Research Article |
Corresponding author: Yuehua Song ( songyuehua@163.com ) Academic editor: J. Adilson Pinedo-Escatel
© 2022 Guimei Luo, Jinqiu Wang, Yuehua Song.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Luo G, Wang J, Song Y (2022) Three new species of the leafhopper genus Mitjaevia Dworakowska from Karst areas in Southwest China (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae). ZooKeys 1125: 159-169. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1125.82258
|
Three new species of the leafhopper genus Mitjaevia
Homoptera, morphology, new taxa, taxonomy
The genus Mitjaevia was designated by Dworakowska in 1970 belonging to the tribe Erythroneurini of the subfamily Typhlocybinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Some members of the genus are known as important agricultural pests in the world. Mitjaevia Dworakowska share similar features with Diomma Motschulsky and Kusala Dworakowska such as the vertex and pronotum, usually with dark spots or stripes; the style with apex slender and curved; and connective with two strong lateral arms but can be distinguished by the combination of the following characters: (1) pygofer lobe with numerous microsetae or microtrichia near caudal area and basal lower angle without clusters of long macrosetae; (2) abdominal apodemes small, not extending beyond hind margin of 3rd sternite; (3) forewing semitransparent, light brown or brown, often decorated with white or milky patches.
Later,
Specimens for this study were collected on roadside weeds in Karst (Guizhou Province, China) by sweep net. The morphological terms used in this study followed
Mitjaevia Dworakowska, 1970: 763.
Erythroneura amseli Dlabola, 1961.
Afghanistan.
Yellow with brown markings; vertex usually with a pair of dark brown spots; pronotum with brown markings or completely dark; scutellum with dark basal triangles; forewing hyaline with several dark patches; abdomen ventrally and subgenital plates dark. Head distinctly narrower than pronotum.
Pygofer caudally rounded or angulate, weakly sclerotized caudally; dorsal pygofer appendage movably articulated, not extended beyond pygofer apex. Style distally slender with apex foot-like; preapical lobe large. Subgenital plates extended beyond pygofer, darkly pigmented, gradually curved dorsad, with three or more macrosetae of differing length present in middle. Aedeagus with shaft tubular, straight or curved dorsad in lateral view, with or without basal processes; preatrium developed. Connective Y- or M-shaped, with short stem and arms, central lobe well developed.
Palaearctic and Oriental regions.
M. aurantiaca Mitjaev, 1969: 1044 (pl. 3, figs 1, 2); Song & Li, 2014: 111, (pl. 2.71, figs D-F; I, J, M, S).
M. bifurcata Luo, Song & Song, 2021: 3–6, fig. 2.
M. diana (Distant, 1918: 100, Typhlocyba); Dworakowska, 1970: 765 (lectotype designated by inference); Dworakowska, 1980: 179, figs 252–262; Song & Li, 2014: 112 (pl. 2.72, figs D-F; I, J, M).
M. dworakowskae Chen, Song & Webb, 2020: 34–39, figs 28–41.
M. korolevskayae Dworakowska, 1979: 44–45, figs 349–358; Song & Li, 2014: 113 (pl. 2.73, figs D-F; I, J, M).
M. nanaoensis Chiang & Knight, 1990: 223, fig. 18.
M. protuberanta Song, Li & Xiong, 2011: 27–29, figs 1–10.
M. bijiensis sp. nov.
M. ramosa Luo, Song & Song, 2021: 6–8, fig. 5.
M. salixia sp. nov.
M. shibingensis Chen, Song & Webb, 2020: 34, fig. 15–27.
M. solitaria sp. nov.
M. tappana Chiang & Knight, 1990: 225, fig. 19.
M. wangwushana Song, Li & Xiong, 2011: 29–30, figs 11–19.
1 | Aedeagus with single or paired processes | 2 |
– | Aedeagus without processes | 10 |
2 | Aedeagal shaft with paired processes | 3 |
– | Aedeagal shaft with single process (Fig. |
M. solitaria sp. nov. |
3 | Aedeagus with apical, subapical or basal processes, but not dorsally | 4 |
– | Aedeagus only with dorsal processes | M. bifurcata |
4 | Aedeagal shaft with apical process | 5 |
– | Aedeagal shaft without apical process | 7 |
5 | Aedeagal shaft with unbifurcated apical process (Fig. |
M. bijiensis sp. nov. |
– | Aedeagal shaft with bifurcated apical process | 6 |
6 | Aedeagal shaft with pair of asymmetric bifurcated short processes at apex | M. ramosa |
– | Aedeagal shaft with pair of symmetrical bifurcated short processes at apex | M. diana |
7 | Aedeagal shaft with paired processes subapically | 8 |
– | Aedeagal shaft without paired processes subapically | 9 |
8 | Aedeagal shaft with pair of small, triangle-like processes subapically | M. protuberanta |
– | Aedeagal shaft with pair of long, curved processes subapically | M. wangwushana |
9 | Aedeagal shaft with finger-like basal processes ventrally | M. aurantiaca |
– | Aedeagal shaft with lamellate-like basal processes ventrally (Fig. |
M. salaxia sp. nov. |
10 | Preatrium of aedeagus long in lateral view | 11 |
– | Preatrium of aedeagus short in lateral view | M. tappana |
11 | Aedeagal shaft cylindrical, evenly tapered from base to apex | 12 |
– | Aedeagal shaft laterally compressed, abruptly tapered from subapically to apex | 13 |
12 | Aedeagus dorsal apodeme visible in lateral view | M. korolevskayae |
– | Aedeagus dorsal apodeme absent or vestigial in lateral view | M. nanaoensis |
13 | Aedeagal shaft with rounded apex in lateral view; preatrium expanded in ventral view | M. shibingensis |
– | Aedeagal shaft with acute apex in lateral view; preatrium narrow in ventral view | M. dworakowskae |
Holotype : ♂, China: Guizhou Province, Bijie, 6.VI.2021, coll. Jia Jiang and Ni Zhang. Paratypes: 1 ♀, same data as holotype.
The new species can be distinguished from other species by the aedeagal shaft long with two apical processes; preatrium of aedeagus with two atrial processes. The head and pronotum yellow. Pygofer dorsal appendage tapered to apex and bent back into a hook shape. Style apex slightly expanded, underpart straight and thick. Connective with large central lobe.
Head and thorax yellow marked with brown; vertex with a pair of dark brown spots (Figs
Abdominal apodemes long, exceeding posterior margin of 3rd sternite (Fig.
Male genitalia. Pygofer lobe broad, with sparse fine setae on lateral surface (Fig.
External morphology of Mitjaevia species 1–5 Mitjaevia bijiensis sp. nov. 1 habitus, dorsal view 2 habitus, lateral view 3 head and thorax, dorsal view 4 face 5 female thorax and abdomen, ventral view 6–10 Mitjaevia solitaria sp. nov. 6 habitus, dorsal view 7 habitus, lateral view 8 head and thorax, dorsal view 9 face 10 female thorax and abdomen ventral view 11–15 Mitjaevia salaxia sp. nov. 11 habitus, dorsal view 12 habitus, lateral view 13 head and thorax, dorsal view 14 face 15 female thorax and abdomen, ventral view.
Body length (including wings). ♂, 2.9–3.0 mm, ♀, 2.8–2.9 mm.
The new species is similar to Mitjaevia diana (Distant, 1918) but can be distinguished by the aedeagal shaft with two apical processes and preatrium of aedeagus with two atrial processes; the style apex slightly expanded, underpart straight and thick; the connective with large central lobe.
The new species is named after its type locality Bijie City in China.
Holotype : ♂, China: Guizhou Province, Bijie, 6.VI.2021, coll. Jia Jiang and Ni Zhang. Paratypes: 18 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, same data as holotype.
The new species can be distinguished from other species by the aedeagal shaft with only one thick finger-like process at base. Pygofer dorsal appendage not extended beyond hind margin of pygofer. Style strong; preapical lobe obvious. Subgenital plate wide and short with one hook-like process on apex.
Vertex yellowish (Fig.
Abdominal apodemes small, located in 3rd sternite (Fig.
Male genitalia. Pygofer dorsal appendage weakly expanded at base, not extended beyond hind margin of pygofer (Fig.
Body length (including wings). ♂, 3.1–3.2 mm, ♀, 3.0–3.2 mm.
The new species is similar to M. aurantiaca (Mitjaev, 1969), but can be distinguished by the aedeagal shaft with only one thick finger-like process at base; the style is stronger and the subgenital plate is shorter and wider.
The new species is named from the Latin word solitarius, referring to the aedeagal shaft with only one processes at the base.
Holotype : ♂, China: Guizhou Province, Bijie, 5.VI.2021, coll. Jia Jiang and Ni Zhang. Paratypes: 1 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀, same data as holotype.
The new species can be identified by the two pairs of abdominal apodemes and the aedeagal shaft with lamellate-like processed at base. Style apex long and slender. Subgenital plate long, expanded near caudal.
Vertex pale yellow (Fig.
Second abdominal apodemes and third abdominal apodemes small and short, lamellate, not exceeded 3rd sternite (Fig.
Male genitalia. Pygofer dorsal appendage simple, curved upward in lateral view, hook-like apically (Fig.
Body length (including wings). ♂, 3.0–3.1 mm, ♀, 2.9–3.0 mm.
The new species is similar to M. protuberanta Song, Li & Xiong, 2011, but differs in having the “lamellate” processed arising from base of aedeagal shaft and not branched at apex; with two pairs of abdominal apodemes.
In recent years, most research on Chinese Erythroneurine leafhoppers has been intensified and focused to enrich the taxonomic knowledge of this tribe and taxonomists have paid attention to documenting taxa using efficient descriptions, high-quality drawings, and photographs. The Guizhou province is located on the eastern slope of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau in southwestern China and has a particularly subtropical humid monsoon climate with four distinct seasons, abundant rainfall, seasonal temperature variations and high vegetation coverage, which is conducive to the survival and reproduction of leafhoppers. Since establishment of this genus, 19 species of Mitjaevia have been described worldwide, and more than half of valid species were found in China. Here, a comparison revealed that three new species shared similarities with already known species but differences were found, for example, the aedeagal shaft of M. bijiensis sp. nov. and M. diana have apical processes, but M. bijiensis sp. nov. dispose processes arising from preatrium of aedeagus, while M. diana shows another processes at base of aedeagal shaft. Mitjaevia. solitaria sp. nov. and M. aurantiaca also have a single process at base of aedeagal shaft, not paired. Moreover, the subgenital plate is short and wide but in latter species it is long or thin. Mitjaevia. salaxia sp. nov. is similar to M. protuberanta but differs in having lamellate-like processes arising from the base of aedeagal shaft and not branched at apex.
We thank Mick Webb for checking and revising the manuscript. This study was partly funded by the World Top Discipline Program of Guizhou Province: Karst Ecoenvironment Sciences (No.125 2019 Qianjiao Keyan Fa), the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Foundation ([2018]1411), the Guizhou Science and Technology Support Project ([2019]2855), the Science and Technology Project of Guiyang City ([2020]7–18), the Innovation Group Project of Education Department of Guizhou Province ([2021]013) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260120).