Research Article |
Corresponding author: Jesús Romero Nápoles ( jnapoles@colpos.mx ) Academic editor: Astrid Eben
© 2016 Jesús Romero Nápoles.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Romero JN (2016) Systematics of the seed beetle genus Decellebruchus Borowiec, 1987 (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). ZooKeys 579: 59-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.579.7716
|
Keys to species, descriptions, synonymy, host plants, and geographical distributions are presented for the three species in the genus Decellebruchus (
Seed beetles, Decellebruchus , Bruchidae , cladistics
The monotypic genus Decellebruchus was erected by Borowiec in 1987 with the type species Decellebruchus walkeri (
Specimens. Preparation of genitalia for study followed the techniques and nomenclature described by
Cladistics. External morphological characters and internal characters, these latter only from male genitalia (Table
Characters used for the cladistic analysis for Bruchidae with pectinate antennae.
External morphology | |
0. Body length | 8–16 mm: 0; 1.5–5.4 mm: 1 |
1. Eye sinus | Shallow: 0; deep: 1 |
2. Male antenna shape | Not pectinate: 0; pectinate 1 |
3. Last antennal segment | About half as long as hind tibia: 0; as long as or longer than hind tibia: 1 |
4. Carina media on frons | With carina: 0; without carina: 1 |
5.Pronotal carina | Complete: 0; no complete:1 |
6. Pronotum shape | Not conical, without distinctly concave sides: 0; conical with distinctly concave sides: 1 |
7. Pronotal disc | Without gibbosites: 0; with gibbosites: 1 |
8. Scutellum shape | Subsquare: 0; elongate: 1 |
9. Metepisternal sulcus | With sulcus:0; without sulcus: 1 |
10. Tenth elytral stria | Extending nearly to apex of elytron: 0; extending to half of elytron: 1 |
11. Elytral basal tubercles | Without tubercles: 0; with tubercles: 1 |
12. Pygidium articulation | Pygidium and penultimate tergum partially fused and no covered by elytra 1; Penultimate tergum no fused to pygidium and covered by elytra 2 |
13. Hind femur | Without carinae: 0; with one carina or obsolete carinae 1; bicarinate: 2 |
14. Spines on hind femur | With 10-14 spines: 0; with 1 to 3 spines: 1; without spines: 2 |
15. Hind tibia carinae | With complete set of carinae: 0; incomplete set of carinae: 1 |
16. Tuft of white setae on fore coxa | Without tuft of white setae: 0; with tuft of white setae: 1 |
17. Male pygidium | Reclinate 0; vertical 1 |
Internal morphology | |
18. Lateral lobes of male genitalia | Fused 0; divided 1 |
19. Ventral valve of male genitalia | No arcuate: 0; deeply arcuate 1 |
20. Shape of apical portion of median lobe of male genitalia| | No bulbous: 0; bulbous: 1 |
21. Basal strut of lateral lobes of male genitalia | With an obsolete or small perpendicular keel: 0; with strong perpendicular keel 1 |
22. Armature of internal sac of male genitalia | Only with spinules: 0; with spinules and small teeth 1 |
Ecological characters | |
23. Distribution | Worldwide 0; New world 1; Old world: 2 |
24. Host plants | Arecaceae: 0; Fabaceae: 1; Convolvulaceae: 2 |
Taxa | Character | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | |
1. Pachymerus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2. Kytorhinus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
3. Megacerus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
4. Callosobruchus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
5. Conicobruchus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
6. Rhipibruchus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
7. Pectinibruchus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
8. D. atrolineatus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
9. D. walkeri | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
10. D. lunae | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
1 | Pygidium with one or two tergites exposed behind elytra; antenae in males pectinate or strongly serrate, in female serrate | Kytorhinus Bridwell |
– | Pygidium covered at base by elytra | 2 |
2 | Tenth elytral stria shortened, extending to middle of elytron; antennae in males pectinate, in female serrate | Megacerus Fahraeus |
– | Tenth elytral stria extending nearly to apex of elytron | 3 |
3 | Hind femur bicarinate, with spine on both internal and external ventral margins; antennae in males strongly serrate or pectinate, in female subserrate or serrate | Callosobruchus Pic |
– | Hind femur not bicarinate or carinae obsolete, or only ventral carina present | 4 |
4 | Pronotum conical with distinctly concave sides, antennae in males serrate or pectinate, in female subserrate | Conicobruchus Decelle |
– | Pronotum not conical, without distinctly concave sides | 5 |
5 | Last antennal segment as long as or longer than hind tibia | 6 |
– | Last antennal segment about half as longer as hind tibia | Decellebruchus Borowiec |
6 | Hind tibia carinate, mucro longer than lateral coronal denticle; scutellum subcuadrate | Rhipibruchus Bridwell |
– | Hind tibia with obsolete lateral carina, mucro absent; scutellum elongate | Pectinibruchus Kingsolver |
1 | Hind femur with only 1 subapical spine | 2 |
– | Hind femur with 1 subapical spine followed by 2 smaller spines | Decellebruchus walkeri (Pic) |
2 | Pygidium with basal spot of white pubescence; antennomere VII 1.76-2.0X wider that longer; hind femur with subapical acuminate spine about as long as width of tibial base | Decellebruchus lunae Romero, sp. n. |
– | Pygidium with two pubescent spots apically; antennomere VII 4.4-5.6X wider than longer; hind femur with small subapical acuminate spine about half as long as width of tibial base | Decellebruchus atrolineatus (Pic) |
Decellebruchus Borowiec, 1987: 149.
Male. Vestiture: Moderately dense or dense, variegated; front coxa with a wide tuft of white setae. Body oval and stout. Head: Short, strongly constricted behind eyes, postocular lobe very short; eyes bulging, deeply emarginate; frons narrow, with sharp median carina; antennae pectinate from 4th or 5th segment. Prothorax: Pronotum subconical, without lateral carina; disc convex, slightly gibbous before scutellum and with shallow median channel; prosternal process narrow, triangular, acute. Meso- and metathorax: Scutellum square, bidentate apically; elytral striae regular; striae 4 and 5 abbreviated basally by tubercle. Legs: Metacoxa densely punctate; hind femur moderately swollen, ventral carinae obsolete. Internal ventral margin with small subapical spine, often followed by two smaller spines; hind tibia straight, enlarged, with complete or incomplete set of carinae, mucro longer than lateral coronal denticle. Abdomen: More or less telescoped, fifth sternite deeply emarginated; pygidium vertical. Genitalia: Internal sac of male genitalia lined with fine spines with or without sclerites; ventral valve deeply arcuate. Female. Similar to male, except antenna not pectinate, eyes less bulging, pygidium subvertical, last abdominal sternite not emarginated.
Bruchus atrolineatus Pic, 1921: 15,
Bruchidius atrolineatus:
Callosobruchus atrolineatus:
Bruchus semiflabellatus Pic, 1931;
Acanthoscelides semiflabellatus:
Callosobruchus semiflabellatus:
Decellebruchus atrolineatus:
Male (Fig.
NAMIBIA: Rundu, 28/V/2015, T. Chauke, 17°55’S 19°46’E, reared seed Glycine max (L.), intercepted at Pretoria SAAFQIS Plant Quarantine Station, South Africa, Sample Pta. 2811 (1 ex
Dolichos lablab L., Glycine max (L.), Phaseolus vulgaris L. Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., Vigna unguiculata subsp. stenophylla (Harv.) Maréchal & Al., Vigna unguiculata subsp. unguiculata (L.)Walp. (Fabaceae).
Algeria, Angola, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Jamaica, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Mexico, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, United Kingdom, Yemen, Zanzibar.
Decellebruchus atrolineatus has high economic importance, because it is a pest mainly in species in the genus Vigna. It is frequently found together with Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Large losses due to this insect are reported frequently in some countries of Africa, where those bruchids are endemic (
Holotype male, allotype female and two paratypes: M. Elgon, Kenya, 20/I/1979, 1900 m, Palm T. (
Male (Fig.
Unknown.
Kenya and South Africa.
The specific epithet honors the grandaughter of the author, Luna Nereida Nila Romero.
This species is included in the genus Decellebruchus because it presents all characters indicated in the diagnosis of the genus; also it can be separated from the other two species in the genus because the typical male pygidium, less strongly male antennae, unique armature of the internal sac of male genitalia, and lateral lobes of which bear a basal strut with a strong perpendicular keel.
Bruchus figuratus Walker, 1859: 261 (homonymy);
Bruchus walkeri Pic, 1912: 92 (replacement name),
Bruchidius walkeri:
Spermophagus figuratus:
Male (Fig.
INDIA: Maharashtra, Lonavla, 28/IV/2000, 650 m, Pacholatko P. (1 ex.,
Unknown.
India, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Thailand.
There is little information about this species. At this time its host plants are unknown and only a few specimens were available for study; three of which were still named Bruchidius walkeri.
A default tree (Fig.
In the cladogram in Figure
I thank the following museum curators: Elizabeth Grobbelaar, South African National Collection of Insects; Paul E. Skelly, Florida State Collection of Arthropods, and Christoffer Fägerström, Musee Zoologique de l’Universite de Lund, Lund University; also Richard L. Westcott, Salem, Oregon, USA and Thomas H. Atkinson, University of Texas for reviewing the manuscript.