Related articles by  
Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Bluesky
Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • NanopubsNanopubs
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Preface
  • Material and methods
    • Brief introduction to doryline ants
    • History of taxonomic and phylogenetic research
    • Current views on doryline classification and evolution
    • Classification of the Dorylinae proposed here
    • Morphology
    • Diagnostic characters of the worker
    • Diagnostic characters of the male
    • Diagnostic characters of the gyne
    • Characters used to describe worker morphology
    • Characters used to describe male morphology
    • Characters used to describe gyne morphology
    • Key to the genera of doryline ants based on workers
    • Provisional key to the genera of doryline ants based on males
  • Taxonomic treatment of the genera of Dorylinae
    • Acanthostichus
    • Aenictogiton
    • Aenictus
    • Cerapachys
    • Cheliomyrmex
    • Chrysapace
    • Cylindromyrmex
    • Dorylus
    • Eburopone
    • Eciton
    • Eusphinctus
    • Labidus
    • Leptanilloides
    • Lioponera
    • Lividopone
    • Neivamyrmex
    • Neocerapachys
    • Nomamyrmex
    • Ooceraea
    • Parasyscia
    • Procerapachys
    • Simopone
    • Sphinctomyrmex
    • Syscia
    • Tanipone
    • Vicinopone
    • Yunodorylus
    • Zasphinctus
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Appendix
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by