The tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae) of Israel and adjacent lands

Andrey V. Matalin; Vladimir I. Chikatunov

doi:10.3897/zookeys.578.7383

Abstract

Based on field studies, museums collections and literature sources, the current knowledge of the tiger beetle fauna of Israel and adjacent lands is presented. In Israel eight species occur, one of them with two subspecies, while in the Sinai Peninsula nine species of tiger beetles are now known. In the combined regions seven genera from two tribes were found. The Rift Valley with six cicindelids species is the most specious region of Israel. Cylindera contorta valdenbergi and Cicindela javeti azari have localized distributions and should be considered regional endemics. A similarity analysis of the tiger beetles faunas of different regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula reveal two clusters of species. The first includes the Great Rift Valley and most parts of the Sinai Peninsula, and the second incorporates most regions of Israel together with Central Sinai Foothills. Five distinct adult phenological groups of tiger beetles can be distinguished in these two clusters: active all-year (three species), spring-fall (five species), summer (two species), spring-summer (one species) and spring (one species). The likely origins of the tiger beetle fauna of this area are presented. An annotated list and illustrated identification key of the Cicindelinae of Israel and adjacent lands are provided.

Keywords

Carabidae , tiger beetles, Cicindelinae , Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Sinai, Levant, Mediterranean, fauna, endemic, near-endemic, catalogue, key, distribution, phenology, faunogenesis

Introduction

The first data about tiger beetles of Palestine were published in the first third of the XXth century. In 1913 Sahlberg described from Wadi El Nawaime (modern Wadi en Nu’eima) Cicindela littoralis aulicoides. In 1934 Mandl recorded for the Palestine two subspecies of Cicindela littoralis: C. l. winkleri and C. l. aulicoides. The first species list of Palestinian Coleoptera including five species of tiger beetles was published by Bodenheimer in 1937. Around the same time, the first information about cicindelids of the Sinai Peninsula appeared and Cicindela aulica (Horn, 1931), Cicindela littoralis aulicoides (Mandl, 1934) and Megacephala euphratica (Schatzmayr, 1936) were recorded. Unfortunately, detailed locality data and collecting dates for specimens of these species were often incomplete.

A second wave of tiger beetles studies in the Levant was completed in the last third of XXth century. Alfieri (1976) published the catalogue of Egyptian Coleoptera with information about 11 species of tiger beetles, six of which were recorded for the Sinai Peninsula. The first data about Cicindelinae of Israel were published by Valdenberg (1983, 1985) and Nussbaum (1987). It should be noted that these papers also contained information about tiger beetles of the Sinai Peninsula. In all eight species were recorded from Israel and seven species for the Sinai. Unfortunately, in the paper by Nussbaum (1987) data about localities for several species given in the text and on the maps do not coincide.

Since the beginning of 2000 interest in the Cicindelinae of the Middle East has increased significantly (El-Moursy et al. 2001; Franzen 2001, 2007; Finkel et al. 2002; Wiesner 2002, 2005; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Rittner 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004, 2012; Chikatunov et al. 2006; Avgin and Özdikmen 2007; Franzen 2007; Avgin and Wiesner 2009; Ptashkovsky 2009; Deuve 2011, 2012; Abdel-Dayem and Kippenhan 2013; Jaskuła and Rewicz 2014). These studies revealed the presence of several species of tiger beetle previously unknown from the area. For example, Habrodera nilotica (Dejean, 1825), Hypaetha singularis (Chaudoir, 1876) and Cephalota littorea (Forskål, 1775) were recorded for the first time in Israel (Chikatunov et al. 2006). However, in the next publications these species were not included (Ptashkovsky 2009).

During the last decade, new information about the distribution of tiger beetles in different parts of the Levant has accumulated, and we include these new records here.

Material and methods

Specimens and data for this report come from the following museums and private collections:

TAU Tel Aviv University (Israel)

ZMUM Zoological Museum of Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia)

MPU Moscow State Pedagogical University (Moscow, Russia)

SIZ I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kiev, Ukraine)

cJW collection of Jürgen Wiesner (Wolfsburg, Germany)

cIOv collection of Igor’ Ovsyannikov (Moscow, Russia)

The nomenclature of elytral pattern follows Acciavatti and Pearson (1989); the nomenclature of male internal sac follows Matalin (1998); the chorology follows Vigna Taglianti et al. (1999) with some additions; the regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula (Egypt) follow Nussbaum (1987). The similarity of the faunas of tiger beetles was calculated using complete linkage procedure (squared Euclidean distances).

The species included here that are not yet recorded from Israel are marked in the catalogue and in the key with a symbol (○).

Results and discussion

Catalogue of the tiger beetles of Israel and adjacent lands

Family Carabidae Latreille, 1802

Subfamily Cicindelinae Latreille, 1802

Tribe Cicindelini Latreille, 1802

Subtribe Cicindelina Latreille, 1802

Genus Calomera Motschulsky, 1862

Calomera aulica aulica (Dejean, 1831)

General distribution

Europe Greece; Asia Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Egypt (Sinai), Saudi Arabia, Arab Emirates, Oman, Yemen, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan; Africa: Cape Verde Islands, Senegal, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Chad, Egypt, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti.

References

Israel – Bodenheimer 1937: 108 (as Cicindela); Valdenberg 1983: 43, 46 (as Cicindela), 1985: 37 (as Cicindela); Cassola 1985: 56 (as Lophyridia); Nussbaum 1987: 9-10 (as Cicindela); Wiesner 1992: 151 (as Lophyridia); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 99; Rittner 2003 (as Lophyridia); Ptashkovsky 2009: 8-9 (as Lophyra); Egypt (Sinai) – Horn 1931: 162 (as Cicindela); Alfieri 1976: 1 (as Cicindela); Cassola 1984: 56 (as Lophyridia); Nussbaum 1987: 9-10 (as Cicindela); Wiesner 1992: 151 (as Lophyridia); Werner 2000: 98 (as Lophyridia); El-Moursy et al. 2001: 66 (as Cicindela); Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003: 205 (as Lophyridia); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 103; Abdel-Dayem 2004: 74 (as Lophyridia).

Distribution

(Figs 1, 2). Israel (including State of Palestine), Jordan Valley: Zor Deir Shaman, 15.III.2005, I. Zonstein - 1♀; Gesher, 17.VIII.1939, H. Bytinski-Salz 1♂ (both TAU); Kinneret zone (after Nussbaum 1987); Dead Sea Area: Ne`ot HaKikkar, 7.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 5♂♂ 7♀♀; 16.VII.1999, 13.VIII.1999, 11.IX.1999, and 12.XII. 1999, light trap BL, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 2♂♂ 7♀♀; Sedom, 15.VIII.1957, leg. J. Wahrman 1♂ 2♀♀ (all TAU); ‘En Gedi, 19-29.V.1989, leg. G. Müler 1♀; Qalya, 28.VIII.1986, 28.6.1987, leg. Y. Nussbaum 2♂♂ (both cJW); ‘Enot Qane (after Nussbaum 1987); Arava Valley: Be`er Ora, 3.IV.1997, leg. V. Chikatunov 3♂♂ 1♀; ‘En ‘Iddan, 15.VII.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♂ 1♀ (all TAU).

Figure 1.

Distribution of Calomera aulica aulica in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Jordan (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg)

Figure 2.

Distribution of Calomera aulica aulica (red circles) and Calomera littoralis aulicoides (blue rhombs) in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols between years 1950–1999, solid symbols records after year 2000; URL map source https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sinai_relief_location_map.svg).

Jordan, Ma’Daba: Callirhoe, 7.VI.1942, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 2♀ (TAU).

Egypt (Sinai), Northern Sinai: Sabkhat al Bardawil, 25.VIII.1967, leg. I. Margalit 3♀♀; 24.VIII.1979, leg. A. Valdenberg 1♂ 2♀♀ (TAU); Ismailia (after Alfieri 1976); Zaranik Protectorate (after El-Moursy et al. 2001; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Sinai Mountains: 20 km NE of Dahab, saline land, 4.VIII.2008, leg. A. Sokolov 4♂♂5♀♀ (MPU); Southwestern Sinai: Suez – 1♂ (ZMUM); Nabeq, 17.VIII.1971, leg. J. Kugler 1♂ 2♀♀; 8.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 4♂♂ 6♀♀; Ras al Tantur, 5.VII.1957, leg. Ch. Lewinsohn 2♂♂ 1♀, 17.VIII.1971, leg. M. Kaplan -1♀ (all TAU); 15 km W Ofira, Golf v. Elat, Straße von Tiran, 3.IV.1981, leg. G. Gerdes 1♂ (cJW); Wadi Gharandal, 20.V.1969, leg. Tsabar 1♂ (TAU); Abu Zenima, Wadi Tayebeh (both after Alfieri 1976); El Tor (after Alfieri 1976; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Ras Muhammad (after Nussbaum 1987).

Calomera littoralis aulicoides (J. Sahlberg, 1913)

General distribution

Asia Turkey, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Egypt (Sinai), Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq; Africa Egypt.

References

Israel – Sahlberg 1913: 3 (as Cicindela); Mandl 1934: 244-245 (as Cicindela lunulata nemoralis aulicoides), 1982: 93-94 (as Lophyridia aulicoides); Valdenberg 1983: 44, 47 (as Cicindela), 1985: 36 (as Cicindela); Nussbaum 1987: 11-12 (as Cicindela); Wiesner 1992: 149 (as Lophyridia); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 100; Chikatunov et al. 2006: 293; Egypt (Sinai)Mandl 1934: 244-245 (as Cicindela lunulata nemoralis aulicoides), 1982: 94 (as Lophyridia aulicoides); Alfieri 1976: 2 (as Cicindela lunulata aulicoides); Wiesner 1992: 149 (as Lophyridia); Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003: 207 (as Lophyridia); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 103; Abdel-Dayem 2004: 74 (as Lophyridia).

Distribution

(Figs 2–3). Israel (including State of Palestine), Golan Heights: Hammat Gader, 2.X.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 1♀ (TAU); Lower Galilee: Teverya, 16.VI.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 1♀; Kinneret, 16.VI.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 3♀♀; Jordan Valley: Zor Deir Shaman, Yarden bank, 32°02'30’'N, 35°30'E, 15.III.2005, leg. L. Friedman & I. Zonstein 3♂♂ 1♀ (TAU); Allenby bridge (after Mandl 1982); Tomer, Ma’oz-Hayyim (both after Nussbaum 1987); Dead Sea Area: Yeriho, Jordan, Palestine, 24.IV.27 – 1♀; ‘Enot Zuqim, 13.III.1993, leg. V. Chikatunov 2♂♂ 1♀, 9.VI.1997, leg. L. Friedman 1♂, 1.II.1994, and 13.III.1994, leg. V. Chikatunov 3♂♂ 2♀♀; Ne`ot HaKikkar, 19.IV.1999, 16.VII.1999, 13.VIII.1999, and 11.IX.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 17♂♂ 11♀♀; Sedom, 19.VIII.1957, J. Wahrman - 2♂♂; Qalya, 9.VI.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 4♂♂ 6♀♀ (all TAU); ‘En Gedi, 1-13.V.1980, 19-29.V.1989, leg. G. Müller 3♀♀; Newe Zohar, 24.VI.1987, leg. Y. Nussbaum 1♂ (both cJW); Wadi El Nawaime [Wadi en Nu’eima] (after Sahlberg 1913); Enot Qane (after Nussbaum 1987); Arava Valley: ‘En Zin, 30°53.60'N, 35°09.17'E, light trap BL, 12.X.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♂; Hazeva, field school, 30°46.70'N, 35°14.25'E, light trap BL, 20.III.1999, 21.V.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♂ 3♀♀; ‘En ‘Iddan, 20.VI.1995, leg. I. Yarom & A. Freidberg 2♂♂ 1♀; 15.VII.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko – 3♂♂ 4♀♀; Nahal Shezaf, 18.V.1999, 8.VI.1999, light trap, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♂ 1♀; Nahal Neqarot, 10.III.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♀ (all TAU).

Figure 3.

Distribution of two subspecies of Calomera littoralis in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Jordan (red circles – C. l. aulicoides, blue circles – C. l. winkleri, open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles – records between years 1950–1999, solid circles – records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).

Jordan, Al Balqā’: Al Maghtas, 12.II.1942, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 1♂ 2♀♀(TAU); Ma’Dabā: Suwayma, Dead Sea, 5.IV.2000, leg. G. & I. Zappi 1♂1♀ (MPU).

Egypt (Sinai), Northern Sinai: Ismailia (after Alfieri 1976); Southwestern Sinai: El Tor (after Alfieri 1976; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004).

Calomera littoralis winkleri (Mandl, 1934)

General distribution

Europe Greece, Armenia, Azerbaijan; Asia Cyprus, Turkey, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan.

References

Israel – Mandl 1934: 240, 243, 245 (as Cicindela); Naviaux 1983: 82 (as Lophyridia), Valdenberg 1983: 44, 46 (as Cicindela), 1985: 36 (as Cicindela); Nussbaum 1987: 11, 13 (as Cicindela); Wiesner 1992: 151 (as Lophyridia); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 101; Rittner 2003 (as Cicindela); Chikatunov et al. 2006: 293; Ptashkovsky 2009: 8-9 (as Cicindela).

Distribution

(Fig. 3). Israel, Upper Galilee: Hula, 23.VI.1952, leg. J. Wahrman 5♂♂ 4♀♀; 8.III.1976, leg. M. Kaplan - 1♂; Sasa, 18.III.1951, leg. J. Wahrman 1♀ (all TAU); Northern Coastal Plain: ‘Akko, 7.VIII.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 4♀♀; Ma’agan Mikha`el, 17-18.III.1979, 27.VI.1979, 26.III.1980, 24.IV.1980, 24.VI.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 17♂♂ 28♀♀; 4.VI.1983, leg. E. Sney-Dor 2♂♂ 1♀; Nahariyya, 19.VI.1942, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 1♂ 2♀♀; Dor, Horvat Tantura, sea-shore, 13.IX.1949, leg. J. Wahrman 1♀; Zikhron Ya’aqov, 29.VI.1998, leg. A. Traub 3♀♀ (all TAU); Central Coastal Plain: Hadera, 28.III.2008, leg. G. Wizen - 1♂ 1♀; Bat Yam, 13.VII.1945, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 1♂ 3♀♀; Hofit, 21.IX.1994, leg. F. Kaplan & A. Freidberg 1♀; Mishmeret, 3.VIII.1983, leg. A. Freidberg 2♂♂ 3♀♀; Qesarya, 11.VII.1979, and 10.VIII.1979, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 4♀♀; Tel Aviv, 20.VI.1982, leg. A. Valdenberg 1♂ 2♀♀; 12.IV.2003, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 4♂♂ 2♀♀; Rosh Ha’Ayin, 16.IV.1993, leg. A. Freidberg & F. Kaplan 1♂ 1♀; Rehovot, 5.V.1942, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 3♂♂ 2♀♀ (all TAU); Southern Coastal Plain: Nitzanim, 13.VII.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 2♀♀ (TAU); Judean Hills: Jerusalem 1♂ (after Mandl 1934: 40, Fig. 65).

Genus Cephalota Dokhtouroff, 1883

Cephalota (Taenidia) zarudniana vartianorum (Mandl, 1967)

General distribution

Asia Israel, Syria, Iran, Iraq.

References

Israel – Naviaux 1983: 78; Valdenberg 1983: 43 (as Cicindela jarudniana vartinorum), 45 (as Cicindela jorudniana), 1985: 37 (as Cicindela jarudniana); Nussbaum 1987: 9, 13 (as Cicindela jarudniana); Wiesner 1992: 177; Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 103; Chikatunov et al. 2006: 293 (as Cephalota deserticola); Ptashkovsky 2009: 8-9 (as Cephalota deserticola).

Distribution

(Fig. 4). Israel (including State of Palestine), Dead Sea Area: Yeriho, 24.IV.1927, leg. O. Theodor 1♂; ‘Enot Zuqim, 1.II.1994, and 13.III.1994, leg. V. Chikatunov 1♂ 2♀♀; Qalya, 6.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 2♂♂ 3♀♀; Ne`ot HaKikkar, 7.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 4♂♂; 28.IV.1984, leg. E. Shney-Dor 2♀♀; 19.IV.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♂1♀ (all TAU), 7.V.1980, leg. R. Naviaux 1♀; V.1990, leg. Orbach 1♂1♀ (both cJW).

Figure 4.

Distribution of Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum (orange triangles), Cicindela javeti azari (red circles) and Cylindera contorta valdenbergi (blue rhombs) in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Lebanon (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols – records between years 1950–1999; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).

Comments

References to Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum (Mandl, 1967) as Cephalota deserticola (Faldermann, 1836) (Chikatunov et al. 2006; Ptashkovsky 2009) were based on two mis-identified males from Qalya by K. Mandl. According to Franzen and Wiesner (1998)C. deserticola is distributed in the western part of Central Asia, as well as in Iran, Azerbaijan, Armenia and north-eastern Turkey.

(○)Cephalota (Taenidia) littorea littorea (Forskål, 1775)

General distribution

Asia Egypt (Sinai), Saudi Arabia; Africa Egypt, Sudan, Eritrea.

References

Egypt (Sinai) Forskål 1775: 77 (as Cicindela); Alfieri 1976: 2 (as Cicindela); Valdenberg 1983: 44, 46 (as Cicindela), 1985: 37 (as Cicindela); Nussbaum 1987: 9, 15 (as Cicindela); Gebert 1991: 176, 187; Wiesner 1992: 175; Werner 2000: 147; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003: 199; Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 103; Rittner 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004: 72.

Distribution

(Fig. 5). Egypt (Sinai), Sinai Mountains: Dahab, 9.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 1♂ 1♀; Ras-Burka, 5.IX.1976, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ (all TAU); Sun Pool (after Nussbaum 1987); Southwestern Sinai: Suez (after Forskål 1775; Gebert 1991); Nabeq, 8.V.1980, 17.VIII.1978, 31.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 25♂♂ 24♀♀; 29.V.1981, leg. A. Freidberg 2♂♂ (all TAU); El Tor (after Alfieri 1976; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Ras Muhammad, 16.VIII.1978, leg. A. Valdenberg 2♂♂ 1♀; (after Nussbaum 1987; Gebert 1991).

Figure 5.

Distribution of Cephalota tibialis tibialis (red circles), Cephalota littorea littorea (blue rhombs) and Habrodera nilotica nilotica (green triangles) in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols – records between years 1950–1999; URL map source https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sinai_relief_location_map.svg).

Comments

The specimen of Cephalota littorea littorea (Forskål, 1775) with label “Jerusalem” from Zoologisches Museum der Humboldt-Universität (Berlin) is mislabelled (see Gebert 1991). All subsequent records of this species from Israel (Wiesner 1992; Puchkov and Matalin 2003) are in error.

In some publications (Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004) Cephalota circumdata (Dejean, 1822) was recorded from the Sinai Peninsula (El Tor). However, the nominotypical subspecies of C. circumdata occurs along the Aegean, Marmora, Black and Mediterranean Sea costs in the Greece, Bulgaria, western Turkey, and, probably Rumania (Franzen 1996; Cassola 1999; Gebert 1999); C. c. cappadocica Franzen, 1996 and C. c. hattusae Franzen, 1996 live along banks of the salt lakes in the central Turkey (Franzen 1996; Cassola 1999; Gebert 1999); C. c. leonschaeferi Cassola, 1970 occupies the Mediterranean sea cost in southern France (including Corsica) and north-western Italia (Gebert 1999); while C. c. imperialis Klug, 1834 records in the Italia (Sardinia and Sicilia), south-eastern Spain (including Balearic Islands), Tunisia and Algeria, but not in the Libya and Egypt (Gebert 1999). Most likely, the aberrant specimen of C. littorea was incorrectly identified as C. circumdata.

(○)Cephalota (Taenidia) tibialis tibialis (Dejean, 1882)

General distribution

Asia Egypt (Sinai); Africa Egypt.

References

Egypt (Sinai) – Valdenberg 1983: 42, 47 (as Cicindela); Nussbaum 1987: 7, 12 (as Cicindela), 1985: 37 (as Cicindela); Gebert 1991: 179, 187; Wiesner 1992: 175; El-Moursy et al. 2001: 66 (as Cicindela littorea); Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003: 200; Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 103; Abdel-Dayem 2004: 72, 2012: 198.

Distribution

(Fig. 5). Egypt (Sinai), Northern Sinai: Yamit, 21.VI.1978, 14.VII.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg – 3♀♀ (TAU); Sabkhat al Bardawil, 7.VI.1977, 26.VII.1978, 31.VIII.1978, 7.VI.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 4♂♂ 7♀♀ (TAU); Arish (after Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003); Zaranik Protectorate (after El-Moursy et al. 2001; Abdel-Dayem 20042012); Sabkhat al Shic (after Nussbaum 1987; Gebert 1991).

Genus Cicindela Linnaeus, 1758

Cicindela (s. str.) javeti azari Deuve, 2011

General distribution

Asia Lebanon, Israel, Syria.

References

Israel – Valdenberg 1983: 42, 48 (as Cicindela campestris herbacea), 1985: 37 (as Cicindela campestris herbacea); Nussbaum 1987: 7-8 (as Cicindela herbacea); Wiesner 1992: 127 (as Cicindela herbacea); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 105 (as Cicindela herbacea); Rittner 2003 (as Lophyridia herbacea); Chikatunov et al. 2006: 293 (as Cicindela herbacea); Franzen 2007: 13 (as Cicindela herbacea); Ptashkovsky 2009: 8-9 (as Lophyra herbacea).

Distribution

(Fig. 4). Israel, Upper Galilee: Mt. Meron, 8.IV.1972, leg. D. Gerling 1♀ (TAU); Golan Heights: Mezudat Nimrod, 8.V.1983, leg. E. Shney-Dor 3♂♂ 1♀ (TAU); Mt. Hermon: 1900 m, 22.IV.1973, leg. D. Furth 1♂; 2000 m, 9.VI.1992, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ 1♀ (all TAU).

Lebanon, Liban-Sud: Jezzin 5♂♂ 11♀♀ (after Deuve 2011).

Syria, Dimashq: Bloudan (after Avgin and Wiesner 2009 as Cicindela thughurica Franzen, 2007).

(○) Cicindela (s. str.) herbacea herbacea Klug, 1832

Distribution

(Figs 6, 9). Israel (including State of Palestine), Northern Coastal Plain: ‘Akko, 23.IV.1927, leg. O. Theodor 1♀; Dor, 23.IV.1998, leg. A. Traub 2♀♀; Haifa, 18.V.1996, leg. Hauser 1♀; Ma’agan Mikha`el, 16.V.1978, 21.XI.1978, 18.XII.1978, 12.II.1979, 4.III.1979, 10.III.1979, 16.VI.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 31♂♂ 56♀♀; 16.IV.1983, leg. E. Shney-Dor – 1♂ 3♀♀ (all TAU); Central Coastal Plain: Bat Yam, 14.III.1940, 12.II.1941, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 2♂♂ 1♀; Hofit, 21.IX.1994, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂; Holon, 4.V.1978, leg. A. Freidberg 3♂♂ 2♀♀; Nahal Alexander, 32°24'N, 34°52'E, 15.V.2005, leg. I. Zonstein 1♀; Rehovot, 18.III.1954, leg. J. Wahrman 2♀♀ (all TAU); Southern Coastal Plain: Ashdod, sands, 29.II.1984, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂; Nir ‘Am, 21.III.1946, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 2♂♂ 3♀♀; Nizzanim, 5.III.1996, leg. A. Freidberg 1♀; Yavne, 17.IV.1974, leg. D. Furth 2♂♂; Ziqqim, 7.II.1996, leg. I. Yarom & A. Freidberg 2♂♂ (all TAU); Dead Sea Area: Qumeran, 18.II.1997, leg. V. Chikatunov 2♂♂; Yeriho, 23.VII.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 1♂ 2♀♀ (all TAU); Arava Valley: ‘En ‘Iddan, 18.IV.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 2♂♂ 1♀ (TAU); Northern Negev: Be`er Sheva, 1.IV.1946, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 2♀♀; Bor Mashash, 18.IV.1995, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ 1♀; Gevulot, 6.IV.1985, leg. E. Shney-Dor 3♂♂ 5♀♀; Revivim, Park Golda, 26.III.1999, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ 1♀ (all TAU); Central Negev: Yeroham, 27.III.1966, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 4♂♂ 7♀♀; 25.IV.1973, 22.IV.1981, leg. J. Kugler 1♂ 4♀♀, 19.III.1978, leg. M. Kaplan 6♂♂ 5♀♀; 19.III.1978, leg. A. Freidberg - 6♂♂; Sede Boker, 8.VI.1987, leg. E. Shney-Dor – 1♂; Kadesh Barnea, 11.IV.1974, leg. D. Furth 3♂♂ 2♀♀; 9.V.1979, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 6♀♀ (all TAU); Southern Negev: Elat, 14.VI.1981, leg. R. Keian 1♀ (TAU).

Figure 6.

Distribution of Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa in Israel and Palestine (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).

Egypt (Sinai), Northern Sinai: Sabkhat al Shic, 8.V.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 2♂♂ 2♀♀ (TAU); Ismailia (after Alfieri 1976); Central Sinai Foothills: Wadi Godirate [Gudeirat] (after Nussbaum 1987: Fig. 6; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Southwestern Sinai: Nabeq (after Abdel-Dayem 2004), Wadi Gharandal (after Alfieri 1976; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003).

Genus Myriochila Motschulsky, 1858

Myriochila (s. str.) melancholica melancholica (Fabricius, 1798)

General distribution

Europe Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Malta, Albania, Greece, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan; Asia Cyprus, Turkey, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt (Sinai), Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Arab Emirates, Oman, Yemen, Bahrain, Kuwait, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tadzhikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan (Punjab, Sind), India (Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal), China (Xinjiang); Africa Cape Verde Islands, Senegal, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Chad, Ivory Coast, Togo, Ghana, Nigeria, Cameroun, Equatorial Guinea, Central African Republic, Congo, Zaire, Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, Sudan, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique, Angola, Namibia, South Africa, Madagascar, Seychelles.

References

IsraelBodenheimer 1937: 108 (as Cicindela); Valdenberg 1983: 43, 46 (as Cicindela), 1985: 40 (as Cicindela); Nussbaum 1987: 9, 14 (as Cicindela); Wiesner 1992: 211; Finkel et al. 2002: 28; Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 114; Rittner 2003; Chikatunov et al. 2006: 293; Ptashkovsky 2009: 8-9; Egypt (Sinai)Nussbaum 1987: 9, 14 (as Cicindela); Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003: 208; Abdel-Dayem 2004: 75.

Distribution

(Figs 7, 9). Israel (including State of Palestine), Upper Galilee: Tel Dan, 25.VIII.1958, leg. J. Wahrman 1♂; 23.VIII.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 2♂♂; Nahal Keziv, 28.IX.1999, leg. M. Finkel 1♂ 1♀; Kefar Szold, 5.V.1998, leg. R. Ortal 1♂; Hula, 1.VI.1968, leg. H. Bytinski-Salz 6♂♂ 3♀♀ (all TAU); Lower Galilee: Teverya, 3.VI.1961, leg. J. Wahrman 4♂♂ 3♀♀; 24.V.1981, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 1♀; Deganya, 15.IX.1951, J. Wahrman - 3♂♂ (all TAU); Golan Heights: Hammat Gader, 23.VII.2002, 2.X.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 5♂♂ 4♀♀ (TAU); Northern Coastal Plain: Ma’agan Mikha`el, 17.VI.1973, leg. D. Furth 5♂♂ 7♀♀; 20.IV.1986, leg. A. Freidberg 2♂♂ 3♀♀ (all TAU); Central Coastal Plain: Herzliyya, 20.V.2000, A. Freidberg 2♀♀; Bet Dagan, 26.VIII.1981, leg. Q. Argaman 2♂♂ 3♀♀; Ramat Gan, 3.VI.1985, leg. D. Gerling 7♂♂ 5♀♀; Rosh Ha’Ayin, 15.X.1994, leg. V. Chikatunov 3♂♂ 4♀♀; Tel Aviv, 2.IX.1974, leg. A. Freidberg & M. Kaplan 57♂♂ 60♀♀; 15.VIII.2002, 12.IV.2003, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 2♂♂ 7♀♀; 24.VII.1948, H. Bytinski-Salz 1♀ (all TAU); Southern Coastal Plain: Nizzanim, 23.VIII.2002, 5.X.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 4♂♂ 4♀♀ (TAU); Judean Desert: Nahal Perat (Wadi Qelt), 23.VII.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 1♂ 2♀♀ (TAU); Jordan Valley: Afiqim, 26.VIII.1971, leg. M. Kaplan 2♂♂; Ma’oz Hayyim, 21.V.1977, leg. A. Valdenberg 4♂♂ 2♀♀ (all TAU), from Dan to Ne`ot HaKikkar (after Nussbaum 1987); Dead Sea Area: Yeriho, 23.VII.2002, 5.X.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 3♂♂ 4♀♀; Qalya, 6.V.1980, leg. A. Valdenberg 3♂♂ 5♀♀ (all TAU); Arava Valley: Gerofit, 2.VIII.2002 and 5.X.2002, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 2♂♂ 4♀♀; Hazeva, 19.VII.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 2♂♂ 3♀♀; 19.IX.1995, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ 1♀; ‘En ‘Iddan, 20.VI.1995, leg. A. Freidberg 3♂♂ 1♀; Yotvata, 24.VIII.1989, leg. A. Eitam 1♂; Zuqim, 22.VI.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 1♂ 2♀♀; Samar, 29°50'N, 35°02'E, 26.IV.2007, leg. N. Ketner 2♂♂ 2♀♀ (all TAU); Northern Negev: Be`er Sheva, 1.VIII.1945, leg. H, Bytinski-Salz 2♂♂ 2♀♀; Dimona, 18.VIII.1957, leg. J. Wahrman 1♂ 1♀; Gevulot, 18.V.1983, 6.VI.1984, 29.VIII.1987, leg. E. Shney-Dor 11♂♂ 12♀♀; Hazerim, 31.VIII.1951, leg. J. Wahrman 1♂ 1♀; Retamim, 12.VI.2002, 5.VI.2003, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 2♂♂ 5♀♀; Revivim, 1.IV.1942, leg. H, Bytinski-Salz 2♂♂ 2♀♀; 2.VIII.1958, leg. J. Kugler 1♂ (all TAU); Ze`elim, 17.IX.1986, leg. Y. Nussbaum, 1♀ (cJW); Central Negev: Mash’abbe Sade, 23.VIII.1965. J. Wahrman - 3♂♂3♀♀; 27.VIII.1986, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ 1♀; Yeroham, 30.V.1957, leg. I. Yarkoni 3♂♂ 1♀; Tel Yeroham, 19.XI.1959, leg. L. Fishelsohn 1♂; Ma`agar Yeroham, 29.VII.2007, leg. L. Friedman 1♂; 30°59.37'N, 34°53.87'E, 22.V.2008, leg. L. Friedman 2♂♂ 2♀♀; Makhtesh Ramon, 9.VIII.1977, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂; Mizpe Ramon, 4.VIII.1977, leg. D. Simon 1♂; Shivta, 23.VI.1978, leg. A. Freidberg 5♂♂6♀♀ (all TAU); Qziot, 8.IX.1986, leg. Y. Nussbaum 2♂♂ (cJW); Ezuz (after Nussbaum 1987); Southern Negev: Elat, 6.IX.1974, leg. A. Freidberg 2♂♂; Shizzafon, 12.VI.2002, 5.X.2001, leg. V. Kravchenko & V. Chikatunov 1♂ 2♀♀ (all TAU).

Figure 7.

Distribution of Myriochila melancholica melancholica in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Jordan (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).

Jordan, Al Balqā’: Al Maghtas, 23.V.1942, H. Bytinski-Salz 1♀ (TAU).

Egypt (Sinai), Northern Sinai: El Arish, 15.VI.1968, leg. J. Kugler 1♂ 2♀♀ (TAU; including after Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Southwestern Sinai: Ofira, sewage, 2.V.1981, leg. A. Freidberg 1♂ (TAU).

Tribe Megacephalini Laporte, 1834

Subtribe Megacephalina Laporte, 1834

Genus Grammognatha Motschulsky, 1850

Grammognatha euphratica euphratica Dejean in Latreille & Dejean, 1822

General distribution

Europe – Spain, Greece (Rhodes, Crete); Asia Cyprus, Turkey, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Egypt (Sinai), Saudi Arabia, Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan; Africa Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Djibouti.

References

Israel – Bodenheimer 1937: 108 (as Megacephala); Naviaux 1983: 75 (as Megacephala), Valdenberg 1983: 42, 47, 1985: 40 (as Megacephala); Nussbaum 1987: 8, 11 (as Megacephala); Wiesner 1992: 44 (as M. euphratica nigra); Franzen 2001: 89 (as Megacephala); Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 118 (as Megacephala); Rittner 2003 (as Megacephala); Chikatunov et al. 2006: 293 (as Megacephala); Ptashkovsky 2009: 8-9 (as Megacephala); Egypt (Sinai)Schatzmayr 1936: 6 (as Megacephala); Alfieri 1976: 1 (as Megacephala); Nussbaum 1987: 8, 11 (as Megacephala); Wiesner 1992: 44 (as Megacephala euphratica nigra); Werner 1999: 68 (as Megacephala); El-Moursy et al. 2001: 66 (as Megacephala); Franzen 2001: 88 (as Megacephala); Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003: 196; Puchkov and Matalin 2003: 118 (as Megacephala); Abdel-Dayem 2004: 73.

Distribution

(Figs 8, 9). Israel (including State of Palestine), Northern Coastal Plain: Haifa (after Franzen 2001); ‘Atlit, 4.VI.1979, 1.V.1979, leg. A. Valdenberg 2♀♀; 4.VI.1983, leg. E. Shney-Dor 1♂; 32°42'N, 34°56'E, 17.V.1997, leg. E. Orbach 1♂ 1♀ (all TAU), VI.1989, leg. E. Orbach 1♂ (cJW); V.1989, not far from the coastal line, running to light, leg. E. Orbach 2♂♂ (after Werner 1999);Dead Sea Area: Bet Ha’Arava, 5.IV.1941, leg. O. Theodor 2♂♂ 2♀♀; Jordan River, near Dead Sea, 5.IV.1941, leg. O. Teodor 1♀ (TAU); ‘En Gedi, 24.III.1958, leg. J. Kugler 2♂♂; 15.III.65, leg. K. Yefenof 1♀; Ne`ot HaKikkar, 15.II.1999, 19.IV.1999, leg. I. Yarom & V. Kravchenko 3♂♂ 1♀; Qalya, 11.IV.1958, leg. M. Pener 2.♂♂ 1♀; Sedom, 6.V.1961, at night, leg. J. Wahrman 1♂; Shefekh Zohar, 16.IV.1980, leg. J. Kugler 1♀; Zomet Zohar, 17.IV.1997, leg. L. Friedman 1♀ (all TAU); Nawit Pools (after Nussbaum 1987); Arava Valley: Gerofit, 23.IV.2003, 12.V.2003, 6.VI.2003, leg. D. Utshitel & V. Chikatunov 3♂♂ 2♀♀ (TAU); Southern Negev: Elat, 30.VIII.1959, leg. L. Fishelsohm – 1 ♂ (TAU).

Figure 8.

Distribution of Grammognatha euphratica euphratica in Israel and Palestine (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).

Figure 9.

Distribution of Hypaetha singularis (red circles), Myriochila melancholica melancholica (blue rhombs), Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa (orange squares) and Grammognatha euphratica euphratica (lilac triangles) in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols – records between years 1950–1999; URL map source https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sinai_relief_location_map.svg).

Egypt (Sinai), Northern Sinai: Sabkhat al Bardawil, 23.III.1969, leg. A. Nitzan 1♂♂ 2♀♀ (TAU); Arish (after Abdel-Dayem 2004); Zaranik Protectorate (after El-Moursy et al. 2001; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Sinai Mountains: Dahab (after Nussbaum 1987); Southwestern Sinai: El Tor (after Schatzmayr 1936; Alfieri 1976; Nussbaum 1987; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004); Nabeq (after Nussbaum 1987).

An identification key to the tiger beetles of Israel and adjacent lands

1(2)	Anterior angles of pronotum projected towards the margin of prothorax (Figs 10, 45); the fourth joint of maxillary palpus shorter than the third one	Megacephalini (Grammognatha euphratica euphratica Dejean, 1822)
2(1)	Anterior angles of pronotum not projected towards the margin of prothorax (Figs 12–14); the fourth joint of maxillary palpus longer than the third one	Cicindelini 3
3(4)	Proepisterna prominent on pronotum so pronotopleural suture clearly visible dorsally (Fig. 42); anterior margin of pronotum with row of flat white setae	*Hypaetha* ((○) Hypaetha singularis (Chaudoir, 1876))
4(3)	Proepisterna not prominent on pronotum so pronotopleural suture not visible dorsally (Figs 30–41, 43–44); anterior margin of pronotum glabrous	5
5(6)	Labrum with four submarginal setae (Fig. 29); middle and hind femora with numerous hooked setae along posterior margin, hind femora with sparse hooked setae (Fig. 64)	Myriochila (s. str.) (Myriochila (s. str.) melancholica melancholica (Fabricius, 1798))
6(5)	Labrum with at least six submarginal setae, except aberrant specimens with 3–5 setae (Figs 15–26, 28); femora without hooked setae along posterior margin	7
7(8)	Genae pilose (Figs 11, 14)	9
8(7)	Genae glabrous (Figs 12–13)	13
9(10)	Clypeus glabrous, anterior and posterior margins of each eye with group of white decumbent setae; labrum with 10 submarginal setae in a single row (Fig. 25); fourth antennomere of males with penicillus (Fig. 14); white elytral pattern with complete humeral lunule, long sinuate middle band and apical lunule coupling together via marginal and sutural bands (Fig. 56)	Habrodera ((○) Habrodera nilotica nilotica (Dejean, 1825))
10(9)	Clypeus pilose, anterior and posterior margins of each eye glabrous; labrum with several rows of numerous submarginal setae (Figs 15–18); fourth antennomere of males glabrous (Fig. 11); white elytral pattern without marginal and sutural bands (Figs 46–49)	Calomera 11
11(12)	Elytra dark brown with purple-bronze or green reflection (Fig. 46); pronotum 1.05–1.15 times as wide as long with straight parallel or slightly convergent lateral sides (Fig. 30); aedeagus straight, with long thin basal portion, apical lobe with distinct lateral flanges and small hook, without central groove (Figs 73, 77), ventro-apical bladder of internal sac short, right and left basi-lateral bladders very large (Figs 77, 81)	Calomera aulica aulica (Dejean, 1831)
12(11)	Elytra green sometimes with bronze or blue reflection (Figs 47–49); pronotum 1.15–1.35 times as wide as long with rounded distinctly convergent lateral sides (Figs 31–33); aedeagus curved, with short basal portion, apical lobe without lateral flanges and hook, but with clear central groove (Figs 74–76, 82–84), ventro-apical bladder of internal long, right and left basi-lateral bladders as small acicular areas (Figs 78–80, 82–84)	Calomera littoralis (Fabricius, 1787) 12a
12a(12b)	Left mandible with four teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. 16); pronotum narrow, 1.15–1.2 times wider than long (Fig. 31); aedeagus with small distinct bulge on the dorsal surface (Fig. 74); ventro-apical bladder of internal sac long and curved towards and on the left, apex of medial tooth blunt (Figs 74, 78, 82)	Calomera littoralis aulicoides (J.R. Sahlberg, 1913)
12b(12a)	Left mandible with three teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. 17–18); pronotum wide, 1.2–1.35 times wider than long (Figs 32–33); aedeagus without bulge on the dorsal surface (Figs 75–76); ventro-apical bladder of internal sac straight and not curved, apex of medial tooth sharp (Figs 75–76, 79–80, 83–84)	12c
12c(12d)	Labrum wider, 2.6–2.65 times as wide as long (Fig. 32), base of medial tooth of internal sac with one rarely two small additional spikes (Figs 75, 79, 83)	Calomera littoralis winkleri (Mandl, 1934)
12d(12c)	Labrum narrower, 2.35–2.45 times as wide as long (Fig. 33), base of medial tooth of internal sac smooth, without additional spikes (Figs 76, 80, 84)	*(○) Calomera littoralis nemoralis* (Olivier, 1790)**
13(14)	Labrum tridentate with distinctly prominent apical teeth; mandibles with two teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. 26); scapus covered by numerous white decumbent setae (Figs 13, 26), fourth antennomere of males with penicillus (Fig. 13); posterior margin of each eye with group of white decumbent setae; white elytral pattern with basal dot and incomplete sutural band (Fig. 57)	Lophyra (s. str.) (Lophyra (s. str.) flexuosa flexuosa (Fabricius, 1787))
14(13)	Labrum unidentate (Fig. 20–24, 28), in some species tridentate but with not or slightly prominent apical teeth only (Fig. 19); mandibles with three teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. 19–24); scapus glabrous (Figs 19–22, 28) or only with several sparse setae except apical ones (Figs 23–24), fourth antennomere of males glabrous (Fig. 11); posterior margin of each eye glabrous; white elytral pattern without basal dots and sutural band (Figs 50–55, 59)	15
15(16)	Head glabrous; scapus with apical setae only (Fig. 19–22, 28); lateral side of pronotum pilose (Figs 34–37, 43); white elytral pattern with long marginal band and long sinuate middle band (Figs 50–53, 59)	17
16(15)	Frons and vertex with long soft hairs, scapus with several setae except apical ones (Figs 23–24); lateral side of pronotum with soft sparse setae (Figs 38–39); white elytral pattern without marginal band and only with short slightly curved middle band (Figs 54–55)	Cicindela (s. str.) 25
17(18)	Anterior portion of apical lunule long, extending basal transverse portion of middle band (Fig. 59)	Cylindera (Eugrahpa) (Cylindera (Eugrapha) contorta valdenbergi (Mandl, 1981))
18(17)	Anterior portion of apical lunule short, extending only apical portion of middle band (Figs 50–53)	Cephalota (Taenidia) 19
19(20)	Labrum tridentate, relatively short, no less than 2.3 times as wide as long (Fig. 19); pronotum 1.2–1.4 times wider than long (Fig. 34); mesepisternum entirely covered by white setae, densely in males and sparsely in females; white elytral pattern with relatively broad marginal band coupling with humeral and apical lunule as well as with middle band (Fig. 50), apical margin of elytra in sexes wide rounded, subtend practically right angle with sutural tooth (Figs 65–66); aedeagus with long thin gradually curved basal portion (Fig. 85)	(○) Cephalota (Taenidia) tibialis tibialis (Dejean, 1822)
20(19)	Labrum unidentate, relatively long, no more than 2.3 times as wide as long (Figs 20–22); pronotum 1.1–1.25 times wider than long (Figs 35–37); mesepisternum covered by white setae only along posterior margin and on the base; white elytral pattern usually with narrow marginal band or without it so in some specimens humeral lunule distinctly separated (Figs 51–53), apical margin of elytra at least in males subtend acute angle with sutural tooth (Figs 67–72); aedeagus with short thin basal portion (Figs 87, 89, 91)	21
21(22)	4–11^th antennomeres dark brown; elytra bright purple, 1.5–1.6 times as long as wide (Fig. 51), apical elytral margin in females narrowly rounded and subtend small right angle with sutural tooth (Fig. 67–68); aedeagus with broad blunt apex (Figs 87–88)	(○) Cephalota (Taenidia) littorea littorea (Forskål, 1775)
22(21)	4–11^th antennomeres light brown or yellowish; elytra greenish or greenish-blue sometimes with distinct golden-purple reflection, no less than 1.65 times as long as wide (Figs 52–53), apical elytral margin in both sexes subtend acute angle with sutural tooth (Figs 69–72); aedeagus with arrow-shaped apex (Figs 89–92)	23
23(24)	Labrum shorter, 2.0–2.2 times as wide as long (Fig. 21); lateral side of pronotum straight, slightly convergent to large posterior angles (Fig. 36); humeral lunule separated or narrowly coupled with marginal band (Fig. 52); aedeagus larger, with relatively long thin basal portion (Fig. 89) and short tapered apex (Fig. 90)	Cephalota (Taenidia) zarudniana vartianorum (Mandl, 1967)
24(23)	Labrum longer, 1.6–1.7 times as wide as long (Fig. 22); lateral side of pronotum slightly rounded, distinctly convergent to small posterior angles (Fig. 37); humeral lunule coupled with middle band via marginal band (Fig. 52); aedeagus smaller, with short thin basal portion (Fig. 91) and long tapered apex (Fig. 92)	(○) Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticola deserticola (Faldermann, 1836)
25(26)	Pronotum with convex lateral sides gradually convergent to posterior angles, anterior margin same length or slightly longer than posterior one, notopleural suture looks like smooth border (Fig. 39); mesepisternum of female with small shallow pit and deep all along coupling sulcus, mesepimeron with groove along anterior margin (Fig. 63); middle band of white elytral pattern without oblique strip between transverse basal and circled apical portions, basal portion of apical lunule small (Fig. 55); aedeagus shorter, no more than 0.55 times as long as elytra (Fig. 97); basal and right ventro-lateral bladders of internal sac short (Figs 98–100)	Cicindela (s. str.) javeti azari Deuve, 2011
26(25)	Pronotum with straight lateral sides sharply convergent to posterior angles, anterior margin clearly longer than posterior one, notopleural suture looks like cut border (Fig. 38); mesepisternum of female with deep apically but shallow and indistinct basally coupling sulcus only, mesepimeron without groove along anterior margin (Fig. 62); middle band of white elytral pattern with distinct oblique strip between transverse basal and circled apical portions, basal portion of apical lunule large (Fig. 54); aedeagus longer, no less than 0.6 times as long as elytra (Fig. 93); basal and right ventro-lateral bladders of internal sac long (Figs 94–96)	(○) Cicindela (s. str.) herbacea herbacea Klug, 1832

Figures 10–14.

Head and pronotum of males, left lateral view: 10 Grammognatha euphratica euphratica 11 Calomera aulica aulica 12 Cicindela javeti azari 13 Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa 14 Habrodera nilotica; aa pr – anterior angle of pronotum; pc – penicillus. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Figures 15–22.

Labrum and mandibles of males, dorsal view: 15 Calomera aulica aulica 16 Calomera littoralis aulicoides 17 Calomera littoralis winkleri 18 Calomera littoralis nemoralis 19 Cephalota tibialis tibialis 20 Cephalota littorea littorea 21 Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum 22 Cephalota deserticola deserticola. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Figures 23–29.

Labrum and mandibles of males, dorsal view: 23 Cicindela herbacea herbacea 24 Cicindela javeti azari 25 Habrodera nilotica nilotica 26 Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa 27 Hypaetha singularis 28 Cylindera contorta valdenbergi 29 Myriochila melancholica melancholica. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Figures 30–45.

Pronotum of males, dorsal view: 30 Calomera aulica aulica 31 Calomera littoralis aulicoides 32 Calomera littoralis winkleri 33 Calomera littoralis nemoralis 34 Cephalota tibialis tibialis 35 Cephalota littorea littorea 36 Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum 37 Cephalota deserticola deserticola 38 Cicindela herbacea herbacea 39 Cicindela javeti azari 40 Habrodera nilotica nilotica 41 Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa 42 Hypaetha singularis 43 Cylindera contorta valdenbergi 44 Myriochila melancholica melancholica 45 Grammognatha euphratica euphratica; pr st pronotopleural suture. Scale bars: 1 mm (30–33: A; 34–37: B; 38–41: C; 42–43: D; 44: E; 45: F).

Figures 46–61.

Left elytron of males, dorsal view: 46 Calomera aulica aulica 47 Calomera littoralis aulicoides 48 Calomera littoralis winkleri; 49 Calomera littoralis nemoralis 50 Cephalota tibialis tibialis 51 Cephalota littorea littorea 52 Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum 53 Cephalota deserticola deserticola 54 Cicindela herbacea herbacea 55 Cicindela javeti azari 56 Habrodera nilotica nilotica 57 Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa 58 Hypaetha singularis 59 Cylindera contorta valdenbergi 60 Myriochila melancholica melancholica 61 Grammognatha euphratica euphratica. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Figures 62–72.

Details of Cicindelinae: 62–63 mesoepisternal coupling sulcus 64 hind femora 65–72 apical part of left elytron 62 Cicindela herbacea herbacea 63 Cicindela javeti azari 64 Myriochila melancholica melancholica 65–66 Cephalota tibialis tibialis 67–68 Cephalota littorea littorea 69–70 Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum 71–72 Cephalota deserticola deserticola 64–65, 67, 69, 71 males 62–63, 66, 68, 70, 72 females. Scale bars: 1 mm (62–63: A; 64: B; 65–66: C; 67–68 D; 69–70: E; 71–72: F).

Figures 73–76.

Aedeagus of Calomera spp., right lateral view: 73 C. aulica aulica 74 C. littoralis aulicoides 75 C. littoralis winkleri 76 C. littoralis nemoralis; mt – median tooth. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figures 77–84.

Internal sack of Calomera spp.: 77, 81 C. aulica aulica 78, 82 C. littoralis aulicoides 79, 83 C. littoralis winkleri 80, 84 C. littoralis nemoralis 77–80 right lateral view 81–84 dorsal view; BLR basi-lateral right bladder; BLL basi-lateral left bladder; VA – ventro-apical bladder; mt – median tooth. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figures 85–92

. Aedeagus of Cephalota spp.: 85–86 Cephalota tibialis tibialis 87–88 Cephalota littorea littorea 89–90 Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum 91–92 Cephalota deserticola deserticola 85, 87, 89, 90 aedeagus, left lateral view 86, 88, 91, 92 apex of aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figures 93–100.

Aedeagus and internal sack of Cicindela ssp.: 93–96 C. herbacea herbacea 97–100 C. javeti azari 93, 97 aedeagus 94–96, 98–100 internal sac 93, 96–97, 100 left lateral view 95, 99 dorsal view 94, 98 right lateral view 98–100 partly inflanted); B basal bladder; VLR – ventro-lateral right bladder. Scale bars: 1 mm (93, 97: A; 94–96: B; 98–100: C).

Figure 101.

Similarities between tiger beetle faunas of different regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula (Complete linkage procedure, squared Euclidean distances).

Distribution

With these current records, eight species of tiger beetles, one of them with two subspecies, belonging to seven genera of two tribes are known from Israel (Table 1). The Rift Valley, including Jordan Valley, Dead Sea area and Arava Valley, with six cicindelids species is the most speciose region. The Coastal Plain is the second richest region with five species. The species richness gradually decreases from Northern (fife species) through Central (four species) to Southern (three species) Coastal Plain. In the central densely populated areas of Israel, such as Samaria and Judea, the least number of tiger beetles species are recorded. Among all M. melancholica melancholica is the most common species observed in all regions of the country (Table 1, Fig. 7), while L. flexuosa flexuosa is the second most widespread species of tiger beetles absent only from northern (Galilee, Golan Heights) and central (Samaria, Judea) regions (Table 1, Fig. 6). Lophyra flexuosa (Fabricius, 1787) reaches the eastern limit of its distribution in Israel.

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

The distribution of tiger beetles in different regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula.

Species/Subspecies	Choro-types	Israel														Siani (Egypt)
		Galilee		Golan Heights (including Mt. Hermon)	Coastal Plain			Judea		Rift Valley			Negev			Northern Siani	Central Siani Foothills	Sinai Mountains	Southwestern Sinai
		Upper	Lower	Golan Heights (including Mt. Hermon)	Northern	Central	Southern	Judean Desert	Judean Hills	Jordan Valley	Dead Sea Area	Arava Valley	Northern	Central	Southern	Northern Siani	Central Siani Foothills	Sinai Mountains	Southwestern Sinai
Calomera aulica aulica	SSS									●	●	●				●		●	●
Calomera littoralis aulicoides	NAA		●	●						●	●	●							●
Calomera littoralis winkleri	SAT	●			●	●	●		●
Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum	INP										●
Cephalota tibialis tibialis	EGYP															●
Cephalota littorea littorea	NAA																	●	●
Cicindela javeti azari	LEVC	●		●
Cylindera contorta valdenbergi	CPND				●	●
Habrodera nilotica nilotica	AFT																	●
Hypaetha singularis	NAA																		●
Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa	WMA				●	●	●				●	●	●	●	●	●	●		●
Myriochila melancholica melancholica	AMC	●	●	●	●	●	●	●		●	●	●	●	●	●	●			●
Grammognatha euphratica euphratica	SMS				●						●	●			●	●		●	●
Total for localities		3	2	3	5	4	3	1	1	3	6	5	2	2	3	5	1	4	7
Total for localities		4		3	5			2		6			3			9
Total for regions		8(9)														9

Three subspecies, C. contorta valdenbergi, C. javeti azari and C. zarudniana vartianorum, are characterized by a restricted distribution in Israel (Fig. 4). The first two first subspecies should be considered as regional endemics.

The nominative subspecies of Cylindera contorta (F.-W., 1828) is widely distributed in Central Asia, some regions of Cis- and Transcaucasia as well as in the northern and western sides of the Black Sea from southern Russia to Romania (Wiesner 1992; Cassola 1999; Puchkov and Matalin 2003), however it is not known from Anatolia (Corel 1988; Cassola 1999; Puchkov and Matalin 2003; Avgin and Özdikmen 2007), Syria (Wiesner 1992; Puchkov and Matalin 2003; Avgin and Wiesner 2009; Jaskuła and Rewicz 2014), Jordan (Wiesner 1992; Puchkov and Matalin 2003), Iraq (Ali 1978; Wiesner 1992; Puchkov and Matalin 2003) and Saudi Arabia (Wiesner 1992; Cassola and Schneider 1997; Puchkov and Matalin 2003; Al Ahmadi and Salem 1999). The populations of C. contorta valdenbergi inhabit the Mediterranean coast from ‘Akko (Northern Coastal Plain) to Bat Yam (Central Coastal Plain) in Israel (Nussbaum 1987; our data) as well as between Ras El Bar and Abu Qir in north-eastern Egypt (Alfieri 1976; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003) are distinctly scattered and bound the southwestern limit of the distributional area of C. contorta as a whole.

Cicindela javeti azari has a restricted distributional area and now is known only from southern Lebanon (Deuve 2011), southwestern Syria (Avgin and Wiesner 2009) as well as northern regions of Israel: Upper Galilee and Golan Heights (Nussbaum 1987; our data). Among three known subspecies (Deuve 2011) C. javeti azari inhabits the southern part of the species range area.

Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum lives from south-eastern Iran across Iraq and Syria to Jordan and Israel (Wiesner 1992; Puchkov and Matalin 2003). The Dead Sea Area is the western border of the distributional area both for this subspecies as well as for the species as a whole.

It should be noted that the three mentioned above subspecies were recorded in Israel only during XX century (Fig. 4), and the latest records are dated from the late 80’s to the early 90’s.

The Sinai Peninsula is the most diversity of tiger beetles region from all neighbouring territories by Israel because nine species live here, and C. tibialis tibialis, C. littorea littorea, H. singularis and H. nilotica nilotica are never really observe in Israel (vsChikatunov et al. 2006). Among them C. tibialis tibialis is an endemic of Egypt and occurs along Mediterranean Sea coast in the Governorates Matrouh, Alexandria, Kafr el-Sheikh, Damietta, Port Said and North Sinai (Gebert 1991; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2012). Moreover, C. littorea littorea is an regional near-endemic living along Red Sea coast in Egypt and Saudi Arabia (Gebert 1991; Cassola and Schneider 1997; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003). Arabian-African Hypaetha singularis lives along Red Sea coast in Egypt, Sudan, Eritrea and Yemen, and on the shore of Gulf of Aden in Djibouti, Somalia and Yemen (Wranik et al. 1991; Werner 2000; Wiesner 2002, 2005) as well as on the littoral of Arabian Sea in Oman (Cassola and Rihane 1996). The Sinai localities are limited the northern border of the distribution area of this species. African Habrodera nilotica nilotica is widely distributed in Afrotropical Region (Wiesner 1992; Werner 2000). Two known localities from Sinai Mountains (Alfieri 1976; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003; Abdel-Dayem 2004) are limited the distribution range of this species to the east.

According to the analysis of the similarity between faunas of tiger beetle of natural regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula two large clusters are recognized (Fig. 101). First of them includes the faunas associated with southern part of the Great Rift Valley (Arava valley and Dead Sea area) and most part of the Sinai Peninsula, while the second combine most Israeli regions as well as Central Sinai Foothills. The last cluster diverges on the four groups. The fist combines assemblages of tiger beetles of the Mediterranean coastal habitats within the Northern and Central Coastal Plains. The communities typical for the arid habitats of the Negev Desert and the Central Sinai Foothills as well as for coastal habitats of the Southern Coastal Plain form the second group. The third group includes assemblages of the northern not seashore habitats of the Jordan Valley, Lower Galilee and Golan Heights. The last group is artificial, because the fauna of tiger beetles of Judea should be most similar to the fauna of the Dead Sea Area or the Northern Negev, while the fauna of tiger beetles of the Galilee, Jordan Valley and Golan Heights should be the most similar to each other. First of all, this discrepancy is due to a lack of data about tiger beetles of the central regions of Israel.

Phenology

According to the literature data (Alfieri 1975; Nussbaum 1987; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003) and the results of our own study some aspects of the phenology of tiger beetles both in Israel and on the Sinai Peninsula are discussed. The period of activity of the beetles but not the breeding period was analysed first of all. As a result, five groups of the tiger beetles were obtained (Table 2). Three species with the longer period of activity from January to November or from February to December belong to the all-year group. Five species, including two subspecies of Calomera littoralis (F., 1787), characterized by the prolonged period of activity from February to October-November, from March-April to November or from March to December and form the richest spring-fall group. Two species recorded only on the Sinai Peninsula with the period of activity from May to August-September are composed the summer group. At last, both the spring group (activity from February to May) and the spring-summer group (activity from February to August) contain a single species each.

Table 2.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

The phenology of tiger beetles in Israel (grey – our data; pink – after Nussbaum 1987) and in the Egypt (green – after Alfieri 1975; blue – after Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003).

Cephalota zarudniana vartianorum

Spring

Grammognatha euphratica euphratica

(Si)

Spring-summer

(Si)

Hypaetha singularis

Si

Summer

Si

Cephalota littorea littorea

Si

(Si)

Cephalota tibialis tibialis

Si

Spring-fall

Si

Calomera littoralis aulicoides

Si

Calomera littoralis winkleri

Cylindera contorta valdenbergi

Cicindela javeti azari

Myriochila melancholica melancholica

Habrodera nilotica nilotica

Si

All-yaer

Calomera aulica aulica

(Si)

Si

(Si)

Si

(Si)

Lophyra flexuosa flexuosa

(Si)

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

VIII

IX

X

XI

XII

It should be noted that the period of activity of some studied species does not correspond with the data of previous studies in Israel (Nussbaum 1987) and on the Sinai Peninsula (Alfieri 1975; Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003), as well as in the other parts of the distribution area (Jaskuła and Rewicz 2015; Jaskuła et al. 2015). For example, the activity of C. aulica aulica, C. littoralis aulicoides, C. zarudniana vartianorum, C. contorta valdenbergi and G. euphratica euphratica start one-two months earlier, while the activity of C. aulica aulica, C. littoralis aulicoides, M. melancholica melancholica and G. euphratica euphratica finish one-three, and in the case with L. flexuosa flexuosa even six months later comparing with the data of Nussbaum (1987). On the other hand, Nussbaum (1987) indicated longer period of activity of C. littoralis winkleri and C. tibialis tibialis as well as the later finish of the activity of C. contorta valdenbergi and C. javeti azari (Table 2).

Similarly, the periods of activity of C. aulica aulica, L. flexuosa flexuosa and M. melancholica melancholica in the central and southern Levant as well as on the Sinai Peninsula are appreciably longer than in the Maghreb region. So, in Tunisia C. aulica aulica records only in June and July (Jaskuła and Rewicz 2015), while in Israel it active from March to December and on the Sinai Peninsula from February to October (Table 2). Both in Tunisia and Morocco the period of activity of L. flexuosa flexuosa lasts from March-April to July (Jaskuła and Rewicz 2015; Jaskuła et al. 2015) but in Israel it continues from February to December (Table 2).

On the contrary, in Tunisia the activity of G. euphratica euphratica begins in March and ends in July (Jaskuła and Rewicz 2015) that is similar with the period of activity in Israel and on the Sinai Peninsula (Table 2), while in Morocco it takes only three months from June to August (Jaskuła et al. 2015). The same situation is observed for different subspecies of Cephalota littorea (Forskål, 1775) as well as C. littoralis. In Tunisia C. littorea gouditii (Dejean, 1829) is active from May to October (Jaskuła and Rewicz 2015) while the period of activity of C. littorea littorea on the Sinai Peninsula lasts from May to September (Table 2). The activity of C. littoralis littoralis in Morocco is observed from April to October (Jaskuła et al. 2015) and in Tunisia from March to August (Jaskuła and Rewicz 2015), while the activity of C. littoralis aulicoides in Israel and on the Sinai Peninsula as well as C. littoralis winkleri in Israel occurs from February to October and from February to November, respectively (Table 2).

However, we must remember that the obtained data are compilative. The differences in the time and the density of sampling, the collection technics as well as the frequency of visit of the particular localities and habitats could really distort the real pattern.

Faunogenesis

The tiger beetle fauna of Israel as well as the Levant as a whole is complex. In geological time these areas were settled by species from different Mediterranean, African and Asiatic regions.

Unfortunately, the information about fossil Cicindelinae is extremely scant (Nagano et al. 1982). At present time South American Oxycheilopsis cretacicus Cassola & Werner, 2004 (Lower Cretaceous ca. 125 Ma) is the oldest known fossil tiger beetle (Cassola and Werner 2004). Three samples of fossil cicindelids are known from the northern Europe Baltic Amber (Oligocene ca. 23-34 Ma). Despite the identification ambiguity of the species, the genera were interpreted as the recent ones (Nagano et al. 1982; Röschmann 1999) as most known fossil Carabidae and other Coleoptera (Alekseev 2013). All other fossil records of the tiger beetles from the Europe and northern America (USA and Canada) are dated from the Quaternary period from Pleistocene to Holocene, and all other species are interpreted as recent (Nagano et al. 1982).

By analogy with other groups of carabid beetles (Kataev 1984, 2011; Casale and Vigna Taglianti 1999; Ruiz et al. 2012), we can assume that the genesis of the ancestral taxa of most recent cicindelids in the Mediterranean region began in late Paleogene – early Neogene (on the border of Oligocene – Miocene). According to data of DNA analysis the divergence processes of taxa of subtribe Cicindelina began ca. 15-25 Ma with most intensity between 2–10 Ma (Barraclough and Vogler 2002; Pons et al. 2004; Tsuji et al. 2015). For example, the diversification of the species within Cicindela hybrida group started ca. 2 Ma (Cardoso and Vogler 2005), while the separation of the genus Cosmodela Rivalier, 1961 from other Cicindelinae took place ca. 2.2–5 Ma (López-López et al. 2015; Tsuji et al. 2015). Based on the fossil material we could be argued that at least 60,000–70,000 yrs. BP the recent species of tiger beetles were already presented both in the North America and in the Eurasia (Nagano et al. 1982).

The continental drift of the Arabian and Anatolian Plates, their collision and, as the result, closing the Neotethys Ocean during Oligocene-Miocene were the most important processes forming the Mediterranean Sea and the genesis of the terrestrial Mediterranean fauna. The Eurasian-African land-bridge formed during late Burdigalian – middle Serravallian ca. 12.5–18 Ma (Rögl 1998) initiated the species change/exchange between the Europe, Asia and Africa (Koufos et al. 2005). The territory of the Sinai Peninsula and the Levant free from the sea formed the first transit corridor. However, it was interrupted at least twice in Langhian (ca. 16–16.4 Ma) and in early Serravallian (ca. 13–13.3 Ma), while in Tortonian (ca. 11.6 Ma) the final connection of Arabian and Anatolian plates and isolation of the Mediterranean Sea took place (Rögl 1998, 1999). Because the Central and Southern Levant as well as the Sinai Peninsula were the part of the Arabian plate connected with the African continent (Rögl 1998; Popov et al. 2004; Robertson et al. 2012; Berra and Angiolini 2014) the African species G. euphratica, H. nilotica, M. melancholica and L. flexuosa could have colonized these territories before the other species.

The sharp decrease of the level of the Mediterranean Sea in Messinian (ca. 5.5–6 Ma) caused the formation of both numerous shallow enclosed saline basins and the land-bridges between Southern Europe and Northern Africa (Rögl and Steininger 1983). In our opinion during this time the active divergence and dispersion of such halophilic genera as Cephalota, Calomera and Hypaetha as well as the species of the subgenus Eugrapha occurred. All of them are arisen in the saline landscapes along the seashores of Para- and Neotethys in the Southern Russland as well as Central and Western Asia. From these regions the ancestors of the recent taxa probably dispersed through the Middle East, Arabian Peninsula and Anatolia to the Levant and the Sinai Peninsula, and some of them to Northern Africa. The second stream of the migration was possible along the Mediterranean coast of Southern Europe. Following this some species reached the Iberian Peninsula, and then the western regions of Northern Africa. In contrast G. euphratica, M. melancholica, L. flexuosa could be populated Southern Europe (Garcia-Reina et al. 2014), Western and Central Asia as well as Sind and some regions of South-Eastern Asia. Finally, possible during the last Glacial Period, the ancestors of C. javeti and C. herbacea dispersed into the Levant from the Anatolia, a region characterized by a higher level of diversity of the species of the Cicindela campestris group (Cassola 1999; Franzen 2007; Deuve 2011, 2012; our unpublished data).

This proposed version of the biogeographical genesis of the fauna of tiger beetles of the Levant should be considered an initial hypothesis. Molecular analysis and more detailed paleontologic information are necessary to robustly reject or validate it.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr. Laibale Friedman (Tel Aviv, Israel), Dr. Alexander Puchkov (Kiev, Ukraine), Mr. Jürgen Wiesner (Wolfsburg, Germany), Mr. Igor’ Ovsyannikov, Mr. Alexander Sokolov, Mr. Pavel Udovichenko and Mr. Eugeny Shankhiza (all Moscow, Russia) who kindly has given material and information for our study. Special thanks to Prof. David L. Pearson (Arizona State University, USA) for revising the English text. For the first author the study received financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Project No 6.632.2014/K).

References

Abdel-Dayem MS (2004) Diversity and spatial distribution of ground and tiger beetles (Carabidae, Coleoptera) in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Egypt 81: 57–80.

Abdel-Dayem MS (2012) An annotated checklist of the endemic Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Egypt. Check List 8(2): 197–203. doi: 10.15560/8.2.197

Abdel-Dayem MS, El-Hawagry MSA, Hassan SA (2003) A review of the Egyptian species of tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae). Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Egypt 80: 193–217.

Abdel-Dayem MS, Kippenhan MG (2013) A new record of Cylindera (Ifasina) rectangularis (Klug) (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae) for the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Coleopterists Bulletin 67(1): 19–21. doi: 10.1649/072.067.0103

Acciavatti RE, Pearson DL (1989) The tiger beetles Cicindela (Coleoptera, Insecta) from the Indian subcontinent. Annals of Carnegie Museum 58(4): 77–354.

Al-Ahmadi AZ, Salem MM (1999) Entomofauna of Saudi Arabia: General Survey of Insects Reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Part I: Checklist of Insects. Academic Publishing and Press, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 240 pp.

Alekseev VI (2013) The beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Baltic amber: the checklist of described species and preliminary analysis of biodiversity. Zoology and Ecology 23(1): 5–12. doi: 10.1080/21658005.2013.769717

Alfieri A (1976) The Coleoptera of Egypt. Mémoires de la Société Entomologique d’Egypte 5: 1–362.

Ali HA (1978) Faunistic Study of the Cicindelidae (Coleoptera) of Iraq and Southwest Asia. The Coleopterists Bulletin 32(1): 1–20.

Avgin SS, Özdikmen H (2007) Check-list of tiger beetles of Turkey with review of distribution and biogeography (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Munis Entomology and Zoology 2(1): 87–102.

Avgin SS, Wiesner J (2009) An annotated checklist and review of the tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) of the Syrian Arab Republic with new locality records. Journal of Entomological Science 44(4): 353–358.

Barraclough TG, Vogler AP (2002) Recent diversification rates in North American tiger beetles estimated from a dated mtDNA phylogenetic tree. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(10): 1706–1716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003993

Berra F, Angiolini L (2014) The evolution of the Tethys region throughout the Phanerozoic: A brief tectonic reconstruction. Petroleum systems of the Tethyan region: AAPG Memoir 106: 1–27. doi: 10.1306/13431840M1063606

Bodenheimer FS (1937) Prodromus faunae Palaestinae: Essai sur les éléments zoogéographiques et historiques du sud-ouest du sous-régne paléarctique. Mémoires présentés à l’Institut d’Egypte 33: 1–286.

Cardoso A, Vogler AP (2005) DNA taxonomy, phylogeny and Pleistocene diversification of the Cicindela hybrida species group (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Molecular Ecology 14(11): 3531–3546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02679.x

Casale A, Vigna Taglianti A (1999) Caraboid beetles (excl. Cicindelidae) of Anatolia, and their biogeographical significance (Coleoptera, Caraboidea). Biogeographia 20: 277–406.

Cassola F (1985) Una notevole conferma per la fauna d’Europa: Lophyridia aulica (Dejean) nella Grecia meridionale (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae). Bollettino dell’Associazione romana di Entomologia 39: 55–61.

Cassola F (1999) The cicindelid fauna of Anatolia: faunistics and biogeography (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae). Biogeographia 20: 229–276.

Cassola F, Rihane A (1996) Notes on the Tiger Beetle Fauna of the Sultanate of Oman (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae). Fauna of Saudi Arabia 15: 196–205.

Cassola F, Schneider W (1997) Tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) from the Saudi Arabian Gulf Coast. Fauna of Saudi Arabia 16: 247–253.

Cassola F, Werner K (2004) A fossil tiger beetle specimen from the Brazilian Mesozoic: Oxycheilopsis cretacicus n. gen., n. sp. Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft.94: 75–81.

Chikatunov V, Kravchenko V, Müller G (2006) Carabidae (Coleoptera) collected in the Israeli light trap survey and their association with the major phyto-geographical zones of Israel Esperiana. Buchreiche zur Entomologie 12: 289–297.

Deuve Th (2011) Esquisse pour l’étude des Cicindela proches de campestris, desertorum, herbacea et javeti au Proche-Orient (ColeopteraCaraboidea). L’Entomologiste 67(3): 125–138.

Deuve Th (2012) Esquisse pour l’étude des populations est-méditerranéennes du grupe de Cicindela campestris (ColeopteraCaraboidea). L’Entomologiste 68(1): 3–16.

El-Moursy A, El-Hawagry M, Abdel-Dayem M, Fadl H (2001) Insect diversity in Zaranik Protectorate, Northern Sinai, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Natural History 3: 62–80.

Finkel M, Chikatunov V, Nevo E (2002) Coleoptera of “Evolution Canyon“. II: Lower Nahal Keziv, Western Upper Galilee, Israel. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, 270 pp.

Franzen M (1996) Zur Systematik von Cephalota circumdata Dejean in der Türkei: Beschreibung von zwei neuen Unterarten aus Zentralanatolien (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae). Coleoptera 24: 1–17.

Franzen M (2001) Distribution of the tiger beetle Megacephala (Grammognatha) euphratica in Egypt, the Middle East and Central Asia (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Zoology in the Middle East 22: 87–93. doi: 10.1080/09397140.2001.10637852

Franzen M (2007) A new species of tiger beetle of the Cicindela campestris group from southern Turkey, with remarks on the identity of C. herbacea Klug, 1832 and other taxa related to C. desertorum Dejean, 1825. Spixiana 30(1): 13–24.

Franzen M, Wiesner J (1998) Erstnachweis von Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticola (Faldermann, 1836) für die Türkei (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae), 49. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cicindelidae. Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen 47(3/4): 88–91.

Garcia-Reina A, López-López A, Serrano J, Galian J (2014) Phylogeographic patterns of two tiger beetle species at both sides of the strait of Gibraltar (Coleoptera: Cicindelini). Annales de la Societe entomologique de France (N.S.) 50(3-4): 399–406 doi: 10.1080/00379271.2014.984954

Gebert J (1991) Revision der Cephalota (Taenidia) littorea (Forskål, 1775) und Cephalota (Taenidia) tibialis (Dejean, 1822) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae). Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 81: 175–192.

Gebert J (1999) Bemerkungen zur Phylogenie und Verbreitung von Cephalota (Taenidia) circumdata Dejean 1822 (Col., Carabidae, Cicindelinae). Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 43: 27–32.

Jaskuła R, Rewicz T (2014) Tiger beetle fauna (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) of Syria: distribution, geographical origin, taxa list and new records. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 14(2): 191–198.

Jaskuła R, Rewicz T (2015) Tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae) of Tunisia: distribution, phenology, taxa list and new records. African Entomology 23(2): 467–485. doi: 10.4001/003.023.0217

Jaskuła R, Rewicz T, Kwiatkowski K (2015) Tiger beetles fauna (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Cicindelinae) of Morocco: distribution and list of taxa. Entomologica Fennica 26: 132–155.

Horn W (1931) Zur Kenntnis de Cicindelen-Fauna von Cypern, Syrien, Sizilien, Aegypten und Sud-Griechenland (insbesondere de geographischen verbreitung der Arten Cicindela aphrodisia Baudi, C. campestris suffriani Loew, C. contorta Fisch. und C. dorsata Br. sowie C. aulica Dejean. Bulletin de la Societé Royale Entomologique d’Egypte 15: 157–163.

Kataev BM (1984) Some peculiarities of the evolution of the genus Harpalus Latr. (Coleoptera, Carabidae).IX Congress of the Entomological Society of the USSR. Naukova Dumka, Kiev1: 213. [In Russian]

Kataev BM (2011) The ground beetles of the genus Harpalus Latr. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Word: taxonomy, zoogeography, phylogeny.Abstract of a thesis of Doctor of Biology (Entomology). ZISP, St.-Petersburg, 1–23. [In Russian]

Korel A (1988) Die Cicindeliden (Coleoptera) Anatoliens. Entomologica Basiliensia 12: 93–111.

Koufos GD, Kostopoulos DS, Vlachou ThD (2005) Neogen/Quaternary mammalian migrations in Eastern Mediterranen. Belgian Journal of Zoology 135(2): 181–190.

López-López A, Aziz AA, Galian J (2015) Molecular phylogeny and divergence time estimation of Cosmodela (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae) tiger beetle species from Southeast Asia. Zoologica Scripta 44(4): 437–445. doi: 10.1111/zsc.12113

Mandl K (1934) Cicindela lunulata Fabr. und ihre Rassen (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Materials des Deutschen Entomologischen Instituts, Berlin-Dahlem). Arbeiten über morphologische taxonomische Entomologie aus Berlin-Dahlem 1(2): 124–129, 239–246.

Mandl K (1981) Neue Coleopteren-Taxa vom Nahen- bis zum Fernen-Osten (Col. Cicindelidae, Carabidae und Chrysomelidae). Entomologica Basiliensia 6: 167–175.

Mandl K1981 (1982) Verbreitungskarten der Arten der Lophyridia aulicoides (Col., Cicibdelidae). Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österreichischer Entomologen 33(3/4): 92–96.

Matalin AV (1998) The tiger-beetles of “hybrida”-species group (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae). III. A taxonomic review of the Iberian Cicindela lagunensis Gautier, 1872 complex. Graellsia 54: 75–96. doi: 10.3989/graellsia.1998.v54.i0.346

Nagano ChD, Miller SE, Morgan AV (1982) Fossil tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): review and new Quaternary records. Psyche 89: 339–346. doi: 10.1155/1982/80694

Naviaux R (1983) Coleoptera, Cicindelidae. Une approche de la faune d’Iran. Revue Scientifique du Bourbonnais, 1983: 73–97.

Nussbaum Y (1987) Tiger beetles from Israel and Sinai (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Yes Quarterly 4(1): 7–15.

Pons J, Barraclough TG, Theodorides K, Cardoso A, Vogler AP (2004) Using exon and intron sequences of the gene Mp20 to resolve basal relationships in Cicindela (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Systematic Biology 53(4): 554–570 doi: 10.1080/10635150490472940

Popov SV, Rögl F, Rozanov AY, Steininger FF, Shcherba IG, Kovac M (2004) Lithologicalpaleogeographic maps of Paratethys. 10 Maps Late Eocene to Pliocene. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 250: 1–46.

Ptashkovsky Yu (2009) The Beetles of Israel. Private publishing, 195 pp. [In Russian]

Puchkov AV, Matalin AV (2003) Subfamily Cicindelinae Latreille, 1802. In: Löbl I, Smetana A (Eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. 1. Archostemata – Myxophaga – Adephaga. Appolo Book, Stenstrup, 99–118.

Rittner O (2003) The insect Word of Israel. Cicindelinae of Israel. http://www.nature-of-oz.com

Robertson AHF, Parlak O, Ustaömer T (2012) Overview of the Palaeozoic–Neogene evolution of neotethys in the Eastern Mediterranean region (southern turkey, cyprus, Syria). Petroleum Geoscience 18: 381–404. doi: 10.1144/petgeo2011-091

Rögl F (1998) Palaeogeographic considerations for Mediterranean and Paratethys Seaways (Oligocene to Miocene). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien.Serie A für Mineralogie und Petrographie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Anthropologie und Prähistorie99A: 279–310.

Rögl F (1999) Mediterranean and Paratethys. Facts and hypotheses of an Oligocene to Miocene paleogeography (short overview). Geologica Carpathica 50(4): 339–349.

Rögl F, Steininger FF (1983) Vom Zerfall der Tethys zu Mediterran und Paratethys. Die neogene Palaogeographic und Palinspastik des zirkum-mediterranen Raumes. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie A für Mineralogie und Petrographie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Anthropologie und Prähistorie85A: 135–163.

Röschmann F (1999) Revision of the evidence of Tetracha carolina (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) in Baltic amber (Eocene-Oligocene). Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Álava 14(2): 205–209.

Ruiz C, Jordal BH, Serrano J (2012) Diversification of subgenus Calathus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Mediterranean region – glacial refugia and taxon pulses. Journal of Biogeography 39(10): 1791–1805. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02751.x

Sahlberg J (1913) Coleoptera mediterranea orientalia. Öfvertryck af Finska Vetenskaps-Societetens Förhandlingar 55: 1–282.

Schatzmayr A (1936) Risultati scientifici della spedizione entomologica di S.A.S. il Principe Alessandro della Torre e Tasso in Egitto e nella penisola del Sinai. XII. Catalogoragionato dei Carabidi finora noti d’Egittoe del Sinai. Pubblicazioni del Museo Entomologico “Pietro Rossi” 14(1): 6–114.

Tsuji K, Hori M, Phyu MH, Liang H, Sota T (2016) Colorful patterns indicate common ancestry in diverged tiger beetle taxa: Molecular phylogeny, biogeography, and evolution of elytral coloration of the genus Cicindela subgenus Sophiodela and its allies. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 95: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.006 [available online 11 November 2015]

Valdenberg A (1983) A key to the species of Cicindelidae of Israel and the Sinai. Shappirit (Journal of the Israel Entomology Center) 1: 38–48. [In Hebrew]

Valdenberg A (1985) Species of Cicindelidae from Israel and Sinai. Shappirit (Journal of the Israel Entomology Center) 2–3: 28–44. [In Hebrew]

Vigna Taglianti A, Audisio PA, Biondi M, Bologna MA, Carpaneto GM, Dd Biase A, Fattorini S, Piatella E, Sindaco R, Venchi A, Zapparoli M (1999) A proposal for a chorotype classification of the Near East fauna, in the framework of the Western Palaearctic region. Biogeographia 20: 31–59.

Werner K (1992) Cicindelidae Regionis Palaearcticae, Cicindelini 2. Science Nat, Die Käfer der Welt. 15, 94.

Werner K (1999) The tiger beetles of Africa (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). 1. Taita Publishers, 191 pp.

Werner K (2000) The tiger beetles of Africa (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). 2. Taita Publishers, 207 pp.

Wiesner J (1992) Checklist of the tiger beetles of the world. Erna Bauer Verlag, Keltern, 364 pp.

Wiesner J (2002) About tiger beetles, recently collected in the Yemen Arab Republis (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae). Coleoptera 6(1/2): 223–229.

Wiesner J (2005) On some tiger beetles collected in the Yemen Arab Republic (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae). Zoologi in the Middle East 36: 115–117. doi: 10.1080/09397140.2005.10638138

Wranik W, Materlik B, Cassola F (1991) The Cicindelidae (Coleoptera) of the Republic of Yemen. Fauna of Saudi Arabia 12: 266–272.