Research Article
Print
Research Article
Seven new species of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) from Xishuangbanna, China
expand article infoCheng Wang, Shuqiang Li§
‡ Tongren University, Tongren, China
§ Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Seven new species of jumping spiders collected from Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden in Yunnan, China, are diagnosed and described: Charippus yinae sp. nov. (♂♀), Chinattus inflatus sp. nov. (♂), Indomarengo yui sp. nov. (♂), Phintella banna sp. nov. (♂♀), P. mii sp. nov. (♂♀), Simaetha menglun sp. nov. (♂♀) and S. pengi sp. nov. (♂♀). Charippus yinae sp. nov. is the second species of the genus Charippus Thorell, 1895, which was previously known only from one sex.

Keywords

distribution, genus, salticid, taxonomy, Yunnan

Introduction

Xishuangbanna is a key biogeographic area and a biodiversity hotspot in China (Myers 1988). Spider diversity in the area is high, with 782 species spanning 305 genera in 46 families (Li 2020). The Salticidae Blackwall, 1841 from this region have been studied by Peng and Yin (1991), Song (1991), Peng (1995), Xie and Peng (1995), Peng and Kim (1997), Song and Zhu (1998), Xiao (2002), Xiao and Wang (2004), Cao et al. (2016), Wang and Li (2020), and Lin and Li (2020). These studies have resulted in the description of 45 new species and increased the total salticid species number to 121 in the last 30 years (Lin and Li 2020). At least 19 salticid species described as new from Xishuangbanna are known only from a single sex, and sparsely collected new species are frequently being discovered as a result of the ongoing project “All Species Inventory” of spiders from the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden. Our results thus far indicate that the salticid fauna of Xishuangbanna remains insufficiently known and requires further research.

A taxonomic study on the recently available salticid samples of Xishuangbanna has revealed seven species that are new to science and are described here. These results increase the total number of salticid species in the region to 128.

Materials and methods

Specimens were collected by fogging and sieving leaf litter in the tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Yunnan, China. All specimens were preserved in 75% ethanol and are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IZCAS) in Beijing, China. The specimens were examined with an Olympus SZ51 stereomicroscope. After dissection, the epigyne was cleared in trypsin enzyme solution before examination and imaging. Images of the copulatory organs and habitus were taken with a Kuy Nice CCD mounted on an Olympus BX51 compound microscope. Compound focus images were generated using Helicon Focus v. 6.7.1.

All measurements are given in millimeters. Leg measurements are given as: total length (femur, patella + tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). References to figures in the cited papers are listed in lowercase type (fig. or figs); figures in this paper are noted with an initial capital (Fig. or Figs). Abbreviations used in the text and figures are as follows:

AAM anterior atrial margin;

AER anterior eye row;

AERW anterior eye row width;

ALE anterior lateral eye;

AME anterior median eye;

AS anterior chamber of spermatheca;

BP basal plate;

CD copulatory duct;

CO copulatory opening;

CP cymbial process;

E embolus;

EC embolic coil;

EFL eye field length;

F fold;

FD fertilization duct;

H hood;

LAM lateral atrial margin;

LP lamellar process;

PERW posterior eye row width;

PL posterior lobe;

PLE posterior lateral eye;

PS posterior chamber of spermatheca;

RFA retrolateral femoral apophysis;

RTA retrolateral tibial apophysis;

S spermatheca;

SD sperm duct;

TB tegular bump.

Taxonomy

Family Salticidae Blackwall, 1841

Charippus Thorell, 1895

Type species

Charippus errans Thorell, 1895

Comments

This monotypic genus is only known from the descriptions of the generotype male (Thorell 1895; WSC 2020). Charippus is similar to Cytaea Keyserling, 1882 by the general shape of the copulatory organs, especially the spiral embolus and the long and coiled copulatory ducts but can be distinguished by the following: 1) the carapace is slightly narrowed anteriorly vs almost square in Cytaea species; 2) the color of the habitus is dark rather than light, as in Cytaea species, indicating that Charippus likely comprises leaf-litter dwellers rather than foliage dwellers, as in Cytaea; 3) the RTA is distinctly longer than in Cytaea species; 4) the male chelicerae only have two promarginal teeth vs at least three promarginal teeth in Cytaea species; 5) the epigyne lacks a distinct median septum, which is present in Cytaea species.

Charippus yinae sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40601), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Leprosy Village (21°53.59'N, 101°17.30'E, ca 550 m), 29.04.2019, Y. Tong et al. leg. Paratypes 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar40602), same data as holotype; 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar40603), Flower Garden (21°55.80'N, 101°45.41'E, ca 530 m), 1.08.2018, C. Wang et al. leg.

Etymology

The species name is a patronym in honor of the late Professor Changmin Yin, one of the pioneers of spider taxonomy of China; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Charippus yinae sp. nov. resembles C. errans Thorell, 1895 by the habitus, shape of the palp, and the cheliceral dentition, but can be easily distinguished by the embolus originating at 9:00 o’clock rather than approximately 11:30 o’clock as in C. errans (Wanless 1988: fig. 40F), and the RTA is curved towards the bulb medially in retrolateral view, instead of curved towards the bulb terminally as in C. errans (Wanless 1988: fig. 40H). The female resembles Cytaea alburna Keyserling, 1882 by the very long, coiled copulatory ducts and the small spermathecae but can be easily distinguished by the following: 1) the carapace is slightly narrowed anteriorly rather than almost square as in C. alburna (Davies and Żabka 1989: 226); 2) the median septum is absent vs present in C. alburna (Davies and Żabka 1989: 226); 3) the chelicerae have only two promarginal teeth vs three promarginal teeth as in C. alburna (Davies and Żabka 1989: 226).

Description

Male (Figs 1, 2C, D, F, G). Total length 3.91. Carapace 1.98 long, 1.56 wide. Abdomen 2.04 long, 1.48 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.38, ALE 0.22, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.28, PERW 1.24, EFL 0.97. Legs: I 3.83 (1.15, 1.61, 0.68, 0.39), II 3.53 (1.07, 1.39, 0.68, 0.39), III 3.78 (1.22, 1.29, 0.88, 0.39), IV 4.27 (1.22, 1.49, 1.07, 0.49). Carapace dark brown, with an irregular red area in the middle of the thoracic part, bearing dense white setae on the cheeks and white and golden setae dorsally. Clypeus dark, with sparse white setae. Fovea longitudinal, dark. Chelicerae red to dark brown, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal fissident with two cusps. Endites red-brown, paler inner margin. Labium dark brown. Sternum somewhat shield-shaped, with sparse setae. Legs I red to dark brown; other legs yellow, with dark markings. Abdomen suboval, dorsum hirsute, with two pairs of faint pale patches anteriorly and a pair of posterolateral falcate bands followed by several chevrons; venter dark anteriorly, covered by small spots and thin brown setae.

Figure 1. 

Male palp of the holotype of Charippus yinae sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1.

Palp (Fig. 1A–D): tibia wider than long in ventral view, with a RTA approximately two times the tibial length, slightly curved medially and blunt at the tip in retrolateral view; cymbium hirsute, proximodorsally with a small process (Fig. 1D, CP) near the RTA base; bulb swollen, with sperm duct strongly curved retrolaterally; embolus originating at around 9:00 o’clock, coiled 1.5 times.

Female (Fig. 2A, B, E). Total length 3.83. Carapace 1.83 long, 1.38 wide. Abdomen 2.13 long, 1.45 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.36, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.21, AERW 1.20, PERW 1.14, EFL 0.88. Legs: I 3.08 (0.98, 1.27, 0.49, 0.34), II 2.88 (0.95, 1.10, 0.49, 0.34), III 3.32 (1.10, 1.15, 0.73, 0.34), IV 3.58 (1.12, 1.29, 0.83, 0.34). Habitus similar to that of male except slightly paler.

Figure 2. 

Charippus yinae sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D holotype habitus, ventral E paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicerae, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 (A, B, G); 0.5 (C–F).

Epigyne (Fig. 2A, B): wider than long, with a pair of arc-shaped anterior atrial margins and a pair of lateral atrial margins; copulatory openings small, slit-shaped, located anterolaterally; copulatory ducts very long, curved into a U-shape at the origin, with anterior tubercles and complex coils; spermathecae suboval, separated from each other by almost two times their width; fertilization ducts nearly cordiform.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Chinattus Simon, 1876

Type species

Habrocestoides szechwanensis Prószyński, 1992

Comments

The genus is represented by 17 nominal species restricted to Asia, except C. parvulus (Banks, 1895), which is known from the USA and Canada. Diagnostic drawings have been made for all species in the genus, and nearly all have limited distributional ranges: 11 species are endemic, and five species are known only from two countries. Six species are known only from a single sex: two from males and four from females (all from China). To date, 12 species are recorded from China. Of those, eight are endemic (WSC 2020).

Chinattus inflatus sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40604), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, tropical rainforest (21°55.20'N, 101°16.21'E, ca 550 m), 30.04.2019, Y. Tong et al. leg. Paratype 1♂ (IZCAS-Ar40605), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The specific name refers to the inflated femur of the male palp; adjective.

Diagnosis

Chinattus inflatus sp. nov. resembles C. wengnanensis Cao & Li, 2016 in the general shape of the habitus and male palp but can be easily distinguished by the inflated palpal femur, the femoral apophysis and the long embolus. The new species also resembles species of the genus Grayenulla Żabka, 1992 by the inflated palpal femur and the femoral apophysis but can be distinguished by leg III, which is one of the shortest legs rather than distinctly the longest as in species of Grayenulla. Additionally, the clypeus lacks bristles, whereas there are three central bristles in species of Grayenulla (Żabka 1992).

Description

Male (Figs 3, 4). Total length 2.72. Carapace 1.53 long, 1.14 wide. Abdomen 1.19 long, 0.92 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.36, ALE 0.21, PLE 0.17, AERW 1.13, PERW 1.08, EFL 0.57. Legs: I 2.82 (0.85, 1.12, 0.46, 0.39), II 2.38 (0.73, 0.85, 0.41, 0.39), III 2.65 (0.85, 0.85, 0.56, 0.39), IV 2.75 (0.88, 0.85, 0.63, 0.39). Carapace brown, dark in eye field, bearing white, thin setae on the lateral submargin, and golden, thin setae on the cheeks and cephalic region. Clypeus dark. Fovea longitudinal, short, bar-shaped. Chelicerae red-brown, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal fissident. Endites, labium and sternum paler than chelicerae. Legs red-brown to dark brown, with pale rings on femora and metatarsi. Abdomen suboval, dorsum brown, speckled, with three pairs of irregular white spots and two pairs of muscle depressions; venter darker than dorsum, with a pair of off-white longitudinal bands laterally and a pair of dotted lines medially.

Figure 3. 

Male palp of the holotype of Chinattus inflatus sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D bulb, ventral. Scale bars: 0.1.

Figure 4. 

Chinattus inflatus sp. nov., male holotype A habitus, dorsal B habitus, ventral C carapace, frontal D chelicerae, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.5 (A–C); 0.1 (D).

Palp (Fig. 3A–D): femur inflated, more than 1.5 times longer than wide, with a subtriangular retrolateral apophysis proximally; tibia wider than long, with a sclerotized, short RTA extending towards the bulb in retrolateral view and almost completely hidden by the bulb in ventral view; posterior lobe well-developed, with oval margin; embolus flat and straight, tapered to a pointed tip.

Female. Unknown.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Comments

The species is placed into this genus because it generally resembles C. wengnanensis Cao & Li, 2016. It is described only based on males, and so there is a possibility that it is conspecific to one of the congeners known only from females.

Indomarengo Benjamin, 2004

Type species

Indomarengo sarawakensis Benjamin, 2004

Comments

This genus only contains four species, all endemic: one from Borneo, two from Indonesia and one from India. Two are known only from a single sex: I. chandra Benjamin, 2004 from males and I. thomsoni (Wanless 1978) from females (WSC 2020). The genus can be distinguished from all other Ballini genera, except Sadies Wanless, 1984, Leikung Benjamin, 2004, and Afromarengo Benjamin, 2004, by the presence of a carapace protuberance. It can be distinguished from Afromarengo and Leikung by the short embolus, which has less than two spirals, and from Sadies by the lack of leaf-like carapace scales (Benjamin 2004).

Indomarengo yui sp. nov.

Figs 5, 6

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40606), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, garbage dump, secondary tropical rainforest (21°54.30'N, 101°16.78'E, ca 620 m), 26.04.2019, H. Yu et al. leg. Paratype 1♂ (IZCAS-Ar40607), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The specific name is a patronym after Prof. Hao Yu (Guiyang, China), one of the collectors of the new species; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Indomarengo yui sp. nov. resembles I. chavarapater Malamel, Prajapati, Sudhikumar & Sebastian, 2019 by the general shape of the palp but can be distinguished by the RTA, which is distally curved towards the bulb in retrolateral view vs almost straight and directed anteriorly in I. chavarapater (Malamel et al. 2019: figs 11, 15); and by the tibia, which is wider than long vs almost as long as wide in I. chavarapater (Malamel et al. 2019: figs 10, 11, 15, 16).

Figure 5. 

Male palp of the holotype of Indomarengo yui sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D bulb, retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1.

Description

Male (Figs 5, 6). Total length 3.12. Carapace 1.36 long, 0.85 wide. Abdomen 1.67 long, 0.76 wide. Clypeus 0.05 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.29, ALE 0.12, PLE 0.12, AERW 0.75, PERW 0.78, EFL 0.53. Legs: I 3.46 (0.93, 1.51, 0.80, 0.22), II 1.79 (0.54, 0.66, 0.37, 0.22), III 1.67 (0.49, 0.59, 0.37, 0.22), IV 2.09 (0.63, 0.78, 0.46, 0.22). Carapace flat, red-brown to dark brown, there are white setae behind the PLEs and posteriorly, with a distinct protuberance on the thoracic region. Clypeus dark. Fovea indistinct. Chelicerae red-brown, with three retromarginal teeth and two promarginal teeth. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum red-brown, elongated and tapered posteriorly, covered with thin setae. Legs I enlarged, with inflated tibia bearing ventral leaf-shaped scales and five spines; other legs pale, with dark stripes laterally on femora and patellae. Abdomen elongated oval, dorsum brown to dark brown, constricted at first anterior third, with white setae at lateral margins; venter pale to brown.

Figure 6. 

Indomarengo yui sp. nov., male holotype A habitus, dorsal B habitus, lateral C habitus, ventral D chelicerae, dorsal E left leg I, prolateral. Scale bars: 0.5 (A–C, E); 0.1 (D).

Palp (Fig. 5A–D): tibia wider than long, with a thin RTA approximately two times the tibial length, widened at the base and curved towards bulb terminally; bulb inflated, divided by a furrow; embolus short, coiled, forming two circles, and partly covered by a membranous structure.

Female. Unknown.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Comments

The species has a distinct carapace protuberance, which is only known to occur in species of the genera Indomarengo Benjamin, 2004, Sadies Wanless, 1984, Leikung Benjamin, 2004, and Afromarengo Benjamin, 2004 of the Ballini. Based on similarities such as the short embolus with less than two spirals and lack of leaf-like carapace scales (more than two spirals in Leikung and Afromarengo species and leaf-like carapace scales present in Sadies species) in addition to closely resembling I. chavarapater Malamel, Prajapati, Sudhikumar & Sebastian, 2019 by the habitus and the shape of the male palp, we place the spider into this genus.

Phintella Strand, 1906

Type species

Telamonia bifurcilinea Bösenberg & Strand, 1906

Comments

Phintella is a rather large genus, represented by a group of small and colorful spiders, typically covered with metallic iridescent scales (Luong et al. 2016). A total of 60 nominal species have been described, primarily from the Afrotropical, Oriental, and Palearctic regions. Diagnostic drawings have been made for all species in the genus, and 27 species are known only from a single sex: 13 from females and 14 from males. To date, 47 species are known from Asia, including 29 from China. Among the Chinese Phintella, 16 are endemic and 12 are known from only a single sex: six from males and six from females (WSC 2020). Based on the continuous discovery of undescribed species in our recent fieldwork, it is likely that the true diversity of Chinese Phintella is much greater than currently known.

Phintella banna sp. nov.

Figs 7, 8

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40608), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Leprosy Village (21°53.59'N, 101°17.30'E, ca 550 m), 4.05.2019, Y. Tong et al. leg. Paratypes 5♀3♂ (IZCAS-Ar40609–40616), same data as holotype; 1♀3♂ (IZCAS-Ar40617–40620), Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, tropical rainforest (21°55.35'N, 101°16.36'E, ca 610 m), 7.08.2018, C. Wang et al. leg.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the name of the type locality; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

Phintella banna sp. nov. resembles P. bifurcilinea (Bösenberg & Strand, 1906) by the small size and the shape of the copulatory organs but can be distinguished by the following: 1) the lamellar process is visible in ventral view vs obscured in P. bifurcilinea (Żabka 1985: fig. 403); 2) the embolus is apically directed anteriorly in ventral view vs directed retrolaterally in P. bifurcilinea (Żabka 1985: fig. 403); 3) the chelicerae of the male are underdeveloped, the ratio of the length of the fang to the width of the paturon is about 1:1 vs well-developed chelicerae, with a ratio of almost 2.5:1 in P. bifurcilinea (Żabka 1985: fig. 406); 4) the copulatory openings are anterior to the spermathecae vs lateral to the spermathecae in P. bifurcilinea (Peng et al. 1993: fig. 527); 5) the copulatory ducts are approximately one-third of the spermathecal diameter vs less than one-fifth of the spermathecal diameter in P. bifurcilinea (Peng et al. 1993: fig. 527).

Description

Male (Figs 7, 8C, D, F, G). Total length 2.41. Carapace 1.34 long, 1.02 wide. Abdomen 1.12 long, 0.88 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.33, ALE 0.17, PLE 0.15, AERW 1.01, PERW 0.98, EFL 0.64. Legs: I 2.73 (0.82, 0.98, 0.59, 0.34), II 2.66 (0.80, 0.93, 0.59, 0.34), III 3.25 (1.01, 1.07, 0.83, 0.34), IV 3.46 (1.10, 1.12, 0.90, 0.34). Carapace dark brown, slightly paler medially in the thoracic area, with yellow and pale scales on the cheeks. Clypeus dark brown. Fovea indistinct. Chelicerae yellow-brown to brown, with one retromarginal tooth and two promarginal teeth. Endites green-brown, pale yellow along the inner edge. Labium wider than long, paler terminally. Sternum green-brown, covered with thin setae. Legs pale to green-brown. Abdomen oval, dorsum hairy, with two pairs of muscle depressions and a transverse white band of scales in the center, followed by recurved dotted lines; venter colored as dorsum, darker medially.

Figure 7. 

Male palp of the holotype of Phintella banna sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1.

Palp (Fig. 7A–D): tibia wider than long, with a tapered RTA terminally curved towards the bulb and pointed apically in retrolateral view; bulb flat, with a lamellar process near the base of the embolus, approximately three times longer than wide, with a small subtriangular bump and a gently curved posterior lobe reaching the middle of the tibia in ventral view; sperm duct long, strongly curved anteriorly; embolus bar-shaped, almost equal to the length of the lamellar process.

Female (Fig. 8A, B, E). Total length 3.07. Carapace 1.29 long, 1.04 wide. Abdomen 1.76 long, 1.33 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.32, ALE 0.18, PLE 0.16, AERW 1.04, PERW 1.01, EFL 0.67. Legs: I 2.31 (0.73, 0.80, 0.49, 0.29), II 2.25 (0.71, 0.76, 0.44, 0.34), III 2.88 (0.88, 0.93, 0.73, 0.34), IV 3.31 (1.02, 1.07, 0.88, 0.34). Habitus similar to that of the male except the transverse abdominal white band is indistinct laterally, and the dorsum of the abdomen with a brown, thin, longitudinal band in the middle.

Figure 8. 

Phintella banna sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D holotype habitus, ventral E paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicerae, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 (A, B, G); 0.5 (C–F).

Epigyne (Fig. 8A, B): wider than long, with an arc-shaped basal plate; copulatory openings anteriorly located, slit-shaped, the distance between them almost equal to the spermathecal diameter; copulatory ducts curved anteriorly, and then descend along the longitudinal axis to connect to the postero-ento-lateral part of the spermathecae; spermathecae spherical, separated from each other by less than one-third their diameter; fertilization ducts well-developed, lamellar, anterior to spermathecae.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Phintella mii sp. nov.

Figs 9, 10

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40621), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, tropical rainforest (21°55.35'N, 101°16.36'E, ca 610 m), 29.07.2018, X. Mi et al. leg. Paratype 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar40622), Palm Garden (21°55.47'N, 101°15.05'E, ca 550 m), 6.08.2018, C. Wang et al. leg.

Etymology

The specific name is a patronym after Prof. Xiaoqi Mi (Tongren, China), one of the collectors of the new species; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Phintella mii sp. nov. resembles P. aequipeiformis Żabka, 1985 in the shape of the palp but can be distinguished by the following: 1) the distance between the embolus and cymbial tip is almost equal to the embolic length vs more than three times the embolic length in P. aequipeiformis (Luong et al. 2016: fig. 4A, D, E); 2) proximally, the RTA is strongly curved dorsally in retrolateral view vs straight in P. aequipeiformis (Luong et al. 2016: fig. 4B); 3) the chelicerae of the male are underdeveloped, the ratio of the length of the fang to the width of the paturon is about 1:1 vs well-developed chelicerae, with a ratio of almost 2.5:1 in P. aequipeiformis (Luong et al. 2016: fig. 3I). The female of this new species can be easily distinguished from other congeners by having an anterior subtriangular lamellar epigynal fold (Fig. 10A, F), which is absent in other species.

Description

Male (Figs 9, 10C, D, F, G). Total length 2.39. Carapace 1.05 long, 0.95 wide. Abdomen 1.15 long, 0.76 wide. Clypeus 0.05 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.30, ALE 0.15, PLE 0.14, AERW 0.93, PERW 0.91, EFL 0.59. Legs: I 2.46 (0.73, 0.90, 0.51, 0.32), II 2.20 (0.68, 0.76, 0.44, 0.32), III 2.68 (0.80, 0.88, 0.66, 0.34), IV 2.92 (0.90, 0.95, 0.73, 0.34). Carapace nearly square, bearing sparse white scales on cheeks, between both ALEs and PLEs and posteriorly, with a pair of indistinct stripes anteriorly and two pairs of round, dark markings near the PMEs and the posterior margin. Clypeus yellow-brown. Fovea longitudinal, short, bar-shaped. Chelicerae yellow, with one retromarginal tooth and two promarginal teeth. Endites yellow to green-brown. Labium dark brown. Sternum green-brown, heart-shaped, covered by dense, white setae. Legs pale to green-brown. Abdomen suboval, dorsum green-brown, speckled, with a nearly square white marking posteriorly, followed by a round, dark spot; venter dark brown, with a pair of longitudinal dotted lines medially.

Figure 9. 

Male palp of the holotype of Phintella mii sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1.

Palp (Fig. 9A–D): tibia wider than long, with a RTA proximally curved dorsally, and then curved towards bulb terminally, pointed at the tip in retrolateral view; bulb flat, with sperm duct strongly bent anteriorly; lamellar process small, nearly round, tegular bump located retrolatero-medially; embolus short, tapered, with a blunt tip directed antero-prolaterally in ventral view.

Female (Fig. 10A, B, E). Total length 3.04. Carapace 1.24 long, 1.01 wide. Abdomen 1.52 long, 1.12 wide. Clypeus 0.06 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.32, ALE 0.16, PLE 0.15, AERW 1.01, PERW 1.00, EFL 0.67. Legs: I 2.16 (0.68, 0.80, 0.44, 0.24), II 2.14 (0.68, 0.76, 0.46, 0.24), III missing, IV 3.05 (0.93, 1.05, 0.78, 0.29). Carapace yellow, with a pair of longitudinal dark stripes anteriorly in eye field and two pairs of dark brown patches close to PMEs and the posterior margin of the thoracic area. Abdomen suboval, dorsum pale, with indistinct transverse brown stripes medially and a round, brown spot at the terminus; venter colored as dorsum.

Figure 10. 

Phintella mii sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D holotype habitus, ventral E paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicerae, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 (A, B, G); 0.5 (C–F).

Epigyne (Fig. 10A, B): with a slightly recurved basal plate; copulatory openings located anteriorly, obscured by an inverted subtriangular lamellar epigynal fold; copulatory ducts extending transversely before extending posteriorly along the longitudinal axis, and then curving to connected to the dorsoectal surface of spermathecae; spermathecae almost round, separated from each other by less than one-third their diameter; fertilization ducts well-developed, located anteriorly on spermathecae.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Comments

The female is paired with the holotype because it shares similar carapace markings with the male. These markings differ from other congeners known only from a single male from Xishuangbanna. However, the male and female have different abdominal markings, so the pairing requires further confirmation.

Simaetha Strand, 1932

Type species

Simaetha thoracica Thorell, 1881

Comments

Simaetha is represented by 19 nominal species distributed in East and Southeast Asia, New Guinea, and Australia (WSC 2020). All species are endemic except S. knowlesi Żabka, 1994, S. paetula (Keyserling, 1882), S. robustior (Keyserling, 1882), S. tenuidens (Keyserling, 1882), and S. tenuior (Keyserling, 1882), known from both New Guinea and Australia. Although a comprehensive work was done by Żabka (1994), the genus is rather poorly studied, with 11 of its species known only from a single sex – five from females and six from males – and four species lack diagnostic drawings. To date, only the endemic species, S. gongi Peng, Gong & Kim, 2000, has been recorded from China.

Simaetha menglun sp. nov.

Figs 11, 12

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40623), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Leprosy Village (21°53.62'N, 101°18.25'E, ca 520 m), 29.04.2019, Y. Tong et al. leg. Paratype 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar40624), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the name of the type locality; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

Simaetha menglun sp. nov. resembles S. pengi sp. nov. in the shape of the copulatory organs but can be easily distinguished by the shape of the habitus, the color pattern, and the cheliceral dentition. S. menglun sp. nov. resembles S. gongi Peng, Gong & Kim, 2000 by the general shape of the copulatory organs and the short palpal tibia but can be distinguished by the following: 1) the tip of the embolus is curved in ventral view vs straight in S. gongi (Peng et al. 2000: fig. 14); 2) the epigynal hood is about one and a half times longer than wide vs almost two times wider than long in S. gongi (Peng et al. 2000: fig. 11); 3) the chelicerae of the female have one bifurcated retromarginal tooth vs two retromarginal teeth in S. gongi (Peng et al. 2000: fig. 10). The male of S. menglun sp. nov. also somewhat resembles S. deelemanae Zhang, Song & Li, 2003 in the shape of the palp, but can be easily distinguished by the palpal tibia which is wider than long rather than distinctly longer than wide in S. deelemanae (Zhang et al. 2003: fig. 7C, D).

Description

Male (Figs 11, 12D, E, G, H). Total length 2.49. Carapace 1.07 long, 1.01 wide. Abdomen 1.24 long, 0.88 wide. Clypeus 0.01 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.26, ALE 0.13, PLE 0.13, AERW 0.89, PERW 0.98, EFL 0.61. Legs: I 1.95 (0.68, 0.76, 0.29, 0.22), II 1.49 (0.49, 0.54, 0.24, 0.22), III 1.34 (0.44, 0.44, 0.24, 0.22), IV 1.79 (0.59, 0.61, 0.32, 0.27). Carapace nearly square, red-brown, with an irregular dark patch in the middle of the cephalic part, bearing dense, white setae on the cheeks, and dense, white and yellow setae dorsally. Clypeus dark. Fovea indistinct. Chelicerae red-brown, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth bifurcated into two pointed tips. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum colored as labium, covered with thin setae. Legs yellow to yellow-brown, with dark rings; legs I with dark, inflated tibia bearing dense setae ventrally. Abdomen elongated, dorsum with longitudinal, irregular, dark-brown stripe extending posteriorly from the anterior margin, followed by two chevrons, covered by dense, thin, white setae laterally; venter dark brown, with a pair of longitudinal white bands laterally.

Figure 11. 

Male palp of the holotype of Simaetha menglun sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D bulb, ventral E dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1.

Palp (Fig. 11A–E): tibia wider than long, with white scales dorsally and a lamellar RTA that tapers to a pointed tip which is almost directed towards 1:30 o’clock in retrolateral view; cymbium hirsute, with a proximo-retrolateral triangular process near the RTA base; bulb round and flat; embolus originates from a plate-like base, superimposed on the surface of the bulb, apically curved towards the prolateral side.

Female (Fig. 12A–C, F, I). Total length 3.01. Carapace 1.28 long, 1.09 wide. Abdomen 1.66 long, 1.23 wide. Clypeus 0.01 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.29, ALE 0.14, PLE 0.14, AERW 0.97, PERW 1.09, EFL 0.69. Legs: I 1.95 (0.66, 0.76, 0.29, 0.24), II 1.63 (0.51, 0.61, 0.27, 0.24), III 1.53 (0.49, 0.51, 0.29, 0.24), IV 2.03 (0.66, 0.76, 0.34, 0.27). Habitus similar to that of male except paler, and the chelicerae have three promarginal teeth.

Figure 12. 

Simaetha menglun sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype A, B epigyne, ventral C vulva, dorsal D holotype habitus, dorsal E holotype habitus, ventral F paratype habitus, dorsal G holotype carapace, frontal H holotype chelicerae, dorsal I paratype chelicerae, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 (A–C, H–I); 0.5 (D–G).

Epigyne (Fig. 12A–C): wider than long, with an anterior hood approximately 1.5 times longer than wide; copulatory openings slit-like, located medially; copulatory ducts short, connected to the anterior chambers of the spermathecae; spermathecae divided into two round chambers; fertilization ducts connected to the anterior part of the posterior chambers of the spermathecae, extending obliquely.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Comments

This species and Simaetha pengi sp. nov. are placed into this genus due to sharing a similar habitus and similar copulatory organs with S. gongi and S. deelemanae which occur in China and Singapore.

Simaetha pengi sp. nov.

Figs 13, 14

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar40625), China: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Leprosy Village (21°53.62'N, 101°18.25'E, ca 520 m), 29.04.2019, Y. Tong et al. leg. Paratypes 2♀ (IZCAS-Ar40626–40627), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The specific name is a patronym in honor of Prof. Xianjin Peng (Changsha, China), who has produced many important taxonomic works on Chinese jumping spiders; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Simaetha pengi sp. nov. resembles S. gongi Peng, Gong & Kim, 2000 but can be distinguished by the apically curved embolus (vs straight), the longer than wide epigynal hood (vs wide than long), and the bifurcated retromarginal tooth of the female chelicerae (vs not bifurcated). The male of S. menglun sp. nov. also somewhat resembles S. deelemanae Zhang, Song & Li, 2003 in the shape of the palp but can be easily distinguished by the short palpal tibia, which is wider than long, but distinctly longer than wide in S. deelemanae.

Description

Male (Figs 13, 14C, D, F, G). Total length 2.17. Carapace 1.15 long, 1.11 wide. Abdomen 1.11 long, 1.01 wide. Clypeus 0.02 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.28, ALE 0.14, PLE 0.13, AERW 0.93, PERW 0.97, EFL 0.62. Legs: I 2.39 (0.78, 1.00, 0.34, 0.27), II 1.80 (0.56, 0.63, 0.34, 0.27), III 1.66 (0.51, 0.54, 0.34, 0.27), IV 2.00 (0.68, 0.71, 0.32, 0.29). Carapace almost square, red-brown, with a pair of indistinct dark brown patches medially on cephalic part, bearing dense, white setae forming two parallel transverse stripes on cheeks and golden-brown setae, two clusters of white setae near the PMEs on the dorsum. Clypeus dark brown. Fovea indistinct. Chelicerae red-brown, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal, pillar-shaped tooth bifurcated distally, with additional digitiform and round protuberances at the promargin and retromargin, respectively. Endites and labium colored as chelicerae. Sternum darker than endites, covered with pale, thin setae. Legs I with inflated, dark femora and tibiae, the latter bearing dense ventral setae, patellae yellow, tarsus pale yellow; other legs yellow with dark rings, except femora dark brown. Abdomen oval, dorsum dark medially, with spots of yellow scales anterolaterally and a yellow longitudinal band of scales posteriorly; venter brown.

Figure 13. 

Male palp of the holotype of Simaetha pengi sp. nov. A prolateral B retrolateral C ventral D dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1.

Palp (Fig. 13A–D): tibia almost as long as wide, with transparent white scales dorsally, and a RTA less than tibial length, tapered to a slightly pointed tip, directed towards 1:00 o’clock in retrolateral view; cymbium hirsute, with a proximo-retrolateral triangular process and sparse, transparent white scales proximo-dorsally; bulb flat, with sperm duct extending along the margin; embolus arises from a plate-like base, superimposed on the surface of the bulb, slightly curved apically.

Female (Fig. 14A, B, E, H). Total length 2.48. Carapace 1.10 long, 1.03 wide. Abdomen 1.40 long, 1.13 wide. Clypeus 0.02 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.26, ALE 0.12, PLE 0.12, AERW 0.86, PERW 1.01, EFL 0.59. Legs: I 1.98 (0.71, 0.76, 0.27, 0.24), II 1.64 (0.54, 0.59, 0.27, 0.24), III 1.53 (0.49, 0.51, 0.29, 0.24), IV 2.03 (0.71, 0.73, 0.32, 0.27). Habitus similar to that of male, except paler, and the chelicerae have one promarginal tooth and one retromarginal fissident with three cusps.

Figure 14. 

Simaetha pengi sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D holotype habitus, ventral E paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicerae, dorsal H paratype chelicerae, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 (A, B, G, H); 0.5 (C–F).

Epigyne (Fig. 14A, B): wider than long, with an anterior bell-shaped hood approximately 1.5 times longer than wide; copulatory openings slit-like, located medially, separated from each other by approximately 1.5 times the width of the hood; copulatory ducts short; spermathecae divided into two round chambers; fertilization ducts connected to the anterior part of the posterior chambers of the spermathecae.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Yunnan, China.

Acknowledgements

The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Yuri Marusik (Magadan, Russia), Dmitri Logunov (Manchester, UK), Galina N. Azarkina (Novosibirsk, Russia), Wayne Maddison (Vancouver, Canada), and an anonymous referee. Łukasz Trębicki confirmed the identification of Charippus yinae sp. nov. Sarah Crews (San Francisco, USA) checked the English of the final manuscript. Yanfeng Tong, Hao Yu, Zhigang Chen, Zilong Bai, Shijia Liu, Xiaoqi Mi, Jiahui Gan, Yuanfa Yang, and Hong Liu helped with fieldwork. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China to Shuqiang Li (NSFC-31530067), Xiaoqi Mi (NSFC-31660609), and Natural Science Research Project Foundation of Guizhou Province of Education (KY-2018-345).

References

  • Davies VT, Żabka M (1989) Illustrated keys to the genera of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 27: 189–266.
  • Li S (2020) Spider taxonomy for an advanced China. Zoological Systematics 45(2): 73–77.
  • Luong PTH, Yamasaki T, Eguchi K (2016) Conspecificity of Phintella aequipeiformis Zabka, 1985 and P. lucai Zabka, 1985 (Araneae: Salticidae) confirmed by DNA barcoding. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 123(2): 283–290.
  • Malamel JJ, Prajapati DA, Sudhikumar AV, Sebastian PA (2019) Two new species of the tribe Ballini Banks, 1892 from India (Araneae: Salticidae). Arthropoda Selecta 28(3): 424–434. https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.28.3.07
  • Peng XJ (1995) Two new species of jumping spiders from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 20: 35–38.
  • Peng XJ, Gong LS, Kim JP (2000) Two new species and two unrecorded species of the family Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from China. Korean Journal of Soil Zoology 5: 13–19.
  • Peng XJ, Kim JP (1997) Three new species of the genus Eupoa from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology 13: 193–198.
  • Peng XJ, Xie LP, Xiao XQ, Yin CM (1993) Salticids in China (Arachnida: Araneae). Hunan Normal University Press, 270 pp.
  • Peng XJ, Yin CM (1991) Five new species of the genus Kinhia from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 16: 35–47.
  • Song DX (1991) Three new species of the genus Ptocasius from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Sinozoologia 8: 163–168.
  • Song DX, Zhu MS (1998) Two new species of the family Salticidae (Araneae) from China. Acta Arachnologica Sinica 7: 26–29.
  • Thorell T (1895) Descriptive Catalogue of the Spiders of Burma, Based upon the Collection Made by Eugene W. Oates and Preserved in the British Museum. London, 406 pp.
  • WSC (2020) World Spider Catalog, version 21.5. Natural History Museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch [2020-8-23]
  • Xiao XQ (2002) A new species of the genus Myrmarachne from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 27: 477–478.
  • Xiao XQ, Wang SP (2004) Description of the genus Myrmarachne from Yunnan, China (Araneae, Salticidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 29: 263–265.
  • Xie LP, Peng XJ (1995) Spiders of the genus Thyene Simon (Araneae: Salticidae) from China. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 10: 104–108.
  • Żabka M (1985) Systematic and zoogeographic study on the family Salticidae (Araneae) from Viet-Nam. Annales Zoologici, Warszawa 39: 197–485.
  • Żabka M (1992) Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from Oriental, Australian and Pacific regions, VII. Paraplatoides and Grayenulla – new genera from Australia and New Caledonia. Records of the Australian Museum 44: 165–183. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.44.1992.31
  • Żabka M (1994) Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) of Oriental, Australian and Pacific regions, X. Genus Simaetha Thorell. Records of the Western Australian Museum 16: 499–534.
  • Zhang JX, Song DX, Li DQ (2003) Six new and one newly recorded species of Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from Singapore and Malaysia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 51: 187–195.
login to comment