Research Article
Print
Research Article
DNA barcoding and morphology reveal European and western Asian Arctia villica (Linnaeus, 1758) as a complex of species (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae)
expand article infoAntonio S. Ortiz, Rosa M. Rubio, Josef J. de Freina§, Juan J. Guerrero, Manuel Garre, José Luis Yela|
‡ University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
§ Unaffiliated, Munich, Germany
| Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
Open Access

Abstract

Currently, the genus Arctia Schrank, 1802 includes approximately 16 species in the Palaearctic region, depending on the taxonomic interpretation. Here, populations of the Arctia villica (Linnaeus, 1758) morphospecies complex were studied from Europe to the Middle East (Turkey, northern Iran) by molecular methods. Morphological treatment has traditionally revealed the presence of five nominal taxa: A. villica (Linnaeus, 1758), A. angelica (Boisduval, 1829), A. konewkaii (Freyer, 1831), A. marchandi de Freina, 1983, and A. confluens Romanoff, 1884. The molecular approach tests whether they represent well-delimited species. Subsequently, this study corroborates the suitability of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) marker sequence for species delimitation. In total, 55 barcodes of the Arctia villica complex were compared, and two molecular species delimitation algorithms were applied to reveal the potential Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs), namely the distance-based Barcode Index Number (BIN) System, and the hierarchical clustering algorithm based on a pairwise genetic distances approach using the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP). The applied ASAP distance-based species delimitation method for the analysed dataset revealed an interspecific threshold of 2.0–3.5% K2P distance as suitable for species identification purposes of the Iberian A. angelica and the Sicilian A. konewkaii and less than 2% for the three taxa of the A. villica clade: A. villica, A. confluens, and A. marchandi. This study contributes to a better understanding of the taxonomy of the genus Arctia and challenges future revision of this genus in Turkey, the Caucasus, Transcaucasia as well as northern Iran using standard molecular markers.

Keywords

Arctia, COI, DNA barcoding, Europe, species delimitation, western Asia

Introduction

The European fauna of Arctiinae moths (Erebidae) is particularly well-known comprising 113 species (Witt and Ronkay 2011), although some genera still require revision in terms of their composition and the taxonomic status of some species (e.g., Setina Schrank, 1802, Eilema Hübner, [1819], Ocnogyna Lederer, 1853, etc). Traditionally, the genus Arctia Schrank, 1802 was considered to include six or seven species in the West Palearctic region and ten species in the East Palearctic region divided into different species groups (Arctia Schrank, 1802, Epicallia Hübner, [1820], Eucharia Hübner [1820], and Pericallia Hübner, [1820]), depending on the taxonomic interpretation of the status for a number of taxa (de Freina and Witt 1987; Murzin 2003; Witt et al. 2011).

More recently, the use of eight molecular markers coupled with proper analytical algorithms (Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference) has postulated a much more comprehensive view of the genus Arctia and closely related genera, including Acerbia Sotavalta, 1863, Ammobiota Wallengren, 1885, Atlantarctia Dubatolov, 1990, Borearctia Dubatolov, 1884, Epicallia, Eucharia, Hyphoraia Hübner, [1820], Pararctia Sotavalta, 1965, Parasemia Hübner, [1820], and Pericallia as synonyms or potential subgenera (Rönkä et al. 2016). Thus, the total number of species within the genus has significantly increased. Some of these Arctia species, such as Arctia caja (Linnaeus, 1758), A. festiva (Hufnagel, 1766), A. flavia (Fuessly, 1779), and A. villica have a broad distribution from Europe to the Siberian mountains and steppes with several geographical subspecies and forms.

Following the current view, Arctia villica is an extremely variable species in body size, coloration, wing pattern, and size of spots including the so far considered subspecies A. v. villica s.str., A. v. angelica (Boisduval, 1829), A. v. konewkaii (Freyer, 1831), A. v. confluens Romanoff, 1884 and A. v. marchandi de Freina, 1983 (Murzin 2003; Witt and Ronkay 2011). Murzin (2003) and Witt and Ronkay (2011) considered A. villica as having a West Palearctic distribution, occurring in the central and southern parts of Europe, from NW Africa and the Iberian Peninsula to Asia Minor, the Caucasus range and Transcaucasia, northern Iran and along the steppe belt to SW Siberia.

In the revisions of the Arctia villica complex, de Freina and Nardelli (2007) and de Freina (2011) studied the nomenclature and systematics based on a large number of specimens from across their distribution range and concluded that all of its subspecies should be considered as species. Arctia villica s. str. has a wide distribution from central and southern Europe to the Caucasus and west Siberia, A. angelica is restricted in the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa, A. konewkaii is endemic to Sicily, and A. marchandi and A. confluens are distributed from Transcaucasia and adjacent areas such as eastern Turkey, northern Syria, Iraq, and northern Iran to Central Asia. In the mentioned works, taxonomy and systematics based on external appearance and genital structures were reviewed, including eleven COI sequences from Caucasian and trans-Caucasian specimens of A. villica. Subsequently, Kizildağ et al. (2019) examined the taxonomic status of A. marchandi in southeastern Turkey. Their note, dealing with some barcodes of A. villica and A. marchandi, suggested subspecific status for A. marchandi, although the sequences were not published in GenBank or BOLD for their evaluation in later studies, which precludes any further comments.

The study of the morphological features and genitalia structures provides valuable criteria for species recognition according to de Freina and Nardelli (2007), de Freina (2011), and others. The recent integration of morphological and DNA-based approaches has proven to be a most effective way to advance species discovery and delineation (e.g., Lumley and Sperling 2010; Padial and De La Riva 2010; Schlick-Steiner et al. 2010), as well as to assist in detecting previously cryptic species (e.g., Hebert et al. 2004; Huemer and Hausmann 2009; Hausmann and Huemer 2011; Mutanen et al. 2012). Integration of molecular methods with morphological analyses may accelerate biodiversity inventories and corroborate the status of doubtful taxa (Smith et al. 2009).

In this paper, we present new insights from DNA barcodes of material collected along the geographical distribution of the different taxa of Arctia villica complex to be added to the previous morphological studies in order to substantiate their taxonomic range.

Materials and methods

Abbreviations of specimen repositories

MWM Museum WITT, München (in ZSM);

RCBA-UMU Research Collection of Biología Animal, Universidad de Murcia;

ZSM Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB).

Morphological study

This study is based on the results of the morphological study of a large amount of collected material deposited in the ZSM and MWM museums, developed by de Freina and Nardelli (2007) and de Freina (2011). New material was added and 115 adult specimens of the Arctia villica complex (Fig. 1) were examined externally to evaluate possible differences in their colouration, spot size, and wing shape based on the taxonomic keys provided by de Freina and Nardelli (2007), Ylla et al. (2010), de Freina (2011) and Witt and Ronkay (2011), and were dissected using the standard procedure (Fibiger 1997) with minor modifications. Adult images were taken with a Nikon D70 digital camera and were z-stacked using Zerene software. Genital structures were examined using a Zeiss Stemi 508 stereomicroscope with a Zeiss Axiocam ICc5 digital camera and were compared with those published by de Freina and Nardelli (2007), de Freina (2011), and Witt and Ronkay (2011). Specimens were deposited in RCBA-UMU, in the Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology of the University of Murcia (Spain), and in the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology in the ZSM (Germany).

Figure 1. 

Distribution of Arctia samples sequenced. Note that each point may represent more than one specimen. The map was created using www.simplemappr.net.

Molecular study

Thirty-four adult specimens of the Arctia villica complex were processed and sequenced at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB, Guelph) to obtain DNA barcodes using the standard high-throughput protocol described by deWaard et al. (2008), which can be accessed at www.dnabarcoding.ca/pa/ge/research/protocols. The study was completed with publicly available sequences downloaded from The Barcode of Life (BOLD: www.boldsystem.org) (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007). Ultimately, the analysis involved 55 Arctia villica sensu lato COI sequences from Europe and countries around the Caucasus, with more than 500 bp for calculations and tree constructions (Table 1). Voucher data, GPS coordinates, images, sequences, GenBank accession numbers, and trace files are publicly available through the public data set (https://doi.org/10.5883/DS-VILLICA) in BOLD.

Table 1.

Taxon names, old (BIN1) and present BINs (BIN2), BOLD accession numbers for the specimens used in distance estimations (Process ID), haplotype, and locality information (Country and Territory).

Taxon BIN1 BIN2 Process ID Haplotype Country Territory
Arctia villica ACP7520 AAC8627 ABOLA146-14 1 Austria Kaernten
ACP7520 AAC8627 ABOLC051-16 1 Austria Niederöesterreich
ACP7520 AAC8627 ABOLD441-16 1 Austria Niederöesterreich
ACP7520 AAC8627 FBLMZ558-12 1 Germany Bavaria
ACP7520 AAC8627 GWOSI563-10 1 Germany Bavaria
ACP7520 AAC8627 IBLAO1063-14 1 Hungary Bacs-Kiskun
ACP7520 AAC8627 NOENO403-17 1 Austria Niederöesterreich
ACP7520 AAC8627 LEASW136-19 2 Greece Peloponnese
Arctia marchandi ACP7520 AAC8627 VNMB685-08 3 Syria Aleppo
AAC8627 AAC8627 IBLAO1080-14 4 Turkey Hakkari
AAC8627 AAC8627 VNMB690-08 4 Turkey Hakkari
AAC8627 AAC8627 VNMB689-08 5 Turkey Hakkari
Arctia villica ACP7477 AAC8627 CGUKD205-09 6 U. Kingdom Devon
ACP7477 AAC8627 CGUKD277-09 6 U. Kingdom Norfolk
Arctia angelica ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1060-14 6 Spain Castilla-León
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1061-14 6 Spain Castilla-León
Arctia villica ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1073-14 6 Spain Cataluña
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1124-14 6 Spain Aragon
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1125-14 6 Spain Asturias
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1126-14 6 Spain Asturias
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO951-14 6 Spain Aragón
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO952-14 6 Spain Aragón
ACP7477 AAC8627 LEATC649-13 6 Italy Südtirol
ACP7477 AAC8627 GWORZ116-10 7 Italy Basilicata
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO553-12 8 Spain Cataluña
ACP7477 AAC8627 PHLAC475-10 9 Italy Südtirol
ACP7477 AAC8627 VNMB688-08 10 Turkey Kars
Arctia confluens ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1077-14 11 Azerbaijan Masally
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1078-14 11 Azerbaijan Lerik
ACP7477 AAC8627 VNMB686-08 11 Russia Dagestan
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1082-14 12 Russia Dagestan
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1081-14 13 Russia Dagestan
ACP7477 AAC8627 IBLAO1083-14 14 Russia Dagestan
ACP7477 AAC8627 VNMB687-08 15 Kyrgyzstan Namagan
ACP8428 AAC8627 IBLAO1064-14 16 Iran Zanjan
Arctia angelica ABY6789 ABY6789 GBMIN80080-17 17 n/a n/a
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1068-14 17 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1069-14 17 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1070-14 17 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1246-20 17 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO733-12 17 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO734-12 17 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1067-14 18 Spain Andalusia
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1071-14 18 Spain Castilla-La Mancha
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1107-14 18 Spain Castilla-La Mancha
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1127-14 18 Spain Castilla-La Mancha
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1128-14 18 Spain Castilla-La Mancha
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1058-14 19 Morocco Marrakech-Tensift-Al Hauz
ABY6789 ABY6789 IBLAO1059-14 19 Morocco Marrakech-Tensift-Al Hauz
Arctia konewkaii ACL5457 ACL5457 GBMIN80081-17 20 Italy Sicily
ACL5457 ACL5457 IBLAO1074-14 21 Italy Sicily
Arctia konewkaii ACL5457 ACL5457 IBLAO1076-14 21 Italy Sicily
ACL5457 ACL5457 IBLAO1188-19 21 Italy Sicily
ACL5457 ACL5457 IBLAO1075-14 22 Italy Sicily
Arctia confluens AAC8628 AAC8628 VNMB693-08 23 Iran Mazandaran
Arctia caja AAA8530 IBLAO551-12 Spain Catalonia
Arctia festiva ABW9262 IBLAO1091-14 Spain La Rioja
Arctia flavia AAV9830 ABOLA435-14 Austria NordTirol
Arctia lapponica ACF2201 LON720-09 Norway Sor-Varanger

Sequence divergences for the barcode region were calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model (Kimura 1980) and the degrees of interspecific genetic variation were calculated using the analytical tools of BOLD. All the new and public species sequences were downloaded and aligned with the CLUSTAL algorithm of the MEGA6 software (Tamura et al. 2013). Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replicates, and initial Neighbour-Joining (NJ) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees based on distance were constructed with the MEGA6 software. A phylogenetic hypothesis with Maximum Likelihood as an optimality criterion was generated using IQ-TREE v. 1.6.12 (Nguyen et al. 2015). An alignment of 658 bps for 59 samples was partitioned into codon positions with ModelFinder software (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) and the codon position was modelled with GTR+F. Support values were calculated by 1,000 replications of both ultrafast bootstraps (UFBoot; Hogan et al. 2017) and Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT; Guindon et al. 2010), as well as approximate Bayes branch test (aBayes; Anisimova et al. 2011). We selected Arctia flavia, A. caja, A. festiva and A. lapponica (Thunberg, 1791) which are taxonomically related to A. villica in the subtribe Arctiina, as outgroups to root the tree (Table 1). To assess the COI divergences between the taxa in the A. villica species complex and the other Arctia species from Europe, we included all sites with the pairwise deletion option. The number of haplotypes was calculated with DnaSP 5.10 software (Rozas et al. 2003).

To elucidate the taxonomic status of some of the A. villica species complex studied, two molecular species delimitation methods were applied to reveal the potential Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) that could represent putative cryptic species. The two methods were distance-based: Barcode Index Number (BIN) System (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013), and the hierarchical clustering algorithm that only considers a pairwise genetic distances approach using the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) (Puillandre et al. 2021).

The BIN method (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013) is implemented as part of the Barcode of Life Data system (BOLD; Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007). Newly submitted sequences are compared together with sequences already available in BOLD. Sequences are clustered according to their molecular divergence using algorithms that aim at finding discontinuities between clusters and each cluster is assigned a globally unique and specific identifier Barcode Index Number (BIN) registered in BOLD.

The ASAP method (Puillandre et al. 2021) build species partitions from single locus sequence alignments (i.e., barcode data sets). Grounded in evolutionary theory, ASAP is the implementation of a hierarchical clustering algorithm that uses pairwise genetic distances, avoiding the computational burden of phylogenetic reconstruction and proposing species partitions by neglecting the use of biological a priori insight of intraspecific diversity. This method has greater potential than the other programs assessed, for instance the barcode-gap approach Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) (Puillandre et al. 2012), the General Mixed Yule-Coalescent model (GMYC) (Pons et al. 2006) and the Poisson Tree Process (PTP) (Zhang et al. 2013), both first developed in a Maximum Likelihood framework, and later extended to a Bayesian framework (Reid and Carstens 2012) according to Puillandre et al. (2021).

Results

Molecular analysis

In the dataset composed of 59 sequences, 55 specimens of the A. villica complex were sequenced or their conspecific sequences were acquired from the databases (BOLD) to analyse taxonomic identity and geographical species grouping, obtaining more than 572 bp for the barcode region (48 of them with 658 bp). In total, 23 different haplotypes were found in the 55 barcode sequences analysed of the five lineages of A. villica species complex ranging from eleven haplotypes in A. villica to three in A. marchandi (Table 1). The overall haplotype diversity (Hd) was 0.922±0.02 in 56 polymorphic sites and nucleotide diversity per site (Pi) was 0.01679. Nucleotide composition showed a A+T of 68.8%. No insertions or deletions were found.

Neighbour-Joining (NJ) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees of COI barcode region generated using MEGA software recovered the same topology and were practically identical, and all haplotypes could be unequivocally assigned to one of the eight major clades (Table 1). A phylogenetic hypothesis with ML as an optimality criterion was generated using IQ-TREE software and the topology obtained was chosen as the basis for our discussion with branch support values (Fig. 2). The monophyly of the A. villica species complex was recovered by all those methods and was corroborated with the inclusion of A. flavia, A. caja, A. festiva, and A. lapponica as outgroups to root the tree.

Figure 2. 

Maximum Likelihood tree of Arctia species, obtained from 59 nucleotide COI sequences. Bootstrap values > 50% are provided at major nodes. Old and new BINs are indicated for each node. ASAP species delimitation result is indicated by vertical and coloured bars.

Three well-supported clades (bootstrap values higher than 70%) were found and were thereafter treated as three MOTUs considered as species, namely A. villica, A. angelica, and A. konewkaii. The divergence between these three groups varies between 2.4% and 3.5% (mean 2.8%; Table 2). The highest interspecific value was found between A. villica and A. konewkaii (3.5%) and between A. angelica and A. konewkaii (3.1%), whereas the lowest one was found between A. villica and A. angelica (2.4%). The total number of nucleotide substitutions between species is 56 variable sites (Table 2; a complete similarity matrix can be accessed in Suppl. material 1).

Table 2.

Interspecific mean K2P (Kimura 2-Parameter) divergences (mean pairwise distances) based on the analysis of COI fragments (> 500 bp) among Arctia species.

A. angelica A. confluens A. konewkaii A. marchandi A. villica01
A. confluens 2.7
A. konewkaii 3.2 3.5
A. marchandi 2.2 1.8 2.7
A. villica01 2.4 1.9 3.3 1.3
A. villica02 2.4 1.5 3.0 1.4 1.5

The A. villica clade shows five different sub-clades with genetic differences of less than 2% among them including the clade 1 sequences from Northern Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom (15 samples with 6 haplotypes); the clade 2, with samples from Germany, Austria, and Hungary (7 samples with 1 haplotype); another clade with samples from Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Azerbaijan (7 samples with 6 haplotypes); the Turkey clade (3 samples with 2 haplotypes); and the one from Syria (1 sample with one haplotype). West and Central European specimens initially identified as A. villica clades 1 and 2 differed up to 1.5% while A. villica clade 2 from Central Europe differed at 1.5% and 1.4% from A. confluens and A. marchandi, respectively (Table 2). Initially, the samples from Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Azerbaijan were identified as A. confluens, and specimens from Turkey as A. marchandi, between which a difference of 1.8% was found. The highest interspecific values were found between both clades of A. villica and A. marchandi (1.8%) and A. confluens (1.5%), whereas the lowest one was found between both clades of A. villica and A. marchandi (1.4% and 1.3%) (Table 2). One specimen from Iran (IBLAO1064-14) identified as A. confluens differed up to 1.5% from the other subgroups.

Delimitation of species

The mean K2P values between the morphologically determined species were used to study species delimitation using two different methods. The BIN System is an online framework that clusters barcode sequences algorithmically and is recalculated from time to time as the number of sequences of each species increases.

All the COI sequences from the five lineages were uploaded and examined into the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD), resulting in four BINs (AAC8627, ABY6789, ACL5457, and AAC8628) (n = 55 seqs; 23 COI haplotypes). The BIN AAC8627 was attributed to 35 sequences (15 COI haplotypes: 577–658 bp) from different continuous localities along Europe, from Spain and the United Kingdom, to Asia Minor, Caucasus, and Iran; ABY6789 was associated with 14 sequences, and three COI haplotypes (658 bp) located in the southern half of the Iberian Peninsula and Morocco; ACL5457 is unique from Sicily, with five sequences and three haplotypes (658 bp); and AAC8628 for one specimen identified as A. confluens (Table 1; field BIN2; Fig. 2). In previous recalculations, six different BINs were related to the five species with singles BIN for A. angelica (ABY6789), A. konewkaii (ACL5457), A. marchandi (AAC8627), two BINs for A. villica (ACP7520 and ACP7477) and three BINs for A. confluens (ACP7477, ACP8428, and AAC8628) sharing BIN ACP7477 with the A. villica clade 2 (Table 1; field BIN1; Fig. 2). This variation in the BIN values, suggesting the presence of different species with unique and specific identifier BIN within the studied Arctia villica complex, should be updated with the results of this study.

ASAP method was performed on the data set of 54 sequences, representing all specimens sequenced. For the ASAP analysis, the sequence of a specimen identified as A. confluens from Iran (VNMB693-08; BIN: AAC8628) was excluded from further analysis because of the doubtful sequence that separates it from the rest of the groups. The analysis resulted in partitioning all COI sequences into eight MOTUs (hypothetical species) corresponding to five main lineages: A. angelica, A. konewkaii, A. villica (2 groups), A. marchandi (2 groups, one of them with only one barcode), and A. confluens (2 groups, one of them with only one barcode). ASAP score 2.5 was the smallest within the range of genetic distances and was calculated as the average among two values: the fourth largest p-value (0.255) and the smallest rank of relative barcode gap width (1.22e-04). The value of probability (p-value) quantifies the chances that each of its new groups represents a single species, and the rank calculates the width of the barcode gap between the previous and this new partition. Both metrics are combined into a single ASAP-score that is used to rank the partitions (see Puillandre et al. 2021). The graphical output shows each node of the hierarchical clustering with the same probability of being a panmictic species (p > 0.1) (Fig. 2).

The two methods used for species delimitation are congruent in recognizing the five main lineages as distinct from any other species studied. The exception are the specimens identified as A. confluens, since they are related to two different BINs: specimens collected from Iran with BIN AAC8628 and the general A. villica BIN AAC8627 including specimens from Caucasus and Syria. This high genetic variation needs to be further investigated with additional samples, particularly from Turkey, Caucasus, and Transcaucasia.

Discussion

Morphological and ecological traits

The contemporary species definitions and the properties upon which they are based were presented and discussed by e.g., de Queiroz (2007). Among them, biological, ecological, evolutionary, phylogenetic, phenotypic, and genotypic were noted as alternative species concepts, and a “Unified Species Concept” was presented by treating the species exists as a separately evolving metapopulation lineage and the definitions of species mentioned above as operational criteria for different lines of evidence to assessing lineage separation.

The Arctia villica complex is a species group with high morphological and colour variability, characterized by the extensive black forewing background with small, well-defined, and rather distinct white patches partly or fully fused, but do not show clearly distinctive differences in the genitalia except in the slight variation of the aedeagus angle, although within each of the species, there is a wide range of variation of the characters with singular overlaps between the peripheric populations where introgression processes probably appear.

In this group of species, wing morphology, zoogeographical distribution, and maternal mitochondrial DNA (barcoding) are properties of lineage separation. Analysis of extensive samples of European and Asian populations of the Arctia villica species complex based on morphological features and zoogeographical and biological information revealed the presence of five species, including different forms and varieties, named A. villica, A. angelica, A. konewkaii, A. marchandi, and A. confluens (de Freina and Nardelli 2007; de Freina 2011). Subsequently, Witt and Ronkay (2011) considered that their distinctive differences in morphology fit well into the range of variation of their characters and all the taxa were considered at subspecific taxonomic rank.

Nevertheless, de Freina and Nardelli (2007) noted that the genital morphology of the entire A. villica group is strikingly uniform in both sexes with an insignificant individual variability that is not relevant for the systematics and without signs of regionally deviating structures that could indicate existing subspecies or development processes leading to such. The absence of notable differences in the male and female genitalia, which is the basic feature of the biological species concept for interbreeding, reproductive isolation, and specific mate recognition or fertilization system does not constitute evidence contradicting a hypothesis of lineage separation since the lineage simply may not yet have evolved that properties, as might be expected if they are still in the divergence process, or do not need them because recognition among sexes is due to chemical mechanisms. There are many other such examples in the Noctuoidea (e.g., several species complexes in the genera Euxoa Hübner, [1821], Agrotis Ochsenheimer, 1816, Cucullia Schrank, 1802, Apamea Ochsenheimer, 1816, and so on).

Although the main criterion to separate Lepidoptera species is genital morphology, other pre- and post-reproductive isolation mechanisms must be considered that prevent the forthcoming of fertile offspring, even though mating may occur (e.g., Yela 2002). De Freina and Nardelli (2007) performed mating experiments between A. villica and A. konewkaii, from which a F1 was obtained without a fertile F2, suggesting that the reproductive barrier could be related to the pheromone chemistry and not to the genital structure. In the only case where mating was achieved between F2 specimens, the female spawned sterile eggs. The presence in nature of hybrid specimens with morphological characteristics of the male and barcoding of the female has been detected in the area where the populations of A. villica and A. angelica overlap in the Iberian Peninsula (Table 1; IBLAO1060-14 and IBLAO1061-14).

BIN discrepancies and species

Detailed morphological, ecological, and genetic analysis can discriminate closely related species that show slight sequence divergence from their nearest neighbour. Molecular analyses enable initial biodiversity evaluation in such taxa, but there is no objective way to select the algorithm or input parameters that best recover actual species boundaries. In different groups of invertebrate taxa, a sequence divergence in the barcode region lower than 2% often corresponds to intraspecific differences, while higher values are typical of interspecific variation and recognized as distinct MOTUs (Hausmann et al. 2011). However, the divergence between young sister species may fall below the 2% threshold, while unusually variable species may exceed it. This is an immediate consequence of the gradual process of speciation, and nominal species do not always correspond to the same divergence stage.

The discrimination of divergences involving these young species requires more algorithmic finesse, and the selection of an effective algorithm for MOTU recognition is necessary. In our study, BIN and ASAP methods were selected to analyse the Arctia villica complex sequences.

The Barcode Index Number (BIN) system is a persistent registry for animal MOTUs recognized through sequence variation in the barcode region. The BIN pipeline analyzes new sequence data for the barcode region as they are uploaded to BOLD, and BIN metadata are dynamic because key elements of specimen records on BOLD, especially taxonomic assignments, are frequently revised by data providers and because of the high flow of new records (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013).

In 2017, BOLD calculated seven different BINS for the five species with singleton BINs for A. angelica, A. konewkaii, and A. marchandi, two for A. villica and three for A. confluens. Currently, four BINs have been calculated clearly differentiating A. konewkaii and A. angelica, while A. villica formed a group that includes A. villica, A. marchandi, and A. confluens. This variation in the BIN values suggests the presence of different species with unique and specific identifiers within the studied Arctia villica complex.

This case of discordance between BIN assignments and the Arctia villica species taxonomy proposed can reflect the inability of sequence variation at COI to diagnose species because of introgression or their young age. These “merged species” have diagnostic nucleotide substitutions in the barcode region that can be correlated with the morphological or ecological traits used in species diagnosis. BIN sharing can be made when algorithms used as ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery, Puillandre et al. 2012), CROP (Clustering 16S rRNA for OTU Prediction; Hao et al. 2011), RESL (Refined Single Linkage; Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013), GMCY (Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent; Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013), and jMOTU (Java Program to define MOTU; Jones et al. 2011) fail to partition very young species because of their limited sequence divergence that cannot be separated completely (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013).

Dellicour and Flot (2018) noted that some methods generally perform well and mostly congruently providing similar species partitions inferred from independent data as other molecular markers, morphological data, or ecological data although they perform poorly when the number of sampled individuals per species or intra- versus interspecific divergences is too low (see Ahrens et al. 2016). Increased sample size and taxonomic and geographic coverage are critical to recognizing species boundaries from barcode sequence information, in addition to other species characteristics.

Integration of molecular and morphological data

Concerning the species delimitation analyses, Puillandre et al. (2021) assessed ASAP power along with three other programs (ABGD, PTP, and GMYC) on real COI barcode data sets noticing the ASAP potential to become a relevant tool to test the hypothesis in an integrative taxonomy process. ASAP identifies a species partition ranked with different scores that must be subsequently tested against other evidence in an integrative taxonomy framework, especially when a single-locus data is used.

The ASAP procedure of the barcoding data obtained in our study indicates the existence of five Arctia species within the formerly known Arctia villica subspecies distributed from the Iberia Peninsula to the areas around Transcaucasia and Iran. Two well-supported and reciprocally monophyletic groups were found in the Iberian Peninsula, A. angelica, and Sicily, A. konewkaii. The other group was made up by sequences of the polymorphic A. villica within two clusters which show notable sequence variability as expected from its wide geographic distribution across many European and Asian localities. These two groups represent two A. villica populations related to both species A. marchandi and A. confluens, respectively. The A. villica populations (clade 1) from Austria, Germany, and Hungary were related to the A. marchandi population from Turkey while one specimen from Syria identified as A. villica is equally related to both groups. The other A. villica population (clade 2) from Great Britain, Italy, and half of the Iberian Peninsula was related to the polymorphic A. confluens (Fig. 2). The polymorphic A. confluens group has three different BINs in the same area of distribution.

Hence, with the combined evidence from comparative morphological studies and the DNA barcode results presented above, Arctia species belonging to the villica group could be considered as metapopulations lineages separately evolving extended through time and including connected subpopulations according to the Unified Species Concept and Species Delimitation (de Queiroz, 2007). In our study, these Arctia species must have evolved separately from other lineages with separated historical biogeographic processes (Fig. 2).

The current distributions of A. villica species complex is likely to be the result of multiple range shifts driven by past climatic changes. Cyclic climatic change during the Pleistocene has caused repeated range shifts in most European taxa, profoundly influencing the biodiversity of Europe (for reviews, see Hewitt 1996, 1999, 2000, 2004; Taberlet et al. 1998; Schmitt 2007).

Three peninsular refugia in the south of the continent, Iberia, Italy, and Balkan harbour high biodiversity and endemism rates due in large part to their long-term environmental stability, which enables the persistence of palaeoendemic taxa (e.g., Jansson 2003; Graham et al. 2006). Isolation among refugial populations promotes genetic and phenotypic differentiation as a result of independent adaptation to local environments and genetic drift, with consequences for reproductive isolation between discrete refugial lineages and the creation of hybrid zones where diverged lineages come into secondary contact (Hewitt 1999).

The major lineage of A. villica may have diversified in four complexes represented by a widespread group of ancient A. villica from Spain to Russia and three species groups restricted to known areas in the Iberian Peninsula (A. angelica), Sicily (A. konewkaii), and around the Caucasus (A. confluens and A. marchandi), showing a pattern that could be considered evidence for similar ecological preferences or parallel histories for these species during the Quaternary. The fact that these four taxa with more restricted distribution make up separated clades to the broadly distributed A. villica suggests that all clades share it as their recent common ancestor. This phylogeographic pattern has been suggested for other Lepidoptera (e.g. those of the genera Polyommatus Latreille, 1804, Erebia Dalman, 1816, Melitaea Fabricius, 1807, Parnassius Latreille, 1804, Chelis Rambur, [1866]), in which it is postulated a marked role of climatic oscillations during the Pleistocene on population isolation and differentiation (Haubrich and Schmitt 2007; Albre et al. 2008; Lenevea et al. 2009; Vila et al. 2010; Todisco et al. 2012; Ortiz et al. 2015).

The apparent absence of a clear lineage sorting between A. villica and A. confluens-A. marchandi may be due to relatively recent radiation. Preliminary information in Kizildağ et al. (2019) suggested that A. marchandi should be considered at the subspecific level, although the A. confluens-A. marchandi divergence must be further evaluated when more specimens from all over their distributional ranges have been sequenced.

However, an increasing number of studies indicate that many endemic taxa inhabiting refugial regions are of Pleistocene origin and formed by allopatric fragmentation. In some cases, they are described as distinct species and, in other cases, these taxa are considered to be subspecies or lineages within species. The present occurrence of A. angelica, A. confluens and A. marchandi in the Iberian Peninsula and around the Caucasus, respectively, showing a sympatric distribution with A. villica, is thought to be the result of a range expansion of A. villica since the last glaciation events, due to the high ecological plasticity of this species and the finding of many suitable habitats, including A. konewkaii in Sicily.

Additional information from nuclear markers and a greater number of samples from the Caucasus will be crucial for the resolution of the different questions that are currently unresolved, such as A. confluens and A. marchandi intraspecific variability and whether they can be delimited and recognized as species utilizing integrated taxonomy.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the staff at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding for sequence analysis. Paul D.N. Hebert and many other colleagues of the Barcode of Life project (Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada) contributed to the success of this study. We are particularly grateful to Ramón Macià, Carlos Antonietty and Pablo Valero for loaning specimens and to Peter Huemer from Tiroler Landesmuseum in Innsbruck (Austria) and Axel Hausmann from Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, of Munich (Germany), for granting access to their projects on BOLD. Thanks are also due to Alejandro López, Ana Isabel Asensio, and Manuel González Veiga for their comments, suggestions and technical support. John Girdley and Claire Ward also helped with comments and linguistic advice.

Environmental Authorities in the National Park of Sierra Nevada (Andalusia), National Park of Picos de Europa (Asturias), Aragón Region, Castilla-La Mancha Region, Natural Park of Alt Pirineu, and Aran Valley (Catalonia) permitted collection and access to field sites. We also thank to Reza Zahiri and various anonymous referees for their comments. We are very grateful for this collegial and kind support. This study has been supported by the project Fauna Ibérica XII – Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea I (PGC2018-095851-B-C63) of the Spanish Ministry of Research and Science and part of DNA sequencing was supported by Genome Canada (Ontario Genomics Institute) in the framework of the iBOL program, WP 1.9. The Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales of Toledo (ICAM-UCLM) provided infrastructure and collaborated in logistic tasks; we thank its director, Prof. Federico Fernández González, for his kind support.

References

  • Ahrens D, Fujisawa T, Krammer HJ, Eberle J, Fabrizi S, Vogler AP (2016) Rarity and incomplete sampling in DNA-based species delimitation. Systematic Biology 65(3): 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw002
  • Albre J, Gers C, Legal L (2008) Molecular phylogeny of the Erebia tyndarus (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) complex of species combining CoxII and ND5 mitochrondrial genes: A case study of recent radiation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47(1): 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.009
  • Anisimova M, Gil M, Dufayard J, Dessimoz C, Gascuel O (2011) Survey of Branch Support Methods Demonstrates Accuracy, Power, and Robustness of Fast Likelihoodbased Approximation Schemes. Systematic Biology 60(5): 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr041
  • de Freina JJ (2011) Revision des Arctia villica-Komplexes – 2. Teil. Nomenklatur und Systematik der osteuropäisch-asiatischen Arten Arctia villica (Linnaeus, 1758) (partim), Arctia marchandi De Freina, 1983 stat. n. und Arctia confluens Romanoff, 1884 stat. n. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Arctiinae). Entomofauna 32(4): 93–124.
  • de Freina JJ, Nardelli U (2007) Revision des Arctia villica-Komplexes – 1. Teil. Nomenklatur und Systematik der adriato- und atlantomediterranen Arten Arctia villica (Linnaeus, 1758 (partim), Arctia angelica (Boisduval, 1829) stat. n. und Arctia konewkaii (Freyer, 1831) stat. rev. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Arctiinae). Entomologische Zeitschrift Stuttgart 117(3): 105–123.
  • de Freina JJ, Witt TJ (1987) Die Bombyces und Sphinges der Westpalaerktis (Insecta, Lepidoptera) Band 1. Forschung and Wissenschaft, München, Germany, 708 pp.
  • deWaard JR, Ivanova NV, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN (2008) Assembling DNA barcodes: Analytical Protocols. In: Martin C (Ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology: Environmental Genetics. Humana Press, Totowa, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-548-0_15
  • Fibiger M (1997) Noctuidae Europaeae. Noctuinae III. Entomological Press, Soro, 418 pp.
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using Single-Locus Data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: A revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology 62(5): 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
  • Graham CH, Moritz C, Williams SE (2006) Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(3): 632–636. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505754103
  • Guindon S, Dufayard J, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  • Hausmann A, Huemer P (2011) Taxonomic decision as a compromise: Acasis appensata (Eversmann, 1832) in Central Italy–a case of conflicting evidence between DNA barcode and morphology (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zootaxa 3070(1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3070.1.7
  • Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(41): 14812–14817. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406166101
  • Hewitt GM (1996) Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58(3): 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1996.0035
  • Hewitt GM (2004) Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 359(1442): 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1388
  • Hogan D, Chernomor O, Haeseler A, Mihn B, Vihn L (2017) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Huemer P, Hausmann A (2009) A new expanded revision of the European high mountain Sciadia tenebraria species group (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zootaxa 2117(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2117.1.1
  • Jansson R (2003) Global patterns in endemism explained by past climatic change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 270(1515): 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2283
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh B, Wong T, Haeseler A, Jermiin L (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Kimura M (1980) A simple model for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Kizildağ S, Kemal M, Koçak AÖ (2019) Comments on the taxonomic status of “marchandi De Freina” in SE Turkey (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae). Miscellaneous Papers 189: 1–3.
  • Lenevea J, Chichvarkhin A, Wahlberg N (2009) Varying rates of diversification in the genus Melitaea (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) during the past 20 million years. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 97(2): 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01208.x
  • Lumley LM, Sperling FAH (2010) Integrating morphology and mitochondrial DNA for species delimitation within the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) cryptic species complex (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Systematic Entomology 35(3): 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00514.x
  • Murzin VS (2003) The Tiger Moths of the Former Soviet Union (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 243 pp.
  • Mutanen M, Aarvik L, Huemer P, Kaila L, Karsholt O, Tuck K (2012) DNA barcodes reveal that the widespread European tortricid moth Phalonidia manniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is a mixture of two species. Zootaxa 3262(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3262.1.1
  • Nguyen L, Schmidt H, Haeseler A, Minh B (2015) A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Ortiz AS, Rubio RM, Guerrero JJ, Garre M, Hausmann A (2015) Integrated taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation in the genus Chelis Rambur, [1866] in the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae). Spixiana 39: 273–286.
  • Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler P (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology 55(4): 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011
  • Reid NM, Carstens BC (2012) Phylogenetic estimation error can decrease the accuracy of species delimitation: A Bayesian implementation of the general mixed Yule-coalescent model. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12(1): e196. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-196
  • Rönkä K, Mappes J, Kaila L, Wahlberg N (2016) Putting Parasemia in its phylogenetic place: A molecular analysis of the subtribe Arctiina (Lepidoptera). Systematic Entomology 41(4): 844–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12194
  • Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Seifert B, Stauffer C, Christian E, Crozier RH (2010) Integrative taxonomy: A multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. Annual Review of Entomology 55(1): 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085432
  • Schrank F (1802) Fauna Boica. Durchgedachte Geschichte der in Baiern einheimischen und zahmen Thiere. Zweyter Band zweyte Abtheilung 2(2). Johann Wilhelm Krüll, Ingolstadt, 152 pp.
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Todisco V, Gratton P, Zakharov EV, Wheatm CW, Sbordoni V, Sperling FAH (2012) Mitochondrial phylogeography of the Holarctic Parnassius phoebus complex supports a recent refugial model for alpine butterflies. Journal of Biogeography 39(6): 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02675.x
  • Vila R, Lukhtanov V, Talavera G, Gil TF, Pierce NE (2010) How common are dot-like distributions? Taxonomical oversplitting in western European Agrodiaetus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) revealed by chromosomal and molecular markers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101(1): 130–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01481.x
  • Witt TJ, Ronkay L (2011) Noctuidae Europaeae. Lymantriinae-Arctiinae, Including Phylogeny and Check List of the Quadrifid Noctuoidea of Europe (Vol. 13). Entomological Press, Sorø, 448 pp.
  • Witt TJ, Speidel W, Ronkay G, Ronkay L, László GM (2011) Arctiinae. In: Witt TJ, Ronkay L (Eds) Noctuidae Europaeae (Vol. 13). Lymantriinae and Arctiinae Including Phylogeny and Check List of the Quadrifid Noctuoidea of Europe. Entomological Press, Sorø, 81‒217.
  • Yela J (2002) The internal genitalia as a taxonomic tool: description of the relict endemic moth, Coranarta restricta sp. n., from the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Hadeninae). Entomologica Fennica 13(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33338/ef.84131
  • Ylla J, Macià R, Gastón FJ (2010) Manual de Identificación y Guía de Campo de los Árctidos de la Península Ibérica y Baleares. Argania edition, Barcelona, 290 pp.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Complete similarity matrix

Antonio S. Ortiz, Rosa M. Rubio, Josef J. de Freina, Juan J. Guerrero, Manuel Garre, José Luis Yela

Data type: Similarity index matrix

Explanation note: Complete similarity index matrix among Arctia villica species.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (143.50 kb)
login to comment