Research Article
Print
Research Article
Unveiling the identity of Diaurora Cockerell, 1903 (Bivalvia, Unionidae): morphology, molecular phylogenetics, and the description of a new species
expand article infoZhong-Guang Chen, Yu-Ting Dai, Shan Ouyang, Xiao-Chen Huang, Xiao-Ping Wu
‡ Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
Open Access

Abstract

The monotypic freshwater mussel genus Diaurora Cockerell, 1903 has long been enigmatic due to its rarity and morphological confusion with Acuticosta. In this study, we comprehensively redescribed Diaurora aurorea (Heude, 1883) through a detailed analysis of shell morphology and molecular phylogenetics of recently collected specimens. Moreover, a new species, Diaurora laeve sp. nov., was identified from the Fuyishui River, a tributary of the Zishui River in Shaoyang County, Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, China. Molecular phylogenetic analyses showed that D. aurorea and D. laeve sp. nov. were reciprocally monophyletic and formed a clade as sister to Schistodesmus. Our study underscores the necessity of further exploring the diversity of freshwater mussels in understudied small tributaries throughout China.

Key words

Changjiang River, freshwater mussel, morphology, phylogenetic analysis, taxonomy

Introduction

Freshwater mussels, an important component of freshwater ecosystems (Liu et al. 1979; Vaughn and Hoellein 2018; Lopes-Lima et al. 2021), represent a diverse group of bivalve mollusks that are often identified by their unique shell morphology (Lopes-Lima et al. 2017; Chernyshev et al. 2020). However, reliance on morphological characteristics for taxonomy has resulted in some confusion within the group, as some species may share similar morphological characteristics and exhibit phenotypic plasticity (Huang et al. 2018b; Wu et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2022). One such example is Diaurora Cockerell, 1903, a monotypic genus of small-sized freshwater mussels that are endemic to the middle and lower reaches of the Changjiang River, also known as the Yangtze River (Heude 1883; Simpson 1900; Tchang and Li 1965; Tchang et al. 1965; Wu et al. 2000; Shu et al. 2009; He and Zhuang 2013; Guo 2022).

Initially, Simpson (1900) described the genus as a subgenus of Parreysia Conrad, 1853, based on the original description of Unio auroreus Heude, 1883, and later renamed as Diaurora by Cockerell (1903). Unio auroreus was originally collected and described by Heude (1883) based on the holotype USNM 472411 (designated by monotype) from Ning-kouo hien in China. However, only a few additional specimens have been reported sporadically since its original description, rendering this species little-known and enigmatic for over a century. Due to the limited availability of specimens for study and the potential confusion arising from its easily confused morphology with Acuticosta Simpson, 1900, the validity and systematic status of Diaurora have remained controversial for an extended period. It has been treated as a separate genus (Haas 1924), a subgenus of Parreysia Conrad, 1853 (Simpson 1900), or even a synonym of Acuticosta (Wu et al. 1999).

To address these taxonomic uncertainties, we analyzed the validity and systematic status of Diaurora using a combination of shell morphology and molecular phylogeny. Furthermore, we redescribed the enigmatic species Diaurora aurorea and described a new species, Diaurora laeve sp. nov., from the Zishui River of Hunan Province, China. Our study sheds light on the distribution, ecology, and protection of this distinct genus, and highlights the possibility of small Chinese tributaries harboring unique freshwater mussels.

Material and methods

Specimen collection and identification

Specimens were collected by hand net from the tributaries of the Changjiang River and the Jiulongjiang River from 2003–2022. These specimens were fixed in 95% ethanol, and some specimens were dissected for observation of the internal structure. Measurements were taken point-to-point with digital calipers recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from somatic tissues preserved in 95% ethanol using a TIANamp Marine Animals DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, China). The quality and concentration of the DNA were checked on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA). F-type mitochondrial COI sequences, which are considered the barcode marker, were amplified using primers LCO22me2 (GGTCAACAAAYCATAARGATATTGG) and HCO700dy2 (TCAGGGTGACCAAAAAAYCA) (Walker et al. 2007). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications of COI were performed in a final 25 μL volume mixture containing 1 μL of template DNA, 1 μL of each pair of primers, 12.5 μL of Green Taq Mix (Vazyme, China), and 9.5 μL ddH2O. Thermal cycling began with one cycle at 98 °C for 10 s, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were purified and sequenced using an ABI 3730XL analyzer by Sangon Biotech (China). The accession numbers of all newly obtained sequences are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study. * indicates the sequences newly obtained in this study.

Species Locality Accession number References
Unioninae Rafinesque, 1820
Diaurora aurorea (Heude, 1883) 1 Ji’an, Jiangxi, China OQ829360* This study
Diaurora aurorea (Heude, 1883) 2 Ji’an, Jiangxi, China OQ829361*
Diaurora aurorea (Heude, 1883) 3 Ji’an, Jiangxi, China OQ829362*
Diaurora aurorea (Heude, 1883) 4 Fuzhou, Jiangxi, China OQ829366*
Diaurora laeve Chen, Dai, Huang & Wu, sp. nov. 1 Shaoyang, Hunan, China OQ829363*
Diaurora laeve Chen, Dai, Huang & Wu, sp. nov. 2 Shaoyang, Hunan, China OQ829364*
Diaurora laeve Chen, Dai, Huang & Wu, sp. nov. 3 Shaoyang, Hunan, China OQ829365*
Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868) Jiangxi, China MG462921 Huang et al. 2018a
Schistodesmus lampreyanus (Baird & Adams, 1867) Jiangxi, China MG463037
Schistodesmus spinosus (Simpson, 1900) Jiangxi, China MG463046
Schistodesmus sp. Hunan, China MG463043
Unio pictorum (Linnaeus, 1758) Europe KC429109 Sharma et al. 2013
Unio crassus Philipsson, 1788 Poland KY290446 Burzynski et al. 2017
Tchangsinaia piscicula (Heude, 1874) Jiangxi, China MG462977 Huang et al. 2018a
Cuneopsis celtiformis (Heude, 1874) Jiangxi, China MG462964
Cuneopsis heudei (Heude, 1874) Jiangxi, China MG462970
Aculamprotula fibrosa (Heude, 1877) Jiangxi, China MG462909
Nodularia douglasiae (Gray, 1833) China KX822653 Lopes-Lima et al. 2017
Nodularia breviconcha Lee, Kim, Bogan & Kondo, 2020 South Korea MT020662 Lopes-Lima et al. 2020
Inversiunio yanagawensis (Kondo, 1982) Japan MT020654
Inversiunio reinianus (Kobelt, 1879) Japan MT020657
Pseudocuneopsis sichuanensis Huang, Dai, Chen & Wu, 2022 Sichuan, China MZ540966 Wu et al. 2022
Pseudocuneopsis capitata (Heude, 1874) Anhui, China NC042469 Wu et al. 2019
Alasmidonta marginata Say, 1818 USA AF156502 Graf and O’Foighil 2020
Lasmigona compressa (Lea, 1829) USA AF156503
Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus, 1758) Russia KX822632 Lopes-Lima et al. 2017
Pseudanodonta complanata (Rossmässler, 1835) Ukraine KX822661
Lanceolaria gladiola (Heude, 1877) Jiangxi, China KY067441 Unpublished
Lanceolaria oxyrhyncha (Martens, 1861) Japan MT020648 Lopes-Lima et al. 2020
Cristaria plicata (Leach, 1814) Jiangxi, China MG462956 Huang et al. 2018a
Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) Jiangxi, China MG463015
Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) China KX822668 Lopes-Lima et al. 2017
Beringiana beringiana (Middendorff, 1851) Japan MT020557 Lopes-Lima et al. 2020
Pletholophus tenuis (Gray, 1833) Vietnam KX822658 Lopes-Lima et al. 2017
Anemina arcaeformis (Heude, 1877) Jiangxi, China MG462936 Huang et al. 2018a
Amuranodonta kijaensis Moskvicheva, 1973 Russia MK574204 Bolotov et al. 2020
Parreysiinae Henderson, 1935
Coelatura aegyptiaca (Cailliaud, 1823) Egypt KJ081162 Graf et al. 2014
Indonaia andersoniana (Nevill, 1877) Myanmar MF352275 Bolotov et al. 2017
Parreysia nagpoorensis (Lea, 1860) India JQ861229 Unpublished
Gonideinae Ortmann, 1916
Pronodularia japanensis (Lea, 1859) Japan LC505454 Fukata and Iigo 2020
Lamprotula leaii (Gray, 1833) Jiangxi, China MG462996 Huang et al. 2018a
Ambleminae Rafinesque, 1820
Lampsilis siliquoidea (Barnes, 1823) USA MH560773 Unpublished
Quadrula quadrula (Rafinesque, 1820) USA HM230409
Margaritiferidae Henderson, 1929
Margaritifera dahurica (Middendorff, 1850) Russia KJ161516 Bolotov et al. 2015
Gibbosula rochechouartii (Heude, 1875) Jiangxi, China MG463022 Huang et al. 2018a

Sequences were aligned using MEGA v. 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013) and checked by eye. The genetic distance, based on the uncorrected p-distance model, was calculated using MEGA v. 6.0. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). Thirty-six reliable unionid sequences from GenBank were use for phylogenetic analysis. Margaritifera dahurica (Middendorff, 1850) and Gibbosula rochechouartii (Heude, 1875) were used as the outgroup for rooting the tree. ML analyses were performed in IQ-TREE v. 1.6.12 (Minh et al. 2013) with 1000 reiterations. The most appropriate model of sequence evolution (TIM3+I+G) was selected under PartitonFinder2 v. 1.1 (Robert et al. 2017). Bayesian inference (BI) was conducted in MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The most appropriate model of sequence evolution (GTR+I+G) was selected under ModelFinder (Subha et al. 2017). Four simultaneous runs with four independent Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) were implemented for 10 million generations, and trees were sampled every 1000 generations with a burn-in of 25%. The convergence was checked with the average standard deviation of split frequencies <0.01 and the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) ~1.

Institutional abbreviations

NCU Nanchang University (Nanchang, Jiangxi, China)

USNM United States National Museum of Nature History (Washington, DC, USA)

NZMC National Zoological Museum of China (Beijing, China)

SMF Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

YHC Collection of Mr Hao Yang (Xiamen, Fujian, China)

Results

Phylogenetic relationships

A total of 43 mitochondrial COI sequences from 38 unionoid species were utilized in the phylogenetic analyses (Table. 1). Phylogenetic analyses revealed ML and BI trees with largely consistent topologies (Figs 1, 2). Our results showed that Diaurora occupied a distinct position in the subfamily Unioninae and was the sister group of Schistodesmus Simpson, 1900 instead of Acuticosta. However, this sister relationship between Diaurora and Schistodesmus was not well-supported (bootstrap support value = 70 and Bayesian inference posterior probability support value = 0.65). Furthermore, Diaurora can be divided into two separate clades: one consisted of Diaurora aurorea, and the other represents a yet-to-be-described species with distinct morphological characters. The genetic distance (uncorrected p-distance) between the two clades in Diaurora was 10.4%. Indeed, we acknowledged that deep relationships in our phylogenetic trees based on the COI dataset were not well resolved but should not overturn the main conclusion drawn here. It is necessary to further reveal the exact phylogenetic relationships using more data such as mitochondrial genomes in the future.

Figure 1. 

Bayesian inference (BI) tree inferred from COI gene sequences. Posterior probabilities are shown on the left of nodes on the tree if greater than 50%. Red font indicates the species from this study.

Figure 2. 

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree inferred from COI gene sequences. Bootstrap supports are shown on the left of nodes on the tree if greater than 50%. Red font indicates the species from this study.

Systematics

Family Unionidae Rafinesque, 1820

Subfamily Unioninae Rafinesque, 1820

Diaurora Cockerell, 1903

Figs 3A, B, 4, 5

Type species

Unio auroreus Heude, 1883, by original designation.

Diagnosis

Shell small size, symmetric, flat, sub-glossy, triangular-ovate to reniform, orangish to brownish, with broken blackish-green rays. Zigzag sculpture present. Posterior ridge absent.

Remarks

Aurora Simpson, 1900 was originally described as a subgenus of Parreysia based on shell morphology. Simpson (1900) indicated uncertainty regarding the taxonomic placement of Unio auroreus and whether it merited a generic rank. As a result, he provisionally designated it as a new subgenus. Cockerell (1903) renamed Aurora as Diaurora due to the former being a junior homonym of Aurora Ragonot, 1887 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Aurora Sollas, 1888 (Porifera: Demospongiae: Ancorinidae). Haas (1924) elevated Diaurora to an independent genus, but this viewpoint was not widely accepted. Wu et al. (1999) recombined Parreysia aurorea as Acuticosta aurorea based on shell morphology and marsupium type. While Diaurora shares some similarities in shell morphology with Acuticosta, it can be differentiated from Acuticosta by its distinct shell shape and the absence of a posterior ridge (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. 

Specimens of Diaurora and Acuticosta chinensis A Diaurora aurorea, 22_NCU_XPWU_DA03 B Diaurora laeve sp. nov., holotype: 22_NCU_XPWU_DL01 C Acuticosta chinensis, 22_NCU_XPWU_AC01.

Diaurora aurorea (Heude, 1883)

Figs 3A, 4A, 5A

Museum material

Holotype : USNM472411, Ning-kouo hien [宁国县], Kien-té hien [建德县], China. NZMC FM00732, Yuanjiang River [沅江], Hunan Province [湖南省], China. SMF24000a–b, Yütanchiao [玉潭桥], Hunan [湖南], China, 28°15′7″N, 112°33′45″E.

New material

22_NCU_XPWU_DA01–02, Fuhe River [抚河], Fuzhou City [抚州市], Jiangxi Province [江西省], China, 27°53′57″N, 116°34′03″E, collected by Zhong-Guang Chen, Yu-Ting Dai, Chen-Chen Jia & Ying-Ying Zhang in September 2022. 22_NCU_XPWU_DA03–15, Ganjiang River [赣江], Jian City [吉安市], Jiangxi Province [江西省], China, 27°12′39″N, 115°09′44″E, collected by Zhong-Guang Chen & Zheng-Jie Lou in November 2022. YHC0028001, Jiulong River [九龙江], Fujian Province [福建省], China, collected by Hao Yang in 2003.

Diagnosis

Shell triangular-ovate; posterior margin obliquely arc-shaped. Periostracum with straight broken blackish-green rays. Zigzag sculpture presented on all over the shell surface.

Description

Shell (Figs 3A, 4A). Shell small size, symmetric, solid, moderately thick, sub-glossy, triangular-ovate. Anterior margin oval, inflated; dorsal margin curved downwards; ventral margin slightly rounded or nearly straight; posterior margin obliquely arc-shaped. Umbo inflated, above hinge line, located at 1/3 of the dorsal margin, and often eroded. Periostracum orangish to brownish, with straight broken blackish-green rays and thin growth lines. Growth lines arranged in irregular concentric circles. Zigzag sculpture presented on all over the shell surface but weakening from umbo to edge. Hinge short. Ligament short and strong. Mantle muscle scars obvious. Anterior adductor muscle scars oval, deep, smooth in junior but rough in adult; posterior adductor muscle scars long oval, smooth. Left valve with two pseudocardinal teeth, equal height, anterior tooth small and flat, posterior tooth thick and pyramidal; anterior pseudocardinal tooth of the right valve well developed, posterior pseudocardinal tooth reduced, connected to lateral teeth. Lateral teeth of both valves long and thick. Nacre white or light orangish.

Figure 4. 

Comparison of the radial pattern on the shell surface in Diaurora A Diaurora aurorea, 22_NCU_XPWU_DA04 B Diaurora laeve sp. nov., 22_NCU_XPWU_DL02.

Length 32.0–41.3 mm, height 20.5–26.0 mm, width 12.4–17.2 mm.

Soft anatomy (Fig. 5A). Mantle off-white to light-brownish, aperture margins brown, flap margin with blackish to brown papillae. Gills light-brownish, inner gills slightly longer and wider than outer gills. Labial palps yellowish to brown (fade to grayish white in alcohol), distally pointed and irregularly fan-shaped in appearance. Visceral mass creamy white, foot orange (fade to grayish white in alcohol).

Figure 5. 

Soft anatomical characters of Diaurora A Diaurora aurorea, 22_NCU_XPWU_DA15 B Diaurora laeve sp. nov., 22_NCU_XPWU_DL50. aam, anterior adductor muscle; pam, posterior adductor muscle; ea, excurrent aperture; ia, incurrent aperture; pia, papillae of the incurrent aperture; pea, papillae of the excurrent aperture; ig, inner gills; og, outer gills; m, mantle; lp, labial palps; vm, visceral mass; f, foot.

Vernacular name

金黄蚌 (Pinyin: jin huang bang).

Distribution and ecology

Scattered in the middle and lower Changjiang River basin and the upper Jiulongjiang River, including Anhui Province, Jiangxi Province, Hunan Province and Fujian Province (Fig. 6). It mainly co-occurs with Aculamprotula polysticta (Heude, 1877), Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868), Cuneopsis heudei (Heude, 1874), Nodularia douglasiae (Gray, 1833), Lamprotula caveata (Heude, 1877), Lanceolaria triformis (Heude, 1877) and Ptychorhynchus pfisteri (Heude, 1874) in the sandy substrates of tributaries of large rivers (Fig. 7). Besides, D. aurorea was reported in Vietnam by Dang et al. (1980), but the specimens were not available for examination (Do et al. 2018). This record is highly dubious due to its considerable distance from the known distribution range of D. aurorea as documented in this study. It is possible that this record was a misidentification of Acuticosta species.

Figure 6. 

Distribution map of Diaurora. Star: type locality of Diaurora laeve sp. nov.; solid triangle: type locality of Diaurora aurorea; hollow triangle: new locality of Diaurora aurorea.

Figure 7. 

Habitat of Diaurora. A habitat of Diaurora aurorea, Fuhe River, Fuzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China B habitat of Diaurora laeve sp. nov., Zishui River, Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, China.

Remarks

The rarity of D. aurorea has been seriously underestimated for a long time due to the common misidentification of museum material. Upon examination of museum specimens, it has been discovered that specimen NZMC10542 in the National Zoological Museum of China and specimens 15_NCU_XPWU_AA01–11 in Nanchang University were actually Acuticosta chinensis. Since its original description, only a handful of additional specimens of D. aurorea have been correctly identified. It has always been shrouded in mystery as there are hardly any photographs of specimens other than the type specimen. The new specimens examined in this study indicate that it is far more widespread than previously recorded. However, the habitats of D. aurorea are severely fragmented and the population size is very small. Therefore, it requires more attention and protection in the future.

Diaurora laeve Chen, Dai, Huang & Wu, sp. nov.

Figs 3B, 4B, 5B

Type material

Holotype: 22_NCU_XPWU_DL01, Zishui River [资水], Shaoyang County [邵阳县], Shaoyang City [邵阳市], Hunan Province [湖南省], China, 26°59′27″N, 111°16′10″E, collected by Zhong-Guang Chen & Zheng-Jie Lou in November 2022; Paratypes: 22_NCU_XPWU_DL02–100, other information same as holotype.

Diagnosis

Shell reniform. Periostracum with irregular broken blackish-green rays. Zigzag sculpture only presented in umbo area.

Description

Shell (Figs 3B, 4B). Shell small size, symmetric, solid, moderately thick, sub-glossy, reniform. Anterior margin oval, inflated; dorsal margin curved downwards and truncate; ventral margin slightly rounded or nearly straight; posterior margin oval. Umbo inflated, above hinge line, located at 1/3 of the dorsal margin, and often eroded. Periostracum orangish to brownish, with irregular broken blackish-green rays and thin growth lines. Growth lines arranged in irregular concentric circles. Zigzag sculpture only presented in umbo area. Hinge short. Ligament short and strong. Mantle muscle scars obvious. Anterior adductor muscle scars oval, deep, smooth in junior but rough in adult; posterior adductor muscle scars long oval, smooth. Left valve with two pseudocardinal teeth, equal height, anterior tooth small and flat, posterior tooth thick and pyramidal; anterior pseudocardinal tooth of the right valve well developed, posterior pseudocardinal tooth reduced, connected to lateral teeth. Lateral teeth of both valves long and thick. Nacre light orangish.

Holotype : length 41.8 mm, height 29.1 mm, width 17.0 mm; Paratypes: length 27.4–45.0 mm, height 17.6–30.8 mm, width 11.0–17.6 mm.

Soft anatomy (Fig. 5B). Mantle off-white to light-brownish, aperture margins brown, flap margin with yellowish papillae. Gills light-brownish, inner gills slightly longer and wider than outer gills. Labial palps yellowish to brown, distally pointed and irregularly fan-shaped in appearance. Visceral mass creamy white, foot orange.

Etymology

The specific name laeve is made from the Latin laeve for smooth, an adjective, alluding to the smoother shell surface of this species.

Vernacular name

平滑金黄蚌 (Pinyin: ping hua jin huang bang).

Distribution and ecology

Diaurora laeve sp. nov. is known from the type locality only (Fig. 6). It was found to occur in a pebbly substrate of the river together with Nodularia douglasiae and Lanceolaria triformis (Fig. 7). It is the dominant species in the habitat, accounting for 98% of the total density of freshwater mussels.

Remarks

The placement of the new species in Diaurora is supported by both morphology and molecular phylogenetic analysis. Diaurora laeve sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from D. aurorea by its reniform shell, smaller zigzag sculptured area, and irregular rays on the shell. The different habitat preferences of Diaurora laeve sp. nov. and D. aurorea may have led to their differentiation. Diaurora aurorea is commonly found in the middle reaches of sandy substrate tributaries, while Diaurora laeve sp. nov. prefers to inhabit the upper reaches of pebbly substrate tributaries. In recent years, with more in-depth investigations and field surveys, new freshwater mussel species such as Inversidens rentianensis Wu & Wu, 2021 and Pseudocuneopsis sichuanensis Huang, Dai, Chen & Wu, 2022 have been discovered in small tributaries of China (Wu et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2022). These findings suggest that the diversity of freshwater mussels in small tributaries of China remains to be fully explored, and future extensive exploration may lead to the discovery of other yet-to-be-described species.

Acknowledgements

We thank Zheng-Jie Lou (Hangzhou), Chen-Chen Jia (Nanchang University) and Ying-Ying Zhang (Nanchang University) for assistance in specimen collection; Hao Yang (YHshells, Xiamen) and Qing Zhang (YHshells, Xiamen) for assistance in specimen examination.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.31772412 and No.32100354.

Author contributions

Zhong-Guang Chen, Yu-Ting Dai, Xiao-Chen Huang & Xiao-Ping Wu designed the study. Zhong-Guang Chen & Yu-Ting Dai collected the specimens. Zhong-Guang Chen & Yu-Ting Dai examined the specimens, performed morphological comparisons and conducted molecular analysis. All authors prepared the manuscript, read and approved the final version.

Author ORCIDs

Zhong-Guang Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2689-3321

Yu-Ting Dai https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5856-3987

Xiao-Chen Huang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0242-3571

Xiao-Ping Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8037-5640

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Bolotov IN, Bespalaya YV, Vikhrev IV, Aksenova OV, Aspholm PE, Gofarov MY, Klishko OK, Kolosova YS, Kondakov AV, Lyubas AA, Paltser IS, Konopleva ES, Tumpeesuwan S, Bolotov NI, Voroshilova IS (2015) Taxonomy and Distribution of Freshwater Pearl Mussels (Unionoida: Margaritiferidae) of the Russian Far East. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0122408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122408
  • Bolotov IN, Vikhrev IV, Kondakov AV, Konopleva ES, Gofarov MY, Aksenova OV, Tumpeesuwan S (2017) New taxa of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) from a species-rich but overlooked evolutionary hotspot in Southeast Asia. Scientific Reports 7(1): 11573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11957-9
  • Bolotov IN, Kondakov AV, Konopleva ES, Vikhrev IV, Aksenova OV, Aksenov AS, Bespalaya YV, Borovskoy AV, Danilov PP, Dvoryankin GA, Gofarov MY, Kabakov MB, Klishko OK, Kolosova YS, Lyubas AA, Novoselov AP, Palatov DM, Savvinov GN, Solomonov NM, Spitsyn VM, Sokolova SE, Tomilova AA, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Lopes-Lima M, Makhrov AA, Vinarski MV (2020) Integrative taxonomy, biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in Russia. Scientific Reports 10(3072): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59867-7
  • Burzynski A, Soroka M, Mioduchowska M, Kaczmarczyk A, Sell J (2017) The complete maternal and paternal mitochondrial genomes of Unio crassus: Mitochondrial molecular clock and the overconfidence of molecular dating. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 107: 605–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.007
  • Chernyshev AV, Sayenko EM, Bogatov VV (2020) Superspecific taxonomy of the Far Eastern unionids (Bivalvia, Unionidae): Review and analysis. The Biological Bulletin 47(3): 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359020010045
  • Cockerell TDA (1903) Some homonymous generic names. The Nautilus 16(10): 118.
  • Conrad TA (1853) A synopsis of the family of Naiades of North America, with notes, and a table of some of the genera and sub-genera of the family, according to their geographical distribution, and descriptions of genera and sub-genera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 6(7): 243–269.
  • Dang NT, Thai TB, Pham VM (1980) Identification of freshwater invertebrates of North Vietnam. Sciences and Technology Publishing Co., Ha Noi, Vietnam.
  • Do VT, Le T, Bogan A (2018) Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) of Vietnam: Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 21(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31931/fmbc.v21i1.2018.1-18
  • Fukata Y, Iigo M (2020) The complete mitochondrial genome of freshwater mussel Pronodularia japanensis (Gonideinae, Unionidae, Unionida) from Tochigi Prefecture, Japan, and its phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA, Part B, Resources 5(2): 1215–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1730726
  • Graf DL, O’Foighil D (2000) The evolution of brooding characters among the freshwater pearly mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of North America. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 66(2): 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/66.2.157
  • Graf DL, Geneva AJ, Pfeiffer III JM, Chilala AD (2014) Phylogenetic analysis of Prisodontopsis Tomlin, 1928 and Mweruella Haas, 1936 (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Lake Mweru (Congo basin) supports a Quaternary radiation in the Zambian Congo. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 80(3): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyu012
  • Guo L (2022) Unionoida. The Straits Publishing, China. [In Chinese]
  • Haas F (1924) Beiträge zu einer Monographie der asiatischen Unioniden. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 38: 187–188.
  • He J, Zhuang Z (2013) The Freshwater Bivalves of China. ConchBooks, Germany.
  • Heude RP (1883) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 8. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Huang XC, Su JH, Ouyang JX, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP (2018a) Towards a global phylogeny of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida): Species delimitation of Chinese taxa, mitochondrial phylogenomics, and diversification patterns. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 130: 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.09.019
  • Huang XC, Wu RW, An CT, Xie GL, Su JH, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP (2018b) Reclassification of Lamprotula rochechouartii as Margaritifera rochechouartii comb. nov. (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae) revealed by time-calibrated multilocus phylogenetic analyses and mitochondrial phylogenomics of Unionoida. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 120: 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.12.017
  • Liu YY, Zhang WZ, Wang YX, Wang EY (1979) Economic fauna of China: Freshwater mollusc. Science Press: Beijing, PR China. [In Chinese]
  • Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Do VT, Ghamiz M, Mock KE, Kebapçı Ü, Klishko O, Kovitvadhi S, Kovitvadhi U, Paulo OS, Pfeiffer III JM, Raley M, Riccardi N, Şereflişan H, Sousa R, Teixeira A, Varandas S, Wu X, Zanatta DT, Zieritz A, Bogan AE (2017) Phylogeny of the most species-rich freshwater bivalve family (Bivalvia: Unionida: Unionidae): Defining modern subfamilies and tribes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 106: 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.021
  • Lopes-Lima M, Hattori A, Kondo T, Lee JH, Kim SK, Bolotov IN, Kondakov AV, Bogan AE, Froufe E (2020) Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the Rising Sun (Far East Asia): Phylogeny, systematics, and distribution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 146(2): 106755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106755
  • Lopes-Lima M, Riccardi N, Urbanska M, Köhler F, Vinarski M, Bogan AE, Sousa R (2021) Major shortfalls impairing knowledge and conservation of freshwater molluscs. Hydrobiologia 848(12): 2831–2867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04622-w
  • Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A (2013) Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(5): 1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst024
  • Robert L, Paul BF, April MW, Tereza S, Brett C (2017) PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Sharma PP, Zardus JD, Boyle EE, Gonzalez VL, Jennings RM, McIntyre E, Wheeler WC, Etter RJ, Giribet G (2013) Into the deep: A phylogenetic approach to the bivalve subclass Protobranchia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69(1): 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.05.018
  • Subha K, Bui QM, Thomas KFW, Arndt von H, Lars SJ (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 5871–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Tchang S, Li SC (1965) Bivalves (Mollusca) of the Poyang Lake and surrounding waters, Kiangsi Province, China, with description of a new species. Dong Wu Xue Bao 3: 309–317. [In Chinese]
  • Tchang S, Li SC, Liu YY (1965) Bivalves (Mollusca) of the Tung-ting Lake and its surrounding waters, Hunan Province, China. Dong Wu Xue Bao 17: 197–216. [In Chinese]
  • Walker JM, Bogan AE, Bonfiglio EA, Campbell DC, Christian AD, Curole JP, Harris JL, Wojtecki RJ, Hoeh WR (2007) Primers for amplifying the hypervariable, male-transmitted COII–COI junction region in amblemine freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea: Ambleminae). Molecular Ecology Notes 7(3): 489–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01630.x
  • Wu XP, Liang Y, Wang H, Ouyang S (1999) Morphological characters of glochidia of Unionidae and the taxonomic significance. Shui Sheng Sheng Wu Hsueh Bao 23: 139–147. [In Chinese]
  • Wu XP, Liang YL, Wang HZ, Xie ZC, Ouyang S (2000) Distribution and species diversity of freshwater Mollusca of lakes along mid-lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Hupo Kexue 12(2): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.18307/2000.0203 [In Chinese]
  • Wu RW, Liu XJ, Wang S, Roe KJ, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2019) Analysis of mitochondrial genomes resolves the phylogenetic position of Chinese freshwater mussels (Bivalvia, Unionida). ZooKeys 812(6): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.812.29908
  • Wu RW, Kim KS, Xie GL, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2020) Phylogenetic position of Aculamprotula polysticta, comb. res. (Bivalvia: Unionidae) inferred from phylogenetic relationships in Unionida. Invertebrate Systematics 34(2): 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS19036
  • Wu RW, Liu XJ, Kondo T, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2021) New species of the genus Inversidens Haas, 1911 (Unionoida, Unionidae, Gonideinae) from Jiangxi Province, China. ZooKeys 1054(3): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1054.69075
  • Wu XP, Dai YT, Yin N, Shu FY, Chen ZG, Guo L, Zhou CH, Ouyang S, Huang XC (2022) Mitogenomic phylogeny resolves Cuneopsis (Bivalvia: Unionidae) as polyphyletic: The description of two new genera and a new species. Zoologica Scripta 51(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12527
login to comment