Print
New species and material of Hagloidea (Insecta, Ensifera) from the Yanliao biota of China
expand article infoJun-Jie Gu, Xin Yang, Rong Huang, Guijun Yang§, Yanli Yue, Dong Ren|
‡ Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China
§ Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
| Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

A new species of Cyrtophyllitinae, Archaboilus polyneurus sp. nov. Gu, Yue & Ren, is described from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation, Daohugou Village, Inner Mongolia, China. The species is characterized by its ScA reaching the anterior wing margin at the level of the divergence of M+ CuA, distally branched RP, lengths of free CuA and free M equal, and numerous branches of CuA + CuPaα. A new fossil of Liassophyllum caii Gu & Ren, 2012 is described which increases knowledge of its wing venation and indicates that Liassophyllum should be assigned to the Tuphellidae.

Keywords

Archaboilus, Daohugou, Cyrtophyllitinae, Liassophyllum, Middle Jurassic, Orthoptera, systematic palaeontology, Tuphellidae

Introduction

The superfamily Hagloidea (Orthoptera) sensu Gorochov 1995 was widespread from the Late Triassic to the Early Cretaceous and consists of the families Haglidae, Tuphellidae, Prophalangopsidae, Hagloedischiidae (Gorochov 1995). A cladistic analysis based on wing venation suggests that it is paraphyletic (Béthoux and Nel 2002). The Prezottophlebiidae was erected by Martins-Neto (2007) and assigned to the Hagloidea on the basis of a new species from the Early Cretaceous Santana Formation of Brazil. Although Haglidae are extinct and Prophalangopsidae are now considered to be relicts, they are the most diverse Hagloidea in the fossil record (Gorochov 1995; Wappler 2001; Gu et al. 2010).

The non-marine Jurassic and Cretaceous deposits of northern China are rich and diverse in fossil insects (Wang et al. 2012; Cai and Huang 2014; Fang et al. 2020; Gao et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021). In the Yanliao and Jehol biota, Prophalangopsidae are the most diverse and abundant Orthoptera with over thirty valid species, while the Haglidae have lower diversity and abundance. Lin (1965) described two haglid species from the Lower Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, but they were erected based on female wings, which are difficult to compare with known haglid species, which are based on males. Alloma Hong, 1982 (Hong 1982a) and Hebeihagla Hong, 1982 (Hong 1982b), are considered as synonyms of Parahagla Sharov, 1968 of Chifengiinae, which were originally assigned to Haglinae of Haglidae (Hong 1982a, b). The family assignment of Yenshania hebeiensis Hong, 1982 (Hong 1982a) is questionable, as the type specimen is very fragmentary. Although Isfaroptera yujiagouensis Hong, 1983 was also erected based on a very fragmentary specimen, its preserved characters are sufficient to support its assignment to Haglidae. Gu et al. (2012a, b) described two Jurassic hagloid species, Archaboilus musicus Gu, Engel & Ren, 2012, and Liassophyllum caii Gu & Ren, 2012. The broad winged species Vitimoilus ovatus Gu, Tian, Yin, Shi & Ren, 2017, was described from the Early Cretaceous Dabeigou Formation, the most recently described haglid species from China (Gu et al. 2017).

Here, we report a new species of the haglid subfamily Cyrtophyllitinae and describe a new fossil of Liassophyllum caii Gu & Ren, 2012, increasing the diversity of Haglidae and knowledge of their wing venation.

Method and materials

The specimens were examined with a Nikon SMZ 25 microscope and photographed with a Nikon DS-Ri 2 digital camera system. Line drawings were prepared using Adobe Illustrator CC 2017 and Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software. Measurements were taken using Adobe Illustrator. The specimens are housed at the Key Lab of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, Capital Normal University (CNU), Beijing, China.

Wing venation terminology follows the interpretation proposed by Béthoux and Nel (2002). Another commonly used Orthoptera venational terminology is that of Sharov (1968; and see e.g., Gorochov 1995). These mainly differ by their interpretations of the media and cubitus areas. For ease of comparison, we also provide the Sharov venation system in parentheses. Corresponding abbreviations used are: ScA (C), anterior subcosta; ScP (Sc), posterior subcosta; RA (RA), RP (Rs), anterior and posterior radius, respectively; MA (MA1), MP (MA2), anterior, posterior media, respectively; CuA (MP), CuP, anterior, posterior cubitus, respectively; CuPaα (CuA1), the anterior branch of first posterior cubitus; CuPaβ (CuA2), the posterior branch of first posterior cubitus; CuPb (CuP), the second posterior cubitus; AA1 (1A), first branch of anterior anal vein.

Systematic palaeontology

Class Insecta Linnaeus, 1758

Order Orthoptera Olivier, 1789

Suborder Ensifera Chopard, 1920

Superfamily Hagloidea Handlirsch, 1906

Family Haglidae Handlirsch, 1906

Subfamily Cyrtophyllitinae Zeuner, 1937

Archaboilus Martynov, 1937

Composition

A. kisylkiensis Martynov, 1937, A. martynovi Gorochov, 1988, A. musicus Gu, Engel & Ren, 2012, A. shurabicus Martynov, 1937, A. similis Zherikhin, 1985, Archaboilus polyneurus sp. nov.

Archaboilus polyneurus sp. nov. Gu, Yue & Ren

Fig. 1

Diagnosis

ScA reaches anterior wing margin at level of divergence of M+ CuA, RP branched distally, lengths of free CuA and free M equal, CuA + CuPaα with numerous branches.

Material examined

Holotype , CNU-ORT-NN2009018PC. Paratype, CNU-ORT-NN2009011.

Locality and age

Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China; Jiulongshan Formation, Bathonian–Callovian boundary interval (Ren et al. 2019), Middle Jurassic.

Description

Forewing oval, estimated length ca 33 mm. ScA crossing area between ScP and anterior wing margin, reaching margin at level of divergence of M+ CuA; basal part of ScP slightly anteriorly curved, ScP reaching anterior margin at 3/4 to wing base with numerous oblique branches uniformly distributed; branches of ScP with secondary vein between them, formed by two rows of cells; most cross-veins between ScP and R straight; stem R slightly undulate; RA basally branched, pectinate with 4–7 terminal branches; base of RP curved towards to posterior margin, RP very distally branched with less branches than RA; area between RA and RP with series of regular arranged cross-veins; area between R and M expanding when R dichotomous, with series of long cross-veins, cross-veins of expanded area curved; presence of a transverse veinlet connecting MA and base of RP (asterisk on Fig. 1B, D, F); M separated from M + CuA distant to origin of RP; MA probably undulate; MP strongly curved basally (not preserved in holotype); lengths of free CuA and free M equal; CuA + CuPaα with numerous branches; CuPaβ oblique; “handle” straight; CuPb strongly oblique, basal part and middle part (where bearing teeth) forms obtuse angle.

Figure 1. 

Photos and drawings of Archaboilus polyneurus sp. nov. Gu, Yue & Ren, asterisk indicates the transverse veinlet connecting MA and base of RP. A–D right and left forewing of the holotype, CNU-ORT-NN2009018C E, F CNU-ORT-NN2009011. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Etymology

From the Latin “polyneurus”, referring to its numerous branches of CuA + CuPaα.

Discussion

Although the preservation and deformation of the specimens makes it difficult to identify the complete structure of ScA, this new species can be assigned to Archaboilus Martynov, 1937 by a combination of its ScA crossing the area between ScP and the anterior wing margin, the base of MP strongly curved, and the presence of a transverse veinlet connecting MA and the base of RP. Besides these diagnostic characters of the genus, A. polyneurus sp. nov. shares with A. musicus from the same locality a slightly sigmoidal ScP, but it differs from it by its much more distally branched RP and distinctly smaller forewing. Although the holotype and single known specimen of A. kisylkiensis Martynov, 1937 is only the basal half of a forewing, its free CuA is much longer than its free M, not as in the new species. A. polyneurus sp. nov. differs from all other Archaboilus species by its shorter ScA, very distally branches of RP, and numerous branches of CuA + CuPaα. Although the terminals numbers of RA and CuA + CuPaα are different between the holotype and paratype, this kind of difference has been shown to be intra-specific variation in orthopterans and their relatives (Béthoux 2008; Gu et al. 2010, 2011).

Family Tuphellidae Gorochov, 1988

Genus Liassophyllum Zeuner, 1935

Liassophyllum caii Gu & Ren, 2012

Fig. 2

Material examined

CNU-ORT-NN2020001.

Locality and age

Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China; Jiulongshan Formation, Bathonian–Callovian boundary interval (Ren et al. 2019), Middle Jurassic.

Description of new material

Isolated left forewing with negative and positive imprint; preserved length 41 mm, estimated complete length ca 49 mm, distal part of subcostal area, R, M, part of posterior margin all missing. Preserved forewing venation almost the same as previously described fossils of the species. Forewing elongated, not typically oval; the anterior wing margin is slightly flattened in its basal part, then arched upwards; there is no curved ScA crossing area between ScP and anterior wing margin; area between ScP and anterior margin basally narrowed, gradually widened to the middle; area between CuPb and CuPaβ broad, very basal cross-veins strongly curved and connected, formed into several irregular cells.

Figure 2. 

Photo (A) and drawing (B) of Liassophyllum caii Gu & Ren, 2012, CNU-ORT-NN2020001. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Discussion

Although the distal part of the forewing is absent, we assign the new fossil to L. caii Gu & Ren, 2012 by the following: R is simple for a long distance and is strongly arched toward the anterior margin distal to the redirection of ScP; MA is undulate; and the area between R and MA is distinctly broad. Liassophyllum caii Gu & Ren, 2012 was erected based on 11 specimens. The holotype is an isolate forewing with the basal area between ScP and the anterior margin missing, the paratypes are well preserved but with wings strongly overlapped and their subcostal area is not clear. The basal part of the subcostal area of the type species L. abbreviatum Zeuner, 1935 is also unknown. The new material described here has a clear subcostal area, improving the knowledge of this important area. It lacks an arched ScA crossing the subcostal area positioned very close to the anterior wing margin. The basal-most area between ScP and anterior wing margin has fan-like veinlets. Zeuner (1939) and Gu et al. (2012a) attributed Liassophyllum to Cyrtophyllitinae, but Gorochov (1995) and Gorochov et al. (2006) excluded the genus from the subfamily, not mentioning its higher-rank assignment. The new material reported here supports exclusion of Liassophyllum from the Cyrtophyllitinae by its absence of an arched ScA crossing the area between ScP and the anterior margin. Further, the undulate MA, the long and more or less undulate stem of R, the very distal dichotomous R, and the broad and long area between CuPb and CuPaβ of Liassophyllum species strongly indicate that this genus belongs to the Tuphellidae.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely appreciate the critical and valuable comments from the editor and the anonymous reviewers. We thank Dr Bruce Archibald from the Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada for improving the manuscript. This research is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41872020, 31760618, 41688103, 32020103006).

References

  • Béthoux O (2008) Revision and phylogenetic affinities of the lobeattid species bronsoni Dana, 1864 and silvatica Laurentiaux & Laurentiaux-Vieira, 1980 (Pennsylvanian; Archaeorthoptera). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 66: 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.018
  • Cai CY, Huang DY (2014) Diverse oxyporine rove beetles from the Early Cretaceous of China (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Systematic Entomology 39: 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12069
  • Gorochov AV (1988) The Lower and Middle Jurassic Superfamily Hagloidea (Orthoptera). Paleontological Journal 22: 50–61.
  • Gorochov AV (1995) System and evolution of the suborder Ensifera (Orthoptera) (part I). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences 260: 1–224.
  • Gorochov AV (1996) New Mesozoic insects of the superfamily Hagloidea (Orthoptera). Paleontologicheski Zhurnal 3: 73–82.
  • Gu JJ, Qiao GX, Ren D (2010) Revision and new taxa of fossil Prophalangopsidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera). Journal of Orthoptera Research 19(1): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1665/034.019.0110
  • Gu JJ, Béthoux O, Ren D (2011) Longzhua loculata n. gen. n. sp., one of the most completely documented pennsylvanian Archaeorthoptera (Insecta; Ningxia, China). Journal of Paleontology 85(2): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1666/10-085.1
  • Gu JJ, Qiao GX, Ren D (2012a) The first discovery of Cyrtophyllitinae (Orthoptera, Haglidae) from the Middle Jurassic and its morphological implications. Alcheringa 36(1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2011.576535
  • Gu JJ, Montealegre ZF, Robert D, Engel MS, Qiao GX, Ren D (2012b) Wing stridulation in a Jurassic katydid (Insecta, Orthoptera) produced low-pitched musical calls to attract females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(10): 3868–3873. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118372109
  • Hong YC (1982a) Fossil Haglidae (Orthoptera) in China. Scientia Sinica (series B) 25(10): 1118–1129.
  • Hong YC (1982b) Mesozoic Fossil Insets of Jiuquan Basin in Gansu Province. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 181 pp.
  • Hong YC (1983) Taxonomic description. In: Rong LB (Ed.) Middle Jurassic Fossil Insects in North China. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 42–48.
  • Lin QB (1965) Two insects from the Lower part of Jurassic, Inner Mongolia. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 13(2): 363–368.
  • Martins-Neto RG (2007) New Orthoptera Stenopelmatoidea and Hagloidea (Ensifera) from the Santana Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Northeast Brazil) with description of new taxa. Gaea 3(1): 3–8.
  • Martynov AB (1937) Liassic insects from Shurab and Kisyl-Kiya. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii nauk SSSR, Moscow, 7: 1–232.
  • Ren D, Shih CK, Gao TP, Wang YJ, Yao YZ (2019) Rhythms of Insect Evolution-Evidence from the Jurassic and Cretaceous in Northern China. Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey, 710 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119427957
  • Sharov AG (1968) Filogeniya orthopteroidnykh nasekomykh. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii nauk SSSR, Moscow, 118: 1–216.
  • Zherikhin VV (1985) The Jurassic Orthoptera in South Siberia and West Mongolia. In: Rasnitsyn AP (Ed.) Jurassic Insects of Siberia and Mongolia. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii nauk SSSR, Moscow, 171–184.
  • Wang YJ, Labandeira CC, Shih CK, Ding QL, Wang C, Zhao YY, Ren D (2012) Jurassic mimicry between a hangingfly and a ginkgo from China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(50): 20514–20519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205517109
  • Wappler T (2001) Haglidae (Insecta: Orthoptera) from the Upper Triassic Molteno Formation in southern Africa. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie – Abhandlungen 222(3): 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1127/njgpa/222/2001/329
  • Yang HR, Shi CF, Engel SM, Zhao ZP, Ren D, Gao TP (2021) Early specializations for mimicry and defense in a Jurassic stick insect. National Science Review 8: nwaa056. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa056
  • Zeuner FE (1939) Fossil Orthoptera Ensifera. British Museum (Natural History), London, 407 pp.