The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

3 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Wusha / –VI–1941 / R. Boloudo // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 1 ex. ‘Wu sha / Formosa / 21. Viii. 1941 / Col. Bumua Tin // Geotrupes / subshiatelluo FAIRMAIR / DET. Y. MIYAKE // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 1 ex. ‘台湾= taiwan 台中= taichû / 関刀山= guandaoshan / 1993. V. 31 // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’.

Phelotrupes (Sinogeotrupes) taiwanus (Miyake and Yamaya, 1995), see Nikolajev et al. (2016).

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 3 exs. ‘Tattaka / Formosa / 10. Vi. 1965 / T. Shirozu // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 1 ex. ‘(FORMOSA) / Mt Rata / Vi–Vii–1972 / L. F, Hang // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 1 ex. ‘(FORMOSA) / Mt Rata / –Vii–1972 / L. F, Hang // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 2 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / 台中= taichû 関刀山= guandaoshan / 3–VI–1993 // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 1 ♂ ‘ [Taiwan] / 台中= taichû 関刀山= guandaoshan / 3–VI–1993 // Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’. 3 exs. ‘Paratype / Sinogeotrupes taiwanus / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Kusui):

1 ex.: [[1 ♀ ‘Mt. Yonahadake, / Kunigami-son, / Is. Okinawa-Hontō, / 28. VI. 1972 (the date given in the original description is 16–17. VI. 1970), / HEIKICHI IRIE leg., // KUSUI // Paratype’]].

Aegus nakanei nakanei Ichikawa and Imanishi, 1976, see Huang and Chen (2017).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. K. Masumoto):

1 ex.: ‘Nikko / Date: 23 V 1981 / K. MASUMOTO leg. // Paratype / Aphodius (Agr) / tanakai MASUMOTO’.

Agoliinus tanakai (Masumoto, 1981), see Dellacasa et al. (2016).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. D. Ahrens):

2 exs.: ‘Phalante 20. 3. / unt. Nebelwaldstufe / 2100–2300 m // PARATYPUS / Aphodius (Phaeaphodius) himalorectus sp. n. / det. D. AHRENS 1994’.

Phaeaphodius himalorectus (Ahrens and Stebnicka, 1997), see Dellacasa et al. (2016).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘SUNGKAN / C. TAIWAN / 29–V. 1987 / K. LAH // PARATYPE / Aphodius (Sinodiapterna) / zeni / OCHI 1991’.

Sinodiapterna zeni (Ochi, 1991), see Dellacasa et al. (2016).

The holotype and following specimen are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘C, Sata /〔KYUSHU〕/ Japan / 25, VI 1971 / T. Kitano leg. // PARATYPE // Holotype: / Rhyparus / kitanoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1992’. (Fig. 1A)

Figure 1. 

Habitus of holotype specimens. A Rhyparus kitanoi (Miyake) B Adoretus (Lepadoretus) ubonensis (Miyake, Yamaguchi et Aoki) C Anomala flavoguttata Miyake D Anomala ohmomoi Miyake, Yamaguchi et Aoki E Anomala thailandiana Miyake, Yamaguchi et Akiyama F Callistethus isidai Miyake G Malaia castanoptera Miyake H Malaia macassara Miyake.

The right and left protarsus and the right antenna of the holotype are missing.

Rhyparus kitanoi kitanoi Miyake, 1982, see Ochi (2001).

In addition to the holotype mentioned above, the following specimen labeled as paratype is not designated in the original description: 1 ex.: ‘Sesonoura / Is. Shimokoshiki / Kagoshima-pref. / 18. VI. 1982 / S. Imasaka leg. // Paratype: Rhyparus / kitanoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1992’.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘Mt. Bawang / Sarawak S. / VIII. 1991 / M. Kon Coll. // PARATYPE / Caccobius / bawangensis OCHI, KON and KIKUTA’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘MT. HALKON / IS. MINDRO / 28–XII. 1988 / D. MOHAGAN // PARATYPE / Copris / (Microcopris) / mindorensis / OCHI, 1992.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. K. Masumoto):

1 ex.: ‘FENGCHIFU / FORMOSA / 7–VII. 74. / T. OCHI // PARATYPE / Onthophagus / setchan / MASUMOTO (1984)’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

6 exs.: 3 ♂ ‘Kanpira / Iriomote Is. / Yaeyama Iss. / 12. VII. 1975 / R. YANO leg. // ♂ // Onthophagus (P.) / acuticollis / sakishimanus / NOMURA (1976)’. 3 ♀ ‘Kanpira / Iriomote Is. / Yaeyama Iss. / 12. VII. 1975 / R. YANO leg. // ♀ // Onthophagus (P.) / acuticollis / sakishimanus / NOMURA (1976)’.

Parascatonomus (Necramator) acuticollis sakishimanus (Nomura, 1976), see Ochi and Kon (2017).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: ‘Kanpira, / Iriomote Is. / Yaeyama Iss. / 12. VII 1975 / R. YANO leg. // PARATYPE / Onthophagus (P.) / murasakianus / NOMURA (1976)’.

Parascatonomus (Necramator) murasakianus (Nomura, 1976), see Ochi and Kon (2017).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘QUESON. N. P / IS. LUZON / 10–VIII. 1981 / K. SUGINO // PARATYPE / Onthophagus / (Parascatonomus) / takedai / OCHI et ARAYA, 1992’.

Parascatonomus (Granulidorsum) takedai (Ochi et Araya, 1992), see Ochi and Kon (2017).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘SEPIROK / N. BORNEO / 4–VII. 1985 / M. KON // PARATYPE / Onthophagus / (Proagoderus) / watanabei / OCHI and KON. 2002’.

Proagoderus watanabei (Ochi et Kon, 2002), see Philips (2016).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘PILU / Taiwan / 21, VIII, 1979 / K. Sugino leg. // PARATYPE / Onthophagus (St) / hiurai / OCHI (1984)’.

Onthophagus (Phanaeomorphus) potanini hiurai Ochi, 1984, see Ziani and Bezděk (2016).

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Shirinthorn (light) / Ubon Ratchatani / E–THAILAND / 27. Feb. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi and / T. Aoki leg. // No. 1 / ♂ // Holotype: / Adoretus / ubonensis // Holotype / Adoretus (Lepadoretus) ubonensis / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AOKI 2002’. (Fig. 1B)

The left mesotarsus and the left metaleg of the holotype are missing.

Junior subjective synonym of Adoretus compressus (Weber, 1801), see Kobayashi (2018).

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Sapa=Chapa / N. Vietnam / 20. V. 1994 / N. KATSURA // Holotype: Anomala / flavoguttata / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. (Fig. 1C)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The holotype and the following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukdahan (light) / E–THAILAND沢= sawa / 8. Mar. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi and / T. Aoki leg. // Holo Type: / Anomala / ohmomoi // Holotype / Anomala ohmomoi / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AOKI 2002’. (Fig. 1D)

4 exs.: ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukdahan (light) / E–THAILAND沢= sawa / 8. Mar. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi and / T. Aoki leg. // Paratype / Anomala ohmomoi / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AOKI 2002’.

Valid species.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Don Far Huan (light) / Ubon Ratchathani / E–THAILAND / 17. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi and / M. Akiyama leg. [white label, front] // Apigoni / 5 [white label, back] // Holotype / Anomala thailandiana / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’. (Fig. 1E)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The holotype and the following paratype are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘ [Taiwan] / Lishan to Pilu / 31–VII–1972 / Y. Miyake leg. // Holotype: / Callistethus isidai / Y. MYAKE, 1987’. (Fig. 1F)

1 ex.: ‘ [Taiwan] / Lishan to Pilu / 31–VII–1972 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype / Callistethus isidia / Y. MIYAKE, 1987’.

The right and left metatarsi of the holotype are missing.

Callistethus plagiicollis isidai Miyake, 1987, see Zorn and Bezděk (2016).

The habitus photograph in the original description does not agree with the holotype. This is also the case with some other species described by Miyake. Apparently, he did not intend to provide the photographs of the holotypes. Also, as noted below, we were unable to trace some specimens illustrated in the original descriptions.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

2 exs.: [[1 ♂, 1 ♀ ‘Tam Dao / N. VIETNAM / 28–30, IV, 1991 (the date given in the original description is 28–30. III. 1991) / M. Fujioka and / R. Muramoto – leg. // PARATYPE / Kibakoganea / ohtanii / Y. MIYAKE et / MURAMOTO, 1992.’]].

Junior subjective synonym of Kibakoganea sexmaculata (Kraatz, 1900), see Miyake (2003).

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Malino, Celebes / Indonesia / 21 Nov 1944 // malino / 2603.11.21 // Holotype: Malaia / castanoptera / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. (Fig. 1G)

7 exs.: 1 ♂, 3 ♀ ‘Malino, Celebes / Indonesia / 21 Nov 1944 // malino / 2603.11.21 // Paratype: Malaia / castanoptera / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 2 exs. ‘Malino, Celebes / Indonesia / 21 Nov 1944 // malino / 2603.11.21 // Paratype: Malaia / castanoptera / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 1 ex. ‘malino / 2603.11.21 // Paratype: Malaia / castanoptera / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’.

Valid species.

The habitus photo in the original description belongs to the female paratype with the label ‘Malino, Celebes / Indonesia / 21 Nov 1944 // malino / 2603.11.21’.

The following paratypes are deposited is RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘32 km from / Palopo / Surawesi / 10. VI. 1982 // Paratype: / Malaia cyanea / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 1 ♀ ‘Punchak–Lombanan / Mamasa, / S. SULAWESI / 1991. AUG. 10. / N. Kashiwai–leg. // Paratype: / Malaia cyanea / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

Valid species.

The holotype and the following paratype are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Lampbatter / Sulawesi / 23–25. VIII. 1999 / M. Takai // Holotype: Malaia / macassara / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. (Fig. 1H)

1ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Lampbatter / Sulawesi / 23–25. XII. 1999 / M. Takai leg. // Paratype: Malaia / macassara / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’.

The left protarsus and metatarsus of the holotype are missing.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

4 exs.: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ ‘Puncak, Palopo / VI–VII, 1989 / Central SULAWESI // Paratype: Malaia / rufofemorata / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 2 ♂ ‘Palu Palolo / VIII. 1990 / Central SULAWESI // Paratype: Malaia / rufofemorata / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 2 ♂, 1 ♀ ‘Palolo, Palu / 01–10/XI. 1990 / native coll. / CELEBES // Paratype: Malaia / rufofemorata / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

58 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Toraja / 1985. III–17 / South SULAWESI / Soma, K. leg. // Paratype: / Malaia / sulawesi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 1 ex. ‘Puncak Palopo / 1989. III. 31 / Centr. CELEBES // Paratype: / Malaia / sulawesi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 3 exs. ‘Palu Pulu / C. Sulawesi / II. 1989 // Paratype: / Malaia / sulawesi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. [[44 exs. ‘Mt. Pedamaran / S. Sulawesi (real data is C. Sulawesi) / 20. X. 1983 (real date is 20. V. 1983) / K. Soma leg. // Paratype: / Malaia / sulawesi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’]]. [[9 exs. ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Toraja / 1983. X–20 (real date is 1983. V–20) / South SULAWESI (real data is Central SULAWESI) / Soma, K. leg. // Paratype: / Malaia / sulawesi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’]].

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

4 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘37 km from / Palopo C.- / Sulawesi / 9. IV. 1982 // Paratype: / Malaia / taoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 1 ♀ ‘32 km from / Palopo / Surawesi / 10. VI. 1982 // 37 km from / Palopo C.- / Sulawesi / 10. VI. 1982 // Paratype: / Malaia / taoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 1 ♂ ‘37 km from / Palopo C.- / Sulawesi / 11. IV. 1982 // Paratype: / Malaia / taoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 1 ♀ ‘32 km from / Palopo / Surawesi / 13. VI. 1982 // 37 km from / Palopo C.- / Sulawesi / 13. VI. 1982 // Paratype: / Malaia / taoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

4exs.: ‘Tondano / N. Sulawesi / 10–IV–1989 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Malaia / tondanoensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

[[1 ex. ‘Tangkoko N. / N. Sulawesi / 10–III–1989 (the date given in the original description is 10–IV–1989) / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Malaia / tondanoensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’]]. [[2 exs. ‘Tondano / N. Sulawesi / 9–IV–1989 (the date given in the original description is 10–IV–1989) / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Malaia / tondanoensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’]].

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Traja / 20–X. 1983 / K. SOHMA lgd. / South SULAWESI // Holotype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. (Fig. 2A)

Figure 2. 

Habitus of holotype and neotype specimens. A Malaia toraja Miyake B Mimela kitanoi Miyake C Mimela marginipennis Miyake D Spinanomala moritai Miyake E Peltonotus morio Burmeister F Peltonotus morio sawaii Miyake G Apogonia ohmomoi Miyake H Apogonia ovata Miyake et Yamaguchi.

27 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Traja / 20–X. 1983 / K. SOHMA lgd. // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 9 exs. ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Traja / 20–X. 1983 / K. SOHMA lgd. // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 2 exs. ‘Mt. Pedamaran / S. Sulawesi / 20. X. 1983 / K. Soma leg. // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’.8 exs. ‘Puncak, Palopo / VI–VII, 1989 / Central SULAWESI // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 2 exs. ‘Central SULAWESI / Puncak, Palopo / VI–VII, 1989 // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 1 ♂ ‘Puncak Palopo / 1989. / Centr. CELEBES // SI [yellow label] // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 4 exs. ‘Puncak Palopo / 1989. / Centr. CELEBES // SI [yellow label] // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’.

Valid species.

The habitus photo in the original description belongs to the female paratype with the label ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Toraja / S. Sulawesi / 7, VIII, 1988 / K. Soma leg.’.

In addition to the paratypes listed above, the following specimens labeled as the paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ♀ ‘Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Toraja / S. Sulawesi / 7, VIII, 1988 / K. Soma leg. // SI [yellow label] // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 1 ex. ‘(Pulu Pulu) / C. Sulawesi / INDONESIA / Dec. 1988 // [yellow label] // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 2 exs. ‘Puncak, Palopo / Centr. CELEBES / 1989. I / INDONESIA // [yellow label] // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 1 ex. ‘Puncak Palopo / 1989. III. 31 / Centr. CELEBES // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. 3 exs. ‘Palu, Palolo / VII 1989 / Central SULAWESI // Paratype: Malaia / toraja / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. K. Wada):

(♀). ‘Larashan / Hsinchu Hs. / VI. 1975, / Fang leg // Holotype: / Mimela kitanoi / Y. MIYAKE, 1987 // Kaoru WADA / Collection 2001’. (Fig. 2B)

Junior subjective synonym of Mimela flavocincta Lin, 1966, see Zorn and Bezděk (2016).

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘[Borneo] / Crocker Range / 1800−1400m alt. / nr. Keningau C. / X. 1988. M. ITOI leg. // Holotype: / Mimela / marginipennis / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. (Fig. 2C)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately, and the left mesotarsus is missing.

Junior subjective synonym of Mimela margarita Arrow, 1910, see Wada (2001).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Crocker Range / (1000–1400 m) / Nr. Keningau C. / N. Borneo, – / 15–V–1989 // [blue label] // Paratype: / Mimela / sawaii / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’.

Junior subjective synonym of Mimela pallidicauda Arrow, 1910, see Wada (2001).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

2ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Mt. Trus Madi / (SW Slopa 1200m alt.) / Sabah, MALAYSIA / 14–IV–1993 / Minoru SAWAI leg. // Paratype: / Mimela / suspecta / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. [[1 ex. ‘Mt. Trus Madi / (SW Slopa 1200m alt.) / Sabah, MALAYSIA / 18–IV–1993 (the date given in the original description is 4–IV–1993) / Minoru SAWAI leg. // [yellow label] // Paratype: / Mimela / suspecta / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’]].

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimen labeled as paratype is not designated in the original description: 1 ♂ ‘Trus Madi Mts. / near Keningau / Saba MALAYSIA / 1993. iv. 17–30. // F //Paratype: / Mimela / suspecta / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

6 exs.: 2 ♀ ‘Puncak, Palopo / Centr. CELEBES / 1989. I / INDONESIA // Paratype: / Popillia / iwasei / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 2 ♀ ‘Puncak Palopo / C. Sulawesi / 1. 1989 // Paratype: / Popillia / iwasei / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 1 ♀ ‘Puncak Palopo / C. Sulawesi / 1989. V / INDONESIA // SI [yellow label] // Paratype: / Popillia / iwasei / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. [[1 ♂ ‘Palolo (the locality given in the original description is Palopo) / II. 1991 (the date given in the original description and Telnov and Zorn (2019) are I. 1989) // Paratype: / Popillia / iwasei / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’]].

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

18 exs.: [[1 ex. ‘ [Malaya] / Fraser’s Hill / 29–III–1977 (the date given in the original description is 28. III. 1977) / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’]]. [[1 ex. ‘ [Malaya] / Freaser’s Hill (the locality given in the original description is Fraser’s Hill) / 30–III–1977 (the date given in the original description is 28. III. 1977) / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’]]. 6 exs. ‘ [Malaya] / Tanah Rata / 30–III–1974 / Y, Miyake leg // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 9 exs. ‘TANARATA / MALAYA / 30 III 1974 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. [[1 ex. ‘Gentig / Hiland (the locality given in the original description is Genting Highland) MALAYA / 5. IV. 1974 (the date given in the original description is 5. IV. 1975) / Y Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’]].

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 8 exs. ‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / 1. III. 1977 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 5 exs. ‘TANARATA / MALAYA / 28, 29, 30 III 1974 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ex. ‘84. IV // Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 2 exs. ‘Paratype: / Spilopopillia / rugosa / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / IV. 1984 / M. Hata // Holotype: / Spinanomala / moritai / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. (Fig. 2D)

11 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / I–II. 1973 / MORITA, Kozo // Paratype: Spinanomala / moritai / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 2 ♂, 3 ♀ ‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / 1. III. 1977 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: Spinanomala / moritai / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. 3 ♂, 2 ♀ ‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / IV. 1984 / M. Hata // Paratype: Spinanomala / moritai / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately and the right metaleg is missing.

Valid species.

The collecting data of the specimen labelled as the holotype do not match the original description. There are two male paratypes (‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / 1. III. 1977 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: Spinanomala / moritai / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’) that match the holotype data.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimen labeled as the paratype is not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘フレーザーヒル= furêzâhiru / MALAYA / 4 – 6. IV. 1977 / M. Hata // Paratype: Spinanomala / moritai / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Timor Is. / Indonesia / V. 1993 / Native Coll. // Timor / Is. [aedeagus mount] // Paratype: / Papuana / timorensis YAMAYA / Y. MIYAKE, 1999’.

Valid species.

The neotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. K. Wada):

(♂). ‘NEPAL・HIMALAYA / 10. 5. 1993 Chhachok Madi– / Khola/ Gandaki (Kaski– / Destr.) 1300m lg: D. Ahrens //Peltonotus / morio Burn. / det: D. Ahrens 1997 // Neotype / Peltonotus / morio Burmeister, 1847 / Jameson and Wada, 2004’. (Fig. 2E)

The aedeagus of the neotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The neotype was designated by Jameson and Wada (2004).

The holotype and the following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Doi Suthep / Chieng Mai / N–THAILAND/ 22. V. 1983 / leg. M. Sawai // 12 // P. morio / Burmi. [white label, front] // Cameron / Highland / Pahang [white label, back] // Holotype: Peltonotus / morio sawaii / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’. (Fig. 2F)

4 exs.: 2 ♂, 1 ♀ ‘Doi Suthep / Chieng Mai / N–THAILAND / 22. V. 1983 / leg. M. Sawai // Paratype: Peltonotus / morio sawaii / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // P. morio /Burmeister’. 1 ♀ ‘Doi Suthep / Chieng Mai / N–THAILAND / 22. V. 1983 / leg. M. Sawai // Paratype: Peltonotus / morio sawaii / Y. MIYAKE, 2000’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Junior subjective synonym of Peltonotus morio Burmeister, 1847, see Krell and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

7 exs.: 2 exs. ‘ [Malaya] / Tanah Rata / 30–III–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: Peltonotus peninsularis / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // Paratype / Peltonotus podocrassus / Jameson and Wada, 2004’. 1 ♂ ‘39 miles from / Tapah, Malaya / 30–III–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: Peltonotus peninsularis / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // Paratype / Peltonotus podocrassus / Jameson and Wada, 2004’. 1 ♂ ‘TANARATA / MALAYA / 30. III. 1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: Peltonotus peninsularis / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // Paratype / Peltonotus podocrassus / Jameson and Wada, 2004’. 1 ♂ ‘V. R〔C. H.〕/ Malaya / 21. III. 1978 // 46 // Paratype: Peltonotus peninsularis / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // Paratype / Peltonotus podocrassus / Jameson and Wada, 2004’. 1 ex. [Malaya] / Tanah Rata / 1–IV–1984 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: Peltonotus peninsularis / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // Paratype / Peltonotus podocrassus / Jameson and Wada, 2004’. 1 ex. ‘TANARATA / MALAYA / 1. IV. 1984 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: Peltonotus peninsularis / Y. MIYAKE, 2000 // Paratype / Peltonotus podocrassus / Jameson and Wada, 2004’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: ‘Mt. Serapi / SARAWAKU / 1991/III. // 20 // Paratype: / Peltonotus sakaii / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1994 // Peltonotus / similis Arrow, 1931 / det. Kaoru Wada, 2004’.

Junior subjective synonym of Peltonotus similis Arrow, 1931, see Krajcik (2012).

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ♂ ‘Mt. Serapi / Kuching, Sarawak / IX. 1990 / BORNEO // Paratype: / Peltonotus sakaii / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1994 // Peltonotus / similis Arrow, 1931 / det. Kaoru Wada, 2004’. 1 ex. ‘Lembah Anai / W. Sumatra / VI. 1990 / INDONESIA // [yellow label] // Paratype: / Peltonotus sakaii / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1994 // Peltonotus / similis Arrow, 1931 / det. Kaoru Wada, 2004’. 1 ♂ ‘Kimanis Road / Near Keningau / N. Borneo / 3–V–1994 // Paratype: / Peltonotus sakaii / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1994 // Peltonotus / similis Arrow, 1931 / det. Kaoru Wada, 2004’. 2 exs. ‘Kimanis Road / Near Keningau / N. Borneo / 3–V–1994 // Paratype: / Peltonotus sakaii / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1994 // Peltonotus / similis Arrow, 1931 / det. Kaoru Wada, 2004’.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

4 exs.: ‘Tondano N. Celebes / INDONESIA / V 1988 / leg. N. Nisikawa // PARATYPE / Peltonotus sulawesiensis / Kaoru WADA, 1990’.

Junior subjective synonym of Neohyphus celebesus Heller, 1896, see Kuijten (1994).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Amiserica / rufidula / NOMURA (1974)’. 1 ♂ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 1. VIII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Amiserica / rufidula / NOMURA (1974)’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: ‘Flores Is. / Indonesia / May. 1995 // Y // Paratype: / Apogonia fujiokai / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1997’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: ‘Vangvieng / P. Vietiane / LAO. P. D. R. / 25–26. MAY. 1994. / K. Miura–leg. // Y // Paratype: Apogonia / fuscoventris / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1997’.

Junior subjective synonym of of Apogonia striatipennis Frey, 1971, see Kobayashi (2010).

The species name on the paratype label is ‘fuscoventris’, which is invalid. Probably, the name was confused with fusciventris by Y. Miyake.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

11 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Hong Kong / China / C. K. Yu / 1974. V. [white label, front] // Native Collector / legt. [white label, back] // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ♂ ‘Hong Kong / China / V. 1974 / C. K. Yu [white label, front] // Legt. / Native / Collector [white label, back] // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ♂ ‘Hong Kong / China / V. 1974 / C. K. Yu [white label, front] // Native Collector [white label, back] // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ♀ ‘♀ // Hong Kong / China / V. 1974 / C. K. Yu [white label, front] // Legt. / Native / Collector // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ♀ ‘♀ // Hong Kong / China / V. 1974 / C. K. Yu [white label, front] // Native / Collector / legt. // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ♀ ‘Hong Kong / 1974 / From C. K. Yu ♀ // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ex. ‘Hong Kong / China / V. 1974 / C. K. Yu [white label, front] // Legt. / native / Collector [white label, back] // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 2 exs. ‘Hang Kong / China / V. 1974 / C. K. Yu Col [white label, front] // Native / Collector / legt. // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 2 exs. ‘Hong Kong / V. 1974 / From C. K. Yu // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’.

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1ex. ‘Hong Kong / 1975 / From. C. K-Yu // Paratype: Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 1 ♀ ‘Hong Kong / ♀ 1975 [white label, front] // from / C. K. Yu [white label, back] // Paratype: / Apogonia / hongkongica / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. A. Bezděk):

4 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘1985. 5. 18−19. / Wieng Ko Sai Nat. / Park, Phrae Prov., / N-Thailand / Col. S. Ohmomo [white label, front] // 5/18 夜= yoru [white label, back] // PARATYPE / Apogonia / inconstans / Kobayashi et Bezděk, 2011’. 1 ex. ‘1985. 5. 18−19. / Wieng Ko Sai Nat. / Park, Phrae Prov., / N-Thailand / Col. S. Ohmomo [white label, front] // 5/18 夜= yoru [white label, back] // PARATYPE / Apogonia / inconstans / Kobayashi et Bezděk, 2011’. 1 ex. ‘1985. 5. 18−19. / Wieng Ko Sai Nat. / Park, Phrae Prov., / N-Thailand / Col. S. Ohmomo [white label, front] // 夜= yoru 5/18 [white label, back] // PARATYPE / Apogonia / inconstans / Kobayashi et Bezděk, 2011’. 1 ex. ‘1985. 5. 18−19. / Wieng Ko Sai Nat. / Park, Phrae Prov., / N-Thailand / Col. S. Ohmomo [white label, front] // night [white label, back] // PARATYPE / Apogonia / inconstans / Kobayashi et Bezděk, 2011’.

Valid species.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘1985. 5. 18−19. / Wieng Ko Sai Nat. / Park, Phrae Prov., / N−Thailand / Col. S. Ohmomo [white label, front] // 夜= yoru 5/18 [white label, back] // 14 // Holotype: / Apogonia / scabra / Y. MIYAKE // Apogonia ohmomoi / Miyake, 1989 / HOLOTYPUS, ♂ / A. Bezděk det. 2011’. (Fig. 2G)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately, and the right antenna, right and left protarsus, right mesoclaw, left mesotarsus, right metatarsus and mesonotum are missing.

Valid species.

The label ‘Apogonia scabra’ was apparently accidentally put by Miyake.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Kaeng Tana / Khong Chiam / Ubonratchathani / [NE-THAILAND] / 29. Aug. 1997 / S. Yamaguchi leg. // Holotype / Apogonia ovata / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAGUCHI 1998’. (Fig. 2H)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Senior synonym of Apogonia miyakei Bezděk, 2004, see Bezděk (2004).

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Don Far Huan (light) / Ubon Ratchathani / E-THAILAND / 17. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. // Holotype / Apogonia terminalis / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’. (Fig. 3A)

Figure 3. 

Habitus of holotype specimens. A Apogonia terminalis Miyake, Yamagushi et Akiyama B Apogonia unidentata Miyake, Yamaguchi et Akiyama C Dichelomorpha sublineata Miyake D Holomelia gigantea Miyake E Holotrichia loochooana umebayashii Miyake F Holotrichia yamayai Miyake et Yamaguchi G Hoplia choui Miyake H Hoplia nakanei Miyake.

4exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukdahan (light) / NE-THAILAND / 5. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. // Paratype / Apogonia terminalis / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’. 3 ♀ ‘Don Far Huan (light) / Ubon Ratchathani / E-TAILAND / 17. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. // ♀ // Paratype / Apogonia terminalis / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately, and the left proclaw, right and left mesotarsus, right metaclaw and left metatarsus are missing.

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukdahan (light) / NE-THAILAND / 5. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. // Holotype / Apogonia / unidentata // Holotype / Apogonia unidentata / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’. (Fig. 3B)

6 exs.: 4exs. ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukudahan (light) / NE-THAILAND / 5. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. // Paratype / Apogonia unidentata / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’. 1 ex. ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukudahan (light) / NE-THAILAND / 5. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. // 63 // Paratype / Apogonia unidentata / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’. 1 ex. ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukudahan (light) / NE-THAILAND / 14. Sep. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi & / M. Akiyama leg. / シミレア= shimirea // Paratype / Apogonia unidentata / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AKIYAMA 2002’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately, and the right protarsus and right and left metatarsi are missing.

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Is. Tioman, east of / Malay Pennisular March. 1993, nat, col // 1 [aedeagus mount] // Holotype: / Dichelomorpha / sublineata / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. (Fig. 3C)

34 exs.: 10 ♂ ‘Is. Tioman, east of / Malay Pennisular / March. 1993. nat, col // Paratype: / Dichelomorpha / sublineata / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. 14 exs. ‘Is. Tioman, east of / Malay Pennisular / March. 1993. nat, col // Paratype: / Dichelomorpha / sublineata / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. 1 ♂ ‘Is. Tioman, east of / Malay Pennisular / March. 1993. nat, col // 11 // Paratype: / Dichelomorpha / sublineata / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. 1 ex. ‘Is. Tioman, east of / Malay Pennisular / March. 1993. nat, col // 4 // Paratype: / Dichelomorpha / sublineata / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. [[8 exs. ‘Tioman Is. / E. of Malaya / III–1933 (the date given in the original description is III–1993), W. // Paratype: / Dichelomorpha / sublineata / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’]].

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The right mesotarsus is missing.

Valid species.

Miyake (1994) did not provide a photograph of the holotype. Apparently he provided a photograph of a paratype, but we could not trace that specimen.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake).

(♂). ‘19 miles from / Tapah, Malaya / 1–II–1974 / Y. Miyake leg [white label, front] // Wu TET KONG / legt. [white label, back] // 29・5 // 家= ie [aedeagus mount] // Holotype: / Holomelia / gigantea / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. (Fig. 3D)

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Cameron H. / MALAYA / Jan–Feb 1974 / Y. Miyake leg. // 30.5 // Paratype: / Holomelia gigantea / Y. MIYAKE, 1996 // 19 miles from / Tapah, Malaya / 1–II–1974 [white label, front] // Wu Tet Kong legt. [white label, back]’. 1 ex. ‘19 miles from / Tapah, Malaya / 1–II–1974 [white label, front] // Wu Tet Kong legt. [white label, back] // Paratype: / Holomelia gigantea / Y. MIYAKE, 1996’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

Miyake (1996) did not provide a photograph of the holotype. Apparently he provided a photograph of a paratype, but we could not trace that specimen.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘〔Loo-Choo〕/ Okinoerabuzima / 21. IV. 1957. / K. Umebayashi // 7 [white label, mounted on a part of tarsus] // HOLOTYPE / Holotrichia / loochooana / umebayashii / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. (Fig. 3E)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The left protarsus and the right and left metatarsus are missing.

Junior subjective synonym of Nigrotrichia loochooana okinawana (Nomura, 1964), see Matsumoto (2016).

The collecting date in the original description is 1.V.1957, which disagrees with the label data.

The holotype and following paratype are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘North Thailand / Chiangmai-Saraphee / 15th, June, 1996 / Native collector // Holotype / Holotricchia yamayai / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAGUCHI 1998’. (Fig. 3F)

1 ex.: 1 ♀ ‘Kaeng Tana / Khong Chiam / Ubonratohathani / [NE-THAILAND] / 27. Aug. 1997 / S. Yamaguchi leg. // Paratype / Holotrichia yamayai / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAGUCHI 1998’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Sozan / Formosa / 26. V. 1940 / Coll. M. Uno // HOLOTYPE / Hoplia / Choui Y. MIYAKE / 1986’. (Fig. 3G)

Abdomen only.

Valid species.

Most part of the holotype specimen was destroyed by Anthrenus verbasci.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘ (Taiwan) / Jibbon / 2. iv. 1970 / Y. Miyake // 1 // HOLOTYPE / Hoplia / nakanei Y. MIYAKE’. (Fig. 3H)

29 exs.: 4 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / 六亀= liugui．石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 5 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / Liukuei 石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / 六亀= liugui．石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1976 / 陳文竜= chen wenzhao leg. // Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 4 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / –V–1963 / T. Shirozu leg. // Paratype / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / –V–1963 / Shirozu leg. // Paratype / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / –V–1963 / T. Shirozu // Paratype: Hoplia / nakanei Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ♂ ‘六亀= liugui．石山= shi shan / alt. 2000 m / 9. VI. 1976 // Paratype: / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘FENCHIFO / FORMOSA / 24. V. 1975 / K. MATSUDA // Paratype: / Hoplia nakanei / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘Swakang / Taiwan / 15. VI. 1970 / Fukuda // Paratype: / Hoplia nakanei / 1986. Y. MIYAKE’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 1. IV. 1970 / H. NOMURA // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. [[4 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / V. 1965 (the date given in the original description is V. 1963) / T. Shirozu // Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / Y. Miyake’]]. [[2 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / V. 1965 (the date given in the original description is V. 1963) / T. Shirozu // Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’]]. [[1 ♂ ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / V. 1965 (the date given in the original description is V. 1963) / Col. T. Shirozu // Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’]]. [[1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / V. 1965 (the date given in the original description is V. 1963) / Col. T. Shirozu // Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’]]. [[1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara / V. 1965 (the date given in the original description is V. 1963) / Col. T. Shirozu // Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / 1986. Y. Miyake’]].

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The label data the holotype do not match the original description. There is one male paratype (‘六亀= liugui．石山= shi shan / alt. 2000 m / 9. VI. 1976 // Paratype: / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’) that agrees with the data of the holotype. Probably the type labels were mixed up and this specimen should be considered the holotype.

In addition to the paratypes listed above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Liukuei / –V–1963 / T. Shirozu col. // Paratype / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘APR II. 1971 / 榮華= ronghua / B-S. CHANG // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nakanei / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘Paratype / Hoplia nakanei / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’.

The allotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

Allotype (♀). ‘Allotype // mt. Noko (2650 m) / V. 20–VI. 2, 1966 // 1 // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nengkaoshana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’.

3ex.: 1 ♂ ‘mt. Nōhō / C-Formosa / V–20 ～ Vi–21 1966 // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nengkaoshana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ♂ ‘MT. HÔFAN / FORMOSA / 5–V. 73 / T. OCHI // 1 // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nengkaoshana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986 // Hoplia / inornata / H. Kobayashi, 1990 / Det. H. Kobayashi, 2015’. 1 ex. ‘JUL. 16. 1966 / 合欢山= hehuan shan / B. S. Chang // PARATYPE / nengkaoshana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986 // Hoplia / inornata / H. Kobayashi, 1990 / Det. H. Kobayashi, 2015’.

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘台中= tai chung 和平郷= heping xiang 早等村= zaodeng cun / 横貫公路= hengguan gonglu. 梨山站= lishan zhan / 海抜= kaibatsu 1679–2196 m. / 13–16. V. 1958. 陶家駒= tao jiayu // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nengkaoshana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘AUG 13. 1970 / 新坡= xinpo / B-S. CHANG // PARATYPE / Hoplia / nengkaoshana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘ [Taiwan] / Liukuei 石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1979 / Y. Miyake leg. // HOLOTYPE / Hoplia / simillima / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. (Fig. 4A)

Figure 4. 

Habitus of holotype specimens. A Hoplia simillima Miyake B Hoplia taiwana Miyake C Maladera hiranoi Miyake D Maladera kusuii Miyake E Nematophylla sugiharai Miyake F Pseudohoplia shibatai makiharai Miyake G Pseudohoplia shibatai matsudai Miyake H Paratrichius kyushuensis Miyake.

5 exs.: 3 exs. ‘(FORMOSA) / Baibara / –V–1969 // Paratype / Hoplia / simillima / 1989, Y. Miyake’. 2 exs. ‘(FORMOSA) / Baibara / –V–1969 / T. Shirozu // Paratype / Hoplia / simillima / 1989, Y. Miyake’.

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Liukuei 石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1979 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype / Hoplia / simillima / 1989, Y. Miyake’. 1 ♂ ‘石= ishi // [Taiwan] / 六亀= liugui 石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype / Hoplia / simillima / 1989, Y. Miyake’. 1 ex. ‘(FORMOSA) / Mt. Ali / 14 V 1968 / Y. HAYASHI // Paratype’.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘HOLOTYPE / Hoplia / Taiwana Y. MIYAKE / 1986’. (Fig. 4B)

9 exs.: 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 3. IV. 1970 / H. NOMURA // PARATYPE / Hoplia taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 4. IV. 1970 / H. NOMURA // PARATYPE / Hoplia taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 5. IV. 1970 / Y. KIYOYAMA // PARATYPE / Hoplia taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘SUNGKANG / FORMOSA / 29. VI. 1971 / Y. MAEDA // PARATYPE / Hoplia taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 31. III. 1981 / Y. YAMAMOTO // Paratype / Hoplia / taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 1. IV. 1981 / F. KIMURA // Paratype / Hoplia / taiwana Y. MIYAKE / (1968)’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 2. IV. 1981 / F. KIMURA // Paratype / Hoplia / taiwana Y. MIYAKE’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 2. IV. 1981 / F. KIMURA // Paratype / Hoplia taiwana / 1986 Y. MIYAKE’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / TAIWAN / 3. IV. 1981 / Y. YAMAMOTO // PARATYPE / Hoplia taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’.

Valid species.

The locality label data of the holotype are missing but the specimen agrees with the original description.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes were not designated in the original description: 3 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / Liukuei 石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // PARATYPE / Hoplia / taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / 六亀= liugui 石山= shi shan / 9–VI–1976 / Y. Miyake leg. // PARATYPE / Hoplia / taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 2 exs. ‘Mt. YUSHAN / TAIWAN / 8. VI. 1980 / M. YAMAMOTO // Paratype / Hoplia / taiwana Y. MIYAKE’. 4 exs. ‘TAIWAN / 陽明山= mt. yangmingshan / 20. IV. 1956 / COL. K. S. LIN // Paratype / Hoplia / taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘LUSHAN / FORMOSA / 13–IV. 74 / S. TAKEDA // PARATYPE / Hoplia / taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘榮華= ronghua / APR. 7. 1971 / BS, CHANG // PARATYPE / Hoplia taiwana / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwana] / Baibara / –V–1965 / T. Shirozu leg. // Paratype: Hoplia / taiwana Y. MIYAKE. 1986’.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘三京= mikyô / 21/VII–82 // HOLOTYPE / Maladera / hiranoi MIYAKE / (1986) // Maladera / impressthorax / hiranoi Y. MIYAKE / DET. Y. MIYAKE, 199 // ムナクボビロウドコガネ= munakubobirôdokogane / Maladera (japonica–G) / impressithorax / Nomura, 1973 / Det. H. Hirasawa 2012’. (Fig. 4C)

Junior subjective synonym of Maladera okinoerabuana Kobayashi, 1978, see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The date on the collecting data label of the holotype is 21.VII.1982, but the collecting date quoted in the original description is 22.VII.1982. Probably, Miyake made a typographical error when writing the description.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Maladera (s. str) / kobayashii / NOMURA (1974)’. 1 ♀ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // PARATYPE / Maladera / kobayashii / NOMURA (1974)’.

Valid species.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘三宅= miyake / コガネムシ上科標準図鑑= koganemushijyôka-hyôjyunzukan / ビロウドコガネ族= birôdokoganezoku / 図鑑使用標本= zukanshiyôhyôhon / 執筆担当= shippitsutantô：平沢 伴明= hirasawa tomoaki / 学研教育出版= gakkenkyôikushuppan (2012) // GAKIYA / Iheya-jima / Aug. 11 1977 / leg. Y Kusui // イヘヤビロウドコガネ= iheyabirôdokogane / Maladera (japonica–G) / kusuii / Y. Miyake, 1986 / Det. H. Hirasawa 2012 // Holotype: / Maladera kusuii / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The right and left protarsi, the left mesotarsus, and the right and left metatarsi are missing, but some of the missing parts are pinned separately.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: 1 ♀ ‘Lishan / Taiwan / 28. VII. 1973 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: / Maladera / lishana / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

2 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Puli 24 // PARATYPE / Maladera / nanshanchiana / NOMURA (1974)’. 1 ♀ ‘Puli 24 // ♀ // PARATYPE / Maladera / nanshanchiana / NOMURA (1974) // ナンザンケイビロウドコガネ= nanzenkeibirodokogane / Maladera (Cephaloserica) / nanshanchiana / Nomura, 1974 / Det. H. Hirasawa 2012’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Lishan / C. Taiwan / 29. vii. 1973 / Y. Miyake // 三宅= miyake // PARATYPE / Maladera / secreta / horaiana / NOMURA (1974)’.

Valid species.

Genus Melanomaladera

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘China, N W Yunnan / Degen City env. / 3300 m alt. / 29. Jun. 1998 / A. Gorodinsky leg. // 13 // Paratype: / Melanoserica / yunnana’. 1 ♀ ‘China, N W Yunnan / Degen City env. / 3300 m alt. / 29. Jun. 1998 / A. Gorodinsky leg. // 13 // Paratype: / Melanoserica / yunnana’.

Archeohomaloplia yunnana (Miyake et Yamaya, 2001), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The genus name on the paratype labels is ‘Melanoserica’, which is invalid. Probably, it was confused with ‘Melanomaladera’ by Y. Miyake.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. D. Ahrens):

1 ex.: ‘NEPAL–HIMALAYA / Annapurna–Mts. / leg. Ahrens 1993 // Pisang bis / Manang, 30. 5. / 3000–3300 m // PARATYPEUS / Parvulomaladera / annapumae sp. n. / det. D. AHRENS 1994’.

Oxyserica pygidialis annapurnae (Ahrens, 1995), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: ‘Lu-SHAN / FORMOSA / 27. IV. 1973 / K. MATSUDA // 三宅= miyake // Paratype / Microserica / nitidipyga / NOMURA (1974) // Microserica / nitidipyga NOM. / DET. Y. MIYAKE, 1994’.

Valid species.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Kiau Gap / Mt. Kinabalu / Sabah, Borneo / 1. IV. 2000 / H. SUGIHARAI leg. // Holotype: Nematophylla / sugiharai / Y. MIYAKE 2000’. (Fig. 4E)

Junior subjective synonym of Nematophylla carinicollis Arrow, 1938, see Krajcik (2012).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: ‘Takashinohama, / Osaka Pref. / 3. VI. 1974 / Coll. Mitsuo Goto // at light // PARATYPE / Nipponoserica / pubiventris / NOMURA (1976)’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

4 exs.: 4 ♂ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // Paratype / Paramaladera / makiharai / NOMURA (1974)’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘（FORMOSA）/ Mt. Ali / 15 V 1968 / Y. HAYASHI // Paratype // Hoplia / shibatai shibatai / Y. Miyake, 1986 / Det. H. Kobayashi, 2015’. 1 ex. ‘（FORMOSA）/ Mt. Ali / 15 V 1968 / Y. HAYASHI // Paratype // Hoplia / shibatai shibatai / Y. Miyake, 1986 / Det. H. Kobayashi, 2015’.

Hoplia shibatai shibatai (Miyake, 1986), see Kobayashi (2017).

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘Mt. Arishan / Formosa / 1. V. 1973 / K. MATSUDA // Paratype // Paratype / Pseudohoplia / shibatai / Y. Miyake, 1986 // 贈台湾農試= zou-taiwan-noushi’. 1 ♂ ‘Houanchi- / Sundchuankang / Nantou Hsien / Taiwan / 25. VI. 1976 / H. Makihara leg. // Paratype // Paratype / Pseudohoplia / shibatai / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘Mt. Arishan / Formosa / 1. V. 1973 / K. MATSUDA // Paratype / Pseudohoplia / shibatai / Y. Miyake, 1986’. 1 ex. ‘MT. ARI / FORMOSA / 1. V. 1973 / K. MATSUDA // Paratype // Paratype / Pseudohoplia / shibatai / Y. Miyake, 1986’.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Mt. Lalashan / Taoyuan Hsien / Taiwan / 21–24. V. 1980 / H. Makihara // HOLOTYPE / Pseudohoplia / shibatai makiharai / Y. MIYAKE, 1886’. (Fig. 4F)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The right antenna is missing.

Hoplia shibatai makiharai (Miyake, 1986), see Kobayashi (2017).

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Mt. Nōko / C-Formosa / v–20～vi–21’ 66 // HOLOTYPE / Pseudohoplia / shibatai matsudai / Y. MIYAKE, 1986’. (Fig. 4G)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Junior subjective synonym of Hoplia shibatai shibatai (Miyake, 1986), see Kobayashi (2017).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

2 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘FUNCHIHO / FORMOSA / 1. VIII. 1973 / H. OHASHI // ♂ // 三宅= miyake // Paratype / Pseudomaladera / nitidifrons / NOMURA, 1974’. 1 ♂ ‘MEIFENG / FORMOSA / 1. VIII. 1973 / T. OCHI // ♂ // Paratype / Pseudomaladera / nitidifrons / NOMURA, 1974’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

2 exs.: ‘China, Yunnan / Boshan C. env. / 2100 m alt. / 10. VII. 1998 / A. Gorodinski // 12 // Paratype / Sinoserica / maculipennis’.

Trioserica maculipennis (Miyake et Yamaya, 2001), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

11 exs.: 1 ♀ ‘Lishan / C. Taiwan / 29. vii. 1973 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // 三宅= miyake // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / NOMURA (1974)’. 2 ♀ ‘Li-shan / C. Taiwan / 26. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / S. NOMURA (1974)’. 2 ♂ ‘Li-shan / C. Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / S. NOMURA (1974)’. 2 ♀ ‘Li-shan / C. Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / S. NOMURA (1974)’. 1 ♂ ‘Li-shan / C. Taiwan / 1. VIII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / S. NOMURA (1974)’. 2 ♀ ‘Li-shan / C. Taiwan / 1. VIII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / S. NOMURA (1974)’. 1 ♀ ‘27 // ♀ // Paratype / Serica / fusifemorata / S. NOMURA (1974)’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: ‘China, Gangu / Mts. Minshan / nr. Wudn. 2100 / 1. VI. 1997 / A. Gorodinski // 4 // Paratype: / Serica / gansuensis’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: ‘Paratype // TASHIRO / CHIKUGO / 4. V. 1952 / Y. MIYAKE // Sericania / miyakei / NOMURA (1960)’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Itoh):

3 exs.: ‘1989–4–17 / 平良植物園= hirara-syokubutsuen /（宮古島）= miyako-jima / leg. T. Ueno // Paratype / Sophrops / takatoshii / T. Itoh’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘MT. ARI / FORMOSA / 30. VII. 1973 / H. OHASHI // ♂ // 三宅= miyake // Paratype / Taiwanoserica / elongata / NOMURA (1974)’.

Serica (Taiwanoserica) elongata (Nomura, 1974), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

22 exs.: 2 ♂ ‘Lishan / C. Taiwan / 30. vii. 1970 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’. 6 ♂ ‘Lishan / C-Taiwan / 29. vii. 1973 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’. 4 ♀ ‘Lishan / C-Taiwan / 29. vii. 1973 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’. 4 ♂ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’. 1 ♀ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 29. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // ♀ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’. 4 ♂ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 1. VII. 1974 // Y. Miyake // ♂ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’. 1 ♀ ‘Li-shan / Taiwan / 1. VII. 1974 // Y. Miyake // ♀ // PARATYPE / Taiwanoserica / lishana / S. Nomura (1974)’.

Serica (Taiwanoserica) lishana (Nomura, 1974), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Paratype / Trichomaladera / elongata / NOMURA (1974)’.

Valid species.

The collecting data label of the paratype is missing.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: ‘Mt. Hiko / [KYUSHU] / 27. 7. 1960 / TAKEISHI // Paratype / Trichoserica / elongata / nitididorsis / Nomura’.

Serica nitididorsis (Nomura, 1971), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

8 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Aomori-pref / 17–vii–1956 / S. Kimotog // Paratype / Trichoserica / incurvata / Nomura (1971) // Aomori / 17. VII. 1956 / S. Kimoto’. 1 ♂ ‘17. VII. 1956 / S. Kimoto // Paratype / Trichoserica / incurvata / Nomura (1971)’. 2 exs. ‘Aomori-pref / 19–vii–1956 / S. Kimotog // Paratype / Trichoserica / incurvata / Nomura (1971) // Kimoto S. / 19. VII. 1956’. 1 ex. ‘Aomori-pref / 19–vii–1956 / S. Kimotog // Paratype / Trichoserica / incurvata / Nomura (1971) // 19. VII. 1956 / S. Kimoto’. 2 exs. ‘Sensuidani 1200 m / Okutama Tokyo / 21–VII–1968 / Coll. H. Yuasa // Paratype / Trichoserica / incurvata / Nomura (1971)’. 1 ex. ‘Okutama / 21. VII. 1968 / YUASA // Paratype / Trichoserica / incurvata / Nomura (1971)’.

Serica incurvata (Nomura, 1971), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘(Kyushu) / Mt. Sobo / 23. V. 1952 / Y. Miyake //Paratype / Trichoserica / nitidiceps / NOMURA’.

Junior subjective synonym of Serica inexspectata (Kontkanen, 1956), see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016).

In addition to the paratype mentioned above, the following specimen labeled as paratype is not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘Mt. Kuju / Bungo / 28. vii. 1961 / Y. Miyake // Paratype / Trichoserica / nitidiceps / NOMURA (1971)’.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. S. Nomura):

3 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘Mt. Hiko / Buzen / 1. VIII. 1953 / Y. Miyake // Paratype / Trichoserica / opacifrons / NOMURA’. 1 ex. ‘mt. Kujū / Hokkeein / 27. VII. 1961 / Y. Miyake Coll // Paratype / Trichoserica / opacifrons / NOMURA’. 1 ♂ ‘ [Kyushu] / Yakushima / 21. Vi. 1954 / Col. K. Matsuda // Paratype / Trichoserica / opacifrons / NOMURA // Ophthalmoserica/ matsudai / sp.n. / DET. Y. MIYAKE’.

Senior objective synonym of Serica planifrons Nomura, 1972, see Ahrens and Bezděk (2016). Nomura (1972) proposed Serica planifrons as a replacement name for Serica opacifrons (Nomura, 1971), a junior secondary homonym of Serica opacifrons Fairmaire, 1891.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Masumoto):

2 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Lishan / Taiwan / 28. VII. 1974 / Y. Miyake // Paratype / Anomalocera / paotao MAS. et SAK.’. 1 ex. ‘Lishan / C, -Taiwan / 29 vii. 1973 / Y. Miyake // Paratype / Anomalocera / paotao MAS. et Sak.’.

Diphyllomorpha paotao (Masumoto et Sakai, 1987), see Bezděk (2016).

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Masumoto):

3 exs.: 2 ♂ ‘FORMOSA / tattaka / 9, VIII 1971 / H. OHARA // Paratype / Rhomborrhina / kurosawai / MASUMOTO et K. SAKAI’. [[1 ♂ ‘Tsuifeng / C. Tsiwan / 26. vii. 1970 (the date given in the original description is 27.vii.1970) // Y. Miyake // Paratype / Rhomborrhina / kurosawai / MASUMOTO et K. SAKAI’]].

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘N. Keningau / N. Borneo / 30. V. 1994 // Paratype: Thaumastopeus / chicheryi tenuigenius / Y. MIYAKE et YAMAYA, 1995’.

Valid species.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

4 exs.: [[‘Tanah Rata / MALAYA / 7. IV. 1972 (the date given in the original description is 7.IV.1978) / M. Hata // Paratype: / Paratrichius / hatai / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’]].

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘MT. SOBO / BUNGO / 28. vii. 1954 / Y. MIYAKE // Holotype: / Paratrichius / kyushuensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1990’. (Fig. 4H)

5 exs.: 1 ex. ‘(Kyushu) / Mt. Sobo / 24. VII. 1950 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: Paratrichius / kyushuensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1990’. 1 ♂ ‘(Kyushu) / Mt. Sobo / 24. VII. 1952 / Y. Miyake // Paratype: Paratrichius / kyushuensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1990’. 1 ex. ‘(Kyushu) / Mt. Ichi Fu Sa / 28 VII 1952 / Col. S. Kimoto // Paratype: Paratrichius / kyushuensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1990’. 1 ex. 1 ♂ ‘(Kyushu) / Mt. Sobo / 24. VII. 1953 / K. MATSUDA // Paratype: Paratrichius / kyushuensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1990’.

The left metatarsus of the holotype is missing.

Valid species.

The date on the label of the holotype is 28.VII.1954 while that in the original description is 28.VII.1952.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimen labeled as paratype is not designated in the original description.: 1 ex. ‘⑦ // Paratype: Paratrichius / kyushuensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1990’.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘M. ITO leg / Sapa=Chapa / N. Vietnam / 23–V–1995 // サパ= sapa [aedeagus mount] // Holotype: Tibiotrichius / vietnamensis Y. MIYAKE, 1996’. (Fig. 5A)

Figure 5. 

Habitus of holotype specimens. A Tibiotrichius vietnamensis Miyake B Charitovalgus banzai Sawada C Dasyvalgus annamensis Miyake D Dasyvalgus castaneodorsalis Miyake E Dasyvalgus decamaculatus Miyake F Dasyvalgus flavicauda Miyake G Dasyvalgus macacus Miyake H Dasyvalgus multicus Miyake.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The neotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Hourng Shoei ken / near Liukuei, / Kao Hsung Hsien / VII. 1972 W. Chen leg // Holotype: Neotype / Charitovalgus / banzai SAWADA / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 5B)

The right and left metatarsi of the neotype are missing.

Valid species.

The neotype was designated by Miyake (1993).

The holotype and following paratype are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘4. 4 / 203 // Iluon Ma Thuot / Annam M. ITO // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / Annamensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 5C)

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Iluon Ma Thuot / Annam M. ITO // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / annamensis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’.

Valid species.

The locality on the collecting data label of the holotype is ‘Iluon Ma Thuot’, but the locality given in the original description is ‘Ban Me Thuot’. However, the habitus of the holotype and the figure in the original description match. Probably, Miyake made a typographical error when writing the description.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin–Doi Phui / 19–IV–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / casraneodorsalis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 5D)

6 exs.: 2 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 19–IV–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / castaneodorsalis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 21–IV–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / castaneodorsalis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 2 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin / 21–IV–1985 / M. TAO // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / castaneodorsalis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Doi Suthep / 10–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / castaneodorsalis / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Iluon Ma Thuot / Annam M. ITO // Holotype: / Dasyvalgus / decamaculatus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 5E)

2 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Near Chang Mai / N. Thailand / 7–V–1994 / K. KUME leg. // Paraype: Dasyvalgus / decamaculatus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ex. ‘Paratype: Dasyvalgus / decamaculatus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’.

The right and left metatarsus are missing.

Valid species.

The locality on the collecting data label of the holotype is ‘Iluon Ma Thuot’, but the locality given in the original description is ‘Ban Me Thuot’. However, the habitus of the holotype and the figure in the original description match. Probably, Miyake caused a typographical error when writing the description.

The holotype and following paratype are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Ban Lao Kram / Mukdahan / E-THAILAND / 17. Feb. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi and / T. Aoki leg. // Holotype: / Dasyvalgus / flavicauda // Holotype / Dasyvalgus flavicauda / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AOKI 2002’. (Fig. 5F)

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Phu Huai Sing / Mukdahan / E–THAILAND / 19. Feb. 1999 / S. Yamaguchi and / T. Aoki leg. // Paratype / Dasyvalgus flavicauda / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AOKI 2002’.

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘〔Thailand〕Pupin–Doi Phui / 19–IV–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / macacus / Y. MIYSKE, 1993’. (Fig. 5G)

4 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi Phui / 1–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / macacus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi Phui / 5–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / macacus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi Phui / 12–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / macacus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi Phui / 21–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / macacus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’.

Valid species.

The habitus photograph in the original description does not refer to the holotype.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: ‘MEIFENG / FORMOSA / 3–VII. 74 / T, OCHI // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / makiharai Y. MIYAKE / (1985)’.

Valid species.

In addition to the paratype mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratype are not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘松崗= songgang / 27～29. VII 1968 / K. YAMAMOTO // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / makiharai / Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ♂ ‘SUNG KANG / FORMOSA / 30–VI, 74 / T. OCHI // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / makiharai Y. MIYAKE / (1985)’.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

78 exs.: 75 exs. ‘Tondano / N. Sulawesi / 10–IV–1989 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / minahasanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’. 3 exs. ‘Tondano / N. Sulawesi / 9–IV–1989 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / minahasanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’.

Valid species.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimen labeled as paratypes is not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘Tondano / N. Sulawesi / 11–IV–1989 / Y. Miyake leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / minahasanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1989’.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘ [Thailand] / プピン-プイ= pupin-pui / 5–V–1985 / M. Tao leg. // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / multicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 5H)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The right and left protarsus are missing.

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Cao Bang / N. Vietnam / 9–11. VI, 1993 / M. ITO leg // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / nudis / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. (Fig. 6A)

Figure 6. 

Habitus of holotype specimens. A Dasyvalgus nudis Miyake B Dasyvalgus rubrothoracicus Miyake C Hybovalgus matsudai Miyake D Neovalgus formosanus Miyake E Oreoderus quadrimaculatus Miyake F Tarsovalgus hatai Miyake.

9 exs.: 3 ♂ ‘Cao Bang / N. Vietnam / 8–10 VI, 1993 / M. ITO leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / nudis / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. 3 ♂ ‘Cao Bang / N. Vietnam / 10. VI, 1993 / M. ITO leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / nudis / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’. [[2 ♂ ‘Cao Bang / N. Vietnam / 9–11. VI, 1993 (real date is 8–10. VI. 1993) / M. ITO leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / nudis / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’]]. [[1 ex. ‘Cao Bang / N. Vietnam / 11. VI, 1993 (real date is 8–10. VI. 1993) / M. ITO leg. // Paratype: / Dasyvalgus / nudis / Y. MIYAKE, 1994’]].

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The right antenna is missing.

Valid species.

The date on the collecting data label of the holotype is 9–11,VI,1993, but the collecting date quoted in the original description is 8–10,VI,1993. However, the habitus of the holotype and the figure in the original description match. Probably, Miyake caused a typographical error when writing the description.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin–Doi Phui / 21–IV–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 6B)

11 exs.: 1 ex. ‘Doi Sutehp / Thailand / 28–IV–1985 / M Tao leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 1–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 1–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 5–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. 1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 11–V–1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. [[1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 17–V–1985 (the date given in the original description is 17–IV–1985) / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’]]. [[1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 21–V–1985 (the date given in the original description is 21–IV–1985) / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’]]. [[1 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 21–V–1985 (the date given in the original description is 21–IV–1985) / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’]]. [[1 ♂‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 23–V–1985 (the date given in the original description is 23–IV–1985) / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’]]. [[2 ♂ ‘〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 28–V–1985 (the date given in the original description is 28–IV–1985) / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’]].

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Valid species.

The date on the collecting data label of the holotype is 21–IV–1985, but the collecting date quoted in the original description is 5–V–1985. However, the habitus of the holotype and the figure in the original description match. Probably, Miyake caused a typographical error when writing the description.

The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

3 exs.: 1 ♂ ‘蓬来= hôrai / 20, 21 VIII 1968 / H. MAKIHARA // Paratype’. 1 ♂ ‘FUNCHIIFO / FORMOSA / 1. VI. 1970 / Y. KIYOYAMA // Paratype // Paratype / Dasyvalgus / similis, Y. MIYAKE / 1985’. 1 ♂ ‘FUNCHIIFO / FORMOSA / 1. VI. 1970 / Y. KIYOYAMA // Paratype’.

Senior objective synonym of Dasyvalgus taiwanus Miyake, 1991. Miyake in Miyake et al. (1991) proposed Dasyvalgus taiwanus as a replacement name for Dasyvalgus similis Miyake, 1985, a junior primary homonym of Dasyvalgus similis Moser, 1908.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 1 ex. ‘LIUKUEI / FORMOSA / 3. X. 1970 / Y. KIYOYAMA // 16 // Paratype // Paratype / Dasyvalgus / similis Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘NANSHANCHI / FORMOSA / 27. VI. 1971 / Y. MAEDA // Paratype // Paratype / Dasyvalgus / similis Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘紅水坑= hongshuikeng / Liukuei / 11. V. 1978 / Chen. W. // Paratype’. 1 ♂ ‘紅水坑= hongshuikeng / Liukuei / 11. V. 1978 / Chen. W. // Paratype’. 1 ex. ‘紅水坑= hongshuikeng / Liukuei / 11. V. 1978 / W. Chen // Paratype // Paratype / Dasyvalgus / similis Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘Paratype’.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

1 ex.: 1 ♂ ‘Paratype / Dasyvalgus / wadai Y. MIYAKE, 1985’.

Valid species.

This paratype has no collecting data label.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Paratype // Holotype / Hybovalgus / matsudai Y. MIYAKE / (1985)’.

The right protarsus is missing.

Valid species.

There is no data label attached to the holotype, but the habitus of the holotype matches the figure in the original description. If confidence is placed in the pinned holotype label and the habitus, the above holotype specimen is the true holotype.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘六亀= liugui．石山= shi shan / 9. VI. 1976 / 2000m // Holotype: / Neovalgus / formosanus / Y, MIYAKE, 1985’. (Fig. 6D)

2 exs.: 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara, mt. Puli / –V–1965 // Paratype: Neovalgus / formosanus Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘ [Taiwan] / Liukuei / 16–V–1978 // PARATYPE / Neovalgus / formosanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1985’.

Valid species.

The date on the collecting label of the holotype is 9.VI.1976, but the collecting date quoted in the original description is 16.V.1978. However, the habitus of the holotype matches the figure in the original description. Probably, Miyake caused a typographical error when writing the description.

In addition to the paratypes mentioned above, the following specimens labeled as paratypes are not designated in the original description: 3 exs. ‘ [Taiwan] / Baibara, mt. Puli / –V–1965 // PARATYPE / Neovalgus / formosanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘Formosa / Wushe / V. 1965 / T. Shiroz / Paratype: Neovalgus / formosanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘六 亀= liugui, 石山= shi shan / 2000 m / 9–VI–1976 / Paratype / Neovalgus / formosanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1985’. 1 ex. ‘Paratype: / Neovalgus / formosanus / Y. MIYAKE, 1985’.

The holotype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘Phu Huai Sing / Mukdahan / E-THAILAND / 19. Feb. 1999 / S. Yamahuchi and T. Aoki leg. // Holotype: / Oreoderus / quadrumaculatus // Or. 4ml / Coll. // Holotype / Oreoderus quadrimaculatus / Y. MIYAKE, YAMAGUCHI / et AOKI 2002’. (Fig. 6E)

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately. The right protarsus is missing.

Valid species.

The holotype and following paratype are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

(♂). ‘ [Malaya] / – –1992 // Holotype: Tarsovalgus / hatai Y. MIYAKE, 1993’. (Fig. 6F)

1 ex.: ‘ [Malaya] / – –1992 // Paratype: / Tarsovalgus / hatai / Y. MIYAKE, 1993’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘YAMAZAKI- / CHO, KYOTO. / 5–IV, 1999 / M. KAWAHARA // PARATYPE / Trox / kyotensis / OCHI and KAWAHARA / 2000’.

Trox (Niditrox) kyotensis Ochi et Kawahara, 2000, see Kalz (2019).

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: ‘Yukyuzan-Park, Nagaoka / Niigata Pref., Japan / 28. V. 1997 / Y and M. Kawahara leg // PARATYPE / Trox / Sabulosus / Subsp. fujiokai / OCHI, 2000’.

Valid species.

The following paratype is deposited in RIEB (ex coll. T. Ochi):

1 ex.: 1♂ ‘MEBORO-DAM / KAMIAGATA. T. / IS. TSUSHIMA / NAGASAKI. J. P / 25–V. 2002 / Y and M. KAWAHARA // 対県= tsu-ken上県町= kamiagata-chô / 目保呂ダム= meborodamu / 25. V. 2002 / Y and M. Kawahara // ♂ // PARATYPE / Trox / setifer / subsp. horiguchii / OCHI and KAWAHARA / 2002’.

Trox horiguchii Ochi and Kawahara, 2002, see Pittino (2006).