Research Article |
Corresponding author: Xiang-sheng Chen ( chenxs3218@163.com ) Academic editor: Fred Legendre
© 2021 Ying-jian Wang, Lin Yang, Fei Ye, Xiang-sheng Chen.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wang Y-j, Yang L, Ye F, Chen X-s (2021) A new species of the genus Arria Stål, 1877 (Mantodea, Haaniidae) from China with notes on the tribe Arriini Giglio-Tos, 1919. ZooKeys 1025: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1025.56780
|
A new species of the praying mantis genus Arria Stål, Arria pura sp. nov. from southwest China is described and illustrated. An overview, comparison, and distribution data of this tribe are given. A new synonym is created: Sinomiopteryx yunnanensis Xu, 2007 is a junior synonym of Arria pallida (Zhang, 1987). One new combination Arria brevifrons (Wang, 1991) comb. nov. (from Sinomiopteryx Tinkham), is proposed.
Arriini, Cernomantodea, genitalia, Oriental Region, praying mantis, taxonomy
The tribe Arriini Giglio-Tos, 1919 (Mantodea, Haaniidae) comprises two genera, Arria Stål, 1877 and Sinomiopteryx Tinkham, 1937 (
The species of Arriini are quite similar in appearance and there are few previous descriptions and illustrations of male genitalia. In this paper, during a study of the external morphology and male genitalia of Arriini, we found that Arria and Sinomiopteryx can be easily distinguished by male genitalia and other valuable appearance features, which are also provided to help distinguish the two genera.
Specimens were collected by sweeping net. The tip of the abdomen was separated and macerated in 10% water solution of KOH for about 12 hours, then washed in water and absolute ethanol. The terminalia were isolated into supra-anal and subgenital parts, the phallomeres were separated into left phallomere, ventral phallomere and right phallomere without overlapping, then all parts were preserved in glycerine in a microvial pinned with the specimen. Some wings were removed and mounted on a slide provided with the data of the specimen. External morphology and male genitalia were observed using a Leica M125 stereomicroscope. Photographs of phallomeres, terminalia and wings were taken with Nikon SMZ25, and photographs of the mounted specimens were taken with Canon EOS-70D digital camera with a Canon 100 mm Macro EF Lens or a Laowa 60 mm Macro Lens. Photo stacks were created using Helicon focus 6.0.18. Figures were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6. Measurements were collected with the Keyence VHX-1000 system using the live measurement mode. Numeric patterns of the discoidal spines: The numbers (from left to right) represent the position (proximal to distal). Their value is representative of their respective length relation to the other spines with 1 being the shortest and 4 being the longest spine. Identical values represent equally long spines (
SEM Shanghai Entomological Museum, CAS, Shanghai, China.
The type specimens of Arria pura sp. nov. are deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China (IEGU).
afa phalloid apophysis;
AvS anteroventral spine;
CuA anterior Cubitus;
DS discoidal spine;
fda main posterior lobe of right phallomere;
HT holotype;
L1 sclerite L1 of left phallomere;
L2 sclerite L2 of left phallomere;
L4 sclerite extending over most of the dorsal and ventral walls of left phallic;
L4A ventral sclerite of L4;
L4B dorsal sclerite of L4;
loa membranous lobe of left phallomere;
paa apical process of left phallomere;
pda primary distal process;
pia a process arising from the midlength to posterior right ventral wall of right phallomere, posterolateral to process pva;
pva a process arising from the midlength of the ventral wall of right phallomere, anteromesal to process pia;
PvS posteroventral spine;
PT paratype;
R1A dorsal sclerite of fda;
R1B sclerite on process pia and pva;
R3 anteriorly extending sclerite of right phallomere;
sdp secondary distal process;
sdpm median secondary distal process;
tl terminal lobe of ventral phallomere in Arria.
A. brevifrons (Wang, 1991), China (Zhejiang), comb. nov.
A. cinctipes Stål, 1877, India (Manipur).
A. leigongshanensis, (Ge & Chen, 2008), China (Guizhou, Yunnan).
A. meghalayensis, (Mukherjee, 1995), India (Meghalaya).
A. oreophila, (Tinkham, 1937), China (Sichuan).
A. pallida, (Zhang, 1987), China (Yunnan), S. yunnanensis,
A. pura Wang & Chen, sp. nov., China (Guizhou).
A. sticta (Zhou & Shen, 1992), China (Guizhou, Hunan, Zhejiang).
S. grahami Tinkham, 1937, China (Sichuan).
S. guangxiensis Wang & Bi, 1991, China (Guangxi).
Arriini
Giglio-Tos, 1919: 65;
Arria Stål, 1877.
China, India (Fig.
Arria
Stål, 1877: 46;
Arria cinctipes Stål, 1877, original designation.
Body medium and slender (Fig.
Sinomiopteryx brevifrons
Wang & Bi, 1991: 125;
Holotype, 1♂, China: Zhejiang Prov., Qingyuan County, Baishanzu, 1100 m, 14.X.1963, Gen-tao Jin leg., ID: 0800123 (SEM).
This species was described and illustrated by Wang and Bi in 1991 based on one male specimen from Zhejiang. The ocelli are not closely grouped as in the males of Sinomiopteryx; forewings are narrow, L/W ratio is 4.8 with CuA5, hindwings with pointed apex and brunet band of near apex of vein M. All features fall into the range of Arria. The specimen has had the abdomen removed, but we did not find the genitalia. According to the spots on the forelegs, A. brevifrons can be distinguished from A. pallida and A. sticta.
Arria cinctipes
Stål, 1877: 46;
Palaeothespis leigongshanensis Ge & Chen, 2008: 53–58.
Holotype, 1♂, China: Guizhou Prov., Leigong Mountain National Natural Reserve, 13.IX.2005, Qiong-Zhang Song leg.; Paratype, 1♀, same locality as for holotype, 14.IX.2005, Zhi-Jie Wang leg. (IEGU).
Pseudothespis meghalayensis
Mukherjee, 1995: 60;
Palaeothespis oreophila
Tinkham, 1937: 497–499;
Arria oreophila was described and illustrated by Tinkham based on 1 male and 1 female from Sichuan, China. In
Palaeothespis pallida Zhang, 1987: 239
Sinomiopteryx yunnanensis Xu, 2007: 244 syn. nov.
Holotype, 1♂, China: Yunnan Prov., Lushui County, 10.X.1980, Guo-zhong Zhang leg. (
Holotype: ♂, China: Guizhou Province, Weining County, Jinzhong Town (26°42.34'N, 104°37.29'E), 2550 m, 17.VIII.2017, Ying-Jian Wang; Paratypes: 1♀, same data and locality as holotype (IEGU), PT1; 1♀, Guizhou Province, Weining County, Xueshan Town (27°04.04'N, 104°06.68'E), 2450 m, 2.IX.2019, Feng-E Li, PT2.
Measurements are provided in Table
Measured structure | HT (male) | PT1(female) #1 | PT2(female) |
---|---|---|---|
Head width | 2.6 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Head length | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 |
Lower frons width | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Lower frons length | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Body length | 26.3 | 23.0 | 21.9 |
Pronotum length | 5.3 | 6.1 | 5.7 |
Prozone length | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
Metazone length | 3.2 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
Pronotum max. width | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Forewing length | 21.6 | – | – |
Forewing max. width | 4.0 | – | – |
Forecoxa length | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Forefemur length | 5.3 | 5.6 | 5.3 |
Forefemur max. width | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Foretibia length | 2.8 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Foretarsus length | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
Mesocoxa length | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Mesofemur length | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Mesotibia length | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
Mesotarsus length | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
Metacoxa length | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Metafemur length | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Metatibia length | 5.6 | 4.8 | 4.4 |
Metatarsus length | 4.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Subgenital plate length | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
Subgenital plate width | 1.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Male. Small, slender (Figs
Head
(Fig.
Prothorax
(Fig.
Cervix. No ventral cervical sclerite. Intercervical sclerite merged at middle, without torus intercervicalis. Postcervical plate and furcasternite flat.
Metathorax. With cyclopean ear of DK type.
Forelegs. Forecoxa longer than metazone with anterior lobes diverging, dorsal edge and ventral edge with 3–4 and 9–11 tubercules respectively, all tubercules with small seta (Fig.
Middle and hind legs. Long, cursorial. Meso- and metafemur apically without genicular spine. Meso- and metatibia apically with two spines. Middle 2 to 5 tarsomeres combined 1.6 times as long as middle metatarsus. Hind metatarsus slightly longer than remaining tarsomeres combined.
Wings
(Fig.
Abdomen. Depressed dorsoventrally, coxosternite 9 (subgenital plate) (Fig.
Male genitalia
(Fig.
Coloration. General color brown. Vertex brown; juxtaocular bulges fuscous. Ocelli hyaline. Foretrochanter black ventrally, base anteroventral of forefemur black as well as base of tibial spur groove (Fig.
Female. Apterous (Fig.
Head
(Fig.
Prothorax
(Fig.
Cervix. As in the male.
Metathorax. With cyclopean ear of DNK type.
Forelegs. Forecoxa longer than metazone with anterior lobes diverging, dorsal margin with 5–6 small tubercules, ventral edge with 13–15 smaller tubercules, all tubercules with small seta, anterior and posterior of forecoxa mostly smooth (Fig.
Middle and hind legs. As in the male.
Wings. Apterous, wing pads fused to meso- and metathorax (Fig.
Abdomen. Much wider than male, fusiform. Posterior margin of 1–9 tergites and 2–6 coxosternites with several small tubercles. The lobes on the middle of tergites inconspicuous. Tergite 10 trapezoidal, longer than wide. Cerci short, slightly surpassing tergite 10.
Coloration. General color brown (Fig.
Ootheca
(Fig.
China (Guizhou) (Fig.
The specific name is derived from the Latin words “pura” (meaning pure) which refers to the forewing without any spots.
The new male species is much smaller than all other known species of Arria. Additionally, it can be distinguished from A. brevifrons, A. cinctipes, A. leigongshanensis, A. pallida and A. sticta by tegmina without any spots. Arria pura also differs from A. oreophila in having less forked RP and M.
China: 3♂♂1♀, Guizhou Prov., Dashahe National Natural Reserve, 26.V.2004, Xiang-Sheng Chen and De-Yan Ge leg. (IEGU); 3♂♂, Hunan Prov., Xiaoxi National Natural Reserve, 15–21.VIII.2016, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU); 5♂♂3♀♀, Guizhou Prov., Leigongshan National Natural Reserve, 17–20.VIII.2019, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU).
Palaeothespis sticta Zhou & Shen, 1992: 62–63.
The holotype is probably lost, as we did not find it in the Zhejiang Museum of Natural History where the author used to work. Arria sticta is similar to A. pallida but differs from the latter in that a dark stripe is located along the anteroventral base to the first discoidal spine of forefemur; with three dark spots on the ventral surface of forefemur.
Sinomiopteryx
Tikham, 1937: 495;
Sinomiopteryx grahami Tinkham, 1937, original designation.
Body medium and slender (Fig.
Sinomiopteryx grahami
Tinkham, 1937: 495;
Sinomiopteryx guangxiensis
Wang & Bi, 1991: 126;
Holotype, 1♂, China: Guangxi Prov., Jinxiu county, Laoshan, 24.IX.1981, Gen-tao Jin & Fu-liang Li leg. ID: 08000387 (SEM); 1♂, Guangxi Prov., Tian’e County, Longtan Nature Reserve, 18.VII.2015, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU).
This species was described and illustrated by Wang and Bi in 1991 based on one male specimen from Guangxi, the holotype has had the abdomen removed, but we did not find the genitalia. Fortunately, we collected a male from Guangxi, and it perfectly fits with S. guangxiensis, and can be used as accurate comparative material.
China: 2♂, Guizhou Prov., Ziyun County, Xiaochuandong, 15.XI.2015, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU); 1♂, Guizhou Prov., Ziyun County, Xiaochuandong, 15.IX.2016, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU); 1♂, Guizhou Prov., Ziyun County, Xiaochuandong, 21.X.2019, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU); 1♂, Guizhou prov., Duyun city, Doupengshan, 22.IX.2016, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU); Hunan Prov., Xiaoxi National Natural Reserve, 20.VIII.2016, Ying-jian Wang leg. (IEGU).
China: 1♂, Yunnan Prov., Maguan County, Gulinqing town, 23.VIII.2020, Xiang-jin Liu leg. (IEGU).
Arria is superficially similar to Sinomiopteryx, but differs substantively in details. Arria can be distinguished from the latter by the following characters: (1) ventral phallomere with terminal lobe (tl) (Sinomiopteryx without pl); (2) styli close to each other (styli further apart in Sinomiopteryx) (Figs
We are indebted to Christian J. Schwarz (Ruhr University Bochum, Germany) for providing important literature and suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We are grateful to Cuiqing Gao (Nanjing Forestry University), Liwei Liu (Zhejiang Museum of Natural History), Weibing Zhu (Shanghai Entomological Museum), Floyd W. Shockley (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution), Gavin Svenson (Cleveland Museum of Natural History) for helping us check the types. This work was supported by the Science and technology support program of Guizhou Province (No. 20201Y129), the Program of Excellent Innovation Talents, Guizhou Province (No. 20154021) and the Program of Science and Technology Innovation Talents Team, Guizhou Province (No. 20144001).