Catalogue |
Corresponding author: Ralph W. Holzenthal ( holze001@umn.edu ) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev
© 2017 Ralph W. Holzenthal, Adolfo R. Calor.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Holzenthal RW, Calor AR (2017) Catalog of the Neotropical Trichoptera (Caddisflies). ZooKeys 654: 1-566. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.654.9516
|
The Neotropical caddisfly (Trichoptera) fauna is cataloged from a review of over 1,000 literature citations through 2015 (partial 2016) to include 3,262 currently recognized, valid species-group names in 25 families and 155 extant genera. Fourteen subspecies are included in the total as well as 35 fossil species and 1 fossil genus. The region covered includes all of Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, and South America. Genus-group and species-group synonyms are listed. For each nominal species, information on the type locality, type depository, sex of type, distribution by country, and other pertinent taxonomic or biological information is included. Summary information on taxonomy, phylogeny, distribution, immature stages, and biology are provided for each family and genus where known. An extensive index to all nominal taxa is included to facilitate use of the catalog. The glossosomatid species Mexitrichia usseglioi Rueda Martín & Gibon, is transferred to Mortoniella comb. n.
Caddisflies, Trichoptera , catalog, Neotropical, taxonomy, distribution, valid names, synonyms, bibliography
Trichoptera are an order of holometabolous insects that have aquatic egg, larval, and pupal stages. These immature stages are ubiquitous in the world’s freshwaters, but are especially diverse in rivers and streams. In the Neotropics, larvae can be found in small trickles and seeps in the high Andean páramo, down to the very large, slowly flowing, lowland rivers, and all kinds of rivers and streams between these extremes. It is in intermediate sized, forested, mountain streams where the fauna seems to reach its greatest diversity. Intermittent streams also support a trichopterous fauna, with a few species especially adapted to seasonal drying. A very few species can be found in waters of thermal origin or with water chemistry that has been affected by volcanic activity. In addition to lotic species, those that frequent standing waters also occur, but this lentic fauna is not as diverse as that of northern, Holarctic lakes and ponds. However, floodplain lakes and pools, swamps and marshes in lowland areas, and mountain lakes all harbor species. There are also species that frequent the spray and splash zones of waterfalls and similar torrential situations as well as hygropetric habitats. These species often occur above the waterline, where a few venture quite far from the aquatic habitat. Only a single species has been reported from a container habitat (bromeliad tanks) and none of the Neotropical species is known from the marine littoral, unlike some Australian and New Zealand species. Recent reviews of Trichoptera diversity, biology, and natural history include those of
Trichoptera larvae are important participants in energy flow and nutrient dynamics in the aquatic environment. They display a wide diversity of trophic adaptations, being surpassed only by aquatic Diptera in the type of food eaten and the manner in which it is obtained. Similarly, the larvae exploit a wide variety of aquatic microhabitats. This trophic and habitat diversity has been attributed to the larvae’s ability to use silk to construct capture nets, retreats, cases, and pupal shelters. In fact, the order has been divided into taxonomic units based on the differences in the way silk is used, whether to spin nets or tubes, or as mortar to make portable cases. The case makers use sand and small mineral fragments, pieces of leaves or other vegetable material, or silk alone to construct cases. Other larvae are “free-living,” but nevertheless lay down a strand of silk as they move across the substrate. Not only do larvae exhibit great diversity in their biology, they also respond to pollution in various manners, most being intolerant to most forms of pollution. As such, they have been used extensively as biological indicators of water quality, especially in temperate regions, where a large field of study has developed around this application. However, in the Neotropics, where larval taxonomy is poorly known, progress in this area has been hampered.
Like most holometabolous larvae, Trichoptera have well-developed mandibulate mouthparts, although the maxillae and labium are closely associated and the latter is modified to spin silk. The thoracic legs are well developed, but the abdomen lacks prolegs, except for a pair of terminal anal prolegs, each bearing a strong anal claw. Highly branched or single filament abdominal gills may be present. The exarate pupae are also aquatic and have dectitious mandibles, at least in the Neotropical families.
Trichoptera adults are less familiar to the aquatic ecologist or taxonomic non-specialist. Adults are small, generally drab colored, and usually begin to fly after the sun sets, when they are attracted to artificial lights, often in great numbers. However, it is this life history stage that is of paramount taxonomic importance because the species level taxonomy of the order is based mainly on structures of the adult male genitalia. Females and larvae must be positively associated with the adult males before their identities can be established. In contrast to that of larvae, the ecology and behavior of adult Trichoptera are poorly known. They, too, are certainly important components of the aquatic and riparian environments, where they serve as food for fish, birds, bats, lizards, frogs, and other vertebrates, as well as spiders and other invertebrates. Adult female flight behavior, especially upstream flight prior to oviposition, is an important compensation for downstream larval drift. The adults have specialized, lapping type mouthparts and most probably imbibe liquids, including nectar. Adult Trichoptera certainly depend on the riparian habitat for mating and oviposition sites, shelter, food, etc. and therefore may be good indicators of riparian health and integrity, and thus that of the entire watershed as shown by
Adult Trichoptera have greatly modified mouthparts. Although most species have reduced mandibles and maxillae, almost all possess well-developed maxillary and labial palps. The compound eyes are well developed, and the head may or may not bear ocelli. Antennae are long and filiform in most species. The head and thorax bear characteristic “setal warts.” Two pairs of wings are present with the forewings longer, but often narrower than the hind wings. Both pairs of wings, as well as the body and other appendages, are covered with setae, or hairs, and occasionally scales. The hairs and scales are usually plainly colored, but the Neotropical fauna contains species with brightly colored or intricate patterns of setae, especially on the forewings. Tibial spurs on the legs are conspicuous.
The world fauna contains about 15,000 described species, but it has been estimated that as many as 50,000 species may occur. In this catalog we record 3,262 valid names of extant species-group taxa from the Neotropics, including 14 extant subspecies. One species is listed as Trichoptera, incertae sedis. This represents 1,050 more species-group taxa than included in the catalog published by
Number of extant and fossil species and genera of Neotropical Trichoptera, by family.
Family | No. Species | No. Genera | ||
Extant | Fossil | Extant | Fossil | |
Anomalopsychidae | 28 | – | 2 | – |
Atriplectididae | 2 | – | 1 | – |
Calamoceratidae | 74 | 1 | 2 | – |
Ecnomidae | 44 | – | 2 | – |
Glossosomatidae | 266 | 5 | 11 | – |
Helicophidae | 16 | – | 5 | – |
Helicopsychidae | 121 | 3 | 1 | – |
Hydrobiosidae | 183 | 1 | 22 | – |
Hydropsychidae | 476 | 4 | 15 | 1 |
Hydroptilidae | 946 | 7 | 36 | – |
Kokiriidae | 2 | – | 1 | – |
Lepidostomatidae | 28 | – | 1 | – |
Leptoceridae | 224 | 2 | 16 | – |
Limnephilidae | 51 | – | 10 | – |
Odontoceridae | 45 | – | 3 | – |
Philopotamidae | 377 | 6 | 5 | – |
Philorheithridae | 6 | – | 2 | – |
Polycentropodidae | 283 | 1 | 5 | – |
Pseudoneureclipsidae | 4 | 4 | 1 | – |
Psychomyiidae | 2 | – | 1 | – |
Rhyacophilidae | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Sericostomatidae | 20 | – | 6 | – |
Stenopsychidae | 3 | – | 1 | – |
Tasimiidae | 2 | – | 2 | – |
Xiphocentronidae | 58 | 1 | 3 | – |
TOTAL | 3262 | 35 | 155 | 1 |
The Neotropical fauna is divided into two distinct faunal elements – the Chilean and Brazilian, equivalent to the Neotropical and Patagonian of
The first descriptions of Neotropical Trichoptera occurred in the 1830s in the works of Perty (1830-1834) (Phryganea maculata = Macrostemum maculatum),
M.E. Mosely was among the first of the “modern” workers to produce several important works and revisions on the fauna (e.g.,
Notable recent workers include E.B. Angrisano, W. Bravo, P. Rueda Martín, and J. Sganga on the fauna of Argentina and Uruguay, J. Oláh on Hydropsychidae and Hydroptilidae, R.J. Blahnik and D.R. Robertson on the Philopotamidae and Glossosomatidae, respectively, J. Bueno-Soria, S. Santiago-Fragoso, and R. Barba-Álvarez on the fauna of Mexico, S.C. Harris, R.E. Thomson, and A.P.M. Santos on Hydroptilidae, A. Prather on Calamoceratidae, K.A. Johanson on Helicopsychidae, F. Muñoz-Quesada on Wormaldia and other taxa, R.W. Holzenthal on Trichoptera across the region, many active Brazilian workers and their students (A.R. Calor, A.M.O. Pes, L.L. Dumas, D.M. Takiya, A.P.M. Santos, H. Paprocki, J.L. Nessimian, and others), and W. Wichard on fossil taxa.
In preparing this catalog several published (or electronic) checklists, catalogs, and bibliographies of the regional and world Trichoptera faunas were consulted. In all cases, the accuracy of the names, citations, or listings in these works were checked and corrected as necessary before inclusion in the present catalog. However, as these former works may be useful to the user of this catalog in further research on the Neotropical fauna or other regional faunas, these works are listed and discussed below, beginning with those covering the world fauna.
The world catalog, Trichopterorum Catalogus, Volumes I–XV + Index, 1960–1973b, by F.C.J. Fischer is an indispensable and first source of taxonomic and associated literature pertaining to Trichoptera. The catalog and its supplements cover all literature from 1758 to the end of 1960. As a planned continuation to Fischer’s catalog, A.P. Nimmo published the first volume of Bibliographica Trichopterorum (
Regional bibliographies of a general nature include those of
Argentina (
In addition, several works have been published containing keys for identifying families and genera of the Neotropical fauna.
The Neotropical Trichoptera fauna is diverse, second only in numbers of species to that of the Oriental fauna (
A catalog is a list of nominal species and associated taxonomic and nomenclatural references arranged in a logical, easily accessible format. Catalogs are important tools to anyone requiring knowledge of currently accepted names, including synonyms and distributional data. Because the binomen is usually the starting point of the information storage and retrieval system afforded by the Linnean hierachy, an accurate list of currently accepted species names is essential for anyone needing information about a species, be it for basic or applied research. By accumulating and organizing all the previously published Neotropical Trichoptera taxonomic information into a single, easily accessed source, we hope to facilitate and stimulate further exploration and research on the fauna. Furthermore, we hope that this catalog benefits research beyond Trichoptera systematics, such as ecology, behavior, conservation, and the application of Trichoptera as biological indicators of water quality.
The need for a comprehensive catalog for the Neotropical Trichoptera grew from discussions between Flint and Holzenthal in 1993. These discussions and effort resulted in the 1999 publication by the Ohio Biological Survey of the Catalog of the Neotropical Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) by Flint, Holzenthal and Harris. The need for an update of the “Catalog” emerged from discussions between Holzenthal and Calor in 2015, some 15 years after the publication by
The current catalog lists names of all species described or recorded from south of the United States, to include all of Mexico, Central and South America, the Greater and Lesser Antilles, and all of the off-shore islands pertaining politically to the countries of the region (although the latter contain very few Trichoptera or have not been surveyed). We realize that this region extends northward beyond the traditional northern boundary of the Neotropical Region to include northern, Nearctic Mexico. However, with regard to Trichoptera, the traditional demarcation between the Neotropical and Nearctic regions, the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, does not apply. There is broad overlap and interdigitation of the Trichoptera faunas of the two regions from at least the southwestern states of the United States through Mexico and Central America until the mountains of eastern Costa Rica and western Panama. Although the region covered by this catalog is artificial with regard to biogeography, it has allowed us to be more objective as to which species to include in the catalog.
Few fossil species of caddisflies have been discovered in the Neotropical Realm. A single species of the fossil family Necrotaulidae has been described from the Rhaetic (upper Triassic) of western Argentina. The larval cases of a Brazilian Tertiary caddis, provisionally placed in the Limnephilidae, has also been described. Otherwise a number of caddisflies have been described in recent years from Dominican and now Mexican amber (
The catalog is organized alphabetically by family, genus, and species. For each family introductory information, including literature citations, of a general nature is given concerning distribution, diversity, taxonomy, biology, habitat, and knowledge of immature stages, if available. Valid generic names are next presented in boldface type, centered on the page, and followed by the author and, in square brackets, the number of currently recognized valid species-group taxa in the region, followed by the number of fossil species. A generic synonymy follows. The currently recognized, valid genus name is followed by its author, date and bibliographic citation of publication, and page number on which the name was formally established. Following this, in square brackets, the type species in its original combination with author and date is presented, along with any synonyms of the type species name, the manner in which the type species was established (e.g., original designation, monotypy, subsequent selection, etc.), and the family in which it was originally described if different from the current family. Other citations containing other important nomenclatural acts, generic revisions, or larval descriptions are next included with annotations contained in square brackets. Generic synonyms follow, in chronological order (oldest names first), and are presented in the same format and with the same information as presented for the valid genus name, with the addition of the citation where the generic synonymy was established. Subgeneric names are presented as generic synonyms and with the same information, but the subgeneric status is so indicated and the citation included. Following the generic synonymy, introductory information on the genus, similar to that presented for the family, is given.
All currently recognized, valid species and subspecies names (specific epithets only), in their current orthography, are then listed in alphabetical order and in boldface type. Fossil species (and genera) are preceded by the symbol †. In cases where subgenera are used, the subgenus name follows the specific epithet, in parentheses. Each species name is followed by its author, date and bibliographic citation of publication, and page number on which the name was formally established. Following, in square brackets, the type locality is presented, as annotated by us for clarity, but otherwise given as indicated in the original publication, except the country of origin is always listed first. The type depository is then given if known, and so indicated if unknown, according to the institution codes presented below. Sex of the type is presented next, if known, and so indicated if not known. Sex of type is followed (separated by a semicolon) by the sex or stage of any other specimens illustrated and described with the type specimen (these also separated by semicolons). Finally, still in square brackets and separated by a semicolon, the genus of the original combination, or the original orthography of the specific epithet if different from present orthography, is presented. In addition, citations for any significant publications containing redescriptions, lectotype or neotype designations or other nomenclatural acts, systematic revisions, larval descriptions, or new distribution records follow their appropriate species’ entries. Synonyms are indicated in italics, preceded by an em dash (—), and listed in chronological order (if more than one) and in their present orthography under the valid species entry. All species-group synonyms are included in the catalog. Information presented for synonyms is the same as presented for the senior name (date and bibliographic citation of the synonymy, sex of type, type depository, genus of original combination or original orthography), but also includes the date and bibliographic reference where the synonymy was established. Lastly, for each species entry the distribution by country, based on published records, is presented.
In addition to original citations and important taxonomic or nomenclatural works, all of the recent and important literature published after 1960 is included in the catalog. However, the extensive bibliographies presented by
All literature cited in the introduction and catalog itself is listed in the References section. The complete title of the journal, book, or other bibliographic source is given to assist the user in obtaining literature. In all cases, the original citation was consulted by the authors in compiling the catalog to ensure accuracy of information or to check date of issue.
The catalog includes all literature known to us up to the end of 2015, as well as several important works published in 2016 and any other literature published after 2015 that has come to our attention. The user is cautioned, however, that we make no claims to have included all the literature published in 2015, and certainly not 2016, but we have done our best to do so. Some literature is not abstracted in Zoological Record or Web of Science until several years after its date of publication and thus may have been missed. Again, the user should check the appropriate bibliographic sources to ensure complete coverage and overlap by several years the bibliography in this catalog when searching the literature in the future.
The catalog ends with an Index that lists all names presented in the catalog and the primary page number where the name occurs. Format of names in the index generally follows that presented in the catalog: valid species and subspecies epithets are presented in bold italics, followed by the current genus in italics; synonyms of species or subspecies names are presented in italics, followed by the current genus in italics. The original orthography of species names, including synonyms, is also indexed, but referred to the species in its current combination and orthography. For subspecies names, the trinomen is also indexed, but referred to the name in combination with the nominotypical name. Homonyms are also indexed, but with the author of the name and date of publication included. Valid genus names are presented in bold, followed by the family in square brackets. Generic synonyms are presented in italics, except that currently recognized subgeneric names are presented in bold italics, both followed by the family in square brackets. Fossil species are followed by the symbol †.
Since the publication of
Order Trichoptera
Suborder Annulipalpia
Superfamily Philopotamoidea
Family Philopotamidae
Alterosa
Chimarra
Chimarra
Chimarrita
Curgia
Otarrha
Chimarrhodella
Sortosa Navás, 1918
Wormaldia
Family Stenopsychidae
Pseudostenopsyche
Superfamily Psychomyioidea
Family Ecnomidae
Austrotinodes Schmid, 1955
Chilocentropus Navás, 1934
Family Polycentropodidae
Cernotina Ross, 1938
Cyrnellus Banks, 1913
Nyctiophylax
Polycentropus
Polyplectropus Ulmer, 1905
Family Pseudoneureclipsidae
Antillopsyche
Family Psychomyiidae
Tinodes
Family Xiphocentronidae Ross, 1949
Cnodocentron
Caenocentron
Machairocentron
Xiphocentron
Antillotrichia
Glyphocentron
Rhamphocentron
Sphagocentron
Xiphocentron
Superfamily Hydropsychoidea
Family Hydropsychidae
Blepharopus
Calosopsyche
Centromacronema Ulmer, 1905
Cheumatopsyche
Diplectrona Westwood, 1839
Hydropsyche
Ceratopsyche
Hydropsyche
Leptonema
Macronema
Macrostemum
† Palaehydropsyche
Plectromacronema
Plectropsyche
Pseudomacronema Ulmer, 1905
Smicridea
Rhyacophylax Müller, 1879
Smicridea
Streptospyche
Synoestropsis Ulmer, 1905
Suborder Integripalpia
Superfamily Glossosomatoidea
Family Glossosomatidae
Canoptila Mosely, 1939
Cariboptila Flint, 1964
Culoptila
Glossosoma
Itauara
Mastigoptila Flint, 1967
Merionoptila
Mortoniella
Protoptila Banks, 1904
Scotiotrichia Mosely, 1934
Tolhuaca
Superfamily Hydroptiloidea Stephens, 1836
Family Hydroptilidae Stephens, 1836
Acostatrichia Mosely, 1939
Alisotrichia Flint, 1964
Anchitrichia
Angrisanoia
Ascotrichia Flint, 1983
Betrichia Mosely, 1939
Bredinia Flint, 1968
Byrsopteryx Flint, 1981
Celaenotrichia Mosely, 1934
Cerasmatrichia Flint, Harris and Botosaneanu, 1994
Ceratotrichia Flint, 1992
Costatrichia
Dicaminus Müller, 1879
Flintiella Angrisano, 1995
Hydroptila
Ithytrichia
Kumanskiella
Leucotrichia Mosely, 1934
Mayatrichia
Mejicanotrichia
Metrichia Ross, 1938
Neotrichia
Nothotrichia Flint, 1967
Ochrotrichia Mosely, 1934
Orinocotrichia Harris, Flint and Holzenthal, 2002
Orthotrichia
Oxyethira
Argyrobothrus
Dactylotrichia
Dampfitrichia
Kelleyella
Loxotrichia
Oxytrichia Mosely, 1939
Tanytrichia
Peltopsyche Müller, 1879
Ragatrichia
Rhyacopsyche Müller, 1879
Scelobotrichia
Taraxitrichia
Tizatetrichia Harris, Flint and Holzenthal, 2002
Tricholeiochiton Kloets and Hinks, 1944
Tupiniquintrichia Santos, Nessimian and Takiya, 2016
Zumatrichia
Superfamily Rhyacophiloidea Stephens, 1836
Family Hydrobiosidae Ulmer, 1905
Amphichorema
Androchorema
Apatanodes Navás, 1934
Atopsyche
Atopsaura
Atopsyche
Dolochorema Banks, 1913
Australobiosis Schmid, 1958
Cailloma
Clavichorema Schmid, 1955
Heterochorema
Iguazu
Isochorema
Metachorema
Microchorema Schmid, 1955
Neoatopsyche Schmid, 1955
Neochorema
Neopsilochorema Schmid, 1955
Nolganema Navás, 1934
Parachorema
Pomphochorema Flint, 1969
Pseudoradema Schmid, 1955
Rheochorema Schmid, 1955
Schajovskoya
Stenochorema Schmid, 1955
Family Rhyacophilidae Stephens, 1836
Rhyacophila
Infraorder Brevitentoria
Superfamily Leptoceroidea
Family Atriplectididae
Neoatriplectides
Family Calamoceratidae Ulmer, 1905
Banyallarga Navás, 1916
Banyallarga Navás, 1916
Histricoverpa
Phylloicus Müller, 1880
Family Leptoceridae
Achoropsyche
Amazonatolica
Amphoropsyche
Atanatolica Mosely, 1936
Brachysetodes Schmid, 1955
Grumichella Müller, 1879
Hudsonema Mosely, 1936
Mystacides
Nectopsyche Müller, 1879
Neoathripsodes
Notalina Mosely, 1936
Neonotalina Holzenthal, 1986
Oecetis
Osflintia
Setodes
Triaenodes
Triplectides
Family Odontoceridae
Anastomoneura Huamantinco and Nessimian, 2004
Barypenthus
Marilia Müller, 1880
Family Philorheithridae Mosely, 1936
Mystacopsyche Schmid, 1955
Psilopsyche Ulmer, 1907
Superfamily Sericostomatoidea Stephens, 1836
Family Anomalopsychidae Flint, 1981
Anomalopsyche Flint, 1967
Contulma Flint, 1969
Family Helicophidae Mosely, 1953
Alloecentrellodes
Austrocentrus
Eosericostoma Schmid, 1955
Microthremma Schmid, 1955
Pseudosericostoma
Family Helicopsychidae
Helicopsyche
Cochliopsche
Feropsyche
Family Sericostomatidae Stephens, 1836
Chiloecia Navás, 1930
Grumicha Müller, 1879
Gumaga
Myotrichia Schmid, 1955
Notidobiella Schmid, 1955
Parasericostoma
Superfamily Tasimioidea
Family Tasimiidae
Charadropsyche Flint, 1969
Trichovespula Schmid, 1955
Infraorder Plenitentoria
Family Kokiriidae
Pangullia Navás, 1934
Superfamily Limnephiloidea
Family Limnephilidae
Anomalocosmoecus
Antarctoecia Ulmer, 1907
Austrocosmoecus Schmid, 1955
Clistoronia
Hesperophylax
Limnephilus
Metacosmoecus Schmid, 1955
Monocosmoecus
Platycosmoecus
Verger Navás, 1918
Superfamily Phryganeoidea
Family Lepidostomatidae
Lepidostoma
ASL Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
BMNH
CMNH
Collection Apollinaris he worked in Colombia, sent material to Navás, material presumed lost
Collection Malicky private collection, Hans Malicky, Lunz am See, Austria
Collection Martynov private collection in Warsaw, material not in ASL, presumed lost
Collection Navás some material transferred to
Collection Poinar collection of George O. Poinar, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Collection Wichard private collection, Wilfried Wichard, Bonn, Germany
CZNC Coleção Zoológica Norte Capixaba, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, São Mateus, Brazil
CZMA Coleção Zoológica do Maranhão, Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Caxias, Maranhão, Brazil
DZRJ
Coleção Entomológica Prof. José Alfredo Pinheiro Dutra, Departamento de Zoologia,
FHCU Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias (Departamento de Artropodos), Univeridad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay
GPIMH Geological-Palaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Hamburg, Germany
IBN
Instituto de Biodiverdidad Neotropical,
IESHC
INBIO
IHNEC
Museo de Paleontología,
ISMA Instituto San Miguel, Buenos Aires, Argentina
IZAM Instituto de Zoología Agrícola, Maracay, Venezuela
KMUL Karl-Marx-University, Leipzig, Germany
MHNJP
MIUP
MNHNP Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
MNHNS
NMSB
OPC
Jánus Oláh private collection, Debrecen, Hungary, presently under protection of
PAN
RNH Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands
SDMNH
San Diego
UChS
UMQ University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
UNLP Museo de la Plata, Universdad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
UZMC Universitetets Zoologiske Museet, Copenhagen, Denmark
ZIUH
ZMUA Zoölogische Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands
ZSZMH Zoologische Staatsinstitut und Zoologisches Museum, Hamburg, Germany
The family Anomalopsychidae was established by
Anomalopsyche
A single species is known from Chile. Larvae and pupae were described by
minuta (
—ocellata
Distribution. Chile.
Contulma
The 27 known species of Contulma range in distribution from Costa Rica, through the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia, to Chile and the mountains of southeastern Brazil. Certainly, many more undescribed species await discovery.
Contulma species are generally found associated with the spray and splash zones of waterfalls, small first order streams, and seeps in lush, montane forests. Several species have been taken from small streams flowing through the páramo.
adamsae
Distribution. Peru.
bacula
Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador.
boliviensis
Distribution. Bolivia.
caldensis
Distribution. Colombia.
cataracta
Distribution. Ecuador.
colombiensis Holzenthal and Flint, in
Distribution. Colombia.
costaricensis
Distribution. Costa Rica.
cranifer
Distribution. Chile.
echinata
Distribution. Colombia.
ecuadorensis
Distribution. Ecuador.
fluminensis
Distribution. Brazil.
inornata
Distribution. Colombia.
lanceolata
Distribution. Ecuador.
meloi
Distribution. Brazil.
nevada
Distribution. Colombia.
paluguillensis
Distribution. Ecuador.
papallacta
Distribution. Ecuador.
penai
Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador.
sana
Distribution. Brazil.
sancta
Distribution. Costa Rica.
spinosa Holzenthal and Flint, in
Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador.
talamanca
Distribution. Costa Rica.
tapanti
Distribution. Costa Rica.
tica
Distribution. Costa Rica.
tijuca
Distribution. Brazil.
tripui
Distribution. Brazil.
valverdei
Distribution. Costa Rica.
Neoatriplectides
Unknown family 1,
Only two species are known in the genus, with definitive records of adults of one from only Peru and Bolivia, and the other from southeastern Brazil. Larval only records are known from Colombia and Ecuador, as well as Peru The larvae were described by
desiderata
—Neoatriplectides sp.,
Distribution. Brazil.
froehlichi
—Probable n. gen., n. sp.,
Distribution. Bolivia, Colombia [probable], Ecuador, Peru.
This is a small, but cosmopolitan family of seven genera and about 200 species, most of which are tropical. Only two genera, Banyallarga and Phylloicus, are to be found in the Neotropics, with 17 and 58 species respectively, including one fossil species from Domincan amber.
Adults are more diurnal in their activity than most Trichoptera. The immature stages and cases of several species of Phylloicus have been described:
Banyallarga
Histricoverpa
This genus of 17 known species is endemic to the Neotropics, being found from Nicaragua to Argentina. Adults exhibit a preference for flying and swarming during the day, and only rarely are attracted to collecting lights.
The larvae are found in slowly flowing areas of small streams on sandy-stony bottoms or among vegetation (
acutiterga (Histricoverpa) (Denning and Hogue), in
Distribution. Costa Rica.
argentinica (Banyallarga)
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Peru.
columbiana (Banyallarga) (
Distribution. Colombia.
echinata (Histricoverpa)
—“n. sp. 1”
Distribution. Peru.
fortuna (Histricoverpa) (Resh), in
—undescribed genus, undescribed species “A”
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
loxana (Banyallarga) (Navás), 1934a:173 [Type locality: Ecuador, Loja; MNHNP; original description implies ♂; but the type is female; in Phylloicus]. —
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru.
mexicana (Histricoverpa)
Distribution. Mexico.
mollicula (Histricoverpa) (
Distribution. Venezuela.
nica (Histricoverpa)
Distribution. Nicaragua.
penai (Banyallarga)
Distribution. Bolivia, Ecuador.
quincemil (Histricoverpa)
Distribution. Peru.
sanchezi (Histricoverpa)
Distribution. Colombia.
sylvana (Histricoverpa)
Distribution. Costa Rica, Nicaragua.
tapanti (Histricoverpa)
Distribution. Costa Rica.
vicaria (Banyallarga) (
—testacea
Distribution. Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela.
villosa (Banyallarga) (
Distribution. Ecuador.
yungensis (Banyallarga)
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela.
Phylloicus
Homoeoplectron
Notiomyia
Murielia Hogue and Denning, in
The genus is limited to Latin America, except for two species which extend into the southwestern United States. As in Banyallarga, the often strikingly colored adults are day active, although they do appear at collecting lights, especially teneral individuals.
Larvae have been described a number of times (
abdominalis (
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil.
aculeatus (
—distans
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
adamsae
—“n. sp. 3” Flint, 1996: 425. —
Distribution. Peru.
aeneus (
—ornatus (
—centralus (
amazonas
Distribution. Brazil, Guyana, Peru, Venezuela.
angustior
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Paraguay, Trinidad[?], Uruguay, Venezuela.
auratus
—“n. sp. 4” Flint, 1996:425. —
Distribution. Brazil, Peru.
bertioga
Distribution. Brazil.
bicarinatus
Distribution. Bolivia, Peru.
bidigitatus
Distribution. Brazil.
blahniki
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
brevior
Distribution. Brazil, Guyana, Suriname.
bromeliarum
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil.
camargoi Quinteiro and Calor, in
Distribution. Brazil.
chalybeus (
Distribution. Cuba.
cordatus
Distribution. Venezuela.
crenatus
Distribution. Colombia.
cressae
Distribution. Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela.
cubanus
Distribution. Cuba.
dumasi
Distribution. Brazil.
elegans Hogue and Denning, in
Distribution. Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Panama.
elektoros
Distribution. Brazil, Peru, Venezuela.
ephippium
Distribution. Ecuador.
farri
Distribution. Jamaica.
fenestratus
Distribution. Brazil, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, Venezuela.
flinti
—“n. sp. 2” Flint, 1996:425. —
Distribution. Brazil, Peru.
hansoni
Distribution. Trinidad, Venezuela.
holzenthali
Distribution. Colombia, Venezuela.
iridescens
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
lituratus
—“species 1”
—priapulus Denning and Hogue, 1983, in
Distribution. Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Panama, Venezuela.
llaviuco
Distribution. Ecuador.
maculatus (
Distribution. Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico.
magnus
Distribution. Colombia.
major
—assimilis (
Distribution. Brazil, Paraguay.
medius
Distribution. Brazil.
mexicanus (
Distribution. Mexico, U.S.A.
monneorum
Distribution. Brazil.
monticolus
Distribution. Dominica, Guadeloupe, Martinique.
munozi
—“species 2”
Distribution. Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama.
nigripennis (
—latus (
—sagittosa (
Distribution. Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua.
obliquus
Distribution. Brazil.
panamensis
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
paprockii
Distribution. Brazil.
passulatus
Distribution. Venezuela.
paucartambo
—“n. sp. 1” Flint, 1996:424. —
Distribution. Ecuador, Peru.
perija
Distribution. Venezuela.
pirapo
Distribution. Argentina, Paraguay.
plaumanni
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil.
pulchrus
Distribution. Cuba, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico.
quadridigitatus
Distribution. Brazil.
quitacalzon
Distribution. Peru.
spectabilis
Distribution. Peru.
spinulacolis
Distribution. Venezuela.
superbus
Distribution. Cuba, Dominican Republic.
tricalcaratus (
Distribution. Brazil.
trichothylax
Distribution. Ecuador.
† velteni
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
yolandae
Distribution. Brazil.
This family now contains 10 genera and almost 400 species, mostly confined to the Southern Hemisphere, with Australia home to several endemic genera. In the Northern Hemisphere, species extend into the Palearctic and just barely into the Nearctic regions. In their recent phylogeny,
The larvae of a number of the Old World species of Ecnomus have been described (
Austrotinodes
Austrotinodes, originally described for a series of species from southern Chile and adjacent Argentina, is now known to occur throughout the entire Neotropics, including the West Indies and Texas (
The pupa of A. recta and the larva of an unknown Chilean species were described by
abrachium Thson and Holzenthal, 2010:39 [Type locality: Brazil, Minas Gerais, Rio Paraúna, 3 km S Santana do Riacho, 19°10.986'S, 43°43.485'W, el. 650 m;
Distribution. Brazil.
adamsae
Distribution. Tobago.
amazonensis
Distribution. Brazil.
ancylus
Distribution. Ecuador.
angustior
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
ariasi
Distribution. Brazil.
armiger
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
belchioris
Distribution. Brazil.
boliviensis
Distribution. Bolivia.
bracteatus
Distribution. Brazil.
brevis
Distribution. Chile.
canoabo
Distribution. Venezuela.
cekalovici
Distribution. Chile.
chihuahua
Distribution. Mexico.
contubernalis
—species B
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
cressae
Distribution. Venezuela.
cubanus
Distribution. Cuba.
doublesi Muñoz and Holzenthal, 1993:565 [Type locality: Costa Rica, Parque Nacional Guanacaste, Estación Pitilla, Río Orosí, 10.991°N, 85.428°W;
Distribution. Costa Rica, Nicaragua.
fortunata
—species B
Distribution. Panama.
freytagi
Distribution. Belize, Honduras.
fuscomarginatus
Distribution. Venezuela.
inbio Muñoz and Holzenthal, 1993:565 [Type locality: Costa Rica, Alajuela, Reserva Forestal San Ramón, Río San Lorencito and tribs., 10.216°N, 84.607°W;
Distribution. Costa Rica.
irwini
Distribution. Chile.
labiatus
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
lineatus (
Distribution. Chile.
longispinum
Distribution. Brazil.
madininae
Distribution. Martinique.
mexicanus
Distribution. Mexico.
neblinensis
Distribution. Venezuela.
nielseni
Distribution. Argentina.
panamensis
Distribution. Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama.
paraguayensis
Distribution. Brazil, Paraguay.
picada
Distribution. Chile.
prolixus
Distribution. Brazil.
quadrispina
Distribution. Chile.
recta
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
recurvatus
Distribution. Chile.
sedmani
—species A
Distribution. Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama.
talcana (
—latior
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
taquaralis
Distribution. Brazil.
triangularis
Distribution. Chile.
tuxtlensis
Distribution. Mexico.
uruguayensis
Distribution. Brazil, Uruguay.
Chilocentropus
This genus is likely a synonym of Austrotinodes, but having no evidence
disparilis
Distribution. Chile.
This cosmopolitan family of approximately 700 described species is represented in the Neotropics only by members of the subfamily Protoptilinae (save for one species of Glossosomatinae). The 269 Neotropical species, including 5 fossils in amber, are distributed among 11 genera, all endemic to the Neotropics, except for Culoptila, with species also in the southwestern U.S., Protoptila, with species widely distributed in North and South America, and a single, northern Mexican Glossosoma species. One of the Neotropical genera (Cariboptila) is endemic to the Greater Antilles, while 4 others (Canoptila, Mastigoptila, Scotiotrichia, Tolhuaca) are endemic to the Chilean Subregion and/or southeastern Brazil.
In their world revision of Glossosomatidae, Protoptilinae,
Six of the 10 Neotropical genera are known in the immature stages. In general, the tropical species tolerate warmer and more slowly flowing waters than the northern species, but feed in the same manner, i.e., by scraping periphyton and associated detritus from the upper surfaces of rocks. The Neotropical species build typical tortoise-cases, often with dorsal respiratory openings resembling chimneys (
Canoptila
Two species are known in the genus, both endemic to the Atlantic forests of southeastern Brazil (
bifida
Distribution. Brazil.
williami
Distribution. Brazil.
Cariboptila
Campsiophora
Cubanoptila Sykora, in
Muangpaipsyche
Cariboptila is endemic to the islands of the Greater Antilles. The immatures stages of C. orophila and C. jamaicensis were described by
arawak (
Distribution. Jamaica.
aurulenta
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
botosaneanui (
Distribution. Cuba.
caab
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
calcigena
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
cubana (Sykora), in
Distribution. Cuba.
† grimaldii (
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
guajira
Distribution. Cuba.
hispaniolica
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
jamaicensis
Distribution. Jamaica.
† longiscapa (
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
madremia (
Distribution. Cuba.
mathisi
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
† mederi (
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
mulata (
Distribution. Cuba.
muybonita (
Distribution. Cuba.
orophila
Distribution. Puerto Rico.
paradoxa
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
pedophila (
—areopagita (
Distribution. Dominican Republic, Haiti, Puerto Rico, Thailand [?].
† poinari (
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
poquita
Distribution. Cuba.
purpurea (Sykora), in
Distribution. Cuba.
soltera
Distribution. Cuba.
tridens (Botosaneanu), in
Distribution. Jamaica.
trispinata
Distribution. Puerto Rico.
Culoptila
The genus was revised by
acaena
Distribution. Mexico.
† aguilerai Wichard, Solórzano-Kraemer and Luer, 2006:39 [Type locality: Chiapas, Simojovel de Allende, approximately 50 km from Tuxtla Gutiérrez, 17°08'19"N, 92°42'00"W, 600 m; IHNEC; ♂; in amber].
Distribution. Mexico.
aluca
Distribution. Mexico.
amberia
Distribution. Mexico.
azulae
Distribution. Mexico.
barrerai
Distribution. Mexico.
bidentata
Distribution. Costa Rica.
buenoi
Distribution. Mexico.
cascada
Distribution. Costa Rica.
costaricensis
Distribution. Costa Rica.
denningi
Distribution. Mexico.
hamata
Distribution. Costa Rica.
jamapa
Distribution. Mexico.
montanensis
Distribution. Guatemala.
moselyi
Distribution. Mexico, U.S.A.
nahuatl
Distribution. Mexico.
pararusia
Distribution. Mexico.
rusia
Distribution. Guatemala, Mexico.
saltena
Distribution. Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua.
tapanti
Distribution. Costa Rica.
tarascanica
Distribution. Mexico.
thoracica (
Distribution. Mexico, U.S.A.
unispina
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
vexillifera
Distribution. Guatemala.
Glossosoma
This is a large genus of primarily Holarctic and Oriental species. One western North American species, G. ventrale Banks, extends southward into northern Mexico. Larvae of the genus have been described a number of times (
ventrale
Distribution. Mexico, U.S.A.
Itauara
Antoptila
alexanderi
Distribution. Brazil.
amazonica (
Distribution. Brazil.
bidentata
Distribution. Guyana.
blahniki
Distribution. Brazil.
brasiliana (
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay.
charlotta
Distribution. Brazil.
emilia
Distribution. Brazil.
flinti
Distribution. Brazil.
guarani (
Distribution. Argentina.
guyanensis
Distribution. Guyana.
jamesii
Distribution. Brazil.
julia
Distribution. Brazil.
lucinda
Distribution. Brazil.
ovis
Distribution. Guyana, Venezuela.
peruensis
Distribution. Peru.
plaumanni (
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay.
rodmani
Distribution. Brazil.
simplex
Distribution. Brazil.
spiralis
Distribution. Guyana.
stella
Distribution. Brazil.
tusci
Distribution. Brazil.
unidentata
Distribution. Guyana.
Mastigoptila
The 9 species of Mastigoptila are known only from the Chilean Subregion of the Neotropics.
bicornuta (
Distribution. Chile.
brevicornuta (
Distribution. Chile.
complicornuta
Distribution. Chile.
curvicornuta
Distribution. Chile.
ecornuta
Distribution. Chile.
elae
Distribution. Chile.
longicornuta (
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
ruizi (
—duplicicornuta (
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
ventricornuta
Distribution. Chile.
Merionoptila
The immature stages are not known for this monotypic genus, but the biology of the adult was described by
wygodzinskyi
Distribution. Argentina.
Mortoniella
Mexitrichia
Paraprotoptila
The 97 described species of Mortoniella are known from Mexico, Central, and South America as far south as Argentina and southeastern Brazil.
acauda
Distribution. Brazil.
aequalis (
Distribution. Peru.
agosta
Distribution. Brazil.
akantha
Distribution. Costa Rica.
albolineata
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay.
alicula
Distribution. Brazil.
anakantha
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
angulata
Distribution. Ecuador.
apiculata
Distribution. Ecuador.
argentinica
Distribution. Argentina.
aries (
Distribution. Ecuador, Peru.
armata (
Distribution. Argentina.
asymmetris
Distribution. Brazil, Paraguay.
atenuata (
Distribution. Peru.
aviceps
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
bifurcata
Distribution. Venezuela.
bilineata
Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador.
bocaina
Distribution. Brazil.
bolivica (
Distribution. Bolivia.
brachyrhachos
Distribution. Mexico.
buenoi
Distribution. Mexico.
carinula
Distribution. Costa Rica.
catarinensis (
Distribution. Brazil.
caudicula
Distribution. Costa Rica.
chicana
Distribution. Ecuador.
collegarum (
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Chile.
crescentis
Distribution. Brazil.
denticulata
Distribution. Venezuela.
dolonis
Distribution. Brazil.
eduardoi (
Distribution. Bolivia.
elongata (
Distribution. Colombia.
enchrysa
Distribution. Colombia.
falcicula
Distribution. Mexico.
flinti
Distribution. Venezuela.
florica (
Distribution. Mexico, Nicaragua.
foersteri (
Distribution. Colombia.
froehlichi
Distribution. Brazil.
guahybae
Distribution. Brazil.
guairica (
Distribution. Paraguay.
hodgesi
Distribution. Ecuador.
hystricosa
Distribution. Brazil.
intervales
Distribution. Brazil.
iridescens
Distribution. Colombia.
latispina
Distribution. Brazil.
leei (
Distribution. Colombia.
leroda (
Distribution. Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua.
limona (
Distribution. Venezuela.
longispina
Distribution. Brazil.
macarenica (
Distribution. Colombia.
macuta (
Distribution. Venezuela.
marini (
Distribution. Bolivia.
meloi
Distribution. Brazil.
meralda (
Distribution. Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua.
mexicana
Distribution. Mexico.
munozi
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
opinionis
Distribution. Costa Rica.
ormina (
Distribution. Brazil.
pacuara (
Distribution. Colombia, Costa Rica.
panamensis
Distribution. Panama.
papillata
Distribution. Costa Rica.
paraenchrysa
Distribution. Bolivia.
paraguaiensis
Distribution. Paraguay.
paralineata
Distribution. Ecuador.
parauna
Distribution. Brazil.
paraunota
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil.
pectinella
Distribution. Panama.
pocita (
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia.
propinqua
Distribution. Costa Rica.
pumila
Distribution. Brazil.
punensis (
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia.
pusilla
Distribution. Brazil.
quinuas
Distribution. Ecuador.
rancura (
Distribution. Mexico.
redunca
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
rodmani
Distribution. Costa Rica.
roldani
Distribution. Colombia.
rovira (
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
santiaga
Distribution. Ecuador.
sicula
Distribution. Costa Rica.
similis
Distribution. Ecuador.
simla (
Distribution. Bolivia, Trinidad, Venezuela.
spinulata (
Distribution. Colombia.
squamata
Distribution. Ecuador.
stilula
Distribution. Costa Rica.
tapanti
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
taurina
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
teutona (
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay.
tranquilla
Distribution. Peru.
tripuiensis
Distribution. Brazil.
truncata
Distribution. Brazil.
umbonata
Distribution. Panama.
unilineata
Distribution. Venezuela.
unota (
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil.
uruguaiensis
Distribution. Brazil, Uruguay.
usseglioi (
Distribution. Bolivia.
velasquezi (
Distribution. Colombia.
wygodzinskii (
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela.
Protoptila
Eighty-seven species and subspecies are presently known from Mexico, Central, and South America, including the Lesser Antilles, but many undescribed species undoubtedly occur in nature. The larvae have been described a number of times (e.g.,
alexanderi
Distribution. Mexico, U.S.A.
altura
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
alumnorum
Distribution. Bolivia.
bicornuta
Distribution. Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico.
boruca
Distribution. Costa Rica.
bribri
Distribution. Costa Rica.
burica
Distribution. Costa Rica.
cana
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
cardela
Distribution. Mexico.
chitaria
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
choluteca
Distribution. Honduras, Nicaragua.
chontala
Distribution. Mexico.
colombiensis
Distribution. Colombia.
condylifera
Distribution. Brazil.
cora
Distribution. Paraguay.
cristata
Distribution. Mexico.
cristula
Distribution. Costa Rica, Nicaragua.
ctenacantha
Distribution. Suriname.
ctilopsis
Distribution. Suriname.
curiosa
Distribution. Colombia.
delaca
Distribution. Mexico.
diablita
Distribution. Bolivia.
disticha
Distribution. Brazil.
dominicensis
Distribution. Dominica, Guadeloupe.
dubitans
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Uruguay.
ensifera
Distribution. Brazil, Suriname.
erotica
Distribution. Mexico, U.S.A.
fimbriata
Distribution. Colombia, Venezuela.
flexispina
Distribution. Brazil.
goitiai
Distribution. Bolivia.
guarani
Distribution. Paraguay.
guata
Distribution. Mexico.
huasteca
Distribution. Mexico.
huava
Distribution. Mexico.
ignera
Distribution. Tobago, Trinidad.
ixtala
Distribution. Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua.
jolandae
Distribution. Costa Rica.
julieta
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Peru.
kjeri
Distribution. Costa Rica.
laterospina
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
leonilae
Distribution. Mexico.
liqua
Distribution. Mexico.
locula
Distribution. Mexico.
longispinata
Distribution. Brazil.
lorada
Distribution. Mexico.
lucia
Distribution. Suriname.
macilenta
Distribution. Brazil.
malica
Distribution. Mexico.
mara
Distribution. Brazil.
marqua
Distribution. Mexico.
mayana
Distribution. Belize.
mina
Distribution. Suriname.
misionensis
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia.
mixteca mixteca
Distribution. Mexico.
mixteca veracruzensis
Distribution. Mexico.
myriamae
Distribution. Bolivia.
olvidada Bueno-Soria, Santiago-Fragoso and Barba-Álvarez, 2004:479 [Type locality: Mexico, Oaxaca, Loxicha, Pluma Hidalgo, el. 450 m;
Distribution. Mexico.
orotina orotina
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
orotina raposa
Distribution. Colombia, Peru.
perdida Bueno-Soria, Santiago-Fragoso and Barba-Álvarez, 2004:480 [Type locality: Panama, Canal Zone, Pipeline Road;
Distribution. Panama.
phyllisae
Distribution. Mexico.
piacha
Distribution. Mexico.
primerana (
Distribution. Argentina.
pseudopiacha
Distribution. Mexico.
quicha
Distribution. Guatemala.
quinoi
Distribution. Mexico.
resolda
Distribution. Mexico, Nicaragua.
rota
Distribution. Mexico, Nicaragua.
salta
Distribution. Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua.
simplex
Distribution. Brazil, Suriname.
spangleri
Distribution. Mexico.
spirifera
Distribution. Costa Rica.
strepsicera
Distribution. Costa Rica.
talamanca
Distribution. Costa Rica.
tarahumara
Distribution. Mexico.
techila
Distribution. Mexico.
ternatia
Distribution. Brazil.
tetravittata
Distribution. Brazil.
tica
Distribution. Costa Rica.
ticumanensis
Distribution. Mexico.
tojana
Distribution. Costa Rica, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru.
trichoglossa
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
trispicata
Distribution. Brazil.
truncata
Distribution. Argentina.
uruguayensis
Distribution. Uruguay.
voluta
Distribution. Colombia.
yurumanga
Distribution. Colombia.
Scotiotrichia
A single species is known in the genus, endemic to the Chilean Subregion. Its immature stages have not been described.
ocreata
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
Tolhuaca
The genus now contains 2 disjunct species, one in southern Chile and one in southeastern Brazil. Nothing is known of the immature stages or their biology.
brasiliensis
Distribution. Brazil.
cupulifera
Distribution. Chile.
The 43 extant species in this family occur on both sides of the southern Pacific Ocean. Four genera and 27 species are known from Australia, New Caledonia, and New Zealand and five genera and 16 species are found in southern Chile and Argentina.
The immature stages of several Australian-New Zealand genera are known (
Alloecentrellodes
The two species known in this genus are associated with small, clear, cold, fast-flowing streams in forested areas (
elongatus
Distribution. Chile.
obliquus
Distribution. Chile.
Austrocentrus
bifidus
Distribution. Chile.
griseus
Distribution. Chile.
valgiformis
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
Eosericostoma
Two species are known in Eosericostoma. Both are common and widespread in central Chile. The larval stages of E. inaequispina have been described (
aequispina
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
inaequispina
—aequispina
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
Microthremma
With eight species, Microthremma is the largest genus in the family in the Western Hemisphere. The immature stages have not been described. Adults have been collected near small streams and spring runs (
angulatum
Distribution. Chile.
bipartitum
Distribution. Chile.
caudatum
Distribution. Chile.
crassifimbriatum
Distribution. Chile.
griseum
Distribution. Chile.
lobatum
Distribution. Chile.
patagonicum
Distribution. Argentina, Chile.
villosum
Distribution. Chile.
Pseudosericostoma
The single species, P. simplississimum, is only known from the single adult type. The larva and its biology are not known.
simplississimum
Distribution. Chile.
Well over 250 species are currently recognized in this small, primarily tropical family, which has been cataloged (
All known larvae build cases in the general form of a snail shell, but there is great diversity in the height of the case, number and tightness of whorls, size, nature, and degree of minerals and silk incorporated, etc. (
Cochliopsyche
Tetanonema
Helicopsyche
Feropsyche
The genus has been recorded from all biogeographical regions, except Antarctica (
Larvae construct helical cases of sand grains closely resembling the shells of snails. In fact, some of the American species were originally described as molluscs. Cases vary greatly among species in structure and composition (
alajuela (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica.
altercoma (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
amazona (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
amica (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Brazil, Guyana, Venezuela.
angeloi (Feropsyche) Holzenthal, Blahnik and Calor, 2016:346 [Type locality: Brazil, Minas Gerais, Córrego das Águas Pretas & tribs., ca. 15 km S Aiuruoca, 22°03.704'S, 44°38.241'W, el. 1386 m;
Distribution. Brazil.
angulata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela.
apicauda (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominica, Guadeloupe.
auroa (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
blahniki (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Venezuela.
blancasi (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Peru.
blantoni (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Panama.
borealis (Feropsyche) (
—lustrica
—arenifera
—glabra
—californica
—annulicornis
Distribution. Canada, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, U.S.A.
brazilia (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
braziliensis (Feropsyche) (
Distribution. Brazil.
breviterga (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Colombia, Venezuela.
caligata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Chile.
camuriensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
centrocubana (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba.
chilensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Chile.
chiriquensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica, Panama.
chocoensis (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Colombia.
cipoensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
circulata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
clara (Cochliopsyche) (
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador.
cochleara (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Ecuador.
colombiensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Colombia, Venezuela.
comosa (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba.
cotopaxi (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Ecuador.
cubana (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba, Jamaica.
curvipalpia (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Mexico.
dampfi (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua.
disjuncta (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
dominicana (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
dorsocurvata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica.
† electra (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
extensa (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Peru, Venezuela.
falcigona (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba.
fistulata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Colombia, Venezuela.
flinti (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
fridae (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Panama.
golfitoensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica.
granpiedrana (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba.
grenadensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Grenada, Venezuela.
guadeloupensis (Feropsyche)
—species 1
—species 2
Distribution. Dominica, Guadeloupe, Martinique, St. Lucia.
guara (Feropsyche) Holzenthal, Blahnik and Calor, 2016:348 [Type locality: Brazil, Santa Catarina, Rio Caeté, at entrance to Parque Ecológico Spitzkopf, 27°00.350'S, 49°06.650'W, el. 92 m;
Distribution. Brazil.
hageni (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba, Dominican Republic.
haitiensis (Feropsyche)
—haitiense
Distribution. Haiti.
helicoidella (Feropsyche) (
Distribution. Brazil.
holzenthali (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
incisa (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama.
kalaom (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
kingstona (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Jamaica.
lambda (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Argentina.
laneblina (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
lara (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
lazzariae (Feropsyche) Holzenthal, Blahnik and Calor, 2016:348 [Type locality: Brazil, Paraná, Voçoroca, along main road to Joinville, 25°50.332'S, 49°03.332'W, el. 650 m;
Distribution. Brazil.
lewalleni (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica, El Salvador.
linabena (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
linguata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Panama.
lobata (Cochliopsyche)
— n. sp. 1
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Peru.
lutea (Feropsyche) (
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
maculisternum (Feropsyche) Botosaneanu, in
—agglutinans
Distribution. Trinidad, Venezuela.
melanochaeta (Feropsyche)
—sp. indet. ex “gr. comosa”
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
merida (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
mexicana (Feropsyche)
—arizonensis
Distribution. Costa Rica, Mexico, U.S.A.
minima (Feropsyche)
—nigra
Distribution. Nicaragua, Puerto Rico.
minuscula (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Peru.
molesta (Feropsyche) Botosaneanu, in Botosaneau and Hyslop, 1998:24 [Type locality: Jamaica, streamlet tributary of East Lucea River at ca. 2 km. upstream from its mouth, Hanover (Lucea); ZMUA; ♂; as subspecies of occidentale]. —
Distribution. Jamaica.
monda (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Venezuela.
montana (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Mexico.
muelleri (Feropsyche)
—angelae
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Peru.
napoa (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Ecuador.
neblinensis (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
nigrisensilla (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
obscura (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Argentina.
occidentale (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba.
ochthephila (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Jamaica.
ocosingua (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Mexico.
opalescens (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela.
pandeirosa (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
paprockii (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
paraguaiensis (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Paraguay.
parahageni (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
paucispina (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Cuba.
perija (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Venezuela.
peruana (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Peru.
pietia (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Mexico.
piroa (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Mexico, Nicaragua, U.S.A.
planata (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Mexico, Nicaragua.
planorboides (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Brazil.
poliochaeta (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Dominican Republic.
propinqua (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Puerto Rico.
puyoa (Cochliopsyche)
Distribution. Ecuador.
quadrosa (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Mexico.
ramosi (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Puerto Rico.
rentzi (Feropsyche)
Distribution. Costa Rica.
sanblasensis (Feropsyche)