Short Communication |
Corresponding author: Yang Zhong ( hubeispider@aliyun.com ) Academic editor: Gergin Blagoev
© 2020 Li-Jun Gong, Yang Zhong.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gong L-J, Zhong Y (2020) Redescription of Pseudopoda taibaischana (Araneae, Sparassidae), with the first description of the female. ZooKeys 991: 111-119. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.991.56969
|
Pseudopoda taibaischana Jäger, 2001 (Sparassidae) is redescribed based on new material from the type locality in Taibaishan Nation Forest Park of Shaanxi Province, China. The female is described and illustrated for the first time, and a redescription is provided for the male.
Biodiversity, huntsman spiders, Shaanxi, taxonomy
The genus Pseudopoda was established by
Specimens were examined and measured with a Leica M205C stereomicroscope. The points arising from the tegular appendages are listed as clock-positions from the left bulb in ventral view. Male palps were examined after dissection and detachment. The epigynes were examined and illustrated after dissection: they were removed and cleared in warm lactic acid before illustration. The vulva was photographed after being embedded in Arabic gum. All photographs were taken with a Leica DFC450 digital camera attached to a Leica M205C stereomicroscope, with 10–20 photographs taken in different focal planes and combined using the image stacking software Leica LAS. Images were edited using Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.
Leg measurements are listed as: total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). The number of spines is listed for each segment in the following order: prolateral, dorsal, retrolateral, ventral (in femora and patellae, ventral spines are absent, and the fourth digit is omitted in the spination formula).
Abbreviations used in the text and figures are given below:
ALE anterior lateral eye;
AME anterior median eye;
AW anterior width of carapace;
C conductor;
CO copulatory opening;
CH clypeus height;
E embolus;
EP embolic projection;
FD fertilization duct;
FE femur;
FW first winding;
LL lateral lobes;
Mt metatarsus;
OL opisthosoma length;
OW opisthosoma width;
Pa patella;
PI posterior incision of LL;
PL carapace length;
PLE posterior lateral eyes;
PME posterior median eyes;
Pp palp;
PP posterior part of spermathecae;
PW carapace width;
RTA retrolateral tibial apophysis;
S spermathecae;
T tegulum;
Ta tarsus;
Ti tibia. I, II, III, IV–legs I to IV.
Family Sparassidae Bertkau, 1872
Sarotes promptus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885.
See
P. daliensis-group (P. anguilliformis
Pseudopoda taibaischana
Jäger, 2001: 86, figs 47a–e (holotype male from Taibaishan National Forest Park of Shaanxi Province, deposited in
2♂, 10♀ (
Pseudopoda taibaischana Jäger, 2001 A–C left male palp (A prolateral view B ventral view C retrolateral view) D, E cheliceral dentition, ventral view (D male E female) F schematic course of internal duct system. Abbreviations: C–conductor, E–embolus, EP–embolic projection, RTA–retrolateral tibial apophysis, T–tegulum. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.
This species resembles Pseudopoda cangshana Jäger & Vedel, 2007 (
Pseudopoda taibaischana Jäger, 2001 A, B Left male palpal tibia (A ventral view B retrolateral view) C epigyne, intact D epigyne, cleared E vulva, cleared F epigyne, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum G vulva, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum (C, D, F ventral view E, G dorsal view). Abbreviations: CO–copulatory opening, FD–fertilization duct, FW–first winding, LL–lateral lobes, PI–posterior incision of LL, S–spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.
Male. PL 3.7, PW 2.8, AW 2.0, OL 4.0, OW 3.2. Eyes and interdistances: AME 0.20, ALE 0.25, PME 0.21, PLE 0.27, AME–AME 0.18, AME–ALE 0.07, PME–PME 0.24, PME–PLE 0.30, AME–PME 0.32, ALE–PLE 0.27, CH AME 0.30, CH ALE 0.28. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2101; Fe: I–III 323, IV 331; Pa: I–IV 001; Ti: I–II 2026, III–IV 2126; Mt: I–II 2024, III 3024, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 6.3 (2.0, 1.1, 1.2, –, 2.0), I 17.9 (4.7, 2.0, 5.4, 4.2, 1.6), II 19.4 (5.4, 2.1, 5.8, 4.3, 1.8), III 14.9 (4.4, 1.6, 4.2, 3.3, 1.4), IV 18.2 (5.2, 1.7, 4.7, 4.9, 1.7). Leg formula: 2-4-1-3. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, each tooth with 22 denticles (Fig.
Palp as in diagnosis. Cymbium longer than tibia. Embolus arising from tegulum at 8 o’clock position, embolic projection making the tip of embolus look somewhat incised. Conductor curved, arising from an 11 o’clock position. Spermophor visible and slightly curved in retrolateral view. RTA arising medially from tibia, with only one apex, broad in retrolateral view (Figs
Female. PL 3.6, PW 3.2, AW 2.3, OL 4.7, OW 3.4. Eyes and interdistances: AME 0.17, ALE 0.23, PME 0.20, PLE 0.26, AME–AME 0.16, AME–ALE 0.10, PME–PME 0.23, PME–PLE 0.30, AME–PME 0.33, ALE–PLE 0.28, CH AME 0.35, CH ALE 0.31. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 1014, 2121; Fe: I–III 323, IV 331; Pa: I–IV 001; Ti: I 2026, III–IV 2126; Mt: I–II 2024, III 3025, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 4.9 (1.6, 0.7, 1.0, –, 1.6), I 12.8 (3.8, 1.7, 3.3, 2.8, 1.2), II 14.0 (4.3, 1.3, 3.7, 3.4, 1.3), III 11.6 (3.5, 1.4, 2.8, 2.9, 1.0), IV 13.3 (4.0, 1.3, 3.3, 3.5, 1.2). Leg formula: 2-4-1-3. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, each tooth with 32 denticles (Fig.
Epigynal field only slightly wider than long, with very short anterior bands or without such bands. Anterior margins of lateral lobes bent anteriorly at their lateral ends. Posterior incision of lateral lobe distinct, near the posterior meeting point of lateral lobes. Base of internal duct system distinctly extending laterally beyond first winding (Fig.
Coloration in ethanol: as in male, but generally darker, abdomen with more spots ventrally (Fig.
We especially thank Dr. Peter Jäger (Senckenberg Research Institute and Museum, Germany) for helping us identify the males of this species. The manuscript benefitted greatly from comments by Drs. Cristina Rheims (Instituto Butantan, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and Alireza Zamani (Zoological Museum, Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku, Finland). This study was financially supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC- 32000303), Natural Sciences Foundation of Hubei Province (2019CFB248), PhD grant from Hubei University Science and Technology (BK201811, BK202114) and Biological Applications of Nuclear Technology, Nuclear Technology Innovation team project of Hubei University of Science and Technology (H2019002).