Research Article |
Corresponding author: Nora Cabrera ( ncabrera@museo.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar ) Academic editor: Astrid Eben
© 2016 Nora Cabrera, Alejandro Sosa, Marta Telesnicki, Mic Julien.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cabrera N, Sosa A, Telesnicki M, Julien M (2016) Morphology of juvenile stages of Kuschelina bergi (Harold) with biological information (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Alticini). ZooKeys 561: 51-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.561.5950
|
Kuschelina bergi (Harold, 1881) is being studied to be evaluated as a natural enemy of Phyla nodiflora var. minor (Hook.) N. O’Leary & Múlgura (Verbenaceae), an invasive weed in Australia. Eggs, and 1st and 3rd instar larvae are described and illustrated for the first time. The following characters distinguish Kuschelina bergi: presence of two medial setae in prosternum, mesosternum and metasternum, absence of tubercle on sternum I and eight setae in abdominal segment IX. The 3rd instar larvae of K. bergi resemble Kuschelina gibbitarsa (Say) larvae: the body shape and details of mouthparts are similar, but the morphology of the mandible is different, as is the tarsungulus which has a single seta. Differences between K. bergi and other known larvae of Oedionychina are discussed. New biological data based on laboratory rearing and field observation are also presented and discussed.
Galerucinae , Alticini , flea beetle, biological control, Phyla , Argentina
Kuschelina
Kuschelina bergi was originally described by
Larval morphology of oedionychines is poorly known. The only detailed study of members of this subtribe are those dealing with the larvae of Alagoasa parana
The identification of K. bergi larvae is important to complete our knowledge of characters in addition to those of the adults and as a first step towards a better understanding of the insect-host plant relationships, needed to conduct studies for biocontrol of Phyla nodiflora var. minor. The purpose of this paper is to describe the immature stages of K. bergi. Biological notes, including field and laboratory host range, are presented as well as some comparative notes on larvae of other Oedionychina species.
Specimens utilized for the study came from adults and larvae of K. bergi which were collected on P. nodiflora from different locations in Argentina during field trips made from 2009 to 2013. A laboratory colony was set up to obtain sufficient specimens for morphological studies and laboratory tests. Specimens were preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol. The larvae were macerated in 10% KOH solution for several minutes and rinsed in water. The methods of dissection, preparation and examination of immature stages follow
Terminology for morphological features of immatures follows
Biological observations were made on 50 eggs laid by adults collected near Tres Arroyos city (RN 3, Km 520, 25 km S Tres Arroyos S 38°32, W 60°31, Buenos Aires Province) in October 2009 and brought to FuEDEI facilities in Hurlingham, Buenos Aires. They were kept in Petri dishes (10 cm diameter, 2 cm high). The hatched larvae were fed fresh leaves of P. nodiflora var. minor. After about 50 days, when the larvae decreased their activity during the prepupal stage, they were transferred to another container (8 cm diameter, 5 cm high) with soil as a substrate for pupation.
Preliminary studies revealed that pupation is a vulnerable stage in the life cycle of K. bergi. Hence, we studied what role the type of substrate and humidity plays on the pupation success through a factorial design experiment. Third instar larvae (N = 180) were collected from the laboratory colony and individually placed in small plastic containers with three different substrates: sand, commercial soil and nothing (as a control) with two levels of humidity (with and without humidity). Treatment with humidity consisted of adding water to containers, at least twice a day, for a completely wet, but not soaking, substrate; treatment without humidity received no water. In the case of the no-substrate test, a piece of tissue paper soaked in water was added for the treatment with humidity. The successful pupation was estimated by registering the emergence of a live adult (yes or no). The data were analyzed using generalized linear modeling, a logistic regression method with over-dispersion accounted for through the use of quasi-binomial error variances. Analysis was performed using R version 3.1.2 (
Voucher specimens are deposited in the collections of the Entomology Department,
Eggs (Fig.
Mature larvae (Figs
Head (Figs
Thorax. Pronotum transverse, bearing two transverse rows of nine anterior and six posterior unisetose tubercles, two fixed at the posterior outer corner; post epipleural tubercle bearing one seta; pre-hypopleural tubercle bearing 2 setae; prosternum with two pairs of median setae. Meso- metathorax subequal, each bearing two anterior and four posterior unisetose tubercles arranged in two rows; mesopleura with alar tubercle bearing two setae; spiracular sclerite bearing one large seta; metapleura with alar tubercle bearing two setae and anterior epipleural sclerite bearing a seta; meso-and metasterna each bearing two median bisetose tubercles. Spiracle annuliform situated in the mesothoracic region. Legs 5-segmented, slightly chitinized, equal in size; trochantin triangular, asetose; coxa trapezoidal bearing eight long setae, two club-like, the others simple, and two sensillae; trochanter, triangular, with four long simple setae; femur sub-rectangular bearing eight long setae; tibia bearing three setae; tarsungulus curved, bearing a setiform pulvillus with a short, thin seta.
Abdomen. Abdominal segments I-VIII with filiform setae, dorsally arranged into two rows, interior prescutal area bearing two setae, posteriorly interior scutoscutellar area with two setae, exterior scutoscutellar with one seta and posterior parascutal areas bearing one seta; epipleural area (Fig.
First instar larva. The first instar larva is very similar to the mature larva, but smaller in size, length 1.0–1.3mm, head capsule width 0.2–0.5mm. Recently emerged first instars are pale yellow. First instars can be distinguished from the mature larvae by the following characters: each side of epicranial plate with three long setae fixed in the middle of the disc, two above antennal margin and another on the outer side of antennae. Frons bearing one pair of long setae inserted on the disc, two pairs fixed on anterior margin and another two pairs on clypeal area. Egg bursters conical, sclerotized, situated on exterior scutoscutellar sclerites of meso-and metathorax.
Material examined. ARGENTINA: Buenos Aires: 13♂♂, RN 3, Km 520, 25 km S Tres Arroyos S 38°32, W 60°31, Sosa col.; 1♂, RP 11, Nueva Atlantis, S36°85 W56°69, Sosa col. (FUEDEI); 8♀♀, Rt. 226, 1 Km. E Bolívar, S36°26 W61°69, Sosa col. (FUEDEI).
Biological aspects. In the field, adults (Fig.
Females dig a hole under the plants and lay eggs in masses of approximately ten eggs. Three larval instars were recorded, and the complete larval development took about two months. Pupation occurred in the soil and lasted over two weeks.
In the laboratory, the rate of emergence of adult K. bergi varied depending on the type of substrate and the humidity (Fig.
Pupation was more successful in moist sand, similar results were obtained in moist soil (t = -2.845, P = 0.00498), and dry soil showed slightly better results than moist soil.
In the “no substrate” treatment, where tissue paper was added for the tests with humidity, very few adults were able to emerge and survival was very low. Where there was no substrate and no moisture, again, a very low number of adults were able to emerge and the survival was extremely low. These results will strongly help to improve rearing methods.
The brief description of K. gibbitarsa precludes detailed comparisons with K. bergi but both species share the following features: body shape, mouthparts with large mala carrying long setae along inner margin, submentum and mentum are fused. However, in contrast with the membranous pulvillus illustrated by
Morphological comparison of third instar larvae of Walterianella bucki Bechyné, Alagoasa parana Samuelson, Alagoasa januaria Bechyné, Kuschelina gibbitarsa (Say), and Kuschelina bergi (Harold) (modified from
Third instar | Walterianella bucki | Alagoasa parana | Alagoasa januaria | Alagoasa gibbitarsa | Kuschelina bergi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Club-like setae | present | absent | absent | absent | absent |
Prominency of tubercles | dorso-lateral only | All dorsal and dorso-lateral | dorso-lateral only | dorso-lateral only | dorso-lateral only |
Dorsolateral tubercles | Prominent and large | Less prominent, short and broad | Less prominent, long and thin | Less prominent, short and broad | Less prominent, short and broad |
Median setae on prosternum | 1 pair | 1 pair | 2 pairs | Not described | 1 pair |
Ventro-lateral tubercle of sg. I | present | Not present | present | Not described | Not present |
Tubercles on meso-and metanotun | 2 posterior unisetose | 4 posterior unisetose | 4 posterior unisetose | 4 posterior unisetose | 4 posterior unisetose |
Dorsolateral tubercle sg. I-VIII | I-VII unisetose, VIII bisetose |
bisetose | unisetose | Bi or trisetose | bisetose |
Setation abd. sg. IX | 8 dorsal, 6ventral setae | Not described | 8dorsal,8 ventral setae | 12 dorsal,10 ventral setae | 8 dorsal setae |
First instar | |||||
Egg bursters | Absent | Present | Present | Present | Present |
The status of Kuschelina as currently defined is somewhat unclear (
As few larvae have been studied so far, we cannot make generalizations about not only the value of the characters to determine taxa but also for phylogenetic studies. Detailed descriptions (adult and immature stages) of Kuschelina are much needed and will contribute to resolving the taxonomic relationships among species and will provide biological knowledge on the Alticini, especially within the subtribe Oedionychina.
We thank J. Rouaux and M. Späth for the illustrations, and C. Gorretta for helping to prepare the plates. We are also grateful to G. Cabrera Walsh, to the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that improved the manuscript. This work was partially supported by