservation of tropical coral reef assemblages.
The Bunaken Park is located in the northwest part of Sulawesi Island, Indonesia, in the coral triangle. It covers a total surface area of more than 89,000 hectares and includes five principal islands (Bunaken, Manado Tua, Mantehage, Nain and Siladen) (Fig.
Locality map of North Sulawesi area showing the sponge collection sites. Black squares are the sampling sites. Key: 1 Liang 2 Lekuan II 3 Depan Kampung 4 Pangalisan 5 Timur 6 Siladen Jetty 7 Siladen Barat 8 Raymond’s Point 9 Fukui 10 Aluang Banua 11 Bualo 12 Tanjung Kopi 13 Tiwoho 14 Tanjung Pisok 15 Barracuda Point 16 Nain 17 Mapia Resort 18 Police Pier 19 Lembeh 20 Pintu Kolada 21 Angel’s window 22 Gangga Jetty 23 Bangka 2 24 Bangka2 25 Busa Bora 26 Yellow Coco.
The studied collection is the result of several expeditions performed in different years (August 1999, March 2000, May 2001, May 2002, September 2003, June 2004, January 2005) in the framework of bilateral agreements between Italy and Indonesia, focused on the exchange of researchers between the Italian Universities of Genoa and Polytechnic of Marche and the University of Sam Ratulangi (Manado, North Sulawesi). In May 2005, a further expedition in collaboration with the biopharmaceutical company Pharma Mar (http://www.pharmamar.com) was organised. In 2011, an expedition at Bangka Island in the frame of a joint project between Sam Ratulangi University and the Polytechnic University of Marche allowed to characterise the diversity of Porifera inside two small mangrove forests. Table
List of the families and species of sponges collected during several research expeditions in the North Sulawesi peninsula, with sampling sites and depth ranges. Numbers in bold (1–26) match the sampling sites showed in Fig.
Family | Specie | Samples | Figure | Notes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | Depth (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plakinidae | Plakortis lita de Laubenfels, 1954 | PH33, BU88 | Figs |
Short description and discussion in |
- | √ | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–24 |
Suberitidae | Aaptos lobata sp. n. | BU82, BU580, PH1, PH27, INDO079, INDO278, INDO339, INDO336 | Fig. |
This work | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | √ | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16.5–20 |
Halichondriidae | Amorphinopsis excavans Carter, 1887 | MA1, MA20 | Figs 11–2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | 0–1 | |
Halichondriidae | Ciocalypta tyleri Bowerbank, 1873 | MA5 | Figs 11–3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 0–1 | |
Halichondriidae | Topsentia halichondrioides (Dendy, 1905) | MA18 | Figs 11–4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | 0–1 | |
Tethyidae | Tethytimea tylota (Hentschel, 1912) | BU98, BU289, BU533, BU545, BU562 | Fig. |
This work | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–20 |
Clionaidae | Cliona albimarginata Calcinai, Bavestrello & Cerrano, 2005 | BU50, BU237 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7–25 | |
Clionaidae | Cliona favus Calcinai, Bavestrello & Cerrano, 2005 | BU11, BU54, BU473 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–10 | |
Clionaidae | Cliona liangae Calcinai, Bavestrello & Cerrano, 2005 | MG1 bis | See picture in |
√ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Tidal zone | |
Clionaidae | Cliona jullieni Topsent, 1891 | BU18, BU52, BU58, BU61, BU62, BU121, BU268 | Fig. 11–5 | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3–17 | |
Clionaidae | Cliona mucronata Sollas, 1878 | BU16bis, BU79, BU501, | Fig. 11–6 | In situ photo not available | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–21 |
Clionaidae | Cliona orientalis Thiele, 1900 | BU73, BU319, BU119 | Fig. 11–7 | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–25 | |
Clionaidae | Cliona schmidtii (Ridley, 1881) | BU56, BU58, BU75, BU83bis, BU255, BU264, BU322 | Fig. 11–8 | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10–21 | |
Clionaidae | Cliona utricularis Bavestrello & Cerrano, 2005 | BU13, BU31, BU60, BU115, BU136, BU145, BU474, BU482, BU500, BU505 | Fig. 11–9 | In situ photo not available | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–16 |
Clionaidae | Cliothosa aurivilli (Lindgren, 1897) | MG1, BU72 | Fig. 11–10 | In situ photo not available | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0–1 |
Clionaidae | Cliothosa hancocki (Topsent, 1888) | BU17, BU120 | Fig. 1–11 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 |
Clionaidae | Pione carpenteri (Hancock, 1867) | BU74 | Fig. 1–12 | In situ photo not available | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9 |
Clionaidae | Spheciospongia solida (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) | BU45, BU228, BU576, PH24 | Fig. 1–13 | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10–25 | |
Clionaidae | Spheciospongia vagabunda (Ridley, 1884) | BU44, BU64, BU296 | Fig. 1–14 | In situ photo not available | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–20 |
Spirastrellidae | Spirastrella pachyspira Lévi, 1958 * | BU78 | Fig. 1-2 | See Suppl. material |
- | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25 |
Acarnidae | Zyzzya fuliginosa (Carter, 1879) | BU53, BU78, BU260, BU265, BU266 | Fig. 1-15 | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10–30 | |
Chondropsidae | Chondropsis subtilis Calcinai, Bavestrello, Bertolino, Pica, Wagner & Cerrano, 2013 | Bugor504 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10–15 | |
Crambeidae | Monanchora enigmatica (Burton & Rao, 1932) | PH45, Bugor410 | Fig. 1-16 | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–27 | |
Desmacididae | Desmapsamma vervoorti van Soest, 1998 | BU222, BU410, BU411, Bugor410, Carramba1, Carramba2, Carramba6, Carramba8, BA4 | Fig. 1-17 | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1–27 | |
Hymedesmiidae | Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) spinata Calcinai, Bavestrello, Bertolino, Pica, Wagner & Cerrano, 2013 | Bugor513, Bugor311, Bugor309, Bugor410bis2 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 23–26 | |
Hymedesmiidae | Hymedesmia (Stylopus) perlucida Calcinai, Bavestrello, Bertolino, Pica, Wagner & Cerrano, 2013 | Bugor511 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | |
Isodictyidae | Coelocarteria agglomerans Azzini, Calcinai & Pansini, 2007 | BU15, BU37, BU38, BU48, BU132, BU219, BU329, BU616, BU644 PH51 | Fig. 1-18 | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | 20–38 | |
Microcionidae | Clathria (Thalysias) cervicornis (Thiele, 1903) | PH48 | Fig. 1-19 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Microcionidae | Clathria (Thalysias) mutabilis (Topsent, 1897) | PH19 | Fig. 1-20 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Mycalidae | Mycale (Aegogropila) furcata Calcinai, Bavestrello, Bertolino, Pica, Wagner & Cerrano, 2013 | Bugor307, Bugor332 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated | |
Mycalidae | Mycale (Mycale) corallina Calcinai, Cerrano & Bavestrello, 2016 | BU485, BU534, BU449 | See picture in |
See Suppl. material |
- | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17–20 |
Podospongiidae | Podospongia colini Sim-Smith & Kelly, 2011 | Fig. 1-21 | Not available data; in situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated | |
Tedaniidae | Tedania (Tedania) brevispiculata Thiele, 1903 | MA21 | Fig. 1-22 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | 1 |
Tedaniidae | Tedania (Tedania) coralliophila Thiele, 1903 | BU582 | Fig. 1-23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | |
Tedaniidae | Tedania (Tedania) dirhaphis Hentschel, 1912 | PH52 | Fig. 1-24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Agelasidae | Agelas ceylonica Dendy, 1905 | BU1, BU3, PH54 | Fig. 1-25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–30 | |
Agelasidae | Agelas mauritiana (Carter, 1883) | BU234, BU570 | Fig. 1-26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 23–35 | |
Agelasidae | Agelas nakamurai Hoshino, 1985 | BU583, PH38 | Fig. 1–27 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12–20 | |
Tetillidae | Cinachyrella australiensis (Carter, 1886) | BU233, BU308, BU316 | Fig. 1–28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–13 | |
Tetillidae | Tetilla ridleyi Sollas, 1888 | MA17 | Fig. 1–29 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 1 |
Ancorinidae | Dercitus (Stoeba) bangkae (Calcinai, Bastari, Makapedua, Cerrano, 2016) | MA16 | Fig. 1–30 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 1 |
Ancorinidae | Rhabdastrella distincta (Thiele, 1900) | BU560, BU575 | Fig. |
This work | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Max. depth 30 |
Ancorinidae | Rhabdastrella globostellata (Carter, 1883) | BU288, BU593, PH29 | Fig. 1–31 | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–23 | |
Ancorinidae | Stelletta clavosa Ridley, 1884 | BU543 | Fig. 1–32 | See Suppl. material |
- | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–30 |
Ancorinidae | Stelletta tethytimeata sp. n. | BU98, BU289, BU533, BU545, BU562 | Fig. |
This work | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–20 |
Geodiidae | Melophlus sarasinorum Thiele, 1899 | PH56 | Fig. 1–33 | See Suppl. material |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Theonellidae | Theonella cylindrica Wilson, 1925 | BU568 | Fig. 1–34 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 40 | |
Theonellidae | Theonella mirabilis (de Laubenfels, 1954) | BU585 | Fig. 1–35 | See Suppl. material |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 |
Theonellidae | Theonella swinhoei Gray, 1868 | BU96, PH12, PH60 | Fig. 1–36 | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–25 | |
Thoosidae | Thoosa letellieri Topsent, 1891 | MTR | Fig. 15 | See Suppl. material |
- | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated |
Biemnidae | Biemna fortis (Topsent, 1897) | BU143, MA11 | Fig. 1–37 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 1–30 |
Dictyonellidae | Acanthella cavernosa Dendy, 1922 | PH53 | Fig. 1–38 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Dictyonellidae | Phakettia ridley (Dendy, 1887) * | BU578 | Fig. 1–39 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Scopalinidae | Stylissa carteri (Dendy, 1889) | PH59 | Fig. 1–40 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Scopalinidae | Stylissa massa (Carter, 1887) | PH57 | Fig. 1–41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25 | |
Callyspongiidae | Callyspongia (Cladochalina) aerizusa Desqueyroux-Faúndez, 1984 | BU242, BU577, PH15 | Fig. 1–42 | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7–20 | |
Callyspongiidae | Callyspongia (Cladochalina) fibrosa (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) | PH2 | Fig. 1–43 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Chalinidae | Chalinula nematifera (de Laubenfels, 1954) | Fig. 1–44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | |||
Chalinidae | Cladocroce burapha Putchakarn et al. 2004 | MA6, MA19a, MA19c, MA19e | Fig. 1–45 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 0–1 | |
Chalinidae | Haliclona (Reniera) fascigera (Hentschel, 1912) | PH8 | Fig. 1–46 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Chalinidae | Haliclona (Halichoclona) centrangulata (Sollas, 1902) | MA4 | Fig. 1–47 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 0–1 | |
Niphatidae | Amphimedon anastomosa sp. n. | PH58 | Fig. |
This work | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Niphatidae | Amphimedon cf. sulcata Fromont, 1983 | BU560, BU560-a1, BU575 | Fig. |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Max. depth 30 | |
Niphatidae | Dasychalina fragilis | BA8 | Fig. 1–48 | Data not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated |
Niphatidae | Gelliodes fibulata (Carter, 1881) | PH20 | Fig. 1–49 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Niphatidae | Gelliodes hamata Thiele, 1903 | Bugor Onong | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | |
Niphatidae | Niphates olemda (de Laubenfels, 1954) | BU581, BU587, BU591, BU597, PH7 | Fig. 1–50 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8–25 | |
Niphatidae | Niphates laminaris sp. n. | PH47 | Fig. |
This work | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Petrosiidae | Acanthostrongylophora ingens (Thiele, 1899) | BU4, BU35, BU133, BU134, BU297, BU298, BU302, BU320, BU323, BU544, PH11, PH16 | Fig. 1–51 | See Suppl. material |
- | √ | - | - | √ | √ | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8–30 |
Petrosiidae | Neopetrosia seriata (Hentschel, 1912) | BU76, BU83, BU324, BU508, BU513 | Fig. 1–52 | In situ photo not available | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30–65 |
Petrosiidae | Neopetrosia similis (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) * | BU122 | Fig. 1–53 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated | |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Petrosia) hoeksemai de Voogd & van Soest, 2002 | BU518, BU520, PH14 | Fig. 1–54 | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3–20 | |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Petrosia) nigricans Lindgren, 1897 | BU1, BU92, BU93, BU232, BU284, BU286, BU299, BU344, BU512, BU517, BU531, BU571, BU572, PH10 | Fig. 1–55 | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4–32 | |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Petrosia) plana Wilson, 1925 | BU97, BU285, BU509, BU515, BU565, BU410 | Fig. 1–56 | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7–43 | |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Petrosia) seychellensis Dendy, 1922 * | BU595 | Fig. 1–57 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Strongylophora) corticata (Wilson, 1925) | BU102, BU277 | Fig. 1–58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25–30 | |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Strongylophora) durissima (Dendy, 1905) * | PH39 | Fig. 1–59 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Petrosiidae | Petrosia (Strongylophora) strongylata Thiele, 1903 | BU516 | Fig. 1–60 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated |
Petrosiidae | Xestospongia testudinaria (Lamarck, 1815) | BU250, BU510 | Fig. 1–61 | In situ photo not available | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated |
Phloeodictyidae | Siphonodictyon maldiviensis (Calcinai, Cerrano, Sarà & Bavestrello, 2000) | BU16, BU200, BU342 | See picture in |
- | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1–40 | |
Phloeodictyidae | Siphonodictyon microterebrans (Calcinai, Cerrano & Bavestrello, 2007) | BU51, BU125, BU261, BU492, BU493, BU496b | See picture in |
- | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5–30 | |
Phloeodictyidae | Siphonodictyon mucosum Bergquist, 1965 | BU19, BU20, BU450, BU484 | Fig. 1–62 | White arrows | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6–40 |
Phloeodictyidae | Oceanapia amboinensis Topsent, 1897 | BU25, BU65, BU147, BU257, BU321 | See picture in |
The aquiferous system of this species was described in |
√ | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0–1 |
Phloeodictyidae | Oceanapia fistulosa (Bowerbank, 1873) | BU6, BU36, BU101, BU103, BU128, BU130, BU274, BU280, BU341, PH43, PH50, Bugor514 | Fig. 1–63 | The aquiferous system of this species was described in |
- | - | - | √ | - | √ | - | √ | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–42 |
Phloeodictyidae | Oceanapia pedunculata (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) | BU64bis | Photos not available | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Depth not stated | |
Phloeodictyidae | Oceanapia seychellensis (Dendy, 1922) * | BU300, BU290, BU328 | Fig. 1–64 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20–44 |
Phloeodictyidae | Oceanapia toxophila Dendy, 1922 * | BU276, BU314 | Fig. 1–65 | In situ photo not available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13–30 |
Irciniidae | Ircinia colossa sp. n. | BU590, PH44, BKA 25, INDO431 | Fig. |
This work | - | - | - | - | √ | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | 20–25 |
Irciniidae | Psammocinia alba sp. n. | PH41 | Fig. |
This work | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
Spongiidae | Spongia (Spongia) ceylonensis Dendy, 1905 | BU589 | Fig. 1–66 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.5 | |
Thorectidae | Hyrtios communis (Carter, 1885) | MA12 | Fig. 1–67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | 1 | |
Thorectidae | Hyrtios reticulatus (Thiele, 1899) | PH36 | Fig. 1–68 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Thorectidae | Phyllospongia papyracea (Esper, 1794) | M3, M4, PH6, BA3 | Fig. 1–69 | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | |
Thorectidae | Carteriospongia foliascens (Pallas, 1766) | BU112, BU343 | Fig. 1–70 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | √ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 |
Spicule preparations, for optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), were made according to
Histological sections were prepared from fragments of sponges fixed in situ in buffered 2.5% glutaraldehyde in artificial sea water, dehydrated in graded ethanol series, desilicified in 4% hydrofluoric acid, decalcified in 4% hydrochloride acid and embedded in Technovit 8100 (Kulzer). Other fragments were routinely paraffin-embedded and sectioned to obtain preparations of the associated sponges.
Comparative type material of Acanthostrongylophora ingens (Thiele, 1899) was kindly provided by The Naturhistorisches Museum at Basel (
A total of 94 demosponge species belonging to 33 families is documented and identified; these species are listed in Table
Seven species (Tethytimea tylota (Hentschel, 1912), Rhabdastrella distincta (Thiele, 1900), Thoosa letellieri Topsent, 1891, Theonella mirabilis (de Laubenfels, 1954), Tedania (Tedania) coralliophila Thiele, 1903, Podospongia colini Sim-Smith and Kelly, 2011 and Amphimedon cf. sulcata Fromont, 1993) were recorded for the first time since their original description; for those involved in symbiotic relationships (T. tylota, R. distincta, and A. cf. sulcata), extensive morphological and ecological remarks are added, while the others are otherwise briefly described in the Suppl. material
Holotype:
BU-82, 22/03/2000, Lekuan II (Bunaken Island), 20 m depth. BU-580, 27/06/2004, Alung Banua (Bunaken Island), 16 m depth. INDO-079, 08/05/2005, Tanjung Kopi (Manado Tua), unknown depth, N01°39'07.4"; E124°41'58.8". INDO-278, 11/05/2005, Tansung Pisok (Manado), unknown depth, N01°34'31.2"; N01°34'31.2". INDO-336, 12/05/2005, Bualo (Manado), unknown depth, N01°37'00.7"; E124°41'21.9". INDO-339, 12/05/2005, Bualo (Manado), unknown depth, N01°37'00.7"; E124°41'21.9".
Cushion-shaped, sub-spherical sponge; yellow, brown or dark orange. Strongyloxeas, styles and subtylostyles not separable in size categories, forming ascending tracts protruding through the sponge surface.
The sponge is massive, sub-spherical or lobate (Fig.
Skeleton. The choanosomal skeleton is radiate, regular in the outer part of the sponge and more irregular in the deeper part. Due to high spicule density, spicule tracts are not easily detectable (Fig.
Spicules. Three size categories of megascleres, partially overlapping at the extremities of their size-frequency distributions. The larger spicules are straight strongyloxeas with acerate or slightly stepped tips (Fig.
Aaptos species distributed in the tropical Indo-Pacific and adjacent areas.
Species | Shape and surface | Colour | Consistence | Skeleton | Spicules (µm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. ciliata (Wilson, 1925) | Massive, lobate; surface conulose and hispid | Whitish brown | - | Collagenous ectosome 0,5 mm thick, with cavities Choanosome dense with ill-defined spicule tracts |
Styles 1400–2000 × 20–36 Ectosomal styles 1100–1300 × 4 |
A. conferta Kelly-Borges & Bergquist, 1994 | Thickly encrusting, lobate; surface smooth or micro-hispid | Jet black outside, mustard yellow inside | Just compressible | Stout megasclere tracts with interstitial spicules | Strongyloxeas 662–1813 × 13–29 2 categories of styles Oxeas 156–537 × 3–8 |
A. globosa Kelly-Borges & Bergquist, 1994 | Spherical; surface smooth | Deep red brown outside, mustard yellow inside | Incompressible | Tracts of primary megascleres radiating at the surface; superficial palisade not piercing the sponge surface | Strongyloxeas I 980–2401 × 18–33 Strongyloxeas II 332–1029 × 8–16 Tylostyles 104–198 × 4–5 Subtylostyles 208–458 × 5–8 |
A. horrida (Carter, 1886) | Massive elongate; surface even and villous | Grey | Very compact | Very compact | 2 size categories of fusiform, acerate spicules |
A. laxosuberites (Sollas, 1902) | Encrusting; surface slightly hispid | Whitish, in spirit | - | Ascending and diverging tracts of megascleres Ectosomal skeleton of small styles |
Strongyloxeas I 750–1120 × 26–40 II 250 × 4 Tylostyles 700 × 20 |
A. niger Hoshino, 1981 | Massive, embedding extraneous material; surface minutely hispid | Black | Incompressible | Ectosome with small styles; radiate architecture and confused spicules in the choanosome | Strongyloxeas I 540–1310 × 18–46 II 170–270 × 5–10 |
A. nuda (Kirkpatrick, 1903) | Massive; surface finely papillate | Pale brown outside, interior lighter (in spirit) | Rather hard | Ill-defined bundles of oxeas radiating towards the surface | Oxeas 1700 × 45 |
A. rosacea Kelly-Borges & Bergquist, 1994 | Spherical to semi spherical; surface smooth and faintly hispid | Oxide red outside and golden yellow inside | Incompressible | Choanosomal tracts of megascleres branching at the surface and forming tufts Superficial palisade of tylostyles and subtylostyles |
Strongyloxeas 735–2009 × 10–23 Styles 367–1102 × 5–12 Tylostyles 94–218 × 3–8 Subtylostyles 198–447 × 4–13 |
A. suberitoides (Broensted, 1934) | Massive; surface faintly hispid | Black outside, dark red inside | Very firm | Radiate, with loose spicule tracts | Styles 900–1100 × 15–23 |
A. tentum Kelly-Borges & Bergquist, 1994 | Globular or sub-spherical; surface microscopically hispid | Different shades of brown outside, brown yellow inside | Firm | Large, loose tracts of megascleres in the choanosome, replaced in the outer region by intermediate spicules; superficial palisade of small tylo- and subtylostyles | Strongyloxeas I 980–2572 × 21–42; II 416–1298 × 10–21; Tylostyles 104–198 × 5–8; Styles or subtylostyles 187–441 × 8–13 |
Aaptos lobata sp. n. | Globular, sub-spherical | Yellow, dark orange, brown | Hard (preserved) | Radiate tracts of larger megascleres protrude towards the surface; intermediate and small spicules, abundant in the outer part, concur to the hispidation | Strongyloxeas: 810–993.91(±119.38)-1320 × 10–19.84(±3.84)-30; Intermediate megascleres: 405–540.91(±107.64)-750 × 7.5–11.53(±4.05)-25; Small megascleres 145–264.87(±65.20)-395 × 2.5–4.91(±1.43)-7.5 |
The name refers to the multi-lobate organisation of the sponge.
The genus Aaptos Gray, 1867, according to
The skeletal organisation of Aaptos lobata sp. n. is comparable with that of the type species of the genus, the Atlantic-Mediterranean Aaptos aaptos (Schmidt, 1864) (see
Donatia tylota Hentschel, 1912: 317.
BU-98, 23/03/2000, Lekuan II (Bunaken Island), 5 m depth. BU-289, 17/05/2001, Raymond’s Point (Bunaken Island), unknown depth. BU-533, 21/06/2004, Bualo (Manado Tua Island), about 8 m depth. BU-545, 23/06/2004, Raymond’s Point (Bunaken Island), about 20 m depth. BU-562, 26/06/2004, Bualo (Manado Tua Island), unknown depth.
Encrusting sponge 3–6 mm thick; the largest examined specimen (BU-289) is approximately 10 cm in diameter. The consistence is firm; the body of the sponge lacunose. The surface is irregular, with extended verrucous areas covered by sand and largely colonised by epibiotic ascidians, algae and hydroids (Fig.
Skeleton. Tethytimea tylota does not have a distinguishable ectosomal skeleton or a proper cortex; the choanosomal skeleton is formed by bundles of big tylostyles of 100–200 µm directed outwards (Fig.
Spicules. Megascleres are straight tylostyles with a slightly developed head (Fig.
Tethytimea tylota (Hentschel, 1912) A specimen in situ (BU-562) B cross section showing bundles of big tylostyles (full arrow) and the microscleres (empty arrow) CSEM image showing fans of small tylostyles (full arrow) and microscleres (empty arrow) of T. tylota (t), below the sponge Stelletta sp. n. (s) involved in the association D small tylostyle E, F heads of tylostyles G–I oxyspherasters J, K tylasters L groups of microscleres.
This sponge was exclusively found as epizoic on Stelletta tethytimeata sp. n. (see below). It has been attributed to T. tylota for its skeletal organisation, made of bundles of main tylostyles supporting superficial fans of small tylostyles, the superficial layer of tylasters (present also in the holotype), the size and shape of megascleres and microscleres (
It is interesting to note that the holotype of T. tylota was encrusting on a stone and in association with another sponge (
See below.
Holotype:
BU-533, 21/06/2004, Bualo (Manado Tua Island), about 8 m depth. BU-545, 23/06/2004, Raymond’s Point (Bunaken Island), about 20 m depth. BU-98, 23/03/2000, Lekuan II (Bunaken Island), 5 m depth.
Massively rounded yellow sponge; the colour changes after fixation. Megascleres are anatriaenes with characteristic bending and a single type of oxeas; microscleres are represented by a heterogeneous set of tylasters and oxyasters.
The sponge is light yellow-lemon in vivo (Fig.
Skeleton. The cortex is a collagenous layer 400-700 µm thick (Fig.
Spicules. Megascleres are anatriaenes (Fig.
Stelletta tethytimeata sp. n. A specimen in situ (BU-533), partially cut to put in evidence the association with Tethytimea tylota. The black arrow indicates the thin layer of the external sponge (T. tylota, orange) while the white arrow indicates S. tethytimeata sp. n. B paraffin-embedded section of T. tylota (t) and S. tethytimeata sp. n. (s) co and ch indicate, respectively, the cortex and the choanosome of S. tethytimeata sp. n. C cross section showing triaenes close to the boundary between T. tylota (t) and S. tethytimeata sp. n. (s) D bundles of oxeas reaching the boundary between T. tylota (t) and S. tethytimeata sp. n. (s) E anatriaene F oxea G micrasters H histological preparation showing the cortex (co) of S. tethytimeata sp. n. The arrow points to the collagenous layer between S. tethytimeata sp. n. and T. tylota (t). The inset shows the layer of tylasters of T. tylota (arrow).
The name refers to the association with Tethytimea tylota.
Stelletta tethytimeata sp. n. is characterised by one type of triaenes and by a single category of oxeas. Out of the 146 species of Stelletta, distributed in all the oceans (
The associated specimens of T. tylota and S. tethytimeata are flat or cushion-shaped with big, rounded lobes and wide oscular structures (Figs
By superficial analysis, the two associated species could appear as a single large individual sponge. The external species (T. tylota) can be detached with difficulty from the internal one (S. tethytimeata sp. n.); the contact area may be observed in SEM images (Fig.
The two associated species are quite common in North Sulawesi, always in association, generally in dim-light conditions, at a maximum depth of 20 m.
Coppatias distinctus Thiele, 1900: 56.
BU-560, 26/06/2004, Bualo (Bunaken Island), unknown depth. BU-575, 27/06/2004, Alung Bauna (Bunaken Island), 27 m depth.
The sponge has a massive and irregular shape, a large size, up to 50 cm in diameter, and was exclusively found partially covered by Amphimedon cf. sulcata (see below). In the part not covered by the epibiotic sponge, R. distincta is yellow-lemon (Fig.
Skeleton. Spherasters are located in the outer part of the sponge, but do not form a real cortex (Fig.
Spicules. Megascleres are fusiform oxeas (Fig.
Rhabdastrella distincta (Thiele, 1903) A, B specimens in situ (r), partially covered by the epibiotic sponge Amphimedon cf. sulcata Fromont, 1993 (a) specimen of Figure
The Indonesian specimens fit with the description of R. distincta in having the same skeletal organisation (characterised by oxeas scattered in the inner part of the sponge and radially arranged close to the surface), absence of triaenes, spherasters in the peripheral part, oxyasters and oxyspheraster scattered in the choanosome. Spicule sizes are comparable to those of the type species that are fusiform oxeas of 850 × 25 µm, spherasters up to 40 µm, oxyasters up to 80 µm and oxyspherasters of 15 µm (see
This is the first record of the species since the original description of
See below.
BU-560, 26/06/2004, Bualo (Bunaken Island), unknown depth. BU-575, 27/06/2004, Alung Bauna (Bunaken Island), 27 m depth.
The sponge is flat, with a roundish contour, about 1 cm thick, without visible oscules. It is completely free of epibiotic organisms. Colour in situ may be greyish-white (Figs
Skeleton. The ectosomal skeleton is a reticulation of pauci-spicular tracts (3-4 spicules) (Fig.
Spicules. Megascleres are straight or slightly curved oxeas with sharp tips; they measure 125 - (188.9 ± 33.5) - 247.5 × 2 - (5.2 ± 3.4) - 12.5 µm (Fig.
The sponge here described has a skeleton organisation fitting with the diagnosis of the genus Amphimedon that is characterised by an ectosomal skeleton of tangential fibres forming meshes, covered by a thin membrane and by a choanosomal skeleton formed by a plumose, irregular reticulation of multispicular tracts (Desqueyroux-Fáundez and Valentine 2002).
Our specimens are similar to A. sulcata, especially for the very characteristic surface: “meandering parallel ridges, interspersed with spaces, give a convolute or brain-like appearance to the surface” (
Among the Indo-Pacific species of Amphimedon, only A. sulcata has sigmas similar in size (13 - (15.9) - 16.9 µm) to our specimens, but its oxeas (122 - (139) - 153 × 3 - (4.5) - 5.3 µm) are smaller than those we observed. Another difference is in the colour: “mauve alive, cream or fawn in alcohol” in A. sulcata (Fromont, 1993).
Amphimedon cf. sulcata is not tightly attached to Rhabdastrella distincta, and the two sponges can be separated rather easily. Frequently, wide areas of R. distincta are not covered by the outer sponge (Figs
In the boundary between the two sponges, a thin collagenous layer is present. Both in the histological preparations and in SEM images, the oxeas of R. distincta are clearly visible, protruding out of the surface and penetrating inside the tissues of the external sponge (Fig.
Holotype:
Dark green, highly branched sponge with an irregular ectosomal skeleton of rectangular, paucispicular meshes and multispicular choanosomal fibres, forming an irregular reticulation. Oxeas are mucronate.
Highly branched sponge (Fig.
Skeleton. The ectosomal skeleton is an irregular reticulation of rectangular meshes 120–150 µm, up to 190–250 µm in diameter, formed by fibres 20–40 µm thick (Fig.
Spicules. Megascleres are oxeas slightly curved, with sharp tips (Fig.
The name refers to the habitus of the sponge, characterised by anastomosing branches.
The species described here may be attributed to the genus Amphimedon due to its skeleton characteristics. Out of the 54 species of Amphimedon hitherto described (
“Amphimedon differ from other Niphatidae in having an optically smooth, but microscopically microtuberculate fibrous superficial skeleton, usually with abundant spongin, and lacking microscleres” (
Holotype:
Lamellate, azure-violet sponge, with differentiated inhalant and oscular faces. Skeleton is a regular reticulum of primary and secondary fibres, with superficial brushes hispidating the surface; megascleres are straight and sinuous oxeas. Microscleres are sigmas.
The sponge is a thin, irregular, folded lamina, attached to the substrate in few points (Fig.
Skeleton. The ectosomal skeleton is a reticulation of multispicular tracts (30–60 µm thick) forming polygonal (mostly quadrangular) meshes 340–900 µm in diameter, with brushes of spicules at the nodes (Fig.
Spicules. Oxeas slightly curved or sinuous, rarely straight, with acerate tips (Fig.
The name refers to the lamellate shape of the sponge.
The new species clearly belongs to the family Niphatidae for the presence of multispicular fibres in the ectosome and to the genus Niphates for the skeletal organisation. The genus Niphates includes sponges with “Surface conulose to spiny [….] produced by primary longitudinal fibres ending on surface” (
Niphates laminaris sp. n. is characterised by a non-spiny, rather irregular, microconulose surface and by a choanosomal skeleton with a reticulation of primary and secondary tracts. Microscleres are numerous. In the Indo-Pacific area, only N. nitida has sigmas. However, N. nitida is a sponge with repent habit, with oscula located at the top of small erect lobes; a choanosomal fibrous reticulation with round or triangular meshes (104–146 µm) and oxeas measuring 128 × 5.6 µm. Therefore, it substantially differs from Niphates sp. n; all other Niphates in the area differ from the new species for the absence of sigmas and for other significant features listed below. Niphates olemda (de Laubenfelds, 1954) is a blue, or pink tubular sponge with small oxeas (92–100 × 2–3 µm), while N. aga (de Laubenfelds, 1954) is ramose with superficial projections, a confused ectosomal skeleton and straight and large oxeas (175–180 × 5 µm). Niphates cavernosa Kelly-Borges & Bergquist, 1988 is a massive, creeping and branching sponge, violet in life, with two categories of oxeas differing in thickness (oxeas I: 5–10 µm thick; oxeas II: 2–4 µm); N. furcata (Keller, 1889) is green, erect, branching, with rather short oxeas (100 × 12 µm). Niphates hispida Desqueyroux-Fáundez, 1984 is a hard and incompressible sponge with very small oxeas (60-80 × 2-4 µm), consisting of a series of coalescent, cylindrical tubes arising from a massive common base. Niphates mirabilis (Bowerbank, 1873) is an ochre-pinkish sponge with a unispicular ectosomal reticulation, while N. obtusispiculifera (Dendy, 1905) is a branching, cylindrical sponge with strongyles as megascleres. Niphates plumosa (Bowerbank, 1876) is fawn-coloured and has a peculiar, stipitate and fan-shaped growth form with only oxeas as spicules. Niphates rowi Ilan et al., 2004 is the species most similar to the new species. Its ectosomal skeleton is a reticulation of fibres creating quadrangular meshes which are smaller than those of Niphates laminaris sp. n. (70–115 µm). In addition, the choanosomal reticulation of N. rowi has rectangular meshes which are smaller (115–200 µm) than those of Niphates laminaris sp. n., whereas the oxea size is similar (115 - (140) - 170 × 5.5 - (6.5) - 7.5 µm). In conclusion N. rowi, which is an encrusting sponge, differs from Nipahtes laminaris sp. n. in the growth form, the absence of sigmas and sinuous oxeas and in the size of the ectosomal and choanosomal meshes.
Holotype:
Lobate, white sponge with oscular cavities at the top of the lobes. Thin armoured surface with sand and foreign spicules. Slightly fasciculated fibres, not very dense.
Massive, lobate sponge with flush, roundish oscular cavities (about 1.5 cm) where the excurrent canals converge, located at the top of the lobes (Fig.
The colour in life is white outside (Fig.
Skeleton. The surface is covered by a thin reticulation of sand and foreign spicules, forming regular, more or less circular, meshes 100 µm in diameter (Fig.
Referring to the white colour in life.
Our species is attributed to Psammocinia due to the presence of a surface armoured by sand and foreign spicules and to the reticular skeleton of primary and secondary fibres.
According to
Psammocinia bulbosa Bergquist, 1995 from New Caledonia and P. lobatus Sim & Lim, 2002 from Korea are the most similar species to Psammocinia alba sp. n. Psammocinia bulbosa is a massive, repent sponge with quite long oscular fistules. Its surface is covered by small conules 0.5–1 mm high and has a sandy crust up to 1 mm thick. The skeleton is formed by primary fibres giving rise to columns up to 700 µm long and secondary fibres 30–50 µm in diameter. The main differences to our species are the presence of fistules, a distinctive characteristic of P. bulbosa, and thicker fibres. Psammocinia lobatus, lobate in shape, has a surface covered by conules 1–2 mm high and 2–5 mm apart. Both primary and secondary fibres (60–10 µm thick) are comparable in size with our species. The main differences to P. alba sp. n. are the colour (dark brown, black), the presence of sharp conules and the small amount of foreign material present in the fibres. From New Zealand, the following species have been described: P. beresfordae Cook & Bergquist, 1996, formed by a compact base with broad-based fistules with an apical osculum 3–7 mm in diameter and primary fibres 120 µm thick; P. verrucosa Cook & Bergquist, 1996, a small, massive sponge with a very characteristic surface with rounded lamellae supported by skeletal fibres and a reticulate pattern; P. hirsuta Cook & Bergquist, 1998, formed by a coalescent group of digitate structures or lobes, with long, cylindrical fistules and a thick (400 µm) superficial sand layer; P. charadrodes Cook & Bergquist, 1998, a massive sponge with very long, rounded conules and very thick (till 1086 µm) primary fibres; P. papillata Cook & Bergquist, 1998, a massive, compact sponge with a coarsely conulose surface and both primary and secondary fibres thicker than in Psammocinia alba sp. n.; P. perforodosa Cook & Bergquist, 1998, a massive, compact sponge without conules, with a folded surface (800 µm thick) armoured by sand, foreign spicules and rocky fragments; P. maorimotu Cook & Bergquist, 1998, a lobate sponge with oscula on top, a surface with grooves and ridges and primary fibres with a thickness of 349 µm. From South Korea and China, the following species have been described: P. conulosa Lee & Sim, 2004, a massive sponge with ectosomal membrane covered by sand but devoid of circular meshes, oscula scattered and sharp conules 2–4 mm high; P. ulleungensis Lee & Sim, 2004, dark grey in colour, with a smooth surface and thick, slightly fasciculated, primary fibres (100–300 µm); P. mammiformis Sim, 1998, a massive, grey or purple coloured sponge, covered with mammiform protuberances and with very thick choanosomal fibres 550–900 µm; P. mosulpia Sim, 1998 mainly differs from P. alba sp. n. for its crust of sand and foreign spicules not organised in circular meshes; P. jejuensis Sim, 1998, characterised by tick fibres (up to 470 µm) and by filaments with large terminal knobs (12–20 µm in diameter); P. gageoensis Sim & Lee, 2001, has no detritus in the fasciculated primary fibres. Both P. samyangensis Sim & Lee, 1998 and P. wandoensis Sim & Lee, 1998 differ from P. alba sp. n. mainly in the thickness of the secondary fibres. Finally, P. rubra Sim & Lee, 2002 differs from P. alba sp. n. for its red colour and the larger size (up to 320 µm) and colour (reddish-brown) of the fibres.
The other species of Psammocinia have a particular morphology, very different respect to Psammocinia alba sp. n.; P. arenosa (Lendenfeld, 1888) and P. hawere Cook & Bergquist, 1996 are cup-shaped sponges. Psammocinia halmiformis (Lendenfeld, 1888) is irregularly lamellate and P. vesiculifera (Poléjaeff, 1884) is a tube sponge. Psammocinia amodes Cook & Bergquist, 1998 is a spatulate sponge with a thin, semi-cylindrical basal portion for anchoring to the substrate, while P. bergquistae Sim & Lee, 2001 has a thumb shape and secondary fibres, forming a secondary web.
Due to the difficulties to differentiate, in some cases, species of the genus Psammocinia from other taxa of the family Irciniidae, we also examined the species belonging to Ircinia and Sarcotragus from the Indo-Pacific area. All these species are different from Psammocinia alba sp. n. in morphology, fibre thickness, and structure (see below).
The incorporation of foreign material can play several roles in sponge growth. Usually, this behaviour is explained just as strengthening of the sponge tissue, but other roles could be considered, e.g. the enhancement of sponging fibre production (
Holotype:
BU-590, 27/07/2004, Timur (Bunaken Island), 25 m depth. INDO-431, 13/05/2005, Jetty (Siladen), depth not stated, N01°37'38.8"; E124°48'00.8".
Soft and elastic cup-shaped Ircinia with a large, central cavity; conulose surface; heavily fasciculated fibres with foreign material.
The sponge is columnar, reminding of a partially hollow cylinder, due to the presence of a wide central cavity (Fig.
Skeleton. The choanosomal skeleton is formed by primary fibres cored by foreign spicules (Fig.
The name refers to the sturdy and large size of the sponge.
The studied specimens are attributed, according to
Only two species of Ircinia, living between 10 and 40 m depth in the temperate water of South-East Australia, show a central cavity: I. caliculata (Lendenfeld, 1888) and I. rubra (Lendenfeld, 1889). Ircinia caliculata differs from I. colossa sp. n. in the general morphology, colour, and organisation of the fibres. It has the rim of the cup bent outwards; the internal part of the cavity with small conules 2–3 mm high. The external part of the sponge presents digitate processes about 10 mm thick. The colour is dark-red brownish. It has fasciculated fibres full of sand grains. Ircinia rubra differs from I. colossa sp. n. in the general shape and fibre size. It is a small, conical, pedunculate sponge with a central cavity. All the fibres are full of debris and foreign spicules and the secondary fibres, 100 µm in diameter, are thicker than those of Ircinia colossa sp. n.
We also examined species belonging to the genus Sarcotragus; none of them fits with the characters of the new species. Sarcotragus aliger (Burton, 1928) is clavate, cylindrical with an apical osculum and fibres 80 µm in diameter, while S. australis (Lendenfeld, 1888) is a massive red sponge. Sarcotragus coreanus (Sim & Lee, 2002) is massive to encrusting, beige in colour; S. gapaensis Sim & Lee, 2000 is subspherical, dark brown to black, with big primary fibres 280–530 µm in diameter. Sarcotragus maraensis Sim & Lee, 2000 is globular with sharp conules 2–8 mm high and an ivory and purple colour. Sarcotragus myrobalanus (Lamarck, 1814) is an ovoid sponge with a long peduncle, brown-reddish in colour; S. tuberculatus (Poléjaeff, 1884) has fibres that often do not ramify and its surface, greyish in colour, is covered by rounded tubercles; filaments are roundish and 55 µm in diameter.
Ircinia colossa sp. n. is frequent in the Bunaken Park and the nearby Bangka Island (North Sulawesi); the paratype was found with other relatively large specimens (50 cm high or more) near a hot vent flowing from a sandy bottom (
This species is probably present also throughout northern Australia and Papua New Guinea (J. Hooper, pers. comm.). Molecular analysis, compared against sequences made by
The marine diversity in Indonesia is still far from being well known. The present contribution highlights the underexplored diversity of Porifera in this area, suggesting the presence of a very high number of still undescribed species. Thanks to this impressive diversity, the areas here considered are important spots for diving tourism, requiring the urgent development of sustainable tourism practices. In particular, at Bangka Island, mining activities are rapidly damaging reef integrity, even if this process is currently strongly counteracted by the local population. It is worth noting that also there, as in many other strongly populated areas, the conflict between the need to preserve local biodiversity and the economic development can quickly lead to a lose-lose equilibrium.
Generally, the economic value of biodiversity is still far from being adequately understood; in particular, the actual value of sponges in the maintenance of the homeostasis of a reef needs to be studied in more detail.
In temperate regions affected by climatic anomalies, filter feeders are among the most affected functional categories (
The area of the present study is very rich in terms of diversity, but the baseline needs urgent implementation and constant update to avoid the possibility of disregarding changes.
We have documented 94 sponge species from three small spots of the northern tip of Sulawesi. Since 1989, van Soest has reported approximately 830 species from Indonesia; the species recorded here represent only a small part of the astonishing sponge diversity of the area.
The coral triangle is known for its high level of biodiversity and continuously, in recent years, new marine organisms have been described. Moreover, many authors (see for example Barber et al. 2000) have demonstrated strong regional genetic differentiation even across short distances and even for reef organisms presumed to be subjected to rapid dispersion even between distant populations. Sponge diversity across Indonesian coral reefs could be extraordinarily underestimated considering the limited capacity of sponge larval dispersal (
The listed taxa (Table
The authors are indebted to the staff of the research outpost Coral Eye (http://coraleye.net/contact-us.html) for logistic support and to Francesca Azzini and M. Boyer (http://www.kudalaut.com) for field support. This work was partially supported by Italian MIUR and MAE funds.
Underwater photos of the species.
Data type: species data
Additional remarks of the species
Data type: species data