Three new species of woodlizards (Hoplocercinae, Enyalioides) from northwestern South America

Abstract The discovery of three new species of Enyalioides from the tropical Andes in Ecuador and northern Peru is reported. Enyalioides altotambo sp. n. occurs in northwestern Ecuador and differs from other species of Enyalioides in having dorsal scales that are both smooth and homogeneous in size, a brown iris, and in lacking enlarged, circular and keeled scales on the flanks. Enyalioides anisolepis sp. n. occurs on the Amazonian slopes of the Andes in southern Ecuador and northern Peru and can be distinguished from other species of Enyalioides by its scattered, projecting large scales on the dorsum, flanks, and hind limbs, as well as a well-developed vertebral crest, with the vertebrals on the neck at least three times higher than those between the hind limbs. Enyalioides sophiarothschildae sp. n. is from the Amazonian slopes of the Cordillera Central in northeastern Peru; it differs from other species of Enyalioides in having caudal scales that are relatively homogeneous in size on each caudal segment, a white gular region with a black medial patch and several turquoise scales in males, as well as immaculate white labials and chin. A molecular phylogenetic tree of 18 species of hoplocercines is presented, including the three species described in this paper and Enyalioides cofanorum, as well as an updated identification key for species of Hoplocercinae.


Introduction
The iguanian lizard clade Hoplocercinae includes 16 currently recognized species assigned to Enyalioides, Hoplocercus, and Morunasaurus distributed from Panama to central Brazil (Torres-Carvajal et al. 2011). Woodlizards (Enyalioides) occupy lowland tropical rainforests including the Chocó and the western Amazon basin, with nine species (75%) occuring east of the Andes and three (25%) occuring west of the Andes.
With nearly 40% of the total number of species described in the last seven years from Ecuador and Peru (Torres-Carvajal et al. 2008;Venegas et al. 2011;Venegas et al. 2013), woodlizards represent one of the South American lizard groups with the highest species discovery rate (corrected for clade size) in the last decade. This is a striking fact given that woodlizards are among the largest and most colorful lizards in South American tropical forests and is most likely the result of recent fieldwork in poorly explored areas of the central and northern Andes. Here we contribute to this growing body of taxonomic knowledge with the description of three new species of Enyalioides, one from the Pacific slopes of the Andes in northern Ecuador, and the other two from the Amazonian slopes of the Andes in southern Ecuador and northern Peru.

Materials and methods
Snout-vent length (SVL) and tail length (TL) measurements were made with a ruler and recorded to the nearest millimeter. All other measurements (i.e., head width, length and height; rostral and mental width and height) were made with digital cali-pers and recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm. Sex was determined by noting the presence of hemipenes or sexually dichromatic characters. The format of Torres-Carvajal et al. (2011) is followed for the descriptions of the new species, as well as the terminology of these authors for scutellational characters and measurements. Specimens of other species of Enyalioides examined in this study are listed in the Appendix. The distribution map was constructed in ArcMap 9.3 (ESRI, Inc.); WGS84 is the datum for all coordinates presented below. Institutional abbreviations correspond to Museo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (QCAZ), Quito; Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad (CORBIDI), Lima, Peru; Museo de Historia Natural San Marcos (MUSM), Lima, Peru.

Phylogenetic analyses
Following laboratory protocols similar to those presented by Torres-Carvajal and de Queiroz (2009), we sequenced a continuous 1773 base fragment of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) that extends from the gene encoding subunit I of the protein NADH dehydrogenase (ND1) through the genes encoding tRNA Ile , tRNA Gln , tRNA Met , subunit II of NADH dehydrogenase (ND2), tRNA Trp , tRNA Ala , tRNA Asn , the origin of light-strand replication (OL), tRNA Cys , tRNA Tyr , to the gene encoding subunit I of the protein cytochrome c oxidase (COI). We added five new sequences from the new species described herein and one of Enyalioides cofanorum (QCAZ 8035) to the mtDNA dataset of Venegas et al. (2013). GenBank accession numbers for the new sequences are provided in Table 1.
Editing, assembly, and alignment of sequences were performed with Geneious 7.1.7 (Drummond et al. 2010). Genes were combined into a single dataset with four partitions, three corresponding to each codon position in protein coding genes and one to all tRNAs. The best partition strategy along with the corresponding models of evolution were obtained in PartitionFinder 1.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012) under the Bayesian information criterion.
Phylogenetic relationships were assessed under a Bayesian inference approach using MrBayes 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) after partitioning the data as described above. To reduce the chance of converging on a local optimum, four runs were performed. Each consisted of five million generations and four Markov chains with default heating values. Trees were sampled every 1000 generations resulting in 5001 saved trees per analysis. Stationarity was confirmed by plotting the -ln L per generation in the program Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2013). Additionally, the standard deviation of the partition frequencies and the potential scale reduction factor (Gelman and Rubin 1992) were used as convergence diagnostics for the posterior probabilities of bipartitions and branch lengths, respectively. Adequacy of mixing was assessed by examining the effective sample sizes (ESS) in Tracer, with ESS > 200 considered as satisfactory. After analyzing convergence, mixing, and sampling, the first 501 trees in the sample were discarded as "burn-in" from each run. We then confirmed that the four analyses had reached stationarity at a similar likelihood score and that the topologies were similar and used the resultant 18,000 trees to calculate posterior probabilities (PP) for each bipartition on a 50% majority rule consensus tree.

Results
The taxonomic conclusions of this study are based on the observation of morphological features and color patterns, as well as the inferred phylogenetic relationships. This information is considered as species delimitation criteria following a general lineage or unified species concept (de Queiroz 1998;2007). size. It can be distinguished from E. oshaughnessyi (character states in parentheses) by the following characters: iris brown in both sexes (iris bright red in both sexes); scales on lateral edge of skull roof just posterior to superciliaries strongly projected (moderately projected); adults of both sexes with light green spots on dorsum (if present, spots turquoise or blue); adult males with a black medial patch on gular region not extending dorsally to form an antehumeral bar (black patch under gular fold extending dorsally to form a short antehumeral bar); scales on flanks almost homogenous in size (flank scales heterogeneous in size, with a few enlarged, circular, keeled scales); pale postympanic stripe on lateral aspect of neck in both sexes (pale postympanic spot in both sexes), posterior surface of thighs without enlarged scales (scattered enlarged scales), tail length/total length 0.57-0.60 (0.59-0.62). Description of holotype. Male (Fig. 1); SVL = 119 mm; TL = 160 mm; maximum head width = 21.9 mm; head length = 29.8 mm; head height = 20.3 mm; dorsal head scales keeled or multicarinate, projected dorsally; parietal eye present; eight scales immediately posterior to superciliaries conical, dorsolaterally projected, and conspicuously larger than adjacent scales; temporal scales small, pyramidal, low; one large conical pretympanic scale; superciliaries 17; canthals five; postrostrals three; supralabials 13 if counted to a point below middle of eye; rostral divided into three small scales, similar in size to adjacent supralabials; one longitudinal row of lorilabials between suboculars and supralabials at level of middle of eye, longitudinal rows of lorilabials anterior to this point two; loreal region with small, keeled, and juxtaposed scales; nasal at level of supralabials V-VI; infralabials 11 if counted to a point below middle of eye; mental (1.68 mm wide × 1.98 mm high) slightly wider and 1.5 times higher than adjacent infralabials; postmentals three; gulars ventrally projected and separated from each other by skin covered with tiny granular scales; gular fold complete midventrally, extending dorsally and posteriorly to form an antehumeral fold; neck with some oblique folds, and a dorsolateral row of enlarged scales; distal aspect of oblique fold immediately anterior to antehumeral fold with approximately six enlarged scales similar in size to gulars, but more than three or four times the size of adjacent fold scales.
Vertebral crest strongly projected and decreasing in size posteriorly, with vertebrals on neck at least four times higher than those between hind limbs; crest bifurcates at a point approximately 10 mm posterior to the cloaca, and extends onto tail about 1/3 its length; body flanks between fore and hind limbs with slight dorsolateral fold; scales on dorsolateral fold slightly larger than adjacent scales; dorsal and flank scales small, smooth, imbricate, more or less homogeneous in size; ventral scales imbricate, keeled, rectangular or rhomboid, with a posterolateral mucron; ventrals more than twice the size (area) of dorsals.
Limb scales keeled dorsally and keeled or feebly keeled ventrally; scales on dorsal and posterior aspects of thighs heterogeneous in size, with most scales less than half the size of those scales on anterior and ventral aspects, separated from each other by skin covered with tiny granular scales; subdigitals on finger IV 25; subdigitals on toe IV 29; femoral pores on each side one; tail laterally compressed and gradually tapering posteriorly; caudal scales smooth at the base of tail, becoming keeled and imbricate towards tip, gradually increasing in size posteriorly on lateral and dorsal aspects of each caudal segment; caudals larger ventrally than dorsally; individual caudal segments three scales long ventrally and seven scales long dorsally.
Color in life of holotype (Fig. 1). Head light green with a few black and dark brown scales; superciliaries, canthals and labials yellow; bluish cream blotch, wider than high, behind tympanum; pretympanic scales bluish cream; dorsal body background light green with a fine dark brown reticulation and scattered bluish cream scales; vertebrals yellowish green; tail green with incomplete dark brown rings; black irregular marks on limbs, covering most of hands and feet; chin white; gular region bluish cream anterolaterally grading into yellowish green and then bluish green posteriorly, with a posteromedial black patch; ventral aspect of body, limbs and tail dirty cream; flank color pattern extending onto ventrolateral aspect of body; iris brown with golden ring around pupil.
Variation. Variation in meristic and morphometric characters of Enyalioides altotambo are presented in Table 2. The single female paratype (QCAZ 6671; Fig. 2 similar in lepidosis and color patterns to the holotype. It differs from the holotype in lacking a black gular patch, and in having a longer pale postympanic stripe, a yellow chin, and a yellow gular region. Furthermore, the scales on the lateral edge of the skull roof and those forming the vertebral crest are more projected in the female (Fig. 2); however, this variation could be ontogenetic rather than sexual because the female is larger (SVL = 134 mm) than the male (SVL = 119). Distribution. Enyalioides altotambo is only known from two adjacent localities at 620-645 m in the Chocoan rainforests of northwestern Ecuador (Fig. 3). Female paratype QCAZ 6671 was found at 5:30 pm with its head facing up on a tree trunk.

) is
Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition and refers to Alto Tambo, Provincia Esmeraldas, Ecuador, a village on the Ibarra-San Lorenzo road where Enyalioides altotambo was discovered.
Remarks. Although previously referred to Enyalioides oshaughnessyi, the possibility that the specimens here named Enyalioides altotambo represented a distinct species was recognized in previous studies. In a phylogenetic analysis of hoplocercine lizards, Torres-Carvajal and de Queiroz (2009) found "E. oshaughnessyi" to be paraphyletic relative to E. touzeti based on three samples of "E. oshaughnessyi". One of them corresponded to the paratype of Enyalioides altotambo, and was sister to a clade containing the sister taxa E. touzeti and E. oshaughnessyi. Torres-Carvajal et al. (2011) noted that the color of the iris in live specimens of "E. oshaughnessyi" from Alto Tambo was not bright red as in live specimens of "E. oshaughnessyi" from other localities and suggested that the two forms represented separate species. Nonetheless, these authors found no other differences between the two potential species and refrained from associating the name E. oshaughnessyi with one versus the other because the type locality data of E. oshaughnessyi is vague ("Ecuador"), and the color of the iris was not recorded in its original description (Boulenger 1881). Here we recognize known populations other than that at Alto Tambo as E. oshaughnessyi based on the enlarged, circular and keeled scales scattered on the flanks of E. oshaughnessyi (absent in E. altotambo), as described and illustrated in its original description ( Paratypes (14). ECUADOR: Provincia Zamora-Chinchipe: QCAZ 12521, juvenile with the same collection data as the holotype except -4.88673°S, -79.08744°W, 738 m; QCAZ 12527, adult male ( Fig. 6) with the same collection data as the holotype except -4.87147°S, -79.08542°W, 738 m; QCAZ 12528, juvenile with the same collection data as the holotype except -4.87136°S, -79.08534°W, 738 m; QCAZ 12531, female with the same collection data as the holotype except -4.87808°S, Diagnosis. Enyalioides anisolepis can be distinguished from other species of Enyalioides, except for E. heterolepis, by having conical dorsal head scales (only in E. anisolepis and E. heterolepis) and scattered, projecting, large scales on the dorsum, flanks, and hind limbs (also in E./Morunasaurus annularis and E./M. groi), which are conspicuous in adults of both sexes (Fig. 7). Besides occurring on opposite sides of the Andes, E. anisolepis differs from E.  43-62, 50.87 ± 6.27 (52-98, 74.61 ± 10.39), a higher vertebral crest with the vertebrals on neck at least three times higher than those between the hind limbs (vertebrals on neck maximum twice as high as those between hind limbs), scattered dark spots on belly in juveniles and adults of both sexes (belly without scattered dark spots, blackish medially in some adult males), tail in adult males moderately compressed laterally (strongly compressed), and a marked sexual dichromatism (Fig. 6), with the dorsal background color greenish in males and brownish in females (both sexes with a brownish background).
The only other species of Enyalioides with scattered, projecting dorsal scales is E. cofanorum, which differs from E. anisolepis in lacking projecting scales on the hind limbs, and in being smaller in size (maximum SVL in males and females of E. cofanorum 107 mm and 109 mm, respectively; 130 mm and 119 mm in E. anisolepis). Additionally, adults of both sexes of E. cofanorum have a brownish background (marked sexual dichromatism in E. anisolepis).
Description of holotype. Male (Fig. 5); SVL = 130 mm; TL = 220 mm; maximum head width = 28.7 mm; head length = 35.3 mm; head height = 24.6 mm; dorsal head scales keeled or multicarinate, those in the parietal region strongly projected dorsally; scales immediately posterior to superciliaries conical and dorsally projected, forming longitudinal row of ten (left) or nine (right) scales that extends posteriorly over supratemporal region; temporal scales small, tuberculate or keeled, juxtaposed; one enlarged pretympanic scale; superciliaries 17; canthals six; postrostrals three; su- pralabials 11 if counted to a point right below middle of eye, and 16 if counted to commisure of mouth; rostral (2.6 mm wide × 1.5 mm high) about twice as wide as adjacent supralabials; single longitudinal row of lorilabials between suboculars and supralabials at level of middle of eye, longitudinal rows of lorilabials anterior to this point 2-4; loreal region with small, smooth and keeled, juxtaposed scales; nasal at level of supralabials III and IV; infralabials nine (left) or eight (right) if counted to a point right below middle of eye, and 13 (left) and 11 (right) if counted to commisure of mouth; mental (2.8 mm wide × 1.5 mm high) wider and higher than adjacent infralabials; postmentals two; gulars projected, low; gular fold complete midventrally; small dewlap present; neck with several longitudinal and oblique folds.
Vertebral crest strongly projected and decreasing in size posteriorly, with vertebrals on neck at least three times higher than those between hind limbs; crest bifurcates at a point approximately 10 mm posterior to the cloaca, and extends onto tail about ¼ its length; flanks between fore and hind limbs with dorsolateral and ventrolateral longitudinal folds, as well as several oblique folds; axillary region with three vertical folds; scales on dorsolateral folds slightly larger than adjacent scales giving the fold the appearance of a low crest; scales between dorsolateral folds and vertebral crest heterogeneous in size, prominently keeled, and imbricate, with largest scales twice as large as smallest ones; neck and scapular region with scattered, large conical scales; flank scales ventral to dorsolateral folds similar to those dorsal to folds, with largest scales four times as large as smallest ones (Fig. 7); axillary region with conical scales forming two short vertical folds; ventral scales imbricate, keeled, rhomboidal, with a posterior mucron; ventrals more than three times the area of smallest dorsals.
Limb scales keeled dorsally and ventrally, homogeneous in size on fore limbs; scales on dorsal and posterior aspect of thighs heterogeneous in size, with most scales less than half the size of those on anterior and ventral aspects; scales on dorsal surface of shanks heterogeneous in size, with granular scales between large keeled scales; subdigitals on finger IV 17; subdigitals on toe IV 25; three femoral pores on left leg, two on right leg; tail laterally compressed and gradually tapering posteriorly; caudal scales strongly keeled and imbricate, increasing in size posteriorly on lateral and dorsal aspects of each caudal segment; caudals larger ventrally than dorsally; individual caudal segments three scales long ventrally and six scales long dorsally.
Color in life of holotype (Fig. 5). Dorsal and lateral aspects of head with scattered black, brown, and pale green scales; labials greenish cream; dorsal background of body, limbs and tail brownish green with scattered pale green scales; vertebral crest pale green, the base and posterior surface of each vertebral scale dark brown; gular scales cream, the skin between them gray; orange patch on medial aspect of throat; chest and belly cream with a pale orange tint; ventral surface of limbs dirty cream with scattered brown spots; ventral surface of tail dirty cream proximally and brown distally; iris pale brown peripherally with dark brown reticulations, dark brown centrally; thin golden ring around pupil.
Variation. Variation in meristic and morphometric characters of Enyalioides anisolepis are presented in Table 2. Enlarged pretympanic scales are absent in more than half of the specimens; when present, they vary between 1-3. A few specimens have smooth scales intermixed with the keeled dorsals. Ventrals are keeled except for an adult female specimen (QCAZ 8428) that has smooth ventrals, and an adult male specimen (QCAZ 12517) that has smooth ventrals anteriorly and feebly keeled ventrals posteriorly. Caudal segments are 6-8 scales long laterally.
This species has a marked sexual dichromatism in background colors (green in males, brown in females; see Fig. 6). Adult male paratypes are very similar in color patterns to the holotype, except for having dark spots on the belly. A subadult male (QCAZ 12517) has scattered black flecks on the gular region.
Adult females share similar color patterns with juveniles ( Fig. 6): dorsal background of head, body, limbs and tail dark or pale brown; flanks dark or pale brown with scattered dark spots, blotches, or transverse bands (cream flecks in QCAZ 8428); diagonal subocular dark stripe extending from subocular region to commisure of mouth; faint cream stripe extending longitudinally from tympanum to scapular region, except in specimen QCAZ 8428, which has instead a cream blotch posterior to tympanum; limbs with faint brown transverse bands; throat, chest, belly and ventral surface of limbs and tail pale brown or cream, with scattered dark spots on belly and thighs (dark spots absent in QCAZ 8428). In addition, juveniles generally have dark brown transverse bands on dorsum, dark flecks on head, and transverse rows of dark brown blotches on flanks. The neck and sides of head have a bright orange tint in one specimen (QCAZ 12535).
Distribution and ecology. Enyalioides anisolepis is known to occur between 724-1742 m on the Amazonian slopes of the Andes in southern Ecuador and northern Peru (Fig. 3). It is known from Provincia Zamora-Chinchipe in extreme southern Ecuador and Región Cajamarca in northern Peru. Most specimens were found sleeping at night (7:00 pm-1:00 am) between 0.2-1.5 m above ground on stems, leaves, and tree roots in primary and secondary forests. Nine of the 15 known specimens were found within 5 m of small streams.
Etymology. The specific epithet anisolepis is a noun (in apposition) in the nominative singular and derives from the Greek words anisos (= unequal) and lepis (= scale). It refers to the heterogeneous scales on the dorsum, flanks and hind limbs of lizards of this species.

Diagnosis.
Enyalioides sophiarothschildae can be distinguished from other species of Enyalioides, except for E. laticeps, by having caudal scales that are relatively homogeneous in size on each caudal segment; in all other species of Enyalioides, the dorsal and lateral caudals increase in size posteriorly on each caudal segment, and the largest (posteriormost) caudals on each segment are mucronate or have some kind of projection (Torres-Carvajal et al. 2011). Enyalioides sophiarothschildae differs from E. laticeps (character states in parentheses) in color patterns: gular region in males white with a black medial patch scattered with turquoise scales (orange or dirty cream with longitudinal brown, reddish-brown, bluish, or orange streaks, and a large brown or black medial blotch at the level of the gular fold); chest in males grayish white with a turquoise tone (usually an orange tone); labials and chin immaculate white (cream or green in many tones, but never immaculate white).
Description of holotype. Male (Fig. 8); SVL = 135 mm; TL = 223 mm; maximum head width = 28.4 mm; head length = 34.7 mm; head height = 24.3 mm; dorsal head scales uni-or multicarinate, projected dorsally; parietal eye present; 3-4 scales immediately posterior to superciliaries conical, dorsolaterally projected, and slightly larger than adjacent scales; temporal scales small, multicarinate, separated from each other by tiny granular scales; no distinctly enlarged pretympanic scales; superciliaries 13; canthals six; postrostrals three; supralabials 10 if counted to a point below middle of eye; rostral (3.14 mm wide × 1.47 mm high) slightly wider than adjacent supralabials; single longitudinal row of lorilabials between suboculars and supralabials at level of middle of eye, two longitudinal rows of lorilabials anterior to this point; loreal region composed of small, smooth, and juxtaposed scales, some of which are separated from each other by tiny granular scales; nasal at level of supralabials III-IV; left and right infralabials nine if counted to a point below middle of eye; mental (2.77 mm wide × 2.60 mm high) slightly wider and 1.5 times higher than adjacent infralabials; postmentals two; gulars ventrally projected and separated from each other by skin covered with tiny granular scales; gular fold complete midventrally, extending dorsally and posteriorly to form antehumeral fold; neck with several oblique folds, and a dorsolateral row of enlarged scales; distal part of oblique fold immediately anterior to antehumeral fold with approximately 10 enlarged scales similar in size to gulars, but more than twice the size of adjacent fold scales.
Vertebral crest strongly projected and decreasing in size posteriorly, with vertebrals on neck at least four times higher than those between hind limbs; crest bifurcates posteriorly and extends onto tail less than ¼ its length; body flanks between fore and hind limbs with slight dorsolateral and ventrolateral longitudinal folds; scales on dorsolateral folds similar in size to adjacent scales; dorsal and flank scales small, keeled, imbricate, more or less homogeneous in size, and separated from each other by skin covered with tiny granular scales; ventral scales imbricate, smooth or slightly keeled, rectangular or rhomboid, with a posterolateral mucron; ventrals more than twice the area of dorsals.
Limb scales keeled dorsally and smooth or slightly keeled ventrally; scales on dorsal and posterior surfaces of thighs heterogeneous in size, with most scales less than half the size of those on anterior and ventral surfaces, separated from each other by skin covered with tiny granular scales; subdigitals on finger IV 17; subdigitals on toe IV 25; femoral pores on each side four; tail laterally compressed and gradually tapering posteriorly; caudal scales strongly keeled and imbricate, not gradually increasing in size posteriorly on lateral and dorsal aspects of each caudal segment; caudals larger ventrally than dorsally; individual caudal segments three scales long ventrally and six scales long dorsally.
Color in life of holotype (Fig. 8). Head dark green with large black blotch between the eye and the tympanum; loreal region, nasal scale, labials and chin white; white blotch on posterior end of mandible; neck greenish brown dorsally and dark brown laterally, with a white rhomboidal blotch extending longitudinally from tympanum to scapular region; dorsal body background dark brown with scattered green scales and pale spots; limbs dark brown with green transverse bands; tail dark green with scattered dark brown marks; vertebral crest with intermixed green and dark brown scales; gular region white with a black posteromedial patch bearing scattered turquoise scales; chest grayish white with a turquoise tone anteriorly; belly grayish white with scattered, faint, pale brown blotches; ventral surface of limbs grayish white, with a longitudinal faint turquoise stripe along the thighs; tail grayish white; iris silver peripherally and dark brown centrally, with dark brown reticulations; silver ring around pupil.
Variation. Variation in meristic and morphometric characters of Enyalioides sophiarothschildae are presented in Table 2. One male paratype (MUSM 21883) differs from the holotype in having some scattered dark brown blotches on the throat.
Distribution and ecology. Enyalioides sophiarothschildae is known from the northeastern slopes of the Cordillera Central in Peru between 1600-1700 m (Fig. 3). This species is only known from two adjacent localities, the trail to La Cueva-Añasco Pueblo in the drainage of the Lejía river and El Dorado in the drainage of the Blanco river, both tributaries of the Huallabamba river in the northern part of the Huallaga river basin. This area corresponds to the Selva Alta (400-1000 m) and Yungas (300-2300 m) ecoregions (Brack 1986;Peñaherrera del Aguila 1989).
Individuals of Enyalioides sophiarothschildae were found active by day in primary forest. The holotype was found crossing a trail and tried to hide between the roots of a big tree when approached for capture. One of the paratypes climbed up a tree three meters above the ground when approached. The other paratype was found sitting on a big root.
Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in the genitive case and is a patronym honoring Sophia Rothschild in recognition of her financial support for the improvement of the herpetological collection of CORBIDI through the BIOPAT Program.

Phylogenetic relationships
The phylogenetic tree inferred in this study (Fig. 9) is consistent with Torres-Carvajal and de Queiroz's (2009) phylogenetic hypothesis in that species of Enyalioides are split into two primary subclades: one containing E. heterolepis and E. laticeps as sister taxa, and the other including all remaining species of Enyalioides, as well as possibly Morunasaurus. All species described in this paper are nested within the second clade. see their Fig. 5) found Enyalioides oshaughnessyi to be paraphyletic relative to E. touzeti based on three samples of E. oshaughnessyi and one sample of E. touzeti. They hypothesized that either E. oshaughnessyi as previously circumscribed represents a single species, but its mtDNA has not yet become monophyletic relative to that of E. touzeti, or E. oshaughnessyi represents more than one species. Torres-Carvajal et al. (2011) found support for the latter hypothesis based on the color of 0.1 the iris, red in both sexes of most specimens of E. oshaughnessyi and reddish brown in two adult specimens from Alto Tambo (E. altotambo type specimens). Addition of sequence data from a second specimen from Alto Tambo further supports this hypothesis in that E. oshaughnessyi and E. altotambo are reciprocally monophyletic. Enyalioides altotambo is strongly supported as monophyletic (PP = 1) and, in agreement with previous phylogenetic hypotheses Venegas et al. 2013), is sister (PP= 1) to a clade (PP = 1) formed by E. touzeti and E. oshaughnessyi (Fig. 9).
Enyalioides anisolepis is strongly supported (PP = 1) as monophyletic and is sister (PP = 0.99) to a clade (PP = 1) composed of E. cofanorum, E. microlepis, E. rubrigularis, and E. praestabilis. Enyalioides sophiarothschildae is sister (PP = 1) to a clade (PP = 1) composed of two recently discovered species, E. binzayedi and E. rudolfarndti (Venegas et al. 2011;Venegas et al. 2013) from Peru. Thus, the phylogenetic tree presented here strongly supports both referral of the three newly discovered species to Enyalioides and their status as different species from those recognized previously. Differences in morphology and color patterns presented above provide additional evidence for recognizing E. altotambo, E. anisolepis and E. sophiarothschildae as species.

Key to the 19 species of Hoplocercinae
The following key is artificial in the sense that its structure does not necessarily reflect the order of branching in the phylogeny.