Research Article |
Corresponding author: Yoshitaka Kamimura ( kamimura@keio.jp ) Academic editor: Fabian Haas
© 2022 Chikkabidare M. Karthik, Yoshitaka Kamimura, Chicknayakanahalli M. Kalleshwaraswamy.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Karthik CM, Kamimura Y, Kalleshwaraswamy CM (2022) A new species of Diplatys (Insecta, Dermaptera, Diplatyidae) earwig from the Western Ghats of India. ZooKeys 1088: 53-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1088.79416
|
To explore diversity of earwigs (Dermaptera) in different agricultural ecosystems of South India, an extensive taxonomic survey was conducted in 2020 during which an undescribed species of Diplatys was collected. Twenty-one species of the genus Diplatys (Diplatyidae, Diplatyinae) have been reported to date from India, of which six species are known from Karnataka, South India. Based on a male specimen collected from a sugarcane field in Karnataka, a new species, Diplatys sahyadriensis sp. nov., is described as the twenty-second species of this genus from India. A revised key to the males of Diplatys species from India and Sri Lanka is provided. This new record adds to the known species diversity in the Sahyadri Ranges of the Western Ghats in Shivamogga District, Karnataka, part of the Southern Plateau and Hills agro-climatic region of India.
Diplatys sahyadriensis sp. nov., Karnataka, Sri Lanka, sugarcane
Earwigs are a moderately diversified group of insects which comprise approximately 1,900 species distributed mainly in tropical and subtropical parts of the world (
Distribution and subgeneric classification of Diplatys species recorded from India and Sri Lanka.
Species | Subgenus by |
Distribution | Sri Lanka | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Highland (Himalayas & N.E. mountains) | Humid Subtropical | Tropical Wet and Dry | Arid | Semiarid | Tropical Wet | |||
D. adjacens Hincks, 1955 | (Syndiplatys) | Uttarakhand1, Madhya Pradesh1 | Madhya Pradesh1 | |||||
D. anamaliensis Srivastava, 1970 | (Syndiplatys) | Tamil Nadu1 | ||||||
D. brindlei Steinmann, 1974 | (Neodiplatys) | Central Himalaya3 | West Bengal1,4 | |||||
D. carinatus Srivastava, 1988 | Not assigned | Karnataka1 | Karnataka1 | |||||
D. carli Srivastava, 1988 | Not assigned | Tamil Nadu1 | ||||||
D. chopardi Hincks, 1955 | (Neodiplatys) | Karnataka1 Tamil Nadu1 |
Tamil Nadu1 | |||||
D. chowdhuryi Srivastava, 1989 | Not assigned | Odisha2 | ||||||
D. coelebs Hincks, 1955 | (Syndiplatys) | Maharashtra1, Tamil Nadu1 | Karnataka1, Kerala1 | |||||
D. confusus Hincks, 1955 | (Syndiplatys) | Tamil Nadu1 | Tamil Nadu1 | |||||
D. devlensis Srivastava, 1974 | (Hypodiplatys) | Tamil Nadu1 | ||||||
D. dolens Hincks, 1957 | (Neodiplatys) | Maharashtra1 | ||||||
D. ernesti Burr, 1910 | (Syndiplatys) | Uva Province1, Central Province1 | ||||||
D. excidens Hincks, 1954 | (Neodiplatys) | Karnataka1 | ||||||
D. fletcheri Burr, 1910 | (Hypodiplatys) | Madhya Pradesh1 | Tamil Nadu1 | Tamil Nadu1 | Uva Province1 | |||
D. greeni Burr, 1904 | (Syndiplatys) | Central Province1, Sabaragamuwa Province1 | ||||||
D. jawalagriensis Kapoor, Bharadwaj & Banerjee, 1971 | (Diplatys) | Karnataka1, Tamil Nadu1 | Tamil Nadu1 | |||||
D. lefroyi Burr, 1910 | (Neodiplatys) | Karnataka1 | ||||||
D. menoni Kapoor & Bharadwaj, 1968 | (Diplatys) | Maharashtra1 | ||||||
D. nathani Hincks, 1960 | (Diplatys) | Madhya Pradesh1 | ||||||
D. nilgiriensis Hincks, 1955 | (Syndiplatys) | Tamil Nadu1 | ||||||
D. papovi Bey-Bienko, 1959 | (Neodiplatys) | Meghalaya1 | ||||||
D. propinquus Hincks, 1955 | (Syndiplatys) | Central Province1 | ||||||
D. sahyadriensis sp. nov. | Not assigned | Karnataka3 | ||||||
D. santoshi Srivastava, 1975 | (Syndiplatys) | Central Province1 | ||||||
D. sinuatus Hincks, 1955 | (Syndiplatys) | Himachal Pradesh1, North Western Himalayas3 | Bihar1, Odisha1, West Bengal4 | West Bengal4 | ||||
D. tikaderi Srivastava, 1988 | Not assigned | Odisha1 |
To explore the diversity of earwigs in different agricultural ecosystems of South India, we conducted an extensive taxonomic survey in agricultural and horticultural crop fields. Here we report a new species, D. sahyadriensis sp. nov., based on a male specimen collected from a sugarcane ecosystem. The possible relationships of the new species with other Diplatys recorded from India and Sri Lanka and the diversity of this genus in this region are also discussed.
The specimen was collected by hand from a sugarcane field in Shivamogga District, Karnataka, India, and preserved in 70% ethanol. For the morphological identification, the specimen was examined under a Stemi 508 stereozoom microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Photographs of the habitus and external body parts were taken under an M205C stereozoom microscope attached with a DFC450 camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The male genitalia were removed by gently lifting the penultimate abdominal sternite, pulling out from the genital chamber with forceps, and cutting at the site of attachment to the ejaculatory ducts. The genitalia were processed by submerson in 5% KOH for two days for clearing tissues and mounted on a glass slide with glycerol. Photographs of dissected genitalia were taken an M205C stereozoom microscope attached with a DFC450 camera. Based on the photographs, the genitalia were illustrated using Adobe Illustrator CS6. The specimen, with voucher number UAHSE19K, is deposited in the Insect Systematics and Vector Biology Laboratory, Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga. The terminology of
Infraorder Protodermaptera Zacher, 1910
Family Diplatyidae Verhoeff, 1902
Subfamily Diplatyinae Verhoeff, 1902
Holotype (♂), India: Karnataka, Hosanagara-Shivamogga Road, Galigekola, 13°59'52.854"N, 75°22'42.576"E, 6.xi.2020, C.M. Karthik leg., ex. sugarcane.
Male has simple forceps, and is easily discriminated from that of other Diplatys species by the unique morphology of the virga: paired portion with developed flanges and a whip-like process at each tip. Flanged virgae have been reported in this genus only for D. jawalagiriensis Kapoor, Bharadwaj & Banerjee, 1971. However, almost no unpaired part is present at the base of each virga in D. jawalagiriensis, with no associated large sclerites in the penis lobe (vs short but conspicuous unpaired part and characteristic associated sclerites are present in D. sahyadriensis sp. nov.).
Male (holotype: Figs
Measurements (mm) of the male holotype of Diplatys sahyadriensis sp. nov.
Length | Measurement (mm) |
---|---|
Body without forceps | 11.12 |
Head | 1.55 |
Pronotum | 1.22 |
Tegmen | 3.00 |
Forceps | 1.30 |
Width | |
Head | 1.57 |
Pronotum | 1.22 |
Tegmen | 1.00 |
Ultimate tergite | 1.25 |
Head (Fig.
Prosternum (Fig.
Abdomen (Fig.
Parameres (= external parameres; Figs
Diplatys sahyadriensis sp. nov. (male holotype) a posterior half of penultimate sternite b left paramere c left penis (in repose), virga with whip-like distal processes (wdp), and associated sclerites (ds, disc-shaped sclerite; iss, inner serrated sclerite; mss, mid serrated sclerite; ods, outer denticulated sclerite).
Female. Unknown.
The specific epithet sahyadriensis refers to the type locality: the specimen was collected from the Sahyadri Ranges, which is a gateway to the Western Ghats of Karnataka.
Only known from Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
The male specimen (holotype) was collected from whorls of sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. (Angiospermae, Gramineae). The collection site is in a mixed area of sugarcane and paddy fields. Faecal pellets were seen on the leaves of sugarcane, suggesting that specimen had been in that place for some time, possibly taking advantage of this shaded spot.
(Adopted from
1 | Virga much reduced, represented by dots; instead, a long chitinous rod projects from penis lobe (According to |
Diplatys chowdhuryi Srivastava, 1989 |
– | Bifurcated virga present | 2 |
2 | Virga paired throughout its entire length |
Diplatys confusus Hincks, 1955; Diplatys coelebs Hincks, 1955; Diplatys jawalagiriensis Kapoor, Bharadwaj & Banerjee, 1971; Diplatys nathani Hincks, 1960; Diplatys dolens Hincks, 1957; Diplatys tikaderi Srivastava, 1988; Diplatys lefroyi Burr, 1910; or Diplatys menoni Kapoor & Bharadwaj, 1968; see couplets 12–25 in the key by |
– | Virga unpaired at base, sometimes forming a rounded vesicle or small protuberance; its length variable in relation to paired portion | 3 |
3 | Unpaired portion of virga about as long as or longer than the paired portion |
Diplatys propinquus Hincks, 1955*; Diplatys ernesti Burr, 1910*; Diplatys adjacens Hincks, 1955; Diplatys sinuatus Hincks, 1955; Diplatys santoshi Srivastava, 1975*; Diplatys nilgiriensis Hincks, 1955; or Diplatys carinatus Srivastava, 1988; see couplets 37–48 in the key by |
– | Unpaired basal portion of virga very short to one-third of the paired portion | 4 |
4 | Parameres internally with a sharp tooth at about the middle, apical half narrow and points externally. Unpaired part of virga short but dilated, forming an oval vesicle | Diplatys brindlei Steinmann, 1974 |
– | Outer margin of parameres almost straight, apical half not obliquely pointing outward. Unpaired part of virga not forming a conspicuous oval-shaped vesicle | 5 |
5 | Posterior margin of penultimate sternite with a pair of conspicuous projections and emarginate between these projections | Diplatys popovi Bey-Bienko, 1959 |
– | Posterior margin of penultimate sternite almost truncate, emarginate, or sinuate, but without conspicuous projections | 6 |
6 | Posterior margin of penultimate sternite almost truncate, or only feebly undulate | 7 |
– | Posterior margin of penultimate sternite emarginate at middle or bisinuate | 8 |
7 | Virga as long as parameres | Diplatys devlensis Srivastava, 1974 |
– | Virga longer than parameres, sometimes exceeding base of genitalia | Diplatys fletcheri Burr, 1910 |
8 | Posterior margin of penultimate sternite emarginate at middle or bisinuate. Virga very long, extending beyond base of genitalia | 9 |
– | Penultimate sternite posteriorly emarginate at middle. Virga short or long, but not extending beyond base of genitalia | 10 |
9 | Penultimate sternite posteriorly bisinuate. Virga very long, extending beyond base of genitalia, paired part not flanged | Diplatys chopardi Hincks, 1955 |
– | Penultimate sternite weakly emerged at middle posteriorly. Paired part of virga convoluted and laterally provided with flange, each apex with a whip-like process | Diplatys sahyadriensis Karthik, Kamimura & Kalleshwaraswamy, sp. nov. |
10 | Virga apparently longer than penis lobe | Diplatys excidens Hincks, 1954 |
– | Virga shorter than or almost as long as penis lobe | 11 |
11 | Virga much shorter than 1/2 of penis lobe; paired part stout and swollen | Diplatys carli Srivastava, 1988 |
– | Virga longer than 1/2 of penis lobe; paired part slender | 12 |
12 | Inner pre-apical tooth of parameres strongly hooked | Diplatys anamaliensis Srivastava, 1970 |
– | Inner pre-apical tooth of parameres normal, not strongly hooked | Diplatys greeni Burr, 1904 |
In the present study, we follow
The male genitalia of D. sahyadriensis sp. nov. are unique in the genus in having several elaborations: a well-developed flange on the paired part of virgae, three differently shaped sclerites with serration (or denticulation) on the penis lobe, and a filament-like appendage at each virgal tip. Diplatys jawalagiriensis, which has been recorded from Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, also possesses flanged virgae (
Diplatys propinquus is a Sri Lankan Diplatys species possibly close to the new species. According to the descriptions and illustrations by
The filament with long spines at each virgal tip represents another characteristic structure of D. sahyadriensis sp. nov. In Diplatys, the Cameroonian D. longipennis Brindle, 1969 also possesses many spines, like barbs, but directly on each tip of the thin, highly elongate paired part of the virgae (
Based on temperature and precipitation, India is divided into six regions: highland, humid subtropical, tropical wet and dry, arid, semiarid, and tropical wet zones (
The new species of earwig, D. sahyadriensis sp. nov. described from sugarcane ecosystem in Western Ghats gives insight into the possible substantial diversity of this genera in India. There is a need to study its distribution, status, and role in agricultural and horticultural ecosystems.
CMK and CMK thank the Director of Research, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, for providing the necessary facilities for the research. We thank Ranjith, Kavya yadav, Sandeep, Santrupti, and Loka Mounika for helping in the field. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. This research was partly supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science via Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Kakenhi) #19K06746 to YK.