Research Article
Print
Research Article
Two new species of Tmethypocoelis Koelbel, 1897 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Dotillidae) from Sulawesi, Indonesia
expand article infoDewi Citra Murniati§, Akira Asakura|, Peter J. F. Davie
‡ Kyoto University, Kyoto-shi, Japan
§ Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia
| Kyoto University, Wakayama, Japan
¶ Queensland Museum, Brisbane, Australia
Open Access

Abstract

Tmethypocoelis Koelbel, 1897, is a central Indo-West Pacific genus of small intertidal, soft sediment dotillid crabs that includes five recognised species. Two new species, Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov., are here described from Sulawesi, Indonesia. Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. is found on the west coast of Central Sulawesi, while T. celebensis sp. nov. occurs in the north-eastern part of Sulawesi. Both new species differ from each other and known congeners by the male cheliped, male pleon, and male first gonopod characters. The differences in gastric mill morphology further confirm the two species as new. The distinct water current patterns in the Makassar Strait and the Maluku Channel might have contributed to the evolution of these two sibling species.

Keywords

Biogeography, Celebes, dotillid crabs, gastric mill, morphology

Introduction

Crabs of the dotillid genus, Tmethypocoelis Koelbel, 1897, are small and found on intertidal mudflats and estuarine mud or sandy-mud banks, often extending into low salinity (Dutreix 1992). Tmethypocoelis is unique among confamilials by having a long narrow apical styliform projection on the eyestalks that extends beyond the cornea (Davie 1990).

The first species to be described was Tmethypocoelis ceratophora (Koelbel, 1897) from Hong Kong. Although it was initially placed in Dioxippe de Man, 1888, Koelbel (1897, 1898) remarked that its unique characters deserved the recognition of a new subgenus Dioxippe (Tmethypocoelis) Koelbel, 1897. Five species are currently known in Tmethypocoelis: T. ceratophora (Koelbel, 1897) from China; T. koelbeli Davie, 1990, from Northern Territory, Australia (Davie 1990; Davie and Kosuge 1995); T. odontodactylus Davie, 1990, from Madang, Papua New Guinea (Davie 1990; Davie and Kosuge 1995); T. choreutes Davie & Kosuge, 1995, from Japan (Davie and Kosuge 1995); T. liki Murniati, Asakura, Nugroho, Hernawan & Dharmawan, 2022, from Papua, eastern Indonesia (Murniati et al. 2022). The previous records of T. ceratophora from Japan and Indonesia (Dutreix 1992; Huang et al. 1992; Murniati 2015) would appear to be misidentifications, and the Japanese specimens have since been described as T. choreutes Davie & Kosuge, 1995. The specimen first recorded from Lombok, Indonesia, is also likely to be a new species and will be further discussed in a subsequent paper with other potential new species from the Indonesian region following ongoing revisionary work on this genus.

Fieldwork by the first author to investigate the systematics of the Dotillidae Stimpson, 1858, of Indonesia has resulted in the discovery of populations of two species occurring on opposite coasts of Sulawesi Island, Indonesia, here described as both new to science and compared with the previously known species of Tmethypocoelis.

Materials and methods

Sampling

Fieldwork to Sulawesi Island was conducted in September 2020 and June 2021 at six sampling estuarine sites: Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi, 1°21'59.6"N, 125°04'38.9"E; Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow, North Sulawesi, 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi, 0°43'29.3"S, 119°40'43.9"E; Tosale, Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi, 0°45'57.1"S, 119°40'58.4"E; Tuladenggi Sibatang, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi, 0°24'41.0"N, 121°07'43.9"E; Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi, 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E (Fig. 1). The crab specimens were collected by hand during diurnal low tide periods. All specimens were preserved in 90% ethanol.

Figure 1. 

Map of Sulawesi. Sampling stations A Moletang Beach, Kema Tiga,North Minahasa, North Sulawesi B Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mogondow, North Sulawesi C Towale, CentralBanawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi D Tosale, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi E Tuladenggi Sibatang, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi F Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi (derived from Wikipedia 2022).

Morphology

The crabs were observed, measured, and photographed using either a stereo microscope (Olympus SZ) connected with a digital camera (Olympus E-330), or a Leica Z6 microscope connected to a computer using LAS Core v. 4.13 software.

Measurements in millimeters (mm) were of carapace width (cw, measured across at the widest point) and carapace length (cl, measured from the mid-front to the mid-posterior margin). Smaller specimens and body parts were examined under a Nikon SMZ 800 stereo Microscope equipped with a camera lucida drawing tube. Drawings were made by hand and enhanced using a Wacom drawing pad and Adobe Illustrator CC2015 software.

Morphological terminology for the teeth of the gastric mill follows Davie et al. (2015). The G1 and teeth on the gastric mill were removed, fixed in glutaraldehyde and cacodylate buffer, serially dehydrated in ethanol (50%, 70%, 85%, 90%, 100%), and vacuum-dried using TITEC VC-96N for 10 minutes. Each prepared sample was then mounted on a specimen stub and coated with gold at 5–8 mA for 5 min using ion coater (Dewi and Purwaningsih 2020). The detailed photos of the teeth plate of the gastric mills and gonopods were captured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), JEOL JSM-IT 200, at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. The photographs of the teeth plate are presented with posterior portion upper-most.

Specimens have been deposited in the following repositories: Directorate of Scientific Collection Management, BRIN, Cibinong, Bogor, Indonesia (MZB); Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore (ZRC); Osaka Museum of Natural History, Japan (OMNH); Naturalis Biodiversity Center, The Netherlands (RMNH); and Queensland Museum, Australia (QM).

Abbreviations

Pl pleonite;

P pereiopod;

G1 male first gonopod;

ovig ovigerous.

Taxonomy

Dotillidae Stimpson, 1858

Tmethypocoelis Koelbel, 1897.

Dioxippe (Tmethypocoelis) Koelbel, 1897: 715; 1898: 574.

Tmethypocoelis Shen 1935: 33. — Sakai 1939: 643; 1976: 625. — Davie 1990: 463; 2002: 347. — Dai et al. 1986: 451. — Dai and Yang 1991: 495. — Huang et al. 1992: 150 (key), 154. — Wada 1995: 415 (key). — Davie and Kosuge 1995: 208. — Ng et al. 2008: 235. — Shih et al. 2015: 61.

Type species

Dioxippe (Tmethypocoelis) ceratophora Koelbel, 1897, by original designation, subsequently elevated to generic status by Shen (1935); gender feminine.

Remarks

The genus name Dioxippe de Man 1888, to which the type species was originally placed, is pre-occupied by Dioxippe Thomson, 1860 [Coleoptera]; and therefore, a replacement name, Tympanomerus, was proposed by Rathbun (1897), and subsequently used by Tesch (1918) in his account of Tympanomerus ceratophora. However, Tympanomerus Rathbun, 1897, is itself currently considered a junior synonym of Ilyoplax Stimpson, 1858. Shen (1935) was the first to formally elevate Tmethypocoelis to full generic rank.

The year of publication of Tmethypocoelis ceratophora has usually been wrongly attributed to Koelbel (1898); the 1898 paper is actually a German translation of Koelbel’s original paper published in 1897 in Hungarian. The name should thus be cited as Tmethypocoelis ceratophora (Koelbel, 1897).

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov.

Figs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17A, C

Material examined

Holotype. Indonesia • 1 ♂ (7.7 × 4.4 mm); Tosale, Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°45'57.1"S, 119°40'58.4"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; MZB.Cru.5573.

Paratypes. Indonesia • 12 ♂ (4.0 × 2.5 – 7.9 × 4.6), 6 ♀ (5.8 × 3.6 – 6.5 × 4.0 mm); Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°43'29.3"S, 119°40'43.9"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; MZB.Cru.5182 • 15 ♂ (4.1 × 2.6 – 7.7 × 4.4 mm), 4 ♀ (3.8 × 2.6 – 6.1 × 3.9 mm); same data as for holotype; MZB.Cru.5183 • 4 ♂ (4.7 × 3.0 – 5.3 × 3.3 mm), 4 ♀ (4.0 × 2.5 – 5.6 × 3.3 mm); Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°43'29.3"S, 119°40'43.9"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; ZRC 2023.0055 • 4 ♂ (4.0 × 2.5 – 5.1 × 3.0 mm); Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°43'29.3"S, 119°40'43.9"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; OMNH-Ar.12758–12761 • 4 ♀ (5.8 × 3.5 – 6.6 × 4.0 mm); Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°43'29.3"S, 119°40'43.9"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; OMNH-Ar.12762–12765 • 6 ♂ (5.5 × 3.4 – 6.7 × 4.0 mm), 5 ♀ (5.0 × 3.1 – 5.8 × 3.5 mm); Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°43'29.3"S, 119°40'43.9"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; RMNH.CRUS.D.58046 • 3 ♂ (6.5 × 3.7 mm – 7.5 × 4.3 mm); Tosale, Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi; 0°45'57.1"S, 119°40'58.4"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati, D. Permatasari, Hairul, A. Padju; QM W29642.

Comparative material

Tmethypocoelis liki Murniati, Asakura, Nugroho, Hernawan & Dharmawan, 2022: Indonesia • paratypes 5 ♂ (5.3 × 3.1 mm – 5.5 × 3.2 mm); Liki Village, Sarmi District, Sarmi Municipality, Liki Island, Papua Province; 01°37'25.29"S, 138°44'26.54"E; 21 Nov. 2018; coll. DC. Murniati; MZB.Cru.5012.

Diagnosis

Carapace pentagonal, ca. 1.7× as wide as long (Fig. 2A). Branchial regions sloping; protobranchial, mesobranchial and metabranchial regions well-defined. Sub-branchial region bulging, bearing regular setae and tubercles. Posterior margin slightly concave, ca. 0.53 distance between exorbital angles. Exorbital angle triangular, acute, directed forward (Fig. 4A). Second anterolateral tooth of carapace slightly acute, slightly shorter than exorbital angle. Male pleon ca. 2× as long as wide (Fig. 4E). Male chelipeds long (Fig. 5); palm bulky, ca. 1.4× as long as wide; fingers shorter than palm; pollex short, triangular, cutting margin gently convex over entire length, without differentiated tooth or lobe; dactylus cutting margin evenly dentate, one enlarged wide convex tooth over proximal half, upper margin with one median row of granules in simple row, narrower distally (Fig. 5O). G1 long, curved, conspicuously slender; apical portion forming two poorly defined lobes, with three conspicuously curved setae on outer margin becoming slightly longer distally, two or three long setae apically, and four short setae on inner margin (Fig. 8A–E).

Figure 2. 

Dorsal habitus of Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. from Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi A holotype, male (7.7 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5573) B paratype, female (5.8 × 3.6 mm) (MZB.Cru. 5182).

Description

Carapace (Fig. 2A, B) pentagonal, weakly convex along mid-dorsal line, weakly convex laterally, ca. 1.7× as wide as long. Dorsal surface smooth, lateral portion with granules, regions semi-defined; epigastric lobe poorly defined. Cervical grooves well-marked. Cardiac region with slight central depression. Branchial regions sloping; protobranchial, mesobranchial and metabranchial regions well-defined. Sub-branchial region bulging, bearing regular setae and tubercles. Carapace widest between exorbital angles. Intestinal and branchial borders poorly defined. Lateral margin of carapace recurved, with row of tubercles and short stout setae. Posterior margin weakly concave, ca. 0.53 distance between exorbital angles; fine ridge parallel to posterior margin forming broad rim. Front with lateral border moderately converging, width at base ca. 0.24× distance between exorbital angles, ca. 0.21 at anterior margin; frontal angle rounded; anterior margin with small central blunt prominence (Fig. 3B). Exorbital angle triangular, acute, directed forward; anterior margin with microscopic tubercles, lateral margin glabrous; one short tubercular ridge parallel to supraorbital margin; posteriorly followed by broad U-shaped sinus. Second anterolateral tooth slightly acute, slightly shorter than exorbital angle. Posterolateral facet well-defined by crest originating anteriorly from base of exorbital angle (Fig. 4A). Supraorbital margin sinuous, sloping backward, microscopically tubercular. Infraorbital margin with medial notch; pterygostome with inwardly directed oblique channel; inner portion consisting of two granular ridges separated by shallow channel; upper ridge granular, with one row of setae; lower ridge granular, granules larger than those of upper ridge, without setation; outer portion granular, concave, ending in broad notch below exorbital angle (Fig. 4B).

Figure 3. 

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.7 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5573), Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi A in-situ with live coloration B front area C merus of left cheliped held against external orbital angle.

Figure 4. 

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.7 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5573), Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi A external orbital angle B orbit area C eyestalk D third maxilliped E pleon. Paratype, female (5.8 × 3.6 mm) (MZB.Cru. 5182), Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi F pleon.

Eyestalks long, not reaching exorbital angle, medial and distal diameters of similar width; projecting ocular style as long as cornea, tipped with setae; medial slope giving twisted appearance; cornea slightly bulging (Figs 2, 3B, 4C).

Third maxillipeds slightly vaulted, not completely covering buccal cavern. Ischium subquadrate; upper-mesial angle with wide triangular lobe; anterolateral angle narrow and triangular; mesial and lower margins with dense setae; lateral margin with setation medially; outer surface with oblique row of dense long setae, scattered granules distributed unevenly (Fig. 4D). Merus slightly larger than ischium; lateral margin convex, narrower distally, covered with short setae; mesial margin straight, with long setae; outer surface covered with scattered short setae (Fig. 4D). Carpus trihedral in cross section, mesial margin with dense long setae (Fig. 4D). Propodus short, margins tubercular and covered with dense setae (Fig. 4D). Dactylus slender, long, twice as long as propodus, margins tubercular, with long dense setae (Fig. 4D).

Male pleon (Fig. 4E) ca. 2× longer than wide; noticeably constricted at base of pleonite 5 (Pl5). Pl1 trapezoidal, narrow, ca. 9.5× wider than long; anterior margin ca. 0.7× as long as posterior margin; ca. 1.3× wider than Pl2. Pl2 ca. 7.5× as wide as long. Pl3 ca. 3.0× wider than long, anterior margin nearly straight, posterior margin convex. Pl4 ca. 2.9× as wide as long, widest proximally, narrowing distally, distolateral angle pointed. Pl5 ca. 1.4× wider than long (widest distally), markedly constricted at base. Pl6 ca. 1.4× as wide as long; widest sub-distally; 1.1× longer than Pl5; lateral margins subparallel, slightly concave. Male telson rounded, ca. 1.4× wider than long (Fig. 4E).

Female pleon conspicuously broad (Fig. 4F). Pl1 shortest; Pl2 distinctly longer, as wide as Pl1; Pl3 trapezoidal, longer than Pl2; Pl4 rectangular, slightly longer than Pl3, lateral margins convex; Pl5 longer than Pl4; Pl6 distinctly longest. Female telson triangular (Fig. 4F).

Male chelipeds stout, long, equal. Merus cross-section triangular; standing higher than exorbital angle (Fig. 3C); lower margin covered with granules extending entire length, granulation branched sub-medially into two rows (Fig. 5A); upper margin narrower proximally, wider distally, with irregular rows of granules on distal half, proximal portion smooth (Fig. 5K); outer margin with a single row of granules extending whole length, granulation branched proximally (Fig. 5L); upper surface slightly convex, with ovate tympanum, microscopic granules outside tympanum, granulation mainly on distal portion, scattered setae (Fig. 5I); lower surface smooth, flattened, without tympanum (Fig. 5J); outer surface slightly convex, wider than upper surface, tympanum smaller than on upper surface, granules outside tympanum distributed evenly (Fig. 5B). Carpus shorter than merus, elongate, ca. 1.5× as long as wide; upper and lower margins tubercular (Fig. 5C, D); outer surface rectangular, convex, microscopic granules only (Fig. 5E); inner surface shiny, with one oblique row of granules (Fig. 5F). Palm bulky, ca. 1.4× wider than long; upper margin with one row of granules, distinct groove extending below granular rows forming clear granular string (Fig. 5G); lower margin granular, granulation branched into two rows medial to distal portion (Fig. 5H); inner surface irregularly granular, upper granulation extending over median portion, curved to sharply cut upper margin of outer surface and base of fingers, lower granulation extending near lower margin from proximal portion to base of pollex (Fig. 5M); outer surface distinctly granular over upper half to base of pollex, lower half smooth (Fig. 5N). Fingers shorter than palm, broadly gaping at base; curved inwards, expanded distally forming spooned-tip; cutting margins evenly serrated; inner margin at tip of both fingers with short row of stout setae. Pollex short, triangular, cutting margin evenly dentate; long flat enlarged dentate tooth over most of length, ca. 0.4× as wide as palm; inner surface smooth (Fig. 5M); outer surface granular proximally parallel to cutting margin (Fig. 5N); lower margin granular nearly whole length (Fig. 5H). Dactylus ca. 0.6× as wide as palm; cutting margin evenly dentate; one enlarged wide convex tooth over proximal half; inner surface granular from proximal to median portion near cutting margin, one clutch of granules proximally near upper margin (Fig. 5M); outer surface with 1 row of granules medially, densest on proximal portion of surface, granulation extending nearly entire length, irregular granulation near cutting margin, a single row of spaced tubercles medially, parallel to upper margin (Fig. 5N); upper margin with median row of granules, narrower distally matching shape of upper margin (Fig. 5O).

Figure 5. 

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.7 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5573), Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi. Left cheliped A merus lower margin B merus outer surface. Carpus C outer surface D inner surface E upper surface F lower surface. Chela G upper margin H lower margin. Merus I upper surface J lower surface K upper margin L outer margin. Chela M inner surface N outer surface O dactylus upper margin.

Female chelipeds small, of typical dotillid type (Figs 2B, 6). Merus with ovate tympanum on upper and lower surfaces. Fingers longer than palm, spooned-tip (Fig. 6). Pollex outer surface with one tubercular ridge parallel to lower margin; lower margin entire; cutting margin with very low denticles. Dactylus cutting margin without denticles.

Figure 6. 

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. Paratype female (5.8 × 3.6 mm) (MZB.Cru. 5182), Towale river, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi. Left chela A inner surface B outer surface.

Pereiopods slender, elongate, P2–P5 similar; smooth ovate tympanum on anterior and posterior surfaces of meri. Tympani on posterior surfaces becoming progressively smaller from P2–P5. Dactyli nearly straight, pointed, shorter than propodi.

P2 (Fig. 7A, B) shorter than P3; merus ca. 2.84× longer than wide; anterior surface with scattered granules mainly near upper margin; posterior surface with sparse granules mainly near distal portion of tympanum; upper margin serrated, sparse long setae; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus subequal in length to propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces bearing scattered granules; margins with sparse long setae.

Figure 7. 

Left pereiopods of Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.7 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5573), Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi A, B P2 C, D P3 E, F P4; G, H P5. Right side, anterior surface; left side, posterior surface.

P3 (Fig. 7C, D) longest; merus ca. 2.67× longer than wide; anterior surface with scattered granules, denser near upper margin; posterior surface with sparse granules denser distal to tympanum; upper margin serrated, sparse long setae; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior surface bearing sparse granules; posterior surface with sparse setae and granules; margins with sparse long setae.

P4 (Fig. 7E, F) merus ca. 2.78× longer than wide; anterior surface with scattered granules denser near upper margin; posterior surface sparsely granulate, denser towards upper margin; upper margin serrated, sparse long setae; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior surface with sparse setae and granules; posterior surface with granules; margins with sparse long setae.

P5 (Fig. 7G, H) shortest; merus ca. 2.71× longer than wide; anterior surface with scattered granules, denser near upper margin; posterior surface sparsely granulate, denser toward upper margin; upper margin serrated, sparse long setae; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.

Reproductive organs. G1 (Fig. 8A–E) long, curved, very slender; sub-proximal bulge (Fig. 8A, B); apical portion forming two poorly defined lobes, with three conspicuous curved setae on outer margin becoming slightly longer distally, two or three long setae apically, and four short setae on inner margin (Fig. 8C–E). Vulva (Fig. 8F) rounded, projecting.

Figure 8. 

Reproductive organs of Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. Paratype, males (A–D 4.1 × 2.6 mm E 6.9 × 4.0 mm) (MZB.Cru.5183), Tosale, Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi, left G1 A dorsal view B apical (dorsal view) C, D apical (ventral view) E mesial view. Paratype female (5.8 × 3.6 mm) (MZB.Cru.5182), Towale river, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi F vulva.

Gastric mill (Fig. 17A, C). Median tooth plate simple, without defined ridges. Urocardiac ossicle relatively broad throughout length. Propyloric ossicle semi-circular, relatively flat and broad; posterior margin curved; anterior margin with one pointed lobe medially; lateral margins slightly truncated, evenly convex (Fig. 17A). Lateral zygocardiac tooth plate with nine slender teeth, four anterior teeth largest (Fig. 17C).

Habitat

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. lives in estuarine conditions on both sandy and muddy substrata (Fig. 9). At Towale Village, it inhabits sandy substrates alongside other ocypodoids, Austruca annulipes (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) and Scopimera intermedia Balss, 1934, but also in muddier areas where it co-occurs with Tubuca dussumieri (H. Milne Edwards, 1852). At Tosale Village, it was typically collected on sandy substrates. While not collected, it was also observed along a small muddy canal near local residences. It was recorded approximately 1 km further upstream beyond the estuary in non-tidal area.

Figure 9. 

Habitat of Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. at mouth of Towale River, Central Banawa District, Donggala, Central Sulawesi.

Etymology

The name simplex refers to the simple form of the cheliped dactylus that lacks a conspicuous outer subdistal dorsal projection, a character that is characteristic of other described species.

Remarks

Differences to distinguish and separate the species from T. celebensis sp. nov. and other congeners are given under “Remarks” for T. celebensis sp. nov.

Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov.

Figs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17B, D

Material examined

Holotype. Indonesia • 1 ♂ (7.4 × 4.3 mm); Moletang River estuary, Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi; 1°21'59.6"N, 125°04'38.9"E; 12 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati and D. Nurdiansyah; MZB.Cru.5574.

Paratypes. Indonesia • 10 ♂ (2.8 × 1.8 – 7.2 × 4.3 mm), 8 ♀ (4.8 × 3.6 – 5.7 × 3.7 mm); Moletang River estuary, Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi; 1°21'59.6"N, 125°04'38.9"E; 12 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati and D. Nurdiansyah; MZB.Cru.5180 • 10 ♂ (5.4 × 3.2 – 6.5 × 3.7 mm); Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow, North Sulawesi; 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. D. Nurdiansyah; MZB.Cru.5181 • 11 ♂ (6.3 × 3.8 – 7.9 × 4.8 mm); Tuladenggi Sibatang, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi; 0°24'41.0"N, 121°07'43.9"E; 10 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati; MZB.Cru.5575 • 10 ♂ (7.3 × 3.8 – 7.4 × 4.3 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; MZB.Cru.5576 • 5 ♂ (5.2 × 3.0 – 6.0 × 3.4 mm); Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow, North Sulawesi; 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. D. Nurdiansyah; ZRC 2023.0056 • 4 ♂ (6.6 × 3.8 – 7.2 × 4.1 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; ZRC. 2023.0057 • 5 ♂ (4.7 × 3.0 – 6.0 × 3.7 mm); Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow, North Sulawesi; 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. D. Nurdiansyah; OMNH-Ar.12770–12774 • 4 ♂ (6.6 × 3.8 – 7.8 × 4.4 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; OMNH-Ar. 12766–12769 • 4 ♂ (6.2 × 3.7 – 7.4 × 4.5 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; RMNH.CRUS.D.58047 • 3 ♂ (4.3 × 3.8 – 4.9 × 3.8 mm); Tuladenggi Sibatang, Parigi Moutong, Central Sulawesi; 0°24'41.0"N, 121°07'43.9"E; 10 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati; QM W29643.

Comparative material

Tmethypocoelis liki Murniati, Asakura, Nugroho, Hernawan & Dharmawan, 2022: Indonesia • paratypes 5 ♂ (5.3 × 3.1 mm – 5.5 × 3.2 mm); Liki Village, Sarmi District, Sarmi Municipality, Liki Island, Papua Province; 01°37'25.29"S, 138°44'26.54"E; 21 Nov. 2018; coll. DC. Murniati; MZB.Cru.5012.

Diagnosis

Carapace pentagonal, ca. 1.6–1.7× as wide as long (Fig. 10A). Branchial region sloping, protobranchial, mesobranchial and metabranchial regions well-defined. Sub-branchial region bulging, bearing regular setae and tubercles. Posterior margin slightly concave, ca. 0.64 distance between exorbital angles. Exorbital angle triangular, acute, directed forward (Fig. 12A). Second anterolateral tooth less acute, slightly shorter. Male pleon ca. 2.0× longer than wide (Fig. 12E). Male chelipeds long. Palm bulky, ca. 1.3× longer than wide (Fig. 13M, N). Fingers shorter than palm. Pollex short, triangular, cutting margin slightly oblique, without large differentiated tooth or lobe (Fig. 13M); cutting margin of dactylus with large teeth over proximal half, small teeth on distal half, without median lobe, upper margin with row of fine tubercles; one triangular, upturned tooth subdistally (Fig. 13M–O). G1 long, recurved, very slender; sub-proximal portion bulging (Fig. 15A, B); apical portion forming two lobes, with three short setae on outer margin, two or three long setae apically, four or five short setae on inner margin (Fig. 15C, D).

Figure 10. 

Habitus dorsal of Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi A holotype, male (7.2 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5574) B paratype, female (5.5 × 3.5 mm) (MZB.Cru.5180).

Description

Carapace (Figs 10A, 12A) pentagonal; weakly convex laterally and longitudinally; ca. 1.6–1.7× wider than long. Dorsal surface smooth, regions semi-defined; epigastric lobe poorly defined. Cervical grooves, well-marked; cardiac region slightly depressed. Branchial regions sloping, protobranchial, mesobranchial and metabranchial regions well-defined. Carapace widest between exorbital angles. Sub-branchial region bulging, bearing regular setae and tubercles. Intestinal and branchial regions well-defined. Posterior margin weakly concave, ca. 0.6× distance between exorbital angles; fine ridge parallel with posterior margin forming broad rim. Lateral margin recurved with row of tubercles and short stout setae. Frontal margin rounded, moderately convergent, basal width ca. 0.19× distance between exorbital angles, ca. 0.13× at anterior margin; anterior margin with small central blunt prominence (Fig. 11A). Exorbital angle triangular, acute, directed forwardly; anterior margin with microscopic tubercles, lateral margin slightly tubercular; posteriorly followed by broad U-shaped sinus. Epibranchial tooth less acute, slightly shorter. Posterolateral facet well-defined by a crest originating anteriorly from base of exorbital angle (Fig. 12A). Supra-orbital borders sinuous, sloping backward, microscopically tubercular. Infra-orbital border with medial notch; pterygostome with inwardly directed oblique channel. Inner part of infra-orbital border with two granular ridges separated by shallow channel; upper ridge with row of setae; granules on lower ridge larger than that of upper ridge, without setation. Outer part of infra-orbital border granular, concave, ending in broad notch below exorbital angle (Fig. 12B).

Figure 11. 

Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.2 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5574), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi A front area B left merus held against external orbital angle.

Figure 12. 

Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.2 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5574), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi A exorbital angle B orbit area C eyestalk D third maxilliped E pleon. Paratype, female (5.5 × 3.5 mm) (MZB.Cru.5180), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi F pleon.

Eyestalks (Figs 10, 11A, 12C) reaching exorbital angle, medial and distal diameters similar size; ocular style as long as cornea, tipped with setae; medial slope gives twisted appearance; cornea bulging.

Third maxillipeds (Fig. 12D) slightly vaulted, not completely covering buccal cavern. Ischium subquadrate, outer surface covered with spaced long setae, with one oblique row of long setae near upper margin, upper margin concave, upper-mesial angle with narrow, rounded lobe; lower-mesial angle curved; inner and lower margins with dense setae; lateral margin without setation (Fig. 12D). Merus slightly larger than ischium, ca. 1.3× longer; outer surface with regularly scattered short setae; lateral margin convex, narrower distally, covered with short setae; mesial margin straight with long setae (Fig. 12D). Carpus trihedral, subequal in length to propodus and dactylus together; mesial margin and distal portion with dense long setae (Fig. 12D). Propodus shorter than dactylus; margins entire, with long dense setae (Fig. 12D). Dactylus slender, with long dense setae laterally (Fig. 12D).

Male pleon (Fig. 12E) ca. 2.0× longer than wide. Pl1 trapezoidal, ca. 8.0× wider than long; ca. 1.3× wider than pl2. Pl2 very narrow, ca. 10× wider than long. Pl3 ca. 3× wider than long. Pl4 ca. 3.2× wider than long, lateral margins convergent distally, distolateral angle pointed. Pl5 ca. 1.5× wider than long (at widest point), markedly constricted at base. Pl6 ca. 1.5× wider than long; widest sub-distally; subequal in length to pl5. Male telson rounded, ca. 1.4× wider than long (Fig. 12E).

Female pleon (Fig. 12F) conspicuously broad. Pl1 shortest; pl2 distinctly longer, as wide as pl1; pl3 trapezoidal, longer than pl2; pl4 rectangular, slightly longer than pl3, lateral margins convex; pl5 longer than pl4; pl6 distinctly longest. Female telson (Fig. 12F) triangular.

Male chelipeds stout, long, equal. Merus triangular in cross-section; standing higher than exorbital angle (Fig. 11B); lower margin with two rows of granules extending whole length of margin (Fig. 13A); upper margin narrowing proximally, with irregular rows of granules on distal half (Fig. 13K); outer margin with one row of granules extending whole length (Fig. 13L); upper surface flattened, ovate smooth tympanum, scattered long setae around tympanum, more setation distally, microscopically tuberculate (Fig. 13I); lower surface flattened, nearly smooth, with scattered granules, lacking tympanum (Fig. 13J); outer surface convex, tympanum smaller than that of upper surface, evenly distributed granules and setae (Fig. 13B). Carpus shorter than merus, elongate, ca. 1.4× longer than wide; upper and lower margins tubercular (Fig. 13C, D); outer surface rectangular, scattered microscopic granules near upper and lower margins, median portion without microscopic tubercles (Fig. 13E); lower surface smooth, with one longitudinal row of granules, one patch of tubercles on proximal part (Fig. 13F). Palm bulky, ca. 1.3× longer than wide; inner surface granular over upper half, with granules extending over upper margin and curved to sharply cut upper margin of outer surface, distally with one row of regular granules reaching pollex, smaller granules near lower margin, median portion smooth (Fig. 13M); outer surface distinctly granular over upper half reaching to base of pollex, lower half smooth (Fig. 13N); upper margin with one row of granules, distinct groove extending below granular rows forming clear granular string (Fig. 13G); lower margin with granulation extending to lower part of inner surface (Fig. 13H). Fingers shorter than palm, lacking obvious basal gape, curved inwards, spooned-tip; cutting margins evenly serrated; inner margin at tip of both fingers with short row of stout setae. Pollex short, triangular, cutting margin slightly oblique, without large differentiated tooth or lobe, ca. 0.5× as long as palm; inner surface nearly smooth, one row of granules over proximal half (Fig. 13M); outer surface granular parallel to cutting margin, granules with similar size (Fig. 13N); lower margin granulated only along proximo-medially (Fig. 13H). Cutting margin of dactylus with teeth, larger teeth over proximal half, smaller teeth over distal half, without median lobe; inner surface with one row of granules parallel to upper margin, granulation extending from proximal to distal, one patch of granules proximally (Fig. 13M); band of granules on outer surface near cutting margin and junction to palm, one tubercular ridge extending medially parallel to upper margin (Fig. 13N); upper margin with row of tubercles terminating with triangular upturned tooth subdistally (Fig. 13O).

Figure 13. 

Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.2 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5574), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi. Left cheliped. Merus A lower margin B outer surface. Carpus C upper margin D lower margin E outer surface F inner surface. Chela G upper margin H lower margin. Merus I upper surface J lower surface K upper margin L outer margin. Chela M inner surface N outer surface O dactylus upper margin.

Female chelipeds small dotillid type (Figs 10B, 14). Not conspicuously different from T. simplex sp. nov. (see description for T. simplex sp. nov.).

Figure 14. 

Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. Paratype, female (5.5 × 3.5 mm) (MZB.Cru.5180), Moletang river (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi. Left chela A inner surface B outer surface.

Pereiopods (Fig. 15) slender, elongate, P2–P5 similar; smooth ovate tympanum on anterior and posterior surfaces of meri. Tympani on posterior surfaces becoming progressively smaller from P2–P5. Dactyli nearly straight, pointed, shorter than propodi.

Figure 15. 

Left pereiopods of Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. Holotype, male (7.2 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5574), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi A, B P2 C, D P3 E, F P4 G, H P5. Right side, anterior surfaces; left side, posterior surfaces.

P2 (Fig. 15A, B) shorter than P3; merus ca. 2.7× longer than wide; anterior surface bearing scattered granules outside tympanum, granules denser near lower margin, sparse setae near lower margin; posterior surface sparsely granulate, denser distal to tympanum; upper margin convex, sparse long setae, distally tubercular; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins without granules, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces with few small granules only; margins with sparse long setae.

P3 (Fig. 15C, D) longest; merus ca. 2.7× longer than wide; anterior surface scarcely granular; posterior surface sparsely granulate, denser near upper margin; upper and lower margins convex; upper margin tubercular distally, sparse long setae; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces nearly smooth, sparse setae distally; margins without tubercles, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.

P4 (Fig. 15E, F) nearly as long as P2; merus ca. 2.6× longer than wide; anterior surface scarcely granular; posterior surface with evenly distributed granules; upper and lower margins convex; upper margin tubercular distally, spaced long setae extending whole length; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.

P5 (Fig. 15G, H) shortest; merus ca. 2.8× longer than wide; anterior surface without granules; posterior surface granulate, granules denser near upper margin; upper and lower margins convex; upper margin sparsely tubercular, with sparse long setae, short setae proximally; lower margin smooth, with sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, with sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.

Reproductive organs. G1 long, recurved, very slender; sub-proximal portion bulging (Fig. 16A, B); apical portion forming two lobes, with three short setae on outer margin, two or three long setae apically, four or five short setae on mesial margin (Fig. 16C, D). Vulva (Fig. 16E) rounded, projecting.

Figure 16. 

Reproductive organs of Tmethypocoelis celebensis b paratype, male (7.3 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5180), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi, left G1 A mesial view B dorsal view C, D apical portion C dorsal view D ventral view. Paratype, female (5.5 × 3.5 mm) (MZB.Cru.5180), Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi E vulva.

Gastric mill. Median tooth plate simple, without defined ridges. Urocardiac ossicle relatively narrower throughout length. Propyloric ossicle semi-circular, relatively narrow and protruding; posterior margin curved; anterior margin with one pointed lobe medially; lateral margins quadrate with anterior lobes discrete, prominent, and rounded (Fig. 17B). Lateral zygocardiac tooth plate with eight slender teeth, three anterior teeth large (Fig. 17D).

Figure 17. 

Teeth of gastric mill (posterior portion on upper part). Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov., paratype, male (6.9 × 4.0 mm) (MZB.Cru. 5183) (A, C). Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov., paratype, male (7.3 × 4.4 mm) (MZB.Cru.5180) (B, D). A, B median tooth C, D lateral tooth.

Habitat

Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. inhabits sandy substrata in estuarine areas (Fig. 18).

Figure 18. 

Habitat of Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. at Moletang River (estuary), Kema Tiga, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the type locality. Celebes is the former name of Sulawesi Island, one of the great islands in Indonesia.

Remarks

The two new species described here differ from each other and from the other known species by numerous characters compared below. In general, the species of Tmethypocoelis are all extremely similar in general morphology with only small differences in male cheliped shape and dentition (Table 1), differences in the apical setal ornamentation of the male first gonopod, and sometimes differences in the proportions of the somites of the male pleon.

Table 1.

Comparison of male chelipeds in the species of Tmethypocoelis.

Species T. simplex sp. nov. T. celebensis sp. nov. T. koelbeli T. liki T. ceratophora T. choreutes T. odontodactylus
Dactylus dorsal and outer armature Upper margin finely tuberculate; lacking differentiated subdistal tooth; outer surface with semi-defined granular row medially; irregular granulation near cutting margin (Fig. 5M–O) Upper margin finely tuberculate; culminating in subdistal upward, upwardly projecting triangular tooth of variable size from high and distinct to low; size not correlated with crab size; outer surface with medial granular row over entire length (Fig. 13M–O) Dorsal band of fine granules; superior border straight, terminating in overhanging triangular tooth at about ¾ length; outer surface with 2 subregular lines of granules, superior one may extend ¾ length to tip, lower one less than that of superior Upper margin with median row of granules, culminating into 1 prominent tooth Finely tuberculate ridge on upper margin of dactylus terminates in outwardly directed flat triangular tooth (see Davie and Kosuge 1995: fig. 1 A, C) Finely tubercular ridge on the upper margin continues evenly distally; outer surface has separate ridge ending in prominent triangular subdistal protrusion (see Davie and Kosuge 1995: fig. 1 B, D) Full length medial granulate ridge; superior granulate crest terminating subdistally in strong upturned tooth (Davie 1990: fig. 3C)
Dactylus cutting margin Evenly dentate; one wide enlarged convex tooth over proximal half Evenly dentate, larger over proximal half, then finger narrower over distal half Evenly dentate; smaller males with raised platform of teeth differentiated in proximal half, but less evident in mature chela Wide and blunt irregular serrations One small low tooth proximally Low broad triangular convexity but lacking clearly differentiated tooth Evenly dentate; slightly deeper medially, but without obvious differentiated tooth
Pollex cutting margin Evenly dentate; long flat enlarged dentate tooth over most of length Evenly dentate; straight, without differentiated tooth or lobe Evenly dentate Irregularly dentate Prominent enlarged convex tooth medially Lacking a defined tooth; slightly convex Weakly convex; evenly dentate
Gape at base of fingers Large Poorly developed Moderate Poorly developed Wide Not strongly developed Not strongly developed

A comparison of male first gonopod setation patterns of described species suggests that the possession of two or three of markedly elongated apical setae (Figs 8C–E, 16C, D; Davie 1990: fig. 2), common to both Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov., is so far shared with T. liki from Papua and T. koelbeli from the Northern Territory, NW Australia. Therefore, these four species may be more closely related to each other than they are to T. ceratophora, T. choreutes, and T. odontodactylus, which all share a coronet of shorter more evenly sized stout setae on the tip of the G1. A more thorough analysis of relationships within the genus will be undertaken as part of a larger revision of the genus, and with the help of DNA sequencing data.

Both Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov. differ significantly from T. koelbeli in the shape of the male pleon, with that of T. koelbeli being relatively narrower, and in particular Pl5 being more constricted proximally (Table 2). The pleons of T. simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov. are similar, however, both Pl6 and the telson are slightly proportionately wider in T. celebensis sp. nov.

Table 2.

Comparison of pleonal somite proportions of Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov. with the closely related T. koelbeli (proportions of latter taken from Davie 1990: fig. 1A).

Species T. koelbeli T. liki T. simplex sp. nov. T. celebensis sp. nov.
Pleonite 5 width/length 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.5
Pleonite 5 narrowest proximal width to distal width 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7
Pleonite 6 width/length 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.5
Telson width/length 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4

Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. differs from T. celebensis sp. nov., T. koelbeli, and T. liki in the form and number of the apical setae of the G1. The G1 of T. simplex sp. nov. typically has two or three very long setae apically (Fig. 8C–E), and subapically there are three shorter stout setae on the outer margin increasing in length distally, and four short, downwardly reflexed setae on inner lobe. The G1 of T. celebensis sp. nov. has two or three very long recurved setae apically (Fig. 16B–D), and subapically there are also three stout setae on the outer margin, though the proximal seta is much smaller and less prominent than on T. simplex sp. nov., and also four or five short, downwardly reflexed setae on the inner lobe. The G1 of T. koelbeli similarly has two long apical setae but lacks a row of outer subapical setae and has a row of five short distally pointed setae on the inner lobe (Davie 1990: fig. 2). The G1 of T. liki has one long and five short apical setae (Murniati et al. 2022: fig. 20C).

Discussion

Tmethypocoelis for many years included only the type species Tmethypocoelis ceratophora (Koelbel, 1897), which was believed to be widespread from Hong Kong, China, Japan, and south to Lombok in Indonesia (Tesch 1918; Dutreix 1992; Huang et al. 1992; Murniati 2015). In recent years, however, four new species have been described (see Introduction), and the distribution of T. koelbeli has become more restricted (Davie 1990; Davie and Kosuge 1995; Murniati et al. 2022). Nevertheless, the genus is outwardly morphologically relatively homogenous, with only small differences among the species most obviously related to chela dactylar tooth shape, and differences in the apical setae of the G1. This is particularly exemplified by the separation of the pseudo-cryptic T. choreutes, that had long been confused with T. ceratophora, but the morphological differences were shown to correlate with the evolution of a different male courtship waving display (Davie and Kosuge 1995).

The relative morphological homogeneity within the genus is also an indication that Tmethypocoelis species have undergone relatively recent speciation based around small-scale biogeographic restrictions. With the complex evolving paleogeography of land-connections and sea-level changes throughout the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago over the last two million years, it can be expected that the genus may have speciated much more than previously thought. Careful collecting across a broad range of areas within the region and more careful observations of populations, including finer scale morphological investigations, behavioural analyses and genetic studies are indeed revealing this pattern, and further new species will be described by the present authors as part of ongoing revisionary work.

General morphology

It is interesting to note that the tympani on the anterior and posterior surfaces of the pereiopods are essentially the same between the present two new species; and while the tympani are very similar on both faces of P2 and P3, on both P4 and P5 the anterior tympani are markedly smaller in size with P5 the smallest; the posterior tympani on P2 and P5 are much larger and cover a proportionately similar surface area to the first two pereiopods (Figs 7, 15). This is simply an observation, and no physiological explanation can be offered.

Feeding morphology

Speciation in ocypodoid crabs seems to have commonly involved variations in structures related to feeding and adaptations to different sediment particle sizes or food types on which each species feeds. For example, both the setation of the second maxillipeds and the shape of the grinding plates inside the gastric mill, have proven useful in distinguishing closely related species (Davie et al. 2015). The second maxilliped has specialized “spoon shaped” setae for sorting organic matter and microorganisms from the sand (e.g., Icely and Jones 1978; Vogel 1984; Colpo and Negreiros-Fransozo 2013). Spoon-tipped setae mostly occur on the inside margins of the second maxillipeds where they hold sand grains that are then brushed by short stiff setae on the outer faces of the first maxillipeds. Such setal structures have been well studied especially in species of Dotilla Stimpson, 1858 and Uca Leach, 1848 sensu lato, and vary according to the preferred substrate particle-size composition, and the distribution of the species on the shore (Icely and Jones 1978). Murniati and Wowor (2017) were the first to use second maxilliped setation to successfully separate three species of Tmethypocoelis occurring in Indonesia, and to help infer micro-ecological niche separation.

Although, the second maxillipeds have not been examined as a part of the present species descriptions, the gastric mill structure has been included, and equally shows that the two new species described here have adapted to different dietary requirements (e.g., see Kosuge and Davie 2001), and this is the first study to report species-specific gastric mill differences within Tmethypocoelis (Fig. 17A–D). The main trunk of the urogastric ossicle is noticeably broader in T. simplex sp. nov. than in T. celebensis sp. nov.; in both species, the medial tooth plate is simple and without defined ridges. However, the lateral margins are evenly convex in T. simplex sp. nov., versus more quadrate margins with anterior lobes discrete, prominent, and rounded in T. celebensis sp. nov.; the propyloric ossicle is also flatter and broader in T. simplex sp. nov., versus narrower and more protruding in T. celebensis sp. nov. In lateral zygocardiac teeth, there are also significant differences: in particular, T. simplex sp. nov. has nine accessory teeth that have a broader thicker brush of apical setae than T. celebensis sp. nov., which has only eight accessory teeth, each with a narrower brush of apical setae. While these differences would need a more specialized study to understand the dietary implications, nevertheless, it is apparent that although Tmethypocoelis species are deposit feeders, the lack of fine transverse median ridges on the urocardiac ossicle (as one would find on deposit feeding ocypodids such as Uca; see Icely and Nott 1992) would seem to indicate that the particulate organic matter that they are consuming does not require fine grinding, and the brushes of setae and fine scales on the accessory teeth of the zygocardiac ossicles serve more of a brushing function.

Biogeography

Tmethypocoelis species are essentially estuarine animals, living abundantly on estuarine mud flats and able to tolerate low salinities. Davie (1985) and Davie et al. (2010) have postulated that a short larval life in combination with local hydrological factors may be enough to lead to the allopatric separation of two geographically close taxa. Davie and Kosuge (1995) remarked that Tmethypocoelis ceratophora and their new species T. choreutes are separated by the relatively narrow strait between Taiwan and the Japanese Yaeyama Islands. Davie et al. (2010) described a similar disjunction between the Chinese/Taiwanese Mictyris brevidactylus Simpson, 1858, and their new species Mictyris guinotae Davie, Shih & Chan, 2010, as well as citing a number of other similar cases of closely related sibling species on either side of the aforesaid strait. They concluded that the Ryukyus appear to be much more influenced by the main Kuroshio Current in contrast to the continental coastline, which is impacted mainly by the South China Sea Current and westerly flowing Kuroshio Branch Current (Jan et al. 2002), and that the deep-water strait between Taiwan and the Yaeyama Islands plays an important additional role in the local circulation patterns of the region, so as to become an effective barrier for species that may have rapid larval development and/or abbreviated life cycles. Thus, this narrow passage of water has functioned as a barrier against genetic flow between the two regions, and allowed the allopatric speciation of sibling taxa.

In the case of the two new species described here, T. simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov., there is good evidence that a similar pattern of local current flow may have led to their separate evolutionary development (Fig. 19). Sprintall et al. (2019) have published an interesting map of current circulation patterns within the Indonesian Archipelago that shows the southerly flowing Mindanao current forming a counter-clockwise circulation flow within the Celebes Sea as well as flowing south through the Makassar Strait. The Celebes Sea is bordered to the east by a shallow ridge and island chain extending northwards from the tip of north Sulawesi to Mindanao in the southern Philippines; whereas the east coast of Sulawesi, home to T. celebensis sp. nov., is instead under the influence of an off-shoot of the North Equatorial Counter Current that flows southwards through the Maluku Channel. There are, therefore, two major separate southerly flowing current systems on either side of the island of Sulawesi, and this appears to effectively separate larval dispersal of both species to the east and west coasts, respectively.

Figure 19. 

Map showing sea-current circulation patterns in the waters surrounding Sulawesi (derived from Wijeratne et al. 2018 and Sprintall et al. 2019).

While no genetic clock estimates have yet been applied to the two species studied here, it can be presumed that their evolutionary separation has been recent, i.e., within the last 2 million years. This time-frame has precedent in other recent speciation events that have occurred in the Indo-West Pacific region. For example, based on the molecular clock of COI mutation rates suggested by Schubart et al. (1998), Ragionieri et al. (2009, 2010, 2012) found that the sister sesarmid species Neosarmatium africanum Ragionieri, Fratini & Schubart, 2012, and N. meinerti (De Man, 1887) became isolated between 1.6–1.96 ± 0.34 mya (1.6% divergence); and similarly, Lai et al. (2010) estimated that the portunids Portunus armatus (A. Milne-Edwards, 1861) and P. reticulatus (Herbst, 1799) became established around 0.78–2.5 mya, based on a 1.8% CO1 divergence.

Given our assumption that species separation has been caused by differences in circulation patterns, then it is important to understand the geological history of the Indonesian archipelago and the geological changes that have led to the current shape of the island of Sulawesi. Nugraha and Hall (2018) have studied the Late Cenozoic palaeogeography of Sulawesi, and it is clear that it is only within the last 2 million years (since the Early Pleistocene) that, Sulawesi began to resemble its present form (Fig. 20A–C). By the Early Pleistocene, paleogeographic change across Sulawesi included the rise of high mountains and the rapid subsidence in offshore basins; much of the North Arm and most of the southern South Arm appear to have emerged although the northern part of the South Arm was still a shallow marine area. Between 1.8–1.0 mya subsidence in the southern SE Arm continued, and by 1 Mya, Sulawesi was very similar in form to the present. The inter-arm basins were close to their present depths of 1.5 to 2.0 km. The North Arm was largely emergent, and there was a land connection between the North Arm and western Central Sulawesi as the Neck elevation increased. Therefore, this pattern of recent island emergence and sea basin separation supports our contention that speciation of T. simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov. began as a vicariant event within the last 2 million years.

Figure 20. 

Paleogeography of Sulawesi. A 2 Mya B 1 Mya map C present time (after Nugraha and Hall 2018).

Studies of survivorships of pelagic larvae under various salinity regimes, and analyses of genetic structure among different island populations throughout the Indonesian Archipelago will provide exciting insights into the speciation of coastal crabs and the evolutionary impacts of paleogeography throughout this region.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues, Dr. Annawati and Fahri M.Si. from Tadulako University, Palu, Central Sulawesi for facilitating us during fieldwork. Thanks to Directorate of Scientific Collection Management, BRIN, Cibinong, Bogor, Indonesia for depositing the specimens. Martin Low of the Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Singapore, is thanked for his research into clarifying the dates of publication of Koelbel’s 1897/1898 publications in which Tmethypocoelis was first described. We are thankful to Sameer Kumar Pati, Peter Kee Lin Ng, and the other anonymous reviewer for comments on the manuscript. We also thank the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia for the PhD scholarship and research fund awarded to DCM. The present study was also supported by Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University, Japan.

References

  • Colpo KD, Negreiros-Fransozo ML (2013) Morphological diversity of setae on the second maxilliped of fiddler crabs (Decapoda: Ocypodidae) from the southwestern Atlantic coast. Invertebrate Biology 132(1): 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12004
  • Dai AY, Yang S (1991) Crabs of the China Seas. China Ocean Press, Beijing, China, 608 pp. [74 pls]
  • Dai AY, Yang SL, Song YZ, Chen GX (1986) Crabs of the China Seas. China Ocean Press, Beijing, 11 + 642 pp. [In Chinese]
  • Davie PJF (1985) The biogeography of littoral crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) associated with tidal wetlands in tropical and sub-tropical Australia. In: Bardsley KN, Davie JDS, Woodroffe CD (Eds) Coasts and tidal wetlands of the Australian Monsoon region. Mangrove Monograph No. 1. Australian National University, North Australia Research Unit, 259–275.
  • Davie PJF (1990) New and rare crabs of the subfamily Dotillinae (Crustacea: Ocypodidae) from northern Australia and Papua New Guinea. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 28: 463–473.
  • Davie PJF (2002) Crustacea: Malacostraca: Eucarida (Part 2): Decapoda-Anomura, Brachyura). In: Wells A, Houston WWK (Eds) Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Vol. 19.3B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1–641.
  • Davie PJF, Kosuge T (1995) A new species of Tmethypocoelis (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae) from Japan. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 43(1): 207–215.
  • Davie PJF, Shih H-T, Chan B (2010) A new species of Mictyris (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Mictyridae) from the Ryukyus Islands, southern Japan. In: Castro P, Davie PJF, Ng PKL, Richer de Forges B (Eds) Studies on Brachyura: a homage to Danièle Guinot. Crustaceana Monographs 11. Brill, Leiden, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004170865.i-366.61
  • Davie PJF, Guinot D, Ng PKL (2015) Anatomy and functional morphology of Brachyura. In: Castro P, Davie PJF, Guinot D, Schram FR, Von Vaupel Klein JC (Eds) Decapoda: Brachyura (Part 1). Treatise on Zoology — anatomy, taxonomy, biology. The Crustacea. Vol. 9C-I. Brill, Leiden, 11–163. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004190832_004
  • Dewi K, Purwaningsih E (2020) Three new species of Cloacininae (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) parasitic in Dorcopsis muelleri (Schlegel, 1866) from Papua and Salawati Island, Indonesia. Zootaxa 4747(3): 535–546. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4747.3.7
  • Dutreix E (1992) Experimental study of the impact of hydrocarbons on the intertidal benthic community: The Mahakam Delta (East Kalimantan, Indonesia). Oceanologica Acta 15(2): 197–209.
  • Huang JF, Yu HP, Takeda M (1992) A review of the ocypodid and mictyrid crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica 31(3): 141–161.
  • Icely JD, Jones DA (1978) Factors affecting the distribution of the genus Uca (Crustacea: Ocypodidae) on an East African shore. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 6(3): 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0302-3524(78)90019-1
  • Icely JD, Nott JA (1992) Digestion and absorption: digestive system and associated organs. In: Harrison FW (Ser. Ed.) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Harrison FW, Humes AG (Vol. Eds) Decapod Crustacea. John Wiley, New York, 147–201.
  • Koelbel K (1897) Rákok [= Crabs]. In: Széchenyi B [Count], 1890–1897. Gróf keletázsiai utjának tudományos eredménye, 1877–1880 [= Count Béla Széchenyi’s Scientific Results of the East Asian passage, 1877–1880]. Vol. 2. K. F. E. K. [= Kilián Frigyes Egyetemi Könyvárus] Bizományában, Budapest, 709–718. [pl. I] [In Hungarian]
  • Koelbel K (1898) Beschreibung der Krebse. In: Széchenyi B [Count], 1893–1899. Die wissenschaftlichen Ergebnisse der Reise des Grafen Béla Széchenyi in Ostasien, 1877–1880 [= The Scientific Results of the Voyage of Count Bela Szechenyi in East Asia 1877–1880]. Vol. 2. Commission der Verlagsbuchhandlung von E. Holzel, Wien, 707–718. [pl. I.] [pp. 567–579 on separate] [German translation of Koelbel 1897]
  • Kosuge T, Davie PJF (2001) Redescription of Macrophthalmus boteltobagoe and M. holthuisi with notes on their ecology (Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 21(2): 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1163/20021975-99990155
  • Lai JCY, Ng PKL, Davie PJF (2010) A revision of the Portunus pelagicus species complex (Crustacea: Brachyura: Portunidae), with the recognition of four species. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 58(2): 199–237.
  • Murniati DC (2015) Distribution and characteristic of deposit feeder crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura) in some mangrove ecosystem types in Lombok Island. Journal of Biological Research (Thessaloniki) 21(1): 24–29. https://doi.org/10.23869/bphjbr.21.1.20155
  • Murniati DC, Wowor D (2017) Second maxilliped setation in genus Tmethypocoelis Koelbel, 1897 (Brachyura: Dotillidae) characterizes its microhabitat. Poster presented at the Third International conference on Southeast Asian Gateway Evolution (SAGE 2017). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19568.76806
  • Murniati DC, Asakura A, Nugroho DA, Hernawan UE, Dharmawan IWE (2022) On a collection of thoracotreme crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae, Macrophthalmidae, Dotillidae) from two offshore islands of Papua, eastern Indonesia, with descriptions of two new species. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 70: 461–491. https://doi.org/10.26107/RBZ-2022-0026
  • Ng PKL, Guinot D, Davie PJF (2008) Systema Brachyororum: Part I. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (Supplement 17): 1–286.
  • Ragionieri L, Fratini S, Vannini M, Schubart CD (2009) Phylogenetic and morphometric differentiation reveal geographic radiation and pseudo-cryptic speciation in a mangrove crab from the Indo-West Pacific. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52(3): 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.008
  • Ragionieri L, Cannicci S, Schubart CD, Fratini S (2010) Gene flow and demographic history of the mangrove crab Neosarmatium meinerti: A case study from the western Indian Ocean. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86(2): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.11.002
  • Ragionieri L, Fratini S, Schubart CD (2012) Revision of the Neosarmatium meinerti species complex (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of three pseudocryptic Indo-West Pacific species. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 60: 71–87.
  • Rathbun MJ (1897) A revision of the nomenclature of the Brachyura. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 11: 153–167.
  • Sakai T (1939) Studies on the Crabs of Japan. IV. Brachygnatha, Brachyrhyncha. Yokendo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, 365–741. [pls. 42–111]
  • Sakai T (1976) Crabs of Japan and the Adjacent Seas. Kodansha Ltd., Tokyo, 773 pp. [251 pls]
  • Schubart CD, Diesel R, Hedges SB (1998) Rapid evolution to terrestrial life in Jamaican crabs. Nature 393(6683): 363–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/30724
  • Shen CJ (1935) On some new and rare crabs of the families Pinnotheridae, Grapsidae and Ocypodidae from China. Dongwuxue Zazhi 1: 19–40.
  • Shih HT, Chan BKK, Teng SJ, Wong KJH (2015) Crustacean Fauna of Taiwan: Brachyuran Crabs. Volume II-Ocypodoidea. National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan, 303 pp.
  • Sprintall J, Gordon AL, Wijffels SE, Feng M, Hu S, Koch-Larrouy A, Phillips H, Nugroho D, Napitu A, Pujiana K, Susanto RD, Sloyan B, Peña-Molino B, Yuan D, Riama NF, Siswanto S, Kuswardani A, Arifin Z, Wahyudi AJ, Zhou H, Nagai T, Ansong JK, Bourdalle-Badié R, Chanut J, Lyard F, Arbic BK, Ramdhani A, Setiawan A (2019) Detecting change in the Indonesian seas. Frontiers in Marine Science 6: 257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00257
  • Tesch JJ (1918) Hymenosomidae, Retroplumidae, Ocypodidae, Grapsidae and Gecarcinidae. The Decapoda Brachyura of the Siboga-Expedition. I. Siboga Expeditie Monografie, XXXIXc1, 1–148. [pls. 1–6] [Feb.1918] https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.10267
  • Vogel F (1984) Comparative and functional morphology of the spoon-tipped setae on the second maxillipeds in Dotilla Stimpson, 1858 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae). Crustaceana 47(3): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854084X00487
  • Wada K (1995) Brachyura. In: Nishimura S (Ed.) Guide to seashore animals of Japan with color pictures and keys. Hoikusha, Osaka, 2: 379–418. [pls. 101–118] [In Japanese]
  • Wijeratne S, Pattiaratchi C, Proctor R (2018) Estimates of surface and subsurface boundary current transport around Australia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123: 3444–34466. https://doi.org.10.1029/2017JC013221
login to comment