Research Article |
Corresponding author: György Makranczy ( makranczy.gyorgy@nhmus.hu ) Academic editor: Patrice Bouchard
© 2016 György Makranczy, Reginald P. Webster.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Makranczy Gy, Webster RP (2016) Description of the larva of Mitosynum vockerothi Campbell, 1982, with remarks on the adult male genital morphology (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Oxytelinae). In: Webster RP, Bouchard P, Klimaszewski J (Eds) The Coleoptera of New Brunswick and Canada: providing baseline biodiversity and natural history data. ZooKeys 573: 257–264. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.573.7972
|
The previously unknown larva of Mitosynum vockerothi Campbell, 1982, is described and illustrated. Adult male terminalia and genitalia are illustrated with line drawings. Adults of this species exhibit little difference in size or external morphology between males and females.
Staphylinidae , Oxytelinae , Mitosynum vockerothi , male genital characters, New Brunswick, Canada
The genus Mitosynum Campbell, 1982, includes a single species that is endemic to New Brunswick, Canada (
One larval specimen of M. vocherothi, not mentioned by
Mitosynum vockerothi Campbell, 1982 adult male (1–5) and larva (L2?) (6–7). 1 tergites IX and X 2 aedeagus, “frontal” view 3 apex of paramere 4 sclerite of internal sac 5 aedeagus, lateral view 6 habitus (dry mounted) 7 side of head. Scale bar: 0.1 mm (3-4), 0.2 mm (2, 5), 0.25 mm (1), 0.3 mm (7), 0.6 mm (6).
The larval specimen was originally dry mounted but subsequently cleared and examined in glycerol following a protocol established in
The examined specimens are deposited in the
Mitosynum vockerothi Campbell, 1982: 690.
CANADA, New Brunswick, Charlotte Co., near New River, 45.21176°N, 66.61790°W, 7.V.2007, R. P. Webster, small pond & marsh, sifting sphagnum and Polytrichum commune on hummock near margin of pond (1 ♂,
Measurements in mm (n = 8; 2 ♂, 2 ♀, 4 sex undetermined) showing size range with mean in parentheses: head width at eyes = 0.77–0.84 (0.80); head width at temples = 0.78–0.88 (0.82); maximum width of pronotum = 0.87–0.96 (0.92); approximate width of humeri = 0.84–0.92 (0.88); maximum width of abdomen = 1.09–1.21 (1.14); head length at the midline from front margin of clypeus to the beginning of neck = 0.55–0.60 (0.58); eye length = 0.25–0.29 (0.27); length of temple = 0.14–0.17 (0.16); length of pronotum at the midline = 0.67–0.74 (0.70); length of elytra from shoulder = 0.64–0.73 (0.69); length of elytra from hind apex of scutellum = 0.58–0.67 (0.61); forebody length = 1.92–2.12 (2.02); approximate body length = 3.76–4.35 (4.06). All measured from dorsal view.
Sternite VIII apex in males almost truncate but with rounded corners. Tergite IX with strongly developed but short ventral strut. Tergite X strongly attached (Fig.
The sample size was inadequate for a statistical comparison of the size between males and females. However, there was little variation in size among individuals in any of the characters that were measured, indicating sexual dimorphism in size in this species is minimal. Sternite VIII apex in female broadly rounded but medially a little more narrowly than in males, otherwise there are no differences in external morphology between males and females.
The apical opening processes of the aedeagus and parameres very strongly resemble those in Deleaster Erichson, 1939. The presence of a few very short peg-like setae (Fig.
(instar unknown but presumed L2). Length (in mm): 3.00 [epicranium width (ew) = 0.61]. Body (Fig.
We thank Margaret Thayer, Patrice Bouchard, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments that improved this manuscript. Caroline Simpson is thanked for editing this manuscript, Harald Schillhammer (Vienna, Austria) for his help with the color photos, and Jon Sweeney for providing comments on an earlier draft. We thank Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and the