Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ricardo Luría-Manzano ( ricardolm@ib.usp.br ) Academic editor: Anthony Herrel
© 2021 José Luis Aguilar-López, Ricardo Luría-Manzano, Eduardo Pineda, Luis Canseco-Márquez.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Aguilar-López JL, Luría-Manzano R, Pineda E, Canseco-Márquez L (2021) Selva Zoque, Mexico: an important Mesoamerican tropical region for reptile species diversity and conservation. ZooKeys 1054: 127-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1054.67916
|
The Selva Zoque region is characterized by a great variety of ecosystems for which there is little information about reptile species diversity and their conservation status. This study is the first assessment of the species richness, composition, and conservation status of reptiles of this region. Additionally, this information is compared with that of seven other tropical regions in northern Mesoamerica. In total, 141 native reptile species belonging to 81 genera and 29 families are recorded for the Selva Zoque region. Sixty species (42% of the total) recorded in Selva Zoque are in high-risk categories according to the Mexican Ministry of the Environment, the highest number for the Mexican regions of Mesoamerica. According to the IUCN, six species are in high-risk categories, seven species are in Data Deficient, and 23 (16%) have not been evaluated yet. According to the Environmental Vulnerability Scores approach, 28 species (20%) are in the high vulnerability category. The Selva Zoque species composition is most similar to Los Tuxtlas and Lacandona regions, and most dissimilar to Sian Ka´an Biosphere Reserve. The reptilian fauna of Selva Zoque has a distinctive composition, with the highest number (11 species) of endemic reptiles in the northern Mesoamerican, and species from two biogeographic provinces: the Gulf of Mexico and the Mexican Pacific Coast. These results indicate that the Selva Zoque is the most diverse region in native reptile species in northern Mesoamerica, highlighting it as extremely important for the conservation of the reptile fauna at local (southern Mexico) and regional levels (northern Mesoamerica).
Compositional similarity, conservation value, Data Deficient, reptile fauna, species composition, species richness
The 25 biodiversity hotspots identified by
One such region is the Selva Zoque, composed by the Uxpanapa-Chimalapas zone (UC) and El Ocote Biosphere Reserve, is located on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in the states of Veracruz, Oaxaca, and Chiapas in southern Mexico. The Selva Zoque region is the second largest extension of well-conserved tropical forest in northern Mesoamerica, is a Pleistocene refuge with high number of endemic species (
Worldwide, habitat modification represents the most common threat to terrestrial reptile species, with one in five species included in high-risk categories of extinction (Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered) by the IUCN. A further one in five species is listed in the Data Deficient category, and four of ten have not been evaluated according to the criteria of the Red List (
Based on a comprehensive review of databases, scientific literature, and fieldwork, we provide the first assessment of species richness, species composition and distribution, and conservation status of the reptile fauna inhabiting the Selva Zoque region. Additionally, we compared this information with other tropical regions on the northern end of Mesoamerica.
The Selva Zoque region is located in southern Mexico east of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Fig.
We consulted two databases between January 2017 and May 2021: the National Information System on Biodiversity (SNIB) curated by the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; www.gbif.org). We also reviewed the scientific literature on reptiles from the study region (Navarro-Singüenza and Meave-Castillo 1998;
We cross-checked records obtained from the three sources of information to avoid duplication, since the databases consulted might have records of the same specimens. Only records with precise geographic coordinates or detailed information about the collection and observation site were included, and from these records we compiled a general database.
To compare the data we compiled for the Selva Zoque region with the data from seven other tropical regions, we obtained information about reptile species richness and species composition from: 1) Los Tuxtlas in Veracruz (
To identify the spatial distribution of reptile records in the study region, we projected all geo-referenced records onto our study area polygon using ArcGIS software, version 10.0 (
We compared reptilian faunal composition between regions using Jaccard’s similarity index (
where a = the number of species shared between the two sites under comparison, b = number of species exclusive to the first site, and c = number of species exclusive to the second site. The index ranges from zero to one, with zero indicating that no species are shared between the sites being compared, and one indicating that all species are found in both sites. We plotted a dendrogram using PAST software version 2.17c (
A total of 141 native reptile species belonging to 81 genera and 29 families has been recorded at the Selva Zoque region. These comprise 62 species of lizards, 70 snakes, seven turtles, and two crocodilians (Appendix
Reptiles have been recorded mostly on the periphery of the study region, notably on western, southern and eastern end portions. In the northwest, northeast, and west, reptile collections are located below 1000 m a.s.l., while in the southeast, most of collections are between 1000 and 2000 m a.s.l. The central portion of Chimalapas, the mountainous zone known as Espinazo del Diablo in Uxpanapa and a zone between El Ocote Biosphere Reserve and UC zones corresponding to the northwest extreme of Cintalapa in Chiapas, remain with no collection of reptiles (Fig.
Of the reptile species recorded in the Selva Zoque region, 60 species (42%) are in high-risk categories according to SEMARNAT: 39 species in the Subject to Special Protection category (Pr), 18 species are in the Threatened category (A) and three are Endangered (P). According to the IUCN Red List, six species (4%) are included in high-risk categories: three are Vulnerable (VU), two are Endangered (EN), and one is Critically Endangered (CR). Additionally, seven species are in the Data Deficient category (DD) and 23 species have not been evaluated (NE). The remaining 105 species are in low-risk categories. According to the EVS system, 28 species (20%) are in the high vulnerability category (Appendix
With 141 native species recorded, the Selva Zoque region harbors the highest reptile species richness among the tropical regions considered in this study, surpassing Los Tuxtlas (113 species). The Mayan Forest ranks third (107 species), followed by La Lacandona (89 species), La Sepultura (79 species), Calakmul (73 species), Sian Ka´an (63 species), and finally Las Choapas (56 species; Table
Taxonomic composition of native reptile species recorded in the Selva Zoque region and seven other regions in northern Mesoamerica. Non-native species are not included in the taxonomic composition data.
Tropical region | Orders | Families | Genera | Lizards | Snakes | Turtles | Crocodilians | Native species | Non-native species |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selva Zoque | 3 | 29 | 81 | 62 | 70 | 7 | 2 | 141 | 3 |
Los Tuxtlas | 3 | 29 | 75 | 35 | 63 | 14 | 1 | 113 | 4 |
Mayan Forest | 3 | 26 | 70 | 35 | 61 | 9 | 2 | 107 | 1 |
Lacandona | 3 | 25 | 64 | 28 | 52 | 7 | 2 | 89 | 1 |
La Sepultura | 2 | 25 | 59 | 29 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 79 | 2 |
Calakmul | 3 | 21 | 51 | 24 | 39 | 9 | 1 | 73 | 3 |
Sian Ka´an | 3 | 23 | 51 | 25 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 63 | 2 |
Las Choapas | 3 | 20 | 41 | 20 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 56 | 2 |
The dendrogram indicates that La Sepultura has the most dissimilar species composition of the nine regions (Fig.
The Selva Zoque and Los Tuxtlas regions have the highest number of endemic species to the regions, with eleven each, followed by La Sepultura (three species) and Mayan Forest with one endemic species while the rest of regions do not have endemic species (Appendix
Number of reptile species in high extinction-risk categories according to A NOM-059-
Our results show that the Selva Zoque region harbors the greatest reptile species richness in northern Mesoamerica, with a distinctive species composition and several species inhabit exclusively on Selva Zoque region. Furthermore, one in every two reptile species that inhabit in Selva Zoque is threatened, is highly vulnerable or there is not sufficient information to know its extinction risk level. All this underscore the importance of the Selva Zoque region for reptile conservation in Mexico and Mesoamerica. This region also offers opportunities to study unexplored well-preserved tropical forest areas, as well as species for which little is known about their biology, ecology, and conservation status.
The Selva Zoque region is more diverse in native reptile species than even Los Tuxtlas, which has 28 fewer native species (
That said, the inventory of reptile species in the Selva Zoque region is far from complete, particularly in UC zones. In the last three years alone, three new species have been described (Anolis purpuronectes [
The high species richness in the Selva Zoque region may be the result of a series of factors. One is the notably complex orography with lowland zones, both on the Gulf of Mexico and on the Pacific versant, and also a series of mountain ranges of intermediate elevation–the Sierra Atravesada, the Espinazo del Diablo, the Sierra Tres Picos, and Cerro La Colmena (
Although the Selva Zoque did not result clustered with any of the regions in the similarity analysis, Los Tuxtlas and Lacandona Biosphere Reserves are the most similar tropical regions to the Selva Zoque. This pattern has been observed for amphibians in a comparison between Uxpanapa-Chimalapas zone and the same tropical regions (except from La Sepultura) used in this study, and can be explained by the high number of recorded species in these three sites and the high number of species that they share. The Selva Zoque reptile fauna has a combined component of species from two different biogeographic provinces (
Our results suggest that Selva Zoque is a priority conservation area for the reptile fauna of Mexico because a relatively high proportion (43%) of the species that inhabit there are in high-risk of extinction categories in the NOM-059; equivalent to 33% of all the Mexican reptile species included in this initiative (
Reptile species in high extinction-risk categories by IUCN, NOM or EVS initiatives, or listed as Data Deficient or Not evaluated by the IUCN red list (see text) A Abronia bogerti B Anolis alvarezdeltoroi C Anolis pygmaeus D Lepidophyma tuxtlae E Xenosaurus arboreus F Xenosaurus rackhami G Tantilla briggsi H Trimorphodon biscutatus I Epictia phenops J Bothriechis rowleyi K Dermatemys mawii and L Crocodylus acutus.
The extensive areas of well-preserved forest in Selva Zoque are mostly located in the Chimalapas zone and El Ocote Biosphere Reserve (
The implementation of activities proven to be effective in the conservation of reptiles in transformed landscapes in the study region is desirable. These could include: 1) ecological restoration (
The authors thank A. Vinalay, C. Nochebuena, D. Aportela, L. Vázquez, L. Alcaide, J. López, M. Oropeza, R. Flores, J. Pelayo, I. Caviedes, F. Vázquez, C. Hernández, and U. García for helping with the fieldwork. Policarpo Ronzón, L. Feria, and A. Vázquez provided logistical support for the trips to the field. The authors are grateful to M. López-Luna for providing the photograph of Crocodylus acutus, to I. Ahumada for providing the photograph of Bothriechis rowleyi, and to L. Badillo for providing the photograph of Epictia phenops. P. Bañuelos prepared the map and B. Delfosse and A. Clause revised the English of the manuscript. The Toala and Chacha families provided accommodation and were our field guides during our work in Uxpanapa. J. Campbell kindly reviewed an early version of the manuscript and offered helpful suggestions, and Roberto Luna-Reyes made useful suggestions on an advanced version of the manuscript. JLAL was awarded graduate studies scholarship No. 344651 by CONACYT. Permits for this study were issued by the Mexican Wildlife Agency, Dirección General de Vida Silvestre of the Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (collecting permit numbers: SGPA/DGVS/03665/06 and SGPA/DGVS/03444/15). This study was funded by project JF-212-CONABIO.
List of native reptile species recorded in the Selva Zoque region and seven other regions in northern Mesoamerica, their distribution range and conservation status. Abbreviations: a = species recorded during our fieldwork. LS = La Sepultura, LT = Los Tuxtlas, MF = Mayan Forest, SZ = Selva Zoque. NA = Species not considered in the EVS system. Exotic species recorded in the evaluated regions: Anolis cristatellus (Calakmul), Anolis sagrei (Selva Zoque, Los Tuxtlas, Calakmul, Sian Ka´an and Mayan Forest), Gehyra mutilata (Selva Zoque), Hemidactylus frenatus (Selva Zoque, Las Choapas, Lacandona, Los Tuxtlas, Calakmul and Sian Ka´an), Hemidactylus turcicus (Los Tuxtlas, La Sepultura) and Indotyphlops braminus (Las Choapas, Los Tuxtlas).
Species | Distribution range | Selva Zoque | Las Choapas | Lacandona | Los Tuxtlas | La Sepultura | Calakmul | Sian Ka'an | Mayan Forest | NOM-059 | IUCN RED LIST | EVS | Category of vulnerability according to the EVS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLASS REPTILIA | |||||||||||||
Order Squamata | |||||||||||||
Suborder Lacertilia | |||||||||||||
Anguidae | |||||||||||||
Abronia bogerti Tihen | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Data Deficient | 18 | High |
Abronia chiszari Smith & Smith | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Endangered | 17 | High |
Abronia morenica Clause, Luna-Reyes & Nieto-Montes de Oca | LS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Abronia ornelasi Campbell | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Data Deficient | 18 | High |
Abronia ramirezi Campbell | LS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 18 | High | |
Abronia reidi Werler & Shannon | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Data Deficient | 18 | High |
Celestus enneagrammus (Cope) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 14 | High |
Celestus ingridae (Werler & Campbell) | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 17 | High | |
Celestus rozellae (Smith) a | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |
Gerrhonotus liocephalus Wiegmann | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Corytophanidae | |||||||||||||
Basiliscus vittatus Wiegmann a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Corytophanes cristatus (Merrem) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 11 | Medium |
Corytophanes hernandesii (Wiegmann) a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |
Laemanctus longipes Wiegmann | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 9 | Low |
Laemanctus serratus Cope | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 8 | Low |
Dactyloidae | |||||||||||||
Anolis alvarezdeltoroi Nieto-Montes de Oca a | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 17 | High | |
Anolis barkeri (Schmidt) | MAMx | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Vulnerable | 15 | High |
Anolis beckeri Boulenger a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Anolis biporcatus (Wiegmann) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Not evaluated | 10 | Medium |
Anolis boulengerianus Thominot | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Data Deficient | 16 | High |
Anolis capito Peters | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Anolis compressicaudus Smith & Kerster a | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 15 | High | |
Anolis cuprinus Smith | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 16 | High |
Anolis duellmani Fitch & Henderson | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Data Deficient | 17 | High |
Anolis laeviventris (Wiegmann) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | 9 | Low | |
Anolis lemurinus Cope a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Anolis matudai Smith | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |
Anolis parvicirculatus Alvarez del Toro & Smith | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 16 | High |
Anolis petersii Bocourt | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 9 | Low | |
Anolis purpuronectes Gray, Meza-Lázaro, Poe & Nieto-Montes de Oca a | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | |
Anolis pygmaeus Alvarez del Toro & Smith a | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Endangered | 16 | High |
Anolis rodriguezii Bocourt a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Anolis sericeus Hallowell a | MA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Anolis spilorhipis (Alvarez del Toro & Smith) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Anolis tropidonotus Peters | MA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Anolis uniformis Cope | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Anolis unilobatus Köhler & Vesely | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Eublepharidae | |||||||||||||
Coleonyx elegans Gray a | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 9 | Low |
Gymnophthalmidae | |||||||||||||
Gymnophthalmus speciosus (Hallowell) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 9 | Low |
Helodermatidae | |||||||||||||
Heloderma horridum (Wiegmann) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 11 | Medium |
Iguanidae | |||||||||||||
Cachryx defensor (Cope) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | P | Vulnerable | 15 | High |
Ctenosaura acanthura (Shaw) | MA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 12 | Medium |
Ctenosaura pectinata (Wiegmann) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 15 | High |
Ctenosaura similis (Gray) | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 8 | Low |
Iguana iguana (Linnaeus) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 12 | Medium |
Mabuyidae | |||||||||||||
Marisora lineola McCranie, Matthews & Hedges | MA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Marisora syntoma McCranie, Matthews & Hedges | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Phyllodactylidae | |||||||||||||
Phyllodactylus magnus Taylor | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Thecadactylus rapicauda (Houttuyn) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 10 | Medium |
Phrynosomatidae | |||||||||||||
Phrynosoma asio Cope | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 11 | Medium |
Sceloporus carinatus Smith | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Sceloporus chrysostictus Cope | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Sceloporus cozumelae Jones | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 15 | High |
Sceloporus internasalis Smith & Bumzahem a | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Sceloporus lundelli Smith | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 14 | High | |
Sceloporus melanorhinus Bocourt | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Sceloporus salvini Günther | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Data Deficient | 15 | High |
Sceloporus serrifer Cope | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Sceloporus siniferus Cope | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Sceloporus smithi Hartweg & Oliver | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 15 | High | |
Sceloporus teapensis Günther | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Sceloporus variabilis Wiegmann a | WD | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | |
Urosaurus bicarinatus (Duméril) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Scincidae | |||||||||||||
Mesoscincus schwartzei (Fischer) | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Plestiodon sumichrasti (Cope) a | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Scincella assata (Cope) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Scincella cherriei (Cope) a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Scincella gemmingeri (Cope) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Scincella incerta (Stuart) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Scincella silvicola (Taylor) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 12 | Medium |
Sphaerodactylidae | |||||||||||||
Gonatodes albogularis (Duméril & Bibron) | WD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 11 | Medium |
Sphaerodactylus glaucus Cope | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 12 | Medium |
Sphaerodactylus millepunctatus (Hallowell) | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Teiidae | |||||||||||||
Aspidoscelis angusticeps (Cope) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Aspidoscelis deppei (Wiegmann) | MA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Aspidoscelis guttata (Wiegmann) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Aspidoscelis maslini (Fritts) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 15 | High |
Aspidoscelis motaguae (Sackett) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Holcosus amphigrammus (Smith and Laufe) a | MAMx | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 11 | Medium | |
Holcosus chaitzami (Stuart) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Data Deficient | NA | NA | |
Holcosus festivus (Lichtenstein & Martens) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Holcosus gaigeae (Smith & Laufe) | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Not evaluated | 13 | Medium | |
Holcosus hartwegi (Smith) | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | 12 | Medium | |
Holcosus parvus (Barbour & Noble) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 13 | Medium | |
Xantusiidae | |||||||||||||
Lepidophyma flavimaculatum Duméril | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 8 | Low |
Lepidophyma lipetzi Smith & Alavarez del Toro | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Endangered | 16 | High |
Lepidophyma mayae Bezy | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Near Threatened | NA | NA | |
Lepidophyma pajapanensis Werler a | MAMx | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |
Lepidophyma smithii Bocourt | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 8 | Low |
Lepidophyma tuxtlae Werler & Shannon a | MAMx | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Data Deficient | 11 | Medium |
Xenosauridae | |||||||||||||
Xenosaurus arboreus (Lynch & Smith) | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 17 | High | |
Xenosaurus rackhami Stuart | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 11 | Medium | |
Xenosaurus sanmartinensis Werler & Shannon | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 17 | High | |
Suborder Serpentes | |||||||||||||
Boidae | |||||||||||||
Boa imperator Daudin | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Dipsadidae | |||||||||||||
Adelphicos latifasciatum Lynch & Smith | LS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Data Deficient | 15 | High |
Adelphicos quadrivirgatum Jan | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Adelphicos visoninum (Cope) | MA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Amastridium sapperi (Werner) a | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Cenaspis aenigma Campbell, Smith & Hall | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | |
Chersodromus australis Canseco-Márquez, Ramírez-González & Campbell | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | |
Clelia clelia (Daudin) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Clelia scytalina (Cope) a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Coniophanes bipunctatus (Günther) | MA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Coniophanes fissidens (Günther) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Coniophanes imperialis (Baird & Girard) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Coniophanes piceivittis Cope | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Coniophanes quinquevittatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Coniophanes schmidti Bailey | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Conophis lineatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Conophis morai7 Pérez-Higareda, López-Luna & Smith | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 17 | High | |
Conophis vittatus Peters | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Dipsas brevifacies (Cope) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 15 | High |
Enulius flavitorques (Cope) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | |
Geophis carinosus Stuart | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Geophis juliai Pérez-Higareda, Smith & López-Luna | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Vulnerable | 13 | Medium | |
Geophis laticinctus Smith & Williams | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 11 | Medium |
Geophis sp. nov. a | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | |
Imantodes cenchoa (Linnaeus) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Imantodes gemmistratus (Cope) | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Imantodes tenuissimus (Cope) | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |
Leptodeira annulata (Linnaeus) | WD | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Leptodeira frenata (Cope) | MA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Leptodeira maculata (Hallowell) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 7 | Low |
Leptodeira nigrofasciata Günther | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Leptodeira polysticta (Günther) a | MA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | 6 | Low | |
Leptodeira septentrionalis (Kennicott) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Manolepis putnami (Jan) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Ninia diademata Baird & Girard a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Ninia sebae (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | |
Oxyrhopus petolarius (Linnaeus) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 14 | High | |
Pliocercus elapoides Cope | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Rhadinaea decorata (Günther) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Rhadinaea macdougalli Smith & Langebartel | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Data Deficient | 12 | Medium |
Rhadinella anachoreta (Smith & Campbell) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | NA | NA | |
Rhadinella godmani (Günther) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Sibon dimidiatus (Günther) a | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Sibon linearis Pérez-Higareda, López-Luna & Smith | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 16 | High | |
Sibon nebulatus (Linnaeus) | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | |
Sibon sanniolus (Cope) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Tretanorhinus nigroluteus Cope | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Tropidodipsas fasciata Günther | WD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Tropidodipsas fischeri (Boulenger) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Tropidodipsas sartorii Cope | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 9 | Low |
Xenodon rabdocephalus (Wied-Neuwied) | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Colubridae | |||||||||||||
Coluber constrictor Linnaeus | WD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 10 | Medium |
Dendrophidion rufiterminorum Cadle & Savage | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Dendrophidion vinitor Smith a | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
Drymarchon melanurus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
Drymobius chloroticus (Cope) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Drymobius margaritiferus (Schlegel) | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
Ficimia publia Cope | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Ficimia variegata (Günther) | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 14 | High | |
Masticophis mentovarius (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Mastigodryas melanolomus (Cope) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
Lampropeltis abnorma (Bocourt) | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Leptophis ahaetulla (Linnaeus) a | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 10 | Medium |
Leptophis diplotropis (Günther) | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 14 | High |
Leptophis mexicanus Duméril, Bibron & Duméril | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 6 | Low |
Oxybelis potosiensis (Taylor) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Oxybelis fulgidus (Daudin) | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Phrynonax poecilonotus (Günther) | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Pituophis lineaticollis (Cope) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Pseudelaphe flavirufa (Cope) | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Salvadora lemniscata (Cope) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 15 | High |
Senticolis triaspis (Cope) | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
Spilotes pullatus (Linnaeus) a | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
Stenorrhina degenhardtii (Berthold) a | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
Stenorrhina freminvillei (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
Symphimus leucostomum Cope | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 14 | High |
Symphimus mayae (Gaige) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 14 | High |
Tantilla briggsi Savitzky & Smith | SZ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Data Deficient | 16 | High |
Tantilla cuniculator Smith | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | NA | NA |
Tantilla jani (Günther) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Vulnerable | 12 | Medium | |
Tantilla moesta (Günther) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | NA | NA | |
Tantilla rubra Cope | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 5 | Low |
Tantilla schistosa (Bocourt) | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
Tantilla slavensi Pérez-Higareda, Smith & Smith | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Data Deficient | 14 | High |
Tantilla tecta Campbell & Smith | MF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Data Deficient | NA | NA | |
Tantillita brevissima (Taylor) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 9 | Low |
Tantillita canula (Cope) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Tantillita lintoni (Smith) a | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 12 | Medium |
Trimorphodon biscutatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Not evaluated | 7 | Low |
Natricidae | |||||||||||||
Nerodia rhombifer (Hallowell) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
Thamnophis cyrtopsis (Kennicott) | WD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 7 | Low |
Thamnophis marcianus (Baird & Girard) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 10 | Medium |
Thamnophis proximus (Say) | WD | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 7 | Low |
Sybinophiidae | |||||||||||||
Scaphiodontophis annulatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) a | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Elapidae | |||||||||||||
Micrurus apiatus (Jan) | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Micrurus browni Schmidt & Smith | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 8 | Low |
Micrurus diastema (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) a | MA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 8 | Low |
Micrurus elegans Jan | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |
Micrurus limbatus Fraser | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 17 | High |
Leptotyphlopidae | |||||||||||||
Epictia phenops (Cope) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 4 | Low | |
Epictia resetari Wallach | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 11 | Medium | |
Loxocemidae | |||||||||||||
Loxocemus bicolor Cope | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 10 | Medium |
Typhlopidae | |||||||||||||
Amerotyphlops microstomus (Cope) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Amerotyphlops tenuis (Salvin) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Viperidae | |||||||||||||
Agkistrodon bilineatus Günther | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Near Threatened | 11 | Medium |
Bothriechis bicolor (Bocourt) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 14 | High |
Bothriechis rowleyi (Bogert) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Vulnerable | 16 | High |
Bothriechis schlegelii (Berthold) | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Bothrops asper (Garman) a | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated | 12 | Medium | |
Cerrophidion godmani (Günther) | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Crotalus ehecatl Carbajal-Márquez, Cedeño-Vázquez, Martínez-Arce, Neri-Castro & Machkour-M'Rabet | MAMx | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Crotalus mictlantecuhtli Carbajal-Márquez, Cedeño-Vázquez, Martínez-Arce, Neri-Castro & Machkour-M'Rabet | LT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | NA | NA | |
Crotalus simus Latreille | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
Crotalus tzabcan Klauber | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | NA | NA | |
Metlapilcoatlus mexicanus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | MA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
Metlapilcoatlus olmec (Pérez-Higareda, Smith & Julia-Zertuche) a | MA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 15 | High |
Porthidium dunni (Hartweg & Oliver) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 16 | High |
Porthidium nasutum (Bocourt) | WD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 14 | High |
Porthidium yucatanicum (Smith) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Pr | Least Concern | 17 | High |
Order Testudines | |||||||||||||
Suborder Cryptodira | |||||||||||||
Cheloniidae | |||||||||||||
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Vulnerable | NA | NA |
Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Endangered | NA | NA |
Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Critically Endangered | NA | NA |
Lepidochelys kempii Garmin | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Critically Endangered | NA | NA |
Chelydridae | |||||||||||||
Chelydra rossignonii (Bocourt) | MA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Vulnerable | 17 | High |
Dermatemydidae | |||||||||||||
Dermatemys mawii Gray | MA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | P | Critically Endangered | 17 | High |
Dermochelyidae | |||||||||||||
Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Vulnerable | NA | NA |
Emydidae | |||||||||||||
Terrapene carolina (Linnaeus) | WD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Vulnerable | 10 | Medium |
Trachemys venusta (Gray) | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Not evaluated | 13 | Medium |
Geoemydidae | |||||||||||||
Rhinoclemmys areolata (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | MA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Near Threatened | 13 | Medium |
Rhinoclemmys pulcherrima (Gray) | MA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Not evaluated | 8 | Low |
Rhinoclemmys rubida (Cope) | MAMx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pr | Near Threatened | 14 | High |
Kinosternidae | |||||||||||||
Claudius angustatus Cope | MA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | P | Near Threatened | 14 | High |
Kinosternon acutum Gray a | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pr | Near Threatened | 11 | Medium |
Kinosternon creaseri Hartweg | MAMx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Least Concern | 15 | High | |
Kinosternon leucostomum (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril) | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Not evaluated | 10 | Medium |
Kinosternon scorpioides (Linnaeus) a | WD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Not evaluated | 10 | Medium |
Staurotypus triporcatus (Wiegmann) | MA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Near Threatened | 14 | High |
Order Crocodylia | |||||||||||||
Suborder Eusuchia | |||||||||||||
Crocodylidae | |||||||||||||
Crocodylus acutus (Cuvier) a | WD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Vulnerable | 14 | High |
Crocodylus moreletii (Duméril & Bibron) | WD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Pr | Least Concern | 13 | Medium |