Research Article
Print
Research Article
A genetic assessment of the population structure and demographic history of Odontamblyopus lacepedii (Perciformes, Amblyopinae) from the northwestern Pacific
expand article infoLinlin Zhao, Shouqiang Wang, Fangyuan Qu, Zisha Liu§, Tianxiang Gao|
‡ Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao, China
§ Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
| Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, China
Open Access

Abstract

Coupled with geological and geographical history, climatic oscillations during the Pleistocene period had remarkable effects on species biodiversity and distribution along the northwestern Pacific. To detect the population structure and demographic history of Odontamblyopus lacepedii, 547-bp fragments of the mitochondrial DNA control region were sequenced. A low level of nucleotide diversity (0.0065 ± 0.0037) and a high level of haplotype diversity (0.98 ± 0.01) was observed. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference phylogenetic trees showed no significant genealogical structure corresponding to sampling locations. The results of AMOVA and pairwise FST values revealed some significant genetic differentiation among populations, and the isolation by distance (IBD) analysis supported that the genetic differentiation was associated with the geographic distances. The demographic history of O. lacepedii examined by neutrality tests, mismatch distribution analysis, and Bayesian Skyline Plots (BSP) analysis suggested a sudden population expansion, and the expansion time was estimated to be around the Pleistocene. We hypothesize that the climate changes during the Pleistocene, ocean currents, and larval dispersal capabilities have played an important role in shaping contemporary phylogeographic pattern and population structure of O. lacepedii.

Keywords

Conservation, control region, fishery management, genetic diversity, genetic structure, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, population demography

Introduction

Odontamblyopus lacepedii (Temminck & Schlegel, 1845), commonly referred to as “eel goby” or “worm goby,” is an elongated, mud-dwelling benthic fish (Murdy and Shibukawa 2003). This air-breathing goby can spawn thousands of eggs at once (Dotsu and Takita 1967; Wu and Zhong 2008). However, it was misidentified in most of the Chinese literature as O. rubicundus (Hamilton, 1822) (Chen and Zhang 2016), which is so far distributed only in the coastal waters of India. Actually, the coastal waters and intertidal zones of East Asia are mainly inhabited by O. lacepedii (Gonzales et al. 2006; Chen and Zhang 2016). Previous studies of this goby have been dedicated to design models about the intertidal burrows (Gonzales et al. 2008a, b), taxonomic studies (Murdy and Shibukawa 2001; Tang et al. 2010) and phylogenetic analysis (Agorreta et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2018). However, little has been known about its population genetic structure and demographic history.

The complex interactions of post geological-history events, life history, and oceanographic condition as evolutionary processes played an important role in shaping population genetic structure and biodiversity of marine fishes (Santos et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2020). The East China Sea, including Yellow and Bohai seas, and South China Sea constitute the marginal oceanic regions of China. The East China Sea has one of the widest shelves in the world, and it was separated from the Pacific Ocean by the Ryukyu Islands Arc during the last glacial maximum when the sea level was 130–150 m lower than today (Xie et al. 1995; Xu and Oda 1999). However, during the postglacial warming period, the barrier disappeared (Ujiié and Ujiié 1999) with the sea level rise (Siddall et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2006), and the isolated marginal seas were reconnected (Liu et al. 2006). Those changes during glacial cycles had dramatic effects on intraspecific genetic diversity and population structure of marine species (Avise 1992; Hewitt 2000; Liu et al. 2007).

Studies have indicated that intraspecific genetic differentiation within widely distributed marine organisms is particularly reduced, mainly due to the high potential of dispersal ability over large areas (Nielsen et al. 2010; O’Donnell et al. 2017). Dispersal is very important to population biology, behavioral ecology, and conservation (Koenig et al. 1996). Most marine organisms have a pelagic larval stage that has tremendous potential for dispersal (Mora and Sale 2002). High dispersal potential may allow eggs, larvae, or adults to travel long distances, yielding high connectivity and population heterogeneity (Liu et al. 2007; O’Donnell et al. 2017). For example, larvae dispersal of Synechogobius ommaturus (Richardson, 1862) was inferred to promote gene flow among populations, thus having a major effect on its phylogeographic pattern (Song et al. 2010). This is not the case for Odontamblyopus lacepedii. The demersal eggs and benthic adults of O. lacepedii indicates limited swimming ability, but until now no studies about its larval dispersal ability have been reported. The otolith microchemistry analysis for this species showed that it can adapt to a wide range of salinity habitats, and the life history stages of individuals hatching in different habitats emerged as different life history types (Lu et al. 2015). Therefore, it is difficult to predict the phylogeographic pattern of O. lacepedii.

Although Odontamblyopus lacepedii has low economic value and is usually not the main fishing object, it still may experience high fishing pressure in the form of by-catch. In this study, the control region of mitochondrial DNA was employed to investigate the demographic history and the population genetic structure of O. lacepedii from four adjacent marginal seas, Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea, and Ariake Bay. The results of the present study will have important implications for fishery management and conservation efforts.

Materials and methods

Sampling and sequencing

All specimens were collected along the coast of China Sea and Ariake Bay from 2013 to 2015 (Table 1; Fig. 1). Muscle tissues were preserved in 95% ethanol or directly used to extract DNA. Genomic DNA was isolated and extracted by proteinase K digestion followed by a standard phenol-chloroform method (Sambrook and Russel 2001).

Table 1.

Sampling information of Odontamblyopus lacepedii examined in this study.

ID Sampling site Location Sample size Date of collection
DD Dandong Bohai Sea 38 2015.6–2015.12
TJ Tianjin Bohai Sea 30 2015.11
HH Huanghua Bohai Sea 30 2015.09
DY Dongying Bohai Sea 1 2010.05
RS Rushan Yellow Sea 1 2015.04
RZ Rizhao Yellow Sea 4 2015.03
LYG Lianyugang Yellow Sea 4 2014.10
SH Shanghai East China Sea 23 2014.11
ZS Zhoushan East China Sea 9 2015.12
RA Ruian East China Sea 24 2013.08
HZ Huizhou South China Sea 1 2015.04
AB Ariake Bay Ariake Sea 24 2014.02
Figure 1. 

Sampling locations of Odontamblyopus lacepedii in the present study.

A 547 bp fragment of mitochondrial DNA control region was amplified using the primers OLF: CGCTGCTTCAAAGAAGGGAGATT (forward) and OLR: CTCCCTTGTCAACTTGCCTTAG (reverse) (Liu et al. 2018). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in 25 μL reaction mixture containing 17.5 μL of ultrapure water, 2.5 μL of 10×PCR buffer, 2 μL of dNTPs, 1 μL of each primer (5 μM), 0.15 μL of Taq polymerase, and 1 μL of DNA template. The PCR amplification was carried out in a Biometra thermal cycler under conditions referred to Zhao et al (2020). PCR product was purified with a Gel Extraction Mini Kit. The purified products were used as the template DNA for cycle sequencing reactions performed using BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit, and bi-direction sequencing was conducted on an ABI Prism 3730 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems) with the same primers used for sequencing as those for PCR amplification.

Data analysis

Sequences were edited and aligned using DNASTAR software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, USA) and refined manually. Molecular diversity indices, such as the number of haplotypes, polymorphic sites (S), nucleotide diversity (π; Nei 1987) and haplotype diversity (h; Nei 1987), were calculated using Arlequin version 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Gene flow (Nm) among populations was estimated by Migrate-n version 3.6.11 (Beerli and Palcaewski 2010). Genetic differentiation between pairs of population samples was evaluated with the pairwise fixation index FST (Excoffier et al. 1992). The significance of the FST was tested by 10,000 permutations for each pairwise comparison in Arlequin version 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Population subdivision and significant population structure was examined using a hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et al. 1992) approximated by the Tamura and Nei model using a one-factor AMOVA with 10,000 data permutations. The populations were defined as different groups in three scenarios based on spatial distribution (Table 4). To test for isolation by distance, pairwise values of Log FST were plotted against geographical distance between sample sites.

The haplotype sequences were compared in MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021), and then the Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed with 1000 bootstrap replications based on distances calculated using the best selected model K2P. The phylogenetic trees were constructed with Odontamblyopus rebecca as the outgroup. The network of haplotypes was constructed using PopART software base on the minimum spanning network (Leigh and Bryant 2015). Demographic history was investigated using mismatch distribution and neutrality test. First is the test of selective neutrality which is performed using D test of Tajima (1989) and Fs test of Fu (1997) based on the infinite site model. Fu’s Fs has been shown to be especially sensitive to departure from population equilibrium as in case of a population expansion. The method to test demographic expansion is mismatch distribution which is the distribution of the observed number of differences between pairs of haplotypes based on three parameters: τ, θ0, and θ1 (τ time since expansion expressed in units of mutational time; θ before and after the population growth) (Rogers and Harpending 1992). The value of τ was transformed to estimates of real time since expansion with the equation τ = 2 μt, where τ is the crest of mismatch distribution, t is the time measured in generation since experiencing expansion, μ is the mutation rate per generation for the entire sequence. Both mismatch analysis and neutrality tests were performed in Arlequin version 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). The population expansion time was estimated using the mutation rate of 5–10%/Myr (Song et al. 2010). BEAST v.1.7 (Drummond et al. 2012) was used to estimate the Bayesian Skyline Plots (BSP). To obtain the effective convergence, HKY + I + G model, stepwise skyline model and a strict molecular clock with 1×108 iterations for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) were performed in this study. Tracer 1.7.5 software was used to generate the skyline plot (Rambaut et al. 2018).

Results

Genetic diversity

All sequences were aligned, and 547-bp segment of the control region was obtained for 189 specimens. A total of 83 polymorphic sites were detected and 127 haplotypes were defined (Table 2). All haplotype sequences were submitted to GenBank (Accession numbers: KX894323KX894449). Most haplotypes were unique, of which 108 were singletons (haplotypes represented by a single sequence in the sample). Of the remaining 19 haplotypes, 13 were shared among populations, but six haplotypes belonged to one population. The most common haplotype was present in six locations with 22 individuals (7 from DD, 3 from HH, 3 from TJ, 5 from AS, 3 from SH and 1 from RS), accounting for 17.3% of all samples.

Table 2.

Molecular diversity of Odontamblyopus lacepedii for seven populations, based on sequence data of the mitochondrial control region. Number of individuals (N), number of haplotype (Nh), number of polymorphic sites (S), mean number of pairwise differences (k), haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π).

Population N N h S k h π
DD 38 28 32 2.61±1.43 0.96±0.02 0.0048±0.0029
TJ 30 26 41 5.17±2.58 0.99±0.01 0.0095±0.0052
HH 30 28 32 4.31±2.20 0.99±0.01 0.0079±0.0045
SH 23 18 24 3.22±1.72 0.98±0.02 0.0059±0.0035
ZS 9 6 9 2.00±1.24 0.83±0.13 0.0037±0.0026
RA 24 18 24 3.41±1.81 0.92±0.05 0.0062±0.0037
AB 24 17 22 2.52±1.41 0.95±0.03 0.0046±0.0029
Total 189 127 83 3.59±1.83 0.98±0.01 0.0065±0.0037

Genetic diversity parameters for seven populations are shown in Table 2. Taxon sampling for populations DY, RS, RZ, LYG and HZ were too small and they were used only in the following phylogenetic and dynamic history analyses. A low level of nucleotide diversity and a high level of haplotype diversity was observed. Nucleotide diversity (π) varied from 0.0037 to 0.0095, while the haplotype diversity (h) ranged from 0.83 to 0.99. The phylogenetic topology based on ML analyses revealed no significant genealogical branches or clusters corresponding to sampling localities (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic network showed that haplotypes in each geographical population presented a mixed distribution pattern, and the evolutionary relationship showed multiple stellate radiation (Fig. 3).

Figure 2. 

Maximum Likelihood tree is shown based on the control region haplotypes of Odontamblyopus lacepedii. The species of O. rebecca was used as the outgroup.

Figure 3. 

Phylogenetic network of all haplotypes.

Population genetic structure

The pairwise FST values among different populations ranged from -0.009 to 0.243 (Table 3). The strong and significant genetic differentiation mainly existed among populations from different groups. The AMOVA performed under three patterns of gene pools (Table 4), and the results showed that the main variation was within populations. To test the relationship between genetic differentiation and geographic distance, IBD analysis was performed. The results showed that there was significant relationship (r = 0.54 P < 0.05) between Log FST and geographic distance, indicating that geographic distance can explain 54% of the genetic variation.

Table 3.

The pairwise FST among seven populations of Odontamblyopus lacepedii, based on partial mitochondrial control region sequence data. Asterisks represent significance levels: *P ≤ 0.01, **P ≤ 0.001.

Population DD TJ HH SH ZS RA AB
DD
TJ 0.012
HH 0.018 0.010
SH 0.044** 0.032 0.015
ZS 0.207** 0.103 0.097 * 0.037
RA 0.103** 0.062** 0.044* -0.001 -0.009
AB 0.028** 0.030 0.033* 0.075** 0.243** 0.123**
Table 4.

AMOVA analysis of Odontamblyopus lacepedii populations based on partial mitochondrial control region sequence data.

Source of variation d.f. Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation Φ-Statistics P
One gene pool (DD, TJ, HH, SH, ZS, RA, AB)
Among populations 6 23.653 0.088 Va 4.76 ΦST = 0.048 0.000
Within populations 171 299.679 1.753 Vb 95.24
Two gene pools (DD, TJ, HH, RA, SH, ZS) (AB)
Among groups 1 4.186 0.00904 Va 0.50 ΦCT = 0.004 0.429
Among populations within groups 5 19.225 0.08448 Vb 4.64 ΦSC = 0.047 0.000
Within populations 171 295.651 1.72895 Vc 94.87 ΦST = 0.051 0.000
Three gene pools (DD, TJ, HH) (SH, RA, ZS) (AB)
Among groups 2 14.379 0.09552 Va 5.18 ΦCT = 0.052 0.016
Among populations within groups 4 9.032 0.02122 Vb 1.15 ΦSC = 0.012 0.045
Within populations 171 295.651 1.72895 Vc 93.67 ΦST = 0.063 0.000

Historical demography

The observed mismatch distribution of Odontamblyopus lacepedii for all samples is presented in Fig. 4. There are no deviations from the expected distributions (Hri = 0.027±0.000, P > 0.05), and SSD (PSSD = 0.001, P > 0.05), and the evident unimodal mismatch distribution indicated a sudden expansion event. The Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs tests were negative with significant P values (P < 0.001), which supported the hypothesis of population expansion (Table 4). The estimated time that O. lacepedii underwent population expansion was 61,700–123,000 years ago, based on the divergence rate of 5–10%/Myr. Estimated effective female population size after expansion (θ1) was 1.4 × 107 times higher than before expansion (θ0) for O. lacepedii. Bayesian Skyline Plots for all samples showed late Pleistocene demographic expansion (about 100,000 years ago) (Fig. 5), which was consistent with the estimate by mismatch distribution analysis.

Figure 4. 

Mismatch distribution for demographic expansion based on mtDNA partial control region sequences of Odontamblyopus lacepedii.

Figure 5. 

Bayesian Skyline Plots based on the mtDNA partial control region sequences of Odontamblyopus lacepedii.

Discussion

Mitochondrial DNA has been proven to be effective for population genetic analysis of marine fishes (Neethling et al. 2008; Bae et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2020). The high level of haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity of Odontamblyopus lacepedii may be a signature of population expansion after founder events or bottlenecks (Grant and Bowen 1998; Zhang et al. 2006). The neutral test and BSP analysis supported that O. lacepedii may have undergone a sudden demographic expansion from its historic refugium. The time of expansion was estimated to be in the late Pleistocene. Pleistocene environmental fluctuations such as sea levels and temperatures had direct effects on species numbers, distributions, and demographics changes (Avise 2000; Gopal et al. 2006; Heyden et al. 2007; Shen et al. 2011). During the last Pleistocene, lower sea levels were associated with Pleistocene glaciations, which resulted in that most of the Chinese continental shelf was exposed, and the Asian continent was separated from the Pacific by a series of marginal seas (Tamaki and Honza 1991; Xu and Oda 1999). When the glaciers retreated, with temperature and sea level rising, those populations sheltering in their ice-age refugium might have undergone a postglacial expansion into new territory. This information supports the hypothesis that O. lacepedii had experienced historical expansion from a glacial refugium.

Table 5.

Tajima’s D, Fu’ Fs statistic and mismatch parameter estimates for Odontamblyopus lacepedii populations.

Population Number D P Fs P τ Thet0 Thet1
DD 38 -2.29 0.002 -26.55 0.000 2.643 0.002 99999.000
TJ 30 -1.84 0.016 -22.09 0.000 3.768 0.687 99999.000
HH 30 -1.69 0.026 -25.75 0.000 3.691 0.000 99999.000
SH 23 -1.89 0.015 -14.44 0.000 3.248 0.000 99999.000
ZS 9 -1.82 0.010 -2.18 0.043 2.395 0.009 10.332
RA 24 -1.74 0.023 -13.10 0.000 4.346 0.002 12.336
AB 24 -2.04 0.008 -14.09 0.000 2.428 0.000 99999.000
Total* 189 -2.29 0.000 -25.86 0.000 3.359 0.012 99999.000

The population structure in marine species has been assumed to have low genetic differentiation among widespread populations due to their high potential dispersal ability and the absence of obvious geographical barriers (Rivera et al. 2004; He et al. 2015). In the present study, the pairwise FST statistics were low and not significant between populations with close spatial distance, demonstrating high gene flow among populations of Odontamblyopus lacepedii. Mukai et al. (2009) found low genetic differentiation of a reef goby (Bathygobius cocosensis) in the Japan-Ryukyu-Guam region, and the oceanic currents might contribute to the dispersal and migration of larvae of this species (Mukai et al. 2009). The pelagic larval dispersal ability is theoretically associated with the level of gene flow and genetic structure (Bay et al. 2006; He et al. 2015). The eggs of O. lacepedii were demersal and the movements of adults were restricted to a small area (Dotsu and Takita 1967; Gonzales et al. 2006), and therefore, it is likely that the adult and eggs possessed no ability to migrate long distances. Many sedentary organisms disperse primarily during the larval phase (Kochzius and Blohm 2005; Song et al. 2010). Besides, the significant population genetic differentiation was detected between different populations with long spatial distance. The isolation by distance (IBD) analysis of this study supported that the genetic differentiation was associated with the geographic distances. The dispersal ability of marine organisms will weaken as the distance increases, which often leads to the IBD patterns (Song et al. 2010).

Apart from historical events and life history (Li et al. 2015), environmental factors, especially marine currents, may greatly influence the genetic population structures of marine species (He et al. 2015). In this study, pelagic larval durations during from July to October were predicted to be linked by the connectivity of ocean currents (Dotsu 1957). The Kuroshio Current flows in a northerly direction, and velocities were commonly recorded as 15–40 cm/s (Guan 1978). The West Korea Coastal Current flows in a southerly direction along the west Korean Peninsula, making a confluence with the Kuroshio Current into Tsushima Strait (Wei 2004). The prevailing wind may enhance the marine current dispersal distance. The ample gene flow among populations implies that the pelagic larval may be transported by the water exchange on these powerfully oceanic currents and therefore, the connectivity among populations should be high.

Conclusions

Historical events of the Pleistocene, ocean currents, and larval dispersal capabilities have played an important role in shaping the contemporary phylogeographic patterns and population structures of Odontamblyopus lacepedii. With modern exploitation and habitat destroyed, O. lacepedii may experience high fishing pressure. The results of the present study have important implications for fisheries management and conservation efforts and for other species with similar life history characters.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD0901301) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41776171).

References

  • Agorreta A, San Mauro D, Schliewen U, Van Tassell JL, Kovačić M, Zardoya R, Rüber L (2013) Molecular phylogenetics of Gobioidei and phylogenetic placement of European gobies. Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution 69: 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.017
  • Avise JC (1992) Molecular Population Structure and the Biogeographic History of a Regional Fauna: A Case History with Lessons for Conservation Biology. Oikos 63(1): 62–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545516
  • Bae SE, Kim EM, Park JY, Kim JK (2020) Population genetic structure of the grass puffer (Tetraodontiformes: Tetraodontidae) in the northwestern Pacific revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequences and microsatellite loci. Marine Biodiversity 50: e19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01042-2
  • Bay LK, Crozier RH, Caley MJ (2006) The relationship between population genetic structure and pelagic larval duration in coral reef fishes on the great barrier reef. Marine Biology 149(5): 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0276-6
  • Chen DG, Zhang MZ (2016) Leiognathidae. In: Marine fishes of China. China Ocean University Press, Qingdao,1819–1820.
  • Dotsu Y (1957) On the bionomics and life history of the ell-like goby, Odontamblyopus rubicundus (Hamilton). Kyushu University Institutional Repository 16(1): 101–110.
  • Dotsu Y, Takita T (1967) Induced spawning by hormone operation, egg development and larva of blind gobioid fish, Odontamblyopus rubicundus. Faculty Fisheries, Nagasaki University 23: 135–144.
  • Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075
  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/131.2.479
  • Gao T, Ying Y, Yang Q, Song N, Xiao Y (2020) The mitochondrial markers provide new insights into the population demographic history of Coilia nasus with two ecotypes (anadromous and freshwater). Frontiers in Marine Science 7: e576161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.576161
  • Gonzales TT, Katoh M, Ishimatsu A (2006) Air breathing of aquatic burrow-dwelling eel goby, Odontamblyopus lacepedii (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae). Journal Experimental Biology 209: 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02092
  • Gonzales TT, Katoh M, Ishimatsu A (2008a) Intertidal burrows of the air-breathing eel goby, Odontamblyopus lacepedii (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae). Ichthyologizal Research 55: 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-008-0042-5
  • Gonzales TT, Katoh M, Ishimatsu A (2008b) Respiratory vasculatures of the intertidal air-breathing eel goby, Odontamblyopus lacepedii (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae). Environment Biology of Fish 82: 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9295-5
  • Gopal K, Tolley KA, Groeneveld JC, Matthee CA (2006) Mitochondrial DNA variation in spiny lobster Palinurus delagoae suggests genetically structured populations in the southwestern Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 319: 191–198. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps319191
  • Grant WAS, Bowen BW (1998) Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. Journal of Heredity 89(5): 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/89.5.415
  • Guan BX (1978) The topographic effects of Taiwan Island, China and adjacent bottom relief on the path of the Kuroshio. Studia Marina Sinica 14: 1–21. [In Chinese]
  • He L, Mukai T, Chu KH, Qiang M, Jing Z (2015) Biogeographical role of the Kuroshio current in the amphibious mudskipper Periophthalmus modestus indicated by mitochondrial DNA data. Scientific Reports 5: e15645. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15645
  • Heyden SVD, Lipinski MR, Matthee CA (2007) Mitochondrial DNA analyses of the cape hakes reveal an expanding, panmictic population for Merluccius capensis, and population structuring for mature fish in Merluccius paradoxus. Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution 42(2): 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.004
  • Hu ZM, Li W, Li JJ, Duan DL (2011) Post-Pleistocene demographic history of the North Atlantic endemic Irish moss Chondrus crispus: glacial survival, spatial expansion and gene flow. Journal Evolution Biology 24(3): 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02186.x
  • Kochzius M, Blohm D (2005) Genetic population structure of the lionfish Pterois miles (Scorpaenidae, Pteroinae) in the Gulf of Aqaba and northern Red Sea. Gene 347(2): 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2004.12.032
  • Liu JX, Gao TX, Wu SF, Zhang YP (2007) Pleistocene isolation in the Northwestern Pacific marginal seas and limited dispersal in a marine fish, Chelon haematocheilus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1845). Molecular Ecology 16(2): 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03140.x
  • Liu JX, Gao TX, Zhuang ZM, Jin XS, Yokogawa K, Zhang YP (2006) Late Pleistocene divergence and subsequent population expansion of two closely related fish species, Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) and Australian anchovy (Engraulis australis). Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution 40: 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.019
  • Liu ZS, Song N, Yanagimoto T, Han ZQ, Gao TX (2018) Complete mitochondrial genome of three fish species (Perciformes: Amblyopinae): genome description and phylogenetic relationships. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 50(6): 2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.6.2173.2183
  • Li W, Chen X, Xu Q, Zhu J, Dai X, Xu L (2015) Genetic population structure of Thunnus albacares in the central Pacific Ocean based on mtDNA COI gene sequences. Biochemical Genetic 53(1–3): 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-015-9666-0
  • Lu MJ, Liu HB, Jiang T, Yang J (2015) Preliminary investigations on otolith microchemistry of Odontamblyopus rubicundus in the Daliao River Estuary. Marine Fisheries 037(004): 310–317.
  • Mukai T, Nakamura S, Nishida M (2009) Genetic population structure of a reef goby, Bathygobius cocosensis, in the Northwestern Pacific. Ichthyological Research 56(4): 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-009-0111-4
  • Murdy EO, Shibukawa K (2003) Odontamblyopus rebecca, a new species of amblyopinae goby from Vietnam with a key to known species of the genus (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae). Zootaxa 138: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.138.1.1
  • Neethling M, Matthee CA, Bowie RC, Von der Heyden S (2008) Evidence for panmixia despite barriers to gene flow in the southern African endemic, Caffrogobius caffer (Teleostei: Gobiidae). BMC Evolution Biology 8(325): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-325
  • Nielsen JL, Graziano SL, Seitz AC (2010) Fine-scale population genetic structure in Alaskan Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis). Conservation Genetic 11(3): 999–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9943-8
  • Planes S, Doherty PJ, Bernardi G (2001) Strong genetic divergence among populations of a marine fish with limited dispersal, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, within the Great Barrier Reef and the Coral Sea. Evolution 55: 2263–2273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00741.x
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Rivera MAJ, Kelly CD, Roderick GK (2004) Subtle population genetic structure in the Hawaiian grouper, Epinephelus quernus (Serranidae) as revealed by mitochondrial DNA analysis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00304.x
  • Rogers AR, Harpending HC (1992) Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Molecular Biology Evolution 9: 552–569.
  • Sambrook J, Russel DW (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
  • Santos S, Hrbek T, Farias IP, Schneider H, Sampaio I (2006) Population genetic structuring of the king weakfish, Macrodon ancylodon (Sciaenidae), in Atlantic coastal waters of South America: deep genetic divergence without morphological change. Molecular Ecology 15(14): 4361–4373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03108.x
  • Shen KN, Jamandre WB, Hsu CC, Tzeng WN, Durand JD (2011) Plio-Pleistocene sea level and temperature fluctuations in the northwestern Pacific promoted speciation in the globally-distributed flathead mullet Mugil cephalus. BMC Evolution Biology 11(2): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-83
  • Siddall M, Rohling EJ, Almogi-Labin A, Hemleben C, Meischner D, Schmelzer I, Smeed DA (2003) Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle. Nature 423(6942): 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01690
  • Song N, Zhang XM, Sun XF, Yanagimoto T (2010) Population genetic structure and larval dispersal potential of spottedtail goby Synechogobius ommaturus in the north-west Pacific. Journal of Fish Biology 77(2): 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02694.x
  • Tang W, Lshimatsu A, Fu C, Yin W, Li G, Chen H, Li B (2010) Cryptic species and historical biogeography of eel gobies (Gobioidei: Odontamblyopus) along the northwestern Pacific coast. Zoological Science 27: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.27.8
  • O’Donnell JL, Beldade R, Mills SC, Williams HE, Bernardi G (2017) Life history, larval dispersal, and connectivity in coral reef fish among the scattered islands of the Mozambique Channel. Coral Reefs 36(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-016-1495-z
  • Wei ZX (2004) Numerical simulation of the China adjacent sea circulation and its seasonal variation. [Doctoral dissertation in Chinese]
  • Wu HL, Zhong JS (2008) Fauna Sinica-Osteichthyes: Perciformes Gobioidei. Science Press Beijing, 742–744. [In Chinese]
  • Xie C, Jian Z, Zhao Q (1995) Paleogeographic maps of the China Seas at the last glacial maximum. In: WESTPAC Paleogeographic Maps. UNESCO/IOC Publications, Shanghai, 75 pp.
  • Zhang J, Cai Z, Huang L (2006) Population genetic structure of crimson snapper Lutjanus erythropterus in East Asia, revealed by analysis of the mitochondrial control region. Journal Marine Science 63: 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.01.004
  • Zhao L, Shan B, Song N, Gao TX (2020) Genetic diversity and population structure of Acanthopagrus schlegelii inferred from mtDNA sequences. Regional Studies in Marine Science 41: 101532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101532
login to comment