Research Article |
Corresponding author: Qun Zhang ( tqzhang@jnu.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Nina Bogutskaya
© 2022 Xiao-Shu Zeng, Cheng-He Sun, Xiao-Ying Huang, Ye-Ling Lao, Jin-Long Huang, Sha Li, Qun Zhang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zeng X-S, Sun C-H, Huang X-Y, Lao Y-L, Huang J-L, Li S, Zhang Q (2022) DNA barcoding of Scomberomorus (Scombridae, Actinopterygii) reveals cryptic diversity and misidentifications. ZooKeys 1135: 157-170. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1135.93631
|
The genus Scomberomorus is economically important; however, the taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships in this genus are not clearly resolved, making it difficult to effectively protect and exploit fish resources. To clarify the taxonomic status of Scomberomorus species, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene sequences of 150 samples were analyzed. The average genetic distance among 14 species was approximately 11 times greater than the distances within species, in accordance with the ‘10× rule’ of species identification. Five of the 14 species did not form monophyletic clades based on a Bayesian inference gene tree. The application of four DNA-based species delimitation methods (automatic barcode gap discovery, barcode index numbers, Poisson tree process, and the K/θ method) yielded several key results. (1) Cryptic species were detected within Scomberomorus commerson. (2) A Scomberomorus queenslandicus sample from Australia was misidentified as S. commerson in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). (3) Specimens originally identified as Scomberomorus guttatus was differentiated into four OTUs or species, two in the Yellow, South China, and Java seas, and two in geographically distant areas, one each in the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal. (4) Six specimens from South Africa originally identified as S. plurilineatus most likely do not belong to the species. (5) Specimens identified as S. maculatus and S. regalis were conspecific; however, introgression cannot be ruled out. Our findings revealed cryptic diversity and difficulties in morphological identification of species in the genus Scomberomorus. This study provides scientifically based support for the conservation of germplasm resources of the genus Scomberomorus.
COI, conservation, cryptic species, DNA-based species delimitation, mackerel, phylogeny
DNA barcoding provides a complementary approach to morphological species identification (
The genus Scomberomorus belongs to the family Scombridae, one of the most popular and familiar food fish in the world (
Species identification in the genus Scomberomorus is mostly based on morphology (
Previous molecular studies of the genus Scomberomorus have mostly focused on a few species within the genus (e.g.,
The collection and sampling of specimens were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Jinan University. All specimens used in this study were collected in accordance with Chinese laws. All experiments were performed to ensure optimal animal welfare and care.
Samples were collected from 11 locations in the coastal waters of China and 116 homologous sequences were downloaded from GenBank and the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). The collected information is shown in Fig.
Muscle tissue samples collected in our laboratory were extracted for the determination of COI sequences. DNA was extracted using a modified phenol/chloroform method (
The sequencing peaks were visualized using Chromas 2.6.6 (
All genetic distances were calculated based on Kimura two parameter (K2P) (
The COI gene sequences were tested for saturation using DAMBE 7.3.5 (
We employed four species delimitation methods: (1) Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) (
The COI gene sequences had an average length of 648 bp (567–652 bp) in 150 samples from 14 species in the genus Scomberomorus, and there were no base insertions or deletions. There were 453 conserved bases, accounting for 69.48% of the total number of bases, and 199 variable bases, accounting for 30.52% of the total number of bases, including 191 parsimony-informative sites and eight singleton bases. The A+T content (53.3%) was higher than the C+G content (46.7%), indicating an AT bias. The transition-to-transversion ratio was 3.1. A saturation analysis (Suppl. material
The intraspecific genetic distances of 14 species of the genus Scomberomorus were 0%–6.0%, with an average genetic distance of 1.18%. The interspecific genetic distances were 0.3%–17.4%, with an average genetic distance of 13.0%, which was approximately 11 times higher than estimates within species. Furthermore, 79% of intraspecific genetic distances were within the range of 0%–2%. The barcoding gap map (Fig.
A BI tree (Fig.
Bayesian inference (BI) tree based on the COI sequences of 14 Scomberomorus species. The green clades represent five species for which the species delimitation result is different based on morphology and the BI tree: S. commerson, S. guttatus, S. plurilineatus, S. regalis, and S. maculatus. Images of the genus Scomberomorus on the right from top to bottom are: S. sierra, S. concolor, S. brasiliensis, S. regalis, S. maculatus, S. semifasciatus, S. cavalla, S. niphonius, S. munroi, S. guttatus, S. plurilineatus, S. commerson, and S. queenslandicus. MT680627 is the outgroup. Numbers near the branches are bootstrap values.
Four DNA-based species delimitation methods yielded consistent results (Fig.
In the ABGD analysis (Suppl. material
Morphological species | OTU | Number | Catalog number |
---|---|---|---|
sierra | OTU-1 | 4 | S.sie.ECU.1, S.sie.MEX.1–2, S.sie.USA.1 |
S. concolor | OTU-2 | 2 | S.con.MEX.1, S.con.MEX.2 |
S. brasiliensis | OTU-3 | 14 | S.bra.NET.1, S.bra.BRA.1–13 |
S. maculatus and S. regalis | OTU-4 | 28 | S.mac.USA.1–11, S.mac.MEX.1–5, S.reg.BRA.1–3, S.reg.BEL.1–3, S.reg.TAT.1, S.reg.BAH.1, S.reg.MEX.1, S.reg.USA.1–3 |
S. sp | OTU-5 | 3 | S.sp.YSP.1–3 |
S. semifasciatus | OTU-6 | 5 | S.sem.AUS.1–5 |
S. cavalla | OTU-7 | 12 | S.cav.USA.1–2, S.cav.MEX.1–7, S.cav.ALT.1, S.cav.USA.3–4 |
S. niphonius | OTU-8 | 14 | S.nip.SLS.1–4, S.nip.LYK.1–3, S.nip.YRP.1–2, S.nip.LDG.1–3, S.nip.ZSM.1, S.nip.ZZS.1 |
S. munroi | OTU-9 | 6 | S.mun.AUS.1–6 |
S. guttatus | OTU-10 | 1 | S.gut.QHK.1 |
OTU-11 | 5 | S.gut.BAN.1–5 | |
OTU-12 | 6 | S.plu.AFR.1–6 | |
OTU-13 | 2 | S.gut.IND.1, S.gut.SA.1 | |
S. plurilineatus | OTU-14 | 9 | S.gut.INDO.1–2, S.gut.MAL.1, S.gut.SCS.1, S.gut.SLYG.1, S.gut.YSP.1–2, S.gut.YYJ.1–2 |
OTU-15 | 5 | S.plu.MYA.1–2, S.plu.BAN.1–2, S.plu.SIN.1 | |
S. commerson | OTU-16 | 15 | S.com.IND.3, S.com.PHI.1, S.com.GDX.1–3, S.com.YYJ.1–3, S.com.YRP.1–2, S.com.YJS.1–4, S.com.TUR.1 |
OTU-17 | 9 | S.com.AFR.1–3, S.com.SA.1, S.com.IND.1–2, S.com.IND.4, S.com.LEB.1, S.com.UAE.1 | |
S. queenslandicus | OTU-18 | 10 | S.com.AUS.1, S.que.AUS.1–9 |
According to the ‘10× rule’ of species identification and 2% threshold (
Intraspecific genetic distance in S. commerson (2.6%) was slightly greater than the threshold of 2%; S. commerson samples were assigned to three lineages in the phylogenetic trees. The samples from Australia were mixed with S. queenslandicus (Munro, 1943) on a single clade. Both species are distributed in Australia (
The bootstrap values for the other two clades of S. commerson were 100 in the BI tree. The samples in this study and the three samples from India, the Philippines, and Turkey were assigned to the same clade, and the remaining samples belonged to a separate clade. The two clades did not show obvious geographical clustering (Fig.
The intraspecific genetic distance in S. guttatus was 5.2%, which was significantly greater than the 2% threshold. Four clades were formed in the phylogenetic trees, and the genetic distances between the clades were greater than 2% in the phylogenetic trees. The inter-clade genetic distance (7.48%) was 31 times higher than the average intra-clade genetic distance (0.24%), which was in accordance with the ‘10× rule’ of species identification (
S. plurilineatus formed two distant clades in the phylogenetic trees, one of which mixed with S. guttatus. the name S. guttatus has been misapplied to S. plurilineatus (
The interspecific genetic distance between S. maculatus and S. regalis was 0.3% and the taxa were mixed on a single clade of the phylogenetic trees. According to FishBase (https://fishbase.org/) and the localities of samples in this study (Fig.
The discovery of cryptic species in this study expands current estimates of biodiversity and allows better precautionary and scientifically management, which is important to plan reasonable conservation strategies (
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
The present study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant number 2018YFD0900802); Fishery resources survey of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (GXZC2022-G3-001062-ZHZB); Director’s Fund of the Hubei Key Laboratory of Three Gorges Project for Conservation of Fishes, China Three Gorges Corporation (0704157) and the Outstanding Innovative Talents Cultivation Funded Programs for Doctoral Students of Jinan University (Project number 2021CXB022).
DNA barcoding of Scomberomorus (Scombridae, Actinopterygii) reveals cryptic diversity and misidentifications
Data type: Data and image (word file).
Explanation note: Specimen information of Scomberomorus in this study. Test of the substitution saturation of COI gene sequences of the genus Scomberomorus. Results of 14 Scomberomorus species based on the BIN analysis. Results of 14 Scomberomorus species based on the K/θ method. NJ tree based on the COI sequences of 14 Scomberomorus species. The green clades represent five species for which the species delimitation result is different based on morphology and the NJ tree: S. commerson, S. guttatus, S. plurilineatus, S. regalis, and S. maculatus. MT680627 is the outgroup. Numbers near the branches are bootstrap values. ABGD analysis of the genus Scomberomorus.
Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.