Research Article |
Corresponding author: Sam-Kyu Kim ( samkyuk@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Zhiyuan Yao
© 2022 Junho Chae, Jun-Gi Lee, Sam-Kyu Kim.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Chae J, Lee J-G, Kim S-K (2022) Taxonomic study on Sinopoda Jäger, 1999 (Araneae, Sparassidae, Heteropodinae), with three new species from Korea. ZooKeys 1114: 77-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1114.85493
|
The genus Sinopoda Jäger, 1999 is a group of huntsman spiders (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), and currently seven species have been reported in Korea. In this study, three new species are described from Korea, Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov., Sinopoda bogil sp. nov., and Sinopoda pantherina sp. nov.; Sinopoda jirisanensis Kim & Chae, 2013 is revalidated with neotype designation, and had been formerly synonymized with Sinopoda forcipata (Karsch, 1881). Additionally, all previous records of Sinopoda stellatops Jäger & Ono, 2002 and S. forcipata from Korea are deemed misidentifications of S. jirisanensis and S. bogil sp. nov., respectively.
Biodiversity, huntsman spiders, Northeast Asia, revalidation, taxonomy
The genus Sinopoda Jäger, 1999 is a group of huntsman spiders (Araneae: Sparassidae), which was designated as a new group comprising some Asian species formerly described under Heteropoda Latreille, 1804. To date, 133 species of this genus have been described, of which more than half described in China, while the others are also widely distributed in the east, south, and southeast Asia, ranging from India to Japan (
Currently only seven species of the genus have been recorded from Korea (
The purposes of this study are as follows: 1) describing three new Sinopoda species from South Korea; 2) revalidating S. jirisanensis as a valid species; 3) correcting misidentifications of Korean records of two previously known species. Detailed descriptions, photographs, and illustrations of four species are provided with taxonomic remarks on these species.
All specimens included in this paper were hand-collected and fixed in 80% ethanol. Photographs of living specimens and all habitus fixed in ethanol were taken with a Nikon D7000 DSLR camera with 105 mm macro lens (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Male palps and female genitalia were examined and photographed using an Olympus SZX10 stereomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a digital camera (Sony a6000; Sony, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on the microscope after detaching and dissecting the parts from the bodies. Hairs on the ventral surface of cymbium of male palp were removed for accurate observation of embolic division. Epigynes were dissected from opisthosoma and cleared in 10% KOH solution in 75 °C for 20 minutes to examine the internal duct systems. Photographs were taken at different focal depths and stacked using Helicon Focus 7 software (Helicon Soft Ltd., Kharkiv, Ukraine). All measurements are given in millimeters. Specimens were measured under a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX10) using HK Basic (Koptic, Yongin, Korea) analytical software. Leg and palp measurements are described as total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Leg spination patterns followed
Abbreviations used in this work:
ALE anterior lateral eyes,
AME anterior median eyes,
AME–ALE interval of AME and ALE,
AME–AME interval of AME and AME,
ALE–PLE interval of ALE and PLE,
AME–PME interval of AME and PME,
AW anterior width of prosoma,
C conductor,
clypeus AME clypeus height at AME,
clypeus ALE clypeus height at ALE,
dRTA dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis,
E embolus,
EA embolic apophysis,
EP epigynal pocket,
FB fusion bubble,
FD fertilization duct,
Fe femur,
GA glandular appendage,
LL lateral lobes,
LS lobal septum,
MS membranous sac,
Mt metatarsus,
OL opisthosoma length,
OW opisthosoma width,
Pa patella,
PL prosoma length,
PW prosoma width,
PLE posterior lateral eyes,
PME posterior median eyes,
PME–PLE interval of PME and PLE,
PME–PME interval of PME and PME,
S spermathecae,
SP spermophore,
ST subtegulum,
SS slit sensillum,
TE tegulum,
Ti tibia,
vRTA ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Subfamily Heteropodinae Thorell, 1873
Sarotes forcipatus Karsch, 1881
This genus is taxonomically close to the genus Heteropoda but has the following combinations of characteristics distinct from Heteropoda and other sparassid genera: 1) male palp with bifurcated RTA, 2) conductor membranous and arising from distal anterior part of tegulum, 3) embolus typically with embolic apophysis, 4) epigyne with pair of modified rims, and 5) female vulva uncoiled, typically fused along the median line, divided into basal part and head (= glandular appendage), situated laterally from the entrance of internal duct into the spermathecae (
The genus Sinopoda is nocturnal and wanders various types of fields such as slope, leaf litter, cave, the forest floor, and on trees with bark (
Holotype ♂ Republic Of Korea: Gyeonggi-do, Hwaseong-si, Is. Gukhwado, bottom part of mixed forest; 37°03.50'N, 126°33.22'E; ca. 13 m; 19 Sep. 2019; D. H. Kim leg. Paratypes 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ same data as holotype. 1 ♀ Chungcheongnam-do, Taean-gun, Wonbuk-myeon, Crack of embankment; 36°51.65'N, 126°11.65'E; ca. 47 m; 17 Jul. 2015; J. Chae leg. 1 ♂ 1 ♀ Incheon, Ongjin-gun, Is. Gureopdo, rock piles of pine tree forest located nearby shoreline; 37°11.33'N, 125°58.88'E; ca. 23 m; 15 Jul. 2020; B. M. Jeong et al. leg. 1 ♀ Jeollabuk-do, Gunsan-si, Is. Yamido, bottom piles of pine tree forest; 35°50.62'N, 126°29.28'E; ca. 20 m; 2 Jun. 2020; J. H. Sohn leg.
The specific epithet bigibba is a compound word of the prefix bi- for two and the Latin adjective gibbus, -a, -um meaning humped, derived from the form of female glandular appendages (Figs
Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov., illustrations of male palp and female epigyne A–C male palp (A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral) D, E female copulatory organ from Is. Gukhwado (D ventral E dorsal). Abbreviations: C conductor dRTA dorsal branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis E embolus EA embolic apophysis FB fusion bubble FD fertilization duct GA glandular appendage LL lateral lobes LS lobal septum MS membranous duct SP spermophore ST subtegulum TE tegulum vRTA ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 2.0 mm (A–C); 0.5 mm (D, E).
This species can be distinguished from other congeners by the combination of following characteristics: Male―embolus with membranous flange extended prolaterally; embolic apophysis tapered distally, with membranous flange slightly extended ventrally; vRTA slightly curved outwardly and distally tapered in ventral view, smooth obtuse-trapezoidal in retrolateral view. Female―posterior muscle sigillae on opisthosoma with pair of large ivory-colored marks; anterolateral margin of lateral lobes sinuous, posterior margin with pair of round humps; lobal septum triangular; glandular appendages very short, slightly protruded.
Male (holotype) Measurements: Total length: 18.79, PL: 8.47, PW: 7.56, OL: 10.32, OW: 4.32, AW: 4.01. Eyes: AME: 0.36, ALE: 0.53, PME: 0.32, PLE: 0.55, AME–AME: 0.31, AME–ALE: 0.12, PME–PME: 0.42, PME–PLE: 0.43, AME–PME: 0.52, ALE–PLE: 0.56, clypeus AME: 0.29, clypeus ALE: 0.46. Leg formula: 2143, Palp: 12.45 (4.51, 1.95, 2.54, 3.45). Legs: I 43.85 (11.26, 4.18, 11.86, 12.53, 4.02), II 47.48 (12.08, 4.75, 13.05, 13.84, 3.76), III 36.59 (10.51, 3.78, 9.56, 10.04, 2.70), IV 40.04 (10.86, 3.46, 10.47, 11.97, 3.28). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2101, 1000. Legs: Fe I, III 323, II 324/323, IV 331/321, Pa I–IV 101, Ti I 1317/1318, II 1118/1218, III–IV 2326, Mt I 1014, II 1014/1013, III 2015/2014, IV 3036. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Palp
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Coloration in ethanol (Fig.
Male (n = 2) Measurements: Total length: 13.49–15.13, PL: 7.07–7.90, PW: 6.25–6.91, OL: 6.42–7.23, OW: 3.74–4.28, AW: 3.44–3.69, Leg I: 36.02–38.89.
Female (paratype) Measurements: Total length: 21.44, PL: 1011, PW: 8.93, OL: 11.33, OW: 7.00, AW: 5.29. Eyes: AME: 0.36, ALE: 0.52, PME: 0.28, PLE: 0.55, AME–AME: 0.43, AME-ALE: 0.25, PME–PME: 0.55, PME–PLE: 0.73, AME–PME: 0.64, ALE–PLE: 0.67, clypeus AME: 0.38, clypeus ALE: 0.44. Palp: 13.10 (4.10, 2.16, 2.67, 4.17). Legs: I 36.05 (10.04, 4.29, 9.53, 9.43, 2.76), II 38.00 (10.81, 4.45, 9.96, 9.85, 2.93), III 32.06 (9.31, 4.03, 8.32, 7.90, 2.50), IV 34.82 (10.01, 3.74, 8.66, 9.85, 2.56). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2121, 1014. Legs: Fe I 323/313, II 323, III 323/332, IV 332/321, Pa I–III 101, IV 101/001, Ti I 1018, II 2026, III 2026/2126, IV 2326/2126, Mt I–II 1014, III 2016/2015, IV 3036. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Copulatory organ
: As per diagnosis (Figs
(Fig.
(Fig.
Female (n = 4) Measurements: Total length: 17.33–24.61, PL: 7.29–9.31, PW: 6.02–8.31, OL: 9.48–15.81, OW: 5.40–11.74, AW: 3.69–5.09, Leg I: 23.85–32.27. An intraspecific variation was observed on the width of lobal septum and the presence of median indentation in epigyne (Fig.
Republic of Korea (Is. Gukhwado, Is. Gureopdo, Is. Yamido, Taean-gun) (Fig.
The male of Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov. is similar to Sinopoda aequalis Zhong, Jäger, Chen & Liu, 2019 (
Sinopoda bogil sp. nov., illustrations of male palp and female epigyne A–C male palp (A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral) D, E female copulatory organ (D ventral E dorsal) Abbreviations: AB anterior band C conductor dRTA dorsal branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis E embolus EA embolic apophysis EP epigynal pocket FD fertilization duct GA glandular appendage LL lateral lobes LS lobal septum MS membranous duct SP spermophore SS slit sensillum ST subtegulum TE tegulum vRTA ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 2.0 mm (A–C); 0.5 mm (D, E).
The female of the new species is similar to S. brevis (
Sinopoda forcipata: Kim, 2009: 238, figs 1A–I, 3A–C (nec Karsch, 1881) (misidentification).
Holotype ♂ Republic Of Korea: Jeollanam-do, Wando-gun, Is. Bogildo, leaf litter slope of mixed forest; 34°09.53'N, 126°32.62'E; ca. 176 m; 5 Apr. 2021; D. Y. Song leg. Paratype 1 ♀ same data as holotype.
The specific epithet bogil is derived from the type locality, Is. Bogildo; noun.
This species can be distinguished from other congeners by the combination of following characteristics: Male―embolus with membranous flange extended prolaterally, broadened in distal; embolic apophysis with blunt triangular membranous tip; tegulum pisiform, with slightly convex prolateral portion; vRTA slightly curved inwardly and distally blunt in ventral view, thumb-shaped in retrolateral view. Female―lateral lobes with distinct median furrow, posteromedially concave; anterolateral margin of lateral lobes slightly sinuated, posterior margin with pair of slightly protruded humps; lobal septum triangular with anterior indentation; glandular appendages linear and slightly curved posterolaterally in apex, distinctly shorter than posterior part of vulva.
Male (holotype) Measurements: Total length: 12.62, PL: 6.09, PW: 5.48, OL: 6.53, OW: 3.54, AW: 3.03. Eyes: AME: 0.25, ALE: 0.42, PME: 0.35, PLE: 0.49, AME–AME: 0.30, AME–ALE: 0.14, PME–PME: 0.34, PME–PLE: 0.49, AME–PME: 0.49, ALE–PLE: 0.51, clypeus AME: 0.26, clypeus ALE: 0.28. Palp: 9.06 (2.94, 1.72, 1.84, 2.56). Legs: I 28.46 (7.50, 2.97, 7.72, 7.65, 2.62), II 31.30 (8.45, 3.40, 7.95, 8.63, 2.87), III 23.99 (7.03, 2.44, 6.28, 6.36, 1.88), IV 26.06 (7.26, 2.55, 6.69, 7.37, 2.19). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2111, 1000. Legs: Fe I 323/312, II–III 323, IV 331, Pa I 101/001, II–IV 101, Ti I 1418/1116, II 1418, III 2326, IV 3236, Mt I 2120/2202, II 2024, III 3034, IV 3036. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Palp
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Coloration in ethanol. (Fig.
Coloration of live specimen. (Fig.
Female (paratype) Measurements: Total length: 13.22, PL: 6.69, PW: 5.72, OL: 6.53, OW: 4.09, AW: 3.74. Eyes: AME: 0.26, ALE: 0.49, PME: 0.36, PLE: 0.45, AME–AME: 0.27, AME–ALE: 0.12, PME–PME: 0.43, PME–PLE: 0.56, AME–PME: 0.55, ALE–PLE: 0.58, clypeus AME: 0.38, clypeus ALE: 0.36. Palp: 9.59 (2.98, 1.44, 2.33, 2.84). Legs: I 23.48 (6.76, 2.69, 6.20, 5.74, 2.09), II 25.98 (7.73, 2.91, 6.69, 6.40, 2.25), III 22.29 (6.71, 2.92, 5.73, 5.29, 1.64), IV 24.41 (6.82, 2.49, 6.23, 6.74, 2.13). Leg formula: II-IV-I-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2121, 1014. Legs: Fe I–III 323, IV 331, Pa I, IV 001, II–III 101, Ti I–II 1018, III 2126, IV 2228/2328, Mt I 0014, II 1014, III 2016, IV 3036. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Copulatory organ
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Coloration in ethanol. (Fig.
Coloration of live specimen. (Fig.
Republic of Korea (known only from the type locality) (Fig.
Sinopoda bogil sp. nov. has been described as Sinopoda forcipata (Karsch, 1881) (
The most comparable species with male of Sinopoda bogil sp. nov. is Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov. (Figs
The female of Sinopoda bogil sp. nov. is also similar to Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov. (Figs
Sinopoda jirisanensis Kim & Chae, 2013: 184, figs 1–11 (type locality: Korea).
Heteropoda stellata: Paik, 1968: 171, figs 3, 4, 22–29; 1978: 396, fig. 178.1–4 (nec Schenkel, 1963) (misidentification).
Sinopoda stellata: Namkung, 2002: 498, fig. 40.2a, b; 2003: 501, fig. 40.2a, b (nec Schenkel, 1963) (misidentification).
Sinopoda stellatops: Kim, 2009: 242, figs 2A–D, 3D–F;
Sinopoda forcipata:
Holotype ♂ Republic Of Korea: Jeollabuk-do, Namwon-si, Sannae-myeon; 35°23.14'N, 127°35.05'E; 20 Jun. 2013; J. Chae leg (lost). Neotype ♂ Jeollabuk-do, Namwon-si, Sannae-myeon, Mt. Jirisan, leaf litter slope of mixed forest; 35°23.11'N, 127°35.08'E; ca. 501 m; 2 Jun. 2020; J. Chae leg. Paraneotypes 1 ♀ same data as neotype. 1 ♂ 1 ♀ same data as neotype except collecting data: 13 Aug. 2013. 1 ♂ 1 ♀ Jeollabuk-do, Jinan-gun, Jucheon-myeon, leaf litter slope of mixed forest; 35°58.50'N, 127°24.95'E; ca. 298 m; 20 May. 2020; J. H. Sohn leg. 2 ♂♂ 1 ♀ Chungcheongbuk-do, Danyang-gun, Mt. Sobaeksan, mixed forest; 36°57.56'N, 128°25.88'E; ca. 518 m; 30 Apr. 2021; J. G. Lee & J. H. Lee leg. 4 ♂♂ 1 ♀ Gyeongsangbuk-do, Bonghwa-gun, Mt. Gakhwasan, bottom of mixed forest; 36°59.48'N, 128°54.35'E; ca. 725 m; 8 Jul. 2019; J. G. Lee leg. 1 ♀ Gangwon-do, Pyeongchang-gun, Mt. Odaesan, mixed forest nearby wooded valley; 37°44.51'N, 128°35.05'E; ca. 682 m; 18 Sep. 2020; S. K. Kim leg.
This species can be distinguished from other congeners by the combination of following characteristics: Male―embolus without membranous flange; embolic apophysis distally with ventrally folded membranous extension; tegulum oval, slightly covered proximal portion of embolus; spermophore slightly curved; dRTA finger-like and slightly curved; vRTA blunt triangular. Female―lateral lobes anteriorly fused without median furrow, posteromedially with indentation; anterolateral margin of lateral lobes slightly concave, posterior margin without humps; lobal septum ~ 1/5 as wide as epigynal field width, anteriorly blunt; posterior part of vulva laterally elongated, round; glandular appendages thick, linear, and distally blunt, as long as posterior part of vulva.
Male (neotype) Measurements: Total length: 12.46, PL: 6.18, PW: 5.60, OL: 6.28, OW: 3.52, AW: 2.75. Eyes: AME: 0.22, ALE: 0.37, PME: 0.28, PLE: 0.40, AME–AME: 0.22, AME–ALE: 0.10, PME–PME: 0.27, PME–PLE: 0.46, AME–PME: 0.41, ALE–PLE: 0.36, clypeus AME: 0.20, clypeus ALE: 0.23. Palp: 9.89 (3.20, 1.49, 2.20, 3.00). Legs: I 32.12 (8.19, 3.09, 8.67, 9.59, 2.58), II 36.31 (9.59, 3.48, 9.78, 10.94, 2.52), III 26.14 (7.21, 2.66, 6.95, 7.32, 2.00), IV 29.51 (7.94, 2.84, 7.57, 8.79, 2.37). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2011, 1000. Legs: Fe I–II 323, III 322/323, IV 321; Pa I 101/001, II–III 101, IV 001, Ti I–II 1318, III 2326, IV 2226/2326, Mt I 1014/1013, II 1014, III–IV 3036. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Palp
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Sinopoda jirisanensis Kim & Chae, 2013, male palp and female epigyne A–C male palp (A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral) D, E female copulatory organ from Mt. Jirisan (D ventral E dorsal) F, G female copulatory organ from Jinan-gun (F ventral G dorsal). Scale bars: 2.0 mm (A–C); 0.5 mm (D–G).
Sinopoda jirisanensis Kim & Chae, 2013, illustrations of male palp and female epigyne A–C male palp (A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral) D, E female copulatory organ from Mt. Jirisan (D ventral E dorsal). Abbreviations: AB anterior band C conductor dRTA dorsal branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis E embolus EA embolic apophysis EP epigynal pocket FD fertilization duct GA glandular appendage LL lateral lobes LS lobal septum MS membranous duct SP spermophore SS slit sensillum ST subtegulum TE tegulum vRTA ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 2.0 mm (A–C); 0.5 mm (D, E).
Coloration in ethanol. (Fig.
Coloration of live specimen. (Fig.
Variation. Male (n = 10) Measurements: Total length: 10.50–14.90, PL: 5.53–7.14, PW: 4.86–5.99, OL: 4.97–7.76, OW: 2.97–4.96, AW: 2.60–3.33, Leg I: 27.63–33.35.
Female (paraneotype) Measurements: Total length: 15.85, PL: 6.59, PW: 5.63, OL: 9.26, OW: 6.73, AW: 3.53. Eyes: AME: 0.26, ALE: 0.39, PME: 0.27, PLE: 0.36, AME–AME: 0.29, AME–ALE: 0.19, PME–PME: 0.40, PME–PLE: 0.52, AME–PME: 0.45, ALE–PLE: 0.48, clypeus AME: 0.28, clypeus ALE: 0.29. Palp: 8.28 (2.46, 1.42, 1.83, 2.57). Legs: I 21.52 (6.07, 2.66, 5.50, 5.45, 1.84), II 23.83 (6.88, 2.90, 6.15, 5.89, 2.01), III 19.65 (5.84, 2.48, 5.03, 4.78, 1.52), IV 21.63 (5.90, 2.33, 5.39, 6.03, 1.98). Leg formula: II-IV-I-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2121, 1014. Legs: Fe I–III 323, IV 321, Pa I–IV 101, Ti I 1218/1018, II 1118/1218, III 2226, IV 2326, Mt I–II 1014, III 2326, IV 3036. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Copulatory organ
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Coloration in ethanol. (Fig.
Coloration of live specimen. (Fig.
Variation. Female (n = 7) Measurements: Total length: 10.50–14.90, PL: 5.53–7.14, PW: 4.86–5.99, OL: 4.97–7.76, OW: 2.97–4.96, Leg I: 27.63–33.35.
In some specimens, some variations are observed in which the internal duct system is wide as long without medial protuberance and the posterior part is distinctly curved toward the dorsal direction. Intraspecific variations were observed in the shape of lateral lobes and the width of lobal septum (Fig.
Republic of Korea (Mt. Jirisan, Mt. Sobaeksan, Jinan-gun, Mt. Gakhwasan, and Mt. Odaesan) (Fig.
It is known that the holotype and paratype were lost due to fire in the depository (JooPil Spider Museum, Namyangju-si, Korea). For taxonomic stability of the species, we designate the neotype and paraneotypes of this species. Some of these materials were collected from the same locality as holotype.
Sinopoda jirisanensis Kim & Chae, 2013 was synonymized to Sinopoda forcipata (Karsch, 1881) (
Moreover, this species has been erroneously described as Sinopoda stellatops Jäger & Ono, 2002 (
The male of this species resembles Sinopoda ogatai Jäger & Ono, 2002 (
Holotype ♂ Republic Of Korea: Gyeongsangnam-do, Geoje-si, Gohyeon-dong, rock piles above leaf litter, walls; 34°52.20'N, 128°36.73'E; ca. 454 m; 14 Jul. 2016; J. Chae leg. Paratype 1 ♀ same data as holotype.
The specific epithet pantherina is derived from the Latin adjective pantherinus, -a, -um, meaning leopard-like, originating from the coloration pattern of live specimens (Fig.
This species can be distinguished from other congeners by the combination of following characteristics: Male―distal portion of cymbium distinctly bent ventrally; embolus with membranous flange extended prolaterally; embolic apophysis distally truncated with membranous flange slightly extended ventrally; spermophore strongly curved; vRTA slightly curved inwardly and distally blunt in ventral view, thumb-shaped in retrolateral view. Female―epigyne with slightly elongated sclerotized epigynal bulges; lateral lobes with indistinct median furrow, posteromedially with deep and wide indentation; anterolateral margin of lateral lobes almost linear, posterior margin without humps; lobal septum narrow and triangular, without indentation; glandular appendages nearly linear, slightly longer than posterior part of vulva.
Male (holotype) Measurements: Total Length: 11.20, PL: 5.32, PW: 5.47, OL: 5.88, OW: 3.66, AW: 2.87. Eyes: AME: 0.25, ALE: 0.37, PME: 0.30, PLE: 0.42, AME–AME: 0.17, AME–ALE: 0.09, PME–PME: 0.25, PME–PLE: 0.37, AME–PME: 0.40, ALE–PLE: 0.37, clypeus AME: 1.11, clypeus ALE: 1.10. Palp: 5.76 (1.74, 1.08, 0.83, 2.11). Legs: I 30.84 (7.58, 2.24, 8.71, 9.19, 3.12), II 35.02 (9.33, 2.63, 9.79, 10.10, 3.17), III 27.11 (7.23, 2.85, 6.85, 7.30, 2.88), IV 29.35 (7.59, 2.59, 7.50, 8.95, 2.72). Leg formula: II-IV-I-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2111, 1000. Legs: Fe I–II 323, III 302, IV 321, Pa I–III 101, IV 001, Ti I 1328, II 1318, III 2126, IV 2226, Mt I 1024, II 1216, III 1016, IV 2026. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Palp
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Sinopoda pantherina sp. nov., illustrations of male palp and female epigyne A–C male palp (A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral) D, E female copulatory organ (D ventral E dorsal). Abbreviations: C conductor dRTA dorsal branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis E embolus EA embolic apophysis EP epigynal pocket FD fertilization duct GA glandular appendage LL lateral lobes LS lobal septum MS membranous duct SP spermophore SS slit sensillum ST subtegulum TE tegulum vRTA ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 2.0 mm (A–C); 0.5 mm (D, E).
Coloration in ethanol. (Fig.
Female (paratype) Measurements: Total length: 15.18, PL: 7.64, PW: 6.72, OL: 7.54, OW: 4.20, AW: 3.98. Eyes: AME: 0.27, ALE: 0.49, PME: 0.30, PLE: 0.47, AME–AME: 0.27, AME–ALE: 0.13, PME–PME: 0.45, PME–PLE: 0.53, AME–PME: 0.43, ALE–PLE: 0.54, clypeus AME: 0.47, clypeus ALE: 0.43. Palp: 9.52 (3.11, 1.37, 2.04, 3.00). Legs: I 26.38 (7.56, 3.13, 7.04, 6.61, 2.04), II 26.93 (7.96, 3.47, 7.56, 5.94, 2.00), III 24.40 (7.21, 2.89, 6.29, 5.71, 2.30), IV 26.92 (7.42, 3.02, 6.84, 7.21, 2.43). Leg formula: II-IV-I-III. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2121, 1014. Legs: Fe I–II 323, III 332/322, IV 331, Pa I 001, II–III 101, IV 101/001, Ti I 1018, II 1118, III–IV 2126, Mt I 0004, II 1014, III–IV 2026. Chelicerae: furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth.
Copulatory organ
: As per diagnosis (Figs
Coloration in ethanol. (Fig.
Coloration in live specimen. (Fig.
Live statements of Sinopoda spp. A, B Sinopoda bogil sp. nov. (A male, dorsal view B female, dorsal view) C Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov., dorsal view of paratype female from Taean-gun D, E Sinopoda pantherina sp. nov., from Geoje-si (D dorsal view of juvenile female E dorsal view of adult female). Scale bars: 5.0 mm (A, B).
The male of Sinopoda pantherina sp. nov. is similar to Sinopoda bigibba sp. nov. (Figs
Female of Sinopoda pantherina sp. nov. is similar to Sinopoda aureola Kim, Lee & Lee, 2014 (
The authors would like to thank Jun-Ho Lee, Sangwoo Kim and Dong-Yeop Song (Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea), Dae-Hee Kim (Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea), Ju-Hyeong Sohn (Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Korea), and Byeong-Min Jeong (Yeoju Insect Museum, Yeoju, Korea) who give great help during specimen collections. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewer and the subject editor Dr. Zhiyuan Yao for providing valuable comments on the manuscript.