Review Article
Print
Review Article
A decade of amphibian studies (Animalia, Amphibia) at Sekayu lowland forest, Hulu Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia
expand article infoBaizul Hafsyam Badli-Sham, Muhamad Fatihah Syafiq, Mohd Shahrizan Azrul Aziz, Natrah Rafiqah Mohd Jalil§, Muhammad Taufik Awang, Muhammad Nouril Ammin Othman, Anis Azira Abdul Aziz, Khunirah Dzu, Nurul Asyikin Abdol Wahab, Nor Liyana Jamil, Murni Azima Ismail, Wan Ahmad Aidil Wan Azman, Ooi Xin Wei, Nur Ain Nabilah Jamaha, Mohamad Aqmal-Naser, Muhammad Fahmi-Ahmad, Noor Shahirah-Ibrahim|, Syed Ahmad Rizal, Daicus M. Belabut, Chan Kin Onn#, Evan Seng Huat Quah¤, Larry Lee Grismer«, Amirrudin B. Ahmad
‡ Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia
§ Academy of Science Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Malaysia
¶ University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
# National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
¤ Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
« La Sierra University, Riverside, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

Amphibians of Sekayu lowland forest have been studied more than a decade, with discoveries of new records of species showing no sign of abating between the years 2003 to 2020, indicating the remarkably rich diversity of anurans in this forest. Despite ceaseless anthropogenic activities in this area, this study successfully recorded 52 species of amphibians from 32 genera in the lowland forest of Sekayu. The species composition consisted of a single species from the family Ichthyophiidae and 51 species of anurans of 31 genera and six families. The number of species recorded has steadily increased especially during more recent surveys from 2015 to 2020. This study augments the total number of amphibian species recorded from Hulu Terengganu by ten additional species, increasing the total to 70 species for the district.

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation, herpetofauna, lowland forest, Malaysia, protected areas

Introduction

The earliest herpetological surveys conducted by Dring (1979) at Gunung Lawit, Hulu Terengganu reported 77 species, of which 44 were amphibians. The survey also discovered two new species of geckos, Cyrtodactylus elok and Cnemaspis argus. Until the 1990s, limited herpetological studies had been conducted, such as the surveys on reptiles in Bukit Labohan in Ma’ Daerah by Davison (1993), which enlisted at least ten reptile species, and the surveys on the freshwater turtle trade conducted by Sharma (1999) in several districts in Terengganu. Surveys from 2000 to 2010 consist of amphibian studies by Norhayati et al. (2006) in Pasir Raja Forest Reserve and a follow-up survey on a reptile in Bukit Labohan by Sharma et al. (2007) with photograph records of amphibians. In 2003 and 2008, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on herpetofauna was done by Tenaga Nasional Berhad Research (TNBR) in Tembat Forest Reserve before the construction of two dams began in this areas (TNBR 2003, 2007). Two new species were made within this period, namely Cnemaspis perhentianensis on Pulau Perhentian Besar (Grismer and Chan 2008) and Cyrtodactylus leegrismeri on Pulau Tenggol (Chan and Norhayati 2010).

From 2011 to the present, extensive efforts have been made to document the herpetofauna diversity in Terengganu, including lowland to upland areas (Gunung Gagau: Hamidi 2013; Gunung Tebu and Lata Belatan recreational forest: Muin et al. 2014; the base of Gunung Lawit, Gunung Tebu, adjacent lowland forests of Lata Tembakah and Lata Belatan: Sumarli et al. 2015; Tasik Kenyir: Zakaria et al. 2019; Komaruddin et al. 2020), wetlands (Setiu: Tamblyn et al. 2006; Zahidin et al. 2017), urbanised areas (UMT Campus: Badli-Sham et al. 2019) and archipelagic islands (Perhentian archipelago, Pulau Redang, and Pulau Tenggol: Grismer et al. 2011; Pulau Bidong: Zakaria et al. 2015; Fatihah-Syafiq et al. 2020). Still, continuous surveys were carried out in Tembat Forest Reserve to monitor the herpetofauna communities during the construction of hydroelectric dams (Chan 2011; Norhayati et al. 2011; Ummi 2013; Nur Amalina et al. 2017, 2020, 2021). Surprisingly, more new species were discovered during this period, such as Lipinia sekayuensis (Grismer et al. 2014, 2016), Tytthoscincus keciktuek and T. monticulous (Grismer et al. 2018) and Rentapia flavomaculata (Chan et al. 2020a), and the discovery of Philautus davidlabangi (Quah et al. 2021) in Tasik Kenyir which is a new record for Peninsular Malaysia. Besides, many localities in Terengganu are still under ongoing surveys by a herpetology team from Biodiversity and Ecology Research Group (BERes), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, particularly in the Hulu Terengganu District.

As part of the Hulu Terengganu Forest Reserve that is adorned with beautiful streams and intact forests, Sekayu lowland forest (SLF) has become the most popular picnic spot in Terengganu amongst locals and tourists alike with nearly 203,000 visitors reported in the year 2010 (Bhuiyan et al. 2011). Accommodated with sufficient facilities, this area has become the most conducive place for recreational and ecotourism activities. SLF is known to house a diverse range of organisms, such as butterflies, aquatic invertebrates (Wahizatul et al. 2011; Wahizatul and Geok 2016) and dragonflies (Wahizatul et al. 2006; Choong et al. 2013), reptiles (Zakaria et al. 2019), fishes (Kottelat et al. 1992; Tan and Ng 2005), and also diverse families of trees (Jarina et al. 2007). Several species of reptiles have been described from this area such as skinks, Lipinia sekayuensis (Grismer et al. 2014, 2016), Tytthoscincus keciktuek and T. monticolus (Grismer et al. 2018), plus a new genus and species of terrestrial crab, Gempala bilobata (Ng and Ahmad 2016), and Johora michaeli (Ng 2020). Recent fieldwork in SLF has contributed additional locality records for several recently described species in Peninsular Malaysia such as the skink Sphenomorphus sungaicolus (Sumarli et al. 2016) and Rentapia flavomaculata (Chan et al. 2020a).

Furthermore, the actual diversity of amphibians in SLF remains uncertain as the checklists were not properly reviewed and updated in the latest taxonomy, may contain several erroneous records or misidentifications of specimens, and the existing areas have not been exhaustively surveyed. The objectives of this paper are to: (1) properly compile and update the information from previous and recent fieldwork to produce a comprehensive checklist of amphibians, (2) to examine the previously and recently collected specimens in SLF for accurate species accounts, and (3) to assess the trend of long-term surveys conducted on amphibians throughout the past decade in SLF. In addition, this paper also provides a compiled checklist based on published records on the amphibian fauna in Hulu Terengganu District (Dring 1979; Norhayati et al. 2011; Hamidi 2013; Sumarli et al. 2015; Nur Amalina et al. 2017) to report the current diversity of amphibians in this area.

Materials and methods

Study area

Sekayu lowland forest (SLF) is located within the Hulu Terengganu Forest Reserve (Annex) near Kuala Berang to the east, and Taman Negara (= National Park) to the west and south-west (Fig. 1), with a total area of 30 ha. This area consists of Sekayu Recreational Forest (SRF) that is covered by tall and old growth lowland dipterocarp trees, cascading waterfalls drained by a pristine stream from the Peres River, and Sekayu Agricultural Park (SAP) which is an enormous agricultural area of 85 ha that is also open for recreational activities, and is drained by the Bubu River (Wahizatul et al. 2011). This area receives heavy rainfall from the northeast monsoon that typically occurs between October and March of each year (Khan et al. 2014).

Figure 1. 

Map A shows the location of Sekayu lowland forest (SLF) indicated by red box in Peninsular Malaysia. The detailed location of SLF and several localities with published checklist on amphibians in Hulu Terengganu were displayed on Map B and indicated by the red circles for respective localities.

Descriptions of study sites

In SLF, fieldworks were conducted at various locations within SRF and SAP. The Sekayu Recreational Forest area (SRF) (entrance at 4°58'01.1"N, 102°57'35.4"E) contains substantial landscape changes to accommodate facilities for Forestry staff and visitors, such as huts, toilets, changing rooms, chalets, and camping sites. SRF is drained by a stream channel of the Peres River, which remains the main attraction for this area for recreational activities such as picnics and camping (Bhuiyan et al. 2011). The trekking route at SRF is also used as the main hiking route to Gunung Gajah Terom. Minor modifications were observed at certain parts of the Peres River, such as the construction of a dam to create shallow pools and suspension bridges that provided access to the forest within the SRF. However, a large portion of trees families and many others vegetations remain intact and well preserved (Jarina et al. 2007; Rafаai 2007; Nor 2007). In addition, many microhabitats such as rock pools, riparian vegetation, and small streams located beyond the recreational area are untouched. Much of the area in the recreational zone consists of a mixture of natural forest vegetation and garden plants, along with artificial drainage, especially at the Herbal Park. The surveys were conducted at six sampling sites within the SRF, which included the upper stream area and a tributary of the Peres River, recreational zone (vicinity of the car park, chalet, Forestry office, and trekking route), Orchid Garden, Herbal Park, and camping site.

Sekayu Agricultural Park (SAP) (entry point at 4°58'01.8"N, 102°57'28.4"E) is comprised of mostly agricultural lands growing various species of fruits such as Lansium domesticum, Nephelium lappaceum, Gracia mangostana, Durio zibethinus, and garden plants. Most of the landscape of this area is significantly altered and surrounded by the forest edge and drained by a stream channel of the Bubu River (Wahizatul et al. 2011). There is an upstream area of the Bubu River (4°58'20.12"N, 102°57'26.86"E) that was predominantly covered by secondary forest as in SRF, along with beautiful cascading waterfalls, an untouched small stream, and an abundance of granitic boulders along the upstream area. Similar to SRF, this area was occasionally visited by locals and has undergone moderate landscape modifications with the construction of recreational facilities such as a suspension bridge, Herbal Park and swimming pool. Half a kilometre from this area, buildings such as rest houses, dormitory and camping sites are provided. However, many of these buildings have been abandoned due to lack of maintenance. The upstream area of the Bubu River was frequently observed to have severe sediment loads, especially in the monsoon season which is assumed to have resulted from logging activities in nearby areas. The surveys were conducted in five sampling sites within the SAP, such as the upper stream area and a tributary of Bubu River, forest trail, recreational zone (area of rest houses, dormitory and camping site), and Herbal Park.

Data collection

Surveys were conducted using standard methods of visual encounter surveys (VES) and acoustic surveys, together with drift-fenced pitfall traps in SLF. VES is a time-constrained technique that is frequently employed in herpetological surveys, in which the observers walk along a in standardised route at a standard pace to visually search the entire area for amphibians (Crump and Scott 1994; Doan 2003). Any calling heard during the surveys were identified by the help of experts and/or calls were referenced at AmphibiaWeb (2021) (https://amphibiaweb.org). Five sets of drift-fenced pitfall traps (each set comprised of three pitfall traps and two 2.5-m long aluminium sheets) were set up for each of the small feeder streams of the Peres River (PR1: 4°57'43.15"N, 102°57'12.16"E; PR2: 4°57'42.43"N, 102°57'11.57"E; PR3: 4°57'42.11"N, 102°57'10.24"E; PR4: 4°57'40.03"N, 102°57'9.04"E; and PR5: 4°57'39.73"N, 102°57'7.2"E) at SFR and along the hiking trail at SAP (HT1: 4°58'17.7"N, 102°57'21.25"E; HT2: 4°58'17.34"N, 102°57'21.12"E; HT3: 4°58'16.99"N, 102°57'21.17"E; HT4: 4°58'16.53"N, 102°57'21.08"E; and HT5: 4°58'16.28"N, 102°57'21.24"E). Four days and three nights were spent for each survey occasion in (1) October and November 2015, (2) March to May and July to November 2016, (3) September to December 2017, (4) August to December 2018, and (5) July to December 2020.

Additional information of species from SLF was obtained from the compilation of amphibian checklists conducted by previous undergraduate fieldwork from 2003, 2004, 2006, 2013, 2014 and early 2015. Voucher specimens collected from previous and more recent fieldwork were examined to confirm species identifications based on Berry (1975), Brown and Guttman (2002), Harvey et al. (2002), Wood et al. (2008b), Matsui (2006), McLeod and Norhayati (2007), Nishikawa et al. (2012), Chan et al. (2014a, b, 2016, 2018, 2020ac), Rujirawan et al. (2013), Sumarli et al. (2015), Zug (2015), Matsui et al. (2014, 2017, 2018), Sheridan and Stuart (2018), Davis et al. (2018), Garg et al. (2019), Jiang et al. (2019), and Hong et al. (2021). The latest taxonomic nomenclatural follows the Amphibian Species of the World online database (Frost 2022). Measurement of snout-vent length (SVL) were taken using digital callipers. All preserved specimens were designated with the code Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Zoological Collections (UMTZC) and deposited in the General Laboratory of Biology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. The voucher photographs included in species accounts were designated with the code UMTZCP (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Zoological Collections Photograph).

Data analysis

The checklist of amphibians from previous studies (2003–2015) were tabulated and compiled together with the most recent studies (October 2015-December 2020) to obtain the accumulated number of amphibian species that have been recorded in SLF. Species accumulation curve and estimated number of duplicates (species with two samples) and unique species (species represented by one sample) (Colwell and Coddington 1994) of amphibians from SLF was generated from the incidence-based data of species obtained from the year 2003 until 2018 by using EstimateS software 9.0 (Colwell 2013).

Results

Fifty-two species of amphibians were recorded in total, consisting of one caecilian from the family Ichthyophiidae and 51 anurans from 31 genera and six families in SLF (Table 1). Thirty-eight species were recorded from previous fieldwork between the years 2003 until early 2015, and 13 additional species were recorded in recent surveys from late 2015 to 2020 in SLF (Table 1). The additional species obtained in the recent surveys were Ichthyophis cf. asplenius, Ansonia lumut, Leptophryne borbonica, Limnonectes plicatellus, L. hascheanus, L. utara, Occidozyga sumatrana, O. martensii, Kalophrynus palmatissimus, Micryletta dissimulans, Pulchrana laterimaculata, Polypedates colletti, and Theloderma licin. Species nomenclature was updated based on the latest taxonomy, such as Kaloula latidisca (formerly reported as Kaloula baleata) (Chan et al. 2014b), Amolops gerutu (formerly known as A. larutensis) (Chan et al. 2018), Sylvirana malayana (formerly known as H. nigrovittata) (Sheridan and Stuart 2018), Kurixalus chaseni (formerly known as K. appendiculatus) (Matsui et al. 2018), Limnonectes deinodon (formerly known as L. laticeps and L. khasianus) (Dehling 2014), Pulchrana sundabarat (formerly known as H. picturata) (Chan et al. 2020c), Zhangixalus prominanus and Z. tunkui (formerly known as Rhacophorus prominanus and R. tunkui) (Jiang et al. 2019) and Rentapia flavomaculata (formerly known as R. hosii) (Chan et al. 2016; Chan et al. 2020a) were recorded in SLF as well.

Table 1.

Checklist of amphibians of Sekayu lowland forest, Hulu Terengganu, Terengganu.

No Family/Species Year
2003 2004 2006 2008 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020
Family Ichthyophiidae
1 Ichthyophis cf. asplenius +
Family Bufonidae
2 Ansonia latiffi + + + + +
3 Ansonia lumut + + +
4 Duttaphrynus bengalensis
(Duttaphrynus sp. 1)
+ + + + +
5 Ingerophrynus parvus + + + + + + + + + +
6 Leptophryne borbonica + +
7 Phrynoidis asper + + + + + + + + + + +
8 Rentapia flavomaculata + +
Family Dicroglossidae
9 Fejervarya limnocharis + + + + + + + + + + +
10 Limnonectes blythii + + + + + + + + + +
11 Limnonectes hascheanus + + + +
12 Limnonectes deinodon + + + + +
13 Limnonectes malesianus + + + + + + +
14 Limnonectes plicatellus + + + +
15 Limnonectes utara +
16 Occidozyga sumatrana + + +
17 Occidozyga martensii + + + +
Family Megophryidae
18 Leptobrachium hendricksoni + + + + + + + + + +
19 Leptobrachella sola + + + +
20 Pelobatrachus nasutus + + + + + + +
Family Microhylidae
21 Kalophrynus kiewi + + + + +
22 Kalophrynus palmatissimus +
23 Kaloula latidisca + + + +
24 Kaloula pulchra + + + + + +
25 Microhyla bedmorei + +
26 Microhyla butleri + + + + + + + +
27 Microhyla cf. heymonsi + + + + + + + + + + +
28 Microhyla superciliaris + + + +
29 Micryletta dissimulans + + + +
30 Phrynella pulchra +
Family Ranidae
31 Amolops gerutu + + + + + + + + + +
32 Chalcorana labialis + + + + + + + + +
33 Humerana miopus + + + + + +
34 Hylarana erythraea + + + + + + + + + +
35 Indosylvirana nicobariensis + + + + + + +
36 Odorrana hosii + + + + + + + + + +
37 Pulchrana glandulosa + + + + + + +
38 Pulchrana laterimaculata + +
39 Pulchrana sundabarat + + + + + +
40 Sylvirana malayana + + + + + + +
Family Rhacophoridae
41 Kurixalus chaseni + + + + +
42 Nyctixalus pictus + + + + + +
43 Polypedates colletti +
44 Polypedates discantus + + + + +
45 Polypedates leucomystax + + + + + + + + + + +
46 Polypedates macrotis + + + + + + +
47 Rhacophorus nigropalmatus + +
48 Rhacophorus pardalis +
49 Theloderma horridum +
50 Theloderma licin +
51 Zhangixalus prominanus + + + +
52 Zhangixalus tunkui +
Total number of species 14 8 14 12 28 20 29 43 34 38 34

Class Amphibia

Order Gymnophiona

Family Ichthyophiidae

Ichthyophis cf. asplenius

Fig. 2 Malayan Caecilian

Examined specimens

One specimen was collected from SRF (UMTZC1792, SVL = 198 mm).

Identification

The specimen had elongated and cylindrical body with SVL 198 mm; head as wide as body; snout round; small eyes; body darkish purple with pale yellowish lateral band. Specimen tentatively recognised as Ichthyophis cf. asplenius as suggested by Nishikawa et al. (2012), until further research to reconfirmed taxonomy of this group in Peninsular Malaysia.

Remarks

The specimen was collected from the downstream areas of the Peres River. The collected individual was spotted amongst piles of wet leaves at the stream edge. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Figure 2. 

Ichthyophis cf. asplenius.

Order Anura

Family Bufonidae

Ansonia latiffi Wood, Grismer, Norhayati & Juliana, 2008

Fig. 3A Latiff’s Torrent-dwelling Toad

Examined specimens

Eight specimens were collected from SRF consisted of four males (UMTZC1319, UMTZC1400, UMTZC1461, and UMTZC1575, SVL = 38–60 mm) and four females (UMTZC1318, UMTZC1353, UMTZC1401, and UMTZC1553, SVL = 41–59 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens from SLF agreed well with the description by Wood et al. (2008b). Size (SVL: 38–60 mm, n = 4 males; 41–59 mm, n = 4 females); snout projecting beyond lower jaw; tympanum distinct; interorbital ridges absent; small warts at jaw; head narrow in females, but wide in males; inner and outer metatarsal tubercles present; first finger reaching tip of second finger; single mandibular asperities in UMTZC1400 and double for other specimens; dorsal tubercles distinct; spotting at gular region, obscured in UMTZC1353 and UMTZC1553; abdomen finely granular; no dorsolateral row of tubercles;

Figure 3. 

A Ansonia latiffi B Ansonia lumut C Duttaphrynus bengalensis (Duttaphrynus sp.1) D Ingerophrynus parvus E Leptophryne borbonica F Phrynoidis asper G male Rentapia flavomaculata H female R. flavomaculata.

Remarks

All observed and collected A. latiffi were found along the banks of the small streams of the Peres River within the areas of SRF. Ansonia latiffi is typically found on rocky substrate or the ground of sloping terrain, and sometimes found perched on low vegetation below 1 m from the ground.

Ansonia lumut Chan, Wood, Anuar, Muin, Quah, Sumarli & Grismer, 2014

Fig. 3B Mossy Stream Toad

Examined specimens

Three males were collected from SRF (UMTZC1527 and UMTZC1991, SVL = 15–24 mm) and SAP (UMTZC1615, SVL = 26 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Chan et al. (2014a). Size (SVL: 15–26 mm, n = 3 males); distinct tympanum; snout projecting beyond lower jaw; snout wider than long; paratoid gland absent; interorbital ridges absent; large yellow rectal tubercles behind tympanum; limbs with yellow cross bars; venter surface pale grey with fine white spotting; first finger much shorter than second; no dorsolateral row of tubercles; dorsum blackish with greenish-yellow reticulations; and flank with small yellow spots.

Remarks

Ansonia lumut was first collected from the Bubu River in SAP by Davis et al. (2016) (LSUHC 11212–13), and a second specimen (UMTZC1615) was collected in the same place during recent surveys. For the Peres River, two specimens were collected from a small stream area (UMTZC1527) and in drift-fenced pitfalls (UMTZC1991). This stream-dwelling species was found on substrates such as granite rock covered with moss, low vegetation at steep edges of the stream, and collected as well in pitfall traps.

Duttaphrynus bengalensis (Duttaphrynus sp. 1) (Daudin, 1802)

Fig. 3C Common Asian Toad

Examined specimens

Four males were collected from SRF (UMTZC1147, UMTZC1148, and UMTZC1149, SVL = 47–68 mm) and SAP (UMTZC1065, SVL = 59 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the former description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 47–68 mm, n = 4 males); stout bodies; head with supraorbital and supratympanic bony ridges; parietal ridges absent; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum distinct; tips of digits blunt; subarticular tubercles distinct; toes more than ½ webbed; paratoid gland ellipsoidal; outer metatarsal tubercles smaller than inner metatarsal tubercles. Based the revision by Jablonski et al. (2022), the specimens resembled the characteristics of Duttaphrynus bengalensis comb. nov. and “hazarensis” such as the concave interorbital space; interorbital space larger than upper eyelid width and internarial distance; snout longer than horizontal eye diameter; tympanum oval; canthus rostralis with a ridge and sharp (Daudin 1802; Khan 2001).

Remarks

This species was more frequently observed at SAP compared to SRF, probably due to the more disturbed and man-made environment that is favoured by this commensal anuran (Shahriza and Ibrahim 2012; Badli-Sham et al. 2019). The species was commonly observed in drains, irrigation ditches, abandoned ponds, and even along the roadside. Calls of this species could be heard after rains. Recently, Jablonski et al. (2022) carried out the molecular assessment on the Duttaphrynus melanostictus complex in the South-East Asia, which revealed the two groups of populations namely, Duttaphrynus bengalensis comb. nov. and “hazarensis” (Duttaphrynus sp. 1) and Duttaphrynus sp. 2 sensu Bisht et al. (2021). However, careful inspection of collected specimens shows a resemblance to Duttaphrynus bengalensis (Duttaphrynus sp. 1) based on five characters by Daudin (1802) and Khan (2001).

Ingerophrynus parvus (Boulenger, 1887)

Fig. 3D Malayan Dwarf Toad

Examined specimens

Ten specimens were previously collected from SRF consisted of seven males (UMTZC1021, UMTZC1025, UMTZC1026, UMTZC1033, UMTZC1255, UMTZC1339, and UMTZC1398, SVL = 33–37 mm) and three females (UMTZC1023, UMTZC1158, and UMTZC1625, SVL = 42–45 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 33–37 mm, n = 7 males; 42–45 mm, n = 3 females); stout body; head with supraorbital and parietal ridges forming straight lines; supratympanic ridges short; tympanum distinct; snout truncate; finger tips rounded; first finger longer than second; subarticular tubercles distinct; toes ½ webbed; paratoid gland rounded to sub-triangular; dorsum skin with distinct spiny tubercles, venter coarsely granular.

Remarks

Most of the individuals were collected and observed near the stream areas. This species is also common in open recreational areas. Ingerophrynus parvus was commonly found on the leaf litter, in rocky crevices and rotten logs, but rarely found on low vegetation.

Leptophryne borbonica (Tschudi, 1838)

Fig. 3E Javan Tree Toad

Examined specimens

Two male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1500 and UMTZC1733, SVL = 22–24 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 22–24 mm, n = 2 males); slender body; head without bony ridges; snout truncate; tympanum distinct; tips of digits swollen into discs; first finger slightly shorter than the second; fingers ½ webbed; subarticular tubercles distinct; skin with small warts; paratoid gland small and almost invisible; dorsum with hourglass shape; pale dorsolateral gland; hind limbs with pinkish red on underside surface.

Remarks

Leptophryne borbonica is so far known to occur at the small streams of SRF with the first collected specimen UMTZC1500 from the Peres small stream and UMTZC1733 from the Bubu small stream. This forest-dwelling species was sighted amongst the piles of dead leaves on the forest floor and the banks of the streams.

Phrynoidis asper (Gravenhorst, 1829)

Fig. 3F Malayan Giant Toad

Examined specimens

Nineteen specimens were collected from SLF consisted of 17 specimens from SRF (Juvenile: UMTZC1136, SVL = 17 mm; Males: UMTZC1020, UMTZC1022, UMTZC1031, UMTZC1083, UMTZC1112, UMTZC1129, UMTZC1135, UMTZC1399, UMTZC1483, UMTZC1508, UMTZC1511, UMTZC1575, UMTZC1576, and UMTZC1577, SVL = 24–111 mm; Females: UMTZC1321 and UMTZC1800, SVL = 93–150 mm) and two specimens from SAP (Males: UMTZC1152 and UMTZC1153, 32–34 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 17 mm, n = 1 juvenile; 24–111 mm, n = 16 males; 93–150 mm, n = 2 females); stocky body; supraorbital and supratympanic bony ridges distinct; snout obtusely pointed; paratoid gland rounded to sub-triangular; tympanum distinct; first finger slightly longer than second; subarticular tubercles conspicuous and large. Five specimens absent of X-shaped dorsum marking (UMTZC1031, UMTZC1129, UMTZC1321, UMTZC1483, UMTZC1511).

Remarks

Phrynoidis asper is common at the stream areas of SLF. This species was typically observed in rocky crevices and the ground near the stream bank. This toad is also amongst the largest species of anuran recorded in this area with a maximum SVL reaching 150 mm.

Rentapia flavomaculata Chan, Abraham & Badli-Sham, 2020

Fig. 3G, H Yellow Spotted Tree Toad

Examined specimens

Two adult females were collected from SRF (UMTZC1404 and UMTZC1495, SVL = 102–104 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description of Chan et al. (2020a). Size (SVL: 102–104 mm, n = 2 females); moderately stout bodies; head without bony ridges; tympanum distinct; paratoid gland short and distinct; finger tips long and expended into broad discs; inner metatarsal tubercles larger than outer; body greenish with yellow spots and reticulations; venter finely granular. One male from areas near SRF was observed and photographed (Fig. 3G).

Remarks

The first collected specimen UMTZC1404 (Fig. 2H) was from a small stream of the Bubu River, and UMTZC1495 was from a small stream of the Peres River, and the photographed male (Fig. 3G) was from the latter location. Both preserved specimens were collected during the post-monsoon season at SRF. Both were seen on rotten logs and tree trunks within the vicinity of the small streams.

Family Dicroglossidae

Fejervarya limnocharis (Gravenhorst, 1829)

Fig. 4A Rice Field Frog

Examined specimens

Twenty-four specimens were previously collected from SAP (Males: UMTZC1391, UMTZC1396, UMTZC1397, and UMTZC1598, SVL = 14–40 mm; Female: UMTZC1497, SVL = 50 mm), and SRF (Males: UMTZC1002, UMTZC1019, UMTZC1048, UMTZC1049, UMTZC1088, UMTZC1089, UMTZC1150, UMTZC1215, UMTZC1216, UMTZC1229, UMTZC1230, UMTZC1239, and UMTZC1259, SVL = 23–45 mm; Females: UMTZC1003, UMTZC1058, UMTZC1087, UMTZC1122, UMTZC1151, and UMTZC1324, SVL = 49–58 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description of Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 23–45 mm, n = 17 males; 49–58 mm, n = 7 females); vomerine teeth in two oblique series between choanae; head moderate; pointed snout; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold distinct; first finger longer than second; fingers lacking fringes of skin; finger tips blunt; pointed toe tips; inner and outer metatarsal tubercle with oval-shaped; male specimens with nuptial pads on dorsal portion of first finger; dorsum skin with longitudinal skin folds.

Figure 4. 

A Fejervarya limnocharis B Limnonectes blythii C L. hascheanus D L. deinodon E L. malesianus F L. plicatellus G L. utara H Occidozyga sumatrana I O. martensii.

Remarks

This species was ubiquitous in cleared and disturbed areas of SLF and is considered as commensal species of frog in this area. Most of the collected specimens were found on the grassy fields and in puddles. Active calling can be heard after the rains.

Limnonectes blythii (Boulenger, 1920)

Fig. 4B Blyth’s Giant Frog

Examined specimens

Seven specimens were collected from SRF consisted of juveniles (UMTZC1390 and UMTZC1599, SVL = 31–38 mm), males (UMTZC1004 and UMTZC1394, SVL = 84 to 87 mm), and females (UMTZC1393, UMTZC1459, and UMTZC1491, SVL = 48–68 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 31–38 mm, n = 2 juveniles; 84–87 mm, n = 2 males; 48–68 mm, n = 3 females); stout body; head long and narrow; pointed snout projecting beyond lower jaw; supratympanic fold distinct; supratympanic fold distinct; toes fully webbed; upper eyelids with low and rounded tubercles; dorsum smooth and sometimes scattered with low tubercles; dorsum pattern variable from dark W-shaped marking on back (UMTZC1390, UMTZC1393, UMTZC1459, UMTZC1491, and UMTZC1599) to a broad vertebral stripe from snout to vent (UMTZC1394), or plain dorsum (UMTZC1004).

Remarks

All specimens were collected from the recreational zones of SLF and the small streams of the Peres and Bubu Rivers. This species is usually found on the ground at stream banks.

Limnonectes hascheanus (Stoliczka, 1870)

Fig. 4C Hill Forest Frog

Examined specimens

Two male specimens were collected from SAP (UMTZC1516, SVL = 29 mm) and SRF (UMTZC1529, SVL = 19 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Hong et al. (2021). Size (SVL: 19–29 mm, n = 2 males); vomerine teeth in two oblique oval groups; head moderate; dark crossbar between eyes; rounded snout; tympanum distinct; distinct supratympanic fold from eye to shoulder; inner metatarsal tubercles large; outer metatarsal tubercles absent; digit tips lacking of circum marginal grooves; toes webbed but not reaching discs of second and third toes; dorsum skin smooth with small and low tubercles; dorsolateral fold absent; dorsum colour pale brown with small dark spots and W-shaped marking.

Remarks

UMTZC1516 was collected from hilly terrain at SAP and they are usually seen quietly perched amongst piles of dead leaves. UMTZC1529 was found at the Herbal Park within SRF on similar substrate as the preceding specimen.

Limnonectes deinodon Dehling, 2014

Fig. 4D Flat-headed Corrugated Frog

Examined specimens

Seventeen specimens were collected from SRF consisted of juveniles (UMTZC1386, UMTZC1388, UMTZC1548, and UMTZC1549, SVL = 20–30 mm), males (UMTZC1392, UMTZC1395, UMTZC1458, UMTZC1547, and UMTZC1557, SVL = 43–55 mm) and females (UMTZC1125, UMTZC1370, UMTZC1371, UMTZC1374, UMTZC1387, UMTZC1389, UMTZC1470, and UMTZC1471, SVL = 31 to 53 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Dehling (2014). Size (SVL: 20–30 mm, n = 4 juveniles; 43–55 mm, n = 5 males; 31–53 mm, n = 8 females); vomerine teeth in two oblique series behind choanae; head wide and moderately depressed; lower jaw with a pair of prominent odontoids; rounded snout; tympanum hidden; supratympanic fold distinct; digit tips rounded and slightly swollen; first finger shorter than second; fingers with narrow dermal fringes; toes webbing reduced which does not reach toe disc and extend beyond penultimate subarticular tubercle on fourth toe; elongate inner metatarsal tubercle and small outer metatarsal tubercle; dorsum and limbs with longitudinal and corrugated warts; dorsum colour variable from pale brown to bright orange; plain or pale marking on back. This species was previously identified as L. laticeps and L. khasianus (Ohler and Deuti 2013; Sumarli et al. 2015).

Remarks

The species was ubiquitous at stream areas of SRF and can be found at various microhabitats such as in rocky crevices, dead leaves, rotten logs, or intermittent pools near the streams.

Limnonectes malesianus (Kiew, 1984)

Fig. 4E Malayan River Frog

Examined specimens

Two male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1123 and UMTZC1628, SVL= 74–81 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Grismer (2012). Size (SVL: 74–81 mm, n = 2 males); broad head; rounded snout projecting beyond lower jaw; lower jaws of males with two fang-like projections; upper eyelids with prominent and spiny tubercles; tympanum distinct; supratympanic distinct; dorsum smooth with W-shaped marking, small tubercles, and longitudinal folds. UMTZC1628 had fine and whitish vertebral line from snout to vent and along the upper side of thigh, while UMTZC1123 had no vertebral line on the back.

Remarks

All specimens were collected from a small stream of the Peres River at SRF. Additional individuals of this species can be found on forest floors and stream banks of the small streams and recreational zones in SRF.

Limnonectes plicatellus (Stoliczka, 1873)

Fig. 4F Rhinoceros Frog

Examined specimens

Two adult specimens were collected from SRF for male (UMTZC1460, SVL = 35 mm) and female (UMTZC1512, SVL = 35 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 35 mm for male and female); large head; blunted snout; vomerine teeth in two oblique series between choanae; lower jaw with two fang-like projections; head with knob-like bony projection between eyes in males; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold distinct; finger tips dilated into small disc; first finger slightly longer than second; toes 2/3 to 3/4 webbed; subarticular tubercles well developed; inner metatarsal tubercle elongate; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; dorsum skin with longitudinal folds; dorsum colour bronze to reddish brown.

Remarks

UMTZC1460 was collected from a small stream of Peres River, and UMTZC1512 from the recreational zone within SRF. Both were found on the forest litter.

Limnonectes utara Matsui, Belabut & Ahmad, 2014

Fig. 4G Warty River Frog

Examined specimen

One male specimen was collected from SLF (UMTZC1964, SVL = 49 mm).

Identification

Morphological character of the specimen agreed well with the description by Matsui et al. (2014). Size (SVL: 49 mm, n = 1 male); obtusely pointed snout; head longer than broad; tympanum almost visible; supratympanic fold distinct; finger tips bluntly rounded; first finger slightly longer than second; nuptial pad present on first finger and second finger of males; toes webbed at base; subarticular tubercles oval-shaped; inner metatarsal tubercle large; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; dorsum smooth; less densely arranged circum-cloacal warts; tibia surface densely covered by warts; dark blotches absent on rear thigh.

Remarks

Information of L. utara from SLF is limited to a specimen and photograph of a dead specimen, as it was contributed through recent undergraduate sampling. This species was previously reported as Limnonectes cf. kuhlii in SRF.

Occidozyga sumatrana (Peters, 1877)

Fig. 4H Yellow Bellied Puddle Frog

Examined specimens

Seven adult male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1507, UMTZC1561, UMTZC1562, UMTZC1610, UMTZC1629, UMTZC1631, and UMTZC1734SVL, SVL = 22–35 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Davis et al. (2018) and Hong et al. (2021). Size (SVL: 22–35 mm, n = 7 males); depressed head; rounded snout; tympanum present but not visible through skin; weak supratympanic fold; tips of digits blunt and dilated to small disc; elliptical and compressed inner metatarsal tubercle, outer metatarsal tubercle absent; toes webbed and reaching discs of all toes; dorsum patterns variable from having a broad and pale vertebral stripe between eyes and shoulder (UMTZC1629) to indistinct dark marking (UMTZC1507, UMTZC1561, UMTZC1610, UMTZC1631, and UMTZC1734), dense and dark blotching, or whitish marking on snout and interorbital region (UMTZC1562).

Remarks

All specimens were found in temporary stagnant water bodies near the Peres River at SRF, such as puddles or intermittent pools that developed after heavy rains on the forest floor and near stream areas. The species is typically observed with its body partially submerged in water with eyes exposed.

Occidozyga martensii (Peters, 1867)

Fig. 4I Marten’s Puddle Frog

Examined specimens

No specimen was collected for this species, but it was recorded by field observation and photographs of two individuals at an artificial pond at Herbal Park in SRF (UMTZCP040519–122).

Identification

All observed individuals had stocky body; flattened heads; tympanum covered by skin; supratympanic fold distinct; first finger longer than second; inner and outer metacarpal tubercles distinct; toes completely webbed; dorsum paler brown with numerous dark blotches and indistinct blackish dorsolateral stripe; venter smooth and yellowish white. Morphological features of these individuals closely resemble Occidozyga martensii based on photographic material illustrated in Chan et al. (2010) from Pulau Pangkor, Shahriza and Ibrahim (2014) from Ulu Paip Recreational Forest, and in Hong et al. (2021) from Batu Hampar Recreational Forest.

Remarks

Both individuals were observed perched on a leaf overhanging the pond, and they quickly escaped into the water when approached.

Family Microhylidae

Kalophrynus kiewi Matsui, Eto, Belabut & Nishikawa, 2017

Fig. 5A Kiew’s Sticky Frog

Examined specimens

Three specimens were collected from SRF consisted of males (UMTZC1484 and UMTZC1563, SVL 29–36 mm) and female (UMTZC1614, SVL = 43 mm).

Identification

All specimens were previously identified as Kalophrynus cf. pleurostigma and were re-examined following the description of populations from Peninsular Malaysia by Matsui et al. (2017) as K. kiewi. Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description of K. kiewi in having size (SVL: 29–36 mm, n = 2 males; 43 mm, n = 1 female); pointed snout which directed downwards; tympanum distinct; first and fourth fingers shorter than second; finger tips rounded and not dilated; fingers with distinct subarticular tubercles (two on third finger and three on other fingers); toes moderately webbed; toes with distinct subarticular tubercles (one on first, second and fifth toes, two on third toe, and three on fourth toe); dorsum skin glandular and spineless; distinct dorsum gland around arm insertion; dorsum pattern with irregular markings extending between eyes and supra-scapular area.

Figure 5. 

A Kalophrynus kiewi B K. palmatissimus C Kaloula latidisca D K. pulchra E Microhyla berdmorei F M. butleri G M. cf. heymonsi H M. superciliaris I Micryletta dissimulans.

Remarks

All specimens were collected from the trekking trails and artificial pond within the Herbal Park at SRF. No calling was heard, but K. kiewi was frequently found on the forest litter and generally towards the monsoon season. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Kalophrynus palmatissimus Kiew, 1984

Fig. 5B Web-footed Sticky Frog

Examined specimens

Two male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1486 and UMTZC1632 = 35–38 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Zug (2015). Size (SVL: 35 38 mm, n = 2 males); head slightly broader than long; snout moderately broad; tympanum distinct; finger tips rounded and not dilated; fingers with distinct subarticular tubercles; no subarticular tubercles on fifth toe; toes strongly webbed; inner metatarsal tubercle oval-shaped; small and indistinct outer metatarsal tubercle; dorsum pale brown to reddish brown; dorsum patterns with darker hour-glass shaped marking on back.

Remarks

Specimens of this species were collected from the open areas of the camping site, and trekking trail of the Herbal Park at SRF, among leaf litter and rotten logs. Brief calling was heard from a specimen found at the camping site in mid-November. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Kaloula latidisca Chan, Grismer & Brown, 2014

Fig. 5C Wide-Disked Bull Frog

Examined specimens

Five specimens (formerly identified as K. baleata) were collected from SRF consisted of juvenile (UMTZC1011, SVL = 20 mm) and adult males (UMTZC1310, UMTZC1316, UMTZC1464, and UMTZC1482, SVL = 35–64 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description of northern populations from Peninsular Malaysia by Chan et al. (2014b). Size (SVL: 20 mm, n = 1 juvenile; 35–64 mm, n = 4 males); head wider than long; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum hidden; supratympanic fold present; limbs long and robust; digit tips expended into distinct discs lacking of circum-marginal grooves; toes webbed at base; subarticular tubercles distinct; inner metatarsal tubercle large and oval-shaped; outer metatarsal tubercle small and rounded; arm and limb insertion with yellowish patches (pale patches in preserved specimens); dorsum with black speckled marking.

Remarks

Kaloula latidisca was frequently spotted on tree trunks around the open and recreational areas, and occasionally at the small streams of the Peres River at SRF. No calling was heard, but K. latidisca was typically found in mid-November and possibly until the end of the monsoon season. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Kaloula pulchra Gray, 1831

Fig. 5D Painted Bull Frog

Examined specimens

Four specimens were collected from SRF (Juvenile: UMTZC1414, SVL = 15 mm; Males: UMTZC1082 and UMTZC1415, SVL = 57–62 mm) and SAP (Male: UMTZC1056 = 45 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Davis et al. (2018). Size (SVL: 15 mm, n = juvenile; 45–62 mm, n = 3 males); stocky body; snout rounded; tympanum distinct; finger tips with expended discs; toes webbed at base; dorsum skin smooth; dorsum colouration medium to dark brown with broad orange, black-edged, or pale stripes which extend from head along each side of body.

Remarks

Kaloula pulchra was ubiquitous in open and recreational areas in SLF, with a tendency to be encountered hiding in irrigation ditches, drains, and toilets. The calls of adult males were heard during and after the heavy rains.

Microhyla berdmorei (Blyth, 1856)

Fig. 5E Berdmore’s Narrow-mouthed Frog

Examined specimens

Three male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1457, SVL = 12 mm) and SAP (UMTZC1062 and UMTZC1063, SVL 13–14 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975), Sumarli et al. (2015) and Garg et al. (2019). Size (SVL: 12–14 mm, n =3 males); head as long as broad; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum hidden by skin; finger tips swollen into small discs; toes almost completely webbed; dorsum with a pale stripe from eyes to shoulder; dorsum pattern with broad black marking; anal region with black spots.

Remarks

UMTZC1457 was collected from the recreational zone within SRF in leaf litter, UMTZC1062 and UMTZC1063 were found at the roadside within SAP, also in leaf litter. Additional individuals were observed inside the artificial ponds at the Herbal Park within SRF during the mid-monsoon season.

Microhyla butleri Boulenger, 1900

Fig. 5F Butler’s Narrow-mouthed Frog

Examined specimens

Eight male specimens were collected from SAP (UMTZC1064, UMTZC1217, UMTZC1218, UMTZC1219, UMTZC1220, UMTZC1221, UMTZC1222, and UMTZC1223, SVL = 21–25 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Garg et al. (2019). Size (SVL: 21–25 mm, n = 8 males); rounded snout; tympanum hidden; upper eyelids without dermal tuberculation; tips of digits dilated into small discs bearing circum-marginal grooves; toes webbed at base; subarticular tubercles small; metatarsal tubercles present; head with whitish streak from the eyes to shoulder; dorsum with wavy markings extending from the eyes to posterior region, forming cross bars on hind limbs with pale edges.

Remarks

Microhyla butleri was usually found beneath piles of leaf litter and occurs throughout SLF. Despite the fact that all collected specimens were from SAP, many individuals of this species were observed on leaf litter, mostly along roadsides and trekking trails within SRF.

Microhyla cf. heymonsi Vogt, 1911

Fig. 5G Heymon’s Narrow-mouthed Frog

Examined specimens

Nine specimens were collected from SRF (Males: UMTZC1028, UMTZC1067, UMTZC1224, and UMTZC1226, SVL = 17–24 mm; Females: UMTZC1008 and UMTZC1066, SVL = 25–27 mm) and SAP (Males: UMTZC1320 and UMTZC1489, SVL = 17–20 mm; Female: UMTZC1343, SVL = 29 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975), Garg et al. (2019) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 17–24 mm, n = 6 males; 25–29 mm, n = 3 females); rounded snouts, projecting beyond lower jaw; tympanum barely visible; supratympanic fold distinct; tips of digits dilated to form large disc bearing circum-marginal grooves; toes basally webbed; dorsum with pale coloured vertebral stripe, with black marks on each side, and dark stripe on lateral sides from tip of snout until groin; ventral surface of foot is dark brown.

Remarks

Microhyla cf. heymonsi was commonly found beneath piles of leaf litter and in rock crevices throughout SLF. This species was also found to occur in similar man-made ponds as with other species of Microhyla. Active and loud calling could be heard from this species after rains. The species is considered a commensal species that is tolerant of habitat alteration (Badli-Sham et al. 2019).

Microhyla superciliaris Parker, 1928

Fig. 5H Batu Cave’s Narrowed-mouthed Frog

Examined specimens

One specimen was collected from SRF (UMTZC1761, SVL = 18 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimen agreed well with the description by Berry (1975), Sumarli et al. (2015), and Manthey et al. (2016). Size (SVL = 18 mm, n = 1 male); rounded snout; upper eyelid with dermal tubercles; tympanum hidden; first finger much shorter than second; finger tips lacking discs; toe tips dilated into well-developed discs and bearing circum-marginal grooves; toes fully webbed and reaching to discs of all except fourth toe; subarticular tubercles obscured; distinct metatarsal tubercles; dorsum skin smooth with few tubercles.

Remarks

Microhyla superciliaris can be easily mistaken for M. butleri that occurs syntopically in the leaf litter at SLF. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Micryletta dissimulans Suwannapoom, Nguyen, Pawangkhanant, Gorin, Chomdej, Che & Poyarkov, 2020

Fig. 5I Camouflaged Paddy Frog

Examined specimens

Five specimens were collected from SRF consisted of males (UMTZC1519, UMTZC1521 and UMTZC1573, SVL = 18–23 mm) and females (UMTZC1520 and UMTZC1523, SVL = 23–26 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens closely resembled the newly described Micryletta dissimulans from Saba Yoi District, Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand (Suwannapoom et al. 2020). Size (SVL: 18–23 mm, n = 3 males; 23–26 mm, n = 2 females); head longer than wide; snout round; interorbital distance two times wider than upper eyelid width; upper lips lacking white patches; tympanum small and barely visible; finger tips rounded; toe tips rounded and weakly dilated into small discs; fingers and toes without webbings; dorsum colour pale to reddish brown; dorsal pattern with merging brown blotches with beige edge; body flanks brown with black spots and whitish mottling.

Remarks

Micryletta dissimulans was commonly found at open areas with grass or places with piles of dead leaves. This species is typically found in early November of each year until the end of the monsoon season. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Phrynella pulchra Boulenger, 1887

Fig. 6 Malacca’s Narrow-mouthed Frog

Examined specimens

The only female specimen ever collected (UMTZC1302, SVL = 38 mm) which deposited as voucher without much associated information of habitat or site, but with a date of 2014 from SLF.

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 38 mm, n = 1 female); small head; snout truncate; tympanum hidden; finger tips depressed and expended into large sub-triangular discs; fingers with distinct subarticular tubercles; toes completely webbed; inner metatarsal tubercles oval-shaped; anal region with large dark spots on that are distinctly separated by white colouration.

Figure 6. 

A dorsal view and B ventral view of Phrynella pulchra preserved specimen.

Remarks

The available information of this species is limited to a description and photograph of a preserved specimen; however, it is presumed to be found within SRF.

Families Megophryidae

Leptobrachium hendricksoni Taylor, 1962

Fig. 7A, B Spotted Litter Frog

Examined specimens

Fourteen specimens were collected from SRF (Juvenile: UMTZC1406, SVL = 28 mm; Males: UMTZC1051, UMTZC1052, UMTZC1091, UMTZC1159, and UMTZC1256, SVL = 40–54 mm; Females: UMTZC1127, UMTZC1160, UMTZC1161, UMTZC1166, and UMTZC1192, SVL = 60–70 mm) and SAP (Juvenile: UMTZC1468, SVL = 35 mm; Males: UMTZC1455 and UMTZC1603, SVL = 40–48 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 28–35 mm, n = 2 juveniles; 40–54 mm, n = 7 males; 60–70 mm, n = 5 females); broad head; vomerine teeth absent; tongue notched posteriorly; snout rounded; tympanum distinct; distinct supratympanic fold from eyes to shoulder; tips of digits rounded; first and second finger almost equal in length; two distinct and large metacarpal tubercles; toes ½ webbed; inner metatarsal tubercle oval shaped, outer metatarsal tubercle absent; tibiotarsal joint reaches to shoulder or tympanum; dorsum and venter smooth; dorsum colour dark brown to greyish; venter whitish with black speckling in adults (Fig. 7B). Juvenile specimens (UMTZC1406 and UMTZC1468) had blackish bodies; stumpy tails; and whitish venters with black dots (Fig. 7A).

Figure 7. 

A juvenile Leptobrachium hendricksoni B adult L. hendricksoni C Leptobrachella sola D Pelobatrachus nasutus.

Remarks

Leptobrachium hendricksoni was common along small streams, cleared areas and man-made ponds in SLF. This species is usually found hiding among grass, on the ground or leaf litter. The tadpoles of L. hendricksoni can be found in the small streams, throughout the year.

Leptobrachella sola (Matsui, 2006)

Fig. 7C Spotted Litter Frog

Examined specimens

Eight male specimens were collected from SLF (UMTZC1378, UMTZC1379, UMTZC1408, UMTZC1409, UMTZC1410, UMTZC1411, UMTZC1473, and UMTZC1521, SVL = 20 to 27 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description of L. sola by Matsui (2006). Size (SVL: 20–27 mm, n = males); head longer than broad; vomerine teeth absent; snout rounded; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold distinct; finger tips slightly swollen; indistinct subarticular tubercles on fingers; fingers unwebbed with first and fourth almost equal or longer than second; toes basally webbed; tibiotarsal articulation reaching nostril; inner metatarsal tubercle low and small; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; nuptial pads absent; dorsum with indistinct brown markings and blackish blotches on flanks.

Remarks

Leptobrachella sola is commonly found near the stream banks, and is usually sighted sitting on low vegetation, bare ground, or piles of dead leaves. This species can be hard to spot during the night as they usually hide amongst the leaf litter and quickly hides beneath the litter when approached.

Pelobatrachus nasutus (Schlegel, 1858)

Fig. 7D Malayan Horned Frog

Examined specimens

Three specimens were collected from SLF (Juveniles: UMTZC1103 and UMTZC1187, SVL = 36–38 mm; Male: UMTZC1494, SVL = 94 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 36–38 mm, n = 2 juveniles; 94 mm, n = 1 male); large heads; tongue completely or partly notched posteriorly; vomerine teeth present; snout truncate and projecting beyond the lower jaw; upper eyelids and snout form pointed dermal projection; tympanum distinct; distinct supratympanic fold from eyes to shoulders; subarticular tubercles indistinct; metacarpal tubercles distinct; dorsum smooth with few tubercles; two pairs of longitudinal skin fold on back reaching until the vent; venter smooth with small tubercles.

Remarks

Pelobatrachus nasutus were found on the forest floor at various locations: UMTZC1494, UMTZC1103 and UMTZC1187 were collected from the small stream of Peres Rivers where it was sighted on the forest floor. Afterwards, two individuals were observed on the forest floor beside the recreational trail at SRF, and three individuals were observed amongst the dead leaves at the banks of the small stream of the Peres River. Loud callings can be heard typically near the monsoon season.

Families Ranidae

Amolops gerutu Chan, Abraham, Grismer & Grismer, 2018

Fig. 8A Warty Torrent Frog

Examined specimens

Thirteen specimens were collected from the SLF consisted of adult males (UMTZC1030, UMTZC1032, UMTZC1036, UMTZC1041, UMTZC1043, UMTZC1045, UMTZC1046, UMTZC1106, UMTZC1137, UMTZC1378, and UMTZC1505, SVL = 30–38 mm) and females (UMTZC1297 and UMTZC1377, SVL = 48–53 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Chan et al. (2018). Size (SVL: 30–38 mm, n = 11 males; 48–53 mm, n = 2 females); dorsum densely covered with irregular sized tubercles; dorsolateral region with slightly enlarged, elongated and ridge-like tubercles; dorsal surfaces of hind limb covered with denser and more pronounce tubercles; indistinct pectoral gland with pale yellowish patches.

Figure 8. 

A Amolops gerutu B Chalcorana labialis (pale yellow colouration) C C. labialis (brown colouration) D Humerana miopus E Hylarana erythraea F Indosylvirana nicobariensis G Odorrana hosii H Pulchrana glandulosa I P. laterimaculata J P. sundabarat (orange dorsolateral stripe) K P. sundabarat (yellow dorsolateral stripe) and L Sylvirana malayana.

Remarks

This species can only be found along the torrential zones of the Peres and Bubu Rivers in SLF. The species can be observed perched on the surfaces of boulder stacks along the streams, and occasionally on adjacent low vegetation. Tadpoles of A. gerutu can found clinging to boulders below the waterline.

Chalcorana labialis (Boulenger, 1887)

Fig. 8B, C White-lipped Frog

Examined specimens

Twelve specimens were collected from SRF consisted of one juvenile (UMTZC1032, SVL = 20 mm), males (UMTZC1029, UMTZC1090, UMTZC1235, UMTZC1236, UMTZC1237, UMTZC1383, and UMTZC1384, SVL = 29–36 mm) and females (UMTZC1132, UMTZC1297, UMTZC1317, and UMTZC1622, SVL = 49–55 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Hong et al. (2021). Size (SVL: 20 mm, n = 1 juvenile; 29–36 mm, n = 7 males; 49–55 mm, n = 4 females); vomerine teeth in oblique groups between choanae; snout pointed; tympanum distinct; digit tips of dilated into discs with circum-marginal grooves; first finger much shorter than second; nuptial pads present on first finger of males; toes webbed and reaching outer edge of first to third toes, inner edge of fifth toe, and fourth toe with one or two phalanges free of webbing; dorsum skin coarsely granular with weak dorsolateral fold; dorsum colour variable from pale green, brownish or pale yellow.

Remarks

This species can be found at many swampy locations and flowing streams within SLF. Chalcorana labialis was usually observed perched on the surface of low vegetation along the streams and swampy areas, and was occasionally found at artificial ponds. All collected and observed individuals were found lower than 2 metres from the ground.

Humerana miopus (Boulenger, 1918)

Fig. 8D Three-striped Frog

Examined specimens

Four specimens were collected from SRF consisted of juvenile (UMTZC1682, SVL = 23 mm), males (UMTZC1007 and UMTZC1379, SVL = 62–65 mm) and female (UMTZC1472, SVL = 70 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 23 mm, n = 1 juvenile; 62–65 mm, n = 2 males; 70 mm, n = 1 female); vomerine teeth in two oblique series between choanae; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum distinct; finger tips expended into small discs bearing circum-marginal grooves; first finger much longer than second; distinct subarticular tubercles on fingers and toes; toes 2/3 to ¾ webbed with two phalanges of fourth toe free from webbing; inner metatarsal tubercles elliptic; outer metatarsal tubercles indistinct or absent; skin smooth with dorsolateral fold; dorsum with two to three diagonal lines on mid-dorsum region.

Remarks

Humerana miopus was common at the artificial ponds of the Herbal Park in SRF. The species was frequently observed perched on low vegetation beside the artificial ponds, and quickly leapt into the water when disturbed.

Hylarana erythraea (Schlegel, 1837)

Fig. 8E Green Paddy Frog

Examined specimens

Eight specimens were collected from SAP consisted of juvenile (UMTZC1264, SVL = 25 mm), males (UMTZC1182, UMTZC1183, UMTZC1184, and UMTZC1186, SVL = 30–40 mm) and females (UMTZC1050, UMTZC1055, and UMTZC1165, SVL = 42–73 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Davis et al. (2018). Size (SVL: 25 mm, n = 1 juvenile; 30–40 mm, n = 4 males; 42–73 mm, n = 3 females); vomerine teeth in two oblique group between choanae; head slightly longer than broad; snout pointed; tympanum distinct; weak supratympanic fold; digit tips of expanded into disc bearing circum-marginal grooves; first finger longer than second; toes webbed reaching base of disc in first to third toes, inner edge of fifth, and fourth toes with two phalanges free; inner metatarsal tubercles oval shaped; outer metatarsal tubercles rounded; dorsum smooth with distinct dorsolateral fold; dorsum colour brown with a pale-coloured dorsolateral stripe and brown flanks; ventral surface white.

Remarks

Hylarana erythraea was common in the swampy areas in SAP. The species was also observed by drains, artificial ponds, and sometimes on grassy areas.

Indosylvirana nicobariensis (Stoliczka, 1870)

Fig. 8F Nicobar Island Frog

Examined specimens

Three specimens were collected from SRF consisted of one male (UMTZC1571, SVL = 50 mm) and two females (UMTZC1563 and UMTZC1676, SVL = 42–43 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Shahriza and Ibrahim (2014). Size (SVL: 50 mm, n =1 male; 42–43 mm, n = 2 females); vomerine teeth in two oblique series between choanae; head longer than wide; snout pointed; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold absent; first finger longer (UMTZC1571) or equal (UMTZC1563) with second; digit tips expended into small discs bearing circum-marginal grooves; nuptial pad present on first fingers in males; dorsum skin granular; narrowed dorsolateral folds; gravid female with eggs on translucent side of belly.

Remarks

This species was common at the Herbal Park in SRF. The species can be observed perching on rock surfaces at artificial ponds and is abundant at the start of monsoon season. Indosylvirana nicobariensis is a pond-breeding frog and can inhabit both natural and altered habitats (Lalremsanga et al. 2016).

Odorrana hosii (Boulenger, 1891)

Fig. 8G Poisonous Rock Frog

Examined specimens

Twenty adult specimens were collected from SRF (Males: UMTZC1164, UMTZC1170, UMTZC1171, UMTZC1172, UMTZC1173, UMTZC1174, UMTZC1233, UMTZC1299, and UMTZC1304, SVL = 32–66 mm; Females: UMTZC1009, UMTZC1044, and UMTZC1063, SVL = 54–96 mm) and SAP (Males: UMTZC1348, UMTZC1351, UMTZC1385, and UMTZC1504, SVL = 32–50 mm; Females: UMTZC1306, UMTZC1323, UMTZC1380, and UMTZC1481, SVL = 48–98 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Hong et al. (2021). Size (SVL: 32–66 mm, n = 13 males; 48–98 mm, n = 7 females); vomerine teeth in two oblique series behind choanae; head as long as broad with pointed snout; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold; tips of digits expanded into large discs with circum-marginal grooves; first finger equal or shorter than second, and all marked with narrow fringes of skin; nuptial pads on first fingers of males; broad webbing reaching tips of all toes; dorsum skin smooth with weak dorsolateral fold.

Remarks

Odorrana hosii was ubiquitous at the rocky sections of streams with many boulders. All individuals were collected at night but specimens could be observed in the day hiding in the roots of large trees at the stream bank.

Pulchrana glandulosa (Boulenger, 1882)

Fig. 8H Poisonous Gland Frog

Examined specimens

Four male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1301, UMTZC1350, UMTZC1576, and UMTZC1608, SVL = 43–74 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 43–74 mm, n = 4 males); vomerine teeth in two oblique series between choanae; head large, rounded snout; tympanum distinct; weak supratympanic fold; digit tips dilated into small discs bearing circum-marginal grooves; first finger much longer than second; skin fringes absent on fingers; toes webbing not well-developed; inner metatarsal tubercles oval-shaped; outer metatarsal tubercles small and rounded; dorsum without dorsolateral fold; dorsum surfaces covered with low and rounded glandular warts; dorsum colour greyish to dark brown with indistinct dark blotches; limbs with dark cross bars.

Remarks

Pulchrana glandulosa was found in the small streams and recreational areas of SLF. The species was commonly observed hidden amongst piles of dead leaves and rotten logs.

Pulchrana laterimaculata (Barbour & Noble, 1916)

Fig. 8I Side-spotted Swamp Frog

Examine specimens

One specimen of adult female specimen was collected from SLF (UMTZC1699, SVL = 50 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimen agreed well with the description by Sumarli et al. (2015) and Leong et al. (2003). Size (SVL: 50 mm, n = 1 female); vomerine teeth in two oblique rows bounded by choanae; head moderate; relatively rounded snout; tympanum distinct and entirely black; upper lips with uninterrupted white line; finger and toe tips expended into discs; toes well-developed webbing but not reaching medial subarticular tubercles; dorsum and flanks with raised rounded tubercles, forming discontinuous longitudinal ridges; distinct humeral glands in male; dorsum pale brown.

Remarks

Pulchrana laterimaculata can be found in areas similar to P. glandulosa in SLF. The species was commonly observed hidden among piles of dead leaves and rotten logs.

Pulchrana sundabarat Chan, Abraham, Grismer & Brown, 2020

Fig. 8J, K Western Sunda Spotted Stream Frog

Examine specimens

Four specimens were collected from SRF consisted of three males (UMTZC1376, UMTZC1377, and UMTZC1387, SVL = 40 mm) and one female (UMTZC1375, SVL = 57 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Chan et al. (2020c). Size (SVL: 40 mm, n = 3 males; 57 mm, n = 1 female); head longer than wide; snout pointed; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold absent; digit tips slightly expended into small disc with circum-marginal groove; nuptial pads distinctly separated on first finger in UMTZC1376 and UMTZC1377, and slightly joined in UMTZC1387; toes slightly more than ½ webbed; dorsum smooth and indistinctly glandular; dorsum colour black; dorsum patterns with conspicuous and defined yellowish to bright orange dorsolateral stripe, dorsum and flanks with yellowish blotches; humeral gland raised and blackly pigmented in males; throat and abdomen with white spots.

Remarks

Chan et al. (2020b, c) revised this complex and suggested that the Pulchrana picturata from the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra belong to this new species, P. sundabarat that is genetically distinct from the true Bornean P. picturata. The specimens were all found at the pristine areas in SRF. This species usually hide beneath the roots of large trees on stream banks. The distinct calls of males could be easily heard in those areas.

Sylvirana malayana Sheridan & Stuart, 2018

Fig. 8L Malayan Black-striped Frog

Examined specimens

Seven specimens were collected from SRF (Males: UMTZC1013, UMTZC1014, UMTZC1107, and UMTZC1382, SVL = 43–47 mm; Females: UMTZC1093 and UMTZC1381, SVL = 51–58 mm) and SAP (Males: UMTZC1308, SVL = 45 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Sheridan and Stuart (2018). Size (SVL: 43–47 mm, n = 5 males; 51–58 mm, n = 2 females); head longer than wide; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum distinct; triangular or teardrop shaped fold slightly behind the tympanum; supratympanic fold absent; digit tips of expended into discs with circum-marginal grooves; first finger much longer than second; toes with well-developed webbing; distinct subarticular tubercles; elongated inner metatarsal tubercle; rounded outer metatarsal tubercle; dorsum finely granular; dorsum brown with broad dark band extending from snout to groin.

Remarks

Sylvirana malayana can be found in the disturbed areas of SLF. This species was commonly observed hiding between rock crevices within the Herbal Park.

Families Rhacophoridae

Kurixalus chaseni (Smith, 1924)

Fig. 9A Malay Frilled Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Ten adult specimens were collected from SRF (Males: UMTZC1095, UMTZC1345, UMTZC1360, UMTZC1361, UMTZC1463, UMTZC1465, UMTZC1574, and UMTZC1627, SVL = 30–41 mm; Female: UMTZC1359, SVL = 44 mm) and SAP (Male: UMTZC1502, SVL = 22 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 22–41 mm, n = 9 males; 44 mm, n = 1 female); vomerine teeth at the anterior edges of choanae; head longer than wide; rounded snout with conical projection on tip; tympanum distinct; digit tips dilated into small discs bearing circum-marginal grooves; fingers webbed at base; toes broadly webbed; fourth fingers, tarsus, heel and vent with crenulated dermal fringes; dorsum smooth and slightly granular; dorsum colour pale brown to mossy green.

Figure 9. 

A Kurixalus chaseni B Nyctixalus pictus C Polypedates colletti D P. discantus E P. leucomystax F P. macrotis G adult Rhacophorus nigropalmatus H subadult R. nigropalmatus I R. pardalis.

Remarks

Kurixalus chaseni can be found perched on low vegetation within artificial ponds of the Herbal Park. Active calls of males can be heard from this place during the monsoon season in SLF.

Nyctixalus pictus (Peters, 1871)

Fig. 9B Cinnamon Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Three adult male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1425 and UMTZC1426, SVL = 29–30 mm) and SAP (UMTZC1601, SVL = 35 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 29–35 mm, n = 3 males); no vomerine teeth; head longer than broad; snout obtusely pointed; vertical loreal region; tympanum distinct; digit tips expanded into round or oval-shaped discs; inner metatarsal tubercle oval-shaped, outer metatarsal tubercle absent; dorsum bright orange with whitish spots scattered over the body; limbs with rows of whitish spots forming cross-bars; abdomen with greenish black reticulation.

Remarks

UMTZC1601 was found on low vegetation, less than 1 m from the ground near the suspension bridge at SAP, and UMTZC1426 and UMTZC1425 were found at bushy areas within a small stream off the Peres River in SRF. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Polypedates colletti (Boulenger, 1890)

Fig. 9C Collett’s Tree Frog

Examined specimen

One adult male specimen was collected from SAP (UMTZC1871, SVL = 67 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimen agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Rujirawan et al. (2013). Size (SVL: 67 mm, n = 1 male); triangular head; snout acutely pointed; low tubercles around eyes; tympanum distinct; skin of head not co-ossified with skull; skin coarsely granular; small white spots on rear thigh; heel with a distinct conical tubercle; dorsum pattern with an hour-glass marking extending from interorbital region to back, flanks with black vermiculations.

Remarks

This species was found at the waterfall of SAP, perched on low vegetation less than 2 m from the ground.

Polypedates discantus Rujirawan, Stuart & Aowphol, 2013

Fig. 9D Malayan Slender Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Twenty-seven specimens were collected from SLF consisted of males (UMTZC1012, UMTZC1015, UMTZC1016, UMTZC1024, UMTZC1081, UMTZC1094, UMTZC1096, UMTZC1113, UMTZC1115, UMTZC1185, UMTZC1240, UMTZC1273, UMTZC1421, UMTZC1509, UMTZC1510, UMTZC1589, and UMTZC1592, SVL = 40–53 mm) and females (UMTZC1006, UMTZC1027, UMTZC1157, UMTZC1179, UMTZC1241, UMTZC1423, UMTZC1424, UMTZC1496, UMTZC1590, and UMTZC1591, SVL = 60–71 mm).

Identification

Based on description by Rujirawan et al. (2013), 29 specimens were identified as P. discantus for having size (SVL: 40–53 mm, n = 17 males; 60–71 mm, n = 10 females); triangular head; snout obtusely pointed; skin of head not co-ossified with skull; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold distinct; digit tips with well-developed disc bearing circum-marginal groove; fingers webbed at base; toes fully webbed; inner metatarsal tubercle oval-shaped; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; nuptial pad present on first and second fingers in males; rear thigh with indistinct or absence of white spots; heel with rounded tubercle; dorsum with variable patterns: plain dorsum with scattered dark blotches, 2 to 4 longitudinal stripes, or X-shaped marking on interorbital region.

Remarks

This species was common in both natural and man-made habitats of SLF. Most of the collected and observed individuals were found clinging to shrubs or leaves of low vegetation less than 2 m from the ground. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Polypedates leucomystax (Gravenhorst, 1829)

Fig. 9E Four-lined Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Twenty-seven specimens were collected from SLF consisted of males (UMTZC1010, UMTZC1114, UMTZC1128, UMTZC1131, UMTZC1180, UMTZC1181, UMTZC1243, UMTZC1244, UMTZC1246, UMTZC1328, UMTZC1329, UMTZC1422, UMTZC1485, UMTZC1624, and UMTZC1417, SVL = 40–52 mm) and females (UMTZC1125, UMTZC1130, UMTZC1154, UMTZC1155, UMTZC1156, UMTZC1178, UMTZC1245, UMTZC1263, UMTZC1272, UMTZC1344, UMTZC1347, and UMTZC1444, SVL = 44–67 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL: 40–52 mm; n = 15 males; 44–67 mm, n = 12 females); vomerine teeth in between choanae; head longer than broad; rounded snout; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold present; digit tips expended into large discs with circum-marginal grooves; fingers without webbing; toes fully webbed; forearm with whitish skin flaps; dorsum skin smooth with colour pale to dark tan; dorsum pattern variable with two to four longitudinal stripes or plain with dark blotches.

Remarks

Polypedates leucomystax can be distinguished from P. discantus by having the skin of the head fused with the skull, distinct white spots or reticulations on a dark background on the rear thigh, and the absence of a tubercle at the heel. This species known as a commensal species and inhabits all manner of human-made and natural habitats in SLF. This species can be observed clinging onto shrubs or the leaves of low vegetation up to 2.5 m off the ground.

Polypedates macrotis (Boulenger, 1891)

Fig. 9F Dark-eared Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Nine specimens were collected from SRF consisted of males (UMTZC1327, UMTZC1346, UMTZC1418, UMTZC1419, and UMTZC1497, SVL = 60–68 mm) and females (UMTZC1030, UMTZC1097, UMTZC1416, and UMTZC1454, SVL= 62 to 102 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015). Size (SVL = 60–68 mm, n = 5 males; 62 to 102 mm, n = 4 females); vomerine teeth in transverse or slightly oblique series between choanae; head broader than long; rounded snout; tympanum distinct and covered with broad dark stripes; supratympanic fold distinct; digit tips expanded into large discs bearing circum-marginal grooves; fingers free of webbing; nuptial pads present on dorsal portion of first and second fingers; toes fully webbed; dorsum with variable markings from two broad longitudinal stripes (UMTZC1327, UMTZC1419, and UMTZC1497), scattered dark blotches (UMTZC1346, UMTZC1416, and UMTZC1418), plain dorsum (UMTZC1030, UMTZC1097, UMTZC1346, and UMTZC1454), and combination of plain and scattered dark blotches (UMTZC1418).

Remarks

Polypedates macrotis is restricted to natural or man-made stagnant water bodies closer to the forested areas. This species can also be observed perched on low vegetation near the ponds in syntopy with other species of Polypedates.

Rhacophorus nigropalmatus Boulenger, 1895

Fig. 9G, H Wallace’s Flying Frog

Examined specimens

Two specimens were collected from SRF consisted of subadult male (UMTZC1732, SVL = 60 mm) and adult male (UMTZC1057, SVL = 95 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 60 mm for subadult male; 95 mm for adult male); vomerine teeth in two straight or transversely curved rows between choanae; head longer than broad; rounded snout; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold absent; digit tips expanded into large and oval-shaped discs and bearing circummarginal grooves; fingers and toes fully webbed; inner metatarsal tubercle oval-shaped; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; dorsum with small clusters of whitish tubercles; broad skin flaps along forearm, rounded on heels, and awning-like flaps on anal region. Head, body, and limbs of subadult male (UMTZC1732) (Fig. 9H) covered with white patches edged in pale brown.

Remarks

UMTZC1057 was collected from a fallen large tree at the Herbal Park within SRF while the second individual UMTZC1732 was found perched on low vegetation at the same location. This species was only encountered during the monsoon season in SLF.

Rhacophorus pardalis Günther, 1858

Fig. 9I Harlequin Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Two male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1111 and UMTZC1110, SVL = 49–53 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975) and Harvey et al. (2002). Size (SVL: 49–53 mm, n = 2 males); vomerine teeth in two or slightly oblique series at inner edges of choanae; head equally longer with width; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold reaching angle of jaws; fingers and toes fully webbed; broad skin flaps along forearm, rounded on heels, and absence on anal region; flanks and abdomen of UMTZC1111 displayed black reticulation, but pale orange in UMTZ1110.

Remarks

Both UMTZC1111 and UMTZC1110 were collected from the large trees beside the artificial pond of the camping site in SRF.

Theloderma licin McLeod & Norhayati, 2007

Fig. 10A Smooth-skinned Warted Tree Frog

Examined specimens

One male specimen was collected from SAP (UMTZC1490, SVL = 28 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimen agreed well with the description by McLeod and Norhayati (2007). Size (SVL: 28 mm, n = 1 male); head equally longer with wide; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum distinct; dorsal and lateral surfaces with fine pearly tipped tubercles; coarsely granular venter; no vomerine teeth; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold reaching angle of jaws; digit tips expended into large disc bearing circum-marginal grooves; fingers webbed at base; toes fully webbed; inner metatarsal tubercle oval-shaped; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; nuptial pad present on second fingers in males; dorsum colour changed from whitish to pale brown when stressed; inguinal area with dark brown blotches.

Figure 10. 

A Theloderma licin and B T. horridum.

Remarks

Theloderma licin was found resting on the ground within piles of dead leaves. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Theloderma horridum (Boulenger, 1903)

Fig. 10B Malayan Warted Treefrog

Examined specimens

No specimen was collected, but photographs of this species from from previous fieldwork in 2014 in SRF (UMTZCP070614-392, Fig. 11B).

Identification

Examined photographs show similar characteristics as described by Berry (1975) and Sumarli et al. (2015) for having stocky body; head wide; distinct tympanum; digit tips expended into distinct disc bearing circum-marginal groove; fingers ½ webbed; toes fully webbed; dorsum rough with warts bearing granular asperities; large lumbar spot; and venter with black-white reticulations.

Remarks

This species was found among the dense vegetation on steep terrain in the forested areas in SRF. Theloderma horridum was spotted clinging to the side of a tree trunk facing upwards.

Zhangixalus prominanus (Smith, 1924)

Fig. 11A Green Tree Frog

Examined specimens

Two male specimens were collected from SRF (UMTZC1469 and UMTZC1299, SVL = 56–57 mm).

Identification

Morphological characters of the specimens agreed well with the description by Berry (1975). Size (SVL: 56–57 mm, n = 2 males); vomerine teeth in two transverse series between choanae; head broader than long; snout obtusely pointed; tympanum distinct; supratympanic fold hidden; tips of digits expanded into large and oval discs with circum-marginal grooves; fingers and toes fully webbed; broad skin flaps along forearm, rounded on heels, and awning-like skin flaps on anal region.

Figure 11. 

A Zhangixalus prominanus and B Z. tunkui.

Remarks

Two specimens of Zhangixalus prominanus were collected from the flooded rock pools within the recreational zones of SRF. Another observed individual was also seen perched on low vegetation or rock surfaces in the same area, only found during the monsoon season. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

Zhangixalus tunkui Kiew, 1987

Fig. 11B Johore Flying Frog

Examine specimens

UMTZCP110414-419.

Identification

One individual of Zhangixalus tunkui was previously recorded in SRF. However, it was only photographed (UMTZCP110414-419, Fig. 11B) and released back to the wild for it was mistaken to be an individual of Z. prominanus, which was only later identified as Z. tunkui by Evan S.H. Quah. Morphology of photographed individual matched description by Kiew (1987) and Leong (2004) based on toe webbing with reddish colouration between fourth and fifth toes (vs. third to fifth toes in Z. prominanus). Photographed individual had body with pale and translucent green colouration; dorsum scattered with whitish spots; smaller SVL, less than 50 mm (M. Taufik Awang, pers. comm.); skin translucent; absence of skin flaps on along forearm; whitish line along the snout, canthus rostralis and around eyes.

Remarks

The individual of this species was found at the flooded rock pools in SRF. This species is a new record for the amphibians in Hulu Terengganu.

From 14 species recorded in the first survey in 2003, the number of species had steadily increased to 18 species in 2008. The surveys continued in 2013 and recorded more species, with a total of 38 species in 2015. This trend of species discoveries kept increasing during the surveys up to the end of 2020. The results shown by the species accumulation curve generated from the list of species recorded between 2003 and 2018 show a constantly increasing trend (Fig. 12). The species accumulation curve has almost reached the asymptote, which indicates that our long-term surveys may have reached the true diversity of amphibians in SLF. The number of unique and duplicate species also kept decreasing over the years. However, even after our exhaustive fieldwork from 2015 to 2020, a few unique species such as Phrynella pulchra, Rhacophorus pardalis, Theloderma horridum, and Zhangixalus tunkui have remained unrecorded after their first discovery in 2013-2014. As for the records of amphibians in Hulu Terengganu District, this study contributes an additional 10 new records for this area, which now totals 70 species so far known (Table 2). The new records are Ichthyophis cf. asplenius, K. palmatissimus, Kaloula latidisca, Micryletta dissimulans, Microhyla superciliaris, Nyctixalus pictus, Polypedates discantus, Zhangixalus prominanus, Z. tunkui and Theloderma licin.

Table 2.

Compilation of updated and revised checklist of amphibian fauna from published materials and this study in Hulu Terengganu, Terengganu. Note: DD = Data Deficient, NE = Not Evaluated, LC = Least Concerned, NT = Near Threatened, EN = Endangered, NP = Not Protected, and P = Protected. Symbol * = represents the additional record of species in Hulu Terengganu, 1 = Sekayu (This study), 2 = Gunung Lawit (Dring 1979; Sumarli et al. 2015), 3 = Tembat (Norhayati et al. 2011; Nur Amalina et al. 2017), and 4 = Gunung Gagau (Hamidi 2013).

No Species IUCN Status WCA 2010 1 2 3 4
Family Ichthyophiidae
1 Ichthyophis cf. asplenius* DD NP +
2 Ichthyophis glutinosus VU NP +
3 Ichthyophis sp. DD NP + +
Family Bufonidae
4 Ansonia latiffi NT NP + + +
5 Ansonia lumut NE NP + +
6 Duttaphrynus bengalensis
(Duttaphrynus sp.1)
LC NP + +
7 Ingerophrynus parvus LC NP + + + +
8 Ingerophrynus quadriporcatus LC NP + +
9 Leptophryne borbonica NE NP + + + +
10 Phrynoidis asper LC NP + + + +
11 Rentapia flavomaculata NE NP + + +
Family Dicroglossidae
12 Fejervarya cancrivora LC NP +
13 Fejervarya limnocharis LC NP + + + +
14 Ingerana tenasserimensis LC NP +
15 Limnonectes blythii NT P + + + +
16 Limnonectes hascheanus LC NP + +
17 Limnonectes utara NE NP + + + +
18 Limnonectes deinodon NE NP + + +
19 Limnonectes malesianus NT P + +
20 Limnonectes tweediei LC P +
21 Limnonectes paramacrodon NT P + +
22 Limnonectes plicatellus LC NP + + +
23 Occidozyga sumatrana LC NP + + +
24 Occidozyga martensii LC NP + +
Family Megophryidae
25 Leptobrachium hendricksoni LC NP + + + +
26 Leptobrachella heteropus LC NP + +
27 Leptobrachella sola EN NP + +
28 Pelobatrachus nasutus LC P + + + +
29 Xenophrys aceras LC P +
Family Microhylidae
30 Chaperina fusca LC NP +
31 Kalophrynus kiewi NE NP + + +
32 Kalophrynus palmatissimus* EN P +
33 Kaloula latidisca* DD NP +
34 Kaloula pulchra LC NP + +
35 Microhyla bedmorei LC NP + + +
36 Microhyla butleri LC NP + + +
37 Microhyla heymonsi LC NP + + +
38 Microhyla superciliaris* LC NP +
39 Microhyla mantheyi LC NP +
40 Micryletta dissimulans* LC NP +
41 Metaphrynella pollicaris LC NP +
42 Phrynella pulchra LC NP + +
Family Ranidae
43 Abavorana luctuosa LC NP +
44 Amolops gerutu NE NP + + + +
45 Chalcorana labialis NE P + + + +
46 Humerana miopus LC NP + +
47 Hylarana erythraea LC P + + +
48 Indosylvirana nicobariensis NE NP + +
49 Odorrana hosii LC P + + + +
50 Pulchrana baramica LC NP +
51 Pulchrana glandulosa LC NP + +
52 Pulchrana laterimaculata LC NP + + +
53 Pulchrana sundabarat LC P + + + +
54 Sylvirana malayana NE NP + + +
Family Rhacophoridae
55 Kurixalus chaseni NE NP + +
56 Nyctixalus pictus* NT P +
57 Philautus vermiculatus LC NP +
58 Polypedates colletti LC P + + +
59 Polypedates discantus* NE NP +
60 Polypedates leucomystax LC NP + + +
61 Polypedates macrotis LC NP + + +
62 Rhacophorus rhodopus LC NP +
63 Rhacophorus nigropalmatus LC P + +
64 Rhacophorus pardalis LC P + +
65 Rhacophorus norhayatiae NE NP +
66 Theloderma leprosum NE NP +
67 Theloderma horridum LC NP + +
68 Theloderma licin* LC NP +
69 Zhangixalus prominanus* LC P +
70 Zhangixalus tunkui* NE NP +
Total numbers of species 52 44 41 18
Figure 12. 

The cumulative species discovery curve of the species (dotted line), species accumulation curve of replicated samples of the amphibians from previous and recent surveys (black line). Red line shows the estimated number of unique, and duplicate species (blue line) of amphibians from long term surveys in Sekayu lowland forest, Hulu Terengganu.

Discussion

This extensive survey on amphibian fauna in SLF highlights the immense biodiversity that can be found on a local scale through long-term inventory study, hence demonstrating the potential of Hulu Terengganu forests as one of the nation’s important biodiversity spots. The approach also affirms the importance of long-term and comprehensive surveys, regardless of substantial time, cost and effort are needed, especially in tropical countries. The long-term surveys in SLF have successfully captured the variation in abundance and composition of amphibians between habitats and the temporal patterns that are apparently impossible in short-term or rapid surveys. In addition, continuous, standardised sampling efforts and multi-habitat surveys could provide the most useful baseline information on the status and trends of amphibian communities in tropical lowland forest for biodiversity monitoring.

Amphibian community particularly in tropical forests are closely related to seasonal factors (Duellman and Trueb 1986; Praderio and Robinson 1990; Pearman et al. 1995), with many of the specialist or cryptic amphibians influenced by changing monsoon patterns (Gibbons and Bennett 1974; Bury and Corn 1987; Crosswhite et al. 1999). This can be indicated by the discovery of several new records during our recent surveys. For instance, seasonal breeding anurans such as Micryletta dissimulans, Kaloula latidisca, and Nyctixalus pictus, (Chan et al. 2014b; Das et al. 2019), and rarer arboreal species like Rhacophorus nigropalmatus and Theloderma licin were only found between October and early January. We can only assume they are influenced by the northeast monsoon (Muhammad et al. 2007; Mandeep 2008; Varikoden et al. 2011). Heavy rainfall would inundate and raise the temporary water bodies over the open forested areas and serve as a cue for breeding season for most of the tropical species (Rastogi et al. 2011).

Expanding the survey areas that have been overlooked before, such as hilly areas of forests and small streams, has been rewarding as additional species were added to the list. Hilly forested areas and small streams in fact serve as the better ground for foraging and breeding areas for many species of anurans (Pineda and Halffter 2004). As reported here, new records of anurans like Leptophryne borbonica and Limnonectes plicatellus were for the first time discovered under thick forest litter near the stream bank of the Peres River small stream, while L. hascheanus and Theloderma licin were encountered for the first time at a long-abandoned hiking trail. We also started to realise that secretive and rarely found species like Pelobatrachus nasutus, Rentapia flavomaculata and Nyctixalus pictus were actually abundant in pristine habitats such as the small stream of Peres River. After the continuous monthly surveys at this habitat, more specimens were obtained.

However, certain species such as Phrynella pulchra, Theloderma horridum, and Zhangixalus tunkui remained undetected since their initial discoveries in 2013–2014, even though continuous surveys have been made since 2015. This might indicate that these secretive species cannot be detected by a simple method such as visual surveys alone and may require alternative techniques that effective on arboreal amphibians. Several studies noted that T. licin and P. pulchra occupied smaller tree holes closer to the ground, generally in the less disturbed areas (McLeod and Norhayati 2007; Chan and Ahmad 2009). Thus, installing tree hole traps in non-recreational areas within SLF might be effective to sample these tree hole dwellers (Berry 1975; Duellman 1978; Yanoviak and Fincke 2005). Although Zhangixalus tunkui shares the same habitat as its congener, which is rock pools along the upper stream areas of SRF, the species remains undetected, possibly because it is only present during the days with the heaviest rainfall in the monsoon season. Unfortunately, conducting fieldwork during such times is impossible due to limited visibility and the risk of fallen trees and wild animals.

The compilation of amphibian records from established inventories in Hulu Terengganu have demonstrated a great diversity of amphibians so far, with a total of 70 species compared to another studied area in Terengganu like Gunung Tebu and adjacent forests in Besut, which have a total of 50 amphibian species (Muin et al. 2014; Sumarli et al. 2015). The records of amphibians in Hulu Terengganu have surpassed the species richness reported from other localities with well-established inventories such as Endau-Rompin National Park (Kiew 1987; Lim 1989; Daicus and Hashim 2004; Norhayati and Shamada 2004; Wood et al. 2008a; Shahriza et al. 2012) and Krau Wildlife Park (Grandison 1972; Jasmi et al. 1999; Norsham et al. 2001; Chan et al. 2008; Zakaria et al. 2014). However, more areas in Hulu Terengganu remain unexplored, especially in Belukar Bukit and a large portion of Lake Kenyir catchment which surely holds vast unreported species diversity.

To date, there are 17 protected species of amphibians under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716). Five species of ‘Near Threatened’, two species of ‘Endangered’ and one species of ‘Vulnerable’ amphibians found in Hulu Terengganu are listed on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2021). This area deserves attention for better protection of the species, especially for the endemic and threatened species in this area. More alarming, frequent changes in taxonomy and the description of many new species has put these species into a vulnerable state as most of them are not evaluated under the IUCN Red List. The problem with the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 appears to be not comprehensive enough, and is outdated as there are only 17 species listed as protected, while many of the unique and newly described species such as Rhacophorus norhayatiae, Ansonia lumut, Limnonectes utara, and many others are not listed. This legislation requires immediate revision to offer better protection of these species from illegal trade and wildlife trafficking. Furthermore, many areas within Hulu Terengganu, even in SLF, are vulnerable to further deforestation if conservation action is not taken seriously. The benefits of this long-term data collection could be utilised to spread public awareness on the importance of biodiversity conservation and be extended for ecotourism benefits of this forest reserve.

Conclusions

Fifty-two amphibian species from 32 genera were recorded from SLF, making up a total of 70 species recorded in Hulu Terengganu District. Data such as this are a clear indication that extensive study and monitoring is the cogent approach in attempting to reveal the true diversity of a forest reserve. Working repeatedly and systematically in this locality during different months of the years from 2003 to 2020 has resulted in revealing the ecological complexity and high species richness within this area. This finding also denotes that varying sampling efforts influence the knowledge on species diversity of the studied area. This study emphasised that continuous efforts of documenting species diversity is crucial to ensuring the reliability and validity of species diversity harboured by any area or habitat. The available information on amphibian diversity in SLF and Hulu Terengganu can hopefully be used to assist conservation programmes and long-term monitoring of biodiversity. In another way, remarkable species diversity of recreational forests and other areas should be preserved as it can be used to nurture conservation awareness and promote scientific citizenship amongst the local folks to work together to protect the biodiversity at this recreational forest.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank, Department of Forestry Terengganu for granting permission to conduct research at Sekayu lowland forest and to Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu for providing facility and equipment to conduct the field survey and laboratory works. We would like to thank Mr Mazrul Aswady, Izzat Husna, Izwan Anas and Najwa Sawawi for assistances during the fieldwork. We are also deeply grateful to the Department of Wildlife and National Parks Malaysia (DWNP) (research permit: T-00563-16-17), Department of Forestry Peninsular Malaysia (JPSM), Forestry Department of Terengganu, Sekayu Recreational Forest staffs, Agriculture Department of Terengganu, and Sekayu Agricultural Park’s authorities for permission to conduct the study. Anuar McAfee (Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, UniSZA, Terengganu) reviewed the English language.

References

  • AmphibiaWeb (2021) AmphibianWeb: Information on amphibian biology and conservation. University of California, California, USA. https://amphibiaweb.org [accessed 30 May 2021]
  • Badli-Sham BH, Shahirah-Ibrahim N, Goh SX, Syamila-Noh H, Abdul Shukor NSA, Shafie FA, Md Daud A, Abdul Razak FA, Rosli R, Abdul Aziz AA, Mohammad FNF, Kamaruzzaman MF, Mohamad S, Dzu K, Shariffudin A, Najwa-Sawawi S, Ahmad A (2019) Herpetofauna of Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Campus: Sustaining biodiversity in campus green area. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 14(1): 11–28.
  • Berry PY (1975) The amphibian fauna of Peninsular Malaysia. Tropical Press, Kuala Lumpur, 130 pp.
  • Bisht K, Garg S, Sarmah A, Sengupta S, Biju SD (2021) Lost, forgotten, and overlooked: systematic reassessment of two lesser-known toad species (Anura, Bufonidae) from Peninsular India and another wide-ranging northern species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 451–470. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.61770
  • Brown RM, Guttman SI (2002) Phylogenetic systematics of the Rana signata complex of Philippine and Bornean stream frogs: Reconsideration of Huxley’s modification of Wallace’s Line at the Oriental-Australian faunal zone interface. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76(3): 393–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb01704.x
  • Bury RB, Corn PS (1987) Evaluation of pitfall trapping in northwestern forests: Trap arrays with drift fences. The Journal of Wildlife Management 51(1): 112–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801640
  • Chan KO (2011) Comparison of herpetofauna assemblages in logged and unlogged hill dipterocarp forests in Hulu Terengganu. Master Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Chan KO, Ahmad N (2009) Distribution and natural history notes on some poorly known frogs and snakes from Peninsular Malaysia. Herpetological Review 40(3): 294–301.
  • Chan KO, Norhayati A (2010) A new insular species of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern Peninsular Malaysia, Malaysia. Zootaxa 2389(1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2389.1.2
  • Chan KO, Norhayati A, Juliana S (2008) Kekayaan spesies herpetofauna di Kuala Gandah menggunakan kaedah perangkap lubang berpagar. In: Sivananthan E, Siti Hawa Y, Abdul Kadir AH, Hasdi H, Lim BL, Rosli H, Noorlidah A, Shukor MN, Rahmah I (Eds) Biodiversity Resources and Conservation Status in Peninsular Malaysia. Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Malaysia, 71–84.
  • Chan KO, van Rooijen J, Grismer LL, Belabut D, Akil MAMM, Jamaludin H, Ahmad N (2010) First report on the herpetofauna of Pulau Pangkor, Perak, Malaysia. Russian Journal of Herpetology 17(2): 139–146.
  • Chan KO, Wood Jr PL, Anuar SMS, Muin MA, Quah ES, Sumarli AX, Grismer LL (2014a) A new species of upland stream toad of the genus Ansonia Stoliczka, 1870 (Anura: Bufonidae) from northeastern Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa 3764(4): 427–440. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3764.4.3
  • Chan KO, Grismer LL, Brown RM (2014b) Reappraisal of the Javanese Bullfrog complex, Kaloula baleata (Müller, 1836) (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae), reveals a new species from Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa 3900(4): 569–580. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3900.4.7
  • Chan KO, Grismer LL, Zachariah A, Brown RM, Abraham RK (2016) Polyphyly of Asian tree toads, genus Pedostibes Günther, 1876 (Anura: Bufonidae), and the description of a new genus from Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145903
  • Chan KO, Abraham RK, Grismer JL, Grismer L (2018) Elevational size variation and two new species of torrent frogs from Peninsular Malaysia (Anura: Ranidae: Amolops Cope). Zootaxa 4434(2): 250–264. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4434.2.2
  • Chan KO, Abraham RK, Badli-Sham BH (2020a) A revision of the Asian tree toad complex Rentapia hosii (Anura: Bufonidae) with the description of a new species from Peninsular Malaysia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68: 595–607. https://doi.org/10.26107/RBZ-2020-0075
  • Chan KO, Hutter CR, Wood Jr PL, Grismer LL, Das I, Brown RM (2020b) Gene flow creates a mirage of cryptic species in a Southeast Asian spotted stream frog complex. Molecular Ecology 29(20): 3970–3987. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15603
  • Chan KO, Abraham RK, Grismer LL, Brown RM (2020c) A systematic review of the Pulchrana picturata complex, with the description of a new species from Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, and southern Thailand. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68: 880–890. https://doi.org/10.26107/RBZ-2020-0096
  • Choong CY, Ng YF, Dow RA (2013) Odonata (Insecta) from three forests of central Terengganu, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 64(2): 95–104.
  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 345(1311): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0091
  • Crosswhite DL, Fox SF, Thill RE (1999) Comparison of methods for monitoring reptiles and amphibians in upland forests of the Ouachita Mountains. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 79: 45–50.
  • Crump ML, Scott Jr NJ (1994) Visual encounter surveys. In: Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayak LC, Foster M (Eds) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 84–92.
  • Daicus B, Hashim R (2004) Herpetofauna of the western region of Endau-Rompin, Johore, Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Science 23(1): 65–72.
  • Das A, Garg S, Hamidy A, Smith EN, Biju SD (2019) A new species of Micryletta frog (Microhylidae) from Northeast India. PeerJ 7: e7012. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7012
  • Daudin FM (1802) Histoire naturelle des rainettes, des grenouilles et des crapauds. Avec planches. Levrault.
  • Davis HR, Grimser LL, Cobos AJ, Murdoch ML, Sumarli AX, Anuar S, Quah ES (2018) Checklist of the herpetofauna of Hutan Lipur Gunung Senyum, Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia. Russian Journal of Herpetology 25(3): 207–220. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2018-25-3-207-220
  • Davis HR, Grismer LL, Klabacka RL, Muin MA, Quah ES, Anuar S, Sites JW (2016) The phylogenetic relationships of a new stream toad of the genus Ansonia Stoliczka, 1870 (Anura: Bufonidae) from a montane region in Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa 4103(2): 137–153. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4103.2.4
  • Davison GWH (1993) Ma'Daerah and Cagar Hutan, Terengganu; if, how and where to develop? Unpublished report, WWF-Malaysia, Petaling Jaya.
  • Dehling JM (2014) Eine neue Fangzahnfroschart der Gattung Limnonectes (Anura: Dicroglossidae) vom Gunung Lawit, Malaiische Halbinsel. Sauria 36: 17–30.
  • Dring JCM (1979) Amphibians and reptiles from northern Trengganau, Malaysia, with descriptions of two new geckos: Cnemaspis and Cyrtodactylus. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 34: 181–241.
  • Duellman WE (1978) The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. University of Kansas, Lawrence, 352 pp.
  • Fatihah-Syafiq M, Badli-Sham BH, Fahmi-Ahmad M, Aqmal-Naser M, Rizal SA, Azmi MSA, Grismer LL, Ahmad AB (2020) Checklist of herpetofauna in the severely degraded ecosystem of Bidong Island, Peninsular Malaysia, South China Sea. ZooKeys 985: 143–162. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.985.54737
  • Garg S, Suyesh R, Das A, Jiang J, Wijayathilaka N, Amarasinghe AT, Meegaskumbura M (2019) Systematic revision of Microhyla (Microhylidae) frogs of South Asia: A molecular, morphological, and acoustic assessment. Vertebrate Zoology 69(1): 1–71.
  • Gibbons JW, Bennett DH (1974) Determination of anuran terrestrial activity patterns by a drift fence method. Copeia 1974(1): 236–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1443029
  • Grandison AGC (1972) The Gunung Benom expedition, 1967: Reptilia and amphibians of Gunung Benom with a description of a new species Macrocalamus. Bulletin of the British Museum, Natural History. Zoology 23(4): 45–101. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314200
  • Grismer LL (2012) Amphibians and reptiles of the Seribuat Archipelago (Peninsular Malaysia). Frankfurt am Main, Edition Chimaira, 239 pp.
  • Grismer LL, Chan KO (2008) A new species of Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Pulau Perhentian Besar, Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa 1771(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1771.1.1
  • Grismer LL, Grismer JL, Wood Jr PL, Ngo VT, Neang T, Chan KO (2011) Herpetology on the fringes of the Sunda Shelf: A discussion of discovery, taxonomy and biogeography. Bonner Zoologische Monographien 57: 57–97.
  • Grismer LL, Lukman HBI, Muhammad TA, Syed AR, Amirrudin BA (2014) A new species of lowland skink (genus Lipinia Gray, 1845) from northeastern Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa 3821(4): 457–464. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3821.4.4
  • Grismer LL, Perry Jr L, Syafiq MF, Baizul HBS, Rizal SA, Ahmad AB, Quah ES (2016) On the taxonomy and phylogeny of the skinks Lipinia sekayuensis Grismer, Ismail, Awang, Rizal and Ahmad and Lipinia surda Boulenger from Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa 4147(1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4147.1.3
  • Grismer LL, Wood PLJ, Ahmad AB, Baizul-Hafsyam BS, Afiq-Shuhaimi M, Rizal SA, Quah ES (2018) Two new Tytthoscincus Linkem, Diesmos, Brown (Squamata; Scincidae) from Peninsular Malaysia and another case of microsyntopy between ecologically specialized, unrelated, leaf-litter species. Zootaxa 4425(1): 87–107. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4425.1.5
  • Hamidi J (2013) Herpetofauna di Gunung Gagau, Terengganu. In: Latiff A, Ali CA, Mohamad KR (Eds) Gunung Gagau, Terengganu: Transforming Natural Assets into an Ecotourism Product. Academy of Sciences Malaysia and Ketengah, 165–172.
  • Hong Z, Shahrul AMS, Grismer LL, Quah ESH (2021) Preliminary report on the herpetofaunal diversity of Batu Hampar Recreational Forest, Kedah, Malaysia. Check List 17(3): 791–814. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.3.791
  • IUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2021-2. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland.
  • Jablonski D, Masroor R, Hofmann S (2022) On the edge of the Shivaliks: An insight into the origin and taxonomic position of Pakistani toads from the Duttaphrynus melanostictus complex (Amphibia, Bufonidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 98(2): 275–284. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.98.79213
  • Jarina MJ, Wahizatul AA, Jamilah MS, Amiruddin A, Muhammad Razali S (2007) The reinforcement of the roles of recreational forest in Malaysia. In: Zakaria MY, Khan NKN, Baharom Y (Eds) Proceedings of the National Conference on the Management and Conservation of Forest Biodiversity in Malaysia: Forest Biodiversity for Better Life. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia, 280–288.
  • Jasmi A, Shaari MA, Norsham Y, Lim BL (1999) Herpetofauna survey at Sungai Chenderoh, Perlok, Krau Wildlife Researve, Pahang. Journal of Wildlife and Parks 17: 83–88.
  • Jiang D, Jiang K, Ren J, Wu J, Li J (2019) Resurrection of the genus Leptomantis, with description of a new genus to the family Rhacophoridae (Amphibia: Anura). Asian Herpetological Research 10: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.180058
  • Khan MS (2001) Notes on cranial-ridged toads of Pakistan and description of a new subspecies (Amphibia: Bufonidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 33(4): 293–298.
  • Khan MMA, Shaari NA, Bahar AMA, Baten MA (2014) Impact of the flood occurrence in Kota Bharu, Kelantan using statistical analysis. Journal of Applied Sciences 14(17): 1944–1951. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2014.1944.1951
  • Kiew BH (1987) An annotated checklist of the herpetofauna of Ulu Endau, Johore, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 41(2–3): 413–424.
  • Komaruddin SA, Mohamad NA, Fatihah-Syafiq M, Sham BHB, Mamat MA, Zakaria N (2020) Dataset of reptiles in fragmented forests at Tasik Kenyir, Hulu Terengganu, Malaysia. Data in Brief 28: 104994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104994
  • Kottelat M, Ng PKL, Lim KKP (1992) Recent collections of freshwater fish from Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Naturalist 46(2): 7–12.
  • Lalremsanga HT, Sailo S, Lalfamkima VC, Hooroo RNK (2016) Choice of ovoposition site by Nicobar frog, Hylarana nicobariensis (Amphibia: Anura). International Journal of Current Research 8(5): 31505–31512.
  • Leong TM (2004) Larval descriptions of some poorly known tadpoles from Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 52(2): 609–620.
  • Leong TM, Matsui M, Yong HS, Hamid AA (2003) Revalidation of Rana laterimaculata Barbour et Noble, 1916 from the synonymy of Rana baramica Boettger, 1901. Current Herpetology 22(1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.22.17
  • Lim KPK (1989) The amphibian fauna of Ulu Kinchin, Pahang, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 43: 322–325.
  • Manthey U, Denzer W, Quah ESH (2016) Südostasiatische Anuren im Fokus: Microhyla palmipes Boulenger, 1897 und Microhyla superciliaris Parker, 1928 der Malaiischen Halbinsel. Sauria 38: 23–30.
  • Matsui M, Eto K, Belabut DM, Nishikawa K (2017) A new Kalophrynus (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae) from Peninsular Malaysia. Current Herpetology 36(2): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.36.75
  • Matsui M, Kawahara Y, Eto K, Hamidy A, Ahmad N, Hossman MYB (2018) Distinct species status of Kurixalus chaseni (Rhacophoridae, Anura) as revealed by mitochondrial phylogeny. Alytes 36: 170–177.
  • McLeod DS, Norhayati A (2007) A new species of Theloderma (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from southern Thailand and peninsular Malaysia. Russian Journal of Herpetology 14(1): 65–72.
  • Muhammad BG, Jumaat HA, Mohd Ekhwan HT, Sahibin AR, Hafizan HJ, Gasim MB, Adam JH, Toriman MEH, Rahim SA, Juahir HH (2007) Coastal flood phenomenon in Terengganu, Malaysia: Special reference to Dungun. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 1(3): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2007.102.109
  • Muin MAMA, Shahrul Anuar MS, Quah ESH, Nurolhuda N, Sharma D, Yap WWL, Nur Minura A, Nur Juliani S, Mohd Yusof O, Zakaria R, Mansor A, Mohd Sukor H (2014) Herpetofauna diversity of Gunung Tebu, Terengganu. In: Abdul Rahim R, Abu Hassan MN, Nordin A, Nor Hasliza MB, Latiff A (Eds) Siri 22 Kepelbagaian biologi hutan. Hutan Simpan Gunung Tebu, Terengganu: Pengurusan hutan, persekitaran fizikal dan kepelbagaian biologi. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia, 312–318.
  • Ng PK (2020) Revision of the freshwater crabs of the Johora tahanensis (Bott, 1966) species group (Crustacea, Brachyura, Potamidae), with a key to the genus. ZooKeys 994: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.994.56810
  • Ng PK, Ahmad AB (2016) A new genus and new species for an unusual semi-terrestrial potamid crab (Decapoda: Brachyura) with a bilobed mandibular palp from Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 36(6): 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1163/1937240X-00002492
  • Nishikawa K, Matsui M, Yong HS, Ahmad N, Yambun P, Belabut DM, Yoshikawa N (2012) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of caecilians from Southeast Asia (Amphibia, Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae), with special reference to high cryptic species diversity in Sundaland. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63(3): 714–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.017
  • Nor ANM (2007) Diversity, abundance and distribution on palmae of Bukit Bauk Forest Reserve and Sekayu Recreational Forest. Undergraduate Thesis, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Norhayati A, Shamada SKS (2004) Fauna amfibia di Taman Negeri Endau Rompin. In: Mohamad Ismail S, Mat Isa M, Ahmad WYW, Rahim Ramli M, Latiff A (Eds) Taman Negeri Endau Rompin: Pengurusan, Persekitaran Fizikal dan Biologi. Jabatan Perhutanan Semenanjung Malaysia, 197–206.
  • Norhayati A, Eszri S, Juliana S, Shukor MN (2006) An annotated checklist of amphibians at Hutan Simpan Pasir Raja, Terengganu. In: Muda A, Jaafar N, Sabran MR, Md Som J, Nizam MS, Latiff A (Eds) Siri kepelbagaian biologi Hutan. Gunung Mandi Angin, Terengganu: Pengurusan, Persekitaran Fizikal, Kepelbagaian Biologi dan Pelancongan Ekologi. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia, 434–450.
  • Norhayati A, Chan KO, Daicus B (2011) Amphibians and reptiles of Sungai Tembat, Terengganu. In: Latiff A, Ali CA, Mohamad KR (Eds) Gunung Gagau, Terengganu: Transforming Natural Assets into an Ecotourism Product. Academy of Sciences Malaysia and Ketengah, 173–178.
  • Norsham Y, Leong TM, Gary L (2001) Amphibians checklist of Bukit Rengit Lanchang, Pahang. Journal of Wildlife and Parks 19: 123–124.
  • Nur Amalina MI, Azhari M, Norshaqinah A, Nor Azrin NA, Shukor MN, Aisah MS, Amirrudin A, Grismer LL, Norhayati A (2017) Species composition of amphibians and reptiles in Tembat Forest Reserve, Hulu Terengganu, Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Applied Biology 46(3): 119–129.
  • Nur Amalina MI, Nazron NS, Nazir NAM, Shukor AM, Ilias R, Ahmad A, Ahmad N (2020) Sustainable dam development: A study of dam environmental impact on the herpetofauna in Hulu Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. In: Sidek LM, Salih GHA, Boosroh MH (Eds) International Conference on Dam Safety Management and Engineering. Springer, Singapore, 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1971-0_46
  • Nur Amalina MI, Ahmad N, Nor SM, Syuhada Nazron N, Adyla N, Abidin Z (2021) Herpetofauna diversity in Sg. Deka, Hulu Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Science and Technology 4(1): 86–93.
  • Ohler A, Deuti K (2013) Pyxicephalus khasianus Anderson, 1871 and Rana laticeps Boulenger, 1882 (Dicroglossidae, Anura, Amphibia) are synonyms. Zoosystema 35(3): 415–424. https://doi.org/10.5252/z2013n3a4
  • Pearman PB, Velasco AM, López A (1995) Tropical amphibian monitoring: A comparison of methods for detecting inter-site variation in species’ composition. Herpetologica 51(3): 325–337.
  • Praderio MJ, Robinson MD (1990) Reproduction in the toad Colostethus trinitatus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in a northern Venezuela seasonal environment. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6(03): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400004600
  • Quah ESH, Badli-Sham BH, Rahman MF-S, Ahmad A, Chan KO (2021) A new record and range extension for Philautus davidlabangi Matsui, 2009 from Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae). Herpetology Notes 14: 1181–1186.
  • Rafaai NH (2007) Gingers (Zingiberaceae) in Bukit Bauk Forest Reserve and Sekayu Recreational Forest. Undergraduate Thesis, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Rastogi RK, Pinelli C, Polese G, D’Aniello B, Chieffi-Baccari G (2011) Hormones and reproductive cycles in Anuran Amphibians. In: Norris D, Lopez KH (Eds) Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates. Academic Press, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374931-4.10009-4
  • Shahriza S, Ibrahim J (2014) A preliminary checklist of amphibians of Ulu Paip Recreational Forest, Kedah, Malaysia. Check List 10(2): 253–259. https://doi.org/10.15560/10.2.253
  • Shahriza S, Ibrahim J (2012) The amphibian diversity of Bukit Jana, Taiping, Perak. Tropical Life Sciences Research 23(2): 49–57.
  • Shahriza S, Ibrahim J, Anuar S, Muin A (2012) Herpetofauna of Peta area of Endau-Rompin National Park, Johor, Malaysia. Pertanika. Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 35(3): 553–567.
  • Sharma DSK, Chong DKF, Darmaraj MR, Lau MM, Ng BS, Abdul Wahab AZ, Nurul Ain E, Nor Zalipah M (2007) An annoted preliminary checklist of reptiles of Bukit Labohan Forest Reserve and the Ma’Daerah turtle sanctuary, Kemaman, Terengganu. In: Sharma D, Abdul Wahab AZ, Basri N, Awang Ali Bema DN (Eds) Biodiversity Expedition in Bukit Labohanm, Ma'Daerah, Terengganu. WWF-Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, 73–80.
  • Sheridan JA, Stuart BL (2018) Hidden species diversity in Sylvirana nigrovittata (Amphibia: Ranidae) highlights the importance of taxonomic revisions in biodiversity conservation. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0192766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192766
  • Sumarli AX, Grismer LL, Anuar S, Muin MA, Quah ESH (2015) First report on the amphibians and reptiles of a remote mountain, Gunung Tebu in northeastern Peninsular Malaysia. Check List 11(4): 1679. https://doi.org/10.15560/11.4.1679
  • Sumarli A, Grismer LL, Ahmad AB, Rizal S, Ismail LH, Izam NAM, Linkem CW (2016) The first riparian skink (Genus: Sphenomorphus Strauch, 1887) from Peninsular Malaysia and its relationship to other Indochinese and Sundaic species. Zootaxa 4173(1): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4173.1.3
  • Suwannapoom C, Van Nguyen T, Pawangkhanant P, Gorin VA, Chomdej S, Che J, Poyarkov NA (2020) A new species of Micryletta (Amphibia: Microhylidae) from southern Thailand. Zoological Research 41(5): 581–588. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.139
  • Tamblyn A, Turner C, Raines P (2006) Malaysia Tropical Forest Conservation Project Report of the Setiu Wetlands Phase. Coral Cay Conservation Ltd, London, United Kingdom, 98 pp.
  • Tan HH, Ng PKL (2005) The fighting fishes (Teleostei: Osphronemidae: Genus Betta) of Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement 13: 43–99.
  • Tenaga Nasional Berhad Research [TNBR] (2003) Detailed environmental impact assessment. Report, Tenaga Nasional Berhad Research Sdn. Bhd. , Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, 114 pp.
  • Tenaga Nasional Berhad Research [TNBR] (2007) Detailed environmental impact assessment. Report, Tenaga Nasional Berhad Research Sdn. Bhd. , Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, 139 pp.
  • Ummi MA (2013) Species composition and richness of vertebrates (herpetofauna, birds, small mammals) at Hulu Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Master Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Varikoden H, Preethi B, Samah AA, Babu CA (2011) Seasonal variation of rainfall characteristics in different intensity classes over Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 404(1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.021
  • Wahizatul AA, Geok HA (2016) Aquatic insect communities in relation with water quality of selected tributaries of Tasik Kenyir Terengganu. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 11(2): 1–10.
  • Wahizatul AA, Julia J, Amirrudin A (2006) Diversity and distribution of dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) in Sekayu recreational forest, Terengganu. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 1(2): 97–106.
  • Wahizatul AA, Long SH, Ahmad A (2011) Composition and distribution of aquatic insect communities in relation to water quality in two freshwater streams of Hulu Terengganu, Terengganu. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 6(1): 148–155.
  • Wood Jr PL, Grismer LL, Youmans TM, Nasir NB, Ahmad N, Senwai J (2008a) Additions to the herpetofauna of Endau-Rompin, Johor, West Malaysia. Herpetological Review 39(1): 112–121.
  • Wood Jr PL, Grismer LL, Norhayati A, Juliana S (2008b) Two new species of torrent-dwelling toads Ansonia Stoliczka, 1870 (Anura: Bufonidae) from Peninsular Malaysia. Herpetologica 64(3): 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1655/07-065.1
  • Yanoviak SP, Fincke OM (2005) Sampling methods for water-filled tree holes and their artificial analogues. In: Leather S (Ed.) Insect sampling in forest ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford, 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750513.ch8
  • Zahidin MA, Candyrilla VB, Abdullah MT (2017) Fauna in setiu wetland forest. Kenyir Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, 11 pp.
  • Zakaria N, Senawi J, Musa FH, Belabut D, Chan CK, Md Nor S, Ahmad N (2014) Species composition of amphibians and reptiles in Krau wildlife reserve, Pahang, peninsular Malaysia. Check List 10(2): 335–343. https://doi.org/10.15560/10.2.335
  • Zakaria AA, Rahim NAA, Abdullah MT (2015) Reptile diversity as an ecotourism attraction in Pulau Bidong. In: Mariapan M, Lim EAL, Isa SS, Karim MS, Hakeem KR (Eds) Ecotourism potentials in Malaysia. Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Malaysia Putra, Serdang, 42–47.
  • Zakaria AA, Rahim NAA, Ahmad A, Abdullah MT (2019) Species richness estimation of reptiles in selected sites of Tasik Kenyir, Hulu Terengganu, Malaysia. In: Abdullah MT, Mohammad A, Nor Zalipah M, Safih Lola M (Eds) Greater Kenyir Landscapes. Springer, Cham, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92264-5_15
  • Zug GR (2015) Morphology and systematics of Kalophrynus interlineatus-pleurostigma populations (Anura: Microhylidae: Kalophryninae) and a taxonomy of the genus Kalophrynus Tschudi, Asian sticky frogs. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 62: 135–190.
login to comment