Research Article |
Corresponding author: Kirill G. Mikhailov ( mikhailov2000@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Pedro Cardoso
© 2016 Kirill G. Mikhailov.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mikhailov KG (2016) On the spider genus Arboricaria with the description of a new species (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). ZooKeys 558: 153-169. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.558.6521
|
The spider genus Arboricaria Bosmans, 2000 is redefined and an updated diagnosis given. The differences between Arboricaria and Micaria Westring, 1851 are discussed in detail. A key to all five species of the genus is provided. One new species, Arboricaria zonsteini sp. n. (♂♀), is described based on specimens from Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan. One new synonym is proposed: A. koeni Bosmans in Bosmans & Blick, 2000, syn. n. is assigned to A. sociabilis Kulczyński in Chyzer & Kulczyński, 1897. Data on the distribution of Arboricaria in Russia and adjacent countries are presented with references to the papers on local spider faunas.
Spiders, Gnaphosidae , new species, taxonomy, Caucasus, Middle Asia
Arboricaria was established by
When preparing a review of the Micaria fauna of the former Soviet Union (
The present contribution not only provides a description of that new species, but it also aims at clarifying the distinctions between two similar genera, Micaria Westring, 1851 and Arboricaria Bosmans, 2000, so as to provide a brief review of and a key to the known species of the latter genus. In addition to
Material of three species was examined in detail: A. subopaca, A. sociabilis and A. zonsteini sp. n. Specimens were examined using MBS-9 and Olympus stereo microscopes. All initial pencil sketches drawn on scale paper were subsequently inked and then digitized with Cintiq.
The following abbreviations are used below: ap – apically, Cb – cymbium, d – dorsally, F – femur, Mt – metatarsus, pl – prolaterally, Pt – patella, T – tarsus, Ti – tibia,
Only basic and necessary synonymies are given in the species reviews below, as a more detailed list is available in
Data on the distribution of Arboricaria species in Russia and Azerbaijan are mostly previously unpublished (my unpublished card Catalogue of the Spiders of Russia and Adjacent Territories; see also
Bosmans, in
Micaria cyrnea Brignoli, 1983.
Arboricaria includes five known species listed above and one new species described below.
Despite not being followed on the world spider catalogues (see above), the original description of Arboricaria and its diagnosis both fully fit the provisions of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, especially Articles 13.1 and 67.4 (
According to the original diagnosis, the new genus “is very close to Micaria and differs by the more flattened, wider cephalothorax, the less spinate legs and the posteriorly truncate sternum. Males differ by the large tibial apophysis, bifid or curved, the bulging bulbus and the absence of the median apophysis (= Retinaculum in
Not all of the characters are equally important.
The width of the carapace is variable within the remaining Micaria (cf. Table
Species/Sex | Index | Source |
---|---|---|
Arboricaria zonsteini sp. n., ♂ | 1.29–1.31 | Present paper |
Arboricaria zonsteini sp. n., ♀ | 1.4 | Present paper |
A. brignolii Bosmans & Blick, 2000, ♂ | 1.32–1.33 |
|
A. brignolii Bosmans & Blick, 2000, ♀ | 1.35, 1.46 |
|
A. koeni Bosmans in Bosmans & Blick, 2000, ♂ | 1.33–1.37 |
|
A. koeni Bosmans in Bosmans & Blick, 2000, ♀ | 1.42 |
|
A. cyrnea (Brignoli, 1983), ♂ | 1.35–1.36 |
|
A. cyrnea (Brignoli, 1983), ♀ | 1.47 |
|
A. subopaca (Westring, 1861), ♂,♀ | 1.25–1.35 |
|
The same concerns the size of the tibial apophysis (for large ones in Micaria, see figs 29a, 31a, in
A median apophysis is absent or almost absent in Micaria rossica Thorell, 1875, wholly absent both in M. utahna Gertsch, 1933 and M. medica Platnick & Shadab, 1988.
An analysis of leg spination (see table 1 in
The shape of the posterior part of the sternum is clearly different in Micaria and Arboricaria (see Figs
Therefore, the above diagnosis of Arboricaria must be adjusted. This genus is indeed close to Micaria, but differs in the following characters that together allow recognizing the genus: a posteriorly truncate sternum in both sexes, a bulging bulbus and a missing median apophysis, a chiefly bifid tibial apophysis, a large epigynal groove with distinctly chitinized posterior margins in females. At least, the shape of bulbus and bifid apophysis can be regarded as apomorphic characters. All these characters constitute Arboricaria as a monophyletic and sister-group to other Micaria. An extended description of Arboricaria is available in
The distribution pattern of Arboricaria is mostly Mediterranean and on the mountain regions of central Asia, although A. subopaca extends to most of the Palearctic.
Type species. Micaria fulgens (Walckenaer, 1802), originally described as Aranea fulgens.
Gnaphosids of the “Micaria-group” (
101 species (
Holarctic. Other records require confirmation.
An analysis of the new Micaria species described from the Palaearctic since
1 | Males | 2 |
– | Females | 6 |
2 | Tibial apophysis not bifurcate (see fig. 35b in |
A. subopaca |
– | Tibial apophysis bifurcate | 3 |
3 | Branches of tibial apophysis of equal or subequal length | 4 |
– | Branches of tibial apophysis different in length | 5 |
4 | Embolus wide and large, rising over bulbus (Figs |
A. sociabilis |
– | Embolus thin, lying directly on apical surface of bulbus (Fig. |
A. zonsteini sp. n. |
5 | Inner branch of tibial apophysis ca 3 times longer than outer branch; maximum width of embolus closer to 1/4 of bulbus width (see figs 24 & 25 in |
A. cyrnea |
– | Inner branch of tibial apophysis ca 2 times as long as outer branch; maximum width of embolus closer to 1/2 of bulbus width (see figs 28 & 29 in |
A. brignolii |
6 | Lateral edges of epigynal groove divergent (see fig. 59 in |
A. subopaca |
– | Lateral edges of epigynal groove parallel or convergent | 7 |
7 | Lateral edges of epigynal groove parallel (see fig. 30 in |
A. brignolii |
– | Lateral edges of epigynal groove convergent | 8 |
8 | Spermathecae shorter than epigynal groove; spermathecae not reaching the latter’s fore edge (Figs |
A. zonsteini sp. n. |
– | Spermathecae long, reaching fore edge of epigynal groove or even exceeding it | 9 |
9 | Hind edge of epigynal groove straight (see fig. 26 in |
A. cyrnea |
– | Hind edge of epigynal groove protruding backwards (see fig. 60a in |
A. sociabilis |
Holotype ♂ (
Honours Sergei L. Zonstein, arachnologist, now living in Israel, earlier in Kirghizia (= Kyrgyzstan).
The new species differs by a combination of the following characters: Males: equally long branches of tibial apophysis with thin embolus lying on apical surface of bulbus; Females: convergent edges of epigynal groove with moderately long spermathecae, the latter being shorter than the groove, the former not reaching the fore edge of the latter.
Male (holotype; measurements of paratype in brackets). Carapace length 1.20(1.05), width 0.93(0.80), ratio 1.29(1.31). Carapace and leg femora reddish brown, in holotype carapace darker, other podomeres, especially metatarsi and tarsi, straw-coloured.
For leg measurements, see Table
Leg/Article | F | Pt | Ti | Mt | T |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 0.79(0.75) | 0.46(0.40) | 0.69(0.58) | 0.57(0.45) | 0.50(0.40) |
II | 0.79(0.73) | 0.41(0.40) | 0.63(0.55) | 0.56(0.45) | 0.51(0.40) |
III | 0.64(0.60) | 0.36(0.30) | 0.49(0.40) | 0.53(0.40) | 0.37(0.30) |
IV | 0.81(0.78) | 0.43(0.38) | 0.79(0.65) | 0.79(0.58) | 0.43(0.40) |
Total | 3.03(2.86) | 1.66(1.48) | 2.60(2.18) | 2.45(1.88) | 1.81(1.50) |
Leg spination: F I d 1, pl 1, F II–IV d 1, Ti III–IV pl 1(ap), Mt III v 2(1.2, 2.2), Mt IV v 1.1.1.2 (1.1.2).
Abdomen length 1.63(1.60), width 0.93(0.93), ratio 1.76(1.72), dark brown, with transverse band of white bristles, broken in the middle.
Palpus as in Figs
Female. Carapace length 1.05, 1.05, width 0.75, 0.75, ratio 1.4, 1.4. Body coloration as in male, but carapace being pale reddish brown. For leg measurements, see Table
Leg/Article | F | Pt | Ti | Mt | T |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 0.63, 0.70 | 0.35, 0.38 | 0.48, 0.55 | 0.40, 0.45 | 0.38, 0.43 |
II | 0.60, 0.68 | 0.30, 0.38 | 0.48, 0.55 | 0.40, 0.45 | 0.38, 0.38 |
III | 0.53, 0.58 | 0.30, 0.28 | 0.38, 0.43 | 0.38, 0.43 | 0.30, 0.40 |
IV | 0.75, 0.75 | 0.33, 0.35 | 0.65, 0.68 | 0.60, 0.68 | 0.38, 0.40 |
Total | 2.51, 2.71 | 1.28, 1.39 | 1.99, 2.21 | 1.78, 2.01 | 1.44, 1.61 |
Leg spination: F I d 1, pl 1, F II–IV d 1, Ti III–IV pl 1(ap), Mt III–IV v 1.2.
Abdomen length 1.55, 1.88, width 0.78, 1.00, ratio 1.88, 1.99.
Epigyne and vulva as in Figs
Northern Kyrgyzstan and Apsheron Peninsula (Azerbaijan).
Micaria
canestrinii
:
Micaria cyrnea Brignoli, 1983: 564 (nomen novum).
Arboricaria
cyrnea
:
Note. This is the type species of the genus.
(after
The new name was proposed by
Micaria subopaca Westring, 1861: 336.
= Micaria albostriata L. Koch, 1877.
= Micaria humilis Kulczyński, 1885.
Micaria
subopaca
:
1 ♂, 1 ♀ (
All Europe north to Norway. Russia east to Urals, with scattered records in Transbaikalia and Kamchatka.
(all as Micaria, exceptions are marked).
Russia. Karelia (
Estonia (
Lithuania (
Latvia (
Belarus: Minsk Area (
Ukraine. Chernovtsy Area (
Moldova (
Micaria sociabilis Kulczyński in Chyzer & Kulczyński, 1897: 254 & 255 (key), 258–259, Tab.X., figs 21 (♀) 25a–b (♂).
M. canestrinii Roewer, 1951: 447 (replacement name for M. aurata Canestrini, 1868, praeocc.).
M.
sociabilis
:
Arboricaria koeni Bosmans in Bosmans & Blick, 2000: 465, figs 32–35 (♂♀), syn. n.
Micaria
sociabilis
:
Micaria
sociabilis
:
NotM. sociabilis
:
1 ♂ (
Originally, the male was matched with the female with some doubts (
A male syntype of Micaria sociabilis from Mukachevo is currently kept in the Zoological Museum in Warsaw, Poland, but both palps are missing (W. Wawer, pers. comm.). The tibial apophysis as redrawn by
Arboricaria sociabilis, male palp, from different sources. 12, 13 original drawings by
The picture of the M. sociabilis male palp as presented by
Characteristically, a male specimen from Rostov-on-Don was initially identified by A.V. Ponomarev as Micaria sociabilis, only later re-labeled as Arboricaria koeni.
Ukraine: Transcarpathia: Mukachevo (= Munkácz in Chyzer & Kulczyński [1897]). NE-Hungary (two other localities from the original description; Debrecen [
See
Micaria ? sociabilis : Wunderlich, 1980: Fig. 60b, c.
Arboricaria brignolii Bosmans & Blick, 2000: 463–465, figs 28–31 (♂♀).
(after
As it was already pointed out by
I am deeply obliged to L. Baert (