Research Article
Print
Research Article
Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae, Ecdyonurinae), a new micro-endemic mayfly species from Aurès Mountains (north-eastern Algeria)
expand article infoBesma M. Dambri‡, Nadhira Benhadji§, Laurent Vuataz|, Michel Sartori|
‡ University of Batna 2, Batna, Algeria
§ University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| Musée cantonal de zoologie, Lausanne, Switzerland
¶ University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Corresponding author: Michel Sartori ( michel.sartori@vd.ch )

Academic editor: Lyndall Pereira-da-Conceicoa
© 2022 Besma M. Dambri, Nadhira Benhadji, Laurent Vuataz, Michel Sartori.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Dambri BM, Benhadji N, Vuataz L, Sartori M (2022) Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae, Ecdyonurinae), a new micro-endemic mayfly species from Aurès Mountains (north-eastern Algeria). ZooKeys 1121: 17-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1121.89613
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4DF8A3A-9306-488B-B5F0-786456E709FA
Open Access

Abstract

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., a micro-endemic species reported from several streams within the Aurès Mountains (north-eastern Algeria), is described and illustrated at nymphal, subimaginal and imaginal stages of both sexes. Critical morphological diagnostic characters distinguishing the new species are presented, together with molecular affinities as well as notes on the biology and distribution of the species.

Keywords

Belezma National Park, COI, mayflies, new species, North Africa, taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Ecdyonurus Eaton, 1868 belongs to the Ecdyonurinae Ulmer, 1920, a subfamily with rather challenging and controversial taxonomy as genera delineation and phylogeny are still partially unsolved or in process (Kluge 2004; Wang and McCafferty 2004; Bauernfeind and Soldán 2012; Yanai et al. 2017). The identification key to genera proposed by Webb and McCafferty (2008) displayed 14 genera in the world; among them, four genera Ecdyonurus, Electrogena Zurwerra & Tomka, 1985, Afronurus Lestage, 1924 and Paracinygmula Bajkova, 1975 (sub. nom. Nixe Flowers, 1980; see Sartori 2014 for discussion) possess Palearctic species. The first three are the most diversified with 61, 45 and 64 species respectively worldwide (Barber-James et al. 2013; Yanai et al. 2017). Recently, the new genus Anapos Yanai & Sartori, 2017 was created to accommodate two Mediterranean species.

In Africa, only three Ecdyonurinae genera are present: Ecdyonurus is restricted to North Africa, whereas Afronurus and Notonurus Crass, 1947 are found in the Afrotropical region (Webb and McCafferty 2008; Vuataz et al. 2013).

Bauernfeind and Soldán (2012) proposed to split the West Palearctic species of the genus Ecdyonurus into two subgenera: Ecdyonurus (25 species) and Helvetoraeticus Bauernfeind & Soldán, 2012 (15 species), according to the arrangement of setae on the superlingua, the number of bristles on the ventral side of the labrum and the number of comb-shaped bristles on the maxilla in nymphs, as well as the shape of the apical sclerite of the male genitalia.

Currently, four taxa of this genus are reported from North Africa (Thomas 1998). Two of them are well-known species with a clear status: Ecdyonurus rothschildi Navás, 1929 and Ecdyonurus ifranensis Vitte & Thomas, 1988, whereas one remains doubtful: Ecdyonurus venosus var. constantinicus Lestage, 1925, and the presence of Ecdyonurus venosus (Fabricius, 1793) mentioned by Gauthier (1928) is still unconfirmed. All of them belong to the subgenus Ecdyonurus.

Navás (1929) described Ecdyonurus rothschildi from an oasis in Biskra Province, north-eastern Algeria, based on a male imago. The species was redescribed by Thomas and Dakki (1979) which gave a detailed account of the adult morphology and related it to the E. aurantiacus (Burmeister, 1839) species group. Later, Soldán and Gagneur (1985), proposed the first description of the nymph and an identification key to separate E. rothschildi, E. dispar (Curtis, 1834) and E. aurantiacus nymphs. The species is now known from all Maghreb countries and is one of the most widespread species (Boumaiza and Thomas 1995; Zrelli et al. 2016; Bouhala et al. 2020). Vitte and Thomas (1988) described Ecdyonurus ifranensis at nymphal and adult stages from the Middle Atlas; the species has later been found in other areas of Morocco (El Alami et al. 2022).

The present study aims to examine Ecdyonurus populations from the Aurès region (Algeria). We collected and reared fresh material at all stages. After critical observations and comparison with other Ecdyonurus species, we have clearly distinguished a new Algerian endemic species.

Materials and methods

The material was collected by the first author between February 2020 and November 2021 from six localities from the Aurès region; the sampling sites are located in the Belezma National Park (BNP) and the Western Aurès Massif (Fig. 1). The region is characterized by a semi-arid climate with cold winters and very hot and dry summers. Sampling was performed using a standard benthic net using the kick-sampling method. Imagos and subimagos were obtained by rearing mature nymphs from the Charchar, Yabous and Berbaga sites. All specimens were preserved in 96% ethanol in the field and stored in the laboratory at 4 °C.

Figure 1. 

Map of the sampling sites.

The physical and chemical parameters of the water was measured in situ for each sampling site using a multi-probe. The following variables were measured: average water depth, bed width, current velocity with a FLOWATCH flowmeter; conductivity, water temperature and pH using an Adwa AD32 tester and a HANNA HI1271 pH electrode; while dissolved oxygen was recorded using a Lutron PDO-519 Dissolved Oxygen Meter.

Morphological analysis

Morphological characteristics for the description of the new species were used according to Hrivniak et al. (2018). Pictures of habitus were made using a Canon EOS 6D camera and the Visionary Digital Passport imaging system (formerly available and distributed by Dun Inc., Virginia), and processed with Adobe Photoshop Lightroom ver. 4.4. and Helicon Focus ver. 5.3. Four nymphs were dissected in Cellosolve (2-Ethoxyethanol) with subsequent embedding in Euparal medium and mounting on slides. Microscopic pictures were taken using an Olympus BX51 microscope coupled with an Olympus SC50 camera; pictures were enhanced with the stacking software Olympus Stream Basic ver. 2.3.2. and Adobe Photoshop ver. 21.2.2.

Molecular analysis

Five specimens belonging to the new species as well as five specimens of Ecdyonurus rothschildi were used for DNA extraction to get a 658 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) (see Table 1). DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing and alignment construction were performed according to Benhadji et al. (2020) or Martynov et al. (2022). One sequence of E. rothschildi was retrieved from GenBank, as well as two sequences of E. aurantiacus and two of E. dispar. Three Electrogena sequences were chosen as the outgroup. We estimated the evolutionary divergence within and between our new species and the other Ecdyonurus species using the COI genetic distances. Both pairwise distance between all sequences and mean distance between and within species were calculated in MegaX (Kumar et al. 2018; Stecher et al. 2020) under the Kimura 2-parameter (K80) substitution model (Kimura 1980). We then applied the recently developed species delimitation method ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning; Puillandre et al. 2021) to our COI data set using the graphical web-interface available at https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/asapweb.html. This distance-based method is similar to the popular ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery; Puillandre et al. 2012) approach but has the advantage of providing a score (i.e. asap-score) that indicates the most likely species delimitation. Pairwise genetic distances were computed under the K80 model, and all other settings were set to default. Because ASAP outputs produced two partitions with equal asap-scores, we favored the partition with the smallest p-value.

Table 1.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Sequenced specimens of E. aurasius sp. nov. and Ecdyonurus rothschildi with collection data and nomenclature of sequences used in the molecular study.

Species Specimen catalogue number Stage Locality GPS coordinates Date GenBank ID GenSeq Nomenclature
Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. GBIFCH 01119302 Male imago Algeria, Wilaya de Batna, Berbaga 35°24'01N, 6°24'31"E 5.xi.2021 ON920531 genseq-2 COI
Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. GBIFCH 01119304 Male imago Algeria, Wilaya de Batna, Charchar 35°24'22"N, 6°23'21"E 17.x.2021 ON920532 genseq-2 COI
Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. GBIFCH 00673191 Nymph Algeria, Wilaya de Batna, Charchar 35°24'22"N, 6°23'21"E 23.vi.2019 ON920533 genseq-2 COI
Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. GBIFCH 00673192 Nymph Algeria, Wilaya de Batna, Charchar 35°24'22"N, 6°23'21"E 23.vi.2019 ON920534 genseq-2 COI
Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. GBIFCH 00673193 Male imago Algeria, Wilaya de Batna, Charchar 35°24'22"N, 6°23'21"E 23.vi.2019 ON920535 genseq-2 COI
Ecdyonurus rothschildi GBIFCH 00763579 Nymph Algeria, oued Cherf, Dbabcha 36°13'00"N, 7°19'05"E 18.x.2019 ON920536 genseq-4 COI
Ecdyonurus rothschildi GBIFCH 00763578 Nymph Algeria, oued Bougous, Oum Ali 36°37'53"N, 8°18'54"E 23.i.2019 ON920537 genseq-4 COI
Ecdyonurus rothschildi GBIFCH 01116263 Nymph Morocco, Draa, Mgoune downstream 31°20.07'N, 6°10.82'W 22.x.2021 ON920538 genseq-4 COI
Ecdyonurus rothschildi EC-CH0 Nymph Algeria, Tafna, Chouly 0 34°47'20"N, 1°13'07"W 19.xii.2015 ON920529 genseq-4 COI
Ecdyonurus rothschildi EC-CH1 Nymph Algeria, Tafna, Chouly 1 34°49'15"N, 1°10'55"W 19.xii.2015 ON920530 genseq-4 COI
Ecdyonurus rothschildi Nymph Tunisia vii.2009 HG935040 genseq-4 COI

Finally, we conducted a Bayesian inference gene tree reconstruction in MrBayes ver. 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012), using the best evolutionary model (GTR + Γ + I) selected in JModelTest ver. 2.1.10 (Darriba et al. 2012) following the second-order Akaike information criterion (AICc). We used five substitution scheme and six gamma categories, with all other parameters set to default. To accommodate different substitution rates among COI codon positions, we analyzed our data set in two partitions, one with first and second codon positions and one with third positions (1 + 2, 3). Two independent analyses of four MCMC chains run for one million generations with trees sampled every 1000 generations were implemented, and 100 000 generations were discarded as a burnin after visually verifying run stationarity and convergence in Tracer ver. 1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018). The consensus tree was visualized and edited in iTOL 6 (Letunic and Bork 2021).

Material is deposited in the following institutions:

FEEL-UB2 Functional Ecology and Environmental Laboratory, University Batna 2, Algeria;

IB-US Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Poland;

MZL Museum of zoology, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Results

Molecular analysis

The COI ingroup data set was 100% complete (no missing data) and included 25% of parsimony informative sites. The COI gene tree grouped the five sequences of Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. into a well-supported monophyletic clade, and was supported as a distinct species in the ASAP analysis (Fig. 2). The K80 mean genetic distance within the five Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. COI sequences was 0.14%. As expected, all other included species were also recovered as distinct species with high node supports. The K80 mean genetic distance between Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. and the other three species of Ecdyonurus ranged from 7.6% (mean distance to E. rothschildi) to 20.1% (mean distance to E. aurantiacus), with a minimum distance of 7.1% between GBIFCH01119302 / GBIFCH00673192 and EC-CH0 sequences.

Figure 2. 

Bayesian majority-rule consensus tree reconstructed from the CO1 data set. Tips labelled with GBIF and EC-CH codes indicate newly sequenced specimens, other codes correspond to previously published GenBank sequences. Vertical boxes indicate species delimitation hypotheses according to the ASAP analysis. The outgroups are represented in grey. Circles on branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95.

Morphological analysis

Heptageniidae Neddham, 1901

Ecdyonurinae Ulmer, 1920

Ecdyonurus aurasius Dambri, Benhadji & Sartori, sp. nov.

https://zoobank.org/0A552D79-3329-4CCA-9724-D01492F82D7B

Material

Holotype. Algeria • male imago in ethanol, with its corresponding nymphal and subimaginal exuviae, Wilaya de Batna, Charchar, 35°24'22"N, 6°23'21"E, 1340 m. a.s.l., 09 Nov. 2021, B. Dambri coll. (GBIFCH01128855) [MZL] • Paratypes. 1 male imago, with its nymphal and subimaginal exuviae (GBIFCH01128846), 1 female imago, with its nymphal and subimaginal exuviae (GBIFCH01128858), [MZL]; 6 female imagos [IB-US], same data as holotype; 1 male imago, 1 male subimago [IB-US], 2 female imagos, 7 male subimagos [FEEL-UB2], 06 Nov. 2021; 1 male imago [IB-US], 1 male imago [FEEL-UB2], 20 Oct. 2021; 1 male imago, with its nymphal and subimaginal exuviae (GBIFCH01119304), 1 female imago, with its nymphal and subimaginal exuviae (GBIFCH01128861) [MZL], 17 Oct. 2021; 1 female imago with its subimaginal exuvia, 1 female subimago (GBIFCH01128849) [MZL], 15 Oct. 2021; 1 female subimago, 1 male subimago [IB-US], 1 male subimago (GBIFCH01128853) [MZL], 2 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 10 Oct. 2021; 3 nymphs [IB-US], 2 nymphs (GBIFCH01128857), 1 nymph on slide (GBIFCH01119301) [MZL], 09 Oct. 2021; 7 nymphs [IB-US], 15 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 18 Jun. 2020; 15 nymphs [IB-US], 18 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 5 nymphs (GBIFCH01128850) [MZL], 3 Mar. 2020; same locality, B. Dambri coll; 10 nymphs (GBIFCH00832138), 2 nymphs on slide (GBIFCH00673191-GBIFCH00673192), 1 male imago (GBIFCH00673193), 1 male imago, 1 female imago, 2 female subimagos (GBIFCH00832125), 23 Jun. 2019, same locality, L. Kechemir coll. et leg. [MZL]

Other paratypes. Algeria • Wilaya de Batna, Berbaga, 35°24'01N, 6°24'31"E, 1445 m. a.s.l., 1 male imago, with its nymphal and subimaginal exuviae (GBIFCH01119302), 1 female subimago with its nymphal exuvia (GBIFCH01128848) [MZL], 5 Nov. 2021; 1 male imago (GBIFCH01128852), 2 nymphs (GBIFCH01128847), 1 nymph on slide (GBIFCH01119303) [MZL], 13 nymphs [IB-US], 5 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 4 Nov. 2021; 1 male imago [IB-US], 12 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 30 Nov. 2020; 1 nymph [IB-US], 16 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 03 May 2020; 1 male imago [IB-US], 10 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 02 Mar. 2020, B. Dambri coll. Algeria • Wilaya de Khenchela, Yabous, 35°21'11"N, 6°38'35"E, 1420 m. a.s.l., 2 female imagos [IB-US], 2 female subimagos, 3 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 22 Oct. 2021; 1 female subimago [IB-US], 2 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 1 female imago with its subimaginal exuvia, 1 female subimago (GBIFCH01128854) [MZL], 13-14 Oct. 2021; 1 male imago with its subimaginal exuvia GBIFCH01128851), 1 female imago with is subimaginal exuvia (GBIFCH01128845) [MZL], 12 Oct. 2021; 5 nymphs [IB-US], 1 female imago, 2 male subimagos, 6 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 09 Oct. 2021; 4 nymphs [IB-US], 2 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 1 nymph (GBIFCH01128859) [MZL], 20 Jul. 2020; 2 nymphs [IB-US], 19 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 1 nymph (GBIFCH01128856) [MZL], 02 Jun. 2020; 1 female subimago with its nymphal exuvia [IB-US], 8 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 09 May 2020; 1 female subimago [IB-US], 15 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 08 Mar. 2020; 1 female subimago with its nymphal exuvia [IB-US], 3 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 23 Feb. 2020, B. Dambri coll. Algeria • Wilaya de Batna, Inoughissen, 35°16'42"N, 6°32'34"E, 1670 m. a.s.l., 1 nymph (GBIFCH01128863) [MZL], 07 Jul. 2020; 1 nymph (GBIFCH01128865) [MZL], 18 Apr. 2020, B. Dambri coll.

Other material

Algeria • Wilaya de Batna, oued Chaâba, 35°33'03"N, 6°00'22"E, 1262 m. a.s.l.,1 nymph [IB-US], 17 Jun. 2020; 3 nymphs [IB-US], 10 nymphs [FEEL-UB2], 1 nymph (GBIFCH01128860) [MZL], 20 Apr. 2020, B. Dambri coll. Algeria • Wilaya de Batna, Bouailef, 35°37'01"N, 6°11'17"E, 1060 m, 1 nymph [IB-US], 08 Mar. 2020, B. Dambri coll.

Etymology

Aurès mountains were coined by the Berber people as Awras, meaning tawny; translated by the Romans as Aurasius mons; aurasius is a noun in apposition.

Description

Male imago Size: body length: 9.0–9.8 mm; forewing length 9.1–10.9 mm; cerci broken. General body color distinctly brown to reddish-brown (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3. 

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., adults in lateral view A male B female. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Head. Light brown, clypeal plate with blackish maculations; eyes grayish blue separated by a distance equal to the diameter of the frontal ocellus; a brownish lateral stripe present at one third of the ventral side; ocelli apically whitish-yellow, dark brown basally; antennae with scapus medium brown, flagellum grayish brown.

Thorax. Pronotum medium brown; mesonotum dorsally dark brown; ventrally with basisternum and furcasternum also dark brown, laterally with spiracles and pleura yellowish-brown. Wings. Forewings hyaline, C, Sc and R1 longitudinal veins medium brown with transverse veins fringed with brown; first transversal vein in the costal field surrounded by a dark brown maculation; others longitudinal veins dark brown, as transversal veins; pterostigmatic area milky, with 15–20 medium brown, simple and forked cross veins. Hind wings same color as forewings. Legs. Fore legs markedly darker than middle and hind ones, brown to reddish-brown; fore femora only slightly darker than tibiae and tarsi; fore legs 8.25–9.4 mm; femur:tibia:tarsi proportion: femur 2.11–2.54 mm; tibia 2.46–2.68 mm; tarsal segments 2.68–4.18 mm; T1 = 0.66–0.73 mm; T2 = 0.99–1.08 mm; T3 = 0.87–1.06 mm; T4 = 0.67–0.77 mm; T5 = 0.49–0.54 mm; gradation of tarsal segments: 2 > 3>4 > 1>5. Middle and hind legs yellowish-brown; dorsal face of femora washed with gray; distal part of femora and proximal part of tibiae dark brown; tarsi darker than tibiae; middle legs 5.16–5.49 mm; femur:tibia:tarsi proportions: femur 2.39–2.49 mm; tibia 1.87–1.91 mm; tarsal segments 0.9–1.09 mm; hind legs 4.97–5.71 mm; femur:tibia:tarsi proportions: femur 2.53–2.82 mm; tibia 1.65–1.93 mm; tarsal segments 0.79–0.96 mm.

Abdomen. General color brown to rusty tawny. Terga light tawny to rusty tawny. Tergum I dark brown, terga II-VII reddish-brown with two median pairs of light markings, proximal pair elongated and slightly divergent, distal pair subparallel to body axis (Fig. 4A). Segments II-VIII with rusty-brown lateral stripes stretching from anterior to posterior margin of the segment (Fig. 3A) and connected dorso-posteriorly (Fig. 4A); terga VII–X slightly darker that other ones; tergum X reddish-brown, yellowish-brown posteriorly. Abdominal sterna yellowish to light brown, with two pairs of light markings, the proximal pair elongated, and divergent, distal pair rounded (Fig. 4B). Sterna VIII-IX darker. Nervous ganglia well visible and tinted with purple on sterna II–VII. Cerci brown, with joints of segments blackish.

Figure 4. 

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., abdomen of adults A male in dorsal view B male in ventral view C female in ventral view D male genitalia in ventral view E male genitalia in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Genitalia. Styliger plate medium brown, lighter in the middle, strongly convex, with two small bumps near gonostyli base; first segment of gonostyli dark brown, second and third lighter (Fig. 4D). Penis lobes yellowish-brown to brown moderately expanded laterally, outer margin rather quadratic (Fig. 4D, E). Basal and lateral sclerites brown, darker than apical sclerite (Fig. 4E). Lateral sclerite rather quadratic slightly larger on inner side; apical sclerite with few medium sized teeth on inner margin (Fig. 5A); basal sclerite outer margin smooth, without teeth. Titillators straight, yellowish-brown, darker on outer margin, with two spines on the dorsal face.

Figure 5. 

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. A penes in dorsal view B egg. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Female imago. Size: body length: 9.9–13.3 mm; forewings length: 10.5–12.9 mm; cerci length: 17.9–21.3 mm. General color of body similar to that in male imago, markedly paler. Head. yellowish-brown; eyes grayish. Thorax. Prothorax yellowish gray to brown. Mesothorax dorsally pale, yellow to yellowish-brown, basisternum and furcasterum medium brown. Abdomen. Terga yellowish laterally and tawny to rusty tawny dorsally. Terga I-VIII with central longitudinal rusty tawny parallel bands and lateral stripes (Fig. 3B). Abdominal sterna yellowish to light brown, especially VIII-IX, segments I–VII generally with two central light short strokes; nervous ganglia strongly tinted with purple on sterna II-VII. Subgenital plate large, whitish and angular, reaching two third of sternum VIII length; subanal plate acutely rounded (Fig. 4C). Cerci brown, with joints blackish.

Female subimago. Size: body length: 12.0–12.4 mm; forewings length: 12.3 mm; cerci length: 14.0–14.8 mm. Measurements and body color similar to female imago; thorax and abdomen slightly paler. Wings dull grey.

Male subimago. Size: body length: 9.8–10.5 mm; forewings length: 10.5–11.4 mm; cerci length: 13.3–26.9 mm. Head brown to reddish-brown. Eyes grayish blue. Ocelli as in male imago. Antennae yellowish, brown basally, same than in male imago. Fore legs darker than middle and hind ones. Fore femora intensively brown distally. Middle and hind legs uniformly yellowish gray to yellow. Wings dark gray. Abdominal terga similar to male imago. Sterna slightly lighter than terga. Protuberances of styliger plate well marked, slightly yellowish, gonostyli intensively brown, yellow to whitish-yellow apically. Typical shape of penis already well apparent. Cerci brown.

Mature nymph. Size: body length: up to 7.12 mm for male and 9.6 mm for female; cerci slightly longer than body length. General body color yellowish-brown with pale yellowish markings.

Head. Mean width/length ratio 1.4–1.6, yellowish-brown to brown, with two central light spots near fore margin, and two whitish stripes along the dehiscence line (Fig. 6A). Eyes blackish grey; ocelli whitish grey, antennae with scape and pedicel medium brown; flagellum yellowish-brown.

Figure 6. 

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., nymphal habitus A dorsal view B ventral view C posterolateral expansions of the abdomen. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Mouthparts. Labrum. Mean length /labrum insertion length ratio 1.58; tips slightly turned backwards (Fig. 7A); anterior margin with a median single row of stout setae (Fig. 7B). Right mandible with prostheca composed of 8–11 feathered bristles; kinetodontium (inner incisor) much shorter than (outer) incisor (Fig. 7D). Left mandible with prostheca composed of 9–11 feathered setae, kinetodontium subequal in length to incisor. Hypopharynx with lingua quadratic with dorsal margin slightly concave in the middle; superlingua well developed, with long hair-like setae on outer margin becoming shorter and less dense near apex (Fig. 7E). Labium typical of the genus; glossae markedly rhomboid, with inner margin straight or slightly concave (Fig. 7F). Crown of the galea-lacinia of maxilla with 16–22 comb-shaped setae; median setae with ca 15–17 teeth (Fig. 7G). Maxillary palps 3–segmented, second segment slightly longer than third one.

Figure 7. 

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., nymphal mouthparts: A hemi-labrum B detail of anteromedial part of labrum in ventral view C left mandible D right mandible E left half of hypopharynx F left half of labium G comb-shaped setae at the crown of the galea-lacinia. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A, F); 0.1 mm (B–E, G).

Thorax. Pronotum. Mean width/length ratio 4.2–5.0, yellowish-brown to brown; lateral projections ca as long as the length of the pronotum; with lateral margin regularly convex, and tip slightly pointed (Fig. 6A). Mesonotum medium brown with yellowish markings.

Legs. Yellowish-brown to brown; dorsal surface of femora yellowish-brown washed with grayish brown; uniformly yellowish white ventrally. Tibiae yellowish-brown. Tarsi brownish. Middle and hind legs coloration similar to fore legs. Fore femora 2.0–2.2 times longer than wide; fore tibiae subequal in length to femora. Middle femora 2.2–2.3 times longer than wide; tibiae 0.8–0.9 times femora length. Hind femora 2.3–2.4 longer than wide; tibiae 0.80–0.85 times femora length. Mid- and hind femora length 1.1–1.3 times fore-femora length. Stout setae on dorsal surface of femora similar on all legs, elongated with subparallel margins, tip truncate or slightly rounded (Fig. 8A); claws elongated and hooked with 2–4 small denticles (Fig. 8B).

Figure 8. 

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., nymphal structures A stout setae on the dorsal surface of femora B claw C posterior margin of tergum IV D–J Gill I to VII. Scale bars: 0.05 mm (A); 0.1 mm (B–J); 0.5 mm (E–G same bar as H).

Abdomen. Terga brownish gray; on terga II–VIII two centrally elongated yellowish spots increasing in size posteriorly and fused on tergum IX; tergum X uniformly medium brown (Fig. 6A). Abdominal sterna yellowish white, nervous ganglia tinted with purple. Posterior margin of terga with large pointed marginal teeth alternating with medium and short ones, and several rows of microdenticles above the margin (Fig. 8C). Posterolateral projections short, weakly sclerotized, reaching from slightly above 1/7 to 1/5 of the length of the following segment (Fig. 6C). Gills grayish brown with distinct brown and developed tracheation; gill I tongue-shaped, gills II–VII leaf-shaped, asymmetrical, gills III-IV slightly longer than wide (Fig. 8D–J). Cerci and paracercus yellowish-brown; each segment with a row of pointed stout setae.

Egg. Length 165–175 µm; width 120–130 µm; numerous KCT’s densely arranged at one pole (Fig. 5B); chorionic surface covered with micro granulations.

Discussion

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. belongs to the subgenus Ecdyonurus by the shape of the apical sclerite of male genitalia and the single row of stout setae on the ventral side of the labrum. However, this species presents some intermediate characters between the subgenera Ecdyonurus and Helevetoraeticus; the number of comb-shaped setae on the crown of the galea-lacinia is generally less than 20 in Ecdyonurus s.s., whereas our species exhibits a range from 16 to 22 setae; the setae on the lateral margin of superlingua are supposed to be long, including the tip, whereas in our species, those at the tip are shorter. We can also add the posterolateral projections on the abdomen which are very short, and the nervous ganglia tinted in purple, two characters not frequent in Ecdyonurus s.s. but more common in Helvetoraeticus. Nevertheless, we are confident that our new species belongs to the subgenus Ecdyonurus.

By the shape of the penis lobes and the posterolateral projections of the abdomen, E. aurasius sp. nov. is closely related to E. aurantiacus, E. dispar, E. rothschildi, and E. ifranensis. The first two are considered as Mediterranean faunal elements, expanding to Central Europe or even the British Islands for E. dispar (Bauernfeind and Soldán 2012). The nymph of E. aurasius sp. nov. can be separated from those of E. aurantiacus and E. dispar by the nervous ganglia tinted with purple, and the tongue-shaped gill I, from E. dispar also by the shape of the stout setae on the dorsal surface of femora (acute and pointed in the latter). The new species presents more affinities with the two other North African endemics but can be distinguished from E. rothschildi by the much longer pronotal projections, the shape of the stout setae on the dorsal surface of femora (pointed in the latter), the shape of the gills (more symmetrical in E. rothschildi) and the shape of the glossae ((inner margin rounded and convex in E. rothschildi). Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. differs from E. ifranensis by the shape of the labrum (less broad in E. ifranensis), the shape of the stout setae on the dorsal surface of femora (pointed in E. ifranensis), and the shape of the glossae similar to E. rothschildi. In males, E. aurasius sp. nov. differs from E. rothschildi, E. dispar and E. aurantiacus by the compound eyes separated and not touching (character not stated in E. ifranensis description), from E. aurantiacus and E. dispar by the posterior margin of the basal sclerite smooth, and from E. ifranensis by the first transversal vein in the costal field surrounded by a dark brown maculation (the same in E. rothschildi), and by the shape of the posterior margin of the basal sclerite rounded (straight in E. ifranensis). It is also worth noting that E. aurasius sp. nov. differs from the two other North African species by the nervous ganglia tinted in purple in female imagos, whereas they are colorless in E. rothschildi and E. ifranensis.

Distribution and biology

Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov., as known so far, is restricted to the Aurès region. The species has been recorded from only six localities in the Western Aurès area; most habitats are located in the highest part of the streams, within altitudes ranging from 1010 to 1800 m a.s.l. These sites are represented by small mountain watercourses with gravel substrate (Fig. 9). The average annual water temperature ranges from 5 °С to 18 °С with high concentration of dissolved oxygen (6.5 to 9.35 mg/L). The nymphs were sampled under current velocity ranging from 0.24 to 0.48 m/sec, the average streams width from 60 cm to 1.50 m, with depth from 10 to 35 cm, and pH from 6.8 to 7.2. The highest population density was recorded at the Charchar site (60 individuals/m2) and the lowest one was observed at the Bouailef site (2–5 individuals/m2).

Figure 9. 

Sampling sites where Ecdyonurus aurasius sp. nov. was collected A Oued Chaâba B Inoughissen C Charchar D Berbaga (photos Besma Dambri).

The mature nymphs and subimagos (together with early-instar nymphs) were observed in May/June and another generation observed in September/October, thus suggesting a bivoltine life cycle. The other Ephemeroptera species sporadically occurring in the same sites were Caenis luctuosa (Burmeister, 1839), Baetis chelif Soldan, Godunko & Thomas, 2005 and Baetis sinespinosus Soldán & Thomas, 1983.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the General Directorate of Forests of Batna province for their accompany on the difficult access sites. We want to express our appreciation to Professor Abdelkrim Si Bachir, Director of the Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, for facilitating the work in the laboratory, and Dr Abdelkrim Arar for his help with the map production. Our sincere thanks to Sonia Zrelli (Bizerte, Tunisia), Mokhtar Benlasri (Marrakech, Morocco) Lina Kechemir (Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria) and Boudjéma Samraoui (Guelma, Algeria) for providing material useful for this study. Céline Stoffel (MZL) is thanked for her dedicated work with the molecular lab. We also express our gratitude to Robert Czerniawski, Director of IB-US for encouraging this collaboration and Tomasz Krepski for providing support and lab material for morphological observations in IB-US laboratory. Comments from and discussion with the two reviewers, Lubos Hrivniak and Ernst Bauernfeind, greatly helped to improve the manuscript.

This research was supported by the Algerian Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique.

References

  • Bajkova OY (1975) Izvestiya Sibirskogo Otdelrniya Akademii Nauk SSSR 1: 54–57. [New genus of Ephemeroptera from the Primor’ye] [in Russian]
  • Bauernfeind E, Soldán T (2012) The Mayflies of Europe. Apollo Books, Ollerup, 781 pp.
  • Benhadji N, Sartori M, Hassaine KA, Gattolliat JL (2020) Reports of Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) species from Tafna Basin, Algeria and biogeographic affinities revealed by DNA barcoding. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e55596. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e55596
  • Bouhala Z, Marquez-Rodriguez J, Chakri K, Samraoui F, El-Serehy FA, Ferreras-Romero M, Samraoui B (2020) The life cycle of the Maghrebian endemic Ecdyonurus rothschildi Navas, 1929 (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) and its potential importance for environmental monitoring. Limnology 22: 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-020-00625-z
  • Boumaiza M, Thomas AGB (1995) Distribution and ecological limits of Baetidae vs the other mayfly families in Tunisia: A first evaluation (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 131: 27–33.
  • Burmeister H (1839) Ephemerina. Handbuch der Entomologie 2: 788–804.
  • Crass RS (1947) The May-flies (Ephemeroptera) of Natal and the Eastern Cape. Annals of the Natal Museum 11: 37–110.
  • Curtis J (1834) Descriptions of some nondescript British species of May-flies of Anglers. The London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4(20): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443408648276
  • Darriba D, Taboada G, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Eaton AE (1868) An outline of re-arrangement of the genera of Ephemeridae. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 5: 82–91.
  • El Alami M, El Yaagoubi S, Gattolliat J-L, Sartori M, Dakki M (2022) Diversity and distribution of Mayflies from Morocco (Ephemeroptera, Insecta). Diversity 14(6): e498. [19 pp] https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060498
  • Gauthier H (1928) Recherche sur la faune des eaux continentales de l’Algérie et de la Tunisie. Minerva, Alger, 149 pp.
  • Hrivniak L, Sroka P, Godunko RJ, Palatov D, Polasek M, Manko P, Obona J (2018) Diversity of Armenian mayflies (Ephemeroptera) with the description of a new species of the genus Ecdyonurus (Heptageniidae). Zootaxa 4500(2): 195–221. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4500.2.3
  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Lestage J-A (1924) Les Ephémères de l’Afrique du Sud. Catalogue critique et systématique des espèces connues et description de trois genres nouveaux et de sept espèces nouvelles. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 12: 316–352.
  • Lestage J-A (1925) Ephéméroptères, Plécoptères et Trichoptères recueillis en Algérie par M. H. Gauthier et liste des espèces connues actuellement de l’Afrique du Nord. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de l’Afrique du Nord 16: 8–18.
  • Letunic I, Bork P (2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 49(W1): W293–W296. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab301
  • Martynov AV, Sivaruban T, Palatov DM, Srinivasan P, Barathy S, Isack R, Sartori M (2022) Contribution to Teloganodidae (Ephemeroptera, Ephemerelloidea) of India. ZooKeys 1113: 167–197. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1113.85448
  • Navás L (1929) Insectes Névroptères et voisins de Barbarie. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de l’Afrique du Nord 20: 57–60.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond A, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard M (2018) Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard M, Huelsenbeck J (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Soldán T, Gagneur J (1985) Ecdyonurus rothschildi Navás, 1929: Description de la larve (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Annales de Limnologie 21(2): 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/1985013
  • Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S (2020) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(4): 1237–1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz312
  • Thomas AGB (1998) A provisional checklist of the mayflies of North Africa (Ephemeroptera). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 134: 13–20.
  • Thomas AGB, Dakki M (1979) Ephémeroptères d’Afrique du Nord: I. Ecdyonurus rotschildi Navás, 1929. Description des imagos. Annales de Limnologie 14(3): 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/1978008
  • Ulmer G (1920) Neue Ephemeropteren. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Abteilung A 11: 1–80. [1919]
  • Vitte B, Thomas AGB (1988) Compléments et corrections à la faune des Ephéméroptères d’Afrique du Nord. 3. Ecdyonurus ifranensis n. sp. du Moyen Atlas marocain (Ephemeroptera). Annales de Limnologie 24(3): 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/1988023
  • Vuataz L, Sartori M, Gattolliat JL, Monaghan MT (2013) Endemism and diversification in freshwater insects of Madagascar revealed by coalescent and phylogenetic analysis of museum and field collections. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66(3): 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.12.003
  • Wang TQ, McCafferty WP (2004) Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera) of the world. Part I: Phylogenetic higher classification. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 130: 11–45.
  • Webb JM, McCafferty WP (2008) Heptageniidae of the world. Part II: Key to the Genera. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification 7: 1–55.
  • Yanai Z, Sartori M, Dor R, Dorchin N (2017) Molecular phylogeny and morphological analysis resolve a long-standing controversy over generic concepts in Ecdyonurinae mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Systematic Entomology 42(1): 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12203
  • Zrelli S, Boumaiza M, Bejaoui M, Gattolliat J-L, Sartori M (2016) New data and revision of the Ephemeroptera of Tunisia. In: Yoshimura M, Takemon Y (Eds) Biology of Inland Waters supplement N°3, Wakayama, Japan, 99–106.
  • Zurwerra A, Tomka I (1985) Electrogena gen. nov. eine Gattung der Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera). Entomologische Berichte (Luzern) 13: 99–104.
login to comment