Data Paper |
Corresponding author: Nuria Macias-Hernandez ( nemaciash@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Dimitar Dimitrov
© 2016 Nuria Macias-Hernandez, Salvador de la Cruz López, Marcos Roca-Cusachs, Pedro Oromí, Miquel A. Arnedo.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Macías-Hernández N, López SC, Roca-Cusachs M, Oromí P, Arnedo MA (2016) A geographical distribution database of the genus Dysdera in the Canary Islands (Araneae, Dysderidae). ZooKeys 625: 11-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.625.9847
|
The ground-dweller spider genus Dysdera shows very high species richness on the oceanic archipelago of the Canary Islands, providing one of the most outstanding examples of island radiation among spiders, only paralleled by Tetragnatha spiders on the Hawaiian archipelago. A georeferenced database of the 48 Dysdera species occurring in the Canary Islands was assembled to facilitate ongoing and future research on this remarkable lineage. All species are endemic to the archipelago except for the cosmopolitan Dysdera crocata. The dataset consists of 794 distributional records documented from 1971 to 2015, each locality being represented only once per species. Distribution maps are provided for each species, along with basic diversity and distribution information. The database and geographical maps included in this article stand for the most updated, accurate and complete information on the distribution of the spider genus Dysdera in the Canary Islands.
Canary Islands, dataset, distribution maps, species richness, spiders
Because of their high level of endemism and conservation challenges, the Macaronesian archipelagos, located in the eastern Mid-Atlantic ocean, are listed among Earth’s biodiversity hot spots (
Arthropods are by far the most diverse assemblage of terrestrial Canarian organisms, with nearly 7000 species, 465 of which are spiders, most of them endemisms (64%) (
During the last 20 years several systematic studies conducted on Canarian Dysdera have resulted in a large amount of specimen records and information on geographic distribution that is not always easily accessible. Part of this information is scattered among several publications, and many records remain unpublished. Moreover, many records of Canarian Dysdera only included information on locality names, sometimes difficult to identify on a map. The conversion of the locality names into georeferenced points facilitates the correct assignment and visualization of species distribution (
Specimens referred in this database were collected during the last 45 years, mainly by members of the GIET (Grupo de Investigaciones Entomológicas de Tenerife) from the University of La Laguna (henceforth ULL), and by members of the University of Barcelona (UB), as well as by some external collaborators. The material used to assemble the database comes from different sources, most of the records corresponding to collection trips conducted during PhD and master thesis fieldwork, and by other research projects (see details below):
Specimens from PhD and master dissertations carried out at the University of La Laguna and University of Barcelona (A.L. Medina 1991, J.L. Martín 1992, M.A. Arnedo 1996, N. Macías-Hernández 2010, M. Roca-Cusachs 2016) (70%, approx. 3,200 records).
Specimens collected during research projects and other unpublished studies conducted by i) GIET at the University of La Laguna: LIFE-Nature Project in Teide National Park (
Most of the material used in the dataset is deposited in the collections of the Department of Animal Biology, Edaphology and Geology, University of La Laguna (
Although the sampling procedure depended on each research project, it was mainly conducted by direct searching under stones and logs, beneath tree bark, scraping soil and rocky embankments, or in volcanic caves. A large amount of specimens were also collected by using pitfall traps both on the surface and in the mesovoid shallow substratum (MSS) (
A complete raw dataset of specimen-based records identified to species level by the authors was firstly assembled. All available information (i.e. number of specimens, species identification, identifier’s name, sex, locality, geographic coordinates, altitude, type of habitat, date, collector and observations) was digitized in a Microsoft Excel 2011 spreadsheet (data not shown). A second species distribution table (Suppl. material
GPS coordinates were converted to decimal degrees with the online coordinate converter available at http://www.asturnatura.com/sinflac/calculadora-conversiones-coordenadas.php. Old locality records without available geographic coordinates were identified and assigned by the IDECanarias online platform Sistema de Información Territorial de Canarias of the Canary Islands Government (http://visor.grafcan.es/visorweb/). Information about doubtful localities was requested from the collectors when possible. Records that were not georeferenced (1% of the total) were excluded from the database.
Following data entry, a data checking procedure to minimize likely data-entry errors was conducted. This included an assessment of records with the same localities for spelling errors, double-checking uncertain records (species identification, geographical coordinates, etc). Accurate spelling of scientific names and taxonomic synonyms was revised according to
A georeferenced distribution map of each Dysdera species was generated using the free open source Geographic Information System program QGIS 2.12.3 (QGIS 2016).
The original raw database, from which all locality records were extracted, consisted of 4,595 individual records identified to species level (data not shown). All georeferenced localities where each species was collected are shown in Suppl. material
The distribution of each Dysdera species per island is summarized in Table
Presence of each Dysdera species per island, indicating the corresponding number of endemic species. The troglobitic species are marked on grey. H: El Hierro, P: La Palma, G: La Gomera, T: Tenerife, C: Gran Canaria, F: Fuerteventura, L: Lanzarote.
Species | H | P | G | T | C | F | L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dysdera alegranzaensis Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera ambulotenta Ribera, Ferrández & Blasco, 1985 | X | ||||||
Dysdera andamanae Arnedo & Ribera, 1997 | X | ||||||
Dysdera arabisenen Arnedo & Ribera, 1997 | X | ||||||
Dysdera bandamae Schmidt, 1973 | X | ||||||
Dysdera brevisetae Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera brevispina Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera calderensis Wunderlich, 1987 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera chioensis Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera cribellata Simon, 1883 | X | ||||||
Dysdera crocata Koch, 1838 | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Dysdera curvisetae Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera enghoffi Arnedo, Oromí & Ribera, 1997 | X | ||||||
Dysdera esquiveli Ribera & Blasco, 1986 | X | ||||||
Dysdera gibbifera Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera gollumi Ribera & Arnedo, 1994 | X | ||||||
Dysdera gomerensis Strand, 1911 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera guayota Arnedo & Ribera, 1999 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera hernandezi Arnedo & Ribera, 1999 | X | ||||||
Dysdera hirguan Arnedo, Oromí & Ribera, 1997 | X | ||||||
Dysdera iguanensis Wunderlich, 1987 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera insulana Simon, 1883 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera labradaensis Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera lancerotensis Simon, 1907 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera levipes Wunderlich, 1987 | X | X | X | ||||
Dysdera liostethus Simon, 1907 | X | ||||||
Dysdera longa Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera macra Simon, 1883 | X | ||||||
Dysdera madai Arnedo, 2007 | X | ||||||
Dysdera mahan Macías-Hernández & Arnedo, 2010 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera minutissima Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera montanetensis Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera nesiotes Simon, 1907 | X | ||||||
Dysdera orahan Arnedo, Oromí & Ribera, 1997 | X | X | |||||
Dysdera paucispinosa Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera ramblae Arnedo, Oromí & Ribera, 1997 | X | ||||||
Dysdera ratonensis Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera rugichelis Simon, 1907 | X | ||||||
Dysdera sanborondon Arnedo, Oromí & Ribera, 2000 | X | ||||||
Dysdera sibyllina Arnedo, 2007 | X | ||||||
Dysdera silvatica Schmidt, 1981 | X | X | X | ||||
Dysdera simbeque Macías-Hernández & Arnedo, 2010 | X | ||||||
Dysdera spinidorsum Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera tilosensis Wunderlich, 1992 | X | ||||||
Dysdera unguimmanis Ribera, Ferrández & Blasco, 1985 | X | ||||||
Dysdera verneaui Simon, 1883 | X | ||||||
Dysdera volcania Ribera, Ferrández & Blasco, 1985 | X | ||||||
Dysdera yguanirae Arnedo & Ribera, 1997 | X | ||||||
Total single-island endemic species | - | 1 | 3 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 3 |
Total Canarian endemic species | 3 | 3 | 9 | 23 | 11 | 5 | 5 |
The proportion of endemic Dysdera species per island and the species shared between islands is shown graphically in Fig.
Graphical representation of the island endemisms and the species shared between islands. Pie sizes are proportional to the number of species on each island. Black sectors: number of species shared with other islands; grey sectors: proportion of local endemisms. Lines connecting pies: number of shared species between the corresponding islands, the width of the lines being proportional to the number of shared species. The disposition of pies reflects the geographical arrangement of the islands: P: La Palma, H: El Hierro, G: La Gomera, T: Tenerife, C: Gran Canaria, F: Fuerteventura, L: Lanzarote.
The species composition of oceanic islands is the joint result of colonization from nearby continental regions, and local speciation and extinction processes (
Species richness in Canarian Dysdera is positively correlated with the area, the elevation and the habitat diversity of the islands (
Dysdera spiders have colonized all types of terrestrial habitats in the Canaries, from the intertidal (
A striking pattern of Dysdera in the Canaries is the frequent co-occurrence of species in the same locality. With very few, if any, exceptions, all the species overlap distributions with at least one other species. This observation raises the question of what are the factors that promote species coexistence in Canarian Dysdera. Co-occurring species tend to differ in size and cheliceral shape, which in Dysdera has been shown to be a proxy for diet specialization: some species seem to be generalist predators while other are oniscophagous specialists (i.e. they feed preferably on woodlice) (
The conservation status of the genus Dysdera in the Canary Islands has not been adequately addressed yet. Some of the richest localities in terms of number of endemic Dysdera are protected areas included in the Red Canaria de Espacios Naturales Protegidos and the Natura 2000 Network. One of the main threats on the species survival is the loss or degradation of suitable habitats. This is especially true for species with very restricted distributions, or low abundances, and the very specialized species inhabiting the fragile underground environment. Previous studies conducted in several caves of the Canarian archipelago (
The database and geographical maps presented in this article stand for the most updated and extensive information on the distribution of the spider genus Dysdera in the Canary Islands. One of the most powerful applications of this database is its use as a data-exploration tool for further ecological, biogeographical, taxonomic and conservation studies. It will facilitate the visualization of widespread and narrowly distributed species, the patterns of species coexistence, and the distribution gaps. Furthermore, the combination of georeferenced distribution data with environmental information (habitat use, vegetation, projected climate, etc.) can be used for ecological niche modelling studies (
Data package title: A geographical distribution database of the genus Dysdera in the Canary Islands (Araneae, Dysderidae)
Provisional doi: 10.5061/dryad.t63mn
Data files: Macías-Hernandez et al. (2016), Zookeys, Species Distribution Table
Macías-Hernandez et al. (2016), Zookeys, Species Distribution Maps
We wish to thank all the people who have helped us throughout the years with fieldwork, either collecting with us or providing logistic support, with special mention to the GIET members, as well as those who have loaned material. We acknowledge the Cabildos of the seven islands, as well as the Teide, Caldera de Taburiente and Garajonay National Parks that have granted us collection permits and often also helped with lodging and logistics during campaigns. None of this work would have been possible without the continuous funding provided by institutions as different Spanish ministries, the Catalan and the Canarian Autonomous governments, and the European Union. Research by N. Macías-Hernández was supported by Canary Islands CIE: Tricontinental Atlantic Campus.
Supplementary Table 1
Data type: distribution data
Explanation note: Distribution of each Dysdera species, indicating species name, locality, district, island, type of habitat, geographic coordinates, and altitude (m).
Supplementary Figure 1
Data type: distribution data
Explanation note: Distributional map of each species of Dysdera (alphabetically ordered).