Research Article
Print
Research Article
New species in the Sitalcina sura species group (Opiliones, Laniatores, Phalangodidae), with evidence for a biogeographic link between California desert canyons and Arizona sky islands
expand article infoAngela DiDomenico, Marshal Hedin
‡ Dept of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

The western United States is home to numerous narrowly endemic harvestman taxa (Arachnida, Opiliones), including members of the genus Sitalcina Banks, 1911. Sitalcina is comprised of three species groups, including the monospecific S. californica and S. lobata groups, and the S. sura group with eight described species. All species in the S. sura group have very small geographic distributions, with group members distributed like disjunct “beads on a string” from Monterey south to southern California and southeast to the sky-island mountain ranges of southern Arizona. Here, molecular phylogenetic and species delimitation analyses were conducted for all described species in the S. sura group, plus several newly discovered populations. Species trees were reconstructed using multispecies coalescent methods implemented in *BEAST, and species delimitation was accomplished using Bayes Factor Delimitation (BFD). Based on quantitative species delimitation results supported by consideration of morphological characters, two new species (Sitalcina oasiensis sp. n., Sitalcina ubicki sp. n.) are described. We also provide a description of the previously unknown male of S. borregoensis Briggs, 1968. Molecular phylogenetic evidence strongly supports distinctive desert versus coastal clades, with desert canyon taxa from southern California more closely related to Arizona taxa than to geographically proximate California coastal taxa. We hypothesize that southern ancestry and plate tectonics have played a role in the diversification history of this animal lineage, similar to sclerophyllous plant taxa of the Madro-Tertiary Geoflora. Molecular clock analyses for the S. sura group are generally consistent with these hypotheses. We also propose that additional Sitalcina species await discovery in the desert canyons of southern California and northern Baja, and the mountains of northwestern mainland Mexico.

Keywords

Species delimitation, plate tectonics, short-range endemism, historical biogeography, Bayes Factor Delimitation, Madro-Tertiary Geoflora

Introduction

Laniatorean harvestmen comprise the majority of Opiliones diversity, with more than 4100 described species (Kury 2013). North temperate Laniatores are typically small (body length usually less than 3 mm), short-legged animals, most often found in sheltered microhabitats such as under rocks and logs. The western United States is home to a diverse laniatorean fauna, with more genera and species than any other region in the Nearctic, making this area a harvestman “hotspot” (e.g., Briggs 1971, Ubick and Briggs 1989, Ubick and Briggs 2008, Derkarabetian and Hedin 2014). Laniatores of the family Phalangodidae are mostly Holarctic in distribution, but particularly diverse in the Nearctic (Ubick 2007). In California there are about 70 described phalangodid species, and this number has been growing with further sampling and use of SEM studies of morphology. Most of the described species have very small geographic distributions, and deserve more evolutionary, biogeographic, and conservation interest than currently afforded (Ubick and Briggs 2008, Emata and Hedin 2016).

The phalangodid genus Sitalcina is comprised of three species groups (Ubick and Briggs 2008), including the monospecific S. californica and S. lobata groups, and the S. sura group which includes eight described species: S. sura Briggs, 1968, S. seca Ubick & Briggs, 2008, S. chalona (Briggs, 1968), S. flava Briggs, 1968, S. borregoensis, S. rothi Ubick & Briggs, 2008, S. catalina Ubick & Briggs, 2008 and S. peacheyi Ubick & Briggs, 2008. With a known distribution from Monterey south to southern California and southeast to the sky-island mountain ranges of southern Arizona (Figure 1), species of the S. sura group occupy a variety of upland habitats. Most of these habitats are dominated by sclerophyllous woody plant taxa (e.g., Quercus, Pinyon pine, Arctostaphylos, Ceanothus, etc.), part of the Madro-Tertiary Geoflora (MTG, Raven and Axelrod 1978, Lancaster and Kay 2013, Baldwin 2014). Exceptions include S. sura from redwood forests, and S. borregoensis from desert canyons, below the elevational level of desert chaparral. Species from the sky-island mountain ranges of southern Arizona occur in mid-elevation Madro-Tertiary habitats, largely below higher elevation conifer forest, but above low desert habitats. In all habitats S. sura group members occupy seemingly similar microhabitats, typically under rocks on shaded north-facing slopes (Ubick and Briggs 2008, Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Distribution of Sitalcina and geographic sample. Groups include S. californica (1 species), S. lobata (1 species), and S. sura (8 described species, 4 geographically novel populations). Sampled populations indicated by circles. General species distributions follow Ubick and Briggs (2008).

Figure 2.

Habitats and live in situ specimens. A Granite talus at Mt Palm Springs, CA – creosote + ocotillo + bursage habitat B live S. borregoensis from Mt Palm Springs C Volcanic talus at Peeples Valley, AZ – pinyon, juniper habitat D live S. rothi from Peeples Valley E live S. peacheyi from Madera Canyon, AZ F live S. sura from Palo Colorado Road, CA. Specimen images not at same scale.

Because of apparent limited dispersal abilities and microhabitat specificity, extreme population genetic structuring and divergence can be expected in Sitalcina, as is observed in other low vagility Laniatores (e.g., Thomas and Hedin 2008, Hedin and Thomas 2010, Derkarabetian et al. 2011, Starrett et al. 2016, Emata and Hedin 2016). As such, some currently described species with naturally fragmented distributions (e.g., S. peacheyi on isolated mountaintops and in caves) may actually comprise multiple cryptic species. Also, the geographic sampling of previous studies may have missed unique species. Finally, members of the S. sura group are very similar in somatic morphology, likely due to niche conservatism (Wiens and Graham 2005, Keith and Hedin 2012). Overall, the S. sura group has the potential to include both newly discovered and cryptic species.

A variety of objective species delimitation methods have been developed in recent years (e.g., Yang and Rannala 2010, Rannala and Yang 2013, Grummer et al. 2014). Several of these species delimitation methods are founded on the multispecies coalescent model, utilizing multilocus genetic data (summarized in Fujita et al. 2012, Carstens et al. 2013). The probable existence of morphologically cryptic species in Sitalcina makes the use of such genetic methods attractive. Also, because Sitalcina populations are allopatric and mostly separated by unsuitable habitat, it can be assumed that interspecific gene flow is minimal. As such, incongruence in gene tree topologies should largely reflect incomplete lineage sorting, consistent with the assumptions of most multispecies coalescent methods (Fujita et al. 2012). Conversely, extreme population genetic structuring across naturally fragmented habitats may represent a deviation from model assumptions (Niemiller et al. 2012, Hedin et al. 2015).

In this research we first use species discovery approaches to formulate alternative species delimitation hypotheses for the S. sura group. Based on genetic species delimitation results, supported by consideration of morphology, two new species and the previously unknown male of S. borregoensis are described. A time-calibrated multilocus species tree is used as a framework to interpret the biogeographic history of the S. sura group. We hypothesize that this history is linked to both plate tectonics and southern ancestry, similar to elements of the MTG.

Methods

Taxon sampling

Fieldwork was conducted in the winter and spring months when surface microhabitats were most suitable for successful collections. Voucher specimens used for morphological study and species descriptions were preserved in 80% ETOH, while those used in genetic analyses were preserved in 100% ETOH at -80 °C. All described species of the S. sura group were collected from at or near type localities (Ubick and Briggs 2008). This sampling included previously discussed (Ubick and Briggs 2008), but undescribed, specimens from the Santa Ynez Mountains, California. In addition, several new populations from California and Arizona were discovered in appropriate habitats. Two specimens per locality were used for phylogenetic analyses when available, with the final sample including 29 ingroup specimens from 16 localities (Figure 1, Suppl. material 1: Table S1). Locality data for all specimens are also available on the Symbiota Collections of Arthropods Network (http://symbiota4.acis.ufl.edu/scan/portal/index.php). Specimens are housed in the San Diego State Terrestrial Arthropod Collection (with SDSU_TAC or SDSU_OP catalog numbers); type specimens are deposited at the California Academy of Sciences (CAS). Sitalcina californica (Banks, 1893) and S. lobata Goodnight & Goodnight, 1942 were used as outgroup taxa in all analyses. Here we accept the hypothesis that Sitalcina is monophyletic, as argued on morphological grounds by Ubick and Briggs (2008).

DNA isolation, amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from leg tissue (2–3 legs) using the Qiagen DNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). DNA fragments for mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and nuclear 28S rRNA, plus five additional protein-coding nuclear genes, were amplified using PCR (Table 1). Primers and cycling conditions are reported in Suppl. material 1: Table S2. Primers for protein-coding nuclear genes targeted terminal exon plus associated 3’ untranslated regions (3’-UTRs), and were developed by comparing transcriptomes of S. lobata (Hedin et al. 2012) to the phalangodid taxon Texella bifurcata (Briggs, 1968) (SRA numbers reported in Emata and Hedin 2016). Both transcriptomes were generated using Illumina short-read technology, and assembled using Trinity software (Grabherr et al. 2011). PCR products were purified using Millipore plates, Sanger sequenced in both directions at Macrogen USA (Rockville, MD), and edited using Geneious Pro 6 (Kearse et al. 2012). Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004), with the exception of 28S data, which were aligned using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013) and the G_INS-I alignment algorithm (Wilm 2006). Alleles from heterozygous nuclear sequences were inferred using PHASE 2.1.1 (Stephens et al. 2001, Stephens and Scheet 2005), with each analysis repeated twice to ensure consistent results.

Gene name, matrix completeness, aligned length, parsimony informative sites (ingroup), evolutionary and clock models.

Gene name Ixodes homolog Matrix % Complete Aligned length PI sites Model of evolution Clock model
Ecotropic viral integration site protein, putative ISCW 021220 75% 508 bp 58 HKY+I Relaxed
Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A, putative ISCW 003443 >75% 242 bp 37 HKY+ Γ Strict
RING finger protein, putative ISCW 003817 >95% 214 bp 32 GTR+I Strict
Protein transport protein Sec24A, putative ISCW 016134 >95% 364 bp 37 GTR+ Γ Relaxed
Neuromusculin, putative ISCW 006547 >95% 197 bp 22 HKY+ Γ Relaxed
28S >95% 1094 bp 71 GTR+I+ Γ Relaxed
COI (all) 100% 549 bp 249 GTR+ Γ Relaxed
COI (pos1) GTR+ Γ
COI (pos2) HKY+I+ Γ
COI (pos 3) GTR+Γ

Gene trees and genetic clustering

Models of DNA sequence evolution were chosen using jModeltest2 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003, Darriba et al. 2012), with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) used to select models (Table 1). Mitochondrial COI gene tree analyses were conducted using both codon partitioned and un-partitioned models. Gene trees for individual loci were reconstructed using MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2011) run on the Cyber Infrastructure for Phylogenetic Research (CIPRES; Miller et al. 2010). Bayesian MCMC analyses for each gene were run for 50 million generations sampling every 5000 generations. Each analysis was repeated twice to confirm results. ESS values along with –lnL scores were evaluated for convergence using Tracer v.1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014). A 50% majority rule consensus tree from the resulting posterior distribution was constructed for each gene region.

We used genetic clustering in the initial “discovery” phase of species delimitation, a procedure common in the recent literature (reviewed in Carstens et al. 2013). STRUCTURE 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al. 2000) was used to analyze biallelic nuclear genotypic data. Each unique haplotype was treated as a single allele and was called using SNAP-map (Aylor et al. 2006). STRUCTURE runs were conducted with 20 iterations for multiple K values (K = number of genetic clusters). Separate runs were conducted with coastal clade species (see Results) with a K of 1-9, and desert clade species (see Results) with a K of 1-8. Analyses were run for 100,000 generations, with the first 10,000 generations removed as burnin. Analyses were run using both a no-admixture model (assumes each individual comes from one of the K distinct populations) and an admixture model (allows for population admixture). All other priors were left as default. Structure Harvester (Earl 2012) was used to find the best-fit K utilizing the ∆K method of Evanno et al. (2005). Data were summarized using the FullSearch algorithm of CLUMPP (Jakobsson and Rosenberg 2007), and visualized with DISTRUCT (Rosenberg 2004).

Species trees and divergence times

Multilocus species trees were reconstructed using *BEAST 1.8 (Drummond et al. 2012). A priori species limits were based on genetic clusters identified by STRUCTURE admixture and no-admixture model results. For each analysis, substitution models, clock models, and trees were unlinked across loci. A best-fit model of molecular evolution was applied to each gene region (Table 1), with mitochondrial COI partitioned by codon and a Yule process applied for the species tree prior. Clock rate parameters were examined using Tracer v1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014). If the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) of the coefficient of variation for any individual gene included zero (indicating that a strict molecular clock could not be statistically rejected), a strict clock was used for that gene region. Subsequent analyses were run with the appropriate uncorrelated relaxed or strict clock models (Table 1). Analyses were run for 200 million generations logging every 2000 generations. ESS values along with –lnL scores were evaluated for convergence using Tracer. Each species tree analysis was repeated twice to ensure consistent results. Posterior distributions of repeated runs were combined using LogCombiner, and a maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree was constructed from the resulting combined posterior distributions using TreeAnnotator.

Divergence time analyses were performed in *BEAST (Drummond et al. 2012). Because of general uncertainty in rates of molecular evolution in Laniatorean harvestmen, we conducted three separate analyses to provide bounds on possible dates. First, a well-accepted arthropod COI clock rate of 3.54% per million years (Ma) (arithmetic mean of branch rates (ucld) setting in *BEAST = 0.0178) was specified for the partitioned COI data (Papadopoulou et al. 2010). Second, the unpartitioned COI rate of Papadopoulou et al. (2010) was used (ucld mean = 0.0169). Finally, a slower COI rate calculated for the laniatorean genus Sclerobunus (ucld mean = 0.01115) was specified for the COI data partition (Derkarabetian et al. 2010). This latter rate was inferred indirectly based on combined biogeographic and fossil calibrations. For each analysis, a Yule process was specified for the species tree prior and a pairwise linear and constant root was applied for the population model, with a uniform distribution on the upper and lower bounds of the age. Substitution models, clock models, and trees were unlinked across loci. The appropriate model of molecular evolution and clock-like rate was applied to each gene fragment (see above). Analyses were run for 50 million generations sampling every 500, and repeated to confirm consistent results. Repeated runs were combined using LogCombiner, and a MCC tree was constructed using TreeAnnotator.

Genetic species delimitation

Bayes factor delimitation (BFD, Grummer et al. 2014) allows testing of alternative species delimitation models by assigning individuals to different lineages, with subsequent comparisons of marginal likelihoods of alternative models. We tested the alternative species delimitation models summarized in Table 2 – these alternative models are based on a combination of STRUCTURE results, geographic considerations, and prior taxonomy. Marginal likelihood estimations were run for 100,000 generations, sampled every 1000 with 100 steps using path sampling (Lartillot and Philippe 2006) and stepping stone (Xie et al. 2011) methods. A comparison of marginal likelihoods was conducted using Bayes factors, with values above 10 considered as decisive support (Kass and Raftery 1995).

Alternative species delimitation hypotheses used in BFD analyses.

Hypothesis Distinct Species (total in parentheses) Motivation
H1 Glen Oaks, Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis, Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava Topanga, S. flava Piuma + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi, S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (13 species) Following STRUCTURE admixture model
H2 Glen Oaks, Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis, Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava Topanga, S. flava Piuma + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi, S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura + S. seca (12 species) Adjacent S. sura + S. seca considered a single species
H3 Glen Oaks, Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis + Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava Topanga, S. flava Piuma + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi, S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (12 species) Anza-Borrego specimens considered a single species
H4 Glen Oaks, Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis, Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava Topanga, S. flava Piuma + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi + S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (12 species) S. peacheyi as single species
H5 Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis, Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava Topanga, S. flava Piuma + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi, S. peacheyi MAD, Glen Oaks + S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (12 species) Coastal STRUCTURE results + Desert no-admixture model results
H6 Glen Oaks, Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis, Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, Palos Verdes + S. flava, S. peacheyi, S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (12 species) S. flava and Palos Verdes as single species
H7 Glen Oaks, S. borregoensis, Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, Santa Ynez + S. flava + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi, S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (11 species) coastal southern CA a single species
H8 Glen Oaks, Santa Ynez, S. borregoensis + Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava Topanga, S. flava Piuma + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi + S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi, S. sura, S. seca (11 species) S. peacheyi as single species; Anza-Borrego specimens considered a single species
H9 S. borregoensis + Borrego Palm Canyon, S. catalina, S. chalona, S. flava +Santa Ynez + Palos Verdes, S. peacheyi + S. peacheyi MAD, S. rothi + Glen Oaks, S. sura + S. seca (7 species) Putative species grouped with geographic neighbors

Niche modeling

With incomplete knowledge of the full distribution of the S. sura group, possible regions with additional new populations or species were identified via ecological niche modeling (ENM). DIVA-GIS (Hijmans et al. 2004) and Maxent (Phillips and Dukid 2008) were used to construct niche models, using known localities for the species group as input. Niche models have previously successfully predicted the potential habitats of animal taxa with small and fragmented distributions (e.g., Rissler and Apodaca 2007, Bond and Stockman 2008, Bond 2012). Predicted distributions of the S. sura group were reconstructed using altitudinal and climatic layers for nineteen quarterly and annual measurements of temperature and precipitation (Bioclimatic layers 1-19), obtained from the WorldClim dataset (Hijmans et al. 2005). A jackknife analysis was conducted in Maxent to discover the most likely environmental factors impacting species’ distributions. Output from Maxent was converted to raster format and reclassified to binary presence/absence in ArcMap 10.3 (ESRI) using the 10 percentile training presence logistic threshold.

Study of morphology

Male penises that were not protruding from the genital operculum were physically extracted using a blunt insect micro pin. Exposed penises were placed in room temperature (or hot) 10% KOH for 1-2 minutes for expansion. Female ovipositors were exposed using the same blunt pin procedure. Specimens were imaged using a Quanta 450 scanning electron microscope (SEM) after being mounted and coated with 20nm platinum. One or two specimens were used for SEM as needed. Whole specimen digital images were captured using a Visionary Digital BK plus system (http://www.visionarydigital.com). Individual images were merged into a composite image using Helicon Focus 6.2.2 software (http://www.heliconsoft.com/heliconfocus.html). Specimen measurements were taken with an SZX12 Olympus dissecting scope equipped with an ocular micrometer, at 50× magnification.

Results

Data characteristics

DNA sequence data were collected for two outgroup taxa (data for S. lobata from transcriptomes), eight described species from the S. sura group, and four novel geographic populations with morphological features placing them in the S. sura group (see diagnostic features below). Not all specimens were successfully amplified for all gene regions, resulting in some missing data (Table 1). All heterozygous nuclear sequences were PHASED with 100% certainty. GenBank accession numbers for unphased sequences are reported in Suppl. material 1: Table S3, and phased data matrices have been submitted to the Dryad Digital Repository (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4gk4f).

Gene trees and genetic clustering

Mitochondrial COI gene trees were reconstructed using both a codon partitioned and un-partitioned model, and are generally topologically similar (Figure 3). A clade that includes southern California desert populations together with Arizona sky-island populations (hereafter named the “desert” clade) is recovered in both analyses. Geographically proximate populations from canyons in the Anza Borrego desert (Borrego Palm Canyon, S. borregoensis) are surprisingly genetically divergent, with average Kimura 2-parameter distances exceeding 17% (calculated using MEGA6, Tamura et al. 2013), and do not form a clade on COI trees. An important incongruence between codon partitioned versus un-partitioned results concerns the uncertain placement of the S. flava + Palos Verdes clade. These populations are consistently placed with other coastal CA populations (hereafter named the “coastal” clade, see below) in nuclear gene tree analyses, but group with the desert clade with low support (posterior probability (PP) = 0.59) in codon partitioned COI analyses.

Figure 3.

Mitochondrial COI gene trees. Results based on A un-partitioned and B codon partitioned analyses. Asterisks indicate posterior probabilities above 0.95. Members of desert clade (see text) highlighted.

Despite expected variance in nuclear gene tree topologies, several general trends are apparent. First, a coastal CA clade is recovered (generally with strong support, PP > 0.95) in all six nuclear gene trees (Figure 4). This clade includes S. sura, S. seca, S. chalona, S. flava, Santa Ynez, and Palos Verdes populations. Specimens from Santa Ynez are genetically distinct in all nuclear gene trees. A desert clade is strongly supported in four of six nuclear gene trees; paraphyly of this group in two gene trees may reflect a gene tree rooting issue. Within the desert clade, Borrego Palm Canyon specimens are genetically distinct from neighboring S. borregoensis in four gene trees where both populations were sampled (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Nuclear gene trees. Individual genes include A Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A B Neuromusculin C Protein transport protein Sec24A D 28S, E RING finger protein, and F Ecotropic viral integration site protein. Outgroups trimmed from all trees except for 28S. Asterisks indicate posterior probabilities above 0.95. Desert taxa shaded.

STRUCTURE analyses for coastal clade specimens favor a K = 6 model (Figure 5A). Both no-admixture and admixture models place S. sura, S. seca, S. chalona, and Santa Ynez individuals into four separate genetic clusters. Specimens from Palos Verdes and S. flava from Piuma Road group together into a fifth genetic cluster, while Topanga Canyon S. flava specimens represent a sixth cluster. The STRUCTURE admixture model favors all discrete desert populations (either found on isolated mountain ranges or in isolated desert canyons) as unique genetic clusters (K = 7, Figure 5B). A no-admixture model favors K = 6, grouping geographically adjacent Glen Oaks and S. rothi specimens (Figure 5C).

Figure 5.

STRUCTURE results. Results for A coastal clade using admixture and no admixture models (K=6) B desert clade using admixture model (K=7), and C desert clade using no admixture model (K=6).

Species trees and divergence times

*BEAST analyses conducted with admixture STRUCTURE clusters as a priori species recover desert and coastal clades with strong support (PP > 0.95, Figure 6A). Relationships among coastal taxa are well supported, with an internal topology that mirrors geography (early-diverging southern lineages, Santa Ynez intermediate, derived northern lineages). Relationships between desert taxa are less strongly supported, with CA desert canyon populations forming a clade sister to montane Arizona populations.

Figure 6.

*BEAST species trees. A Includes summary of STRUCTURE and BFD species delimitation results. Outgroup taxa not shown B Includes divergence time estimates based on Papadopoulou et al. (2010) partitioned COI rate. Ages (in millions of years) and bars indicating 95% highest posterior density (HPD). Outgroup taxa not shown.

Using the Papadopoulou et al. (2010) partitioned COI rate, the estimated divergence time for the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) of the S. sura group is ~18 Ma, the tMRCA for the coastal clade is ~10 Ma, and the tMRCA for the desert clade is ~7 Ma (Figure 6B). The Papadopoulou et al. (2010) unpartitioned COI rate provides very similar time estimates, while the slower Sclerobunus rate results in clearly older time estimates for these same nodes (Table 3). In general, we have no a priori reason to favor one of these rates, given the general lack of knowledge of rates of molecular evolution in laniatorean harvestmen. However, we favor the younger dates for three reasons. First, the Papadopoulou et al. (2010) rates result in date estimates that coincide with important biogeographic events in the region (see Discussion). Second, various temporal analyses conducted by Emata and Hedin (2016) for the California phalangodid genus Calicina also showed that the Papadopoulou et al. (2010) rate provided biologically realistic dates for a California taxon, while slower rates suggested unrealistically old divergence dates. Finally, we note that recent studies of Sclerobunus using whole genome SNP data (Derkarabetian et al. 2016) provide younger divergence ages than previously hypothesized in that system, suggesting that the Derkarabetian et al. (2010) COI rate may have been underestimated. All of these arguments are ad hoc, with resolution in the Sitalcina system ultimately requiring additional data.

Divergence time estimates from alternative COI molecular clock rates.

Model Papadopoulou partitioned COI rate Papadopoulou unpartitioned COI rate Derkarabetian COI rate
tMRCA S. sura group 18.25 (12.88–25.26) 19.36 (13.58–26.47) 29.43 (19.56–40.87)
tMRCA coastal clade 10.12 (6.88–14.03) 10.98 (7.56–14.85) 16.25 (10.57–23.07)
tMRCA desert clade 7.09 (4.85–10.01) 7.49 (5.09–10.37) 11.39 (7.64–16.04)
tMRCA S. borregoensis, S. oasiensis 4.86 (2–7.95) 5.32 (2.09–8.57) 7.87 (3–13.22)

Niche modeling

Precipitation in the coldest quarter (BIO19) and precipitation in the driest month (BIO14) were the best predictors of S. sura group distributions. ENMs based on these variables provide a visualization of possible sampling gaps within the S. sura group (Figure 7). In California and Baja California Norte, areas of high suitability that represent possible gaps include the Santa Ynez Mountains northwest of Santa Barbara, and the southern Santa Lucia Mountains. Some of these habitats are occupied by S. californica, which has an apparently exclusive distribution with members of the S. sura group (i.e., no sympatry has ever been recorded, Figure 1). Similarly, we expect S. lobata to occupy the predicted suitable habitats of coastal southern CA and northern Baja (Figure 1). In these particular cases, we hypothesize that the ENM has over-predicted the distribution of the S. sura group. California desert canyon habitats, both north and south of our sampled populations, have predicted suitability. In Arizona and northern mainland Mexico (Sonora), unsampled populations are predicted to occur in montane habitats between known S. catalina - S. rothi populations, and south of our current sample. We are not aware of Sitalcina records from northern mainland Mexico, but based on habitat and distribution of other regional sky-island animal taxa (e.g., Maddison and McMahon 2000, Bryson et al. 2011, Bryson et al. 2013, Grummer et al. 2014), we expect Sitalcina to occur in the mountains of Sonora.

Figure 7.

Binary ENM for Sitalcina sura species group. Purple regions indicate predicted habitat and dots indicate collection localities used in model estimation. Major geographic features highlighted.

Genetic species delimitation

BFD results support a 13 species model, following the K = 6 STRUCTURE model for coastal taxa and the K = 7 model for desert taxa (Tables 2 & 4, Figure 6). This 13 species model supports three new populations as putative species (Borrego Palm Canyon, Santa Ynez, Glen Oaks), and the division of both S. peacheyi and S. flava into separate species. This model is decisively supported over alternative species delimitation models (Table 4). In translating BFD results into formal taxonomy, we have taken a conservative approach, also considering support from other lines of evidence. Because Glen Oaks is known only from a single adult female specimen, we defer formal species description to a later date, when additional specimens can be collected and studied. Further attention should be also directed at the geographically disjunct Palos Verdes population, which is genetically distinct from S. flava for multiple genes (Figures 3, 4). Finally, because we failed to find obvious morphological differences between disjunct populations of S. peacheyi and S. flava, and because multispecies coalescent models might oversplit genetically structured populations (Niemiller et al. 2012, Hedin et al. 2015), we do not further split S. peacheyi and S. flava at this time.

BFD results.

Model Path Sampling Bayes Factor PS Stepping Stone Bayes Factor SS
H1 -12137 NA -11953 NA
H2 -12387 499 -12366 827
H3 -12308 342 -12252 598
H4 -12258 241 -12137 369
H5 -12303 331 -12235 563
H6 -12235 196 -12129 351
H7 -12264 253 -12140 373
H8 -12352 429 -12300 693
H9 -12287 300 -12131 357

Genetically distinct and morphologically diagnosable populations from Borrego Palm Canyon and Santa Ynez are formally described below. Also, previously unknown males of S. borregoensis are described. Following Ubick and Briggs (2008), we emphasize both somatic and genitalic characters in our descriptions.

Taxonomy

Morphological abbreviations (following Ubick and Briggs 2008): 1. Somatic morphology: AT = anterior tubercles of scute, BL = body length (viewed laterally), EM = eye mound, GO = genital operculum, Fm = femur, SL = scute length (from front edge of EM to posterior edge of scute, viewed dorsally), SW = scute width at widest point, viewed dorsally), TC = tarsal count, TrIV = trochanter of leg IV. 2. Penis morphology: DL = dorsal lobe of glans, PSL = parastylar lobe(s) of glans, S = stylus, VP = ventral plate of penis, VS = ventral setae of ventral plate, AS = apical spine of ventral plate. 3. Ovipositor morphology: OV = ovipositor, OVM = ovipositor microspines, OVS = ovipositor apical setae. All measurements are in millimeters unless noted otherwise.

Sitalcina Banks, 1911

Diagnosis. As presented in Ubick and Briggs (2008).

Sitalcina sura Group

Diagnosis. Members of the S. sura group are distinguished from related S. californica and S. lobata by the following characters (Ubick and Briggs 2008): Both sexes possess a short row of dorsomesal asetose tubercles on the palpal Fm. Males lack an AS, possess a bilobed PSL, and a curved to straight ectal spur on TrIV. Females with imbricate OVM (absent/weak in the (S. chalona, (S. sura, S. seca)) clade), and curved OVS with brush-like tips.

Sitalcina borregoensis Briggs, 1968

Figures: map Figure 1; habitus Figure 2B; male Figure 8A–D

Sitalcina borregoensis Briggs, 1968: 30. Ubick and Briggs 2008: 22, fig. 25.

Type material examined

Holotype female from California, San Diego County, Anza- Borrego Desert State Park, Mountain Palm Springs, collected by T. Briggs, April 5, 1967 (CAS).

Diagnosis

This small-bodied species is most similar to S. rothi and S. oasiensis, with a low EM and a flattened body profile in both sexes. Females can be diagnosed by the moderately imbricate OVM. Males possess a TrIV spur that is approximately straight, and longer than in S. oasiensis. The distal end of PSL is conspicuously serrate.

Description

FEMALE. As in Ubick and Briggs 2008.

MALE. Integument color pale orange, appendages lighter. Body finely rugose with a few large tubercles on posterior tergites, one pair anteriorly on EM; 3 pairs of AT. EM low, flattened, eyes present. Palpal Fm with median dorsobasal row of 4 asetose tubercles and one small mesal tubercle. Palpal megaspines: trochanter one ventral and small; Fm 3 ventrobasal, one mesodistal; patella 2 mesal, one ectal; tibia and tarsus 2 mesal, 2 ectal. TC 3-5-5-5.

Measurements taken from following specimens: SDSU_OP3011 (SDSU_OP3010): BL 1.32 (1.24). SL 0.75 (0.84), SW 0.75 (0.78). EM width 0.19 (0.18), height 0.12 (0.10). GO length 0.17 (0.14), width 0.17 (0.14). Leg II length - missing (2.78), Leg II/SL - missing (3.31). TrIV spur present, nearly straight. Penis VP entire, apically pointed, with 8 pairs of setae, AS absent; glans DL quadrate; PSL serrate distally; S not visible.

Figure 8.

Male Sitalcina borregoensis (ETOH - SDSU_OP3011, SEM prep - SDSU_TAC000293) – A habitus B EM C TrIV D penis. Scale bar = 1 mm (A), 200 µm (B), 100 µm (C, D).

Other material examined

New males were collected on 19 February, 2012 from the vicinity of the type locality. Suppl. material 1: Table S1 provides additional locality information for specimens examined.

Distribution and habitat

Known only from the vicinity of Mountain Palm Springs, Anza Borrego Desert State Park. New collections are from a north-facing slope, under the first layer of granite rocks in a small ravine adjacent to a palm grove (Figure 2A).

Sitalcina oasiensis DiDomenico & Hedin, sp. n.

Figures: map Figure 1; male Figure 9A–E; female Figure 10A–D

Type material

Holotype male (SDSU_TAC000211, CASENT 9029998) from California, San Diego County, Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, Borrego Palm Canyon. N33.28025°, W116.43369° elev. ca. 430 m. Collected by A. DiDomenico, D. Carlson, S. Derkarabetian, S. Bejarano, February 23, 2013.

Etymology

Named for the well-known palm oases of Borrego Palm Canyon.

Diagnosis

Both sexes are small-bodied, with a low EM and a flattened body profile, similar to S. borregoensis. Females can be distinguished by the more strongly imbricate OVM. The male TrIV spur is approximately straight, shorter than in S. borregoensis.

Genetic data

Description

Integument color pale orange with lighter appendages. Body finely rugose with larger tubercles along tergal margins and small tubercles anteriorly on EM; 2-3 pairs of AT. EM low and rounded, eyes present. Palpal Fm with median dorsobasal row of 3 asetose tubercles and one small mesal tubercle. Palpal megaspines: trochanter 2 ventral; Fm 3 ventrobasal, one mesodistal; patella 2 mesal, one ectal; tibia and tarsus 2 mesal, 2 ectal. TC 3-5-5-5.

MALE. Holotype (paratypes SDSU_TAC000297, SDSU_TAC000298): BL 1.3 (1.13–1.28). SL 0.81 (0.75- 0.8), SW 0.78 (0.73–0.88). EM width 0.19 (0.20), height 0.11 (0.10- 0.13). GO length 0.14, width 0.15. Leg II length 2.7 (2.34–2.64), Leg II/SL 3.33 (2.93–3.12). TrIV spur short, straight. Penis VP entire, apically rounded, with 9 pairs of setae, AS absent; glans DL quadrate; PSL simple and bilobed, rounded at apical end; S not visible.

FEMALE paratype SDSU_TAC000299: BL 1.5. SL 0.8, SW 0.9. EM width 0.25, height 0.13. Leg II length 3.0, Leg II/SL 3.75. Strongly imbricate OVM, apical teeth absent, 7 pairs of OVS, curved, multifurcate.

Figure 9.

Male Sitalcina oasiensis (ETOH - SDSU_ OP3140, SEM prep - SDSU_TAC000289) – A habitus B EM C palpal Fm, asetose tubercles at arrows D TrIV E penis. Scale bar: 1 mm (A), 300 µm (B), 100 µm (C–E).

Figure 10.

Female Sitalcina oasiensis (SDSU_TAC000290) – A TrIV B OV C OVM D OVS. Scale bar: 200 µm (A), 100 µm (B), 30 µm (C), 20 µm (D).

Other material examined

See Suppl. material 1: Table S1 for locality information for specimens examined.

Distribution and habitat

Known only from the type locality. Specimens were collected from sparse desert chaparral habitat, under small rocks amongst larger granite boulders, NE-facing slope above palm oases.

Sitalcina ubicki DiDomenico & Hedin, sp. n.

Figures: map Figure 1; male Figure 11A–D; female Figure 12A–D

Type material

Holotype male (SDSU_TAC000216, CASENT 9029999) from California, Santa Barbara County, Santa Ynez Mtns, Montecito, E Mountain Drive, 0.4 mi NE from jct. with Cold Spring Road N34.45496°, W119.65288°, elev. ca. 230 m. Collected by A. DiDomenico, K. Emata, E. Garcia, A. Schönhofer, February 18, 2012.

Etymology

This species is named in honor of Darrell Ubick (CAS) whose foundational taxonomic research with Sitalcina made this project possible.

Diagnosis

Similar to other members of the northern coastal clade (S. sura, S. seca, S. chalona) in body form, relatively large-bodied, with a tall and pointed, tuberculate EM. Male TrIV spur curved, penis PSL similar to but distinguishable from S. chalona.

Description

Integument color light orange with lighter appendages. Body finely rugose with larger tubercles along tergal margins and anteriorly on EM; 3-4 pairs of AT. EM tall, slightly pointed, eyes present. Palpal Fm with median dorsobasal row of 4 asetose tubercles and one small mesal tubercle. Palpal megaspines: trochanter 2 ventral; Fm 3 ventrobasal, one mesodistal; patella 2 mesal, one ectal; tibia and tarsus 2 mesal, 2 ectal. TC 3-5-5-5.

MALE. Holotype (paratypes SDSU_TAC000300, SDSU_TAC000301, SDSU_TAC000302): BL 2.1 (1.68–2.4). SL 1.14 (1.15–1.4), SW 1.3 (1.2–1.4). EM width 0.33 (0.35–0.4), height 0.23 (0.25–0.35). GO length 0.21, width 0.21. Leg II length 5.16 (4.2–5.12), Leg II/Scute Length 4.52 (3.14–3.66). TrIV spur short, curved. Penis VP entire, apically pointed, with 12 pairs of setae, AS absent; glans DL quadrate; PSL simple, rounded at apical end; S thick.

FEMALE. Paratypes SDSU_TAC000207 (SDSU_TAC000303, SDSU_TAC000304): BL 1.88 (1.7–2.0). SL 1.36 (1.0–1.25), SW 1.4 (1.25–1.35). EM width 0.36 (0.35), height 0.36 (0.2–0.25). Leg II length 4.48 (3.75–4.4), Leg II/Scute Length 3.29 (3.0–3.52). Slightly imbricate OVM, 6 pairs of OVS, straight, multifurcate.

Figure 11.

Male Sitalcina ubicki (ETOH - SDSU_TAC000216, SEM prep - SDSU_TAC000291) – A habitus B penis, stylus at arrow C EM D TrIV. Scale bar: 1 mm (A), 200 µm (C), 100 µm (B, D).

Figure 12.

Female Sitalcina ubicki (SDSU_TAC000292) – A EM B TrIV C OV D OVM E OVS. Scale bar: 100 µm (A, B, C), 20 µm (D, E).

Other material examined

See Suppl. material 1: Table S1 for locality information of all specimens examined.

Distribution and habitat

Known only from the vicinity of Montecito, Santa Ynez Mountains, Santa Barbara County. Specimens were found under stones, in narrow ravine with stream, in a Quercus and Platanus forest.

Note

This population was mentioned by Ubick and Briggs (2008), but specimens were damaged and left undescribed. The new material collected for this study is from the same general vicinity as specimens studied by Ubick and Briggs (2008); northern edge of Montecito, off East Mountain Drive.

Discussion

Sitalcina remains poorly known

Species limits in the S. sura group were first studied by Ubick and Briggs (2008) based on consideration of somatic and genital morphology. In the current study, these and other species hypotheses (Table 2) were formally tested using multilocus DNA sequence data and a Bayes Factor Delimitation approach. With two newly described species, Sitalcina now includes a dozen species, and we expect future research to uncover additional undescribed taxa. Ultimately, we predict that Sitalcina diversity might approach that observed in the phalangodid genus Calicina, a taxon that includes over 25 short-range endemic species from central and northern California (Ubick and Briggs 1989, Emata and Hedin 2016).

Our results imply that some described species (e.g., S. peacheyi, S. flava) may actually comprise multiple cryptic species. This pattern is expected in a morphologically conservative group that occupies naturally fragmented habitats. This prediction would also apply to the geographically widespread S. californica (see Ubick and Briggs 2008), which has an interesting disjunct distribution in California (Figure 1). We have also discovered new geographic populations (e.g., Glen Oaks, Palos Verdes) that may represent new species. For both new populations and potential cryptic species, future research implementing genomic-scale datasets would be informative. Finally, our results confirm highly localized geographic speciation in these sedentary animals. Examples include geographically adjacent S. seca, S. sura, and S. chalona, as well as S. borregoensis plus S. oasiensis. If we extrapolate this pattern of localized divergence to regions where Sitalcina is likely, but currently unknown, this suggests many additional species. If Sitalcina is distributed like “beads on a string”, we are missing many of the beads.

Sitalcina specimens are sometimes very challenging to collect. Specimens only occur near the surface (i.e., under accessible rocks or woody debris) at certain times of the year, apparently migrating deep into the soil matrix as surface conditions dry (Ubick and Briggs 2008). This means that collections must take place in “good” years (e.g., non-drought years), in appropriate months, by experienced collectors in suitable microhabitats. An example is the Mountain Palm Springs population of S. borregoensis, which was first collected in 1967 (Ubick and Briggs 2008), but not recollected until 2012. Glen Oaks is another example, with only a single specimen collected despite over 3 hours of search time by a team of six experienced collectors. In this context, new populations of Sitalcina in poorly collected regions are likely, and we highlight the montane sky islands of northern Mexico and the desert canyons of southern California plus Baja California Norte as potential undiscovered diversification hotspots.

If multiple known species occur on the handful of sky-islands in southeastern Arizona, we expect additional undescribed species on the dozens of montane sky islands in northern Sonora. For many lineages, montane populations in southern Arizona constitute a “northern tip of a southern iceberg”, with centers of distribution found in northern Mexico (e.g., montane jumping spiders - Maddison and McMahon 2000, montane rattlesnakes - Bryson et al. 2011). The desert canyons of southern California plus Baja California Norte constitute another distributional area with potentially high unknown diversity. This region is tectonically active. For example, the population at Mountain Palm Springs lays almost directly on the Elsinore Fault, while the Borrego Palm Canyon population inhabits the area between the San Felipe Fault and the more easterly San Andreas Fault (Steely et al. 2009). Furthermore, relictual canyon populations are expected to be strongly isolated by unsuitable xeric habitats, leading to active speciation. As an example, Bond (2012) described multiple species of cryptic trapdoor spider species from a small region in Anza-Borrego Desert State park, with each species known only from one or two locations. Similar desert canyon local endemics likely occur in Sitalcina.

Historical biogeography

Niche modeling reveals a conspicuous geographic gap between habitats that are suitable for Sitalcina, separating eastern habitats in Arizona from western habitats in California (Figure 7). This gap is not only consistent with biotic features that separate these regions (i.e., low elevation Sonoran desert), but also coincides with major modern day and historical biogeographic barriers. These biogeographic barriers include marine incursions into the Salton Trough associated with the opening of the Gulf of California (ca. 6.3 Ma, Oskin and Stock 2003, Dolby et al. 2015), and the more recent drainage of the Colorado River into the Gulf (ca. 4.1 Ma, Dorsey et al 2007, Dolby et al. 2015). Moreover, populations on either side of this biogeographic gap are currently found on different continental plates – all S. sura group populations from California are found on the Pacific plate, while all populations from Arizona are found on the North American plate (we note here that Anza-Borrego canyon populations are close to plate boundaries, further discussed below). For these reasons, a logical prediction would include a primary phylogenetic division in this region, resulting in California versus Arizona clades. Major phylogenetic or phylogeographic splits coincident with the Colorado River (or Salton Trough) have been found in many animal taxa (e.g., Riddle et al 2000, Riddle and Hafner 2006, Crews and Hedin 2006), although we emphasize that these studies have focused mostly on low elevation desert species.

We failed to recover this predicted pattern, but instead recovered a well-supported phylogenetic pattern in both gene and species trees that includes the separation of S. sura group members into coastal versus desert clades (Figures 3, 4, 6). Here, southern Californian populations from the Anza Borrego desert region are phylogenetically allied with Arizonan populations, rather than with geographically proximate Californian populations. Because all lines of evidence indicate that Sitalcina is dispersal-limited, we hypothesize that vicariance has dominated the biogeographic history of this lineage. Below we present a biogeographic model for Sitalcina that emphasizes the role of plate tectonics and habitat connections to elements of a MTG.

The fundamental spatial premise of our model is that the S. sura group has a center of origin in northwestern Mexico, perhaps centered around the region which is today the northern Gulf of California. The fundamental temporal premise is that initial diversification in the group happened before the Pacific plate began to migrate actively northwestwards (along the San Andreas Fault system) against a stationary North American plate (Figure 13). Geological evidence indicates older rifting beginning as early as ca. 30 Ma in northwestern Mexico, with more active northwestern plate movement sometime after ca. 12.3 Ma (Atwater and Stock 1998, Dolby et al. 2015). Furthermore, our model postulates initial diversification along a west to east axis, with westerly coastal clade members (plus S. lobata and S. californica), and easterly desert clade members. Importantly, this eastern lineage is hypothesized to have straddled both continental plates prior to active plate movements (Figure 13). Our estimates for the overall age of the S. sura group, and for the tMRCA of desert versus coastal clades are generally consistent with this predominantly Miocene timeframe. Also, estimated times for the separation of CA canyon taxa from remaining desert clade members are consistent with the evolution of the Gulf of California (tMRCA of 7.09, Figure 6B, versus ca. 6.3 Ma, Oskin and Stock 2003, Dolby et al. 2015).

Figure 13.

Biogeographic model. General timeframe and plate positions follow Dolby et al. (2015). The labeled “hypothetical ancestral area” is only approximate; arrows indicate present distribution of lineages.

Our model has interesting connections to the botanical literature. As noted in the Introduction, most members of the S. sura group (and Sitalcina more generally) are found in habitats dominated by sclerophyllous woody plant taxa (e.g., Quercus, Pinyon pine, Arctostaphylos, Ceanothus, etc.). These plant lineages are part of a MTG, as originally defined by Raven and Axelrod (1978). Although this concept was invoked prior to modern phylogenetic analyses, recent molecular studies have generally supported core aspects of this idea (Lancaster and Kay 2013, Baldwin 2014). Important properties of plant lineages included in this flora include southwestern ancestry, deepest divergences occurring in the Oligocene and/or Miocene (e.g., Lancaster and Kay 2013, figure 2), a proposed role for plate tectonics (e.g., Raven and Axelrod 1978, fig. 4), and biogeographic connections between California and Arizona upland taxa (Raven and Axelrod 1978, table 7). These aspects of the MTG are consistent with our biogeographic model. Another interesting parallel is that many Madro-Tertiary taxa now found in coastal southern California are hypothesized phylogenetic relicts, found only in suitable habitats directly adjacent to a marine influence (Raven and Axelrod 1978). In this regard, we note that coastal clade S. sura group species are all found in moist mountains with direct marine influence (e.g., Palos Verdes peninsula, Santa Monica Mountains, Santa Ynez Mountains, Santa Lucia Range), with the single exception of S. chalona.

Several predictions can be derived from our biogeographic model. First, we expect undescribed species in upland habitats of western Sonora, some of which may be related to California desert canyon taxa. Second, we predict undiscovered populations in desert canyons of northern Baja, and again predict possible mixed phylogenetic affinities (some coastal clade, some desert clade). Third, we predict that northern populations of S. californica on the North American plate (north of San Francisco) should be phylogenetically derived from southern populations on the Pacific plate (Figure 1). Finally, if our model has generality, we predict that future studies of other regional dispersal-limited animal lineages will show similar biogeographic patterns.

Both California and deserts of the American southwest are active areas for modern biogeographic research in animals. Despite this fact, we have found relatively few animal taxa that show biogeographic patterns similar to those observed in Sitalcina. Salamanders in the Batrachoseps pacificus group have a distribution much like the coastal clade (from Monterey south to northern Baja, almost all populations restricted to Pacific plate, Jockusch et al. 2014), and the group includes isolated southern California desert populations, but these populations have apparent western ancestry (Martínez-Solano et al. 2012,). Aptostichus trapdoor spiders include many California coastal, California desert canyon, and Arizona sky island species (Bond 2012), but phylogenetic details remain uncertain. One compelling parallel is found in night lizards (Xantusia). Leavitt et al. (2007) found that taxa from mostly transmontane southern California and northern Baja (including X. wigginsi, “San Jacinto” Clade, and “Yucca Valley” Clade) are sister to X. bezyi from uplands of central Arizona. Western species are found in pinyon-juniper and desert chaparral, while eastern X. bezyi occur in desert chaparral. These lizard taxa are hypothesized to have diverged 6.4 Ma, coincident with the evolution of the Gulf of California (Leavitt et al. 2007). All of these biogeographic patterns are similar to those observed in the Sitalcina desert clade.

Conclusions

We have uncovered an apparently novel phylogenetic pattern in a biogeographically well-studied region. Our biogeographic model can be tested with additional research, both in Sitalcina, but also in other plant and animal lineages with similar geographic distributions. Ubick and Briggs (2008) suggested that Sitalcina likely included additional undescribed species – our data support this contention, and suggest even more undiscovered richness. Basically all members of the S. sura group have very small geographic distributions, and many represent apparently old lineages found in often disturbed habitats. Examples include the Palos Verdes population, known only from a single impacted canyon in a matrix of urban development. Similarly, the two known species from Anza-Borrego Desert State Park are each known only from single desert canyons, both located in close proximity to popular hiking trails. These short-range endemic taxa should receive more conservation attention than currently afforded (Harvey 2002, Harvey et al. 2011).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Darrell Ubick and Thomas Briggs for their foundational work on Sitalcina, and expertise when needed for this project. We would also like to thank Dave Carlson, Alphonse DiDomenico, Kristen Emata, Erika Garcia, Casey Richart, Axel Schönhofer, Daniel Sitzmann, and Erik Stiner for their help with specimen collection. Sophia Bejarano, Alexa Feist, and Jeanne Rahe provided lab assistance, Joshua Coleman and Erik Ciaccio helped with image editing. Steve Barlow provided SEM support at SDSU. Shahan Derkarabetian helped to collect specimens, worked with ENM files, and edited the manuscript. Dean Leavitt clarified biogeographic patterns in Xantusia, and provided comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Ronald Clouse, Adriano Kury, Darrell Ubick and Gonzalo Giribet provided additional comments that improved the manuscript. Research was funded by grants to AD from the American Arachnological Society, Community Foundation Desert Research Grant, and the Anza-Borrego Foundation Howie Wier Memorial Conservation Grant, and an NSF grant awarded to MH (DEB 1354558).

References

  • Atwater T, Stock J (1998) Pacific-North America plate tectonics of the Neogene southwestern United States: an update. International Geology Review 40: 375–402. doi: 10.1080/00206819809465216
  • Aylor DL, Price EW, Carbone I (2006) SNAP: Combine and map modules for multilocus population genetic analysis. Bioinformatics 22: 1399–1401. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl136
  • Baldwin BG (2014) Origins of plant diversity in the California floristic province. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45: 347–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135847
  • Banks N (1893) The Phalangida Mecostethi of the United States. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 20: 149–152.
  • Banks N (1911) The Phalangida of California. Pomona College Journal of Entomology 3: 412–421.
  • Bond JE (2012) Phylogenetic treatment and taxonomic revision of the trapdoor spider genus Aptostichus Simon (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Euctenizidae). ZooKeys 252: 1–209. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.252.3588
  • Bond JE, Stockman AK (2008) An integrative method for delimiting cohesion species: Finding the population-species interface in a group of Californian trapdoor spiders with extreme genetic divergence and geographic structuring. Systematic Biology 57: 628–646. doi: 10.1080/10635150802302443
  • Briggs TS (1968) Phalangids of the laniatorid genus Sitalcina (Phalangodidae: Opiliones). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 36: 1–32.
  • Briggs TS (1971) The harvestmen of family Triaenonychidae in North America (Opiliones). Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 90: 1–43.
  • Bryson RW, Murphy RW, Graham MR, Lathrop A, Lazcano-Villareal D (2011) Ephemeral Pleistocene woodlands connect the dots for highland rattlesnakes of the Crotalus intermedius group. Journal of Biogeography 38: 2299–2310. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02565.x
  • Bryson Jr RW, Riddle BR, Graham MR, Smith BT, Prendini L (2013) As old as the hills: Montane scorpions in southwestern North America reveal ancient associations between biotic diversification and landscape history. PLoS ONE 8: e52822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052822
  • Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Satler JD (2013) How to fail at species delimitation. Molecular Ecology 22: 4369–4383. doi: 10.1111/mec.12413
  • Crews SC, Hedin M (2006) Studies of morphological and molecular phylogenetic divergence in spiders (Araneae: Homalonychus) from the American southwest, including divergence along the Baja California Peninsula. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 470–487. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.010
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Derkarabetian S, Steinmann DB, Hedin M (2010) Repeated and time-correlated morphological convergence in cave-dwelling harvestmen (Opiliones, Laniatores) from montane western North America. PLoS ONE 5(5): e10388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010388
  • Derkarabetian S, Ledford J, Hedin M (2011) Genetic diversification without obvious genitalic morphological divergence in harvestman (Opiliones, Laniatores, Sclerobunus robustus) from montane sky islands of western North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61: 844–853. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.08.004
  • Derkarabetian S, Hedin M (2014) Integrative taxonomy and species delimitation in harvestmen: a revision of the Western North America genus Sclerobunus (Opiliones: Laniatores: Travunioidea). PLoS ONE 9: e104982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104982
  • Derkarabetian S, Burns M, Starrett J, Hedin M (2016) Population genomic evidence for multiple refugia in a montane-restricted harvestman (Arachnida, Opiliones, Sclerobunus robustus) from the southwestern United States. Molecular Ecology, submitted.
  • Dolby GA, Bennett SEK, Lira-Noriega A, Wilder BT, Munguia-Vega A (2015) Assessing the geological and climatic forcing of biodiversity and evolution surrounding the Gulf of California. Journal of the Southwest 57: 391–455. doi: 10.1353/jsw.2015.0005
  • Dorsey RJ, Fluette A, McDougall KA, Housen BA, Janecke SU, Axen GJ, Shirvell CR (2007) Chronology of Miocene-Pliocene deposits at Split Mountain Gorge, southern California: A record of regional tectonics and Colorado River evolution. Geology 35: 57–60. doi: 10.1130/G23139A.1
  • Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1969–1973. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075
  • Earl DA (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
  • Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340
  • Emata KN, Hedin M (2016) From the mountains to the coast and back again: Ancient biogeography in a radiation of short-range endemic harvestmen from California. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 989: 233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.002
  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
  • Fujita MK, Leaché AD, Burbrink FT, McGuire JA, Moritz C (2012) Coalescent- based species delimitation in an integrative taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 480–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.04.012
  • Goodnight CJ, Goodnight ML (1942) New Phalangodidae (Phalangida) from the United States. American Museum Novitates 1188: 1–18.
  • Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, Chen Z, Mauceli E, Hacohen N, Gnirke A, Rhind N, di Palma F, Birren BW, Nusbaum C, Lindblad-Toh K, Friedman N, Regev A (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29: 644–52. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883
  • Grummer JA, Bryson Jr. RW, Reeder TW (2014) Species delimitation using Bayes factors: simulations and application to the Sceloporus scalaris species group (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae). Systematic Biology 63: 119–133. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt069
  • Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520
  • Harvey MS (2002) Short-range endemism the Australian fauna: some examples from non-marine environments. Invertebrate Systematics 16: 555–570. doi: 10.1071/IS02009
  • Harvey MS, Rix MG, Framenau VW, Hamilton ZR, Johnson MS, Teale RJ, Humphreys G, Humphreys WF (2011) Protecting the innocent: studying short-range endemic taxa enhances conservation outcomes. Invertebrate Systematics 25: 1–10. doi: 10.1071/IS11011
  • Hedin M, Thomas SM (2010) Molecular systematic of eastern North American Phalangodidae (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores), demonstrating convergent morphological evolution in caves. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.020
  • Hedin M, Starrett J, Akhter S, Schönhofer AL, Shultz JW (2012) Phylogenomic resolution of paleozoic divergences in harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones) via analysis of next-generation transcriptome data. PLoS ONE 7: e42888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042888
  • Hedin M, Carlson D, Coyle F (2015) Sky island diversification meets the multispecies coalescent – divergence in the spruce-fir moss spider (Microhexura montivaga, Araneae, Mygalomorphae) on the highest peaks in southern Appalachia. Molecular Ecology 24: 3467–3484. doi: 10.1111/mec.13248
  • Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Bussink C, Mathur P, Cruz M, Barrentes I, Rojas E (2004) DIVA-GIS. Vsn. 5.0. A geographic information system for the analysis of species distribution data. http://www.diva-gis.org
  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965–1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276
  • Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801–1806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
  • Jockusch EL, Martínez-Solano Í, Timpe EK (2014) The effects of inference method, population sampling, and gene sampling on species tree inferences: An empirical study in slender salamanders (Plethodontidae: Batrachoseps). Systematic Biology 64: 66–83. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu078
  • Katoh D, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Keith R, Hedin M (2012) Extreme mitochondrial population subdivision in southern Appalachian paleoendemic spiders (Araneae: Hypochilidae: Hypochilus), with implications for species delimitation. Journal of Arachnology 40: 167–181. doi: 10.1636/A11-49.1
  • Kury AB (2013) Order Opiliones Sundevall, 1833. In: Zhang Z-Q (Ed.) Animal Biodiversity: An outline of higher–level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3703: 27–33. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.7
  • Lancaster LT, Kay KM (2013) Origin and diversification of the California flora: re-examining classic hypotheses with molecular phylogenies. Evolution 67: 1041–1054. doi: 10.1111/evo.12016
  • Lartillot N, Philippe H (2006) Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Systematic Biology 55: 195–207. doi: 10.1080/10635150500433722
  • Leavitt DH, Bezy RL, Crandall KA, Sites Jr. JW (2007) Multi-locus DNA sequence data reveal a history of deep cryptic vicariance and habitat-driven convergence in the desert night lizard Xantusia vigilis species complex (Squamata: Xantusiidae). Molecular Ecology 16: 4455–4481. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03496.x
  • Maddison WP, McMahon MM (2000) Divergence and reticulation among montane populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold. Systematic Biology 49: 400–421. doi: 10.1080/10635159950127312
  • Martínez-Solano Í, Peralta-García A, Jockusch EL, Wake DB, Vázquez-Domínguez E, Parra-Olea G (2012) Molecular systematics of Batrachoseps (Caudata, Plethodontidae) in southern California and Baja California: mitochondrial-nuclear DNA discordance and the evolutionary history of B. major. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 131–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.026
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 N. 2010, New Orleans, LA, 1–8. doi: 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Niemiller ML, Near TJ, Fitzpatrick BM (2012) Delimiting species using multilocus data: diagnosing cryptic diversity in the southern cavefish, Typhlichthys subterraneus (Teleostei: Amblyopsidae). Evolution 66: 846–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01480.x
  • Papadopoulou A, Anastasiou I, Vogler AP (2010) Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench calibration. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 1659–1672. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq051
  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161–175. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
  • Rannala B, Yang Z (2013) Improved reversible jump algorithms for Bayesian species delimitation. Genetics 194: 245–253. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.149039
  • Raven PH, Axelrod DI (1978) Origin and relationships of the California flora. University of California Publications in Botany 72: 1–134.
  • Riddle BR, Hafner DJ, Alexander LF (2000) Evolution of Baileys’ pocket mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi), comparative biogeography of C. baileyi and the Peromyscus eremicus species-group, and historical vicariance of peninsular and continental deserts in western North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 161–172. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0842
  • Riddle BR, Hafner DJ (2006) A step-wise approach to integrating phylogeographic and phylogenetic biogeographic perspectives on the history of a core North American warm deserts biota. Journal of Arid Environments 66: 435–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.01.014
  • Rissler LJ, Apodaca JJ (2007) Adding more ecology into species delimitation: Ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Systematic Biology 56: 924–942. doi: 10.1080/10635150701703063
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2011) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Rosenberg NA (2004) Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 137–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x
  • Starrett J, Derkarabetian S, Richart CH, Cabrero A, Hedin M (2016) A new monster from southwest Oregon forests: Cryptomaster behemoth sp. n. (Opiliones, Laniatores, Travunioidea). ZooKeys 555: 11–35. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.555.6274
  • Steely AN, Janecke SU, Dorsey RJ, Axen GJ (2009) Early Pleistocene initiation of the San Felipe fault zone, SW Salton Trough, during reorganization of the San Andreas fault system. GAS Bulletin 121: 663–687. doi: 10.1130/B26239.1
  • Stephens M, Scheet P (2005) Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation. The American Journal of Human Genetics 76: 449–462. doi: 10.1086/428594
  • Stephens M, Smith N, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. The American Journal of Human Genetics 68: 978–989. doi: 10.1086/319501
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Thomas SM, Hedin M (2008) Multigenic phylogeographic divergence in the paleoendemic southern Appalachian opilionid Fumontana deprehendor Shear (Opiliones, Laniatores, Triaenonychidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 645–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.10.013
  • Ubick D (2007) Phalangodidae. In: Pinto-da-Rocha R, Machado M, Giribet G (Eds) Harvestmen, The Biology of Opiliones, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London, 217–221.
  • Ubick D, Briggs TS (1989) The harvestmen family Phalangodidae. 1. The new genus Calicina, with notes on Sitalcina (Opiliones: Laniatores). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 46: 95–136.
  • Ubick D, Briggs TS (2008) The harvestman family Phalangodidae 6. Revision of the Sitalcina complex (Opiliones, Laniatores). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 59: 1–108.
  • Wiens JJ, Graham CH (2005) Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 519–539. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431
  • Wilm A, Mainz I, Steger G (2006) An enhanced RNA alignment benchmark for sequence alignment programs. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 1: 19. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-1-19
  • Xie WG, Lewis PO, Fan Y, Kuo L, Chen MH (2011) Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Systematic Biology 60: 150–160. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq085
  • Yang Z, Rannala BR (2010) Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 9264–9269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913022107