Research Article
Print
Research Article
New cheiracanthiid spiders from Xishuangbanna rainforest, southwestern China (Araneae, Cheiracanthiidae)
expand article infoJianshuang Zhang, Hao Yu§, Shuqiang Li|
‡ Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
§ Guizhou Education University, Guiyang, China
| Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Four new species of the genus Cheiracanthium C.L. Koch, 1839 from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China are described: C. daofeng Yu & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. duanbi Yu & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀), C. gou Yu & Li, sp. nov. (♂), and C. wuquan Yu & Li, sp. nov. (♀). In addition, Sinocanthium Yu & Li, gen. nov., is described with the type species S. shuangqiu Yu & Li, sp. nov. A key to cheiracanthiid genera distributed in East and Southeast Asia is provided.

Keywords

key to genera, new genus, new species, Oriental Region, taxonomy

Introduction

Cheiracanthiidae Wagner, 1887 is a relatively large spider family with twelve genera and 354 valid species distributed worldwide, except for the Polar Regions (WSC 2020). The Cheiracanthiidae fauna of China is presently known by 42 described species, all of them belonging to Cheiracanthium C.L. Koch, 1839 sensu lato (Li 2020). The global diversity of this family remains insufficiently studied, and several new species have been described recently (Lotz 2015; Marusik and Fomichev 2016; Zhang et al. 2018; Li and Zhang 2019). The current paper reports new Cheiracanthiidae taxa from Xishuangbanna.

Xishuangbanna, which lies between 21°08'–22°36'N and 99°56'–101°50'E, is in southwestern China and shares a border with Myanmar in the southwest and Laos in the southeast. Xishuangbanna is a biodiversity hotspot, and a large number of new taxa across a wide variety of spider families have been discovered in this region recently (Li 2020). Seven Cheiracanthium species were reported from Xishuangbanna before the current study. They are C. exquestitum Zhang & Zhu, 1993, C. falcatum Chen, Huang, Chen & Wang, 2006, C. insigne O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1874, C. insulanum (Thorell, 1878), C. ningmingense Zhang & Yin, 1999, C. taiwanicum Chen, Huang, Chen & Wang, 2006, and C. unicum Bösenberg & Strand, 1906.

During the examination of spiders collected from 2006 to the present in Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden in Menglun Town, four species recognized as new to science are described here and are temporarily placed in Cheiracanthium sensu lato. The fifth species is not readily assignable to any of the existing genera; thus, we established a new genus to accommodate it. Detailed morphological descriptions and diagnoses of the new taxa are given. The body and the copulatory organs are photographed and illustrated for each species. An identification key to cheiracanthiid genera occurring in East and Southeast Asia is provided.

Materials and methods

Specimens were collected by fogging, pitfall trapping, and hand collecting from the canopy, tree trunks, and leaf litter in the tropical rainforest in Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden and preserved in 75 or 95% ethanol. All type specimens are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IZCAS) in Beijing, China (curator: Jun Chen).

Specimens were examined using a LEICA M205C and an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope. Further details were studied under a CX41 compound microscope. Male and female copulatory organs were examined and illustrated after dissection. Left male palps are illustrated, unless otherwise indicated (photos of the right palp were horizontally mirrored in the figures to allow easier comparison with other species). Epigynes were removed and cleared in lactic acid or warm 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. Some vulvae were imaged after being embedded in Arabic gum. Images were captured with a Canon EOS 70D digital camera mounted on an Olympus CX41 compound microscope and assembled using Helicon Focus 6.80 image stacking software. All measurements were obtained using an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope and are given in millimetres. Eye diameters are taken from the widest distance. The total body length does not include chelicerae or spinnerets. Leg lengths are given as total length (femur, patella + tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Most of the terminology in the text and figure legends follows Lotz (2015) and Zhang et al. (2018), and some follows Marusik and Fomichev (2016) and Morano and Bonal (2016). Abbreviations used in the text and figures are as follows:

A atrium

AAM atrial anterior margin

AER anterior eye row

AL abdomen length

ALE anterior lateral eyes

AME anterior median eyes

AME–AME distance between AMEs

AME–ALE distance between AME and ALE

APM atrial posterior margin

AW abdomen width

C conductor

CD copulatory duct

CF cymbial fold

CI carapace index

CL carapace length

CL/CW carapace length / carapace width

CLL clypeal length

CO copulatory opening

CS cymbial spur

CW carapace width

DTA dorsal tibial apophysis

E embolus

EB embolic base

FD fertilisation duct

LL total length of leg I

LL/CL leg I / carapace length

MA median apophysis

MOQ median ocular quadrangle

MOQA MOQ anterior width

MOQP MOQ posterior width

OAL ocular area length

OAW ocular area width

PER posterior eye row

PLE posterior lateral eyes

PME posterior median eyes

PME–PME distance between PMEs

PME–PLE distance between PME and PLE

PMT promarginal teeth

PTA prolateral tibial apophysis

R receptacle

RMT retromarginal teeth

RTA retrolateral tibial apophysis

STL sternum length

STW sternum width

TL total body length

A DNA barcode was also obtained for species delimitation and matching of different sexes. A partial fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (CO1) gene was amplified and sequenced using the primers LCOI1490 (5’-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTG-3’) and HCOI2198 (5’-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAAT-3’). For additional information on extraction, amplification, and sequencing procedures, see Morano and Bonal (2016). All sequences were analysed using BLAST and are deposited in GenBank. The accession numbers are provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Voucher specimen information.

Species Voucher code Sex GenBank accession number Sequence length
C. daofeng sp. nov. YHCH010 MT449426 664bp
YHCH021 MT478102 665bp
C. duanbi sp. nov. YHCH030 MT478103 665bp
YHCH029 MT478104 665bp
C. gou sp. nov. YHCH016 MT477871 665bp
C. wuquan sp. nov. YHCH020 MT477870 664bp
S. shuangqiu sp. nov. YHCH011 MT478105 665bp

Taxonomy

Family Cheiracanthiidae Wagner, 1887

Key to cheiracanthiid genera occurring in East and Southeast Asia (females)

1 Trochanters not notched; epigynal atrium absent or reduced (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 251, fig. 335) Calamoneta
Trochanters notched (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 64, fig. 94); epigynal atrium present (Figs 2A, 2B, 4A, 4B, 6C, 6D, 6F, 11C, 11D, 11F; Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 241, fig. 305; 247, figs 323, 328) 2
2 Small-sized spiders (less than 4 mm) Summacanthium
Medium to large-sized spiders, usually larger than 4 mm (Figs 2G, 2H, 4G, 4H, 6A, 6B, 11A, 11B) 3
3 Fragile cheiracanthiids with a slender body and greenish colour (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 247, figs 321, 322), carapace flattened (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 247, fig. 321), venter of abdomen with colour pattern (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 247, fig. 322), trochanters shallowly notched, metatarsus and tarsus I flexible, with pseudosegments Calamopus
Yellow or brownish spider, sometimes with reddish or dark brown head, carapace not flattened, abdomen ventrally without distinct colour pattern (Figs 2G, H, 4G, H, 6A, B, 11A, B), trochanters are deeply notched, metatarsus and tarsus I inflexible, without pseudosegments 4
4 Copulatory ducts absent; atrium located anteriorly, with delimited margin posteriorly (Fig. 11C–G) Sinocanthium gen. nov.
Copulatory ducts distinct, with variable shapes, lengths and courses; atrium located posteriorly or centrally, usually rebordered anteriorly and laterally (Figs 2A–D, 4A–D, 6C–G) Cheiracanthium sensu lato

Key to cheiracanthiid genera occurring in East and Southeast Asia (males)

1 Trochanters not notched; cymbium without spur (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 251, figs 333, 334) Calamoneta
Trochanters notched (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001:64, fig. 94); cymbial spur present (Figs 79; Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 241, figs 303, 304; 243, figs 310, 311; 246, figs 315, 316; 247, fig. 327) 2
2 Small-sized spiders (less than 4 mm); abdomen ventrally with a scape-shaped bulge, bulge laterally with chitinized pits (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 241, figs 301, 302; 243, figs 307, 308) Summacanthium
Medium- to large-sized spiders, usually larger than 4 mm; abdomen unmodified (Figs 2E, 2F, 4E, 4F) 3
3 Fragile cheiracanthiids with a slender body and greenish colour (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 246, fig. 312; 247, figs 319, 320), carapace flattened (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 247, fig. 318), venter of abdomen with colour pattern (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 247, fig. 320), trochanters notched shallowly, metatarsus and tarsus I flexible with pseudosegments; cymbial spur reflexed near the base, directed alongside the dorsal cymbium, directed apically alongside the dorsal cymbium (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 246, figs 315, 316; 247, 327) Calamopus
Yellow or brownish spider, sometimes with reddish or dark brown head, carapace not flattened, abdomen ventrally without distinct colour pattern (Figs 2E, F, 4E, F, 5D–F), trochanters are deeply notched, metatarsus and tarsus I inflexible without pseudosegments; cymbial spur not flexed at base, pointing in variable directions Cheiracanthium sensu lato

Comments. The debate on the group’s limits and internal structure of this family remains open (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001), and there is much dispute about the family placement of Neotropical genera (i.e. Eutichurus Simon, 1897) (Marusik and Fomichev 2016). Within Cheiracanthiidae, four genera from East and Southeast Asia can be considered most closely related to the type genus Cheiracanthium.

Cheiracanthium C.L. Koch, 1839

Chiracanthops Mello-Leitão 1942 (Cheiracanthium is considered a senior synonym of Chiracanthops, Bonaldo and Brescovit 1992: 732).

Cheiracanthium C.L. Koch 1839: 9 (type species: Aranea punctoria Villers, 1789); Simon 1897: 87; Simon 1932: 895; Petrunkevitch 1933: 53; Reimoser 1937: 71; Edwards 1958: 368; Lehtinen 1967: 291; Dondale and Redner 1982: 17; Roberts 1985: 88; Sterghiu 1985: 100; Yaginuma 1986: 177; Chikuni 1989: 122; Paik 1990: 3; Wolf 1991: 233; Bonaldo and Brescovit 1992: 731; Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 224; Lotz 2007a: 4; 2007b: 148; 2011: 23; 2014: 303; 2015: 322; Li and Lin 2016: 78.

Helebiona Benoit, 1977: 80 (type species: H. wilma Benoit, 1977); Lotz 2007a: 66.

Type species

Aranea punctoria Villers, 1789, type locality: Europe.

Comments

The genus Cheiracanthium currently includes 215 extant species that are widespread in the Old World and represent 61% of the total number of Cheiracanthiidae species (WSC 2020). However, the genus remains inadequately studied because: (1) almost half of the species are known from a single sex or juveniles (37 from males, 59 from females, two from juveniles), and in some cases, the adults are apparently mismatched, or conspecific male and females have been described as separate species (Dankittipakul and Beccaloni 2012; WSC 2020); (2) original descriptions are rather brief and lack illustrations or the illustrations are inadequate (Zhang et al. 2018); (3) the diversity of this genus is still insufficiently known (Zhang et al. 2018). Although several major taxonomic studies on a regional scale have been conducted, e.g., Edwards (1958) for the US, Wolf (1991) for Central Europe, Bonaldo and Brescovit (1992) for the Neotropical Region, Lotz (2007a, b, 2011, 2014, 2015) for the Afrotropical Region, Deeleman-Reinhold (2001) for Southeast Asia, the genus Cheiracanthium has been widely considered paraphyletic (Wunderlich 2012; Marusik and Fomichev 2016). We agree with Bayer (2014) regarding the need of an extensive, large-scale review of the genus. Consequently, the present study follows the WSC (2020) and temporarily places the four new species in Cheiracanthium sensu lato.

Cheiracanthium daofeng Yu & Li, sp. nov.

Figures 1, 2, 7A, 8A, 9A, 10A–C

Holotype

♂ (IZCAS-Ar 34741), China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, seasonal tropical primary rainforest, 21°54.725'N, 101°13.261'E, elevation ca. 734 m, 8.VIII.2007, Guo Zheng leg. Paratype: 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar 34742), same data as holotype.

Other material examined

China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, 1♂ (YHCH010), Baka Village, 21°57.703'N, 101°12.062'E, elevation ca. 736 m, 5.VIII.2012, Guo Zheng leg.; 1♀ (YHCH021), Bubang Village, monsoon forest, 21°36.827'N, 101°34.847'E, elevation ca. 690 m, 12.VIII.2012, Guo Zheng leg.

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Chinese pinyin ‘dāo fēng’, which means ‘blade point’, referring to the narrow, sharp conductor which is shaped like a blade; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

Males of the new species can be easily distinguished from the congeners by the blade-shaped pointed conductor with a sharp tip and by the embolar tip extending to the apex of the cymbium (Figs 1A–C, 7A, 8A, 10A–C) (the conductor and the embolar tip are relatively short and do not extend to the cymbial tip in almost all other Cheiracanthium species, such as C. duanbi sp. nov. and C. gou sp. nov.; Figs 3A–C, 5A–C, 7B, C, 8B, C, 10D–I). The females are similar to those of C. taiwanicum (Chen and Huang 2012: 25, fig. 7E, F) in having a similar habitus, an eyebrow-shaped atrial anterior margin, and coiled copulatory ducts but differ in the following: (1) the receptacles are kidney-shaped (Fig. 2C, D) (vs. globular in C. taiwanicum), and (2) having different numbers of copulatory duct coils (four coils in C. daofeng sp. nov., vs. six coils in C. taiwanicum) (Fig. 2C, D).

Figure 1. 

Palp of Cheiracanthium daofeng sp. nov., male holotype. A Prolateral view B ventral view C retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; CF = cymbial fold; CS = cymbial spur; DTA = dorsal tibial apophysis; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.

Description

Male. Holotype (Figs 2E, F): TL 4.95; CL 2.15, CW 1.74, CI (CL/CW) 1.24; AL 2.80, AW 1.34. Carapace pale brown, with pair of brown lateral bands extending from behind PME and PLE, almost reaching posterior margin, fused, forming a U-shaped patch. Eyes: AER slightly recurved, PER slightly wider than AER, almost straight in dorsal view. All eyes dark with black rings. Eye sizes and interdistances: OAL 0.37, OAW 0.99; AME 0.12, ALE 0.14, PME 0.11, PLE 0.13; AME–AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.10, PME–PME 0.17, PME–PLE 0.27; MOQA 0.37, MOQP 0.45, CLL 0.05. Chelicerae protruding and coloured as carapace, with a small basal condyle, three teeth on promargin and three on retromargin. Sternum pale brown, STL 1.04, STW 0.91. Labium and endites coloured as carapace. Legs pale yellow, without distinct markings. Leg measurements: I 21.08 (5.36, 6.70, 6.72, 2.30), II 11.50 (3.11, 3.83, 3.66, 0.91), III 8.58 (2.35, 2.57, 2.85, 0.82), IV 12.28 (3.24 3.76, 4.27, 1.02); LL/CL 9.80. Abdomen lanceolate, dorsally yellowish white, dorsum with indistinct heart-shaped mark, two pairs of inconspicuous muscle depressions, scattered numerous white pigmented spots; venter yellowish white without distinct pattern.

Figure 2. 

Cheiracanthium daofeng sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype. A Epigyne, intact, ventral view B epigyne, cleared, ventral view C vulva, cleared, dorsal view D vulva, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum, dorsal view E male habitus, dorsal view F male habitus, lateral view G female habitus, dorsal view H female habitus, ventral view. Abbreviations: A = atrium; AAM = atrial anterior margin; CD = copulatory duct; CO = copulatory opening; FD = fertilization duct; R = receptacle. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–D); 1 mm (E–H).

Palp (Figs 1A–C, 7A, 8A, 9A, 10A–C). Tibia with two apophyses: a retrolateral one that is relatively long and sclerotized, ca. 1/3 of palpal tibia length, with a more-or-less finger-like apex; a very minute, tooth-shaped dorsal apophysis; cymbial spur two times shorter than tibia, beak-shaped; cymbial fold strongly developed and conspicuous in ventral and retrolateral views for approximately 2/3 of cymbium length; tip of cymbium long, ca. 1/2 of cymbium length. Tegulum oval, 1.6 times longer than wide; median apophysis long and filamentous, more than 1/2 of tegulum length, with a curved tip resembling a sickle in ventral view; embolus filiform, originating on the retrolateral flank (approximately 1 o’clock on tegulum), surrounding base and ending at conductor apex, its tip curved behind conductor and extending to apex of cymbium; conductor large, shaped like a blade point, base wide, gradually tapering toward apex.

Female. Distinctly larger and darker than male. Paratype (Fig. 2G, H) measured: TL 6.32; CL 2.40, CW 1.67, CI (CL/CW) 1.44; AL 3.92, AW 2.42. Eye diameters and interdistances: OAL 0.41, OAW 1.07; AME 0.11, ALE 0.13, PME 0.12, PLE 0.13; AME–AME 0.09, AME–ALE 0.15, PME–PME 0.19, PME–PLE 0.22; MOQA 0.39, MOQP 0.46, CLL 0.08. PMT: RMT = 3:3. STL 1.20, STW 1.06. Legs yellowish white, without distinct markings. Leg measurements: I 21.08 (5.36, 6.70, 6.72, 2.30), II 11.50 (3.11, 3.83, 3.66, 0.91), III 8.58 (2.35, 2.57, 2.85, 0.82), IV 12.28 (3.24 3.76, 4.27, 1.02); LL/CL 9.80.

Epigyne (Figs 2A–D). Atrium ca. two times wider than long, atrial anterior margin eyebrow-shaped and heavily sclerotized, posterior and lateral margins inconspicuous; receptacles are faintly visible through epigynal plate in ventral view; two copulatory openings, large and conjoined, located at posterior portion of epigynal plate; transparent copulatory ducts coiled, forming four entwined loops (including three ascending coils and one descending coil); receptacle reniform, separated by diameter of receptacle.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China.

Cheiracanthium duanbi Yu & Li, sp. nov.

Figures 3, 4, 7B, 8B, 9B, 10D–F

Holotype

♂ (IZCAS-Ar 34743, YHCH030), China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, G213 roadside, Anogeissus acuminata plantation, 21°53.748'N, 101°17.084'E, elevation ca. 620 m, 1.V.2019, Zhigang Chen leg. Paratype: 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar 34744, YHCH029), Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 21°54.007'N, 101°16.395'E, elevation ca. 620 m, 10.V.2019, Zilong Bai leg.

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Chinese pinyin ‘duǎn bì’, which means ‘short dagger’, and refers to the dagger-shaped retrolateral tibial apophysis; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

The male of C. duanbi sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other Cheiracanthium species, except C. exquestitum (Zhang and Yin 1999: 287, figs 8, 9), by having a distally wide cymbial spur, a spine-like median apophysis, and a beak-shaped conductor but can be distinguished from C. exquestitum by having: (1) the distal tip of the cymbial spur partly membranous and not forked (Figs 3A–C, 7B, 8B); with a sclerotized and forked apex in C. exquestitum; (2) the retrolateral tibial apophysis erect, like a short dagger, in retrolateral view (Figs 3C, 8B), instead of sinuate and hook-shaped as in C. exquestitum; (3) the median apophysis shorter (Figs 3B, C, 7B, 8B, 10D–F). The females are similar to those of C. exquestitum (Zhang and Yin 1999: 287, figs 10, 11), C. rehobothense Strand, 1915 (Bayer 2014: 29, figs 8a–c, 9a, b), C. gratum Kulczyński, 1897 (Merkens and Wunderlich 2000: 42, figs 6–9), and C. fulvotestaceum Simon, 1878 (Hänggi and Stäubli 2012: 64, fig. 5) by the general shape of the atrium and vulva but can be distinguished by the copulatory ducts having three turns (vs. copulatory ducts with four turns in C. exquestitum, with two turns in C. rehobothense and C. gratum) and by the larger atrium (lateral margin of atrium close to the receptacle in C. duanbi sp. nov. vs. distant from the receptacle in C. fulvotestaceum).

Figure 3. 

Palp of Cheiracanthium daofeng sp. nov., male holotype. A Prolateral view B ventral view C retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; CF = cymbial fold; CS = cymbial spur; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis; PTA = prolateral apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Description

Male. Holotype (Figs 4E, F): TL 7.68; CL 3.64, CW 2.83, CI (CL/CW) 1.29; AL 4.01, AW 1.99. Carapace white, uniformly coloured, without any pattern. Eyes: in dorsal view, both anterior and posterior eye rows recurved, PER slightly wider than AER. All eyes dark, on tubercles. Eye sizes and interdistances: OAL 0.41, OAW 1.27; AME 0.18, ALE 0.20, PME 0.17, PLE 0.12; AME–AME 0.15, AME–ALE 0.22, PME–PME 0.28, PME–PLE 0.32; MOQA 0.51, MOQP 0.56, CLL 0.04. Chelicerae robust and coloured as carapace, both margins with two teeth. Sternum yellowish white, STL 1.87, STW 1.41. Labium and endites coloured as carapace. Legs white with greyish metatarsi and tarsi. Leg measurements: I 29.59 (7.23, 9.39, 9.69, 2.28), II 21.05 (5.77, 6.86, 6.58, 1.84), III 15.11 (3.81, 4.86, 5.08, 1.35), IV 20.96 (5.31, 6.81, 7.07, 1.77); LL/CL 8.13. Abdomen lanceolate, dorsally grey, lighter anteriorly, darker posteriorly; dorsum with a lengthwise white heart mark, 1/3 of opisthosoma length; venter greyish without any pattern.

Figure 4. 

Cheiracanthium duanbi sp. nov., female paratype and male holotype. A epigyne, intact, ventral view B epigyne, cleared, ventral view C vulva, cleared, dorsal view D vulva, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum, dorsal view E male habitus, dorsal view F male habitus, lateral view G female habitus, dorsal view H female habitus, ventral view. Abbreviations: A = atrium; AAM = atrial anterior margin; CD = copulatory duct; CO = copulatory opening; FD = fertilization duct; R = receptacle. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–D); 1 mm (E–H).

Palp (Figs 3A–C, 7B, 8B, 9B, 10D–F). Tibia relatively long, ca. 2/3 of cymbium length, with two apophyses: a short and sclerotized retrolateral one, ca. 1/2 of palpal tibia length, with wide base and narrow apex, dagger-shaped; and a small, round, thumb-like prolateral apophysis; cymbial spur approximately as long as tibia, distal tip wide and partly membranous; cymbial fold well-developed and clearly visible in ventral and retrolateral views for ca. 1/2 length of cymbium; tip of cymbium long, ca. 1/2 of cymbium length. Tegulum oval, 1.4 times longer than wide, surface wrinkled; median apophysis small and hyaline, spine-like; embolus filiform, arising at approximately 12 o’clock position, terminating at approximately 11 o’clock position, tip covered by conductor; conductor short, wide, beak-shaped, base covering embolic base, tip covering embolar apex.

Female. Distinctly larger and darker than male. Paratype (Figs 4G, H): TL 10.32; CL 3.64, CW 2.79, CI (CL/CW) 1.30; AL 6.69, AW 4.20. Eye diameters and interdistances: OAL 53, OAW 1.46; AME 0.21, ALE 0.23, PME 0.18, PLE 0.17; AME–AME 0.12, AME–ALE 0.31, PME–PME 0.37, PME–PLE 0.41; MOQA 0.55, MOQP 0.74, CLL 0.06. PMT: RMT = 2:3. STL 1.79, STW 1.50. Legs yellowish brown, without distinct markings. Leg measurements: I 20.68 (5.27, 7.07, 6.06, 2.28), II 14.99 (4.25, 5.33, 4.00, 1.42), III 10.55 (2.91, 3.47, 2.97, 1.21), IV – (3.86, –, –, –); LL/CL 5.68.

Epigyne (Fig. 4A–D). Atrium large, located at posterior portion of epigynal plate, with delimited margin anteriorly and laterally, length is almost equivalent to width; receptacles and copulatory ducts prominent through epigynal plate in ventral view; two copulatory openings located at basolateral atrial borders; transparent copulatory ducts coiled, with three turns (including two ascending coils and one descending coil); receptacles elongated and pyriform, ca. two times longer than wide, separated by 1.5 diameters.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China.

Cheiracanthium gou Yu & Li , sp. nov.

Figures 5, 7C, 8C, 9C, 10G–I

Holotype

♂ (IZCAS-Ar 34746, YHCH016), China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 48 km landmark in the reserve, seasonal rainforest, 21°58.704'N, 101°19.748'E, elevation ca. 1088 m, 12.VIII.2011, Guo Zheng leg.

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Chinese pinyin ‘gōu’, which means ‘hook’, and refers to the curved distal tip of the cymbial spur which is shaped like a hook; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

Males of this new species can be easily distinguished from all other Cheiracanthium species by the structure of the palp. The retrolateral tibial apophysis consists of a thin distal half and a wide basal half. The cymbial spur is partly membranous proximally and sclerotized distally with the distal tip blunt and thick, hook-shaped (Figs 5A–C, 7C, 8C, 9C). By contrast, in almost all known Cheiracanthium species, the retrolateral tibial apophysis and the cymbial spur cannot be easily divided into two parts, and the distal tip of the cymbial spur is usually sharply pointed, such as in C. daofeng sp. nov. and C. duanbi sp. nov. (Figs 1A–C, 3A–C, 7A, B, 8A, B, 9A, B).

Figure 5. 

Cheiracanthium gou sp. nov., male holotype. A Flipped right palp, prolateral view B left palp, ventral view C left palp, retrolateral view D habitus, dorsal view E habitus, ventral view F habitus, lateral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; CS = cymbial spur; DTA = dorsal tibial apophysis; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–C); 1 mm (D–F).

Description

Male. Holotype (Fig. 6D–F): TL –; CL 3.63, CW 2.83, CI (CL/CW) 1.28; AL –, AW –. Carapace pale yellow, uniformly coloured, without distinct pattern; cephalic region inconspicuously raised, cervical groove and radial grooves distinct, tegument smooth, clothed with short, fine hairs. Eyes: in dorsal view, both anterior and posterior eye rows recurved, PER slightly wider than AER. All eyes dark, on tubercles. Eye sizes and interdistances: OAL 0.49, OAW 1.32; AME 0.22, ALE 0.20, PME 0.17, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.17, AME–ALE 0.18, PME–PME 0.22, PME–PLE 0.28; MOQA 0.53, MOQP 0.58, CLL 0.09. Chelicerae with three teeth on promargin and three on retromargin, with long red fangs. Sternum pale yellow, STL 1.67, STW 1.32. Labium and endites orange. Legs distinctly long, yellowish white, with brown metatarsi and tarsi, without distinct markings. Leg measurements: I 32.75 (8.38, 1.062, 11.29, 2.46), II – (5.32, –, –, –), III missing, IV 22.07 (6.4, 6.34, 7.72, 1.61); LL/CL 9.02. Abdomen missing.

Palp (Figs 5A–C, 7C, 8C, 9C, 10G–I). Tibia with two apophyses: long and sclerotized retrolateral apophysis, ca. 1/3 of palpal tibia length, with thin distal half and wide basal half; and a short, thin, stalk-like dorsal apophysis; cymbial spur short, ca. 1/3 of cymbium length, partly membranous proximally, heavily sclerotized distally, distal tip curved and blunt; cymbial fold poorly developed and indistinct in ventral and retrolateral views for ca. 1/2 the length of cymbium; tip of cymbium long, ca. 1/2 of cymbium length. Bulb elongated, 1.5 times longer than wide; median apophysis long and hyaline, more than 1/2 of tegulum length, with wide base, thin middle part, and hook-shaped tip; embolus originates at ca. 1 o’clock position, surrounds base, and ends atop conductor at distal end of tegulum; conductor short, thick, membranous.

Female. Unknown.

Comments

According to the WSC (2020), a total of ten Cheiracanthium species from China are known only from females: C. approximatum O. P.-Cambridge, 1885, C. escaladae Barrion et al., 2013, C. fujianense Gong, 1983, C. hypocyrtum Zhang & Zhu, 1993, C. liuyangense Xie et al., 1996, C. olliforme Zhang & Zhu, 1993, C. potanini Schenkel, 1963, C. solidum Zhang et al., 1993, C. sphaericum Zhang et al., 1993, and C. longtailen Xu, 1993. Among them, C. escaladae is supposedly a Clubiona species based on epigyne morphology, C. approximatum and C. potanini are doubtful or invalid species because of the poor original illustrations and descriptions, C. liuyangense may be a synonym of C. taegense Paik, 1990, and C. longtailen is considered a junior synonym of C. pichoni Schenkel, 1963. The remaining five species can be tentatively considered valid species. In addition, C. spectabile (Thorell, 1887) from Myanmar is known by the male but is not illustrated. We cannot rule out the possibility that the above six species are conspecific to C. gou sp. nov.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China.

Cheiracanthium wuquan Yu & Li , sp. nov.

Figure 6

Holotype

♀ (IZCAS-Ar 34747, YHCH020), China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 48 km landmark in the reserve, seasonal rainforest; 21°58.704'N, 101°19.748'E, elevation ca. 1088 m, 12.VIII.2011, Guo Zheng leg.

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Chinese pinyin ‘wǔ quān’, which means ‘five loops’, and refers to the coiled copulatory ducts, forming five entwined coils; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

The female of the new species is similar to those of C. japonicum Bösenberg & Strand, 1906 (Zhu and Zhang 2011: 341, fig. 246A, B), C. simaoense Zhang & Yin, 1999 (Zhang and Yin 1999: 286, figs 6, 7), C. turiae Strand, 1917 (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 234, figs 292, 293), and C. virescens (Sundevall, 1833) (Zhu and Zhang 2011: 346, fig. 250A, B) by the general shape of the atrium and receptacles and the coiling of the copulatory duct around the distal part of the receptacle. The new species can be easily distinguished by the different number of copulatory duct coils (copulatory ducts with five turns in C. wuquan sp. nov. vs. three turns in C. simaoense and C. virescens and four turns in C. japonicum and C. turiae) (Figs 6C–G).

Figure 6. 

Cheiracanthium wuquan sp. nov., female holotype. A Habitus, dorsal view B habitus, ventral view C epigyne, intact, ventral view D epigyne, cleared, ventral view E vulva, cleared, dorsal view F epigyne, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum, ventral view G vulva, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum, dorsal view. Abbreviations: A = atrium; AAM = atrial anterior margin; CD = copulatory duct; CO = copulatory opening; FD = fertilization duct; R = receptacle. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, B); 0.2 mm (C–G).

Figure 7. 

Cheiracanthium spp., left palp, ventral view. A C. daofeng sp. nov., male holotype B C. duanbi sp. nov., male holotype C C. gou sp. nov., male holotype. Abbreviations: C = conductor; CF = cymbial fold; CS = cymbial spur; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis; RTA = prolateral tibial apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Description

Female. Holotype (Fig. 6A, B): TL 6.85; CL 2.69, CW 2.42, CI (CL/CW) 1.11; AL 4.15, AW 2.78. Carapace yellowish orange except yellowish brown ocular area, without distinct pattern; cervical groove and radial grooves indistinct. Eyes: both anterior and posterior eye rows almost straight in dorsal view, PER slightly wider than AER. All eyes dark, with black rings. Eye sizes and interdistances: OAL 0.37, OAW 1.10; AME 0.15, ALE 0.11, PME 0.14, PLE 0.14; AME–AME 0.20, AME–ALE 0.23, PME–PME 0.30, PME–PLE 0.33; MOQA 0.46, MOQP 0.57, CLL 0.04. Chelicerae robust and brownish red, with long, red wine-coloured fangs, with three teeth on promargin and two on retromargin. Sternum pale yellow, STL 1.35, STW 1.12. Labium and endites light orange. Legs yellowish white with brown metatarsi and tarsi, without distinct markings. Leg measurements: I 9.38 (2.54,3.35, 2.73, 0.77), II 7.83 (2.00, 2.88, 2.23, 0.72), III 5.78 (1.64, 1.86, 1.65, 0.62), IV 7.96 (2.41, 2.43, 2.42, 0.70); LL/CL 3.49. Abdomen oval, uniformly grey, dorsum with two pairs of conspicuous muscle depressions; venter medially with two longitudinal dotted lines.

Epigyne (Figs 6C–G). Atrium large, slightly wider than long, located at posterior portion of epigynal plate, with arched anterior hood and indistinct posterior margin; two copulatory openings, large and contiguous, located at basolateral atrial borders; receptacles and copulatory ducts conspicuous through epigynal plate in ventral view; transparent copulatory ducts coiled, with five ascending turns, connecting receptacle anteriorly; receptacles elongated and separated by 1.5 diameters, pear shaped, ducts coil around distal part.

Male. Unknown.

Comments

Due to the large and long, ovoid receptacles and the slender copulatory duct encircling the anterior part of the receptacles, we justifiably place C. wuquan sp. nov. in Cheiracanthium sensu stricto. Until now, five Cheiracanthium species from China are known from males only: C. antungense Chen & Huang, 2012, C. echinulatum Zhang, Zhang & Yu, 2018, C. gobi Schmidt & Barensteiner, 2000, C. ningmingense Zhang & Yin, 1999, and C. chayuense Li & Zhang, 2019 (WSC 2020). Based on the palpal structure, with the exception of C. ningmingense, the other four species do not belong to Cheiracanthium sensu stricto (Wunderlich 2012). C. ningmingense is presently known from Ningming county in Guangxi (type locality), Shimen county in Hunan, and Xishuangbanna in Yunnan. However, C. ningmingense maybe a junior synonym of one known species.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China.

Figure 8. 

Cheiracanthium spp., left palp, retrolateral view. A C. daofeng sp. nov., male holotype B C. duanbi sp. nov., male holotype C C. gou sp. nov., male holotype. Abbreviations: C = conductor; CF = cymbial fold; CS = cymbial spur; DTA = dorsal tibial apophysis; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 9. 

Cheiracanthium spp., left palp, dorsal view. A C. daofeng sp. nov., male holotype B C. duanbi sp. nov., male holotype C C. gou sp. nov., male holotype. Abbreviations: CF = cymbial fold; CS = cymbial spur; DTA = dorsal tibial apophysis; PTA = prolateral tibial apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 10. 

Cheiracanthium spp., left bulb, prolateral view (A, D, G), ventral view (B, E, H), retrolateral view (C, F, I).A–C C. daofeng sp. nov. D–F C. duanbi sp. nov. G–I C. gou sp. nov. Abbreviations: C = conductor; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Sinocanthium Yu & Li, gen. nov.

Type species

Sinocanthium shuangqiu Yu & Li, sp. nov.

Etymology

The generic name is derived from its similarity to Cheiracanthium and the Latin adjective Sino- for Chinese referring to the distribution region of the genus. The gender is neuter.

Diagnosis

Sinocanthium gen. nov. resembles Cheiracanthium by the similar habitus (Figs 11A, B, 4G, H, 6A, B) but is consistently separable by the shape of the epigyne. Sinocanthium gen. nov., as in most Cheiracanthium species, has a yellow body, a wide cephalic part, long legs, subequal eyes, and parallel eye rows of equal width occupying the greater width of the head. It can be distinguished from Cheiracanthium sensu lato by the absence of copulatory ducts (Fig. 11E, G) (vs. copulatory ducts with variable lengths but distinct in all Cheiracanthium species, including C. daofeng sp. nov., C. duanbi sp. nov., and C. wuquan sp. nov. (Figs 2C, D, 4C, D, 6E, G), and by the atrium located anteriorly with a rebordered posterior margin (Figs 11C, D, F) (vs. atrium located anteriorly or centrally, atrial hood located anteriorly in Cheiracanthium).

Figure 11. 

Sinocanthium shuangqiu sp. nov., female holotype. A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, ventral view C epigyne, intact, ventral view D epigyne, cleared, ventral view E vulva, cleared, dorsal view F epigyne, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum, ventral view G vulva, cleared and embedded in Arabic gum, dorsal view. Abbreviations: A = atrium; AAM = atrial anterior margin; APM = atrial posterior margin; CO = copulatory opening; FD = fertilization duct; R = receptacle. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, B); 0.2 mm (C–G).

Description

Same as for the species.

Composition

Type species only.

Comments

Based on the original figures and text descriptions of the epigynes, Cheiracanthium sensu lato can be further divided into at least four or five different taxa (Wunderlich 2012). The morphology of the epigyne exhibits very high diversity. However, all Cheiracanthium species related to the generotype have copulatory ducts, even though the shapes, lengths, and courses of the copulatory ducts are variable. Despite the variable shapes, the atria of the different taxa are located posteriorly or centrally and are usually rebordered anteriorly and laterally. Obviously, Sinocanthium shuangqiu sp. nov. cannot be placed in Cheiracanthium sensu lato because of the peculiar structure of the epigyne, so we described a new genus to accommodate it. Although we examined only one female of S. shuangqiu sp. nov., our specimen is strikingly different from all Cheiracanthium species: The atrium is located anteriorly, the atrial posterior margin is rebordered, and copulatory ducts are absent, supporting our decision.

Sinocanthium shuangqiu Yu & Li , sp. nov.

Figure 11

Holotype

♀ (IZCAS-Ar 34745, YHCH011), China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 48 km landmark in the reserve, seasonal rainforest; 21°58.704'N, 101°19.748'E, elevation ca. 1088 m, 12.VIII.2011, Guo Zheng leg.

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Chinese pinyin ‘shuāng qiú ‘, which means ‘double ball’, and refers to the two bulb-shaped receptacles; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

The new species is easily distinguished from other cheiracanthiids by the epigyne, which has a fan-shaped fovea that is rebordered posteriorly and by the absence of copulatory ducts.

Description

Female. Holotype (Fig. 11A, B): TL 5.02; CL 2.13, CW 1.71, CI (CL/CW) 1.25; AL 2.89, AW 2.06. Carapace pale yellow, ocular area brown, a pair of brown lateral bands originating from behind PME and PLE, almost reaching posterior half of carapace. Eyes: AER almost straight, PER wider than AER and slightly procurved in dorsal view. All eyes dark, with black rings. Eye sizes and interdistances: OAL 0.51, OAW 0.93; AME 0.16, ALE 0.16, PME 0.17, PLE 0.13; AME–AME 0.21, AME–ALE 0.26, PME–PME 0.28, PME–PLE 0.34; MOQA 0.49, MOQP 0.58, CLL 0.11. Chelicerae with orange base, fangs red wine-coloured, both margins without teeth. Sternum yellowish, STL 1.17, STW 0.94. Labium and endites coloured as ocular area. Legs yellowish white, without any markings. Leg measurements: I and II missing, III – (–, 1.56, 1.36, 0.57), IV 8.02 (2.35, 2.59, 2.37, 0.71). Abdomen (Fig. 11A, B) oval, dorsally yellowish white, dorsum with two pairs of inconspicuous muscle depressions; venter white with no distinct pattern.

Epigyne (Fig. 11C–G). Atrium large and fan-shaped, located anteriorly on epigynal plate, margin delimited, atrial anterior margin long and indistinct, posterior margin heavily sclerotized; atrium ca. two times wider than long, blocked by mating plug before cleaning; receptacles clearly visible through the tegument in ventral view; copulatory openings small, located at basolateral atrial borders; receptacles perfectly round, separated by 0.8 diameters.

Male. Unknown.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China.

Acknowledgements

We thank Yuri M. Marusik (Magadan, Russia), Mikhail M. Omelko (Vladivostok, Russia), and Alireza Zamani (Turku, Finland) for providing constructive comments on the manuscript. Sarah Crews checked the English of an earlier draft. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China to Hao Yu (NSFC-31702006) and Shuqiang Li (NSFC-31530067), the Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province to Hao Yu ([2020]1Y081), PhD grant from Guizhou Normal University to Jianshuang Zhang (11904/0517069), and Guizhou Education University Academic Discipline Project (2019YLPYXKB01).

References

  • Bayer S (2014) Miscellaneous notes on European and African Cheiracanthium species (Araneae: Miturgidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 47: 19–34. https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit4704
  • Benoit PLG (1977) La faune terrestre de l’Ile de Sainte-Hélène, quatrième partie, 3. Arachnida: 3. Araneae, 9. Fam. Clubionidae. Annales du Musée royal de l’Afrique central, Série Zoologie, 220: 64–81.
  • Bonaldo AB, Brescovit AD (1992) As aranhas do gênero Cheiracanthium C.L. Koch, 1839 na região neotropical (Araneae, Clubionidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36: 731–740.
  • Chen SH, Huang WJ (2012) Miturgidae (Arachnida: Araneae). In: Chen SH, Huang WJ (Eds) The spider fauna of Taiwan. Araneae. Miturgidae, Anyphaenidae, Clubionidae. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 5–30, 101–102, 114–125.
  • Chikuni Y (1989) Pictorial Encyclopedia of spiders in Japan. Kaisei-sha Publishing, Tokyo, 310 pp.
  • Dankittipakul P, Beccaloni J (2012) Validation and new synonymies proposed for Cheiracanthium species from south and southeast Asia (Araneae, Clubionidae). Zootaxa 3510: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3510.1.5
  • Deeleman-Reinhold CL (2001) Forest spiders of South East Asia: With a Revision of the Sac and Ground Spiders (Araneae: Clubionidae, Corinnidae, Liocranidae, Gnaphosidae, Prodidomidae and Trochanterriidae). Brill, Leiden, 591 pp.
  • Dondale CD, Redner JH (1982) The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 9. The sac spiders of Canada and Alaska. Araneae: Clubionidae and Anyphaenidae. Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Publication 1724, 194 pp.
  • Edwards RJ (1958) The spider subfamily Clubioninae of the United States, Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Clubionidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 118: 365–436.
  • Hänggi A, Stäubli A (2012) Nachträge zum “Katalog der schweizerischen Spinnen” 4. Neunachweise von 2002 bis 2011. Arachnologische Mitteilungen 44: 59–76. https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit4410
  • Koch CL (1839) Die Arachniden. Sechster Band, Nürnberg, 156 pp
  • Li S (2020) Spider taxonomy for an advanced China. Zoological Systematics 45(2): 73–77.
  • Li S, Lin YC (2016) Species Catalogue of China. Volume 2. Animals. Invertebrates (I), Arachnida: Araneae. Science Press, Beijing, 549 pp.
  • Li ZY, Zhang F (2019) Two new species of Cheiracanthium C. L. Koch, 1839 (Araneae, Cheiracanthiidae) from Xizang, China. Acta Arachnologica Sinica 28(2): 87–95.
  • Lotz LN (2007a) The genus Cheiracanthium (Araneae: Miturgidae) in the Afrotropical region. 1. Revision of known species. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum Bloemfontein 23: 1–76.
  • Lotz LN (2007b) The genus Cheiracanthium (Araneae: Miturgidae) in the Afrotropical region. 2. Description of new species. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum Bloemfontein 23: 145–184.
  • Lotz LN (2011) The genus Cheiracanthium (Araneae: Miturgidae) in the Afrotropical region. 3. Description of four new species. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum Bloemfontein 27: 21–36.
  • Marusik YM, Fomichev AA (2016) A new species of Cheiracanthium (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) from Mongolia. Indian Journal of Arachnology 5(1–2): 79–83.
  • Merkens S, Wunderlich J (2000) Zwei für Deutschland neue Spinnenarten (Araneae): Enoplognatha serratosignata (L. Koch) (Theridiidae) und Cheiracanthium gratum Kulczyński (Clubionidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 19: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit1906
  • Morano E, Bonal R (2016) Cheiracanthium ilicis sp. n. (Araneae, Eutichuridae), a novel spider species associated with Holm Oaks (Quercus ilex). ZooKeys 601: 21–39. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.601.8241
  • Paik KY (1990) Korean spiders of the genus Cheiracanthium (Araneae: Clubionidae). Korean Arachnology 6: 1–30.
  • Petrunkevitch A (1933) An inquiry into the natural classification of spiders, based on a study of their internal anatomy. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 31: 299–389.
  • Reimoser E (1937) Beitrag zur Spinnenfauna von Erythreae. Memorie della Società Entomologica Italiana 16: 16–24.
  • Roberts MJ (1985) The spiders of Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 1: Atypidae to Theridiosomatidae. Harley Books, Colchester, England, 229 pp.
  • Simon E (1897) Description d’Arachnides nouveaux. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 41: 8–17.
  • Simon E (1932) Les Arachnides de France. Tome VI. Synopsis générale et Catalogue des espèces françaises de l’ordre des Araneae. Paris, 773–978.
  • Sterghiu C (1985) Fam. Clubionidae. In: Fauna Republicii Socialiste România: Arachnida. Academia Republicii Socialiste România, Bucharest 5: 1–165.
  • Wolf A (1991) Cheiracanthium. In: Heimer S, Nentwig W (Eds) Spinnen Mitteleuropas. Ein Bestimmungsbuch. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, 543 pp.
  • WSC (2020) World Spider Catalog. Version 21.0. Natural History Museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch [accessed on 15 April 2020]
  • Wunderlich J (2012) Few rare and a new species of spiders (Araneae) from Portugal, with resurrection of the genus Chiracanthops Mello-Leitao 1942 (Clubionidae: Eutichurinae). Beiträge zur Araneologie 8: 183–191.
  • Yaginuma T (1986) Spiders of Japan in colour. Hoikusha Publishing, Osaka, 305 pp
  • Zhang JS, Zhang GR, Yu H (2018) Four species of spider genus Cheiracanthium C. L. Koch, 1839 (Araneae, Eutichuridae) from Jinggang Mountains, Jiangxi Province, China. ZooKeys 762: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.762.23786
  • Zhang YJ, Yin CM (1999) Two new species of the genus Cheiracanthium from China with notes on male spiders of two species (Araneae: Clubionidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 24: 285–290.
  • Zhu MS, Zhang BS (2011) Spider Fauna of Henan: Arachnida: Araneae. Science Press, Beijing, 558 pp.
login to comment