Research Article |
Corresponding author: Yucheng Lin ( linyucheng@scu.edu.cn ) Corresponding author: Shuqiang Li ( lisq@ioz.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Yuri Marusik
© 2020 Ya Li, Yucheng Lin, Shuqiang Li.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Li Y, Lin Y, Li S (2020) A review of Crassignatha (Araneae, Symphytognathidae). ZooKeys 988: 63-128. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.988.56188
|
Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995 is redefined to include species with six eyes in three diads, chelicerae fused only near the base, sculpturing on the carapace, one or two clasping spurs on tibia II, a bilateral scutum of the male abdomen, and globular spermathecae and adjacent copulatory openings in the female. A key and distribution map are provided for 24 Crassignatha species in this paper. Diagnoses and illustrated photographs are provided for 22 species from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Thirteen species are described and documented as new to science: C. baihua Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. bangbie Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♀), C. changyan Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♀), C. dongnai Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♀), C. gucheng Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. mengla Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. nantou Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. nasalis Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. rostriformis Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. shunani Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. si Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. thamphra Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♀), and C. xichou Y. Lin & S. Li, sp. nov. (♀). Three new combinations are proposed: C. bicorniventris (Lin & Li, 2009), comb. nov., C. quadriventris (Lin & Li, 2009), comb. nov., and C. shiluensis (Lin & Li, 2009), comb. nov. are transferred from Patu Marples, 1951. DNA barcodes and genetic distances of seventeen species are obtained to confirm correct identification. Types of seven known Chinese Crassignatha species are re-examined, and the taxonomic placement of C. longtou Miller, Griswold & Yin, 2009 may be incorrect based on morphological and molecular data.
Asia, barcode, new combination, new species, redescription, symphytognathids, taxonomy
Symphytognathidae Hickman, 1931 is a category of super miniature (body size ca. 1 mm or less), poorly known, araneoid spiders that contains eight genera and 74 documented extant species (
Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995 was erected as a monotypic genus and originally placed in Synaphridae Wunderlich, 1986. The phylogenetic analysis of
From 2006 to 2018, we have accumulated a considerable number of symphytognathid specimens during many field collecting trips in China, Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, and Indonesia. Some of these specimens were described as new species (
The main aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of Crassignatha and to report 22 species which are found in Southern China and the Indo-China Peninsula. The circumscription and diagnosis of Crassignatha are reconfirmed. Thirteen species are described and designated as new members of Crassignatha, as well as three new combinations that are transferred from Patu Marples, 1951. The types of seven known Crassignatha species from the Gaoligong Mountains in Southwest China are re-examined. A key and distribution records are provided for all Crassignatha species.
Most of the specimens from this study were collected by hand or sifting leaf litter and immediately preserved in a 95% ethanol solution. Type specimens of other known Chinese Crassignatha species were borrowed from the Life College of Sciences, Hunan Normal University in Changsha (
Tissue samples were taken from twenty-eight individuals of Crassignatha, including eleven new and six known species. Molecular data were obtained from specimens collected at the type locality, although not from the type specimens themselves. A partial fragment (636 bp) of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) was amplified and sequenced to calculate the genetic distances between morphologically similar species and to confirm identifications and sex pairing accuracy.
The primers used are: LCO1490 (5'-GGTCAACAAATCATCATAAAGATATTGG-3') and HCO2198 (5'-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3'). Raw sequences were edited and assembled using BioEdit v.7.2.5 (Hall 1999), and the uncorrected pairwise distances between species were calculated using MEGA7.0.14 (Kumar et al. 2016). Results of the genetic distance analysis are shown in Appendix
Abbreviations used in the text or figures are given in Table
Male palp | Epigyne | ||
---|---|---|---|
C | conductor | CD | copulatory duct |
CB | cymbium | CO | copulatory opening |
CT | cymbial tooth | FD | fertilization ducts |
E | embolus | S | spermathecae |
EM | embolic membrane | Sp | scape |
Fe | femur | Ocular area | |
MA | median apophysis | ALE | anterior lateral eye |
Pa | patella | PLE | posterior lateral eye |
T | tegulum | PME | posterior median eye |
Ti | tibia | PER | posterior eye row |
TS | tibial spur on leg II | ||
Institutions | |||
|
College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China | ||
|
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China | ||
|
Natural History Museum of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China |
GenBank accession numbers for new DNA sequence data from seventeen Crassignatha species.
Species | Identifier | Sex/Stage | COI | Collection localities |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crassignatha baihua sp. nov. | HA109 | ♂/adult | MT992007 | China, Yunnan, Longling Co., Baihualing Village |
HA109 | ♀/adult | MT992006 | ||
Crassignatha bangbie sp. nov. | HA137 | ♀/adult | MT992015 | China, Yunnan, Longling Co., Bangbie Village |
Crassignatha dongnai sp. nov. | HA092 | ♀/adult | MT992004 | Vietnam, Dong Nai Pro., Cat Tien National Park |
Crassignatha ertou | HA108 | ♀/adult | MT992005 | China, Yunnan, Baoshan, Mangkuan Town, Baihualing |
Crassignatha gucheng sp. nov. | HA132 | ♀/adult | MT992014 | China, Yunnan, Longling Co., Mt. Xiaohei Nature Reserve |
Crassignatha mengla sp. nov. | HA080 | ♂/juvenile | MT992000 | China, Yunnan, Mengla Co., Baca Nature Reserve |
HA080 | ♀/adult | MT991999 | ||
Crassignatha nantou sp. nov. | HA055 | ♂/adult | MT991996 | China, Taiwan, Nantou Co., Hehuan Hill |
HA055 | ♀/adult | MT991995 | ||
Crassignatha nasalis sp. nov. | HA041 | ♂/adult | MT991992 | China, Sichuan, Guling Co., Yuhua Town, Taoyuan Cave |
HA041 | ♀/adult | MT991991 | ||
Crassignatha pianma | HA113 | ♂/adult | MT992009 | China, Yunnan, Lushui Co., Pianma Town, broad-leaf forest |
HA113 | ♀/adult | MT992008 | ||
Crassignatha quadriventris | HA025 | ♀/adult | MT991990 | China, Hainan, Dongfang City, Nanlang Village, E’xianling |
Crassignatha rostriformis sp. nov. | HA079 | ♂/adult | MT991998 | China, Yunnan, Xichou Co., Xianren Cave |
HA079 | ♀/adult | MT991997 | ||
Crassignatha shiluensis | HA081 | ♂/juvenile | MT992002 | China, Yunnan, Mengla Co., Xishuangbanna Botanical Garden |
HA081 | ♀/adult | MT992001 | ||
Crassignatha shunani sp. nov. | HA046 | ♂/juvenile | MT991994 | China, Sichuan, Guling Co., Dahei Cave |
HA046 | ♀/adult | MT991993 | ||
Crassignatha si sp. nov. | HA141 | ♂/juvenile | MT992017 | China, Yunnan, Yiliang Co., Dazhezong Village, Baiyan Cave |
HA141 | ♀/juvenile | MT992016 | ||
Crassignatha thamphra sp. nov. | HA089 | ♀/adult | MT992003 | Thailand, Khon Kaen Pro., Phu Pha Man Distr., Tham Phra Cave |
Crassignatha yamu | HA115 | ♂/adult | MT992011 | China, Yunnan, Fugong Co., Shilajia Village, Yamu River |
HA115 | ♀/adult | MT992010 | ||
Crassignatha yinzhi | HA117 | ♂/adult | MT992013 | China, Yunnan, Longling Co., Mt. Xiaohei Nature Reserve |
HA117 | ♀/adult | MT992012 |
Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995: 546
Crassignatha
Crassignatha haeneli Wunderlich, 1995 by original designation, from Malaysia.
Crassignatha can be distinguished from Anapistula Gertsch, 1941 by having six eyes vs. four or absent in the latter; and from Anapogonia Simon, 1905 by the chelicerae fused near the base vs. unfused. (The latter is tentatively placed in Symphytognathidae (Plantnick and Forster 1989: 76)). Crassignatha differs from Globignatha Balogh & Loksa, 1968 and Symphytognatha Hickman, 1931 by the chelicerae fused only near the base vs. almost fully fused in the latter two (
Body length 0.50–0.90 in male, 0.60–1.30 in female; six eyes in three diads. Ocular area in male raised more than in female. Carapace sub-rounded or pear shaped, brown or yellow-brown, usually sculptured on surface, but smooth in a few species. Cervical groove distinct. Clypeus concave. Chelicerae usually fused near base, with one or two retromarginal teeth. Labium triangular or semilunar, fused to sternum. Sternum scutellate or heart shaped, slightly plump, surface mostly sculptured, rarely smooth, truncated posteriorly. Legs pale yellow to brown-yellow. Leg formula: I-II-IV-III or I-VI-II-III. Male tibia II usually with two long clasping spurs on ventral-subdistal part (but only one spur in a few species). Abdomen globular or quadrate posteriorly in both sexes, male usually with weakly sclerotized abdominal scutum laterally and posteriorly (absent in few species), with an annular plate around spinnerets. Colulus absent.
Male palps oblate. Cymbium wraps around bulb on the prolateral-ventral surface, with a distal cymbial tooth. Median apophysis present, conductor absent. Embolus sclerotized, usually attached to a transparent embolic membrane at base.
Female genital area weakly sclerotized, internal structure faintly visible through tegument. Majority of species with protruded scape, copulatory opening located at apex of scape. Paired spermathecae globular, separated. Copulatory ducts tortile, usually connected to the posterolateral or dorsal surface of spermathecae. Fertilization ducts usually starting at the posterior or lower inner surface of spermathecae.
Crassignatha baihua sp. nov., C. bangbie sp. nov., C. bicorniventris (Lin & Li, 2009), C. changyan sp. nov., C. danaugirangensis
Southern China (Guizhou, Yunnan, Hainan, and Taiwan), Central Japan (Honshu, Shikoku), Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia.
1 | Males | 2 |
– | Females | 18 |
2 | Embolus long, extending beyond anterior edge of median apophysis (Figs |
3 |
– | Embolus short, not extending beyond anterior edge of median apophysis (Figs |
13 |
3 | Embolus filiform, flexible (Figs |
4 |
– | Embolus spiraled, stiff (Figs |
8 |
4 | Embolus coiled (Figs |
5 |
– | Embolus not coiled (Fig. |
6 |
5 | Embolus coiled into more than two loops (Fig. |
C. shiluensis |
– | Embolus coiled into fewer than two loops (Fig. |
C. yamu |
6 | Embolus filiform, without basal nodule | 7 |
– | Embolus straight, pointed, with a basal nodule (Fig. |
C. yinzhi |
7 | Median apophysis bilobate ( |
C. haeneli |
– | Median apophysis trilobate ( |
C. danaugirangensis |
8 | Embolus twisted anticlockwise (Figs |
9 |
– | Embolus twisted clockwise (Fig. |
C. si sp. nov. |
9 | Cymbial tooth large, hook shaped (Figs |
10 |
– | Cymbial tooth small, tooth-like (Figs |
11 |
10 | Embolic base narrow (Fig. |
C. ertou |
– | Embolic base wide (Fig. |
C. rostriformis sp. nov. |
11 | Embolic tip blunt, stiff (Fig. |
C. nasalis sp. nov. |
– | Embolic tip sharp, narrow (Figs |
12 |
12 | Cymbial tooth sharp, median apophysis lacks a hook (Fig. |
C. shunani sp. nov. |
– | Cymbial tooth blunt, median apophysis with a hook (Fig. |
C. nantou sp. nov. |
13 | Embolic tip blunt (Figs |
14 |
– | Embolic tip pointed (Figs |
16 |
14 | Embolic base wide; cymbial tooth spur-like (Figs |
15 |
– | Embolic base narrow; cymbial tooth spine-like (Fig. |
C. gucheng sp. nov. |
15 | Median apophysis subquadrate, with a hooked process (Fig. |
C. pianma |
– | Median apophysis subtriangular, with a truncated process (Fig. |
C. quanqu |
16 | Embolic tip narrow; median apophysis with a process (Figs |
17 |
– | Embolic tip wide; median apophysis lacks a process (Fig. |
C. mengla sp. nov. |
17 | Embolic apex flat (Fig. |
C. baihua sp. nov. |
– | Embolic apex sloped (Fig. |
C. quadriventris |
18 | Scape long, distinctly protrudes from epigastric furrow (Figs |
19 |
– | Scape short or absent (Figs |
27 |
19 | Copulatory ducts merged into a tubular atrium medially (Figs |
20 |
– | Copulatory duct junction near copulatory opening (Figs |
22 |
20 | Copulatory atrium short, does not extend beyond spermathecal anterior margin | 21 |
– | Copulatory atrium long, extends beyond spermathecal anterior margin (Fig. |
C. si sp. nov. |
21 | Copulatory ducts do not overlap atrium (Fig. |
C. gudu |
– | Copulatory ducts overlap part of atrium (Fig. |
C. yamu |
22 | Copulatory ducts form a V-shape before junction (Figs |
23 |
– | Copulatory ducts nearly parallel at center before junction (Figs |
24 |
23 | Copulatory ducts make two sharp turns (Fig. |
C. yinzhi |
– | Copulatory ducts make four sharp turns (Fig. |
C. ertou |
24 | Copulatory duct connects to spermathecal dorsum (Figs |
25 |
– | Copulatory duct connects to posterior margin of spermathecae (Fig. |
26 |
25 | Copulatory ducts twisted twice in center of vulva (Fig. |
C. gucheng sp. nov. |
– | Copulatory ducts twisted once in center of vulva (Fig. |
C. dongnai sp. nov. |
26 | Copulatory ducts make four turns (Fig. |
C. baihua sp. nov. |
– | Copulatory ducts make six turns (Fig. |
C. quadriventris |
27 | Scape absent (Figs |
28 |
– | Scape present (Figs |
33 |
28 | Copulatory duct loops 3 ×, connects anterolaterally to spermathecae (Fig. |
C. shiluensis |
– | Vulva not as above | 29 |
29 | Spermathecae separated by at least their diameter (Figs |
30 |
– | Spermathecae separated by less than their diameter (Figs |
31 |
30 | Copulatory ducts vertically linked to copulatory opening (Fig. |
C. xichou sp. nov. |
– | Copulatory ducts diagonally linked to copulatory opening (Fig. |
C. changyan sp. nov. |
31 | Copulatory ducts vertical and parallel in center of vulva (Fig. |
C. nantou sp. nov. |
– | Copulatory ducts not as above | 32 |
32 | Copulatory ducts twisted 2× (Fig. |
C. nasalis sp. nov. |
– | Copulatory ducts twisted 4× (Fig. |
C. bicorniventris |
33 | Spermathecae separated by less than 1.5× their diameter | 34 |
– | Spermathecae separated by more than 3× their diameter ( |
C. danaugirangensis |
34 | Copulatory ducts nearly vertically linked to copulatory opening (Figs |
35 |
– | Copulatory ducts diagonally or horizontally linked to copulatory opening | 37 |
35 | Proximal part of copulatory ducts not confluent (Fig. |
C. shunani sp. nov. |
– | Copulatory ducts confluent before reaching copulatory opening (Figs |
36 |
36 | Spermathecae separated by their diameter (Fig. |
C. mengla sp. nov. |
– | Spermathecae spacing does not exceed their diameter (Fig. |
C. rostriformis sp. nov. |
37 | Copulatory ducts horizontally linked to copulatory opening | 38 |
– | Copulatory ducts diagonally linked to copulatory opening | 39 |
38 | Copulatory duct has two inflection points in middle of vulva (Fig. |
C. pianma |
– | Copulatory duct has one inflection point in middle of vulva (Fig. |
C. bangbie sp. nov. |
39 | Proximal copulatory ducts curved (Fig. |
C. quanqu |
– | Proximal copulatory ducts straight (Fig. |
C. thamphra sp. nov. |
Holotype
♂ (
1♂ 13♀ (
Crassignatha baihua sp. nov. is similar to C. quadriventris but can be distinguished by the short, rigid, distally flat embolus (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.64. Carapace 0.32 long, 0.32 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.10 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.44 long, 0.44 wide, 0.48 high. Length of legs: I 0.94 (0.20, 0.10, 0.28, 0.16, 0.20); II 0.84 (0.16, 0.10, 0.24, 0.14, 0.20); III 0.60 (0.10, 0.06, 0.14, 0.12, 0.18); IV 0.68 (0.14, 0.06, 0.18, 0.10, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of the paratypes). Total length 0.96. Carapace 0.36 long, 0.36 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.10 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.64 long, 0.64 wide, 0.72 high. Length of legs: I 1.30 (0.42, 0.14, 0.30, 0.20, 0.24); II 1.06 (0.30, 0.14, 0.24, 0.16, 0.22); III 0.70 (0.18, 0.08, 0.20, 0.08, 0.16); IV 1.02 (0.30, 0.14, 0.24, 0.14, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific epithet is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
♀ (
Crassignatha bangbie sp. nov. is similar to C. pianma but can be distinguished by the copulatory duct having one inflection point in middle of vulva rather than two inflection points as in the latter (Fig.
Female (holotype). Total length 0.80. Carapace 0.32 long, 0.36 wide, 0.32 high. Clypeus 0.14 high. Sternum 0.20 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.52 long, 0.56 wide, 0.60 high. Length of legs: I 1.16 (0.40, 0.12, 0.28, 0.16, 0.20); II 0.92 (0.28, 0.12, 0.24, 0.12, 0.16); III 0.84 (0.24, 0.12, 0.16, 0.12, 0.20); IV 0.96 (0.32, 0.08, 0.24, 0.16, 0.16).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Patu bicorniventris Lin & Li, 2009: 50, figs 1, 2A–D (♀).
Holotype
♀ and paratype 1♀ (
1♀ (
This species resembles C. nasalis sp. nov. but can be distinguished by the copulatory ducts twisting 4× but only 2× in the latter (Fig.
Female (
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
Although we were unable to obtain molecular data for this species, the configuration of the vulva and the modified habitus leave little doubt that it is a member of the genus Crassignatha and not Patu. Therefore, we propose a new combination, Crassignatha bicorniventris (Lin & Li, 2009) comb. nov., transferring it from Patu.
China (Hainan) (Fig.
Holotype
♀ (
Crassignatha changyan sp. nov. is similar to C. xichou sp. nov. but differs by the copulatory ducts diagonally linked to the copulatory opening but vertically linked in the latter (Fig.
Female (holotype). Total length 0.88. Carapace 0.36 long, 0.32 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.14 high. Sternum 0.20 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.56 long, 0.56 wide, 0.60 high. Length of legs: I 1.12 (0.34, 0.20, 0.20, 0.14, 0.24); II 0.96 (0.32, 0.12, 0.16, 0.12, 0.24); III 0.78 (0.26, 0.10, 0.14, 0.08, 0.20); IV 0.98 (0.32, 0.12, 0.18, 0.12, 0.24).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
♀ (
This species is similar to C. gucheng sp. nov. but can be distinguished by the copulatory ducts twisted once in the center of vulva vs. twisted twice in the latter (Fig.
Female (holotype). Total length 1.28. Carapace 0.48 long, 0.40 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.14 high. Sternum 0.28 long, 0.28 wide. Abdomen 0.84 long, 0.76 wide, 0.80 high. Length of legs: I 1.60 (0.54, 0.18, 0.40, 0.24, 0.24); II 1.30 (0.40, 0.14, 0.32, 0.20, 0.24); III 1.00 (0.26, 0.14, 0.20, 0.16, 0.24); IV 1.20 (0.38, 0.14, 0.28, 0.18, 0.22).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Vietnam (Fig.
Crassignatha ertou
Holotype
♂ (
1♂ 7♀ (
The male of C. ertou is similar to that of C. rostriformis sp. nov. but can be distinguished by the narrower embolic base, wider in the latter (Fig.
See
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
♂ (
The male of C. gucheng sp. nov. is similar to that of C. pianma and C. quanqu but can be distinguished by the narrower embolic base and spine-like cymbial tooth vs. a wider embolic base and spur-like cymbial tooth in the latter two (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.72. Carapace 0.32 long, 0.36 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.44 long, 0.44 wide, 0.44 high. Length of legs: I 1.28 (0.38, 0.14, 0.32, 0.20, 0.24); II 0.98 (0.26, 0.14, 0.26, 0.14, 0.18); III 0.78 (0.20, 0.10, 0.16, 0.12, 0.20); IV 0.94 (0.30, 0.12, 0.18, 0.14, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of the paratypes). Total length 1.08. Carapace 0.44 long, 0.40 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.28 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.72 long, 0.72 wide, 0.84 high. Length of legs: I 1.48 (0.56, 0.16, 0.40, 0.14, 0.22); II 1.20 (0.38, 0.16, 0.34, 0.12, 0.20); III 0.84 (0.28, 0.14, 0.18, 0.10, 0.14); IV 1.1 (0.38, 0.14, 0.28, 0.18, 0.12).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan), Vietnam (Fig.
Crassignatha gudu
Holotype
♀ (
Crassignatha gudu can be easily distinguished from other congeners, except C. yamu and C. si sp. nov., by having a columnar atrium formed by the fusion of proximal copulatory ducts (Figs
See
Holotype
♂ (
The male of Crassignatha mengla sp. nov. is similar to that of C. baihua sp. nov. and C. quadriventris (Lin & Li, 2009) comb. nov. but differs by the wider and longer embolic tip and the median apophysis lacks a process, rather than a narrower (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.72. Carapace 0.36 long, 0.32 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.16 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.44 long, 0.40 wide, 0.44 high. Length of legs: I 1.24 (0.38, 0.14, 0.30, 0.18, 0.24); II 1.04 (0.28, 0.14, 0.24, 0.14, 0.24); III 0.74 (0.18, 0.10, 0.14, 0.12, 0.20); IV 0.88 (0.24, 0.12, 0.20, 0.12, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (paratypes). Total length 1.00. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.36 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.14 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.64 long, 0.64 wide, 0.60 high. Length of legs: I 1.38 (0.42, 0.14, 0.36, 0.20, 0.26); II 1.14 (0.30, 0.12, 0.30, 0.18, 0.24); III 0.88 (0.26, 0.10, 0.18, 0.14, 0.20); IV 1.10 (0.38, 0.12, 0.24, 0.14, 0.22).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
♂ (
Crassignatha nantou sp. nov. differs from other congeners, except C. shunani sp. nov., by the long, spiral embolus with a sharp, narrow tip and the separate bases of copulatory ducts (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.80. Carapace 0.36 long, 0.36 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.20 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.52 long, 0.40 wide, 0.60 high. Length of legs: I 1.34 (0.42, 0.14, 0.32, 0.20, 0.26); II 1.10 (0.32, 0.12, 0.26, 0.16, 0.24); III 0.80 (0.22, 0.10, 0.16, 0.12, 0.20); IV 1.02 (0.32, 0.12, 0.22, 0.12, 0.24).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of paratypes). Total length 1.08. Carapace 0.44 long, 0.40 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.16 high. Sternum 0.28 long, 0.28 wide. Abdomen 0.68 long, 0.60 wide, 0.80 high. Length of legs: I 1.68 (0.58, 0.16, 0.42, 0.24, 0.28); II 1.38 (0.46, 0.14, 0.34, 0.22, 0.22); III 1.00 (0.28, 0.12, 0.22, 0.16, 0.22); IV 1.24 (0.42, 0.14, 0.26, 0.18, 0.24).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Taiwan) (Fig.
Holotype
♂ (
The male of C. nasalis sp. nov. is similar to that of C. rostriformis sp. nov. but can be distinguished by the sharp hook of the median apophysis and a straight cymbial tooth vs. a blunt hook of the median apophysis and a hook-like cymbial tooth (Figs
Male (holotype). Total length 0.80. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.32 wide, 0.44 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.52 long, 0.44 wide, 0.56 high. Length of legs: I 1.10 (0.30, 0.14, 0.30, 0.16, 0.20); II 0.92 (0.24, 0.12, 0.24, 0.14, 0.18); III 0.72 (0.20, 0.10, 0.14, 0.10, 0.18); IV 0.82 (0.22, 0.10, 0.20, 0.12, 0.18).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of paratypes). Total length 1.00. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.36 wide, 0.40 high. Clypeus 0.16 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.68 long, 0.68 wide, 0.76 high. Length of legs: I 1.40 (0.46, 0.16, 0.32, 0.20, 0.26); II 1.18 (0.36, 0.14, 0.26, 0.18, 0.24); III 0.82 (0.20, 0.12, 0.16, 0.14, 0.20); IV 1.04 (0.30, 0.14, 0.24, 0.16, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific epithet is a Latin adjective (= nasal) and refers to the shape of the copulatory openings of the epigyne.
China (Sichuan) (Fig.
Crassignatha pianma
Holotype
♂ (
21♂ 93♀ (
The male of C. pianma is similar to C. quanqu in the form of the palp but can be distinguished from the latter by the subquadrate median apophysis with a hooked process, rather than a subtriangular median apophysis with a truncated process (Figs
See
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Patu quadriventris Lin & Li, 2009: 55, figs 7A, B, 8A, B, 9A–E, 10A, B (♂♀).
Holotype
♂ and paratypes 2♂ 2♀ (
1♂ 4♀ (
This species differs from other congeneric species except C. baihua sp. nov. by the short, stiff embolus (Fig.
Male (
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The shape of the male palps, the configuration of the epigyne, the modified carapace, and the male abdominal scutum and clasping spurs on tibia II leave no doubt that this species is a member of Crassignatha and not Patu. Therefore, we propose a new combination, C. quadriventris (Lin & Li, 2009) comb. nov., transferring it from Patu.
Crassignatha quanqu
Holotype
♂ (
The male of Crassignatha quanqu is similar to C. gucheng sp. nov. but can be distinguished by the median apophysis with two tapered distal processes and the details of the palp (Fig.
See
Holotype
♂ (
The male of C. rostriformis sp. nov. is similar to C. nasalis sp. nov. in the form of the palp but differs from the latter by the large, hooked cymbial tooth and the wider embolic base (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.64. Carapace 0.28 long, 0.28 wide, 0.32 high. Clypeus 0.10 high. Sternum 0.20 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.40 long, 0.36 wide, 0.48 high. Length of legs: I 1.04 (0.32, 0.12, 0.24, 0.16, 0.20); II 0.84 (0.22, 0.12, 0.20, 0.12, 0.18); III 0.66 (0.20, 0.10, 0.12, 0.10, 0.14); IV 0.80 (0.26, 0.10, 0.16, 0.12, 0.16).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of paratypes). Total length 0.92. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.36 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.60 long, 0.72 wide, 0.68 high. Length of legs: I 1.36 (0.46, 0.12, 0.32, 0.22, 0.24); II 1.12 (0.38, 0.14, 0.26, 0.16, 0.18); III 0.82 (0.22, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18); IV 1.02 (0.30, 0.12, 0.24, 0.16, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective rostriformis (rostriform), in reference to the shape of the copulatory openings.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Patu shiluensis Lin & Li, 2009: 59, figs 11A, B, 12A, B, 13A–D (♂♀).
Holotype
♂ and paratypes 4♂ 9♀ (
3♂ 8♀ (
This species differs from all other species of Crassignatha by the long embolus coiling into two loops (Fig.
See
A series of combinations: the form of the male palp and the configuration of the epigyne, the chelicerae fused at the base, and the male clasping setae distoventrally on tibia II suggest that this species is more similar to Crassignatha than Patu. It shares homologous characters of Crassignatha, such as a large median apophysis on a slightly oblate male palpal bulb and globular spermathecae rather than a nearly oviform male palpal bulb and claviform spermathecae as in Patu. Thus, we propose a new combination, Crassignatha shiluensis (Lin & Li, 2009) comb. nov., transferring it from Patu.
China (Hainan, Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
♂ (
This species is similar to C. nantou sp. nov. in the form of the male palp and the vulva configuration but can be distinguished by having a sharp cymbial tooth and lacking a hooked process on the median apophysis (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.68. Carapace 0.32 long, 0.28 wide, 0.32 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.20 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.40 long, 0.40 wide, 0.48 high. Length of legs: I 1.02 (0.32, 0.12, 0.24, 0.16, 0.18); II 0.88 (0.24, 0.12, 0.20, 0.16, 0.16); III 0.66 (0.18, 0.10, 0.12, 0.10, 0.16); IV 0.76 (0.22, 0.10, 0.16, 0.12, 0.16).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of paratypes). Total length 0.80. Carapace 0.36 long, 0.32 wide, 0.32 high. Clypeus 0.12 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.56 long, 0.60 wide, 0.64 high. Length of legs: I 1.12 (0.38, 0.12, 0.26, 0.18, 0.18); II 0.94 (0.26, 0.12, 0.22, 0.14, 0.20); III 0.74 (0.18, 0.10, 0.16, 0.12, 0.18); IV 0.88 (0.26, 0.12, 0.18, 0.12, 0.20).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific name is from the Chinese pinyin shŭ nán, referring to the collection locality of this new spider species from southern Sichuan; noun in apposition.
China (Sichuan) (Fig.
Holotype
♂ (
The male of C. si sp. nov. differs from all other congeners by the presence of a helical embolus coiled slightly more than twice (Fig.
Male (holotype). Total length 0.56. Carapace 0.20 long, 0.24 wide, 0.28 high. Clypeus 0.04 high. Sternum 0.16 long, 0.16 wide. Abdomen 0.36 long, 0.36 wide, 0.48 high. Length of legs: I 0.88 (0.24, 0.10, 0.20, 0.14, 0.20); II 0.76 (0.24, 0.08, 0.16, 0.10, 0.18); III 0.6 (0.18, 0.08, 0.12, 0.10, 0.12); IV 0.68 (0.18, 0.08, 0.14, 0.10, 0.18).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (one of paratypes). Total length 0.92. Carapace 0.36 long, 0.32 wide, 0.36 high. Clypeus 0.06 high. Sternum 0.24 long, 0.24 wide. Abdomen 0.56 long, 0.56 wide, 0.52 high. Length of legs: I 1.22 (0.40, 0.16, 0.28, 0.18, 0.20); II 1.02 (0.28, 0.14, 0.22, 0.18, 0.20); III 0.66 (0.16, 0.08, 0.18, 0.10, 0.14); IV 0.86 (0.24, 0.08, 0.22, 0.14, 0.18).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific name is derived from the Chinese pinyin word for “spiral” (si), referring to the shape of the embolus, and is a noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
♀ (
This species differs other Crassignatha species, except C. yinzhi, by the copulatory ducts diagonally connected to the copulatory opening and not fused before reaching copulatory opening. It can be easily distinguished from C. yinzhi by the larger spermathecae separated by less than their diameter and the tighter turns of the copulatory ducts at center of the vulva (Fig.
Female (holotype). Total length 0.64. Carapace 0.32 long, 0.32 wide, 0.28 high. Clypeus 0.10 high. Sternum 0.20 long, 0.20 wide. Abdomen 0.44 long, 0.48 wide, 0.48 high. Length of legs: I 0.92 (0.28, 0.12, 0.20, 0.16, 0.16); II 0.74 (0.22, 0.10, 0.14, 0.12, 0.16); III 0.64 (0.16, 0.10, 0.12, 0.12, 0.14); IV 0.84 (0.24, 0.12, 0.18, 0.12, 0.18).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Thailand (Fig.
Holotype
♀ (
This new species can be easily distinguished from all species of Crassignatha by the lack of a scape, the fertilization ducts starting at the posterolateral margin of the spermathecae, the copulatory ducts connecting to the anterolateral margin of spermathecae, fusing into an H-shaped atrium above copulatory opening (Fig.
Female (holotype). Total length 0.60. Carapace 0.24 long, 0.28 wide, 0.24 high. Clypeus 0.06 high. Sternum 0.16 long, 0.16 wide. Abdomen 0.44 long, 0.40 wide, 0.48 high. Length of legs: I 0.88 (0.24, 0.10, 0.20, 0.14, 0.20); II 0.78 (0.20, 0.10, 0.18, 0.12, 0.18); III 0.64 (0.14, 0.10, 0.14, 0.10, 0.16); IV 0.74 (0.20, 0.10, 0.16, 0.10, 0.18).
Somatic characters (Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Crassignatha yamu
Holotype
♂ (
6♂ 8♀ (
The male of C. yamu is most similar to that of C. haeneli, C. danaugirangensis, and C. shiluensis in the form of the palp and the long, linear embolus but differs from C. haeneli and C. danaugirangensis by the spiral embolus on the ventral portion of the palpal bulb (Fig.
See
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Crassignatha yinzhi
Holotype
♂ (
6♂ 6♀ (
The male of C. yinzhi is similar to C. ertou but can be distinguished by the nearly straight embolus and the caniniform cymbial tooth, rather than spiraled embolus and hooked cymbial tooth in the latter (Fig.
See
China (Yunnan) (Fig.
Distribution records of Crassignatha spp. in Asia. 1 C. baihua sp. nov. 2 C. bangbie sp. nov. 3 C. bicorniventris 4 C. changyan sp. nov. 5 C. danaugirangensis 6 C. dongnai sp. nov. 7 C. ertou 8 C. gucheng sp. nov. 9 C. gudu 10 C. haeneli 11 C. mengla sp. nov. 12 C. nantou sp. nov. 13 C. nasalis sp. nov. 14 C. pianma 15 C. quadriventris 16 C. quanqu 17 C. rostriformis sp. nov. 18 C. shiluensis 19 C. shunani sp. nov. 20 C. si sp. nov. 21 C. thamphra sp. nov. 22 C. xichou sp. nov. 23 C. yamu 24 C. yinzhi.
The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Yuri Marusik (Magadan, Russia) and Akio Tanikawa (Tokyo, Japan). Theo Blick (Hummeltal, Germany) checked etymology. Sarah Crews (San Francisco, USA) corrected the English of the final manuscript. Permission for field surveys was granted by Biodiversity Institute of Gongshan Administration Bureau (Director: Yingchun Li). Xianjin Peng and Xiang Xu (Changsha, China) facilitated the loan of type material of Chinese symphytognathids from the Gaoligong Mountains. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31772410, 31750002, 31972870).
Uncorrected genetic pairwise distance (below diagonal) and standard error (above diagonal) of a partial fragment of COI from the seventeen species discussed in this text.
Species | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♀ | ♀ | ♀ | ♀ | ♂J | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂J | ♀ | ♂J | ♀J | ♂J | ♀ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | |||
1 | C. baihua sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.003 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
♂ | 0.005 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |||
2 | C. bangbie sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.090 | 0.088 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
3 | C. dongnai sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.045 | 0.044 | 0.090 | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
4 | C. ertou | ♀ | 0.104 | 0.099 | 0.101 | 0.106 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
5 | C. gucheng sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.022 | 0.021 | 0.087 | 0.044 | 0.103 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
6 | C. mengla sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.040 | 0.039 | 0.080 | 0.026 | 0.103 | 0.037 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
♂J | 0.040 | 0.039 | 0.080 | 0.026 | 0.103 | 0.037 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |||
7 | C. nantou sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.097 | 0.096 | 0.090 | 0.094 | 0.101 | 0.097 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
♂ | 0.097 | 0.096 | 0.090 | 0.094 | 0.101 | 0.097 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |||
8 | C. nasalis sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.081 | 0.085 | 0.097 | 0.080 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
♂ | 0.083 | 0.081 | 0.078 | 0.080 | 0.096 | 0.078 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||
9 | C. pianma | ♀ | 0.083 | 0.081 | 0.062 | 0.085 | 0.105 | 0.076 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.105 | 0.105 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
♂ | 0.080 | 0.078 | 0.057 | 0.083 | 0.099 | 0.076 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||
10 | C. quadriventris | ♀ | 0.032 | 0.031 | 0.088 | 0.044 | 0.104 | 0.027 | 0.035 | 0.035 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.088 | 0.083 | 0.081 | 0.078 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
11 | C. rostriformis sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.068 | 0.066 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 0.094 | 0.071 | 0.066 | 0.066 | 0.088 | 0.088 | 0.074 | 0.071 | 0.073 | 0.067 | 0.068 | 0.001 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.011 | |
♂ | 0.069 | 0.068 | 0.073 | 0.076 | 0.096 | 0.073 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.076 | 0.073 | 0.074 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.002 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.011 | |||
12 | C. shiluensis | ♀ | 0.144 | 0.150 | 0.155 | 0.147 | 0.175 | 0.147 | 0.151 | 0.151 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 0.140 | 0.136 | 0.157 | 0.155 | 0.149 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | |
♂J | 0.144 | 0.150 | 0.155 | 0.147 | 0.175 | 0.147 | 0.151 | 0.151 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 0.140 | 0.136 | 0.157 | 0.155 | 0.149 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | |||
13 | C. shunani sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.099 | 0.097 | 0.088 | 0.101 | 0.108 | 0.092 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.068 | 0.071 | 0.096 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.094 | 0.134 | 0.134 | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.012 | |
♂J | 0.101 | 0.099 | 0.087 | 0.103 | 0.110 | 0.094 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.069 | 0.073 | 0.097 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.096 | 0.142 | 0.142 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |||
14 | C. si sp. nov. | ♀J | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.078 | 0.083 | 0.094 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.080 | 0.078 | 0.083 | 0.078 | 0.074 | 0.064 | 0.066 | 0.149 | 0.149 | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.000 | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
♂J | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.078 | 0.083 | 0.094 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.080 | 0.078 | 0.083 | 0.078 | 0.074 | 0.064 | 0.066 | 0.149 | 0.149 | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.000 | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||
15 | C. thamphra sp. nov. | ♀ | 0.090 | 0.088 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.104 | 0.083 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.108 | 0.108 | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.095 | 0.092 | 0.088 | 0.080 | 0.081 | 0.142 | 0.142 | 0.104 | 0.110 | 0.095 | 0.095 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
16 | C. yamu | ♀ | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.085 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.087 | 0.083 | 0.103 | 0.097 | 0.090 | 0.076 | 0.078 | 0.163 | 0.163 | 0.101 | 0.103 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0.097 | 0.003 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
♂ | 0.094 | 0.092 | 0.087 | 0.097 | 0.096 | 0.081 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.082 | 0.078 | 0.094 | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.071 | 0.073 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.092 | 0.094 | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.094 | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||
17 | C. yinzhi | ♀ | 0.092 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.088 | 0.076 | 0.081 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.074 | 0.069 | 0.083 | 0.081 | 0.087 | 0.081 | 0.083 | 0.151 | 0.151 | 0.083 | 0.088 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.080 | 0.094 | 0.088 | 0.004 | |
♂ | 0.092 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.088 | 0.073 | 0.081 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.071 | 0.069 | 0.080 | 0.078 | 0.087 | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 0.088 | 0.090 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.078 | 0.094 | 0.088 | 0.010 |