Research Article |
Corresponding author: Sérgio Alexandre dos Santos ( sergio.pisces@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Caleb McMahan
© 2021 Sérgio Alexandre dos Santos, Marcelo Ribeiro de Britto.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
dos Santos SA, de Britto MR (2021) The ichthyofauna of a poorly known area in the middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: diagnostics and identification keys. ZooKeys 1054: 25-66. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1054.67554
|
Knowledge about the taxonomy and fish composition from the upper rio Paraúna (rio São Francisco basin) and upper rio Santo Antônio (rio Doce basin) in the middle portion of the Southern Espinhaço mountain range, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil is still incipient. Only few studies focusing on ichthyofaunistic diagnostic and species descriptions in the lower stretches of the rio Santo Antônio are available. Herein the aim was to provide a species list of the freshwater ichthyofauna from the headwaters of both basins in such region, and to verify the occurrence of threatened, exotic, and potentially new species. Sixty species were registered, with 34 associated to the upper rio Paraúna, and 40 to the upper rio Santo Antônio. Two species are included in some threatened category, three are exotics, and 14 represent potentially new species. An identification key of the fish species recorded in the area is also provided.
Headwater, inventory, rio Doce, rio Paraúna, rio Santo Antônio, rio São Francisco, taxonomy
The Espinhaço mountain range is one of the most diverse areas in Brazil, presenting a poorly known fauna with high degree of endemism and records of new fish species in recent years (
The complex of mountains in such a region presents a considerable diversity of fishes that, among other reasons, primarily supported the inclusion of such basins in the list of priority areas for fish conservation in the state of Minas Gerais (
Herein we aim to present a species list of the ichthyofauna from the headwaters of the middle portion of southern Espinhaço mountain range: the upper rio Paraúna (rio São Francisco basin) and the upper rio Santo Antônio (rio Doce basin). In addition, we propose a dichotomous identification key for the fish species found in the region.
The middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range (SEMR) is located in the central-south region of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in an area between the municipalities of Conceição do Mato Dentro, Alvorada de Minas, Congonhas do Norte, Presidente Kubitschek, and Santana de Pirapama. The rio Paraúna is an affluent of the rio das Velhas, and the latter is one of the most important tributaries of the rio São Francisco on its right bank. In its turn, the rio Santo Antônio is one of the most important tributaries of the rio Doce basin on its left bank. Throughout these drainages we sampled 40 localities, which drain the watershed of the upper rio Paraúna and upper rio Santo Antônio (Table
Sampled localities in the middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range, hydrographic basins, and coordinates.
Site | Locality | Drainage | Basin | Coordinates |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rio Parauninha | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°56'16"S; 43°38'29"W |
2 | Ribeirão Congonhas | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°53'07"S; 43°40'52"W |
3 | Ribeirão Congonhas | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°52'20"S; 43°40'33"W |
4 | Rio Lambari ou Cachoeira do Jacu | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°53'43"S; 43°36'34"W |
5 | Rio Lambari ou Cachoeira do Jacu | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°52'43"S; 43°37'24"W |
6 | Córrego Santa Maria | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°49'03"S; 43°39'51"W |
7 | Ribeirão Gurutuba | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°46'20"S; 43°36'57"W |
8 | Ribeirão Gurutuba | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°44'07"S; 43°36'29"W |
9 | Córrego Santa Maria | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°50'11"S; 43°38'28"W |
10 | Ribeirão Santo Antônio ou Cruzeiro | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°48'39"S; 43°33'32"W |
11 | Rio Parauninha | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°56'31"S; 43°37'59"W |
12 | Rio Paraúna | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°41'42"S; 43°34'14"W |
13 | Ribeirão Santo Antônio ou Cruzeiro | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°49'26"S; 43°32'21"W |
14 | Rio Paraúna | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°42'23"S; 43°31'38"W |
15 | Ribeirão Congonhas | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°52'49"S; 43°40'21"W |
16 | Córrego Ponte Nova | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°42'18"S; 43°31'37"W |
17 | Córrego sem nome | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°46'46"S; 43°33'22"W |
18 | Ribeirão Santo Antônio ou Cruzeiro | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°47'01"S; 43°33'38"W |
19 | Córrego Pica-pau | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°46'58"S; 43°33'11"W |
20 | Córrego Ponte Nova | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°41'59"S; 43°31'27"W |
21 | Córrego Pica-pau | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°47'01"S; 43°33'23"W |
22 | Córrego sem nome | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°41'16"S; 43°34'14"W |
23 | Ribeirão Santo Antônio do Norte | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°47'55"S; 43°31'01"W |
24 | Ribeirão Santo Antônio do Norte | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°48'24"S; 43°30'47"W |
25 | Córrego sem nome | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°52'13"S; 43°40'23"W |
26 | Córrego sem nome | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°53'14"S; 43°39'44"W |
27 | Córrego dos Esteios | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°40'57"S; 43°46'08"W |
28 | Córrego dos Esteios | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°40'51"S; 43°46'28"W |
29 | Córrego sem nome | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°39'08"S; 43°45'49"W |
30 | Córrego sem nome | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°38'37"S; 43°45'46"W |
31 | Córrego do Sítio | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°38'33"S; 43°45'11"W |
32 | Ribeirão do Tijucal | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°40'04"S; 43°36'16"W |
33 | Ribeirão do Tijucal | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°40'27"S; 43°36'35"W |
34 | Córrego Santa Maria | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°47'49"S; 43°42'35"W |
35 | Córrego Capão | Santo Antônio | Doce | 19° 00'55"S; 43°35'10"W |
36 | Córrego Capão | Santo Antônio | Doce | 19° 01'20"S; 43°35'37"W |
37 | Ribeirão das Pedras | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°45'50"S; 43°27'36"W |
38 | Ribeirão das Pedras | Santo Antônio | Doce | 18°45'44"S; 43°25'45"W |
39 | Calha principal do Rio Cipó | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°41'38"S; 43°59'24"W |
40 | Córrego sem nome | Rio das Velhas | São Francisco | 18°41'04"S; 43°59'18"W |
Two field expeditions were carried out in March and July-August 2016, under collecting permits 8142-1 and 52362-1, issued by the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade and 041-2016, by the Instituto Estadual de Florestas (IEF-MG). For this purpose, fishing artifacts commonly employed in ichthyological studies were used, which included aluminum ring sieves and 1 mm-mesh mosquito net, aluminum cord and hoop socks and 1 mm mesh mosquito net, 15 mm- and 20 mm-mesh netting and bamboo rods with nylon line, and worm used as bait. Samples were taken during the day and occasionally in the early evening.
The care and use of experimental animals complied with animal welfare laws, guidelines and policies under Collecting Permit by Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (SISBIO #8142-1). Afterwards, the collected specimens were preserved in 10% formalin solution and transferred to 70% ethanol solution. The sampled material was deposited at the Ichthyological Collection of the Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (
Fish species found in the middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Legend: (+) presence of species in drainages. CG = Ribeirão Congonhas; CP = Rio Cipó; PA = Rio Paraúna; PD = Ribeirão das Pedras; PH = Rio Parauninha; SA = Rio Santo Antônio; 1 – threatened species, according to COPAM (2010) and/or (MMA, 2018); 2 – endemic species from Rio São Francisco basin; 3 – endemic species from Rio Doce basin; 4 – exotic species to Rio São Francisco and/or Rio Doce basin. The order sequence follows
Species | Upper Rio Paraúna | Upper Rio Santo Antônio | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG | CP | PA | PD | PH | SA | |
Order Characiformes | ||||||
Family Prochilodontidae | ||||||
Prochilodus costatus 2 Valenciennes, 1850 | + | |||||
Family Anostomidae | ||||||
Hypomasticus mormyrops (Steindachner, 1875) | + | |||||
Hypomasticus thayeri 1 (Borodin, 1929) | + | |||||
Leporellus vittatus (Valenciennes, 1850) | + | |||||
Leporinus amblyrhynchus 4 Garavello & Britski, 1987 | + | |||||
Leporinus copelandii Steindachner, 1875 | + | |||||
Leporinus marcgravii 2 Lütken, 1875 | + | |||||
Leporinus taeniatus 2 Lütken, 1875 | + | |||||
Megaleporinus obtusidens (Valenciennes, 1837) | + | |||||
Family Crenuchidae | ||||||
Characidium fasciatum Reinhardt, 1867 | + | |||||
Characidium sp. A | + | + | ||||
Characidium sp. B | + | + | ||||
Characidium sp. C | + | + | ||||
Family Bryconidae | ||||||
Brycon opalinus 1 (Cuvier, 1819) | + | |||||
Family Characidae | ||||||
Phenacogaster franciscoensis 2 Eigenmann, 1911 | + | |||||
Astyanax lacustris Lütken, 1875 | + | + | + | + | + | |
Astyanax sp. | + | + | ||||
Deuterodon giton Eigenmann, 1908 | + | + | + | |||
Deuterodon intermedius Eigenmann, 1908 | + | |||||
Deuterodon pedri 3 Eigenmann, 1908 | + | + | + | |||
Deuterodon aff. taeniatus | + | + | + | |||
Deuterodon sp. | + | |||||
Psalidodon rivularis 2 (Lütken, 1875) | + | + | + | |||
Psalidodon sp. | + | + | ||||
Hasemania nana 2 (Lütken, 1875) | + | + | + | + | ||
Hasemania sp. | + | + | ||||
Knodus moenkhausii Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903 | + | + | ||||
Oligosarcus argenteus Günther, 1864 | + | + | + | + | ||
Piabina argentea Reinhardt, 1867 | + | |||||
Family Erythrinidae | ||||||
Hoplias intermedius (Günther, 1864) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Order Siluriformes | ||||||
Family Aspredinidae | ||||||
Bunocephalus hartti 2 Carvalho, Cardoso, Friel & Reis, 2015 | + | |||||
Family Trichomycteridae | ||||||
Trichomycterus alternatus (Eigenmann, 1917) | + | + | + | + | ||
Trichomycterus melanopygius Reis, dos Santos, Britto, Volpi & de Pinna, 2020 | + | + | + | |||
Trichomycterus sp. A | + | |||||
Trichomycterus sp. B | + | + | + | + | ||
Family Callichthyidae | ||||||
Callichthys callichthys (Linnaeus, 1758) | + | + | + | |||
Hoplosternum littorale (Hancock, 1828) | + | |||||
Family Loricariidae | ||||||
Euryochus thysanos Pereira & Reis, 2017 | + | |||||
Neoplecostomus sp. A | + | + | + | |||
Neoplecostomus sp. B | + | |||||
Harttia intermontana 3 Oliveira & Oyakawa, 2019 | + | |||||
Harttia sp. | + | |||||
Hypostomus francisci (Lütken, 1874) | + | |||||
Hypostomus sp. | + | |||||
Pareiorhaphis scutula 3 Pereira, Vieira & Reis, 2010 | + | + | + | |||
Pareiorhaphis vetula 3 Pereira, Lehmann & Reis, 2016 | + | + | ||||
Pareiorhaphis sp. | + | |||||
Family Heptapteridae | ||||||
Phenacorhamdia tenebrosa (Schubart, 1964) | + | |||||
Rhamdia quelen group | + | + | + | + | + | |
Family Pimelodidae | ||||||
Duopalatinus emarginatus 2 (Valenciennes, 1840) | + | |||||
Pimelodus fur 2 (Lütken, 1874) | + | |||||
Order Gymnotiformes | ||||||
Family Gymnotidae | ||||||
Gymnotus carapo group | + | + | + | + | + | |
Family Sternopygidae | ||||||
Eigenmannia virescens (Valenciennes, 1836) | + | |||||
Order Cyprinodontiformes | ||||||
Family Poeciliidae | ||||||
Phalloceros harpagos Lucinda, 2008 | + | |||||
Phalloceros uai 2 Lucinda, 2008 | + | + | ||||
Poecilia reticulata 4 Peters 1859 | + | + | + | |||
Order Synbranchiformes | ||||||
Family Synbranchidae | ||||||
Synbranchus marmoratus group | + | |||||
Order Cichliformes | ||||||
Family Cichlidae | ||||||
Australoheros mattosi 2 Ottoni, 2012 | + | |||||
Australoheros sp. | + | |||||
Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard ,1824) | + | + | + | + | + |
The identification keys are exclusive for identifying species that occur in the upper rio Paraúna (rio São Francisco basin) and upper rio Santo Antônio (rio Doce basin), state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. We first present a dichotomous key based on morphological characters to identify fish orders. Registered orders that have representatives of a single family, have their respective names given in parentheses, including the number of genera and species associated with the family. A second dichotomous key is organized sequentially, following the classification adopted by
Species were identified through available publications and comparisons with reference material in fish collections. Meristic and morphometric data were taken point to point, whenever possible, on the left side of specimens. Morphometric data were taken using digital calipers under a stereomicroscope. Standard length of the specimens was abbreviated as SL and measurements were taken in millimeters. Whenever necessary, analysis of branchial arch, teeth, procurrent rays of caudal fin, and vertebrae were obtained from cleared and stained material, according to
Parodontidae: Apareiodon ibitiensis Amaral Campos, 1944 (n = 3); Curimatidae: Cyphocharax gilbert (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824) (n = 1); Prochilodontidae: Prochilodus costatus Valenciennes, 1850 (n = 1); Anostomidae: Hypomasticus mormyrops (Steindachner, 1875) (n = 8); Hypomasticus thayeri Borodin, 1929 (n = 24); Leporellus vittatus (Valenciennes, 1850) (n = 1); Leporinus amblyrhynchus Garavello & Britski, 1987 (n = 1); Leporinus copelandii (Steindachner, 1875) (n = 1); Leporinus marcgravii Lütken, 1875 (n = 1); Leporinus taeniatus Lütken, 1875 (n = 2); Megaleporinus obtusidens (Valenciennes, 1837) (n = 1); Crenuchidae: Characidium fasciatum Reinhardt, 1867 (n = 24,); Characidium zebra Eigenmann, 1909 (n = 1 paratype); Characidium sp. A (n = 91); Characidium sp. B (n = 22); Characidium sp. C (n = 26); Bryconidae: Brycon opalinus Cuvier, 1819 (n = 9); Characidae: Phenacogaster franciscoensis Eigenmann, 1911 (n = 1), Astyanax lacustris (Lütken, 1875) (n = 221); Astyanax sp. (n = 10); Deuterodon sp. (8); Deuterodon giton (Eigenmann, 1908) (n = 41); Deuterodon intermedius (Eigenmann, 1908) (n = 449); Deuterodon pedri Eigenmann, 1908(n = 123); Deuterodon aff. taeniatus (n = 395); Psalidodon sp. (n = 62); Psalidodon fasciatus (Cuvier, 1819) (n = 17); Psalidodon rivularis (Lütken, 1875) (n = 765); Hasemania nana (Lütken, 1875)(n = 335); Hasemania sp. (n = 84); Knodus moenkhausii (Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903) (n = 662); Oligosarcus argenteus Günther, 1864 (n = 153); Piabina argentea Reinhardt, 1867 (n = 8); Serrapinnus heterodon (Eigenmann, 1915) (n = 2); Erythrinidae: Hoplias intermedius (Günther, 1864) (n =) Aspredinidae: Bunocephalus hartti Carvalho, Cardoso, Friel & Reis, 2015 (n = 4); Trichomycteridae: Cambeva variegata (Costa, 1992) (n = 60); Trichomycterus alternatus (Eigenmann, 1917) (n = 522); Trichomycterus auroguttatus Costa, 1992
We recorded 60 species which were distributed in six orders and 17 families (Table
Rio São Francisco basin.
Prochilodus costatus is diagnosed from its congeners by having 44–47 perforated scales in the lateral line; 8–9 scales between the origin of dorsal fin and lateral line.
Rio Paraíba do Sul, rio Piabanha, and rio Doce basins, Brazil.
Hypomasticus mormyrops differs from H. thayeri by the moderate lips; mouth ventral; premaxillary and dentary teeth anteriorly oriented when mouth is closed; first teeth (close to the symphysis in the premaxilla and dentary) larger than the others.
Rio Paraíba do Sul and rio Jequitinhonha basins, Brazil.
Hypomasticus thayeri differs from H. mormyrops by the upper lip developed; mouth subterminal, not facing down; premaxillary teeth posteriorly oriented and dentary teeth anteriorly oriented when mouth is closed; three anterior teeth of premaxilla and dentary with similar size.
Characiformes species from the middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range, Minas Gerais state, Brazil A Hypomasticus thayeri,
Rio Amazonas, rio Paraná-Paraguay, and rio São Francisco basins: Brazil, Ecuador, Colombia, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Peru.
Leporellus vittatus is diagnosed by having two longitudinal dark stripes on upper and lower lobes and one on the caudal fin median rays.
Rio Paraná and upper rio São Francisco basins, Brazil.
Leporinus amblyrhynchus differs from its congeners by a longitudinal dark band on the sides of the body and 8–10 transversal dark bands on the dorsal region.
Rio Paraíba do Sul and rio Doce basins, Brazil.
Leporinus copelandii differs from its congeners by having three rounded or slightly rectangular spots conspicuously distributed in median line of the body, respectively below dorsal fin, below adipose fin and at the end of caudal peduncle; and all fins presenting reddish color.
Rio São Francisco basin, Brazil.
Leporinus marcgravii differs from its congeners by having several conspicuous maculae throughout the lateral line and smaller maculae above and below lateral line; hyaline or slightly darkened fins base.
Rio das Velhas, rio São Francisco basin, Brazil.
Leporinus taeniatus differs from its congeners by dark macula in the maxilla and reddish pigmentation under the longitudinal dark band.
Upper rio Paraná, rio Jacuí, rio São Francisco, rio Paraguay, and rio Uruguay basins.
Rio São Francisco basin.
Characidium fasciatum differs from Characidium sp. A by the high or little tapered snout; adult specimens with vertical bars without defined shape or almost missing in the lateral of the body; narrow longitudinal dark band occupying less than one scale; pigmentation on caudal fin rays not forming conspicuous bands or just forming narrow bands. Distinguished from Characidium sp. B by having 36 or 37 perforated scales in the lateral line; four series of scales below lateral line.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Characidium sp. A differs from its congeners of this study by having very tapered snout; wide and conspicuous vertical bars in the lateral of body in both juveniles and adults specimens; longitudinal dark band occupying one or more scales; one-two dark, wide and conspicuous bands in half of caudal fin rays and another in the base of first and posterior caudal fin ray.
In this study, we refer Characidium sp. A such as a first putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another similar ones from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as C. alipioi, C. grajahuense, C. lagosantense, C. lauroi, and C. timbuiense.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Characidium sp. B differs from its congeners from the study area by predorsal length less than 45% of total length; lateral vertical bars absent or without defined shape; dark maculae on caudal fin not forming defined bands.
In this study, we refer Characidium sp. B such as a second putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as C. alipioi, C. grajahuense, C. lagosantense, and C. lauroi.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Characidium sp. C differs from its congeners from the study area by predorsal length up to 55% of total length; vertical bars always arranged above and below the lateral line in a “y” or “yy” shape; weak of narrow dark band on caudal fin.
In this study, we refer Characidium sp. C such as a third putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as C. cricarense and C. litorale.
Rio Paraíba do Sul and rio Doce basins.
Brycon opalinus is diagnosed from its congeners by having one humeral spot and another in the caudal peduncle, never extending up to median caudal fin rays; tubules of the lateral line without secondary branches.
Rio São Francisco basin, Southeastern Brazil.
Astyanax lacustris differs from Astyanax sp. by the absence of teeth in maxillary bone; a conspicuous oval humeral spot arranged horizontally; hyaline fins usually yellowish, more evident in the caudal fin. It is also diagnosed by having 33–36 perforated scales in lateral line; 26–29 branched rays in anal fin; 6.5–7.5 scales above and 5.5–6.5 scales below lateral line.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Astyanax sp. differs from A. lacustris by having teeth in maxillary bone; conspicuous humeral spot vertically oriented; hyaline fins slightly reddish. It is also diagnosed by having teeth tetracuspidate to heptacuspidate in the inner series of premaxillary bone forming a notch; dentary teeth decreasing abruptly in size from fourth tooth; 6.5 scales above the lateral line; iii+19 or 20 anal fin rays.
In this study, we refer Astyanax sp. such as putative new species from the study area, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as A. microschemos and A. turmalinensis.
Rio Paraíba do Sul, Brazil.
Deuterodon giton differs from its congeners of the study area by having dentary teeth decreasing gradually in size until the sixth or seventh tooth; dentary with more than five cusps (usually seven or eight); infraorbital 3 totally exposed, with almost no naked area prior to preopercle; infraorbital 3 shiny due to high concentration of guanine crystals and low concentration of chromatophores.
Deuterodon giton is described from the rio Paraíba do Sul basin. However, in the present study it was found in the rio Doce basin, confirming the first record of the species for this basin. The difference observed in the specimens between both morphotypes is a tendency of longer length in adult specimens from the rio Paraíba do Sul basin.
Rio Paraíba do Sul basin and coastal drainages in state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Deuterodon intermedius can be distinguished from its congeners of the study area by the absence of space in the symphysis of dentary; five tetracuspidate to hexacuspidate teeth in the inner series of the premaxillae; infraorbital 3 without chromatophores; small humeral spot, sometimes slightly rounded in smaller specimens; no more than 1.5 scales below the lateral line; 35–37 perforated scales in the lateral line
Deuterodon intermedius is described from the rio Paraíba do Sul basin. However, in the present study it was found in the rio Doce basin. The only difference observed in the specimens between both morphotypes is a tendency of longer length in adult specimens from the rio Paraíba do Sul basin.
Rio Doce basin.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Deuterodon aff. taeniatus differs from its congeners of the study area by the presence of a space in the symphysis of dentary; infraorbital 3 with high concentration of chromatophores; usually verticalized humeral spot with a lower comma-shaped feature, reaching 2.5 scales below the lateral line; 32–39 perforated scales in the lateral line; iii-v+17–24 anal fin rays.
Deuterodon taeniatus is described from the rio São João and rio Macaé basins (rio Paraíba do Sul basin), in state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The presence of the species in different basins has been notified in literature (
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Deuterodon sp. differs from its congeners from the study area by having five hexacuspidate to heptacuspidate teeth in the inner series of the premaxillae; cusps straight, not forming notch; infraorbital 3 with naked area anteriorly, and below it; low concentration of chromatophores in the infraorbital 3; inconspicuous humeral spot slightly verticalized, straight anteriorly and straight or half-moon shaped posteriorly; 5.5 scales above lateral line; iii+21 anal fin rays.
In this study, we refer Deuterodon sp. such as putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another from southeastern Brazil river basins such as D. giton, D. intermedius, and D. taeniatus.
Rio São Francisco basin.
Hasemania nana differs from Hasemania sp. by having 13–19 branched rays in anal fin and absence of rounded blotch in the median caudal fin rays.
Hasemania nana is an endemic species from the rio São Francisco basin. However, in the present study it was found in the rio Doce basin, confirming the first record of the species for this basin. The only difference observed in the specimens between both morphotypes is a tendency of higher number of anal fin rays in the specimens from the rio Doce basin (13–19 vs. 13–16). The higher number of anal fin rays is congruent to the H. nana morphotype from the rio Paraopeba (rio São Francisco basin).
Upper rio Paraúna, rio São Francisco basin.
Hasemania sp. differs from H. nana by having 11–14 branched rays in anal fin and presence of rounded blotch in the base of median caudal fin rays.
In this study, we refer Hasemania sp. such as putative new species and second record from the rio São Francisco basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as H. bilineata, H. crenuchoides, H. nana, and H. uberaba. In the taxonomic revision carried out by
Rio Doce, rio Paraíba do Sul, upper rio Paraná, rio Paraguay, and rio Jequitinhonha basins, in Brazil, and some drainages in Bolivia and Paraguay.
Occurrence of K. moenkhausii in the rio Doce basin was already confirmed. Different studies have mentioned about such record (
Rio Doce, rio das Velhas, and upper rio Paraná basins, Brazil.
Oligosarcus argenteus is diagnosed by having 17–24 teeth in maxillary bone; 44–48 perforated scales in lateral line; 8–9 series of scales above and 6–8 below lateral line; iv-v+20–25 branched rays in the anal fin; 17–20 scales around caudal peduncle.
Rio São Francisco basin, Brazil.
Upper rio Paraná, rio São Francisco, rio Itapicuru, rio Paraíba do Sul, and rio Itapemirim basins: Brazil and Paraguay.
Piabina argentea is diagnosed by having longitudinal dark band in the lateral of the body; dark spot in caudal peduncle absent; 18–21 rays in anal fin.
Rio São Francisco basin, Southeastern Brazil.
Psalidodon rivularis differs from its congeners of the study area by having premaxilla aligned with dentary in lateral view; four or five wide teeth in the inner series of premaxilla (if present, the fifth tooth is too small or not aligned with others); chromatophores surrounding abdominal scales and in higher concentration on the base of scales; developed scales in pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins.
Psalidodon rivularis was originally described as an endemic species from the rio São Francisco basin. However, in the present study it was found in the rio Doce basin, confirming record of the species in this basin.
Upper rio Paraúna, rio São Francisco basin, and upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Psalidodon sp. can be distinguished from its congeners from the study area, except of P. rivularis, by higher body anteriorly to dorsal fin origin; from A. rivularis by having premaxilla slightly in front of dentary in lateral view; five narrow teeth aligned in the inner series of premaxillary bone; two narrow vertical lines of chromatophores surrounding border of abdominal scales; small hooks in pectoral and anal fins in mature males.
In this study, we refer Psalidodon sp. such as putative new species from the study area, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another Stethaprioninae from Southeastern Brazil river basins, such as P. fasciatus, P. rivularis, A. scabripinnis, and A. turmalinensis.
Rio São Francisco and rio Paraná basins plus tributaries of the rio Doce, Brazil.
Hoplias intermedius is diagnosed by having 4–6 pores in lateral sensory system of the ventral surface of dentary; 42–46 perforated scales in lateral line; dark or light brown color in head and body.
Middle rio São Francisco basin, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bunocephalus hartii is diagnosed by the absence of hooks throughout anterior margin of spine of pectoral fin; posterior ray of dorsal fin completely or almost adnate to dorsum.
Siluriformes species from the middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range, Minas Gerais state, Brazil A Bunocephalus hartti,
Rio Doce basin, in the states of Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Trichomycterus alternatus differs from its congeners of the rio Doce and rio São Francisco basins by having seven branchiostegal rays; yellowish to light brown body color; rectangular or rounded sequential dark maculae at the midline of the body, sometimes fused and with a vermicular pattern, or forming a narrow stripe from the post-opercular region to the base of caudal fin; a row of rectangular sequential middorsal maculae, round or fused to maculae of the midlateral of the body; subtruncate caudal fin.
Tributaries from rio Doce basin.
Trichomycterus melanopygius differs from its congeners of the study area by the absence of evident maculae, spots, streaks and/or stripes on the flanks and dorsum of the body; i+7 (rarely i+8) pectoral fin rays; dark band in the median caudal fin rays.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Trichomycterus sp. A is distinguished from its congeners of the study area by the spotted body due to high concentration of large maculae with no defined shape; caudal fin strongly truncated; eight branchiostegal rays; few dorsal procurrent rays (14 or 15).
In this study, we refer Trichomycterus sp. A such as a putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another with similar color pattern from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as T. auroguttatus, T. albinotatus, T. brasiliensis group, T. caipora, T. argos, T. novalimensis, and T. rubiginosus.
Upper rio Paraúna, rio São Francisco basin, and upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Trichomycterus sp. B differs from its congeners of the study area by having nine branchiostegal rays; high concentration of rounded dark spots on the head and sides of the trunk, dorsum, and belly, which may fuse and form small vermiculations; rounded caudal fin.
In this study, we refer Trichomycterus sp. B such as a putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology and color pattern between this species and another with similar color pattern from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as T. brasiliensis group, T. argos, T. landinga, T. novalimensis, and T. rubiginosus.
Drainages from Colombia to the Río de La Plata basin, South America.
Widespread in South America.
Coastal rivers in Eastern Brazil, from the rio Itapemirim, and including the larger basins of the rio Doce and Mucuri, in Espirito Santo and Minas Gerais states, to the rio Frades, state of Bahia.
Euryochus thysanos is diagnosed by having rounded and short inferior lip, leaving a large naked area in the ventral portion of head; inferior lip with barbel developed; 30–35 bicuspidate teeth in the premaxillary and dentary bones; absence of hypertrophied odontodes.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Harttia sp. differs from H. intermontana by inferior region of orbit straight; compressed and narrow plates with developed odontodes in the dorsal and ventral region of caudal peduncle.
In this study, we refer Harttia sp. such as a putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology between this species and another from Southeastern Brazil river basins such as H. carvalhoi, H. garavelloi, H. leiopleura, H. loricariformis, H. novalimensis, and H. torrenticola.
Upper rio Doce basin, Brazil.
Harttia intermontana differs from Harttia sp. by having orbit rounded; short and wide plates with poorly developed odontodes in the dorsal and ventral region of caudal peduncle.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Hypostomus sp. differs from H. francisci by having black and large spots in the head and throughout the body.
The only juvenile specimen collected in the study area was analyzed in such a way that is not possible to mention about species level identity or if it configures into a new species.
Rio São Francisco and rio Paraná basins.
Hypostomus francisci can be distinguished from Hypostomus sp. by pale small, rounded spots in the whole body, including in the fins; spine of the dorsal fin slightly smaller than predorsal distance.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Neoplecostomus sp. A differs from Neoplecostomus sp. B by the maxillary barbels poorly developed; premaxillary teeth and dentary with separate cusps and large concavity between them; lateral and central cusps with similar size; no developed papillae between branches of dentary; plates between dorsal and adipose fin meeting on the back of the dorsum.
In this study, we refer Neoplecostomus sp. A such as a putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology between this species and another from the rio Doce basin such as N. doceensis, and N. pirangaensis.
Upper rio Paraúna, rio São Francisco basin.
Neoplecostomus sp. B differs from Neoplecostomus sp. A by the maxillary barbels developed; premaxillary teeth and dentary with close cusps; median cusp more developed than lateral one; plates between dorsal and adipose fin not meeting.
In this study, we refer Neoplecostomus sp. B such as a putative new species from the rio São Francisco basin, due to differences in morphology between this species and another from rio São Francisco basin such as N. franciscoensis.
Upper rio Doce basin, Brazil.
Pareiorhaphis scutula differs from its congeners of the study area by having abdomen with small plates covered by skin from the pectoral fin region to insertion of pelvic fins; fins with pale yellow and light brown spots.
Rio Doce basin, Brazil.
Pareiorhaphis vetula can be distinguished from its congeners of the rio Doce basin by inferior lip with maxillary barbels completely adnate; elongated and pointed urogenital papilla.
Upper rio Paraúna, rio São Francisco basin.
Pareiorhaphis sp. differs from Pareiorhaphis scutula by the abdomen without plates; from P. scutula and P. vetula by the pectoral, pelvic and anal fins with clear color; dark caudal with clear borders. Pareiorhaphis sp. can still be distinguished from Pareiorhaphis vetula by inferior lip with developed maxillary barbels; urogenital papilla with normal size, not elongated.
In this study, we refer Pareiorhaphis sp. such as a putative new species from the rio Doce basin, due to differences in morphology between this species and another from rio Doce basin such as P. nasuta, and P. proskynita.
Upper rio Paraná and rio São Francisco basins, Argentina and Brazil.
Coastal river drainages from state of Rio de Janeiro to state of Santa Catarina, Brazil (Angrizani & Malabarba, 2020).
A redescription of R. quelen was made, and the original locality where it comes from is rio Macacu drainage, a tributary of rio Soarinho, in the municipality of Cachoeira de Macacu, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rio das Velhas drainages in rio São Francisco basin, Brazil.
Rio São Francisco basin, Brazil.
Upper rio Paraúna, rio São Francisco basin, and upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Gymnotus carapo group is diagnosed by having the mouth upturned, pronate; rictus curved ventrally; eyes positioned below half of median line of the head; branchial opening throughout the posterior margin of opercle; oblique and conspicuous dark bands in the lateral of the body, from dorsal region to ventral surface of preanal; longitudinal band reaching the base of the anal fin.
Although G. carapo is widespread from Trinidad and Tobago to Argentina, in this study we refer the species as G. carapo group, since the taxonomic status of G. carapo is uncertain for the Southeastern and Southern Brazil and may represent more than one species. A taxonomic review of the G. carapo group in Central and South America is needed.
Fish species from the middle-southern Espinhaço mountain range, Minas Gerais state, Brazil A Gymnotiformes (Gymnotus carapo group,
Widespread from rio Orinoco to rio de La Plata basin.
Eigenmannia virescens is diagnosed by having small branchial opening, smaller than the snout; body light brown, maculae absent.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Synbranchus marmoratus group is diagnosed by having dark-brown color on dorsal region of body and light brown below the midline and head; many rounded dark spots or irregularly shaped dark spots throughout the whole body; dark stripe composed by fusion of many dark spots in ventrolateral region of head.
Albeit the true S. marmoratus have a wide distribution in the Neotropical region, in this study we refer the species as S. marmoratus group, since the taxonomic status of S. marmoratus may represent more than one species. A taxonomic review of S. marmoratus from Central and South America is needed to clarify this problematic issue.
Rio Paraná-Paraguay basin and coastal rivers from rio Itabapoana to rio Araranguá, in Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina.
Phalloceros harpagos differs from P. uai by having gonopodium with hook in the two gonopodial appendages in males positioned close to the appendages; distal half of the appendage narrower than proximal half; urogenital papilla centralized in females, positioned between anus and the base of first anal fin ray.
Albeit P. harpagos presents a relatively wide distribution in coastal drainages of Brazil, here we present the first record of the species in the rio Santo Antônio basin.
Rio das Velhas, rio São Francisco basin, Brazil.
Phalloceros uai differs from P. harpagos by having gonopodium with small left hook facing down or up and forward in males, situated near to gonopodial appendage base; right hook absent; urogenital papilla directed to the right side in females, positioned laterally; anal opening in contact with first anal fin ray or close to it.
Phalloceros uai is an endemic species from rio São Francisco basin and, in this study, we present the first record for the rio Santo Antônio basin.
Trinidad and Tobago in Central America and Northern South America.
Poecilia reticulata was widely introduced in aquatic environments in Brazil, so its occurrence in many rivers of the country is quite common nowadays.
Rio São Francisco basin, Southeastern Brazil.
Australoheros mattosi differs from Australoheros sp. by having XVI–XVII+9–11 dorsal fin rays; VII–VIII+9 anal fin rays.
Upper rio Santo Antônio, rio Doce basin.
Australoheros sp. differs from A. mattosi by having XVIII+7 dorsal fin rays; VIII+7 anal fin rays.
In this study, we refer Australoheros sp. such as putative new species due to differences in morphology between it and another from rio Doce basin, since A. perdi and A. ipatinguensis seems to be restricted to small areas such as lagoons and small rivers in the rio Doce basin. However, a higher number of specimens with difference sizes is needed and a taxonomic review of the cichlid Australoheros genus as well.
coastal drainages in eastern Brazil.
An identification key for its species from the study area is provided.
1 | body covered by scales | 2 |
– | scales absent, naked body covered by skin or bony plates | 5 |
2 | pelvic, dorsal, and caudal fins absent | GYMNOTIFORMES |
– | pelvic, dorsal, and caudal fins present | 3 |
3 | presence of spines in pelvic, dorsal, and anal fins | CICHLIFORMES |
– | spines in pelvic, dorsal, and anal fins absent | 4 |
4 | premaxilla protractible; anal fin modified in gonopodium in males; adipose fin absent | CYPRINODONTIFORMES |
– | premaxilla non-protractible; anal fin not modified in gonopodium in males; adipose fin usually present | CHARACIFORMES |
5 | barbels present on anterior portion of head (at least, one pair); two branchial openings located in variable position in the head; pelvic and pectoral fins present | SILURIFORMES |
– | barbels absent; single branchial opening, located ventrally in the head; pelvic and pectoral fins absent | SYNBRANCHIFORMES (Synbranchidae: 1 gen., 1 sp.) (Synbranchus marmoratus group) |
CHARACIFORMES
1 | Small teeth implanted in thick moving lips in premaxillary and dentary bones | Prochilodontidae (Prochilodus costatus) |
– | Teeth with different shapes, sizes, and numbers in premaxilla and dentary, implanted in bones of the maxillae | 2 |
2 | Fontanel absent in head | 3 |
– | Fontanel present | 4 |
3 | A single series of conical teeth in premaxillary and dentary bones; presence of three unbranched rays in the pectoral fins; caudal fin forked | Crenuchidae |
– | Canine teeth; one unbranched ray in the pectoral fins; rounded caudal fin (with rounded margin) | Erythrinidae (Hoplias intermedius) |
4 | Supraorbital bone present; 6–8 recurved teeth in a single series in premaxillary and dentary bones, decreasing in size from symphysis to corner of mouth, and arranged as a ladder; teeth close to the symphysis conspicuously larger than the lateral ones; gill membranes attached to the isthmus | Anostomidae |
– | Supraorbital bone absent; 1–3 series of cuspidate teeth in premaxilla and 1–2 series in dentary, cusps present or not; branchial membranes free from isthmus | Characidae |
SILURIFORMES
1 | body totally or partially covered by bone plates | 2 |
– | body covered by skin; bony plates absent | 3 |
2 | Mouth terminal or subterminal; double series of plates in the sides of body; nuchal plate meeting parieto-supraoccipital bone in the midline of predorsal region | Callichthyidae |
– | Mouth ventral, forming an oral disc; presence of plates on each side of body arranged in three longitudinal series or more | Loricariidae |
3 | presence of patch of odontodes in preopercle and opercle | Trichomycteridae |
– | odontodes absent | 4 |
4 | head and body severely depressed, its maximum width at posterior region of skull and pectoral girdle; adipose fin absent | Aspredinidae (Bunocephalus hartti) |
– | slightly depressed or rounded head and high body; adipose fin present | 5 |
5 | head higher than wide; first ray of pectoral and dorsal fins modified in an acute and penetrating spine | Pimelodidae |
– | head as wide as high; first ray of pectoral and dorsal fins modified in a hard spine, but not exactly an acute and penetrating spine | Heptapteridae |
GYMNOTIFORMES
1 | Mouth terminal; narrow head; frontal and parietal fontanels present; anal fin not reaching the posterior end of the body | Sternopygidae (Eigenmannia virescens) |
– | Mouth upturned; wide head; frontal fontanel absent; anal fin reaching the posterior margin of body | Gymnotidae (Gymnotus carapo group) |
CYPRINODONTIFORMES
1 | Poecillidae (1 subfamily) | |
– | Third, fourth and fifth rays of the anal fin modified in an intromittent organ (gonopodial structure) | Poecilliinae |
CICHLIFORMES
1 | Presence of spines and soft rays in dorsal, pelvic and anal fins; lateral line divided in anterior and posterior branches: one located in the laterodorsal region of flank (from posterior region of opercle to caudal peduncle region); and the other located in a median line (from caudal peduncle to the base of the caudal fin | Cichlidae |
FAMILY ANOSTOMIDAE
1 | dark blotch on anterior dorsal fin rays | Leporellus (Leporellus vittatus) |
– | Absence of dark blotch on dorsal fin rays and dark stripes on caudal fin lobes | 2 |
2 | dark longitudinal band present; absence of three or more large maculae in the sides of the body | 3 |
– | dark longitudinal band absent; three or more large maculae in the lateral of body | 4 |
3 | dark macula in the maxilla; reddish pigmentation under the longitudinal band | Leporinus taeniatus |
– | dark macula in the maxilla absent; 8–10 transversal dark bands in the dorsal region | Leporinus amblyrhynchus |
4 | terminal mouth | 5 |
– | Mouth subterminal or ventral; premaxilla ventrally oriented | 7 |
5 | premaxilla and dentary with three teeth | Megaleporinus obtusidens |
– | premaxilla and dentary with 4 teeth; red macula in the mouth commissure | 6 |
6 | three rounded or slightly rectangular spots conspicuously distributed in median line of the body, respectively below dorsal fin, below adipose fin and at the end of caudal peduncle; all fins presenting reddish color | Leporinus copelandii |
– | several conspicuous maculae throughout the lateral line and smaller maculae above and below lateral line; hyaline fins or slightly darkened on base | Leporinus marcgravii |
7 | anterior region of snout convex in lateral view, moderate lips; mouth ventral; premaxillary and dentary teeth anteriorly oriented when mouth closed; first teeth (close to the symphysis in the premaxilla and dentary) larger than the others | Hypomasticus mormyrops |
– | anterior region of snout straight in lateral view, upper lip developed; mouth subterminal, not facing down; premaxillary teeth posteriorly oriented and dentary teeth anteriorly oriented when mouth closed; three anterior teeth of premaxilla and dentary with similar size | Hypomasticus thayeri |
FAMILY CRENUCHIDAE
1 | very tapered snout; wide and conspicuous vertical bars in the lateral of the body in both juveniles and adult specimens; longitudinal dark band occupying one or more scales; one to two dark, wide and conspicuous bands in half of caudal fin rays and another in the base of first and posterior caudal fin ray | Characidium sp. A |
– | high or little tapered snout; adult specimens with vertical bars without defined shape or almost missing in the lateral of the body; narrow longitudinal dark band occupying less than one scale; pigmentation on caudal fin rays not forming conspicuous bands or just forming narrow bands | 2 |
2 | 36–37 perforated scales in the lateral line; four series of scales below lateral line | Characidium fasciatum |
– | 34–36 perforated scales in the lateral line; two scales below lateral line | 3 |
3 | predorsal length less than 45% of total length; lateral vertical bars absent or without defined shape; dark maculae on caudal fin not forming defined bands | Characidium sp. B |
– | predorsal length up to 55% of total length; vertical bars always arranged above and below the lateral line in a “y” or “yy” shape; weak of narrow dark band on caudal fin | Characidium sp. C |
FAMILY CHARACIDAE
1 | three series of teeth in premaxillary bone | 2 |
– | 1 or 2 series of teeth in premaxillary bone with one or more cusps; one series of teeth in dentary | 3 |
2 | obtuse snout; teeth in premaxillary bone arranged in three series and two series in dentary; posterior series composed by a pair of small symphysial conic teeth on each corner | Brycon (Brycon opalinus) |
– | short and sharp snout; intermediate series of premaxillary teeth not totally separated from external one | Piabina (Piabina argentea) |
3 | pseudotimpanum present; very large scales covering preventral area | Phenacogaster franciscoensis |
– | pseudotimpanum absent; preventral area with scales of small size | 4 |
4 | scales reaching half of the caudal fin rays | Knodus moenkhausii |
– | scales just in the caudal fin base | 5 |
5 | adipose fin absent | 6 |
– | adipose fin present | 7 |
6 | 13–19 branched rays in anal fin; absence of rounded blotch in the median caudal fin rays | Hasemania nana |
– | 11–14 branched rays in anal fin; presence of rounded blotch in the base of median caudal fin rays | Hasemania sp. |
7 | a single series of conic teeth in the premaxillary, maxillary and dentary bones; premaxilla aligned or slightly anterior to dentary in lateral view | Oligosarcus (Oligosarcus argenteus) |
– | two series of tricuspidate to multicuspidate teeth in the inner series of premaxilla; one series of tricuspidate to multicuspidate teeth in dentary | 8 |
8 | teeth in the inner series of premaxillary bone forming a notch | 9 |
– | teeth in the inner series of premaxillary bone not forming a notch | 10 |
9 | absence of teeth in the maxillary bone; a conspicuous oval humeral spot arranged horizontally; hyaline fins usually yellowish, more evident in the caudal fin; more than 20 branched rays in the anal fin | Astyanax lacustris |
– | presence of teeth in maxillary bone; conspicuous humeral spot vertically oriented; hyaline fins slightly reddish; iii+19 to 20 anal fin rays | Astyanax sp. |
10 | Greater body height roughly in the middle of the pectoral fin | 11 |
– | body higher at the dorsal fin origin | 12 |
11 | premaxilla slightly in front of dentary in lateral view; five narrow teeth aligned in the inner series of premaxillary bone; two narrow vertical lines of chromatophores surrounding border of abdominal scales; small hooks in pectoral and anal fins in mature males | Psalidodon sp. |
– | premaxilla aligned with dentary in lateral view; 4 or -5 wide teeth in the inner series of premaxilla (if present, the fifth teeth is too small or not aligned with others); chromatophores surrounding abdominal scales and in higher concentration on the base of the scales; developed scales in the pectoral, pelvic and anal fins | Psalidodon rivularis |
12 | eeth of dentary decreasing gradually in size until sixth or seventh tooth | 13 |
– | teeth of dentary decreasing abruptly from the fifth tooth | 14 |
13 | infraorbital 3 with naked area prior to preopercle, high concentration of chromatophores; conspicuous humeral spot vertically oriented, its similar width either above and below lateral line; lateral line 38–41 (x¯ = 39) perforated scales in the lateral line | Deuterodon pedri |
– | infraorbital 3 totally exposed, with almost no naked area prior to preopercle; infraorbital 3 shiny due to the high concentration of guanine crystals and low concentration of chromatophores; conspicuous humeral spot vertically oriented, larger above lateral line; 37 or less perforated scales in the lateral line | Deuterodon giton |
14 | presence of space in the symphysis of dentary; infraorbital 3 with high concentration of chromatophores | Deuterodon aff. taeniatus |
– | absence of space in the symphysis of dentary; infraorbital 3 with low concentration of chromatophores | 15 |
15 | five hexacuspidate to heptacuspidate teeth in the inner series of the premaxilla; infraorbital 3 with naked area anteriorly, and below it; low concentration of chromatophores in the infraorbital 3; inconspicuous humeral spot slightly verticalized, straight anteriorly and straight or half-moon shaped posteriorly | Deuterodon sp. |
– | five tetracuspidate to hexacuspidate teeth in the inner series of the premaxilla; naked area anteriorly, below, and posteriorly; absence of chromatophores in the infraorbital 3; small humeral spot, no regular shaped ,sometimes slightly rounded in juveniles; no more than 1.5 scales below the lateral line; 35–37 perforated scales in the lateral line | Deuterodon intermedius |
FAMILY CALLICHTHYIDAE
1 | coracoid bones covered by thick skin; caudal fin lobed | Callichthys callichthys |
– | coracoid bones exposed; caudal fin bifurcated | Hoplosternum littorale |
FAMILY TRICHOMYCTERIDAE
1 | absence of evident maculae, spots, streaks and/or stripes the flanks and dorsum of the body; i+7 (rarely i+8) pectoral fin rays; dark band in the median caudal fin rays | Trichomycterus melanopygius |
– | body with round or rectangular spots; stripes and/or vermiculations on the flanks and/or dorsum of the body; i+6 or i+7 pectoral fin rays | 2 |
2 | Body spotted due to a high concentration of large maculae with no defined shape; caudal fin strongly truncated; eight branchiostegal rays; few dorsal procurrent rays (14 or 15) | Trichomycterus sp. A |
– | body with round or rectangular spots; stripes and/or vermiculations on flanks and/or back of the body; 7–9 branchiostegal rays; more than 20 dorsal procurrent rays | 3 |
3 | rounded head in dorsal view; nine branchiostegal rays; high concentration of rounded dark spots on the head and sides of the trunk, dorsum and belly, which may fuse and form small vermiculations; rounded caudal fin | Trichomycterus sp. B |
– | subtriangular head in dorsal view; seven branchiostegal rays; yellowish to light brown body color; rectangular or rounded sequential dark maculae at the midline of the body, sometimes fused and with a vermicular pattern, or forming a narrow stripe from the post-opercular region to the base of caudal fin; a row of rectangular sequential middorsal maculae, round or fused to maculae of the midlateral of the body; subtruncate caudal fin | Trichomycterus alternatus |
FAMILY LORICARIIDAE
1 | depressed snout and caudal peduncle; adipose fin absent | Loricariinae |
– | caudal peduncle not depressed; adipose fin present | 2 |
2 | functional spinelet of the dorsal spine; i+7 dorsal fin rays | Hypostominae |
– | no functional spinelet of the dorsal spine; i+7 dorsal fin rays | Neoplecostominae |
Subfamily Loricariinae
1 | orbit rounded; short and wide plates with poorly developed odontodes in the dorsal and ventral region of caudal peduncle | Harttia intermontana |
– | inferior region of the orbit straight; compressed and narrow plates with developed odontodes in the dorsal and ventral region of caudal peduncle | Harttia sp. |
Subfamily Hypostominae
1 | black and large spots in the head and throughout the body | Hypostomus sp. |
– | pale small rounded spots in the whole body, including in the fins; spine of the dorsal fin slightly smaller than predorsal distance | Hypostomus francisci |
Subfamily Neoplecostominae
1 | large eyes (until 19.7% in HL); flat body between posterior dorsal fin ray and adipose origin; flat abdomen with no plates | Euryochus (Eurochus thysanos) |
– | small (less than 19% in HL); body usually rounded; abdomen plated or not; rounded or oval inferior lip, leaving small naked area in the ventral portion of the head | 3 |
3 | odontodes well developed in the first ray of pectoral fins and on the sides of head in nuptial males; odontodes with normal size in no nuptial males and females | Pareiorhaphis |
4 | inferior lip with maxillary barbels completely adnate; elongated and pointed urogenital papilla | Pareiorhaphis vetula |
– | inferior lip with free and conspicuous maxillary barbels; papilla not developed in males | 5 |
5 | abdomen without plates; pectoral, pelvic and anal fins with clear color; dark caudal with clear borders | Pareiorhaphis sp. |
– | abdomen with small plates covered by skin, from the pectoral fin to insertion of pelvic fins; fins with pale yellow and light brown spots | Pareiorhaphis scutula |
– | odontodes poorly developed in the first ray of pectoral fins in mature and not nuptial males; odontodes with normal size on the lateral margin of head; abdomen with a large number of plates | Neoplecostomus |
1 | maxillary barbels poorly developed; premaxillary teeth and dentary with separate cusps and large concavity between them; lateral and central cusps with similar size; no developed papillae between branches of dentary; plates between dorsal and adipose fin meeting on the back of the dorsum | Neoplecostomus sp. A |
– | maxillary barbels developed; premaxillary teeth and dentary with close cusps; median cusp more developed than lateral one; plates between dorsal and adipose fin not meeting | Neoplecostomus sp. B |
FAMILY HEPTAPTERIDAE
1 | short adipose fin originating posteriorly to anal fin origin, in a vertical trough | Phenacorhamdia tenebrosa |
– | very long adipose fin originating anteriorly to anal fin origin in a vertical trough, meeting the posterior border of the dorsal fin | Rhamdia quelen group |
FAMILY PIMELODIDAE
1 | palatal teeth absent; humeral process, dorsoposteriorly oriented; silver body with no obvious spots | Pimelodus fur |
– | Palatal teeth arranged in joined areas with each other; humeral process posteriorly oriented; rounded dark maculae with different sizes from head to caudal peduncle | Duopalatinus emarginatus |
FAMILY POECILIIDAE – subfamily Poecilliinae
1 | modified anal fin in a short gonopodium in males (not exceeding or reaching the tip of the dorsal fin rays, in a vertical); 1–2 dark maculae in the sides of the body, anteriorly to a vertical through dorsal fin origin | Poecilia reticulata |
– | long gonopodium in males (reaching and even surpassing in a vertical trough the tip of the dorsal fin rays); vertical or slightly rectangular macula at the dorsal fin rays height or slightly posterior to them | 2 |
2 | gonopodium with hook in the two gonopodial appendages in males positioned close to the appendages; distal half of the appendage narrower than proximal half; urogenital papilla centralized in females, positioned between anus and the base of first anal fin ray | Phalloceros harpagos |
– | gonopodium with small left hook facing down or up and forward in males, situated near to gonopodial appendage base; right hook absent; urogenital papilla directed to the right side in females, positioned laterally; anal opening in contact with first anal fin ray or close to it | Phalloceros uai |
FAMILY CICHLIDAE
1 | upper branch of first branchial arch with lobe | Geophagus brasiliensis |
– | lobe absent in first branchial arch | 2 |
2 | XVI-XVII+9–11 dorsal fin rays; VII-VIII+9 anal fin rays | Australoheros mattosi |
– | XVIII+7 dorsal fin rays; VIII+7 anal fin rays | Australoheros sp. |
The predominance of Characiformes and Siluriformes in the study area is consistent with the pattern observed among freshwater fishes in the Neotropical region (
Although taxonomic (e.g.,
Almost 32% of the whole ichthyofauna from the rio das Velhas (
The highest species richness was registered at ribeirão das Pedras and rio Cipó, which are in lower altitude areas (Fig.
As expected for the Southern Espinhaço mountain range, and corroborating
Considering our results, we reinforce the importance of headwater environment conservation, as pointed out by
The substantial number of taxonomically inaccurate identifications (ca. 30%) and potentially new species (almost 22%) recorded herein, added to the lack of data on distributional patterns reinforces the need of studies in such areas. The considerable number of potentially new species indicates the large knowledge gap in the Espinhaço mountain range. It is important to mention that the aforementioned species have been studied by different researchers and descriptions have been made, such as the currently described H. intermontana and T. melanopygius. Also, the occurrence of many large ventures in the region, such as mining and hydroelectric power plants, make such areas high priorities for biodiversity studies, to minimize the possibility of populations and species extinctions even before they are properly recognized. The increase of knowledge about such fishes may contribute to future assessments of the conservation status and the encouragement of exploratory field expeditions of remote areas, as in the case of this study. The new results shown here can provide a better understanding about biogeographic patterns and evolution of fish at the Espinhaço mountain range and adjacent basins.
Most of the present study was conducted at the Setor de Ictiologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, as a requirement for a Master’s degree in Zoology at the Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia) – PPGZoo. Financial support to SAS was provided by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazilian Federal Government). We are indebted to D.F. Moraes Jr and P.R. Menezes (
Summarizes voucher information and comparative material with institutional acronyms, following Sabaj (2019).
Data type: species data
Explanation note: Number in brackets represent the total number of specimens.