Research Article |
Corresponding author: Adolfo Ricardo Calor ( acalor@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Robin Thomson
© 2022 Amanda Cavalcante-Silva, Rafael Pereira, Adolfo Ricardo Calor.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cavalcante-Silva A, Pereira R, Calor AR (2022) Caddisflies (Trichoptera) checklist and a new species of Helicopsyche von Siebold, 1856, from the Brejo de Altitude de Triunfo, a relict rainforest within the Caatinga domain, Northeast Brazil. In: Pauls SU, Thomson R, Rázuri-Gonzales E (Eds) Special Issue in Honor of Ralph W. Holzenthal for a Lifelong Contribution to Trichoptera Systematics. ZooKeys 1111: 215-244. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1111.77541
|
Brejos de Altitude are evergreen seasonal forests, associated with plateau regions in the middle of the Caatinga domain in Northeast Brazil, which possibly acted as biological corridors between the Atlantic Forest and the Amazon rainforest during the Pleistocene. The first entomological survey in the highest point in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil, the Brejo de Altitude de Triunfo, was implemented and resulted in a checklist of caddisflies with six families, nine genera, and eleven species, including a new species. Helicopsyche ralphi sp. nov. is described and illustrated, based on all semaphoronts. A key to Brazilian Helicopsyche (Feropsyche) Johanson, 1998 species is also provided. In addition to the caddisfly survey in the Brejos de Altitude, the results include new records for the state, region, and also for the country. Thus, this study updates the number of species in the Brazilian Northeast region and Pernambuco state to 169 species and 43 species, respectively.
Aquatic insects, distribution, Helicopsyche (Feropsyche), larvae, semaphoronts, snail-case caddisfly, taxonomy
The Caatinga domain is a mosaic of xerophyte forest of 912.529 km2 in Northeastern Brazil (
Brejos de Altitude represent forest refuges enclaved in the Caatinga domain (
Brejos de Altitude environments also play an important role in freshwater flow, and as a consequence of orographic rains, several headwater streams emerge from them (
Trichoptera is the most diverse order of strictly aquatic insects, with ~ 16,300 extant species, 632 genera and 63 families (
Trichoptera are holometabolic insects, presenting an egg, larva (generally five instars), pupa and adult stage (
The Brejo de Altitude de Triunfo (07°50'17"S, 38°06'06"W) is located in the Baixo Pajeú region and represents the highest altitude mountain in the Pernambuco state, Brazil, with altitude of 500–1,260 m. The area is predominantly composed of seasonal semideciduous forest, exhibiting average rainfall of 1,222 mm/year, with higher rainfall occurring in March and April (
Collection data from Brejo de Altitude de Triunfo, with the sample of each collection site, geographic coordinates, elevation, date, traps (LPT = UV Light Pan Trap, MAL = Malaise and WSA = White Sheet Attraction), and acronyms of collectors.
Sample | Collection sites | Geographic coordinates | Elevation (a.s.l.) | Date | Trap | Acronyms of collectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Pico do Papagaio stream | 7°49'36"S, 38°3'32"W | 1050 m | 02.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP |
B1 | Grito stream | 7°51'41"S, 38°5'25"W | 740 m | 07.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS |
B2 | 7°51'41"S, 38°5'25"W | 740 m | 09.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
B3 | 7°51'41"S, 38°5'25"W | 740 m | 09.x.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
C1 | Laje stream | 7°52'13"S, 38°5'18"W | 580 m | 07.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS |
C2 | 7°52'13"S, 38°5'18"W | 580 m | 08.ix.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
C3 | 7°52'13"S, 38°5'18"W | 580 m | 10.x.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
C4 | 7°52'13"S, 38°5'18"W | 580 m | i.2019 | MAL | ACS | |
C5 | 7°52'28,2"S, 38°8'15,6"W | 570 m | 02.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
C6 | 7°52'28,5"S, 38°8'13,6"W | 560 m | 02.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
C7 | 7°52'28,5"S, 38°8'15,3"W | 860 m | 03.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
D1 | Pinga stream | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 16.xii.2017 | LPT | ACS |
D2 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 18.xii.2017 | LPT | ACS | |
D3 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 21.ix.2017 | LPT | ACS | |
D4 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 07.ii.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
D5 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 09.ii.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
D6 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 06.viii.2018 | WSA | ACS | |
D7 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 06.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
D8 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 07.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
D9 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 21.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
D10 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | ix.2018 | MAL | ACS | |
D11 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 09.x.2018 | LPT | ACS | |
D12 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 03.ii.2019 | LPT | ACS | |
D13 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 07.ii.2019 | LPT | ACS | |
D14 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 09.ii.2019 | LPT | ACS | |
D15 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 10.ii.2019 | LPT | ACS | |
D16 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 11.iii.2019 | LPT | ACS | |
D17 | 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W | 890 m | 16.iv.2019 | LPT | ACS | |
D18 | 7°52'5,5"S, 38°7'15,6"W | 870 m | 01.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
D19 | 7°52'4,7"S, 38°7'15,3"W | 860 m | 01.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
D20 | 7°52'5,5"S, 38°7'15,7"W | 865 m | 01.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
D21 | 7°52'3,2"S, 38°7'13,8"W | 840 m | 01.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
D22 | 7°52'3,2"S, 38°7'13,8"W | 840 m | 02.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
E1 | Alfinim stream | 7°51'44"S, 38°7'52"W | 940 m | 08.viii.2018 | LPT | ACS |
E2 | 7°51'44"S, 38°7'52"W | 940 m | 08.viii.2018 | WSA | ACS | |
F1 | Icó stream | 7°52'28,8"S 38°8'15,8"W | 800 m | 01.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP |
F2 | 7°52'28,5"S, 38°8'15,3"W | 810 m | 02.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP | |
F3 | 7°52'28,5"S, 38°8'15,8"W | 800 m | 02.v.2019 | LPT | ACS, RP |
The map with collection sites was created using QGIS 3.4.15 and finalized in Corel Draw X5. The species distribution data were obtained from
The illustrations were made with the aid of a microscope equipped with a camera lucida, scanned, and finalized in Adobe Illustrator CS6. Microphotographs were made with a Leica stereoscope equipped with a digital camera, Nikon model DS-Fi1 and finalized in Corel Draw X5. Descriptions were made using the DELTA system (
Holotype. Brazil, 1 male; Pernambuco, Triunfo, Pinga stream; 7°52'3"S, 38°7'13"W, el. 890 m; 21.ix.2017; Cavalcante-Silva, A. leg.; UV light pan trap (
Helicopsyche ralphi sp. nov., male A genitalia, lateral view B segments IX and X and inferior appendages, dorsal view C inferior appendage, ventral view D phallus, lateral view E phallus, ventral view F sternum VI, lateral view. Abbreviations: seg. IX = abdominal segment IX; a.seg. IX = apodeme of abdominal segment IX; sup.a = superior appendage; seg. X = abdominal segment X; bas.l = basomesal lobe; inf.a = inferior appendage; pha.b = phallobase; pha.scl. = phallotremal sclerite.
The new species is distinguished from all other congeners by the following characters of the male genitalia: inferior appendage subtriangular, acuminated in posterior region, basomesal lobe subtriangular ~ 1/2 the length of the inferior appendage, in lateral view, trapezoid, with spine-like setae in posterior margin, in ventral view; abdominal segment X slender, slightly cleft at the apex, in dorsal view. The characters of the genitalia of new species are morphologically similar to Helicopsyche flinti
Helicopsyche ralphi sp. nov., female A genitalia, lateral view B genitalia, ventral view C genitalia, dorsal view D sternum VI, lateral view. Abbreviations: seg. VIII = abdominal segment VIII; seg. IX = abdominal segment IX; e.seg. IX = external part of abdominal segment IX; pre.a = preanal appendage; Xd = dorsal branch abdominal segment X; Xv = ventral branch abdominal segment X; vag. = vagina; vag. scl. = vaginal sclerite.
Adults (Fig.
Male (Figs
Head
: interantennal warts present, brownish, spherical, covered with small setae; posteroantennal warts present, brownish, club shaped, covered with long setae; cephalic warts present, brownish, subtriangular, covered with long setae; postocular warts present, filiform, brownish, covered with long setae (Fig.
Genitalia. Abdominal segment IX with slightly concave anteroventral margin in ventral half; apodeme well developed laterally, located midlaterally on segment; posterior margin nearly straight, in lateral view (Fig.
Female (Figs
Head
: interantennal warts present, brownish, spherical, covered with small setae; postero-antennal warts present, brownish, covered with long setae; cephalic warts present, brownish, subtriangular, covered with long setae (Fig.
Genitalia. Abdominal segment IX is well separated from abdominal segment VIII and indistinctly separated from abdominal segment X, anterior margin convex, in lateral view (Fig.
Larva (5th instar) (Figs
Head
: oval, with anterior margin 1.3 × broader than posterior margin, in dorsal view (Fig.
Larval case
(Figs
Helicopsyche ralphi sp. nov., pupa and case A pupa front B abdominal segment IX and anal processes, dorsal view C pupa lateral habitus D–H abdominal segments I–V, dorsal, with details of dorsal hook plates I pupa case, ventral view J pupa case with sieve membrane highlighted, ventral view.
Pupa
(Fig.
This species is named in honor of Dr. Ralph W. Holzenthal, for his outstanding contribution to the study of Neotropical caddisflies, and also as an acknowledgment for collaboration and his contributing to the training of young researchers.
A1 (1 female), C6 (643 males); C7 (10 larvae, 10 pupae); D2 (34 males); D7 (1 male); D17 (14 males); D18 (379 males); D18 (49 females); D20 (32 females); D22 (1 larvae); E1 (1 male); F2 (30 males); F3 (17 males) (UFBA) (Table
Brazil (Pernambuco state).
Helicopsyche braziliensis (Swainson, 1840) and H. helicoidella (Vallot, 1855) are not included in the key because their males are not known.
1 | Inferior appendage with distal region rounded, in lateral view ( |
2 |
– | Inferior appendage with distal region acuminated, in lateral view ( |
11 |
2 | Abdominal segment X with projections ( |
3 |
– | Abdominal segment X without projections ( |
6 |
3 | Abdominal segment IX with anterior lobe rounded, anterodorsal margin notched, in lateral view ( |
4 |
– | Abdominal segment IX with anterior lobe acuminate, anterodorsal margin nearly straight, in lateral view ( |
5 |
4 | Abdominal segment X rectangular with projections less developed, in dorsal view ( |
H. luziae Dumas & Nessimian, 2019 |
– | Abdominal segment X deltoid with pair of large tab-like midlength projections, in dorsal view ( |
H. planorboides Machado, 1957 |
5 | Inferior appendage with length equal to or shorter than abdominal segment X, basal lobe nearly as wide as distal lobe, in lateral view ( |
H. bendego Dumas & Nessimian, 2019 |
– | Inferior appendage longer than abdominal segment X, basal lobe narrower than distal lobe, in lateral view ( |
H. guara Holzenthal, Blahnik & Calor, 2016 |
6 | Inferior appendage longer than abdominal segment X, distal lobe narrow and longer, in lateral view ( |
7 |
– | Inferior appendage with length equal to or shorter than abdominal segment X, distal lobe wide and short, in lateral view ( |
8 |
7 | Abdominal segment X with a row of setae going from base to the apex, in dorsal view ( |
H. vergelana Ross, 1956 |
– | Abdominal segment X with a row of setae going from middle to the apex, in dorsal view ( |
H. tapadas Denning, 1966 |
8 | Abdominal segment X with apical cleft, in dorsal view ( |
9 |
– | Abdominal segment X without apical cleft, in dorsal view ( |
10 |
9 | Inferior appendages bear very prominent spine-like setae on their apicomesal face and mesally at midlenght, in ventral view ( |
H. angeloi Holzenthal, Blahnik & Calor, 2016 |
– | Inferior appendages without setae on their apicomesal face and mesally at midlenght, in ventral view ( |
H. cipoensis Johanson & Malm, 2006 |
10 | Abdominal segment X with apical cleft V-shaped, in dorsal view ( |
H. daome Dumas & Nessimian, 2019 |
– | Abdominal segment X with deep and short apical cleft U-shaped, in dorsal view ( |
H. timbira Silva, Santos & Nessimian, 2014 |
11 | Basomesal lobe not or very little projected on anterobasal margin of the inferior appendage, in lateral view ( |
12 |
– | Basomesal lobe well projected on anterobasal margin of the inferior appendage, in lateral view ( |
21 |
12 | Abdominal segment X with projections ( |
13 |
– | Abdominal segment X without projections | 14 |
13 | Inferior appendage deltoid, in lateral view; basomesal lobe unprojected, in ventral view ( |
H. lazzariae Holzenthal, Blahnik & Calor, 2016 |
– | Inferior appendage globose with distal finger shaped projection and ventromedial setose projection, in lateral view ( |
H. inflata Gama-Neto, Ribeiro & Passos, 2019 |
14 | Abdominal segment X subretangular with apex nearly straight, in dorsal view ( |
15 |
– | Abdominal segment X ovaled with apex rounded, in dorsal view ( |
16 |
15 | Abdominal segment IX with broad base, in lateral view ( |
H. petri Dumas & Nessimian, 2019 |
– | Abdominal segment IX with short base, in lateral view; abdominal segment X with rounded apex, in lateral view ( |
H. monda Flint, 1983 |
16 | Inferior appendage with a wide concavity in the posterobasal margin; basomesal lobe square with almost straight margins, in ventral view ( |
17 |
– | Inferior appendage nearly straight or with a short convexity in posterobasal margin; basomesal lobe finger shaped with rounded margins, in ventral view ( |
19 |
17 | Abdominal segment X with lateral margin nearly straight, subapical cluster of setae and apex with a deep, and long cleft, in dorsal view ( |
H. succincta Johanson & Holzenthal, 2004 |
– | Abdominal segment X with lateral margin convex, with a row of setae going from base to the apex, and apical shallow, short cleft, in dorsal view ( |
18 |
18 | Inferior appendage subrectangular, with a large lobe inner face, in dorsal view, ( |
H . valligera Flint, 1983 |
– | Inferior appendage in boomerang shape, without large lobe inner face, in dorsal view ( |
H. guariru Vilarino & Calor, 2017 |
19 | Inferior appendage subrectangular with wide basal lobe almost as wide as distal lobe, in lateral view ( |
H . muelleri Banks, 1920 |
– | Inferior appendage subtriangular, basal lobe narrow and distal lobe wide; basomesal lobe less than half the length of the inferior appendage, in ventral view ( |
20 |
20 | Abdominal segment X and Inferior appendages subequal in length, with clusters setae on apex, in dorsal view ( |
H. shaamunensu Dumas & Nessimian, 2019 |
– | Abdominal segment X shorter than inferior appendage in length, with a row of setae going from base to the apex, in dorsal view ( |
H. dinoprata Dumas & Nessimian, 2019 |
21 | Basomesal lobe filiform shaped with a cluster of spine-like setae in distal region, in lateral view (Souza et al. 2017: fig. 1A), apex rounded covered with spine-like setae, in ventral view ( |
22 |
– | Basomesal lobe subtriangular with a cluster of spine-like setae in dorsal and ventral margin, in lateral view (Fig. |
23 |
22 | Abdominal segment IX with anterior lobe acuminated, in lateral view (Souza et al. 2017: fig. 1A); abdominal segment X rectangular, row of setae going from base to the apex, apex nearly straight with shallow and short cleft, in dorsal view (Souza et al. 2017: fig. 1D); inferior appendage with nearly straight posterior margin and with setose projection and shorter apicodorsal projection, in lateral view (Souza et al. 2017: fig. 1A) | H. catoles Souza, Gomes & Calor, 2017 |
– | Abdominal segment IX with anterior lobe rounded, in lateral view ( |
H. carajas Gama-Neto, Ribeiro & Passos, 2019 |
23 | Abdominal segment IX with anterodorsal margin notched, in lateral view ( |
H. paprockii Johanson & Malm, 2006 |
– | Abdominal segment IX with anterodorsal margin nearly straight, in lateral view (Fig. |
24 |
24 | Abdominal segment X with apex rounded, medial row of spine-like setae, in dorsal view (Fig. |
H. ralphi sp. nov. |
– | Abdominal segment X with apex nearly straight, side row of spine-like setae, in dorsal view ( |
H. flinti Johanson, 1999 |
Smicridea (Smicridea) palifera Flint, 1981: 23 [type locality: Venezuela, Aragua, Maracay, El Limón; NMNH; male; female].
Brazil: Pernambuco: B2 (71 males, 9 females); C1 (4 males, 2 females); C5 (4 males); C6 (2 males, 3 females); D4 (1 female); D5 (1 female); D6 (4 males, 3 females); D7 (27 males, 15 females); D10 (1 female); D11 (3 males, 1 female); D15 (1 male); D17 (1 male); D18 (3 males); D19 (3 males, 2 females); D20 (6 males, 10 females); F1 (1 female).
Brazil (AL, ES, MA, MT, MG, PB, PE, RJ, RO), Grenada, and Venezuela.
This species differs from all other species in the Smicridea nigripennis group due to the presence of a simple aedeagus, with only a sclerotized spine, and large rounded lobe in segment X (
Oecetis excisa Ulmer, 1907: 15 [type locality: Argentina, Chaco de Santa Fé, Las Garzas, Río Las Garzas, 25 km W Ocampo; MNHNP; male].
Brazil: Pernambuco: B2 (1 male, 1 female); B3 (1 male); C1 (2 males, 8 females); C3 (1 male); C5 (1 male); D3 (17 males); D5 (1 female); D9 (20 females); D10 (1 male); D11 (1 male, 2 females); D12 (16 males, 4 females); D21 (1 female); E1 (1 male).
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (BA, CE, GO, MS, MT, PA, PB, PE, RN, SP), Mexico, Paraguay, and Venezuela.
The examined specimens match the description of Ulmer (i.e., tibial spur formula 1,2,2), unlike specimens examined by
Chimarra potiguar Queiroz, Dias & Calor, 2020: 101 [type locality: Brazil, Rio Grande do Norte, Portalegre, Pinga Stream, MZUSP; male].
Brazil: Pernambuco: C1 (4 males, 17 females); C2 (1 male); C4 (2 males); C5 (5 males); C6 (7 males, 4 females); D1 (3 males); D2 (54 males, 55 females); D7 (6 males, 7 females); D10 (6 males, 5 females); D11 (2 males, 2 females); D12 (2 females); D13 (1 female); D14 (2 females); D16 (1 male, 3 females); D17 (2 males, 2 females); D18 (39 males, 18 females); D19 (28 males, 10 females); D20 (52 males, 42 females); D21 (4 males, 3 females); E1 (11 females); E2 (2 females).
Brazil (RN, PE [new record]).
The occurrence of this species was recorded only for the Brejo de Altitude de Portalegre, Rio Grande do Norte state (altitude of 642 m) (
Cyrnus fraternus (Banks, 1905): 17 [type locality: United States, Maryland, Plummer’s Island; MCZ; female].
Brazil: Pernambuco: C3 (1 male); D2 (4 males); D7 (1 male); D11 (3 males); D12 (4 males); D13 (4 males); D14 (7 males); D16 (8 males); D17 (1 male); D21 (1 male).
Argentina, Brazil (AM, BA, ES, MA, MG, MS, MT, PA, PE [new record], PI, PR, RJ, SC), Costa Rica, El Salvador, Ecuador, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Suriname, United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
Cyrnellus Banks contains 12 species in the Neotropical region, and is widely distributed in North, Central, and South America (
Cyrnellus mammillatus Flint, 1971: 30 [type locality: Brazil [Edo. Amazonas], Lago des Rio Luna am oberen Teil; NMNH; male].
Brazil: Pernambuco: B2 (6 males); D12 (3 males).
Argentina, Brazil (AM, MA, MG, MS, PA, PE, PI, PR, RJ, SP), Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay.
In the Northeast of Brazil, the occurrence of this species was recorded for the Caatinga and Cerrado domains (altitude range 60–448 m) (
Cyrnellus kozepes Oláh, 2016: 159 [type locality: Argentina, Corientes Province, Carlos Pellegrini Posada, Aguape, 28°32'26"S, 57°10'20"W; male].
Brazil: Pernambuco: D14 (1 male).
Argentina and Brazil (PE [new record]).
Previously recorded only for Argentina (type locality) (
Metrichia peluda Santos, Takiya & Nessimian, 2016: 35 [type locality: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Itatiaia, 1st order tributary of Rio Palmital, 22°25'40"S, 44°32'46"W, el. 584 m; DZRJ; male].
Brazil: Pernambuco: D3 (7 males); D7 (1 male).
Brazil (PE [new record], RJ).
Previously recorded only from the type locality, domain of the Atlantic Forest (Southeast region of Brazil), the known distribution of this species is extended into the Northeast region with this study.
Neotrichia feolai
Santos & Nessimian, 2009: 766 [type locality: Brazil, Amazonas, Rio Preto da Eva (tributary to Rio Preto da Eva, 02°38'14,6"S, 59°44'09,9"W);
Brazil: Pernambuco: D3 (2 males).
Brazil (AM, PE) and Venezuela.
This species was previously recorded only for the Amazon rainforest (Northern region of Brazil) and Venezuela (
Oxyethira tica Holzenthal & Harris, 1992: 168 [type locality: Costa Rica, Guanacaste, Parque Nacional Santa Rosa, Quebrada El Duende near La Casona, 10.838°N, 85.614°W; NMNH; male; female].
Brazil: Pernambuco: B2 (9 males); C1 (2 males); D3 (32 males); D7 (2 males).
Brazil (AL, AM, BA, CE, MA, MG, PB, PE, PI, RJ, SE), Costa Rica, Dominica, Ecuador, French Guiana, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Honduras, Martinique, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Trinidad, and Venezuela.
Hydroptila zerbinae Souza, Santos & Takiya, 2014: 641 [type locality: Brazil, Pernambuco, Vicência Cachoeira do Engenho Embú, 07°37'22"S, 35°22'51"W, el. 186 m; DZRJ; male].
Brazil: Pernambuco: B1 (1 male); B2 (26 males); C1 (243 males); C3 (1 male); D7 (2 males); D8 (1 male).
Brazil (AL, BA, PE).
Previously recorded only in the Brazilian Northeast region, Caatinga and Atlantic Forest domains (states of Alagoas, Bahia, and Pernambuco) (
The new species described here is an important step forward for the knowledge of Trichoptera in the Brejos de Altitude of Northeastern Brazil. Furthermore, the species presented here composes a small group of 12 of the 177 species of Helicopsyche (Feropsyche) that have all the semaphoronts described. Knowing and describing all semaphoronts represents a qualitative gain of information mainly for morphology-based systematics (to differentiate similar or cryptic species), and quantitative gain of characters for phylogenetic analyses, since different semaphoronts may represent distinct evolutionary scenarios (Farias et al. 2020).
This study is the first on the caddisfly biodiversity in the Brejos de Altitude, and a includes new species record from Brazil (Cyrnellus kozepes), and new records for the Brazilian Northeast region (Cyrnellus kozepes and Metrichia peluda), and Pernambuco state (Chimarra potiguar, Cyrnellus kozepes, Cyrnellus fraternus, and Metrichia peluda), as well as a new species, Helicopsyche ralphi sp. nov. Including the species previously recorded for Brazilian Northeast region (
Our results are helpful in guiding further studies in understanding the historical relationships between the Atlantic Forest and Amazon rainforest through the Brejos de Altitude. The shared distribution of these caddisfly species can be the result of past connections, when these enclaves acted as biological corridors between the Atlantic Forest and Amazon rainforest, harboring species from both domains, as proposed by some authors (e.g.,
Among the 43 Brejos de Altitude (
The present paper identified eleven caddisfly species from the Brejo de Altitude de Triunfo, Pernambuco state. These data revealed four new distributional records for Pernambuco state (Chimarra potiguar, Cyrnellus fraternus, Cyrnellus kozepes, and Metrichia peluda), two of them for Brazilian Northeast region (Cyrnellus kozepes and Metrichia peluda), and one for Brazil (Cyrnellus kozepes). Previously, 39 species were registered for Pernambuco state and as a product of this survey, the records are updated to 43 species. Furthermore, this inventory is a pioneer in Brejos de Altitude, thus showing the lack of knowledge of the fauna of Trichoptera in these locations, which possibly have the dynamics of populations influenced by the isolation of these enclaves.
In addition, a new species of Helicopsyche (Feropsyche) is described, including all semaphoronts. In this way, this description represents a qualitative gain of information mainly for systematics based on morphology (Farias et al. 2020), as it presents a new source of characters for phylogenetic studies and also increases the accuracy in the identification of immatures and females, also useful in ecological studies.
We are especially grateful to the LEAq team for laboratory and field assistance. We appreciate authorization to collect on your properties to Sr. Ney, Sr. Adelmo, Sra. Eneida, the family of the Icó farm, and Pico do Papagaio farm. We also thank the indispensable help in the collections of Pollyana Santos, Jônatan David, and Nívea Moraes. A. Cavalcante-Silva also thanks the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB) (process 317/2018) for M. Sc fellowship. R. Pereira, also thanks to the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, finance code 001, PDS-CAPES-88882.453922/2019-01) for doctoral fellowship. We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Programa de Apoio à Pós-Graduação (PROAP-CAPES) for financial support, and this study was financed in part by the CAPES – Finance Code 001. We are grateful to Dr. Steffen Pauls and Dr. Everton Dias for valuable comments on the manuscript.