Research Article
Print
Research Article
Description of a new species of Wormaldia from Sardinia and a new Drusus species from the Western Balkans (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae, Limnephilidae)
expand article infoSimon Vitecek, Ana Previšić§, Mladen Kučinić§, Miklós Bálint|, Lujza Keresztes, Johann Waringer, Steffen Pauls#, Hans Malicky¤, Wolfram Graf«
‡ University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
§ University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
¶ Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
# Senckenberg, Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Department of Limnology and Conservation, Gelnhausen, Germany
¤ Sonnengasse 13, Lunz am See, Austria
« Institut für Hydrobiologie und Gewässermanagement, Wien, Austria
Open Access

Abstract

New species are described in the genera Wormaldia (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae) and Drusus (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae, Drusinae). Additionally, the larva of the new species Drusus crenophylax sp. n. is described, and a key provided to larval Drusus species of the bosnicus-group, in which the new species belongs. Observations on the threats to regional freshwater biodiversity and caddisfly endemism are discussed.

The new species Wormaldia sarda sp. n. is an endemic of the Tyrrhenian island of Sardinia and differs most conspicuously from its congeners in the shape of segment X, which is trilobate in lateral view. The new species Drusus crenophylax sp. n. is a micro-endemic of the Western Balkans, and increases the endemism rate of Balkan Drusinae to 79% of 39 species. Compared to other Western Balkan Drusus, males of the new species are morphologically most similar to D. discophorus Radovanovic and D. vernonensis Malicky, but differ in the shape of superior and intermediate appendages. The females of D. crenophylax sp. n. are most similar to those of D. vernonensis, but differ distinctly in the outline of segment X. Larvae of D. crenophylax sp. n. exhibit toothless mandibles, indicating a scraping grazing-feeding ecology.

Keywords

Caddisfly, Europe, larval key, taxonomy, conservation, Mediterranean, hydropower

Introduction

The Mediterranean area is a flora and fauna biodiversity hot-spot. The Tyrrhenian islands and the Balkans, in particular, are noteworthy for their high number of plant endemics (Médail and Quezél 1997, 1999; Nikolić et al. 2008; Fenu et al. 2010; Bacchetta et al. 2012), and mammal and invertebrate endemics (Holdhaus 1924, Vigne 1992, Muccedda et al. 2002, Griffiths et al. 2004, Grill et al. 2007). Freshwater biodiversity has recently become a focus of attention throughout Europe, including the Mediterranean region with the Western Balkans and Sardinia (e.g., di Sabatino 2003, Zakšek et al. 2009, Tierno de Figueroa et al. 2013, Klobučar et al. 2013, Weiss et al. 2014).

The genus Wormaldia currently comprises 204 species (Morse 2014) of which 36 species occur in Europe (Malicky 2005, Graf et al. 2008). Most species are widely distributed, but also several apparently highly endemic species have been described (Graf et al. 2008, Martínez-Menéndez and González 2011). Aquatic stages of the genus, with few exceptions, prefer crenal and rhithral sections of alpine to lowland streams, are caseless and behave as passive filter feeders using characteristic nets (Graf et al. 2008). Species in the genus exhibit characteristic male genitalia, but also comparatively high variability, particularly of the phallic structures (Malicky 2004, Martínez-Menéndez and González 2011, Neu pers. comm.), resulting in the description of several subspecies.

The genus Drusus is in the subfamily Drusinae Banks, and comprises 84 species (Malicky 2004, 2005; Kučinić et al. 2011a; Oláh 2010, 2011; Oláh and Kovács 2013). Larvae of the group prefer eucrenal to epirhithral sections of cold alpine or montane streams and brooks. Feeding ecology of Drusus larvae is complex, and three different feeding guilds can be distinguished based on the shape of larval mandibles and leg setation: filtering carnivores, omnivorous shredders, and scraping grazers (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009). Taxonomic richness of Drusinae is particularly high in the Western Balkans, including a high number of micro-endemics (Malicky 2004; Graf et al. 2008; Oláh 2010, 2011; Kučinić et al. 2011a, b; Oláh and Kovács 2013, Previšić et al. 2014a, b).

In this paper we describe a new species of Wormaldia and a new grazer Drusus species, including a key to the hitherto known larval stages of the bosnicus-group, in which Drusus crenophylax sp. n. belongs.

Materials and methods

Adults were collected using sweep nets and immature stages by handpicking. Collected specimens were stored in 70% and 96% EthOH, for morphological and molecular analyses, respectively.

Male and female genitalia were examined after being cleared in either KOH or lactic acid. Nomenclature of male genitalia of Wormaldia McLachlan follows Nielsen (1957, for Wormaldia occipitalis Pictet), nomenclature of male genitalia of Drusus follows Nielsen (1957, for Limnephilus flavicornis Fabricius) using the simplifying terms “superior appendages” for the lateral processes of segment X (cerci sensu Snodgrass 1935), and “intermediate appendages” for the sclerite and the anterior process of segment X (paraproct sensu Snodgrass 1935). Nomenclature of larval morphological features follows Wiggins (1998) and Waringer and Graf (2011), nomenclature of primary setae and setal areas follows Wiggins (1998). Illustrations were prepared according to Thomson and Holzenthal (2010) in which pencil drawings made with a camera lucida are digitized, edited and inked in Adobe Illustrator (v. 16.0.4, Adobe Systems Inc.).

Molecular genetic sequence data were used to support larval association and assess relationships to previously described Drusus species. DNA extraction and amplification of a 541-bp-long fragment of the mtCOI gene using standard primers (forward primer: Jerry, Simon et al. 1994, reverse primer: S20, Pauls et al. 2006) was performed as outlined by Pauls et al. (2008) and Previšić et al. (2009b). Sequences were edited manually using Geneious version R7 (http://www.geneious.com, Kearse et al. 2012) and aligned using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013). Sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession nos: KC881524, KP793081KP793089 (Table 1). Inter- and intraspecific genetic distances (uncorrected p-distances) were calculated in Mega 4.0.1 (Tamura et al. 2007).

Detailed list of Drusus specimens used for mtCOI analysis. Abbreviations: M adult male, F female; L larva; U unknown.

Species Locality Specimen ID/Stage Accession # Collectors
D. crenophylax 44°32.932'N, 17°23.562'E fDsp4501M/M KP793082 Dmitrović, Šukalo
D. crenophylax 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E fDsp4502L/L KP793083 Dmitrović, Šukalo
D. crenophylax 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E fDsp4503L/L KP793081 Dmitrović, Šukalo
D. crenophylax 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E fDsp3401F/F KP793084 Dmitrović, Šukalo
D. crenophylax 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E fDsp3402F/F KP793085 Dmitrović, Šukalo
D. vernonensis 41°0.887'N, 21°10.448'E DdphPEIM1/M KC881524 Kučinić, Graf
D. vernonensis 41°0.887'N, 21°10.448'E DdphPEIM2/M KP793087 Kučinić, Graf
D. vernonensis 41°0.887'N, 21°10.448'E DdphPEIM3/M KP793086 Kučinić, Graf
D. discophorus Macedonia, Jablanica Mts. fDds0110M/M KP793089 Kučinić
D. discophorus Macedonia, Jablanica Mts. fDds0112F/F KP793088 Kučinić

Taxonomy

Wormaldia sarda Graf & Malicky, sp. n.

Material examined

Holotype. 1 male pupa, holotype: Sardinia, Gola di Gorruppo; 40°11.122'N, 9°30.104'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 28.03.2001; leg. Monika Hess, Ulrich Heckes; currently in coll. W. Graf, will deposited in the Biologiezentrum des Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseums, Linz, Austria.

Type locality

Italy, Sardinia.

Diagnosis

Morphology of the male terminalia suggests placement of the new species in Wormaldia. The species is unique in the European Trichoptera fauna, and easily differentiated from all other Wormaldia species by the combination of the following characters: (1) presence of median subtriangular protrusion in the distal half of the harpago, (2) membraneous dorsoproximal portion and trilobate lateral portions of segment X, and (3) distinct sclerotized structures visible on the invaginated phallus.

Description

Adults (in pupa). Habitus dark, sclerites and tergites brown; cephalic and thoracic setal areas pale; cephalic, thoracic and abdominal setation dark brown; legs light brown, proximally darker; haustellum and intersegmental integument pale cream. Wings brown mottled with golden patches. Male maxillary palp 5-segmented. Spurformula 2–4–4 in males.

Male genitalia (Fig. 1A–D). Segment IX in lateral view subrectangular, bulging anteriad; dorsal quarter reduced to a narrow transverse bridge, ventral 3/4ers broad (Fig. 1A). Segment X in lateral view trilobate: unpaired dorsal lobe strongly convex with a bicuspid apex, dorsoproximally membraneous; 1 lateromedian lobe, subovate, pointed on either side; 1 ventral lobe, posteriad, pointed on either side (Fig. 1A, B). Superior appendages suboval, curved dorsad in lateral view, flat with a rounded apex in dorsal and ventral view (Fig. 1A, C, D). Invaginated phallus terminally with a dorsal pair of sclerotized, laterad divergent tines and a ventral sclerotized plate; internally with 4 distinct tines (Fig. 1A, D). Coxopodite subovate in lateral view, ventrally with a sharp mediolaterad ridge (Fig. 1A, C). Harpago subovate in lateral view, in ventral view distally with a median subtriangular serrated protrusion flattened dorsoventrally (Fig. 1A, D).

Figure 1.

Male genitalia of Wormaldia sarda sp. n. A right lateral view, intact B right lateral view, superior appendage removed C ventral view D dorsal view.

Mature pupa (Fig. 2D–F). Mandibles tubular, dilated at the apex (Fig. 2E,F). Abdominal dorsal sclerites as in Fig. 2D.

Figure 2.

Pupal characteristics of Wormaldia sarda sp. n., Philopotamus montanus, and Wormaldia spp. A generalized pupal abdomen in dorsal view, depicting the position of the dorsal sclerites B dorsal sclerites of Philopotamus montanus C dorsal sclerites of Wormaldia occipitalis D dorsal sclerites of W. sarda sp. n. E head of W. sarda pupa in left lateral view F head of W. sarda pupa in ventral view G pupal mandibles of Philopotamus montanus in ventral view H pupal mandibles of Wormaldia copiosa in ventral view. Scale bars: 100 µm (B); 50 µm (C, D).

Female and larva unknown.

Etymology

The species epithet refers to the island of Sardinia, the type locality.

Drusus crenophylax Graf & Vitecek, sp. n.

Material

Holotype. 1 male: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cvrcka river; 44°32.932'N 17°23.562'E; 393 m a.s.l.; 01.10.2014; leg. Dejan Dmitrović, Goran Šukalo; specimen identifier: fDsp4501M. Paratypes: 2 females: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Spring of Cvrcka river, Vilenjska vrela; 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E; 456 m a.s.l.; 12.09.2012; leg. Dejan Dmitrović; specimen identifiers: fDsp3401F, fDsp3402F. 4 males, 3 females, 19 larvae: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Spring of Cvrcka river, Vilenjska vrela; 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E 456 m a.s.l.; 12.09.2012; leg. Dejan Dmitrović, Goran Šukalo; specimen identifiers for 3 larvae: fDsp4502L, fDsp4503L, fDsp4504L. Holotype and paratypes currently in coll. W. Graf, will deposited in the Biologiezentrum des Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseums, Linz, Austria.

Type locality

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska, Cvrcka River.

Diagnosis

Males of the new species are most similar to Drusus discophorus Radovanovic and D. vernonensis Malicky, but exhibit (1) subtriangular superior appendages in lateral view, (2) subtriangular, low tip of the intermediate appendage in lateral view, and (3) simple, rounded tips of intermediate appendages in caudal view. Drusus discophorus males have suboval superior appendages and a high round tip of the intermediate appendage in lateral view; D. vernonensis males have round superior appendages in lateral view and trilobate tips of intermediate appendages in caudal view.

Females of the new species show the reduced median lobe of the vaginal sclerite and high base of the lateral lobe of segment IX as typical for Balkan Drusinae, and are most similar to Drusus vernonensis, but exhibit (1) a sharp dorsal notch of segment X in lateral view, and (2) segment X with 2 round median lobes in dorsal view. Drusus vernonensis females have a rounded dorsal outline of segment X and lack the median lobes of segment X.

Larvae of the new species are most similar to Drusus klapaleki Marinković-Gospodnetić and D. serbicus Marinković-Gospodnetić, but exhibit (1) a semicircular area dorsomedially on the pronotum anterior the pronotal ridge void of white recumbent setae, (2) lateral gills, and (3) a subtriangular pronotal ridge in lateral view. Larvae of D. klapaleki have white recumbent setae covering the whole pronotum, and larvae of D. serbicus lack lateral gills and have an annular pronotal ridge.

Description

Adults. Habitus dark; sclerites and tergites brown; cephalic and thoracic setal areas pale; cephalic, thoracic and abdominal setation blond; legs light brown to fawn, proximally darker; haustellum and intersegmental integument pale, whitish. Wings smoky, with dark setae. Male maxillary palp 3-segmented. Forewing length 11–13.2 mm, spur formula 1–3–3 in males; forewing length 13–14.5 mm, spur formula 1–3–3 in females.

Male genitalia (Fig. 3A–E). Tergite VIII dark brown, in dorsal view cranially distinctly incised, with lighter areas around fused alveoli; setation concentrated at laterocranial borders of spinate areas; spinate area as two ± triangular laterocaudal lobes medially connected by a band of spines, embracing a medial, indent less sclerotized area (translucent in cleared specimens) with scarce spines. Ninth abdominal segment (IX) ventrally wider than dorsally in caudal view; in lateral view medially with a sharp caudad protrusion and a ventral protrusion, embracing the base of the inferior appendices. Superior appendages in lateral view subtriangular, somewhat Y-shaped with a shorter dorsal and a longer ventral protrusion separated by a slight indentation. Intermediate appendages in lateral view blocky with 2 tips, the proximal sharp, the distal high, rounded, rough; in dorsal view the tips parallel, extending laterally: a bar-shaped, laterally rounded distal tip and a sharp proximal tip, separated by a rounded excision with round edges; in caudal view approximately triangular, tips rounded. Inferior appendages (gonopods sensu Snodgrass 1935) in lateral view proximally wide, medially slightly constricted with a slight dorsal triangular protrusion, curved dorsadly in the slender posterior third; in dorsal, ventral and caudal view proximal part laterad, distal part approximately straight in dorsoventral plane, curved dorsad; in caudal view tips distinctly slender; setal alveoli fused, creating a rugged, less sclerotized ventral area. Parameres simple, with a distinct medial thorn-like spine and 2 proximal spines in the proximal half.

Figure 3.

Genitalia of Drusus crenophylax sp. n. A–E male genitalia: A right lateral view B paramere in right lateral view C ventral view D caudal view E dorsal view F–I female genitalia: F right lateral view G ventral view H caudal view I dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Female genitalia (Fig. 3F–I). Segment IX setation abundant, concentrated in the caudal half; lateral lobe of segment IX membraneous, in lateral view oblique triangular, the ventral edge about twice as long as the dorsal edge, with a dorsal sclerotized setose part protruding caudally; in dorsal and ventral view slender, projecting lateradly; in caudal view dorsal sclerotized setose part somewhat triangular. Segment X in lateral view with a proximal and a distal part, defined by a sharp dorsal notch; in dorsal view trapezoidal, with rounded shoulders, 2 small dorsal median lobes, and distally with 2 triangular, sharp-tipped lateral lobes, each with a lateral rounded setose and a small median rounded protrusion; ventrally unsclerotized, open. Supragenital plate in lateral view sinuously-edged quadrangular with a small, rounded dorsal protrusion, caudal line slightly indent; in ventral view quadrangular, in caudal view quadrangular, dorsally slightly wider than ventrally. Vulvar scale in lateral view triangular, rather straight, longer than the supragenital plate; in ventral view slender with 3 lobes: 2 lateral lobes, digitiform, roundly oval, straight; 1 median, short (reduced), of greater width than length: length approximately 1/6th of that of lateral lobes.

Fifth instar larva (Fig. 4A–I). Head capsule hypognathous, finely granulated with a field of microspinules dorsal to each eye, dark brown dorsally, fading to yellow ventrally; 18 pairs of primary setae present: #1, 4, 6, 10, 12, 13 yellow and #6, 13 short, inconspicuous, the rest dark brown, long (Fig. 4A); antennae located on high carinae, each carina about as high as long, both strongly curved mediad (Fig. 4B); mandibles toothless. Pronotum dark brown, coarsely granulated; distinct medial ridge present, rounded, steeper anteriorly in lateral view; recumbent white setae present, but lacking in a semicircular area anterior the pronotal ridge (Fig. 4C); pronotal horn present. Mesonotum completely covered by 2 sclerites, dark brown, with darker apodemes; edges black; sa1 comprising 4–6 setae, sa2 and sa3 connected, comprising 28–34 setae in total on each sclerite (Fig. 4D). Metanotum with 3 pairs of sclerites: anteriomedian sclerites subtriangularly ovoid, dark brown with 11–19 setae; posteromedian sclerites rhomboid, pale brown, with 13–15 setae; lateral sclerites long, curved dorsally in lateral view, pale brown fading to yellow ventrally with a dark median spot and 21–25 setae (Fig. 4E). Legs yellow-light brown, dorsally and distally darker (Fig. 4F–H). Abdomen white (Fig. 4G), dorsal gills from II praesegmental position to VI praesegmental position, lateral gills from II praesegmental position to IV praesegmental position, ventral gills from II prasegmental position to VII postsegmental position; lateral line from last quarter of II to first quarter of VIII (Fig. 4I); abdomen I with 1 dorsal and 2 lateral protuberances, posterior sclerites absent on lateral protuberances, setal areas sa1–3 fused dorsally and ventrally (Fig. 4D, E), sternum bearing 2 setae with distinct basal plates; abdomen VIII with 2 long and 2–4 short posterodorsal setae on either side; abdomen IX with 1 posterodorsal seta on either side, dorsal sclerite IX semicircular, pale brown with 7 long and several shorter setae. Case simple, constructed of mineral particles.

Figure 4.

Larval characteristics of Drusus crenophylax sp. n. A head, frontal view B head, left lateral view C pronotum dorsal view D meso- and metathorax with abdominal segment I, dorsal view E abdominal segments I-V, left lateral view F left thoracic leg I, frontal view G left thoracic leg II; frontal view H left thoracic leg III, frontal view; bottom, gill and lateral line diagram, positions of gills are depicted as black circles, position of lateral line bold.

Molecular species delimitation and larval affiliation

Analysis of the genetic distance of mtCOI between Drusus crenophylax sp. n. and the in the adult stage morphologically most similar species, D. discophorus and D. vernonensis, clearly supports the recognition of the new species. Uncorrected p-distances recorded in a fragment of the mtCOI gene (ranging from 2–8%; Fig. 5), agree with the interspecific distances commonly recorded in Limnephilidae (e.g., Graf et al. 2005; Kučinić et al. 2011a; Previšić et al. 2014a, b) and other caddisfly families (e.g., Hydropsychidae; Pauls et al. 2010). Also, all haplotypes of Drusus crenophylax sp. n. adults were completely identical to another and those of undescribed Drusus-larvae collected at the locus typicus, enabling confident affiliation of larvae and adults of D. crenophylax sp. n.

Figure 5.

Distance matrix (lower left) and colour heat map (upper right) showing uncorrected inter- and intraspecific p-distances of the partial mtCOI sequence (541 bp) between Drusus crenophylax sp. n., D. vernonensis and D. discophorus. For detailed information on the haplotypes, see Table 1.

Ecology and distribution

Drusinae species typically are members of crenal species communities, and mainly inhabit crenal sections of cold streams. Larval D. crenophylax were collected at eucrenal sections of the Cvrcka River (Fig. 6A, B) and behave as epilithic grazers, as indicated by mandible morphology (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009). Based on regional collection data, we assume that the species is a micro-endemic restricted to the watershed of the Cvrcka river.

Figure 6.

Habitat of Drusus crenophylax sp. n. at the type locality. A collection site of the larval paratypes B collection site of the male holotype.

Etymology

The species epithet is a compound name, combining κρηνον (‘well, spring, fountain’ in Ancient Greek) and φυλαξ (‘guard, keeper, protector’ in Ancient Greek), terms that reflect the high degree of niche specificity of Drusus species, the majority of which inhabit crenal sections of streams (Graf et al. 2008).

Key to Drusinae larvae of the bosnicus-group

Drusinae have evolved into three distinct subclades reflecting feeding ecology of larvae (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009). The grazer clade sensu Pauls et al. 2008 represents the largest clade, comprising over 70 species in several subclades (Malicky 2004, 2005; Kučinić et al. 2011a; Oláh 2010, 2011; Oláh and Kovács 2013). Larvae of scraping grazers species characteristically develop toothless mandibles (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009, Waringer and Graf 2011). In the Western Balkans, the grazing bosnicus-group represents a group of morphologically similar endemics and comprises according to Marinković-Gospodnetić (1976) Drusus bosnicus Klapálek, D. klapaleki Marinković-Gospodnetić, D. medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, D. plicatus Radovanović, D. radovanovici (Marinković-Gospodnetić), D. ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, D. septentrionis (Marinković-Gospodnetić) and D. vespertinus Marinković-Gospodnetić (Kučinić et al. 2011a).

Larvae of the bosnicus-group also develop, with the exception of D. ramae (Kučinić et al. 2010), a field of microspinules close to each eye (Kučinić et al. 2011a, b; Waringer et al. 2015). Further, carinae of D. bosnicus, D. radovanovici, D. septentrionis and D. medianus are high and curved mediad. Larvae of D. crenophylax sp. n. share those characters and can be integrated in the following dichotomous key (Waringer et al. 2015):

1 Head with flat vertex Drusus bosnicus (Kučinić et al. in press)
Vertex evenly rounded 2
2 Pronotum with thin long, yellow setation Drusus radovanovici (fig. 17 in Kučinić et al. 2011a)
Pronotum without thin long, yellow setation 3
3 Pronotum with numerous short, white, recumbent setae 4
Pronotum without numerous short, white, recumbent setae Drusus septentrionis (figs 4, 5 in Kučinić et al. 2008)
4 Dorsal pronotal hump smoothly rounded Drusus medianus (fig. 43 in Kučinić et al. 2010, figs 20–22 in Kučinić et al. 2011b)
Dorsal pronotal hump with distinct ridge 5
5 Anterior metanotal sclerites narrowly subtriangular (width / length ratio ≥ 2.0) Drusus vespertinus (Previšić et al. 2009a)
Anterior metanotal sclerites broadly subtriangular (width / length ratio < 2.0) 6
6 In lateral view, dorsal pronotal ridge annular, posterior section sharply descending Drusus serbicus (Waringer et al. 2015)
In lateral view, posterior section of dorsal pronotal ridge gently descending 7
7 White recumbent setae cover the entire pronotum Drusus klapaleki (Kučinić et al. 2011b)
White recumbent setae lacking in a semicircular area anterior to the pronotal ridge Drusus crenophylax sp. n.

Discussion

Systematic significance of Wormaldia sarda sp. n

The Tyrrhenian islands and Sardinia in particular have been renowned for their relictual fauna and flora for a long time (Holdhaus 1924) and represent one of the Mediterranean biodiversity hotspots (Grill et al. 2007). Wormaldia sarda sp. n. represents an addition to the distinct Sardinian biodiversity. As no species similar to W. sarda sp. n. are recorded from neither northern Africa nor mainland Europe, it is likely that this species is restricted to Sardinia, as are several other species such as Crunoecia irrorata sarda Curtis, Stactobia ericae Malicky or Hydropsyche sattleri Tobias (Graf et al. 2008). However, the geological history and geographic proximity of the Tyrrhenian islands – Sardinia and Corsica in particular (Vigliotti et al. 1990) – suggest that some species may occur on both islands. For instance, Leptodrusus budtzi Ulmer or Micrasema togatum Hagen occur also on Corsica, or other Mediterranean islands (Graf et al. 2008).

The distinct apomorphic characters, particularly the modified segment X and the very different pupal characters (mandibles, dorsal abdominal sclerites; Fig. 2D–F), might warrant establishing a new genus for this species. The pupal characteristics alone are strikingly different from those of either Wormaldia or Philopotamus (Lepneva 1964; Fig. 2). However, since pupae of only three species of Wormaldia are described (Nielsen 1942, Lepneva 1964) the range of genus-level pupal characters remains unknown. Further, modifications of segment X are common in southeast Asian species of Wormaldia (Malicky 2010). Tooth-like structures on segment X similar to the ones observed in W. sarda sp. n. are present in Wormaldia species from Thailand (e.g., W. acheloos Malicky & Chantaramongkol, W. congina Malicky & Chantaramongkol, W. lot Malicky & Chantaramongkol), or Sulawesi (W. otaros Neboiss). Nevertheless, Wormaldia species with a phallus shaped as in W. sarda sp. n. have not yet been described. Since the whole genus is in need of revision (Malicky 2005, Malicky unpubl. data), we refrain, in the interest of taxonomic stability, from creating a new genus.

Aquatic diversity of the Western Balkans under threat

Endemic freshwater species are particularly vulnerable to global change and (anthropogenic) habitat degradation (Hering et al. 2009, Tierno de Figueroa et al. 2010, Bálint et al. 2011, Conti et al. 2014). The Balkans is rich in apparently endemic freshwater species (Griffiths et al. 2004). Recent taxonomic efforts in the Western Balkans increased the number of endemic Drusinae taxa to 31 of 39 described Drusinae species (Previšić et al. 2014b, Vitecek et al. unpubl. data). Further, several endemic species of Chaetopteryx were recently described from the Western Balkans (Oláh et al. 2012, Kučinić et al. 2013) indicating the need for further systematic investigations on an underestimated diversity of southeastern Europe.

The construction of hydropower dams in emerging economies is currently one of the greatest threats to freshwater biodiversity (Zarfl et al. 2014). Small hydropower plants fed by small cold-water mountain rivers such as the Cvrcka River are currently under construction throughout the Western Balkans (Freyhof 2012, Schwarz 2012), and gravely threaten the habitats that harbour endemic highland caddisflies such as Drusinae (Previšić et al. 2014a, Vitecek et al. unpubl. data, this study), or Chaetopteryx species (Kučinić et al. 2013). The description of Drusus crenophylax sp. n. highlights the importance of biodiversity research in southern Europe, and demonstrates that the currently prevailing energy policy will likely result in the loss of known and unknown biodiversity.

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to Monika Hess and Ulrich Heckes, Germany, and Dejan Dmitrović and Goran Šukalo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, for kindly donating their material. The scientific quality of this contribution was greatly improved by the thorough reviews of two anonymous reviewers and Ralph Holzenthal.

This contribution is a result of research on the project “The Drusinae (Insecta: Trichoptera) in a world of global change“ (project number P23687-B17, PI: J. Waringer), funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF). This work benefited from EU 7th Framework Directive support, specifically the MARS project (contract number 603378).

S. Vitecek and W. Graf contributed equally to this manuscript. F. Hoppeler, Germany, assisted in the generation of genetic sequence data.

References

  • Bacchetta G, Fenu G, Mattana E (2012) A checklist of the exclusive vascular flora of Sardinia with priority rankings for conservation. Annales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 69(1): 81–89. doi: 10.3989/ajbm.2289
  • Bálint M, Domisch S, Engelhardt CHM, Haase P, Lehrian S, Sauer J, Theissinger K, Pauls SU, Nowak C (2011) Cryptic biodiversity loss linked to global climate change. Nature Climate Change 1: 313–318. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1191
  • Conti L, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Grenouillet G, Graf W (2013) A trait-based approach to assess the vulnerability of European aquatic insects to climate change. Hydrobiologia 721(1): 297–315. doi: 10.1007/s10750-013-1690-7
  • di Sabatino A, Cicolani B, Gerecke R (2003) Biodiversity and distribution of water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) in spring habitats. Freshwater Biology 48: 2163–2173. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01151.x
  • Fenu G, Mattana E, Congiu A, Bacchetta G (2010) The endemic vascular flora of Supramontes (Sardinia), a priority plant conservation area. Candollea 65: 347–358. doi: 10.15553/c2010v652a10
  • Freyhof J (2012) Threatened freshwater fishes and molluscs of the Balkan, potential impact of hydropower projects. Unpublished report, ECA Watch Austria&EuroNatur, 81 pp.
  • Graf W, Lubini V, Pauls S (2005) Larval description of Drusus muelleri McLachlan, 1868 (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some notes on its ecology and systematic position within the genus Drusus. Annales de Limnologie 41: 93–98. doi: 10.1051/limn/2005012
  • Graf W, Murphy J, Dahl J, Zamora-Muñoz C, López-Rodríguez MJ (2008) Volume 1 - Trichoptera. In: Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D (Eds) Distribution and Ecological Preferences of European Freshwater Organisms. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Moscow, 388 pp.
  • Graf W, Waringer J, Pauls SU (2009) A new feeding group within larval Drusinae (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae): the Drusus alpinus Group sensu Schmid, 1956, including larval descriptions of Drusus franzi Schmid, 1956, and Drusus alpinus (Meyer-Dür, 1875). Zootaxa 2031: 53–62.
  • Grill A, Casula P, Lecis R, Menken S (2007) Endemism in Sardinia. In: Weiss S, Ferrand N (Eds) Phylogeography of Southern European Refugia. Springer, Netherlands, 273–296. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4904-8_10
  • Griffiths HI, Krystufek B, Reed JM (2004) Balkan Biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2854-0
  • Hering D, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Murphy J, Lucke S, Zamora-Muñoz C, Lopez-Rodriguez MJ, Huber T, Graf W (2009) Potential impact of climate change on aquatic insects: A sensitivity analysis for European caddisflies (Trichoptera) based on distribution patterns and ecological preferences. Aquatic Sciences 71: 3–14. doi: 10.1007/s00027-009-9159-5
  • Holdhaus K (1924) Das Tyrrhenisproblem. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 37: 1–200.
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Kučinić M, Previšić A, Gottstein S, Hrašovec B, Stanić-Koštroman S, Pernek M, Delić A (2008) Description of the larva of Drusus radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1970 and Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971 (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. Zootaxa 1983: 1–17.
  • Kučinić M, Previšić A, Stanić-Koštroman S, Franjević M, Šerić Jelaska L, Delić A, Posilović H (2010) Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes. Zootaxa 2484: 1–24.
  • Kučinić M, Previšić A, Graf W, Šeric Jelaska L, Stanić-Koštroman S, Waringer J (2011a) Larval description, genetic and ecological features of Drusus radovanovici radovanovici Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971 (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some phylogenetic and taxonomic data on the bosnicus group in the Balkan Peninsula. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 58: 136–153. doi: 10.1002/mmnd.201100010
  • Kučinić M, Previšić A, Stanić-Koštroman S, Graf W, Franjević M, Posilović H, Waringer J (2011b) Morphological and ecological features of Drusus larvae from the bosnicus group on the Balkan Peninsula with description of the larva of Drusus klapaleki Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. Zoosymposia 5: 244–254.
  • Kučinić M, Szivak I, Pauls S, Bálint M, Delić A, Vučković I (2013) Chaetopteryx bucari sp. n., a new species from the Chaetopteryx rugulosa group from Croatia (Insecta, Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) with molecular, taxonomic and ecological notes on the group. ZooKeys 320: 1–28. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.320.4565
  • Kučinić M, Previšić A, Graf W, Stanić-Koštroman S, Lelo S, Šoufek M, Vitecek S, Waringer J (in press) Larval description, molecular and ecological features of Drusus bosnicus (Klapálek, 1898) (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with note of distribution. Zootaxa.
  • Klobučar GIV, Podnar M, Jelić M, Franjević D, Faller M, Štambuk A, Gottstein S, Simić V, Maguire I (2013) Role of the Dinaric karst (Western Balkans) in shaping the phylogeographic structure of the threatened crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium. Freshwater Biology 58: 1089–1105. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12110
  • Lepneva SG (1964) Fauna of the U.S.S.R., Trichoptera, Vol II, no. 1. Larvae and pupae of Annulipalpia. Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., New Series 88, Vol II (1).
  • Malicky H (2004) Atlas of European Trichoptera, Second edition. Springer, 359 pp.
  • Malicky H (2005) Ein kommentiertes Verzeichnis der Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera) Europas und des Mediterrangebietes. Linzer biologische Beiträge 37: 533–596.
  • Malicky H (2010) Atlas of Southeast Asian Trichoptera. Edited by P. Chantaramongkol. Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 346 pp.
  • Marinković-Gospodnetić M (1976) The differentiation of Drusus species of the group bosnicus. In: Malicky H (Ed.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trichoptera. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, 77–85. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-1579-0_13
  • Martínez-Menéndez J, González MA (2011) A new species of Wormaldia from the Iberian Peninsula (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 87(2): 193–195. doi: 10.1002/zoos.201100001
  • Médail F, Quezél P (1997) Hot-Spot Analysis for Conservation of Plant Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84(1): 112–127. doi: 10.2307/2399957
  • Médail F, Quezél P (1999) Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting Global Conservation Priorities. Conservation Biology 13(6): 1510–1513. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98467.x
  • Muccedda M, Kiefer A, Pidinchedda E, Veith M (2002) A new species of long-eared bat (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from Sardinia (Italy). Acta Chiropterologica 4: 121–135. doi: 10.3161/001.004.0202
  • Nielsen A (1942) Über die Entwicklung und Biologie der Trichopteren mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Quelltrichopteren Himmerlands. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 17: 255–631.
  • Nielsen A (1957) A comparative study of the genital segments and their appendages in male trichoptera. Biologiske Skrifter udgivet af Det Kongelige Dankse Vedenskabernes Sleskab 8: 1–159.
  • Nikolić T, Antonić O, Alegro L, Dobrović I, Bogdanivić S, Liber Z, Resetnik I (2008) Plant species diversity of Adriatic islands: an introductory survey. Plant Biosystems 142: 435–445. doi: 10.1080/11263500802410769
  • Oláh J (2010) New species and new records of Palearctic Trichoptera in the material of the Hungarian Natural History Museum. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 102: 65–117.
  • Oláh J (2011) New species and records of Balkan Trichoptera. Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matrensis 35: 111–121.
  • Oláh J, Kovács T, Sivec I, Szivák I, Urbanić G (2012) Seven new species in the Chaetopteryx rugulosa species group: applying the phylogenetic species concept and the sexual selection theory (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae). Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis 36: 51–79.
  • Oláh J, Kovács T (2013) New species and new records of Balkan Trichoptera II. Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matrensis 37: 109–121.
  • Snodgrass RE (1935) Principles of Insect Morphology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 667 pp.
  • Pauls S, Lumbsch HT, Haase P (2006) Phylogeography of the montane caddisfly Drusus discolor: Evidence for multiple refugia and periglacial survival. Molecular Ecology 15: 2153–2169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02916.x
  • Pauls SU, Graf W, Haase P, Lumbsch HT, Waringer J (2008) Grazers, shredders and filtering carnivores - The evolution of feeding ecology in Drusinae (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae): Insights from a molecular phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 776–791. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.003
  • Pauls SU, Blahnik RJ, Zhou X, Wardwell CT, Holzenthal RW (2010) DNA barcode data confirm new species and reveal cryptic diversity in Chilean Smicridea (Smicridea) (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29(3): 1058–1074. doi: 10.1899/09-108.1
  • Previšić A, Graf W, Kučinić M (2009a) The larva of Drusus vespertinus Marinković-Gospodnetić 1976 (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Poster shown at SIEEC 21, Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic.
  • Previšić A, Walton C, Kučinić M, Mitrikeski PT, Kerovec M (2009b) Pleistocene divergence of Dinaric Drusus endemics (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) in multiple microrefugia within the Balkan Peninsula. Molecular Ecology 18: 634–647. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04046.x
  • Previšić A, Graf W, Vitecek S, Kučinić M, Bálint M, Keresztes L, Pauls SU, Waringer J (2014a) Cryptic diversity of caddisflies in the Balkans: the curious case of Ecclisopteryx species (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 72(3): 309–329.
  • Previšić A, Schnitzler J, Kučinić M, Graf W, Ibrahimi H, Kerovec M, Pauls SU (2014b) Microscale vicariance and diversification of western Balkan caddisflies linked to karstification. Freshwater Science 33: 250–262. doi: 10.1086/674430
  • Schwarz U (2012) Balkan Rivers - The Blue Heart of Europe. Hydromorphological Status and Dam Projects. Report. Vienna, Austria, 151 pp.
  • Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A (1994) Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651–701. doi: 10.1093/aesa/87.6.651
  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092
  • Thomson RE, Holzenthal RW (2010) New Neotropical species of the genus Austrotinodes Schmid (Trichoptera: Ecnomidae). Zootaxa 2437: 38–50.
  • Tierno de Figueroa JM, López-Ródriguez MJ, Lorenz A, Graf W, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D (2010) Vulnerable taxa of European Plecoptera (Insecta) in the context of climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation 19(5): 1269–1277. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9753-9
  • Tierno de Figueroa JMT, López-Rodríguez MJ, Fenoglio S, Sánchez-Castillo P, Fochetti R (2013) Freshwater biodiversity in the rivers of the Mediterranean Basin. Hydrobiologia 719(1): 137–186. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1281-z
  • Vigliotti L, Alvarez W, McWilliams M (1990) No relative motion detected between Corsica and Sardinia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 98: 313–318. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(90)90033-T
  • Vigne JD (1992) Zooarcheology and the biogeographical history of the mammals of Corsica and Sardinia since the last ice age. Mammal Review 22: 87–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1992.tb00124.x
  • Weiss M, Macher JN, Seefeldt MA, Leese F (2014) Molecular evidence for further overlooked species within the Gammarus fossarum complex (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Hydrobiologia 721: 165–184. doi: 10.1007/s10750-013-1658-7
  • Waringer J, Graf W (2011) Atlas of Central European Trichoptera Larvae. Erik Mauch Verlag, Dinkelscherben, 468 pp.
  • Waringer J, Graf W, Bálint M, Kučinić M, Pauls SU, Previšić A, Keresztes L, Ibrahimi H, Živić I, Bjelanovic K, Krpač V, Vitecek S (2015) Larval morphology and phylogenetic position of Drusus balcanicus, Drusus botosaneanui, Drusus serbicus and Drusus tenellus (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae: Drusinae). European Journal of Entomology 112(2): 1–18. doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.037
  • Wiggins GB (1998) Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), second edition. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 457 pp.
  • Zakšek V, Sket B, Gottstein S, Franjević D, Trontelj P (2009) The limits of cryptic diversity in groundwater: phylogeography of the cave shrimp Troglocaris anophtalmus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Atyidae). Freshwater Biology 18: 931–946.
  • Zarfl C, Lumsdon AE, Berlekamp J, Tydecks L, Tockner K (2014) A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences 77(1): 161–170. doi: 10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0