Research Article
Print
Research Article
The only species of Mohnia Friele, 1879 (Caenogastropoda, Buccinoidea, Buccinidae) in the North Pacific represents an unrecognized new genus of Newtoniellidae (Triphoroidea)
expand article infoEllen E. Strong, Boris I. Sirenko§, James H. McLean|
‡ Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of America
§ Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, United States of America
† Deceased author
Open Access

Abstract

Mohnia kurilana Dall, 1913 was described more than 100 years ago from deep waters off the Kuril Islands and remains exceedingly rare in museum collections. Originally placed in the carnivorous neogastropod family Buccinidae, fragmentary soft parts from the type lot and from several specimens belonging to allied species collected in the Aleutian Islands in the 1990s have allowed anatomical investigations for the first time. These have revealed the presence of a paucispiral operculum with an eccentric nucleus, foot with a deep propodial pedal gland and metapodial pedal gland, taenioglossate radula, short acrembolic proboscis, well-developed mid-esophageal gland, glandular prostate, and the absence of a penis; the nervous system is epiathroid with a long supra-esophageal connective and numerous statoconia in the statocysts. Analysis of the gut contents revealed abundant halichondriid sponge spicules. This evidence indicates a placement in the Triphoroidea, a diverse superfamily of specialized spongivores. Mohnia kurilana is transferred to the Newtoniellidae and placed in the new genus Pseudomohnia gen. nov. Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov. is established for a new species from the Aleutian Islands characterized by its narrowly turreted shell and distinctive multicuspid rachidian. A lectotype is designated for Mohnia kurilana.

Keywords

Anatomy, radula morphology, shell morphology, systematics

Introduction

Mohnia kurilana Dall, 1913 was described more than 100 years ago from deep waters off the Kuril Islands in the northwestern Pacific (Figs 1A, 2). In the absence of comparative material, the species has been retained in the genus Mohnia Friele, 1879, which is a member of the carnivorous neogastropod family Buccinidae (Kantor et al. 2021). Its shell and operculum bear a remarkable likeness to the type species, Fusus mohni Friele, 1877, but are unlike those of other species currently assigned to the genus. Until recently, Mohnia was considered to be distributed in deep waters of the North Pacific and North Atlantic. However, recent revisions have seen many of its members allocated to closely related buccinoid genera, including Fusipagoda Habe & Ito, 1965, Retifusus Dall, 1916 and Retimohnia McLean, 1995 (McLean 1995; Kosyan and Kantor 2014, 2015, 2016; Kantor et al. 2021). This has left Mohnia kurilana as the sole North Pacific member of the genus, otherwise represented by eight North Atlantic species (MolluscaBase 2021a).

Comparative material has remained exceedingly rare. Dried soft parts from the type lot of Mohnia kurilana, as well as several specimens belonging to allied species collected in the Aleutian Islands in the 1990s, have enabled anatomical investigations for the first time, which allow its affinities to be reassessed.

Figure 1. 

Shell morphology of Pseudomohnia gen. nov. A, B Pseudomohnia kurilana (Dall, 1913) comb. nov A lectotype, USNM 205224. Kuril Islands B ZIN 57494/1. Kuril Islands C, D Pseudomohnia sp. LACM 1997-156.7 Aleutian Islands E–I Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov. Aleutian Islands E holotype, LACM 3776 F LACM 1997-174 G LACM 1997-174 H LACM 1997-163.21 I LACM 1997-165.20. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 2. 

Distribution of Pseudomohnia gen. nov. in the North Pacific. Squares, Pseudomohnia kurilana (Dall, 1913) comb. nov.; circles, Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov.; stars, Pseudomohnia sp. Symbols with black fill are type localities. Scale in kilometers.

Materials and methods

Anatomical investigations of Mohnia kurilana were based on dried soft parts in the type lot, USNM 205224. In addition, a fishery monitoring cruise conducted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the Aleutian Islands (Alaska) in 1997 yielded seven specimens of two allied species. This material was mostly dried, but included one fragmentary, alcohol-preserved body lacking a shell that at some point had been allowed to partially dry and that was broken at the base of the mantle cavity (LACM 1997-168.10). A second, highly fragmentary, alcohol-preserved body was used for a radula preparation (LACM 1997-156.7). Radulae were also prepared from several of the dried specimens by drilling a hole with a Dremel 8000-03 cordless rotary tool in the abapertural surface of the penultimate whorl and pushing the dried soft parts through the aperture with forceps.

Specimens were dissected under a Leica MZ 16.5 stereo microscope with camera lucida and stained with toluidine blue to enhance contrast. Radulae were tissue digested overnight in 100 µl of ATL lysis buffer (Qiagen, Inc.) containing ~ 50 µg of Proteinase-K, then sonicated and rinsed in de-ionized water (Holznagel 1997). Cleaned radulae were mounted on aluminum stubs using carbon adhesive tabs, coated with 25–30 nm gold/palladium (60/40), and imaged using an Apreo scanning electron microscope (FEI Company) at the National Museum of Natural History. Shells were photographed using a Canon EOS 50D camera and Canon MT-24EX macro twin light flash with a Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8 macro lens; protoconchs were photographed with a Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 1–5X macro lens.

The classification used here follows Bouchet et al. (2017). See Discussion for the subfamily placement of the new genus Pseudomohnia.

Repositories:

LACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, USA;

USNM National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (formerly U.S. National Museum), Washington DC, USA;

ZIN Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Results

Anatomical investigations revealed the presence of a paucispiral operculum with an eccentric nucleus, foot with a deep propodial pedal gland and deep medial cleft bearing the opening of a metapodial pedal gland, short acrembolic proboscis, taenioglossate radula, well-developed mid-esophageal gland, glandular prostate, epiathroid nervous system with a long supra-esophageal connective, and numerous statoconia in the statocysts. The stomach and intestine contained abundant sponge spicules. This evidence indicates a placement in the Triphoroidea, a diverse superfamily specialized to feed on sponges, and to the Newtoniellidae in particular, a family distributed predominantly in cold, deep marine waters and frequently characterized by their dextral shell and taenioglossate radula (Bouchet and Warén 1993; Fernandes et al. 2015). Mohnia kurilana is transferred to this family and is designated as the type species of a new genus, Pseudomohnia gen. nov. A second species from the Aleutian Islands is described as new, Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov., distinguished by its multicuspid rachidian and narrowly turreted shell. Anatomical investigations indicate the presence of a third undescribed species, but we refrain from describing it pending the discovery of additional comparative material.

Systematics

Class GASTROPODA Cuvier, 1795

Superfamily TRIPHOROIDEA Gray, 1847

Family NEWTONIELLIDAE Korobkov, 1955

Pseudomohnia gen. nov.

Newtoniellidae gen. nov. pro “Mohniakurilana Dall, 1913: Sirenko, Kantor and Gulbin 2013: 156.

Type species

Mohnia kurilana Dall, 1913, here designated (Fig. 1A).

Description

Shell dextral, thin, whitish in color, ~ 15–20 mm in adult shell length; whorls convex, suture deeply impressed, growth indeterminate. Protoconch large, multispiral, nucleus smooth, cancellate sculpture on subsequent whorls, transition to teleoconch gradual or indistinct. Teleoconch with spiral sculpture of fine cords and axial threads, often diminishing on body whorl and on base. Axis slightly gyrate, pervious; columellar plait lacking. Anterior canal short, slightly recurved. Operculum paucispiral with eccentric nucleus. Radula taenioglossate with small, concave rachidian, robust bicuspid lateral teeth, and slender marginal teeth with cylindrical shafts. Foot with deep propodial pedal gland and with metapodial pedal gland opening to deep medial cleft. Acrembolic proboscis short, salivary glands acinous, mid-esophageal gland well developed. Penis lacking. Nervous system epiathroid with long supra-esophageal connective.

Etymology

In reference to the superficial similarity of the shell and its original placement in the genus Mohnia Friele, 1879 (Neogastropoda, Buccinoidea).

Distribution and ecology

Known only from the Kuril and Aleutian Islands (Fig. 2) in 114–660 m, feeding on sponges.

Remarks

The unique combination of shell and radula characters displayed by Pseudomohnia are unknown in the family and cannot be confused with any other genus. The recognition of Mohnia kurilana as representing a new genus of Newtoniellidae had already been noted by Sirenko et al. (2013) based on as yet unpublished evidence provided in the present paper.

As documented in a number of newtoniellids, the presence of a large, ribbed protoconch with a gradual or indistinct transition between protoconch and teleoconch, despite being multispiral, points to a non-planktotrophic and intra-capsular mode of larval development (e.g., Marshall 1977; Bouchet and Warén 1993; Tsuchida and Sasaki 1998; Gofas 2003; Fernandes et al. 2015).

Little is known of the anatomy of newtoniellids, but that of Pseudomohnia compares favorably with Houbrick’s (1987) description of Ataxocerithium eximium Houbrick, 1987 in the presence of a deep propodial pedal gland and a metapodial pedal gland opening to a deep medial cleft in the foot sole, a broad muscular snout, short acrembolic proboscis, well-developed mid-esophageal gland, and epiathroid nervous system with a long supra-esophageal connective.

Pseudomohnia kurilana (Dall, 1913), comb. nov.

Figs 1A, B, 3A, B, E, 4, 5A

Mohnia kurilana Dall, 1913: 503; Dall 1925: 21, pl. 34, fig. 1; Kosuge 1972, pl. 12, fig. 2 (Fig. 1A)

Mohnia kurilana: Golikov and Sirenko 1998: 112, fig. 7E; Kantor and Sysoev 2006: 187, pl. 93, figs J, J’ (Fig. 1B)

Type material

Lectotype. Kuril Islands • 13.40 mm in length; off Simushir Island; 46°42'N, 151°45'E; 229 fm [~ 419 m]; 24 June 1906; USFC steamer Albatross stn 4803; USNM 205224, here designated (Figs 1A, 3A, B, E, 4, 5A).

Other material

Kuril Islands • 1 spm; near Iturup Island; 44°47.7'N, 148°55.5'E; 660 m; 27 July 1984; R/V Odyssey; B Sirenko leg.; ZIN 57494/1 (Fig. 1B); • 2 spms; Krusenstern Strait; 48°35.6'N, 153°54.8'E; 210 m; 9 October 1987; R/V Tikhookeanskiy; V Lukin leg.; ZIN 62774/2.

Description

Shell. Shell broadly turreted, spire angle ca. 42°, ~ 14 mm in adult shell length, consisting of approximately six, thin, convex whorls, separated by deeply impressed suture (Fig. 1A, B); growth indeterminate. Shell whitish, with thick, velvety periostracum. Larval shell non-planktotrophic, ~ 2.75 low, convex whorls, with smooth, blunt nucleus; well-defined opisthocyrt riblets and spiral threads producing cancellate sculpture on subsequent whorls. Inferred transition to teleoconch marked by change in orientation of axial sculpture and slight expansion in whorl diameter (Fig. 3A, B). Teleoconch with six to eight distinct, flattened, regular, spiral cords, separated by broader grooves, and which extend onto base. Spiral ornament crossed by variably developed, well separated, weakly prosocline axial threads and growth increments; axial threads becoming obsolete on body whorl. Aperture broad, outer lip thin, sharp. Axis slightly gyrate, pervious; columellar plait lacking. Anterior canal short, slightly recurved.

Figure 3. 

Protoconch and operculum morphology of Pseudomohnia gen. nov. A, B, E Pseudomohnia kurilana (Dall, 1913) comb. nov. Lectotype, USNM 205224 C, D, F Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov. Holotype, LACM 3776 A, C protoconch, apical view B, D protoconch, lateral view E, F Operculum. Black arrows indicate approximate position of inferred transition between protoconch and teleoconch. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Operculum [Lectotype]. Operculum thin, corneous, honey in color, thinning toward edges; paucispiral, nucleus eccentric, occupying ca. 31% of operculum length (Fig. 3E).

Radula [Lectotype]. Radula taenioglossate (Fig. 4A). Rachidian small, concave, narrow, tapering slightly to chevron-shaped base (Fig. 4B, C). Cutting edge flaring slightly, bearing single, prominent, blunt cusp and smaller irregular denticle at outer edge on each side. Radular membrane diagonally creased between rachidian and lateral teeth of each row. Lateral teeth robust, broad, with smooth inner edge of shaft curving posteriorly; cutting edge with prominent, dagger-like, pointed cusp, occasionally with small, rounded accessory denticle at inner base, and with small, blunt inner cusp (Fig. 4A, B). Marginal teeth long, slender, with cylindrical shafts and slight constriction below claw-like tips; cutting edges of inner and outer marginal teeth bearing unequal numbers of short, curving, smoothly conical cusps, with three to four cusps on inner marginal teeth, and two to three on outer marginal teeth (Fig. 4D, E).

Figure 4. 

Radula morphology and gut contents of Pseudomohnia kurilana (Dall, 1913) comb. nov., lectotype, USNM 205224 A radular ribbon B detail of rachidian and lateral teeth C detail of rachidian D detail of marginal teeth E detail of inner and outer marginal teeth F sponge spicules from gut. Scale bars: 20 µm (C, D, E); 100 µm (A, B, F).

Anatomy [Lectotype]. Foot elongate oval. Propodium large, triangular, presumably with deep, propodial groove (Fig. 5A), but depth could not be determined. Shallow furrow (= epipodial skirt) continuous with opercular lobe, evident along sides of foot sole, becoming obsolete in deep groove where propodium joins neck below snout. Foot sole divided longitudinally by deep medial cleft that deepens posteriorly before shallowing again along posterior quarter of sole. The presence and/or disposition of any glands could not be determined, although the epithelium in a broad swath on either side of the cleft is opaquely white and glandular in appearance.

Figure 5. 

Anatomy of Pseudomohnia gen. nov. A Pseudomohnia kurilana (Dall, 1913) comb. nov., lectotype, USNM 205224 B–E Pseudomohnia sp., LACM 1997-168.10 A, B external anatomy, dorsal view, mantle cavity opened via mid-dorsal incision C foregut, dorsal view D foregut, left-lateral view E pallial gonoduct, left-lateral view. Scale bars 1 mm. Abbreviations: ae, anterior esophagus; bg, buccal ganglion; cs, longitudinal cleft in foot sole; ct, ctendium; dg, digestive gland; go, gonad; hg, hypobranchial gland; meg, mid-esophageal gland; od, odontophore; op, opercular lobe; os, osphradium; pg, pallial gonoduct; ppg, propodeal pedal gland; r, rectum; rm, retractor muscles; rs, radular sac; sg, salivary gland; si, siphon; sp, supra-esophageal ganglion; sto, stomach; t, cephalic tentacle.

Head with broad, muscular snout and long, tapering cephalic tentacles. Eyes conspicuous, on prominent ocular peduncles at outer bases of tentacles. Mantle edge smooth, with short siphon at left. Columellar muscle long, extending roughly one whorl to the level of mid-stomach. Mantle cavity one-half whorl in length. Mantle roof partially adhering to head and neck, not well preserved. Details of osphradium not readily observable. Ctenidium long, extending from siphon to base of mantle cavity. Hypobranchial gland well developed at left of rectum, releasing abundant mucus upon rehydration. Rectum broad, filled with sponge spicules, terminating in non-papillate anus well back from mantle edge. Pallial gonoduct presenting thin, non-glandular, open furrow below rectum. Penis lacking. Pericardial complex behind rear of mantle cavity compressed owing to retraction; details not observable. Bordered just behind by intestine.

Proboscis acrembolic, short. Jaws large, robust, dorsally flanking mouth. Buccal mass large with large odontophore occupying posterior two-thirds of buccal cavity behind jaws when retracted. Odontophore flattened, elongate, projecting upward from ventral posterior buccal mass, with flattened anterior end projecting against buccal roof behind jaws. Long, narrow, glandular subradular organ projecting between jaws from antero-ventral surface of odontophore. Moderately long radular ribbon emerging mid-ventrally near posterior end, embedded within acinous salivary glands posteriorly enclosing posterior buccal mass, and extending alongside anterior esophagus. Rather narrow mid-esophagus forming mid-esophageal gland with broad, glandular septae almost completely occluding lumen.

Stomach extending to ~ 1.5 whorls back from mantle edge, forming elongate chamber ~ 0.5 whorl in length, lying along left side of whorl ventrally surrounded by digestive gland. Stomach chamber broader posteriorly, narrowing anteriorly, filled with sponge spicules (Fig. 4F). Posterior esophagus entering stomach at left, near posterior quarter. Anterior end of stomach lying just behind reno-pericardial complex, large intestine curving right across body whorl, then turning anteriorly at base of mantle cavity on right side of body to form rectum. Digestive gland extending to anterior curve of intestine behind mantle cavity. Gonad dorsally overlying digestive gland at right of stomach.

Distribution and ecology

Known only from the Kuril Islands (Fig. 2) in 210–660 m, feeding on sponges.

Remarks

The original description stated that the type material was dredged by the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries steamer Albatross in 229 fathoms (~ 419 m) off the Kuril Islands. The original, handwritten accession ledger at the USNM indicates that it was collected off Simushir Island at station 4803, which was sampled on 24 June 1906, 46°42'N, 151°45'E.

Only limited morphological observations were possible given the size and condition of the dried soft parts but agree well with those obtained for Pseudomohnia sp. (see below). Although undeveloped, the pallial gonoduct appears to lack accessory sperm storage pouches (Fretter 1951; Houston 1985) and hence the dissected individual is inferred to be male. Details of the nervous system were not observable.

Analysis of the gut contents revealed the common occurrence of large (297 × 14 µm mean length × width) along with skinnier oxeas (248 × 6 µm) (Fig. 4F) which point toward a halichondriid sponge as the principal diet (Demospongiae, Suberitida, Halichondriidae) (K Ruetzler, pers. comm.).

Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov.

Figs 1E–I, 3C, D, F, 6

Type material

Holotype. Aleutian Islands • 17.53 mm in length; Near Islands, north of Attu Island; 53°5.55'N, 173°43.46'E; 114 m; 4 August 1997; R/V Dominator stn 23-971-218; RN Clark leg.; LACM 3776 (ex LACM 1997-174) (Figs 1E, 3C, D, F, 6).

Other material

Aleutian Islands • 2 spms; Near Islands, north of Attu Island; 53°5.55'N, 173°43.46'E; 114 m; 4 August 1997; R/V Dominator stn 23-971-218; RN Clark leg.; LACM 1997-174 (Fig. 1F, G); • 1 spm; Near Islands, south of Attu Island; 52°29.30'N, 172° 57.50'E; 166 m; 2 August 1997; R/V Dominator stn 23-971-210; RN Clark leg.; LACM 1997-163.21 (Fig. 1H); • 1 spm; Near Islands, south of Agattu Island; 52°13.50'N, 173°27.80'E; 166 m; 6 August 1997; R/V Dominator stn 23-971-229; RN Clark leg.; LACM 1997-165.20 (Fig. 1I).

Description

Shell. Shell narrowly turreted, spire angle ca. 30°, ~ 18 mm in adult shell length, consisting of approximately eight, thin, convex whorls, separated by deeply impressed suture (Fig. 1E–I); growth indeterminate. Shell whitish, with thick, velvety periostracum. Larval shell non-planktotrophic, ~ 3 elevated, constricted whorls, with smooth, blunt nucleus; well-defined opisthocyrt riblets and spiral threads producing cancellate sculpture on subsequent whorls. Prominent thread at shoulder and flattened subsutural ramp producing angulate appearance of first 1–1.5 whorls; gradually becoming more convex. Axial elements becoming more closely spaced toward teleoconch transition. Inferred transition to teleoconch marked by change in orientation of axial sculpture and slight expansion in whorl diameter (Fig. 3C, D). Teleoconch with seven to eight distinct, flattened spiral cords, somewhat irregular in width and spacing, and which extend onto base but may be less distinct. Spiral ornament crossed by variably developed, well separated, weakly prosocline axial threads and growth increments; axial threads obsolete on base. Aperture broad, outer lip thin, sharp. Axis weakly gyrate, pervious; columellar plait lacking. Anterior canal short, slightly recurved.

Operculum [Holotype]. Operculum thin, corneous, honey in color, thinning toward edges; paucispiral, nucleus eccentric, occupying ca. 38% of operculum length (Fig. 3F).

Radula [Holotype and LACM 1997-163.21]. Radular ribbon long, comprising 40 rows, ~ 3.7 mm in length, to 51 rows, ~ 4.4 mm in length (holotype). Radula taenioglossate (Fig. 6A). Rachidian small, concave, with sharp constriction below broad cutting edge, tapering to flat or pointed, narrow base. Cutting edge straight, bearing single, prominent, sharply pointed, triangular cusp and zero to four smaller, irregular, occasionally bifid denticles on each side (Fig. 6B, C). Radular membrane diagonally creased between rachidian and lateral teeth of each row. Lateral teeth robust, broad, with undulating inner edge of shaft curving posteriorly; cutting edge with prominent, dagger-like, pointed cusp, rarely with small, rounded accessory denticle at inner base, and with small, blunt inner cusp (Fig. 6A, B, D). Marginal teeth long, slender, with cylindrical shafts and constriction below claw-like tips; cutting edges of inner and outer marginal teeth bearing three to six elongate, curving, pointed cusps (Fig. 6E).

Figure 6. 

Radula and jaw morphology of Pseudomohnia rogerclarki sp. nov., holotype, LACM 3776 A radular ribbon B detail of rachidian and lateral teeth C detail of rachidian D detail of lateral and marginal teeth E detail of inner and outer marginal teeth F jaw, inner surface. Scale bars: 10 µm (C); 20 µm (B, D, E); 100 µm (A, F).

Anatomy [Holotype and LACM 1997-163.21]. Jaws large, robust, oval-rectangular to L-shaped (holotype; Fig. 6F), partially connected across posterior midline via thin membrane, comprised of rectangular rods. Rectum filled with sponge spicules.

Etymology

In honor of Roger N Clark, Associate in Malacology at the LACM, who collected the type material during a fishery monitoring cruise conducted by NOAA in the Aleutian Islands in 1997.

Distribution and ecology

Known only from the Aleutian Islands (Fig. 2) in 114–166 m, feeding on sponges.

Remarks

This species differs from Pseudomohnia kurilana in having constricted and elevated early whorls with an early angulation that is somewhat variable among available specimens. The shell is more turreted, with a narrower spire angle, and the operculum has a slightly larger nucleus. The radula is distinguished by the multicuspid rachidian and a greater number of cusps on the marginal teeth.

A radula preparation showing the distinctive multicuspid rachidian that was photographed in July 2006 could not be located in the collections of the LACM (L Groves, pers. comm.). Notes in an unpublished draft for the Northeast Pacific Gastropod volume indicate that LACM 1997-165.20 was used for a radula preparation. This lot (Fig. 1I) contains a damaged shell with a broken operculum and dried soft parts lacking a head.

Pseudomohnia sp.

Figs 1C, D, 5B–E, 7

Material examined

Aleutian Islands • 2 spms; Rat Islands, southwest of Amchitka Island; 51°27.70'N, 178°35.0'E; 384 m; 27 July 1997; R/V Dominator stn 23-971-181; RN Clark leg.; LACM 1997-156.7 (Fig. 1C, D); • 1 spm; southwest of Buldir Island; 52°18.50'N, 175°49.0'E; 325 m; 9 August 1997; R/V Dominator stn 23-971-243; RN Clark leg.; LACM 1997-168.10 (Figs 5B–E, 7).

Description

Shell [LACM 1997-156.7]. Shell broadly turreted, spire angle ca. 41°, ~ 24 mm in adult shell length, consisting of approximately eight, thin, convex whorls, separated by deeply impressed suture (Fig. 1C, D); growth indeterminate. Shell whitish, with thick, velvety periostracum. Larval shell non-planktotrophic, ~ 3 elevated, constricted whorls, with smooth, blunt nucleus; well-defined opisthocyrt riblets and spiral threads producing cancellate sculpture on subsequent whorls. Axial elements becoming more closely spaced toward teleoconch transition. Inferred transition to teleoconch marked by change in orientation of axial sculpture and slight expansion in whorl diameter. Teleoconch initially with six or seven thin spiral cords, somewhat irregular in width and spacing; cords becoming flatter, broader and less distinct on later whorls and on base and intercalated by additional cords. Spiral ornament crossed by variably developed, well separated, weakly prosocline axial threads and growth increments; axial threads becoming obsolete on body whorl. Aperture broad, outer lip thin, sharp. Axis weakly gyrate, pervious; columellar plait lacking. Anterior canal short, slightly recurved.

Operculum [LACM 1997-156.7]. Operculum thin, corneous, honey in color, thinning toward edges; paucispiral, nucleus eccentric, occupying ca. 42% of operculum length.

Radula [LACM 1997-168.10]. Radular ribbon comprising 37 rows, ~ 5.7 mm in length. Radula taenioglossate (Fig. 7A). Rachidian small, concave, with slight constriction below broad cutting edge, tapering to flat, narrow base. Cutting edge bearing single prominent, broadly triangular, bluntly pointed, finely serrated cusp, and single smaller, irregular denticle on each side (Fig. 7B, C). Radular membrane diagonally creased between rachidian and lateral teeth of each row. Lateral teeth robust, broad, with smooth inner edge of shaft curving posteriorly; cutting edge with prominent, dagger-like, pointed cusp and small, blunt inner cusp (Fig. 7B, D, E). Marginal teeth long, slender, with cylindrical shafts and constriction below claw-like tips; cutting edges of inner and outer marginal teeth bearing three to five elongate, curving, pointed cusps, somewhat angular in cross section (Fig. 7E).

Figure 7. 

Radula morphology of Pseudomohnia sp., LACM 1997-168.10 A radular ribbon B detail of rachidian and lateral teeth C detail of rachidian D, E detail of lateral and marginal teeth F detail of inner and outer marginal teeth. Scale bars: 20 µm (C, F); 100 µm (A, B, D, E).

Anatomy [LACM 1997-168.10]. Foot elongate oval. Propodium large, crescent shaped, with deep, triangular propodial groove (Fig. 5B). Shallow furrow (= epipodial skirt) continuous with opercular lobe, evident along sides of foot, becoming obsolete in deep groove where propodium joins neck. Foot sole, particular that of metapodium, deeply wrinkled with many deep transverse grooves. Sole divided longitudinally by deep medial cleft. Rather large bilobed mesopodial pedal gland within foot below and in front of pedal ganglia on both sides of cleft, opening via large pore near center of sole.

Head with short, broad, muscular snout and long, tapering cephalic tentacles (Fig. 5B). Eyes conspicuous, on prominent ocular peduncles at outer bases of tentacles. Mantle edge smooth, with short, clearly defined siphon at left. Columellar muscle short, broad, extending roughly one-half whorl to base of mantle cavity. Ctenidium long, extending from siphon to base of mantle cavity, with long, narrowly triangular leaflets. Osphradium forming tall, narrow, undulating ridge, extending almost entire length of gill, from near anterior end almost to base. Hypobranchial gland well developed. Rectum broad, filled with sponge spicules, terminating in papillate anus near mantle edge at right. Rectum bordering pallial glandular gonoduct. Pallial gonoduct open for much of its length, lacking accessory pouches; thick, highly glandular tissue subdivided by deep transverse grooves (Fig. 5E). Penis lacking.

Proboscis acrembolic. Introvert rather short, muscular, oral tube not cuticularized. Jaws large, robust, surrounding anterior end of odontophore (Fig. 5C). Buccal mass large with long radular sac (Fig. 5C, D) emerging mid-ventrally near posterior end, continuing to right before arcing dorsally across anterior esophagus just behind buccal mass with posterior, weakly-bifid tip lying on left side of esophagus near supra-esophageal ganglion. Posterior buccal cavity with broad, deep, subtriangular, acinous salivary glands on either side of dorsal food groove. Anterior esophagus not cuticularized. Large mid-esophageal gland (Fig. 5C) with shallow, glandular septae and voluminous lumen, narrowing to posterior esophagus near end of mantle cavity, with ca. seven low, longitudinal folds.

Nervous system epiathroid. Circum-esophageal nerve ring surrounding anterior esophagus (Fig. 5C) just behind buccal apparatus. Nerve ring highly asymmetrical, with both cerebral ganglia lying on left side of esophagus; left cerebral ganglion below and slightly in front of right ganglion, joined by very short but distinct commissure. Buccal ganglia (Fig. 5D) joined by short commissure, lying on either side of posterior buccal mass at emergence of anterior esophagus, just below salivary glands. Small pleural ganglia lying immediately behind cerebral ganglia, separated by narrow constrictions. Long connective joining right pleural with supra-esophageal ganglion (Fig. 5C) at left side of cephalic hemocoel near tip of radular ribbon. Sub-esophageal ganglion lying below right side of anterior esophagus, separated from left pleural ganglion by slight constriction. Long, highly asymmetric connectives joining cerebral and pleural ganglia with pedal ganglia lying within foot at short distance anterior to cerebral ganglia. Small statocysts with numerous, tiny statoconia on postero-dorsal surface of pedal ganglia. Pedal ganglia joined by short, thick commissure.

Distribution and ecology

Known only from the Aleutian Islands (Fig. 2) in 325–384 m, feeding on sponges.

Remarks

Given the absence of accessory sperm storage pouches in the pallial gonoduct (Fretter 1951; Houston 1985), the dissected individual is inferred to be male.

The disposition of the remnants of the shell from LACM 1997-168.10 on which the anatomical observations were made is unknown and there is no known photograph (RN Clark, L Groves, pers. comm.). The anatomy and radula morphology show several differences compared to Pseudomohnia kurilana and P. rogerclarki (see below). The two specimens in LACM 1997-156.7 (Fig. 1C, D) have a broader spire angle than P. rogerclarki, but share the constricted, elevated early whorls. The spiral sculpture of the teleoconch is less distinct and more irregular than in P. kurilana and P. rogerclarki. Fragmentary soft parts from one of the two specimens in LACM 1997-156.7 (Fig. 1D) produced a radula that we infer to be teratological, lacking a rachidian and bearing stunted marginal teeth with weakly lobed tips. The two available lots were collected in deeper waters (325–384 m) than P. rogerclarki (114–166 m). Given the fragmentary and incomplete information available, we cautiously conclude that the broad morph represented by the two specimens in LACM 1997-156.7 is conspecific with LACM 1997-168.10 and represents a third and undescribed species of Pseudomohnia. It is possible that the shells and the soft parts are not conspecific, and that the broad morph represents population variation or sexual dimorphism within the range of P. rogerclarki. Thus, we refrain from describing another species until additional comparative material becomes available.

To the extent that comparisons are possible, the anatomy of Pseudomohnia sp. agrees well with that of P. kurilana. The most conspicuous differences between the two concern details of the anterior alimentary system; specifically, the salivary glands appeared more irregular, the snout longer, the radular sac shorter, the mid-esophageal gland less developed, and the length of the introvert shorter in P. kurilana. The length of the introvert is known to vary within the family (Houbrick 1987; Golding et al. 2009), but that of P. kurilana also may have been incompletely retracted which would also explain the appearance of the snout. Pseudomohnia sp. is more similar to P. kurilana in morphology of the radula, but differs in the broader, more triangular and finely serrated central cusp of the rachidian and in the morphology of the marginal teeth which bear slightly fewer (two to four versus three to five), shorter, more smoothly conical cusps in P. kurilana. However, the range of values of marginal cusp counts overlaps in the two species and its significance could diminish with greater sampling. Like other triphoroideans, the nervous system is epiathroid with a long supra-esophageal connective, but differs in the presence of numerous, tiny statoconia in the statocysts rather than a single statolith (Risbec 1943).

Discussion

In triphoroideans, the plesiomorphic taenioglossate condition has yielded an impressive diversity in tooth number and morphology possibly reflecting the diversity of their sponge hosts (e.g., Kosuge 1966; Marshall 1978, 1980, 1983, 1984; Bouchet 1985; Bouchet and Warén 1993; Nützel 1998; Fernandes and Pimenta 2019; Ponder et al. 2020). As far as is currently known, most newtoniellids have retained the taenioglossate configuration (Sars 1878; Thiele 1929; Powell 1951; Marshall 1978, 1980; Houbrick 1987; Bouchet and Warén 1993; Nützel 1998) apart from Adelacerithium Ludbrook, 1941 (Marshall 1984), Sasamocochlis Gründel, 1980 (Tsuchida and Sasaki 1998), and a species of Trituba Jousseaume, 1884 (Bouchet and Fechter 1981; as Triforis).

As noted by Ponder et al. (2008), triphoroideans have remained virtually untouched by comparative approaches. The anatomy of Pseudomohnia agrees well with what little has been described for members of the superfamily thus far (Risbec 1943; Fretter 1951; Kosuge 1966; Houston 1985), and for newtoniellids in particular (e.g., Houbrick 1987; Golding et al. 2009), and in their ecology as feeders on sponges. However, the family and subfamily classification currently in use (Bouchet et al. 2017) is based primarily on morphology of the shell (including protoconch) and radula; anatomical characters that might serve to distinguish family-level taxa have not been established (Ponder and Warén 1988) and the phylogenetic cohesiveness of the Ataxocerithiinae (which at present is a nomenclaturally unavailable name) and other currently recognized subfamilies remains unknown. This is an area ripe for testing within a molecular framework. Thus, we refrain here from making a more formal subfamily placement. That said, Pseudomohnia seems to bear the closest affinity to species currently classified in the Laeocochlidinae Golikov & Starobogatov, 1987 and particularly to Laeocochlis Dunker & Metzger, 1874. The latter is presently understood to contain a single Recent species, Laeocochlis sinistrata (Nyst, 1835), distributed in offshore waters of the North Atlantic (Bouchet and Warén 1993; MolluscaBase 2021b). Both genera possess ribbed, multispiral protoconchs and development is inferred to be non-planktotrophic. The large teleoconchs are characterized by convex whorls separated by a deeply impressed suture and a dominant sculpture of spiral cords. The radulae are taenioglossate, with teeth that are solid and comparatively plain (Sars 1878; Thiele 1929; Powell 1951; Marshall 1978, 1980, 1984; Houbrick 1987; Bouchet and Warén 1993; Nützel 1998). The shell of Pseudomohnia differs in being dextral, smaller in length at adulthood (~ 15–20 mm vs. > 25 mm), more inflated with a broader spire angle, and with a less gyrate axis and a shorter, less distinct siphonal canal. The radula differs in the small, concave rachidian and slender marginal teeth with cylindrical shafts; the teeth of Laeocochlis are all unicuspid (Bouchet and Warén 1993: fig. 1281). The monotypic Sasamocochlis, also currently placed in the Laeocochlidinae (MolluscaBase 2021b), has a similarly large, sinistral shell with convex whorls and dominant spiral sculpture, and possesses a radula with unicuspid teeth, but lacks marginal teeth (Tsuchida and Sasaki 1998).

While showing some affinity to species currently classified in the Laeocochlidinae, the morphology of the radula and shell of Pseudomohnia presents many unique features previously undocumented in newtoniellids (Sars 1878; Powell 1951; Marshall 1978, 1980; Houbrick 1987; Nützel 1988; Bouchet and Warén 1993). Indeed, the unusual shell morphology has obscured its true affinities for over 100 years. Confirmation of its family placement will require molecular sequence data and the genus may merit recognition at a higher rank.

Acknowledgements

This collaboration began as part of Jim McLean’s ‘Northeast Pacific Shelled Gastropods’ project (https://doi.org/10.11646/zoosymposia.13.1). We are grateful to Lindsey Groves (LACM) for access to collections under his care. We also thank Klaus Ruetzler (Emeritus, USNM) for his identification of the sponge spicules, Yolanda Villacampa (USNM) for scanning electron microscopy, and Dan Cole (USNM) for producing the map figure. BIS was supported by the State scientific program “Taxonomy, biodiversity and ecology of invertebrates from Russian and adjacent waters of World ocean, continental water bodies and damped areas AAA-A19-119020690072-9”. Scientific research was performed using equipment of the “Taxon” Research Resource Center (http://www.ckp-rf.ru/ckp/3038/) of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg). Our thanks to Maurício Fernandes and Alexandre Pimenta (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) for their careful reading and constructive reviews of the manuscript.

References

  • Bandel K (1984) The radulae of Caribbean and other Mesogastropoda and Neogastropoda. Zoologische Verhandelingen 214: 1–188.
  • Bouchet P, Fechter R (1981) Two Recent dextral Triforis in the Eastern Atlantic. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 111: 165–172.
  • Bouchet P (1985) Les Triphoridae de Méditerranée et du proche Atlantique (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Lavori, Società Italiana di Malacologia 21: 5–58.
  • Bouchet P, Rocroi J-P, Hausdorf B, Kaim A, Kano Y, Nützel A, Parkhaev P, Schrödl M, Strong EE (2017) Revised classification, nomenclator and typification of gastropod and monoplacophoran families. Malacologia 61: 1–526. https://doi.org/10.4002/040.061.0201
  • Dall WH (1913) New species of the genus Mohnia from the North Pacific. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 65: 501–504.
  • Dall WH (1925) Illustrations of unfigured types of shells in the collections of the United States National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 66(2554): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.66-2554.1
  • Fernandes MR, Pimenta AD (2019) Basic anatomy of species of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 517: 1–60. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.517
  • Fernandes MR, Garofalo R, Pimenta A (2015) New species and records of Newtoniellinae (Caenogastropoda, Newtoniellidae) from Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95(4): 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315414001933
  • Fretter V (1951) Observations on the life histories and functional morphology of Cerithiopsis tubercularis (Montagu) and Triphora perversa (L). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of Great Britain 29: 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400052784
  • Gofas S (2003) An endemic radiation of Trituba (Mollusca, Gastropoda) on the North Atlantic seamounts. American Malacological Bulletin 17: 45–63.
  • Golding RE, Ponder WF, Byrne M (2009) The evolutionary and biomechanical implications of snout and proboscis morphology in Caenogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Journal of Natural History 43: 2723–2763. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930903219954
  • Golikov AN, Sirenko BI (1998) Prosobranch gastropods of the continental slope of the Kurile Islands. Ruthenica 8: 91–135. [in Russian]
  • Holznagel WE (1997) A nondestructive method for cleaning gastropod radulae from frozen, alcohol-fixed or dried material. American Malacological Bulletin 14: 181–184.
  • Houbrick RS (1987) Description of a new, giant Ataxocerithium species from Australia, with remarks on the systematic placement of the genus (Prosobranchia: Cerithiopsidae). The Nautilus 101: 155–165. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.17411
  • Houston RS (1985) Genital ducts of the Cerithiacea (Gastropoda: Mesogastropoda) from the Gulf of California. Journal of Molluscan Studies 51: 183–189.
  • Kantor YuI, Sysoev AV (2006) Marine and brackish water Gastropoda of Russia and adjacent countries: an illustrated catalog. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, 371 pp. [+ 140 pls]
  • Kantor YuI, Fedosov AE, Kosyan AR, Puillandre N, Sorokin P, Kano Y, Clark R, Bouchet P (2021) Molecular phylogeny and revised classification of the Buccinoidea (Neogastropoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, in press. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab031
  • Kosuge S (1966) The family Triphoridae and its systematic position. Malacologia 4: 297–324.
  • Kosuge S (1972) Illustrations of types of molluscs described by William Healey Dall (Northwestern Pacific gastropods). Published by the author, Tokyo, 3 pp. [+ 29 pls]
  • Kosyan AR, Kantor YuI (2014) Revision of the genus Retifusus Dall, 1916. Ruthenica 24: 121–163.
  • Kosyan AR, Kantor YuI (2015) Notes on the abyssal genus Fusipagoda Habe & Ito, 1965 (Neogastropoda: Buccinidae) from the North Pacific. Ruthenica 25: 77–87.
  • Kosyan AR, Kantor YuI (2016) Revision of the genus Retimohnia McLean, 1995 (Gastropoda: Buccinidae). Ruthenica 26: 85–121.
  • McLean JH (1995) Four new genera for Northeastern Pacific prosobranch gastropods. The Nautilus 108: 39–41.
  • Nützel A (1998) Über die Stammesgeschichte der Ptenoglossa (Gastropoda). Berliner Geowissenschaftlichte Abhandlungen, Reihe E 26: 1–229.
  • Ponder WF, Warén A (1988) Classification of the Caenogastropoda and Heterostropha – A list of the family-group names and higher taxa. Malacological Review Supplement 4: 288–328.
  • Risbec J (1943) Recherches anatomiques sur les Prosobranches de Nouvelle-Calédonie. (Quatrième partie). Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie 11: 89–107.
  • Sars GO (1878) Bidrag til Kundskaben om Norges arktiske Fauna. I. Mollusca Regionis Arcticae Norvegiae. Oversigt over de i Norges arktiske Region Forekommende Bløddyr. Brøgger, Christiania, 466 pp. [+ 34 pls] https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.42224
  • Sirenko B, Kantor YuI, Gulbin VV (2013) Clade Ptenoglossa. In: BI Sirenko (Ed.) Check-list of species of free-living invertebrates of the Russian Far Eastern Seas. Explorations of the Fauna of the Seas 75(83): 156.
  • Thiele J (1929) Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde, vol. 1, part 1. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 376 pp.
  • Tsuchida E, Sasaki T (1998) Discovery of live specimens of Sasamocochlis sasamorii (Kuroda, 1943) from Tsugaru Straits, Northern Japan (Gastropoda:Triphoroidea). Venus 57: 1–9.
login to comment