Information gaps about species distribution hamper the evaluation of conservation status and decisions on biodiversity conservation, affecting to a greater extent, areas with high species richness and endemism. In this context, biological inventories are an important tool to fill these gaps by providing data on the composition, richness, and abundance of species in each locality. The Parque Nacional da Serra das Lontras (PNSL) protects various mountain range just up 1000 m. in altitude, and, together with other conservation units, forms an ecological corridor in the southern part of the state of Bahia, within the Atlantic Forest hotspot. We conducted systematic samplings on transects, and opportunistic records in ponds and streams, in order to record amphibian and reptile species in the PNSL. We complement the sampling with the information available in the literature and in scientific collections. A total of 100 species (49 amphibians and 51 reptiles) was recorded, 53 of them endemic to the Atlantic Forest, 13 to the state of Bahia, and two known only from the PNSL. Hylidae was the most diverse family of amphibians (22 spp.) and Colubridae of reptiles (33 spp.). New information on the distribution and natural history of these species is provided, many of which have not yet been assessed by the IUCN while others have already been categorized as at risk of extinction at the regional level. Results confirm the high species richness and rates of endemism in southern Bahia and highlight the importance of protecting high altitude areas for the preservation of evolutionary and ecological processes within the Atlantic Forest.

Anura, Reptilia, Herpetofauna, biological inventory, species distribution

Biodiversity inventories are crucial in megadiverse countries, particularly in those that still have areas that are poorly sampled or without information about the species that inhabit them (Trindade-Filho et al. 2012; Verdade et al. 2012). These inventories provide data on natural history, behavior and make it possible to find taxa previously unknown to the region or still undescribed (Verdade et al. 2012; Oliveira et al. 2017). At the same time, they provide updated data on the state of conservation of the locality sampled and the threats present for the reported populations.

Deforestation, climate change, pollution, invasive species and diseases are among the main threats to biodiversity (Lips et al. 2005; Butchart et al. 2010). According to IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 41% of amphibian species and 22% of reptiles are included in some threat category (Hoffmann et al. 2010). In fact, many species of reptiles still lack enough information to allow their categorization (Böhm et al. 2013) making it even more difficult to implement effective actions for their conservation.

The Atlantic Forest biome stands out for having a high species richness and endemism rate. Despite harboring species not yet described and discovered (Morellato and Haddad 2000), it is estimated that it houses half of the endangered species of Brazil, 38.5% of which are endemic to this biome (ICMBio 2018a). However, the biome has also shown high rates of deforestation and is considered one of the biodiversity hotspots in the world (Myers et al. 2000). The south of the state of Bahia, located in Northeastern Brazil, is still home to the largest forest remnants of the Atlantic Forest in this part of the country, most of them associated with slopes or altitude zones (Thomas et al. 1998; Oliveira-Filho and Fontes 2000; Amorim et al. 2009). In these zones, high levels of plant richness and endemism (Amorim et al. 2009) and the second largest number of amphibian species for the entire biome have been recorded (Dias et al. 2014).

The Parque Nacional da Serra das Lontras (PNSL), together with two more conservation units, the Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Una and the Reserva Biológica Una, form an ecological corridor which protects from low areas of the Atlantic coast to mountain peaks of just over 1000 m. in altitude. From the PNSL the presence of 709 species of angiosperms has been documented, the largest number of species reported for an altitude area in southern Bahia (Amorim et al. 2009). Also, 295 species of birds have already been recorded, 18 of them threatened with extinction (Silveira et al. 2005). For amphibians, 16 species were reported (Silvano and Pimenta 2003). However, the sampling effort was very low and there is no list of reptiles available for the region. Even so, new species of birds, amphibians and reptiles have been described with material collect in the PNSL (see Pacheco et al. 1996; Recorder et al. 2010; Teixeira et al. 2013). In order to provide information that can help in the elaboration of species management plans, conservation plans and aid the categorization of species, we complement and update the list of amphibians and present, for the first time, a list of reptiles for this conservation unit.

We recorded 100 species, 49 of amphibians, and 51 of reptiles in the PNSL (Table 1, Figs 3–5). Ten families of amphibians, being the most diverse Hylidae (22 spp.), followed by Craugastoridae (06 spp.), Centrolenidae and Bufonidae (04 spp. each), Brachycephalidae and Leptodactylidae (03 spp. each), Eleutherodactylidae, Phyllomedusidae and Hemiphractidae (02 spp. each), and Hylodidae (01 sp.). In turn, we report 13 families of reptiles: Colubridae (33 spp.), Viperidae (04 spp.), Amphisbaenidae, Boidae, and Gymnophthalmidae (02 spp. each), and a species each of the families Chelidae, Dactyloidae, Elapidae, Gekkonidae, Leiosauridae, Polychrotidae, Teiidae, and Tropidophiidae.

Figure 3. 

Amphibians recorded in the Parque Nacional da Serra das Lontras: A Brachycephalus pulex B Ischnocnema verrucosa C Ischnocnema cf. parva D Rhinella crucifer E Vitreorana baliomma F V. eurygnatha G Vitreorana sp.nov. H V. uranoscopa I Haddadus binotatus J Pristimantis sp. 1 K Pristimantis sp. 2 L Pristimantis paulodutrai M Pristimantis vinhai N Adelophryne sp. 8 O Adelophryne sp. 2 P Gastrotheca recava Q Aplastodiscus ibirapitanga R A. weygoldti S Boana faber T Bokermannohyla lucianae.

Figure 4. 

Amphibians and reptiles recorded in the Parque Nacional da Serra das Lontras. A Dendropsophus branneri B Dendropsophus aff. bromeliaceus C D. elegans D D. haddadi E Ololygon strigilata F Phyllodytes sp. 1 G Scinax cf. x-signatus H Crossodactylus sp. I Adenomera clade M J Crossodactylodes septentrionalis K Leptodactylus cf. latrans L Phasmahyla spectabilis M Phyllomedusa burmeisteri N Corallus hortulanus O Chironius fuscus P Dipsas catesbyi Q Dipsas neuwiedi R Erythrolamprus reginae, S Imantodes cenchoa T Oxybelis aeneus.

Figure 5. 

Reptiles recorded in the Parque Nacional da Serra das Lontras. A Oxyrhopus clathratus B O. formosus C O. guibei D Xenopholis scalaris E Anolis fuscoauratus F Hemidactylus mabouia G Leposoma nanodactylus H L. scincoides I Enyalius catenatus J Tropidophis grapiuna K Bothrops bilineatus L B. jararaca.

Forty amphibians and 13 reptiles are endemic of the Atlantic Forest biome. Of these, eleven species of anurans and two of reptiles are restricted to the state of Bahia; and two anurans, Dendrophryniscus oreites and Crossodactylus septentrionalis, to the PNSL (Table 1). Although some individuals of amphibian are identified as “sp.”, "cf.", or “aff.”, individuals of the genus Phyllodytes are being considered endemic to the biome, as, until now, they have not been reported from other biomes.

Brazil is currently home to 1137 species of amphibians and 795 reptiles (Costa and Bérnils 2018; Segalla et al. 2019). However, new species are constantly being described from different biomes (Ferrão et al. 2017; Orrico et al. 2017; Vörös et al. 2017; Arias et al. 2018; among others), reflecting our scant knowledge about the species richness of these groups. From the state of Bahia, approximately 190 species of amphibians and 278 reptiles with ca. 129 species of snakes (Hamdan and Lira-da-Silva 2012; Dias et al. 2014; Costa and Bérnils 2018) have been reported so far. Here we report 49% of the total amphibian species and 19% of reptiles known for the state from an area slightly larger than 110 km². We believe that this number does not reflect the real diversity of amphibians and reptiles in the PNSL.

The first amphibian inventory undertaken at PNSL recorded 16 species (Silvano and Pimenta 2003). Due to taxonomic changes in different groups after that publication, we updated the binomial names and discuss some of the identifications. In order to avoid under- or overestimation of species richness, we assign the names to the species that were also found in our samples and hypothesize the presence of other species based on other records in nearby areas.

Species of Bufo were transferred to the genus Rhinella (Frost et al. 2006). Rhamphophryne proboscidea is now included in Dendrophryniscus (Fouquet et al. 2012a); we did not record this species, but its presence was confirmed in the last revision of the genus (see Cruz et al. 2019) and has also been reported in nearby areas (Silva et al. 2011). The ancient specious genus Eleutherodactylus was revised and several of its species have been transferred to other genera, thus E. binotatus moved to Haddadus (Hedges et al. 2008), and E. vinhai first to Ischnocnema (Heinicke et al. 2007, Hedges et al. 2008) and later to Pristimantis (Canedo and Haddad 2012). Likewise, the six reported species of Hyla currently belong to the following binomials: Boana crepitans, B. faber, Bokermannohyla lucianae, Dendropsophus bipunctatus, D. elegans, and D. minutus (Faivovich et al. 2005; Dubois 2017). We note that the record of Bokermannohyla lucianae was identified as “Hyla sp. n3” (Silvano and Pimenta 2003), with the species being described a year later (see Napoli and Pimenta 2004). We consider the record of Scinax cuspidatus as S. juncae because we recorded several individuals vocalizing in a pond. In the same way, the record of S. fuscovarius is now attributed to S. cf. x-signatus. Finally, we relate Leptodactylus ocellatus to L. cf. latrans, given that there are species delimitation problems, being barely distinguishable from the species complex including L. chaquensis and L. macrosternum (de Sá et al. 2014).

Dias et al. (2014) carried out an amphibian inventory in an area close to the PNSL, the RPPN Serra Bonita (SB), where they found 80 species. The SB, in addition to being close the PNSL (31.15 km away as a straight line), it shares the same relief characteristics (200–950 m) and vegetation types (Amorim et al. 2009). Our research differs from that developed by Dias et al. (2014) regarding the sampling effort (192 man hours in transects in the forest, versus 59.3 man hours in PNSL), installation of transects close to streams, and installation of pitfall traps. Although we sampled for several days in the rainy season (approximately one week), the presence of seasonal ponds was limited and, when formed, the number of species with expected explosive reproduction were not found (Duellman and Trueb 1994; Wells 2008). We also highlight that the area sampled in the PNSL represents only a small fraction of the park’s extension.

We found 49 species of amphibians that represent more than half of those known from SB, an area considered to harbor the second largest species richness in the Atlantic Forest (Dias et al. 2014). PNSL and SB share 31 species of anurans. We believe that with more sampling efforts in streams, temporary and permanent ponds, and in other areas of the PNSL, we would find several of the species already reported from SB: Boana semilineata, Bokermannohyla circumdata, Ceratophrys aurita, Chiasmocleis crucis, Dendropsophus anceps, D. giesleri, D. oliverai, Leptodactylus cupreus, L. mystaceus, Physalaemus camacan, P. erikae, Pipa carvalhoi, Pithecopus rhodei, Proceratophrys renalis, Pr. schirchi, Rhinella granulosa, R. jimi, Ololygon argyreonata, Siphonops annulatus, Sphaenorhynchus prasinus, Stereocyclops histrio, S. incrassatus, and Trachycephalus mesophaeus which would increase our list by another 24 species. However, in the PNSL we have recorded four species not yet reported from the SB, Dendropsophus cf. bromeliaceus, Gastrotheca recava, Vitreorana baliomma, and Vitreorana sp. nov.

Considering the taxonomic uncertainties and the possibility of undescribed entities in the region, we try to assign identifications to the finest possible level. Pristimantis sp. 1 differs from all other species of Pristimantis found in the PNSL by its eye color, spotted dorsal pattern, and call parameters. Pristimantis sp. 2 is the same species reported as Pristimantis sp. from the Reserva Ecológica Michelin (Mira-Mendes et al. 2018). Fouquet et al. (2012b) defined Adelophryne populations from neighboring areas as A. pachydactyla but further research refuted this hypothesis (see Dominato et al. 2018; Lourenço-de-Moraes et al. 2018). In our sampling we found two species of this genus and due to their morphological characteristics, we identified them as Adelophryne sp. 2 and Adelophryne sp. 8 sensu Lourenço-de-Moraes et al. (2018). Likewise, individuals from Adenomera are attributed to clade M, sensu Fouquet et al. (2014).

The flea-toad, Brachycephalus pulex, was known only from the upper parts of the type locality in Serra Bonita (Napoli et al. 2011). Our record expands its distribution by 31 km in a straight line. Bokermannohyla lucianae appears to have a distribution bounded by the Cachoeira and Jequitinhonha rivers in the southern part of Bahia (Dias et al. 2011), with PNSL being only the fourth known location for the species. Pristimantis sp. 2 is distributed in lowland forest of southern Bahia (Mira-Mendes et al. 2018).

Five species of the genus Vitreorana are known from the Atlantic Forest biome (Rossa-Feres et al. 2017). Although Rossa-Feres et al. (2017) considered V. eurygnatha as endemic to the Atlantic Forest, the species was reported in a locality within the Cerrado biome (Cintra et al. 2013). However, the PNSL, with four syntopic species (V. baliomma, V. eurygnatha, V. uranoscopa, and one species as yet undescribed) is the most diverse site for the genus in the Atlantic Forest, where usually only one or two species are found (see Pontes et al. 2014; Dias et al. 2014; Mira-Mendes et al. 2018). We heard vocalizations of V. eurygnatha and V. uranoscopa in the months of February and April, and V. baliomma only in April, all records being made in 2018. All these species use the vegetation on the banks of streams to vocalize, mate, and for oviposition (Haga et al. 2014; Zaracho 2014), with V. baliomma and V. eurygnatha sharing vocalization microhabitats. The new species of Vitreorana differs from the others by morphological and genetic characters.

Most of the reptile’s records were obtained from material deposited at MZUESC. During our systematic sampling, we did not install pitfall traps, which could have increased the number of lizards and snakes of terrestrial and fossorial habitats in our records (Cechin and Martins 2000). At the same time, the fact that our samplings were carried out mainly at night may have privileged the record of amphibian species (Doan 2003). We emphasize that, in the methodological evaluations, eleven species were recorded by a single individual. In absolute numbers, the PNSL can be considered as the third locality with the greatest reptile richness in the state of Bahia, being only surpassed by the Serra da Jibóia and the Serra do Timbó, with 59 and 54 species, respectively (vs. 51 from PNSL) (Freitas et al. 2018; Freitas et al. 2019).

The rare turtle Hydromedusa maximiliani has records associated to water bodies within primary forests in mountainous regions, with previous records from other localities in Bahia (Argôlo and Freitas 2002). Although Tozetti et al. (2017) considered Oxyrhopus formosus to be endemic to the Atlantic Forest, its distribution is unclear with records scattered through the Brazilian, Ecuadorian, and Peruvian Amazon (Catenazzi et al. 2013; Wallach et al. 2014; Costa and Bérnils 2018). This taxon is considered a species complex with populations in Guyana, Colombia, and some places in Ecuador having been reidentified as O. occipitalis (Lynch 2009; MacCulloch et al. 2009). In the Atlantic Forest, O. formosus is considered a rare species categorized as EN in the state of Bahia (Argôlo 2004; SEMA 2017), and reported from four localities within this biome: Almadina and Coaraci (Argôlo et al. 2012; Dias et al. 2014b) and Mucuri, the type locality (sensu Vanzolini and Myers 2015), all in the state of Bahia; and Duas Barras in Espírito Santo state (Tonini et al. 2010). Considering the conservation status and doubts about its geographical distribution, molecular, pholidosic, and other morphological data can help solve the taxonomic problem of this species with disjunct distribution.

Oxyrhopus clathratus inhabits dense coastal ombrophilous and mixed ombrophilous forests from the northeast and southeast of Brazil (Tozetti et al. 2017), and reaches the north of Argentina (Di-Bernardo et al. 2012). Di-Bernardo et al. (2012) suggested that the color patterns of individuals are related to altitude, and the pattern of our individual is consistent with the one most common in lowland areas, although found at ~750 m. Our record represents the third for Bahia, having previously been found in Barra do Choça (Argôlo 2001) and in the SB (Medeiros et al. 2010).

Only two individuals of Tropidophis grapiuna are known in the literature, both collected in ombrophilous forest between 725–750 m altitude in the southern portion of Bahia (Curcio et al. 2012). Since its description, no other individuals have been collected. We found an individual in the leaf litter at 550 m, representing the first collected male, the lowest altitudinal record, and the first record inside a conservation area for this species.

The species Cercophis auratus, Echinanthera cephalostriata, Hydromedusa maximiliani, Oxyrhopus clathratus, and Tropidophis grapiuna represent populations restricted to montane forests in the latitude range of this study (Argôlo and Freitas 2002; Argôlo 2009). In fact, long-term sampling in southern Bahia has never detected any of these species in the lowlands of the region (Argôlo 2004). The lizards Leposoma nanodactylus and L. puk are known principally from mountain forests of southern Bahia. Leposoma nanodactylus has records in the PNSL and, in view of the known distribution of L. puk (Rodrigues et al. 2002; Rodrigues et al. 2013), it is likely that this species also occurs there. This information helps to highlight the importance of the PNSL for biodiversity conservation.

Of the 100 species reported in the PNSL, 53 are endemic to the Atlantic Forest and 13 of these are endemic to the state of Bahia, of which only two, Crossodactylodes septentrionalis and Dendrophryniscus oreites, are, until now, restricted to the park. One of the theories to explain the large number of endemic species in this biome is that of the Pleistocene refuge hypothesis (Haffer 1997). The PNSL is located inside the “Refúgio da Bahia”, identified as the one with the greatest extension in the biome, a zone of climatic stability that allowed the maintenance of different species during the last glacial maximum (Carnaval et al. 2009). In this way, the altitude areas of the region may have functioned as opportune places of climatic stability and, subsequently allowed a diversification of the surviving fauna (Graham et al. 2014).

Climatic conditions in these areas can shape the lives of the amphibians and reptiles that inhabit them (Duellman and Trueb 1994). It has been proposed that small frogs of the genus Brachycephalus inhabit areas of altitude due to a dependence on temperature and microclimate that are modulated by mist (Haddad et al. 2008). The scarcity of water bodies in the higher parts of the mountains may have favored these places to be occupied by species of genera with direct development, such as Adelophryne, Brachycephalus, Ischnocnema, and Pristimantis (Siqueira and Rocha 2013), and those using bromeliads for tadpole development, Crossodactylodes spp. and Phyllodytes spp. (Sabagh et al. 2017). In fact, we found species of these genera in the highest locals of the PNSL where bromeliads are more abundant.

Lastly, the expansion of agricultural activities, particularly coffee crops, seems to be a threat to the PNSL. During our fieldwork, we found that areas destined for this cultivation are being expanded between Arataca municipality and the PNSL borders. Within the PNSL, we noted the absence of monkey vocalizations and other mammal footprints on the trails and edges of streams. During the days in the field, although we did not hear shotguns, we did find some traps set up for hunting small mammals. Some residents have reported that hunting activity was frequent in the region. The areas of cabruca are still being utilized and we did not record any expansion of use during our visits. On one of the trails towards a mountain ridge, called “Peito de Moça” by locals, we saw an open area under recovery with abundant ferns and shrub vegetation and the presence of an abandoned wooden house. Among these threats, habitat loss was identified as the most visible and probably the main threat for amphibian and reptile species in Brazil (Rodrigues 2005; Silvano and Segalla 2005).

We conclude that the Parque Nacional da Serra das Lontras harbors a representative number of species of amphibians and reptiles, many of which are endemic to the Atlantic Forest and to the state. The new records of endemic, endangered, and species new to science reveal it as an outstanding area for the conservation and maintenance of ecological and evolutionary processes in this portion of southern Bahia, a region already known for its abundant biodiversity.

First of all, we want to dedicate this work to the memory of Zezito; his kindness, hospitality, and advice were of great importance to the fieldwork and the successful completion of this work. We thank Caio V. de Mira-Mendes, Camila Cassano, Carol Barreto, Elaine Macêdo, Gabriel Novaes e Fagundes, Leildo Carilo, Ramon Dominato Renan Nunes Costa, Rudolf von May, Paulo Machado, Pedro Peloso, and Tadeu Medeiros for the support and suggestions in different stages of the work. Pablo Monan, Fernanda Natascha Pimentel Freitas, Laísa Santos, Marcos Vinicius Coutinho Ferreira, Marcelo Sena, Erick Leandro Santos, and Victor Zucchetti for their company during the field trips. To Nathalie Yonow, Pedro Calixto, Pedro Taucce, and Santiago Castroviejo-Fisher for comments on drafts of the manuscript. To Paula and Zirlene for their support and for sharing Zezito’s house with us after his unexpected departure. ORP thanks Programa de Alianzas para la Educación y la Capacitación de la Organización de Estados Americanos and the Grupo Coimbra de Universidades Brasileñas (PAEC OEA-GCUB) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, to Idea Wild for donation of field equipment, and particularly to Ariadne Angulo and Meri Ushiñahua. MS acknowledges funding by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (304999/2015-6) and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)/Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH) for an experienced researcher grant (BEX 0585/16-5). VGDO thanks CNPq (Project numbers: 310467/2017-9 and 431772/2018-4). IRD is grateful for the scholarships provided by CNPq (Project: 406899/2017-7, Process: 167387/2017-0 and 155198/2018-1).

Specimens deposited and examined in the herpetological collection of the Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz.

AMPHIBIA

Brachycephalidae

Brachycephalus pulex – MZUESC 21691–21697.

Ischnocnema verrucosa – MZUESC 21303, 21304, 21359, 21361, 21362.

Ischnocnema cf. parva – MZUESC 21306, 21393, 21404, 21405.

Bufonidae

Rhinella crucifer – MZUESC 21300, 21351, 21354, 21389, 21417, 21650, 21652, 21653.

Centrolenidae

Vitreorana baliomma – MZUESC 21037, 21039.

Vitreorana eurygnatha – MZUESC 21034, 21038, 21040, 21042, 21043, 21045.

Vitreorana sp. nov. – MZUESC 21044.

Vitreorana uranoscopa – MZUESC 21035, 21036, 21046.

Craugastoridae

“Eleutherodactylus” bilineatus – MZUESC 17025.

Haddadus binotatus – MZUESC 21298, 21309, 21385, 21387, 21390, 21392, 21394–21396, 21399–21401, 21403, 21408–21411, 21413, 21419, 21424, 21429, 21434.

Pristimantis sp. 1 – MZUESC 20995, 2009–21001, 21004, 21005, 21008, 21009, 21012, 21013, 21015, 21016, 21021, 21024, 21027, 21030, 21032, 21033.

Pristimantis sp. 2 – MZUESC 21443, 21454, 21482, 21495, 21496, 21513, 21535, 21550, 21559, 21577, 21580, 21584, 21588, 21590, 21591, 21594, 21604, 21610–21612, 21632, 21643, 21644, 21647.

Pristimantis paulodutrai – MZUESC 21447, 21485, 21486, 21492, 21497, 21507, 21538, 21539, 21541, 21593, 32452.

Pristimantis vinhai – MZUESC 21020, 21439–21441, 21448–21451, 21453, 21461, 21462, 21484, 21487–21491, 21494, 21494, 21508–21511, 21514–21518, 21525, 21526, 21528, 21531, 21532, 21537, 21540, 21549, 21551–21556, 21563–21567, 21571–21573, 21578, 21579, 21586, 21587, 21603, 21606, 21613, 21618–21622, 21641, 21642, 21648.

Eleutherodactylidae

Adelophryne sp. 2 – MZUESC 21445, 21446, 21502, 21504, 21505, 21519, 21522, 21529, 21575, 21583, 21602, 21638.

Adelophryne sp. 8 – MZUESC 21444, 21450, 21483, 21498, 21499, 21506, 21512, 21520, 21521, 21523, 21524, 21527, 21530, 21533, 21534, 21536, 21557, 21560, 21568–21570, 21576, 21585, 21589, 21596–21601, 21605, 21607–21609, 21615, 21616, 21623–21631, 21634–21637, 21639, 21645, 21646.

Hemiphractidae

Gastrotheca recava – MZUESC 21350, 21353, 21357, 21358.

Hylidae

Aplastodiscus ibirapitanga – MZUESC 21305.

Aplastodiscus weygoldti – MZUESC 21356.

Boana crepitans – MZUESC 2222, 2223.

Boana faber – MZUESC 21388, 21391, 21428, 21651, 21655, 21656.

Boana pombali – MZUESC 21397.

Bokermannohyla lucianae – MZUESC 21299, 21307, 21386, 21406, 21412, 21414, 21415, 21418, 21422, 21423, 21425–21427, 21430, 21431, 21437, 21438.

Dendropsophus branneri – MZUESC 21500, 21592.

Dendropsophus aff. bromeliaceus – MZUESC 21041, 21047.

Dendropsophus elegans – MZUESC 21558.

Dendropsophus haddadi – MZUESC 21456–21460, 21501, 21542–21548, 21581, 21582.

Ololygon strigilata – MZUESC 21352, 21402, 21407, 21416, 21433, 21435, 21436.

Phyllodytes sp. 1 – MZUESC 20994, 20996, 20997, 21000, 21002, 21003, 21006, 21007, 21010, 21011, 21014, 21017–21019, 21022, 21023, 21025, 21026, 21028, 21029, 21031, 21442, 21561, 21640.

Scinax cf. x-signatus – MZUESC 20408–20410, CFBH 44693.

Hylodidae

Crossodactylus sp. – MZUESC 20965–20971.

Leptodactylidae:

Adenomera clade M. – MZUESC 21713, 21714.

Crossodactylodes septentrionalis – MZUESC 14363, 21668.

Leptodactylus cf. latrans – MZUESC 21384, 21654.

Phyllomedusidae

Phasmahyla spectabilis – MZUESC 21301, 21360.

Phyllomedusa burmeisteri – MZUESC 21308, 21363.

REPTILIA

Amphisbaenidae

Amphisbaena petrei – MZUESC 16975.

Leposternon sp. – MZUESC 6707.

Boidae

Corallus hortulanus – MZUESC 1231, 1732, 3151, 3152, 6682.

Epicrates cenchria – MZUESC 2161, 4897, 8891.

Chelidae

Hydromedusa maximiliani – MZUESC 1235, 2189.

Colubridae

Cercophis auratus – MZUESC 1131.

Chironius exoletus – MZUESC 1102, 1122, 1228, 2167, 2236, 2237, 2904, 2905, 8861.

Chironius foveatus – MZUESC 1124, 8864.

Chironius fuscus – MZUESC 1101, 1003, 1125, 1130, 1137, 1138, 1220, 1744, 1755, 2234–2235, 6698, 6700.

Chironius laevicollis – MZUESC 6699.

Coronelaps lepidus – MZUESC 2227.

Dipsas catesbyi – MZUESC 21664, 2166, 4873.

Dipsas indica – MZUESC 1730, 4882.

Dipsas neuwiedi – MZUESC 1104–1106, 1127–1129, 1221–1223, 1232, 1233, 1736–1738, 1750, 2173, 2174, 21398, 2230–2233, 4272, 4425, 4493, 4874, 4875, 6687–6691, 6702, 8867.

Dipsas variegata – MZUESC 1108–1111, 1136, 1739, 1740, 2191, 2192, 4883, 6704, 6705.

Drymoluber dichrous – MZUESC 1528, 2247, 4881, 6683.

Echinanthera cephalostriata – MZUESC 1213.

Elapomorphus wuchereri – MZUESC 4489, 8890.

Erythrolamprus aesculapii – MZUESC 4876, 6692.

Erythrolamprus miliaris – MZUESC 2249.

Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus – MZUESC 2172.

Erythrolamprus reginae – MZUESC 1747, 1748, 21660, 2246, 2895, 6694.

Erythrolamprus taeniogaster – MZUESC 2901.

Imantodes cenchoa – MZUESC 1227, 19220, 21663.

Leptodeira annulata – MZUESC 1107, 1123, 1743, 2190, 2897, 4268, 4270, 4493, 4500, 6703.

Oxybelis aeneus – MZUESC 1224, 21662, 2171, 4427.

Oxyrhopus formosus – MZUESC 19221.

Oxyrhopus guibei – MZUESC 21665, 2226, 3791, 4878, 4879, 6706, 8887.

Oxyrhopus petolarius – MZUESC 1112, 1113, 1218, 1219, 1749, 2170, 2229, 2900, 4275, 4880.

Philodryas olfersii – MZUESC 8892.

Pseudoboa nigra – MZUESC 8862.

Siphlophis compressus – MZUESC 1234, 2168.

Spilotes pullatus – MZUESC 18800, 2164, 8881, 8882.

Spilotes sulphureus – MZUESC 2243, 3153, 4426, 4495, 4503, 4852, 8863.

Thamnodynastes cf. nattereri – MZUESC 19722, 2169, 2241, 2242, 2248, 4269, 4271, 4502, 6701.

Xenodon rabdocephalus – MZUESC 1133–1135, 1214, 1215, 1229, 1230, 1529, 1729, 1741, 1742, 2175–2179, 2193–2197, 2228, 2244, 2245, 2902, 2903, 2989, 3792, 4496–4999, 4273, 4274, 4424, 4884–4889, 6684–6686, 6696, 6697.

Dactyloidae

Anolis fuscoauratus – MZUESC 21420, 21421.

Elapidae

Micrurus corallinus – MZUESC 1746, 4877, 6693.

Gekkonidae

Hemidactylus mabouia – MZUESC 21355.

Gymnophtalmidae

Leposoma nanodactylus – MZUESC 21562, 21573, 21595, 21633.

Leposoma scincoides – MZUESC 21614.

Leiosauridae

Enyalius catenatus – MZUESC 1116, 1731, 2165, 21302, 21310, 21311, 21349, 21432, 21657–21659.

Polychrotidae

Polychrus marmoratus – MZUESC 1115, 1117.

Teiidae

Ameiva ameiva – MZUESC 1114, 1139–1140.

Tropidophiidae

Tropidophis grapiuna – MZUESC 19219.

Viperidae

Bothrops bilineatus – MZUESC 1119–1120, 1530, 21661, 2899, 3790, 4428–4430, 4869–4872, 6708.

Bothrops jararaca – MZUESC 1091–1100, 1121, 1126, 1132, 1216, 1225, 1226, 1727, 1728, 1733–1735, 2180–2188, 2198–2203, 3147–3150, 3787–3789, 4265–4267, 4501, 4417–4419, 4421–4423, 4431, 4490–4492, 6709–6721, 6695, 8865, 8866, 8868–8880, 8883–8886, 8888, 17480, 17822, 19719, 21666, 2238–2240, 4890–4896, 6670–6681.

Bothrops leucurus – MZUESC 1217, 2896, 4264, 4416, 4418, 4420.

Lachesis muta – MZUESC 2162, 2163, 4263, 4232–4434, 4504, 4898.