Data Paper
Data Paper
Diversity of benthic marine mollusks of the Strait of Magellan, Chile (Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia): a historical review of natural history
expand article infoCristian Aldea, Leslie Novoa, Samuel Alcaino, Sebastián Rosenfeld§|
‡ Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
§ Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Santiago, Chile
Open Access


An increase in richness of benthic marine mollusks towards high latitudes has been described on the Pacific coast of Chile in recent decades. This considerable increase in diversity occurs specifically at the beginning of the Magellanic Biogeographic Province. Within this province lies the Strait of Magellan, considered the most important channel because it connects the South Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. These characteristics make it an interesting area for marine research; thus, the Strait of Magellan has historically been the area with the greatest research effort within the province. However, despite efforts there is no comprehensive and updated list of the diversity of mollusks within the Strait of Magellan up to now. This study consisted of a complete bibliographic review of all available literature that included samples of mollusks in the Strait of Magellan. More than 300 articles were reviewed, covering 200 years of scientific knowledge. There were 2579 records belonging to 412 taxa, of which 347 are valid species. Of the total valid species, 44 (~13%) are considered of doubtful presence in the Strait. This work increases the known richness of mollusks of the Strait of Magellan by 228%; it is also the first report that integrates all available diversity studies of the three most speciose classes of benthic mollusks (Gastropoda, Bivalvia and Polyplacophora) from the Strait of Magellan.


benthos, Magellanic Biogeographic Province, Mollusca, South Atlantic, South Pacific, species richness


It has been described that mollusks show an increase in diversity towards high latitudes in the Chilean southeastern Pacific coast (Valdovinos et al. 2003). This increase in mollusk richness occurs around 42°S, coinciding with the beginning of the Magellanic Biogeographic Province (Spalding et al. 2007). The Magellanic Province has been the focus of study of several scientific expeditions that contributed to the knowledge of marine mollusks. The first reports were made by King and Broderip (1832), d’Orbigny (1835–1846) and Philippi (1845). Other reports that contributed considerably to the knowledge of mollusks of the Magellanic Province were Smith (1881), Rochebrune and Mabille (1889), Strebel (1904, 1905a, b, 1906, 1907, 1908), Odhner (1926), Marcus (1959) and Soot-Ryen (1959). Carcelles and Williamson (1951) published the first checklist of species of marine mollusks of the Magellanic Province in the 1950s, defining the province from around 37°S in the Pacific coast and 43°S in the Atlantic coast, to 56°S. In their checklist 614 species were reported. Many taxonomic revisions of specific groups have been published (e.g., McLean 1984a; Castellanos 1988; Castellanos and Landoni 1988, 1989, 1990, Castellanos 1990, 1992a, b; Castellanos and Landoni 1993a, b; Castellanos et al. 1993; Ponder and Worsfold 1994; Schrödl 1996), therefore the checklist of Carcelles and Williamson (1951) had to be updated, for species synonyms and newly found species. Linse (1999) presented a new checklist of mollusks of the Magellanic Province, defining the province from around 41°S in the Pacific and Atlantic coasts to 56°S. However, the classes Polyplacophora and Cephalopoda were excluded from this checklist, which included 397 species of mollusks.

One of the most important channels in the Magellanic Province is the Strait of Magellan, where most historical reports of mollusks are focused. This extensive channel connects the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and is considered the most important one of the province. It is influenced by water masses of the Pacific, Atlantic and Southern Oceans, and it possess several geological characteristics derived from the last glaciation (Antezana 1999). For these reasons the Strait of Magellan offers unique characteristics for the study of biodiversity and related aspects of the biogeography of mollusks (Linse et al. 2006). Linse et al. (2006) presented the only report of mollusk richness in the Strait of Magellan, which contains 116 species. However, a list of species is not provided and only the classes Gastropoda and Bivalvia are included. Between the year 2000 and the present there have been several studies that have provided more information about the diversity of mollusks in the Strait of Magellan (e.g., Ríos et al. 2003; Ríos et al. 2005; Ríos et al. 2007; Thatje and Brown 2009; Aldea et al. 2011; Rosenfeld et al. 2013; Rosenfeld et al. 2015), presenting new records of species. Several taxonomic revisions of specific groups have been published in recent years, where erroneous records, changes in nomenclature, synonymized species and descriptions of new species have been made (e.g., Sirenko 2006a; Zelaya and Geiger 2007; Aranzamendi et al. 2009; Zelaya 2009; González-Wevar et al. 2011; Güller et al. 2016; Pastorino 2016; Güller and Zelaya 2017; Korshunova et al. 2017). In order to have a comprehensive list of species in the most important channel of the Magellanic Province it is necessary to provide an updated list of records of the malacofauna of the Strait of Magellan. The objective of this study is to provide the first list of species of benthic marine mollusks of the three most speciose and best documented classes (Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia) of the Strait of Magellan, integrating all studies throughout history.

Materials and methods

To make the list of mollusks as complete as possible, information was gathered from all the available scientific publications that have sampled or reviewed benthic marine mollusks in the Magellanic Province, from the expedition of the HMS Beagle in the 19th century (King and Broderip 1832) to the present. A total of 323 articles were reviewed, of which 146 contained species within the Magellanic Province. The records and their respective geographical positions were entered into a spreadsheet structured with the Darwin Core Standard (Wieczorek et al. 2012), adjusted taxonomically according to the MolluscaBase (2019) and the revisions of classification and systematics of gastropods (Bouchet et al. 2017), bivalves (Nevesskaja 2009) and polyplacophorans (Sirenko 2006b). The Strait of Magellan was divided into 420 quadrants of 6×6 minutes of latitude and longitude. The records located within this area were analyzed (Fig. 1), taking into account their georeference or approximate location. This analysis was developed using tools for Google Earth (, which transforms XLS extension files (Excel format) to KML (files that contains geographic data). In total, 108 articles provided records for the Strait of Magellan.

Figure 1. 

Study area. Location of the Strait of Magellan (marked by the red line), including Inútil Bay, Whiteside Channel and Almirantazgo Sound.

Dubious records were counted as were species that were recorded only once in history. Criteria were followed to determine doubtful species records, as follows: species that were cited once and later questioned in taxonomic revisions or never reported again; species that greatly exceed their distribution limit and do not appear in taxonomic revisions or alpha diversity studies; and species that have a huge geographical discontinuity and are not explained or figured in the article.

A new matrix was elaborated with the Darwin Core standard from the database, with presence-absence data of each taxon per quadrant entered as 1 or 0, respectively. The quadrants with no species were removed from the matrix and species/taxa considered doubtful and/or with imprecise locations were not included in the matrix. However, the above cases were considered in the quantification of total richness. On the other hand, the records up to or above genus level (registered as “indet.” or “sp.”) were not considered as valid species for both species richness values and estimation models, except for those in which the author commented that it could be a new species.

Finally, to detect whether the historial sampling effort was able to estimate all the species of mollusks in the Strait of Magellan, the non-parametric species accumulation models Chao 2 and Jacknife 1 (Burnham and Overton 1978; Burnham and Overton 1979; Chao 1987; Colwell and Coddington 1994) were used to evaluate the sampling effort spatially and estimate the number of species expected theoretically in the Strait of Magellan. These methods require only presence-absence data; Chao 2 is calculated with the species that occur in only one sample (single or singleton species) and those that occur exactly in two samples (doubletons). Jacknife 1 is a more accurate and less biased estimator, since it only uses the number of singletons and the number of samples (Moreno 2001). Complementarily, parametric accumulation models were used to detect whether the historical sampling effort was able to estimate the total species of mollusks (Soberón and Llorente 1993); the linear dependence and Clench models were used. All samples were randomized so as not to affect the shape of the curve (Colwell and Coddington 1994; Moreno and Halffter 2000). The estimation of the coefficients of each nonlinear regression model was done using the Simplex and Quasi-Newton estimation methods of the statistical package STATISTICA 7. For all models, species with imprecise locations were not included.


A total of 134 articles summarizing two centuries of study were entered in the spreadsheet, representing 2579 records corresponding to 412 taxa distributed in the three classes studied (Table 1, Appendix I). Of the total taxa, 65 were reported up to or above genus level (i.e., “indet.” or “sp.”), finding no evidence that they may correspond to new species. On the other hand, 44 species were considered doubtful. Of the total 303 validated species with effective distribution in the Strait of Magellan (Fig. 2), 57.1% belong to the class Gastropoda (173 species); 24.1% of these correspond to the most diverse families: Buccinidae, Muricidae, Calliostomatidae, Fissurellidae, Eatoniellidae, Nassariidae, Rissoidae and Naticidae. The family Buccinidae was the most diverse in the class, with 15 species. The class Bivalvia was represented by 35.3% of the species (107 in total); 17.5% of these correspond to the most diverse families: Mytilidae, Philobryidae, Lasaeidae, Mactridae, Veneridae, Cyamiidae, Neoleptonidae, Nuculidae and Thyasiridae. The remaining 7.6% correspond to the class Polyplacophora (23 species). The family Chitonidae was the most diverse, with 2.0% of the species. In total, 106 families were recorded.

Table 1.

Species checklist of benthic marine mollusks of the Strait of Magellan (Polyplacophora, Gastropoda and Bivalvia). Those species with a single record are marked with an asterisk (*) and those which are dubious with a square (▪). Their presence is indicated (+) in the eastern (E), central (C) and western (W) microbasins. References provided at the end of the list.

Taxa Reference E C W
Class Polyplacophora
Polyplacophora indet. ab, as, bo, cp +
Order Lepidopleurida
Leptochitonidae indet. f +
Leptochiton sp. cc
Leptochiton kerguelensis Haddon, 1886 t, cd, bm, b, cq, as + + +
Leptochiton laurae Schwabe & Sellanes, 2010 cd + +
Leptochiton linseae Sirenko, 2015 cd +
Leptochiton medinae (Plate, 1899) as, cd, cq, bm, h + + +
Leptochiton smirnovi▪ Sirenko, 2016 as +
Lepidopleurus cullierti▪ Rochebrune, 1899 as, bm + +
Order Chitonida
Ischnochiton sp.* e +
Ischnochiton punctulatissimus (Sowerby I, 1832) b + +
Ischnochiton pusio (Sowerby I, 1832) b, cq, br + +
Ischnochiton stramineus (G. B. Sowerby I, 1832) p, cq, cc, b, t, bv, am, ej + + +
Ischnochiton striolatus▪ (Gray, 1828) br
Stenosemus exaratus (Sars G. O., 1878) cq +
Chaetopleura angulata▪ (Spengler, 1797) br
Chaetopleura isabellei▪ (d’Orbigny, 1841) br
Chaetopleura peruviana▪ (Lamarck, 1819) h, e +
Callochiton bouveti Thiele, 1906 bm, as + +
Callochiton gaussi Thiele, 1908 t, as +
Callochiton puniceus (Gould, 1846) am, as, bm, ct, i, b, cq, bn, bo, e, t, br, am, bv, ej + + +
Callochiton steinenii (Pfeffer, 1886) bm, as + +
Acanthopleura granulata▪ (Gmelin, 1791) p
Chiton sp. bl +
Chiton bowenii King, 1833 b, j, bv, cc, ct, ej + +
Chiton magellanicus▪ Gmelin, 1791 dd
Chiton magnificus▪ Deshayes, 1827 h, j +
Chiton olivaceus▪ Spengler, 1797 p
Tonicia sp. b, i, j +
Tonicia atrata (G. B. Sowerby II, 1840) cq, ct, j, as, bm, bo, e, s, bu, bv, ar, ej + + +
Tonicia calbucensis Plate, 1897 cq, j + +
Tonicia chilensis (Frembly, 1827) j, as, bm, bu, bv + +
Tonicia disjuncta▪ (Frembly, 1827) as +
Tonicia lebruni Rochebrune, 1884 bm, cq, ej + + +
Tonicia smithi Leloup, 1980 b, cc, bu, bv, b, a, am, cc +
Nuttallochiton hyadesi▪ (Rochebrune, 1884) p +
Nuttallochiton martiali (Rochebrune, 1884) b, cq, br, t, bv + +
Plaxiphora aurata (Spalowsky, 1795) bu, bv, cq, bm, bo, e, j, am, a, br, ar, bk, ba, bl, t, i, b + + +
Notoplax magellanica* Thiele, 1909 am
Hemiarthrum setulosum Carpenter in Dall, 1876 br, cc
Class Gastropoda
Gastropoda indet. as, j, bo +
Order Patellida
Lottia sp. bl, bk, cb +
Lottia orbignyi▪ (Dall, 1909) h
Scurria ceciliana (d’Orbigny, 1841) br, b, a, cs + + +
Scurria ceciliana magellanica (Strebel, 1907) co, de + +
Scurria plana▪ (Philippi, 1846) bg
Scurria variabilis▪ (G. B. Sowerby I, 1839) e +
Lepetidae indet.* as +
Iothia emarginuloides (Philippi, 1868) co, bm, b, ce, bv, v, ad + + +
Nacellidae indet.* as +
Nacella sp.* as, bv, bl +
Nacella sp. juvenile b + +
Nacella deaurata (Gmelin, 1791) cv, co, as, ab, aa, b, a, bm, aq, cb, bw, e, y, d, bu, bv, ba, bg, bk, bl, br, cd, j + + +
Nacella flammea (Gmelin, 1791) b, bu, bv, bw, j, e, i, y, ar, bk, bl, aa + +
Nacella magellanica (Gmelin, 1791) as, bw, an, ah, ai, y, cs, aq, co, b, a, cv, bl, bk, bg, br, e, bu, aa, h, j, ar, cb, ab, d + + +
Nacella mytilina (Helbling, 1779) co, cv, z, bw, cs, bg, i, as, b, bv, br, x, aa, bk, ar, ba, bo, cg, cp + + +
Order Seguenziida
Lissotesta impervia* (Strebel, 1908) b +
Order Lepetellida
Fissurellidae indet. as + +
Diodora patagonica* (d’Orbigny, 1839) bg +
Fissurella sp. as, b, e, bo, bl, ab, j + +
Fissurella nigra* Lesson, 1831 k
Fissurella oriens G. B. Sowerby I, 1834 co, b, bu, bv, i, br, bo, ce, ao + +
Fissurella picta (Gmelin, 1791) co, bu, e, ar, bo, bk, bl, bg + +
Fissurella picta picta (Gmelin, 1791) a, b, ao, bv + +
Fissurella radiosa Lesson, 1831 b, ao, ar, e, br, bu, cr, ba + +
Fissurellidea patagonica (Strebel, 1907) bw, ap +
Lucapinella henseli (Martens, 1900) k, av +
Parmaphorella sp.* as +
Puncturella sp. bm, as + +
Puncturella conica (d’Orbigny, 1841) b, f, k, cy + +
Puncturella noachina▪ (Linnaeus, 1771) as, co + +
Scissurella clathrata Strebel, 1908 cz, b, dj, eb +
Scissurella petermannensis* Lamy, 1910 cz
Anatoma conica (d’Orbigny, 1841) cz +
Anatoma euglypta (Pelseneer, 1903) df
Order Trochida
Trochidae indet.* as +
Diloma nigerrimum* (Gmelin, 1791) h
Calliostoma sp.* b +
Calliostoma irisans Strebel, 1905 cl + +
Calliostoma modestulum Strebel, 1908 bv, as + +
Calliostoma moebiusi Strebel, 1905 bm, as, l + +
Calliostoma nudum (Philippi, 1845) as, bm, b, j, bv, cl, l + + +
Margarella sp.* as +
Margarella expansa (G. B. Sowerby I, 1838) a, b, bv, ci, bt + +
Margarella jason▪ Powell, 1951 av, as +
Margarella pruinosa* (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885) bq, l +
Margarella violacea (King, 1832) as, cl, b, bt, av, i, bd, cg, bm, ar, bv, s, bo, bw, e, j, ak, ba + + +
Photinastoma taeniatum (G. B. Sowerby I, 1825) as, bm, bv, bq, f, av, l + +
Photinula coerulescens (King, 1832) br, av, bm, ar, i, as, bn, bk, ce, bg, s, ak, bp, cl, al + +
Photinula crawshayi* E. A. Smith, 1905 cg +
Photinula roseolineata (E. A. Smith, 1885) bm, bw +
Homalopoma cunninghami (E. A. Smith, 1881) bm, as, b, h, cl + + +
Margarites sp.* bm +
Margarites sigaretinus▪ (Sowerby I, 1838) ci +
Tegula atra (Lesson, 1830) b, as, bw, j, o + +
Tegula patagonica (d’Orbigny, 1835) bg, l +
Prisogaster niger* (W. Wood, 1828) h
Caenogastropoda unassigned
Turritellidae indet.* as +
Epitoniidae indet. as + +
Cirsotrema magellanicum (Philippi, 1845) br, bh +
Cirsotrema strebeli Zelaya & Güller, 2018 cm, ed + +
Eumetula michaelseni (Strebel, 1906) as, cm, ef +
Eumetula pulla (Philippi, 1845) b, bm, bv, as, sm, ce, bh + + +
Order Littorinimorpha
Eatoniella sp. as, b, bm + + +
Eatoniella afronigra Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bv, bc +
Eatoniella argentinensis* Castellanos & Fernández, 1972 bm +
Eatoniella denticula Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc, b + +
Eatoniella ebenina Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc, b + +
Eatoniella glomerosa* Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc +
Eatoniella picea* Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc +
Eatoniella turricula Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc +
Capulus compressus* Pelseneer, 1903 m
Capulus subcompressus▪ Pelseneer, 1903 as +
Capulus ungaricoides* (d’Orbigny, 1841) av +
Laevilitorina caliginosa (Gould, 1849) b, ar, co, bk + +
Naticidae indet.* as +
Euspira constricta* Dall, 1908 bh +
Falsilunatia carcellesi Dell, 1990 as, bm, al, dj + +
Falsilunatia falklandica▪ (Preston, 1913) bm +
Falsilunatia patagonica (Philippi, 1845) br, av, bw, bh, cn, b, v, i, f, dj, dz + +
Natica sp.* s +
Natica limbata* d’Orbigny, 1837 cg, dz +
Notocochlis isabelleana▪ (d’Orbigny, 1840) bm +
Polinices sp. dz
Tectonatica impervia (Philippi, 1845) bh, cn, bm, v, b, o, dz + + +
Onoba georgiana (Pfeffer, 1886) bc +
Onoba lacuniformis Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc +
Onoba schythei (Philippi, 1868) b, bc, as, af + +
Onoba subincisa Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc +
Onoba sulcula* H. Adams & A. Adams, 1852 b +
Powellisetia microlirata Ponder & Worsfold, 1994 bc, b + +
Caecum chilense* Stuardo, 1962 b +
Caecum magellanicum (di Geronimo, Privitera & Valdovinos, 1995) dg +
Littoridina angustiarum* Preston, 1915 bh +
Littoridina faminensis* Preston, 1915 bh +
Littoridina limosa* Preston, 1915 bh +
Littoridina lioneli* Preston, 1915 bh +
Hydrobia antarctica Philippi, 1868 bh
Eulimidae indet. as +
Calyptraeidae indet.* as +
Crepipatella sp. dh +
Crepipatella dilatata (Lamarck, 1822) b, br, ar, e, bw, as, bn, bo, cn + + +
Crucibulum quiriquinae (Lesson, 1830) di
Trochita pileolus (d’Orbigny, 1841) as, av, bm, bn, b, f, dj, ec + + +
Trochita pileus (Lamarck, 1822) bm, bw, cn, av, as, a, bu, bv, ar, o, i, bn, bh, ce, dj, ec + + +
Lamellaria sp.* j +
Lamellaria ampla Strebel, 1906 dj +
Lamellaria elata Strebel, 1906 dj, m +
Lamellaria hyadesi* Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889 br +
Lamellaria mopsicolor▪ Ev. Marcus, 1958 dk
Lamellaria patagonica Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889 as, cn + +
Lamellaria perspicua (Linnaeus, 1758) dl +
Marseniopsis pacifica▪ Bergh, 1886 m
Argobuccinum pustulosum (Lightfoot, 1786) b, s, j + +
Fusitriton magellanicus (Röding, 1798) j, b, s + +
Order Neogastropoda
Volutidae indet.* as + +
Adelomelon ancilla (Donovan, 1824) cn, bi, as, bm, s, av, e, b, br, f, i, ba + + +
Adelomelon beckii (Powell, 1951) bi, cn +
Adelomelon ferussacii (Donovan, 1824) s, cn + +
Odontocymbiola magellanica (Gmelin, 1791) as, e, bi +
Admete sp.* f +
Admete magellanica (Strebel, 1905) as, bm, cm + + +
Admete philippi* Ihering, 1907 s +
Admete schythei (Philippi, 1855) b, bi + +
Buccinidae indet. as, dj + +
Anomacme smithi Strebel, 1905 as, bm + +
Antistreptus magellanicus Dall, 1902 bi, as, dj + +
Argeneuthria cerealis (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885) b, bv + +
Argeneuthria euthrioides* (Strebel, 1905) cm +
Argeneuthria paessleri (Strebel, 1905) cm, b, bv + +
Argeneuthria philippii (Strebel, 1905) az, cm +
Falsimacme kobelti (Strebel, 1905) cm, az + + +
Glypteuthria meridionalis (E. A. Smith, 1881) as, az, cm, ce + +
Meteuthria martensi (Strebel, 1905) cm, az, b + + +
Microdeuthria michaelseni (Strebel, 1905) as, az, b, bm, cm, bv + + +
Pareuthria atrata (E. A. Smith, 1881) as, b, cm, ak, bm, av, az, o, ce, dj + + +
Pareuthria fuscata (Bruguière, 1789) az, j, bw, ar, cm, bu, bv, as, a, f, i, ab, cb, b, bd, bk, e, bn, ak, o + + +
Savatieria areolata* Strebel, 1905 bm +
Savatieria coppingeri (E. A. Smith, 1881) as, cm +
Savatieria frigida Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885 as, cm, dm + +
Savatieria meridionalis (E. A. Smith, 1881) b, cm, bv, ce + +
Buccinanops cochlidium* (Dillwyn, 1817) c
Buccinanops deformis* (King, 1832) c +
Buccinanops monilifer (Kiener, 1834) c +
Buccinanops paytensis (Kiener, 1834) c, bw,r + +
Nassarius coppingeri*(E. A. Smith, 1881) b +
Nassarius gayii (Kiener, 1834) h, r +
Nassarius taeniolatus▪ (Philippi, 1845) r
Acanthina monodon (Pallas, 1774) bw, e, ar, bu, bk, bl, cg +
Acanthina unicornis▪ (Bruguière, 1789) w +
Concholepas concholepas (Bruguière, 1789) dn
Coronium acanthodes (Watson, 1882) ay +
Enixotrophon veronicae* Pastorino, 1999 ax +
Fuegotrophon pallidus (Broderip, 1833) as, ce, bm, ar, bv, ak, a, ck, dj, eg + + +
Tromina sp.* bm +
Tromina dispectata Dell, 1990 cu, q
Trophon sp. as, ab +
Trophon geversianus (Pallas, 1774) b, e, i, j, s, ar, av, ay, ck, ce, cf, bu, bv, bw, br, bk, bl, bi + + +
Trophon minutus* Melvill & Standen, 1907 as +
Trophon ohlini Strebel, 1904 as, ck, dj, eg +
Trophon plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786) ar, ck, av, ce, b, ay, cu, f + +
Xymenopsis buccineus (Lamarck, 1816) cn, ak, av, aw + +
Xymenopsis muriciformis (King, 1832) b, ak, ar, as, av, aw, bi, bk, bl, bo, br, bv, bw, cu, ce, cn, eg, p + + +
Xymenopsis subnodosus (Gray, 1839) aw
Typhlodaphne filostriata (Strebel, 1905) cm, eh + +
Typhlodaphne payeni (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885) b + +
Typhlodaphne strebeli Powell, 1951 b + +
Aforia sp. bm +
Agladrillia fuegiensis (Smith, 1888) bm, as, bi + +
Leptadrillia elissa▪ (Dall, 1919) bm, as + +
Belalora cunninghami* (E. A. Smith, 1881) b, eh +
Lorabela sp. bm +
Mangelia martensi (Strebel, 1905) do
Mangelia michaelseni (Strebel, 1905) bm, cm + +
Oenopota magellanica (Martens, 1881) br, cm, dj + +
Leucosyrinx sp.* as +
Pleurotomella ohlini (Strebel, 1905) cm, eh + +
Thesbia michaelseni (Strebel, 1905) cm, eh + +
Turridae indet. as +
Infraclass “Lower Heterobranchia
Mathilda magellanica Fischer, 1873 b +
Mathilda malvinarum (Melvill & Standen, 1907) df
Atomiscala xenophyes (Melvill & Standen, 1912) df
Infraclass Euthyneura
Acteon biplicatus (Strebel, 1908) bm, bv, bj + +
Acteon delicatus▪ Dall, 1889 bj
Microglyphis curtula* (Dall, 1890) as +
Order Pleurobranchida
Berthella platei (Bergh, 1898) bn + +
Order Nudibranchia
Doris fontainii* d’Orbigny, 1837 by
Doris kerguelenensis (Bergh, 1884) bx, by, at + +
Doris magellanica▪ Cunningham, 1871 s +
Diaulula hispida (d’Orbigny, 1834) by, bx +
Diaulula punctuolata* (d’Orbigny, 1837) by
Gargamella immaculata* Bergh, 1894 by
Geitodoris patagonica* Odhner, 1926 by
Holoplocamus papposus Odhner, 1926 bx, by, bj + +
Thecacera darwini* Pruvot-Fol, 1950 by
Tyrinna delicata (Abraham, 1877) dp
Cadlina magellanica Odhner, 1926 by, bz +
Acanthodoris falklandica Eliot, 1907 by, j +
Ancula fuegiensis* Odhner, 1926 by
Janolus sp.* j +
Tritonia australis* (Bergh, 1898) h +
Tritonia challengeriana Bergh, 1884 by, bx, j +
Tritonia vorax* (Odhner, 1926) by
Itaxia falklandica (Eliot, 1907) by, bx +
Cuthona valentini (Eliot, 1907) by, bx +
Eubranchus fuegiensis* Odhner, 1926 by
Aeolidia sp. as, bk + +
Aeolidia campbellii (Cunningham, 1871) by, ar, h, dq +
Phidiana patagonica* (d’Orbigny, 1836) bx +
Order Cephalaspidea
Cylichna gelida* (E. A. Smith, 1907) as +
Toledonia sp.* as +
Toledonia parelata* Dell, 1990 bs +
Toledonia perplexa Dall, 1902 cm, b, n, bj, dj + +
Diaphana paessleri (Strebel, 1905) b, dj + +
Superorder Sacoglossa
Elysia hedgpethi Marcus, 1962 bx +
Ercolania evelinae* (Marcus, 1959) bx +
Limapontia sp.* bx +
Aplysiopsis brattstroemi▪ (Marcus, 1959) bx +
Order Siphonariida
Siphonaria fuegiensis* Güller, Zelaya & Ituarte, 2016 a, ea + +
Siphonaria laeviuscula▪ G. B. Sowerby I, 1835 dr
Siphonaria lateralis Gould, 1846 b, co, ar, bk, ab, ea + + +
Siphonaria lessonii Blainville, 1824 b, bw, ab, ar, e, co, a, bu, bk, bl, ba, cb, ea + + +
Williamia magellanica Dall, 1927 n +
Superorder Pylopulmonata
Odostomia sp. b +
Turbonilla sp.* as +
Turbonilla sanmatiensis* Castellanos, 1982 bm + +
Turbonilla smithi (Strebel, 1905) as, bm + +
Turbonilla strebeli Corgan, 1969 b + +
Order Systellommatophora
Onchidella marginata (Couthouy in Gould, 1852) b +
Class Bivalvia
Bivalvia indet. as, bm +
Order Nuculida
Ennucula eltanini Dell, 1990 as, v + +
Ennucula grayi (d’Orbigny, 1846) as, cw, cp, bn +
Ennucula puelcha (d’Orbigny, 1842) t, cw +
Linucula sp.* as +
Linucula pisum (G. B. Sowerby I, 1833) cw +
Nucula sp. as, cp + +
Nucula falklandica Preston, 1912 b, cw, dj + +
Order Solemyida
Acharax patagonica (E. A. Smith, 1885) as + +
Solemya notialis Simone, 2009 du
Solemya occidentalis Deshayes, 1857 dt
Order Nuculanida
Aequiyoldia sp.* i +
Nuculana sp.* s +
Propeleda longicaudata* (Thiele, 1912) cp +
Malletia chilensis* Desmoulins, 1832 h
Malletia inequalis Dall, 1908 ds +
Malletia subaequalis (G. B. Sowerby II, 1870) as, cw, be, f +
Neilonella sulculata (Gould, 1852) b, f, as, br, cw + +
Silicula patagonica (Dall, 1908) as, v + +
Tindaria virens (Dall, 1890) as +
Yoldia sp.* as +
Yoldiella chilenica (Dall, 1908) as, cw +
Yoldiella granula (Dall, 1908) ds +
Yoldiella indolens (Dall, 1908) as, cw + +
Yoldiella valettei▪ (Lamy, 1906) cp +
Order Mytilida
Mytilidae indet. as +
Aulacomya atra (Molina, 1782) bn, j, ab, bw, cb, bo, as, e, bk, bl, bu, bv, bm, ar, ch, ba, u, t + + +
Choromytilus chorus (Molina, 1782) i, bw +
Crenella sp.* as +
Crenella decussata▪ (Montagu, 1808) as +
Crenella magellanica Linse, 2002 b + +
Modiolus patagonicus (d’Orbigny, 1842) dt
Mytilus chilensis Hupé, 1854 a, b, e, f, g, j, t, u, ar, ab, as, bk, bl, bm, bo, bp, br, bu, bv, bw, cb, ch, ei + + +
Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819 dv, ei +
Mytilus platensis d’Orbigny, 1842 as, ba +
Perumytilus purpuratus (Lamarck, 1819) g, j, ab, e, bk, bl, b, bu, cb, ch + +
Order Arcida
Barbatia platei (Stempell, 1899) dt
Limopsis sp. as + +
Limopsis hirtella Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889 as, v +
Limopsis marionensis E. A. Smith, 1885 as, v, bn + +
Limopsis perieri P. Fischer in de Folin & Périer, 1870 dt
Lissarca miliaris (Philippi, 1845) b, as, v + +
Philobrya sp. bm, b, bv + + +
Philobrya aequivalvis▪ (Odhner, 1922) bm, as + +
Philobrya antarctica (Philippi, 1868) dt
Philobrya atlantica* Dall, 1896 as +
Philobrya blakeana▪ (Melvill & Standen, 1914) b, bm + +
Philobrya capillata* Dell, 1964 as +
Philobrya crispa Linse, 2002 as, bm + +
Philobrya magellanica (Stempell, 1899) as +
Philobrya sublaevis Pelseneer, 1903 as, bm, be + +
Order Pectinida
Pectinidae indet. as +
Aequipecten tehuelchus (d’Orbigny, 1842) dt
Austrochlamys natans (Philippi, 1845) b, h, as, bv + +
Chlamys sp.* as +
Delectopecten vitreus (Gmelin, 1791) as, v +
Zygochlamys patagonica (King & Broderip) bn, bo, as, h, bm, b, f, bv, be, cx, t, i + + +
Cyclopecten sp.* as +
Cyclopecten subhyalinus (Smith, 1885) as +
Cyclochlamys multistriata (Linse, 2002) b + +
Order Limida
Limidae indet. as +
Acesta patagonica* (Dall, 1902) bn +
Limea pygmaea (Philippi, 1845) as, v, t, b, bv, bm, ch + + +
Limatula deceptionensis▪ Preston, 1916 as +
Limatula hodgsoni (E. A. Smith, 1907) as, v +
Order Lucinida
Epicodakia falklandica Dell, 1964 as, b + +
Lucinoma lamellata (E. A. Smith, 1881) as, aj, cf + +
Loripes pertenuis▪ E. A. Smith, 1881 ce, br
Adontorhina pisum (Dall, 1908) ac, be + +
Parathyasira magellanica (Dall, 1901) db +
Thyasira debilis (Thiele, 1912) db, cp, as +
Thyasira fuegiensis* Dall, 1890 db +
Thyasira patagonica Zelaya, 2010 dc + +
Order Carditida
Cyclocardia compressa (Reeve, 1843) as, ce, b + +
Cyclocardia thouarsii* (d’Orbigny, 1845) s +
Cyclocardia velutina (E. A. Smith, 1881) as, bn, f, bf +
Carditella exulata▪ E. A. Smith, 1885 bf +
Carditella naviformis (Reeve, 1843) ag, as, bv +
Carditella tegulata (Reeve, 1843) b + +
Carditopsis flabellum (Reeve, 1843) u, b, ag + +
Carditopsis malvinae▪ (d’Orbigny, 1845) as + +
Astarte longirostra d’Orbigny, 1842 as, bm, ce, bv, b, u, v + + +
Order Cardiida
Cardium parvulum Dunker, 1861 ag
Macoploma inornata* (Hanley, 1844) br
Superorder Imparidentia
Cyamiocardium sp.* as +
Cyamiocardium dahli Soot-Ryen, 1957 b + +
Cyamiocardium denticulatum (E. A. Smith, 1885) v, bm, as + +
Cyamiocardium yeskumaala Urcola & Zelaya, 2018 dy +
Cyamium sp.* b +
Cyamium antarcticum* Philippi, 1845 br +
Kidderia pusilla (Gould, 1850) br
Gaimardia trapesina (Lamarck, 1819) b, bw, bv, i, br, cg, ak + +
Order Galeommatida
Altenaeum mabillei (Dall, 1908) be, v +
Kellia bullata Philippi, 1845 bm, br, as + +
Lasaea adansoni▪ (Gmelin, 1791) b + +
Lasaea miliaris* (Philippi, 1845) u +
Lasaea petitiana* (Récluz, 1843) h
Mysella sp. cp, bm, b + +
Mysella rochebrunei (Dall, 1908) ds +
Pseudokellya cardiformis (E. A. Smith, 1885) bm, v, as + +
Montacutidae indet.* f +
Order Venerida
Darina solenoides (King, 1832) ca, s, br, al, cg + +
Mactra fuegiensis E. A. Smith, 1905 ca +
Mulinia byronensis Gray, 1837 ca +
Mulinia edulis (King, 1832) w, s, bw, bf, bm, al, br + +
Mulinia exalbida (King, 1832) s, ca +
Mulinia levicardo* (E. A. Smith, 1881) br, ca
Diplodonta patagonica* (d’Orbigny, 1842) o
Diplodonta punctata▪ (Say, 1822) dx
Veneridae indet.* as +
Eurhomalea exalbida (Dillwyn, 1817) as, b, bf, i, bm, f, bp, cj, + + +
Leukoma antiqua (King, 1832) b, bw, cj, o + +
Petricola dactylus G. B. Sowerby I, 1823 dw +
Pitar rostratus (Philippi, 1844) b, bf +
Proteopitar patagonicus (d’Orbigny, 1842) br
Tawera elliptica (Lamarck, 1818) bw, cp, bl, b, as, ce, cg +
Venus inflata▪ King & Broderip, 1832 al +
Neolepton sp. b + +
Neolepton amatoi* Zelaya & Ituarte, 2004 b +
Neolepton cobbi* (Cooper & Preston, 1910) as + +
Neolepton concentricum (Preston, 1912) b, da, bm, as + +
Neolepton hupei Soot-Ryen, 1957 as +
Neolepton yagan Zelaya & Ituarte, 2004 b, da + +
Order Myida
Sphenia hatcheri* Pilsbry, 1899 bf +
Netastoma darwinii (G. B. Sowerby II, 1849) dt
Bankia martensi (Stempell, 1899) h, bf +
Order Adapedonta
Hiatellidae indet.* as +
Hiatella sp. bv, as, ce +
Hiatella antarctica (Philippi, 1845) b + +
Hiatella arctica (Linnaeus, 1767) as, bu, e, i, u, ar, f, bm, bo, ch + + +
Ensis macha (Molina, 1782) s, as +
Superorder Anomalodesmata
Pandora braziliensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1874 br, bm, as, f, ae + +
Pandora cistula▪ Gould, 1850 as, br +
Entodesma cuneata (Gray, 1828) dt
Entodesma elongatulum Soot-Ryen, 1957 bm, as + +
Entodesma solemyalis*(Lamarck, 1818) bf
Laternula elliptica▪ (King, 1832) as +
Cuspidaria sp. as +
Cuspidaria patagonica (E. A. Smith, 1885) as, bm, cp, bf + + +
Cuspidaria tenella* E. A. Smith, 1907 as +
Luzonia chilensis (Dall, 1890) dt
Dermatomya mactroides▪ (Dall, 1889) as +
Policordia radiata (Dall, 1889) as + +
Figure 2. 

Species richness of mollusks from the Strait of Magellan, highlighting the families with higher diversity. The numbers of species and their percentages are indicated in parentheses.

There has been a constant increase since the decade of the 1980s in the number of studies (Fig. 3a) and records (Fig. 3b). The largest number of records in history were incorporated for the Strait of Magellan in the last decade (2007–2018) (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3. 

A number of studies per decade of the Strait of Magellan mentioned in this study B number of mollusk records per decade reported in the Strait of Magellan.

Of the 420 quadrants proposed, 163 presented species (Fig. 4, Appendix II). Ordering the matrix of absence and presence of species according to these quadrants, 1229 mollusk records were counted. The eastern microbasin had 35 quadrants with records, while the central microbasin had 104. The western microbasin proved to be the least historically sampled, with only 24 quadrants with records. The total richness of the Strait of Magellan was 303 species. However, 47 species had imprecise locations, as they were described as inhabitants of the Strait of Magellan, but the site of their habitat was not defined with geographical accuracy. These species include three polyplacophorans (Leptochiton sp., Notoplax magellanica and Hemiarthrum setulosum), 25 gastropods (Fissurella nigra, Anatoma euglypta, Scissurella petermannensis, Diloma nigerrimum, Prisogaster niger, Capulus compressus, Hydrobia antarctica, Crucibulum quiriquinae, Buccinanops cochlidium, Savatieria frigida, Concholepas concholepas, Tromina dispectata, Xymenopsis subnodosus, Mangelia martensi, Mathilda malvinarum, Atomiscala xenophyes, Doris fontainii, Gargamella immaculata, Diaulula punctuolata, Geitodoris patagonica, Thecacera darwini, Tyrinna delicata, Ancula fuegiensis, Tritonia vorax and Eubranchus fuegiensis) and 19 Bivalvia (Solemya notialis, Solemya occidentalis, Malletia chilensis, Modiolus patagonicus, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Barbatia platei, Limopsis perieri, Philobrya antarctica, Aequipecten tehuelchus, Cardium parvulum, Macoploma inornata, Lasaea petitiana, Mulinia levicardo, Diplodonta patagonica, Proteopitar patagonicus, Netastoma darwinii, Entodesma cuneata, Entodesma solemyalis and Luzonia chilensis).

Figure 4. 

Species richness by quadrant in the Strait of Magellan.

The quadrants that had species records cover ~37% of the total area of the Strait of Magellan; most of the studies are concentrated in the central microbasin. The quadrant with the highest richness was Punta Santa Ana and Fuerte Bulnes (C59), 60 km south of Punta Arenas with 112 nominal taxa, greatly exceeding the diversity of other quadrants (Fig. 4). The most common species was the gastropod Nacella magellanica, present in 33 quadrants, followed by Pareuthria fuscata (25 quadrants), Callochiton puniceus (23), Nacella deaurata (23), Margarella violacea (23), Nacella mytilina (22), Trophon geversianus (22), Aulacomya atra (22), Trochita pileus (21), Plaxiphora aurata (20), Zygochlamys patagonica (20), Mytilus chilensis (19), Pareuthria atrata (18), Leptochiton kerguelensis (17), and Xymenopsis muriciformis (17).

The estimated prediction for the richness of species associated with the sampling effort for the Strait of Magellan determined by the Clench model showed that the values of the constants were a = 5.664075 and b = 0.014764. The relation of these values (a / b) obtained a maximum expected richness of 383.6 species (value of the asymptote of the species accumulation curve with R2 = 0.97), higher than the 270 species observed. The constants of the linear dependence model were a = 4.953160 and b = 0.017756, thus the maximum expected richness (a / b) was 279 species with R2 = 0.97, obtaining a higher value in 9 species than observed in this study (Fig. 5a). Therefore, neither of the two theoretical models predicted exactly the observed number of mollusk species for the Strait of Magellan. Both non-parametric models estimated an expected richness much higher than that observed empirically (Chao 2 = 353.49; Jacknife 1 = 360.39), and both curves were above that of observed richness (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5. 

a accumulation curves of mollusk species according to the parametric estimators Clench and linear dependence, and b according to the non-parametric estimators Chao 2 and Jack 1 for the Strait of Magellan.


According to Valdovinos (1999), the Chilean coast has about 959 species of the three most diverse classes of benthic marine mollusks (671 gastropods, 226 bivalves and 62 polyplacophorans), including Antarctic and oceanic island species. The Magellan Biogeographic Province (41°S to 56°S) is one of the geographical areas with the highest diversity of mollusks on the Chilean coast (Valdovinos et al. 2003). Taking into account this database, the 303 mollusk species recorded in this study correspond to ~31.6% of the species cited for the Chilean coast (Fig. 6). About 400 species of marine mollusks, 250 gastropods, 131 bivalves (Linse 1999) and 19 polyplacophorans (Sirenko 2006a) have been reported for the Magellan Province. Therefore, the 303 species recorded for the Strait of Magellan represent 75% of the mollusks reported for the MBP. However, comparing the value of richness found in this study (303 species) to the 116 species of gastropods and bivalves reported for the Strait of Magellan by Linse et al. (2006), plus 17 species of polyplacophorans by Sirenko (2006a), the richness of mollusks for the Strait of Magellan was increased by 228% (Fig. 6). Most of the records were reported in the last 70 years. However, records of the late 19th century and early 20th century greatly increased the knowledge of the zone, surpassing previous reports (see Fig. 3). This is mainly due to the publications of Rochebrune and Mabille (1889) and Strebel (1904, 1905a, b, 1906, 1907) which reported 267 records in the Strait. The number of studies has increased in the last 40 years, and therefore the records (see Fig. 3). However, some of these records belong to reviews of biological collections and older studies.

Figure 6. 

Number of mollusk species cited for the Chilean coast (1: Valdovinos 1999), Magellan Province (2: Linse 1999; 3: Sirenko 2006a) and Strait of Magellan (4: Linse et al. 2006; * this study).

One criterion was followed to determine doubtful species; those records that were cited in the past and have been questioned in taxonomic reviews. Species such as Carditella exulata or Pandora cistula were identified as dubious according to these criteria (Güller and Zelaya 2013; Güller and Zelaya 2016b). Other criteria included records in which the same taxonomist discussed the species described such as the case of Doris magellanica (Cunningham, 1871), records that considerably exceed their distribution limit and do not appear in taxonomic revisions or alpha diversity studies or are simply dismissed, such as Lottia orbignyi, Leptochiton smirnovi, Falsilunatia falklandica, etc. (Espoz et al. 2004; Pastorino 2005b; Sirenko 2016), and records that have a huge biogeographical discontinuity and are not explained or figured in the article, is the case of Ischnochiton striolatus, Puncturella noachina and Acteon delicatus (Rochebrune and Mabille 1889; Strebel 1907; Ramírez 2000). On the other hand, of the taxa reported up to or above genus level (“indet.” or “sp.”), only two could correspond to new species, according to the authors’ remarks: Leptochiton sp. (Sirenko 2006a) and Crepipatella sp. (Nuñez et al. 2012).

Recent studies using molecular tools have observed that several species co-distributed in the Antarctic Peninsula and South America actually belong to different lineages, with evolutionary units separated by millions of years (Poulin et al. 2014). This has been mainly observed in species of the genus Aequiyoldia Soot-Ryen, 1951 (González-Wevar et al. 2019).

Finally, there are species in the list that do not qualify as doubtful, but which have been classified as unknown species due to their low number of records or due to its small body size, which makes it difficult to identify the species, with poor ecological or descriptive information (Castellanos 1979; Geiger 2012; Rosenfeld et al. 2017), e.g., Notoplax magellanica, Lissotesta impervia, Onoba sulcula, Onoba georgiana, Microglyphis curtula, Cylichna gelida, Turbonilla sanmatiensis, Philobrya atlantica. In this sense, it should be noted that much of the mollusk information that was collected in this work comes from manual collections and various types of sampling gears, trawl and grabs (e.g., Watson 1886; Rochebrune and Mabille 1889; Strebel 1907; Linse 2002; Ríos et al. 2003). However, taxonomic works on specific groups have allowed a good representation of unknown micromollusks (Ponder and Worsfold 1994; Geiger 2012; Pastorino 2016; Di Luca and Pastorino 2018). Despite the aforementioned contributions, micromollusks could continue to be underestimated, since the comparative morphology of various species is only beginning to be illustrated and described in detail (Di Luca and Pastorino 2018).

This historical compilation of the richness of benthic mollusks of the Strait of Magellan promotes the need and urgency for the management of coastal environments. Despite the historical sampling effort and about 192 years of records, the Strait of Magellan has a high diversity of mollusk species which is not yet fully known. The richness estimated by the parametric models was greater than that observed. Two reasons may explain this: i) the sampling effort along the Strait of Magellan has been low (only about 36% of the total area is recorded), and ii) there is still a lack of knowledge about the taxonomy of many mollusk groups, since many species remain undetermined and are not included in the listings or are not recognized in the field. According to Soberón and Llorente (1993), the probability of finding a new species in the Clench model will increase according to experience in the field. Therefore, the Clench model suggests increasing the sampling effort but at a broader spatial and temporal scale to reach the asymptote in the estimation of mollusk species from the Strait of Magellan.

The richness estimated by non-parametric models was higher than the observed. These non-parametric models work based on the number of unique (number of species that occur only in one sample) and duplicate (number of species that occur in exactly two samples). This is based on the assumption that individuals of a species do not live alone in ecosystems, but in populations (Magurran 1988), therefore many unique species in a sample may be indicating that a sufficient number of sampling units has not been used. This historical compilation showed that there are many places in the Strait of Magellan that only have one or two records, which was reflected in both estimators.

However, it is important to consider that in order to evaluate the behavior of the different estimators, it is necessary to know the number of species in the community (Walther and Moore 2005; González-Oreja et al. 2010). Unless the community has been thoroughly sampled, these curves may not work properly (Magurran 2004). Therefore, some authors recommend not working with only one estimator, but testing several models to see how they behave with the data (González-Oreja et al. 2010), since these may vary depending on the situation or for a specific group of organisms (Walther and Moore 2005). The results of the four models used in this study allows us to infer that greater sampling effort is needed in the Strait of Magellan, mainly because the largest number of records and species richness are concentrated at the same points within the Strait of Magellan, in the central microbasin.


This study provides a clearer idea of the diversity of mollusks in the Strait of Magellan, identifying erroneous records and those that need verification, encouraging other researchers to sample less-studied areas of the strait. This will update knowledge of the diversity of mollusks of the Strait of Magellan, contributing to Chile’s biodiversity heritage and future studies of biogeographical models that are currently based on the 116 species of gastropods and bivalves cited by Linse et al. (2006) and the 17 species of polyplacophorans cited by Sirenko (2006a) for the Strait of Magellan. Finally, with this information of all the records, it will be possible to identify the hotspots of diversity for study and gaps in knowledge, among other things.


This work was financially supported by the Direction of Research of the Universidad de Magallanes (Program PR-06-CRN-18) to C.A. and S.R.; by Project PIA CONICYT ACT172065 to S.R.; Conicyt PIA Support CCTE AFB170008 through the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB) to S.R. and the Institutional Development Fund, Student Entrepreneurship Line (FDI 2015 UMAG), of the Ministry of Education of Chile to S.A. The authors appreciate the permanent endorsement of Dr Andrés Mansilla (UMAG). Likewise, we acknowledge Dr Jesús Troncoso (UVIGO-Spain) and Dr Claudio González-Wevar (UACH) for their comments in the initial stages of the MS. Finally, we especially thank Lafayette Eaton for English revision and editing and Leonardo Santos de Souza for his comments to improve the manuscript.


  • Alamo V, Valdivieso V (1997) Lista Sistemática de Moluscos Marinos del Perú. Segunda Edición, Revisada y Actualizada. Instituto del Mar del Perú, Callao, 183 pp.
  • Aldea C, Rosenfeld S, Cárdenas J (2011) Caracterización de la diversidad de moluscos bentónicos sublitorales en la isla Carlos III y áreas adyacentes, Estrecho de Magallanes, Chile. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 39(2): 73–89.
  • Allmon WD (1990) Review of the Bullia Group (Gastropoda: Nassariidae) with comments on its evolution, biogeography, and phylogeny. Bulletins of American Paleontology 99(335): 1–179.
  • Andrade C, Ríos C, Gerdes D, Brey T (2016) Trophic structure of shallow-water benthic communities in the sub-Antarctic Strait of Magellan. Polar Biology 39(12): 2281–2297.
  • Aranzamendi C, Gardenal N, Martin JP, Bastida R (2009) Limpets of the genus Nacella (Patellogastropoda) from the Southwestern Atlantic: species identification based on molecular data. Journal of Molluscan studies 75(3): 241–251.
  • Araya JF (2015) Current status of the non-indigenous molluscs in Chile, with the first record of Otala punctata (Müller, 1774) (Gastropoda: Helicidae) in the country and new records for Cornu aspersum (Müller, 1774) and Deroceras laeve (Müller, 1774). Journal of Natural History 49: 1731–1761.
  • Arntz W, Gorny M (1996) Cruise report of the Joint Chilean-German-Italian Magellan “Victor Hensen” Campaign in 1994. Berichte zur Polarforschung 190: 1–113.
  • Astorga MS, Rodríguez EM, Díaz C (2007) Comparison of mineral and trace element concentrations in two molluscs from the Strait of Magellan (Chile). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20: 273–279.
  • Bergh R (1898) Die Opisthobranchier der Sammlung Plate. Zoologische Jahrbücher 4: 481–582.
  • Bouchet P, Rocroi J, Hausdorf B, Kaim A, Kano Y, Nützel A, Parkhaev P, Schrödl M, Strong E (2017) Revised classification, nomenclator and typification of gastropod and monoplacophoran families. Malacologia 61(1–2): 1–526.
  • Burnham KP, Overton WS (1979) Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60: 927–936.
  • Cañete J, Aldea C, Figueroa T (2014) Guía Para la Identificación de la Macrofauna Bentónica de la Bahía de Porvenir, Chile. Editorial Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, 83 pp.
  • Carcelles A, Williamson S (1951) Catálogo de los moluscos marinos de la Provincia Magallánica. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales «Bernardino Rivadavia» 2: 225–383.
  • Cárdenas CA (2008) Factores que Organizan la Estructura Comunitaria del Megaepibentos del Submareal Rocoso de Punta Santa Ana, Estrecho de Magallanes, Chile. Tesis de Magíster en Ciencias con Mención Manejo y Conservación de Recursos Naturales de Ambientes Subantárticos. Universidad de Magallanes.
  • Castellanos ZA (1970) Catálogo de los moluscos marinos bonaerenses. Anales de la Comisión Científica 8: 9–365.
  • Castellanos ZA (1979) Micromoluscos poco conocidos del sur Argentino-Chileno. Neotropica 25: 133–140.
  • Castellanos ZA (1988) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 1. Placóforos. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 41 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA (1990) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 5. Mesogastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 36 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA (1992a) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 7. Neogastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 41 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA (1992b) CatálogoDescriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 8. Neogastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 27 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA, Landoni NA (1988) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 2. Archigastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 40 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA, Landoni NA (1989) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 3. Archigastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 40 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA, Landoni NA (1990) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 6. Mesogastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 38 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA, Landoni NA (1993a) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 9. Neogastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 25 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA, Landoni NA (1993b) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 11. Neogastropoda. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 31 pp.
  • Castellanos ZA, Landoni NA, Dadon J (1993) Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 12. Opisthobranchia. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires, 29 pp.
  • Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics: 783–791.
  • Coan EV (1997) Recent species of the genus Petricola in the Eastern Pacific (Bivalvia: Veneroidea). The Veliger 40: 298–340.
  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 345: 101–118.
  • Cunningham R (1871) XVII. Notes on the Reptiles, Amphibia, Fishes, Mollusca, and Crustacea obtained during the voyage of HMS ‘Nassau’ in the years 1866‐69. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 27(4): 465–502.
  • d’Orbigny A (1835–1846) Voyage dans l’Amérique Méridionale Exécuté Pendant les Années 1826–1833 par Alcide d’Orbigny. 5. Mollusques. Libraire de la Société géologique de Paris, France.
  • Dall WH (1908) The Mollusca and the Brachiopoda. Reports of the dredging operations off the coast of Central America to the Galapagos... [and] Reports on the scientific results of the expedition to the eastern tropical Pacific... Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 43: 205–487. [22 pls.]
  • Dall WH (1909) Report on a Collection of Shells from Perú, with a summary of the littoral marine mollusca of the Peruvian Zoological Province. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 37: 147–294.
  • Dell RK (1964) Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Mollusca: Amphineura, Scaphopoda and Bivalvia. Discovery Reports 33: 99–250.
  • Dell RK (1971) The marine Mollusca of the Royal Society Expedition to southern Chile, 1958–1959. Records of the Dominion Museum 7(17): 155–233.
  • Dell RK (1990) Antarctic Mollusca with special reference to the fauna of the Ross Sea. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 27: 1–311.
  • Di Geronimo I, Privitera S, Valdovinos C (1995) Fartulum magellanicum (Prosobranchia, Caecidae): A new species from the Magellanic Province. Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción 66: 113–118.
  • Di Luca J, Pastorino G (2018) A revision of the genus Savatieria Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885: an endemic group of buccinulid gastropods from the Magellanic region. Journal of Molluscan Studies 84: 293–302.
  • Geiger DL (2012) Monograph of the Little Slit Shells (1st ed.). Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, 1291 pp.
  • González-Oreja J, de la Fuente-Díaz-Ordaz A, Hernández-Santín L, Buzo-Franco D, Bonache-Regidor C (2010) Evaluación de estimadores no paramétricos de la riqueza de especies. Un ejemplo con aves en áreas verdes de la ciudad de Puebla, México. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 33: 31–45.
  • González-Wevar CA, Nakano T, Cañete J, Poulin E (2010) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of Nacella (Patellogastropoda: Nacellidae) in the Southern Ocean. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56(1): 115–124.
  • González-Wevar CA, Nakano T, Cañete JI, Poulin E (2011) Concerted genetic, morphological and ecological diversification in Nacella limpets in the Magellanic Province. Molecular Ecology 20: 1936–1951.
  • González-Wevar CA, Hüne M, Rosenfeld S, Gérard K, Mansilla A, Poulin E (2016a) Patrones de diversidad y estructura genética en especies antárticas y subantárticas de Nacella (Nacellidae). Anales Instituto Patagonia 44(3): 49–64.
  • González-Wevar CA, Rosenfeld S, Segovia NI, Hüne M, Gérard K, Ojeda J, Mansilla A, Brickle P, Díaz A, Poulin E (2016b) Genetics, Gene Flow, and Glaciation: The Case of the South American Limpet Nacella mytilina. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0161963.
  • González-Wevar CA, Nakano T, Palma A, Poulin E (2017) Biogeography in Cellana (Patellogastropoda, Nacellidae) with Special Emphasis on the Relationships of Southern Hemisphere Oceanic Island Species. PloS ONE 12(1): e0170103.
  • González-Wevar CA, Gérard K, Rosenfeld S, Saucède T, Naretto J, Díaz A, Morley SA, Brickle P, Poulin E (2019) Cryptic speciation in Southern Ocean Aequiyoldia eightsii (Jay, 1839): Mio-Pliocene trans-Drake Passage separation and diversification. Progress in Oceanography 174: 44–54.
  • Guarda B (2015) Producción Secundaria del Ensamble Macrobentónico en el Intermareal de Bloques y Cantos: una Comparación Entre Grupos Tróficos. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas.
  • Güller M, Zelaya D (2013) The families Carditidae and Condylocardiidae in the Magellan and Perú-Chile provinces (Bivalvia: Carditoidea). Zootaxa 3682(2): 201–239.
  • Güller M, Zelaya D (2016a) Species of Iothia (Gastropoda: Lepetidae) from Shallow Waters of the Magellan Region. Malacologia 59(2): 321–330.
  • Güller M, Zelaya D (2016b) Unravelling the identity of Pandora species (Bivalvia: Pandoridae) from southern South America. Journal of Molluscan Studies 82(3): 440–448.
  • Güller M, Zelaya D (2017) New insigths into the diversity of rissoids from sub-antarctic and antarctic waters (Gastropoda: Rissooidea). Polar Biology 40(10): 1923–1937.
  • Güller M, Zelaya D, Ituarte C (2016) How many Siphonaria species (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) live in southern South America? Journal of Molluscan Studies 82(1): 80–96.
  • Guzmán L (1978) Patrón de distribución espacial y densidad de Nacella magellanica (Gmelin, 1971) en el intermareal del sector oriental del Estrecho de Magallanes (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 9: 205–219.
  • Guzmán L, Ríos C (1987) Age and Growth of the Subantarctic Limpet Nacella (Patinigera) magellanica magellanica (Gmelin, 1791) from the Strait of Magellan, Chile. The Veliger 30(2): 159–166.
  • Holmes AM, Oliver PG, Sellanes J (2005) A new species of Lucinoma (Bivalvia: Lucinoidea) from a methane gas seep off the southwest coast of Chile. Journal of Conchology 38(6): 673–682.
  • Hombron JB, Jacquinot H (1854) Voyage au Pôle Sud et dans l’Océanie. Zoologie, Mollusques. Gide et J. Baudry, Paris, 152 pp.
  • Huber M (2010) Compendium of Bivalves: a Full-Color Guide to 3300 of the World’s Marine Bivalves; a Status on Bivalvia After 250 Years of Research. ConchBooks, Hackenheim, 901 pp.
  • Huber M (2015) Compendium of Bivalves 2: a Full-Color Guide to the Remaining Seven Families; a Systematic Listing of 8’500 Bivalve Species and 10’500 Synonyms. ConchBooks, Hackenheim, 907 pp.
  • Kaas P, Strack HL, VanBelle RA (2006) Monograph of living chitons: Mollusca: Polyplacophora. 6: Suborder Ischnochitonina (concluded): Schizochitonidae & Chitonidae; additions to volumes 1–5. Brill, Leiden, 464 pp.
  • Kienberger K, Carmona L, Pola M, Padula V, Gosliner TM, Cervera JL (2016) Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) (Mollusca: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia), single species or a cryptic species complex? A morphological and molecular study. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177: 481–506.
  • King PP, Broderip WJ (1832) Description of the Cirripedia, Conchifera and Mollusca, in a collection formed by the officers of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle employed between the years 1826 and 1830 in surveying the southern coasts of South America. Zoological Journal 5: 332–349.
  • Korshunova T, Martynov A, Bakken T, Evertsen J, Fletcher K, Mudianta WI, Saito H, Lundin K, Schrödl M, Picton B (2017) Polyphyly of the traditional family Flabellinidae affects a major group of Nudibranchia: aeolidacean taxonomic reassessment with descriptions of several new families, genera, and species (Mollusca, Gastropoda). ZooKeys 717: 1–139.
  • Leloup E (1956) Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. Lunds Universitets Arsskriften 52(15): 1–94.
  • Linse K (2002) The shelled Magellanic Mollusca: with Special Reference to Biogeography Relations in the Southern Ocean. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG, Ruggell, 251 pp.
  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Pub, Malden, 256 pp.
  • Mancilla R (2010) Respuestas Poblacionales de Nacella (Patinigera) magellanica (Gmelin, 1791) en Ambientes Intermareales Estructuralmente Diferentes del Estrecho de Magallanes. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas.
  • Marcus E (1959) Lamellariacea and Opisthobranchia. Lunds Universitets Arsskriften 55(9): 1–133.
  • McLean JH (1984a) Systematics of Fissurella in the Peruvian and Magellanic faunal provinces (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 354: 1–70.
  • McLean JH (1984b) Shell reduction and loss in fissurellids: a review of genera and species in the Fissurellidea group. American Malacological Bulletin 2: 21–34.
  • Menéndez S (2013) Estrategia Reproductiva en Nacella magellanica (Gmelin, 1791) y Nacella deaurata (Gmelin, 1971) en una Zona del Estrecho de Magallanes. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas.
  • Moreno CE (2001) Métodos para Medir la Biodiversidad. CYTED, ORCYT – UNESCO, Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, Zaragoza, 84 pp.
  • Mutschke E, Ríos C, Montiel A (1998) Situación actual de la macrofauna presente en el intermareal de bloques y cantos de Bahía Laredo, Estrecho de Magallanes. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia, Serie Ciencias Naturales 26: 5–29.
  • Nakano T, Ozawa T (2007) Worldwide phylogeography of limpets of the order Patellogastropoda: molecular, morphological and palaeontological evidence. Journal of Molluscan Studies 73: 79–99.
  • Nuñez JJ, Vejar-Pardo A, Guzmán BE, Barriga EH, Gallardo CS (2012) Phylogenetic and mixed Yule-coalescent analyses reveal cryptic lineages within two South American marine snails of the genus Crepipatella (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae). Invertebrate Biology 131: 301–311.
  • OBIS (2018) Ocean Biogeographic Information System. Census of Marine Life. [Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO]
  • Odhner NH (1926) Die Opisthobranchien. In: Further Zoological Results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903 under the direction of Dr. Otto Nordenskjold 2(1): 1–100.
  • Osorio C (1999) Gastrópodos Prosobranquios del Extremo sur de Chile. Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile 48: 37–49.
  • Osorio C (2002) Moluscos Marinos en Chile, Especies de Importancia Económica, Guía para su Identificación. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, 211 pp.
  • Oyarzún PA, Toro JE, Cañete JI, Gardner JPA (2016) Bioinvasion threatens the genetic integrity of native diversity and a natural hybrid zone: smooth-shelled blue mussels (Mytilus spp.) in the Strait of Magellan. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 574–585.
  • Pastorino G (1999) A new species of Gastropod of the genus Trophon Montfort, 1810 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae) from subantarctic waters. The Veliger 42(2): 169–174.
  • Pastorino G (2005a) A revision of the genus Trophon Monfort, 1810 (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from southern South America. The Nautilus 119(2): 55–82.
  • Pastorino G (2005b) Recent Naticidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Patagonian coast. The Veliger 47(4): 225–258.
  • Pastorino G (2016) Revision of the genera Pareuthria Strebel, 1905, Glypteuthria Strebel, 1905 and Meteuthria Thiele, 1912 (Gastropoda: Buccinulidae) with the description of three new genera and two new species from Southwestern Atlantic waters. Zootaxa 4179(3): 301–344.
  • Pastorino G, Harasewych MG (2000) A revision of the Patagonian genus Xymenopsis Powell 1951 (Gastropoda: Muricidae). The Nautilus 114(2): 38–58.
  • Pastorino G, Urteaga D (2012) A taxonomic revision of the genus Trochita Schumacher, 1817 (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from the southwestern Atlantic. The Nautilus 126(2): 68–78.
  • Pelseneer P (1903) Mollusques (Amphineures, Gastropodes et Lamellibranches). Résultats du voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897–1898–1899 sous le commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery. Rapports Scientifiques Zoologie R 14: 14–85.
  • Philippi RA (1845) Diagnosen einiger neuen Conchylien. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 11: 50–71.
  • Ponder WF, Worsfold TM (1994) A review of the rissoiform gastropods of Southwestern South America (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 445: 1–63.
  • Poulin E, González-Wevar C, Díaz A, Gérard K, Hüne M (2014) Divergence between Antarctic and South American marine invertebrates: What molecular biology tells us about Scotia Arc geodynamics and the intensification of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Global and Planetary Change 123: 392–399.
  • Ramírez J (1993a) Catálogo: Moluscos de Chile. 4° Vol.: Bivalvia. Tomo 1. Santiago, Chile, 145 pp.
  • Ramírez J (1993b) Catálogo: Moluscos de Chile. 4° Vol.: Bivalvia. Tomo 2. Santiago Chile, 143 pp.
  • Ramírez J (1996a) Moluscos de Chile. Volumen I: Archaeogastropoda (2da edn.). Santiago, Chile, 157 pp.
  • Ramírez J (1996b) Catálogo: Moluscos de Chile. Volumen II: Mesogastropoda (2da edn.). Santiago, Chile, 194 pp.
  • Ramírez J (1997) Catálogo: Moluscos de Chile. Volumen III: Neogastropoda (2da edn.). Santiago, Chile, 185 pp.
  • Ramírez J (2000) Catálogo: Moluscos de Chile. Volumen V: Opisthobranchia. Santiago, Chile, 83 pp.
  • Ríos C, Arntz WE, Gerdes D, Mutschke E, Montiel A (2007) Spatial and temporal variability of the benthic assemblages associated to the holdfasts of the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in the Straits of Magellan, Chile. Polar Biology 31: 89–100.
  • Ríos C, Gerdes D (1997) Ensamble bentónico epifaunistico de un campo intermareal de bloques y cantos en bahía Laredo, estrecho de Magallanes. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 24: 47–55.
  • Ríos C, Mutschke E, Morrison E (2003) Biodiversidad bentónica sublitoral en el estrecho de Magallanes, Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 38(1): 1–12.
  • Ríos C, Mutschke E, Montiel A, Gerdes D, Arntz WE (2005) Soft-bottom macrobenthic faunal associations in the southern Chilean glacial fjord complex. Scientia Marina 69(2): 225–236.
  • Ríos C, Mutschke E, Montiel A (2010) Estructura de la comunidad macrofaunística bentónica en la boca oriental del estrecho de Magallanes, Chile austral. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 38(1): 83–96.
  • Rochebrune A, Mabille J (1885) Diagnoses de mollusques nouveaux, recueillis par les membres de la mission du Cap Horn et M. Lebrun, Préparateur au Muséum, chargé d’une mission à Santa-Cruz de Patagonie. Bulletin de la Société Philomathique de Paris 7(9): 100–111.
  • Rochebrune A, Mabille J (1889) Mollusques. Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn. VI, Zoologie, Paris, 129 pp.
  • Rosenfeld S, Aldea C (2011) Un ignoto opistobranquio (Mollusca: Gastropoda) en la región de Magallanes (Toledonia parelata Dell, 1990): nuevos registros y especies similares. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 39(2): 133–136.
  • Rosenfeld S, Aldea C, Ojeda J (2011) Nuevos antecedentes sobre la biología y distribución del gasterópodo Margarella expansa (Sowerby, 1838). Amici Molluscarum 19: 19–26.
  • Rosenfeld S, Marambio J, Aldea C (2013) Comparación de ensambles de moluscos en dos sustratos intermareales de la cuenca central del estrecho de Magallanes. Amici Molluscarum 21(2): 7–18.
  • Rosenfeld S, Aldea C, Mansilla A, Marambio J, Ojeda J (2015) Richness, systematics, and distribution of molluscs associated with the macroalga Gigartina skottsbergii in the Strait of Magellan, Chile: A biogeographic affinity study. ZooKeys 519: 49–100.
  • Rosenfeld S, Aldea C, Ojeda J, Mansilla A, Rozzi R (2017) Diferencias morfométricas de dos especies del género Eatoniella en Isla Navarino, Reserva de Biosfera Cabo de Hornos, Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 52: 169–173.
  • Schrödl M (1996) Nudibranchia y Sacoglossa de Chile: Morfología externa y distribución. Gayana Zoología 60(1): 17–62.
  • Schrödl M (1999) Zoogeographic relationship of Magellan Nudibranchia (Mollusca: Opistobranchia) with particular reference to species from adjacent regions. Scientia Marina 63(1): 409–416.
  • Schrödl M (2000) Revision of the Nudibranchia genus Cadlina (Gastropoda: Opistobranchia) from the Southern Ocean. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 80(2): 299–309.
  • Schrödl M (2003) Sea slugs of Southern South America. Systematics, Biogeography and Biology of Chilean and Magellanic Nudipleura (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia). Conchbooks, München, 165 pp.
  • Sellanes J (2018) Base de datos de la Sala de Colecciones Biológicas de la Universidad Católica del Norte (SCBUCN). Version 1.2. Universidad Católica del Norte. Occurrence dataset accessed via [2018-11-21]
  • Silva F (2015) Efecto de los mitílidos sobre la estructura y diversidad de comunidades intermareales del Estrecho de Magallanes. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas.
  • Sirenko B (2006a) Report on the present state of our knowledge with regard to the chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) of the Magellan Strait and Falkland Islands. Venus 65(1–2): 81–89.
  • Sirenko BI (2006b) New Outlook On the System of Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Venus 65(1–2): 27–49.
  • Sirenko BI (2015) Shallow and deep-sea chitons of the genus Leptochiton Gray, 1847 (Mollusca: Polyplacophora: Lepidopleurida) from Peruvian and Chilean waters. Zootaxa 4033(2): 151–202.
  • Sirenko BI (2016) A new South African Leptochiton (Mollusca: Polyplacophora: Lepidopleurida). Ruthenica 26(3–4): 145–151.
  • Smith EA (1881) Account of the zoological collections made during the survey of the H.M.S. “Alert” in the Straits of Magellan and on the coast of Patagonia. IV. Mollusca and Molluscoidea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1881: 22–44.
  • Smith EA (1885) Report on the Lamellibranchiata collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Reports of the Scientific Results of the Exploratory Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger. Zoology 13(35): 1–341.
  • Smith EA (1905) On a small collection of Mollusca from Tierra del Fuego. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London VI: 333–339.
  • Soot-Ryen T (1959) Pelecypoda. Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. Lunds Universitets Arsskriften 55(6): 1–86.
  • Sowerby GB (1838) A descriptive catalogue of the species of Leach’s genus Margarita. Malacological and Conchological Magazine 1: 23–27.
  • Sowerby GB (1847) Thesaurus Conchyliorum or monographs of genera of shells (Vol. 1). London.
  • Spalding M, Fox H, Allen G, Davidson N, Ferdaña Z, Finlayson M, Halpern B, Jorge M, Lombana A, lourie S, Martin K, McManus E, Molnar J, Recchia C, Robertson J (2007) Marine ecoregions of the world: A Bioregionalization of coastal and shelf Areas. BioScience 57(7): 573–583.
  • Strebel H (1904) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Molluskenfauna der Magalhaen-Provinz. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere 21: 171–248.
  • Strebel H (1905b) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Molluskenfauna der Magalhaen-Provinz. No 3. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere 22: 575–666.
  • Strebel H (1906) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz. No 4. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere 24: 91–174.
  • Strebel H (1907) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Molluskenfauna der Magalhaen-Provinz. No 5. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere 25: 79–196.
  • Strebel H (1908) Die Gastropoden (mit Ausnahme de nackten Opisthobranchier). Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903 6(1): 1–111.
  • Thiele J (1908) Die Antarktischen and Subantarktischen Chitonen. In: Drygalski E von (Ed.) Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition (1901–1903) 10: 8–23.
  • Tryon GW, Pilsbry HA (1890) Manual conchology. Structural and systematic with illustrations of the species. Philadelphia, XII, 321 pp. [62 pls.]
  • Tryon GW, Pilsbry HA (1891) Manual of conchology. Structural and systematic with illustrations of the species. Philadelphia, XIII, 195 pp. [74 pls.]
  • Tryon GW, Pilsbry HA (1892) Manual of conchology. Structural and systematic with illustrations of the species. Philadelphia, XIV, 350 pp. [31 pls.]
  • Valdovinos C (1999) Biodiversidad de moluscos chilenos: base de datos taxonomica y distribucional. Gayana 63: 111–164.
  • Villarroel M, Stuardo J (1998) Protobranchia (Mollusca: Bivalvia) chilenos recientes y algunos fósiles. Malacologia 40(1–2): 113–229.
  • Waloszek D (1984) Variabilität, Taxonomie und Verbreitung von Chlamys patagonica (King and Broderip, 1832) und Anmerkungen zu weiteren Chlamys-Arten von der Südspitze Süd-Amerikas (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Pectinidae). Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Hamburg 27: 207–276.
  • Walther BA, Moore JL (2005) The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28: 815–829.
  • Watson RB (1886) Report on the Scaphopoda and Gasteropoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 1873–1876, Zoology 15: 1–756.
  • Wieczorek J, Bloom D, Guralnick R, Blum S, Döring M, Giovanni R, Robertson T, Vieglais D (2012) Darwin Core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PloS ONE 7(1): e29715.
  • Zelaya DG (2009) The genera Thyasira and Parathyasira in the Magellan Region and adjacent Antarctic waters (Bivalvia: Thyasiridae). Malacologia 51(2): 271–290.
  • Zelaya DG, Geiger DL (2007) Species of Scissurellidae and Anatomidae from Sub-Antarctic and Antarctic waters (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda). Malacologia 49(2): 393–443.
  • Zelaya DG, Ituarte C (2004) The genus Neolepton Monterosato, 1875 in Southern S outh America (Bivalvia: Neoleptonidae). Journal of Molluscan Studies 70: 123–137.

Appendix I

Registration in GBIF database.

Publication date: June 9, 2020

Hosted by: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente de Chile

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Endpoints: (Darwin Core Archive), (EML)

Preferred identifier, DOI:

Alternative identifiers:

Appendix II

Quadrants of the Strait of Magellan in which mollusks are recorded.

Quadrant Location Latitude (S) / Longitude (W)
E1 Dungeness Point 1 52°24’12"S, 68°25’40"W
E10 Dungeness Point 2 52°24’1"S, 68°26’35"W
E11 Dungeness Point 3 52°21’58"S, 68°26’50"W
E12 Dungeness Point 4 52°20’59"S, 68°28’23"W
E22 Point Catalina 52°27’55"S, 68°46’17"W
E26 Cape Posession 1 52°19’40"S, 68°51’5"W
E27 Cape Posession 2 52°19’3"S, 68°56’50"W
E28 Cape Posession 3 52°16’20"S, 69°0’33"W
E40 Posession Bay 1 52°14’25"S, 69°12’30"W
E48 Posession Bay 2 52°17’8"S, 69°12’30"W
E49 Posession Bay 3 52°13’30"S, 69°17’12"W
E50 Tandy Point 52°15’20"S, 69°21’58"W
E51 Posession Bay 4 52°17’8"S, 69°17’17"W
E54 Punta Anegada 52°25’59"S, 69°25’26"W
E55 Nunición Bay 52°20’09"S, 69°26’38"W
E57 Punta Delgada 53°27’12"S, 69°32’7"W
E58 First Narrow 1 52°32’25"S, 69°34’10"W
E60 Punta Remo 52°38’20"S, 69°39’27"W
E61 First Narrow 2 52°32’55"S, 69°40’31"W
E63 Punta Barranca 1 52°32’28"S, 69°43’12"W
E64 Punta Barranca 2 52°37’7"S, 69°43’53"W
E66 Punta Piedras 1 52°44’48"S, 69°50’40"W
E67 Punta Piedras 2 52°38’58"S, 69°50’43"W
E68 Santiago Bay 1 52°34’6"S, 69°50’40"W
E69 Santiago Bay 2 52°29’33"S, 69°51’3"W
E70 Santiago Bay 3 52°31’44"S, 69°55’33"W
E71 Triton Bank 1 52°36’52"S, 69°55’39"W
E72 Triton Bank 2 52°41’44"S, 69°56’6"W
E78 Gregorio Bay 1 52°34’34"S, 70°4’47"W
E79 Gregorio Bay 2 52°35’00"S, 70°08’23"W
E80 Gregorio Bay 3 52°38’13"S, 70°7’58"W
E82 Cape Gregorio 52°39’27"S, 70°14’25"W
E83 Second Narrow 1 52°43’5"S, 70°14’48"W
E86 Second Narrow 2 52°41’44"S, 70°26’17"W
E90 Punta Remo 52°42’43"S, 69°40’28"W
C5 Cabo Negro 1 52°56’30"S, 70°47’46"W
C6 Río Seco 53°2’27"S, 70°49’50"W
C7 Punta Arenas 1 53°8’8"S, 70°51’30"W
C8 Punta Arenas 2 53°11’47"S, 70°55’52"W
C9 Leñadura 1 53°15’24"S, 70°51’35"W
C10 Leñadura 2 53°15’46"S, 70°56’32"W
C11 Santa María Point 1 53°21’57"S, 70°57’37"W
C12 Colorado River 1 53°29’10"S, 70°56’49"W
C13 Colorado River 2 53°28’47"S, 70°51’4"W
C14 Santa María Point 2 53°21’53"S, 70°51’51"W
C16 Paso Ancho 1 53°8’53"S, 70°43’11"W
C17 Paso Ancho 2 53°4’5"S, 70°42’43"W
C18 Cabo Negro 2 52°56’29"S, 70°44’50"W
C21 Marta Island 52°52’57"S, 70°34’48"W
C23 Paso Ancho 3 52°58’19"S, 70°39’54"W
C24 Paso Ancho 4 53°2’11"S, 70°40’1"W
C25 Paso Ancho 5 53°7’34"S, 70°41’34"W
C26 Paso Ancho 6 53°13’4"S, 70°42’24"W
C28 Paso Ancho 7 53°23’35"S, 70°48’47"W
C32 Paso Ancho 8 53°2’15"S, 70°32’49"W
C33 Paso Ancho 9 52°56’34"S, 70°32’5"W
C34 Paso Ancho 10 52°56’19"S, 70°27’31"W
C36 Zegers Point 52°56’20"S, 70°18’52"W
C37 Gente Grande Bay 1 52°55’44"S, 70°12’33"W
C38 Gente Grande Bay 2 52°55’40"S, 70°7’41"W
C42 Gente Point 53°3’13"S, 70°25’45"W
C43 Paso Ancho 10 53°9’47"S, 70°26’17"W
C44 Paso Ancho 11 53°16’46"S, 70°28’16"W
C45 Porvenir Bay 1 53°20’57"S, 70°27’33"W
C49 Paso Boquerón 53°25’59"S, 70°19’40"W
C50 Porvenir Bay 2 53°18’29"S, 70°22’45"W
C52 Carrera Bay 53°33’53"S, 70°54’57"W
C53 Paso del Hambre 1 53°32’47"S, 70°49’20"W
C55 Paso del Hambre 2 53°32’30"S, 70°39’57"W
C57 Cape Valentín 1 53°32’12"S, 70°24’51"W
C58 Inútil Bay 1 53°32’8"S, 70°17’0"W
C59 Santa Ana Point 53°37’55"S, 70°54’41"W
C60 Paso del Hambre 3 53°37’51"S, 70°49’53"W
C64 Cape Valentín 2 53°39’16"S, 70°27’59"W
C65 Inútil Bay 2 53°39’4"S, 70°19’33"W
C66 Inútil Bay 3 53°38’40"S, 70°14’8"W
C67 Cape Boquerón 53°32’26"S, 70°13’43"W
C68 Inútil Bay 4 53°31’49"S, 70°9’20"W
C78 Puerto Nuevo 53°22’23"S, 69°22’14"W
C81 Inútil Bay 5 53°31’36"S, 69°23’42"W
C82 Inútil Bay 6 53°26’59"S, 69°23’58"W
C84 Inútil Bay 7 53°31’5"S, 69°30’41"W
C85 Inútil Bay 8 53°25’58"S, 69°35’25"W
C86 Inútil Bay 9 53°29’40"S, 69°35’4"W
C87 Inútil Bay 10 53°26’28"S, 69°44’32"W
C88 Inútil Bay 11 53°32’24"S, 69°44’48"W
C89 Inútil Bay 12 53°37’18"S, 69°39’42"W
C91 Inútil Bay 13 53°39’9"S, 69°45’59"W
C93 Inútil Bay 14 53°33’13"S, 69°52’27"W
C94 Inútil Bay 15 53°27’20"S, 69°52’32"W
C95 Inútil Bay 16 53°33’38"S, 69°59’57"W
C96 Cameron Point 1 53°39’3"S, 69°59’10"W
C97 Inútil Bay 17 53°35’41"S, 70°7’51"W
C98 Inútil Bay 18 53°40’22"S, 70°8’39"W
C99 Inútil Bay 19 53°40’23"S, 70°15’42"W
C100 Cameron Point 2 53°43’38"S, 69°59’20"W
C101 Cape Nose 1 53°44’21"S, 70°5’37"W
C102 Cape Nose 2 53°45’22"S, 70°10’58"W
C104 Whiteside Channel 1 53°45’35"S, 70°22’4"W
C105 Kelp Point 53°47’10"S, 70°25’49"W
C106 Chown Point 53°52’8"S, 70°10’17"W
C107 Whiteside Channel 2 53°52’7"S, 70°14’29"W
C108 Whiteside Channel 3 53°52’12"S, 70°18’59"W
C109 Harris Bay 53°51’18"S, 70°25’33"W
C111 Cóndor River 53°56’44"S, 70°7’46"W
C113 No Entres Bay 53°58’37"S, 70°21’2"W
C115 Owen Sound 1 53°59’8"S, 70°35’16"W
C116 Owen Sound 2 53°59’14"S, 70°38’46"W
C117 Karukinka Point 54°3’57"S, 70°5’17"W
C118 Whiteside Channel 4 54°4’10"S, 70°8’44"W
C122 Owen Sound 3 54°4’8"S, 70°32’47"W
C124 Port Castillo 54°9’47"S, 69°54’58"W
C134 Alta Island 54°16’21"S, 69°55’49"W
C165 Árbol Point 53°45’50"S, 70°57’51"W
C166 Paso del Hambre 4 53°45’57"S, 70°51’16"W
C167 Lomas Bay 1 53°45’50"S, 70°44’45"W
C169 Lomas Bay 2 53°50’6"S, 70°39’51"W
C171 Amigo Bay 53°51’3"S, 70°52’12"W
C172 Paso del Hambre 5 53°52’12"S, 70°57’27"W
C173 Glascott Point 53°51’45"S, 71°5’25"W
C175 Valdés Point 53°55’9"S, 70°52’54"W
C183 Magdalena Channel 53°55’36"S, 70°56’51"W
C184 Magdalena Sound 1 54°5’5"S, 70°57’30"W
C185 Magdalena Sound 2 54°3’8"S, 71°4’51"W
C189 Paso Froward 1 53°58’35"S, 71°13’35"W
C193 Paso Froward 2 53°51’23"S, 71°31’58"W
C200 Cape Holland 53°50’34"S, 71°37’16"W
C204 Andrés Bay 53°45’50"S, 71°49’0"W
C207 West Point 53°44’38"S, 71°55’28"W
C210 Fortescue Bay 53°42’25"S, 72°1’36"W
C211 Charles Island 1 53°44’22"S, 72°4’14"W
C214 Bárbara Bay 53°48’42"S, 72°9’6"W
C217 Charles Island 2 53°45’25"S, 72°8’42"W
C219 Choiseul Bay 53°45’14"S, 72°19’21"W
C220 Charles Island 3 53°40’56"S, 72°8’34"W
C221 Rupert Island 53°39’55"S, 72°14’14"W
C222 Ballena Sound 1 53°40’38"S, 72°19’31"W
C223 Ballena Sound 2 53°40’9"S, 72°25’25"W
C226 Cape Froward 53°53’52"S, 71°15’9"W
W2 Carlos III Island 53°34’32"S, 72°20’6"W
W3 Paso Tortuoso 53°33’25"S, 72°26’20"W
W4 Jerónimo Channel 53°30’13"S, 72°25’4"W
W13 Spider Island 53°31’14"S, 72°40’26"W
W15 Glacier Bay 53°22’9"S, 72°55’35"W
W17 Paso Largo 53°20’52"S, 73°2’12"W
W23 Lewis Bay 53°15’0"S, 73°19’51"W
W37 Chapman Isles 53°3’18"S, 73°45’13"W
W40 Cape Tamar 52°56’38"S, 73°44’54"W
W41 Brazo Damián 53°1’31"S, 73°55’23"W
W42 Tamar Island 52°55’31"S, 73°50’14"W
W46 Sholl Bay 52°43’42"S, 73°50’16"W
W49 Patranca Island 52°56’46"S, 74°1’59"W
W50 Félix Point 52°56’6"S, 74°8’12"W
W53 Tuesday Bay 52°50’43"S, 74°24’40"W
W55 Paso Tamar 1 52°50’27"S, 74°14’40"W
W56 Paso Tamar 2 52°50’43"S, 74°7’21"W
W57 Paso Tamar 3 52°50’24"S, 74°1’10"W
W60 Paso Tamar 4 52°44’34"S, 74°0’41"W
W65 Cape Pilar 1 52°43’29"S, 74°33’11"W
W67 Cape Pilar 2 52°41’56"S, 74°38’45"W
W69 Western entrance 52°37’40"S, 74°33’38"W
W85 Western entrance 52°33’27"S, 74°45’44"W
W102 Victoria Island 52°18’31"S, 74°50’10"W
login to comment