Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of Arrhopalites Börner (Collembola, Symphypleona, Arrhopalitidae) from China, with a key to the Asian species of the caecus group
expand article infoNerivania Nunes Godeiro§, Feng Zhang, Bruno Cavalcante Bellini|
‡ Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
§ Shanghai Natural History Museum, Shanghai, China
| Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
Open Access

Abstract

The second species of Arrhopalites from China is described and illustrated and an identification key to the Asian species of the caecus group is presented. Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov. is the eleventh species of the caecus group recorded in Asia and it can be clearly differentiated by the unguiculus III with 2 internal teeth (0–1 in all other species). Also, the combination of antennae less than 2 times the size of the head, antennal segment IV without annulations, 1+1 eyes, dorsal head with 9 spines, 2+2 regular spines per side on the anal valves, circumanal chaetae without basal serrations, subanal appendage long and apically serrated, manubrium with 5+5, and dorsal dens with 16 chaetae is unique among the Asian species of the caecus group.

Keywords

Appendiciphora, grassland, Katiannoidea, springtails, taxonomy

Introduction

Arrhopalitidae Stach, 1956 comprises species of Arrhopalites Börner, 1906, Pygmarrhopalites Vargovitsh, 2009 and Troglopalites Vargovitsh, 2012. Currently this family gathers 141 species described worldwide, with 41 of them belonging to Arrhopalites (Bellinger et al. 1996–2022). Vargovitsh (2013) divided the genus into three species groups based on the ventral (anterior) dental chaetotaxy: diversus group, with the chaetal formula of 3, 2, 1, 1 from the apex to the basis of the structure; caecus group, with 3, 2, 1, 1, 1 chaetae; and harveyi group with 3, 2, 2, 1, 1 chaetae. This division, as well as the support for the family and genera, have not been tested yet with the use of molecular phylogenetics, which could clarify different points of view about the systematics of Arrhopalitidae internal systematics (Zeppelini 2011; Vargovitsh 2013). Also, such kind of study could verify the phylogenetic signal of the dental chaetotaxy within Arrhopalites, which is widely used among the Symphypleona to separate species groups, but may be, at least in few genera, an arbitrary feature to gather unrelated taxa (see Cipola et al. 2021: 37–38). Nevertheless, Vargovitsh’s groups of Arrhopalites currently provide clear data to quickly compare species within the genus (Vargovitsh 2013).

Despite its extensive territory, only one species of Arrhopalites was recorded from China so far, A. pukouensis Wu & Christiansen, 1997, described from Jiangsu Province, in the eastern region of the country. Another species (A. nanjingensis Lin & Chen, 1997) was originally described as Arrhopalites, but it was transferred to Pygmarrhopalites by Vargovitsh (2009). So, herein we describe in detail a second species of Arrhopalites from China and provide an identification key to the Asian species of the caecus group.

Materials and methods

Specimens were collected in the field with entomological aspirators and transferred to plastic containers in the laboratory of Entomology, Nanjing Agricultural University (NJAU), China, where they are being cultured. Specimens used for description were sorted in September 2021 and transported to Shanghai Natural History Museum, where the following steps were developed. Under a stereomicroscopy Teelen XTL-207, specimens were bleached and diaphanized, first in 5% KOH and after in 10% lactophenol for three minutes/each. Hoyer’s liquid was used to mount the specimens between a slide and a glass coverslip. Slides were dried in an oven at 50 °C for 10 days (Christiansen and Bellinger 1980, 1998). A Leica DM2500 microscope with a drawing tube was used to draw the illustrations, which were posteriorly vectorized with Corel Draw 2018 v20. Habitus of the species was photographed in 70% ethanol under a Leica S8AP0 stereomicroscope attached to a Leica DMC4500 camera, using Leica Application Suite software. Slides with type specimens mounted in Hoyer’s liquid along with 78 specimens preserved in 98% ethanol are deposited at the collection of Shanghai Natural History Museum (SNHM).

The terminology used in descriptions follows Fjellberg (1999) for the labial palp papillae, Cipola et al. (2014) for the labral chaetotaxy, Nayrolles (1988) for the proximal tibiotarsi chaetotaxy, Betsch and Waller (1994) for head and anterior large abdomen chaetotaxy, Vargovitsh (2009, 2012, 2013) for the posterior large abdomen chaetotaxy and Betsch (1997) for the small abdomen chaetotaxy. On the dens we considered as the dorsal chaetae the sum of the dorsal, dorso-internal and dorso-lateral rows. Drawings and observations were made based in the entire type series.

The abbreviations used in the text and drawings are: Abd = abdominal segment(s); Ant antennal segment(s); and Th = thoracic segment(s).

Taxonomy

Order Symphypleona Börner, 1901 sensu Bretfeld, 1986

Suborder Appendiciphora Bretfeld, 1986

Superfamily Katiannoidea Bretfeld, 1994

Family Arrhopalitidae Stach, 1956 sensu Bretfeld, 1999

Genus Arrhopalites Börner, 1906

Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, Table 1

Type material

Holotype on slide “SNHM00001”: female, Jilin Province, China, 44°33'N, 123°31'E, 2013, in soil samples from the Ecological Research Station for Grassland Farm, July 2013, Bing Zhang leg. Paratypes on slides: 9 females on slides, same data as holotype. Besides the type material, 78 specimens are kept in 98% ethanol at the SNHM, plus several paratype slides are kept at the laboratory of Entomology, NJAU, China.

Diagnosis

Female. Antennae short, about 1.4 times the head length. Ant IV not subdivided and short, about twice or less the length of Ant III. Eyes 1+1. Clypeal area a–f lines with 7(+1)/7/5/4–5/5/6 chaetae respectively, plus 3 central chaetae with unclear homologies, frontal area A–C lines with 1/1/2(+1) short stout spines. Small abdomen, dorsal anal valve with 2 cuticular spines per side and 4 sword-shaped smooth chaetae (ms1, mps1–3), ventral anal valves with 2 cuticular spines each and 3 sword-shaped smooth chaetae (mi3, mpi1–2), subanal appendage long, similar in length to mi3, mpi1–2, with a spatulated and apically serrated apex. Manubrium with 5 chaetae on each side, dens ventral formula from the apex to the basis as 3,2,1,1,1, dorsally with 16 chaetae. Mucro with both edges serrated, apically swollen. Ungues I slender, III broad, all with an underdeveloped tunica, unguiculus III with 2 inner teeth.

Description

Female. Body (head + trunk) length of type series (females, N = 4) ranging between 0.71 and 0.81 mm, average 0.74 mm, holotype with 0.75 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 1. Specimens pale yellowish with brownish spots of pigment on frontal and dorsal head and dorso-lateral large abdomen. Body chaetae smooth and acuminate, with the exception of the subanal appendage.

Figure 1. 

Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov.: habitus of specimen fixed in ethanol.

Head (Figs 1, 2). Antennae shorter than the body, with 0.32 mm in the holotype (Fig. 1), ratio antennae: head length of the holotype 1.3:1, type series average 1.4:1. Holotype antennal segments ratio of Ant I:II:III:IV as 1:1.6:2.3:4.3, and of type series (N = 4) as 1:1.3–2.7:2.1–3.3:3.8–6.7. Ant IV short and stout, about twice or less the size of Ant III (in holotype, ratio Ant III:IV = 1:1.87), without subsegments, with about 87 regular chaetae of different sizes distributed in apparently 13 whorls (Fig. 2A). Ant III slightly swollen with 17 chaetae, Ape, Ae, Ap, Ai, Aa, Api, and Aai present, Api slightly reduced, Aai as the accessory microsensillum, sense rods not swollen inside separate invaginations (Fig. 2B). Ant II with 13 regular chaetae, Ant I with 7, the two more apical reduced (Fig. 2C). Eyes 1+1, head length (eyes to mouth) of holotype 0.25 mm. Clypeal area a–f lines with 7(+1)/7/5/4–5/5/6 chaetae respectively, plus 3 central chaetae of unclear homologies; interantennal area α and β lines with 2/1(+1) short chaetae respectively, plus 2+2 small oval organs (pseudopores) and 1+1 large circles lacking tegument granules near the lateral chaetae on α line; frontal area A–C lines with 1/1/2(+1) short stout spines, D line with 2 elongate thinner erect chaetae (Fig. 2D). Ventral groove with 2 surrounding chaetae from lines a and b, labial basomedian field with 4, basolateral field with 5 chaetae (Fig. 2E). Labial papilla E lateral finger-shaped, not reaching the papilla apex, other labial structures unclear. Maxillary outer lobe apical chaeta longer than the basal one, sublobal plate with three sublobal hairs (Fig. 2F). Distal margin of the clypeus with 3 prelabral chaetae, labral chaetotaxy with 2(+1) p, 2(+1) m and 2 a chaetae, all subequal (Fig. 2G).

Figure 2. 

Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov. head A left Ant IV (dorsal side) B left Ant III (ventral side) C left Ant I–II (dorsal side) D anterior head – left side shows the complete chaetotaxy, * marks unpaired chaetae, white arrow points to chaeta present or absent, large dashed circle on central clypeal region marks asymmetrical chaetae E ventral head chaetotaxy – right side shows the complete chaetotaxy, including labial basomedian and basolateral fields F left maxillary outer lobe and sublobal plate G prelabral chaetae and labrum.

Trunk (Fig. 3A, B). Trunk length of holotype 0.5 mm. Large abdomen: thorax continuous with abdomen, without any constrictions. Th II with 1 a and 3 m chaetae; Th III with 1 a and 3 m chaetae; Abd I with 5 a, 4 m and 1 p chaetae, respectively. Three chaetae (1–3) on the upper side of bothriotrichum A, plus accessory a1 nearby its alveolus; b1 accessory chaeta between B and C bothriotricha, c2 just under C, c1 absent; bothriotricha A–C misaligned, with B bothriotrichum closer to C than A; dorso-posterior longitudinal series dI-1, dII-1, dIII-1 with 5–7, 9–10 and 6–8 chaetae, respectively; two rows with 3 chaetae each between C and D bothriotricha; D with 4 surrounding chaetae posteriorly; parafurcal area (furcula basis) with 8 regular chaetae; ventral complex with 1 chaeta (Fig. 3A). Small abdomen of the female: dorsal anal valve with as2–4, ms1–5?, mps1–3, and ps1–2 chaetae, ms1 and mps1–3 sword-shaped and smooth, 2 cuticular spines surrounding mps2; ventral anal valves each with ai1–6, ami1–2, mi1–5, mpi1–2, and pi1–3 chaetae, mi3 and mpi1–2 sword-shaped and smooth, mi5 as the subanal appendage long (similar in length to mi3, mpi1–2) with a spatulated and apically serrated apex (sometimes one of the lateral edges is also distally serrated), curved toward the genital opening, 2 cuticular spines surrounding mpi2 (Fig. 3B). Genital plate of the female unclear.

Figure 3. 

Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov. trunk, proximal legs and furca A large abdomen and coxae chaetotaxy (right side) B female’s small abdomen (left side) C right manubrial chaetotaxy (dorsal side) D right dens ventral chaetotaxy E right dens dorsal chaetotaxy F mucro.

Abdominal appendages (Fig. 3C–F) Collophore with 1 distal chaeta on each side, with a pair of a little wrinkled, almost smooth, sacs. Tenaculum with 3 teeth on each ramus plus the basal tubercle, with a single unpaired apical chaeta. Furcal size length in holotype: manubrium = 75 µm; dens = 113 µm; and mucro = 75 µm (ratio 1:1.5:1). Manubrium with 5 dorsal chaetae on each side, the most proximal thinner than the others (Fig. 3C); dens ventral (or anterior) formula from the apex to the basis as 3,2,1,1,1, all chaetae enlarged except for the most proximal one, (Fig. 3D); dens dorsally (or posteriorly) with 16 chaetae, 7 of them on the lateral edges of the more distal region more robust, almost spine-like (Fig. 3E). Mucro apically swollen with both edges serrated from the basis until almost the apex (Fig. 3F).

Legs. (Figs 3A, 4) Epicoxae, subcoxae and coxae I–III with 1,0,1/1,1,4/1,1,4 chaetae, respectively, coxae II–III with 1 long and 1 tiny chaeta each (Fig. 3A). Trochanters I–III with 4 chaetae each, II–III with 1 chaeta each modified as an anterior trochanteral organ (Fig. 4A–C). Femurs I–III with 13/13/14 chaetae respectively, of which 1/1/3 as reduced chaetae (Fig. 4A–C). Tibiotarsi without oval organs, tibiotarsus I region F with 3 chaetae (FPae, FPe, and FPpe), whorls I–V with 9,8,8,8,9 chaetae respectively, whorl I without clearly modified chaetae except for a larger dorsal one, whorl V with 2 ventro-distal chaetae (Fig. 4D). Tibiotarsus II region F with 3 chaetae (FPae, FPe, and FPpe), whorls I–V with 9,8,8,8,7 chaetae respectively, whorl I without clearly modified chaetae except for a slightly larger dorsal one, whorl V with 1 ventro-distal chaeta (Fig. 4E). Tibiotarsus III region F with 4 chaetae (FPae, FPe, FPpe, and FSa), whorls I–V with 9,8,8,8,7 chaetae respectively, whorl I without clearly modified chaetae except for a slightly larger dorsal one, whorl V with 1 ventro-distal chaeta (Fig. 4F). Foot complexes I–III with 2 pretarsal chaetae each, 1 anterior and 1 posterior; ungues (claws) without cavity or pseudonychia, but with an underdeveloped tunica covering about 2/3 up to 3/4 of the dorsal ungues, lateral lamellae apparently lacking teeth, each unguis with one internal tooth; unguis I slender, III broad (Fig. 4D–F). Unguiculi (empodia) never surpassing the ungues, unguiculus I almost reaching the apex of unguis I, unguiculi II–III clearly shorter; unguiculi I–II with one proximal internal tooth each, unguiculus III with 2 more distal teeth (Fig. 4D–F).

Figure 4. 

Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov. legs A–C trochanters and femurs I–III (anterior side), respectively D–F tibiotarsi and empodial complexes I–III (anterior side), respectively.

Male. Not found, species possibly parthenogenetic.

Etymology

The new species was named after its short antenna (from Latin brevi- = short; cornis = “horns”, antennae).

Distribution and habitat

The new species was collected and only recorded in Jilin Province, Changling County, at the Ecological Research Station for Grassland Farm (ERSGF). This region is characterized by a semi-arid continental monsoon climate, with cold, dry winters and warm, rainy summers. Annual mean temperature in the region ranges from 4.68 to 6.48 °C, and annual precipitation is 280 to 400 mm with about 70% falling in the June-August period (Changling County Climate Station, Jilin Province). Changling County is located at a transitional zone of cropping and grazing, with high economical potential. However, drastic environmental disturbances are happening in this region, like sand and dust storms, emergence of saline-alkali soils, and land over-utilization.

Remarks

Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov. belongs to the A. caecus (Tullberg, 1871) group of species sensu Vargovitsh (2013), according to its ventral (or anterior) dental chaetotaxy (3, 2, 1, 1, 1). Currently, there are ten other Asian species of the genus which belong to this group: A. antrobius Yosii, 1954, A. abchasicus Vargovitsh, 2013, A. caecus, A. coreanus Park & Kang, 2007, A. gul Yosii, 1966, A. macronyx Vargovitsh, 2012, A. minor Park & Kang, 2007, A. minutus Yosii, 1970, A. potapovi Vargovitsh, 2015 and A. pukouensis, (Bellinger et al. 1996–2022; Vargovitsh 2012, 2013, 2015). Arrhopalites brevicornis sp. nov. can be distinguished from all of them especially by the unguiculus III with 2 internal teeth (0–1 in all other species). Also, the combination of antennae less than 2 times the size of the head, Ant IV without annulations, 1+1 eyes, dorsal head with 9 spines, 2+2 regular spines per side on the anal valves, circumanal chaetae without basal serrations, subanal appendage long and apically serrated, similar in length to mi3, mpi1–2, manubrium with 5+5 and dorsal dens with 16 chaetae is unique among the Asian species of the caecus group (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparison between the Asian species of Arrhopalites from the caecus group.

Species A. antrobius A. abchasicus A. caecus A. coreanus A. gul A. macronyx A. minor  A. minutus  A. potapovi  A. pukouensis  A. brevicornis sp. nov.
Distribution Japan Abkhazia Cosmopolitan S. Korea S. Korea Abkhazia S. Korea Japan Russia China China
Cave species Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No
Body size (mm) 1.3 0.9 up to 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.2 0.5 0.5 up to 0.88 up to 1.3 0.71–0.81
Color pattern unpigmented unpigmented or with dorsal spots unpigmented or with dorsal spots with dorsal spots unpigmented or with dorsal spots with dorsal spots with lateral spots unpigmented unpigmented, only eyes pigmented or with dorsal spots unpigmented with dorso-lateral spots
Ant IV annulations 4 5–7 (-) (-) 7 7–8 (-) (-) (-/+)5–6 (-) (-)
Ant at least 2× longer than head Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No
Head dorsal spines ? 9 6–13 10 (possibly more) (+) (-) 9 13 13 (-) 9
Eyes 0+0 1+1 1+1 1+1 1+1 0+0? 1+1 1+1 1+1 0+0 1+1
Ungues I;II;III tunica (+);(+);(+) (–);(-);(-) (-/+);(+);(+) (+);(+);(+) (-);(-);(-) (-);(-);(-) (+);(+);(+) (-);(-);(+) (-/+);(-/+);(-/+) (-);(-);(-) (+);(+);(+)
Ungues I–III inner tooth (+) (-/+) (+) (+) (-/+) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+)
Unguiculus III inner teeth 0 1 1 1 0–1 1 1 0 0–1 1 2
FAV cuticular spines (per side) 2+2 2+2 to 0+0 2+2 0+0 0+0 0+0 0+0 2+2 2+2(1+1 enlarged) 0+0 2+2
Subanal appendage shape long, apically pointed long, apically serrated long, apically serrated long, apically pointed short, apically blunt long, apically pointed long, apically pointed short, apically serrated short, apically serrated short, apically serrated long, apically serrated
ms1 chaeta shape not forked not forked not forked forked not forked not forked not forked not forked not forked not forked not forked
Circumanal basally serrate chaetae (-) (+) (+) (-) (+) (+) (-) (-) (+) (-) (-)
Tenaculum chaetae 1 1 1–2 1 1 1–2 1 ? 1 1 1
Manubrium dorsal chaetae ? 5+5 ? 5+5 4+4 5+5 9+9 4+4 5+5 5+5 5+5
Dorsal dens chaetae more than 10 16 15? 16 16 16 14–16 14 15 15 16

Concerning the species recorded from localities closer to Jilin Province, China, the South Korean A. coreanus, A. gul and A. minor share a similar color pattern, number of eyes, the presence of dorsal spines on head and number of dorsal dens chaetae with the new species. However the later differs from them by: the absence of Ant IV annulations (7 of A. gul); antennae less than 2 times the size of the head (at least two times in A. coreanus and A. gul); all ungues tunicate (without tunica on A. gul); female’s subanal appendage apically serrated (pointed in A. coreanus and A. minor, and blunt in A. gul); dorsal anal valve chaeta ms1 not forked (forked in A. coreanus); circumanal chaetae without basal serrations (with in A. gul) and manubrium with 5+5 chaetae (4+4 in A. gul, 9+9 in A. minor).

The only other species of the caecus group registered from China is A. pukouensis, from Nanjing, Jiangsu District, approximately 1800 km distant from the type location of the new species. Both species are vastly different as A. pukouensis is unpigmented (vs. pigmented), has no eyes and dorsal head spines (vs. 1+1 eyes and 9 spines, respectively), its ungues are devoid of tunica (vs. present); its female’s anal valves have no cuticular spines and their subanal appendage is short (vs. 2+2 spines per side and the subanal appendage is long, respectively) and its dorsal dens shows 15 chaetae (vs. 16 in the new species). A detailed comparison of the morphology and the known distribution of all the cited species is presented in Table 1. We also provide a key of all Asian species of caecus group below.

Identification key to the Asian species of caecus group

1 Females’ subanal appendage pointed 2
Females’ subanal appendage blunt or apically serrated 5
2 Ungues without tunica; at least part of the circumanal chaetae of females basally serrate A. macronyx Vargovitsh, 2012
Ungues with tunica; all circumanal chaetae of females basally smooth 3
3 Eyes absent; unguiculus III without inner teeth; female’s anal valves with 2+2 cuticular spines per side (Fig. 3B) A. antrobius Yosii, 1954
Eyes 1+1; unguiculus III with one inner tooth; female’s anal valves lacking cuticular spines 4
4 Dorsal head with 10 or more spines; dorsal anal valve ms1 chaeta forked; manubrium with 5+5 dorsal chaetae A. coreanus Park & Kang, 2007
Dorsal head with 9 spines; dorsal anal valve ms1 chaeta not forked; manubrium with 9+9 dorsal chaetae A. minor Park & Kang, 2007
5 Antennae at least two times longer than head length 6
Antennae shorter, less than two times the head length 7
6 Body size about about 0.9 mm; manubrium with 5+5 dorsal chaetae A. abchasicus Vargovitsh, 2013
Body size about about 1.2 mm; manubrium with 4+4 dorsal chaetae A. gul Yosii, 1966
7 Eyes absent; ungues III without tunica; female’s anal valves without cuticular spines A. pukouensis Wu & Christiansen, 1997
Eyes 1+1; ungues III with tunica; female’s anal valves with 2+2 cuticular spines per side 8
8 Female’s anal valves with 1+1 large modified cuticular spines per side A. potapovi Vargovitsh, 2015
Female’s anal valves with only small cuticular spines (Fig. 3B) 9
9 Unguiculus III with one inner tooth; female’s anal valves circumanal chaetae basally serrate A. caecus (Tullberg, 1871)
Unguiculus III toothless or with two inner teeth; female’s anal valves circumanal chaetae basally smooth 10
10 Dorsal head with 13 spines; ungues I–II without tunica; unguiculus III toothless; manubrium with 4+4 dorsal chaetae; dorsal dens with 14 chaetae A. minutus Yosii, 1970
Dorsal head with 9 spines; ungues I–II with tunica; unguiculus III with 2 inner teeth; manubrium with 5+5 dorsal chaetae; dorsal dens with 16 chaetae A. brevicornis sp. nov.

Discussion

The current knowledge on the Chinese Symphypleona is still incipient, despite the recent efforts from different research groups in describing the local springtail fauna and studying its systematics. So far only 17 species of the order were recorded from China, mostly from dicyrtomids of the genera Papirioides Folsom, 1924 (6 spp.) and Ptenothrix Börner, 1906 (5 spp.) (Folsom, 1924; Denis, 1929; Lin and Xia, 1985; Itoh and Zhao, 1993; Chen and Christiansen, 1996; Guo and Chen, 1996; Wu and Chen, 1996; Li et al. 2007). The other records are from Arrhopalitidae (3 spp., including A. brevicornis sp. nov.) and Sminthuridae (2 spp.) and there is a single species of Bourletiellidae (Lin and Chen 1997; Wu and Christiansen 1997; Li et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2019). Due to the vast area of the country and its many different terrestrial habitats, it is likely these numbers are very far from representing the real richness of the Symphypleona from China, and further efforts should be done to better comprehend this particular fauna. Also, adequate strategies to manage the grazing intensity in Chinese grasslands are crucial to preserve endemic species from these regions.

Acknowledgements

The first author is funded by the Research Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Museum and Postdoctoral fund of Haibo Program of Pudong New Area in 2021. The second author is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970434) and National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (2018FY100300). The senior author is funded by CNPQ/PQ2021, Process # 309114/2021-7. We also thank the reviewer Kyung-Hwa Park for helpful comments on this article.

References

  • Bellinger PF, Christiansen KA, Janssens F (1996–2022) Checklist of the Collembola of the world. http://www.collembola.org [accessed 18 January 2022]
  • Betsch J-M (1997) An ontogenetically focused chaetotaxial scheme in Symphypleona (collembolan): The 6th abdominal segment. Pedobiologia 41: 13–18.
  • Betsch J-M, Waller A (1994) Chaetotaxic nomenclature of the head, thorax and abdomen in Symphypleona (Insecta, Collembola). Acta Zoologica Fennica 195: 5–12.
  • Börner C (1901) Neue Collembolenformen und zur Nomenclatur der Collembola Lubbock. Zoologischer Anzeiger: 24(638–658): 696–712.
  • Börner C (1906) Das System der Collembolen nebst Beschreibung neuer Collembolen des Hamburger Naturhistorischen Museums. Mitteilungen aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum in Hamburg 23: 147–188.
  • Bretfeld G (1986) Phylogenetic systematics of the higher taxa of Symphypleona Borner, 1901 (Insecta, Entognatha, Collembola). Proceedings of 2nd International Seminary of Apterygota 1: 302–311.
  • Bretfeld G (1994) Sturmius epiphytus n. gen. n. spec. from Colombia, a taxon of the Symphypleona (Insecta, Colembola) with an unexpected character combination. Description and position in non-Linnean and Linnean classifications of the Symphypleona. Zoological Systematics and Evolution Resources 32: 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1994.tb00487.x
  • Bretfeld G (1999) Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola, Volume 2. Symphypleona. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Görlitz 71(1): 1–318.
  • Chen J, Christiansen KA (1996) A new species of Ptenothrix from China (Collembola: Dicyrtomidae). The Florida Entomologist 79(4): 586–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/3496072
  • Chen CG, Chen T, Hua BZ, Wan TR (2019) Structure and functions of the ventral tube of the clover springtail Sminthurus viridis (Collembola: Sminthuridae). Scientific Reports 9: e897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37354-4
  • Christiansen K, Bellinger P (1980) The Collembola of North America, North of the Rio Grande: A taxonomic analysis. Grinnell College, Grinnell.
  • Christiansen K, Bellinger P (1998) The Collembola of North America, North of the Rio Grande: A taxonomic analysis. Grinnell College, Grinnell.
  • Cipola NG, Morais JW, Bellini BC (2014) A new species of Seira (Collembola: Entomobryidae: Seirini) from Northern Brazil, with the addition of new chaetotaxic characters. Zoologia 31(5): 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000500009
  • Cipola NG, Medeiros GDS, Oliveira VAMD, Barbosa LGDM, Lycarião TA, Bellini BC (2021) Contributions to the Taxonomy of Arlesminthurus Bretfeld and Calvatomina Yosii (Collembola, Symphypleona, Appendiciphora), with the Description of New Species from Northeastern Brazil. Insects 12(433): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050433
  • Denis JR (1929) Notes sur les Collemboles recolts dans ses voyages par le Prof. F. Silvestri. Bolletino del Laboratorio die Zoologia Agraria 22: 305–320.
  • Fjellberg A (1999) The Labial Palp in Collembola. Zoologischer Anzeiger 237: 309–330.
  • Folsom JW (1924) East Indian Collembola. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 65: 505–517.
  • Guo JY, Chen JX (1996) A new species of Ptenothrix (Papirioides) (Collembola: Dicyrtomidae) from China. Entomotaxonomia 18: 235–238.
  • Itoh R, Zhao LJ (1993) A new species of the genus Papirioides (Collembola, Sminthuridae) from Xishuangbanna, China. Japanese Journal of Entomology 61: 847–851.
  • Li ZH, Hua C, Chen JX (2008) Bourletiella, a genus new to China, with redescription to Bourletiella arvalis (Fitch) (Collembola, Symphypleona). Dong Wu Fen Lei Xue Bao 33(4): 807–809. [in Chinese with abstract in English]
  • Lin SX, Xia F (1985) Four new species of Ptenothrix from Dinghu Mountain, Guangdong (Collembola: Dicyrtomidae). Entomotaxonomia 7(1): 61–67.
  • Nayrolles P (1988) Chetotaxie tibiotarsale des collemboles symphyplèones. Travaux du Laboratoire d’Ecobiologie des Arthropodes Édaphiques, Toulouse 5(4): 1–19.
  • Stach J (1956) The apterygotan fauna of Poland in relation to the World-fauna of this group of insects, family: Sminthuridae. Polska Akademia Nauk, PWN, Kraków, 287 pp.
  • Tullberg T (1871) Förteckning öfver Svenska Podurider. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar- Stockholm 28: 143–155.
  • Vargovitsh RS (2013) Cavernicolous Arrhopalites abchasicus sp. nov. (Collembola: Symphypleona: Arrhopalitidae) from the West Caucasus with a key to the World species of the genus. Zootaxa 3666(1): 16–30. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3666.1.2
  • Wu M, Christiansen K (1997) A new species of Arrhopalites from China (Collembola: Sminthuridae). The Florida Entomologist 80(2): 266–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/3495560
  • Yosii R (1954) Höhlencollembolen Japans I. Kontyû 20(3–4): 62–70.
  • Yosii R (1966) Results of the speleological survey in South Korea 1966. IV. Cave Collembola of South Korea. Bulletin of the National Science Museum 9(4): 541–561.
  • Yosii R (1970) On some Collembola of Japan and adjacent countries II. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory. Kyoto University 23: 1–32.
  • Zeppelini D (2011) Phylogeny of Arrhopalites s.l. (Collembola: Symphypleona: Arrhopalitidae): testing the monophyly of the recently erected genera Arrhopalites s.s. and Pygmarrhopalites. Invertebrate Systematics 25(2): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS10044
login to comment