Research Article |
Corresponding author: Stuart H. McKamey ( stuart.mckamey@usda.gov ) Academic editor: Christopher H. Dietrich
© 2022 Stuart H. McKamey, Adam M. Wallner.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
Citation:
McKamey SH, Wallner AM (2022) The immatures of the New World treehopper tribes Acutalini Fowler and Micrutalini Haupt (Hemiptera, Membracidae, Smiliinae). ZooKeys 1136: 187-208. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1136.90525
|
The nymphs of Acutalis Fairmaire, Bordoniana Sakakibara, Thrasymedes Kirkaldy, and Micrutalis Fowler are described and illustrated (Bordoniana and Thrasymedes for the first time). The nymphs of all four genera are exceedingly cryptic. The nymphs of some species lack scoli on the head and pronotum but all have paired scoli on the meso- and metathoracic nota and abdominal segments III–IX. Some species also have lateral rows of enlarged chalazae on the abdomen, and even large scoli ventrolaterally—the latter condition is unique within Smiliinae. The eggs are deposited in stems (not in exposed masses) and nymphs are solitary and not ant-attended. The fifth instar nymphs of Micrutalini range in length from 3.0–3.5 mm, much smaller than the fifth instars of most other treehoppers.
Acutalis, Bordoniana, immature stage, life history, Micrutalis, Thrasymedes
Adult treehoppers (Membracidae, Aetalionidae, and Melizoderidae) are well known for their expanded pronotum present in adults of more than 430 genera and 3,350 species (
Besides the uniqueness of morphology of membracid nymphs, they also differ from nymphs of all other Auchenorrhyncha families in having the last visible abdominal segment (IX) fused ventrally, forming a tube containing the anal segments, which can be everted by the nymphs at will (
The present paper is part of the larger effort to describe the immature stages of New World treehopper genera, which has so far covered the Caribbean genera Antillotolania Ramos, Deiroderes Ramos (
Despite the scarcity of Acutalini and Micrutalini nymphs in collections, and their solitary nature and cryptic coloration and morphology, there has been some progress in nymphal descriptions.
Micrutalini only contains two genera: Micrutalis Fowler and Trachytalis Fowler. Several authors have contributed to our knowledge of micrutaline taxonomy and biology. For instance,
In the present study, additional natural history information in provided as well as the descriptions of four genera of Acutalini and Micrutalini, two tribes of the New World subfamily Smiliinae. Nymphs of Bordonia and Thrasymedes have never been illustrated or described until now.
Preserved specimens were either collected by the first author or found in the U.S. National Collection. Vouchers of all examined nymphs and their associated adults are deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, in Washington DC (
Photographs of dried specimens were taken with a Canon 5Dsr camera with an adjustable 65mm lens. Photos were taken using Capture One Pro v. 10.1.2, 64 bit, build 10.1.2.23 imaging software, aided by CamLift v. 2.9.7.1. The specimen was illuminated using two adjustable Dynalite MH2050 RoadMax flash heads, each attached to a Manfrotto 244 arm. The light was diffused using a simple, lampshade-style cone of translucent paper between the specimen and light sources. After individual “slices” were photographed, they were compiled into a single, composite image using Zerene Stacker - USDA SI-SEL Lab Bk imaging system, v. 1.04, build T201706041920. Stacked images were enhanced and edited in Adobe Photoshop CSS Extended v. 12.0.
Key tzo 5th instars of Acutalini genera (excluding Euritea and Cornutalis) and Micrutalis. Fifth instars differ from earlier instars in having a well-developed forewing pad that attains the posterior margin of the first visible abdominal segment (segment III) and usually overlaps part of the second visible segment (segment IV).
1 | Total length 3.5 mm or less | Micrutalis |
– | Total length 4.3–8.5 mm | 2 |
2 | Abdomen laterally glabrous, not setose; dorsal scoli directed posteriorly (Figs |
Acutalis |
– | Abdomen laterally densely setose (Figs |
2 |
3 | Abdominal tergum IX distinctly shorter than length of remaining abdominal segments combined (Figs |
Bordoniana |
– | Abdominal tergum IX as long as remaining abdominal segments combined (Fig. |
Thrasymedes |
Nymphs are unknown for the acutaline genera Cornutalis Sakakibara and Euritea Stål.
Body with full complement (9 pairs in total) of dorsal, short scoli from postmetopidium to last visible abdominal segment, and sometimes also 1 pair of scoli on head and 1 pair of scoli on premetopidium; metathoracic scoli directed forward, in opposite direction of abdominal scoli (backwards), low to tergal surface but not appressed; abdomen laterally with 3 rows of slightly enlarged chalazae but otherwise almost without setae.
Overall body. Fifth instar length 4.3 mm. Cross-section subtriangular; chalazae on thorax and abdomen, excluding those on scoli, sparse, almost absent; chalazal setae short; scoli parallel. Head. With simple conical scoli (except absent in Acutalis tartarea), directed anterad, length relative size to basal width about subequal; chalazal bases long-stalked; compound eye surface with setae; frontoclypeus with dense setae; enlarged chalazae absent between eyes, but present in front of ventral margin of eye and also adjacent to central or dorsal margin of eye; frons extending over central margin of eye. Prothorax. Premetopidium scoli present (except absent in Acutalis tartarea), directed anteriorly; postmetopidium scoli present, directed anteriorly; posterior extension of pronotum not surpassing anterior margin of metanotum; if present, premetopidial scoli length about 2–4× basal width; postmetopidial scoli length about 2–4× basal width. Mesothorax. Scoli bearing stalked chalazae; scoli directed dorsoanteriorly; forewing pad anterior costal margin straight; dorsal scoli length about 2–4× basal width; anterior basal side of scoli lacking cluster of enlarged chalazae; forewing pad surface chalazae absent; forewing pad costal chalazae present only only on base of costal margin; meso- and metathorax without lateral rows on enlarged chalazae. Metathorax. Scoli bearing stalked chalazae; scoli directed dorsoanteriorly; dorsal scoli length about 2–4× basal width. Legs. Chalazae of tibia on anterior and posterior lateral margins, absent or very few on dorsal surface; prothoracic tibia form subcylindrical. Abdomen. Terga III–VIII ventrolateral margins each with row of four or more enlarged chalazae; terga III–VIII dorsal scoli subequal in size to each other; terga III–VIII tallest dorsal scoli length 2–4× basal width; tergum IV dorsal scoli directed preapically dorsally, apically posteriorly but not appressed; terga III–VIII lateral rows bearing 3 rows slightly enlarged chalazae; lamellae absent; scoli bearing stalked chalazae. Segment IX: dorsal length subequal to combined length remaining visible abdominal terga; preapically with paired enlarged setae dorsally, with 1 pair dorsal scoli apically.
Acutalis 1–3 Acutalis fusconervosa Fairmaire from Chiapas, Mexico in anterior, dorsal, and lateral views, respectively 4 Acutalis sp. from Durham, NC, courtesy of Margarita Lankford 5 Acutalis sp. from Hoover, AL, courtesy of Vitaly Charny 6 Acutalis sp. from Costa Rica, ex Asteraceae, courtesy of Kenji Nishida 7 Acutalis tartarea, courtesy of Mark Rothschild.
Acutalis fusconervosa, 1 adult, 2 nymphs, Mexico: Chiapas, 13 km S Pichucalco, 170 m alt., 17°26'38"N, 93°10'49"W, 2 November 2001, S.H. McKamey (
There is a difference between
Body densely setose; abdominal tergum IX distinctly shorter than length of remaining abdominal segments combined; abdominal terga IV–VIII sometimes with large scoli ventrolaterally; head and prothorax sometimes lacking scoli.
Overall body. Fifth instar length 5.1–6.5 mm. Cross-section subtriangular (except vertically depressed in Bordoniana sp. 2), chalazal dense on thorax and abdomen except scoli, obvious throughout body; chalazal setae long (expect short in Bordoniana sp. 1), scoli parallel (except splayed or divergent away from each other in B. virescens). Head. Scoli pair absent (except with simple conical scoli in B. virescens); scoli projection directed anterad in B. virescens; chalazal bases variable (see Remarks below); compound eye surface with setae; between eyes, enlarged chalazae variable (see Remarks below); scoli length about 2–4× basal width in B. virescens; enlarged chalazae present in front of ventral margin of eye and also adjacent to central or dorsal margin of eye (except enlarged chalazae absent in Bordoniana sp. 1.); enlarged chalazae adjacent to central or dorsal margin of eye present (except absent in Bordoniana sp. 1); frons extending over central margin of eye. Prothorax. Premetopidium scoli present (except absent in Bordoniana sp. 1); premetopidium scoli directed dorsoanteriorly; postmetopidium scoli absent; posterior extension of pronotum not surpassing anterior margin of metanotum but does not attain posterior margin (except surpasses posterior margin of metanotum in Bordoniana sp. 1); premetopidial scoli length relative to basal width variable (see Remarks below). Mesothorax. Scoli bearing tuberculate chalazae (except bearing stalked chalazae in B. virescens); scolar direction variable (see Remarks below); forewing pad anterior costal margin sinuate (except straight in B. virescens); forewing pad chalazae short and dense, continuously covered (except densely covered in long setae in Bordoniana sp. 1); scoli length about 2–4× basal width (except scoli about as tall as basal width in Bordoniana sp. 1); anterior basal side of scoli lacking cluster of enlarged chalazae (except present in B. virescens); forewing pad costal chalazae present along entire costal margin (except present only at base of costal margin B. virescens); lateral rows, if present, with most medial row extending onto meso- and metathorax (except not extending onto thorax in B. virescens). Metathorax. Scoli bearing tuberculate chalazae (except bearing stalked chalazae in B. virescens); scoli directed dorsally or almost so (except directed posteriorly in Bordoniana sp. 1); scoli length about 2–4× basal width (except scoli about as tall as basal width in Bordoniana sp. 1). Legs. Tibia with chalazae present on both lateral margins and dorsal surface; prothoracic tibia form subcylindrical (except foliaceus in Bordoniana sp. 1). Abdomen. Terga III–VIII ventrolateral margins variable (see Remarks below); terga III–VIII dorsal scoli subequal in length relative sizes to each other subequal (except scoli size decreasing posteriorly in B. virescens); terga III–VIII tallest dorsal scoli length about 2–4× basal width; tergum IV dorsal scoli directed preapically variable (see Remarks below); tergum IV dorsal scoli directed apically dorsoposteriorly (except posteriorly in Bordoniana sp. 1); terga III–VIII lateral rows bearing 2 rows enlarged chalazae (except not manifested in B. virescens); lamellae absent (except present with lateral margins converging, apex pointed in Bordoniana sp. 2); lamellae (if lamella present) bearing chalazae marginally and dorsally; scoli bearing tuberculate chalazae (except bearing stalked chalazae in B. virescens). Segment IX: dorsal length subequal to combined length of segments V–VIII (except subequal to combined lengths of segments VI–VIII in Bordoniana sp. 1); preapically with dorsal surface irregularly covered in chalazae.
Bordoniana virescens Sakakibara, 1 adult, 1 nymph, Peru: Acobamba, July 1940, W.D. Funkhouser Collection (
Substantial morphological variation was found among the nymphs of the Bordoniana species examined. Specifically, the head and pronotum may have or lack scoli on the head and pronotum, and one species of undescribed Bordoniana has large scoli venrolaterally on segments IV–VIII (Fig.
We also discovered differences among the three species of Bordoniana. Head: chalazal bases tuberculate in Bordoniana sp. 1, short-stalked in Bordoniana sp. 2, and long-stalked in B. virescens; enlarged chalazae between eyes absent in B. virescens, present as a single pair in Bordoniana sp. 2, and present as pair of vertical rows in Bordoniana sp. 1. Prothorax: premetopidial scoli length relative to basal width about subequal to their basal widths in Bordoniana sp. 2, about 2–4× their basal widths in B. virescens, and scoli absent in Bordoniana sp. 1. Mesothorax: scoli directed dorsoanteriorly in B. virescens, dorsally or almost so in Bordoniana sp. 2, and directed posteriorly in Bordoniana sp. 1. Abdomen: terga III–VIII ventrolateral margins each with a single enlarged chalazae in B. virescens, with acuminate lateral extensions in Bordoniana sp. 2 (Fig.
Body densely setose; with full complement of paired dorsal scoli from head to abdominal segment IX (12 pairs in total), though slender, not long and without stalked chalazae; abdominal segment IX as long as combined length of remaining abdominal terga; abdomen without scoli ventrolaterally.
Overall body. Fifth instar length 8.5 mm. Cross-section subtriangular; thorax and abdomen densely covered with chalazae, distinct throughout body; chalazal setae long; scoli parallel. Head. With simple conical scoli, directed anterad; chalazal bases long-stalked; compound eye surface with setae; enlarged chalazae between eyes present as pair of vertical rows; setae of frontoclypeus dense; scoli length about 5–7× basal width; enlarged chalazae in front of ventral margin of eye present; enlarged chalazae adjacent to central or dorsal margin of eye present; frons not extending over central margin of eye. Prothorax. Premetopidium scoli present, directed dorsoanteriorly; postmetopidium scoli present, directed anteriorly; posterior extension of pronotum surpasses anterior margin of metanotum, but does not attain1 its posterior margin; premetopidial scoli length about 5–7× basal width; postmetopidial scoli length about 5–7× basal width. Mesothorax. Dorsal scoli bearing stalked chalazae; scoli directed dorsoanteriorly and length about 5–7× basal width; anterior basal side of scoli lacking cluster of enlarged chalazae; forewing pad anterior costal margin straight; forewing pad surface densely covered by long chalazae; forewing pad costal chalazae along entire costal margin; lateral rows, if present, most medial row extending unto meso- and metathorax. Metathorax. Scoli bearing stalked chalazae; scoli directed dorsally or almost so; dorsal scoli length about 5–7× basal width. Legs. Chalazae of tibia present on both lateral margins and dorsal surface; prothoracic tibia form subcylindrical. Abdomen. Terga III–VIII ventrolateral margins each with 3 enlarged chalazae; terga III–VIII dorsal scoli length subequal to each other and bearing stalked chalazae; terga III–VIII tallest dorsal scoli length about 5–7× basal width; tergum IV dorsal scoli preapically directed dorsally or almost so, apically dorsoposteriorly; terga III–VIII bearing 1 lateral row of slightly enlarged chalazae; lamellae absent. Segment IX: longer than combined length of remaining abdominal terga, but shorter than length of rest of body; preapically with dorsal surface irregularly covered in chalazae.
Thrasymedes pallescens (Stål): 39 adults, 1 nymph, 4 5th instar exuviae, Mexico: Michoacán, Route 150, km 270, 40 km E Panindicuaro, 2150 m elev., 19°52'55"N, 101°24'45"W, 9 November 2001, S.H. McKamey leg. (
As for Acutalini,
Considered within the larger context of Smiliinae, however, the features described by
In comparing morphology of adults and nymphs, we found more uniformity among Micrutalis adults than in their nymphs. Nymphs have yet to be discovered for Trachytalis Fowler, the only other micrutaline genus.
Fifth instar body length 3.0–3.5 mm; head and premetopidium lacking enlarged chalazae or scoli, postmetopidium with short scoli or enlarged chalazae; mesonotum to abdominal segment IX with small paired scoli; abdominal terga with 1 or 2 well-developed rows of enlarged chalazae or scoli; body densely setose, triangular in cross-section, not vertically compressed; abdomen lacking ventrolateral lamellae; wing pad costal margin linear or almost so; fused portion of abdominal segment IX directed posteriorly.
Overall body. Fifth instar length 3.0–3.5 mm. Cross-section subtriangular (except laterally compressed in M. dubia Fowler); chalazae on thorax and abdomen usually dense; chalazal setae long; no parts of body covered with wax-like substance; dorsal contour of abdomen in lateral view linear; scoli parallel; overall body in dorsal view elongate. Head. Lacking scoli; dorsal or anterior rounded protuberances absent; chalazal bases long-stalked (except tuberculate in M. dubia); chalazal setae simple, needlelike (except narrowly peltate in M. dubia) compound eye surface with setae; enlarged chalazae present or absent between eyes; setae of frontoclypeus scattered and sparse (except dense in M. callangensis); enlarged chalazae present in front of ventral margin of eye; enlarged chalazae present adjacent to central or dorsal margin of eye; frons extending over central margin of eye. Prothorax. Premetopidium lacking scoli; postmetopidium without dorsal paired structures or, if present (Fig.
Micrutalis nymphs 23 M. calva from Allison Park, Allegheny Co, PA, courtesy of John Rosenfeld 24 M. discalis (Walker) on mistletoe from AZ, courtesy of Al Wheeler 25 Micrutalis sp. from Costa Rica ex Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae), courtesy of Kenji Nishida 26 Micrutalis sp. from León, Nicaragua, lateral view 27, 28 M. dubia Fowler, from Zona los Cinaros, Mérida State, Venezuela, in dorsal and lateral view, respectively.
Micrutalis 38–40 Micrutalis sp. in anterior, detailed lateral head and portion of pronotum, and detailed abdomen, dorsal view, respectively 41, 42 Micrutalis undescribed sp., adult and nymph from Costa Rica, ex Hamelia patens Jacq. (Rubiaceae), courtesy of Kenji Nishida 43 Micrutalis undescribed sp., adult (upper right) and nymph (lower left, indicated by arrow) from San Juan, Bolivia by © Kozue Kawakami (CC BY).
Micrutalis callangensis, 1 adult, 1 nymph, Ecuador: Cañar, Ducur, 25 May 1986, S.H. McKamey leg., lot # 86-0525-4, 86-0525-5 (
The great majority of Micrutalis species lack host information. Nevertheless, there are some host records in the literature and among specimens examined in this study.
Although Micrutalini adults are distinguished by their wing venation and genitalia, the small size of the fifth instars of Micrutalis sets them apart from most treehoppers. The only New World treehoppers that rival their small size are some Bolbonota Amyot & Serville, Eunusa Fonseca, some Tragopini, Thuridini, Quadrinareini, some Amastris Stål, Centrodontini, Endoiastinae, Deiroderes, Brachytalis Metcalf & Bruner, Brachybelus Stål, and Abelus Stål. Micrutalis nymphs differ from the nymphs of all these small genera in one or more of the features listed above in the diagnosis of Micrutalis. In contrast to nymphs of Micrutalis, Bolbonota nymphs are covered with white wax-like exudate; Eunusa nymphs are covered with erect, stalked scoli and have the segment IX directed dorsally; nymphs of Tragopini, Thuridini, and Quadrinareini lack scoli entirely; Centrodontini and Endoiastinae lack setae, Brachytalis nymphs have the posterior margin of the metathorax mesally lengthened; and Deiroderes and Brachybelus nymphs have ventrolateally flattened abdominal lamellae. The only genus among these for which the nymphs are unknown is Abelus. We presume these resemble those of the closely related Ischnocentrus Stål, which have the costal margin of the wing pad notched. The most unusual Micrutalis species is M. callangensis, with its rounded meso- and metathoracic scoli, and its abdomen with lateral rows manifested as scoli rather than enlarged chalazae, and a proportionately longer segment IX.
Considering the great variability that we have observed, morphological variation within Acutalini and within Micrutalini are underestimated. This situation is exacerbated by the absence of known nymphs for Euritea and Cornutalis (Acutalini) and Trachytalis (Micrutalini). This is especially the case for Micrutalis, for which only a few of the many species are known. For all genera in Acutalini and Micrutalini, we expect that more species will reveal more variability than accounted for here. In this respect it is like any taxonomic revision; it represents only the species studied and becomes outdated when more are available for examination.
We thank Taina Litwak and Alyssa Seemann (USDA/ARS Systematic Entomology Laboratory) for taking and processing photographs, Alyssa Seemann for producing plates, Vitaly Charny, Margarita Lankford, Jean Michel Maes, Kenji Nishida, John Rosenfeld, Mark Rothschild, and Al Wheeler for photographs of live specimens, and L.L. Deitz (North Carolina State University) for comments on an earlier draft. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.