Checklist |
Corresponding author: Suelen Fernanda Ranucci Pini ( suelen.pini@hotmail.com ) Academic editor: Maria Elina Bichuette
© 2021 Suelen Fernanda Ranucci Pini, Maristela Cavicchioli Makrakis, Mayara Pereira Neves, Sergio Makrakis, Oscar Akio Shibatta, Elaine Antoniassi Luiz Kashiwaqui.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Pini SFR, Makrakis MC, Neves MP, Makrakis S, Shibatta OA, Kashiwaqui EAL (2021) Ichthyofauna in the last free-flowing river of the Lower Iguaçu basin: the importance of tributaries for conservation of endemic species. ZooKeys 1041: 183-203. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1041.63884
|
The fish fauna from the Lower Iguaçu River and tributaries upstream of the Iguaçu Falls, the last free-flowing river stretch, were investigated. Twenty five sites in tributaries and the main channel were sampled between 2010 and 2016 using several kinds of fishing gear. The species were categorized according to their size, origin, and conservation status. Species richness and abundance in the main channel and tributaries were compared. In total, 87,702 specimens were recorded, comprising 76 species, 25 families, 53 genera, and eight orders. Characiformes and Siluriformes were the richest orders, representing 92% of the total specimens; Characidae, Cichlidae, Pimelodidae, and Loricariidae were the richest families. The fish fauna was composed of small and medium-sized species and included endemic (42%), autochthonous (24%), allochthonous (21%), and exotic (9%) species, as well as hybrids (4%). Significant differences in the relative numerical abundance of species were found among sites. Ancistrus mullerae and Rhamdia branneri (endemic) were indicator species for tributaries inside of Iguaçu National Park (INP), while Phalloceros harpagos (autochthonous) and Ictalurus punctatus (exotic) for tributaries outside of INP and Odontesthes bonariensis (allochthonous) for the main channel. The last dam-free stretch of the Lower Iguaçu River and tributaries upstream the Iguaçu Falls exhibits a rich endemic fish fauna, including some rare, endangered species (Steindachneridion melanodermatum, Gymnogeophagus taroba, and Psalidodon gymnogenys). These findings are essential to predict and understand the effects caused by the new Baixo Iguaçu Hydroelectric Power Plant and highlight the importance of tributaries and Iguaçu National Park for conservation of endemic species.
Abundance, fish, origin, richness, size, threats, updated list
The high diversity of species in the Neotropical region is recognized worldwide. This region currently has more than 5,160 species of freshwater fish and may have as many as 9,000 species (
Endemism is a well-recognized feature of the Iguaçu river basin (
The main anthropogenic threats to fish fauna are habitat loss and environmental degradation. Specifically, damming rivers for hydroelectric power generation and water diversion for irrigation, as well as extensive changes in land use for agriculture and urbanization, are the main drivers of habitat loss (
The topographic relief of the Iguaçu river basin has been a major attraction for hydroelectric projects. There are now five large reservoirs and several small ones, which have changed the natural landscape and stream habitats in the basin (
The demand for electricity has grown in recent decades. To supply this demand in Brazil, most of needed electricity comes from hydroelectric plants (
Changes in land use have also negatively affected the biodiversity of fish in the Lower Iguaçu river basin (
This study provides an ichthyofaunistic inventory of the last free-flowing river stretch of the Lower Iguaçu River. This area is poorly studied and may be affected by the construction of a new hydroelectric power plant near Iguaçu National Park. While a previous inventory has been carried out in the river mostly upstream of the Salto Caxias Dam (
The Iguaçu River is considered one of the most important tributaries of the Paraná river basin, having 1,320 km in length (
The study area comprises the Lower Iguaçu River, including its tributaries and the main channel, extending from the Salto Caxias dam downstream to the mouth of the Santo Antônio mouth, which is in INP (Fig.
Characteristics of the sampled sites in the Lower Iguaçu river basin, Brazil. INP = Iguacu National Park; T = tributary; C = main channel.
Sites | Sub sites | Latitude and longitude | Altitude (m) | river width (m) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | a | 25°35'17.04"S, 53°29'56.58"W | 257 | 39 | Cotejipe River, tributary of Iguaçu. Located just downstream of Salto Caxias HPP. |
b | 25°33'9.54"S, 53°29'46.92"W | 270 | |||
T2 | 25°35'10.74"S, 53°30'7.44"W | 278 | 12 | Sarandi River, tributary of Cotejipe River. | |
C1 | 25°32'30.18"S, 53°30'37.98"W | 268 | 348 | Iguaçu River, just downstream of the Salto Caxias. | |
T3 | a | 25°27'36.18"S, 53°31'51.69"W | 291 | 24 | Andrada River, tributary of Iguaçu River. |
b | 25°29'29.70"S, 53°31'55.08"W | 263 | 37 | ||
c | 25°31'2.28"S, 53°32'34.44"W | 309 | 62 | ||
C2 | 25°30'48.00"S, 53°32'40.62"W | 246 | 652 | Iguaçu River. | |
T4 | a | 25°39'54.84"S, 53°37'15.66"W | 268 | 25 | Capanema River, tributary of Iguaçu River. |
b | 25°36'8.40"S, 53°36'46.98"W | 275 | 38 | ||
c | 25°34'16.26"S, 53°35'52.68"W | 256 | 72 | ||
C3 | 25°33'49.14"S, 53°36'16.92"W | 284 | 592 | Iguaçu River. | |
C4 | 25°30'42.58"S, 53°39'5.76"W | 262 | 287 | Iguaçu River, just upstream of Baixo Iguaçu HPP (current reservoir). | |
T5 | a | 25°28'12.96"S, 53°37'39.00"W | 269 | 9 | Monteiro River, tributary of Iguaçu River. |
b | 25°30'25.38"S, 53°39'27.24"W | 279 | 17 | ||
T6 | a | 25°12'58.98"S, 53°39'0.06"W | 460 | 17 | Gonçalves Dias River, tributary of Iguaçu River. Located at the limit of the INP (right margin). Its mouth with Iguaçu is approximately 500 meters from the Baixo Iguaçu HPP. |
b | 25°21'48.12"S, 53°39'18.00"W | 293 | 36 | ||
c | 25°29'57.06"S, 53°40'40.50"W | 241 | 38 | ||
C5 | 25°29'57.54"S, 53°40'53.52"W | 249 | 747 | Iguaçu River, just downstream of the Baixo Iguaçu HPP reservoir, right bank in the INP. | |
T7 | 25°32'14.82"S, 53°48'31.98"W | 225 | 39 | Floriano River, a tributary of Iguaçu River. Fully inserted in the INP. | |
T8 | a | 25°34'11.09"S, 53°54'20.36"W | 250 | 31 | Silva Jardim River, a tributary of Iguaçu River. Fully inserted in the INP. |
b | 25°34'51.24"S, 53°54'43.68"W | 229 | 20 | ||
T9 | a | 25°48'6.28"S, 53°49'28.35"W | 265 | 40 | Santo Antônio River, a tributary of Iguaçu River. It is the border between Brazil and Argentina. |
b | 25°40'25.80"S, 53°51'15.90"W | 233 | 15 | ||
c | 25°35'17.16"S, 53°59'25.20"W | 215 | 57 |
Study area: Lower Iguaçu river basin highlighting the existing hydroelectric dams (SA: Foz do Areia; SE: Segredo; SS Salto Santiago; SO: Salto Osório; SC: Salto Caxias; and BI: Baixo Iguaçu) and the Iguaçu National Park (left). Sampling sites are located in tributaries (black dots) and the main channel (red dots) of the Iguaçu River (right). Sampling sites in tributaries were indicated considering their upstream (a), intermediate (b), and downstream location (c).
The Baixo Iguaçu HPP (25°30'S, 53°40'W), the last hydroelectric power plant on the Iguaçu River downstream from Salto Caxias HPP, is approximately 500 meters from the mouth of the Gonçalves Dias River, at the INP boundary. On its right bank is the municipality of Capanema, and on its left bank is the municipality of Capitão Leonidas Marques (Paraná, Brazil).
Fish samples were collected (Fig.
After capture, the fish were euthanized with 250 mg/L benzocaine, fixed in 10% formaldehyde, and preserved in 70% ethanol. Fish were collected under license from the Instituto Ambiental do Paraná (IAP) (licenses no. 37788 and 43394) and Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) (no. 003/2014 and 63/2016-DIBIO/ICMBio). The protocols of the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA, no. 62/09) of the Universidade Estadual Oeste do Paraná were followed.
The specimens identified according to
The species were classified according to body size, origin, and conservation status. Using standard length (measured and reported in the literature), the species were classified as small (S = <20 cm), medium (M = 20–40 cm), and large (L = >40 cm) following
The conservation status of species was based on the Red Book of Endangered Brazilian Fauna (
The generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to verify differences in the relative numerical abundance of species according to their origins (allochthonous, autochthonous, endemic, exotic, and hybrid) among sites. GLMMs were constructed using Gaussian family distribution, including sites as response variables (fixed factor), and the time (sampling years) as random factor. GLMMs were ran using the following packages: “nlme” (
To determine fish species indicative for each site category (main channel: C1–C5; tributaries outside of INP: T1-T5 and T9, and tributaries inside or in the border of INP: T6–T8), the indicator value analysis (IndVal;
A total of 87,702 specimens were recorded, comprising 76 species, 25 families, 53 genera, and eight orders (Fig.
Fish species recorded and their respective occurrence at the sampling sites in the Lower Iguaçu River basin, Brazil. %N: abundance in numerical percentage; SL: standard lengths (minimum-maximum; cm); Size: the reported size that the species can reach: Small (S)= fish less than 20 cm; Medium (M)= 20-40 cm; and Large (L)= more than 40 cm; Origin refers to species classified in Autochthonous (AU), Endemic (END), Allochthonous (AL), Exotic (EX), and Hybrid (HY) to the Lower Iguaçu River; Threat level= Brazilian Red List of Threatened Species: Extinct in the wild (EW), Critically endangered (CR), Endangered (EN), Vulnerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), Data Deficient (DD), and Least Concern (LC) (
Taxonomic position/Species | % | SL (cm) / Size | Origin/ | Sampling sites | Voucher specimens | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Threat level | T1 | T2 | C1 | T3 | C2 | T4 | C3 | C4 | T5 | T6 | C5 | T7 | T8 | T9 | |||
CYPRINIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyprinidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 | 0.06 | 16.0/74.0/L | EX | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13303 | ||||||
Xenocyprididae | ||||||||||||||||||
Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844) | 0.01 | 23.0/48.8/L | EX | x | x | x | ||||||||||||
Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845) | * | 26.0/M | EX | x | MZUEL15861 | |||||||||||||
CHARACIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Parodontidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Apareiodon vittatus Garavello, 1977 | 1.00 | 1.4/15.5/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17679 |
Curimatidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyphocharax cf. santacatarinae (Fernández-Yépez, 1948) | 2.67 | 1.3/22.7/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16272 |
Steindachnerina brevipinna (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889) | 2.87 | 2.0/22.0/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17613 |
Prochilodontidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1837) | 0.03 | 19.6/36.0/M** | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13315 | ||||
Anostomidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Megaleporinus macrocephalus Garavello & Britski, 1988 | 0.03 | 15.3/39.6/M | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15870 | ||||
Megaleporinus piavussuBritski, Birindelli & Garavello, 2012 | 0.02 | 16.4/41.2/L | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17944 | ||||||||
Megaleporinus obtusidens (Valenciennes, 1837) | 0.02 | 16.0/43.0/L | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15836 | ||||
Schizodon borellii (Boulenger, 1900) | * | 29.5/35.0/M | AL/LC | x | x | MZUEL17941 | ||||||||||||
Crenuchidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Characidium sp. | 0.38 | 1.7/9.9/S | END | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17568 |
Serrasalmidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887) | 0.04 | 10.5/68.0/L | AL/NT | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17986 | ||||||
Characidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Astyanax dissimilis Garavello & Sampaio, 2011 | 3.14 | 2.0/14.4/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16339 |
Astyanax lacustris Lütken, 1875 | 6.69 | 1.0/16.4/S | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16359 |
Astyanax minor Garavello & Sampaio, 2010 | 5.50 | 2.2/28.7/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16346 |
Astyanax serratus Garavello & Sampaio, 2011 | * | 9.7/13.0/S | END/LC | x | x | MZUEL15827 | ||||||||||||
Bryconamericus ikaa Casciotta, Almirón & Azpelicueta, 2004 | 10.83 | 0.7/8.3/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17521 |
Bryconamericus pyahu Azpelicueta, Casciotta & Almirón, 2003 | 0.08 | 2.3/5.8/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15830 | ||
Charax stenopterus Fowler, 1932 | 0.01 | 6.9/9.6/S | AL/LC | x | x | MZUEL13309 | ||||||||||||
Diapoma aff. alburnus (Hensel, 1870) | 2.40 | 1.1/30.0/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13243 |
Hyphessobrycon boulengeri Ellis, 1911 | 0.01 | 2.7/4.3/S | AU | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17979 | ||||||||||
Oligosarcus longirostris Menezes & Géry, 1983 | 4.46 | 2.2/36.4/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17522 |
Psalidodon bifasciatus (Garavello & Sampaio, 2010) | 20.71 | 2.0/38.9/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16267 |
Psalidodon gymnodontus (Eignmann, 1911) | 7.68 | 2.0/16.3/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16353 |
Psalidodon gymnogenys Eignmann, 1911 | 0.10 | 6.0/14.5/S | END/EN | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL20821 | |||
Bryconidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Brycon hilarii (Valenciennes, 1850) | 0.01 | 18.0/30.6/M | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15855 | |||||||
Salminus brasiliensis (Cuvier, 1816) | 0.02 | 18.0/41.0/L | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13302 | ||||||||
Erythrinidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Hoplias sp. 1 | 0.30 | 5.5/48.2/L | AU | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13264 |
Hoplias sp. 2 | 0.30 | 5.5/52.0/L | AU | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17662 |
SILURIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Trichomycteridae | ||||||||||||||||||
Cambeva davisi (Haseman, 1911) | 0.01 | 3.8/13.4/S | AU/LC | x | x | MZUEL15841 | ||||||||||||
Cambeva stawiarski (Miranda Ribeiro, 1968) | 0.01 | 3.5/13.0/S | END/LC | x | x | MZUEL17950 | ||||||||||||
Callichthyidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Corydoras carlae Nijssen & Isbrücker, 1983 | * | 5.5/6.0/S | END/LC | x | x | MZUEL17500 | ||||||||||||
Corydoras ehrhardti Steindachner, 1910 | 0.09 | 1.7/4.5/S | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17475 | ||||||
Corydoras longipinnis (Jenyns, 1842) | 0.27 | 1.5/14.6/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17681 | ||
Loricariidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Ancistrus agostinhoi Bifi, Pavanelli & Zawadzki, 2009 | * | 4.8/12.0/S | END/LC | x | x | x | MZUEL15856 | |||||||||||
Ancistrus mullerae Bifi, Pavanelli & Zawadzki, 2009 | 1.22 | 1.5/16.1/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15862 | ||
Hisonotus yasi (Almirón, Azpelicueta & Casciotta, 2004) | 0.11 | 1.2/19.0/S | END | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||
Hypostomus albopunctatus (Regan, 1908) | 0.03 | 11.0/35.5/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15849 | |||||||
Hypostomus commersoni Valenciennes, 1836 | 0.17 | 3.3/43.5/L | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15887 | ||
Hypostomus derbyi (Haseman, 1911) | 0.53 | 13.8/40.5/L | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17495 |
Hypostomus myersi (Gosline, 1947) | 3.29 | 13.4/37.5/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16348 |
Loricariichthys cf. rostratus Reis & Pereire, 2000 | 1.44 | 5.0/28.5/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17604 | |
Pareiorhaphis cf. parmula Pereira, 2005 | * | 2.5/2.5/S | END/LC | x | ||||||||||||||
Heptapteridae | ||||||||||||||||||
Heptapterus sp. | * | 11.0/16.0/S | END | x | MZUEL15845 | |||||||||||||
Imparfinis hollandi Haseman, 1911 | 0.02 | 3.7/25.8/M | END | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17985 | |||||||
Pariolius sp. | 0.01 | 8.5/18.5/S | END | x | x | |||||||||||||
Rhamdia branneri Haseman, 1911 | 0.19 | 6.3/39.0/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13276 | |
Rhamdia voulezi Haseman, 1911 | 0.41 | 5.0/36.8/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15871 |
Ictaluridae | ||||||||||||||||||
Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818) | 0.03 | 11.0/73.8/L | EX | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13246 | |||||||
Auchenipteridae | ||||||||||||||||||
Glanidium ribeiroi Haseman, 1911 | 3.75 | 5.1/29.0/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16268 |
Tatia jaracatia Pavanelli & Bifi 2009 | 0.10 | 3.9/7.4/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16278 | |
Clariidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Clarias gariepinus (Bourchell, 1822) | 0.03 | 19.8/85.0/L | EX | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15858 | ||||||
Pimelodidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Leiarius marmoratus (Gill, 1870) | * | 35.5/35.5/M | AL/LC | x | MZUEL15874 | |||||||||||||
Pimelodus britskii Garavello&Shibatta, 2007 | 10.12 | 1.0/40.2/L | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17494 |
Pimelodus ortmanni Haseman, 1911 | 0.79 | 9.0/32.0/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16275 |
Pseudoplatystoma corruscans (Spix& Agassiz, 1829) | * | 42.5/58.0/L | AL/NT | x | x | MZUEL20820 | ||||||||||||
Steindachneridion melanodermatum Garavello, 2005 | 0.01 | 17.4/72.5/L | END/EN | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17620 | ||||||||||
GYMNOTIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Gymnotidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Gymnotus inaequilabiatus (Valenciennes, 1839) | 0.04 | 8.0/21.4/M | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16279 | |||||||
Gymnotus sylvius Albert & Fernandes-Matioli, 1999 | 0.25 | 2.5/34.0/M | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13300 |
Apteronotidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Apteronotus sp. | * | 26.7/27.5/M | AU | x | x | MZUEL13271 | ||||||||||||
ATHERINIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Atherinopsidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Odontesthes bonariensis (Valenciennes, 1835) | 0.31 | 4.8/34.5/M | AL/DD | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13290 | ||||
CYPRINODONTIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Poeciliidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Phalloceros harpagos Lucinda, 2008 | 0.21 | 1.0/4.1/S | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17981 | |||
Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859 | * | 1.4/1.7/S | AL | x | MZUEL15839 | |||||||||||||
SYNBRANCHIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Synbranchidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Synbranchus marmoratus Bloch, 1795 | 0.15 | 6.8/41.0/L | AL/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13245 | ||
CICHLIFORMES | ||||||||||||||||||
Cichlidae | ||||||||||||||||||
Australoheros kaaygua Casciotta, Almirón & Gómez, 2006 | 0.01 | 2.7/9.0/S | END/LC | x | x | x | MZUEL15854 | |||||||||||
Coptodon rendalli (Boulenger, 1897) | 0.07 | 3.2/42.3/L | EX | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16254 | |
Crenicichla iguassuensis Haseman, 1911 | 2.68 | 1.8/36.6/M | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17614 |
Crenicichla lepidota Heckel, 1840 | 0.06 | 4.8/17.2/S | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL15847 | |||||||
Crenicichla sp. Casciotta, Almirón & Gómez, 2006 | 0.97 | 2.0/29.1/M | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13301 |
Crenicichla tapii (Piálek, Dragová, Casciotta, Almirón y Rícan, 2015) | * | 10.0/10.0/S | END | x | MZUEL20809 | |||||||||||||
Crenicichla tesay Casciotta & Almirón, 2009 | 0.15 | 3.0/19.6/S | END/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL20811 | |
Crenicichla tuca (Piálek, Dragová, Casciotta, Almirón y Rícan, 2015) | * | 9.6/9.6/S | END | x | MZUEL20810 | |||||||||||||
Geophagus iporangensis Haseman, 1911 | 2.28 | 1.1/41.5/L | AU/LC | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL17616 |
Gymnogeophagus taroba Casciotta, Almirón, Piálek & Rican, 2017 | 0.73 | 1.3/11.1/S | END/EN | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL16354 |
Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) | 0.09 | 3.3/43.0/L | EX | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | MZUEL13318 | ||
Hybrid | ||||||||||||||||||
Piaractus mesopotamicus X Colossoma macropomum | * | 33.5/36.9/M | HY | x | x | MZUEL15832 | ||||||||||||
Piaractus mesopotamicus X Piaractus brachypomus | * | 31.6/31.6/M | HY | x | ||||||||||||||
Pseudoplatystoma corruscans X Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum | * | 28.0/46.0/L | HY | x | x | MZUEL15877 |
Species richness was greater (76 species) at sites in the tributaries than in the main channel (58 species). The tributaries with the highest species richness were T9 (62 species) and T4 (58 species). Species richness was less in T7 (39 species). Eighteen species were caught only in tributaries. The following species had a restricted occurrence: Heptapterus sp. in T2, Leiarius marmoratus in T4, Poecilia reticulata in T5, Pareiorhaphis cf. parmula and Crenicichla tapii in T6, Crenicichla tuca in T7, and Hypophthalmichthys nobilis in T9. In the main channel, the greatest species richness was at C2 (46 species) and the lowest at C4 and C5 (40 species each). The hybrid Piaractus mesopotamicus × P. brachypomus had restricted capture in the main channel (C3). The most frequent species at all sampling sites (main channel and tributaries) were Psalidodon bifasciatus (21%), Bryconamericus ikaa (11%), and Pimelodus britskii (10%).
The fish fauna was characterized chiefly by small and medium-sized species (74% of total numerical abundance; Table
On the biogeographic origin of the species in terms of richness, 42% are endemics, 24% autochthonous, 21% allochthonous, 9% exotic, and 4% hybrids. In terms of abundance, endemic and autochthonous species represented 92% of the total abundance (54% and 38%, respectively). In general, the most frequent endemic species were B. ikaa (10.83%), P. britskii (10.12%), and P. gymnodontus (7.68%). Psalidodon bifasciatus (20.71%) was most frequent autochthonous species, Astyanax lacustris (6.69%) the most frequent allochthonous species, Oreochromis niloticus (0.09%) and Coptodon rendalli (0.07%) the most frequent exotic species, and Pseudoplatystoma corruscans × P. fasciatum (<0.001%) was the most frequent hybrid (Table
The results of the GLMMs indicated that the relative numerical abundance of allochthonous (F = 2.54; p = 0.007), autochthonous (F = 3.80; p = 0.0001), and endemic (F = 4.30; p < 0.0001) species differed among sites (Table
Effects of the sampling sites on the relative numerical abundance of autochthonous, allochthonous, and endemic species evaluated in the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs).
Sites | Endemic | Autochthonous | Allochthonous | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | df | t value | Pr(>|t|) | Estimate | Std. Error | df | t value | Pr(>|t|) | Estimate | Std. | Error | df | t value | Pr(>|t|) | |
C1 | 63.97 | 4.20 | 56.08 | 15.24 | < 0.0001 | 30.64 | 3.77 | 63.08 | 8.12 | < 0.0001 | 5.20 | 5.20 | 1.68 | 56.44 | 3.09 | 0.003 |
C2 | -4.35 | 5.90 | 59.28 | -0.74 | 0.464 | 2.62 | 5.51 | 59.35 | 0.48 | 0.636 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 2.36 | 59.50 | 0.83 | 0.409 |
C3 | -1.52 | 5.90 | 59.28 | -0.26 | 0.797 | -1.66 | 5.51 | 59.35 | -0.30 | 0.764 | 3.27 | 3.27 | 2.36 | 59.50 | 1.38 | 0.172 |
C4 | -17.99 | 5.61 | 58.87 | -3.21 | 0.002 | 12.01 | 5.24 | 58.69 | 2.29 | 0.026 | 6.12 | 6.12 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 2.72 | 0.008 |
C5 | -6.30 | 5.61 | 58.87 | -1.12 | 0.266 | 3.72 | 5.24 | 58.69 | 0.71 | 0.481 | 2.69 | 2.69 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 1.20 | 0.237 |
T1 | 1.97 | 5.61 | 58.87 | 0.35 | 0.727 | -3.91 | 5.24 | 58.69 | -0.75 | 0.459 | 1.71 | 1.71 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 0.76 | 0.450 |
T2 | -11.77 | 5.61 | 58.87 | -2.10 | 0.040 | 9.11 | 5.24 | 58.69 | 1.74 | 0.088 | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 1.20 | 0.235 |
T3 | -17.63 | 5.90 | 59.28 | -2.99 | 0.004 | 15.07 | 5.51 | 59.35 | 2.74 | 0.008 | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.36 | 59.50 | 1.13 | 0.262 |
T4 | -13.14 | 5.61 | 58.87 | -2.34 | 0.023 | 5.34 | 5.24 | 58.69 | 1.02 | 0.313 | 7.80 | 7.80 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 3.47 | 0.001 |
T5 | -11.14 | 5.61 | 58.87 | -1.99 | 0.052 | 6.66 | 5.24 | 58.69 | 1.27 | 0.209 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 2.03 | 0.047 |
T6 | -22.91 | 5.90 | 59.28 | -3.89 | < 0.0001 | 20.74 | 5.51 | 59.35 | 3.77 | < 0.0001 | 2.10 | 2.10 | 2.36 | 59.50 | 0.89 | 0.378 |
T7 | 0.57 | 5.90 | 59.28 | 0.10 | 0.923 | 0.62 | 5.51 | 59.35 | 0.11 | 0.911 | -1.16 | -1.16 | 2.36 | 59.50 | -0.49 | 0.624 |
T8 | 3.30 | 5.90 | 59.28 | 0.56 | 0.578 | -1.54 | 5.51 | 59.35 | -0.28 | 0.780 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 2.36 | 59.50 | -0.84 | 0.407 |
T9 | -17.55 | 5.61 | 58.87 | -3.13 | 0.003 | 16.71 | 5.24 | 58.69 | 3.19 | 0.002 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 2.25 | 59.12 | 0.40 | 0.693 |
Species indicators defined by IndVal analysis, performed for main channel and tributaries outside and inside Iguaçu National Park – INP.
Species indicator | stat | p |
---|---|---|
Main channel | ||
O. bonariensis | 0.70 | 0.001 |
Tributaries outside of INP | ||
P. harpagos | 0.74 | 0.001 |
I. punctatus | 0.49 | 0.024 |
Tributaries inside of INP | ||
A. mullerae | 0.95 | 0.001 |
R. branneri | 0.74 | 0.004 |
Three Endangered (EN) species were sampled in low abundance (<1%) (Table
This study is the first ichthyofaunistic survey carried out on a dam-free stretch of the Iguaçu River and its tributaries between the Salto Caxias Dam and the Iguaçu Falls. The number of identified species accounted for 72% of the number of species observed in a previous study for the Lower Iguaçu basin (
The richness and abundance of Siluriformes and Characiformes species were higher than those of other orders, both in the Iguaçu River and in its tributaries. Similarly, the same pattern was pointed out by previous studies along the Lower Iguaçu river basin: in reservoirs (
Small water bodies are as refuges for small species and provide a greater diversity of food resources from riparian vegetation and a larger diversity of microhabitats (
Other small species, mainly belonging to the genera Astyanax, Psalidodon, and Crenicichla, occurred at all sampling sites. These species are generalists with high trophic plasticity, favoring their wide distribution within the basin and in varied habitats (
The introduction of species is among the leading causes of species extinction in worldwide (
Fish farms are potential sources of invasive species (
Due to their multiple uses of water, the implementation of hydroelectric projects has also been associated with facilitating the introduction and dissemination of exotic species (
The last dam-free stretch of the Lower Iguaçu River upstream of the Iguaçu Falls exhibits a rich endemic fish fauna, rare endangered species restricted to this region, and new species for science. This diversity is threatened with extinction by biotic and abiotic factors. Exotic species have occurred in low abundance, but their presence in most sampling sites and the Iguaçu National Park is worrisome, requiring actions to mitigate its harmful effects and to avoid new introductions. The presence of hybrids of allochthonous species escaped from fish farms requires strict supervision of these commercial operations. Another source of threats is the construction of the Baixo Iguaçu HPP, which will promote hydrological changes in the main channel and severe damage to many fish species. Thus, tributaries will play an essential role in maintaining the diversity of fish in the Iguaçu river basin since many species of the Iguaçu River also frequent in the tributaries, besides the species that occur only in these environments. The protection of free-flowing tributaries has been an appeal worldwide (
We thank Consórcio Empreendedor Baixo Iguaçu for the financial support to the research. Suelen F.R. Pini was supported by a doctoral scholarship from CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel). Sergio Makrakis received a Productivity Scholarship in Technological Development and Innovative Extension from CNPq. All authors are grateful to the students of Grupo de Pesquisa em Tecnologia em Ecohidráulica e Conservação de Recursos Pesqueiros e Hídricos from the Unioeste and technicians from the Instituto Água Viva for the fieldwork and laboratory assistance.